pdf - The Militant
Transcription
pdf - The Militant
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiMiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiMintiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimiiiiimMiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiMiiiiiiiiKiiiiiiiiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiniiuiiiiiiniiiiiiiHiiiiimiiuiii THE MILITANT In Reply to Castro's A tta c k on "Trotskyism" Published in the Interest of the Working People — See page 4 — V o l. 30 - No. 5 M onday, J a n u a ry 31, 1966 P rice 10c D. A. Presents Case In Malcolm X Trial B y H e rm a n P o rte r N E W Y O R K , Jan. 25 — The tr ia l o f the three men accused of m u rd e rin g M alco lm X began w ith th e opening statem ent b y the pros ecution, presented to the ju r y on Jan. 21. V in ce n t J. D erm ody, the assistant d is tric t a tto rn e y in charge o f the prosecution, e x p la in ed th a t an opening statem ent in w h ic h the prosecutor states w h a t he expects to prove in the case is re q u ire d b y la w . A sum m ary of D erm ody’s statem ent fo llo w s: In 1952 M alco lm X became a m em ber o f the B la ck M uslim s, w h ic h was un d e r the leadership o f E lija h M uham m ad. M alco lm X be came a m in is te r and established Mosque No. 7 in H arlem . On Nov. 23, 1963 M a lco lm X was suspended fro m his duties as a m in is te r and rem ained suspended thereafter. In M a rch 1964 M alco lm X broke aw ay fro m the B la ck M uslim s and form ed his ow n organization. I t was kn o w n as the O rganization of A fro-A m erican U n ity and also as the M u s lim Mosque Incorporated, and had its headquarters at the H o te l Theresa. H e attracted m any people in c lu d in g B la ck M uslim s. He h e ld w e e kly rallies, in v a ria b ly at the A udubon B allroom . Describes Events On Feb. 21, 1965 a t about 3 p.m. M a lcolm X started to address an audience o f about 200 people at the A udubon. The three defen dants, a ll active mem bers o f the B lack M uslim s, w ere in the au d ito riu m . Talm adge H a ye r (also kno w n as Thomas H agan) and N orm an (3 X ) B u tle r w ere seated together, each w ith an autom atic pistol. Thomas (1 5X ) Johnson was seated alone, w ith a shotgun. B y a prearranged plan, H a ye r and B u tle r created a disturbance. H ayer shouted about B u tle r t r y ing to p ic k his pocket. A t th is p o in t Johnson approached the stage and fire d p o in t b la n k at M a lcolm X . In the confusion, H ayer and B u tle r rushed to w a rd the stage and each fire d shots in to the prone body o f M a lco lm X . Johnson dropped the shotgun on the flo o r and slipped away. H ayer and B u tle r w ere pursued b y sev- LBJ Steps Up Drive Against Viet Forces B y D ick Roberts M a lc o lm X eral people b u t B u tle r managed to escape. H a ye r was shot in the leg; he was caught and beaten. Police rescued him . A n autopsy showed th a t M a l colm X died o f pellets fro m a shotgun, and bullets fro m a .45 ca lib e r autom atic and a 9 m m autom atic. Police recovered the weapons and ballistics experts w ill te s tify th a t th e y w ere the ones used to k i l l M a lco lm X . B u tle r was arrested Feb. 25, 1965, and Johnson was arrested M arch 3. * * * The defense attorneys have the option o f also m a kin g an opening statement. O n ly P eter L . F. Sab batino, H a y e r’s la w y e r, chose to do so. In b rie f, Sabbatino said th a t he w o u ld show the fo llo w in g : H a ye r was arrested on Feb. 21 and held incom m unicado fo r al most three weeks. He was n o t a r raigned o r b ro u g h t in to a co u rt o f la w fo r several weeks. He was not allow ed to see an a tto rn e y o r (C ontinued on Page 3) JA N . 25 — In the m id st o f w h a t gives a ll appearances o f being a s p lit in the ru lin g class o ver how best to prosecute the w a r in South east Asia, one p o in t has emerged over w h ic h there is absolutely no disagreement in W ashington — to continue th e ir campaign to destroy the forces o f the N a tio n al L ib e ra tio n F ro n t o f south V ie tn a m in the shortest possible tim e, and to b u ild up an in v in c ib le stronghold o f U. S. m ilita r y bases. U n d e r the cover o f the so-called peace offensive, U. S. troops have been p o u rin g in to south V ietnam b y the thousands, b rin g in g the to ta l land forces to over 190,000. A t the same tim e, saturation bom bing o f the countryside has continued w ith o u t le t-u p , and plans are un d e rw a y to increase the num ber o f B -52’s, w h ic h have been fly in g fro m Guam to targets near Cambodia every day since the Christm as truce. Congress is about to pass a $4 b illio n supplem ental a p propria tions b ill to finance the w a r th ro u g h June. Defense Secretary M cN am ara announced on Jan. 17 th a t the Defense D epartm ent w o u ld seek a new increase o f 113,000 men in the strength o f the arm ed forces. This increase, over and above th a t sought last sum mer, w ill b rin g the to ta l m ilita ry strength up to 3,093,000 m ilita ry personnel and 1,093,000 civilia n s. M cN am ara’s request fo llo w e d by eig h t days the statem ent fro m the d ire c to r o f the Selective Service System, L t. Gen. L e w is B. H e rshey,. th a t plans fo r n e x t year’s d ra ft w o u ld p ro b a b ly n o t exceed those o f the K orean W ar. The highest d ra ft in 1965 was a lit tle over 40,000. The K orean W a r level registered m o n th ly d ra ft calls as h igh as 80,000. T he present designs o f W ashing ton in south V ie tn a m w ere sum med up in one sentence b y the U . S. M A R IN E stands guard on w om en, c h ild ren and o ld people in south V ie tn a m villag e. W ashington is escalating w a r against south Vietnam ese. C hairm an o f the J o in t Chiefs of S taff, G eneral E a rl G. Wheeler, te s tify in g before a congressional h earing Jan. 22: “ O u r objective out there,” W heeler stated, “ — and th is is G eneral W estm ore land’s strategy — is to defeat, to gether w ith the Vietnam ese fo r ces, the m a in -fo rce V ietcong units and the N o rth Vietnam ese forces th a t have been introduced.” The disagreement in W ashing ton, w h ich was b ro u g h t to a head Jan. 24 by Senator J.W . F u llb rig h t’s a tta ck on the a d m in istra tio n ’s V ie tna m policy, centers on the question o f w heth er to resume the bom bing o f n o rth V ietnam , and to appear to leave open the door fo r negotiations w ith H anoi, o r w he th e r to drop the w hole “ peace o f fensive” and re-escalate the w a r against n o rth V ie tnam im m ediate ly. There is no disagreem ent over the decision o f in d e fin ite occupa tio n and continued m ilita r y b u ild up in south V ietnam . Since Jan. 21, Johnson and his chie f appointees have been in the process o f easing o u t o f the “ peace offensive” w ith about the same am ount o f concern fo r tr u th th a t they displayed in opening th e o f fensive a m outh ago — none w h a t soever. The P resident h im se lf set the tone o f th e propaganda he wants to see used in a n o t too (Continued on Page 2) Answer to the " Peace Offensive" — Bring the GI’s Home! B y F re d Halstead One effe ct o f the so-called “ peace offensive” has been the spreading o f the illu s io n th a t the U. S. escalation o f the w a r has been ha lted a t least te m p o ra rily by the suspension o f the bom bing in n o rth V ietnam . B u t th is is an e n tire ly false illu sio n . Suspension o f the re g u la r bom b in g o f n o rth V ie tn a m is n o t the same as de-escalation o f the w ar. I t is nothing m ore than suspension o f the bom bing o f n o rth V ietnam . F o r th e a n tiw a r m ovem ent in the U. S. to adopt an a ttitu d e o f assuming th a t unless and u n til the bom bing o f n o rth V ie tn a m re sumes, the escalation o f the w a r has n o t resumed, w o u ld be dan gerous fo lly . The unassailable facts are th a t under the cover o f a smokescreen propaganda campaign about “ negotiations,” the U. S. has proceeded w ith a gigantic escala tio n w h ich already has 190,000 U. S. troops in south V ie tn a m and the preparations proceeding fo r sending 113,000 more. In spite o f these facts, there has been som ething o f a l u ll in the a ctivitie s o f the a n tiw a r m ove m ent w ith in the U . S., due in p a rt a t least to a w a it-and-see a ttitu d e to w a rd the so-called “ peace o f fensive.” A w idespread m ix tu re o f suspicion and hope has pre va ile d w ith in the ranks o f th e a n tiw a r m ovem ent in th is co u n try since Christmas. In th is s itu a tio n i t is the clear d u ty o f the a n tiw a r movem ent, and especially o f its p ro m in e n t spokesmen and leaders, to expose the falseness .of these hopes by te llin g the tr u th about the escala tio n in the south, and to prepare the m ovem ent to escalate its ow n a ctivitie s in the most effe ctive pos sible way. C le a rly the most e ffe ctive an sw er to the c u rre n t escalation is the demand to b rin g the troops home fro m V ie tn a m now. F o r th is sim ple, easily understood, and broadly p o p u la r demand hits, the central problem rig h t on the head. No am ount o f tw is tin g b y th e w a rmakers can get around i t th e w a y th e y get around the demand fo r “ negotiations” and even tu rn i t to th e ir ow n advantage. I t is also clear th a t as long as U. S. troops re m a in in V ie tn a m the self-determ ination o f the V ie t namese people is being violated. No am ount o f d o u b le ta lk b y John son, Rusk, etc. w ill change th a t fact. Even those w ith in the U.S. pow er stru ctu re w ho advocate, a m ore “ moderate” course in V ie t nam m a in ta in — along w ith Johnson — th a t U. S. troops must rem ain in south V ie tn a m u n til a governm ent acceptable to the U.S. is fir m ly established there. The e d ito ria l in the Jan. 23 New York Times, fo r example, speaks of “ achieving a representative adm in is tra tio n in Saigon p rio r to A m e ri can w ith d ra w a l.” T h a t is, a gov e rnm ent determ ined b y the pres ence o f U. S. troops and represen ta tiv e o f U. S. interests. There are no end o f commen tators and advisers these days p o in tin g o u t th a t on the face o f it, the statements b y W ashington and H anoi and even the south V ie t namese N a tio n al L ib e ra tio n F ront, are not v e ry fa r apart. T hey a ll say they are fo r “ self-determ ina tio n ,” fo r the Geneva agreements, etc. B u t a w o rld of differe nce re m ains: fo r the Vietnamese self-de te rm in a tio n means the w ith d ra w a l o f fo re ig n troops, and fo r the U. S. governm ent “ self-determ ination” means leaving the U . S. troops there. I t is in this context th a t the re p o rt b y Staughton L y n d and Thomas Hayden on th e ir recent tr ip to H anoi should be viewed. As published in the Ja n u a ry is sue o f V iet Report, i t says: “ On the one hand, as w e w ere to ld over and over again, the N L F and D R V [D em ocratic R epublic o f V ie tn a m ] req uire, as a precon d itio n to negotiations, an unam biguous decision b y the U nite d States to w ith d ra w a ll its troops fro m V ietnam . On th e oth e r hand, they w o u ld seem to be prepared to leave the U nited States consider able freedom in choosing how to dem onstrate b y concrete steps th a t th is decision has been made. E v e ry in d ic a tio n is th a t there is no e x p lic it requirem e nt o f the ph ysi cal w ith d ra w a l o f a ll U n ite d States troops p rio r to negotiations.” A ssum ing th a t L y n d and Hayden have here co rre ctly sensed the Vietnamese position does this mean th a t the a n tiw a r m ovem ent in the U. S. should re fra in fro m dem anding the im m ediate w ith d ra w a l o f U. S. troops? A b so lu te ly not. The Vietnamese m ay feel i t necessary to seek an end to the fig h tin g u nd er con ditions w h ich are short o f f u ll (Continued on Page 2) T H E M IL IT A N T Page Two Monday, January 31, 1966 ... Drive to Crush Vietnamese 400 subway m otorm en w ere the f ir s t members o f the T ra n sp o rt W orkers U nion to hear a re p o rt on the contract s till being negotiated w ith the N ew Y o rk C ity T ra n s it A u th o rity . A lth o u g h the N ew Y o rk tra n s it s trik e is o ver the T W U and the T A are s till negotiating on how to d ivid e the m oney “ package” agreed to. O th e r tra n s it w orkers w ill p ro b a b ly receive s im ila r b rie fin g s at separate meetings instead o f hav in g the e n tire contract aired at a general m em bership meeting. F o llo w in g these b rie fin g s at w h ic h no votes are taken, tra n s it w o rkers w ill vote on the contract v ia a m a il b allot. * “I n a ve ry * * fo rth rig h t fashion, the 400 delegates to the recent B.C. [B ritis h C o lum bia] Federa tio n o f La b o r convention took issue w ith the top o ffic ia ls o f the A F L -C IO fo r th e ir support o f the P resident Johnson p o lic y in V ie t nam and the D om inican R epublic. “ In the resolution w h ic h passed unanim ously, th ey urged the E x ecutive C ouncil o f the CLC [C a nadian L a b o r Congress] to use th e ir in flu e nce to dissuade the A m erican leadership o f the A F L C IO fro m co n tin u in g th e ir dan gerous anti-social position. T hey also proposed th a t a ll differences between countries be re fe rre d to the U n ite d N ations and con demned the use o f u n ila te ra l force and u n ila te ra l in te rv e n tio n in the a f f a i r e o f independent nations.” Quoted fro m Dec.-Jan. On The Level, m o n th ly paper o f V an couver, B.C. Local 452 Carpenters U n io n and Local 1928 M illw o rk e rs U nion. * A grow ing * * labor shortage re s u ltin g fro m increased w a r pro duction and stepped up d ra ft calls Weekly Calendar A D RATES The r«t» for advertising in this col umn is 40 cants a line. Display ads are $2 a column inch. There is a ten^ per cent discount for regular advertisers. Advertising must reach us by th e M on day prior to the date of publication. C H IC A G O IM M E D IA T E W IT H D R A W A L VS. NE G O T IA T IO N S . A socialist view o f the debate in the antiwar movement. Lew Jones, national committee member, Young Socialist Alliance. Friday, Feb. 4, 8 p.m., Debs Hall, Rm. 204, 302 S. Canal. Ausp. Friday N igh t Socialist Forum. • DETROIT TH E DETROIT S C H O O L S . Panel dis cussion: Gwendolyn M allett, M ary Ellen Riordan, Evelyn Sell. Fri., Feb. 4, 8 p.m. Debs H all, 3737 W oodward. Ausp. Fri day N igh t Socialist Forum. • LOS ANGELES THE W R ETC HE D O F THE EARTH: How th e People of the Colonial W orld Live and W h y They Must Revolt. Based on the book by Franz Fanon. Speaker: Theodore Edwards, KPFK socialist com mentator. Fri., Feb. 4, 8:30 p.m., 1702 E. 4th St. Ausp. M ilitan t Labor Forum. is the topic o f research b y the n e w ly created fe d e ra l M anpow er Requirem ents Com m ittee. In a p ilo t study o f M ilw aukee, Wis., i t noted th a t the “ n o rm a l” s k ille d la b o r force had been exhausted and th a t u n skille d service w o rk ers w o u ld have to be b ro u g h t in to s k ille d jobs. Im p lic it in the re p o rt was the fe a r th a t th is change in jobs w o u ld generate increasing pres sure fo r wage increases. Despite th is increasing shortage, the U.S. L a b o r D epartm ent re ports th a t unem ploym ent in Negro com m unities such as W atts, H a r lem , and West O akland is “ dan gerously hig h .” * * * 10,695 charges o f u n fa ir labor practices w e re file d w ith the Na tio n a l L a b o r Relations B oard last year. The N L R B says m ore 'th a n 70 percent o f the charges i t han dles in v o lv e ille g a l fir in g o f w o rk ers engaged in u n io n organizing campaigns. A ccording to the Jan. 19 W all Street Journal, th is is an in d ica tio n o f g ro w in g company cam paigns to keep unions o u t o f th e ir plants. One o f the p riv a te organi zations used b y the bosses in th e ir anti-union campaigns is the A m e ri can Association of In d u s tria l Management. Included in its dis cussion meetings are ways “ to com bat union organizing drives.” Attendance a t these m eetings by com pany executives has risen to 1,000 compared to some 400 in 1963. The Journal reported on the successful e ffo rts o f the C arpenter Steel Co. to defeat an organizing campaign b y the U n ite d Steel W orkers in Reading, Pa. In the tw o days p rio r to the election, the com pany president gave seven anti-union speeches at d iffe re n t p la n t locations. “ In a d d itio n ,” said the Journal, “ the p la n t’s 2,000-odd w o rke rs w ere bombarded w ith letters, b u lle tin board messages and posters alleging a ll the ad vantages o f non-unionism .” A n o th e r anti-union g im m ic k used b y the Consolidated A lu m in u m Co., Jackson. Tenn., was a phonograph record o f a p la n t manager’s voice w h ic h was dis trib u te d to w orkers fo r p la y in g in the home. I t w arned w o rke rs not to gam ble th e ir fu tu re on the unions and give up “ o u r freedom fo r the co n tro l o f un io n bosses.” (Continued from Page 1) c a re fu lly phrased re m a rk to re porters w h ile cru isin g to In d e pendence, Mo., in the P residential a irp la n e Jan. 21. “ I th in k every schoolboy knows th a t peace is not u n ila te ra l,” Johnson to ld the reporters aboard the plane. “ I t takes m ore than one to sign an agreement. I t seems clear to a ll th a t w h a t is h o ld in g up peace in the w o rld today is not the U n ite d States,” the P resi dent continued. “ W hat is holding back the peace is the m istaken v ie w on the p a rt o f the aggressors th a t w e are going to g ive up o u r principles, th a t we m ay y ie ld to pressure, o r abandon o u r allies, o r fin a lly get tire d and get out.” One th in g you have to a d m it about Johnson’s grade-school in te rp re ta tio n o f the w a r is th a t there’s n o th in g ambiguous about it. F irs t, you see, there’s the U nited States in V ie tn a m and then there’s the aggressor (H a n o i); second, any agreem ent th a t the U. S. makes m ust be between i t and the ag gressor; and th ird , the U. S. is go in g to stay p u t in V ie tn a m no m a tte r w h a t the aggressor hopes or thinks. Spelled O u t Just in case anyone missed the point, however, Secretary o f State Dean Rusk spelled i t o u t a lit tle more d ip lo m a tic a lly in a W ash in g to n news conference about the same tim e Johnson was headed to M isso u ri to pay trib u te to his o ld bu d d y H iro sh im a H a rry . Rusk opened the news conference by stating th a t there had been no response fro m H anoi to the 29-day “ peace” campaign. Reporters pointed o u t th a t the U N Secretary General, U Thant, had indicated th a t i f the U. S. w o u ld make a concrete proposal a llo w in g the N ational L ib e ra tio n F ro n t a place in the postw ar gov ernm ent o f south V ietnam , i t w o u ld lead to actual negotiations. Rush re plied: Double T a lk Local 301, In te rn a tio n a l U nion of E le c tric a l W orkers w e n t on s trik e against the G eneral E le ctric Co. in Schenectady, N.Y., on Jan. 20. The s trik e rs w ere protesting against p oor w o rk in g conditions and the suspension o f tw o w o rk ers b y the company la st Novem ber. “ W ell, I th in k th a t o u r v ie w is th a t the governm ent o f south V ie t nam is a m a tte r w h ic h should be determ ined by the people o f south V ie tn a m themselves. We, o u r selves, have supported and con tin u e d to support the idea o f free elections in w h ic h the south V ie t namese people can m ake these de cisions ra th e r than have these de cisions made fo r them by im p o s itio n fro m the outside. W h a t is needed here is a proposal fro m H anoi . . .” H o w Rusk’s and Johnson’s fla g ra n t d is to rtio n o f the facts is supposed to square aw ay w ith the detailed sum m ary o f the situ a tio n in V ie tn a m in the M ansfield Re port, is anybody’s guess. A ccording to M a n sfie ld ’s statement, w h ic h was the re s u lt o f an extended stu d y b y the Senate Foreign Re lations C om m ittee, the present force o f the People’s A rm y o f n o rth V ietnam in the south is 14,000. . The to ta l strength o f the Saigon ____________ EAST COAST EAST COAST_____________ * M o re than * * 10,000 members o f SOCIALIST EDUCATIONAL WEEKEND FEBRUARY 5-6 In N ew York • N E W YORK B IO L O G IC A L A N D C H E M I C A L W A R FA R E RESEARCH a t the University o f Pennsylvania. Reporter: Robin Martin, of the Philadelphia Area C om m ittee to End the W a r in Vietnam. Fri., Feb. 4, 8:30 p.m. 873 Broadway (a t 18th S t.). Contrib. $1, students 50c. Ausp. M ilitant Labor Forum. * * * Save the Fridays of Feb. I Ith 4 18th fo r Memorial Meetings for Malcolm X. Speakers: G eorge Breitman, Clifton De Berry, Robert Vernon and Tapes o f M a l colm X. • T W IN CITIES IN D IA — LA N D O F F A M IN E . Speak er: Charles Scheer. Fri., Feb. 4, 8:30 p.m. 704 Hennepin Ave., Rm. 240 Ausp. Friday N ig h t Socialist Forum. SPEAKERS: GEORGE NOVACK Author of Origins of Materialism, on "SOCIALISM: ITS PROBLEMS A N D PERSPECTIVES" HERMAN PORTER Staff writer, The Militant, on "IM PACT OF VIETNAM W A R O N THE U.S. EC O N O M Y" JACK BARNES National Chairman Young Socialist Alliance, on " W H IC H W A Y FOR TODAY'S RADICAL YOUTH?" Registration at 10 a.m. at 873 Broadway (a t 18th St.) For further information: YSA, P.O. Box 471, Cooper Sta., New York, N. Y. 10003. Phone 982-6051 or YSA in your area. No Recruits In Danang A re a E x p la in in g to New Y o rk H erald Tribune correspond ent B e v e rly D eepe w h y U.S. forces are bottled up in the D anan g area, a U.S. o ffic ia l said: “T h e biggest headache is th a t w e can’t m ove our V ietn am ese troops and c a d re ' out of this 20 -sq u are-kilo m eter collection of ham lets u n til w e have villag ers here w ho can defend th e area. T h e re ’s not one young m an here betw een the ages of ten and 36 w h o m w e can re c ru it.” A rm y is over 600,000, and th a t o f the U. S. forces, in c lu d in g th e o ff shore N avy, over 200,000. T h at comes to 800,000 troops against 14,000 “ aggressors” — 800,000 troops w h ich have been supported by n a v a l-a rtille ry bom bardm ent o f coastal areas and by saturation bom bing o f the in te rio r on a scale never before kn o w n in w ar. There is som ething phony about th is a r gument, and one guesses th a t “ even a school boy” could fig u re i t out. The fa c t o f the m a tte r is th a t Johnson has no in tentions o f ad m ittin g the tr u th about the w ar, nam ely th a t i t is a w a r p rim a rily against the N LF , w h ic h its e lf is supported b y the vast m a jo rity o f the south Vietnamese people. The “ people o f south V ie tn a m ’’ w hom Johnson and Rusk are re fe rrin g to w hen they speak o f “ selfd e term in ation ” and “ free elec tions” are the tin y m in o rity of c o rru p t land lords and m ilita ry cliques w ho ru le Saigon — pres e n tly headed b y a fascist a ir m a rsha ll named Nguyen Cao K y. A w eek ago K y a ll b u t a d m it ted th a t his governm ent w ould collapse i f the U. S. w ith d re w sup port, w hen K y launched a v ir u le n t a ttack on the “ peace o ffe n sive.” Rush — the same man quoted above — made an em er gency tr ip to Saigon to assure K y th a t no m a tte r w h a t happens, the U. S. w ill continue to support his governm ent. A nd on th is point, there’s no disagreement between the W ashington policy-m akers. The M ansfield R eport stated, “ Despite the great increase in A m erican m ilita r y com m itm ent, it is d o u b tfu l in vie w o f the accelera tio n o f V ietcong e ffo rts th a t the constricted position now held in V ietnam b y the Saigon govern m ent can continue to be held fo r the in d e fin ite futTtre, le t alone extended, w ith o u t a fu rth e r aug m entation o f A m erican forces on the ground.” W here M ansfield and F u lb rig h t disagree on V ietn am p o licy w ith the view s expressed by Johnson and Rusk is on the question o f how long to m a in ta in the peace offensive and how to go about it. H ig h ly conscious o f the over w h e lm in g opposition to the V ie t namese w a r b y the masses o f peo ple a ll over the w o rld , M ansfield and F u lb rig h t feel th a t i t is' nec essary fo r the Johnson adm inis tra tio n to m ake some sort o f con cession tow ards peace, a t least b y no t resum ing the bom bing o f n o rth V ietnam . T hey are w e ll aw are o f the hyp o critic a l stance o f the “ peace o f fensive” and have urged Johnson to m ake approaches to the N L F itself. T h e ir concern w ith p u b lic op inion is p ro b a b ly heightened by the feeling expressed in the M ans fie ld R eport th a t any force re a lly capable o f crushing th e N L F w ill in v o lv e a gigantic escalation o f troop com m itm ent, an escalation w hich w o u ld no doubt reinforce the a n tiw a r feelings o f the A m e ri can people as d ra ft calls cu t deep er and deeper in to the ranks o f young men. No W o rd on South W h ile leaning tow ards an e x tension o f the “ peace offensive” fo r these reasons, however, th is group o f Democrats has not said one single w o rd against the con tin u a tio n o f the w a r in south V ie t nam. They fa v o r in d e fin ite U . S. occupation o f th is country, and they w ill go along w ith such re in forcements o f ground troops as th e Pentagon feels is necessary to m ainta in U. S. bases. T his m ilita r y occupation w ill guarantee th a t a p ro -U . S. d icta torship can be m aintained in Sai gon, and w ith o u t saying so, they know th a t i t w ou ld give U. S.Saigon forces tim e to roundup a ll supporters o f the N L F and e ith e r m u rd e r them o r th ro w them in prisons. T h is was the course fo l lowed by the U. S.-backed South K orean d ictatorship d u rin g the heavy U. S. m ilita r y occupation o f th a t co u n try a fte r the Korean W ar. The advantages to W ashington o f voicin g a t least p a rt o f th is debate in p u b lic are obvious. They hope i t w ill sid e -tra ck some of the c ritic is m o f the Democrats’ fa ilu re to te ll the tru th about V ie t nam. ... Bring Troops Home (C ontinued fro m Page 1) sovereignty — as the y d id in the o rig in a l Geneva agreements. T h a t is up to them since i t is th ey w ho are un der the napalm . B u t i t is another m a tte r fo r A m erican c iti zens in the a n tiw a r movem ent in th is co u n try to give any credence whatsoever to the claim s by the U. S. governm ent th a t i t has any rig h t to negotiate a n yth in g about the fu tu re o f V ietnam . E q u a lly im p o rta n t is the fa c t th a t the d u ty o f the A m erican a n tiw a r movem ent is to be as ef fe ctive an in stru m e n t fo r b rin g in g massive pressure against U. S. in volvem ent in the w a r as possible. The decisions o f the movem ent should be made on th is crite rio n , and not on the c rite rio n o f w h a t the diplo m a tic m aneuvering o f the m om ent m ay be. A ll wars, o f course, end in some sort of negotiations, and in th a t sense no one is opposed to negotiations as such. B u t i t is im p o rta n t to note th a t the effective ness o f the a n tiw a r m ovem ent — to be an im p o rta n t fa cto r in ending the w a r — does not depend on its a b ility to advise the a dm inistra tio n as to w h a t face-saving devices m ay exist in this or th a t d ip lo m a tic m ove or negotiations p ro cedure. Its effectiveness depends on its a b ility to appeal to masses o f A m ericans to oppose the w ar, and to create an objective fa ct o f massive opposition w h ic h can help force a decision fo r U. S. w ith d ra w a l. There are those w ith in the peace m ovem ent in th is co u n try, how ever, w ho are bending e very ef fo r t to have the m ovem ent devote its energies to “ g a ining the ear” o f the a dm in istra tio n , to concen tra tin g on appealing to the lib e ra l po liticia n s to come o u t a lit tle m ore b o ld ly fo r “ negotiations.” These elements — and they include the C om m ittee fo r a Sane N uclear P o licy and the C om m unist P a rty — have been invo lve d in a de term ined cam paign to muzzle the demand fo r im m ediate w ith d ra w a l o f U. S. troops w ith in the move ment, on the grounds th a t this de mand is too “ ra d ica l.” W hat they re a lly mean is th a t the demand fo r im m ediate w ith d ra w a l is too unequivocal to be ac cepted b y the lib e ra l c a p ita list po l iticia n s w ho w a n t to have th e ir cake and eat i t too, w ho w a n t to pretend to be sym pathetic w ith the a n tiw a r m ovem ent w h ile they are supp orting the w ar. F o r the movem ent to ta ilo r its demands to those lib e ra l po liticia n s w o u ld be to become tr u ly irre le va n t. ... Malcolm X (Continued fro m Page 1) any m em ber o f his fa m ily d u rin g th a t tim e. H a ye r denies categorically that he was a m em ber o f the M u s lim m ovem ent, said Sabbatino. He w e n t to the A udubon B a llro o m alone and out o f cu rio sity. The person w ho shot h im , Sabbatino said, had a c r i m i n a l record and w o u ld n a tu ra lly seek to claim in self-defense th a t H aye r shot M a lco lm X . The id e n tific a tio n of H a yer as one o f the assassins was b y a mob, he concluded. Testim ony o f the fir s t im p o rta n t eyewitness, C ary Thomas, began th e same day, a fte r a presentation o f diagram s o f the b u ild in g and a u d ito riu m in w h ic h the shooting to ok place. Cross-examination of Thomas is n o t ye t com pleted a fte r his th ird day on the w itness stand. In response to D erm od y’s ques tions, Thomas te s tifie d th a t he had witnessed the m u rd e r and seen i t u n fo ld ju s t as D erm ody’s opening statem ent said i t had. Thomas said he knew the three defendants to be M uslim s and had seen each of th e m several tim es in H a rle m ’s Mosque No. 7. Thomas to ld the fo llo w in g story: he had se'en Johnson s ittin g at the back o f the b a llro o m w hen he a r riv e d at about 2:20 p.m. on Feb. 21. H e w e n t over to Reuben F ra n cis a fte r he saw Johnson. W hen M a lcolm X began to address the audience Thomas was seated in a booth on the le ft side o f the chairs w h ic h faced the stage. H a ye r rose fro m his ch a ir d ire c tly in fro n t o f w here Thomas was sittin g . H a ye r said: “ M an w h a t are you doing w ith y o u r hands in m y poc k e t,” to B u tle r w ho was seated n e x t to H ayer. H a ye r had an au tom atic pisto l in his hand. He tu rn e d and faced Thomas d ire c tly . Then there was a gunshot and Thomas saw a m an standing near M alco lm X facing the stage. The m an tu rn e d around and Thomas saw i t w a s ' Johnson h o ld in g a sawed-off shotgun. A fte r that, H a ye r and B u tle r ra n to w a rd the stage. Thomas saw them both a t the stage w ith th e ir backs to w a rd him . Each was m a k in g the same p um p in g m otion w ith his hand, as i f fir in g a gun. T hough he had never a ctu a lly seen a gun in B u tle r’s hand, he saw “ shells being ejected fro m the p istol fa llin g on the flo o r.” * * * C ary Thomas has stuck to this s to ry th rough a ll the cross-exam in a tio n so fa r. Though he is dog gedly certain about his observation o f these events and his m em ory o f them, his know ledge o f the other' circumstances surrounding the assassination is e xtre m e ly fa u lty and his m em ory o f almost e v e ryth in g else connected w ith the case about w hich he was ques tioned is outrageously bad. Thomas described his back ground under questioning b y the defense: He has also been know n as A b d u l M a lik and C ary 2X. He is 35, m arried, w ith fo u r children, b u t had not seen his w ife d u rin g the tw o years before the assassina tion. He has owned a t least one gun ever since he was 15 and u su a lly c a rrie d one on his person. He had one w ith h im at the Audubon b u t d id n o t use i t then. He was in the a rm y fro m 1947 to 1953 and was co urtm artialed some 10 times, sometijnes fo r serious crimes lik e possession o f a pistol w ith in te n t to do b o d ily harm . He was given an a d m in istra tive discharge fo r bad conduct. He was a user o f he ro in fo r three years, and a pusher. H e was convicted o f possession o f narco tics in 1961 in Boston. The tw o year sentence was suspended and M alcolm X Speaks O u r re g u la r featu re , e x cerpts fro m the book M a l c o lm X S peaks, was not ru n this issue because o f space problem s. W e w i ll resume this fe a tu re n ext w eek. Page Three T H E M IL IT A N T M onday, January 31, 1966 U.S. PRESS SILEN T Trial he was placed on probation. Thomas said th a t he jo in e d the B la ck M uslim s. He te s tifie d firs t th a t he joined o ffic ia lly and re ceived his X fro m Chicago in December 1963, and le ft in No vem ber 1964. L a te r he 'said he d id n ’t re ca ll the date he joined. A t another tim e he te s tifie d th a t he had never been in Mosque No. 7, w here he was a m em ber, a fte r N ovem ber 1963. He te stifie d th a t he couldn’t re m em ber w h e th e r M alcolm X was the m in is te r w hen he joined. There w ere several m inisters he said, b u t he couldn’t rem em ber the names o f any o f them . One tim e he said he attended m eetings fo r about one year before he joined. A n o th e r tim e he stated th a t he’d been going fo r tw o years. Thomas declared th a t he le ft the B la ck M uslim s w hen M a lco lm X did. He said he was a mem ber o f M a lco lm ’s organization fo r about a year. (M a lco lm X was k ille d n o t qu ite one year a fte r he broke w ith E lija h M uham m ad.) B u t Thomas never discovered th a t M alcolm form ed tw o organizations — one religious, the M u s lim Mos que Inc., and one non-religious b u t dedicated to w in n in g “ free dom, justice ■and e q u a lity ” fo r b lack people in A m erica, the O r ganization o f A fro -A m e rica n U n ity . H e s till th in k s they are the same organization — th a t the O A A U was p a rtly religious — even though M a lco lm X made the dis tin c tio n repeatedly. The O A A U was n o t form e d u n til m any m onths a fte r the M u slim Mosque, w h ic h was an orthodox Is la m ic organiza tion. P ecu liar M u slim Though Thomas claim ed to be a m em ber o f the B lack M uslim s, his testim ony showed he d id n ’t act lik e one. He rem ained separ ated fro m his w ife and c h ild re n d u rin g the e n tire period, even though the M uslim s place stress on the im portance o f fa m ily life . He te s tifie d he was sent to B ellevue H o sp ita l (w h ic h is often used fo r p sych ia tric observation) because he was d ru n k . T h is in c id e n t oc c u rre d in 1963 a fte r he supposedly jo in e d the M uslim s. M uslim s have a s tric t taboo against alcohol. The m ost im p o rta n t contradic tio n in Thomas’ testim ony reveal ed so fa r involves a reversal o f the role o f the defendants in his story. A ccording to records read a t the tria l, Thomas te s tifie d be fo re the grand ju r y on M arch 3, 1965, th a t Johnson and B u tle r, not H a ye r and B u tle r, rushed to w a rd the stage a fte r the shotgun blast. Thomas claim s th a t th is was a s lip made because he was nervous and in fe a r o f his life . A t the tim e o f the assassination, the police to ld the press th a t Hayer was the one w ho had fire d the shotgun. W hen th e y changed th e ir m inds is not clear. In his testim ony before the grand ju ry , Thomas id e n tifie d H a ye r as a m em ber o f the Jersey C ity mosque. U nder cross-exam in a tio n he revealed th a t the o n ly basis fo r th is was th a t he had seen H a ye r w ith members o f the Jersey C ity mosque several times. He could not re ca ll the dates, even ap p ro xim a te ly, w hen he had seen any o f the three defendants in the H a rle m mosque, though he claim ed to have seen each o f them several times. Thomas was picked up on M arch 2, 1965, and held by police as a m a te ria l w itness in a c iv il ja il. W h ile in the c iv il ja il he was in dicted fo r arson and tra n sfe rre d on June 4 to a re g u la r prison in Queens. \ How Cuba Uprooted Race Discrimination B y H a r r y R ing 16 pages 15 cents M e r it Publishers 5 East T h ird St. N e w Y o r k , N . Y . 10003 Blood Bath in Indonesia B y F red H alstead Since la st October the Indonesian a rm y and rig h t-w in g te rro rists have perpetrated one o f the w o rst peace-time fra tric id a l blood baths in h is to ry . I t is com parable — though on a la rg e r scale — to the reprisals taken b y the French capitalists against the P aris w o rk in g class fo llo w in g the P aris Com m une in 1871. “ M ore than 100,000 Communists and th e ir sym pathizers have been k ille d in Indonesia in the last three months, according to in fo r m ation available here,” reported A n th o n y L e w is fro m London in the Jan. 13 New Y ork Times. The Sunday Times o f London on Jan. 2 said th a t “ fig u re s given o f the nu m b e r k ille d v a ry betw een 20,000 and 200,000 b u t f a ir ly conser va tiv e estimates b y W estern d ip lo mats p u t the figures a t around 100,000.” The London re p o rt continues: “ European engineers, businessmen and oth e r fo re ig n tra ve le rs re tu rn in g fro m up-country speak o f riv e rs fille d w ith flo a tin g decapi tated corpses . . . I t is re lia b ly re ported th a t on the island o f B a li alone between 3,000 and 4,000 were k ille d in the past ten days . . . There is no sign at present th a t the a rm y intends to take over fo rm a lly , though in practice its w r it runs n o m in a lly everyw here outside o f Jakarta. In Sum atra there is in e ffe ct a m ilita r y state w ith in a state.” Indonesian P resident Sukarno a dm itted Jan. 15 th a t 87,000 per sons w ere know n to have been k ille d since Oct. 1 in the chain o f islands th a t m ake up the coun try , alm ost a ll o f them members o r sym pathizers o f the Indonesian C om m unist P a rty (P K I) o r o f mass organizations a ffilia te d w ith it. S ukarno said the death to ll “ was bigger than th a t in the cu r re n t V ie tn a m w a r.” On the basis o f these figures the te rro r in Indonesia constitutes the w o rst o rgy o f counterrevolu tio n a ry p o litic a l m urders any w here in the w o rld since H itle r. A ll th is b lo o d le ttin g against c iv il ians has taken place w ith o u t the slightest protest fro m the govern ments o r the press in the ca p ita list w o rld , in c lu d in g the U nited States. This is in sharp contrast to the o u tp o u rin g o f o ffic ia l statements, headlines and e d ito ria ls protesting the execution o f a mere 500 con victed m urderers and to rtu re rs by the re v o lu tio n a ry Cuban regim e in 1960. Distinct G ain On the co n tra ry, the New York Times comments th a t the In d o nesian developments are view ed in W ashington as a d is tin c t gain fo r U.S. foreign policy. The w ave o f c o u n te rre vo lu tio n a ry te rro r was begun b y the a rm y a fte r an unsuccessful coup on Sept. 30 b y a fe w so-called le ftw in g officers headed b y L t. Col. U ntung, in w h ich six rig h t-w in g generals and a sm all num ber o f o ther persons w ere k ille d . The a rm y h ie ra rch y responded w ith a coup o f its own, ta k in g pow er in fact, i f n o t fo rm a lly , th roughout most o f the country, and d e live r in g a devastating b lo w to the P K I. The P K I was the largest single p a rty in the country, the largest C om m unist P a rty in the ca p ita list countries, and held posts w ith in S u k a rin ’s co a litio n governm ent. The P K I was aligned w ith P ek ing, and its leaders had operated un d e r the lin e o f “ re v o lu tio n b y stages.” F o llo w in g th is p o licy, th e y form ed coalitions and blocs w ith the “ n a tio n a l bourgeoisie” and re strained the w o rke rs and peasants fro m proceeding w ith re v o lu tio n a ry measures th a t w o u ld be ob jected to b y the n a tive capitalists and landlords. Each tim e the masses surged fo rw a rd , the P K I leadership sought to channel the struggle against the single target o f fo re ig n im p e ria lism . Since the Sukarno governm ent m aintained frie n d ly relations w ith C hina and M ao Tse T un g s tru c k a generally a n ti-im p e ria list pose in in te rn a tio n a l relations, the P K I leadership supported it, took re s p o n sib ility fo r its actions, and avoided pressing the class strug gle in te rn a lly w ith in Indonesia fo r fe a r o f breaking up th e coalition. This lin e was described last A p r il b y P K I C hairm an D. N. A id it in an in te rv ie w w ith W ilfre d G. B u rc h e tt reported in the Dec. 18 National Guardian. B u rch e tt asked A id it about the P K I’s posi tio n on land reform , and A id it re plied: “ T h a t is a big question. We con sider the tw o m ain tasks o f our period: the struggle against im p e ria lism and th a t against feud al ism. P rio rity is fo r the struggle against im perialism . T his means not o n ly the te r rito ria l aspects of im p e rialism , b u t also the struggle against its economic bases inside the country. The governm ent, o f w h ic h we are a p art, is u n ite d on th is aspect, those w ho are against i t do n o t dare to oppose i t openly in any case. T his is the p o in t on w h ic h m a xim u m u n ity is possible. To place too m uch emphasis on the anti-feu dalist struggle w ould weaken this u n ity w ith in the coali tio n governm ent. “ The governm ent is lik e a twola y e r cake w ith progressive and reactionary forces co-existing, b u t sometimes one la y e r or top, some tim es the other. The reactionary forces are s till v e ry strong and active; b u t the rela tio nsh ip is changing in fa v o r o f the progres sive forces. Even so, i f i t had been le ft to p a rlia m e n ta ry debate and cabinet decisions, w e w ould never have been able to c a rry out the three great waves of e xp ro p ria tio n o f im p e ria lis t p ro p e rty . . . These w ere genuine mass actions; the people moved and ju s t took over the im p e ria lists’ property, facing the governm ent w ith a fa it ac com pli w h ich was then confirm ed b y p residential decrees. T his could have been done — and ou r p a rty and its a ffilia te d organizations played a leading ro le — because i t fe ll w ith in the fra m e w o rk o f the p rio rity task o f a n ti-im p e ria l ism . . . “ To have carried out the antifeudal struggle in a s im ila r w ay w o u ld have been ina p pro p ria te i f n o t impossible, and th is applies to the th o rn y question o f land re fo rm .” B u rc h e tt says, paraphrasing A id it: “ He said the basic question o f land tenure had n o t been touched because th is w o u ld have bro u g h t headlong ‘co n fro n ta tio n ’ between the tw o layers o f the cake. He indicated th a t Sukarno, w h ile w illin g to go to any lengths in the a n ti-im p e ria lis t struggle, w o u ld have been cool to drastic measures re garding peasant-landlo rd relations.” A id it continued: “ W hat we have done is to organize the peasants, educate them, m ake them clearly see w herein la y th e ir problems. We introduced, and had accepted b y P a rlia m e n t ce rta in measures to a lle via te th e ir lot, such as cancel ing back debts and fix in g a ceil in g on land rents. T he peasants kn o w a ll about this, fo r them w e are ‘th e ir p a rty .’ The m ain th in g is th a t they are organized and among the m ost p o litic a lly con scious elements o f the population.” I t was th is lin e o f “ peaceful coexistence” w ith the Indonesian ca p ita list class and landlord s prac ticed b y the P K I leaders w h ic h fa ile d to prepare the w o rkers and peasants to struggle against th e ir ow n Indonesian oppressors, and paved the w a y fo r the success o f the co u n te rre vo lu tio n a ry d rive . The in fla tio n and p o ve rty con tinued to worsen and the economic and social crisis could n o t be re solved b y the Sukarno co a litio n because the solution re qu ire d measures opposed b y the w e a lth ie r M uslim s, the landlords and capi talists. M eanw hile the arm y, cen te r o f cou n te rre vo lu tio n a ry forces, was being q u ie tly strengthened b y the U.S. On Oct. 1, i t made its m ove to begin resolving the crisis in fa v o r o f reaction b y d ro w n in g the mass organizations o f the peasants and w orkers in blood. In this h ou r o f need, Sukarno proved to be no help w hate ver to the P K I and he stood b y w h ile the slaughter proceeded. The P K I i t self, having fa ile d to prepare the w orkers and peasants fo r such a struggle, was unable to even de fend itself. Believed K ille d “ The b e lie f among in fo rm e d analysts here,” reports L ew is fro m London, “ is th a t v ir tu a lly a ll the leaders o f the once p o w e rfu l Com m u n ist P a rty o f Indonesia have been k ille d or captured b y the Indonesian m ilita r y forces. W h ile there is no d e fin ite w o rd o f the p a rty ’s chairm an, D. N . A id it, i t is thou ght th a t he is dead.” The to ta l m em bership o f the Indonesian CP was once reported a t three m illio n , the largest in the ca p ita list w o rld . L ew is says i t is now dow n to 150,000. The p a rty also used to have three m illio n in a People’s Y o u th w in g and a fo l lo w in g o f 20 m illio n in mass or ganizations o f w orkers, peasants, women and governm ent w orkers. T his is a large force, o f w h ic h considerable m ay rem ain. The re v o lu tio n a ry m ovem ent in the colo n ia l and sem i-colonial countries has seen m any instances since the Second W o rld W a r o f re m a rk able resurgence a fte r p a rtia l de feats. The defeat in Indonesia m ay no t prove to be a long-range one, b u t in term s o f lives lost alone, i t is already one o f the w o rst tragedies ever suffered b y a w o rk ers’ movem ent. A ll the m ore reason th a t i t should be c a re fu lly studied, the facts honestly faced, and the costly lessons learned. B u t there has been a p la y in g dow n o f the news, not o n ly in the ca p ita list w o rld , b u t b y news m edia fro m the Chinese and Soviet-bloc countries as w e ll. A n d in the news releases and pe rio dicals coming in to The Militant office, there has as ye t been no re p o rt o f campaigns o f protest b y the w o rld ’s C om m unist parties over the slaughter in Indonesia. INDISPENSABLE If you want to deepen your own understanding o f socialism and want a first-class piece o f writing to In troduce others to the ideas o f social ism, get yourself several copies o f the recently reprinted A m e ric a ’s R oad To Socialism By James P. Cannon 50 cents PIONEER PUBLISHERS Five East Third St. New York, N.Y. 10003 T H E M IL IT A N T — Page Four THE MILITANT In Answer to Castro's Attack on "Trotskyism" E d ito r: JO S E P H H A N S E N M anagin g E d ito r: B A R R Y S H E P P A R D Business M anager: K A R O L Y N K E R R Y P ub lished w e e k ly , except d u rin g J u ly and A ugu st w h en published b i-w e e k ly , b y T h e M ilita n t P u b lis h in g Ass’n., 873 B ro ad w ay. N e w Y o r k , N . Y . 10003. Phone 533-6414. Second-class postage paid a t N e w Y o rk , N . Y . Subscription: $3 a y ear; C anadian. $3.50; foreign , $4.50. Signed articles b y contrib utors do not necessarily rep resent T h e M ilita n t's views. These are expressed In editorials. Vol. 30 - No. 5 <*^^>345 Monday, January 31, 1966 The Havana Conference The documents approved by the Tricontinental Conference, which ended in Havana Jan. 15, are not yet available in New Y o rk. From the reports, however, it is possible to form a pre lim in ary judgment O f this gathering. There is no doubt that it marks a step forward for the revolutionary struggle in Latin America. Some 430 delegates, representing all kinds of groups from 74 countries of Asia, A frica and Latin America participated. Both Moscow and Peking sent representatives. One of the main values of the conference was the opportunity it offered g uerrilla fighters from a number of countries in Latin Am erica to discuss th e ir problems and to exchange experiences. Together w ith their Cuban hosts they set the tone, which • was extrem ely m ilitan t, the emphasis being on “armed struggle” as a requisite for success in the battle for national freedom and socialism. The organization of effective aid for the Vietnamese freedom fighters also occupied the delegates. The fervor of the conference can be gathered from the declarations of figures noted up to now for their avoidance of “armed struggle.” Thus Cheddi Jagan, form er prim e m inister of B ritish Guiana, declared that “the w ar in Vietnam and the Dominican crisis prove to us that the peaceful road is closed . . . the only road le ft open to us is armed struggle.” Salvador Allende, leader of the Frente Revolucionario de Accion Popular, who was defeated in the last presidential elections in Chile, was moved to say that “the possibility is not excluded of an insurrectional struggle in Chile.” O f more interest was the stand taken by the K rem lin ’s delegation. They did not spare words in favor of “armed struggle.” The delegations of the pro-Moscow Communist parties in L atin America toed the line. U n til very recently the concept of “armed struggle” was viewed in these circles as an unfortunate q uirk of Castroism, if not a “Trotskyite provocation.” Even the delegates of the pro-Moscow B razilian Communist P arty, long notorious for its opportunism, joined in supporting the line of “armed struggle.” The leaders of these parties, along w ith Cheddi Jagan and Salvador Allende, can be expected to do little about converting their leftist phrases into action. B ut it is a different m atter w ith the rank and file who expect words to be matched by deeds. The crisis which many of these parties have been undergoing can be expected to deepen, w ith the chances considerably im proved for an outcome in the revolutionary direction. The Cuban hosts of the conference succeeded in getting both Peking and Moscow to subordinate their differences for the sake of displaying a. united front on the main theme of unity against the im perialist enemy. This aim was considerably facilitated by the complaisance of the Moscow delegation in verbally going along w ith the sentiment for armed struggle. M aladroit attempts of the Chinese delegates at factionalism m et w ith rebuffs. As Cedric Belfrage put it, “U n ity against imperialism t r i umphed over internal L e ft disputes . . .” W ritin g from Mexico C ity, the form er editor of the National Guardian said: “In Peru the guerrillas’ leadership (including the original leader Luis de la Puete, killed in action) is ‘Trotskyist’ ; in Guatemala, guerrillas led by Luis Turcios (who headed his country’s delegation) have split w ith those led by Yon Sosa, whom Turcios accused of harboring ‘Trotskyist elements.’ But neither those matters nor Moscow and Peking ‘lines’ were raised in the conference h all . . . The absence of ideological dispute was above all due to the Vietnam shadow hanging over the deliberation.” The effort to m aintain a facade of unity in a conference where deep differences were present was highly dubious in our opinion. The m ajor aim of the conference — to strengthen the struggle against imperialism and for socialism — m ight have been better advanced by clearly acknowledging from the beginning that differences did exist but that the conference was being held on a nonexclusionist basis w ith provisions made for discussion of the differences in panels or workshops for those interested. This would have opened the way for a free discussion and a greater clarification of some extrem ely im portant issues. As it was, the effort at presenting a united front of all tendencies was broken fin ally by no one less than Fidel Castro himself, although in a speech delivered after the conference and w ith no opportunity provided for examination of the facts or a reply by those under fire. (See the articles in this issue concerning Castro’s assertions about “Trotskyist elements.” ) The conference as a whole, however, gave no satisfaction to Washington. The delegates from the 27 L atin Am erican countries who were present w ill return to their battle fronts freshly inspired and heartened. The Vietnamese, who have been standing up so heroically against the imperialist effort to deny them victory in their struggle for freedom, w ill certainly feel less isolated. And we in the U nited States who are fighting for socialism can take encouragement from this strengthening of the front in the entire area south of the Rio Grande. By Joseph Hansen U n fo rtu n a te ly , 1 have not yet been able to obtain a copy o f the speech made b y F id e l Castro at a mass m eeting Jan. 16, fo llo w in g the T ric o n tin e n ta l Conference in Havana, a speech in w h ic h he a t tacked “ T ro tskyism .” Due to W ashington’s blockade o f Cuba it is not easy to obtain m a te ria l q u ic k ly fro m the nearby island w here the fir s t great re v o lu tio n a ry socialist success was w on in the W estern Hemisphere. C onsequently 1 m ust re ly on the quotations and in te rp re ta tio n s provided b y a special dispatch fro m Havana published in the Jan. 23 W orker, the voice o f the A m erican C om m unist P a rty , a no to rio u s ly u n re lia b le source. In extenuation, i t is n o t lik e ly th a t the W orker le ft o u t m uch on th is point, w h ic h i t handles as i f i t w ere about a ll Castro had to say in his speech, and as i f i t w ere the most im p o rta n t th in g th a t happened a t the T ric o n tin e n ta l Congress — as indeed i t m ay have been fro m the v ie w p o in t o f A m e r ican S talinism . W hy Guevara’s Silence? Introduced w ith a fe w para graphs about the u n ity achieved at the gathering, the account ca r ries the headline, “ Castro H a ils U n ity Gained A t T ric o n tin e n ta l Conference.” The emphasis placed by the W orker on w h a t Castro said about “ T ro tskyism ” is understandable. Since the heyday o f the Moscow fram e-up tria ls in w h ic h T ro ts k y and his fo llo w e rs fig u re d as the m ain victim s, the most v ile ly slandered v ic tim s in a ll histo ry, the struggle o f the W orker against “ T ro ts k y is m ” has become arduous indeed w h a t w ith th e revelations at the T w e n tie th Congress about S ta lin ’s monstrous crimes. A n at tack lik e th is b y no one less than Castro is no sm all w in d fa ll. B u t w h y d id Castro lend h im se lf to such needs? Castro’s attack against “ T ro ts k y ism ” appears com pletely d ispro p o rtionate on the face o f it. Some “ elements,” allegedly o f “ T ro ts k y ite ” persuasion, spread the ru m o r th a t Che Guevara was m urdered b y Castro. W h y d id n ’t Castro send a message to Che re p o rtin g the ru m o r and the damage i t was do in g to the good name o f the Cuban governm ent? Che, ta k in g a page fro m the w orks o f M a rk T w a in , could have d ra w n up a statem ent to be read a t the T ric o n tin e n ta l Conference saying, “ The re p o rt o f the circum stances o f m y alleged death have been g re a tly exag gerated . . A n d Che could have added a fe w w ords about the significance o f the H avana conference and his esteem fo r F idel, n o t to m ention the im portance o f organizing guer rilla s th ro u g h o u t L a tin A m erica. W ouldn ’t th a t have been a m uch m ore appropriate, credible, and in s p irin g answ er to the ru m o r than the not-very-original nonsense about “ T ro tskyism ,” a “ v u lg a r in s tru m e n t o f im p e ria lism and reac tio n ,” being at the bottom o f i t all? Flim sy "Proofs” The “ proofs” cited b y Castro to back his assertions are equally flim s y . The jo u rn a ls th a t attracted his attention includ e Marcha of M ontevideo, I I Nuovo Mundo of Rome and the M onthly Review of N ew Y ork. B u t n o t a single one o f these publications is “ T ro t s k y ite ” — Castro a n d /o r the W orker to the co n tra ry. The N o rth A m erican audience m ay n o t easily be able to judge fo r themselves w ith regard to Marcha and I I Nuovo Mundo. T h ey can, however, ru n a spot check on the Monthly Review w ith o u t m uch trouble. The Montjily Review is an un a f filia te d socialist magazine. U nd er the influ ence o f the Cuban R evolu tion, w h ich i t stro n g ly supports, i t has become increasingly independ ent in recent years. The articles b y A d o lfo G illy published b y the M onthly Review c e rta in ly d id no h a rm to eith e r the Cuban or G uatem alan revolutions. W h ile one could disagree w ith G illy on specific points, the articles w ere perceptive and in fo rm a tiv e and fo r th a t reason alone o f value. There can be no doubt a t a ll th a t the a u th o r is a lo ya l suppo rte r of the L a tin A m erican re v o lu tio n as a w hole and an active p a rtic ip a n t in it. H is articles w ere m uch ap preciated — and n o t o n ly b y N o rth A m erica n socialists. I f G illy made a statem ent in Marcha th a t was open to m isin te rp re ta tio n or was even w rong, he could be answered in a rea soned w ay, as Castro attem pts to do in considering Cuba’s capacity to do m ore fo r the D om inican re v olutionists than -was done. W hat purpose is served by dragging in “ T ro tskyism ” as an e p ith e t in a w ay rem iniscent o f S ta lin is t prac tices before the T w e n tie th Con gress? I t can o n ly in ju re the cause o f u n ite d action against the com m on im p e ria lis t, foe. The reference to “ A lb a G uante” and the p la y given h im b y E l Universal, one o f the m a in b ou r geois papers o f M exico C ity , is even shakier. Agence France-Press, re p o rtin g Castro’s use o f E l Uni versal as a source, lists his name as “ A lva h u a n te ” and says he claim s to be a “ fo rm e r secretary o f Leon T ro ts k y .” A lva h u a n te or A lb a G uante is n o th in g o f the k in d . W hat in te re st th is in d iv id ual has in g iv in g h im se lf a “ T ro t skyist” past and presenting h im self as a c u rre n t “ T ro ts k y is t lead e r” rem ains obscure. Even m ore obscure is the interest o f the M exi- The 'Worker' Report on Castro's Speech The following is the report from Havana printed in the Jan 23 W o rke r, on what Fidel said about “Trotskyism.” Greeted b y storm y applause was Castro’s denunciation o f the T ro tskyites as agents o f im p e ria lism . W hat the F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l com m itted, he declared, was a c rim e against the re v o lu tio n a ry m ovem ent, in te n d in g to isolate i t fro m the rest o f the people b y c o rru p tin g i t w ith stupidities. He said his ire was aroused by T ro ts k y ite articles “ accusing Cuba o f not g iv in g E rnest Guevara a h earing and even m a kin g the v i cious in sin u a tio n th a t Castro, his comrade in arms, m urdered h im .” Castro cited articles b y A d o lfo G illy in the Monthly Review o f N ew Y o rk , in Marcha, the Spanish T ro ts k y ite w eekly, and in Nuovo Mondo, the Ita lia n T ro ts k y ite newspaper, as w e ll as an a rticle b y Felipe A lb a Guante, the M e x i can T ro tskyite , in E l Universal. G illy , in his a rtic le Oct. 22 in Marcha had claim ed th a t Che G uevara had le ft Cuba because o f differences w ith Castro over the Chinese question. Castro, in his speech revealed th a t Guevara had an understand in g w ith the Cuban re vo lu tio n ists fro m the v e ry outset th a t “ w hen the struggle was com pleted in Cuba he w o u ld have o ther duties to f u l f i l l in another place, and we always gave h im o u r w o rd th a t no state interest, no n a tio n a l in terest, no circumstances w o u ld lead us to ask h im to rem ain in o u r co u n try o r h in d e r h im fro m c a rry in g out th a t w ish, th a t de sire, and w e f u lly and fa ith fu lly k e p t th a t prom ise made to Com rade Guevara.” C uba’s enemies, Castro said, have m ounted a w o rld w id e cam paign to d iscre d it Cuba b y using G uevara’s departure as a pretext. I t was necessary fo r Che to de p a rt secretly, he noted, and th is gave the im p e ria lists a chance to use this circumstance. Then Castro held up a new s-clipping, as one ite m among m any, and said: “ T h is ite m is a U P I cable dated Dec. 6, 1965, w h ic h reads, ‘Ernesto G uevara was m urdered b y Cuban p rim e m in is te r F id e l Castro fo l lo w in g orders fro m the USSR, de clared Felipe A lb a Guante, leader o f the M exican T rotskyite s, in a statem ent made to El Universal.’ He adds th a t Che Guevara was liq u id a te d because he insisted on a lig n in g Cuba w ith the Chinese line. This set the tone o f a cam paign w h ic h T ro ts k y ite elements began to launch everyw here sim u l taneously.” Castro considered A d o lfo G illy ’s accusation th a t Cuba did n o t sup p o rt the D om inican R epublic to be p a rtic u la rly v illa in o u s. He pointed o u t th a t G illy said this at the v e ry m om ent when the U.S. au th o ritie s sought to ju s tify in te rv e n tio n b y cla im in g th a t L e ftists and C om m unists heading the D om inican re v o lu tio n w ere tra in e d in Cuba. Castro on G illy Castro spoke o f G illy ’s a rticle in the Monthly Review as “ v il lainous.” “ T his person,” he said, “ had the vileness to accuse the Cuban re v o lu tio n o f n o t h aving given active aid to the re v o lu tio n in the D om inican R epublic,” he said (s ic ). “ W hat does ‘active a id ’ mean? D id they expect th a t Cuba, whose weapons and resources are w e ll know n, could stop th e la n d in g o f U.S. troops in the D om inican Re public? “ Cuba has weapons to defend its e lf and has these defense weap ons in an in fin ite ly in fe rio r num ber w ith re la tio n to the im p e ria l ists, and these gentlem en are so despicable, so shameless th a t they blam e Cuba fo r n o t ha vin g pre vented the lan ding , because w h a t else does ‘active support’ mean? “ A ll th a t Cuba could do under those circumstances, a ll th a t i t could have done and should have done, i t d id .” He added th a t asking Cuba to p revent th is la n d in g “ is lik e ask in g Cambodia in Southeast Asia to p revent bom bings o f N orth V ie tn a m and to prevent the occu pation o f South V ietna m b y Y an kee im p e ria lism .” Cuba, he said, does n o t have “ m illio n s o f men un d e r arms, i t is n o t a c o u n try h a vin g nuclear weapons, because here o u r weap ons are m oral and the n um b e r of m illio n s is n o t in fin ite , the num ber o f m en is n o t in fin ite , b u t the d ig n ity and the decorum o f th is people is in fin ite .” Castro assailed the “ in filtr a tio n ” o f T ro tskyite s in to th e Guatem alan re v o lu tio n a ry m ovem ent. One, he said, became the e d ito r o f a news paper w h ic h copied the program o f the F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l “ fro m head to ta il.” “ W hat the F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l thus com m itted,” he thundered fro m the ro stru m to the delegates fro m three continents, “ was a tru e crim e against the re v o lu tio n a ry m ovem ent to isolate i t fro m the masses b y c o rru p tin g i t w ith the stupidities, the dishonor and the repugnant and nauseating th in g th a t is T ro tskyism today w ith in the fie ld o f politics. “ I f T rotskyism , a t a certain stage represented an erroneous position b u t a position w ith in the fie ld o f p o litic a l ideas, in la te r years i t became a v u lg a r in s tru m ent o f im p e ria lism and reaction. “ These gentlem en reason that, fo r instance, w ith regard to South V ietnam , w here a vast re v o lu tio n a ry fro n t has u n ite d the immense m a jo rity o f the people and has closely grouped d iffe re n t sectors o f the population around the lib eration m ovem ent in the struggle against im p e ria lism , to T rotskyites th is is absurd, i t is counter-revolu tio n a ry .” day, January 31, 1966 Page Five stro's A ttack on "Trotskyism" L E O N T R O T S K Y in 1921, w h en h e was head o f Red A rm y o f young S o viet R ep u b lic, w ith some o f his s ta ff. can bourgeois press in g iv in g prom inence to his declarations, w h ic h could n o t in ju re the w o rld T ro ts k y is t m ovem ent m ore i f they w ere de lib e ra te ly planted by the C IA . T h e Posadas G roup Castro’s references to “ in filt r a tio n ” b y “ T ro tskyite s” in to the G uatem alan g u e rrilla movem ent in v o lv e a com plex situation. Gen u in e differences over perspectives exist among the g u e rrilla leaders. The differences hinge on th e ir at titu d e to w a rd the so-called “ na tio n a l bourgeoisie.” U p to now, Y on Sosa has stood fo r complete independence. H is opponents, e v i d e n tly under the in flue nce o f the G uatem alan C om m unist P a rty, have pressed fo r a softer posture. The issue is c le a rly one th a t af fects the re v o lu tio n a ry struggle in .m any countries besides Guatemala. I t is in fa c t o f decisive im portance to success, as the course o f the Cuban R evolution w e ll illustrates. A com plicating fa c to r in the Guatem alan s itu a tio n is the role o f representatives o f the Posadas group. This is a s p lit-o ff fro m the F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l, the w o rld p a rty o f socialist re v o lu tio n founded b y Leon T ro tsky. The Posadas group calls its e lf “ T ro t s kyist” and even makes out th a t i t constitutes the “ F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l.” The leader o f the group, J. Posadas, holds th a t a n u clear w a r is in e v ita b le and even desirable. “ The n u clear w a r is a t th e same tim e the re v o lu tio n ,” he w rite s ty p ic a lly in the December 1965 is sue o f Red Flag. He predicts th a t N ew Y o rk and London w ill be an n ih ila te d in the com ing nuclear w a r and th a t th is w il l touch o ff What theTrotskyist Press Said About Guevara's Leaving Cuba The following article on Guevara’s departure from Cuba is typical of the statements made by the Trotskyist press. I t has been translated from the December issue of the Argentine magazine Estrategia, edited by Nahuel Moreno: As we w ent to press, w orld public opinion was surprised by Ernesto Guevara’s letter resigning his Cuban citizenship and his posts in the Cuban government and in the Communist P arty of that country. W e came to two conclusions over the news: First, against the campaign of the w riters in the pay of imperialism and the exploiters, w e reject any insinuation that Guevara was “purged” by the Cuban regime and its undisputed leader, Fidel Castro. In our opinion, as we characterize the regime and its leader, the persecution of revolutionary militants or leaders, whether Cubans or foreigners, is excluded. Second, if “Che” Guevara is in another country helping the revolutionary process, as can be gathered from his letter and Fidel’s report, we can only say that as always Guevara is showing that he is a revolutionist to the marrow, acting in ac cordance w ith his concepts to death itself. The editors of this magazine feel impelled to make these two observations because for years w e have polemicized w ith in the revolutionary Castroist ranks themselves, of which we are proud to count ourselves a part, against the public concep tions of the Cuban leadership and specifically Che Guevara (see Estrategia No. 2 in p artic u la r). This means that once more we must repeat that we con sider Fidel and “Che” Guevara as the greatest victorious rev olutionary leadership — speaking m orally and politically — that history has given us since the leadership of Lenin and Trotsky. the re vo lu tio n . “ W hen the masses o f the w o rld w ill see, w ill learn th a t ‘N ew Y o rk is destroyed’ a ll the fa ith in the c a p ita lis t system and in the bourgeoisie and in the strength o f capitalism w ill van ish.” Posadas holds th a t an attack on Moscow w ill fu rth e r strengthen the re v o lu tio n : “ On the o ther hand as w e have said the bom bardm ent o f Moscow w ill be the ris in g of the w o rld p ro le ta ria t and w il l p ro voke the. revenge o f the w o rld and European p ro le ta ria t.” The th re a t o f ra d io a ctive fa ll o u t does n o t w o rry Posadas v e ry m uch. He agrees th a t i t is “ nec essary to fin d measures to combat ra d io a c tiv ity . . . to tr y to localize the centers o f ra d io a c tiv ity . . B u t the solution to the problem , as he conceives it, should not prove to be o v e rly d iffic u lt. As the nuclear w a r develops in to re v o lu tio n, committees o f the people m ust be set up. A m ong th e ir tasks w ill be: “ G oing fro m zone to zone, in o rder to e lim in a te pests, insects, cockroaches, flies, ty p h o id and ra d io -a c tiv ity .” Such “ stu p id itie s” have been u tiliz e d b y the S talinists to smear the T ro ts k y is t m ovem ent. They do n o t m ention Posadas, since th a t w o u ld give the game aw ay too easily. T hey give cre d it, instead, to the phony “ F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l” label used b y Posadas. Castro’s references to the “ F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l” are o f th is nature. Posadas happens to have a fe w fo llo w e rs in both Cuba and G uatem ala whose u ltra le ft s tu p id i ties do isolate them fro m the masses. To say th a t th e y consti tu te a “ vu lg a r in s tru m e n t o f im p e ria lism and reaction” is, h ow ever, a slander. G u evara’s A ttitu d e Is Castro w e ll in fo rm e d about the a ttitu d e o f the w o rld T ro t s kyist m ovem ent to w a rd the Cuban R evolution? In his speech d id he s im p ly u n c ritic a lly u tiliz e m a te ria ls prepared fo r h im b y grad uates o f the S ta lin is t school of fa lsifica tio n ? T here is n o t m uch purpose in speculating about this. The p o in t is th a t Castro should k n o w better. Che Guevara, fo r in stance, took the tim e to gain ac curate know ledge o f the a ttitu d e o f the w o rld T ro ts k y is t m ovem ent to w a rd th e Cuban R evolution. Guevara, o f course, d id n o t be come a T ro ts k y is t. B u t fro m an at titu d e depreciative o f T ro tskyism as a whole, he d id change. The Posadas group, w h o m he knew fir s t hand, gave h im a v e ry bad impression. H is view s about T ro t skyism altered as he gathered m ore facts and ta lke d and argued w ith genuine representatives o f the F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l. Thus i t was th a t Che Guevara said o f H ugo Blanco, the P eruvian peasant leader w ho has n ow spent some three years in prison w ith out a tr ia l: “ H ugo B lanco is the head o f one o f the g u e rrilla movements in Peru. He struggled stu b b o rn ly b u t the repression was strong. I don’t k n o w w h a t his tactics o f struggle w ere, b u t his fa ll does n o t s ig n ify the end o f the m ove ment. I t is o n ly a m an th a t has fa lle n , b u t the m ovem ent con tinues. One tim e, when we were p re p a rin g to m ake o u r la n d in g fro m the Granma, and w hen there was a great ris k th a t a ll o f us w o u ld be k ille d , F id e l said: ‘W hat is m ore im p o rta n t th a n us is the exam ple we set.’ I t ’s the same th in g . H ugo B lanco has set an exam ple, a good example, and he struggled as m uch as he could. B u t he suffered a defeat, the pop u la r forces suffered a defeat. I t ’s o n ly a passing stage. A fte rw a rd w ill come another stage.” Che Guevara said th is in A lg ie rs in an in te rv ie w J u ly 23, 1963, th a t was published in the Aug. 3 issue o f E l Moudjahid. He was n o t ta lk in g about a fo llo w e r o f J. Posadas b u t o f one o f the leaders o f the F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l. I t w o u ld be in te re stin g to know w h a t F id e l Castro’s view s are about this statem ent b y Che Guevara praising a genuine T ro t s k y ist leader w h o has been held w ith o u t tr ia l fo r alm ost three years in the prison at Concepcion be cause he sought to fo llo w the exam ple set b y the leaders of the Cuban R evolution. Castro, i t m arks a de parture fro m the p rin c ip le d p o litic a l course he has sought to fo llo w u p to noW. I t w o u ld in dicate th a t Cuba’s posi tio n has become g re a tly weakened vis-a-vis the K re m lin . (2) I t was designed as “ camou flage” fo r th e decided emphasis placed b y the T ric o n tin e n ta l Con W h y D id C astro D o It? W hy did Castro decide to cap ference bn the need fo r “armed struggle.” The extrem e m ilita n c y the T ric o n tin e n ta l Conference w ith an a tta ck against “ T ro tsk yism ” ? o f the declarations made a t th is A s w e have indicated, i t is not ga therin g are alm ost certain to be estim ated in m any quarters, iialik e ly th a t he did i t u n w ittin g ly , clu d in g the K re m lin , as a step In m e re ly because his “ ire was the d ire ctio n o f T rotskyism . What aroused” b y m a te ria l com piled by b e tte r w a y o f countering such ac one of the agencies o f the Cuban governm ent o r possibly the delega cusations than b y opening an A t tio n w h ic h the G uatem alan Com tack on “ T ro tskyism ” ? The tro u b le w ith th is is th a t i t m u n ist P a rty keeps in Cuba. T w o o ther possible explanations re does n o t p u ll the w ool over tpe>' eyes o f the Moscow bureaucrats. m ain: (1 ) I t was a p o litic a l concesB u t I t does tend to sow confusion sion made in the K re m lin ’s dire c and d is u n ity among the m ilita n ts in th e re v o lu tio n a ry tio n . Peking, too, i t should be engaged struggle. noted, is receptive to attacks on “ T ro tskyism .” D. N. A id it, head of W hatever C astro’s reasons, the the Indonesian C om m unist p a rty, m ove in ju re d the e ffo rts to achieve was given to occasional diatribes u n ity on a correct program in the against “ T ro tskyism ” in the days d iffic u lt b a ttle against im p e ria lis t before he led his p a rty to disaster. in te rv e n tio n and aggression. I t is These diatribes w ere c a re fu lly re to be hoped th a t he w ill soon see ported b y P eking’s news media. the necessity to re c tify h is stand I f th is was w h a t m otivated on th is im p o rta n t question. Fourth International Asks Castro to Rectify Assertions The United Secretariat of the Fourth International sent the fol lowing letter to Fidel Castro protesting an attack against “Trotskyism" made by the Cuban prime minister in a speech Jan. 16. The letter, sent from Paris, is dated Jan. 20 and signed by Pierre Frank in behalf of the highest body of the world Trotskyist movement. * * * To Comrade F id e l Castro, P rim e M in is te r o f S ocialist Cuba, F irs t Secretary o f the C entral C om m ittee o f the Cuban C om m unist P a rty . D ear Comrade, F ro m the Jan. 18 issue o f Le Monde, w e learned about y o u r polem ic against “ some T ro ts k y is t elements w ho, according to the bourgeois press o f M exico, Guatem ala and Ita ly , re p o rte d ly stated th a t ‘Che’ Guevara was assassinated b y the Cuban governm ent.” F ro m an Agence F rance- Presse dispatch o f Jan. 17, w e also learned th a t one A lvahuante, w ho is com pletely u n know n to us, b u t w h o claim s to be a “ fo rm e r secretary o f Leon T ro ts k y ,” was quoted b y you as asserting th a t “ Che Guevara was liq u id a te d b y the C astroist regim e.” W e m ust m ake clear th a t o n ly the F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l represents the c o n tin u ity o f the thou ght o f Leon T ro tsky and th e organization founded b y him . I t has no th in g in comm on w ith scattered in d iv id u a ls and irresponsible groups. I t has never departed fro m an o bje ctive at titu d e w ith regard to tendencies and governm ents th a t cla im to be fo r the p ro le ta ria t; i t w ill c e rta in ly n o t do so in th e case o f socialist Cuba w h ic h i t has n o t fa ile d to defend en ergetica lly in a ll countries w here i t has sections o r frie n d ly organizations. We state th a t a t no tim e o r in any place have w e published slanders such as those alluded to b y you. O u r press handled th e de p a rtu re o f Comrade Guevara fro m Cuba in a com pletely d iffe re n t w ay, ve ry responsibly, as you can judg e fo r yo u rse lf fro m the enclosed a rticle , “ ‘A N ew F ie ld o f B a ttle ’ fo r Che G uevara,” w ritte n b y ou r frie n d J. Hansen, e d ito r o f The M ilita n t in N ew Y o rk , w h ic h was re p rin te d in o u r o ffic ia l magazine Q uatriim e Internationale (N ovem be r 1965). M ore than once, Comrade F id e l Castro, you have proclaim ed quite c o rre ctly th a t th e re v o lu tio n needs the tru th . Y o u r declaration against the T ro tskyists a t the end o f the T ric o n tin e n ta l Conference was w id ely reported in the w o rld press. In the name o f the tr u th w e ask you to re c tify y o u r declaration and to m ake clea r th a t these accusations were n o t aimed a t the F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l. The la tte r has alw ays stood a t the side o f the Cuban re vo lu tio n ists in th e ir struggle fo r socialism and fo r the L a tin -A m e ric a n re vo lu tio n . W ith our internationalist Communist greetings, F or the U nited Secretariat of the Fourth In ternatio n al: P IE R R E F R A N K Peking vs. Moscow The Meaning O f the G re a t D ebate By William F. Warde T li* flir t comprehensive appraisal of th * Sino-Sovlat dispute from a Marxist standpoint 50 cents PIONEER PUBLISHERS 5 East Third St. New York, N. Y. 10003 Back in Print Uneven and Combined Development In History By William F. Warde 60c Pioneer Publishers 5 East Third St. New York, N.Y.. 10003 THE MILITANT P age S ix Monday, January 31, 1966 Lessons of the New York Transit Workers Strike By Farrell Dobbs Young people today have had little chance to perceive the in herent social power of the work ing class. All their lives they have seen the unions dom inated by a gang of bureaucrats who truckle to the capitalist class. These misleaders of labor support the brutal im perialist foreign policy of the ruling class. They give only lip service to the Freedom Now strug gle of th e Negro people, the vast m ajority of whom are workers. A t the point of production the bureaucrats act to cripple the union power, usurping w orkers’ democracy to impose th eir own dictatorial rule over the union membership. They keep labor tied to capitalist politics, leaving the governm ental power in the hands of greedy banks and corporations. Under these conditions doubts arise as to w hether organized la bor is really capable of playing a progressive social role. Such doubts are also sowed by wouldbe theoreticians who claim th at the unions can never again play th e ir one-time m ilitant role. Citing the lafior bureaucrats’ default in organizing w hite collar workers they falsely in terpret it as “proof” th at the unions have nothing to offer th at growing, category of wage earners. Detractors of labor point to statistics about a relative decline of industrial w orkers in propor tion to the population as a whole. Like a con man short-changing his victim, they juggle these figures George Meany around in an effort to show that history is rendering unionism, im potent. Again, and once again, the M arxist view of the revolutionary potential of the working class is proclaimed obsolete. History itself has a way *of re futing such theoretical fantasies. A graphic exam ple is the New York tran sit' strike th at stands forth as a high point in union struggle after m any years of rela tive labor quiescence. There are im portant lessons for young peo ple, both workers and students, to learn from the exam ple set by the tran sit workers. Some 36,000 strikers tied up public transportation in a city of eight million and the powers-thatbe couldn’t move a single train or bus in public service during the walkout. Clearly it was not the sheer weight of numbers that gave the transit workers this impres sive strength. The decisive factor was the key functions they per form within the city’s economic structure. Similarly in national terms, it is not the relative nu merical weight of the workers in terms of the population as a whole th at determines their strength as a social force. It is their strategic role in the total economic com plex, plus their distinctive char acteristics as a relatively homo geneous social class. Numerical strength has prim ary importance in term s of class solidarity among the workers in volved in a given struggle, rath er than in the relative size of the em battled force. The problem of solidarity begins w ith the strikers themselves, and it extends from there to a quest for broader labor support according to the needs of the fight. As we shall see, it was in the broader union sphere, espe cially among the top AFL-CIO bureaucrats, th at class solidarity with the transit workers was crim inally violated. \Vithin the Transport Workers Union the ranks stood solid throughout the strike. Not a peep came from inside the TWU that Republican Mayor Lindsay, or his Democratic collaborators at City Hall, could use to sm ear the strike. It was a case of aroused workers who fought for just de mands and who stood united in their common needs as class broth ers. They fought off strikebreak ing attem pts of the kind that, especially in recent years, have nipped in the bud m any efforts by w orkers to defend their inter ests. This time the TWU officials didn’t capitulate w ithout a fight as they have done before. Instead of making a deal for a union con tract on City H all’s terms, they fought at least until the union had won a partied victory. Some TWU officials even showed a spark of the militancy they prob ably had in earlier times before they got on the bureaucratic gravy train. Mike Quill, for example, uttered a tru th when he said, “It is about tim e th at someone, some where along the road of labor ceased to be respectable.” Fine words, indeed, but it doesn’t follow th at the power of the strike should be attributed to a sudden break w ith bureaucratic “respectability” by TWU officials. While giving them due credit for the way they stood up to City Hall, it is im portant to recognize the real reason w hy they did so. Like everybody else in the line of fire, the TWU officials were up against an aroused membership th at w asn’t about to hold still for a fast shuffle from anybody, either inside or outside the union. They had to fight, or else. What a fight the transit work ers made! They brushed aside a court injunction based on an anti labor state law and went on strike in defiance of the judge and the A m erica 's Revolutionary H eritage: John Brown — Guerrilla Leader only conditions of which are per petual imprisonment, and hopeless servitude or absolute exterm ina tion . . . ” In the sum m er of 1859 Brown began to assemble his men on a small farm near H arper’s Ferry, at the juncture of the Potomac and the Shenandoah rivers. They planned to take the arsenal, free slaves in the area and re tre at into m ountains of Virginia to begin operations into the South. By L eslie Evans He captured Harper’s Ferry w ith his nineteen m en so true; He frightened Old Virginia till she trem bled through and through. They hung him for a traitor, them selves the traitor crew, B ut his soul is marching on. — "John Brown’s Body” It is m ore than a century since John Brown and his small band captured the United States arsenal a t H arper’s Ferry, Virginia. Dec ades of historical falsification, which have sought to depict the rebellion of the Southern slavocracy — the Civil W ar — as a re grettable misunderstanding, have strived equally to tarnish the memory of John Brown, labelling him criminal, fanatic and lunatic. John Brown was none of these. John Brown came from a verybid New England family. His roots in America date back almost to the Mayflower landing. His grand father died in the American Rev olution, his father was an ardent Abolitionist and a conductor on th e Underground Railroad. His sons after him w ere fighters in the Abolitionist cause. Coming from generations of deeply reli gious P rotestant pioneers, John Brown was rem arkably like his father and grandfather in char acter and outlook. Born in 1800 in Connecticut, and raised in Ohio, he worked at various trades, being successively a tanner, surveyor, shepherd, wool-merchant and farm er. He *Iived in m any of th e N ortheastern states, m arried twice, and raised a large family, all of whom w ere committed to t h e fight against slavery. For m any years Brown believed with W illiam Lloyd G arrison th at slavery could be abolished peace fully. His father was a trustee of Oberlin College, th e first college in the United States to adm it Ne groes, and he had hopes that Negro education would put an end to slavery. The passage of the Fugitive Slave Law in 1850 convinced John Brown th a t only arm ed action could effectively dissuade the slaveholders from hunting down fugitive slaves. In 1851 he founded the League of the Gileadites in New York, a society of armed Negroes who rescued fugitives who had been captured by South ern slave-catchers. For some years he had planned a project for establishing a moun tain stronghold in the Southern Appalachians from which to launch raids into the South to free slaves. W hile in Europe in 1851 in connection w ith his wool business, he inspected fortifica tions, read widely on m ilitary tac tics and studied guerrilla warfare. He visualized a string of m ountain fortresses from which an armed force of freed Negroes would stage guerrilla sorties to liberate large num bers of slaves. It was not in Virginia, however, but on the W estern plains that John Brown’s first armed clash w ith slavery was to take place. In 1854 five of his sons set out for the Kansas T erritory to help win it for the Free Soil party. While the free soilers were in a clear m ajority in the territory, arm ed gangs of Southerners te r rorized the area and sought by any means to establish slavery in Kansas. Brown’s sons appealed to him to come w ith arms to help organ ize resistance among the fright ened settlers. In the spring of 1855 when elections w ere held for the territorial legislature, thou sands of arm ed pro-slavery South erners came over the border from Missouri, took over the polls and elected a pro-slave legislature for Kansas! In the late fall John Brown rode into Kansas w ith a wagonload of guns and ammuni tion. The Free Soilers refused to ac cept the rigged election, set up their own legislature and declared Lawrence as their capital. In May of 1856 the slaveholders burned Lawrence, killing a num ber of its defenders. John Brown, now Cap tain of a volunteer militia at Trapped A fter Victory John Brown Ossawatamie, captured five of the leaders of the pro-slavery gang and killed them. W ar broke out between the pro and anti-slavery forces that was to give the ter ritory the name of “Bleeding K an sas.” Brown was declared an outlaw, but he commanded tremendous sympathy and adm iration from thousands in Kansas and through out the North. He carried on guer rilla w arfare, leading attacks against the pro-slavery forces, and making raids to free slaves into Missouri, until the intervention of Federal troops ensured Kansas as a free state. John Brown emerged from Kansas as a steeled revolutionary soldier. He was now determ ined to return to his original plan of mountain guerrilla w arfare. In 1858 he called a convention of free Negroes in Canada where he an nounced his plans and a consti tution was drafted under which his forces were to be governed. The constitution said in part, " . . . Slavery, throughout its en tire existence in the United States is none other than a most bar barous, unprovbked, and unjusti fiable w ar of one portion of its citizens upon another portion; the On Monday, Oct. 17, John Brown with twenty-two men cap tured the town of H arper’s Ferry. Delaying their retreat too long, they w ere trapped in the engine house at the arsenal. Slaves who had joined them were slaughtered, ten of Brown’s men, including two of his sons, were killed and Brown himself and the survivors w ere captured by U.S. Marines under the command of Robert E. Lee. Accused of treason, it was his captors, jailers and judges who were to prove themselves “the traitor crew,” and in less than two years at that. Rushed to trial and condemned to death, John Brown rose to his full stature in his impassioned de fense which was a burning indict m ent of slavery: “Had I inter fered . . . in behalf of the rich, the powerful, the intelligent, the socalled great, or in behalf . . . of any of that class — and suffered and sacrificed w hat I have in this interference, it would have been all right; and every man in this court would have deemed it an act w orthy of rew ard rath e r than punishm ent.” Sentenced to die, he was ex ecuted by hanging on Dec. 2, 1859. In his last testam ent, w ritten the day he died, he said: “I, John Brown, am quite certain th a t the crimes of this guilty land will never be purged away but with blood. I had, as I now think vain ly, flattered myself th at without very much bloodshed it m ight be done.” whole City Hall gang. When their top negotiators were jailed as “law breakers,” a second team stepped in to speak for the union. The strikers rem ained solid in the face of court proceedings intended to impose massive fines on the union. They stood up against savage sm ear propaganda in the capitalist news media and against a rising capitalist clam or to call out the National G uard against them. A t a crucial point in the strike the TWU ranks m et the capitalist attack by dem onstrating their solidarity and fighting spirit through a mass picket line at City Hall. Significant bodies of work ers from other unions supported the demonstration. Even some bureaucrats from other New York unions, who had slowly and tim id ly come out in support of the strike, turned up a t the demon stration. Many local bureaucrats did nothing, and a few openly finked on the TWU. The main thing, however, was th at the TWU ranks w ere solid and th a t they were winning rank and file sup port from other unions. Unable to break the strike w ith injunctions, jailings and threats of fines, Lindsay appealed to “re sponsible” to p ' officials of the AFL-CIO for help in stopping the strike. If it w asn’t stopped, he said in effect, the bureaucrats need have no hopes of getting legislative crumbs from the cap italist table. Friends are friends, but after all the “friends of labor” in the Democratic and Republican parties are against strikes. George M eany responded by approving the jailing of the TWU leaders w ith the rem ark th at Mike Quill “wanted to go to jail.” As though th at scabby comment wasn’t criminal enough, he added th at Mayor Lindsay, who was trying to break the strike, was “handling himself very well.” A fter the strike W alter R euther proved his “respectability” with a statem ent th at “society can’t tol erate stoppages” like the transit strike. Silence among other union bureaucrats about the rem arks of M eany and Reuther makes them parties to this crime against the working class. ■ Despite all obstacles the transit workers won a partial victory by forcing concessions from City Hall that it hadn’t intended to make. The fact remains, however, th at the settlem ent fell far short of the workers’ just demands and they remain victims of gross wage in equities. Unmoved by the serious economic problems still plaguing the TWU ranks, President Johnson denounced the gains they did win as a violation of his wage “guideposts.” Such flexing of the Presi dential jawbone can mean only one thing: he obviously w anted City Hall to try harder to break the strike. Johnson left no doubt about th at when he followed through w ith a call for fu rther anti-strike laws. Both the Republican Mayor and the Democratic President proved themselves enemies of the transit workers. The strikers got nothing they didn’t fight for and even then the lackeys of capitalism cheated them out of a just settlem ent. It shows th at labor can place no trust in capitalist politicians. The workers will get only w hat tfyey can w in through m ilitant use of the union power at the job level and through mobilization of their class political strength in an in dependent labor party. Labor’s inherent capacity to take that road is dem onstrated by the transit strike, as is the work ers’ growing desire to do so. Many workers throughout the country face problems as pressing as those of the TWU ranks and they are developing an increasing urge to fight in defense of th eir class in terests. The main thing standing in their way is a crisis of union leadership, and the time is grow ing nearer when the w orkers will set out to correct th at situation. THE MILITANT Monday, January 31, 1966 L e t t [This column is an open forum for all viewpoints on subjects of general interest to our readers. Please keep your letters brief. Where necessary they w ill be abridged. W riters’ initials w ill be used, names being w ithheld unless authorization is given for use.] Jim Crow i Plentywood, Montana Is there a complete history of Negro slavery from the beginning until the present tim e — a true account? A t home we have never hated the Negroes. Many of my fath er’s people were killed in the Civil War. My dad’s father was killed a t the B attle of Shiloh. His boy was fighting there and he saw him loading his gun w ith his fin gers shot off hanging by the skin w ith blood running down the gunJ IU IU IIIIIH IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIO M IIIIIM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIM IIIIIIIM IIIM IIIIIIII^ 20 Years A go In The M ilitant jf t it m ii iii ii iiM i iii iii in i ii iii iii m H i ii m iii iiH i iM ii iii n ii iii im ii ii iii im ii in i r GI DESCRIBES HOW SOL DIERS ON OKINAWA ORGAN IZED MASS PROTEST DEM ONSTRATION — Okinawa, Jan. 13 — The inform ation th a t came over the radio a few weeks back th at GIs in M anila had staged a demonstration against the demobi lization snafu had a tremendous effect here. Every place you went, w her ever there were two or more sol diers, the subject was: “L et’s call a m eeting” ; “L et’s go on strike” ; “They did it there, we can do it here.” A rash of mimeographed leaflets sprang up. A couple of men w ere busted for mim eograph ing pamphlets. Then on Jan. 9, an inpromptu meeting of about 1,000 GIs was held . . . The next night there was an American Veterans Committee meeting that I attended. There w ere about 100 present, including a colonel . . . A couple of GIs got up and spoke. They said they had received permission to hold the meeting, but the subject of demobilization was not to be dis cussed . . . Yesterday, the new G eneral in command of Okinawa m ade a speech over the radio . . . It was full of such favorite bywords as “The Team,” (i.e. the A rm y), “The Team ” (i.e. the A rm y), said he needs men to set up in stallations and warehouses. A nd not one word on demobilization. The men got burned up about it. Especially about the p art w here he mentioned the “honored dead of Okinawa graveyards.” The way they figure it — w hat the hell did he know about the honored dead? So came this afternoon, a t two o’clock. We had to drive a jeep about 20 miles to get there . . . They m ust have received perm is sion to talk about demobilization, however, as the chairm an of the m eeting got up and said: “I u n derstand some of you men have something to say about demobi lization.” There was a roar from the 12,000 throats. They took any man from the audience who w ant ed to speak and gave him a m ax imum of two minutes. Well they took off — but good. They ripped into the G eneral’s speech. Speaker after speaker said: “We can’t trust the War D epartm ent,” “We can’t trust the brass hats in W ashington,” “We have to take things into our own hands.” They asked a lot of em barrassing ques tions. They quoted the 13th amendment to the Constitution. A bunch of Negro soldiers got up and said their piece, to the effect: “We’re all in this together, for better' or worse.” They got a big hand. The m eeting broke up after a num ber of telegram s w ere sent to Congress. — Feb. 2, 1946. e r s f r o barrel. In a little while he was lying on the ground dead. It has been a puzzle to me that the Negroes did not start killing the slave traders. I am reading H arriet Tubm an in The M ilitant and she was th e most outstanding woman in United States history. Also about Nat T urner and John Brown. There is a man here th at was raised in Florida. He hates Ne groes and would like to kill them. This m an said w hat he would most desire would be the separa tion of the whites and blacks, not to make voters or jurors of Negroes, not to allow them to hold office or interm arry, and so on. You no doubt have heard all of that, so I will not dwell on it. I think the freedom movement has done very well considering the way the Negroes were ground down and w hat they went through. Wayne La Grange W e 're Genuinely Grateful Baltimore, Md. Although a little late, I am send ing $2.10 to help support the So cialist Education Fund. I know th a t w hat I am sending is very small, but I only get $54 a m onth Social Security and my w ife only gets $20 making a total of $74 to buy our own fuel and keep up our house—and no fringe benefits. W.C. IL A Bosses in Saigon Detroit, Mich. It is hard to conceive of a more abysmal disgrace to the American labor movement than the “aid” now being given by “veteran dockw orkers” in expediting the unloading of w ar m ateriel in the ports of Saigon, Vietnam. According to the Jan. 15 AFLCIO News, stevedores from the International Longshoremen of America “patriotically” answered governm ent call and now have begun to install a new cargohandling system which will make it possible to unclog the ports. As of early December, Saigon was tied up with m ountains of food, supplies and ammunition. Thanks to the ILA “patriots,” the U.S. governm ent can hope to clear the w ay for more men and shipments to be used against the popular revolution now sweeping southern Vietnam. The ILA is paying for a six-month tour of duty for at least four men, which w ill cost the union — not the governm ent — some $50,-$60,000; the ILA also plans to pay for costs to bring Vietnamese dockworkers to the U.S. for on-the-job training. President Thomas Gleason of the ILA says the new system should cut ship “tu rn around” tim e from weeks to days or hours. U.S. “labor” thus brings more productivity to Vietnamese labor but does not even bother itself w ith the fact th at it will be tu rn ing th e south Vietnamese w orker back to a b ru tal antilabor regime which, as Emil Mazey of the UAW months ago pointed out, does not allow free trade unions even to exist. Gleason and the other “patriots” also do not bother themselves with the fact th at they are aiding the suppression of a movement of the working and farm ing population of Vietnam, by the same ruling class th at wants to hold down American w orkers’ wages and m O Page Seven u r R e a d e autom ate their jobs out of ex demn it in the eyes of every civilized person on earth. Every istence. “Saigon is an old port,” Glea one is for peace. No one for war. son said, patronizingly. “They’ve Yet for a decade we have been been operating it lazy for a thou bankrupting the country and making debt slaves of the people sand years or so. When you try to change customs, you’re not and their children for untold gen too welcome. But w e’re getting erations to come in preparing for a w ar th at no one wants. How through to them .” Gleason w asn’t in Saigon a foolish can we get? thousand years ago so maybe he - The problem is not easy. Today, doesn’t realize th at the Viet in our country about ten percent namese dockworkers are “lazy” of our labor force is employed in today because they don’t w ant to preparing for this w ar that no one unload bullets to kill their broth wants. A nother ten percent serv ices those who are already en ers. If you were in the same predicament, and you didn’t dare gaged in w ar in Vietnam. Add this tw enty percent to the already organize, you’d be “lazy” too. Perhaps it takes such an 'Utter unemployed in this country and betrayal of labor solidarity as'th a t you can readily see th a t the re of the ILA in Vietnam before sult would be really serious. No American workers will realize that w onder the Washington govern they should be hesitant about m ent is more afraid of peace than cooperating w ith the executioner of war. World W ar II solved the un of their colonial brothers. They m ust turn for inspiration to the employment problems of the exam ple of the Seattle w orkers in 1930s. Shall the present problem 1919 who struck rath e r than ship be solved only by a third World m ateriel to suppress the Russian W ar th at would m ake the other Revolution. But their responsibil two look like Sunday School pic nics in comparison? It is a sad ity is even greater in 1966. Jan Garrett indictm ent of our economic sys tem when, apparently, we cannot Think It O ver have prosperity and good times in Fort Bragg, Calif. this country w ithout w ar or prep If there were no other argu arations for war. m ents against the insanity and I will ask my readers to reflect futility of w ar the terrible waste a moment on the figures below of resources, money and m an and ask themselves if the untold power would be enough to con- billions of dollars we are spending r s on w ar and preparations for a bigger w ar could not be used for a better purpose. Here is w hat the cost of one heavy bomber would do: Build two modem, ' fully equipped hospitals. Build two electric power plants, each serving a city of 60,000 peo ple. Build a modern school in each of th irty cities. The cost of a single destroyer would build enough homes to house 60,000 people. We pay for a fighter plane w ith half a million, bushels of wheat. Remember, if a third world w a r would come w ith the m odem weapons we have today half the people would be crem ated w ithin hours and only a barbaric, brutal ized form of life would rem ain in which the living would envy the dead. THINK IT OVER. Jack Odom, Route 2 Box 208, For Bragg, Calif. 95437 Renewal Manati, Puerto Rico I am enclosing $1 for a sixmonth subscription to your paper. Becoming acquainted w ith The M ilitant while living in Jersey City I would really like to receive it once more. So please send me the paper as soon as possible. AG. It W a s R ep o rted in the P re s s McCarthyism Revisited ■— On Jan. 14 ABC carried a program in which actress Jean M uir was perm itted to tell the chilling story of how she was driven out of broadcasting during the McCarthy era after being labelled a “Com m unist” by Red Channels, a lucra tive red-hunting publication of the time. However, after Miss M uir taped the show ABC deleted a few things from it. Among the facts taken out were the name of the sponsor that fired her (General Foods), and the name of the broadcasting system that went along w ith it (NBC). Otherwise it was quite a daring expose of McCarthyism. News of the Week — A con fessed bomber of a Negro home in Jacksonville, Fla., named five Klansmen as conspirators to the bombing. They w ere tried and acquitted. The judge said racial feelings of the jurors played a part in the verdict. Dim View — Prof. Gerhard O. W. Mueller of New York Uni versity Law School takes w hat some might interpret as an unAmerican view of the benefits of the profit motive. Testifying on a proposed New York law to com pensate the victims of criminal violence, he offered two argu ments against it. He said crim inals would tend to take the same “nobody-gets-hurt” view of rob bing individuals as they now do of banks, etc. He further argued th at a psychological relationship often existed between the crim inal and victim in which the vic tim often unconsciously invited attack. The possibility of compen sation for the victim’s family, he said, m ight increase the invita tions to homicide. tary, “The World of the TeenAger,” New York Times television critic Jack Gould commented: “In an hour’s consideration of the m atters on minds of high-school students, there was not one word about Vietnam and the draft.” Homey — A survey of swank M anhattan town houses and apart ments shows th at rich people pre fer their kitchens simple, reports the New York Times. For ex ample, when a Mr. and Mrs. Mi chael Tucker designed “their spa cious ground-floor kitchen and their second-flogr serving pantry (larger than most kitchens), they stuck to such tried and true ap pliances as stainless steel ranges, sinks, refrigerators and freezing cabinets.” At the home of Mr. and Mrs. Irw in Donenfeld, “the equip m ent is standard. There is quite a lot of it, though — two dish washers, two stainless steel sinks, two electric ovens, a restaurantsize refrigerator and a six-burner gas range.” O.K. For Foreigners — The fed eral government is making sure that the tobacco industry is com pensated for any possible loss re sulting from the required health warning on cigarette packages. The D epartm ent of Agriculture is paying W arner Brothers $106,000 to insert scenes designed to stim u late smoking in a travelogue to be shown overseas. The D epartm ent is also putting up $210,000 to sub sidize cigarette advertising in J a pan, Thailand and Austria. I. Q. Test — Manuel Yellen, board chairm an of the Lorillard tobacco company, doubts th a t the health w arning on cigarette pack ages will have any significant im pact on sales. He said: “I think the American public is too intel ligent to pay any attention to that type of warning.” •■'.Y' G reat Pacifier — Asked if busi ness would tu rn against Johnson because of some price restraints, Paul Wren, president of Boston’s Old Colony T rust Co., commented: “There isn’t any open w arfare and there won’t be any as long asthose good profits hold up.” — Harry R ing ~ l FO R N E W R E A D E R S If you are a new reader and would like to get better acquainted, you may obtain a special four-month intro ductory subscription by sending this blank and $1 to th e Complete Coverage — After viewing the NBC-TV documen- MILITANT 873 Broadway Ne\y York, N. Y. 10003 Thought for the W eek “The only people in south Vietnam who have staked their lives on Am erican support have been the cliques and coteries of businessmen and m ilitary m en of south Vietnam who have lived for 11 years off Am erican m oney and support. That is w hy we hear K y reject negotia tions w ith the north; that is w hy this tyrannical little tinhorn dictator of south Vietnam — w hom we financed and set up — is most eager that American bombing of North Vietnam be resumed." — Senator W ayne Morse, Jan. 19, 1966. Name Street City ................................................. State Zip.. | Page Eight th e MILITANT M onday, January 31, 1966 JU LIAN BOND Veterans Plan Protest An Atlanta 3rd Party Possibility In Capital on Viet War B y A le x H a rte J u lia n Bond, the Negro Repre sentative-elect w ho was refused his seat e a rly th is m o n th in the G eorgia legisla ture on grounds o f his opposition to the V ie tn a m w a r, m ay ru n as an independent can didate instead o f a D em ocrat in th e Feb. 23 special election to f i l l his vacant seat. '‘•O bviously m y philosophy does h o t agree w ith e ith e r the Demo crats o r Republicans,” said Bond, Whose seat was challenged a fte r he declared support to a Jan. 6 statem ent against the w a r b y the S tudent N o n vio le n t C oo rd in a tin g C om m ittee. Bond, w h o was elected by an overw h e lm in g vote in a p red om inate ly b la ck d is tric t in A t lanta, is p u b lic ity d ire c to r fo r SNCC. A ccording to a Jan. 24 A P dis patch, Bond hasn’t y e t decided w h a t designation he w il l use in th e Feb. 23 election, b u t he says a th ir d Pa rty based on A tla n ta ’s black popu lation and supported b y SNCC appears lik e ly . 'SNCC chairm a n John L e w is said SNCC leaders d id n o t expect the Bond controversy, b u t th a t now th a t i t has broken out, i t “ pre sented an o p p o rtu n ity to s ta rt o r ganizing in A tla n ta ” along lines already mapped out in parts of A labam a. I n Low ndes and Greene Coun ties in A labam a, SNCC has backed th e fo rm a tio n o f the “ B la c k Pan th e r” p a rty. Negroes outnum ber w hites in b oth counties and w ith re g istra tio n d rives now underw ay m ay be able to m uster m ore votes a t the polls than the w h ite racists. Julian Bond The day a fte r Bond was re fused his seat, SNCC released a statem ent sup p o rtin g h im and de c la rin g th a t SNCC and its allies plan to “ Convene w ith in the near fu tu re an e x p lo ra to ry conference to discuss the fe a s ib ility o f fo rm in g a freedom organization, s im ila r to the M ississippi Freedom Democra tic P a rty (M F D P ) b u t in no w ay aligned w ith o r supporting the re g u la r D em ocratic P a rty .” The M F D P had organized in dependently o f the state Demo c ra tic P a rty, b u t had supported the n a tional D em ocratic P a rty candidates and sought to replace the ra cist M ississippi delegates in the n a tio n a l D em ocratic P a rty convention in A tla n tic C ity in 1964. The M F D P was re b u ffe d on this. A le a fle t d is trib u te d by SNCC in pre p a ratio n fo r organizing the B la ck P an th e r p a rty in A labam a, ca rrie d the sym bol o f the Demo cra tic P a rty o f A labam a w ith the statem ent: “ Is th is the p a rty you w ant?” The sym bol is a w h ite rooster labeled “ w h ite suprem acy.” The le a fle t declared: “ T his is the p a rty o f: George W allace, A1 L in go, B u ll Connor, S h e riff James C la rk and a ll the o ther racists in Alabam a . . . [as w e ll as o f] L y n don Baines Johnson, President of the U n ite d States. T h e y a ll oper ate together, in A labam a and in W ashington . . . I f Alabam a doesn’t w a n t to repeat w h a t happened to the M ississippi Freedom Demo c ra tic P a rty then Alabam a doesn’t have to.” On Jan. 22 the A labam a State D em ocratic Com m ittee re moved the “ w h ite suprem acy” slo gan fro m the p a rty b a llo t emblem in an a tte m p t to head o ff the new movem ent. A ll-N e g ro Gov’t Speaking o f the B la ck P anther p a rty , L e w is re ce n tly said “ in some instances i t m ig h t be necessary to have all-N egro governm ent before you can have a w o rka b le in te r ra cia l governm ent.” R ichard H a ley, Southern regional d ire c to r fo r the Congress o f R acial E q u a lity said CORE w ould support a ll b lack slates o f candidates in some counties w here blacks are a ma jo r it y and w here there w ere no w hites w h o w ere not racists w ill in g to run. In Tuskegee, A labam a recently, signs have appeared among Negro dem onstrators s a y i n g : “ Macon C ounty is 85 percent Negro; Ne groes should ru n the governm ent.” N EW Y O R K — The Veterans and Reservists to End the W a r in V ie tn a m here have scheduled a dem onstration fo r Feb. 5 in W ashington, D. C. w here members o f the group w ill re tu rn th e ir discharge papers and campaign ribbons to P resident Johnson in protest against the V ie tfta m w ar. Others w ill fo rm a suppo rting p ic ke t lin e in fr o n t o f the W h ite House. The dem onstration w ill take place on the fir s t anniversary of the s ta rt o f the bom bing o f n orth V ietnam . The c a ll fo r the demon stra tio n declares: “ The U n ite d States was created by a group o f men w ho treasured th e ir independence and w ere be in g s tifle d b y a repressive govern m ent thousands o f m iles away. W hen reasoning fa ile d they chose re vo lu tio n to get w h a t th e y knew were th e ir ju s t righ ts. T he V ie t namese people have an equal rig h t to choose fo r themselves how they shall liv e and be governed . . . “ O u r co u n try has been dis honored b y its [th e U. S. govern m en t’s] arro gant disregard o f the w ill of the Vietnamese people, by its creation and support o f a ser ies of dictatorships in south V ie t nam, by its fre q u e n t attem pts to deceive the A m erican p u b lic . . . We call fo r a ll Am ericans, par tic u la rly veterans and reservists, com m itted to freedom and in te r n a tion al justice to support the ac tio n we are ta kin g and jo in us in dem anding o f the President and o u r governm ent an im m ediate end to th is dishonorable w a r.” The m eeting place o f the dem onstration in W ashington is L a fayette P ark, d ire c tly opposite the W h ite House on P ennsylvania A ve nue, a t 11:30 a.m. Feb. 5. Those in the N ew Y o rk area m ay take chartered buses a t $7 per round tr ip tic k e t, fro m 5 Beekm an St. at 6:00 a.m. th a t m orning. There w ill be a m eeting o f the N ew Y o rk p a rticip a n ts a t 8:00 p.m. on Feb. 3 at the com m ittee’s headquarters, 5 Beekman St. Room 1033, New Y o rk, N . Y . 10038. NSA Supports St. Johns' S trike N E W Y O R K , Jan. 26 — Thousands o f m em bers of th e N a tio n a l S tudents Associa tion plan to picket S t. John’s U n iv e rs ity h ere Jan. 28 to support th e 31 teachers dis missed last m onth because o f th e ir stand in fa v o r of academic freedo m and union organization. N S A m em bers w ill come here in buses fro m cities on th e eastern seaboard. T h ey w i ll appear at th e St. John’s campuses in B ro o klyn and Queens. T h e U n ite d F e d eratio n of College Teachers has been on s trik e a t St. John’s — th e c o u n try’s la r gest C atholic u n iv e rs ity — since Jan. 4 in protest against th e 31 dismissals. W a ll Street M aps Plan To Go Underground [T h e following are- excerpts from an article in the January 12, 1966 W a ll S treet Jo u rn a l.] Q u ie tly, and sometimes secret ly , m any o f the na tio n ’s biggest companies are b u ild in g a lternate headquarters safe fro m nuclear attack. B u rie d underground o r dispersed aw ay fro m b ig target cities, th ey w o u ld be v ita l in keep in g the economy fu n c tio n in g i f ever H-bombs fa ll. N ear here, fo r exam ple, [H u d son, N .Y .] a m am m oth corporate b u n ke r lies hidden in the hollowed-out core o f Iro n M o u n ta in — p ro tected1fro m blast, heat and ra d ia tio n b y countless tons o f rock, soil and iro n ore. A 28-ton steel door in the m o u n ta in side swings open, and a v is ito r w an ders th ro u g h offices, kitchens, dorm itories, com m unications fa c ili ties. N ew Y o rk , 115 m iles to the south, could be incinerated b u t Iro n M o u n ta in offers protection against a ll b u t a near-direct h it b y a m ulti-m egaton weapon . . . I t is a second home fo r several companies, among them S tandard O il Co. (N e w Jersey), M anufac tu re rs H anover T ru s t Co. and S hell O il Co. M ost o f Iro n M oun ta in ’ s 700 “ customers” o n ly re n t storage space fo r v ita l records and documents, a common enough practice in the nuclear age. B u t toe three firm s named m a in ta in elaborate subterranean headquar ters, as w e ll, w here selected ke y employes and other corporate bom b su rvivo rs w o u ld liv e and w o rk a fte r an attack . . . “ I t ’s safe to say now th a t alm ost a ll o f the 500 top corporations have some sort o f alternate head quarters arrangem ents,” says V ir g il L . Couch, assistant d ire c to r fo r in d u s tria l p a rtic ip a tio n in the O ffice o f C iv il Defense . . .1 Some o f these command posts are spartan indeed; a records storage va u lt, a sm all o ffice w ith tw o or three desks, a fe w cots, perhaps a camp stove and some canned o r dehydrated food. B u t others are designed as fu ll-fle d g e d nerve centers cram m ed w ith fa c ilitie s and capable o f housing scores o f employes fo r extended periods . . . Jersey S tandard’s fa c ility , fo r example, can accommodate 200 people in 50 bedrooms and d o r m ito rie s . . . Once inside, i t is hard to te ll th a t the headquarters are u n der ground. W alls are painted in a v a rie ty o f b rig h t colors, and v iv id p rin ts adorn them . O ffices lo o k m uch lik e those in modern sky scrapers. T here is also a lounge area, a m edical section complete w ith e x a m in in g room and hospi ta l beds, and a “ m usic” room, w here easy chairs and a red-andgold couch in v ite com fortable lis te n in g to piped-in concerts . . . The entrance to S hell O il’s bun k e r is lin e d w ith a rtific ia l flow ers and colored spotlights. The m ain o ffice contains about 40 ye llo w desks w ith stylish wooden tops, and the e n tire la y o u t has a cozy “ co u n try ” a ir. S hell is no w busy in s ta llin g a w o rld -w id e com m uni cations system in the b u n ke r and has already p u t executives through d ry runs as practice fo r ru n n in g the fa c ility . . . . So has M anufacturers Hanover, w h ic h dispatched ten o f its o f ficers to Iro n M o u n ta in 16 months ago fo r an exercise. There they “ reconstructed” the accounts o f a branch bank w h ic h th e o re tica lly had been destroyed. U sing d u p li cate records stored in the a lte r nate headquarters, they had com plete success in id e n tify in g cus tom er accounts and came up o n ly $6,800 sho rt in tra cin g the branch’s outstanding loans . . . . O the r concerns already have selected key employes. T h is raises a k n o tty problem : W ho shall the chosen people be? Some com panies hope to be able to m an th e ir centers at the fir s t sign th a t w a r m ig h t come. Thus, those forew arned w o u ld have a fa r bet te r chance o f staying a liv e than those deemed unessential and le ft in the c ity to brave the bomb. A nd even i f the selection is made i a fte r an attack, those picked w o uld be m ore lik e ly to s u rvive in underground safety than those le ft outside . . . . Jersey Standard, w h ic h plans to house fam ilies, has faced the prob lem b y assigning skeleton crew functions to certain jo b slots, not to in d ivid u a ls. So i t ’s possible fo r a m an to get a prom otion and fin d he no longer has a desk at Iro n M ou ntain. “ I have n o th in g against vice presidents,” says Chester O. French, .assistant se c u rity a d m inistrator, “ b u t w e need operating specialists to ru n the operation . . .” Though companies s triv e to avoid the appearance o f special p rivile g e fo r those selected, i t ’s perhaps in e vita b le th a t a skeleton crew assignment has become a status sym bol com parable to the executive washroom ke y — at least at some concerns. “ Listen, you’re a nobody in th is corpora tio n i f yo u r name isn’t on a desk at alternate headquarters,” says an executive o f one fir m . . . . H o w to get them there? T his m a tte r plagues m a n y companies. C e rta in ly all-out nuclear attacks on U.S. cities w o u ld m ake trans p o rta tio n a nightm are, and com panies w ith alternate headquar ters concede th a t m any o f th e ir key personnel m ay n o t be able to fin d th e ir w a y o u t o f the con fusion — i f the y su rvived the in i tia l attack . . . . Such d iffic u ltie s help convince some companies th a t an alternate headquarters isn’t w o rth the trouble. “ I don’t see how you’re going to get people there before a nuclear a ttack — there p ro b a b ly w o n ’t be m uch w a rn in g — o r afterw ards. F o r another, i t ’s a a p re tty agonizing th in g to decide w ho is going to s ta ff a s u rv iv a l headquarters,” says an executive o f one b ig m a n u fa ctu re r w ith no s u rv iv a l center. A n o th e r executive adds: “ I f the bombs come, there w on’t be a n yth in g le ft to adm inis te r.”
Similar documents
The Militant
ground, E th e l became interested in the e a rly th irtie s in the great social upheaval in Russia. She made a to u r o f the S oviet U nion; and, upon re tu rn in g to Toledo, O hio, she gave a r...
More information