(or cippus), dating
Transcription
(or cippus), dating
Abstract: Submission 2 This paper is a detailed study of a very well preserved Egyptian “magical” stela (or cippus), dating to the Late or Ptolemaic period (c. 700-100BCE). The object provides very interesting insights into Egyptian religious iconography, healing practices, and the power of hieroglyphic signs in the ritual context – when they were not even designed for reading. The paper begins by providing an overview of the iconography, including the key gods and demons shown on the obverse of the stela, as well as the hieroglyphic signs inscribed on the reverse. There is also a short section on the object history, which is deeply unclear but provides an interesting insight into the antiquities market of the early 20th Century. The main focus of the essay is on how such stelae were used, and in particular on the role of hieroglyphic inscriptions. The standard explanation is that water was poured over the stela, absorbing “magical” healing properties from its surface. It could subsequently be applied to patients’ skin or ingested, acting as a “magical” remedy. Sometimes, the hieroglyphic inscriptions are inscribed magical spells, which would fit this hypothesis well. However, on this stela, the hieroglyphs are incoherent. While acknowledging the possibility of deliberate fraud, this paper argues that the signs themselves were imbued with so much “magical” significance that they could serve as remedies in their own right, even without forming words. This in turn has important implications for understanding the production and socio-cultural function of such stelae, suggesting that they could be considered effective even if not inscribed by scribal specialists. Such an inference is highly significant for broader attempts to understand the nature of popular religion in the Egyptian Late Period, emphasising that literacy was not everything. Word count: 2997 A Cippus of Horus on the Crocodiles (Musuem of Archaeology and Anthropology, Cambridge) Description (accession no: 1947.1072) A small cippus stela, with maximum height 77mm, width 61mm, and thickness 7mm, doubling to 14mm at the base, made of a very hard, dark material, possibly haematite. The total mass is 121g. The base is flat, but the cippus is nonetheless unstable in a vertical position. The top is gently curved. The principal scene on the obverse is in raised relief, with hieroglyphs and subsidiary scenes in sunken relief. All images and hieroglyphs on the reverse are likewise in sunken relief. Obverse (fig. 1) The principal scene shows the god Horus as a naked child with the side-lock of youth, standing atop two crocodiles with left leg thrust forward. His left hand grasps a snake and a gazelle, held by the horns or on a leash. It may represent a demon, as discussed later. His right hand holds a scorpion and a lion, both by their tails, and also another snake. Directly above Horus is a large head of Bes, its top protruding above the curving boundary of the stela. On either side are two unidentified figures, probably guardian deities. Flanking Horus are a lotus stalk representing Nefertum on his left and a falcon-topped papyrus plant on his right. The preservation state is near perfect, except for substantial damage to the face of Horus. A register of hieroglyphs covers the base, with further signs by the shoulders of Horus. The stela sides are inscribed too, but most signs are too small and faded to identify. Bes head Standing protective figure Papyrus plant with falcon Squatting protective figure with knife, possibly falconheaded Lotus stalk of Nefertum 77 mm Scorpion and lion in right hand Snake and gazelle in left hand Pair of subdued crocodiles Horus as Ḥrpɜ-ẖrd (Harpocrates or Horus the Child) Fig. 1. Obverse 61mm Page Word Count: 243 Cumulative Word Count: 243 1 Reverse (fig. 2) The uppermost register depicts what is apparently a procession of gods. They include two squatting falcon-headed deities with knives, resembling the one in the upper right corner of the obverse, who cannot be securely identified. Iconographically they match some of the knife-wielding zoomorphic guardians of Amun-Re from the Amduat – the cosmological treatise describing this god’s nightly journey through the Underworld (Hornung & Abt 2007: 47). There is also a ram-headed deity; possibly Amun or one of his syncretised forms, and an anthropomorphic, probably female figure of unclear identity. Finally, the procession also contains a falcon on a goat. This curious image cannot be fully understood: while falcons are common in divine iconography, goats generally are not, although they can represent revered ancestors (Faulkner 1962: 214). Underneath are six registers of hieroglyphs written from right to left. Only a narrow range of common signs is present, and these do not fit together coherently. Nonetheless, they likely still had great meaning, as discussed later. Squatting falconheaded protective figures with knives Probable ramheaded deity Falcon perched on a goat Commonly recurring sign group. Syllabic reading ikt (no semantic meaning), found twice on obverse and six times on reverse (with further minor variants elsewhere) Another group common in other religious Fig. 2. Reverse inscriptions, read as wrt (great) Group common in other religious inscriptions, read as ḏt (eternity) Otherwise unattested sign Standard group for ɜst - the goddess Isis Biliteral found in the standard spelling of nsw (king), again common in inscriptions Fig. 2. Reverse (dimensions as for obverse) Provenance The original provenance is unknown, but some information on the stela’s movements and owners in the 20th century is available. It was catalogued in the Cambridge Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology in May 1992 (MAA Catalogue), having previously been in the Mackintosh Collection. Unfortunately, the collector has left little historical trace, apart from the name L. Mackintosh, the collection catalogue, and the name of a presumably related Miss H. J. Mackintosh (MAA Catalogue). The latter is listed as responsible for transferring the stela to the MAA, but other than that nothing is known of her too. Nonetheless, while the Mackintoshes themselves remain mysterious, the remaining transaction record is remarkable. The catalogue exists in at least four meticulously detailed editions, 2 Page Word Count: 248 Cumulative Word Count: 491 released between 1919 and 1944. Over this 25-year period, Mackintosh, whoever this was, created an impressive collection of Egyptian amulets, apparently inspired by Petrie’s earlier work (Mackintosh 1944: 1, Petrie 1914). This task involved extensive travel between Cairo, Paris, London and many other private dealers and UK auction houses. In 1943, the itinerant Mackintosh purchased a “Horus-on-the-Crocodiles” stela at Guildford in a private transaction from a certain Sapirstein (Mackintosh 1944: 64). This is our object. Various contemporary records of the Surrey Archaeological Society mention a Nathan Sapirstein of Quarry Street, Guildford (Surrey 1931: xxxv, 1936: xli & 1937: xxxvii). He is listed as a member of the Society since 1925, but never published anything in its journal. His name appears for the last time in 1946, when he apparently moved to Epsom Road, Guildford (Surrey 1946: liii). Nothing else is firmly known about him: the Hebraic first name and Ashkenazi surname suggest a possible Jewish background, but no corroborating evidence is available. What is recorded, however, are Sapirstein’s dealings with Mackintosh in 1943; involving the sale of faience busts of the four sons of Horus, a crowned faience hawk amulet, a faience wɜs-amulet, and our stela (Mackintosh 1944: 77, 102, 112). The agreed price was £6.10.0 – an “expensive deal” (Mackintosh 1944: 152). The wide variety of objects, alongside their good condition, high price and Sapirstein’s long-standing membership of an established antiquarian society, all strongly imply that he was either a professional antiquities dealer, or at least took this very seriously. Where he managed to obtain the stela would be fascinating to discover, but no more is known to help with this. The stela was likely discovered outside an official excavation, since it ended up on the antiquities market. Since cippi are not tied to any particular area of Egypt, and indeed also occur outside of Egypt altogether, linking this object to a specific site is a thankless task. A likely scenario would involve it being sold in a major Egyptian commercial hub, such as Cairo, perhaps in the late 19th or early 20th century. Here, it could either have been bought directly by Sapirstein, himself unlikely to have access to archaeological sites, or by an intermediary. It may be worth noting that Egypt in the early 20th century had a large Jewish population of around 80,000 (Beinin 1998: 4) and if Sapirstein were indeed Jewish himself, he could perhaps have operated through cultural connections. That is however pure speculation – all that is known for certain is that the object was treated well even if it repeatedly changed hands, still being in excellent condition. Cippus discovered at unknown site (not even necessarily in Egypt). 19th century(?) Cippus enters antiquites market and passes through an unknown number of intermediaries. Late 19th/early 20th century. Obtained by N. Sapirstein, a Jewish antiquities dealer connected to Egypt (?). Early 20th century. Sold by Sapirstein to the collector L. Mackintosh in Guildford. 1943. Part of Mackintosh collection, eventually passing to Miss H. J. Mackintosh. Post-1944. Obtained by MAA, with Miss Mackintosh listed as the "source" (possibly posthumously). 1992 Fig. 3. Summary of known object history Dating Horus cippi underwent iconographic changes over time, making dating reasonably straightforward. Early examples from Ramesside times to the 26th Dynasty generally show Horus in a sideways striding posture (Johnson 1975: 144), which is clearly inapplicable here. The latest examples from the Roman period are generally associated with relatively poor quality relief, disproportionately thin or broad Horus figures, and very flat or steeply sloping tops (Johnson 1975: 145). This too can therefore be discounted. The remaining options are Late Period or Ptolemaic - so a date between the 7th and 1st centuries BCE emerges. This is obviously still very broad, but narrowing the date down further is considerably harder. The Late Period cippi all depict Horus in a nude, full frontal form, and so do the Ptolemaic examples. The only fairly consistent difference is the curvature on the top of the stela - Ptolemaic cippi tend to have gentler curves than their Late Period counterparts (Johnson 1975: 145). The curvature of our stela is quite gentle, making a Ptolemaic date slightly more likely. However, earlier examples are not necessarily all steep without exception, so it could conceivably be older. Page Word Count: 561 Cumulative Word Count: 1052 3 Distribution Cippi are not only attested all over Egypt, but also travelled very widely, emerging at sites such as Byblos (Lebanon), Hama (Syria), Meroe (Sudan), Axum (Ethiopia), Rome (Italy) (Ritner 1989: 106), Nippur (Iraq) (Johnson 1975: 143) and Susa (Iran) (Abdi 2002: 203). Their distribution therefore spans three continents and is an obvious indication of their importance as exports. They may have travelled alongside Egyptians living abroad (Abdi 2002: 210); perhaps serving as messengers or soldiers during Egypt’s integration into larger political units like the Persian, Macedonian and ultimately Roman empires. An alternative interpretation is that they were exported into non-Egyptian cultural contexts, perhaps being considered somehow symbolic of Egypt. An argument can be made that Horus-on-theCrocodiles, although not necessarily theologically understood, became emblematic of Egypt in the late Neo-Assyrian Empire, where the image seems to have percolated into literary sources as well as the archaeological record1. Considering this, it seems probable that similar associations could have occurred in other areas later on, with cippi becoming a stock export seen as par excellence representative of Egyptian culture as a whole. Function and Iconography Cippi were used for curing the bites of noxious animals (Shaw & Nicholson 1995: 133), such as snakes and scorpions. Water poured over them was believed to absorb the healing power in the iconography and spells on the cippus, which sufferers could then drink or apply to afflicted body parts (Ritner 1989: 105-107). Indeed, the verb ‘to swallow’ (cm), had very strong connections with magic (ḥkɜ) from the New Kingdom onwards (Ritner 1989: 107-108) so by swallowing this water, collected in basins under the stelae, sufferers would also swallow magic deemed capable of defeating disease. This probably had a considerable placebo effect, and the endurance of cippi for over a millennium suggests that the consequences were indeed beneficial enough to warrant their continued use for so long. From an iconographic viewpoint, the cippus studied here is very typical and reflects established theology. Crocodiles and scorpions were believed to have wounded Horus as a child (Ritner 1989: 105), but he recovered from their bites through the magic of his mother Isis. The stela shows him triumphing over the animals who had harmed him. The lion and snakes are added as they were clearly also dangerous, but the usually harmless gazelle is more mysterious. It probably represents a one-horned gazelle demon who opposes the Sun-God Amun-Ra in some New Kingdom cosmological texts (Piankoff 1964: pl.3). Incidentally, this demon can be accompanied by snakes and crocodiles (fig. 4), perhaps reflecting the dual dangers of water and desert. As Horus defeats them all, the sufferer could be identified with him, hence recovering through the same divine assistance. The Bes head over Horus is meant to further strengthen the recovery, Bes being a guardian deity (Wilkinson 2003: 102-104), and the contrast between his elderly features and the youthful Horus may also indicate rejuvenation (Ritner 1989: 111). While these features are generally present on all cippi, the curious falcon-on goat motif in the divine procession in the upper register of the reverse is perhaps more original. However, the rest of that scene is more explicable: the knife-wielding deities clearly being protective, and the ram-headed figure probably being Amun-Ra; not out of place considering both his vast cosmic role and the belief that he too was once cured of a snake-bite by Isis (Borghouts 1978: 51-56). Overall, the reverse scene therefore does not undermine the general iconographic typicality of the cippus. Page Word Count: 591 Cumulative Word Count: 1643 1 This is the key theme of my current BA dissertation, and consequently cannot be expanded here owing to University regulations. The crucial textual attestation is in The Underworld Vision of an Assyrian Prince (Livingstone 1989: 71: 4). 4 Cippus iconography is largely based around the powerful magic of Isis, namely spells principally invoking the powers of Thoth and the combined rejuvenating forces of Osiris and the sun disk (Borghouts 1978: 62-69). Excerpts from these are usually written on all available cippi surfaces, with the most complete example containing all the spells being the 4th century BCE Metternich Stela (Scott 1951: 201-217). Most other cippi contain spells found there, and comparison therefore allows them to be reconstructed and translated. It is here that the cippus of this study is distinct: not only is it unmatched on the Metternich Stela, but it cannot be read at all despite plentiful hieroglyphs. So what were these signs for? Interpreting the “inscription” This illegible hieroglyphic sequence is surely the most striking feature of this stela. From an epigraphic perspective, care was taken to make it look like a genuine inscription: there are many combinations of narrow, tall signs and broader, low signs stacked atop one another, creating sign blocks of even height. These are common both in lapidary inscriptions and hieratic group-writing. The repeated ikt-groups (fig. 2) exemplify this. Moreover, a number of important words from a lexical register appropriate to a coherent magico-religious inscription quickly become recognisable (fig. 2), including wrt (great), ḏt (eternity), and ɜst (Isis). However, these outward indications of legibility can only satisfy individuals who have Fig. 4. Demons around the sun, with gazelleseen Egyptian inscriptions before and visually know what to demon at top and bottom right. (Tomb of Seti II. expect, but ultimately have very little or no reading knowledge. Image from Piankoff 1964: pl.3) The signs cluster in repeated groups, whose combined phonetic values yield no semantic meaning. Additionally, several signs and groups unattested in legible Egyptian inscriptions are present. The hieroglyphs were therefore not designed to be read, but still not chosen randomly. This raises interesting questions about the socio-cultural context in which this object was produced. It seems likely that the stela was produced in an illiterate environment, or at least for use by illiterate individuals. The Late and Ptolemaic periods are well-known for commercialisation of religion and ritual, and fraud was not out of the question. Notably, studies of vast animal cemeteries indicate complex processes of breeding, killing, and mummification of animals done on a vast commercial scale (Ikram & Dodson 1998: 131-136), with mummies subsequently sold to worshippers even when poorly prepared or incomplete. Indeed, the same applies even to human mummies (Ikram & Dodson 1998: 130). It seems quite feasible that, in a society where fake mummies were sold, stelae with fake inscriptions could be too. They would certainly be easier to produce, as the Metternich stela texts needed for a “genuine” inscription may not have been widely available, and one would need considerable scribal proficiency to write them down correctly. Finding experts capable of this would probably be difficult and expensive, while carving a few signs which simply looked similar was a much easier, faster and cheaper task. Thus, more cippi could be made to satisfy high demand. In any case, if purchasers were unable to verify that the inscription made no sense, they would probably accept cippi with “fake” inscriptions just as eagerly. Economically, producing such cippi would therefore make very good sense, just like quickly producing poor-quality mummies. Page Word Count: 505 Cumulative Word Count: 2148 5 An interesting question is to what extent does the “fakeness” of the hieroglyphs constitute real fraud – was the actual content of the spell all-important, effectively meaning that faking made the entire object meaningless, or was the essential feature in fact not the content but the hieroglyphs themselves? Thus, was the producer deliberately duping naïve, illiterate consumers, callously maximising profit by selling cheap but theologically unacceptable items? Obviously, one cannot know, but a strong argument can be made for an alternative view. A possible theory of use for cippi with “fake” inscriptions This interpretation revolves around discoveries of large statues holding cippi (fig. 5; Oakes & Gahlin 2002: 313, 452), which are also covered in inscriptions from the Metternich Stela. The standard interpretation is that they were designed to maximise space for healing spells (Oakes & Gahlin 2002: 452), thereby increasing their perceived efficacy. Some statues also have evidence of rubbing (Ritner 1989: 108), so direct contact with hieroglyphs was probably another way in which sufferers hoped to alleviate symptoms. However, the present author would like to suggest that the statues can also be taken at face value, as representations of people holding cippi during a ritual where water was poured over themselves as well as the cippus, and where the emphasis was very much on the intrinsic sacred nature of the signs. Hieroglyphs, known as words of the gods (mdw-nṯr) to the Egyptians (Allen 2010: 2), possessed perceived divine qualities irrespective of semantic meaning. Looking at the cippus studied here, it has already been noted that many of the individual signs stand for crucial cosmic concepts like eternity, greatness and Isis, the “great of magic” (Wilkinson 2003: 147). Perhaps this is not out of a desire to fool illiterate purchasers into thinking that the inscription is correct, but rather because the presence of these groups is Fig. 4. Inscribed statues bearing cippi. (Images from Oakes and Gahlin 2002: 313-right & 452-left) powerful in itself, and amplified further by the surrounding hieroglyphs. Thus, if a sufferer held the cippus, the power of these sacred signs would seep into them, and pouring water over the sufferer and cippus combined would effectively join the two together. The power of the signs would then flow over all body parts, initiating a corporeal transformation from illness to blessedness through the pouring. It is striking that mummies were divinised (snṯr) through similar processes of pouring incense, oils and resin over them (Ikram & Dodson 1998: 106): the two rites could quite conceivably be related, with the pouring triggering a perceived ontological change through powers dissolved in each liquid. Within this framework, it matters little whether the inscription is coherent – it merely serving as a trigger for broader magical forces. This would also explain why so much of the stela, sides included, is covered in signs. Put simply, the more signs, the better. Surviving examples of statues holding cippi support this explanation. They frequently stand inside basins, supporting the idea that water was poured over all of them (Ritner 1989: 107, Oakes & Gahlin 2002: 452). Texts written on Page Word Count: 425 Cumulative Word Count: 2573 6 statues as well as cippi may reflect the absorption of magic onto bodies as water was poured. One question that does emerge is why should such statues even be made if real people could use their own bodies in the procedure, and moreover why do many have correct inscriptions while stelae like the one studied here do not? A likely answer lies in differences of function: the elaborate statues (or even larger, ornate cippi like the Metternich stela) were designed for eternity: stating the names of their owners, they were probably made to protect them forever, in the afterlife as well as on earth. Accounting for this, it seems logical to assume that particular care would be taken to fashion these objects to very high standards of workmanship and textual coherence. However, the cippus here was a working object - small, portable, relatively cheap and above all designed for immediate relief in this world. Here, the mere presence of hieroglyphs could comfortably suffice, so its manufacture is probably not deliberate fraud. Moreover, such an interpretation makes it quite feasible that non-literate classes could make such objects without recourse to high-order specialists, which seems highly likely considering the overall popularity of cippi in the Late and Ptolemaic periods. Concluding comments This cippus is an interesting case study on at least three levels. Firstly, it highlights the complexities of reconstructing object histories when the initial date and provenance is unknown and documentation on subsequent owners is missing. Nonetheless, studying it does give an interesting insight into the antiquities trade of the early 20th century and some specific people involved in it. Secondly, the difficulty in locating the original findspot highlights the fact that a cippus like this could come from almost anywhere, as such objects travelled widely and were perhaps considered symbolic of Egypt. This is an interesting avenue for potential research into perceptions of Egyptian culture in the outside world. Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, close examination of this cippus forces a reevaluation of rituals associated with such stelae, focussing on the intrinsic power of signs and pouring in contexts where the spells themselves were incoherent. Sufferers’ bodies were transformed with the pouring of water, making them healthy and akin to Horus. That is a fitting conclusion for a project seeking to transform approaches to cippi, pouring in comparanda from mummification and statuary to obtain a more realistic overall picture. Total Word Count (excluding all headings, captions, bibliography, references and acknowledgements): 2997 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the staff of the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, and in particular Imogen Gunn, for granting me access to the MAA collection and the Mackintosh catalogue, and for permitting me to take photographs of the object. I am also grateful to Dr. Derek Welsby of the British Museum for introducing me to graphics pad technology, which has proved very useful in understanding the materiality of this object. Appendix: Photographs of Stela (taken by A. Loktionov) - See next two pages. Page Word Count: 424 Cumulative Word Count: 2997 7 Obverse 8 Reverse 9 Bibliography Abdi, K. 2002 An Egyptian Cippus of Horus in the Iran National Museum. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 61: 3: 203210. Allen, J.P. 2010 Middle Egyptian: An Introduction to the Language and Culture of Hieroglyphs (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Beinin, J. 1998 The Dispersion of Egyptian Jewry: Culture, Politics, and the Formation of a Modern Diaspora. Berkeley: University of California Press. Online: http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft2290045n/ Borghouts, J.F. 1978 Ancient Egyptian Magical Texts. Leiden: Brill. Catalogue of the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology (MAA), Cambridge. Written and Online Versions (Online version accessed: 17th January 2014). Faulkner, R. 1962 A Concise Dictionary of Middle Egyptian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hornung, E. & T. Abt (trans. D. Warburton) 2007 The Egyptian Amduat: The Book of the Hidden Chamber. Zurich: Living Human Heritage Publications. Ikram, S. & A. Dodson 1998 The Mummy in Ancient Egypt: Equipping the Dead for Eternity. London: Thames & Hudson. Johnson, J. H. 1975 Excavations at Nippur: Eleventh Season (OIC 22). Chicago: Oriental Institute Communications. Livingstone, A. 1989 Court Poetry and Literary Miscellanea. Helsinki: State Archives of Assyria. Mackintosh, L. 1944 Catalogue of the Mackintosh Collection (4th edn). Manuscript in Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology (MAA), Cambridge. Oakes, L & L. Gahlin 2002 Ancient Egypt: An Illustrated Reference to the Myths, Religions, Pyramids and Temples of the Land of the Pharaohs. London: Anness Publishing Ltd. Petrie, W.M.F. 1914 Amulets: Illustrated by the Egyptian Collection in University College, London. London: Constable & Co. Ltd. Piankoff, A. 1964 The Litany of Re. New York: Bollingen Foundation. Ritner, R.K. 1989 Horus on the Crocodiles: A Juncture of Religion and Magic in Late Dynastic Egypt. 103-117 in Allen, J.P. (ed.) 1989 Religion and Philosophy in Ancient Egypt. Connecticut: Yale Egyptology Series. Scott, N. 1951 The Metternich Stela. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. Shaw, J. & P. Nicholson 1995 The British Museum Dictionary of Ancient Egypt. London: British Museum Press. Surrey Archaeological Society 1946 Surrey Archaeological Collections Vol. XLIX. Guildford: Surrey Archaeological Society. 10 Surrey Archaeological Society 1937 Surrey Archaeological Collections Vol. XLV. Guildford: Surrey Archaeological Society. Surrey Archaeological Society 1936 Surrey Archaeological Collections Vol. XLIV Guildford: Surrey Archaeological Society. Surrey Archaeological Society 1931 Surrey Archaeological Collections Vol. XXXIX Guildford: Surrey Archaeological Society. Wilkinson, R.H. 2003 The Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt. London: Thames & Hudson. 11