September 8, 2000 - Virginia Law Weekly
Transcription
September 8, 2000 - Virginia Law Weekly
Virginia Law Weekly The Newspaper of the University of Virginia School of Law Since 1948 THOMAS JEFFERSON Around North Grounds Thumbs down to the big huge ugly mess in the parking lot after Dandelion Parade. You got time to make it, you got time to clean it up. Thumbs up to the two incredibly responsible students who did clean it up. Brooms and trashbags in the early a.m. on Saturday — the Law School thanks you! Big thumbs down to first-year section F. If you throw things at the crowd at Dandelion Parade, make sure they’re soft. If you choose to throw hard things, better make sure they don’t fall in someone’s drink, splattering them from head to toe in red punch. If you choose to throw hard things in bystanders’ red drinks, better make sure that said bystander is not an editor for the Law Weekly. Journal tryouts for second-year students are this weekend (Sept. 8) and next weekend (Sept. 15). If you have any questions, contact third-year Susannah Stroud at sjs9f@virginia.edu. Thumbs up to the first-year class’s involvement in public service. These guys are just filling up every meeting room. Go 1Ls! Perhaps some of the $30 million for the recent renovations should have been designated for maintenance of the already-existing space? Not only does a trash can stand in the center of WB 154 to collect the rain as it drips in through the ceiling, but a large wall panel in the back of the room has fallen off and is leaning against the wall. Better stick it back up there before someone steals it. Thumbs up to Professor G.E. White for admitting that he waits breathlessly for the Law Weekly to arrive every week. Huge thumbs up to Professor O’Connell for his spirited rendition of Mickey from Rocky. You won the parade for Section I. In this issue: Student Scholarly Lunch Series Schedule ..... p. 4 Love in the Air ....... p. 6 This traffic median may soon be transformed into a First Amendment park. See page 3. Vol. 53, No. 3 Friday, September 8, 2000 Subscriptions Available 2000 Dandelion Parade: The “I”s Have It Feisty O’Connell Helps Usher in the New Semester Section B’s social outcasts were delion ship and got the first-year by Will Homiller ’02 An afternoon that featured a quickly followed by Section C and class back on track. Section D brought to life the rapping rabbit, President Clinton, its tribute to President Clinton classic film “Dazed and Con13 kinds of adult beverages, dozfused” with tie-dyed colors and ens of sexual innuendoes, and wild party attitude. While they Professor O’Connell in a boxing refrained from paddling memmatch could only be summed up bers of Section B, they were with three words: The Dandesaid to be meeting up later that lion Parade. On Friday, the Law night for a kegger at the tower. School held its annual tribute to Section E, donning bunny the Commissioners, softball, and teeth and led by a human-sized Dionysian indulgence as the Energizer bunny, boasted their first-year sections treated the Energizer-like stamina and student body to candy, drinks, served potent “Battery Acid” to and a show that they probably the Commissioners through a won’t want to remember. funnel. Their exhibition was With an audience crowded on capped by a raging drum solo either side of the D2 parking lot and rap performed by the Eneroutside Caplin Auditorium, the gizer bunny himself. first-year floats ran the gauntSection F added a little Mexilet of critical upper-class stucan flavor to the parade with its dents in alphabetical order with raucous Fiesta float. Scatterthemes relating to each section’s ing pieces of candy and confetti designated letter. into the crowd, the members of Section A kicked off the fesSection F danced by the Comtivities with its A-Team float, missioners to sexy Latin featuring the beloved characters rhythms. With sombreros, pifrom everyone’s favorite Soldiers natas, Coronas, and bodies of Fortune. They promptly repainted like the Mexican flag, turned to the Los Angeles unthese first-years caught the eye derground to help people who of many upperclass students. could find them. Third-year Jenni Wieland loved Section B protested the enphoto by Brian Gist Section I brought out Professor their effort, noting, “Excellent tire idea of the parade with its fairly uninteresting Boycotters O’Connell as their float’s centerpiece. choreography! And good use of the electric slide!” float. Not only did they elect to Section G paid homage to Probypass the traditions of the pa- and the Secret Service. Employrade, they also elected to bypass ing the use of lewd signs and a fessor G.E. White by collectively any chance of eating lunch with bevy of Monica Lewinsky look- undergoing G.E. makeovers and alikes, the C float righted the Dan- naming themselves the G.E. White the cool kids this year. Law Library Features New Photography Exhibit, RFK Memorial brary from 4:30 to 6 p.m. All stuby Jonathan Riehl ’02 Two new exhibits have been re- dents are invited to attend. Library Director Taylor Fitchett, cently put on display in the Law Library. In the entrance alcove, a in her third year at the University, bust of Robert F. Kennedy stands in mentioned that she hopes the topic front of a glass-etched panel featur- of the exhibit will stimulate intering a quotation from the 1951 U.Va. est among student on the topic of child labor. law gradu“When I arate. The bust rived here I was dedimet David cated at last Martin,” she year’s public added, “and service conthere is cerference, tainly a group which was of students attended by here who are Kennedy’s involved in son, Maxphoto by Brian Gist these issues.” well Taylor New art graces the walls of the The library Kennedy — library. has set aside also a Vira number of books on child labor, ginia Law graduate. Also, a series of several dozen available in the area across from original photographs by nationally the Reference desk. Parker’s work has been pubacclaimed artist David L. Parker have been hung on the second floor lished in book form, accompanied walls. The exhibit, which is titled by text on the problems and issues “Stolen Dreams,” features varying associated with child labor worldimages of child labor in the develop- wide, including the United States. ing world. Parker’s work has been Stolen Dreams: Portraits of Workdisplayed in a number of formal ing Children was published last settings in recent years, including year by the Lerner Group. Fitchett was first exposed to the law libraries of other universiParker’s work when it was disties. Parker, an occupational health played at the University of physician as well as a photogra- Cincinnati’s law library, where she pher, will be speaking about his served as director for 12 years, prior work here at the University on Mon- to her move to Charlottesville. She day, September 18. He traveled ex- hopes to feature a different art distensively in Latin America and play in the library each year. Last South East Asia assembling the pho- year the library showed works by tographs for this exhibit, and study- four artists, in various mediums. While Parker’s work is preing child labor work conditions. There will be a slide presentation sented, previously displayed painton the 18 from 3 to 4:15 p.m. in ings have either been relocated or WB102 and a reception in the lisee ART page 3 Printed on recycled paper All-Stars. Accompanied by indiscernable, bass-heavy tunes, the All-Stars wore “Tort Me Baby!” jerseys and cautioned audience members to “drink at your own risk.” Section H brought a little class to the event with its Hugh Hefner’s House of Harlots and Hustlers. After an intricate dance routine by bunny-tailed babes and robed hunks, they announced to the crowd, “In Section H, we don’t play softball, we play hardball!” While their performance was appreciated by all, it was a bit overshadowed by the distribution of Playboys and Playgirls to the crowd. Asked why this float was her favorite, secondyear Nykia Jordan explained, “Hello… free porn!” Section I brought the house down with its Rocky-themed, “I of the Tiger” float. Professor Jeffrey O’Connell made a guest appearance, training a prize-fighter who defeated a series of opponents with knockout punches. O’Connell, dressed in sweats and a knit cap, took several hard hits but won the crowd with his tenacity and fiery dedication to boxing. Section J followed with a float that posed the question, “Where Would We Be Without the Js?” Carrying signs like “_esus,” “_im Beam,” “_udge _udy,” and “Paula _ones,” the Js did make a case for having the least important letter see DANDELION page 3 Slaughter Hall Today ➔ “Freedom of religion, freedom of the press; freedom of persons under the protection of the habeas corpus; and trial by juries impartially selected, — these principles form the bright constellation which has gone before us, and guided our steps through an age of revelation and reformation.” Proposed Renovations ➔ Slaughter Hall Shuffle by Rich Bland ’01 As part of a larger plan to increase the visibility and overall attractiveness of the Public Service Center, Law School Dean Robert E. Scott has decided to reshuffle almost all of the student organizations, legal journals and some student services from their current locations in Slaughter Hall to new locations within a newly refurbished Slaughter. “The Public Service Center needed a proper space,” said Assistant Dean Bill Bergen, on behalf of Dean Scott, in an announcement this Monday before an audience of leaders of student organizations. “It had kind of been an afterthought,” said Bergen referring to the Center and its evident importance at the time of the plans to renovate the entire Law Grounds. However, Bergen made it clear that Dean Scott feels the new Center has come to need a better, more visible location to make it an even more attractive resource and career choice for all students. Dean Kimberly Emery, Director of the Public Service Center, was very enthusiastic about the move: “Our hope is that all students will become more aware of the Public Service Center and be more likely to stop by and meet staff and learn about the services we provide.” Next summer, the exterior of Slaughter will undergo a facelift in which the second floor offices on the exterior will get full floor-toceiling windows below the existing ceiling-level windows. On the interior, the Public Service Center will move to the second floor closer to current Career Services and Admissions offices. The other major change will be that all student organizations will be located in new offices, allocated by SBA, along the interior hallway of Slaughter. Taking their old rooms upstairs, all journals except for Virginia Law Review and the Journal of International Law will be moved or given improved space, as to be determined by Dean see SLAUGHTER page 3 2 Student Voice Virginia Law Weekly Jury Box What was your most memorable Dandelion Parade experience? Amy Payne, 3L: “My narrow escape from being kissed by a saucy Bill Clinton. Luckily, he kissed my roommate, Susannah Stroud.” Norrinda Brown, 2L: “Observing second and third-year law students resorting to stealing alcohol from the first-years when all they have to do is walk down to Harris Teeter and buy it.” Stacey “Rocky” Rose, 1L: “Riding in the truck with Jeffrey O’Connell, listening to him impart golden nuggets of legal wisdom from under a coat as my sectionmates consumed massive quantities of alcohol and banged on the outside of the truck.” Shane Smith, 3L: “Getting a face-full of tequila from my friends in Section F.” Editorial Policy The Virginia Law Weekly publishes letters and columns of interest to the Law School and the legal community at large. Views expressed in such submissions are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Law Weekly or the Editorial Board. Letters from organizations must bear the name, signature, and title of the person authorizing the submission. All letters and columns must either be submitted in hardcopy bearing a handwritten signature along with a disk containing the file, or be mailed from the author’s email account. Submissions must be received by 5 p.m. the Monday before publication and must be in accordance with the submission guidelines posted on the door to the Law Weekly office in Rooms SL277 & SL279. Letters over 500 words and columns over 700 words may not be accepted. The Editorial Board reserves the right to edit all submissions for length, grammar, and clarity. Although every effort is made to publish all materials meeting our guidelines, we regret that not all submissions received can be published. Virginia Law Weekly Editorial Board Rich Bland Editor-in-Chief Amy Collins Sarah Shalf Executive Editor Senior Editor Tarah Grant Managing Editor Howard Chang Amy Kobelski Columns Editor Reviews Editor Jonathan Riehl Jackie Sadker News Editor Features Editor Associate Editors Dan Brozost Associate Columns Editor Will Homiller Associate News Editor Deborah Prisinzano Treasurer Jeremy Gott Associate Production Editor Courtney Masini Associate Production Editor Megan McLaughlin Associate Features Editor Staff C ONTRIBUTORS: Dana Foster. C OLUMNISTS: Brendan Johnson (SBA Notebook), V ANGUARD. Turn in your tryout today. R EVIWERS: Your name could be here. Turn in your tryout review to the Law Weekly mailbox by Monday, Sept. 11. Published weekly on Friday except during holiday and examination periods and serving the Law School community at the University of Virginia, the Virginia Law Weekly (ISSN 0042-661X) is not an official publication of the University and does not necessarily express the views of the University. Any article appearing herein may be reproduced provided that credit is given to both the Virginia Law Weekly and the author of the article. Advanced written permission of the Virginia Law Weekly is also required for reproduction of any cartoon or illustration. Entered as second class matter at the Post Office at Charlottesville, Virginia. One year subscriptions are available for $25.00. Subscriptions are automatically renewed unless cancelled. Address all business communications to the Managing Editor. Subscribers are requested to inform the Managing Editor of change of address at least three weeks in advance to insure prompt delivery. Mailing Address: Virginia Law Weekly, 580 Massie Rd., University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903-1789 Phone: (804) 924-3070 Fax: (804) 924-7536 E-mail Address: Va-Law-Weekly@virginia.edu Website: http://www.student.virginia.edu/~law-wkly Printed on recycled paper by the Virginia Law Weekly and the University of Virginia Printing Office. © 2000 Virginia Law Weekly Friday, September 8, 2000 Becoming Bartleby One of the benefits of spending a summer practicing law in a historic New England port (Portland, ME), is that you can hang out in local pubs “on the docks.” (Purely educational visits, I assure you.) Inside the dank, dimly lit, Rich Bland, a third-year law student, is the Law Weekly Editor-inChief. wooden structures, you drink “aged” beer from kegs that taste as if they were offloaded from a whaling vessel sometime last century. You munch on traditional fare like “fried fried” — the extra fried parts on a fried clam platter that consist of no actual clam but instead entirely fried material. If you’re lucky this delicacy comprises more than half the platter. Still, one can appreciate seeing walls decorated with old lobster pots, shattered compasses and ripped sails that weren’t produced in some New Jersey factory by Chili’s parent company, but instead were probably found washed up on the rocks in front of the bar. The romantic in me liked to conjure up histories of the items on the walls and some of the more “authentic” characters around. Funnily enough, some of the regulars in places like the “Dry Dock” and the “Port Hole,” included the stereotypical old, crotchety, seafarer type who sits at the end of the bar and mutters to himself. (Believe it or not, they really do exist.) Yet, to my horror, I discovered that most of these Ahabs hadn’t lost their leg to a great white whale, battled with giant squids in the South Pacific, or even witnessed the tragedy of the great storm of ’38, but were in fact... lawyers gone sour. You see, Portland is quite famous for an abundance of another sort these days. Apparently, Portland has the second most lawyers per capita than any other city in the nation (D.C. being number one). The quality of life, re- vived city and low cost of living has attracted scores of attorneys seeking refuge from the big firms in Boston and New York. Thus, the tale of woe emitted from the drunken sod at the end of the bar was of mergers gone bad, juries lost or judges “who just didn’t see the law my way.” On one of these visits, one of these drunken wizened sorts accosted me with two cryptic words of warning: “Read Bartleby,” he muttered. Then louder: “READ BARTLEBY!” To be fair, this guy was relatively respectable looking and was drinking single malt, but he did have gray hair, a trashed outfit, and his breath reeked something fierce. Furthermore, his message was indeed a warning, not of the perils of high seas, but of stifled creativity and other legal fees. Now as most of you probably know, Bartleby is Melville’s somewhat famous/infamous story of a legal clerk gone crazy. (At least that was about all I could remember from junior year high school English.) Everybody also knows that neither was Melville a particularly happy man nor are most novelists prone to weave a tale of wonder about the greatness of being a lawyer. Thus it shouldn’t be much of a surprise, that Melville’s take on the legal profession, was, shall we say, less than reverent. Yet my curiosity was sparked and I felt I kind of owed it to the old guys — the drunk in the bar and his apparent friend, Bartleby. The story begins quite humorously. Bartleby is given an office that some of us may fear will be in our future: a room “which originally had afforded a lateral view of certain grimy back yards and bricks, but which owing to subsequent erections, commanded at present no view at all ... within three feet of the [window] panes was a wall.”Bartleby is then given rather dry work as a scrivener, “[verifying] the accuracy of his copy, word by word.” Yet, our hero is undeterred: “At first Bartleby did an extraorsee BARTLEBY page 3 SBA Notebook I appreciate the thoughts that many of you shared regarding last week’s article. Sentiment was best summarized by Professor Larry Walker’s statement: “Mr. Johnson, I did read your article this week. I read every article every week. Yours does suck.” Brendan Johnson, a third-year law student, is SBA president. Once again this week, I’ve put together a 700-word article about Law School news that I find interesting. Of course, this article should not be confused with the VANGUARD. The VANGUARD is actually entertaining, and normal people read it. Dandelion Parade Congratulations to all of the first-year sections that put together outstanding floats, but in the end there was no doubt that Professor O’Connell stole the show. It was also great to see so many first-years at the softball game that followed. Once again, kudos to Professor O’Connell who hit two triples and a double, and later cooled down with a fourminute keg stand. Brown’s Mountain The boys managed to throw a great party despite the weather. However, it was apparent that some law students are struggling to define their identity. One prominent example was Kevin Yopp’s silk shirt, which he appar- ently stole from Ponneh’s underwear drawer. All of the classes within the Law School were well represented; first-year section C apparently decided to use the party for their section mixer. This forced Matt Bosher, who distributed party invitations, to admit that he is confused by the mailbox color coding system. D-20 Parking Auction Today is your last opportunity to enter the D-20 Parking Auction. The D-20 parking spots are located immediately behind the Law School, next to the area formerly known as Café North. There are 20 spaces available for students. Unfortunately, these spaces will only be available for the first semester. During the second semester those who received a D-20 pass during the first semester will be permitted to park in the D-3 lot. The D-20 auction is open to all second- and third-year students who do not live within walking distance of the Law School. The face value of the parking permit is approximately $200. If these spots were allocated by lottery instead of by auction, lottery winners would have to pay $200 directly to Parking and Transportation for a D-20 permit. If you bid $500 in the auction and, for example, that bid is one of the winning bids, you will write a check to Student Funded Fellowships for $500. SFF will then pay $200 to Parking and Transportation for your permit and use the “ The Whitebread Legacy: Faculty Quotes of the W eek And the Winner is... G.E. White: (after requesting to have the Law Weekly delivered personally to his box) “Not only is the Law Weekly popular with the faculty, but sometimes defamatory comments are made and one wants to know if they are actionable.” Runners-Up: G.E. White: “[If a vegetarian were to come up to you and ask why you wear leather shoes] . . . you might say to the vegetarian, “I don’t know how your bowels survive.” John Harrison: (to a cold-called student) “I'll tell a brief anecdote while you actually look at the case.” John Harrison: “We all know there’s only one theme in the law: fees.” Graham Lilly: “I’m not sure how early I predicted this — but very early, I’m sure.” Boomer Scott: “Have you seen the two flagpoles up at Darden? They’re really obscene, aren’t they? It looks like somebody plunked down a Marriott hotel.” Jennifer Mnookin: “I really can’t say that I’ve had a lot of experience with handcuffs.” G.E. White: “Yes, that is what he is saying. What you say he is saying, he is saying. But look at what he is saying when he says that.” Barry Cushman: “Then, three months after the families were toasting one another at the wedding, they were suing each other over a $100,000 life insurance policy. Where I grew up, that was known as ‘bad form.’” ” remainder to support the Public Interest Law program. Bids will be accepted by e-mail only. When you have decided how much to bid, send an e-mail to spf5y@virginia.edu with “D-20 Bid” as the subject and your bid as the text. You may bid as many times as you wish, but you may only increase your bid. You may participate in the D20 Auction if you already have a Blue or D3 permit. But if you win, you must turn in your old permit. You will, of course, receive full credit for that permit. If you bought a D-3 permit last week for $162 and next week you win a D20 permit with a winning bid of $662, you will turn in your D-3 permit (worth $162) plus $500 to get your D-20 permit. The value of the D-20 is difficult to calculate. Predictive factors indicate that the winning bids will be quite high: (1) Many students have no parking passes at all. (2) D-20 is very close to the school. (3) The net proceeds of the auction are for a great cause. (4) Interview season starts soon. (5) D-20 will not be oversold. (6) You can watch Hank Brier “park” with eager first-years. SBA Book Sale Special thanks to Scott Strobridge and the SBA representatives who coordinated the SBA book sale. This year, thousands of dollars worth of books were sold. In the future, the SBA will not permit students to use the book sale as an opportunity to unload adult periodicals. Virginia Law Weekly Center Proposes First Amendment Monument by Tarah Grant ’02 Imagine a gigantic blackboard on the east end of the Downtown Mall, where anybody can express their views about anything. That’s what the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression will propose at the Charlottesville City Council’s meeting on Sept. 18— the construction of a monument that would both honor the First Amendment right of free expression and serve as a venue for its exercise. While a simple plaque emblazoned with the words of the First Amendment would probably receive unanimous support, what the Thomas Jefferson Center has in mind is undoubtedly a bit more provocative. As a nation, we are “curiously ambivalent” toward the First Amendment, explains Professor Robert O’Neil, the founding director of the T h o m a s Jefferson Center. Americans have a “clear conviction that each person should be com- pletely free to say or read or view what he or she wishes, but less clearly what a neighbor or colleague wishes, and far less clearly what a neo-Nazi, racist, homophobe, or political radical may wish to say or see.” This observation may explain why some people are apprehensive about the proposed monument’s interactive nature. “Most of the people that I have spoken with have responded enthusiastically to the concept of the monument,” explains Josh Wheeler (Law ’92), program director for the Thomas Jefferson Center. “For those few who have expressed reservations about it, their concern seems to be based in the prospect of somebody writing something offensive on the monument.” But, according to Wheeler, this concern can be easily addressed. Although the First Amendment would bar the City from creating regulations aimed at controlling the content or viewpoint of the messages placed on the wall, the City could adopt a content-neutral policy requiring that the entire monument’s surface be erased on a periodic basis. Such a proced u r e would guarantee that all mes- News Friday, September 8, 2000 sages placed on the wall would remain there only temporarily and would provide others with a literal clean slate on which to express themselves. Also, a private individual would have the option of erasing something specific that he or she found offensive. While the Thomas Jefferson Center would prefer an alternate course of action, namely for the individual to pick up a piece of chalk and respond to the comment, the act of erasing something from the monument would also serve a useful purpose as a “manifestation of the debate over the limits of free expression in American society,” Wheeler says. The uniqueness of the “community blackboard” concept should make the proposal especially attractive; the Thomas Jefferson Center has found no monument in the United States that resembles the one that it is proposing. And no location for this monument could be more appropriate than Charlottesville, Wheeler adds, noting the city’s historical connection to the primary architects of the First Amendment, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. If the City Council approves the Thomas Jefferson Center’s proposal, the Center would immediately start raising the money needed to transform the plot of land in front of City Hall, which currently serves only as a traffic median, into a First Amendment park. The monument, the focal point of the park, would be composed of a 72-footlong concrete wall, covered with seven-foot-high panels of local slate. Immediately in front of the wall would be a small trench filled with chalk. In addition to the community blackboard, the Center’s proposal for the area includes landscaping, a speaker’s podium facing City Hall and a panel inscribed with the First Amendment of the United States’ Constitution. A scale model of the monument is on public display at the Thomas Jefferson Center, drawings and site plans are posted on the Center’s website at http:/ /www.tjcenter.org/ monument.html, and the real thing may be on the Downtown Mall in just a few years. 3 DANDELION continued from page 1 after Q and X. Section K, modeling karate outfits and displaying Asian decorations, boasted, “Section K Kicks Ass.” They tossed fortune cookies into the crowd while two members staged a demonstration of martial arts mastery not seen since the hit movie Only the Strong. Rounding out the parade were Section L’s Viva Las Vegas float — featuring Elvis impersonators, topless cocktail waiters, and other Vegas stereotypes — and the L.L.M.s’ “Liquored Legal Monsters” display of costumed, inebriated terrors dancing about to Michael Jackson’s “Thriller.” At the conclusion of the parade, the Commissioners congregated and voted for the best floats. They selected Section I’s “I of the Tiger” as the best float in the 2000 Dandelion Parade, with special recognition going to Professor O’Connell. Section H was selected as runner-up while the L.L.M.’s were recognized for their choreography. ART continued from page 1 returned to the artists from whom they were on loan. For the record,. the ubiquitous sheep which once greeted flocks of law students at the top of the library stairs have not met the same fate as the Hounds of Hell. The work was safely returned to the hands of its artist, John Evans. Fitchett noted that she moved the sheep from their initial conspicuous location partly in response to student unrest (“People were saying nasty things about lambs to the slaughter!”), and partially in response to the disappearance of the Hounds. For sheep fans, “Clouds,” a larger variant on the more famous work, is on display in the library administration offices. SLAUGHTER continued from page 1 New York Washington London “ Only a handful of firms exist that offer the quality and breadth of Cahill Gordon’s practice. None of them extends to associates greater freedom to shape their own legal career. ” CAHILL GORDON & REINDEL will be on interviewing on campus on Thursday, September 28. Please visit our website at www.cahill.com. We encourage you to sign up on September 8 to speak with us. Scott. The current computer lab will be reduced in size due to the increase in wireless access and a second lab will be located near the library in Withers-Brown. The only setback , according to Bergen, will be the lack of a stu- dent lounge and kitchen area in the fall of 2001. Bergen said he expects that substitute lounge and refrigerator space may be created outside of Caplin Auditorium near the temporary food trailer. BARTLEBY continued from page 2 dinary quantity of writing. As if long famishing for something to copy, he seemed to gorge himself on my documents. There was no pause for digestion. He ran a day and night line, copying by sunlight and by candlelight.” Soon enough, though, the narrator, Bartleby’s boss, begins to sense something wrong: “I should have been quite delighted with his application, had he been cheerfully industrious. But he wrote on, silently, palely, mechanically.” And then comes the famous day, and the famous line in which generations of angst-ridden adolescents have sought refuge and pleasure. (Not to mention perhaps a 3L or two.) The narrator describes the critical scene: “I abruptly called to Bartleby. In my haste and natural expectancy of instant compliance, I sat with my head bent over the original on my desk and my right hand sideways, and somewhat nervously extended with the copy, so that emerging from his retreat, Bartleby might snatch it and proceed to business without the least delay. “In this very attitude did I sit when I called to him, rapidly stating what it was I wanted him to do —namely to examine a small paper with me. Imagine my surprise, nay, my consternation, when, without moving from his privacy, Bartleby, in a singularly mild firm voice, replied, ‘I would prefer not to.’” Without spoiling the ending for you if you haven’t read it, I will say that Melville’s vision of being a legal technician is fairly bleak. Bartleby ends up using these five words (“I would prefer not to.”) to answer every inquiry for the rest of his life. In some ways, the story has become trivialized. It is widely used by many overly simplistic anti-legal, anti-Wall Street, kneejerk critics. Yet, not all has been lost in the power of the message. Certainly Bartleby’s work as a scrivener was far below what many first-year associates, or even fifth-year associates are assigned. However, without being too moralizing, there are aspects of his life that ring true. If nothing else, lessons like the tendency of billing obscene amounts of hours in your first year leading to burn out, or that work as a legal technician can prove to be somewhat personally unfulfilling, merit attention. I guess my old crotchety friend in Portland did have something more than a scotch induced sermon to give me. And I recommend Bartleby’s poor tale for the aspiring yet wary lawyer in us all. Plus, now if you hear your classmate or co-worker reply to a professor’s cold call or a partner’s assignment with a perfunctory, “I would prefer not to,” you have the knowledge that no less a man than Bartleby agreed. 4 Features Virginia Law Weekly Friday, September 8, 2000 Lazy Days on the James? Not W ith Law Students Involved. Now, when you go tubing, they the rear of the bus (the last five by Dana Foster, ’02 Law school got you stressed put you on a bus and take you up- rows of seats had been ripped out out? Legal research and writing river. Then you float lazily down to facilitate the tube storage). He bringing you DOWN, 1Ls? Job the waterway, back to where you then asked that we all cram on to search kickin’ your backside, parked. So we all got on the bus the bus. Just so everybody is caught up 2Ls? Sweatin’ over how to spend to begin our relaxing day on the James. We arrived at the land- — we started with hopes of cool those four-day weekends, 3Ls? Well do I have the cure for all ing and unload the tubes. Half of water caressing our little piggies of you. Take a nice, calm, relax- the troop got into the water (with and cold ones in hand. Now there ing inner tube cruise down the coolers of our favorite beverages, are around 80 of us (half of us serene James River. Ahhhhhhh. of course) when there was a noise wet) jam-packed on a bus. But Warm sun on your shoulders, cool in the sky. It was the sound of everything is okay, because the water caressing your toes, favor- any chance of tubing that day storm won’t last more than 20 ite beverage in your hand (with coming to an end. Oh, but the minutes or so, and then we’ll be on our way. We’ll just stay here plenty more at arms length). Now FUN was about to begin. Those of us who had gotten on the bus. Uh, no. this is the life. Ahhhhhhhhh. The bus driver (who could NOT I was lucky enough to go tub- into the water already (with the ing a few weekends ago. And let coolers) very reluctantly came be older than 17) decided, I beme tell you — WOW! A few of my ashore (a significant portion of lieve unilaterally, that he would close, personal friends and I had my section — section I, give it UP drive the bus back to the “lodge.” a time. Sit back, get comfy, grab — wanted to continue, and to By this time it is raining buckthem I give a hearty salute). The ets, with thunder bellowing and a beverage and let me tell you. lightning Sections I (my prominent in section — give it the sky. And UP) and J arrived hail. I believe at the tubing there was hail. lodge a little afThe front winter 1 p.m. It was dow of the bus slightly overcast, was comand the forecast pletely fogged called for a 70% over. To call chance of rain. the road we But, as a wise photo courtesy of jamesriver.com were on man once said: a These are not law students. We would like to show you law slightly nar70% chance of students inner-tubing. They tried, but no go. So, these are other row would be rain means that people. They look pretty happy, huh? like calling the there’s a 30% Super Bowl chance that it’s not going to rain (okay, maybe initial plan was to wait on the chances of the Cincinnati Bengals that guy wasn’t so wise). Any- banks of the serene James (un- slightly narrow. It sounds like the beginning of way, we were ready, rain or shine. der a couple of nice, tall trees The first thing that greeted us and a power line) until the storm a lawyer joke — what do you call was a gentleman standing atop a passed. Thankfully there was an 80 law students careening wooden platform like a carnival- officer of the law nearby to dish through the backwoods of Virbarker. He gave us instructions out a heaping helping of reason. ginia in a driving thunderstorm about the rules and regulations He directed the awaiting law stu- on a bus driven by a teenager? A mass tort waiting to happen, of tubing. One was, “Git aat a thu dents back on the bus. But, somehow there was now baby. wata if ther is lightnin’.” Another, I know we were in the ditch a “Don’t git sucked unda thu ferry two busloads of students and only boat or you will DIE!” Needless one bus. So, the ever-resourceful couple of times, with the bus to say, I was very comforted after peace officer directed the “guide” swaying to one side at a seemimpossible angle. to remove the inner tubes from ingly his presentation. . Wın3-Year law .school . tuıtıon! NEWS U JMP Crossword Solution To succeed in law school, you need to work smart. The lexis.com sm research system is designed to help you work smarter by rewarding you with relevant information without wasting time. From September 3 – December 2, 2000, you could win a full three-year tuition reimbursement and more! Enter Now at www.lexis.com/lawschool Simply go to the Rewards of Working Smarter banner on the lexis.com/lawschool home page to register for the Promotion. After that, each time you sign on to lexis.com for your research projects, you’re entered to win! (up to 5 entries per week) Enter now for your chance to WIN! Over 3,000 awards available Full Tuition Grand Prize: a full three-year tuition reimbursement* Student Scholarly Lunch Series The Student Scholarly Lunch Series, in which faculty members present research papers to students for comment and discussion, begins September 18, 2000. Students receive copies of the papers before the presentations so that they can prepare to discuss the topic ahead of time. In return, students are rewarded with a free lunch, courtesy of the Olin Foundation. All lunches will take place in WB 121 at 12 noon. A sign-up sheet and copies of the papers are available in Joyce Holt’s office WB358. Schedule Tuition Relief One $1,000 tuition reimbursement prize awarded every month at your school! Law Books One $100 American Express® Gift Cheque toward book reimbursement awarded every week at your school! * Up to a maximum of $90,000. Exact amount will be determined by winner’s specific law school tuition rates. LEXIS-NEXIS Law School Sweepstakes Official Rules. NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. You must be 18 years of age or older and a registered law school student to enter. To enter, follow instructions on the entry screen at http://www.lexis.com/lawschool. Register to enter by confirming your individual LEXIS-NEXIS identification number, name, law school, status and expected graduation date. You must also confirm your mailing address (no P.O. Boxes) and e-mail address. You only need to register once during the Promotion. Once registered, each time you log on with your LEXIS-NEXIS ID number, you will receive an entry. Only five (5) entries per student per week allowed. A week will be deemed to commence on Sunday at 12:00:01 a.m., Mountain Time, and end on Saturday at 11:59:59 p.m., Mountain Time. If multiple online entries are received within a one-week period, only the first five entries received will be qualified. All additional entries will be disregarded. In the event of a dispute, entries will be deemed to have been submitted by the Authorized Account Holder. Authorized Account Holder means the natural person to whom LEXIS-NEXIS Group, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. (Sponsor), has assigned an individual student ID number. Any attempts by an individual to access the site via a bot script or other brute-force attack will result in that IP address becoming ineligible. Sponsor is not responsible for incomplete or incorrect information, garbled transmissions, and telecommunications failures or service interruptions. Sponsor reserves the right to suspend and/or terminate the Sweepstakes, without notice, in whole or in part, in the event of computer, programming and/or system errors, telephone system malfunction or other problems that affect the Sponsor’s ability to proceed as intended. By entering this Sweepstakes, entrants agree to be bound by these Official Rules and the decisions of the judges, which shall be final and conclusive on all matters. Sweepstakes starts September 3, 2000 at 12:00:01 a.m., Mountain Time, and ends December 2, 2000 at 11:59:59 p.m., Mountain Time. PRIZES: GRAND PRIZE (1): One Grand Prize winner will receive a check in an amount equal to 3 years of full-time student tuition at the annual rate that would have been charged to the winning student as of September 3, 2000 at the law school where the student is enrolled, up to a maximum of $90,000. Exact amount awarded will be determined by winner’s specific law school tuition rates. The number of eligible entries received between September 3, 2000, and December 2, 2000 will determine odds of winning the Grand Prize. (ARV: Maximum of $90,000) FIRST PRIZE (591): One thousand dollars towards law school tuition. Prize will be awarded in the form of a check, payable to each winning student. (ARV: $1,000) SECOND PRIZE (2,561): A $100 American Express Gift Cheque. (ARV: $100) The total number of valid entries received each month for the First Prize, and each week for the Second Prize will determine odds of winning any First or Second Prize. DRAWINGS: Second Prize Drawings: At each eligible law school, a Second Prize winner will be randomly selected weekly from all eligible entries received that week. You must enter each week to be eligible for each weekly drawing. Second Prize drawings will be held on Tuesdays (on or about 9/12, 9/19, 9/26, 10/3, 10/10, 10/17, 10/24, 10/31, 11/7, 11/14, 11/21, 11/28 and 12/5 of the Sweepstakes period). The names of the Second Prize winners are expected to be posted on this Web site on or about the Friday following each drawing. First Prize Drawings: At each eligible law school, a First Prize winner will be randomly selected monthly from all eligible entries received for the months of September, October and November. You must enter each month to be eligible for each monthly drawing. First Prize drawings will be held on or about 10/3, 11/7 and 12/5. The names of the First Prize winners are expected to be posted on this Web site on or about the Friday following each drawing, subject to each winner meeting all qualifications and final eligibility criteria. Grand Prize Drawing: One Grand Prize will be randomly selected on or about December 3, 2000. The name of the Grand Prize winner is expected to be posted on this Web site within 14 days of being selected, subject to winner meeting all qualifications and final eligibility criteria. Prize drawings or notifications are conducted under the supervision of D.L. Ryan Companies, Ltd., an independent judging organization, or its authorized representative. All winners will be contacted via mail, e-mail and/or telephone. ELIGIBILITY: Sweepstakes open to all legal residents of the United States, 18 years of age or older, who are currently enrolled in an eligible law school. An eligible law school is defined as a law school (accredited or non-accredited) that distributes individual LEXIS-NEXIS I.D. numbers to its students and has a fully executed Subscription Agreement with LEXIS-NEXIS as of 7/25/00. Employees and household family members of Reed Elsevier Inc., D.L. Ryan Companies, Ltd., their parents, subsidiaries, agencies, affiliates and retailers are not eligible. Void in Puerto Rico and where prohibited, taxed or otherwise restricted by law. All federal, state and local laws and regulations apply. Taxes on prizes, if any, are winners’ sole responsibility. Prizes are not transferable. All decisions of the judges are final. Grand and First Prize winners are required to complete an Affidavit of Eligibility and Liability/Publicity Release, unless prohibited by law. If affidavits and releases are not returned within 14 days of notification, prize will be forfeited, and an alternate winner will be randomly chosen from among all eligible entries received. No substitution of any prize, except at the Sponsor's sole discretion. Entry constitutes each winner’s permission to post winner’s name on Web site and to use his/her name, photograph and/or voice recordings for publicity purposes without additional compensation or permission, except where prohibited by law. WINNERS LIST: For a complete list of winners, visit this Web site after December 20, 2000. RELEASE OF LIABILITY: All entrants release Sponsor, D.L. Ryan Companies, Ltd., and each of their parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors, shareholders, agents, employees and all others associated with the development and execution of this Sweepstakes from any and all liability with respect to, or in any way arising from, this Sweepstakes and/or acceptance, use or misuse of the prizes, including liability for personal injury, death, damages or loss. SPONSOR: LEXIS-NEXIS Group, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc., 9443 Springboro Pike, Miamisburg, OH 45342. LEXIS and NEXIS are registered trademarks, and lexis.com is a service mark of Reed Elsevier Properties, Inc., used under license. © 2000 LEXIS-NEXIS Group. All rights reserved. AL2000-1 Relevant information without wasting time. www.lexis.com/lawschool AHHHHHHH. There was no erage? AHHHHHHHH. shoulder. Other buses were travSo, obviously, we made it back eling in the opposite direction okay. As the bus finally pulled (obviously they had not spoken up to the parking area, after what to the law enforcement officer seemed an eternity, I let out a yet). The storm was raging huge sigh of relief. And as we all around us. And, of course, all the trundled off the bus into the people on the bus had been magi- storm towards our SUVs and cally transluxury vehicles formed into I stopped to high schoolers. shake the kid’s People were hand. “Thanks y e l l i n g , for not careenwhoopin’ and ing into a tree, hollerin’. They man,” I said. were grabAnd he said, assin’ around. “Y’all come And somebody back now, even grabbed y’hear.” photo courtesy of jamesriver.com my leg. So, if you see Tubing point of entry... and exit. AHHHHHHH. a person in SecAnd the kid (who may have tions I (my section — give it UP) been driving on his learner’s per- or J, go up, introduce yourself, mit) was not afraid. We just kept and shake their hand. Tell them on going. I’m sure we hit 60 mph you’re proud of their bravery and a couple of times going downhill. that you’re glad that they didn’t The bus was lurching back and die. forth with every turn. The wind And if you get a chance — let was howling against us. And I me just tell you. 1Ls — tell Proam sardined in a bus with 100 fessor Foster-Riley to get off your potential litigants driven by a back. 2Ls — log off of CASE and pre-pubescent. And all I kept toss your lawweb IDs. 3Ls — tell thinking (other than who the hell Mike at Birdwood that you’ll see is grabbing my leg) is, “Relax- him tomorrow. And all of you ation my butt!” Where was the head on down to Scottsville for cool water on my digits? Where some relaxation on the James. was the warm sun? The cold bev- AHHHHHHH. September 18 - George Rutherglen “Distributing Justice: Lessons from the Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust” *October 2 - Kevin Kordana “Charitable Conversions” October 23 - Anne Coughlin “Intercourse and Interrogation” *October 30 - Jesse Rudy (Olin Summer Research Fellow) “An Empirical Study of the At-Will Doctrine in Employment Law” November 13 - Earl Dudley “The Scalia Anomaly: Divergent Approaches to Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation” * December 4 - Ed Kitch To Be Announced *These three lunches are sponsored by the John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics. Virginia Law Weekly Friday, September 8, 2000 Advertisement 5 6 Columns Virginia Law Weekly Friday, September 8, 2000 Love, Lust and the Law Okay, so there are activities fairs, journal tryouts, and clerkship meetings — isn’t it about time for some news we can use? Advice on how to brief a case is all well and good, but let’s hit the juicy stuff we really care about — love and lust at the Law School. Jackie Sadker, a second-year law student, is the Law Weekly Features Editor. First-years, welcome back to high school. Second-years, remember what it was like to enter this bizarre dating land? Third-years, get off the undergrads — they won’t solve that whole receding hairline problem. First off, the term dating is misleading. What we’ve got here is just two types of folks (and few dates): scammers (those whose end goal is the almighty hook-up) and couples in love. The best way to tell them apart is that you can talk to and about your love interest, but not your hook-up interest. Find the category you fall into and read on for further tips on how to succeed in this whole law-lovelust-land. Oh, and take them all with an industrial-sized grain of salt — if I had any of the answers, I probably wouldn’t be writing this column. Hook-Ups — Folks Who Don’t Need Nothing But A Good Time Don’t: Use the intimate space of the patio at Buddhist or the backyard at a Law School party as a kickoff for your rendezvous. News flash: not only do we attend the smallest Law School in the world, but we even have a gossip column with eyes everywhere (aka the VANGUARD phenom). Unless you want your indiscretions to lack discretion, get a room. Do: Greet the rendezvous partner with a friendly wave in Slaugh- ter the next day. There are several reasons for this: while every impulse in your body may be to run from the reminder of the excess of alcohol you imbibed or the potentially damaging things you did, preserve both civility and the option for a future hook-up by feigning happiness to see your transgression in the light of day. Don’t: Tell ALL your friends. See VANGUARD phenom noted above. Also, we’re swimming in a pretty small pond here; we don’t need or want to know the sexual history of everyone in every class. It’s hard enough to pay attention as it is… Don’t: Hook up with anyone in your first-year section during your first year. Unless you are sure it will ascend to the next level, this is to be avoided at all costs. With the same classes, friends, and social calendars, there is just too much interaction to sustain a hook-up-only relationship. First-years may have already fallen into this trap, as witnessed post-Dandelion Parade last week. Best advice now that the damage is done: Get married or switch sections. This advice just doesn’t apply to second- and third-years – that whole world of 15 previously off-limits people opens up when you start your second fall. Do: Be nice to the hook-up partner’s roommate(s). You may have just met them, but they suddenly have power over you. See VANGUARD phenom noted above. Love — Folks Who Want Something To Believe In Ahh, love. You are suddenly so glad you didn’t go to Georgetown, because your soulmate happened to be awaiting you here in Charlottesville. Perhaps you were even in the same section (J) with them. Fate can be kind. Since you have been so lucky to find love in between the law lines, you certainly won’t mind just a few guidelines to smooth the whole process. WYCHE Don’t: Be all over each other in the Law School. This seems obvious, but you would be amazed. It’s not that there is anything wrong with PDA — I personally think it’s kinda sweet. But in the computer lab? The romance of ISIS escapes me. Do: Let everyone know of your coupleness. This is both to address the VANGUARD issue (nothing gossipy about common knowledge) and to stave off all those who fall into the first category. Don’t: Cheat. Duh. True everywhere, but factor in the oft-cited VANGUARD phenomenon, and you’d have to be a complete moron. Don’t: Stop socializing with your friends. While you may not believe it, there is the slightest of teensiest chances that your match made in heaven may turn into anything but. Law school can be a lonely place if you are the only third-year who knows no one outside of your small section. Do: Join Law Partners. They just seem like nice people. So there are my two cents. Now go, mate and be merry. Just keep in mind, the Law Weekly (and everyone else) is watching… Love’s in the Law School Air by Howard Chang ’01 If you haven’t read ANG this year or heard any of the gossip fluttering through our hallowed halls, you might be surprised to hear that half of the Law School recently got married or engaged over the summer. All right, all right, “half” might be exaggerating a bit since that would mean roughly 500 people. But at least eight or nine people in the law school got married or engaged over the summer! What, you ask, could be the source of this sudden stampede to the chapel of love? Timing appeared to provide the principal catalyst for our guppy lawyers making the big move. More specifically, some of our peers in long term relationships could feel the fire burning under their posteriors and realized that it was time to put up or shut up. “After six years of dating, I think [my fiancée] would have killed me if I made her wait much longer,” admitted third-year Anthony Stenger. “I have been dating my fiancée for five years and I was getting the feeling that if I waited until I graduated I may not have a girlfriend to propose to,” explained second-year Graham Eddy. Clearly, these wise fellows demonstrated a keen knack for preventative issue-spotting. Third-year Jen Bresnahan, however, gave a gentler, less cynical explanation for the impetus behind her engagement: “The timing just seemed right. We’ve been dating for four years, so I think we were both pretty ready” (emphasis added). Unfortunately, this reporter could not reach Bresnahan’s fiancé for cross-examination. photo by Brian Gist Coming soon to a finger near you.... Not every law student, however, felt the Hellhound of time nipping away at his or her heels. Some students simply decided that the time was appropriate to elevate their relationship regardless of the fact that they were still enrolled in school. “I never thought I’d be married in school,” admitted second-year Susan Foubert (formerly McMurry), “[but] the time was right, the person was right, so it just seemed like the right thing to do!” Third-year Alice Shuffield similarly described her motivations: “The timing was just right — it wasn’t planned with [the] law school schedule in mind really.” Whether the timing was “just right” or whether it was just time to put up, one truth has definitely emerged from this batch of recent engagements: Love is in the law school air. And with love, no less, comes newfound confidence. All of the happy people interviewed for this story expressed confidence that the impending change in their tax status would not complicate their lives as law students. “I have many married friends at the Law School,” explained Eddy, “and my fiancée hangs out with them a lot. We often go on double dates with these couples.” Stenger similarly did not foresee any changes in his lifestyle: “Women showed no interest in me before I was engaged and I don’t expect that to change.” Likewise, Bresnahan saw no reason for her interaction with her peers to change: “I’ve been dating [my fiancé] for all of the time I’ve been here, so my friends never knew me any other way. They won’t treat me any differently. But they threw me an amazing wedding shower, complete with margaritas, a mini wedding cake, and themed gifts. I’m so glad…that I can include them in my wedding plans … not to mention the bachelorette party.” Third-year Ben Block, who married third-year Karen Fuchs this past weekend, summarized the change in his life accordingly: “It is by far the best thing that has happened to me at law school!” Hear, hear. Virginia Law Weekly Two views on dating in Manhattan at the Regal Downtown Autumn in New York stars Richard Gere as Will, a 48-year-old successful restauranteur and womanizer. Since he’s apparently able to have commitment-free sex with any woman in Manhattan, Will logically chooses to fall for 21year-old Charlotte (Winona Ryder), an elfin, immature hat Reviews Friday, September 8, 2000 7 Still Among the Best of What’ s Around every week to talk about their sexual exploits. Their conversations are misogynistic, vulgar, repetitive and puerile. These guys are the most offensive men imaginable, matched only by sheer odiousness the of the married member of the group, Eric (Judah Domke). The minimal plot is that the Three Musketeers all fall for ideal Movie Review babe Mia (Amanda Peete) who by Amber Husbands ends up having sex with all of them without even changing her sheets in between. It’s not impordesigner with a fatal heart condi- tant why they all fall for her or tion whose unsophisticated charm why they keep dating her once knocks poor Will right off his feet. they find out. You wouldn’t beAt least, I hope it’s her charm, lieve it anyway, since it’s hard to because the “hats” she designs are decide what’s worse here – the the ugliest things I have ever seen, writing or the acting. There is no reminiscent of something your redeeming social value or even enmom might tertainment have made you value to this for your thirdmovie. It’s nothgrade Hallowing more than an een costume. excuse to string Director together endless Joan Chen vile euphemisms seems to be for sex and sex ormore in love gans. with filmmakIt’s astonishing techniques ing that a movie than Will and that’s all about Charlotte’s resex could be so utlationship. terly unsexy. There’s the Whipped just obligatory fallmakes you hope leaves-in-Centhat there really tral-Park aren’t any people, photo courtesy of MGM/UA scene, various anywhere, that Richard Gere and Winona colored birds to are even remotely Ryder star in symbolize life like the characAutumn in New York. and death, and ters in this movie. an annoying propensity for film- I felt unclean just for having seen ing scenes through glass. Writer it. Allison Burnett clutters the story with distracting plotlines about a mysterious woman in Will’s life and an emergency surgery that just might save Charlotte’s life. She should have spent her time working on the dialogue, which It took five years, but Brit-popalternates between the overblown and the mundane. Sometimes Will pers Elastica have finally returned and Charlotte sound like they’re with a long-awaited follow up alquoting bad poetry, and sometimes bum. 1995’s self-titled debut Elastheir exchanges are reminiscent tica, scored a major U.S. hit with the high-powered “Connection.” of giggling middle-schoolers. It’s not so much that I don’t The tune was everywhere — even believe Winona Ryder could fall picked up by Budweiser for its TV for Richard Gere. It’s that I don’t commercials that season. believe that arrogant, insensitive, selfish Will and whiny, childish Music Review Charlotte would ever have found each other and fallen in love. In by Jonathan Riehl real life, it takes more than a dying no-talent waif to convert a lifeThe band has changed shape long ladies’ man into a paragon of devotion. I hope. Oh, and not only over five years, but maintained its is Will more than twice her age, he original sound and cynical edge. once had a relationship with The intervening years have not Charlotte’s now-deceased mother. been entirely kind to Elastica’s Neither of them finds this dis- press coverage, with London tabtasteful or inappropriate. And Will loids and music mags frequently never stops to think about why the filled with rumors of drug abuse, first woman to steal his heart is feuds, and the like. As things one who’s guaranteed not to be stand now, the band may be getting back together after around in a year. There’s definitely a place at the all. And Elastica’s well-promovies for sentimental tear- duced and totally fun followjerkers. But Autumn in New York up album would seem a fitisn’t a modern-day Love Story. It’s ting soundtrack for the recliched and sentimental — and union. A world tour is underway, didn’t even make me cry! Let’s be clear; I cry at Nike commercials, and Elastica will soon be playthe Harry Potter books, and People ing in Washington, D.C. for magazine. But Richard Gere’s the first time in four years. In crocodile tears over wan Winona’s the interest of journalistic indeathbed didn’t even elicit a sniffle. tegrity, the author should disWhipped, on the other hand, close he was in the front row elicited much stronger emotions; of that performance. And will namely, disgust, horror, and won- likely be elbowing his way to der that someone actually gave a similar spot at the return writer/director Peter M. Cohen showing, scheduled for the 9:30 money to make this crude and Club on October 3. Elastica’s style is an inventive infantile sex comedy. Whipped is the story of three college buddies, mix of funky Brit-pop tunesmithBrad (Brian Van Holt), Jonathan ism, a-la Blur, and high-energy (Jonathan Abrams), and Zeke 70s punk, a-la The Clash, Blondie, (Zorie Barber), who get together and Wire. The band has always A week ago Thursday, a group of five Dave worshipers escaped from a rainy Charlottesville (not that we’d been there long) to an even rainier GTE Virginia Beach Amphitheater, the venue of the final Virginia stop on the Dave Matthews Band’s 52 concert, seven-week tour. If you didn’t get to see this C’ville legend in action this summer, then follow along and take a virtual trip to Dave’s world. After a stop at one fan’s Virginia Beach home for pizza and non-public bathroom use, we took back roads to the amphitheater and geared up for lawn seating and serious rain. Music Review by Amy Kobelski and Mindy Cupps First, the Dave crowds aren’t what they used to be. The younger part of the crowd, clad in a uniform of Tommy jeans and apronbacked tops, didn’t seem especially thrilled with Dave’s play list. The older folks — though perhaps more appreciative of the music — remained seated or stationary throughout the concert. Our merry group fell somewhere in the middle in terms of age and enthusiasm. Some things never change, however: Friend #1 (who should have known better) remarked that something “funny smelling” was “itching her nose.” Dave Matthews, a Charlottesville resident since 1986, was energetic by Dave standards, rocking especially hard on “All Along the Watchtower” and the closer, “Rapunzel.” Dave and company mellowed appropriately for slower songs like the new “Raven” (which one reviewer expects to become a personal favorite). As usual, Matthews’ between-set talk was incomprehensible: the intimacy in the studio. A friend who saw lost in the microphone static and the D.C. show reported that violin from the enormous crowd de- player Boyd Tinsley sang lead on tracted from what was otherwise one of the new songs, which may much more like a small, acoustic, very well show up on Dave’s new CD. That may Dave and Tim set. A few be a sign that the strobe lights provided band now has the only on-stage decoenough clout to ration, and as may be cut an album as relevant to some fans, they want it — if Dave’s left hand bore no not, you may adornment, either. (We have to wait for leave the question of another Listener whether this absence reSupported CD to futes the rumor of Dave’s hear what we marriage to some tolerheard. ant young woman to you The opinions logical reasoning exof individuals in perts.) On to the photo courtesy of execpc.com our group varied from Friend #3, underappreciated set C’ville legend Dave list: the band played a Matthews rocked 52-plus who said the concert was all right lot of songs off the new venues this summer. but others had album and a few of the major classics — “Tripping Bil- been better, to Friend #2, who said lies,” “Best of What’s Around,” the concert was the best of the four “Crush,” and even “All Along the she’d seen. Yet despite the rain Watchtower.” The new songs are and an encounter with sadistic reminiscent of Classic Dave, too: police officers (who informed trustthe band seemed much more in- ing Friend #2 that there were no terested in exploring rougher mu- “working” public bathrooms and that she had missed the show’s “great” opening act, Taj Mahal and the Phantom Blues Band) overall spirits and opinions were high. Dave Matthews Band summer concerts have become a dependable staple to all, and remain a highlight for othphoto courtesy of dmband.com DMB violinist Boyd Tinsley had his own local ers. So if you band before joining forces with Dave. missed out this sical intricacies than emulating summer, tide yourselves over on their polished middle album, the new album (due out in NovemCrash. It will be interesting to see ber or December)—and become fawhether this sound makes it onto miliar with all the new songs in the new album, or is over-refined time for next summer’s tour. The Menace : Elastica’ s Back Punk Band Makes a Comeback acknowledged its roots, and has even quoted some punk riffs in its tunes. (This did not protect them from legal liability. Several exmembers of “quoted” bands filed suit against Elastica for copyright violation.) Critical reaction to the new album, which appeared in the U.K. in April, has been mixed. “Even theoretically, Blur plus Wire doesn’t equal pop anymore,” said the Village Voice. I don’t know if The Menace equals “pop,” but what exactly does that mean anymore? What The Menace does equal is some fun, funky, and musically interesting listening. Elastica’s brand of pop is a layered blend of past and present, a nicely postmodern mix of DJ Culture, punk guitar, memorable foot-tapping tunes, and interesting lyrics, usually delivered in lead singer Justine Frischman’s trademark hyper-inflected voice. Her voice is a unique character actor, always alluring: part football hooligan, part seductive barfly, part pop poetess. There is the energy of punk, the sultry vocals of a sex symbol— which Frischman has established herself as in the UK, at least—and the happy nonsense of pop stars very willing to laugh at the culture that supports their successes. The punk nonsense of “Da Da Da” with its half-German lyrics is a fine example. And then there’s “10 KB” where Justine rants that “REAL TIME…IS OUT OF SYNCH.” In an overconnected, hyperlinked world, this might even amount to decent philosophicalpop commentary. The ’90’s Brit-pop craze was fueled largely by the rivalry between Oasis and Blur, both of whom have faded notably from the U.S. musical scene. Oasis’s Standing on the Shoulders of Giants was a fantastic flop in American markets, and Blur is yet to follow up on its more Fatboy Slim-like success with tunes like “Song 13” from the summer of ’98. As an aside, both Oasis and Blur are exclusively male bands. Elastica was female with the exception of drummer Justin Welch. The original Elastica looks as though it may be getting back together, with guitarist Donna Mattews having appeared in several of the band’s performances. Mattews has had touch-and-go relations with Frischman over the past few years, and is not officially listed as a band member on the liner notes for The Menace. Mattews contributed four of the new album’s songs while she was still with the band. These numbers are reminiscent of the more low-key, reflective tunes from the band’s debut. “Nothing Stays,” in particular, is a mellow-sounding, melancholy example — a satisfyingly worded take on what has become a standard lament of the sophomore pop band. There is, however, a genuineness in the lyrics, given in Elastica’s fragmented style. “Face the facts, being best got bitter/simple tastes won’t suit me better/used to matter but that got done/best at being was not best at all/nothing stays the same/ always change to remain.” Track five, given the colorful title “Your Arse, My Place,” has been distinguished by Frischman as “the first time I’ve used 12-bar blues.” Hmmmm. It’s a typical set piece, given at a medium-pace, dipped in punk irony. “I twist, you shout, I’m in, you’re out/too sharp, too flat/it’s fate, and that’s that...get with it, baby.” Several of the tracks on The Menace are instrumentals, or nearly so. “10 KB” and “Da Da Da” at times sound more like rave riffs than pop numbers, with vocals spliced in more as if they were shouts from the audience (on key, of course, and with Justine’s strong, bending voice adding to the effect) than from a member of the band reciting lyrics. The mixing and editing on the “instrumentals,” as with the entire album, emphasizes more depth and blending than the band’s first album. Keyboard effects play a key role here, but the overall rhythmic spunk is not sacrificed to the larger overall effect. The sound is bigger, but no less energized. The Menace is available on Atlantic Records no. 4VW28. UK Release was on Bluff records no. 075. 8 Law School Life Virginia Law Weekly VANGUARD OF DEMOCRACY While the 198th Annual Dandelion Parade saw neither the return of Thomas Jefferson’s Michie Tavern All-Stars nor the promised presence of the great and fabled Tawny Kitaen, this year’s extravaganza provided more than its share of memorable highlights. Beginning with 3L K.Y. & Co.’s fanciful field decorations—including, in a moment reminiscent of Kramer’s coffee-table book about coffee-tables, a softball pinata filled with softballs—the parade ushered in the fall softball season in grand fashion indeed. At the outset, it is VG’s duty and pleasure to salute benevolent tort god Professor J.O’C. for joining Section I’s “‘I’ of the Tiger” float. Prof. O’C.’s good-natured and dead-on rendition of Mickey from the early “Rocky” films singlehandedly propelled his section to victory — though not without stiff competition. Section H’s Hugh Hefner-themed hi-jinks were a hit with the drunken masses, as was Section C’s hilarious “C-Cret Service” float, featuring a Monica Lewinsky clone, a stunt-Clinton, and plenty of cigars and shots (you can guess what kind). Kudos are also in order to the LLMs, whose spirited trash-bag dancing made them crowd favorites. Hats off to all who braved the Saigon-like climate to revel in the festivities. The event also marked an NGSL first: the retiring of a jersey. For those of you who missed the makeshift but heart-warming cer- Friday, September 8, 2000 Tawny, We Har dly Knew Y e… emony, some background is in order. Last season, defending macho-league champions Chico’s Bail Bonds were set to defend their crown on one of the last days of finals. However, 3L M.K. — the pitcher and lynchpin of the Chico’s squad — did not realize that the game was scheduled in the middle of one of his exams. Rather than skip the game or even push for a rescheduling, M.K. decided to skip out of his exam an hour early. The fact that Chico’s ultimately lost the game is immaterial; the point is that M.K. showed a dedication heretofore unseen in the NGSL. Thus, his “00” shall remain perched atop the backstop at Copeley for all eternity, or at least until the wind blows it off or a large bird eats it. Which brings us to our next topic: the season itself. 3L B.M. has been quietly plotting a revolution in the macho league this year, re-tooling his Free Pizza squad to become serious contenders for this year’s title. Though rumors that B.M., J.R. and company imported a Japanese league all-star are unconfirmed at this time, it is true that Free Pizza has enlisted the services of yet another transfer ringer. VG wants to know where all these imported studs are coming from. Does the admissions office even look at grades for transfer applicants, or do they simply run them through an NFL-like combine? In addition, one cannot rule out DANDELION PHOTO GALLERY photos by Brian Gist a championship for 2L wunderkind M.H. and his TMC All-Stars squad. While they had their ups and downs as 1Ls, including winning the award for silliest name, these kids can play some serious ball. 2L B.R., whose on-field intensity nearly caused him to burst into flames in the vicinity of second base last year, is rumored to have taken up self-meditation to better channel his fiery emotions. Instead of handing out verbal beat-downs this semester, B.R. will be handing out flowers from his shortstop position to passing baserunners. Ohhhmmmm…. Finally, one-time macho league champions Chico’s is poised for another run at the top spot, as 3L A.G. and company have drafted a “secret weapon” in the outfield to replace an injured starter. Which Chico’s will show up this year: the can-do professionals of last fall, or the cocky and bloated drunks of spring? Will 3L D. “Jesco” R. hit one off the Darden sign, or screw himself into the ground trying? Will 3L K.B. extend Christian forgiveness to this season’s umpires? Only time will tell. Got dirt? In an effort to better serve you, our loyal readers, VG is soliciting gossip. Got a nugget you’d like to share with the masses? Write or type up your story, complete with names (we’ll handle the initials), and put it in the envelope marked “VG Turncoats” in the NGSL mailbox. Leave your name and number for verification purposes, and we’ll take it from there. VANGUARD OF DEMOCRACY is an independent column of the North Grounds Softball League and does not necessarily represent the views of the Editors of the Virginia Law Weekly. Top 12 Tasteless, Offensive, and Ultimately Rejected Dandelion Parade Float Themes by anonymous 12. 11. 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. §A’s “Adventures in Adultery” §B’s “Bulimia Fiesta” §C’s “Censored for Content” §D’s “Drunk Driver Behind the Wheel Fun Float — Look out Everybody!” §E’s “Everybody Loves Making Fun of the Elderly” §F’s “Fun with Farm Animals” §G’s “Grandma’s Going to a Hospice” §H’s “Hell on Earth — Burn, Sinners, Burn!” §I’s “Intimacy between Siblings: A Tribute to Incest” §J’s “Jumping Rope with People with Neck Injuries” §K’s “Ken and Barbie Kicking It” §L’s “Loogies on the Crowd: When it Rains, it Pours” Submit your top ten list to Jackie Sadker, Features Editor, in SL 279 or via email at Va-Law-Weekly@virginia.edu. Please have entries in by 5 p.m. on Tuesday for the following publication.