2004/05 - George Eliot Hospital
Transcription
2004/05 - George Eliot Hospital
George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust Annual Report and Review 2004/05 Better Care Without Delay 2 Chairman and Chief Executive’s Report year, but we The George Eliot congratulate and thank Hospital plays a vital all our colleagues for role in our local their efforts in community and it is reducing the deficit through the dedicated considerably. support of our staff, our Additional challenges volunteers and our local have also affected our population, who give overall performance tirelessly of their time, and we were of course effort and kind disappointed to lose a donations to support us, Frank McCarney, star in the Healthcare that we continue to Trust Chairman Commission’s ratings. provide excellent quality However, a change in structure acute care to those who need it. and a range of new measures in This has been a year of great place are already showing change at the Eliot and great demonstrable improvements in challenge. We have seen some of our most challenging areas, unprecedented increases in the including delayed transfers of care number of people attending our and the impact this can have on A&E department over the year and A&E and cancelled operations. whilst this speaks volumes of the We are both extremely proud to excellent and swift care that is be associated with the Trust and, provided, it has inevitably had an despite some of the constraints that impact on other areas of our we have faced, the hard work of our service. staff has ensured we have It is unfortunate that we were unable to reach financial balance this demonstrated excellent outcomes in and the qualitative the following: improvements around l Meeting urgent the actual patient cancer referrals experience. within two weeks As you know, the for all cancers headlines don’t always l Meeting breast reveal the full story cancer diagnosis and and we thank our local referral to treatment population for taking targets the time to understand l Ensuring patients some of the real wait no longer than Duncan Phimister, challenges that we face 13 weeks for a first Acting Chief Executive and the ways we are outpatient addressing them. appointment We hope the following pages will l Providing patients with suspected give you an insight into many of the heart attack with thrombolysis excellent areas of work that are treatment within 30 minutes of continually improving throughout arriving at the hospital door the Trust, in addition to the l Maintaining good levels of operational information that you cleanliness may be interested in. We are totally committed to But, of course, patient care is about providing the best quality care to much more than hitting targets and the people of North Warwickshire, we welcome the Healthcare Nuneaton, Bedworth, South Commission’s decision to move away from performance targets to a Leicestershire and the surrounding areas. quality standards based approach We are fortunate to have an throughout the coming year. incredibly dedicated staff and This means we will be required to volunteer base who really make the meet the Government’s ‘Standards difference between providing good for Better Health’, which will provide patients with a much clearer care and an excellent patient experience. Thank you to you all. outline of both the quantitative improvements such as waiting times Frank McCarney and Duncan Phimister Mr Tucson Dunn was the substantive Chief Executive Officer for the whole of 2004/05. In May 2005 The George Eliot and he parted company following his suspension. The suspension was made to enable investigations into allegations made against him and was a neutral act, apportioning no blame. The matter is now closed and Mr Duncan Phimister will be Acting Chief Executive Officer until a substantive appointment is made. Key statistics George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust provides acute hospital services to the people of Nuneaton and Bedworth, North Warwickshire, South West Leicestershire and Northern Coventry. During 2004/05, we cared for the following: l 4,581 elective (planned) inpatients l 15,825 elective (planned) day cases l 132,000 outpatient appointments (new and follow-up) l 58,196 A&E attendances, of which 23,803 were admitted This level of activity is supported by 1,800 staff, 400 beds and an annual budget of £85 million. 3 A profile of the Trust and our work The Trust’s staff deliver traditional district general hospital services to a local population of around 250,000 and provide specialist plastic surgery services to a much wider area. We are based on one site on the outskirts of Nuneaton, Warwickshire. Demographics Some 61,900 people live in the largely rural Borough of North Warwickshire. Many of the settlements in North Warwickshire developed to meet the needs of the mining industry. This is in contrast to the towns and villages on the western side of the Borough, which developed to meet the needs of commuters. Nuneaton and Bedworth is the second largest District in Warwickshire, with a population of just over 119,000 but the smallest geographical area. The age, gender and ethnic structure is broadly comparative with England and Wales. However, there is a greater proportion of children resident in urban wards around Nuneaton and a greater proportion of elderly (over 75 years) in rural areas surrounding North Warwickshire. There is a relatively high rate of teenage and young adult conceptions and births, with lower than national average birth rates among women over 30. Our feature on pages 6-7 outlines the joint approach we are taking with North Warwickshire PCT to work with young parents (under 19 years old) and the development of services to support them. North Warwickshire has high rates of coronary heart disease, obstructive pulmonary disease and colorectal cancer in comparison to other Districts and Boroughs in Warwickshire. Local PCTs, including North Warwickshire PCT, are responsible for planning and providing the care needed for the populations they serve, in collaboration with partner organisations. With increasing life expectancy and a national shift towards managing long-term conditions, much of this will support the development of alternatives to acute care. The Trust already takes a proactive approach to providing outreach services, which can be seen later in this report in our features on diabetes, osteoporosis and physiotherapy, where the Trust is working collaboratively with primary care providers and commissioners to offer care in the most appropriate setting for patients. This also supports our aims of reducing occupancy rates and length of stay to free up capacity for elective activity and generate additional income. Working with our local partners We work closely with other healthcare providers in clinical networks, including cancer, pathology and orthopaedic services. Our key network partners are University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, South Warwick General Hospital and the Arden Cancer network. We run shared services – such as physiotherapy and occupational therapy - with local NHS Primary Care Trusts, primarily North Warwickshire PCT and Hinckley and Bosworth PCT. We also work closely with local Social Services partners to deliver integrated care. A mission to be a ‘no wait’ hospital Harnessing the power of technology The Trust’s mission is to provide better care without delay by striving to become a ‘no wait’ hospital. We are committed to providing patient-centred care in an environment that aims to personalise and demystify the healthcare experience for patients and their families. Staff at the ‘Eliot’, as it’s affectionately known, work to provide outstanding clinical quality with a sincere commitment to patient dignity. We also recognise the importance of information technology in modernising patient care and have gained national recognition as a leader in embracing technological advances. SEPTEMBER 2005 T 1 F 2 S 3 S 4 M 5 T 6 W 7 T 8 F 9 S 10 S 11 M 12 T 13 W 14 T 15 F 16 S 17 S 18 M 19 T 20 W 21 T 22 F 23 S 24 S 25 M 26 T 27 W 28 T 29 F 30 4 An overview of our performance Star rating The George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust was awarded one star in the Healthcare Commission’s national star ratings for 2003/04. Whilst disappointed at the loss of a star, the Trust has a clear understanding of where the gaps were and. more importantly, has robust plans in place that are already demonstrating excellent progress in these areas. Accident and emergency The Trust made good progress, ensuring that 98% of patients attending A&E were seen within four hours. Unfortunately, following an extremely busy winter period, the Trust was unable to maintain this target without the risk of compromising patient care. We are pleased to report that the Trust has since introduced new ways of working and analysing information, helping us to pinpoint our pressure points. A clear action plan has helped turn performance around and, despite the continuing high numbers of attenders, patients are being seen within four hours. Delayed transfers of care The Trust experienced some difficulties, often called ‘delayed discharges, with discharging patients who are medically fit but who require some form of Figure 1: Number of A&E Attenders from April 03 - June 05 Note: There is a fairly well established seasonal pattern, and now the overall trend looks more steady. ‘intermediate care’ (i.e., rehabilitation, nursing care or support at home). The Primary Care Trust has plans to increase intermediate care capacity locally. The George Eliot welcomes the support this will bring. If we have problems moving patients on to more appropriate settings, it reduces the number of patients we can admit. Combined with an increase in emergency admissions (and a duty to treat patients on the basis of need), this can unfortunately result in the cancellation of routine operations due to a shortage of beds something the Trust never wants to do. The good news is that since a multi-agency discharge team meeting has been established, the number of delayed transfers of care have been reducing dramatically. The meeting was established in April 2005 and includes representatives from both George Eliot Hospital and North Warwickshire PCT, Occupational Therapy, Physiotherapy, discharge liaison nurses, intermediate care, Social Services, health advisors, rehabilitation (Bramcote) and Trust Matrons. By working collaboratively, each ‘agency’ is able to help pinpoint ways in which they can alleviate constraints in the system and ensure that patients’ needs are addressed early, reducing the length of their hospital stay. 5 An overview of our performance Figure 2: Percentage of A&E attenders seen (admitted, discharged or treated) within four hours. Waiting times Break even The Eliot has had a good reputation for maintaining low waiting times. We are pleased we have ensured that almost every outpatient attending their first appointment has been seen within 13 weeks – 91.7% compared to the England average of 83.4%. Similarly, no patients waited more than nine months for an inpatient or day case admission, whilst the Trust ensured all urgent cancer patients were seen inside two weeks. NHS Trusts have a statutory duty to ‘break even’ on income and expenditure. Although the Eliot just missed this particularly challenging target, the deficit of £786,000 was less than 1% of turnover. Staff have been congratulated on their efforts to keep the deficit at a minimum. The Trust’s reference cost index (the measure of how ‘costeffective’ an NHS Trust’s services are) was 79%. This essentially means that George Eliot provides services 21% cheaper than the average NHS hospital, indicating not only how economical we are but also why there is little room for cut-backs. Check out Money Matters on page 24 for further information from our Finance Director. OCTOBER 2005 S 1 S 2 M 3 T 4 W 5 T 6 F 7 S 8 S 9 M 10 T 11 W 12 T 13 F 14 S 15 S 16 M 17 T 18 W 19 T 20 F 21 S 22 S 23 M 24 T 25 W 26 T 27 F 28 S 29 S M 30 31 6 From here to maternity It has been an action-packed year at the George Eliot’s Maternity Unit following its major internal refurbishment last year. A total of 2,671 babies were born during the year and the team keep adding to their support for expectant parents and new parents, not to mention the babies too! Back to birthing basics Using the Royal College of Midwives guidelines, George Eliot staff produced their own Midwife- led Care guidelines to help bring ‘birthing back to basics’. Two ‘active birth rooms’ have been designed by midwives to be sensitive to the needs of women and their partners during pregnancy, with the aim of bridging the gap between home and hospital. Midwife Gerry Duffin said: “Birth is a natural process and midwifery led care offers a ‘holistic’ approach during childbirth, with the emphasis on keeping birth normal. “The private and quiet environment created encourages women to follow their own instincts, while the midwives provide ‘self help’ methods and simple solutions to ease discomfort during labour. “The support provided reduces the need for strong pain relief, reduces interventions and increases women’s satisfaction.” Future plans include the provision of two early labour rooms on the antenatal/postnatal ward (Drayton), allowing partners to stay and offer support in the privacy of the purpose built room. Midwives demonstrate the ‘home from home’ active birth rooms. Cottoning on… The George Eliot recently became one of the first hospitals in the country to use only cotton nappies as part of a new scheme promoting the benefits of environmentally friendly nappies. The maternity unit is working in partnership with community learning charity, ContinYou, and Warwickshire County Council on the three-year project, which ensures all new parents at the The first babies to try the cotton nappies hospital are provided with a supply of cotton nappies. The project, which should help reduce landfill waste in Warwickshire, will cost the new parent an average of £250 - instead of £1,000 - in nappies. New Mum Vanessa said: “I am really impressed with how small and easy it is to use the cotton nappies. I think the Cotton on to Cotton Nappies project is a great idea.” 7 Parents and children Preparing Young Parents Hospital and community based midwives were responsible for establishing Preparing Young Parents (PYPs) groups that were launched in January 2005 in conjunction with colleagues from Connexions, the Early Years Project and Warwickshire Teenage Pregnancy Strategy. The weekly drop-in sessions are aimed at expectant mums who are under the age of 19, as well as at their partners/families. Young parents benefit from a wide range of support and advice from the Connexions advisor and midwife, who are always present at the weekly sessions. The Connexions advisor can provide information on benefits, housing needs and training opportunities whilst the groups participate in informal discussions that are focused around birth, labour, coping strategies, relaxation, emotions and feeding. Special topics are frequently arranged and have included baby massage techniques, smoking cessation advice, counselling on breast feeding and aromatherapy amongst others. The sessions run at Hatters Space, Abbey Green, Nuneaton, every Friday 1-3pm and at the Early Years Centre, Kings Avenue, Atherstone, every Monday from 11.30 am to 1.00 pm. Plans are in place to offer the same in Bedworth. Joined-up working benefits children’s services Rotational working practices have been established for staff working in the George Eliot and University Hospitals of Coventry & Warwickshire Neonatal Units. By working across both units, staff are maintaining and further developing their clinical and management skills, which enhances the quality care neonates receive and also improves staff retention. The Trust was also delighted to appoint two new paediatricians to the Integrated Child Health Services. Dr Melanie Kershaw’s specialty is in paediatric diabetes. She also carries the responsibility of the Named Doctor for Child Protection. The other new acute based paediatrician is Dr Kathy Bailey, whose specialty is rheumatology. NOVEMBER 2005 T 1 W 2 T 3 F 4 S 5 S 6 M 7 T 8 W 9 T 10 F 11 S 12 S 13 M 14 T 15 W 16 T 17 F 18 S 19 S 20 M 21 T 22 W 23 T 24 F 25 S 26 S 27 M 28 T 29 W 30 8 Accessibility to all The Trust is committed to improving accessibility to our services for everyone who needs them, regardless of age, ethnicity, language or disability. Over the last year, we have been making some important strides: Liaison nurse for learning disabilities An important link between the hospital and the community has been established for people with learning disabilities who need to use hospital services. Louise Bates, who works fulltime for the North Warwickshire PCT as a community nurse, is now based in the hospital two days per week as Liaison Nurse, Learning Disabilities. Louise aims to raise awareness amongst adults with learning disabilities, as well as offering advice, support and information to them about their health needs. This vital role involves close Louise Bates works with a member of staff working with hospital staff, carers and other professionals to facilitate a smoother transition and greater understanding between the hospital and community areas. Commenting on her role, Louise said: “I am available to offer support on consent and capacity issues and will be developing ‘best interest guidance’ and preadmission assessments to assist the ward staff in the patients’ care.” PALS (Patient Advice and Liaison Service) As it enters into a fourth year of service here at George Eliot Hospital, the number of people approaching the Patient Advice & Liaison Service (PALS) continues to increase. PALS staff are asked to assist with various issues or concerns that people have - from delays with appointments, cancelled operations and instances of poor communication to passing on praise for a member of staff who has “gone the extra mile”. The department also has a wellestablished team of volunteers, whose help is invaluable. The volunteers are involved in escorting patients and visitors to various departments around the PALS volunteers here to help site, giving directions and meeting and greeting visitors as they enter through the main entrance. They are also helping to set up a health information resource within PALS by sourcing leaflets and booklets on varying health conditions and support groups. If you have any questions or queries about any of the services provided by the George Eliot Hospital, or if indeed you would like to pass on your thanks, please do not hesitate to contact PALS on (024) 76865550 or freephone 0800 0407194, Monday to Friday 8.30 am – 6.00 pm. Cross-cultural support The Multi-Lingual Co-Worker service has gone from strength to strength and is well into its third year as part of PALS. Parveen Deen, Multi-Lingual Co-Worker, has recently been working very closely with the Trust’s Patient & Public Involvement Forum to introduce them to local ethnic minority groups. This is in an effort to raise community groups’ awareness of the work the PPI Forum is undertaking, and also to raise the Forum’s awareness of the different community groups within the local area. Plans are also well under way for the Trust’s third annual multicultural event, the theme of which is around the work of volunteers, to coincide with 2005 – the ‘Year of the Volunteer’. If you have any queries or questions around multi-cultural issues or interpreting requirements (Punjabi, Urdu and Hindi), please contact Parveen on (024) 76865595. 9 Communication and involvement Accessing Expert Advice Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Who better to tell us what is working well and what needs improving than our patients themselves? The Trust takes the compliments, complaints and suggestions from everyone using our hospital very seriously. We strive to use as many ways of accessing your opinions as we can to help guide and drive forward improvements in your care. Patient and Public Involvement plays an important role within the Trust. The delay in the Trust’s intentions to become a Foundation Trust has prevented some of the plans to work with George Eliot Membership. Members of our local community and PPI Forum participate in groups and activities within the Trust. This ensures the patient viewpoint is central to the decisions that we make Santa visits about service development. our It is planned to form a Christmas patient information group Fair. to comment on all new information leaflets developed in the Trust. If you would like to be part of this group - which is postal only - please contact Christine Longstaff, Head of Patient Partnerships, on (024) 7686 5661. A very successful Christmas Fair was held in November 2004, with stalls from the community as well as the Trust. In addition to the money raised by individual groups, the Trust raised over £1,000 for cancer services. During the coming months it is hoped to raise the profile of patient and public involvement to make sure that it continues to play a central role. Patient surveys The Healthcare Commission carried out two surveys nationally in which 140,000 patients gave their perception of outpatient clinics and emergency departments across England. The surveys represented one of the biggest national tests of patient attitudes, and are being used as an indicator of whether patients believe that services are really improving. In total, 367 George Eliot Hospital patients responded to the Emergency survey and 469 to the Outpatient survey. Although this represents only a small proportion of the patients we see each year, the Trust is using the findings to help direct future improvements. The overall picture at the Eliot was in line with national results. Key results for the Trust showed that 94% of patients responding rated their care in the Outpatients department as good, very good or excellent, and 90% in A&E. Constructive criticism Complaints provide the Trust with an opportunity to learn from our patients’ experiences and to improve our services. In the year to 1st April 2005, the Trust received a total of 238 formal complaints. This is a slight increase from 2003/04 (218), which may be due to the fact that verbal complaints are now included in these figures. We try to respond to complaints within the time limits set by the NHS Complaints procedure. Unfortunately, unavailability of staff due to holidays, sickness and pressure of work sometimes prevents this, and the Trust will not respond within these time limits at the expense of a full investigation and a satisfactory response. In the year we succeeded in responding to 78% of all complaints within the 20 working day guidance. The number of complaints resolved at the local resolution stage of the process i.e., the initial stage - was 229 (96%), During the year new leaflets have been made available to inform patients and their relatives on the Formal Complaints Process. The Trust will continue to treat all complaints with equity and to encourage staff to use these as a learning opportunity. A number of service improvements, based on concerns raised, have been made. Two such examples are: l All patients admitted with a fractured femur are now referred automatically to a dietician. l A number of wards have implemented the use of ‘white’ boards as a reminder to follow the progress of requests for investigations. Equally, we welcome the many ‘thank you’ letters that we receive and ensure the relevant staff are made aware of them. The Comments Book in main reception also provides an opportunity for many to express their thanks. These comments are always passed on. DECEMBER 2005 T 1 F 2 S 3 S 4 M 5 T 6 W 7 T 8 F 9 S 10 S 11 M 12 T 13 W 14 T 15 F 16 S 17 S 18 M 19 T 20 W 21 T 22 F 23 S 24 S 25 M 26 T 27 W 28 T 29 F S 30 31 10 The Year of the (invaluable) Volunteer As mentioned in our earlier article about PALS, the Trust is extremely fortunate to have a dedicated team of volunteers who give tirelessly of their time and effort to support patients and staff in practical ways, and by raising much appreciated funds. We would also be unable to provide such a comprehensive level of care without our PALS volunteers or, indeed, without the other forms of support described on this page. As 2005 is The Year of the Volunteer, why not get involved yourself? Celebrating 50 years of the League of Friends In the 50 years since they were established in the Eliot, the Nuneaton Hospitals League of Friends, an independent charity and member of the National Association of Hospital & Community Friends, has raised and donated more than £2.5 million to benefit the care of local patients through the provision of vital life-saving equipment. This staggering achievement is all down to the hard work of the volunteers who run the Handover of electric beds by the League of Friends League and provide hours of help behind the two tea bars situated in the main hospital corridor and in the Maternity department, in addition to organising other fundraising events throughout the year. The many donations are too numerous to mention, but some of the most recent include £194,000 (the League’s biggest single donation to date) to pay for 164 state-of-the-art electric beds, the peripheral DEXA scanner mentioned on page 14, and £30,000 to provide a more appropriate setting for the Trust’s Bereavement Centre. Duncan Phimister, the Hospital’s Acting Chief Executive, paid tribute to the League of Friends: “The League plays an invaluable role in supporting the quality of patient care and we thank them all wholeheartedly.” League Chairman, Linda O’Raw, also said: “I’d like to thank the amazing team of volunteers who give up their time to serve on the tea bars, arrange fundraising events and keep the League going. They are truly selfless. I’d also like to Tea bar pay tribute to those who kindly leave legacies and donations. These, too, provide very valuable income for the League and, ultimately, patient care.” It needs a minimum of 52 people just to run the main tea bar each week and the League is in need of more volunteers to keep it up. Could you spare a few hours to help out on the tea bar, support the running of the League, or organise additional fundraisers? The minimum support asked for is just three hours per month. For a chat about how you can get involved, please call Linda O’Raw, League Chairman on 024 76 319057. At the time of going to print, the Trust was informed of the sad news that League of Friends former Chairman and Honorary Life President Ken Tyler had passed away. Mr Tyler was a volunteering stalwart and both the Trust and League have paid tribute to him. 11 Supporting our spiritual needs As we have already established, the link between the Trust and volunteers goes far beyond fundraising for vital equipment. The hospital Chapel was made possible from a gift by the League of Friends 11 years ago, while the support of volunteers is instrumental to the success of the Chaplaincy team today. The work of colleagues within the Chaplaincy is supported by 25 lay visitors from six Christian denominations, in addition to Chaplaincy team volunteers with the Rev. Rick White visitors from other faith groups across the local community. With the help of these volunteers, the Chaplaincy is able to offer a more holistic approach to healthcare by providing good levels of access to patients requiring spiritual support. The integration of the Chaplaincy service across acute care and primary care, including its work with local GPs, mental health services and hospices, is still considered a radical and relatively unusual approach to providing spiritual, pastoral and religious care to patients. Canon Edward Pogmore, who heads up the team, explained: “Spiritual needs and care don’t stop at the hospital door or the mental health unit. By understanding better the spiritual needs of the patient, we can impact on the health and well-being of the whole person, not just the physical needs.” The team works with staff across the various healthcare settings to improve training and understanding in spiritual care. It is also playing a role in the newly launched ‘single assessment process’ (SAP), which aims to reduce the number of assessments patients receive as they move through the health and social care system. Said Canon Pogmore: “By simply asking a patient what is important to them and what support they have from family, friends and their faith, we can understand better their individual needs and provide appropriate care to suit them. It also reminds us not to make unnecessary assumptions about a patient.” The team is continuing with its drive to increase the role of spiritual care in community regeneration. It does this by working across the many community interfaces, including healthcare, voluntary organisations and multi-faith groups, to expand support for ‘healthy living’. Trust Chairman, Frank McCarney and Museum Curator, Ann Cahill with children visiting the museum The teaching role of the Trust’s Museum The Trust’s museum has had a particularly successful year, welcoming a total of more than 500 schoolchildren through its doors. Almost 400 of them came during three weeks in March to visit the workshops run as part of the National Science Week initiative. The museum aims to support people in making informed choices about their health by reflecting on lessons learnt from the past and connecting them to the present. This year’s workshop theme for National Science Week Them Bones - was designed to help children make the links between bones and the way that lifestyle can impact on them. The GEH Museum is one of only seven NHS-owned museums in the country and is run by Curator Ann Cahill and a small team of volunteers. Anyone interested in volunteering their time to help with the museum, particularly those with a medical, nursing or teaching background, are invited to contact Ann Cahill on 02476 351351. The museum holds a large range of artifacts and is open to staff, patients and visitors. JANUARY 2006 S 1 M 2 T 3 W 4 T 5 F 6 S 7 S 8 M 9 T 10 W 11 T 12 F 13 S 14 S 15 M 16 T 17 W 18 T 19 F 20 S 21 S 22 M 23 T 24 W 25 T 26 F 27 S 28 S 29 M T 30 31 12 Infection control Looking beyond the headlines at good practice in hygiene MRSA is a headline grabbing topic and any story about a healthcareacquired infection is bound to raise concern. There are always risks associated with healthcare, but it’s important that we put those risks into perspective and understand what we can do about them. The good news is that we at the George Eliot take infection control extremely seriously. We know that our patients and public do too, and we are doing everything we can to minimise the risk of spreading infection. Good practice in basic hygiene and cleanliness are the most important aspects. But we can’t do it on our own – we need everyone’s help. Information on this page gives you the facts that may be helpful in understanding the real risks associated with infection, the ways we have been tackling them and what you can do to help. Clean Hands Campaign kicks off The Trust is proud to have joined the National Patient Safety Agency’s (NPSA’s) Clean Hands Campaign, which aims to reduce the risk of infection in hospitals by reminding staff to wash their hands before and after every contact with patients. One of the most important parts of the campaign is reminding patients, carers and visitors that they must wash their hands too. They are also encouraged to ask staff if they have washed their hands. Please join in and help us to make this campaign a success. MRSA reports by quarter Date April 03 - Sept 03 October 04 - Mar 04 April 04 - Sept 04 October 04 - Mar 05 Actual number 15 10 17 9 Colleagues kick off the clean hands campaign. Facts and figures The Trust is rated ‘green’ in the PEAT (Patient Environment Action Team) Assessment that includes cleanliness and hospital food as indicators of our standards. Green is the highest standard achievable. There are a number of infections that hospital patients may be more susceptible to, one of which is Staphylococcus Aureus (S. Aureus). S. Aureus is a very common cause of bacterial infections such as boils, carbuncles, infected wounds, deep abscesses and bloodstream infection (or bacteraemia). It was first described in the 1880s when doctors realised it was the most common cause of infected surgical wounds. About 30% of the general population are colonised by S.Aureus. This basically means that 30% of us live with it on our skin, causing us no problem. MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus) means that the type of infection is resistant to traditional antibiotic treatments, which is due mainly to the organism’s ability to develop resistance. MRSA only usually becomes a problem when it enters the body, particularly when gets into the bloodstream. Currently, NHS hospital Trusts are required to report the number of MRSA blood stream infections to the Health Protection Agency. The actual numbers are very small and are rated nationally as incidences per 1,000 bed days. The Trust’s most recent figures are shown on the left of this page. 13 ‘Love your hospital’ Love Your Hospital month: Think Lean, Think Clean, Think Hygiene Staff throughout the Trust joined forces during this month-long campaign in February to help provide the best possible environment for patients and staff by ensuring cleanliness, tidiness and hygiene were, and continue to be, top of everyone’s priorities. We launched the month of activities with ‘Love Your Hospital’ day on St. Valentine’s Day and participated in the national event ‘Think Clean Day’ on 28 February. As part of the activities, Trust Directors went ‘back to the floor’ to take a few lessons from our crucial domestic staff. Beverley Mushing, the Trust’s Acting Training Manager. said: “Our drive is to help improve quality and service standards throughout the hospital. Gaining NVQ qualifications also gives staff a sense of achievement.” National recognition for cleanliness training Earlier in the year, George Eliot staff received the runners-up trophies (for trainers and students) for Centre of Excellence in N/SVQ provision at the British Institute of Cleaning Science (BICS) awards ceremony in Solihull. The Trust’s NVQ (national vocational qualification) training team for hotel services beat off competition from several collegebased NVQ providers in this national competition. As part of the final judging, BICS assessors conducted a thorough examination of the hospital’s training regime and cleanliness. Directors brush up their skills Colleagues receive their award How you can help Keeping it real We try to protect patients from all bugs that may be carried by visitors, not just the headline hitters like MRSA. So here are a few top tips: A summary of what we have in place to minimise risks around infection: l The Matron’s Charter, which focuses on ward cleanliness l A clear infection control strategy, including a strict hand-washing policy and regular mandatory training l The Trust has placed hand gels at every bedside for several years l Disposable curtains have been tried and will be phased in across the hospital l A restrictive approach to antibiotic prescribing (Because patients on antibiotics are more susceptible to Clostridium Difficile Associated Diarrhoea (CDAD), the Trust takes a cautious approach to prescribing antibiotics.) l Please use hand gel on entering and exiting clinical areas and wards – this helps to reduce infection. l Please do not bring flowers into the clinical areas – for the reasons of infection control, health and safety and limited space. l Please do not sit on patients’ beds – this helps reduce cross infection. l Please help reduce clutter by taking excess belongings or washing home – this makes cleaning easier. l If your relative or friend is in isolation, please seek advice from nursing staff, who will provide an explanation and advice. FEBRUARY 2006 W T 1 2 F 3 S 4 S 5 M 6 T 7 W 8 T 9 F 10 S 11 S 12 M 13 T 14 W 15 T 16 F 17 S 18 S 19 M 20 T 21 W 22 T 23 F 24 S 25 S 26 M 27 T 28 14 Proactive approach promotes power of prevention Screening service targets osteoporosis and falls Hundreds of people across North Warwickshire have been benefiting from a simple screening service based at the George Eliot that aims to reduce the number of people suffering fractures due to falls and osteoporosis. The joint initiative between the George Eliot and GPs within North Warwickshire PCT helps to identify those at risk of osteoporosis by sending out a questionnaire to all women and men registered with them, aged over 50 and 65 respectively. Once the scan is complete, Donna Baldwin, Osteoporosis Facilitator at the Trust, explains the results and gives diet and lifestyle advice, answering any questions the patient may have. Some patients will need no further treatment, some may be referred back to their GP for additional treatment and some may be referred for a full body scan. Speaking from personal experience Vida Nash from Bedworth was diagnosed with osteoporosis at the George Eliot. Until she had a scan, she was unaware that she was at risk or could have it. She said: “I had no idea that I could have osteoporosis - I walk, knit and garden - so I am very grateful that my doctor referred me for a scan and I am now being treated to help strengthen my bones.” GP practices taking part Nine GP surgeries have taken part in the scheme so far. It is hoped others will participate too. But the Trust doesn’t only provide the service to patients referred by GPs. Excellent progress has been made to ensure that as many as possible of the patients who need scanning are able to access it, whether they come into the Trust as an inpatient, outpatient or through A&E. “Avoiding unnecessary fractures due to osteoporosis will reduce the number of hospital admissions for the older residents of North Warwickshire, meaning they can enjoy a better quality of life whilst keeping their independence,” said Mr Wilfred Quarcoopome, Associate Specialist in Orthopaedics, George Eliot Hospital. Donna Baldwin with Vida Nash Osteoporosis facts and figures Results from the Eliot’s screening emphasise just how common a problem it can be. From January 2004 to December 2004, the George Eliot scanned 1,020 people, of whom 468 were referred from the hospital’s fracture clinic and 552 by GPs. Of the total 1,020 scanned, 349 were found to be Osteopenic (reduction in bone density) and 388 to be Osteoporotic (thinning of bones). Osteoporosis is estimated to affect half of women and one in five men over 50 years old. It is a disease that makes the bone weak and brittle and is often referred to as the ‘silent disease’, as it has no signs or symptoms. The Trust is extremely grateful to the League of Friends, without whom this screening service would not be possible. The League has generously bought the Trust its own peripheral DEXA (Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry) scanner, which had previously been loaned to the Trust by the manufacturers, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD). Read more about the League of Friends and their sterling work on page 10. 15 Extending roles saves time for all All patients who have undergone a total knee replacement come back for a course of physiotherapy as outpatients. Previously, the patients were also coming back at eight weeks and, occasionally, at 12 weeks to be ‘signed off’ by their consultant. Staff in the physiotherapy department recognised the additional workload this put on consultants, as well as the fact that patients were having to make an unnecessary visit. So they proposed a solution. As autonomous practitioners, physiotherapists are competent and fully qualified to sign off a patient (conclude their treatment). With the backing of two orthopaedic consultants and a Clinical Director, the physiotherapists piloted a scheme to sign off patients at the conclusion of their physiotherapy, without the need for them to revisit the consultant. During the five-month pilot, 85 patients were discharged from their ‘episode of care’ by a physiotherapist and six were referred back to their consultant for additional treatment, saving a total of 144 outpatient slots in five months. The new approach has now been integrated as a standard part of the service, with all four of the Trust’s orthopaedic consultants supporting it. Direct access to physiotherapy Our Physiotherapy Department is also working closely with a number of local GP practices to provide patients with direct access to physiotherapists, reducing unnecessary GP appointments. This new approach was piloted at Atherstone GP surgery between November 2004 and February 2005. Posters and leaflets were provided in the GP surgery detailing suitable criteria for patients to self-refer directly to the physiotherapist. During this four-month trial, 89 patients referred themselves directly, with 95.5% found to be appropriate referrals. This effectively freed up 85 unnecessary GP appointments. A physiotherapist from the George Eliot is based at Atherstone for eight sessions per week (four mornings and four afternoons) and the service has now begun at Arley surgery too. The spreading of this good practice also supports the NHS Plan to free up consultant and GP time and ensure that, where appropriate, allied health professionals (AHPs) become the first point of contact for patients. MARCH 2006 W T 1 2 F 3 S 4 S 5 M 6 T 7 W 8 T 9 F 10 S 11 S 12 M 13 T 14 W 15 T 16 F 17 S 18 S 19 M 20 T 21 W 22 T 23 F 24 S 25 S 26 M 27 T 28 W 29 T F 30 31 16 Diabetes Trail-blazing with award-winning diabetes care Our dedicated diabetes care team based in the Outpatients Department have yet again been breaking new ground with their award-winning developments for patients and professionals. Some diabetes sufferers may be more likely to develop a number of other conditions associated with diabetes, including angina or heart failure, non fatal stroke, cataracts, and retinal problems/ blindness. In extreme cases diabetes can lead to necessary amputation, renal failure and even death. Thankfully, many of these conditions can be managed to minimise any risks. As part of the National Service Framework for Diabetes and the national drive to improve care for people with ‘long-term conditions’, the local diabetes team are working tirelessly to improve care for people with diabetes. The team aims not only to enhance patients’ access to services but also to provide an integrated approach to prevention that minimises patients’ risk of suffering from associated complications. One of the ways the team is doing this is through their awardwinning Alphabet Strategy. Led by Drs Vinod Patel and John Morrissey, the diabetes team won last year’s Medical Management Team of the Year award from the British Association of Medical Award Winning Ways The Diabetes Care team at George Eliot has a proven track record in clinical research, based mainly around implementation of evidencebased practice in Diabetes Care. We have devised various models of care that are patient-centred but involve the whole multi-professional team from senior clinical staff to administrators. We have published and presented extensively, with our work being awarded the following main prizes: l British Association of Medical Managers Top Team Award 2004 l West Midlands NHS Innovation Award First Prize 2005 l Diabetes UK Award for most significant contribution to Diabetes Care l Health and Social Care awards Runner Up 2005 The Diabetes Team and their BAMM award Managers (BAMM) for their work on the Alphabet Strategy. BAMM judges rated entries against criteria that included creativity, innovation, patient needs, patient involvement, crossing boundaries, working across the service and use of multi-disciplinary resources. Dr Morrissey said: “We were able to demonstrate that good management is essentially all about doing simple things, but properly. And real success - as illustrated by this award - is all down to good team work.” Facts and figures l It is estimated that 1.8 million people in the UK have diabetes mellitus. - Up to 1.25 million have type 2 diabetes - 0.15 million have type 1 diabetes l There may be as many as one million undiagnosed cases in the UK alone. l The estimated cost of NHS expenditure on diabetes is around 5% of total NHS budget, approximately £5.2 billion This is equivalent to: £99,717,567 a week £14,245,367 a day £593,560 an hour £9,893 a minute £165 a second 17 At a Glance - the Alphabet Strategy explained Advice Advice and education to patients on diet, medication, smoking cessation, exercise, weight reduction Blood pressure Strict control of blood pressure levels can help reduce diabetes-related illnesses including heart failure, stroke, vision deterioration and even death. Innovation award UK could prevent an estimated 1,500 new cases of blindness. The Diabetes NSF guarantees that 80% of people with diabetes will be screened by 2006, rising to 100% by the end of 2007. Cholesterol Cholesterol can be a major contributor to Coronary Heart Disease. Diabetes sufferers can be at a greater risk of developing CHD. Feet examination Emphasises the importance of an annual foot examination by podiatrist, GP, practice nurse, or diabetes nurse. Diabetes control Careful control of glucose (blood sugar) levels can alleviate many of the associated problems of diabetes and significantly reduce the risk of diabetesrelated complications. Guardian drugs Recommends preventative medication against complications and associated illnesses, such as prescription of aspirin to suitable patients at risk of cardiovascular ‘events’. Eye examination Diabetic retinopathy is the most common cause of blindness under the age of 65 in the western world. Yearly screening in the Heart disease risk Recommends a long-term, sustained approach to care, aimed at multiple risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Evidence suggests this approach can reduce the risk of cardiovascular and microvascular ‘events’ by about 50%. In March 2005, another project by the Diabetes Care team, led by Dr Lakshminarayanan Varadhan and Dr Vinod Patel, won first prize for the best Innovative Health Care Delivery Project for the year 2005 from MidTECH, the West Midlands NHS Innovation Hub awards. The awards aim to encourage and promote innovation within the NHS. The i-DREAM project, developed by Dr Lakshminarayanan Varadhan and the team, is an interactive computer based tool that prompts clinicians to incorporate research evidence into clinical practice and helps them to make evidence-based decisions, as well as providing recommended management plans for particular conditions. The programme has links to hospital protocols and contains details about landmark trials in diabetes. The Award, which included a trophy, a certificate and a cheque for £3,000, was presented by Ms Gisela Stuart, Member of Parliament for Edgbaston, and Mr Alan Wenban-Smith, Chairman of MidTech, to the winning team at a function held at Millennium Point, Birmingham, on 11th April, 2005. Dr Varadhan and Dr Patel with Ms Gisela Stuart, MP APRIL 2006 S 1 S 2 M 3 T 4 W 5 T 6 F 7 S 8 S 9 M 10 T 11 W 12 T 13 F 14 S 15 S 16 M 17 T 18 W 19 T 20 F 21 S 22 S 23 M 24 T 25 W 26 T 27 F 28 S 29 S 30 18 Sooner, faster, better.... Day Procedures Patients are realising the benefits of day case care as hundreds of unnecessary overnight hospital stays are eliminated. The George Eliot’s Day Procedures Unit was opened in June 2003 and is speeding up care for the vast majority of patients attending the Eliot for elective (planned) surgical procedures and Endoscopy. The DPU has gone from strength to strength. Of the 20,676 elective patients we see each year, 15,825 are day cases and the remaining 4,581 are inpatients. DPU acting manager, Sister Croft, said: “The DPU is having a dramatic improvement on the patient’s experience. Some patients still find it surprising that they can come into hospital for a procedure and be back home before the end of the day. But that’s exactly what happens. “The NICE guidelines ensure patients are prepared. This enables them to recover quickly in the unit. Evidence suggests that most patients recover far better in the home environment, so if we can cut out an overnight stay, the patients are generally far happier.” A patient from Nuneaton, Mrs H, said: “I recently attended the outpatient department for a consultation. That afternoon I underwent a minor operation at the ‘Day Procedure Unit’… What an excellent service I received… I was overwhelmed by the professional, caring and extremely well organised ‘Tenby Unit’. This praise extends from the calm, pleasant receptionist through to the highest level of nursing staff and theatre staff.” Facts and figures l The drive to increase the number of patients attending as a day case, rather than an inpatient, is part of a national commitment to improve the patient experience. l The NHS Plan outlines that, by 2008, 75% of all operations should be performed as day cases. l The George Eliot is pleased to be well ahead of this target, performing 76% as day cases three years early. However, the DPU has now put plans together to increase activity to 84% over the next two years, thus giving more patients the opportunity to go home the same day. Day Procedures Unit 19 Radiology refurbishments Reduced waits, a sparkling new environment and state of the art equipment are now an everyday reality for patients requiring a scan. The Trust’s ‘cross sectional’ imaging suite is now open following the completion of building works and the delivery of a brand new, static MRI (magnetic-resonance imaging) scanner. The scanner was delivered in April 2005 and became fully operational, following set-up and training, from May 2005. Until its arrival, the Trust had relied on a mobile scanner that was shared between the George Eliot site and South Warwickshire Hospitals, supported by ad hoc sessions provided by the Department of Our new MRI scanner arrives - just like moving your fridge, the MRI had to wait for its gases to settle before use. The George Eliot’s new MRI room Health, to help reduce waiting times. Demands for MRI scans have been growing steadily over the years. In 2003, the Trust made a bid for Department of Health funding for the new MRI scanner, as well as a new ‘multi-slice’ CT (Computerised Tomography) scanner, due to be delivered in July 2005. Waits for radiological procedures are often referred to nationally as ‘hidden waits’ in the system. The Eliot has not been alone in struggling with the rising demands for scans but, thankfully, with the new MRI fully operational and additional investment from the Trust to provide increased staffing, routine waits for an MRI scan have already dropped significantly in just a few months and are set to fall far further. It is important to highlight that urgent requests for scans are always met within two weeks. MAY 2006 M T 1 2 W 3 T 4 F 5 S 6 S 7 M 8 T 9 W 10 T 11 F 12 S 13 S 14 M 15 T 16 W 17 T 18 F 19 S 20 S 21 M 22 T 23 W 24 T 25 F 26 S 27 S 28 M 29 T W 30 31 20 Connecting for Health Connecting for Health (formerly the NHS Information Authority) is running the National Programme for IT (NPfIT), which aims to revolutionise the NHS by bringing our IT systems into the 21st century. It is a mammoth programme of work which is planned to be implemented over a period of 10 years. Ultimately, this will ensure the establishment of electronic health records - all of our medical history held on-line and available to authorised clinicians on demand. There is a long way to go before we reach this and there are many different aspects that make up the ‘umbrella’ of NPfIT. Over the past year, George Eliot has been preparing for the introduction of an entirely new Patient Administration System (PAS), which is likely to be implemented during 2006. In the meantime, the Trust has also been maintaining its reputation as a leading light in piloting new and emerging technologies. Here are just some of the examples: PACS pilot Over the next three years, every acute NHS hospital trust in England is mandated by NHS Connecting for Health to change from conventional film-based radiology to a Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS). The George Eliot took the initiative to explore this PACS pilot technology earlier than most by installing a PACS pilot within the Trust. Although the Trust will not receive its official PACS for another year or so, the feedback from the pilot was extremely encouraging and should result in a swifter transfer to the new technology when it is fully installed. The PACS pilot, focused in A&E and Radiology, allowed staff to experience an entirely digital process. Instead of printing films, Radiographers simply scanned a CR (Computed Radiography) plate, eliminating expensive film and chemical costs. The digital images were then instantly available in A&E for immediate review. Normally, the introduction of CR plate scanning is a difficult hurdle when deploying PACS but, as Linda Neale commented: “The pilot has not had a negative impact on the way we work. In fact, the introduction has been relatively seamless. Radiographers who have never dealt with digital imaging technology had little or no trouble at all in using the equipment.” The ultimate benefit, even in a pilot situation, has been the care of George Eliot patients. Immediate access to images that can be manipulated helps ensure that A&E staff make faster, more informed decisions. Mobility pilot Clinical colleagues across the Trust have also been piloting a project to improve access to patient information through wireless technology. The ‘mobility pilot’ has seen 20 ‘tablet’ laptop-type devices provided in key areas such as EMU (Emergency Medical Unit), A&E and outpatients. A number of clinical colleagues were also provided with devices for their ward rounds. It is early days yet but the project has proved a positive benefit in providing up to the minute patient information electronically, rather than that information having to be delivered manually. The pilot is part of the wider ‘Connecting for Health’ national initiative and could be spread to other Trusts if successful here. Sharon King, Senior Nurse for EMU, was impressed with the new technology. She said: “It’s changed the way I work because I’ve been able to stay at the patient’s bedside, do a round with the consultants and actually get the results that they need next to the patient. This means we can discuss the results with the patient instead of disappearing for ten or fifteen minutes to get them.” Dr Thulasiharan, Senior House Officer at the Trust, has also found the pilot beneficial, saying: “I spend less time on admin. Rather than just waiting for somebody to leave the ward computer until I could log on, I can get results immediately. I now spend more time on the patients, so it’s very helpful.” One of the outputs from the pilot is the production of Return on Investment (ROI) data, which to date looks extremely encouraging in its portrayal of significant cost savings and efficiency gains - again translating to better patient care. 21 Connecting for Health Air tubes Whilst not a part of the national Connecting for Health programme, George Eliot took the decision earlier in the year to improve its own connections across the site by installing a pneumatically powered air tube system that went live in September 2004. The system links the pharmacy and pathology departments with wards and other departments across the George Eliot Hospital, via a network of tubes. Items are sent in sealed, leakresistant carriers that are transported through the tubes at 5 metres per second by a current of air generated by large fans. Most wards and departments have a ‘send-receive station’ reasonably close by. Each station includes a despatch tube, a keypad and a locked cupboard into which returned carriers fall. When a carrier arrives at a station, an audible alarm briefly sounds and an arrival light flashes on the ward concerned, informing staff that they have a carrier to collect. Ward and departmental staff send carriers by entering the four digit code for the destination required into the station’s keypad, then inserting the carrier into the station’s despatch tube. Red carriers are used for pathology specimens. Blue carriers are used for prescriptions and medicines. The system is used to transport specimens to pathology, prescriptions to pharmacy and dispensed medicines from pharmacy to wards and departments. With 180mm diameter carriers used on the system, it means the majority of dispensed discharge prescriptions can be sent via the air tube. Every month, the system delivers around 3,500 carriers containing specimens to pathology and 1,500 carriers containing prescriptions to pharmacy. A carrier sent from Lydgate ward to the main pharmacy department in maternity takes around one minute to travel across the site. The benefits are clear: transit times have been reduced and portering time saved. A recent survey within the Trust demonstrated that a majority of ward and department staff regularly used the system. Seventy eight per cent of staff who completed the survey felt that the system had improved patient care by facilitating the process for sending prescriptions and pathology specimens. The system is now perceived as an essential element of the Trust’s communications system. Pharmacy manager Paul Mills - deputy chief pharmacist, checks on the air-tube installation on Elizabeth Ward with clerical support worker Jackie Probyn. JUNE 2006 T 1 F 2 S 3 S 4 M 5 T 6 W 7 T 8 F 9 S 10 S 11 M 12 T 13 W 14 T 15 F 16 S 17 S 18 M 19 T 20 W 21 T 22 F 23 S 24 S 25 M 26 T 27 W 28 T 29 F 30 22 Our Greatest Asset Our Greatest Asset Whilst 2004-05 was a challenging year for the Trust, patients continued to receive good quality care thanks to the unwavering dedication of our staff who operate at some of the most costefficient rates in the NHS. The work of every colleague has an impact on patient care and that’s why the Trust is working hard to give something back to staff by improving their working lives. Agenda for Change Agenda for Change is the biggest ever change to pay structures the NHS has experienced. Designed to ensure fair pay and conditions for NHS staff, it aims to improve career opportunities and offer greater rewards for those who take on more demanding roles. Agenda for Change will apply to staff directly employed by the NHS, excluding doctors, dentists and top senior managers. The new system means that all relevant staff must have had their role ‘job matched’ to national outlines and assimilated against national criteria in order to be assigned a specific pay band. The Department of Health has stipulated that all relevant staff must have been assimilated by 30th September 2005. By the end of March 2005, 60% of staff employed by the Eliot had been matched and assimilated on to the new pay bands, with the remaining The numbers 40% to be matched over the remaining few months. Staff survey Between October and December 2004, over 217,000 staff from 572 NHS Trusts and 26 strategic health authorities (SHAs) in England took part in the second national NHS staff survey, conducted by the Healthcare Commission. A total of 795 members of staff at the George Eliot were selected randomly, of whom 395 returned a completed questionnaire. Whilst the response represents only about a fifth of the staff here, it did provide a useful indicator from which we can develop our approach to improving staff satisfaction. Some of the key actions to improve staff morale are being addressed through improved communication, support, training, improving worklife balance and minimising stress. Improving Working Lives (IWL) A key step in addressing staff satisfaction is through Improving Working Lives accreditation, the ‘kite mark’ for NHS employers and employees to measure Human Resources management. Staff from all areas across the Trust have been working together to help the George Eliot reach the second stage of the Improving Working Lives accreditation – Practice Plus. IWL looks at all aspects of staff experience. Some of the key areas of work currently being undertaken involve improving the way we communicate with staff, the way we support them and the ways in which we can minimise stress. The Trust offers staff many working benefits under the umbrella of IWL, including child care vouchers to help with the cost of child care, an on-site nursery newly opened last year, the possibility of flexible working and family friendly hours, subject to negotiation, and a range of discounts at local and national retailers. 23 Our Greatest Asset Equality statement The George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust is committed to building a workforce which is valued and whose diversity reflects the communities it serves, enabling it to deliver the best possible healthcare service to the community. The Trust will seek to ensure that it is a fair employer achieving equality of opportunity and outcomes in the workplace; and to ensure that the Trust uses its influence and resources as one of the biggest employers in the area to make a difference to the life, opportunities and health of the local community. Everyone has a duty, both morally and legally, not to discriminate. The Trust will not accept discrimination by any of its employees and will work to eradicate discrimination on the basis of age, disability, race, nationality, ethnic or national origin, gender, religion, beliefs, sexual orientation, domestic circumstances, social and employment status, HIV status, gender reassignment or political affiliation or trade union membership. The Trust has also adopted a Race Equality Scheme (RES) in accordance with the Government’s commitment to eliminate the potential for discrimination in the public sector. A Race Equality Audit has been developed to enable the Trust to monitor the service goals as set out in our RES. The Trust has a robust policy for working with employees with disabilities as part of the Equality and Diversity agenda. The Trust was accredited the ‘two ticks’ disability symbol by the Job Centre Plus in March 2005 in recognition of our work in this area. Occupational health The George Eliot’s occupational health service is currently provided on site by North Warwickshire PCT and is accessible to all staff. The service supports the Trust in managing sickness absence and rehabilitation into work through return to work policies, and provides full health screening for all relevant roles, as directed by the Trust’s policies. Investing in staff The Trust’s training department also offers a range of training and development opportunities, including NVQs (National Vocational Qualifications), for Health Care Support Workers and any staff member who does not hold a professional qualification for the role that they perform. Training and Education Centre All staff without such a qualification are entitled to an Individual Learning Account through which they can develop professionally. NVQs that are provided by the inhouse Training Department include administration levels 2 and 3, care levels 2, customer services, cleaning and support services, catering and hospitality, operating department level 2 and diagnostic/therapeutic support level 3. which has led to an increase in the number of medical students at George Eliot.” We are confident that the GETEC will enable the Trust to build on this reputation, and develop a centre of excellence for health training in the region. The centre has been designed to improve the quality of education and training facilities for students, staff and patients in the North Warwickshire Community. Facilities will include: Investing in the future l Lecture Theatre l Seven Seminar Rooms l Clinical Skills and Resuscitation l Skills Wards l Clinical Skills Laboratory l Library l On-site catering l Office Accommodation for Education, Research and Training After more than two years of planning, we received approval to start building work on the new George Eliot Training and Education Centre (GETEC). Funded by the Department of Health and the Strategic Health Authority, the new £5.5m centre will provide the Trust with a state-of-the-art venue packed with facilities. Commented Dr Neeta Manek, Clinical Director for Education and Consultant Microbiologist: “The training and education teams have an excellent reputation for providing high quality teaching, The GETEC will take approximately 60 weeks to complete and is due to open in late August 2006. From January 2007 all courses, including inductions, resuscitation training, professional training and manual handling, will be staged in the new centre. JULY 2006 S 1 S 2 M 3 T 4 W 5 T 6 F 7 S 8 S 9 M 10 T 11 W 12 T 13 F 14 S 15 S 16 M 17 T 18 W 19 T 20 F 21 S 22 S 23 M 24 T 25 W 26 T 27 F 28 S 29 S M 30 31 24 Money matters: summary financial information Finance Director’s Report I am pleased to present my first report as Director of Finance, having taken over the reins in September 2004 from my predecessor Terry Hueck, who retired last year. I could not have joined the Trust at a more challenging time both operationally and financially. Having been faced with a potential £5.2m deficit in October, the Trust weathered a number of further financial pressures and ended the year with a deficit of £786k, which was below 1% of turnover. Despite the significant improvement in our financial position in the second half of the financial year, this outturn does mean that the Trust failed to meet the first of its key financial targets, i.e., to break even on its income and expenditure account. The Trust did, however, successfully deliver its other key financial targets, namely: l To manage cash flows and balances within the limits set for the Trust by the Department of Health. l To manage capital expenditure within limits set by the Department of Health. l To pay a dividend back to the Department of Health, equivalent to 3.5% of our assets. Reflections on the Year The Trust faced a very difficult year in 2004/05 financially. There was an initial financial savings target of £4.5m at the start of the year, which increased to £5.2m part way through the year as further financial pressures crystallised. After six months the Trust was £2.6m overspent. Working closely with the West Midlands South Strategic Health Authority and the North Warwickshire Primary Care Trust, the Eliot developed an in-year financial recovery plan, which included tight controls over recruitment and non-pay expenditure. In addition, patient activity significantly over-performed compared to initial plans and the Trust was able to secure £2m in additional income to support this activity. The Trust also secured non-recurrent income of £2.6m to support service and operational pressures, which closed the financial gap to £786k at year-end, being within 1% of turnover. The Trust’s Reference Costs Index is a guide to how efficient a hospital is for patient services in comparison to the rest of the NHS. Our rating for 2003/04 was 79, meaning that the Trust is 21% more cost-efficient than average for the patient services we provide. This demonstrates the exceptional value for money of services that are provided to local people and is a testament to the way our staff manage within the resources available to them. Future Financial Challenge In 2005/06 the Trust faces perhaps its biggest ever financial challenge. Despite an unprecedented growth in NHS resources at a national level, the Trusts is faced with challenging service and efficiency targets, the impact of pay reforms and the impact of significant non-recurrent income in previous years unwinding. The financial gap to be closed as we start the new financial year is £10.7m. The Trust is currently working with the Strategic Health Authority and local Commissioners to prepare a balanced and financial plan. At the current time, there remains a minimum £4m gap, which will require a solution to be identified in-year. In the longer term, it is recognised that health care providers throughout Coventry and Warwickshire will need to work even more closely together to drive through lasting efficiency gains and deliver long-term financial stability. Payment by Results (PBR) PBR is the Government’s proposed system that will ensure most acute NHS hospital services across England are paid for by local commissioners at a set national tariff. Whilst this was planned for full implementation during 2005/06, the full programme has now been deferred and will be introduced gradually over the next four financial years. The Government’s decision to defer full implementation of payment by results will continue to impact on the George Eliot’s income because we currently provide many of our services at a much cheaper rate than the national average. Work completed during November 2004 indicates that, once it is fully implemented, the Eliot may gain by up to £12m. However, under current guidance operational in 2005/06, the Eliot income will increase by £316k. A further rebasing review of this position will be conducted during the autumn of 2005. Acknowledgements I would like to recognise the achievements of the staff of the George Eliot in maintaining services and the care to our patients broadly within the resources available during a year that has seen unprecedented levels of emergency activity and service pressure. I would also like to thank the dedicated members of the Finance team who have completed once again the annual accounts for the Trust. Karl Simkins Director of Finance 25 Money matters: summary financial information Income and expenditure INCOME SPLIT 2004/05 The following pages show an abridged summary of some of the key information in the Trust’s annual accounts. If you would like a free copy of our full accounts, you can view them on www.geh.nhs.uk or you can request a copy by contacting the Finance Directorate on 02476 351351. Alternatively, email enquiries@geh.nhs.uk Income and Expenditure Account for the Year ended 31 March 2005 Income Income from healthcare activities Income from other activities Operating expenses: OPERATING SURPLUS 2004/05 £000 2003/04 £000 84,487 70,129 14,358 (82,937) 1,550 75,930 63,968 11,962 (73,727) 2,203 0 (49) 1,550 133 0 0 1,683 (2,469) (786) 2,154 187 0 0 2,341 (2,333) 8 (Loss)/profit on disposal of fixed assets SURPLUS BEFORE INTEREST Interest receivable Interest payable Other finance costs SURPLUS FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR Public Dividend Capital dividends payable RETAINED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) FOR THE YEAR EXPENDITURE SPLIT 2004/05 Financial Performance Year Turnover £000 44,433 48,176 52,331 56,785 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 2000/01 Surplus/ (Deficit) £000 229 (182) (1,265) 349 Year Surplus/ (Deficit) £000 7 909 8 (786) Turnover £000 62,790 71,643 75,930 84,487 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 AUGUST 2006 T 1 W 2 T 3 F 4 S 5 S 6 M 7 T 8 W 9 T 10 F 11 S 12 S 13 M 14 T 15 W 16 T 17 F 18 S 19 S 20 M 21 T 22 W 23 T 24 F 25 S 26 S 27 M 28 T 29 W T 30 31 26 Money matters: summary financial information BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31 MARCH 2005 31.3.05 £m 31.3.04 £m 75.1 67.6 6.6 5.5 (6.2) (6.5) 0.0 0.0 LESS PROVISIONS FOR LIABILITIES AND CHARGES Provisions set aside for future payments (0.4) (0.3) TOTAL NET ASSETS 75.1 66.3 FIXED ASSETS Land, buildings and equipment CURRENT ASSETS Stocks, money owed to the Trust and cash LESS CREDITORS <1 YEAR LESS CREDITORS > YEAR Money owed by the Trust in more than one years time FINANCED BY PUBLIC DIVIDEND CAPITAL Capital Provided by the government 45.0 42.0 REVALUATION RESERVE Increase in the value of fixed assets 29.5 23.7 Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses for the Year Ended 31 March 2005 £000 2003/04 £000 1,683 2,341 0 0 Unrealised surplus on fixed asset revaluations/indexation 6,587 5,165 Increases in the donated asset and government grant reserve due to receipt of donated and government grant financed assets 104 299 (191) (163) 0 0 8,183 7,642 0 0 8,183 7,642 Surplus for the financial year before dividend payments Fixed asset impairment losses Reductions in the donated asset and government grant reserve due to the the depreciation, impairment and disposal of donated and government grant financed assets Additions/(reductions) in “other reserves” Total recognised gains and losses for the financial year Prior period adjustment DONATION RESERVE Value of donated fixed assets 1.1 1.1 Cumulative income and expenditure deficits from previous years (0.5) (0.5) TOTAL NET ASSETS 75.1 66.3 INCOME AND EXPENDITURE RESERVE The Better Payment Practice Code requires the Trust to pay all valid non-NHS invoices within 30 days of receipt of goods or a valid invoice, whichever is later. Performance in 2004/05 was: Better Payment Practice Code - measure of compliance Number £000 Total bills paid in the year 23,987 Total bills paid within target 20,472 Percentage of bills paid within target 85.35% 16,490 14,282 86.61% 2003/04 Number £000 23,706 20,780 87.66% 15,650 13,774 88.01% Total gains and losses recognised in the financial year This table shows how the cash was used in the year that ended 31 March 2005 and the total change in the amount of cash we held. Audit Committee The Audit Committee members in 2004/05 comprised: Carol Gibson, Kishor Pala, Julie Jackson, Frank McCarney, John Beaumont and Ann Garratt. Capital cost absorption rate The Trust is required to absorb the cost of capital at a rate of 3.5% of average relevant net assets. The rate is calculated as the percentage that dividends paid on Public Dividend Capital, totalling £2,469,000, bears to the average relevant net assets of £68,574,000, that is 3.6%. The variance from 3.5% is within the Department of Health materiality range of 3.0% to 4.0%. CASH FLOW FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2005 31.3.05 £m 31.3.04 £m Cash from Operating Activities Interest received Sale of Fixed Asset New Public Dividend Capital 4.0 0.1 0.0 3.0 4.6 0.2 0.0 2.0 TOTAL 7.1 6.8 31.3.05 £m Capital Expenditure Dividend Payments Interest Paid Increase in Cash Balances 31.3.04 £m 4.7 2.4 0.0 0.0 4.5 2.3 0.0 0.0 7.1 6.8 27 Money matters: summary financial information INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO DIRECTORS OF GEORGE ELIOT HOSPITAL NHS TRUST ON THE SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Board Members’ Remuneration The remuneration of non-executive directors is determined nationally, and the remuneration of executive directors is determined by the Board’s Remuneration Committee in line with national guidelines. Respective Responsibilities of Directors and Auditors The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report. Our responsibility is to report to you our opinion on the consistency of the summary financial statements with the statutory financial statements. We also read the other information contained in the annual report and consider the implications for our report if we become aware of any misstatements or material inconsistencies with the summary financial statements. Basis of audit opinion We conducted our work in accordance with Bulletin 1999/6 ‘The auditor’s statement on the summary financial statements’ issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in the United Kingdom. Opinion In our opinion the summary financial statements are consistent with the statutory financial statements of the George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust for the year ended 31 March 2005 on which we have issued an unqualified opinion. 19 August 2005 Date: …………………. Signature: ………………………………….. Cornwall Court, 19 Cornwall St, Address: …………………………………… PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Birmingham, B3 2DT Name: …………………………….… ……………………………………………… Management Pay Pay rises for senior managers in 2004/2005 did not exceed a pay envelope of 3.225% Management Costs Management costs Income £000 2003/04 £000 3,390 83,820 3,094 74,896 The Trust achieved its own management cost target of £3,409,994. Management costs were 4.04% of Income (compared with 4.13% last year). (bands of £5000) £000 2004-05 Other Remuneration (bands of £5000) £000 Benefits in Kind Rounded to the nearest £100 (bands of £5000) £000 2003-04 Other Remuneration (bands of £5000) £000 Benefits in kind Rounded to the nearest £100 15-20 0 0 15-20 0 0 105-110 0 0 40-45 0 0 70-75 0 0 75-80 0 0 N/A N/A N/A 30-35 0 0 N/A N/A N/A 20-25 0 0 N/A N/A N/A 45-50 0 0 N/A N/A N/A 10-15 120-125 6,700 10-15 100-105 0 70-75 0 0 70-75 0 0 50-55 0 0 60-65 0 0 25-30 0 0 70-75 0 0 55-60 0 0 80-85 0 0 75-80 0 0 70-75 0 0 N/A N/A N/A 5-10 0 0 5-10 0 0 5-10 0 0 5-10 0 0 5-10 0 0 5-10 0 0 0-5 0 0 5-10 0 0 5-10 0 0 5-10 0 0 Salary We have examined the summary financial statements set out on pages 25 to 30. Name and Title Cllr Frank McCarney Chairman Tucson Dunn Chief Executive from 5/10/03 Duncan Alexander Phimister Acting Chief Executive from 30/6/03 to 4/10/03 Deputy Chief Executive from 5/10/03 to 15/8/04 and from 1/12/04 to 31/3/05 David Lingwood Acting Chief Executive to 27/6/03 Terry Alan Hueck Director of Finance to 31/3/04 Edmund Mark Knight-Jones Acting Director of Finance from 1/4/04 to 5/9/04 Karl Simkins Director of Finance From 6/9/04 Peter Handslip Medical Director Jane Taylor Director of Nursing Julie Whittaker Director of Operations to 30/11/04 Simon Freeman Director of Information from 6/10/03 to 31/8/04 Ruth Tyrrell Director of Human Resources Sandra Jane Chittenden Director of Strategic Development to 31/3/05 Shaun Mountford Chief Executive Intern - Modernisation Carol Ann Gibson Non Executive Director Julie Jackson Non Executive Director John Brian Beaumont Non Executive Director Ann Garratt Non Executive Director to 31/10/04 Kishor Pala Non Executive Director Salary Consent withheld Consent withheld 28 Money matters: summary financial information Board Members’ Remuneration The remuneration of non-executive directors is determined nationally, and the remuneration of executive directors is determined by the Board’s Remuneration Committee in line with national guidelines. Name and Title Cllr Frank McCarney Chairman Tucson Dunn Chief Executive from 5/10/03 Duncan Alexander Phimister Acting Chief Executive from 30/6/03 to 4/10/03 Deputy Chief Executive from 5/10/03 to 15/8/04 and from 1/12/04 to 31/3/05 Edmund Mark Knight-Jones Acting Director of Finance from 1/4/04 to 5/9/04 Karl Simkins Director of Finance from 6/9/04 Peter Handslip Medical Director Jane Taylor Director of Nursing Julie Whittaker Director of Operations to 30/11/04 Simon Freeman Director of Information from 6/10/03 to 31/8/04 Ruth Tyrrell Director of Human Resources Sandra Jane Chittenden Director of Strategic Development to 31/3/05 Shaun Mountford Chief Executive Intern - Modernisation Carol Ann Gibson Non Executive Director Julie Jackson Non Executive Director John Brian Beaumont Non Executive Director Ann Garratt Non Executive Director to 31/10/04 Kishor Pala Non Executive Director Real Total accrued Cash Equivalent Cash Real Increase Employers increase in pension and Transfer Value Equivalent in Cash Contribution pension and related lump at 31 March 05 Transfer Equivalent to related lump sum at age 60 Value at Transfer Stakeholder sum at age 60 at 31 March 05 31 March 05 Value Pension (bands of (bands of £2500) £5000) To nearest £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £100 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-7.5 5-10 25 7 17 0 10-12.5 145-150 606 532 59 0 0-2.5 20-25 53 45 7 0 17.5-20 75-80 231 164 63 0 47.5-50 200-205 823 597 210 0 0-2.5 90-95 275 257 12 0 22.5-25 90-95 352 246 98 0 2.5-5 5-10 16 4 11 0 2.5-5 40-45 125 97 25 0 2.5-5 35-40 115 101 12 0 15-17.5 50-55 141 89 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A Cash Equivalent Transfer Value (CETV) is the actuarially assessed capital value of the pension scheme benefits accrued by a member at a particular point in time. The benefits valued are the member’s accrued benefits and any contingent spouse’s pension payable from the scheme. A CETV is a payment made by a pension scheme, or arrangement to secure pension benefits in another pension scheme or arrangement when the member leaves a scheme and chooses to transfer the benefits accrued in their former scheme. The pension figures shown relate to the benefits that the individual has accrued as a consequence of their total membership of the pension scheme, not just their service in a senior capacity to which the disclosure applies. The CETV figures, and from 2004-05 the other pension details, include the value of any pension benefits in another scheme or arrangement which the individual has transferred to the NHS pension scheme. They also include any additional pension benefit accrued to the member as a result of their purchasing additional years of pension service in the scheme at their own cost. CETVs are calculated within the guidelines and framework prescribed Real Increase in CETV - This reflects the increase in CETV effectively funded by the employer. It takes account of the increase in accrued pension due to inflation, contributions paid by the employee (including the value of any benefits transferred from another pension scheme or arrangement) and uses common market valuation factors for the start and end of the period. Remuneration Committee The remuneration and terms of service of Executive Directors of the Trust are determined by the Remuneration Committee, which comprises solely the Chairman and Non-Executive Directors of the Trust. The committee reviews the salaries of Executive Directors each year and agrees with the Chief Executive at the commencement of the year performance criteria against which all Executive Directors will be measured. The Chief Executive and the Executive Directors are appointed under open competition. An appointment Panel comprising Non Executive Directors and external assessors appoints to Director positions. The performance of the Chief Executive is monitored by the Chairman. Executive Directors’ performance is monitored by the Chief Executive. The Chief Executive and Executive Directors are subject to the Trust’s disciplinary procedure. External auditors The Trust's external auditors are PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the total charge for work undertaken in 2004/05 was £144,000 (inclusive of VAT). The work included: Statutory audit and services carried out in relation to the statutory audit of the Trust's accounts; Department of Health mandatory audit work on: Acute Hospital Portfolio; Data Quality and; Spot Check Review. The work on the Acute Hospital Portfolio comprised a review and assessment of performance in the areas of therapy and dietetics, pathology, information and records and facilities management. The work on data quality comprised a review and assessment on the quality of data provided by the Trust. All audit work is managed, monitored and reported through the Trust's Audit Committee as part of the governance arrangements in place within the Trust. This ensures that audit is independent of the management process within the Trust. Significant accounting policies The Trust has provided £223,504 within expenditure for the estimated cost of the assimilation of staff under Agenda for Change. This is a national initiative to modernise the pay system within the NHS whereby all staff groups other than doctors, consultants and directors are assimilated into a modern pay structure from 1st October 2004. Because of the complexity of implementing the new scheme, not all staff groups have yet been assimilated. The provision (including back pay to 1st October 2004) represents the Trust's best estimates of the likely additional costs of the remaining groups to be assimilated, mainly administration and clerical staff, scientific therapeutic and technical staff. 29 Money matters: summary financial information Statement of the Chief Executive’s responsibilities as the Accountable Officer of the Trust The Secretary of State has directed that the Chief Executive should be the Accountable Officer to the Trust. The relevant responsibilities of Accountable Officers, including their responsibility for the propriety and regularity of the public finances for which they are answerable, and for the keeping of proper records, are set out in the Accountable Officers’ Memorandum issued by the Department of Health. To the best of my knowledge and belief, I have properly discharged the responsibilities set out in my letter of appointment as accountable officer. Duncan Phimister Acting Chief Executive The Directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Trust and to enable them to ensure that Date: 12 July 2005 Statement on Internal Control 2004/05 1. Scope of responsibility The Board is accountable for internal control. As Accountable Officer, and Chief Executive of this Board, I have responsibility for maintaining a sound system of internal control that supports the achievement of the organisation’s policies, aims and objectives. I also have responsibility for safeguarding the public funds and the organisation’s assets for which I am personally responsible as set out in the Accountable Officer Memorandum. The West Midlands South Strategic Health Authority monitors the performance of the George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust through a quarterly review process. The Trust is part of a network of acute and primary care trust’s in the local economy, which regularly meet on a formal basis to develop partnerships in improving health care for the local community. Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities in respect of the Accounts The Directors are required under the National Health Services Act 1977 to prepare accounts for each financial year. The Secretary of State, with the approval of the Treasury, directs that these accounts give a true and fair view of the state of the Trust and of the income and expenditure of the Trust for that period. In preparing those accounts, the Directors are required to: - apply on a consistent basis accounting policies laid down by the Secretary of State with the approval of the Treasury - make judgements and estimates which are reasonable and prudent - state whether applicable accounting standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the accounts. 2. The purpose of the system of internal control The system of internal control is designed to manage risk to a reasonable level rather than to eliminate all risk of failure to achieve policies, aims and objectives; it can therefore only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance of effectiveness. The system of internal control is based on an ongoing process designed to: l identify and prioritise the risks to the achievement of the organisation’s policies, aims and objectives; l evaluate the likelihood of those risks being realised and the impact should they be realised, and to manage them efficiently, effectively and economically. The system of internal control has been in place in the George Eliot Hospital for the year ended 31 March 2005 and up to the date of approval of the annual report and accounts. 3. Capacity to handle risk The Trust’s Risk Management Policy sets out the following direction and intent with respect to risk management: l The Trust will seek to reduce risk to patients, employees and others by appropriate management control, accepting that some risk will always be inherent and identified accordingly. l The Trust will adopt a pro-active approach with a programme of risk management, which aims to preserve its assets and reputation and to provide protection against preventable injury and loss to employees, patients and the general public. l Risk management is a fundamental part of the trust’s ethos and total approach to quality, corporate and clinical governance and the Trust’s controls assurance programme. Leadership in delivering the risk management strategy comes from: l The Trust Board is responsible for reviewing the effectiveness of internal the accounts comply with requirement outlined in the above mentioned direction of the Secretary of State. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Trust and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities. The Directors confirm to the best of their knowledge and belief they have complied with the above requirements in preparing the accounts. By order of the Board Duncan Phimister - Acting Chief Executive, 12 July 2005 Karl Simkin - Director of Finance, 12 July 2005 controls - financial, organisational and clinical. l The Chief Executive has ultimate responsibility for having an effective risk management system in place and overall responsibility for controls assurance and the management of risk throughout the Trust. l The Director of Nursing has delegated responsibility for managing the strategic development and implementation of risk management and controls assurance. l The Director of Finance has responsibility for managing the strategic development and implementation of financial risk management. Risk awareness training is provided to all new employees as part of the Trust’s induction programme and updated annually as part of mandatory training. Risk management training is also available as part of the Trust’s internal training programme. Departments are required to nominate staff who are trained to complete risk assessments for the areas where they work and a system is in place to document risks identified as part of this process and to ensure that action is taken to remedy any issues. Information for all staff is available on the Trust’s intranet. The Trust is informed of the Audit Commission’s new Code of Audit Practice effective from 2005-06. This requires a change in audit work, were there are now two key focus, namely: l Accounts including a review of the Statement of Internal Control l Use of resources The Trust is currently reviewing its governance arrangements to meet the requirements of the new code, which will include an internal assessment covering the following areas: l Financial Reporting l Financial Management l Financial Standing l Internal Control 30 Money matters: summary financial information Statement on Internal Control 2004/05 - continued l Value for money (economy, efficiency and effectiveness) 4. The risk and control framework The key elements of the risk strategy are: l Directors, managers and staff all have responsibility for the management of risk; l risks are identified and reported through an incident reporting system: significant risks are reported in a risk register and referred to the Governance Committee and Trust Board; l a controls assurance framework is established; l Committees including Governance, Clinical Risk, Health and Safety, Infection Control and Drugs and Therapeutics meet on a regular basis to manage the risk control process. Risk management is an integral part of the Trust’s culture. The Trust Board is committed to ensuring that risk management forms an integral part of its philosophy, practices and business plans rather than viewed or practised as a separate programme and that responsibility for implementation is accepted at all levels of the organisation. Trust Board approved a Controls Assurance Framework in March 2004. The Directors of the Trust following a workshop facilitated by the Trust’s external and internal auditors developed the framework. The key elements of the framework are: l corporate assessment of risks covering all aspects of the Trust business; l identification of key controls in respect of each potential risk; l assessment of assurances on controls in place to manage the risks; l identification of any gaps in controls and assurances; l an action plan to address these gaps. Internal Audit’s review of the organisation’s overall arrangements for gaining assurance has concluded that: ‘An Assurance Framework has been established which is designed and operating to meet the requirements of the 2004/05 SIC and provide reasonable assurance that there is an effective system of internal control to manage the principal risk identified by the organisation’ Trust Board reviewed and updated the framework in March 2005 to ensure compliance with standards for better health, alignment with current business plans and corporate risks and the overall process for greater participation of directorates. The initial controls assurance framework identified some minor gaps in controls and assurances within the Trust in the following areas: l financial information and costing systems; l risk register; l discharge of patients; l information and IT support. l access to national and local training initiatives; During 2004-05 action has been taken to remedy these gaps with progress reported to Trust Board in March 2005 and part of the review, The Board has agreed an updated action plan which will continue to be monitored by the Trust’s Audit and Clinical Governance Committees. The Trust involves stakeholders by informing and consulting on the management of any significant risks. Stakeholder involvement is sort through: l presentation at open Board meetings and explicit references in the Trust’s Annual Reports; l the wide range of communication and consultation mechanisms, which already exist with relevant stakeholders, both internal and external; l consultation on all future policy documents; stakeholders have the opportunity to comment on the risk elements. 5. Review of effectiveness As Accountable Officer, I have responsibility for reviewing the effectiveness of the system of internal control. My review is informed in a number of ways. The head of internal audit provides me with an opinion on the overall arrangements for gaining assurance through the Assurance Framework and on the controls reviewed as part of the internal audit work. Executive managers within the organisation who have responsibility for the development and maintenance of the system of internal control provide me with assurance. The Assurance Framework itself provides me with evidence that the effectiveness of controls that manage the risks to the organisation achieving its principal objectives have been reviewed. My review is also informed by: l the opinion of both Internal Audit and External Audit, given in reports to the Audit Committee; l reports presented to the Clinical Governance Committee. The Trust Board, Audit and Clinical Governance Committees have advised me on the implications of the result of my review of the effectiveness of the system of internal control. A plan to address weaknesses and ensure continuous improvement of the system is in place. The process that has been applied to maintain and review the effectiveness of the system of internal control is as follows: The Trust’s Audit Committee approves an annual internal audit programme and receives all internal audit reports. The Committee monitors the Assurance Framework action plan and the purpose of the Audit Committee is as follows: ‘The Board has responsibility for ensuring that effective internal financial control operates within the Trust, and as corporate trustee, within charitable funds. The Audit Committee will contribute to the achievement of these objectives by providing a means of independent and objective review of: a) Financial and budgetary control systems for the Trust and charitable funds b) Financial and management information used by the Trust c) Compliance with law, guidance, and best practice d) The performance of the internal and external audit functions of the Trust e) The implementation of guidance issued by the Directorate of Counter Fraud Services The Audit Committee will serve to reduce the risk of illegal or improper acts, reinforce the importance and independence of the audit function, ensure that the overall audit cost to the Trust represents value for money, and increase confidence in the objectivity, integrity of financial, and management reporting’. The Trust’s Clinical Governance Committee monitors standards of clinical performance through the Assurance Framework, receiving regular reports from committees including, Clinical Risk, Health and Safety and Infection Control. The purpose of the Clinical Governance Committee is as follows: ‘To ensure that policies, procedures, systems and processes are in place to effect clinical governance’ The Trust incurred an income and expenditure deficit in 2004-05, albeit within 1% of turnover; this highlights one of the key risks identified in the assurance framework in March 2004. During the year the Trust has taken action to address any control and assurance gaps, which were identified at the start of the year, which may impact on the financial performance. However, income and expenditure plans for 200506 present the Trust with a very challenging financial position, which will require careful management and active support from the Strategic Health Authority and local NHS organisations to redress the position. Signed on behalf of the Trust Board: Acting Chief Executive Date: 12 July 2005 31 George Eliot Board - Register of Interests for 2004/05 Name Frank McCarney Chairman Tucson Dunn Chief Executive Edmund Knight-Jones Acting Director of Finance Karl Simkins Director of Finance Dr Simon Freeman Chief Information Officer Duncan Phimister Deputy Chief Executive Dr Peter Handslip Medical Director Dr Sam Chittenden Chief Executive Intern - Strategy Shaun Mountford Chief Executive Intern - Modernisation Julie Whittaker Chief Executive Intern - Operations Ruth Tyrrell Director Human Resources Jane Taylor Director of Nursing Dr Neeta Manek Director of Clinical Education Dr Vinod Patel Director of Audit, Research & Evidence Based Practice Mrs Ann Garratt Non-Executive Director Miss Carol Gibson Non-Executive Director Mrs Julie Jackson Non-Executive Director Mr Kishor Pala Non-Executive Director Mr Beaumont Non-Executive Director Interest None None None None None None Paid academic lectures per year x3-4, 2 to 3 overseas meetings per year, to attend approved academic meetings Chair of Nuneaton & Bedworth Healthy Living Network None None None None Non-Executive Director of CDS Development Services Lectures to healthcare professionals some attracting fees and expenses None None Nuneaton & Bedworth Borough Councillor None Director Bulkington Village Centre, Director Furnace Fields Parents Centre. Spouse - Manager, DIAL Nuneaton & Bedworth In a nutshell Mission The George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust’s mission is to provide Better Care Without Delay for all our patients. Our vision is for the George Eliot to become a ‘no wait’ hospital. We aim to achieve our mission and vision through our core values: l Patient Satisfaction l Our People and their Development l Quality and Service Improvement l Financial Responsibility Governance The Trust has been working towards developing a fully integrated Governance strategy including a new Governance structure and framework. Significant changes have included the appointment of a new manual handling trainer and a Head of Governance, due to commence shortly, to assist the Trust in implementing good practice across all areas of governance corporate and clinical. The new Governance framework has been developed on the basis of recommendations and advice, following routine inspections by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and the West Midlands South Strategic Health Authority. The Trust continues to work collaboratively with external agencies including the HSE, the National Patients Safety Agency, the Healthcare Commission and Health Protection Agency to further improve the patient environment, quality of care and working lives for staff. Clinical Governance is the system adopted by the NHS to ensure that patients receive the highest possible quality of care, ensuring high standards, safety and improvement in patient services. The Trust’s Clinical Governance Committee ensures patient safety and quality of care are prioritised throughout the organisation as part of the overarching strategy to achieve Standards for Better Health. For further information on Standards for Better Health, visit the Healthcare Commission’s web site www.healthcarecommission.org.uk. Performance and waiting times The Trust received one star in the 2004/05 performance ratings by the Healthcare Commission. l 96% inpatients waited 6 months of less (England average - 95%) l 92% outpatients waited 13 weeks or less (England average - 83%) l 86% A&E attenders seen within 4 hours (England average - 97%) l 100% of Breast cancer diagnoses treated within one month (England average 99.5%) To see the full performance ratings visit www.healthcarecommission.org.uk. The Trust has been working closely with the Health and Safety Executive to implement improvements for staff and patients following mandatory inspections that took place at the beginning of March 2004. Improvement notices were issued on five key areas that the Trust has since been addressing rigorously. Further information on the improvement notices can be found on www.hse.gov.uk. Major incidents The Trust has in place a major incident plan which is fully compliant with “Handling Major Incidents: An Operational Doctrine” and accompanying NHS guidance on major incident preparedness and planning. Contact us George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust Head Office - Lewes House College Street Nuneaton Warwickshire CV10 7DJ Email: enquiries@geh.nhs.uk Useful numbers Switchboard: Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS): PALS freephone: Multi-lingual co-workers: 024 7635 1351 024 7686 5550 0800 0407 194 024 7637 0028