Workforce Analysis: Jobs One-Stop
Transcription
Workforce Analysis: Jobs One-Stop
Workforce Analysis Jobs One-Stop Ashtabula Lake Williams Defiance Fulton Lucas Ottawa Wood Henry Sandusky Erie Huron Seneca Putnam Trumbull Lorain Paulding Van Wert Geauga Cuyahoga Medina Summit Portage Mahoning Hancock Wyandot Allen Crawford Richland Ashland Wayne Stark Columbiana Hardin Shelby Knox Logan Union Darke Licking Miami Clark Preble Montgomery Madison Fayette Butler Muskingum Fairfield Greene Noble Perry Pickaway Morgan Hocking Warren Clinton Ross Pike Clermont Brown Adams Washington Athens Vinton Meigs Jackson Gallia Scioto Lawrence WORKFORCE 411 Belmont Monroe Jobs One-Stop Highland Hamilton Harrison Guernsey Franklin Jefferson Tuscarawas Coshocton Delaware Champaign Carroll Holmes Morrow Workforce Analysis Marion Auglaize Mercer 2007 Workforce Analysis Jobs One-Stop Table of Contents Preface ......................................................................................................................................... ii Highlights .....................................................................................................................................iii I. Understanding the Local Labor Market ................................................................................ 1 Figure 1: Regional Commuting Patterns ................................................................................. 1 Figure 2: Net Flow of Ohio Commuters................................................................................... 2 II. Key Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3 Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure 3: Population Trends .................................................................................................. 3 4: Demographic Characteristics ................................................................................... 3 5: Employment Trends ............................................................................................... 4 6: Employment in the Jobs One-Stop by Major Industry................................................. 4 7: Unemployment Trends............................................................................................ 5 8: Per Capita Income.................................................................................................. 6 9: Number of New Residential Building Permits............................................................. 7 10: Valuation of New Residential Building Permits ......................................................... 7 III. Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................. 8 Figure Figure Figure Figure 11: 12: 13: 14: Employment by Major Sector, 2005........................................................................ 8 Employment by Industry Sector, 2005.................................................................... 9 Employment Prospects by Industry Sector ............................................................ 10 Sectors Ranked by 2005 Average Weekly Earnings ................................................ 11 IV. Educational Infrastructure ................................................................................................. 12 Figure 15: Educational Attainment ....................................................................................... 12 Technical Notes ......................................................................................................................... 13 References ................................................................................................................................. 14 Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix A: Workforce Investment Area 7 ........................................................................... 15 B: Metropolitan and Micropolitan Areas................................................................ 16 C: Major County-to-County Commuting Patterns ................................................ 19 D: Major Employers by County .............................................................................. 20 Jobs One-Stop Preface Over the last few years, the Bureau of Labor Market Information (BLMI) has prepared several sets of customized regional publications to help workforce professionals and others gain a better understanding of their local economy and how it has fared compared to other areas. In June 2002, “Demographic, Labor Force and Industry Trends” were published for Ohio’s 12 Economic Development Regions; “Market Analysis of Key Workforce Trends” was published for all of Ohio’s Workforce Investment Areas in 2000. This current set of “Workforce Analysis” publications is an extension of that effort to produce reports for all the One-Stops in WIA 7 and the eighteen other WIAs in the state. This workforce analysis report provides a summary snapshot of the Jobs One-Stop, the One-Stop System for Fairfield, Pickaway and Ross Counties. This presentation also examines some of the key trends compared to state and national trends. The first section begins with a review of the area’s basic demographic and economic characteristics. The second section shows trends in important statistics for the area, including population, employment, unemployment rates, income and housing. Employment characteristics by industry receive a detailed examination in the third section. The fourth and final section looks briefly at the area’s educational characteristics. A careful review of this information can yield important insights about the local economy. One may assess the health of the local economy by examining key economic trends and comparing them to the state or the nation. Or an examination of industry composition will yield insights into the strengths and weaknesses that local economic development policy might address. Please refer to the Technical Notes and References sections at the end of this publication for reference and documentation of the wide variety of statistical data presented. Keith Ewald, Ph.D., Chief Bureau of Labor Market Information Office of Workforce Development Ohio Department of Job and Family Services ii Jobs One-Stop Highlights Fairfield County appears to be the economically and demographically dominant county in this region. Ross County is defined as economically “transitional” under the Appalachian Regional Commission. The Jobs One-Stop area has a high level of commuting, primarily from Fairfield and Pickaway Counties to jobs in Franklin County. Both counties are included in the Columbus Metropolitan Statistical Area. Population has grown 11.4 percent between 1995 and 2005. Demographically, the counties differ significantly in their age distributions. Employment rolls grew 7.9 percent in the last decade, having recently recovered from the 2001 recession. The unemployment rate began to rise a year before that recession, but otherwise the patterns have been similar to those of the state and nation. Nominal per capita income has grown at an annual compound rate of 3.9 percent in the last ten years. New residential building permits experienced a boom in Fairfield County in 2003. Pickaway and Ross Counties remained fairly stable. The most dominant employment sector here is government, especially education at the local level. Government employment is more concentrated here than it is statewide. Local government, accommodation and food services and construction were the three sectors to add the most jobs between 2000 and 2005. Federal government workers had the highest average weekly earnings for this area. The highest-paying sector to have added jobs in the last five years was local government. Generally, the Jobs One-Stop region has a somewhat higher overall level of educational attainment than the rest of the state, due in part to the high proportion of educated residents in Fairfield County. iii Workforce Analysis Jobs One-Stop I. Understanding Local Labor Markets Labor economists define a labor market as a geographic area in which both the demand and supply for labor are met primarily within that region. 1 In other words, it is an area where there are jobs and the majority of workers needed for those jobs. An important first step in identifying local labor markets is to examine the commuting patterns of individuals who live or work in the area. These patterns are one of the primary inputs used to define metropolitan and micropolitan areas. 2 Overall, the Jobs One-Stop region is characterized by large-scale out commuting. Each of the counties exhibits a negative flow, with Fairfield County having the most out-commuters. Commuters in both Fairfield and Pickaway Counties travel predominantly to jobs in Franklin County, not surprising considering both are included in the Columbus Metropolitan Statistical Area. Figure 1: Regional Commuting Patterns Jobs One-Stop Total Working in the County In Commuters Percent of In Commuters Total Employed Living in the County Out Commuters Percent of Out Commuters Commuting Balance: Net Flow Percent of Total Commuters Fairfield Pickaway Ross In Commuters 36,957 17,332 28,140 10,214 7,557 6,725 27.6% 43.6% 23.9% Out Commuters 60,465 21,921 30,409 33,722 12,146 8,994 55.8% 55.4% 29.6% Net Comparison Statistics -23,508 -4,589 -2,269 -53.5% -23.3% -14.4% Figure 2 on the next page shows a visual summary of the net flow of commuters from the 2000 decennial census. Most workers commuting into a county to work usually do so from adjacent counties. Detailed county-to-county commuting is shown in Appendix C. Ross County was defined as economically ‘transitional’ by the Appalachian Regional Commission for FY 2006. 3 This means it has at least one economic indicator below the national average. 1 Goldstein 2005, p. 10. Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Area definitions are excerpted from the Office of Management and Budget’s Federal Register Notice (65 FR 82228 – 82238). See Appendix B for detailed definitions. 3 Appalachian Regional Commission, August 2006 2 Understanding Local Labor Markets, continued Jobs One-Stop Figure 2: Net Flow of Ohio Commuters *Net flow equals in commuters minus out commuters. A negative number means more people are commuting to work outside the county than are in commuting. For more detailed information, please visit http://lmi.state.oh.us/Census/CommutingPatterns2000.pdf on the web. Source: Bureau of Labor Market Information 2 Jobs One-Stop II. Key Trends Population: The area’s population grew 11.4 percent between 1995 and 2005, driven largely by growth in Fairfield County (21.0%). For comparison, Ohio’s population grew only 2.3 percent during this period. The remaining two counties in this region grew only modestly, with Pickaway County’s population increasing 1.4 percent and Ross County growing 3.5 percent. Figure 3: Population Trends 300,000 Jobs One-Stop Fairfield Pickaway Ross 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Jobs One-Stop 239,308 241,140 243,513 246,240 247,210 249,739 252,402 255,107 259,304 262,744 266,609 Fairfield 114,410 115,822 117,432 119,250 121,431 123,446 126,228 129,252 132,685 135,913 138,423 Pickaway 52,253 52,328 52,554 53,155 52,492 52,848 52,408 51,679 51,883 51,999 52,989 Ross 72,645 72,990 73,527 73,835 73,287 73,445 73,766 74,176 74,736 74,832 75,197 Demographic Traits: Data from the 2000 Census, shown in Figure 4 below, reveal some interesting differences between the counties. Fairfield and Pickaway Counties have similar median ages as Ohio’s 36.2. Fairfield County has the largest proportion of children under 18 (26.3%) while Pickaway County has the largest proportion of working adults between 18 and 64 (66.3%). Ross County has the oldest profile of the three, with the highest median age and proportion of people 65 and older (11.9%). Figure 4: Demographic Characteristics Age Demographics Total Population Under 5 years 5 to 17 years 18 to 24 years 25 to 44 years 45 to 64 years 65 years and older Median Age Jobs One-Stop Fairfield Pickaway Ross Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 255,885 100.0% 126,723 100.0% 53,431 100.0% 75,731 100.0% 15,373 6.0% 7,879 6.2% 3,158 5.9% 4,336 5.7% 48,737 19.0% 25,431 20.1% 9,235 17.3% 14,041 18.5% 22,986 9.0% 11,352 9.0% 5,160 9.7% 6,474 8.5% 80,667 31.5% 38,463 30.4% 17,897 33.5% 24,307 32.1% 59,900 23.4% 30,007 23.7% 12,350 23.1% 17,543 23.2% 28,222 11.0% 13,561 10.7% 5,631 10.5% 9,030 11.9% 36.2 36.0 36.9 3 Key Trends, continued Jobs One-Stop Employment: Total nonfarm employment in the Jobs One-Stop region has just recently recovered from the 2001 recession with total growth of 7.9 percent in the last decade. Much of this trend was again led by Fairfield County, which added about 6,500 jobs during this period (21.2%). Ross County employment rolls grew 4.9 percent. Pickaway County was the only county in this area to lose jobs since 1995—about 12.5 percent. Figure 5: Employment Trends 90,000 Jobs One-Stop Fairfield Pickaway Ross 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Jobs One-Stop 72,880 74,300 74,431 76,157 77,680 78,747 77,195 76,385 77,233 78,510 78,618 Fairfield 30,907 31,894 32,227 33,171 34,345 34,631 34,280 34,386 35,678 36,858 37,453 Pickaway 16,436 16,361 16,107 16,375 16,431 16,754 16,192 15,013 14,882 14,533 14,378 Ross 25,537 26,045 26,097 26,611 26,904 27,362 26,723 26,986 26,673 27,119 26,787 While a few sectors’ employment growth figures could not be published here due to confidentiality restrictions, several major industries reported job growth between 2000 and 2005, notably education and health services; leisure and hospitality; professional and business services; and financial activities. Manufacturing and trade, transportation and utilities recorded drops in employment during this period. Figure 6: Employment in the Jobs One-Stop by Major Industry Major Sector 2000 Total All Sectors 78,747 Natural Resources and Mining 259 Construction 3,606 Manufacturing 15,706 Trade, Transportation and Utilities 14,471 Information NA Financial Activities 2,237 Professional and Business Services 5,673 Education and Health Services 7,538 Leisure and Hospitality 7,691 Other Services, except Public Administration NA Government, including Public Schools 17,979 NA-Data not available due to confidentiality restrictions. 4 2005 78,618 309 4,007 11,782 13,585 931 2,562 6,373 9,606 8,551 2,216 18,668 Percent Net Growth Growth 2000-2005 2000-2005 -129 -0.2% 50 19.3% 401 11.1% -3,924 -25.0% -886 -6.1% NA NA 325 14.5% 700 12.3% 2,068 27.4% 860 11.2% NA NA 689 3.8% Key Trends, continued Jobs One-Stop Unemployment: This region largely followed the same patterns in unemployment as the rest of the state and nation, but with rates in the area beginning to rise in 2000, a year before the 2001 recession. Fairfield County generally had the lowest rates in the last ten years, even lower than national rate until 2005, while Ross County had the highest rates. Figure 7: Unemployment Trends 9.0% U.S. Ohio Jobs One-Stop Fairfield Pickaway Ross 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 U.S. 5.6% 5.4% 4.9% 4.5% 4.2% 4.0% 4.7% 5.8% 6.0% 5.5% 5.1% Ohio 4.9% 5.0% 4.6% 4.3% 4.3% 4.0% 4.4% 5.7% 6.2% 6.2% 5.9% Jobs One-Stop 4.3% 4.5% 4.1% 4.0% 3.6% 3.9% 4.2% 5.7% 6.2% 6.3% 6.1% Fairfield 3.8% 3.6% 3.2% 3.0% 2.9% 3.3% 3.5% 5.1% 5.3% 5.4% 5.2% Pickaway 3.6% 4.0% 3.7% 3.5% 3.3% 4.1% 4.5% 6.0% 6.6% 7.2% 7.0% Ross 5.8% 6.2% 5.9% 6.0% 5.2% 5.1% 5.4% 6.7% 7.6% 7.7% 7.3% 5 Key Trends, continued Jobs One-Stop Income: Per capita income has been rising steadily over the past ten years, showing a 3.9 percent annual compound rate of growth—higher than Ohio’s growth rate of 3.7 percent, but lower than the national 4.1 percent growth. Fairfield County has had the highest income of the area, nearly $30,400 per capita by 2004. Pickaway and Ross Counties had similar income levels and rates of growth during this period, but were below $25,000 per capita in 2004. Figure 8: Per Capita Income $35,000 U.S. Ohio Jobs One-Stop Fairfield Pickaway Ross $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 U.S. $23,076 $24,175 $25,334 $26,883 $27,939 $29,845 $30,574 $30,810 $31,484 $33,050 Ohio $22,495 $23,322 $24,656 $26,017 $26,859 $28,207 $28,601 $29,212 $29,954 $31,161 Jobs One-Stop $19,634 $20,393 $21,826 $22,968 $23,657 $25,031 $25,500 $26,074 $26,574 $27,602 Fairfield $22,163 $22,942 $24,464 $25,951 $26,605 $28,088 $28,626 $28,946 $29,393 $30,383 Pickaway $17,400 $17,780 $19,481 $19,939 $20,406 $21,802 $22,456 $22,998 $23,580 $24,842 Ross $17,258 $18,224 $19,292 $20,333 $21,103 $22,219 $22,315 $23,213 $23,648 $24,470 6 Key Trends, continued Jobs One-Stop Housing Permits: New permits for residential construction are shown in Figure 9 below. The number of permits peaked in 2003, due largely to a building boom in Fairfield County. New permits in Pickaway and Ross Counties have stayed fairly stable in the last ten years. Average valuation for new residential permits, shown in Figure 10, show steady increases in Fairfield and Pickaway Counties. The spike in average valuation for Ross County in 2002 occurred because all the permits reported in that year were single-family units. Figure 9: Number of New Residential Building Permits 2,000 Jobs One-Stop Fairfield Pickaway Ross 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Jobs One-Stop 989 1,118 891 1,027 1,086 1,187 1,071 1,482 1,817 1,561 1,200 Fairfield 705 820 676 767 810 914 814 1,288 1,553 1,265 992 Pickaway 241 247 177 193 199 205 193 148 216 249 169 43 51 38 67 77 68 64 46 48 47 39 Ross Figure 10: Valuation of New Residential Building Permits $200,000 Jobs One-Stop Fairfield Pickaway Ross $180,000 $160,000 $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Jobs One-Stop $111,514 $111,129 $116,887 $130,222 $139,407 $146,524 $158,792 $152,475 $156,223 $152,251 $170,872 Fairfield $113,427 $114,463 $120,052 $137,033 $149,158 $151,311 $174,233 $153,065 $159,132 $158,118 $173,900 Pickaway $106,830 $105,579 $109,209 $114,476 $116,568 $140,073 $117,236 $135,949 $147,229 $133,547 $169,138 Ross $106,395 $84,412 $96,342 $97,613 $95,856 $101,628 $87,723 $189,130 $102,568 $93,435 $101,364 7 Jobs One-Stop III. Industry Analysis Employment by Sector: Figure 11 below shows the distribution of industry employment in 2005. These statistics generally do not include farmers, self-employed workers, and others not covered by unemployment insurance. This pie chart shows a very diverse mix of employment in the Jobs One-Stop. The largest single employer, accounting for nearly one out of every four workers in the area, is government, including public schools. There are six postsecondary schools in the region (see page 12). Other significant categories represented in this chart are trade, transportation and utilities, which includes retail and trucking services (17.3%); manufacturing (15.0%); education and health services, including hospitals, clinics and private schools (12.2%); leisure and hospitality, which includes restaurants, hotels and certain recreation facilities (10.9%); professional and business services such as law and accounting firms, corporate offices and administrative support (8.1%); construction (5.1%); financial activities like banking, insurance and real estate (3.3%); other defined service industries such as laundries, repair services and certain non-profit organizations (2.8%); information, which includes publishing and telecommunications (1.2%); and finally a small number of workers in natural resources and mining (0.4%). Figure 11: Employment by Major Sector, 2005 Natural Resources and Mining 0.4% Construction 5.1% Government 23.8% Manufacturing 15.0% Other Services 2.8% Trade, Transportation and Utilities 17.3% Leisure and Hospitality 10.9% Information 1.2% Financial Activities 3.3% Education and Health Services 12.2% Professional and Business Services 8.1% Figure 12 on the following page shows more detailed information about sector employment in the Jobs One-Stop region and how it compares with the state. In addition to the area’s industry mix relative to the state, the proportion of total state employment for each sector helps identify the importance of a sector’s employment in Ohio. The biggest example for this region is state 8 Industry Analysis, continued Jobs One-Stop government; across Ohio, state workers account for only 2.5 percent of employees, but here they account for 5.1 percent of workers. Local government employment especially is quite prevalent here. Appendix D suggests this may be due to public education in the area. Two other such concentrated industries are accommodation and food services, which employs 9.8 percent here compared to 8.1 percent statewide, and construction, which employs 5.1 percent here compared to 4.4 percent statewide. There are also a few industries that are less concentrated in the Jobs One-Stop than they are in Ohio, such as finance and insurance and administrative and waste services. Figure 12: Employment by Industry Sector, 2005 Industry Sector Total All Sectors Natural Resources and Mining Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Mining Construction Manufacturing Trade, Transportation and Utilities Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transportation and Warehousing Utilities Information Financial Activities Finance and Insurance Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Professional and Business Services Professional, Scientific and Technical Services Management of Companies and Enterprises Administrative and Waste Services Education and Health Services Education Services Health Care and Social Assistance Leisure and Hospitality Arts, Entertainment and Recreation Accommodation and Food Services Other Services, except Public Administration Government, including Public Schools Federal Government State Government Local Government NA-Data not available due to confidentiality restrictions. Employment 78,618 309 NA NA 4,007 11,782 13,585 1,718 10,446 NA NA 931 2,562 1,786 776 6,373 1,818 424 4,130 9,606 408 9,198 8,551 844 7,707 2,216 18,668 1,439 4,019 13,210 9 Percent Distrib. 100.0% 0.4% NA NA 5.1% 15.0% 17.3% 2.2% 13.3% NA NA 1.2% 3.3% 2.3% 1.0% 8.1% 2.3% 0.5% 5.3% 12.2% 0.5% 11.7% 10.9% 1.1% 9.8% 2.8% 23.7% 1.8% 5.1% 16.8% State Employment 5,308,808 24,925 14,136 10,790 232,472 811,894 1,035,829 235,497 613,800 166,144 20,389 89,876 299,322 229,744 69,578 643,266 231,601 98,622 313,043 750,229 85,739 664,489 499,494 67,979 431,515 165,617 753,515 76,892 132,144 544,479 State Distrib. 100.0% 0.5% 0.3% 0.2% 4.4% 15.3% 19.5% 4.4% 11.6% 3.1% 0.4% 1.7% 5.6% 4.3% 1.3% 12.1% 4.4% 1.9% 5.9% 14.1% 1.6% 12.5% 9.4% 1.3% 8.1% 3.1% 14.2% 1.4% 2.5% 10.3% Percent of State Total 1.5% 1.2% NA NA 1.7% 1.5% 1.3% 0.7% 1.7% NA NA 1.0% 0.9% 0.8% 1.1% 1.0% 0.8% 0.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.5% 1.4% 1.7% 1.2% 1.8% 1.3% 2.5% 1.9% 3.0% 2.4% Industry Analysis, continued Jobs One-Stop Employment Prospects: The table below looks at industry classifications and is color coded to more quickly identify those sectors most important to the region. The left column ranks nineteen sectors shown by their employment levels in 2005. The top eight sectors in this column are printed in blue. The right column ranks sectors by the net number of new jobs created since 2005. The growth sectors in the second column are printed in red. Sectors that appear at the top of both lists are printed in purple. Sectors for which we could not establish a growth rate due to confidentiality restrictions are printed in italics. Sectors with high employment levels are often a major source of job openings because seven of ten openings are expected to be replacement needs. 4 At the top of both lists is local government, which has added nearly 1,800 jobs in the last five years. Increases in local government staffing can often accompany broader community growth as citizens demand more public services, especially education. Manufacturing is another large employer, although it also reported the most jobs lost in the period of analysis. Retail trade and state government were other large sectors that also lost jobs. The remaining large employers that did add jobs were accommodation and food services; administrative and waste management; and construction. Aside from the large employers, four more sectors added jobs between 2000 and 2005: finance and insurance; arts, entertainment and recreation; natural resources and mining; and real estate and rental and leasing. There were seven sectors for which growth rates could not be published due to confidentiality restrictions. One of these, health care and social assistance, most likely had significant growth given the increased demand due to the aging of the baby boom generation and the emergence of new medical technologies. Figure 13: Employment Prospects by Industry Sector 2005 Employment Local Government Manufacturing Retail Trade Health Care and Social Assistance Accommodation and Food Services Administrative and Support and Waste Management State Government Construction Other Services, except Public Administration Professional, Scientific and Technical Services Finance and Insurance Wholesale Trade Federal Government Information Arts, Entertainment and Recreation Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Management of Companies and Enterprises Education Services Natural Resources and Mining 4 New Jobs: 2000-2005 Local Government Accommodation and Food Services Construction Administrative and Support and Waste Management Finance and Insurance Arts, Entertainment and Recreation Natural Resources and Mining Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Federal Government State Government Retail Trade Manufacturing Education Services Health Care and Social Assistance Information Management of Companies and Enterprises Other Services, except Public Administration Professional, Scientific and Technical Services Wholesale Trade Ohio Job Outlook to 2012, p. 3. 10 Industry Analysis, continued Jobs One-Stop Average Weekly Earnings: Figure 14 below ranks the sectors in the Jobs One-Stop region by their average weekly earnings—total wage or salary regardless of hours worked—and shows how much the sectors have grown or declined by 2005. Statewide average weekly earnings for all employers were $718 in 2005, compared to $607 for this region. This table also uses the same color-coding system as Figure 13 on the previous page, with sectors printed in purple being large sectors with growth. The highest-earning sector in this region was federal government, where the average worker earned over $1,100 per week. The second highest was manufacturing, with average earnings of about $900 per week. The remaining sectors earning more than the statewide average were management of companies and enterprises (this mostly includes corporate headquarters) at $876, state government at $823, and wholesale trade at $785. The highest-paying industry to have added jobs in the last five years was local government, where the average worker earned $649 per week. Bear in mind that industry size and growth do not always coincide with earnings potential. Many such industries tend to hire large numbers of part-time workers who may not earn as much per week, as well as earn part of their income in tips, which is not included in these wage figures. For example, accommodation and food services added about 800 workers in this area, yet this industry had the lowest average weekly earnings: $205 per week. Figure 14: Sectors Ranked by 2005 Average Weekly Earnings Industry Sector 2000 Employment 2005 Employment 1,847 15,706 NA 4,674 NA NA 11,458 NA 3,606 1,477 NA 259 3,817 759 11,155 NA NA 788 6,901 1,439 11,782 424 4,019 1,718 931 13,210 9,198 4,007 1,786 1,818 309 4,130 776 10,446 2,216 408 844 7,707 Federal Government Manufacturing Management of Companies and Enterprises State Government Wholesale Trade Information Local Government Health Care and Social Assistance Construction Finance and Insurance Professional, Scientific and Technical Services Natural Resources and Mining Administrative and Support and Waste Management Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Retail Trade Other Services, except Public Administration Education Services Arts, Entertainment and Recreation Accommodation and Food Services NA-Data not available due to confidentiality restrictions. 11 Net Change -408 -3,924 NA -655 NA NA 1,752 NA 401 309 NA 50 313 17 -709 NA NA 56 806 Percent Change -22.1% -25.0% NA -14.0% NA NA 15.3% NA 11.1% 20.9% NA 19.3% 8.2% 2.2% -6.4% NA NA 7.1% 11.7% Average Weekly Earnings $1,149 $902 $876 $823 $785 $690 $649 $643 $643 $640 $591 $502 $475 $430 $393 $380 $368 $278 $205 Jobs One-Stop IV. Educational Infrastructure Figure 15 below shows educational attainment for persons 25 and older in the area, according to data from the 2000 decennial census. Generally, the Jobs One-Stop has a similar overall level of educational attainment as the state, with slightly higher proportions of adults without high school diplomas and adults with at least some college education. Fairfield County has the highest educational attainment, with nearly 22 percent of adults holding a bachelor’s degree and ten percent holding a master’s degree or better. Fairfield also has the lowest proportion of adults holding only a high school degree. Pickaway and Ross Counties have nearly identical educational profiles skewed toward less educational attainment. Figure 15: Educational Attainment 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Ohio Jobs One-Stop Fairfield Pickaway Ross 547,276 8,445 5,153 1,334 1,958 Bachelor's Degree 1,016,258 17,843 11,507 2,694 3,642 Associate Degree 436,608 9,606 5,530 1,585 2,491 Some College 1,471,964 32,365 17,152 6,539 8,674 High School Graduate 2,674,551 39,650 3,695 15,073 20,882 No High School Diploma 1,262,085 29,740 9,911 8,033 11,796 Master's Degree or Higher There are six postsecondary schools in the Jobs One-Stop area: Ohio University at Lancaster, Southeastern Business College in Lancaster and Chillicothe, Circleville Bible College, Ohio University at Chillicothe, and the Pickaway-Ross Joint Vocational School District. In addition, the area is host to 251 apprentices in 12 programs, covering such fields like electrical work; plumbing; masonry; carpentry; painting; roofing; sheet metal work; and heating, ventilation and air conditioning. 5 5 Many of the apprentices in Pickaway County are in vocational programs within the Orient Correctional Institute. 12 Jobs One-Stop Technical Notes Commuting data are from the 2000 Census of Population and Housing, “County-to-County Worker Flow Files.” Data is available at http://www.odod.state.oh.us/research/files/P0005.htm. Population and demographic estimates were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau. The figures are available online at http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.php. Employment data were obtained from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), Bureau of Labor Market Information, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services. The data are based on reports filed by employers subject to the Ohio Unemployment Compensation Law, as well as those covered under Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees, by place of work. See the NAICS-based Economic Development Profiles at http://lmi.state.oh.us/CEP/CEP.htm or the data query menu for Employment and Wages by Industry at http://www.ohioworkforceinformer.org. Because data for some industry sectors in some counties have not been released due to confidentiality restrictions, we were not able to report data for these sectors in the region. Total employment may include employment and wage data for non-classifiable establishments. Unemployment statistics are produced by the Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) section, Bureau of Labor Market Information, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services. Data for One-Stop areas are available for query at http://www.ohioworkforceinformer.org or for other geographies at http://lmi.state.oh.us/ASP/LAUS/vbLaus.htm. Per capita income figures are from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and are downloadable from http://www.bea.gov/bea/regional/reis. Information on residential construction permits and their valuation are from the U.S. Census Bureau, “Construction Reports: Housing Authorized by Building Permits and Public Contracts.” Data are available online at http://www.census.gov/const/www/permitsindex.html. Data on education were obtained from the Ohio Department of Development, Office of Strategic Research, based on information from the 2000 decennial census. Detailed information on each of Ohio’s counties is available at http://www.odod.state.oh.us/research/files/s0.htm. The Bureau of Labor Market Information also collects data on programs for the Integrated Postsecondary Educational Data System (IPEDS). These data are posted on the internet by the National Center for Education Statistics at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cool. The list of major employers in each county is available in the Ohio County Profiles produced by the Ohio Department of Development’s Office of Strategic Research at http://www.odod.state.oh.us/research/files/s0.htm. For more information on Ohio workforce statistics, visit the Ohio Workforce Informer online at http://ohioworkforceinformer.org or the Ohio Labor Market Information Classic website at http://lmi.state.oh.us. 13 Jobs One-Stop References Appalachian Regional Commission. County Economic Status Designations in the Appalachian Region, Fiscal Year 2006. September 2005. Internet. http://www.arc.gov/index.do?nodeId=2934. 29 August 2006. Goldstein, Harvey, University of North Carolina. Projecting State and Area Industry Employment. Prepared through a grant from the Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor. Projections Workgroup, August 2005. Ohio Department of Development. Office of Strategic Research. Commuting Patterns by County. March 2003. Internet. http://www.odod.state.oh.us/research/files/P0005.htm. 29 August 2006. Ohio Department of Development. Office of Strategic Research. Ohio County Profiles. October 2005. Internet. http://www.odod.state.oh.us/research/files/s0.htm. 29 August 2006. Ohio Department of Job and Family Services. Bureau of Labor Market Information. Demographic, Labor Force and Industry Trends. June 2002. Ohio Department of Job and Family Services. Bureau of Labor Market Information. Market Analysis of Key Workforce Trends. 2000. United States. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Local Area Personal Income. Internet. http://www.bea.gov/bea/regional/reis/. 29 August 2006. United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. June 2005. United States. Census Bureau. Building Permits. Internet. http://www.census.gov/const/www/permitsindex.html. 29 August 2006. United States. Census Bureau. Population Estimates. Internet. http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates/php. 29 August 2006. United States. Census Bureau. Current Lists of Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas and Definitions. 23 August 2006. Internet. http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metrodef.html. 29 August 2006. 14 Jobs One-Stop Appendix A Workforce Investment Area 7 15 Jobs One-Stop Appendix B Metropolitan and Micropolitan Areas 16 Appendix B, continued Jobs One-Stop Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) have at least one urbanized area with a population of 50,000 or more, plus adjacent territory that has a high degree of social and economic integration with the core as measured by commuting ties. Micropolitan Statistical Areas have at least one urban cluster with a population of at least 10,000 but less than 50,000, plus adjacent territory that has a high degree of social and economic integration with the core, measured by commuting ties. For further information on the Office of Management and Budget’s 2000 Standards for Defining Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas, please visit http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metrodef.html. Metropolitan Statistical Areas in Ohio and Adjacent States A. Akron MSA: Portage and Summit Counties. B. Canton-Massillon MSA: Carroll and Stark Counties. C. Cincinnati-Middletown MSA*: Brown, Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren Counties in Ohio; Dearborn, Franklin and Ohio Counties in Indiana; and Boone, Bracken, Campbell, Gallatin, Grant, Kenton and Pendleton Counties in Kentucky. D. Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor MSA: Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain and Medina Counties. E. Columbus MSA: Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Licking, Madison, Morrow, Pickaway and Union Counties. F. Dayton MSA: Greene, Miami, Montgomery and Preble Counties. G. Huntington-Ashland MSA*: Cabell and Wayne Counties in West Virginia; Boyd and Greenup Counties in Kentucky; and Lawrence County in Ohio. H. Lima MSA: Allen County. I. Mansfield MSA: Richland County. J. Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna MSA*: Pleasants, Wirt and Wood Counties in West Virginia and Washington County in Ohio. K. Sandusky MSA: Erie County. L. Springfield MSA: Clark County. M. Toledo MSA: Fulton, Lucas, Ottawa and Wood Counties. N. Weirton-Steubenville MSA*: Jefferson County in Ohio and Brooke and Hancock Counties in West Virginia. O. Wheeling MSA*: Marshall and Ohio Counties in West Virginia and Belmont County in Ohio. P. Youngstown-Warren-Boardman MSA*: Mahoning and Trumbull Counties in Ohio and Mercer County in Pennsylvania. *Statistical areas in other states that include Ohio counties. 17 Appendix B, continued Jobs One-Stop Micropolitan Statistical Areas in Ohio 1. Ashland 2. Ashtabula 3. Athens 4. Bellefontaine: Logan County 5. Bucyrus: Crawford County 6. Cambridge: Guernsey County 7. Celina: Mercer County 8. Chillicothe: Ross County 9. Coshocton 10. Defiance 11. East Liverpool-Salem: Columbiana County 12. Findlay: Hancock County 13. Fremont: Sandusky County 14. Greenville: Darke County 15. Marion 16. Mount Vernon: Knox County 17. New Philadelphia-Dover: Tuscarawas County 18. Norwalk: Huron County 19. Point Pleasant*: Mason County in West Virginia and Gallia County in Ohio 20. Portsmouth: Scioto County 21. Sidney: Shelby County 22. Tiffin-Fostoria: Seneca County 23. Urbana: Champaign County 24. Van Wert 25. Wapakoneta: Auglaize County 26. Washington Court House: Fayette County 27. Wilmington: Clinton County 28. Wooster: Wayne County 29. Zanesville: Muskingum County The micropolitan area name is the same as the county name unless otherwise noted. *Statistical areas in other states that include Ohio counties. 18 Jobs One-Stop Appendix C Major County-to-County Commuting Patterns Percent of workers that work outside the county: 55.8% Average commute time in minutes: 27.7 Number of workers 16+ years of age Number of workers 16+ years of age living in Fairfield County: 60,465 working in Fairfield County: 36,957 Commute Out To Number Percent Commute In From Number Percent Franklin Co. OH 28,259 46.7% Franklin Co. OH 3,261 8.8% Licking Co. OH 1,563 2.6% Perry Co. OH 1,980 5.4% Pickaway Co. OH 1,289 2.1% Hocking Co. OH 1,897 5.1% Delaware Co. OH 395 0.7% Licking Co. OH 915 2.5% Hocking Co. OH 361 0.6% Athens Co. OH 431 1.2% Fairfield Percent of workers that work outside the county: 55.4% Average commute time in minutes: 26.7 Number of workers 16+ years of age Number of workers 16+ years of age living in Pickaway County: 21,921 working in Pickaway County: 17,332 Commute In From Number Percent Commute Out To Number Percent Franklin Co. OH 9,613 43.9% Ross Co. OH 2,617 15.1% Ross Co. OH 847 3.9% Franklin Co. OH 1,517 8.8% Madison Co. OH 392 1.8% Fairfield Co. OH 1,289 7.4% Fairfield Co. OH 349 1.6% Hocking Co. OH 564 3.3% Fayette Co. OH 244 1.1% Fayette Co. OH 248 1.4% Licking Co. OH 86 0.4% Pike Co. OH 241 1.4% Hocking Co. OH 62 0.3% Madison Co. OH 172 1.0% Pickaway Percent of workers that work outside the county: 29.6% Average commute time in minutes: 25.9 Number of workers 16+ years of age Number of workers 16+ years of age living in Ross County: 30,409 working in Ross County: 28,140 Commute In From Number Percent Commute Out To Number Percent Pickaway Co. OH 2,617 8.6% Pike Co. OH 1,450 5.2% Franklin Co. OH 2,335 7.7% Jackson Co.OH 917 3.3% Pike Co.OH 1,071 3.5% Pickaway Co. OH 847 3.0% Highland Co.OH 671 2.2% Vinton Co.OH 538 1.9% Fayette Co.OH 503 1.7% Franklin Co.OH 497 1.8% Jackson Co. OH 325 1.1% Scioto Co. OH 494 1.8% Madison Co.OH 289 1.0% Highland Co. OH 347 1.2% Ross Source: Ohio Department of Development, Office of Strategic Research, 2000 Census Data. 19 Jobs One-Stop Appendix D Major Employers by County Fairfield Cyril-Scott Co. Fairfield Medical Center Global Home Products/Anchor Hocking Kroger Co. Lancaster City Board of Education Meijer, Inc. Pickerington Local Board of Education Ralcorp/Ralston Foods State of Ohio Pickaway ALSCO Metals Corp. Berger Health System Circleville City Board of Education E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. General Electric Co. Logan Elm Local Board of Education PPG Industries, Inc. State of Ohio Teays Valley Local Board of Education Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Ross Adena Regional Medical Center Chillicothe City Board of Education Horizon Telecom, Inc. NewPage Corp. PACCAR/Kenworth Truck Co. Pickaway-Ross County JVSD State of Ohio Trim Systems, LLC Union Spring and Manufacturing Corp. U.S. Federal Government/Veterans Administration Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. YSK Corp. Manufacturing Health Care Manufacturing Retail Government Retail Government Manufacturing Government Manufacturing Health Care Government Manufacturing Manufacturing Government Manufacturing Government Government Retail Health Care Government Utilities Manufacturing Manufacturing Government Government Manufacturing Manufacturing Government Retail Manufacturing Source: Ohio Department of Development. Ohio County Profiles. Employers are listed in alphabetical order. 20 Office of Workforce Development P.O. Box 1618 Columbus, OH 43216-1618 Bureau of Labor Market Information Business Principles for Workforce Development Partner with the workforce and economic development community. Develop and deploy new information solution tools and systems for the workforce and economic development community. Provide products and services that are customer and demand driven. Be known as an important and reliable source for information solutions that support workforce development goals and outcomes. Acknowledgements: The Workforce Research Section, under the direction of Labor Economist Larry Less, was responsible for the composition of this report. Labor Market Analyst Jonathan Calig was primarily responsible for production. Thanks are extended to the many other analysts who developed and reviewed the data presented in this report. This publication was prepared under the supervision of Labor Market Information Bureau Chief Keith Ewald and Assistant Bureau Chief Rudy Wilkinson. This report was prepared by the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, Office of Workforce Development. For further information, visit our website at http://lmi.state.oh.us or contact the Ohio Bureau of Labor Market Information at 1-888-2WORK-411 or 1-888-296-7541. Ted Strickland, Governor State of Ohio Helen E. Jones-Kelley, Director Ohio Department of Job and Family Services Office of Workforce Development Bureau of Labor Market Information ODJFS is an Equal Opportunity Employer and Service Provider (Rev. 7/2007)