1 Meconium Aspiration Syndrome Meconium MSAF Prenatal
Transcription
1 Meconium Aspiration Syndrome Meconium MSAF Prenatal
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome Rita M. Ryan, MD Chief, Division of Neonatology Professor of Pediatrics, Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, and Gynecology-Obstetrics Meconium y first intestinal discharge from newborns is meconium ◦ a viscous, dark green substance composed of intestinal epithelial cells, lanugo, mucus, and intestinal secretions, such as bile. ◦ Intestinal secretions, mucosal cells, and solid elements of swallowed amniotic fluid are the 3 major solid constituents of meconium. ◦ Water is the major liquid constituent, making up 85-95% of meconium. y Intrauterine distress can cause passage of meconium into the amniotic i i flfluid. id ◦ Factors that promote the passage in utero include placental insufficiency, maternal hypertension, preeclampsia, oligohydramnios, and maternal drug abuse, especially of tobacco and cocaine. y y Meconium-stained amniotic fluid may be aspirated during labor and delivery, causing neonatal respiratory distress. Because meconium is rarely found in the amniotic fluid prior to 34 weeks' gestation, meconium aspiration chiefly affects infants at term and postterm. Dave Clark emedicine 2004 Pediatric Grand Rounds October 3, 2008 Meconium Aspiration Syndrome - More Than Intrapartum Meconium [Editorial] Ross, Michael G. New England Journal of Medicine. 353(9):946353(9):946-8, 2005 Sep 1. Harbor--UCLA Medical Center Harbor Meconium, the fecal material that accumulates in the fetal colon throughout gestation, is a term derived from the Greek mekoni, k i meaning i poppy juice j i or opium. i Beginning with Aristotle's observation of the association between meconium staining of the amniotic fluid and a sleepy fetal state or neonatal depression, obstetricians have been concerned about fetal well-being in the presence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid. MSAF y The passage of mec in utero accompanies 8% to 20% (average 12-13%) of all deliveries ◦ <37 weeks Æ 2% ◦ >42 weeks Æ 44% ◦ seen predominantly in infants who are SGA and postmature, cord complications or other factors compromising the in utero placental circulation MSAF is usually considered to be indicative of fetal distress. y Many MSAF babies exhibit no signs of depression, etc., but some brief period of asphyxia could have induced the passage of mec before delivery. y MAS seen in 4% of MSAF deliveries y Fanaroff and Martin 2002, Miller, Fanaroff and Martin Avery 1991, Hansen and Corbet Prenatal Management y presence of MSAF is not always an indication of fetal distress in all infants ◦ MSAF may signal fetal hypoxia, but if FHR, pH remain normal then outcome usually favorable y combination of MSAF and ominous FHR tracing is often associated with significant fetal and neonatal asphyxia with accompanying morbidity Fanaroff and Martin 2002, Miller, Fanaroff and Martin Pathophysiology y passage of meconium in utero: ◦ we think it is associated with asphyxia but data actually are weak ◦ ? result of transient parasympathetic stimulation from cord compression in a neurologically mature fetus ◦ ? natural phenomenon that reflects the maturity of the GI tract ◦ most agree that MSAF plus FHR abnormalities are a marker for fetal distress and associated with increased perinatal morbidity Avery 1991, Hansen and Corbet 1 Pathophysiology y y y Mec in the AF may stain the umb cord, placenta and fetus when fetal distress is present, gasping may be initiated in utero Æ AF and particulate matter contained therein may be inhaled into the large airways Î mec aspiration may occur antenatally mec inhaled by the fetus may be present in the trachea or larger bronchi at delivery Æ after air breathing has commenced Æ rapid distal migration of mec within the lung Pathophysiology y If aspiration of meconium stained amniotic fluid before, during, and after birth occurs, there can be 3 major pulmonaryy effects: p ◦ airway obstruction ◦ surfactant dysfunction ◦ chemical pneumonitis Fanaroff and Martin 2002, Miller, Fanaroff and Martin Ball--Valve Phenomenon Ball Dave Clark emedicine 2004 Pathophysiology areas of atelectasis, resulting from total airway obstruction, adjacent to y areas of overexpansion, from gas trapping in regions with partial obstruction y Î “salt and pepper” appearance on CXR y air leaks y ◦ pneumomediastinum ◦ pneumothorax chemical inflammation Æ pneumonitis in vitro: concentration-dependent inhibition of surfactant y animal models: influx of inflammatory cells and protein, inactivation of surfactant, decrease in surf proteins y y during inspiration, lower airways open Æ air can go into the alveolar air space however, during expiration, the lower airways collapse and with the meconium present air cannot leave Æ air trapping Æ hyperinflation, PTX Clinical Findings postmaturity mec staining – nails, skin, umbilical cord y often perinatal depression y y ◦ neurologic, resp depression secondary to hypoxia (which precipitated the passage of mec in the first place) y Severe respiratory distress may be present: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Fanaroff and Martin 2002, Miller, Fanaroff and Martin Cyanosis End-expiratory grunting Alar flaring Intercostal retractions Tachypnea Barrel chest in the presence of air trapping Rales Dave Clark emedicine 2004 Fanaroff and Martin 2002, Miller, Fanaroff and Martin 2 PPHN in MAS Clinical Manifestations clinical symptoms progress over 12-24 hours as mec migrates to the periphery y mec ultimately has to be removed by phagocytosis p agocytos s Æ resp esp distress st ess and a resp esp support may be persist for days or even weeks y y y can be a major problem in infants with MAS both prenatal and postnatal maladaptation of the pulmonary circulation may contribute to the development of PPHN in infants with MAS ◦ anatomic abnormalities x evidence of injury to the vascular bed of the lung that dates back several weeks prior to birth. x Vasc smooth muscle extends into the walls of normally nonmuscularized intra-acinar arterioles Æ bad PPHN ◦ active vasoconstriction x directly or may cause plt aggregation Æ release of thromboxane, a potent pulm vasoconstrictor Avery 1991, Hansen and Corbet Fanaroff and Martin 2002, Miller, Fanaroff and Martin Avery 1991, Hansen and Corbet CXR coarse, irregular densities with areas of diminished aeration and consolidation y pneumomediastinum, PTX y hyperinflation y cardiomegaly at times, due to perinatal asphyxia y “salt and pepper” y Meconium Aspiration Air trapping and yp p from hyperexpansion airway obstruction Dave Clark emedicine 2004 Left pneumothorax with depressed diaphragm and minimal mediastinal shift because of noncompliant lungs Dave Clark emedicine 2004 3 Treatment y Diffuse chemical pneumonitis from constituents of meconium let them breathe fast in hood oxygen ◦ arterial line – frequent ABGs ◦ minimal stimulation ◦ try to avoid intubation y if intubate – no longer aggressive in hyperventilation / alkalosis but avoid hypercarbia / acidosis ◦ no consensus on “optimal” optimal vent strategy ◦ if a lot of parenchymal disease Æ HFOV y target normal blood pressure y not a big fan of nasal CPAP y if intubate, use sedation generously y nothing on this slide has been well-studied ◦ avoid hypotension Æ PPHN ◦ just makes them mad ◦ may need paralysis (no data) Dave Clark emedicine 2004 Treatment Surfactant r/o sepsis but not automatic commitment to a full course Abx y steroids are not recommended – textbook te tboo recommendation eco e at o but this t s may ay be changing…. y y meconium may inhibit surf function Æ role for exogenous surf y multicenter RCT of term infants with severee resp seve esp failure, a u e, 50% of o whom w o had a MAS as primary dx Æ surf decr need for ECMO Fanaroff and Martin 2002, Miller, Fanaroff and Martin Lotze et al, (J Pediatr 1998;132:401998;132:40-7) y y y Need for ECMO (%) A multicenter (n = 44), randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. Infants > 2000g and > 36 wks, OI* 15-39, n=328 stratified: ◦ by diagnosis (MAS, sepsis, or idiopathic PPHN) and ◦ oxygenation index (15 - 22, 23 - 30, 31 - 39) y four doses of surfactant (Survanta) 100 mg/kg or air placebo, every 6 hours before ECMO treatment and four additional doses during ECMO, if ECMO was required. *OI = FiO2 x MAP pO2 The need for ECMO therapy was significantly less in the surfactant group than in the placebo group (p = 0.038) 4 Need for ECMO (%) this effect was greatest within the lowest oxygenation index stratum (15 to 22; p = 0.013). Steroids in MAS - Cochrane Review - 2003 Steroid therapy for meconium aspiration syndrome in newborn infants Cochrane Reviews Ward, M; Sinn, J Date of Most Recent Update: 25-August-2003 At present, there is insufficient evidence to assess the effects of steroid therapy in the management of meconium aspiration syndrome. A further large randomized controlled trial assessing potential benefits and harm would be required to determine its role. role. (85 patients in 2 trials) Modes of action to explain efficacy of steroids inhibition of prostaglandin and leukotriene synthesis y removal of excess edema fluid y suppression of cytokine mediated inflammatory reaction y inhibition of nitric oxide production y 5 y y y y y y y Sultantate of Oman pilot study, case series, not RCT all ventilated, all OI >25, all PPHN average age starting dex 80hrs dex 0.5/kg/day div q12h x3d, 0.3 x3d, 0.125 x3d steroids started if not weaning on vent or OI worsening over 16h RCT, 3 arms ◦ placebo ◦ 0.5 mg/kg/d Methylprednisilone div q12h ◦ 50 ug q12h budesonide y blinded y not sure if ventilated population 2006 Steroids Results 2 deaths, both in placebo group (one with massive PTX, one with sepsis/DIC) y no baby in steroids group needed MV y y y RCT, n=99, 3 arms, not blinded placebo, methylprednisilone 0.5mg/kg/d q12h x7d, budesonide 50ug q12h x7d 6 Steroids for MAS Need larger studies y Need long term follow up y ◦ Effects on brain / neurodevelopment x Need reallyy large g studies y Inflammation in MAS 11 neonatal patients with MAS, 16 neonates without MAS, and 9 healthy children. y 6 cytokines higher in MAS compared with non-MAS neonates: Could be useful for sickest babies Steroids in MAS y ◦ IL-6, IL-8, GM-CSF, G-CSF, interferonγ, MIP-1, and TNF y y y Tripathi et al, Ind J Med Microbiology (2007) 25 (2):103-7 RCT, blinded, 3 groups ◦ Placebo, methylprednisilone, inhaled budesonide IL-10 (anti-inflammatory cytokine) also was higher in the MAS group x Steroids given for 7 days ◦ Tracheal aspirates on day 1, 3, 4 y y Decreased TNFα in steroid treated groups TNFα levels correlated with LOS Controversies in the treatment of meconium aspiration syndrome Controversies in the treatment of meconium aspiration syndrome y 25,000-30,000 cases per year in US Gelfand, J Fanaroff, Walsh, Clinics in Perinat 2004;31,445-452 y 13% of live births have MSAF • • • Amnioinfusion intrapartum suctioning tracheal suctioning ◦ 1000 deaths annually ◦ onlyy 5% of these babies have MAS y MAS defined as “resp distress in an infant born through MSAF whose symptoms cannot be otherwise explained” Gelfand, J Fanaroff, Walsh, Clinics in Perinat 2004;31,445-452 7 Amnioinfusion Fraser WD et al, N Engl J Med 2005;353: 909-17 Average BW 3.4 kg dilutes meconium relieves cord compression Æ relieving hypoxia Æ decreasing gasping y does it reduce MAS? – meta-analysis of 13 studies suggests that both fetal distress and MAS are decreased: y y x Hofmeyr, GJ et al, Cochrane review, 2001, 2004 update Gelfand, J Fanaroff, Walsh, Clinics in Perinat 2004;31,445-452 Table 3 continued… Amnioinfusion – Fraser WD et al N Engl J Med 2005;353: 909909-17 y Conclusions: For women in labor who have thick MSAF, amnioinfusion did not reduce the risk of moderate or severe meconium aspiration p syndrome, y perinatal p death, or other major maternal or neonatal disorders. DeLee and tracheal suctioning y preventive approach ◦ thorough suctioning of nose and pharynx by OB after delivery of head but before thorax is delivered and the infant can take a breath ◦ if infant depressed Æ tracheal suctioning to remove residual mec Amnioinfusion does not prevent meconium aspiration syndrome. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 346. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1053–5. Fanaroff and Martin 2002, Miller, Fanaroff and Martin 8 Intrapartum suctioning y considered standard for 25 years y Wiswell et al Peds 2000;105:1-7 x Carson et al Am J Ob Gyn 1976;126:712-5 Fanaroff and Martin 2002, Miller, Fanaroff and Martin ◦ RCT studyy to examine tracheal suctioningg 2094 infants ◦ MAS increased in those who did not receive intrapartum oropharyngeal suctioning before delivery of the shoulders (8.5% vs. 2.7%, OR 3.35, CI 1.55-7.27) Gelfand, J Fanaroff, Walsh, Clinics in Perinat 2004;31,445-452 Intrapartum Suctioning – NRP 2005 y y y y Aspiration of meconium before delivery, during birth, or during resuscitation can cause severe aspiration pneumonia. One obstetrical technique to try to decrease aspiration has been to suction meconium from the infant’s airway after delivery of the head but before delivery of the shoulders (intrapartum suctioning). Although some studies (LOE 3) suggested that intrapartum suctioning might be effective for decreasing the risk of aspiration syndrome, subsequent evidence from a large multicenter randomized trial (LOE 1) did not show such an effect. Therefore, current recommendations no longer advise routine intrapartum oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning for infants born to mothers with meconium staining of amniotic fluid (Class I). Circulation 2005 y y Circulation 2005 Recommendations were generally labeled Class IIb when the evidence documented only short-term benefits from the therapy or when positive results were documented with lower levels of evidence. Class IIb recommendations fall into 2 categories: ◦ (1) optional and ◦ (2) recommended by the experts despite the absence of high-level supporting evidence. ◦ Optional interventions are identified by terms such as “can be considered” or “may be useful.” Interventions that the experts believe should be carried out are identified with terms such as “we recommend.” Vain et al, Lancet 2004;364;597-602 9 Intrapartum suctioning Infants were randomly allocated to either suctioning of the oropharynx and nasopharynx (including the hypopharynx) before delivery of the shoulders (suction group), or no suctioning (no-suction group). y 10-Fr to 13-Fr connected to a negative pressure of 150 mm Hg. Hg y Oropharyngeal suctioning was done first, followed by bilateral nasopharyngeal suctioning, when possible. y Thereafter, care was given according to NRP y ◦ tracheal suctioning for non-vigorous infants Vain et al, Lancet 2004;364;597-602 Vain et al, Lancet 2004;364;597-602 Intrapartum suctioning y y The primary outcome was incidence of MAS. Diagnosis of the syndrome was defined by (1) respiratory distress (tachypnea, retractions, or grunting) in a neonate born through MSAF; (2) need d ffor supplemental l l oxygen to maintain i i oxygen saturation levels at 92% or greater; (3) oxygen requirements starting during the first 2 h of life and lasting for 12 h or longer; and (4) absence of congenital malformation of the airway, lung, or heart. Vain et al, Lancet 2004;364;597-602 Vain et al, Lancet 2004;364;597-602 DeLee and tracheal suctioning y preventive approach ◦ thorough suctioning of nose and pharynx by OB after delivery of head but before thorax is delivered and the infant can take a breath ◦ if infant depressed Æ tracheal suctioning to remove residual mec Fanaroff and Martin 2002, Miller, Fanaroff and Martin Fanaroff and Martin 2002, Miller, Fanaroff and Martin 10 Tracheal Suctioning – NRP 2005 Traditional teaching recommended that meconiumstained infants have endotracheal intubation immediately following birth and that suction be applied to the endotracheal tube as it is withdrawn. y Randomized controlled trials have shown that this practice offers no benefit if the infant is vigorous (Class I). A vigorous infant is defined as one who has strong respiratory efforts, good muscle tone, and a heart rate 100 beats per minute (bpm). y Endotracheal suctioning for infants who are not vigorous should be performed immediately after birth (Class Indeterminate). y Circulation 2005 Circulation 2005 Tracheal suctioning y Linder et al – Israel – J Peds 1988 – n>500 ◦ no morbidity in infants with Apgar scores of 8 or higher at 1 minute who had been deLee suctioned y Wiswell et al Peds 2000;105:1-7 ◦ prospective RCT of vigorous infants with MSAF ◦ 2094 iinfants f t att 12 centers, t vigorous i bbaby b ◦ 149 (7.1%) of enrolled infants Æ resp distress x 62 (3%) dx with MAS x 87 (4.2%) other (TTN, delayed transition, sepsis, PPHN) ◦ no diff whether tracheally suctioned or not x MAS 3.2% intubated vs. 2.7% non-intubated ◦ no diff in other resp disorders Meconium Aspiration Syndrome Is Surfactant Lavage the Answer? John P. Kinsella, AJRCCM, 2003;168:4132003;168:413-4 commentary y method to enhance removal of particulate meconium from the airway using bronchoalveolar lavage with a dilute bovine surfactant preparation. y 2 week old piglets y They found that a 30-ml/kg lavage volume of dilute surfactant was associated with increased meconium removal, improved post-lavage lung function, and less lung injury as compared with perflourocarbon emulsion or multiple, smaller aliquots of dilute surfactant. Endotracheal intubation at birth for preventing morbidity and mortality in vigorous, meconium meconium-stained infants born at term Halliday, HL; Sweet, D; Cochrane review, 2000, 2005 4 RCTs y Meta-analysis of these trials does not support routine use of endotracheal intubation at birth in vigorous meconium-stained babies to reduce mortality, MAS, other resp symptoms / disorders, disorders PTX, PTX O2 need, need stridor, stridor HIE and convulsions. y Conclusions: Routine endotracheal intubation at birth in vigorous term meconium-stained babies has not been shown to be superior to routine resuscitation including oro-pharyngeal suction. y This procedure cannot be recommended for vigorous infants until more research is available. y y Dargaville, Morley et al, Melbourne, AJRCCM 2003; 168:456–463 controls perfluorocarbon y dilute surf lavage 11 dilute surf lavage Therapeutic lung lavage in meconium aspiration syndrome: A preliminary report perfluorocarbon y Dargaville, Morley et al (Australia) y Infants with severe MAS, HFOV Lavaged infants typically stablized but not improving, still on high FiO2 with an alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (AaDO2) of >400 mm Hg ◦ Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 43 (2007) 539–545 y ◦ Lavage not performed if arterial pH < 77.20, 20 sat < 75% 75%, or mean bp <35 mm Hg ◦ Lavage performed in sedated muscle-relaxed infants y y 1/5 dilution of Survanta, mixed gently in sterile NS and warmed to 37°C, delivered via catheter protruding approximately 0.5 cm below ETT Lavage aliquot volumes were increased through the case series, aiming to deliver two aliquots of 15 mL/kg 3-5 minutes apart Dargaville, Morley et al, Melbourne, AJRCCM 2003; 168:456–463 Surfactant lavage y 8 babies enrolled ◦ median age of 23 h (range 8–83 h) ◦ 88% nitric oxide, 3 on adrenalin infusion ◦ lavage was associated with significant desaturation but not bradycardia or hypotension y y 3 in “Therapeutic lavage group”Æ subgroup of infants who received at least 25mL/kg within 24h age 34 babies in non-lavaged group No lavage all lavaged infants P=0.03 repeated measures ANOVA “Tx” lavage ◦ Comparable, if anything, lavaged babies sicker Surfactant lavage efficacy deserves further investigation in a randomized controlled trial y About 10 prior human studies y RCT – Surfaxin ongoing ◦ y “lessMAS” y Lavage with Exogenous Surf Suspension in MAS ECMO usage iNO HFOV y surfactant y less post-term pregnancies Æ less ECMO y y Gelfand, J Fanaroff, Walsh, Clinics in Perinat 2004;31,445-452 12 Decreased Use of Neonatal Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): How New Treatment Modalities Have Affected ECMO Utilization 1993-4 1996-7 Patients were included if: y ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ *OI >15 x 1 within the first 72 hours of admission >35 weeks dx MAS, PPHN or sepsis/pneumonia <5 days of age on admission Pre-ECMO surfactant iNO 3 (6.1%) 0 18 (44.7%) *OI = FiO2 x MAP pO2 Hintz S et al, Pediatrics 2000;106:1339– 1343 Neonatal Respiratory ECMO Conrad SA et al, ASAIO Journal 2005;51:4-10 Hintz S et al, Pediatrics 2000;106:1339– 1343 Neonatal Respiratory ECMO Conrad SA et al, ASAIO Journal 2005;51:4-10 From the Departments of Pediatrics and Obstetrics/Gynecology, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland AFB,Texas Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:731–9 CONCLUSION: Reduction in post-term delivery was the most important factor in reducing meconium aspiration syndrome. Yoder et al, Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:731–9 13 Yoder et al, Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:731–9 Yoder et al, Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:731–9 Yoder et al, Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:731–9 Yoder et al, Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:731–9 Yoder et al, Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:731–9 Yoder et al, Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:731–9 14 Results y MASINT ◦ 1061of 2,490,862 live births (0.43 of 1000) ◦ decrease in incidence from 1995 to 2002 Pediatrics 2006;117;1712-1721 May 2006 Data were gathered on all of the infants in Australia and New Zealand who were intubated and mechanically ventilated with a primary diagnosis of MAS between 1995 and 2002, inclusive. Information on all of the live births during the same time period was obtained from perinatal data registries. y MASINT ◦ 34% > 40 weeks’ gestation ◦ 6.5% > 41 weeks’ gestation g y total birth population ◦ 16% > 40 weeks’ gestation ◦ 2.0% > 41 weeks’ gestation y y P < .001 in both cases Associated with MASINT: ◦ low 5-minute Apgar score ◦ maternal ethnicity Pacific Islander or indigenous Australian ◦ planned home birth MASINT = intubated for MAS Possible etiology of lower MASINT Compared with 1995, in 2002, there were fewer deliveries beyond 41 weeks’ gestation (1.6% vs 2.8%; P .001) and y fewer infants with a 5-minute Apgar score <7 7 (1.4% (1 4% vs 1.7%; 1 7% P .001). 001) y These factors combined account for 62% of the reduction in MAS incidence noted in this time period. y 15 Yoder et al, Ob Gyn, Gyn, March 2008 Is there a trade-off? Logistic regression Æ 5 factors independently related to resp morbidity: GA, C/S, male, FHR, low 5 min Apgar Change in GA distribution from 1990 to 1998 Yoder et al, Ob Gyn March 2008 Summary y y y y y y MSAF is often associated with in utero fetal distress and hypoxia. The pathophysiology of MAS includes airway obstruction, surfactant inactivation and a chemical pneumonitis leading to air trapping, atelectasis and PPHN. Standard therapy for MAS includes supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilation, surfactant, nitric oxide and ECMO. The use of ECMO for MAS-PPHN patients is decreasing due to the increased use of other therapies such as HFV, surfactant and iNO. Preventive measures such as amnioinfusion, intrapartum oroand naso-phayngeal suctioning, and tracheal suctioning are now controversial and no longer recommended as routine. The incidence of MAS is decreasing, primarily related to fewer post-mature infants and less intrapartum fetal distress. 16