Natural History, Ecology and Evolution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes
Transcription
Natural History, Ecology and Evolution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes
Natural History, Ecology and Evolution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus with Special Reference to Florida P Lounibos, Univ. of Florida, Florida Medical Entomology Lab Part I: Invasion Biology & Competitive Displacement Part II: Natural History & Ecology of Life Stages in Florida Part III: A Resurgence of A. aegypti in Florida? Major range expansion of Aedes albopictus occurred in the past 40 years from Asia 1991 1985 1991 1985 Enserink. 2008. Science These two species both frequent container habitats provided by humans and, as adults, mate in association with host-seeking Rapid disappearance of A. aegypti in Bermuda after establishment of A. albopictus Ex Kaplan et al. (2010) Biological Invasions Decline of A. aegypti after the arrival of A. albopictus in Florida Lake city Gainesville Ocala Leesburg Apopka Orlando Kissimmee St. Cloud Yeehaw Junction Okeechobee Modified from O’Meara et al. J. Med. Entomol. 1995 Surveillance in south Florida cemeteries since 1990 documented rapid displacement and led to testing hypotheses of proposed mechanisms Patterns of exclusion and co-existence in south Florida cemeteries (modified ex Lounibos et al. 2010 An. Entomol. Soc. Am.) Larval densities, leaf litter, and species were manipulated in experiments in tires and plastic cups in Vero Beach, Florida and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2004 (Braks et al. 2004) Auto salvage yards harbor sympatric A. albopictus and A. aegypti in south Florida Evidence of interspecific mating among field-collected females Sperm from Collection Site M& K Auto Species aegypti Mean No. (SE) Per Coll 73.4 (18.7) (n=7) albopictus Belle Glade (n=2) Spermathecae Totals 85 A. albopictus 0 161.0(60.0) 1 71 72 aegypti 67.5(2.5) 82 3 85 albopictus 411.5(170.5) 1 61 62 169 135 304 Totals A.aegypti 85 Ex: Tripet et al. (2011) Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. Sperm extracted from field-collected females and DNA amplified Hypothesis: Male accessory gland (MAG) products of A. albopictus asymmetrically sterilize A. aegypti Science 156: 1499-1501 (1967) Experiment: 1. Inject MAG homogenates from conspecific or heterospecific males into unmated females of both species. 2. Allow post-injection females access to conspecific males in cages. 3. Assess insemination rates by spermathecal dissections Results (Tripet et al. [2011] AJTMH 85) confirmed that the sterilizing effects of MAG extracts are asymmetric in their interspecific effects Reproductive Character Displacement = phenotypic evolution in a population caused by cross-species mating and which results in enhanced prezygotic reproductive isolation between sympatric species. (Grether et al. 2009, Biol. Rev. 84) Hypothesis: Aedes aegypti which remain in sympatry with A. albopictus will evolve a mechanism(s) to avoid wasteful interspecific matings Experiment: compare frequencies of interspecific matings in cages of allopatric vs. sympatric populations of the two species from the USA Cage Trials of Interspecifc Matings between Populations 100 Mean (± SE) percentage of females inseminated 90 80 70 60 50 Females: A. aegypti Allopatric females source χ2(1) female origin 25.3*** male origin 0.1ns female X male 0.1ns block(2) 30.9*** Sympatric females Females: A. albopictus Allopatric females source χ2(1) female origin 47.7*** male origin 3.0ns female X male 4.4* block(2) 1.3ns Sympatric females 40 30 20 10 0 Allopatric Sympatric Allopatric Sympatric Allopatric Sympatric Allopatric Sympatric Males: A. albopictus Males: A. aegypti Ex Bargielowski et. al. (2013) PNAS Percentage (± s.e.) of females inseminated 70 60 Allopatric populations of 50 40 30 KW A. aegypti females exposed KW control to A. albopictus males evolve 20 10 0 resistance to interspecific mating in a few generations 70 60 50 40 Miami 30 20 Miami control 10 0 Bargielowski & Lounibos (2013) Evol Ecol Factors contributing to competitive displacement and segregation of Aedes aegypti by Aedes albopictus U N F A V O R A B L E LARVAL COMPETITION rural SATYRIZ ATION + albopictus (invader) C L I M A T E HABITAT SEGREGATION aegypti albopictus & aegypti (resident) suburban - 30° Ν urban 1985 ARRIVAL & ESTABLISHMENT L A T I T U D E 25° Ν Natural History & Ecology of Life Stages in Florida • Eggs: A. albopictus A. aeg ypti Desiccation-resistance of aedine eggs influences what habitats may be colonized. All species shown (3 included as ‘forest’) belong to the subgenus Stegomyia. Numbers refer to different geographic strains. (ex: Sota & Mogi 1992. Oecologia 90:353-358) Aedes eggs, laid on tongue depressors Depressors with eggs of each species in a screened vase 1.0 2001 A. aegypti A. albopictus % Hatch (SE) 0.8 0.6 2006 *** *** 0.4 *** ** 0.2 0.0 2 weeks. 4 weeks. 2 weeks 4 weeks Weeks of Exposure Lounibos et al. 2010 An. Entomol. Soc. Am. MANOVA for 2001 Microclimate PCs: Effect DF Pillai’s Trace F P Cemetery 15,54 2.046 7.72 <0.001 Type 0.923 64.16 <0.001 Factor 2 High rhmax, rhmean 3,16 4 2 0 A. aegypti persists -2 -4 -4 Low rhmin -2 0 Factor 1 2 High 4 tmax, tmean Lounibos et al. 2010 An. Entomol. Soc. Am. 14L : 10D 21oC Assay eggs for diapause 10L : 14D Photoperiodic egg diapause occurs in all Florida populations of A. albopictus tested Site Lat.(°N) E. St. Louis 38° 38´ Pensacola 30° 25´ Cottondale 30° 48´ Jacksonville 30° 19´ Vero Beach 27°35´ Miami 25°45´ Card Sound 25°25´ % Hatch (no. eggs) 1998-20001 14L:10D 10L:14D 92.3 (1,359) 0.6 (1,511) 98.2 (979) 89.4 (1,390) 91.3 (403) 91.0 (600) 99.4 (325) 1.2 (1,241) 8.9 (1,267) 13.1 (381) 30.3 (892) 23.3 (365) % Hatch (+SE) 2008 14L:10D 10L:14D 91.0 (4.9) 6.9 (2.6) 98.6 (0.5) 3.2 (0.6) 97.7 (0.8) 83.6 (14.5) 95.5 (0.8) 96.5 (1.4) 6.6 (1.9) 66.1(3.3) 69.4(3.9) 20.7(4.5) Ex Lounibos et al. 2011 JAMCA 27: 433-436 Short-day (diapause) eggs survive south Florida winter better than long-day (non-diapause) eggs Ex Lounibos et al. 2011 JAMCA 27: 433-436 Quiescence and Diapause in Aedine Eggs • Quiescence = inactivity owing to unfavorable environment - flooding, especially with deoxygenated water, stimulates hatch - conditioning influences hatchability Diapause eggs will not hatch with flooding alone, and require reactivation (=diapause termination) - obligate state in univoltine species - facultative in temperate, multivoltine species % Hatch No. Hatch Stimulus Among treehole mosquitoes on the Kenya Coast, most eggs of Aedes aegypti hatched after first flooding (Ex. Lounibos 1981. Ecol. Entomol.6) Habitat Segregation in South Florida Ovitraps number of mosq. 2000 A. aegypti 1500 WPB BR 1000 500 ! 0 urban suburban rural number of mosq. 2000 A. albopictus 1500 WPB BR 1000 500 ! 0 urban suburban rural Ex Braks et al. 2003 J. Med Entomol 40: 785-794. Ovitrap abundances of the two species in three south Florida counties were associated in opposite directions to compound habitat variables quantified from aerial images Ex Rey et al. (2006) J. Med Entomol. 43:1134-1141 Florida Keys 2002-09 Aedes aegypti Ex Hribar & Whiteside (2010) Both species occur throughout the year in south Florida FMEL Treeholes 1991-2003 Ex Lounibos & Escher (2008) Natural History & Ecology of Life Stages in Florida Aquatic Stages: Container Habitats Producing A. aegypti Pupae in the Florida Keys Ex Hribar & Whiteside (2010) Stud Dipteralog 17:237-251 Ex Lounibos et al. (2003) Ecol. Entomol. 28 0.8 % Survival A. albopictus 0.7 F-stats Litter Wyeomyia Litter x Wyeomyia 6.68* 25.95*** 4.57(ns) 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 S2 0 + 1 Wyeomyia S1 - 2 - Litter + Ecological homologs co-occurring in eastern USA Aedes albopictus (invasive) Aedes triseriatus (native) Dipterous predators in Florida treeholes preferentially consume A. albopictus over A. triseriatus T. rutilus IV consuming Aedes sp. IV instar C. appendiculata IV consuming Aedes sp. II How is predation success of C. appendiculata influenced by prey (A. albopictus) behavior? Significant differences (P<0.0001) in activities (χ2(3)=25.04) and positions (χ2(3)= 45.73) Kesavaraju et al. 2007 Ecological Entomology Thrashing, Bottom Browsing, Resting, Surface The behavior of native treehole larvae, but not the invasive, changes in the presence of water-borne cues of C. appendiculata IV 1.5 1.0 b Control Predation 0.5 0.0 a -0.5 -1.0 a Aedes albopictus a Aedes triseriatus -1.5 Kesavaraju et al. 2007 Ecological Entomology Prediction – multigeneration field experiment – (open to immigration): C. appendiculata will reduce the invasability of naturally exposed tires by A. albopictus and facilitate coexistence with A. triseriatus Containers & Setting: Golf cart tires with sieved tire water and 2.0 g oak leaves, arranged in groups of four at eight random sites in hammock Treatments (4): - control (no added macroinvertebrates) - 100 I A. triseriatus - 100 I A. triseriatus + 2 IV C. appendiculata - 100 I A. triseriatus + 8 IV C. appendiculata Census every nine days, adding supplementary A. triseriatus Is and C. appendiculata IVs Repeat in summers of 2005 & 2006 Mean A. albopictus per tire ( SE) 50 2006 Control Competitor Low Predator (2) High Predator (8) 40 30 20 10 0 9 18 27 Days of observation Both low and moderate-density predator treatments suppressed colonization of tires by A. albopictus (Juliano et al. 2010 Oecologia) 50 2005 2006 Aedes albopictus eggs 40 30 20 10 0 CONTROL COMPETITOR LOW PRED. HIGH PRED. Treatment Juliano et al. 2010 Oecologia 162 Natural History & Ecology of Life Stages in Florida Adults: What are the bloodmeal hosts of these species in nature? Blood Meal Analyses of Wild-caught Aedes aegypti Location Dominant Host Reference Kenya Reptiles McClelland & Weitz 1963 Thailand Humans Ponlawat & Harrington 2005 USA (Hawaii) Humans Tempelis et al. 1970 USA (PR) Scott et al. 2000 Uganda Humans Rodents McClelland & Weitz 1963 Blood Meal Analyses of Wild-caught Aedes albopictus Location Brazil Dominant Host Humans, cows Spain Humans Muňnoz et al. 2011 Thailand Humans Ponlawat & Harrington 2005 USA (Hawaii) Humans Reference Gomes et al. 2003 Tempelis et al. 1970 USA (Illinois) Rabbits & Rats USA (Missouri) Rabbits Niebylski et al. 1994 Savage et al. 1993 Is Superior Reproductive Success on Human Blood without Sugar Limited to Aedes aegypti? No! Both Species May Utilize This Strategy (Braks et al. 2006) Evidence for Multiple Blood Meals per Gonotrophic Cycle Based on Dissections of Biting Females % of A. albopictus with eggs: Thailand 19% (n=2341) Singapore 8% (n=631) Kenya data from Trpis & Hausermann 1986 Thai data from Gould et al. (1970); Singapore from Chan (1971) Activity Rhythms of Female Aedes aegypti: Jones, 1981, Physiol. Entomol. 6 Dispersal of gravid A. aegypti, marked with Rb, in Rio de Janeiro Ex Honorio et al. 2003 Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz 98 Dispersal of gravid A. albopictus, marked with Rb, in Rio de Janeiro Ex Honorio et al. 2003 Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz 98 Installment oviposition of A. aegypti from Puerto Rico a.) Means of Individual females b.) means of ten females Ex Reiter 2007 VBZD In experiments in outdoor cages, Rey & O’Connell (2014) found both skip oviposition and laying eggs on the water surface to be more common in A. aegypti than A. albopictus Will Satyr-resistant Aedes aegypti Recover in Florida? AFTER ~20 YR OF ABSENCE, A. AEGYPTI RECENTLY DETECTED IN THREE SUBURBAN-RURAL SOUTH FLORIDA CEMETERIES SSix parallel collecting transects established from the coast to inland in Palm Beach County, Florida Kriged distribution of Ae. aegypti 0% transparency Color intensity internally consistent within sampling period Reiskind & Lounibos 2012 Med. Vet. Entomol. Five Year Comparison Interpolated landscape in 2006 & 2007 (proportion A. aegypti; brown = A. albopictus, blue = A. aegypti) Interpolated landscape in 2013 (proportion A. aegypti; brown = A. albopictus, blue = A. aegypti) 100 NS NS % Aedes aegypti (n=6 sites) 90 NS Mean % A. aegypti in 2013 80 p<0.009 70 Mean % A. aegypti in 2006 & 2007 60 50 40 30 20 NS 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Kilometer from Coast Paired T-tests on proportion A. aegypti (df=5) Courtesy M. Reiskind NCSU Selected References Christophers SR. 1960. Aedes aegypti (L.) The Yellow Fever Mosquito. Its Life History, Bionomics and Structure. Cambridge University Press, UK. Hawley WA. 1988. The biology of Aedes albopictus. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 4 (Supplement #1): 1-39. Silver, JB. 2008. Mosquito Ecology. (3rd edition). Springer, NY