New Malaysian Essays 3
Transcription
New Malaysian Essays 3
1 Copyright of the essays and visuals are (c) The respective writers, artists and photographers Special Thanks: Liza Manshoor & Teck Hee New Malaysian Essays 3 is a free download released on 16 September 2010. Do spread it around! Published by: Matahari Books B-8-2A Opal Damansara Jalan PJU 3/27 47810 Petaling Jaya Malaysia ISBN: 9789834484552 Information on all other Matahari Books publications can be obtained at: www.mataharibooks.com Contact: info@mataharibooks.com Contents Introduction 4 Yin Shao Loong 1. H ow to Demonstrate Creatively: A Manual of Innovative Civil Disobedience in Malaysia 8 Wong Chin Huat 2. An Empty Canvas on Which Many Shadows Have Already Fallen 23 Simon Soon 3. Q ueer Ways: An Un-straight Survey of the Direction of Malaysian 40 Popular Culture and Fashion Clarissa Lee 4. U wang Asli Moden | Orang Asli Moden59 Mor Ajani 5. A mongst the Exiles: Reflections of a Refugee Lawyer 79 Sumitra Visvanathan Bios 89 4 Introduction Welcome to New Malaysian Essays 3 and welcome, perhaps, to a different Malaysia than you may be used to. The essays in this volume deal with peoples and subjects that do not normally reach the public at large, yet all are distinctively Malaysian issues and passions. We will meet protesting men in black, art critics who urinate over gallery works, drag queens, Orang Asli in cyberspace, and refugees in Malaysia. The theme for this volume could be described as the ‘other’ Malaysias that persist and have persisted alongside more dominant or official narratives (and here I tip my proverbial hat to the efforts of historian Farish A. Noor). Datuks and Tunkus may be mentioned here and there, but they take a back seat to the awesome diversity and inventiveness of everyday common people. Since 2010 is the first year that Malaysia Day, September 16, is being celebrated as a national holiday, we are marking this belated occasion by making this volume of New Malaysian Essays available as a free e-book for all. By making this a free e-book we hope to further New Malaysian Essay’s mission of increasing the availability of original non-fiction writing of substantial length to Malaysians. Happy 47th birthday, Malaysia! Enjoy the read, it’s on us. So, don’t worry about intellectual piracy or trouble getting this from the stores before authorities seize it, as long as you have an internet connection you can download, enjoy, and share this with your nearest and dearest, or even total strangers! If you like what you read, let the authors and the publisher know at info@mataharibooks.com Unfortunately, as the observant among you will no doubt note, despite plans to the contrary we were unable to include any submissions from East Malaysians this time around, but this is something we hope to rectify in the future. In the meantime, we have started to address exclusions by featuring work by and about Orang Asli, in an Orang Asli language. Which brings us to what’s in store in this volume. We have political scientist Wong Chin-Huat’s upbeat guide to civil disobedience, a small handbook of ideas on getting your views heard whilst pressing for political reform in Malaysia. Wong may be familiar to readers as a columnist for the online news portal The Nut Graph, as well as Malaysia’s ‘man in black’, a form of sartorial protest he launched after the Perak state constitutional coup that 5 occurred in February 2009. His relentless advocacy of democratisation in Malaysia earned him some time in the lockup in May 2009 on accusations of sedition, a situation that led to the Brickfields police arresting even the lawyers for supporters of Wong who were detained while protesting his arrest. All, including Wong, were released without charge several days later. Wong’s essay draws on concepts developed in Gandhian non-violent direct action and its descendants in the U.S. civil rights movement. Here, he applies them with a twist to the Malaysian context. With the repressive laws on free speech and public assembly in Malaysia, and a political culture and media inhospitable to dissent, principled civil disobedience offers a non-violent way for concerned citizens to reach out to the public and inspire, if not action, then a transformation in attitudes and opinion. Repressive political regimes will often go to absurd lengths to retain hegemony, but in doing so, they risk losing legitimacy or may provoke public outrage to such an extent that it overcomes the fears inhibiting wider dissent. The reformasi protests of the late 1990s and the debacle over the 2009 Perak constitutional coup, which included the arrest of people for simply wearing black, are homegrown examples of this phenomenon in action. Wong’s hope is that Malaysians will make the shift from kopitiam grousing to more focused forms of action, which can still involve savouring one’s favourite kopi O in novel politicised ways. The next two essays take on popular culture and the arts in an historical light. Simon Soon, an independent art curator, takes us on a journey through the debates surrounding the development of a homegrown aesthetic in the arts. His account takes place amidst the social upheaval in the wake of the 13 May, 1969 ethnic riots and the subsequent period of national emergency and suspension of democracy under Tun Abdul Razak’s National Operations Council (NOC). For many decades frank discussion of this period has been frowned upon by the authorities, though in the last few years new writing has emerged, such as Dr Kua Kia Soong’s controversial thesis on the origins of 13 May, 1969, and more commentators have stepped forward to argue that we should leave the shadow of 13 May behind us and instead embrace the idea that dramatic change in the political landscape need not result in a bloodbath. The electoral aftermath of March 2008 seems to suggest that peaceful political change is possible. Less discussed, however, have been the cultural consequences of the post-1969 emergency. In particular, the efforts to forge a unifying national culture; an attempt to make a single Malaysia before it became a public relations catch-phrase. The 1971 National Cultural Congress and its National Cultural Policy (NCP) sought to chart out an ‘authentic’, homegrown direction for cultural production in Malaysia. It shared much in common with similar efforts across the Third World in its antagonism towards derivative cultural production dependent on the former colonial masters. However, a stance opposed to foreign domination all too easily slips into a reactionary closure to all external influences, whether beneficial or not. The result is not unlike cutting off oxygen and sunlight for a plant. Malaysia, today and in the past, is the product of the confluence of great Asian civilisations and their Western usurpers. It has, on the whole, grown stronger as a result of such interaction, and isolation has never been a viable or attractive option. Soon takes us through these big issues via the careers of a dynamic duo of the Malaysian art world, perhaps ‘terrible twins’ is a more apt moniker; Redza Piyadasa and Sulaiman Esa. These two artist- 6 intellectuals debated, challenged and provoked each other and those around them to find a fruitful way to produce art in a manner that was both critical and socially relevant. Both were early enthusiasts of the NCP, but found themselves having to chart out a more flexible and ecumenical direction in order to make themselves both Malaysian and globally significant. Along the way, they have to contend with the urinary critique of an even more formidable enfant terrible, poet Salleh Ben Joned. Soon’s analysis of the good intentions of the NCP and its eventual failure to nurture creativity or authenticity in the arts could offer instructive lessons in this period of vague talk about one Malaysia, our persisting concerns to establish ourselves in globally-relevant terms, and struggles over our capacity to do so. Even readers unfamiliar with the particular lingo and dynamics of the art world will find national and humanistic significance in the struggles of Piyadasa and Sulaiman to make themselves into better artists. Clarissa Lee’s essay takes us into another side of the cultural world that is seldom subjected to analysis; the world of fashion and popular culture since Merdeka. This is not an exhaustive survey, but rather one that explores multiple strands including advertising, branding, film, beauty pageants, burlesque, stripping, dress, cross-dressing, nasyid, drag shows, and men and women’s magazines. Lee also challenges her readers to question any assumption that Malaysian history is simply a history of heterosexuals. In order to break this presumption of heteronormativity (a technical, scholarly term now finding increasing use by gender activists – meaning that heterosexuality is considered a norm), she blends queer with straight in her account of Malaysian cultural mores and obsessions over the decades. For those of us who rarely venture into the diverse sub-cultures she details, her essay offers a sense of the diversity that is urban Malaysia, both past and present. Taking us into the zone between village and city is Mor Ajani’s essay on modern life amongst the Orang Asli, Peninsular Malaysia’s indigenous peoples. Mor is a young comic book artist, cultural documenter, and cultural activist on Orang Asli matters. He paints a picture of how Orang Asli have engaged in modern urban life, an encounter that has frequently placed their lands and traditions in jeopardy. However, one will not find a trace of bitterness in Mor’s essay. Instead, we find listed the diverse initiatives underway, many with Mor’s involvement, to bring Orang Asli together via new media channels as well as to promote their culture. I am also very pleased to present his translation of his essay in Bahasa Temuan, the language of his tribe, or suku. It is rare to find Temuan in published works, as it is primarily an oral language, but Mor has been at the forefront of releasing materials in both Malay and Temuan. If you have not encountered Bahasa Temuan before you will find many similarities with Malay. Reading and speaking it is somewhat akin to engaging with the various regional dialects of Malay. If you are one of the 8 million-odd Malaysians on Facebook you should seek out the Club Bahase Temuan which Mor helped found to educate people on his language. I hope the reader who is unfamiliar with Orang Asli matters will find that the Orang Asli share much in common with urban Malaysians in their cultural pride, dreams, delights, and aspirations. Last, we travel further afield to the terrain of exile. Sumitra Visvanathan is a veteran refugee lawyer 7 who has worked in Malaysia and the region for the United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR). She has personally processed thousands of asylum applications in her 14-year career. Working this closely with refugees has given her a sharp insight into their plight and their humanity. Recognition of refugees in Malaysia is still in its infancy. The laws of the land regard them as ‘illegal immigrants’ rather than human beings deserving of help and protection. However, there is a growing and dedicated core of concerned Malaysians striving to extend compassionate assistance where the authorities have failed to do so. Part of the solution will involve the development of empathy on our part for those who find themselves refugees. Sumitra’s piece is a contribution to that effort as she tries to help us understand what it is like to live the life of an exile. My own thoughts are that our treatment of (foreign) strangers is intimately tied to our frequent habit of treating of fellow Malaysians as strangers. Our (mis)treatment of refugees often rests upon the same attitudes and instruments we apply to divide Malaysia into apparently opposed camps. Foreigner :: Local. Native :: Pendatang. Compliant :: Troublemaker. Us :: Them. Do we not all bleed the same blood, breathe the same air, sweat under the same sun? We are a nation of travellers; old, new and ancient. Exile is a form of arrival to our shores that is by no means new, but the values of our more civilised world now demand that we approach it with greater humanity and compassion. Malaysia is a land of plenty, but debate still rages over who deserves to enjoy it, and to what degree. Fear, mistrust and force have been frequent responses, but they need not be the only ones. Openness, fairness, and compassion may lead to new, previously unimagined states of harmony and prosperity. Rather than dismissing any attempt at such out of turn, should we not perhaps try? Are we not more confident and capable now after 47 years? So, there you have it. From the city streets to the kampung, from pop culture to the galleries, from democracy to the detention camp, five slices of Malaysia past and present rendered in word and text, by Malaysians, for Malaysia and the world. Enjoy this journey into a Malaysia that you may have thought familiar, I hope you will leave having found something new. Acknowledgements Thanks go to the prolific Amir Muhammad for entrusting the third volume of New Malaysian Essays to my care. Thanks also to the writers for taking time out of their busy schedules to contribute their pieces, and to artist Mun Kao for the cover art, “Goldfish.” The pictures in Wong Chin-Huat’s article are courtesy of Tan Hui Chun, and those from Sumitra Visvanathan’s are from UN Photos. Along the way, various friends and colleagues brainstormed content and possible directions with me. I would like to thank Nandita Solomon, Bernice Chauly, Yee I-Lann, Eva McGovern, and Snow Ng for all their advice and help. Yin Shao Loong September 2010 8 H OW TO DEMONSTRATE CREATIVELY: A MANUAL OF INNOVATIVE CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE IN MALAYSIA A What is a Demonstration? Wong Chin Huat Most Malaysians have a fixed idea of demonstration, that it must be a gathering at a specific location at a specific time. Such a perception has a few important implications. Firstly, people have to attend the gathering. Secondly, if the people can be stopped from attending the gathering either through roadblocks or arrest of organisers, a demonstration can then be stopped by the police. Thirdly, if the demonstration fails to be stopped at the start, the police can still end it by dispersing the demonstrators with physical force. Fourthly, because such a demonstration is often a contest to control a particular site at a particular time, the site becomes effectively a battleground and often ends in some violent conflicts. Fifthly, because the site for such a demonstration is inevitably a strategic place with intensive human activities, many – individuals and businesses – become to different degrees the collateral damage in the conflicts following or related to the demonstration. Sixthly and most importantly, as the government-controlled media frame the demonstration as a threat to peace and public order, even when successful, such a demonstration often loses its legitimacy and may do a disservice to its cause. But, why must demonstrations be confined to a particular place and a particular time and those who can be there? Why can’t we break some or all of these constraints – why can’t it be held at everywhere at a particular time? Why can’t it be held at a given place at all times, or on an ongoing basis? If either the time or the space constraints can be broken, then the attendants can be much larger and it might be technically impossible for the police or the authorities to stop a demonstration. 9 A demonstration should therefore be defined not by its means and forms, but by its intention and effect. As long as you are expressing yourself and conveying your message to an audience, beyond making a plain statement, you are demonstrating. The baby boy is demonstrating when he cries to draw attention of his mom. The old newspaper collector is demonstrating when she announces her arrival through loudspeaker in her van. The romantic guy was demonstrating when he proposed to his girlfriend with a diamond ring on the bill board by the LDP highway. You mean, demonstrating is like advertising? Absolutely! If we want to limit demonstration to those events related to politics, you may call demonstrating a form of political advertisement campaign. It differs from conventional political advertisement in a few major ways. Firstly, it does not involve media or advertising professionals and can instead be staged by ordinary people who believe in the cause. Secondly, it is therefore cheaper and can even be free. Thirdly, it can be staged anywhere and therefore not crippled by structural constraints like media monopoly or bill board permits. Fourthly, it tends to tremendously affect people – both the participants and the onlookers, in a way that is unmatchable by political advertisement on television or newspapers. In short, political demonstration can be the political advertisement for the newcomers in politics – people who have limited resources, networking or experience to start a new political campaign. Of course, there is no reason why established political forces cannot resort to demonstration too. B Why Demonstrate? Suppressing the freedom to demonstrate essentially acts to curb political competition. Even in countries where political parties or NGOs can advertise freely, this would limit the contestation of ideas to those who can afford the expensive cost of television, radio, newspaper or billboard advertisement. Since gathering is the most common form of demonstration, freedom of assembly can therefore be seen as a specific form and an extension of free speech. Now, you may protest: not all demonstrations are meant to persuade, some are rather meant to intimidate or blackmail. True, demonstrations may turn ugly if the organisers or participants are actually threatening violence. In such case, intimidation should be punished by law, but not the expression itself. In other words, we can exclude in our discussions here violence-inclined demonstrations. Now, what if you are threatening the authorities or the society not by violence, but by peaceful resistance or civil disobedience? In history, individuals – sometimes alone, sometimes collectively – have chosen to go to jail for refusing to pay tax, for rejecting military conscription, for opposing colonial rule or defying legal discrimination; are those not a form of blackmail? Indeed they are, but such blackmail is legitimate and it contests with law for legitimacy. After all, law and order work on the principles of coercion and legitimacy, which are substitutes to each other to some extent. If a law is not backed up by credible threat of penalties - carried out by the use of state violence when necessary - then even a highly legitimate one – like a speed limit - may be broken by free-riders. On the other hand, if a law is not legitimate in the eyes of the population, then its compliance will require a huge dose of coercion. And by willingly choosing penalty 10 over compliance, civil disobedience is effectively stripping legitimacy off the law, leaving it nakedly backed by only state violence. Hence, when a citizen is tried in a court of law for principally defying a law, the law is at the same time tried in the court of public opinion. And if the public backlash is strong enough, the law will ultimately have to be done away or amended, or the state will risk having to try hundreds or thousands of offenders. When the freedom to demonstrate is curbed and articulation of certain issues silenced, creative demonstration in the spirit of civil disobedience becomes all the more important. As a matter of fact, those planning or participating in such creative reform should ask themselves hard if the protest can strip the legitimacy of the authorities. If you get arrested for such a protest but the protest fails to get others questioning the legitimacy of the authorities or the status quo with regards to your cause, you fail. On the other hand, if you return home safely after robbing the authorities, or whichever the parties you are protesting against, of their legitimacy, you succeed! In other words, martyrdom is not the measure for success in the creative protests we will discuss here. The measure is winning legitimacy from your opponents. C Five Rules for Creative Demonstrations in Malaysia Rule 1: Everyone can demonstrate Demonstration is very much a numbers game. Ceteris paribus, more demonstrators are better than less. So, the protest must be simple, low-risk, easy to organise and if possible, fun. Why? For decades, Malaysians have been taught to stay away from politics because it is dangerous and dirty. Demonstrations are seen as dangerous stunts for the few opposition or NGO heroes, not a tool of expression for average Joe and Jane. Simplicity and low risk would take away citizens’ excuse not to participate. Ease in organization and mobilization then eliminates the need for complex networking. Hence, the police cannot crack down by arresting ring readers. And in times of emergency, people can always duplicate such acts as a ritual of protest. Lastly, if demonstrations can be associated with fun, more would be attracted than if it is associated with sacrifice. Rule 2: Politics is an inseparable part of everyday life The existing laws that suppress freedom of assembly like the Penal Code and Police Act operate on the basis that politics can be separated from other parts of life, so political activism can be curbed without disrupting other activities. Traditional demonstrations can be curtailed or quarantined surgically because they are distinctive from other activities. So, the challenge here is to blend politics into your daily life as much as possible that political activism cannot be singled out for suppression. Another benefit of immersing politics into daily life is that it helps to break the official indoctrination that politics is just for politicians, and it may induce others to follow in your footsteps, perhaps in some mild way. Rule 3: Peace speaks louder than violence Demonstrating will lose legitimacy when it is associated with violence and chaos. Never hit back or get into physical struggle even when attacked, whether physically or verbally. Your best weapon should be cameras or voice recorders. Areas frequented by foreign tourists would be ideal because they will likely spread your story to the rest of the world in real time. Practice silence if necessary and appropriate as noise may be easily associated with chaos and violence. Another option is sing- 11 ing the national anthem or spiritual or cultural songs that ordinary persons on the street may identify with and therefore enhance the legitimacy of demonstration. Rule 4: Demonstrate because you are mainstream Never let the powers-that-be paint you as fringe or radicals. Otherwise, you are conceding the majority to your opponent and defeat the purpose of winning people over. You must instead signal your mainstreamness. There must be something in your demonstration that ordinary people may identify with. Even if you do not look mainstream now, you must position yourself as the mainstream for tomorrow. Remember, perceptions can be self-fulfilling. If you believe that you are mainstream, and you talk like as if you are, you have a good chance of defining what mainstream is. Rule 5: Begin with the news headlines in mind Always remember your ultimate audience is not the few hundred or thousand bystanders or onlookers who are there to see you in action. It is the millions who are not there that you want to win over. According to Steven Covey, one of the habits of highly effective people is “to begin with the end in mind”. In creative demonstration, you begin with the news headlines in mind. So, put on your journalist/editor thinking cap. Eventually, you are fighting a battle of legitimacy in the media with the authorities or your opponents. If they are smart, they will pay attention to news headlines too. While the authorities have their spin doctors in the mainstream media to set agenda and do gate-keeping, they don’t have control over the foreign media and citizen journalists. To defeat the colossal propaganda machine, all you really need sometimes is a simple message. Remember the man who stopped the tanks in Tiananmen? DTen Examples of /Suggestions for Creative Demonstrations in Malaysia 1. Colour demonstration Colours are always political. And if you can get thousands of people to wear a singular colour, then you are organizing a huge demonstration whether or not they gather in one place. That’s how the red-shirts and yellow-shirts in Thailand do their politics. Further from home, you have the success of Rose Revolution in Georgia (2003), the Orange Revolution in Ukraine (2004), Tulip Revolution (2005) and Cedar Revolution in Lebanon (2005). And of course, you also have brutal crackdowns of the Saffron Revolution in Burma (2007) and Green Revolution in Iran (2009). Back at home, UMNO was perhaps the pioneer of colour demonstrations. In 1946, the nascent nationalist party mobilised the Malays to wear a white band on their songkok as a part of the larger civil disobedience campaign against the Malayan Union proposal. In 2007, colour became important in Malaysian politics as yellow was identified as the colour of BERSIH (the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections) while saffron the colour of HINDRAF (the Hindu Rights Action Force). After the rallies, Yellow Saturdays and Saffron Sundays were organised to retain public memory and keep the momentum, although the success was limited. In February 2009, as an immediate response to the palace coup in Perak, some of us began wearing black to mourn the death of democracy. When the Barisan Nasional coup regime decided to further 12 remove the legislative speaker Sivakumar on May 7 (Thursday), BERSIH held a press conference to call upon all Malaysians to wear black on that day as a sign of protest. Amongst other things, it says: Najib’s slogan: “1Malaysia, people first, performance now” is now a cruel joke on Malaysians. Is this the old “1Authoritarian-and-Corrupt Malaysia” getting worse? What “people first” when people are forced to be blind, deaf, mute and immobile with the media curfew and city lockdown? What “performance now” when the “performance” in law-breaking may never be known? In response to all these, we urge all Malaysians to wear black on May 7th. Let’s show the world Najib Razak’s true colour, that the1Malaysia under Najib Razak is “1BLACKMalaysia” living in darkness. Let’s paint every state and territory, every town and village black with our clothes, hats, ribbons and stickers on that day. He may hijack our unelected institutions like the judiciary, civil service, police and Election Commission, but he will never win our heart and mind. He is no reformist until he dares to face elections in Perak. Let’s show the world that Malaysians will stand up against any invasion of democracy, freedom and peace by unscrupulous politicians. We will not allow coup[s to] be the way to power in Perak, or anywhere in Malaysia. No one shall take away our democracy, freedom and peace. I was arrested immediately in the same evening. The police later went hysterical by banning the colour black. In the following days and weeks, more than 160 people including lawmakers and lawyers were arrested for gathering near the state legislature building, lighting candles in vigil, providing legal assistance, staging a hunger strike and indeed, even simply wearing black. This however backfired as many Malaysians felt that the police had gone too far and looked stupid. They wore black in protest of the arrests. For many, that was the first act of defiance in their life and they felt good about doing it. This dismantled their long-held fear of getting involved in politics. Wearing black has since then become a sign of protest in Malaysia. A campaign “Wear BLACK on Merdeka Day” was launched in the cyberspace and participated by many who were angry with the death of Selangor Government officer Teoh Beng Hock and the Shah Alam cow-head protest amongst other developments. The success of the black message is perhaps best illustrated by a protest on November 19, held by some MCA young members and supporters against their party president Ong Tee Keat amidst the party’s bitter infighting. Evaluation: Rule 1: it is simple, low-risk and easy to organise. Rule 2: literally wear your heart on your sleeve. Rule 3: it is definitely peaceful. Rule 4: black is a popular colour in any way. Rule 5: it is catchy, reminiscent of colour revolutions and eventually induces the police to over-react. 13 2. Singing the National Anthem The point here is to utilise state symbols and to drive home the point that we demonstrate because of patriotism. Never let the state demonise you as unpatriotic troublemakers. As compared to bringing national flags or wearing national flowers, singing the national anthem is so easy to do and can be done anytime anywhere. You can do that to make the point before you get arrested by police. They would have to stand still to show respect while you sing. If the police are stupid enough to attack you when you are singing national anthem, then they get themselves into a public-relations disaster. That indeed happened on the eve of 1st anniversary of the BERSIH rally (November 9, 2008) in Petaling Jaya. A bunch of police charged into a group of citizens who were singing the national anthem at the end of their anti-Internal Security Act rally. A few were injured. Civil society groups gave the Selangor police a good lecture on patriotism: “…..it is every Malaysians’ birth right to peaceful assembly, as enshrined in Article 10 of the Federal Constitution. The police dispersal of citizens’ peaceful gathering is unwarranted and an act of contempt against the Constitution. While Malaysians are taught from young to stand to attention when the national anthem is being played or sung, the behaviour of the police was such that they felt they had to stop the peaceful crowd from finishing the song and then proceeded to punish them violently.” They urged then Home Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Syed Albar to immediately apologise to Malaysians and demanded that the Selangor Chief of Police, Deputy Commissioner Datuk Khalid Abu Bakar take responsibility for his part in this fiasco and resign. Selangor Chief Police Officer Khalid Abu Bakar was silly enough to deny that the citizens were singing national anthem as if video cameras did not exist. Of course his lie was exposed squarely by citizen journalists equipped with modern technology. Khalid Abu Bakar got himself in hotter soup when he tried to compare the demonstrators with criminals: “What would happen if every criminal that we confront starts singing the national anthem?” BERSIH described his comparison of patriotic citizens with criminals as “obscene, outrageous and les majeste”. The coalition said: “The citizens were singing Negaraku to show their love to the Nation and the King. They did not disturb peace or cause harm to anyone. Only a colonial government or an occupying force will find the singing of a country’s national anthem criminal. Datuk Khalid Abu Bakar’s Freudian slip shows the skewed mentality of some police officers who subconsciously see themselves as the supreme ruler or the colonial master of Malaysians. If the police’s intention was only to arrest the gathering citizens, they could arrest them peacefully after the singing has been completed. 14 BERSIH demands the Home Minister Syed Hamid Syed Albar to apologise to the King, the Sultan and the people and take immediate action on Datuk Khalid Abu Bakar to show that his action is not instructed or consented to by the Federal Government. By first instructing policemen to charge a group of citizens singing the national anthem, then lying to the public by denying such an act took place, and now implying that singing national anthem without police permit is criminal, his position is absolutely untenable.” While Khalid Abu Bakar of course kept his job, he has lost badly in the battle of legitimacy. Evaluation: Rule 1: it is simple, low-risk and easy to organise. Rule 2: the innocent act of singing the national anthem becomes a political statement. Rule 3: singing is definitely peaceful Rule 4: what can be more mainstream than singing the national anthem? Rule 5: If you get arrested when singing national anthem, you virtually get arrested for singing national anthem! Who’s the public enemy here? 3. Restaurant protests Who say restaurants are only for dining? Modern human beings are multitasking all the time. We go to restaurants for business negotiation, socializing and courtship, why can’t we go to them for demonstrations? When people turn up in a particular restaurant performing the same ritual, they are demonstrating. To have a nationwide protest, all you need then is a restaurant chain. The good thing about demonstrating in restaurant is that police would have to disrupt the business of food and beverage industry to stop the protest. The idea came from a private party titled 1BLACKDinner organised by myself for friends and comrades after my release. We made fun of the police’s anti-BLACK attitude by coming out with a menu that was completely black. (See picture) The idea of having public protest was put into test in June 4, 2009 by the 1BLACKMalaysia campaign. We designed a four-element protest ritual: 1. Thursday evening (time); 2. Old Town White Coffee (location); 3. wearing black (dress code); and 4. ordering kopi-o (black coffee) (behaviour). The ritual was purposely made simple so that anyone can do it when there is such a need to protest. Some questioned why we chose Old Town and not simply any coffee shop or mamak store. The key point is that if the meeting venue is too widespread, then the protesters to be too scattered to be noticed. Fixing on a specific restaurant not only helps would-be protestors to find the place, it also helps the media to follow the story. And Old Town White Coffee was picked because it has more than 100 outlets nationwide. That Old Town was from Perak was the pleasant coincidence, not the determinant of this choice. 15 While many thought that idea was too comical to be threatening, the five Old Town outlets chosen by us on Facebook were mysteriously closed down on that day. We never know if the police had a hand in this, but it was clear that the idea of blending food and politics had hit the right pressure point for some. The kopi-o session did not gain momentum and eventually stopped by the end of the year after spreading to Bukit Mertajam and Klang for a while. Why? My reading is that members of public do not see a need to have weekly protests. Had the police continued its crackdown, drinking black coffee might become politically popular like wearing black. Evaluation: Rule 1: Everyone eats – just choose your menu of protest! Rule 2: When eating and drinking becomes political, crackdown would have the restaurant industry as collateral damage. Rule 3: How can you look violent when eating or drinking? Rule 4: Of course we are mainstream – eating is our national sport! Rule 5: Crackdown on a restaurant is surely odd and unusual for the entire world. 4. Fasting If eating can be a vehicle of protest, so can fasting. Traditionally, fasting is an act of restraint and is therefore the best response to violence. Hence, when the cow-head gang in Shah Alam put up their ugly protest against the plan to relocate a Hindu temple, some Malaysians of all religious and cultural backgrounds who are angered by such intimidation and bigotry organised what was perhaps the nation’s first multi-faith fasting activity: “Fast for the nation, peace for Malaysia”. The day chosen was Malaysia Day, which happened to fall in the month of Ramadhan. In the past, this month was a time where you find two Malaysias – one fasting, one not fasting. On September 16 2009, hundreds of Malaysians- Muslim, Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Taoist, Atheist - had decided to fast together. Their statement said it all about how you may protest in peace against violence, even though the word protest is not mentioned at all: “Malaysia is a peaceful country and it should remain that way forever. Acts of Violence and inciting hatred must have no place in our public life. Unfortunately, too many cruelties and injustices have happened since the nation’s last birthday. It is tempting to slip into despair or become revengeful. Let us turn our anger and sadness into a positive force for change. This September 16, let us all combine our efforts to present a meaningful gift for Malaysia on her 46th birthday. 16 Let us be united in one single action. Let us all fast from dawn to dusk for peace in this blessed land. Let the Muslims amongst us fast with a specific prayer for peace for the nation. Let the Bahais, Buddhists, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Taoists, followers of other spiritual traditions and atheists amongst us fast in solidarity and the same determination for peace. Let our common experience of hunger and human weakness humble, strengthen and unite us. Let us offer a hospitable smile to people we know and especially to those we don’t. Let us perform one extra act of kindness while fasting on this Malaysia day. Let us show our love and compassion for each other. Let Malaysia be a better country on her 46th birthday and every day after. Let Malaysia be truly happy and peaceful this September 16. And so we fast. . . . . . . to make room for justice and peace!” The success of this fasting exercise was a sharp contrast to the hunger strike launched by Pakatan Rakyat Perak which ended with police arrests. The latter was disadvantaged in a few ways. Firstly, it was much more high-profile and high-risk, turning away ordinary citizens. Secondly, it was distinctively partisan political and hence not mainstream enough. Thirdly, the hunger-strike was separated from the daily activities of ordinary people, making it possible for a surgical crackdown. Fourthly, because the participants were all politicians, the police managed to frame this as a political conflict and make the crackdown less illegitimate. Evaluation: Rule 1: While it may take a bit determination, everyone can fast. Rule 2: When fasting is political, how do you separate politics from other aspect of life? Rule 3: Fasting is a symbol of restraint. Rule 4: Fasting is found in almost every spiritual tradition. While some religious people may not be happy, they could not find a legitimate ground to protest. Rule 5: How can they force you to eat in fasting month? 17 5. Protest By Moving Around Protest can be merged into your daily activities like walking. All you need to do is carry a striking message with you, like how sandwich-board men get their message across. The trick is to get the public’s attention without annoying them. Public transport in this sense becomes an ideal vehicle to be hijacked for protests. The 1BLACKMalaysia fellowship tested this idea in protest of the mysterious death of Teoh Beng Hock. On a Saturday morning, seven of us took the LRT from KL Sentral to Masjid Jamek. From there we walked through Lebuh Ampang to Jalan Dang Wangi where we took the monorail to Jalan Imbi. All of us carried a transparent clear holder which contained some A4 papers with messages related to custody death. Sometime we deliberately flashed them to the curious onlookers, sometime we just acted as if we were a natural part of the street scenery. Whether walking, taking LRT and monorail, dining in restaurant or just standing idly at the entrance of LRT/monorail station, our A4 placard drew public attention in a way similar to sandwich-board men. This idea was later tried by media freedom activists in their “read newspapers upside-down” stunts. They took the LRT from Kelana Jaya at one end to Wangsa Maju at another end and easily captured public attention. Evaluation: Rule 1: Everyone can carry some message when walking or driving. It’s like a human car-sticker. Rule 2: To stop people from walking or driving with a political message, police would have to stop pedestrians or vehicles. Rule 3: Walking and flashing your placards cannot be associated with violence or chaos. In line with this rule, you should not actively talk to people. Rule 4: Dressing like a normal office worker may create a stronger connection with the members of public because you just look like one of them. Rule 5: Bukit Aman and Putrajaya wont like such a headline in New York Times: ‘Malaysian police arrest protesting pedestrians’. 6. Protest tourism Taking the protest-by-moving-around one step further is to organise trips to tourism spots using public transport: trains or coaches, or even budget airlines. As long as the participants can be easily identified with either the colour of clothing or some other symbols, it will create newsworthy scenes from the beginning of the journey all the way to its end. It will also affect others who share the public transport vehicle or visit the same destination. It is important not to make this too serious like Gandhi’s Salt March, for few Malaysians are ready to emulate Gandhi. Instead, make it fun as an escapade or carnival. The more joyful it is, the more especially foreign tourists - may just join in. And the more ordinary people are involved, the harder it will be for the authorities to crack down. If the state is desperate enough to halt public transport or close down the tourist destinations, you achieve your goals anyway because more people will know about your cause and the authorities look helpless and silly. 18 This idea has not been tested till now. An ideal plan would be to organise a trip from the northern and southern ends of Malaysia taking the intercity train to meet in Ipoh and either march or take chartered bus to the tree of democracy and other tourist destinations. Evaluation: Rule 1: Marry vocation with protest. That reduces the seriousness of political activism. Rule 2: Why cant I protest while supporting Malaysian tourism? Rule 3: Tourists are not terrorists. You don’t even have to say anything! Rule 4: Holiday makers are not trouble-makers. Make sure you dress like genuine tourists. Rule 5: Your best protection from police violence is the annual budget of tourism advertisements. 7. Reading protests Reading can be a powerful form of silent protest. All you need to do to subvert the normal habit of reading is to choose the right reading material or change the “method” of reading. For example, if you want to protest against a book ban, one easy way is to read the banned books in front of a major book store in shopping centre. Imagine just 50 people reading Karen Armstrong’s The Battle for God: Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam at the entrance of Kinokuniya bookstore in KLCC. What can the state do about it? Arresting 50 people for reading a banned international bestseller? That would be the worst publicity you want internationally. On the other hand, not doing anything is basically conceding the absurdity of the ban. Hence, this simple form of civil disobedience immediately illustrates the flaws of the rules and regulations. The risk can be lowered when the protest focuses on how to read rather than what to read. As a sign of protest against political intervention and self-censorship in the newsroom, media freedom activists carried out “reading newspapers upside-down” in parks, at shopping centres and tourism spots, and on LRT cars in a few cities this year. The flash-mob-style protests carried out in four weekends from May 2 (the eve of World Press Freedom Day) to May 23 (the last Sunday before the Malam Tak Nak Potong on May 28) had a catchy but simple message: “when newspapers report news upside-down, you just have to read them upside-down!” While the protestors were stopped or questioned by shopping centre or LRT personnel in some cases, they did not encounter any police intervention. The police’s inaction is self-explanatory: under which section of Penal Code or Internal Security Act will reading newspapers upside-down constitute an offense? Clearly seeing the catch, UMNO Youth responded by sending some members to read Harakah and Suara Keadilan upside-down alongside the genuine protestors. Rule 1: It is simple, low-risk and easy to organise. In particular, newspapers protest can be staged anywhere with news stands. 19 Rule 2: Reading – especially newspapers – is part of daily life even for Malaysians who are supposedly no book lovers. Stopping someone from reading newspapers or books is hard to execute. Rule 3: The act of silent reading disturbs nobody. In comparison, the traditional act of burning newspapers can be easily associated with violence. Rule 4: Reading is well regarded by the society. It is hard to attack the political element of a reading protest without crashing into traditional values. Rule 5: “Malaysians get arrested for reading”? Good. No advertisement in The New York Times can repair the damage. 8. Shopping Protests Malaysians like shopping, so why should we forego the great opportunity to get the messages through? After all, shopping centres are ideal gathering places of audiences – and potential participants too. Instead of organising a rally on your own and face overcoming police obstruction, you should just deliver your public interest message to the innocently gathering crowd. One good thing about marrying shopping and protests is that participants can easily pretend that they are just normal shoppers and hence reduce the risk of police arrest. A good example is the shopping protest in Jalan Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kuala Lumpur at the height of the Reformasi wave in 1998. On Saturday afternoons, some activists would just suddenly go to the middle of the road and shout “reformasi” and many shoppers would gather and demonstrate. They would disperse in time and go back into normal shopping before the police could make any arrest. It’s like a flash mob. You can also do protest shopping in other way. Instead of shouting slogans and risk police arrest or being escorted out by security guards, you may stage a quiet protest by gathering at a particular place in a shopping centre or shopping district. All you need to do is to dress in a certain way like wearing the same colour or wearing a flower, a badge, a headband for your fellow protesters and the members of public to recognise you. Now, there is nothing in the Penal Code or other laws – to my best knowledge – that prohibits you from shopping in a uniform way. So, you really do not have to worry about police arrest as long as you don’t disturb other shoppers. You can instead sue the police for unlawful arrest if they detain you without reason. The police may of course block suspicious people from entering the shopping centre/district, but this would likely disrupt business activities. For this reason, if you choose shopping districts/malls which foreign tourists frequent, you are likely to get your way. You would unlikely be manhandled because the police officers know they could not stop the foreigners from taking videos and posting the police’s actions on YouTube later. Lastly, if your cause has yet to pick up momentum, you may use shopping centres to disseminate information and raise public awareness in rather innocent ways. In a few weekends in November and December 2007, a few friends and myself would stand in shopping balls and LRT stations and give away give bananas to passers-by. If asked why, we would simply tell them that we were celebrating “Yellow Saturday”. Only if they further ask what “Yellow Saturday” was, we would tell them that the first Yellow Saturday was November 10, when 40,000 to 50,000 people gathered in downtown 20 Kuala Lumpur to push for electoral reforms and the continued celebration of “Yellow Saturdays” to come was but a way to raise public consciousness. This act would sooner or later attract the attention and intervention of security guards, all you need to do is move a bit away from their entrance. Insofar as you remain orderly and calm, it is not an offence to give away some free bananas or other small gifts. The police know that. Rule 1: This is very simple and easy organise as you just need to politicise your normal shopping activities by giving them a specific recognisable appearance. Rule 2: By combining shopping and protest, crackdowns on protests would likely cause disruption to business activities. This may alienate the business community if you play your card right. Rule 3: As long as you don’t carry banners or shout slogans within the premise of the shopping centres, it is hard to accused of disrupting public order. Rule 4: You should show to fellow shoppers that protest is just as normal and as much a part of daily life as shopping. In other words, protest while shopping is very mainstream and trendy. Rule 5: “Shoppers arrested for making political statements”? Or “Shopping Mall shut down to avoid protest”? You know well such news headlines are a nightmare for the government. 9. Flower Protests Flowers are the perfect antithesis of guns and fists. They can therefore be a powerful weapon against violence. Remember the HINDRAF’s Rose campaign targeting the Prime Minister on Valentine’s Day? If you can persuade more people to protest by wearing or holding a flower anywhere they are at a designated date and time, then the police cannot even crackdown or lock down. They will have to face a sea of flowers. Imagine this: in commemoration of all victims of state violence, from Kugan to Teoh Beng Hock to Amirulrasyid, thousands of Malaysians pledge to lay down a white flower – be it melati, jasmine, chrysanthemum or lotus – at designated police stations and Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) offices. How can the police stop them? By threatening arrest if anyone carries a white flower within 50 meter from a police station or MACC building? If they do nothing, then the accumulated white flowers – a scene commonly seen in the site of killing or disasters – would move more people to do so. In other words, the police would find themselves caught between a rock and a hard place. Rule 1: Again, this is super easy to organise and participate as flowers are easy to get. Also, people normally don’t get arrested for holding flowers. 21 Rule 2: Carrying a flower can be part of your daily life, without obstructing other things to do in life. Rule 3: Flowers are an embodiment of love and beauty, making it hard to paint you as a terrorist or criminal. Rule 4: Flowers are so important in our mainstream cultural life that destroying flowers is offensive by default. Attacking someone who carries a bouquet of flowers looks barbaric. Rule 5: Your flower campaign, whether successful or cracked down upon, can easily produce some internationally newsworthy images. 10. Outdoor Protests All public spaces are good for protests, parks, fields and beaches included. Remember the Woodstock festival in the 1960s? Who say you cannot relive history? Use your imagination. Organise an outing somewhere and get people to come wearing some common t-shirts, badges, ribbons or any other signs. Now, if 500 families gathered in Taman Tasik Jaya to picnic under canopies that read “We want our third votes”, is that illegal assembly? You can also organise a national bicycle tour like the Jaringan Rakyat Tertindas (JERIT) once did. Like all other forms of creative protests detailed above, you only need to think out of the box, marrying protest with some usual activities we do and give it a political twist. Rule 1: Outdoor activities are simple and easy to organise. The risk of getting arrested by police for organising a cross-country or a mass picnic is next to zero. Rule 2: You go to parks, fields and beaches anyway, so just bring your politics along. Rule 3: Picnic, riding, beach games and other outdoor activities are normally associated with fun, not violence. Rule 4: Again, outdoor activities are mainstream. You should carry out your protest as naturally as possible when you do these activities. Rule 5: No one in the world has got arrested for organising a political picnic yet? Feel like making a Guinness record? 22 23 A N EMPTY CANVAS ON WHICH MANY SHADOWS HAVE ALREADY FALLEN Simon Soon Art as Theatre We need a type of theatre which not only releases feelings, insights and impulses possible within the particular historical field of human relations in which the action takes place, but employs and encourages those thoughts and feelings which help transform the field itself. – Bertolt Brecht We enter our subject by way of time travelling, going back to the first week of August, 1974. In the Sudut Penulis (Writer’s Corner) of Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (DBP), our national language and culture institution, the opening ceremony for an exhibition was taking place. It was Kuala Lumpur in the 70s, and the race riots of 1969 that closed the preceding decade lingered in the minds of many. But that would not hinder life from moving on, and for the citizens of this young country the notion of how we could transform that tragic episode in Malaysian history, and how we could understand our identity and live with one another would become a pivotal lesson. For many creative types and intellectuals the city had then promised fertile, stirring and exciting encounters. It had yet to develop the kind of conservative backlash that, as the decade progressed, would gradually come to replace an attitude of fervid curiosity, openness and willingness to experiment adopted by members of all stripes within the small yet bustling artistic circle. Many of the creative luminaries that have since been regarded as a pioneering generation of arts practitioners were present that day. Krishen Jit, Ismail Zain, Salleh Ben Joned, Faridah Merican, to name a few. 24 However, they gathered that day for an exhibition that was beyond the norm of the expectations of cultural taste in that era. Two half drunk coke bottles, a rumpled raincoat, a potted plant, an empty canvas, ashes from burnt out mosquito coils, a pile of human hair collected from a barber shop, used tins of paint, a chair, a bird cage. These were some of the objects that comprised the exhibition Towards a Mystical Reality. Burnt-out mosquito coils used to keep away mosquitoes on the night of 25th march 1974. Discarded after the exhibition. Image source: Piyadasa: An Overview, 1962-2000 by T.K. Sabapathy Empty Canvas on which so many shadows have already fallen, 1974. Artwork destroyed. Image source: Piyadasa: An Overview, 1962-2000 by T.K. Sabapathy Two half-drunk Coca-cola bottles, 1974. Discarded after the exhibition. Image source: Piyadasa: An Overview, 1962-2000 by T.K. Sabapathy A month before the exhibition, the newly published literary monthly Dewan Sastera included an interview with the two young artists, Redza Piyadasa and Sulaiman Esa, who had come forward to present what was described as ‘a documentation of a jointly initiated experience’. These objects were not sculptures per se, at least in our commonplace understanding of sculpture as a three dimensional object endowed with aesthetic value, skilfully rendered by an artistic hand and mind. Instead, they were found objects taken from our environment, collected samples of our everyday, displaced from the outside world into a gallery setting. They operated within the discourse of the ready-made and objet trouvé (found object), a unique new innovation of modern art. 25 Needless to say, the Kuala Lumpur audience, more familiar with the gestural palette of the then vogue-ish local styles of abstract expressionism that were introduced a decade before, were miffed. What was to be made of these articles? Reactions ranged from incredulity to boredom. Yet in between the spectrum of responses, the exhibition marked the culmination of a process of rethinking art that was a response to the cultural direction in which Malaysia was to embark. A public debate on the Towards A Mystical Reality exhibition held at the Sudut Penulis in Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Piyadasa (center) and Sulaiman (second from left). Image source: Piyadasa: An Overview, 1962-2000 by T.K. Sabapathy, taken from FEMALE magazine, September 1975. Sulaiman Esa (left) and Redza Piyadasa (right), 1973. Image source: Piyadasa: An Overview, 1962-2000 by T.K. Sabapathy My interest in looking back at this particular moment in the history of art in Malaysia rests on the many exasperating and at times defeating conversations I had with contemporary artist Sharon Chin. In 2009, like the rest of our generation who grew up with our life stapled to the virtual world, we wanted to initiate a blogging project about art and culture, in the hope of communicating and building new audiences for a provincial art world that was at best removed from the cultural life of the country, and at worst, operating under the false pretense that art mattered to the society at large. With this endeavour in mind, we began talking about the fractured/fractious relationship within the art community itself; how artists are divided along the lines of language, race, and therefore to a large extent, class. The need to communicate across borders became an imperative. We wanted to look at the broader picture, to understand the sort of cultural landscape of the country and how that had changed and why it had changed since the founding of Malaysia. This is where Towards a Mystical Reality comes into the picture. It provided a window into the cultural life of 70’s Malaysia, shoring against its discarded raincoats and empty coke bottles, the tides of cultural change germinated by creative responses to two historical events that shaped the cultural direction of the country – the May 13 racial riots of 1969 and the National Cultural Policy of 1971. It was not because it was entirely unique in its proposition for an alternative Non-Western approach to art making that interests me here. After all, other artists, swept by the excitement of building a localised intellectual culture, were similarly excited. It was because it argued for a bigger, smarter and more complex understanding of who we were and what we could contribute to the world. It was the scale and ambition and, perhaps in some respect, the foolishness and sheer audacity of its idealism that I fall sway to. 26 Because of Piyadasa and Sulaiman’s involvement in both the literary and theatre scenes in the preceding years, the audiences who attended the exhibition came from all three worlds. Was it art? Was it sculpture? Was it a great Malaysian novel? Was it drama? None, however, came as close in providing an insight as did theatre critic and director Krishen Jit when he remarked that the exhibition interested him primarily as theatre. The director jotted in his foreword that the dramatic element borne from this initiative exposed ‘us to our everyday reality.’ Krishen’s description resonated with American art historian Michael Freid’s critical dismissal of minimalism as a form of theatre, polluting the high modernist demands for the purity of painting as a medium. Writing against the incursion of minimalism’s fetishisation of objecthood, Fried observed how this had robbed painting of its mystical, transcendental value. By focusing on the materiality of the paint, or the structural quality of a sculpture, the audience would come to realise his or his own sense of being and perception in relation to the object within the physical exhibition space. Art is no longer a window into another abstract or transcendental emotion, or a representation of our world through the medium paint, it is an event that happens in the here and now. In other words, the aesthetic moment becomes the live ‘drama’ of the real world. It seemed like the very movement that had de-centred modernism was also one that connected us to the everyday reality. This was the natural progression for Piyadasa and Sulaiman, whose previous works were constructivist in nature, paying more attention to material and objecthood. In many ways, working across disciplines such as contributing theatre set designs for Uda dan Dara in 1972, Alang Rentak Seribu in 1974, and The Birds in 1974 provided them the opportunity to challenge theatre with their visual art cunning and in return, allowed theatre to challenge them. Because this history is intimately tied to the way we are able to engage with culture, it is theatre in the most dramatic sense of the word, a parable for how our cultural history shifted through the decade and the lessons we can learn from this episode through the complexity of its thought, execution and resolution. And drama was what Piyadasa and Sulaiman Esa got. The critical reception that resulted from the exhibition highlighted the ethos and social mores of the artworld at large. There was however, a much more visceral reaction to the duo’s theatre. Gripped by the feverish spontaneity and irrationality of Zen Buddhist thought illustrated in the personal traits of legendary irascible monastic abbots, the opening night crowd also saw Salleh Ben Joned, who took to peeing on the 10,000 word manifesto. The latter was later accused of prostituting his dignity. Sadly, try as we may, our art life has never since been visited by a level of controversy comparable to this act of sacrilege and transcendence. 27 Vagaries of the Young Turks The passage from Merdeka (Independence) in 1957 through the cataclysmic events in May 1969 and to the end of the Seventies is a movement from optimism and innocence to the realisation that there are dark, violent, divisive and tragic profiles to mankind. – TK Sabapathy, Vision and Idea: Relooking Modern Malaysian Art 70s Malaysia is sepia-tinted. Ask someone from that era about music and an entire decade, or at least the first half of it, floods back like the uncontrollable rush of an oncoming tide. Then, ask them about fashion and your Baju Melayu-clad, songkok-wearing uncle would most likely shy away from the modish sartorial narcissism of tight fitting shirts and bell bottom pants that he once so fervidly embraced, believing that the following decades had successfully aborted this fashion mis-step from his memory. So in writing on the 70s, contemporary artist Wong Hoy Cheong observed, ‘Among artists and writers, the early 70s represented a period of uncertainty. A lot of questioning and rethinking about the relationship of art, culture and society took place.’ The idea of the modern had yet to exhaust itself. Artists and writers tirelessly sought to address this from the peripheral capital (in relation to the world) of Kuala Lumpur. Piyadasa and Sulaiman returned to Malaysia in the closing years of the 60s as young Turks, ready to take on what was by now the increasingly stultifying trends of emotive and abstract painting styles that had dominated the artistic discourse of Malaysia and represented the ethos of that era. For painterly abstraction that came to embody high modernism had already waned in the West, supplanted by a host of different artistic movements and strategies that aimed to complicate the way we understood art – minimalism, pop art, performance art, Op Art1, etc. Hornsey Art College, which both artists attended in the mid 60s, was a hotbed for all these different approaches to art. Taught by Maurice de Sausmarez, Bridget Riley and the like, the curriculum stressed intellectual development through analytical approaches to art making. Sulaiman and Piyadasa met in college, it wasn’t hard to identify one Malaysian from others in a foreign country. What brought them together was also a shared interest in art theory. More importantly though, they enjoyed each others’ company and became sparring partners in the intellectually rigorous environment of Hornsey Art College. Returning to Malaysia, little were they aware of the turbulent year ahead as they busied themselves with establishing careers in different governmental institutions, part of the design of their scholarship. Piyadasa was initially posted to a secondary school in Terengganu, followed shortly by a teaching position in the Institut Teknologi Mara (UiTM). Sulaiman spent two years in Dewan Bahasa and Pustaka (DBP) as an in-house designer before joining Piyadasa in UiTM in 1970. The camaraderie that developed into their 1974 ‘jointly initiated experience’ was to happen later, though the New Scene exhibition was where this friendship was renewed despite the absence of Sulaiman Esa from the participation roster. 1 Op Art = optical art, a style of visual art making use of optical illusions [Editor]. 28 Tragically, a few months before the exhibition was to take place, the optimism of a newly independent nation that drove the less than decade-old Malaysia was shattered by the race riots between Malays and Chinese on 13 May 1969. A national emergency was declared and the country was effectively run by a National Operations Council, headed by Tun Abdul Razak under which the social, cultural and economic makeup of Malaysia was overhauled and redirected through the implementation of policies that served to augment the political, social and economical role of the Malays. A standing coffin with its otherwise black surface painted with fragments of what can be made out to be the stripes and colours of the Malaysian flag symbolised a fractured nation in a 1970 group exhibition titled Manifestasi Dua Seni. It was controversially elegiac, yet cogently representative of this crucial period in Malaysian history. Underneath the coffin was placed a mirror and one could peer into it, seeing the reflection multiply this symbol of a collapsed dream into the abyss. This artwork by Redza Piyadasa, May 13, 1969, ringing a death knell to the dream of a multi-cultural Malaysia, would also come to represent the turning point in which art would be caught up within the shifting social landscape at a moment in history where the role of the artist would be questioned in relation to nation-building. May 13, 1969, 1970 (Reconstructed replica 2006), Acrylic on plywood and mirror, 183 x 123 x 123 cm. Image source: Singapore Art Museum 8 But backtracking a little to August 1969, the New Scene exhibition burst into the local art world with a clarion call for a new approach to art making. Its grammar was austere and principally constructivist, while it could not have been a response to the times and events, it was prescient and timely in the manner in which its appeal to rationality, as well as the analytical and constructive principles of art making that it espoused, were a retort of some sort to the unbridled emotions of expressionism consonant with the irrational outburst of the racial clash some months before. Piyadasa, in writing for the catalogue noted, “Our show aims at reinforcing the concept that works which are entirely the outcome of the conscious workings of the intellect are an equally valid art forms.” This celebration of ‘cerebral and impersonal’ art was to continue with two subsequent group exhibitions, Experiment ’70 and Dokumentasi ’72. The New Scene had its disciples, among them Tan Teong Eng, Tan Tuck Kang, Choong Kam Kow. Writing on the new scene, art historian TK Sabapathy noted, ‘[They] sought to investigate into the structural and perceptual properties of 29 art, such as space, colour and the nature of materials… They aimed for an art without metaphorical significance, stripped of literary, expressive and associative values.’ In many ways, the group turned its back on the visual language of abstract expressionism and considered it as kitsch. The late Ismail Zain considered the hegemony of abstract expressionism as ‘truly one of the most successful exports to the world; perhaps next to McDonald’s and Coca-cola’. But the New Scene too was derivative and belated. Abstract landscape artist Jolly Koh who participated in the first New Scene exhibition but later rejected their aesthetic goals over what he claimed to be the artificial boundary drawn up between emotion and the intellect, described it as, ‘nothing new but an imitation of the Hard Edge school, a style of painting that was current in London at that time.’ This is not entirely surprising. Malaysia, a newly federated multi-cultural nation engineered with the help and guidance of the British, primarily lacked a cohesive shared cultural tradition. London, being the capital of ‘Mother England’, was for many back then the epicenter of modern culture. It was where artists and writers looked to in the absence of a dominant local discourse that was compelling enough to rival its colonial counterpart. Kathy Rowland, who wrote on the impact of the National Cultural Congress on Malaysian theatre, observed, ‘Prior to the May 1969 Riots, the Government was largely absent from the performing arts and cultural arena. Significantly, there are no provisions for culture in the Constitution, although religion and language are prominent features. Artists, whatever the genre or language of practice, were left much to their own devices. The Riots changed this. The reconfigured relationship between the arts and the State was most vividly symbolised by the National Cultural Congress, held in 1971.’ So it was towards the end of the emergency rule that a plenary meeting was organised to hammer out a national direction for culture under the National Cultural Congress, which was held at the University of Malaya on August 20 1971. Professor Ungku A. Aziz proposed that the pursuit of lofty aesthetic ideals represented by the pithy phrase ‘art for art’s sake’ should be replaced by an artistic commitment to nation-building, furthering social causes and issues, on par with economic and political development then dubbed ‘Art for Society’. The proposal was debated for close to two hours, after which, Tan Sri Nik Ahmad Kamil, acting as chairman, put the motion to vote. The majority favoured the motion and the disgruntled lot left in protest. In this respect, Congress participants also formulated what was to be the guiding document that has since shaped the cultural landscape of our country, which resulted in The National Cultural Policy (NCP) and the use of indigenous Malay culture as the focus of all cultural development. Elements of other cultures are accepted, to reflect the multicultural society that Malaysia is, as long as they do not contradict with the prevailing values of Malay culture. Islam, being the official religion of the country, was to be an important component in the molding of national culture. This made many artists, writers, poets and playwrights rethink their values and search for new models of expressions. Coming at the tail end of the race riot and the National Cultural Congress, it rang a death knell for many who imagined a more plural framework that better reflect the multicultural make up of the country. 30 Art historian Nirajan Rajah observes, “Throughout the 1970’s, artists began the difficult, painful process of rethinking their positions, and recasting their perceptions of culture, language, race, state/nation and identity. For some, the prospects loomed as intolerable and inhospitable and they chose to migrate; some retreated into temporary or permanent silence; for everyone else, the stakes were too important and consequential not to be involved.” Eventually, most Malay artists found it in spirituality and their Malayness. This gradually shaped itself in the late 70s, first as Malay and then as Islamic revivalism. But in the early 70s, although the directions recommended by the National Cultural Policy were prescriptive, the interpretative scope had not yet achieved the level of dogmatism that would effect a sense of alienation and exclusion for those who did not subscribe to the ethno-religious ethos. Absurdist Malay theatre was one of the arenas in which the very values and ideas behind a fixed essential Malay identity was constantly challenged by modernity and existentialism. Moreover, Anak Alam (Children of Nature), an art collective that wilfully adopted an interdisciplinary approach to art making, also subscribed to a much more primordial, if not romantic, vision of nature and creativity. The land and the lure of locality was prioritised over racial and religious identity and values. Similarly then, under the cloud of mistrust that had come to threaten the social fabric of a multicultural nation that had barely come of age, a friendship developed between two individuals who hailed from different ethnic and religious backgrounds. When Piyadasa and Sulaiman were assigned to teach the foundation course in UiTM, they wasted no time in introducing their investigative approaches to their students. Sulaiman taught colour studies and Piyadasa taught 3D design. Their cultural appetite was wider than the visual art world. Having studied overseas and living in a city, both men developed a cosmopolitan sensibility. They encountered Malay literary writers, became interested in modern and pre-independence history. They too became actively involved in Malay theatre as set designers. As pedagogues in a tireless crusade preaching to a larger public unaccustomed to art, Piyadasa also took to writing a weekly column in The Sunday Times under ‘Art Scene by Redza’ in 1972. Experiment ‘70 and Dokumentasi 74’ followed the New Scene exhibition and became a filtering process, with the rest of the artists gradually dropping out of the Piyadasa and Sulaiman circle. Sulaiman gave an analogy of this process as survival of the fittest, finding that most of the artists didn’t quite make the cut when it came to intellectual engagement. They too played the role of provocateurs, upsetting the lofty etiquette of the art world, challenging other artists on their claims and understanding of what art was. If other artists were left behind, it was also because Piyadasa and Sulaiman were heading towards another direction. It helped that they were teaching in the same college. Sulaiman would recount in his later years how this friendship would develop over the heady conversations that took place after work. ‘I would sit with Piya after work. Both of us were avid subscribers to many international art magazines back then and we would bring along anything of interest, to keep each other up to date with what is happening internationally. Piya would have his beer and, let me tell you, can he drink! I would have my glasses of orange juice to keep pace. The more he drinks the more he talks. And can 31 Piya talk! You can kind of tell as the evening progresses, six o’clock, seven o’clock, eight o’clock. Piya is a really fast thinker but careless. And by eleven, he would be talking gibberish.’ It was in a setting such as this that they would come to realise where they needed to take their art to. After exploring different aspects of the art object in relation to space in their paintings and sculptures, it dawned on them that the natural development was to use real time and space. Piyadasa noted, ‘If you’re going to move in time, then you are going to be involved with and in everything around you… Ismail Zain used to bring up the idea of alienation in the Makyong theatre and of course the blurring of boundaries, breaking down of barriers and allowing for continuous crossover.’ Piyadasa and Sulaiman reached a stumbling block. How do artists address these new problems about the divide between art and life? They wanted ‘real time, real space’ and the ability to understand and address this dichotomy between art and life. Then, the conclusion that had eluded them during their New Scene years became clear. ‘We are in Malaysia and not in USA or Europe,’ reminisced Piyadasa. In effect, the NCP proposed a direction in which artists and writers should take. Many, such as Piyadasa and Sulaiman, did so and went through a process of identity searching, but not at the expense of disengaging themselves from international art dialogue or retreating into the confinement of one’s own provincial cultural sphere, thus shutting out the bigger world. They sought to enrich the global intellectual bank from different positions, on different grounds, in different terms, decentering the Western hegemony in artistic discourse. In this fashion, the germination of a need for an artistic language that argued from a position and process began. Piyadasa and Sulaiman, in responding to the call of the National Cultural Policy, would come to reject the models of empiricism and rationality that they had keenly adopted for the New Scene, taking a leap of faith into other investigative models of artmaking, morphing from the Cartesian Man into the Eastern Mystic. A Jointly Initiated Experience “It was collaboration that enabled the artists to escape the audience’s gaze, for what was presented was art about, and theoretically available to, something beyond communication: nonmaterial, nonverbal, pre-rational perception.” - Charles Green on the collaboration between Marina Abramovic and Ulay, The Third Hand Collaboration proposes a new model of authorship, and the revival of collaboration in late 60s art evinced a conscious process of rethinking amongst the avant-garde about how art was made and the ways we may experience them. Artists such as Marina Abramovic and Ulay, Gilbert and George, Christo and Jeanne Claude have all explored collaboration, suggesting plural authorship in the belief that it opens up potentialities and change the way art is made. 32 In many instances however, authorship is re-asserted rather than erased. Often they take the form of what Charles Green called ‘the third hand’, the symbolic incarnation of a third supra-identity that directs and motivates a particular collaborative process. However in Redza Piyadasa and Sulaiman Esa’s jointly initiated experience, the intention was to do just the opposite. In their ten thousand-word manifesto, they gave evidence of a region-wide art tradition where the skilled artisans and creatives remained anonymous, counter-acting how the individual artistic genius is glorified in Western art. But how did they de-center authorship and question its meaning? Cartoonist ’s satirical take on the found object in Berita Harian. Image source: Piyadasa: An Overview, 1962-2000 by T.K. Sabapathy Piyadasa and Sulaiman resorted to found objects. They conducted a random sampling of everyday objects that came to picture the mundane and ordinariness of our reality. In this manner, they weren’t artists in the conventional sense of the word. They were not creators of art. They merely compiled a list of objects and displayed them as objects worthy of our attention. Perhaps a precursor to what the term ‘curating’ has come to signify in our contemporary times? The purpose of the exhibition called for a reconsideration of the philosophical rationale behind art making for modern artists in Asia. In their manifesto accompanying the exhibition, they hoped to ‘sow the seeds for a thinking process which might someday liberate Malaysian artists from their dependence on Western influence.’ What is this ‘Western influence’ that they so thoroughly wished to eschew? Piyadasa and Sulaiman learnt well from their experience as the New Scene Young Turks, who fought a battle against the dominance of abstract expressionism in Malaysia. They realised that so long as they remained indebted to Western-oriented idioms; whether they were the cool analytical Hard-Edge style of the New Scene, or the expressive splashes of paint by 60s Malaysian expressionists, they would never make any significant contribution to the international modern art dialogue because, truth be told, the works, ‘would always remain derivative and second rate’. However they too became aware that it was impossible to abandon modern art forms and languages, simply to revert back to traditional art-making of the region. That would simply become a display of conservatism. Rather, they insisted upon producing works that were in dialogue with 33 global art discourses, albeit from a perspective that was peripheral and distant. If art was to produce a language or a system of representing how we understood the world, then perhaps there was another way in which we could think of the world. Piyadasa and Sulaiman observed a tendency in Western art since the Enlightenment to emphasise ‘the physicality of the tangible forces of nature through form’. They argued that modern ‘Westernoriented idioms’, which developed out of a specific cultural worldview derived largely from Western empirical and humanistic principles, were not necessarily the only valid way regarding reality. Traditional art in Asia, however, was more attuned and driven by a desire to represent the occult and spiritual energies of the invisible world or ‘semangat’. Thereby, they apprehended reality from a different trajectory. Piyadasa remarked, “Asian artists do not place value on tangible forms as completed works in itself but as a process that hint that a timeless continuum.” Inspired by Taoist and Zen apprehensions of reality, this perception would take a non-rational approach rather than an empirical one as a way to comprehend reality. Art in this instance was not a window into another reality - whether an abstract gateway towards transcendence or the naturalistic mirror of our physical reality - instead the objects served as triggers of a collusion in time and space, between the past and the present. Take Burnt-out Mosquito Coils Used to Keep Away Mosquitoes On the Night of 25th March 1974 was an example. The title indicates a seemingly banal incident or an event related to a specific time in the past. From the title, we know that it is a relic or an archive of pastime past and it sat in the gallery as a document of this seemingly brief period of time which was part of the artists’ experience. In a similar fashion, Empty Bird-Cage after release of Bird at 2.46PM on Monday 10th June 1974 used the title to stir us into the realisation that the object right in front of us was not ontologically neutral, it had an existence beyond the gallery space: a past, a history that had extended out into the world. These works play out the now familiar idea of institutional critique by deconstructing the ideological underpinning of the exhibition space itself. The early decades of Post-War art and the rise of abstract expressionism was synonymous to the emergence of the gallery with white walls, conceived as a non-interfering neutral space in which the work is isolated from everything that distracts us from evaluating it on its own ground. Brian O’Doherty, who wrote his three-part series Inside the White Cube for Artforum magazine in 1976, remarks, ‘So powerful are the perceptual fields of force within this chamber that, once outside, art can lapse into secular status. Conversely, things become art in a space where powerful ideas about art focus on them’ Towards a Mystical Reality is in many ways a visual articulation of O’Doherty’s argument. By bringing in daily objects into a sanctified space that frames them as art, the exhibition also conversely asserted that this space was not as neutral as it seemed, art comes from our outside world, it is not divorced from it. These objects trigger us to look beyond and consider our way of looking at reality not through scientific reasoning but through an understanding of time as a passage transacting from one moment (the past) to the next (the present), colluding in what is termed a ‘mystical’ apprehension. 34 What interests me about Piyadasa and Sulaiman’s argument is that this is not a specifically national phenomenon and they projected this as a shared Asian thinking process. As if shouting into the ears of anyone who would care to listen to their plea, they exhorted, incited and inculcated in capital letters, ‘ANY ATTEMPT TO VIEW OUR CONTRIBUTIONS WITHIN A PURELY “MALAYSIAN” CONTEXT CAN ONLY RESULT IN A FAILURE TO REALISE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE QUESTIONS WE ARE ATTEMPTING TO RAISE. THE PRESENT EXHIBITION DEALS WITH A KIND OF SITUATION WHICH PREVAILS IN MANY PARTS OF ASIA WHERE SOME KIND OF MODERN ART INVOLVEMENT EXISTS.’ Malaysia, located in maritime Southeast Asia is, after all, a crossroads. A melting pot of culture, whose sum cultural tradition is inflected by an amalgamation of Hindu, Buddhist, Chinese and Islamic elements, followed by Western colonial influences. On top on this, the 19th century brought large numbers of Chinese and Indian immigrants by the British who stayed on and brought with them their culture and tradition. Adding to this mix are Sabah and Sarawak’s indigenous cultures. It is therefore impossible to locate at one instance an enduring cultural singularity that Malaysia holds. Recognising this multiplicity, the artistic challenge for the vanguard is always to identify the country within a larger shared regional heritage and understand its essence. Yet, this is not something entirely new. Latiff Mohidin early on, after his education in Berlin, fancied himself as a pengembara (traveler) and embarked in 1964 on a journey around Southeast Asia to produce an aesthetic vision of the region through his Pago-pago series. Similarly, Lee Joo For in 1968 proposed in Orientobyzantine a ‘fantasticaly rich images and symbols of the eras for they are redolent to me of human history, loves and strife.’ But instead of resorting to the reclamation of regional motifs to replicate what was seemingly a Western art styles such as Latiff Mohidin or Lee Joo For, Towards a Mystical Reality presents this reality as a document. Downplaying the ‘artifact-oriented’ tendency of artmaking, they instead considered the displayed objects as props, keys and documents that helped facilitate an ‘experience of the mind’ in confrontation with reality - Our reality as opposed to Theirs. It was to mark a kind of critical distance as an exercise to remap our mental geography, so that the ‘here’ is no longer peripheral to some culturally superior center, but that the center can be anywhere and everywhere. Not everyone was convinced by this brash display of bravura. Some thought it pretentious and to have lost the plot. Others were more reactionary, coming out in defence of aesthetics and beauty. It is perhaps difficult, in our day and age, where we have become so used to, jaded and cynical of the spectacle of the found object that is the readymade, to appreciate its radicalism and shock-value. Yet, there it was. This exhibition came together as an archaeological documentation of our society, sampling the articles that make up our daily life. It was not motivated by the reconstruction of a solemn spiritual form based on traditional architectures of the Southeast Asia of Latiff’s Pago-Pago, nor the intense emotional landscape of place and time expressed through the singular artistic genius. It did not seek to reclaim classical motifs of the region by means of asserting an identity. Rather, Towards a Mystical Reality catalogued the ordinary sediment of our modern society. A discarded raincoat, half drunk coca-cola bottles, a potted plant, mosquito coils – an expansive poetic litany of objects belonging to the nameless collective of people that had together come to realise a community. 35 Zen and the Art of Pissing Piya, you want art, but you’re confused about art; you want reality but you are confused about reality. Reality? Remember the stream of my piss – the one that celebrated the culmination of reality; between refinement and the coarse, the spiritual and the vulgar, the mystical and the concrete; it is the consequence of the Zen which you so look highly to. So Piya, when I took off my pants in that historical exhibition of yours, I wasn’t prostituting my dignity. In fact, I was revealing reality. – Pissing and Art: Letter from Salleh Ben Joned to Piyadasa In 2006, at the now defunct artist-run Reka Art Space, Vincent Leong staged a Duchampian assessment of Malaysian art in his first local solo, The Fake Show. Assuming the guise of a curator featuring a number of artists from thinly disguised references local art pioneers - such as Rizal P. Dasar (Redza Piyadasa) Chua Li Khor (Jolly Koh)- to fictional collectives (The Anti-Corruption Avengers), a specific work ‘Piss Take’ draws parallels among the artist, Redza Piyadasa and Duchamp. It was a comical ribbing at the kind of Zen/Taoist inflected attitude to art-making and thinking that Redza Piyadasa and Sulaman Esa espoused in the Towards A Mystical Reality exhibition, taking the form, in this instance, of an oriental pissoir. The spilt-up pissoir, borrowing its visual cue from Piyadasa’s late-70s series of conceptual art and text propositional sculptures, is a highly apt allusion in more ways than the act of appropriating Piyadasa’s vocabulary. For on the opening night of the Towards a Mystical Reality exhibition, in a brash yet brilliant display of one-upmanship in the most inimitably Dadaist fashion, Salleh Ben Joned, enfant terrible of Malaysian poetry, urinated on Piyadasa and Sulaiman Esa’s manifesto. Sulaiman was rendered speechless, ‘I didn’t know how to react back then. You have to remember that we were quite young back then and already staging the exhibition and receiving the kind of response and feedback from a clueless audience was daunting enough. Then you have Salleh there taking a piss in a corner’. Piya was, to say the least, pissed off. The more conservative segment of the art world responded disparagingly. In another discussion thread between Piyadasa and ‘Anak Alam’ arts collective member Siti Zainon Ismail in the issues of Dewan Sastera following the exhibition, the latter took a swipe at Salleh Ben Joned, accusing him of prostituting his dignity (melacur maruah). In response, Piyadasa dismissed Salleh’s act as irrelevant and beyond the artistic control he was able to exercise over the exhibition. Therefore, it was only natural that Salleh Ben Joned provided a rejoinder to clear himself of the charge. While Salleh expressed sympathy for Piyadasa’s effort to cultivate a polemical discourse in art and largely agreed that most Malaysian artists are ignorant about origins and ideology behind the ‘modernist idioms’ which they have adopted, he distanced himself from Piyadasa’s exhortation that all artists need to be able to posture themselves as theorists and polemicists. 36 Salleh went on to comment, ‘The tone and the stance of your exhibition manifesto is too solemn and pretentious. How often have you repeated and shouted in capital letters (capitalising sentences and using exclamation mark seems to be a truly Piyadasa style). It seems that you’ve made this into a voracious reading programme! (oh dear!). But your rhetorical hysteria or verbal amok in your manifesto might cause doubt in a Zen guru whether or not you have truly grasped the meaning of mysticism or its spirit.’ Salleh then went on to defend himself by claiming that a crucial aspect to Zen (of the classical variety, not the intellectual fad, he would add in parenthesis) was the element of humour, irony and a devilish fondness for practical jokes in its teaching. Zen is quick to capture and expose pomposity, pretension, arrogance as well as ‘abstract thought that forgot reality in the name of Reality (with a capital R)’ that comes with intellectual posturing and seriousness. Salleh’s reprimand turned out to be a valuable lesson for both Piyadasa and Sulaiman. Piyadasa would recall later, ‘He really cut us down to size and punctured our ego!’ and conceded their inability to appreciate the subtler philosophical contexts upon which Salleh based his actions. However, what would hit home was the insight Salleh Ben Joned offered concerning the relationship between the avant-garde and the institution. Why, he asked, would this direct confrontation with a (mystical) reality require the legitimising of representatives from institutions and the academia? Why was the representative from the Ministry of Culture who officiated this ‘confrontation with a mystical reality’ allowed to dribble on for half an hour? A decade and a half later, artist Wong Hoy Cheong would conclude similarly, ‘… the majority of young artists would find no awkward contradictions between rebellion and a need for the support of the dominant art institution… You are critical of the power structures and yet you are dependent on these very powers to legitimise and evaluate the worthiness of your work.’ Was this need for legitimisation the result of a sincere interest to fall in step with the national cultural policy which the artists helped shape and develop in 1971? Wong Hoy Cheong reminded me, ‘You have to remember, there was this sense of optimism back then.’ It was an opportunity to build a national culture and many were taking it in different direction, interpreting it in the broadest and most open sense of the word. It is in this spirit that we can now turn to the broader question of provocation in art. What is the value of controversy in art? Why, in the conventional understanding of art, do we primarily consider art as an object of beauty? Why promulgate the notion of anti-aesthetic as Piyadasa and Sulaiman had done? Why destroy the established criteria and values we have placed in art? Why fight beauty when the world is ugly enough? For many of us who derive pleasure from pretty pictures and like our art to just provide this pleasure, it remains hard to fathom the intentions of artists who create works to agitate, provoke, and challenge this order. But for artists who consider art as the arena in which the sum of our intelligence, culture, creativity and humanity are contested, this need becomes an imperative. It teaches us to suspect anyone who would come forward and claim that there is a singular definition to what art is. 37 For Art, with a capital A, a sum tradition of creativity and the imagination, is the thing that disagrees with whatever one thinks it is. It contains a plural, dissenting, cacophonous field of creative motivations that are constantly arguing, sharpening, perfecting and changing the way we think, demonstrating that the very foundation of a democratic culture is not fostered through consensus, but dissent. Or at the very least, the ability to be civil when disagreeing. Peeing on another artist’s manifesto constitutes a breach of civility, which is a matter of debate. One might argue that it hinges on the cultural context in which it is performed. It is not hard to imagine how this would be a harder act to pass off today. But this was 70s Malaysia and in its early days, it would seem that the National Cultural Policy had not been weighed down by the trenchant inwardness that had come to stifle the possibilities of a much more multi-vocal articulation of its direction. For what constitutes the richness of bumiputera culture if not the fluidity, porousness and receptiveness of its identity? I like to look back at Dewan Sastera in the early 70s for clues to how responses to the NCP can be productive, rich and so much more embracing. Launched in January 1971, the monthly publication, under the editorship of Usman Awang, is worlds apart from the Dewan Sastera I was made to read in my secondary school years in the late 90s. It had an ambitious literary agenda. The world was theirs to take, so to speak. The magazine translated poems by Jorge Luis Borges, Pablo Neruda and many other writers from non-Western countries into the Malay language. Malay literati wrote back from England or wherever their wanderlust took them, detailing their experiences and new ideas. Ethnic Chinese Malaysian writers shared developments and new works in modern Chinese literature. But this diversity of material and information was held up not merely by passive consumption but through rigorous debate. Disagreement ensued. Sure, but it was a feverish exchange that reflected a reading public who was curious, passionate, hungry and open. For it was here that they seemed to display a kind of confidence, telling us from a not so distant past, ‘We are Malaysians, but we too, are citizens of the world.’ Post-Reality: Finding Relevance A National Culture is not a folklore, nor an abstract populism that believes it can discover the people’s true nature. It is not made up of the inert dregs of gratuitous actions… which are less and less attached to the ever-present reality of the people. A national culture is the whole body of efforts made by a people in the sphere of thought to describe, justify and praise the action through which that people has created itself and keeps itself in existence. – Franz Fanon, On National Culture. Redza Piyadasa passed away in 2007, unmourned by the wider Malaysian public. For the rest of the country, the relevance of art, let alone the history of art, to their cultural life are almost nonexistent. Three and the half decades that brought us to the present day came and went. What has happened since the exhibition? 38 There was paucity on the part of Piyadasa and Sulaiman, partly because of need to develop and grow in new directions and partly because of exhaustion. Piyadasa left the country shortly after the exhibition to complete his postgraduate studies in Hawaii. There he would be given the opportunity to further his interest in Asian art history, giving him access to a wealth of knowledge hitherto unobtainable in Kuala Lumpur. Sulaiman took a break from art for the next three years as he attempted to wrestle with the conflicting impulses between his training in Western art and his desire to realign himself as an artist with the principles of Islam, the religion he grew up with. He would later articulate this conflict in a series of prints, Waiting for Godot, and would later go abroad and return to espouse a contemporary genre of abstract formalism grounded in Islamic values. Both artists would continue to influence generations of artists that came after and developed different bodies of work, although their commitment to a local or regional aesthetic based on a nonWestern ‘thinking approach’ that is in dialogue with an international discourse never expire. The cultural landscape of Malaysia too was changing. It seemed as if stakeholders who had hoped for a broader and more expansive understanding of what national culture could be was defeated by a bigger majority who took on a much more literal and parochial interpretation of the National Cultural Policy. The shaping of a national identity based on indigenous culture turned out to be less plural and complex as artists and writers working in the early 70s hoped to be. In effect, it emphasised its Malaysian-ness as an Other to the extent that it isolated itself from an engagement with the world at large, turning instead to define national culture along the most narrow of ethno-religious lens as a reclamation of an identity that was lost during the colonial period. Yet in many senses, this wasn’t a revival per se. Jennifer Lovell, researching on Malay artists and the Malaysian National Cultural Congress, argues that Malaysia as a post-colonial nation instead arrives at ‘a Malay-Islam identity’. The latter is an identity that was not part of the imagination of Malaysia at its founding in 1963, but something that was molded in the subsequent years, buoyed by a rhetoric of revivalism, fixing the Malay identity in essentialist terms, synonymous with the values of modern Islam. It would take a decade later, around the mid-80s, for the deconstruction of this cultural direction to gain momentum. The realities of Redza Piyadasa and Sulaiman Esa were far reaching in that it embodied the kind of balance between internationalism and local engagement that is seldom realised in our desire to polarise ourselves in a mentality of us against them that has narrowly shaped post-colonial thinking in its crudest and most reductive form. The art world too has since changed. Nirajan Rajah notes,’ Today the urgent assertion for Malay dominance of the 1970s has given way to a more relaxed multiculturalism at home. However, the forces of globalisation have usurped the role of national institutions in representing our cultural identity on the world stage’ This means that artists who work outside the parameters were able to challenge the systematic prejudices on a global platform, renewing international engagement via the globalised art biennale circuits. Meanwhile the national institutions continue their downward slide towards irrelevance as artists, given the opportunity to show abroad as well as with the gradual growth of the art market, found other means of patronage and validation, freeing them from the shackles of the National Cultural Policy. 39 The rapid development that came in the 90s, brought in by foreign direct investment in a growing industrial sector saw the city transformed in a cosmetic make-over through the relentless pounding and building of an urban space that is the direct result of the Wawasan 2020 (Vision 2020) slogan of the Mahathir era. Kuala Lumpur was building itself upwards, but culture, on an official level, was not compensated in this modernising fever. A niggling feeling persists amongst artists and writers, now situated at the periphery of this muscular growth, who feel that the importance of art is more relevant in our times of development; as thinking and feeling space that is independent of the sort of politicised sentiments that have gripped the public’s imagination. It dawned upon many artists that perhaps because art cannot do without its audience (was it not Umberto Eco who wrote that a writer who does not write for a reader is an atheist?), and if we do not have one - what we have to do is to take matters into our own hand, and build our own. Does this precipitate a change in the way we write, talk or communicate about art? Does this precipitate a change in the way we make and distribute art? Early in the 20th century, Walter Benjamin called for a politicisation of aesthetics, to make the experience of art accessible to the most number of people and recognise its innate democratising value, in contrast to the aestheticisation of politics, where specific political agendas (Benjamin was thinking about Fascism’s adoption of futurism) are made pretty or glorified through art for the purpose of concealing its totalitarian grip on power. Vanguard artists in Malaysia since the 90s looked into this claim seriously, and began working with the community, projects aimed at offering the larger public different ways of imagining the world we live in, different ways of understanding our reality. In short, making available the experience of art to more and more people. LabDNA, Kampung Medan Art Project, Apa-Apa, Main Dengan Rakyat, Chowkit Art Festival, Blue Skies Pudu Jail Art Event, Bangun Penang Clan Jetty Art Festival, to name a few. But this is another story altogether. These are, in some ways, step-children of Towards A Mystical Reality. When the wall between art and life is broken down, art floods out into real life. I thought of leaving the closing remarks to Sulaiman Esa, because I largely feel he is misrepresented in our current day art historical narrative of reducing the complexity of his thought by largely situating his practice within the Islamic formalism movement from the early 80s (which by any accounts he has moved beyond in the 90s), forgetting that his practice ultimately comes full circle and needs to be reconsidered in light of the openness of Malaysian culture that was so enthusiastically embraced in the first half of the 70s and reflected in the spirit of the jointly initiated experience the young Sulaiman once offered to a young country. ‘I do what I do because of my background and training. You must remember I belong to a different era and I’m continuing that sort of training in honour of the tradition through which my practice acquires significance and meaning. Today it is a different thing. It’s pointless to do what I do or emulate my style or interest. Artists now need to broaden their understanding of the world and work with the people. We can no longer live within the safety of our own art community. Young artists need to engage with the larger public, the bigger world. Do what young people do best, get your peers involved, listen to your audience, create your own audience, make works in installation, video, performance, or whatever you want to call it. This is spiritual art too. Art can no longer be a hermetic pursuit. Only by actively engaging with others will our art acquire meaning and significance. Only then will it become relevant.’ 40 Q UEER WAYS: AN UN-STRAIGHT SURVEY OF THE DIRECTION OF MALAYSIAN POPULAR CULTURE AND FASHION. Clarissa Lee 30th August 1957, circa 8 pm. In a modest brick house in Jalan Ampang, in a small, single bedroom overlooking a small garden full of dahlias, frangipanis and begonias, was a woman wearing a baju kebaya. She wore a sheer light-blue top with gold thread with trimmings bordering the patterned shells and edges of the blouse and a batik skirt (kemban). Her hair was already done up as a bun (sanggul), with an ornamented opal pin holding it up. At the point at which this story began, she was still working on her hair, adding smaller pins and a tortoiseshell comb. The finishing touch was added with generous use of hairspray. She allowed a few ringlets to drop across her forehead and her cheeks, twisting them with her finger to accentuate the curls. As she smiled at her reflection in the mirror, pouting her lips, she whipped up a compact of bright-red creamy substance and used a tiny brush to draw around her lips, before filling them in. She then proceeded to rouge her cheeks with orange-pink rouge from Max Factor, which she had ‘picked-up’ from her mother’s dressing table, using the make-up brushes she had procured from a haberdashery nearby. Her creamy caramel complexion went well with the colour. Now it was time to tackle the eyes, which she had left to the last because she had only now decided on what she should do with them; she was going to aim for the 1930s smoky-look which she intended to effect with an Avon mascara, eyelash extensions, eyeliner and eyebrow pencil, all of which she had ‘borrowed’ from her sister’s dressing table. Her long and thick lashes were further augmented through the use of a curler and Chanel mascara she had bought from a departmental store. 41 She took a long look at her own handiwork in front of the bedroom mirror before smirking, a smirk that she quickly turned into a demure smile. The final touch would be to dust some pinkish powder she had procured from the same departmental store. Her skins seemed smooth but for some tiny, but visible and thickish, hair near her cheeks and chin, requiring a slight operation with tweezers. She looked at the clock. It was about 8:30 now. About time to leave, otherwise, she would be late for the appointment. Her family had left more than an hour earlier, as she said she would be going separately with her friends. Taking a last look into the mirror, she turned to pick up a lilac tasselled shawl she had left draped on a chair. Taking one last look behind, and patting her hair, she slipped into a pair of brocaded sandals, one which she had to specially order at the shoe shop between Java Street and Malay Street since her feet were bigger than the sizes carried by the shoe-store. Closing the gates behind her, she walked to the main street running parallel to her house towards a row of shophouses. Parked along the sides were a few trishaws, their owners taking a break at some tables lining the outside of a Chinese coffee-shop. As she approached the trishaw front-most of the line, one of the men congregating at a table covered with teapots and cups and porcelain bowls of soup that hinted on a prior meal of noodles, got up and approached her. With minimal ado, she climbed on board the trishaw and was on her way to the rendezvous… In another part of town, in Brickfields, a dapper-looking young man in his early-to-mid twenties, dressed in a white flannel shirt, pin-stripped tie and dark-grey corduroy trousers was doing his toilette, which consisted in putting pomade in his hair and combing it over, spritzing some cologne on his collar and adjusting his tie. Prior to that, he had taken extra pain to ensure that his breath would smell minty fresh; after all, he was about to meet a young woman he had been looking forward to seeing all week, especially since it had not been easy for them to meet up; she was from a respectable family and unchaperoned dates were frowned upon. But it was a special day; they would be meeting by the square near the Selangor Club to celebrate an occasion. This young man worked as an attorney and solicitor in one of the law firms not too far from the Selangor Club. He had rented a room in Brickfields with a kindly elderly Punjabi lady living alone whose husband had passed on and whose children had left home to set up their own homes. She usually cooked dinner for herself if she was home; she would make sure to cook enough for two so that he could have a home-cooked meal for dinner. For lunch however, he would usually head out to the Coliseum, his favourite haunt. On Sundays, he would go there for brunch or tea. It was on one of those days there that he had met the young woman; she was daintily having tea by herself, dressed in a yellow strapless sundress with a knee-length flared skirt, stockings and white mules. She wore one of those flapper-style hats that were popular in the 1920s of matching yellow (she had later informed him that she had bought it while studying in or visiting London). Her sharp face, cinnamon-coloured smooth skin, dark lashes and dimpled chin, as well as what was for him a very sweet smile, had attracted his attention. He looked at the table clock by his bedside table. It was close to half-past-eight; he would have to leave soon if he was to make their meeting at nine o’clock near the entrance of the Selangor Club. He opened the top drawer of the armoire next to the mirror and took out a small and classy looking paperbag. He dipped inside and extracted a folded white silk scarf that he had found at an emporium near Masjid Jamek. It looked like it may have been from Chanel, except that it was 42 not. Stroking it lovingly, he carefully put it into the bag, folding the latter’s mouth down slightly. He picked up his pair of black platform pimp shoes from his wardrobe before exiting through the side entrance of the house that had been reserved for him just so that he could have the privacy of moving in and out without disturbing his landlady. He walked out in the hope of either catching a taxi or trishaw near the shophouses. It might be difficult since many people would also be heading out in the same direction. It was a warm night and walking dressed as he was would not have been comfortable; it would be hard to last the entire night drenched in sweat. As luck would have it, 10 minutes from his house, he saw a passing black taxi that had just dropped a passenger, which he immediately hailed. Now it would just be a short ride to the square. Along the way, he saw a large billboard for a Bollywood film to be showing in one of the cinemas near the Coliseum, publicity for Mother India by Mehboob Khan, set next to an F&N soft-drink and Tiger Balm advertisement. Such billboards were becoming more prominent around Kuala Lumpur as the city council was beginning to sell an increasing number of advertising spaces around town. 9 pm. The square was filling up rapidly even though it was still about three hours before the official announcement would be made. One can hear music in the highly-charged air as people were buzzing around. He made his way to the gate of the Selangor Club. As he was not a member, he could not enter so he had to wait outside. She wasn’t there yet. He waited expectantly, and somewhat impatiently. She should be there anytime. Sure enough, five minutes into the wait, he saw her walking towards him, past throngs of people milling about the place. As she approached, he noticed the elaborate kebaya she was wearing; it could possibly have been from Kelantan, for she said that her family was originally from there. She seemed shapely, though her body was svelter than the other Malay women he had seen, her hips much smaller. But then, hadn’t she told him that she was of Dutch, Chinese, Thai and Malay extraction? She saw him and smiled. His heart skipped a beat. She looked like a princess tonight, not unlike the royalty that would be making their appearances later at the square. As she went near him, he greeted her and after an exchange of pleasantries, gave her the little paperbag he had been carrying since he left the house. She smiled and thanked him. She then took his arm and they walked off together towards the square, determined to enjoy each other’s company and also the celebration that would soon be taking place. The square was milling with all kinds of people, people that were not mentioned in newspaper articles of that period, in historical entries on the Declaration of Independence of the Federation of Malaya or in any reminiscences of that period. There was no mention of the advertisements around the milieu of the square. That were also almost no mention of the fact that the people congregating around the square were not merely homogenous forms of Malay, Chinese, Indians, East Malaysians, Eurasians and other minority groups. There could have been a good mix of those donning their so-called traditional costumes and those in Western garb. With the number of people milling about, who would be looking closely at the people behind the clothes? Why should the officially received Independence Day celebration be seen as a straight celebration, even though it was held long before the time of the Women’s Liberation movement, let alone other 43 forms of sociological liberation (beyond the abolition of slavery and indentured employment)? Moreover, the 1957 Independence Day celebration was not a victorious celebration for all, as some have felt that Independence was compromised by the reification of monarchical and feudal structures within society.1 If any of the people who had resisted the form of Independence in which they were given had even turned up to see for themselves a ‘sad’ day, what would they had been dressed in? A fashion, cultural and consumption history of Malaya/Malaysia (1957 – 2009) The 1950s in Malaysia was a time when national versus ethnic identity was still at a nascent stage. At that time, even if the community were very much aware of their racial identity, there were other things of greater concern. Even in the midst of political upheavals, the consumer culture was unperturbed and moving ahead strongly due to an increasing number of, albeit still small, affluent and urban classes who were willing to spend more money on consumer goods and leisure. The Cathay and Odeon cinema chains were starting up in both big and smaller towns. It was the Golden Age of cinema. Even as they received part of their inspiration from Hollywood and European classics, the Bangsawan and other forms of Malay theatre also played a role in influencing the Malayan/Malaysian silver screen as some of the very early actors and actresses were involved as Bangsawan performers in the early part of their career. The modern local cinema was conservative towards the roles that its actresses and actors could take up. In other words, actresses were supposed to perform their predefined femininity and actors their predefined masculinity, with little space for ‘difference.’ It was only very seldom that one may catch an actress in pants while on screen, regardless of what they may prefer to wear off-screen. Hollywood inspired make-up and dresses were modified with locally available material and designs. Pop-culture publications of that period did not present any visuals or narration outside the heteronormative formula, and at that time, most pop-culture journals were inspired by standards set in the Western world which were also constrained by heteronormative prescriptions, for they were all about promoting particular modes of thinking that would sell best; modes of thinking dictated by external representations (and dress) that constituted femininity and masculinity. However, even from as early as the 1950s, advertising and branding were very much driven by cinematic developments and the performing arts (as well as the lifestyles that the screen divas represented, even if not to the scale that one saw in the later decades). Even though advertising-driven consumption was still at its infancy at that time, billboards were springing up all over Malaysia, posters illustrating popular drinks, food and cosmetics of that period could be found in cinemas, emporiums, restaurants and on the increasing number of billboards found around town. Advertising agencies were set up in pre-Independent and post-Independent Malaya/Malaysia. While the cabarets were already in existence since the early part of the twentieth century, their golden age was in the 1950s, at the time when the local film scene was on the rise. Cabarets became 1 or example, much of the manifestos delivered to the Commission that drafted the first Malayan Constitution were rejected. Moreover, F the 1947 draft of the Constitution drafted by parties wanting to see a complete rejection of the old regime and the establishment of a republic was rejected. The British wanted to maintain the good will of the royalty and nobility, even if that was at the expense of real democracy, the consequence of which we have to now bear. 44 the discursive site where alternative acts, some considered to be overly rife with sexual nuances and burlesque, were performed. Drag shows and strip-tease performances were very much part of the cabaret acts from as early as the 1960s, with the former inhabited by male performers dressing as women and the latter largely the domain of female performers dressed as come-hither females. When the film industry underwent a dip in the 1960s, alternative sites of performances such as cabaret acts grew in popularity amidst the more ‘permissive’ environment of the 1960s and 1970s in the urban areas (even if such permissiveness did not extend to sexual agency for women or the breaking of social taboos which were/are still strongly reified within societies). Moreover, even as early as the 1960s, and though unacknowledged in the mainstream cultural history of Malaysia, was the fact that some of the beautiful models who were peddling cosmetics, clothes and household items were female transsexuals. Perhaps, the lack of acknowledgement accorded to them stemmed from the fact that most did not realise that these women used to be men. Because of the small size of most South East Asian men, and the similarity in the bodily structure of South East Asian men and women, savvy use of make up and dressing would hide any bodily flaws or tell-tale signs that the person is actually not a natural-born woman. Moreover, many of these transgendered males-to-females (MTFs) performed their feminine roles in accordance with the prevailing prescriptions of femininity. Hence, while their existence in the heteronormative world of advertising seems an act of transgression, of audacity, the reality is that none of these transgendered persons attempt to challenge the role that patriarchy had assigned to women. Instead, they spent most of their time playing up their femininity in an attempt to stay in business. This of course did not preclude the fact that some of them did have ‘male’ interests in their former lives as boys and men, but such interests were often subsumed in the new roles which they played. Even as early as the 1960s, there was a multiplicity of beauty pageants in which transgendered MTFs participated in (but this of course were not widely publicised) but such pageants were banned in the 1990s. These pageants received sponsorship from various commercial brands. As early as the 1960s, there were many clubs catering to non-heteronormative needs, though they of course exist outside the consciousness of the so-called respectable society. Even as the world of pop culture, consumerism and entertainment infiltrated from the US and Britain into the urban world of Malaya, and later, that of Malaysia, there were very few news articles on the alternative scenes drag shows, strip tease and various cabaret acts - even though exploits by performers such as Rose Chan, the legendary striptease, were sure to make headlines. However, they were less publicised in mainstream publications than in posters and flyers that were handed around town. Moreover, Rose Chan was popular enough that people knew where and when she would be performing. While her strip-tease acts were calculated moves of commerce, they also became a critique of the hypocritical morality of society. Many traditional dances such as joget and ghazal had female roles taken up by male dancers. Before the twentieth century, female roles in the Bangsawan were performed by men since women were prohibited from performing in public spaces. If we were to return to the mainstream world of higher education, to University Malaya in the 1960s, there were acts of transgression that were taking place as well, though in a more subtle manner. Even though the Women’s Liberation movement failed to make its entry into Malaysia at the moment of its rebirth in the 1960s (the first time being in the late nineteenth century in Europe), the peace and anti-war movements garnered much interest among the university students, to such an extent that the fashion worn by students and protesters in the West, cheesecloth and afghan tops with bell-bottoms, were adopted. 45 The protests led to growing consciousness of local issues at the ideological and pragmatic level, thus turning protests over campus-related issues into a form of broader consciousness-raising. Students were able to raise enough money to run an autonomous union, bringing in international acts such the musician Jose Feliciano and theatrical acts from Japan such as Katanagara. Experimental theatre and agit prop were beginning to make their presence felt, particularly between the late 1960s and the 1970s when students saw those as a means of expressing themselves. The students were also trend-setters in the world of fashion as they aped and modified the trends that were spilling in from the West. Even if the sanctified grounds of academia was far removed from the seedy and seamy sides of Masjid Jamek and Chow Kit, there were similarities in their aims to counter the hegemony of prescribed cultures, of cultures legitimised by institutions with particular political agendas, sometimes at the expense of marginal or less visible cultures, particularly those seen as transgressive or a threat to present dominant agendas. Bellbottoms and cheesecloth aside, there were the usual shirts and pants for men and blouse and mini-skirts for women. What the 1960s and 1970s epitomised was the lack of strict dress-codes, so much so that there was the occasional blurring of lines between what was constituted as feminine and masculine dress-codes. In the Malay community for instance, there were no restrictions on what constituted masculine or feminine tops when it came to Western clothes. However, while the fluidity of appearances did not draw much reaction from the community, especially before growing Islamisation from the mid-1980s onwards, practices of sexuality outside heternormative prescriptions drew strong sanctions and castigation from society. If the larger community in Kuala Lumpur and other urban areas housed cross-dressers of both sexes, most were very discrete about their preferences, preferring to keep a low profile most of the time, dressing in clothes considered normative to their sexes and only showing their natural tendencies in places they felt comfortable in (or at least among their own friends). Even as early as the 1950s, Kuala Lumpur had been the mecca of cross-dressers and queers in the same way that San Francisco was the destination for lesbians/gays/bisexuals/transsexuals (LGBTs) from less friendly parts of the United States. However, instead of broadcasting their own social and sexual identity, they tended to keep to themselves or try to assimilate into society. Transgendered models who managed to obtain jobs in the advertising world took every care to ensure that their true identities were never revealed, at least not involuntarily. In fact, prior to the mid 1990s, every transsexual that had undergone a sex-change operation was allowed to change the category of their sex on their identity cards. However, such freedom did not extend to making films that question the very meaning of gender and sex. These only came about much later with the turn of the twenty-first century, when daring individuals were more willing to take up a topic perceived as contentious. If the 1950s to the 1970s were days of great individual freedom and minimal moral policing, especially in dress codes, Malay women, especially those living urban areas, did not feel the pressure of donning the hijab or masking their figure. Hence, dressing was also an indirect way of flaunting their sexuality or their pride in their physicality. It could also have been a form of political expression or for the purpose of comfort. However, by the 1980s, things were slowly changing. The inflow of Islamist evangelicals from countries such as Pakistan, the Iranian revolution of 1979, the establishment of ABIM (Malaysian Islamic Youth Movement), the increasing number of Malaysian students who were sent to study in Egypt and Jordan, and the growing Arabisation of Malay culture led to mass donning of the closed and tight (as opposed to loose) head scarves as well as the baju kurung, a form-masking dress with a sack-like top and ankle-length A-line skirt. 46 It was around this period that one could see the increasing visibility of such fashion in fashion magazines particularly targeted at Malay women, pressuring them subtly on the importance of guarding their modesty. While girls in primary schools were still allowed to wear shorts for sports and physical education, they were barred from doing so by the time they reached secondary school (which is when most enter the age of puberty). Some would even wear the headscarf tightly around their heads and necks while playing sports, despite the fierce sun beating down on their heads, while their mothers (if their mothers had attended schools) would have been bare-headed (or wearing a hat) and in shorts. By the 1980s, the once short-skirted and bare-headed (and mostly urban) Malay female students in the local universities were replaced by a mixture of female students from more rural areas and other urban areas dressed in hijabs and baju kurungs, and such visibility climaxed in the 1990s, due to the growing strength of the Islamic student movements fuelled and encouraged by ABIM and other Islamist organisations. The 1990s, of course, saw a large influx of students, with Malay students going from being the minority to being the majority group through the institution of the quota system. By the 1990s, there were many more rural Malays than urban Malays as many of the latter were sent abroad on government and private scholarships, or by their parents. The same rings true for the parents of other ethnic groups. In other words, the generation born to those who went to University Malaya in the 1960s and 1970s were sent to study abroad, or to twinning degree programs in private colleges that were mushrooming around the same time. The fluctuating demographics stemming from the changing education landscape, growing middle-class and upper-middle class segment and growing affluence mean that majority of those who attended local universities before the economic crisis of 1997 in South East Asia and East Asia tended to be those of the lower income (with middle-class and upper-middle class members now constituting the minority instead of the majority such as it was in the 1960s and most of the 1970s). Even as the years after 1997 saw more parents sending their children to Malaysian public universities and, for those unable to earn a place there, to private colleges, the cultural landscape of college-going youths was irrevocably changed. The 1980s and the 1990s in particular saw a conflict between advocates of ‘eastern’ values and ‘western’ values.2 This coincided with growing Islamic fundamentalism in Malaysia, rising antiSemitism that led to strong criticism of the US, and increasing draconian measures taken by the ruling government to remain in power at all cost. Prior to the 1980s, and as early as 1971, after the race riots of 1969, there had been an attempt to establish a ‘national’ culture that would place the Malay and Islamic identity as the main priority and the core, and other minority cultures (read ‘non-Malay’ cultures) as contributing sources as long as they did not challenge the prevailing interpretation of Islam in Malaysia. The attempt was made through the organisation of the National Cultural Congress by the Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, which is a body charged with regulating and governing the use of Malaysia’s national language, Malay. However, nothing happened beyond the congress to seriously push the issues since continuous bickering of the ‘culture vultures’ that were participants and interested observers of the Congress created an impasse. In fact, when the idea of ‘Eastern’ values was given birth to in the 1980s, there was almost no reference to this early attempt made during the Congress. Moreover, ‘Eastern’ values were not any real solid construction beyond a reactionary attempt to counter democratic and liberal claims as ‘western’ culture. There was neither real discourse nor any attempt to define more rigorously the meaning of ‘Eastern’ values. 2 I t was around the 1980s that the “Look East” policy was instituted by the then Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohamad, who at that time was at odds with British due to the steep hike in student fees instituted by the latter, thus affecting the government scholars who were sent to study in Great Britain. 47 On the other hand, the Congress was at least willing to debate the issue and maintain a somewhat more open mind compared to the promoters of “Eastern values” in the 1990s, even if it was mostly limited to the level of addressing the forms of programming that radio and television could have, which were at that time fully government-controlled. However, the papers published as a result of the congress were not averse to borrowing what were considered as good performing practices from the other cultures. At the very least, the Congress participants had a higher interest in looking at culture as a dialectical construct rather than as a static object. However, the advocates of ‘Eastern’ values were unable to come up with much of a concrete framework in which they could frame the very provenance and philosophy of their ‘values.’ The 1990s, more so than the 1980s, were seen as the age of globalization and clashing cultures, as folk culture struggling for footholds were ignored or manipulated by government-instituted cultural policies for the purpose of touristic or propagandistic consumption whilst imported popular cultures (rather than folk/traditional cultures) from the US and Japan in the form of anime, toys and icons, video games, music and even styles of dressing took the entire country by storm. Particularly from the mid 1990s to current times, access to the Internet (which came to Malaysia around the mid 1990s) took access to such popular cultures to a new level and heightened their spread among youths and those under 30 before it also began to spread to those above that age group. While all this was happening, the Islamists were also beginning to create their own brand of popular culture through the establishment of nasyid singing groups in boy-band style, such as the group Raihan, which were meant to capture the interest of the young. However, there were not many attempts to bring folk-music and existing traditions into the locally manufactured pop cultures, with the latter being modifications of pop music from countries such as Indonesia, Hong Kong, and the US in terms of musical styles. Of course, all the pop music produced in these countries take on musical forms that originated from Europe (pentatonic scales), with certain styles particularly popular within particular communities due to their synchronicity with the latter’s psyches. While recent times have seen the revival of interest in folk-cultures and performances due to efforts of certain bodies, most of the work done in this area had more to do with preservation and documentation than development, re-interpretation, and integration, all-important for the survival and continuous evolution of any art forms. The 1990s also saw the establishment of the Boom Boom Room in Kuala Lumpur, the place where all forms of ‘marginal’ stage entertainments such as drag shows were brought into the mainstream and made more respectable as they opened up comic stand-ups such as the infamous Joanne Kam Poh Poh. Even then, ‘acceptable’ mainstream drag shows could not challenge the sexual privileging of heteronormativity but instead provided a comic parody of men trying to play out female roles. Hence, staging a performance equivalent to M. Butterfly would lead to moral outrage that I believe as stemming more from discomfort with its subtle implications than portrayal of gendered roles. On the other hand, the 1990s also saw more concerted efforts from queer (LGBT) groups to organise themselves and their communities as they faced challenges caused by the spread of HIV among those in the community. They became concerned with the necessity of non-judgmental sexual health education which led to the production and direction of Bukak Api in 2000. Bukak Api was a docu-drama about sex-workers working the infamous seedy red-light district of Chow Kit (which bears little resemblance to the one in Amsterdam). A large number of the 48 sex-workers are transvestites who were not able to obtain jobs in the other sectors. The objective was to educate the public and sex-workers on the importance of safe-sex for disease prevention, not merely to prevent unwanted pregnancies. Moreover, the docu-drama tried to empower sexworkers to insist on the use of condoms by their clients and demonstrating how that could be part of fore-play. By the 21st century however, queer groups in Malaysia, even if their numbers are still low, were coming together and organising events to highlight to society at large (even if society consists mostly of urbanites) their existence and the struggle of their lives. Organisations such as Pink Triangle would put on performances which would be constituted as raucous and lewd, due to their ‘wanton’ references to human sexuality, by those who had grown up under the heavy hands of censorship and did not have the privilege of seeing anything else otherwise. However, these performances are meant to mirror and sublimate the realities of our everyday world, even the worlds we choose to be blind about. The bad-press the LGBT community received due to the wanton violation of ethical journalism by the tabloids in Malaysia gave society, many of whom received their news and conceive their views mainly from such tabloids, the impression that the groups want to wish their ‘hedonistic’ and ‘lewd’ lifestyles upon others. The very same press then refuses to do any stories representing the day-to-day realities and lives of the LGBT communities and the people living in them. Nonetheless, performances, gatherings and defaming publications aside, queer activism in Malaysia is still in its infancy, as the increasing Islamic radicalisation in Malaysia has led to discomfort among many Muslim queer-identified folks who find it too risky to come-out for fear of reprisals, thus leading to suppression, depression and social problems.3 Stringent moral policing also meant that entertainment outlets could not function without harassment and disruption to their business. One example is the aforementioned Boom Boom Room that faced the same problem of harassment, as do other entertainment outlets. Thus, many were not able to function continuously, but would open and close for periods of time as part of their business model, so as to adjust themselves to the social conditions under which they were operating. In the turn of the 21st century, there is a blurring of boundaries between what is ‘theirs’ and ‘ours’ as popular culture is instantly franchised, spreading like memes that grip nations with evolved entertainment channels and consumer systems. An example is American Idol that began in the US and had since spread to many parts of the world, including Malaysia, each with its own seasons. Later, Malaysia created its own brand of reality TV show in the form of Akademi Fantasia, a televised academy that is aimed at grooming future pop-stars, dancers and pop-art performers. It was the third season of this reality TV in 2005 that gave us the infamous pop icon, Mawi, who had continuously made headlines for a number of years as the ‘Islamic’ answer to the pop-music world before also disappearing under the sea of new acts (or, newspapers stopped writing as much about him compared to the early years). While other forms of reality TV that were to later dominate the prime time channels of US cable TV did not evolve into Malaysian versions, they were eagerly followed by subscribers of Astro, Malaysia’s first satellite TV service and also through the private channels that have slowly increased in number since the late 1990s, even though the numbers are still kept very low due to stringent regulations. As the publishing industry (or at least the magazine publishing industry in Malaysia) was undergoing a maturing process between the 1950s and now, with the inflation of prices of overseas publications, the Malaysian public was turning to local publications to inform them of the newest 3 Which is always what happens when a person is not true to him/herself, leading to less than honest behaviour. 49 and latest in trends and of products available. The magazines published in Malaysia are mostly on lifestyles/fashion in the most general way possible and are firm advocates of social advancement. There are a few trade journals dedicated to hobbies, gadgets, business, IT and education but these only occupy a small percentage of the publication output. The two biggest magazine publishing houses, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (DBP) and Karangkraf together have a strong grip on the school-going market with magazines, academic or general interest, targeting populations from primary school through college. DBP also puts out a magazine centering on literature, called Dewan Sastera, and is about the only literary magazine published in Malaysia, if one does not count short-lived attempts or non-mainstream publications. Karangkraf also publishes comics in the Malay language and entertainment magazines with a focus on the local entertainment scenes. There were of course, here and there, Malay and Chinese magazine tabloids or magazines devoted to formulaic short stories and ‘true stories’ not unlike that found in the West. Political parties such as PAS (Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party) publish their own magazine on general interest and political issues, Siasah. There are some online webzines and pullouts from weeklies and dailies that publish articles relating to current and not-so-current issues on culture, politics and literature. However, that said, there are no journals featuring world issues or attempts to make academic subjects (such as philosophy, anthropology, history, astronomy and psychology) accessible to the general public. There were attempts to publish general science magazines, but with the exception of Popular Science that seems to concentrate more on gadgets and technology than on interrogating issues relating to scientific disciplines, most did not last long in the market due to poor publicity and general lack of availability in most outlets selling magazines and newspapers. One need not even think about feminist publications of any sort, or publications catering to people with alternate lifestyles or niche preferences (including less common hobbies and interests). When asked, most publishers would point to lack of interest and that such magazines do not sell well. There has always been an assumption that the general readership is unable to digest anything heavier than practical tips on childcare, romances, true-stories, everyday psychology and alternative medical treatments. This is ironic seeing that the price of many of these magazines would put them out of the reach of the lower income group, thus making much of the readership comprise many of those who had reached a certain level of educational attainment that would include the digestion of technical materials. It is a wonder how the glut of these lifestyle magazines talking about almost the same issues would not also make such a ‘safe’ model unsustainable, especially at a time when much of the same information could also be obtained online. As a writer and contributor to such magazines for many years, I have seen such magazines come and go, some lasting not more than a year due to financial difficulties. Some had to undergo much revamping, which means the inclusion of more advertorial material than ever rather than the improvement of content. Much of the attraction of these magazines come more from the visuals they provide (which are costly to produce) and the semi-gossipy columns featuring advice or personal dirt. However, much of the issues discussed stay within safe boundaries and do not transgress current social superstructures for fear of losing their ‘imaginary’ readership. Despite the multiplicity of languages in which these magazines are published (mostly in Malay, English or Chinese), much of the content is pretty similar across the board and even repetitious, with some slight modification according to the perceived profile of the readership. 50 What I would like to do here is to provide a brief analysis of some of these lifestyle magazines containing a more specific fashion focus. I have decided to limit my analysis to a selection of Malaylanguage magazines, with a gesture towards a small sampling of magazines targeted at the Chinesereading public and English-language magazines targeted at the Indian community. My reason for selecting Malay-language lifestyle magazines as my main focus is due to the sizeable readership which they have, as a large proportion of the Malaysia population is Malay-speaking and reads mainly in Malay. Moreover, these magazines are most indicative of the social climate/developments in Malaysia and the preoccupations of a readership constituting a majority of the population. Even though the more upmarket of these magazines are pretty similar to their Western predecessors, there is a greater preoccupation with cultural differences and religious particularities (such as hijab-based fashion). An example is Nona. This magazine targets the professional and socially mobile (particularly from the upper-middle class on) by showcasing in its pages examples of women ranging from the well-groomed and hyperfeminine datin to the business-suit-and-pants corporate types. Mostly targeted at the married, soon-to-be-married, or any woman aspiring towards domestic bliss, even though there is certainly an emphasis on combining career with domesticity (this is always an integral part of the selected profiles). Everyone is happily married (at least they have achieved a level of happiness with the nth marriage, even if not the first) and everyone seems a contented heterosexual. ‘Masculine’ clothing worn by the go-getter woman is softened by the use of lighting, styling and make-up, or in the way she is asked to discuss her femininity (family or other feminine pursuits). Most of the women are corporate leaders, but not necessarily revolutionary, innovative nor inventive in their work (though there are elements of creative flair in working within an existing system); they do not necessarily try to turn the wheel in a different direction. However, they are all portrayed as having self-motivation to succeed in their chosen path. The women portrayed range from upper-middle to upper class (one sees many New Malays (Melayu Baru) and their progeny among the pages). The December 2009 issue particularly, portrays the ceremony surrounding the ascension of the new Malay King. It is interesting that throughout the magazine, the marital statuses of the women, and even the occasional men interviewed (usually experts in particular specialities considered of interest to women) are emphasised (almost all of them are married with kids). Of course, it goes without saying that all the women are Malay (except for the models) and the very culture (especially in weddings or traditional ceremonies) which they inhabit is subtly emphasised, but ‘updated’ against a modern consumer culture. Nona portrays a mix of aurat (modesty)-covering clothing and ‘recent traditional’ dresses in the form of baju kurung; some more body-hugging (shaped around the body) and some more loosefitting. Then, there are different ways of wearing head scarves and the usual designer wear and contemporary designs you would see in any other magazines. It is interesting that clothes such as the baju kurung, which are supposed to detract from the allure of the woman, become an object of sartorial fetishism, a magnification of the very allure its intention is suppose to de-emphasise. This is done through textual and pictorial demonstrations of how women enhance their attractiveness by wearing the right colours, patterns and fabric, as one would do with the ‘sexy’ dresses. If the body of the woman is hidden and camouflaged by these clothes, the clothes become the ‘new body’ of the woman, the titillating screen or ‘third term’ that increases the desirousness of the ‘hidden’ body. At the same time, the chameleonic possibilities highlighted by such clothes also represent a form of agency for women so they need not feel impeded by the mores of religion. However, these clothes, 51 52 as do the clothes throughout the magazine, emphasise rather than take away from the focus on the womanly form, since their presentation in the magazine is about putting them on par with the other ‘regular’ designer wear, and thus desirable to women who may be hesitant about donning such clothes for fear of fashion monotonousness. Eh, on the other hand, is geared towards 20-something women, particularly students and those still at the start of their careers. It is the Malay-language version of Cleo. The clothes are a mix of prêt-a porter, high street, with the occasional bow to celebrity haute-couture. There is a remarkable absence of hijab-wearing models and baju kurungs. Fashions from the Middle East, such as that from Iran, are also showcased, thus heralding the growing dominance of these cultures in Malaysia. A number of these clothes fall under the province of high fashion rather than religious garbs. Wanita is the Malay version of Female. It is targeted at the Malay middle-class or those aspiring towards middle-class respectability. However, unlike the first two magazines, there is greater visibility of non-Malay people covered. There is much emphasis given to lifestyle issues and articles that are generic in some ways but also culturally specific in other ways, since religion is always hovering in the background, and comes up many times in many question-and-answer segments. Like Nona, there is also an emphasis on heterosexual relationships and domesticity. In the December 2009 issue, there was an entire spread on Islamic fashion. Glam tries to approximate Glamour in all its content, down to the kinds of clothes modelled. There is certainly an aspiration towards high-society, and greater hedonism implied (one can consider Glam as the more hedonistic version of Nona). The religious element is less strong. Designer clothes and accessories are aplenty, with many of the clothes plucked off international runways and catwalks. There is barely a hijabed woman in sight. Of course, the role models interviewed are still Malay women, particularly those who have achieved success in the world of business. Femininity and heterosexuality is obviously emphasised. Glam is more unapologetic about the business of beauty and glamour than the other magazines discussed above. Nur4* is very explicitly targeted at Muslims, especially Malay Muslim women. Almost all the women in the magazine are hijabed, and for the magazine, that is considered the highest order of virtue. The December 2009 issue features an article of a businesswoman who specialises in clothing for Muslim women and how that becomes her way of evangelising and preaching to those yet unconverted to such forms of dressing. In a way, it is also a critique of the way in which hijabs and Islamic clothing had been glamorised by other women/fashion magazines instead of functioning as intended, to cover the modesty of a woman, and act as a counterweight to all the other magazines. There are also pages dedicated to teaching women the best way to don the headscarf. As a counterpoint to the women’s magazines we have been looking at, I would like to turn our attention to the fast-growing segment of lifestyle/fashion magazines targeted at men, whether the new metrosexuals or merely just men who care a little about their image. I have decided to look at two English-language lifestyle/fashion magazines dedicated to men, M2 and August, and a Chinese-language men’s magazine, New Icon5. M2 is decidedly targeted at the gentleman, or at least someone aspiring to become one. There is less emphasis on male machismo compared to magazines such as FHM or Maskulin. This magazine is perhaps a magazine for the intelligent man 4* 5 rabic for ‘light’, likely a reference to the 24th surah, chapter, of the Qur’an which discusses matters of family, sexuality, testimony, A adultery, privacy and modesty. It contains lines interpreters have used to argue for the hijab [Editor’s note]. It is interesting that in Malaysia, the only available vernacular magazine, besides the Malay-language Maskulin, specifically looking at men’s lifestyles or fashion needs is in Chinese. This speaks for the social structuration of the Malaysian society. 53 54 who seemingly favours brains over brawn (even though there is nothing outstanding about that). It contains a hodge-podge of articles featuring Malaysian and international (Western) content. This is unsurprising since the original magazine is from New Zealand. However, this being a man’s magazine, there are still the requisite gadgets associated with males; cars, big-bikes, electronic gadgets, the works. Today’s men are also more health and image conscious, so there are the parallel articles in health, grooming and fashion, and accessories. Clothes displayed in the pages range from casual to funky, rugged and corporate. August, on the other hand, is the GQ of Malaysia. There is a strong emphasis on designer-wear. It is more European-centric than M2 and targeted at men with social standing. It is interesting that a majority of the models in the December 2009 have very androgynous looks, and thus give a slight ‘feminine’ edge to the ‘masculine’ clothes that they are modelling (you can almost imagine an androgynous woman wearing these clothes). However, the male icons interviewed for the magazine are local icons of masculinity, dressed up in power-suits, even if their personalities and demeanours are more on the level of androgyny or quirkiness. August, even more than M2, is a mix of culture and brawn, creativity and subtle masculinity. The fashion spread creates the aura of the aforementioned binaries. In an unspoken way, August seems to be representing a man assured enough in his masculinity not to have to justify it through wanton display. It is interesting to note that there is less discussion of gender roles and men’s position in the world of men’s magazines, perhaps arriving from the assumption that men are assured in their roles in this world, whereas women are expected to have enough political savvy to negotiate through the restrictions and limitations they are experiencing. A Weekend in the Life of Twenty-Something Female Yuppie, circa 2009 Jessica M is of Peranakan-Eurasian extraction. She lives in Kuala Lumpur with her parents, younger sister and brother. Like a number of upper-middle class families, she was sent abroad to study by her parents and had pursued a degree in PPE (politics, philosophy and economics) in Oxford and had worked for about three years in London’s City before returning to Malaysia to work for a governmental research arm as an economic policy analyst due to a desire to contribute to the country. As her job keeps her busy during the weekdays, she only has time in the evenings to go to the gym or for her belly-dancing class, a hobby she had recently taken up. Sometimes, she would write short stories which she currently kept stashed up in her Moleskine notebook or hard-drive. Occasionally, she would meet her friends for lunch or dinner, or attend a function or dinner-parties in the evenings. But most of her activities are reserved for the weekends. Due to the nature of her work, she is dressed mostly in blouse and pants, and occasionally, she would be wearing a knee-length skirt with platforms, stilettos or court shoes. On Fridays, she tries to leave work earlier just so as to be able to have an early start. As she works sometimes either at Putrajaya and or in Kuala Lumpur, she would sometimes be stuck in major congestion. This is when she will attempt some meditation while at the wheel, or listen to one of her audio books on her iPod. How she spends her Friday nights differ by the week, though occasionally, she has to work late. Some weekends, she might even have to travel out of town for work but the weekends she did not have to travel are spend on very many different activities. As a student 55 she was an activist interested in women’s rights and environmental issues. As a working person, she found that she had less time than before but decided to spend some weekends volunteering at an animal shelter or the zoo. Sometimes, she would arrange with like-minded friends to visit an old-folks home or an orphanage. Some weekends, she would also attend gigs, spend time with her family (including her extended family), catch up with more friends or lounge about. However, for this Friday, Jessica was able to get off work early. Traffic was not so bad so she was able to get home early, at about 6:30 pm rather than the usual 7 or 7:30 pm. Since her parents are not home yet, and her brother and sister are both out and about, she decided to use that extra time to go for a jog at the park about two blocks away from her home, listening to Evanescence to get her into the mood. She wears the pink Elle seersucker jacket and sweatpants she received from her aunt as a birthday present. After an hour of running and stretching at the park, she headed home to shower and prepared for dinner with her family. The family maid was just about bringing out the dishes when her parents arrived home at just about 8 pm. Her brother is away camping that weekend and her college-going sister has gone out for dinner and a movie with her friends. Dinner is the time that Jessica uses to catch up with her parents on their day-to-day. They both run a factory and shop selling home fittings and work more than an hour away from the family home. After dinner, the entire family decided to chill out and watch some sitcoms. Jessica received a text message on her iPhone from a friend asking her if she would like to join some people for drinks. Deciding that she would rather read a new novel she had not had the time to start on, she declined the offer. She would be meeting up with this friend, and a few other girlfriends, for a shopping trip tomorrow afternoon. Changing out of her shorts and baby tees, she puts on a kaftan which she likes sleeping in and reads until midnight before calling it a night. She wakes up at about 10 am that Saturday, and prepares to go for her belly-dancing class that starts at about 11am and goes on for an hour and a quarter. Her belly-dancing class runs twice a week, on a Wednesday and Saturday. After the class, she went home for a quick shower and lunch that the family maid has prepared. She dresses up in a thick-strap sleeveless white blouse with tiny periwinkles and a pair of stonewashed jeans she had picked up during a trip to the California a year back. Slipping into a pair of low-heel sandals with rope-like straps and carrying a sling bag, she drove out to pick up one of her friends. Their favourite shopping haunts in PJ tend to be 1Utama but today, they decided to go to the Pavilion as they wanted to look for some designer brands that were on sale that day, especially as they were looking for dresses to wear at a mutual friend’s upcoming wedding reception. After about 3 hours, they manage to pick up most of the clothes they wanted, and a pair of shoes to go with the clothes. Of course, along the way, they have picked up various things that they had found interesting or would like to have: skincare products, a cosmetic product here and there, accessories, snacks and little tokens. Most of them bought from local designers such as Sonny San, Eclipse, Tom Abang Saufi, Melinda Looi and Khoon Hooi. They go on to the foodcourt for refreshments, famished after the hours spent walking about. While her friends are thinking about catching a movie before going home, Jessica wants to head straight home as she is planning to attend a gig and poetry session later in the evening where some of her friends would be performing. Beating the congestion of a Saturday evening in Kuala Lumpur, she arrives home just around 6:30 pm and relaxed awhile by the couch, watching Bloomsbury news while waiting for dinner to be served and her parents to return from their workplace. After dinner, she takes a shower and 56 changes into a yellow summer dress with pink primrose motifs and flowery sleeves, as well as a waist tuck from which the ankle-length flare skirt. The dress is made of cotton but layered over by silk organza. Carrying a tote made of straw that she had purchased on a trip to Bali recently and wearing a pair of peep-toe heels, she is ready for the night. There are all kinds of dress-styles found that night at the venue where the performances are taking place, ranging from the extreme casual to those who look like they may be going clubbing right after. After the event, Jessica goes off for drinks at one of the ubiquitous mamak stalls near the Bukit Bintang area. Sunday, Jessica decides to spend it lazing about and finishing up the novel she had begun on Friday, at least as many pages as she could get through. As today is when her brother comes home, she spent part of the afternoon talking to him and with her sister who was also staying home to finish up some assignments. Her parents are not working today and her dad decides to spend some time at the garden, pruning and checking on the health of his prized bougainvilleas, hibiscus, begonias and dahlias. Her mother is spending the morning baking in the kitchen and the afternoon painting miniatures, the latter a recent hobby she had picked up from none other than her son, except that the miniatures she is painting are miniatures of a little traditional house she is making for an exhibition rather than cars. Jessica helps her father out in the garden for a bit before deciding to give herself a treat by soaking in the bath salts she had bought from a specialty retailer at the Pavilion. Lighting aromatic candles around the bath, she soaked herself while continuing her reading of the novel. As the afternoon continues, she suddenly remembers that she needs to look through a work-related report in preparation for a meeting on Monday afternoon. By the evening, she sat down with her family as they were having their evening meals, watching the news and discussing current events. After dinner and during dessert, the family sits together and watches Talentime by Yasmin Ahmad, a story about mixed-race love between a Malay girl and an Indian boy, though Jessica’s sister has to excuse herself half-way through the film as she has to complete her assignments that night. A Weekend in the Life of a Twenty-Something man, circa 2009 Zolkiflee is of Malay-Chinese and Eurasian-Pakistani descent in his late twenties and is single. As his family lives in Penang, he lives alone in a condominium near one of the upmarket areas in Kuala Lumpur. He works in the advertising and brand design industry as a creative director for one of the smaller advertising houses. He had been working at his career for the last eight years, beginning as a junior graphic designer when in his early twenties after having graduated from a design school in London. As he works long hours on most weeks, and sometimes even on weekends, he tries to spend his free time catching up on sleep, meeting up with friends or racing on his newly purchased Harley Davidson. He drives a five-year old Proton Iswara and prefers to spend his money on his bike. Sometimes, he would try to attend an art exhibition or a concert performance. On Sundays, which he need not work, he would spend it on playing futsal with his friends. Working in the creative industry means that he could wear whatever he wants to work. An impeccable dresser, he prefers to wear plain cotton long-sleeves with colourful ties and pressed corduroy trousers to work everyday, though on weekends, he may concede to wearing a T-shirt (not any T-shirt but one of the collectors’ variety he had amassed during his years as a student in London and during his travels) and jeans to work. 57 On this particular Friday in which we are following Zolkiflee, he has to work late on Friday but was able to get a weekend off as he had just met the final deadline for a major project. Leaving the office just after midnight, he decides to hit the gym a block away from his office to de-stress from the week’s work, running on the treadmill and lifting some weights while listening to his favourite band. After a shower, he goes to one of those 24-hour eating stores ubiquitous around Kuala Lumpur and has a plate of roti canai with egg. By 2 am, he is home and ready to call it a day, reading a design magazine until he is ready to fall asleep. Waking up just before noon on Saturday, he washes himself and changes into a checkered shirt, a pair slacks and then put on a pair of sneakers before going out. Of course, he puts a little of parfum pour l’homme before doing so. He has a lunch date today, with a single young woman named Miranda whom he had met while out for drinks with friends a week ago. They are going to meet in a restaurant-café in Bangsar, which is the favourite hangout place for many of the middle to upperincome groups. She works as a sales manager for a large French cosmetics firm. Dressed in a frontbuttoned lilac-coloured off-shoulder blouse and sleek, black ankle-length skirt and pumps, she looks relaxed and worry-free that day. They’ve decided to have lunch at a restaurant specialising in Peranakan food. While talking, they find that they are both into beer-tasting and are members of an environmental adventure club, except that Zolkiflee has never attended any of the activities since he joined six months back due to his uncertain work schedule. After the pleasant lunch, they promised to meet up again soon before going their respective ways. Zol decides today to hit the race circuit in Sepang, since it is not often that he has an entire afternoon off. Calling up his racing buddies, they decide to meet in Sepang in about an hour from that time. Dressed in gear he had custom-imported from Italy, he and his buddies are on and about the track for about 2 hours as each attempts to improve his time. They take a 10 minute break between each hour to catch up a little on the latest news on the racing and big bikes as well as to pack in some 100Plus, seeing that it was a really hot day today. By the time Zol reaches home, it is close to 6 pm. After a quick shower, he decides that it is time to put out fresh food for his cat and change the litter box. Thinking that it might be nice to make himself a meal tonight rather than eat out all the time, he decides it would be detoxifying to have salad and tofu for dinner and some fruit juice. But as there’s no substantial food left in the house that could fulfil his purpose, he has to go out to get some. As he is about to grab his car keys, his friend who has just returned from abroad calls and asks him out for dinner with a bunch of other friends. They are planning to meet up at Sri Hartamas at the infamous nasi lemak place for dinner before going to one of the very few jazz clubs in town. So much for having a healthy dinner at home and quiet night in. Changing out of his ‘lounging’ clothes of khakis and short-sleeved striped shirt, he pulled on a body-hugging sleeveless shirt before wearing an unbuttoned white shirt with blue lines and squares, and a pair of lincoln green slacks. On Sunday, he decides to take things easy and spend his time lounging about and drawing cartoon strips, a passion which he has had since he knew how to draw. However, it was only in the past two years that he has been taking up the hobby seriously and created a series of strips which he hopes would eventually turn into a graphic novel. A perfectionist, he has been drawing and redrawing some of the scenes. He has now moved beyond the story board and is bent on producing an actual prototype. He has had an all-consuming interest on history and heritage issues, particularly due to his familial heritage, and he hopes to create an alternative graphic history of Malaysia, a history 58 that will include all the riff-raff and ‘unacceptable’ elements of society. He has punctuated his artistic endeavours with research and readings, though his recent promotion as creative director eight months ago has taken away even his very limited free time. He is also interested in looking at how religion and religious institutions have played a role in shaping the Malaysian landscape. Late in the afternoon, he receives a call from his sister, Min, who is living in Australia with her partner, Marianne. She is planning a visit to Kuala Lumpur for a work project and wonders if she could stay with him so that they could spend some time catching up. Min is an architect by profession and her firm has been hired to work on a construction project on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur. Zol was happy to oblige as he has not seen his sister physically (Skype video conferencing not included) in over three years, as he had not been to Australia in that time period, nor has she been visiting home. He has kept her informed on his graphic novel venture and she has been interested in its progress, and had offered to help him with contacts who can enlighten him on the un-straightforward ‘queer history,’ a section which he particularly wants to work on as a tribute to his sister, and also his best friend, Merwin, who was homosexual and had died in a car accident. He manages to go out in the early evening to do the badly needed grocery shopping, obtaining the salad, tofu and fruit juices that he needs, and of course, some nice healthy muesli bars, berried cereals, high-grained bread and fat-free milk. That evening, dressed in his pyjamas, a bowl of cereal in hand, he watches three episodes of Dollhouse. 31st August 1957, circa 1:00 am. She had just returned home and is in her room. The rest of the family is not back yet but she had wanted to get in before they did. She stood in front of the bathroom mirror and diligently stripped of all the makeup, removed the lash extensions and undid her bun. Removing the wig from her head, she dunked it in a pail of warm water to remove the hair gel she had layered on generously earlier. Taking off her kebaya carefully and laying them out on the bed, she stripped herself off her under-things and put on a cotton shirt and sarung. Folding up the kebaya suit, she put it back into a paper bag she had stowed at the back of her wardrobe. She would take it to the dobi later. She took the scarf that was given to her by the young man, caressing it lovingly before stowing it, together with the bag which holds it, into the drawer of her desk. She was just about to completed her transformation when her little sister, who had just returned home with the family, came knocking at her door. She heard the muffled sweet voice asking, “Abang, dah balik ke?” 59 U wang Asli Moden O rang Asli Moden Mor Ajani Maeh tek bila de tanyak sapak Uwang Asli, uwang lua ingat kitak nin bangse yang tinggal deket dalam hutan. Didik kaba yang uwang kitak nin kejak nyak membu’uk natang, cayau petai dan lain-lain kejak lagik deket dalam hutan. Tapik kinin pasal banyak kesedaran uwang kitak untuk bejaye dengan banyak kampung-kampung uwang kitak yang dah betuka menjadik banda, uwang kitak pun te’pakse menukar ca’ak hidup didik. Sebelum akuk citak dengan lebih lanjut tentang Uwang Asli akuk nak bagi seken info pasal Jikalau dahulu bila kita sebut sahaja Orang Asli mesti kita akan terbayang bahawa Orang Asli ialah satu puak minoriti yang tinggal di dalam hutan dan mereka ini menjalankan sistem ekonomi sara diri seperti bercucuk tanam, memburu binatang dan sebagainya. Pada zaman era moden ini kebanyakan Orang Asli tidak lagi hidup seperti dahulukala. Mereka telah hidup mereka sama seperti kehidupan kaum di Malaysia yang lain. Sebelum pergi lebih lanjut lagi tentang Orang Asli moden, terlebih dahulu diterangkan sedikit sebanyak mengenai Orang Asli. Uwang Asli kitak nin tai. Uwang Asli nin tedi’ik daipadak 18 suku deket semenanjung Malaysia. Uwang Asli de bahagi kepadak tigak suku kaum utamak iaituk Negrito , Senoi dan Jobok Asli. Uwang kitak daik sukuk kaum Negrito tedi’ik daikpadak suku Kensiu, Kintak, Lanoh, Jahai, Mendriq dan Bateq. Daikpadak sukuk kaum Senoi pulak ialah sukuk Temiar, Semai, Semoq Beri, Che Wong, Jah Hut dan Mah Meri. Manakalak daik sukuk Jobok Asli pulak Orang Asli adalah penduduk asal atau penduduk peribumi di Semenanjung Malaysia. Terdapat 18 suku kaum Orang Asli di Semenanjung Malaysia. Mereka dibahagikan kepada tiga suku kaum utama iaitu Negrito, Senoi dan Melayu Asli. Orang Asli dari suku kaum Negrito terdiri daripada suku Kensiu, Kintak, Lanoh, Jahai, Mendriq dan Bateq. Orang Asli suku kaum Senoi pula terdiri daripada suku Temiar, Semai, Semoq Beri, Che Wong, Jah Hut dan 60 iaklah da’ik sukuk Temuan, Semelai, Jakun, Orang Kanaq, Orang Seletar dan Orang Kuala. Padak tahun 2000, Uwang Asli kitak cumak membentuk 0.5% hajak da’ikpadak semuhak penduduk deket Malaysia. Bilangan jumlah Uwang Asli kitak kinin dalam anggaran 148,000 uwang hajak. Uwang Asli de bahagi kepadak tigak suku kaum utamak iaituk Negrito , Senoi dan Jobok Asli. Group Uwang Asli kitak yang terbesar adaklah da’ik group Senoi iak ituk 54% da’ikpadak kemuhak jumlah uwang kitak. Manak kalak group Jobok Asli pulak adaklah 43 % dan group Negrito 3%. Kemiskinan dalam komuniti Uwang Asli kitak mencapai 76.9%. Jabatan Statistik Malaysia adak kaba yang 35.2% Uwang Asli kitak betul-betul hidup dalam miskin dan papak. Kebanyakan Uwang Asli kitak tinggal deket nuak pendalaman, manakalak adak sejumlah kecen hajak uwang kitak yang tinggal deket nuak banda. Bahase Uwang Asli kitak de bagih kepadak tigak kategori iak ituk bahase Austro-Asiatic, bahase Austronesian dan bahase Aslian. Bahase suku kaum Uwang Asli kitak Semelai adaklah da’ikpadak kategori Austro-Asiatic, manak kalak bahase suku kaum Temuan pulak adaklah da’ikpadak kategori Austronesian. Manakalak kebanyakan kategori Uwang Asli bebual bahase yang dikategorikan sebagai bahase Aslian. Selain menggunakan bahase uwang kitak. Uwang kitak juga mahir dalam bahase Jobok. Kebanyakan Uwang Asli kitak tinggal be’dalai deket negeik Selangor, Perak, Pahang, Negeik Sembilan, Joho dan Kelantan. Adak satuk Muzium Uwang Asli kitak deket Gombak 25 kilometer da’ikpadak Kualak Lumpu. Muzium nin menyimpan banyak koleksi sejarah Uwang Asli kitak contohnya gambar-gambar lamak untuhik kitah maeh, alatan yang digunakan ulih uwang kitak, sejarah Senoi Praaq (pasukan khas pulis hutan Uwang Asli) dan patung muyang Uwang Asli kita da’ik sukuk Mah Meri dan bermacam-macam lagik ba’ang kebudayaan Uwang Asli kitak. Adak sepa’uh uwang kitak seka’ang nyap lagik kejak macam untuhik kitak maeh tapik didik dah mulak kejak makan gajik Mah Meri. Manakala Orang Asli daripada suku kaum Melayu Asli pula terdiri daripada suku Temuan, Semelai, Jakun, Orag Kanaq, Orang Seletar dan Orang Kuala. Menurut kajian pada tahun 2000, kaum Orang Asli membentuki 0.5% daripada semua penduduk Malaysia. Kini bilangan Orang Asli dianggaran sebanyak 148,000 orang. Kumpulan suku kaum Orang Asli yang terbesar ialah dari suku kaum Senoi yang merangkumi 43% diikuti suku kaum Melayu Asli sebanyak 43% dan suku kaum Negrito sebanyak 3%. Menurut statistik kajian jumlah kemiskinan berlaku di dalam komuniti Orang Asli adalah mencapai angka 76.9%. Mengikut kajian Jabatan Statistik Malaysia pula 35.2% masyarakat Orang Asli betul-betul hidup dalam kemiskinan tegar. Kebanyakan kaum Orang Asli tinggal jauh di dalam pendalaman, manakala cuma sejumlah kecil sahaja kaum Orang Asli menetap di kawasan bandar. Bahasa Orang Asli dikategori kepada tiga kategori iaitu bahasa Austro-Asiatic, bahasa Austronesian dan bahasa Aslian. Suku kaum Orang Asli yang menggunakan bahasa Austro-Asiatic adalah suku kaum Semelai. Bahasa Orang Asli dari suku kaum Temuan pula dikategorikan sebagai bahasa Austronesian. Manakala kebanyakan suku kaum Orang Asli yang lain menunggakan bahasa yang dikategorikan sebagai bahasa Aslian. Selain menggunakan bahasa yang pelbagai daripada suku kaum masing-masing, Orang Asli juga fasih berbahasa Melayu. Kebanyakan Orang Asli tinggal merata-rata tempat di semenanjung Malaysia. Contoh negeri yang ramai Orang Asli ialah negeri Selangor, Perak, Pahang, Negeri Sembilan, Johor dan Kelantan. Terdapat satu muzium khas untuk Orang Asli di Gombak iaitu yang terletak 25 kilometer daripada Kuala Lumpur. Muzium Orang Asli ini banyak menyimpan koleksi sejarah kaum Orang Asli semenanjung seperti gambar-gambar Orang Asli yang diambil pada tahun sebelum kemerdekaan Malaysia iaitu pada zaman pemerintahan British, alatan ayaman 61 sama adak da’ik sektor gomen ataupun swasta. Ada jugak uwang kitak masih lagi buat kejak kampung macam motong getah, usahe ladang kebali dan bagai. Gamai jugak uwang kitak dah bejaye deket lua nun. Adak yang dah jadik dokto, lawyer, bisnesman dan lain-lain lagik kejayak moden. Contoh Uwang Asli yang bejaye iaklah Yoap (Yayasan Orang Asli Perak), Koperasi orang Asli Selangor dan lain-lain lagi. Orang Asli, artikel-artikel tentang Orang Asli, ruang khas Senoi Praaq (pasukan polis hutan Orang Asli yang pernah berkhidmat untuk menentang komunis pada zaman dulu), ukiran patung-patung moyang daripada suku kaum Mah Meri dan bermacam-macam lagi barangan kebudayaan Orang Asli. Pada zaman yang serba moden ini kebanyakan Orang Asli pada tidak lagi mengamalkan sistem ekonomi sara diri. Ramai Orang Asli lebih suka bekerja dengan pihak kerajaan atau denagn pihak swasta dan ramai juga Orang Asli memiliki perniagaan mereka sendiri. Contoh dua syrikat Orang Asli yang berjaya adalah Koperasi Orang Asli Selangor dan YOAP (Yayasan Orang Asli Perak). Ramai juga Orang Asli yang bekerja sebagai jurutera, doktor, peguam dan lain-lain kerjaya moden. Kelahiran Kelahiran Kalau maen tek banyak bebodok kecen atau met lahir deket umah didik sendi’ik. Biasak nyak bodok yang bahauk lahir tuk de sambut ulih genui-genui atau tahak-tahak bidan yang adak pengalaman. Tapik seka’ang ja’ang jugak bebodok Uwang Asli kitak yang lahir deket umah. Pasal gamai uwang kitak yang beanak deket hospital. Faktok utamak nyak iak lah uwang kitak gelik kalau bodok yang bahauk lahir disambut ulih bidan tuk matik. Didik asak nyap selamat kalau bidan yang menyambut anak didik yang bahauk lahir pasal niak gerenti yang bidan tek dapat menjamin keselamatan bodok yang bahauk lahir tek. Uwang kitak seka’ang lebih pecaye deket dokto yang nenala dapat menyambut kelahiran bodok dengan selamat. Faktor keduak pulak iak lah keku’angan bidan. Kenapak bulih keku’ang bidan dalam komuniti Uwang Asli kitak? Salah satuk sebab nyak iaklah uwang kitak nyap payah gunak bidan dah bilak nak melahirkan anak pasal dah adak hospital. Sebab tuk gamai yang ngan jadik bidan. Lain-lain sebab pulak anak mude ngan belaja ilmu bidan pasal nyap minat. Tapik khidmat bidan adak jugak digunakan walaupun ja’ang. Contohnya uwang kitak yang tinggal deket hu- Pada masa dulu sebelum adanya kemudahan hospital berhampiran dengan kawasan penempatan Orang Asli ramai Orang Asli menggunakan khidmat bidan semasa proses kelahiran bayi. Mereka bergantung semata-mata kepada bidan kerana kemudahan hospital pada ketika itu terletak berjauhan daripada kawasan tempat tinggal mereka. Pada zaman sekarang yang serba moden kebanyakan Orang Asli lebih gemar menunggu kelahiran bayi mereka di hospital. Faktor keselamatan merupakan salah satu sebab utama mengapa ramai Orang Asli lebih gemar menunggu kelahiran bayi mereka di hospital. Ada juga terdapat bebarapa kes di mana para bidan yang menyambut bayi gagal dalam tugasan mereka dan menyebabkan kematian pada bayi atau pada ibu mengandung. Mungkin kerana bidan tersebut kurang pengalaman atau bidan tersebut tidak mengamalkan kebersihan hinggakan menyebabkan kuman terhadap anak dan ibu mengandung. Kejadian seperti itu jarang sekali berlaku di hospital kerana doktor di hospital memang berpengalaman menyambut kelahiran bayi dan mereka sentiasa mengamalkan kebersihan supaya kuman tidak merebak semasa mereka menyambut kelahiran 62 tan. Didik payah nak pegik deket hospital nuak banda jadik didik terpakse gunakan khidmat bidan untuk melahirkan bodok. Yak lah nyap semuhak Uwang Asli kitak tinggal deket nuak banda, adak jugak yang masih lagik tinggal jauh da’ik banda. bayi. Kekurangan bidan juga merupakan satu lagi faktor kenapa Orang Asli tidak lagi menggunakan khidmat bidan pada masa kini. Ilmu bidan adalah ilmu yang di turun secara temurun dan oleh kerana ramai anak muda Orang Asli tidak berminat untuk menuntut ilmu bidan menyebabkan kepupusan ramai pengamal bidan dikalangan masyarakat Orang Asli. Walaupun begitu khidmat bidan masih lagi digunakan di sesetengah tempat di kawasan pendalaman di mana penempatan Orang Asli terletak jauh daripada kawasan hospital contohnya di kawasan penempatan Orang Asli yang terletak di dalam kawasan hutan. Pe’ubatan Perubatan Macam kelahiran jugak, Uwang Asli kitak suka pegik hospital untuk beubat bilak didik sakit. Gamai uwang kitak yang pegik ke hospital untuk mendapatkan rawatan. Ku’ang dah uwang kitak yang ca’ik bomoh untuk nangkal. Walaupun macam tuk uwang kitak masih adak lagik bomoh tapik gamai customer bomoh tek adaklah uwang lua yang biasak nyak nak mintak tangkal minyak pengasih, pelaris perniagaan dan lain-lain lagik. Uwang kitak seka’ang lebih pecayak deket perubatan moden. Contoh nyak kalau demam didik mesti pegik deket klinik untuk be’jumpak dengan dokto. Gamai uwang kitak dah ku’ang pecayak deket perubatan tradisional. Faktor lain pulak banyak dipengaruhi oleh gomen yang manak gomen banyak hantar ubat-ubatan ke perkampungan uwang kitak yang jauh da’ik banda. Tapik kalau tempat kampung-kampung kitak yang jauh da’ik banda dan deket dalam hutan. Ddik terpakse gunak perubatan tradisional pasal payah nak pegik klinik atau ke hospital. Sesetengah Uwang Asli kitak jugak dah memeluk agame. Contoh nyak adak uwang kitak yang memeluk itu agama Kristian, Islam dan lain-lain. Ada ajaran dalam agame yang menegah uwang kitak pahau menggunakan bomoh lagik pasal bertentangan den- Seperti juga kelahiran, Orang Asli yang tinggal di zaman moden sekarang lebih suka berkunjung ke hospital untuk mendapatkan rawatan. Semakin kurang jumlah Orang Asli yang mengunjungi dukun atau bomoh Orang Asli untuk mendpatkan rawatan. Ramai pelanggan bomoh atau dukun Orang Asli terdiri daripada orang luar di mana mereka ingin mendapatkan tangkal pelaris perniagaan, minyak pengasih dan lain-lain produk lagi daripada bomoh Orang Asli. Manakala Orang Asli sendiri pula lebih mempercayai perubatan moden. Contohnya kalau mereka deman, mesti mereka segera mendapatkan rawatan di klinik atau hospital. Agensi kerajaan seperti Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia banyak juga mempengaruhi Orang Asli kerana mereka sering mengunjungi ke kawasan penempatan pendalaman Orang Asli untuk memberikan rawatan dan bekalan ubat-ubatan. Agama juga merupakan salah satu faktor di mana Orang Asli lebih gemar menggunakan perubatan moden. Ramai juga Orang Asli pada zaman sekarang yang telah memeluk agama seperti agama Islam, Kristian dan lain-lain lagi. Kebanyakan agama-agama ini menegah pengunaan perubatan tradisional Orang Asli kerana bertentang dengan ajaran mereka. Walaupun 63 gan ajaran agame didik. Faktor agame jugak me’upakan salah satuk sebab kenapak uwang kitak lebih sukak pegik ke hospital mask didik sakit atau untuk be’anak. Pelajaran Untuk bejaye dalam duniak moden nin kitak mestilah anak pelajaran. Kalau kitak hap pelajaran kitak nyap pegik ke manak-manak. De atas kesedaran tuk lah, gamai anak mude Uwang Asli kitak dah pegik belaja deket universiti gomen atau deket kolej swasta. Adak Uwang Asli kitak yang dah bejaye jadik dokto, lawyer, bisnesman dan lain-lain lagik kejak moden. Kalau kitak genung gamai jugak anak muda kitak yang belaja sampai peringkat yang tinggik nyap kiak jantan atau betinak. Pengaruh mui bapai adaklah puncak utama yang membuatkan anak-anak mude Uwang Asli belajar sampai ke peringkat tinggik. Adak yang da’ik keluarga yang susah dan didik sedar cumak satuk ca’ak yang didik bulih bantuk keluarge didik iak ituk dengan belaja tinggik. Kalau dah belaja tinggik, didik senang nak cayau kejak yang gajik tinggi dan dengan gajik yang tinggik nin didik dpat bawai keluarge didik kelua daikpadak kemiskinan. Adak jugak yang belaja tinggik-tinggik untuk memajukan uwang kitak. Contohnya suwang pelajar uwang kitak yang belaja dalam bidang pertanian. Diak dapat bawai ilmu tuk dan di praktikan deket kampung diak. Mungkin dengan ilmu pertanian yang diak belajar diak dapat membukak ladang pertanian yang moden. Nin akan membagihkan peluang pekerjaan deket uwang kampung diak dan seterusnya membantu Uwang Asli daik segi ekonomi. Dengan adak nyak pelajaran lah kitak dapat mempertahankan hak-hak Uwang Asli kitak. Kelak kitak niak pelajaran hak kitak akan dinafikan. Contohnya isu tanah adat Uwang Asli kitak. Kalau kitak niak pelajaran kitak nyap ta- begitu terdapat juga segelintir kecil Orang Asli yang masih lagi menggunakan kaedah perubatan tradisional kerana faktor lokasi seperti mereka yang tinggal jauh di pendalaman dan juga kerana setelah perubatan moden gagal mengubati penyakit yang mereka hidapi. Pelajaran Orang Asli sudah sedar bahawa untuk berjaya dalam hidup yang serba moden ini mereka memerlukan pelajaran untuk berjaya. Ramai juga anak muda Orang Asli telah menjejak kaki mereka ke universiti awam dan swasta di dalam mahupun di luar negara. Ramai juga pelajar Orang Asli yang telah berjaya menamatkan pengajian mereka dan telah berjaya bekerja sebagai doktor, peguam, pegawai kerajaan dan lain-lain kerjaya yang setaraf dengan kelulusan yang mereka perolehi. Pada masa kini bukan sahaja pelajar lelaki Orang Asli yang berjaya belajar sampai ke peringkat tertinggi malahan pelajar perempuan Orang Asli juga turut mejejaki kaki mereka ke peringkat universiti. Ini adalah bertentangan dengan cara hidup Orang Asli dahulukala di mana mereka lebih suka anak perempuan mereka di duduk di rumah dan menjadi isteri orang. Pengaruh ibubapa merupakan satu faktor utama yang mendorong anak-anak Orang Asli untuk berjaya dalam bidang pelajaran. Ibubapa Orang Asli sedar bahawa mereka tidak boleh bergantung sematamata kepada guru sekolah untuk mendorong anak mereka supaya berjaya di dalam pelajaran. Ada juga pelajar Orang Asli yang berasal daripada keluarga yang susah dan mereka sedar cuma satu cara mereka boleh membantu keluarga mereka iaitu dengan berjaya dalam pelajaran. Mereka tahu bahawa kalau mereka sudah tamat pengajian mereka, mereka akan mendapat pekerjaan dengan gaji yang lumayan dan dengan ini mereka dapat membawa keluarga mereka keluar daripada dibelenggu kemiskinan. Ada juga pelajar Orang Asli yang belajar ke peringkat tinggi untuk memajukan bangsa 64 huk hak tanah adat kitak. Berbeza pulak kalau kitak adak pelajaran. Kitak bulih tahuk macam manak ca’ak untuk mempertahankan tanah adat kitak mengikut channel undang-undang yang sah. Pelajaran jugak dapat membantuk kitak berkomunikasi dengan duniak lua yang serba canggih nin. Kita dapat baca berite samadak dalam atau lua nega’ak. Kita dapat gunak komputer. Cubak kitak bayangkan kalau kitak niak belajar, dapatkah kitak nak gunak computer mimanglah susah tai. Kitak jugak adak Persatuan Siswazah Orang Asli Semenanjung yang meupakan satuk group yang ditubuhkan ulih pelaja-pelaja uwang kita bekas lulusan Universiti gomen dan swasta yang terdi’ik dai’ikpadak Uwang Asli Semenanjung. Mulak-mulak Persatuan Siswazah Orang Asli Semenanjung nin cumaklah sebuah kelab dan akhir nyak dituka menjadik persatuan pasal untuk pengembangan supayak persatuan nin dapat menarik generasi uwang mude. Orang Asli. Sebagai contohnya ada seorang pelajar Orang Asli yang belajar dalam bidang pertanian. Pelajar ini membawa dan memperaktikan ilmu yang beliau belajar di kampung halamannya. Ilmu yang beliau belajar akan diperaktikan dengan cara membuka ladang pertanian yang moden. Pembukaan ladang pertanian yang moden ini akan memberikan peluang pekerjaan kepada penduduk kampung di tempat beliau dan seterusnya dapat menjana ekonomi di situ. Gamai jugak bodok-bodok mude Uwang Asli kitak yang mendaftar deket sinin. Mengekot rekod ahli persatuan padak 9 september 2009, lebih daikpadak 80% daikpadak jumlah semuhak keseluruhan lulusan Uwang Asli universiti gomen dengan swasta dah jadi ahli persatuan Persatuan Siswazah Orang Asli Semenanjung nin. Persatuan Siswazah Orang Asli Semenanjung mempunyak objektif untuk meningkatkan kesedaran pendidikan di kalangan pelaja Uwang Asli kitak dan bagih menambah ilmu pengetahuan dalam masyarakat Uwang Asli kitak. Persatuan Siswazah Orang Asli Semenanjung jugak mempunyai objektif untuk megapatkan hubungan seda’ak sesamak Uwang Asli kitak supayak dapat mengasuh golongan mudak supayak dapat belaja ca’ak jadik pemimpin persatuan. Selain ituk Persatuan Siswazah Orang Asli Semenanjung jugak berobjektif untuk buat bisnes yang sah supayak didik dapat kompol duit untuk tabung didik. Persatuan Siswazah Orang Asli Semenanjung adaklah satuk tempat perjumpaan golongan pelaja Uwang Asli kitak dan iak nyak jugak untuk memupuk semangat seda’ak antarak ahli-ahli Pelajaran juga dapat membantu Orang Asli berkomunikasi dengan dunia luar seperti penggunaan internet. Internet dapat membantu Orang Asli untuk menyebarkan informasi tentang berita, sukan dan sebagainya. Penggunaan internet amatlah popular dikalangan mudamudi Orang Asli pada zaman sekarang. Selain daripada itu Orang Asli juga mempunyai persatuan pelajar yang dipanggil Persatuan Siswazah Orang Asli Semenanjung. Persatuan ini ditubuhkan oleh para pelajar Orang Asli daripada lulusan universiti awam dan swasta. Persatuan pada mulanya hanya sebuah kelab ini terpaksa ditukar statusnya daripada kelab kepada persatuan kerana untuk mengembangkan kelab ini dan seterusnya dapat menarik perhatian golongan muda mudi Orang Asli untuk menyertainya. Pelajaran juga dapat membantu Orang Asli untuk mempertahankan hak-hak asasi mereka. Contohnya isu tentang hak tanah adat Orang Asli yang semakin dinafikan. Kalau Orang Asli yang berpelajaran tinggi mesti dapat menangani masalah Tanah Adat berbanding Orang Asli yang kurang berpelajaran. Kalau Orang Asli yang berpelajaran tinggi mesti dapat mencari jalan penyelesaian berdasarkan saluran undang-undang yang sah. Ramai juga anak muda-mudi Orang Asli menyertai Persatuan SISWAZAH Orang Asli Semenanjung. Mengikut rekod ahli persatuan pada 9 September 2009 lebih daripada 80% daripada jumlah keseluruhan Orang Asli daripada universiti awam dan swasta sudah menjadi ahli Persatuan Siswazah Orang Asli Semenanjung. 65 nyak. Persatuan Siswazah Orang Asli Semenanjung jugak punyak tanggungjawab untuk bagih nasihat pendidikan kepadak Uwang Asli dengan membuat bengkel, korikulum, seminar konvensen dan lain-lain ca’ak yang sesuai untuk memartabatkan pendidikan Uwang Asli kitak supayak uwang kitak akan lebih bejaye. Perkahwinan Upacare perkahwinan uwang kitak jugak dah jadik moden. Kalau maen tek untuhik kitak lamak pakai kulit bajuk te’ap hajak masak didik nikah. Tapik seka’ang pakaian Uwang Asli kitak banyak de pengaruh dengan pakaian nikah Jobok dan perkahwinan umputih. Biasaknyak Uwang Asli kitak akan pakai bajuk nikah Jobok time bersanding aik siang dan pakai bajuk nikah umputih padak aik gelap. Bajuk nikah umputih nin meupak’kan sepasang bajuk gaun dan baju kot. Daikpadak segi ba’ang makan padak masak nikah adak uwang kitak yang masak sendiik dan de tolong ulih semuhak uwang kampung. Kiaknyak bergotong royong bilak adak sesapak nikah deket sesuatuk kampung. Adak jugak uwang kitak yang berduit nyap payah masak ba’ang makan. Didik cumak ude deket catering lua. Persatuan Siswazah Orang Asli Semenanjung mempunyai objektif untuk meningkatkan kesedaran di kalanagan pelajar Orang Asli. Selain daripada itu Persataun Siswazah Orang Asli adalah satu tempat perjumpaan golongan pelajar Orang Asli dan ianya juga mempunyai objektif untuk merapatkan hubungan persaudaraan sesama Orang Asli supaya dapat mengasuh golongan muda mudi supaya mereka dapat belajar mengenai cara kepimpinan persatuan. Persatuan ini juga mempunyai objektif untuk membuat perniagaan secara sambilan supaya mereka dapat duit tabung untuk membiayai segala aktiviti persatuan. Persatuan Siswazah Orang Asli Semenanjung juga mempunyai tanggungjawab untuk memberi nasihat dari segi pendidikan kepada anak muda Orang Asli dengan mengadakan bengkel, kokurikulum, seminar konvensen dan lain-lain cara yang sesuai untuk memartabatkan pendidikan anakanak Orang Asli supaya mereka akan lebih berdaya saing dan maju ke depan. Perkahwinan Upacara perkahwinan Orang Asli pada masa kini juga kian berubah. Kalau pada masa dahulu baju pengantin pasangan Orang Asli hanya dibuat daripada kayu kulit pokok terap, tapi sekarang pakaian pengantin mereka bayak dipengaruhi oleh pakaian pengantin Melayu dan pakaian pengantin barat. Pada kebiasaanya semasa perkahwinan Orang Asli moden mereka akan memakai pakaian pengantin Melayu pada siang hari dan memakai pakaian pengantin barat yang berupa kot hitam dan gaun pada malam hari. Makanan pada hari perkahwinan Orang Asli pula di masak oleh penduduk kampung secara bergotong royong dan dengan cara ini mereka akan mengeratkan tali persaudaraan sesama mereka. Walaupun begitu pada masa kini bagi Orang Asli yang agak berada, mereka akan memesan perkhidmatan katering untuk dijamu kepada para hadirin yang menghadiri ke majlis perkahwinan tersebut. 66 Maen tek untuhik lamak kitak cumak makan hubik kayuk dan nasik hajak masak didik nikah tapik seka’ang kuwang kitak dah bulih makan macam-macam ba’ang makan. Adak upacare tertentuk deket manak untuhik kitak nyap pernah buat iak ituk upacare potong kek. Upacare potong kek nin adaklah pengaruh de budayak umputih. Ba’ang hantaran Uwang Asli kitak padak jaman moden dah jugak bertambah. Maen tek pengantin jantan uwang kitak cumah bagih kain putih dengan cincin hajak deket keluarge pengantin betinak tapik seka’ang padak jaman yang moden nin ba’ang hantaran untuk masak nikah uwang kitak dah jugak be’tambah. Sebagai contoh nyak antarak hantaran moden masak nikah Uwang Asli kitak iaklah alat mekap, kasut, minyak wangi, beg tangan, minyak gambut dan lain-lain hantaran lagik. Kematik’an Padak masak maeh uwang kitak nyap gunak kerande bilak didik nak nanam uwang matik. Didik Cuma gali lubang untuk nanam uang matik lepas tek lubang tek de timbus dengan tanah. Tapik seka’ang gaji uwang kitak yang belik kerande untuk ahli keluargak didik yang matik. Biasak nyak kerande nin de belik daikpadak toke cinak. Toke cinaklah lah yang meguruskan pengangkutan daikpadak umah si matik ke kawasan kubuu uwang kitak dengan gunak van atau luri mayat. Daik segi hiasan deket batuk nisan deket kawasan kubuu pulak, ma’eh tek untuhik kitak cumak gunakan kayu, batuk dan botol untuk menandakan kubuu uwang kitak deket sesuatuk tempat. Tapik seka’ang didik dah letak semen deket kawasan kubuu ahli keluarga didik yang matik. Adak jugak uwang kitak yang temapah batuk nisan deket uwang Jobok atau uwang cinak. Gambar dan tulisan namak uwang matik jugak de letak deket atas batu nesan. Nin nyap pernah de buat de untuhik kitak Juadah yang dihidangkan kepada para hadirin juga bertambah. Jikalau dahulu pada masa perkahwinan pasangan Orang Asli cuma terdapat ubi kayu dan sedikit lauk-pauk sahaja yang dihidangkan tapi kini di dalam perkahwinan Orang Asli moden bermacam-macam juadah yang disediakan. Ada juga satu upacara baru dalam upacara perkahwinan Orang Asli iaitu upacara memotong kek. Budaya memotong kek ini adalah dipengaruhi oleh budaya barat. Biasanya upacara memotong kek akan dilakukan pada waktu malam. Barangan hantaran untuk pengantin perempuan juga bertambah. Jikalau dahulu pengantin lelaki Orang Asli cuma memberi kain putih, sebentuk cincin emas dan sedikit wang kepada ibubapa pengantin wanita tapi sekarang barangan hantaran semakin bertambah contohnya pada zaman sekarang pihak pengantin lelaki ada juga menghantar alat mekap, minyak wangi, beg tangan, minyak rambut dan lain-lain hantaran lagi kepada keluarga pengantin wanita. Upacara Kematian Pada masa dulu kala semasa kematian Orang Asli tidak menggunakan keranda untuk mengembumikan si mati. Mereka cuma menggali liang lahat bagi mengembumikan si mati. Berbeza pula dengan keadaan sekarang di mana Orang Asli sudah menggunakan keranda semasa upacara pengembumian si mati. Biasanya keranda ini dibeli daripada kedai pengembumian milik tauke Cina. Tauke Cina inilah yang akan menguruskan pengangkutan si mati dari rumah si mati hingga ke kawasan perkuburan dengan menggunakan van atau lori jenazah. Perhiasan di batu nesan kubur Orang Asli pada zaman kini juga sudah kian berubah. Jikalau dulu mereka hanya menggunakan botol-botol minuman atau batu sebagai menandakan kawasan perkuburan milik mereka, tapi sekarang mereka mula menempah batu nesan daripada kedaikedai batu nesan. Kedai batu nesan ditempah pula adalah daripada kedai milik orang Melayu atau Cina. Pada masa kini pada batu nesan si 67 lamak maen pasal jaman tuk didik nyap adak pelajaran lagi dan didik jugak hap gambar untuk de letak deket batuk nisan. Seka’ang setiap Uwang Asli kitak yang matik akan de tulis bilak diak matik dan deletak gambar diak sekalik. Uwang kitak buat macam tuk supayak senang didik nak melawat kubuu ahli keluarga didik yang dah hap dan jugak didik senang nak tahuk bilah ahli keluarge didik matik. Senanglah didik nak melawat ahli keluarge didik mengikut aikbulan deket atas batuk nisan. mati milik Orang Asli juga terdapat gambar dan sedikit catatan seperti tarikh kelahiran si mati, sebab kematian dan bila si mati meninggal juga di catatkan di atas batu nisan. Perkara seperti ini tidak pernah di buat oleh Orang Asli pada masa dahulu kala kerana mungkin pada masa itu mereka tidak berpelajaran dan memang sukar untuk mencatat data di atas batu nesan. Sekarang dengan gambar dan catatan di atas batu nesan memudahkan ahli keluarga si mati untuk melawat si mati kelak. Kejayaan Kejayak’an Banyak jugak uwang kitak yang telah bejaye deket lua tek. Nin adaklah dua contoh kompeni uwang kitak yang telah bejaye membangunkan dan bagih peluang ekonomi deket uwang kitak supayak Uwang Asli kitak te’us majuk ke depan. Yayasan Orang Asli Perak dan Koperasi Orang Asli Selangor adaklah duak contoh kompeni uwang kitak yang telah bejaye membangunkan kaum Uwang Asli kitak. Yayasan Orang Asli Perak telah ditubuhkan ulih bebeapak uwang kitak dai’ikpadak nege’ik Perak pasal didik dah sedar Uwang Asli kitak nin jauh ketinggalan dalam pembangunan sosio-ekonomi. Didik sedar yang Uwang Aslik kitak nyap payah bergantung deket JHEOA hajak untuk maju ke depan dan berpendapat bahawak kitak sendi’iklah kenak usahe send’ik kalau kitak nak bejaye. Yayasan Orang Asli Perak ditubuhkan dengan tujuan membantu Uwang Asli kitak maju dalam segi ekonomi. Penubuhan Yayasan Orang Asli Perak melambangkan komitmen untuk membantuk Uwang Asli kitak. Yayasan Orang Asli Perak adaklah pertubuhan yang adak lesen kontraktor bertauliah yang berdaftar dengan PKK bertaraf bumiputera dan didik banyak buat kejak-kejak buat umah atau pembangunan. Didik jugak adak buat pertanian kelapa sawit deket nuak Slim River, Perak. Selain itu Yayasan Orang Asli Perak adak jugak buat kejak bekal ba’ang makanan, perabot, ba’ang binaan dan lain-lain lagik. Ramai juga Orang Asli telah berjaya membuka syarikat dan perusahaan sendiri di luar sana. Yayasan Orang Asli Perak atau YOAP dan Koperasi Orang Asli Selangor merupakan dua contoh syarikat atau perusaahan Orang Asli yang telah berjaya. Kedua-dua syarikat ini telah berjaya membangun dan seterusnya memberikan peluang kepada penjanaan ekonomi Orang Asli dan seterusnya memajukan sesama kaum Orang Asli. Yayasan Orang Asli Perak telah ditubuhkan oleh beberapa individu Orang Asli yang berasal daripada negeri Perak di atas kesedaran bahawa masyarakat Orang Asli telah jauh ketinggalan dalam pembangunan sosioekonomi. Mereka sedar bahawa Orang Asli tidak lagi perlu terlalu bergantung pada Jabatan Hal Ehwal Orang Asli (JHEOA) untuk maju ke hadapan dan berpendapat bahawa Orang Asli sendiri yang perlu membangunkan kaum mereka sendiri. Yayasan Orang Asli Perak ditubuhkan dengan tujuan membantu Orang Asli untuk maju dalam segi ekonomi dan penubuhannya melambangkan komitmen untuk membantu kaum Orang Asli maju ke hadapan. Yayasan Orang Asli Perak adalah pertubuhan yang mempunyai lesen kontraktor bertauliah yang berdaftar dengan Pusat Khidmat Kontraktor (PKK) bertaraf bumiputera dan mereka banyak membuat kerja-kerja binaan seperti rumah dan bangunan. Selain daripada itu Yayasan Orang Asli Perak juga ada membuka ladang 68 Manakalak Koperasi Asli Selangor ditubuhkan padak 22hb Oktuber 1998 deket Kampung Uwang Asli Tanjung Sepat, Kuala Langat, Selangor. Koperasi Asli Selangor ditubuhkan dengan matlamat meningkatkan ekonomi ahli nyak yang tedi’ik da’ikpadak Uwang Asli kitak. Tujuan Koperasi Selangor adaklah untuk meningkatkan minda ahli nyak dan supayak menjadik pengge’ak kepadak kemajuan ekonomi Uwang Asli kitak. Koperasi Uwang Asli Selangor adak menyediakan pelbagai tabung membantuk ahli nyak yang tedi’ik da’ikpadak Uwang Asli. Tabung nin adaklah membantuk pelajar Uwang Asli dan jugak untuk membasmi kemiskinan tegar di kalangan masyratkat Uwang Asli kitak. Antarak jenis tabung yang diwujudkan iak lah Khairat Kematian, Rawatan khas, Hilang uapayak, Malak Petakak (gibut), dan jugak Tabung Pendidikan. Tabung pendidikan nin diwujudkan untok bagih minat anak-anak Uwang Asli bejaye dalam bidang pendidikan di semuhak peringkat sekulah nyak ki’ak yang belaja deket sekulah gendah, sekulah menengah dan jugak ke pe’ingkat universiti. Antarak aktiviti bisnes yang dijalankan ulih Koperasi Asli Selangor iak lah pembekalan tanah mi’ah, batuk gravil dan pasii deket projek-projek gomen dan swasta. Koperasi Asli Selangor adak jugak buat pertanian dan penternakan seca’ak komersial. Selain itu didik jugak adak buat perkhidmatan kebudayakan, pelancungan dan kraftangan Uwang Asli. Didik jugak buat pelbagai projek ekonomi untuk membantu komuniti Uwang Asli kitak. pertanian kelapa sawit di kawasan Slim River, Perak dan mereka juga ada membekalkan barang makanan, perabot, barang binaan dan lain-lain lagi. Manakala koperasi Orang Asli Selangor pula ditubuhkan pada 22hb Oktober 1998 di kampung Orang Asli Tanjung Sepat, Kuala Langat, Selangor. Koperasi Orang Selangor ditubuhkan dengan matlamat meningkatkan ekonomi ahlinya yang terdiri daripada masyarakat Orang Asli. Tujuan Koperasi Orang Asli Selangor adalah untuk meningkatkan minda ahlinya dan menjadi pemangkin kepada kemajuan ekonomi Orang Asli. Koperasi Orang Asli Selangor ada menyediakan pelbagai tabung untuk membantu ahlinya yang terdiri daripada Orang Asli. Tabung ini adalah ditubuhkan khas untuk membantu para pelajar Orang Asli dan juga untuk membasmi kemiskinan tegar di kalangan masyarakat Orang Asli. Antara tabung mereka sediakan ialah tabung Khairat Kematian, Rawatan Khas, Hilang Upaya, Malapetaka (ribut) dan juga Tabung Pendidikan. Tabung pendidikan ini diwujudkan untuk menarik minat anak-anak Orang Asli supaya mereka berjaya dalam bidang pendidikan di semua peringkat dari peringkat rendah, menengah, sampailah ke peringkat Universiti. Antara aktiviti perniagaan yang dijalankan oleh Koperasi Orang Asli Selangor adalah pembekalan tanah merah, batu gravil dan pasir ke projek-projek pembangunan kerajaan dan swasta. Koperasi Orang Asli Selangor juga membuat pertanian dan penternakan secara komersial. Selain daripada itu Koperasi Orang Asli Selangor ada juga membuat perkhidmatan kebudayaan, pelancongan dan kraftangan Orang Asli. Mereka juga ada membuat berbagai-bagai lagi projek ekonomi yang lain untuk membantu menjana ekonomi komuniti Orang Asli. 69 Internet Internet Lokasi kampung Uwang Asli kitak terletak berjauhan antarak satuk sama yang lain membuat kitak payah untuk kitak berhubung sesamak Uwang Asli kitak. Kebanyakan Uwang Asli suku Temuan adak deket nuak Selangor, suku Semai pulak adak deket nuak Perak, suku Jakun deket belah nuak Pahang dan nuak Johor dan sebagainyak. Pasal lokasi kitak yang jauh nin pasal uwang kitak payah nak berjumpak dan bergaul sesamak kitak. Kalau kitak nak pegik da’ik satuk kampung ke satuk satu kampung untuk jumpak kawan-kawan Uwang Asli kitak akan memakan duit dan masak kitak. Tek pasallah Uwang Asli kitak gamai yang gunak internet untuk berkomunikasi sesamak kitak. Nyap payah lagik kitak jumpak kawan kitak deket kampung diak. Ulih ituk kitak kenak gunakan internet untuk berhubung sesamak uwang kitak. Apa yang kitak perlu buat iaklah duduk depan komputer lepas tek bukai internet dan kita dapat jumpak kawan kitak yang tinggal jauh daik kita seca’ak virtual. Contohnya deket Desa Temuan, Bukit Lanjan gamai uwang kitak da’ik yang kecen sampai uwang tuhik duduk lepak deket cyber café deket situk untuk gunak internet. Didik nin biasaknya lepak deket cybercafe tek padak aik gelap pasal masak yang terluang. Adak yang nak gunak internet untuk buat kejak sekulah. Adak yang boring duduk umah dan nak cayau kawan deket Facebook, MySpace dan lain-lain lagik laman web sosial. Lokasi yang berjauhan antara satu sama lain membuatkan Orang Asli sukar berkomunikasi sesama mereka. Kebanyakan Orang Asli dari suku Temuan tinggal di sekitar negeri Selangor dan Perak, suku Semai pula tinggal di Perak, suku Jakun di sebelah negeri Pahang dan negeri Johor dan sebagainya. Oleh kerena lokasi yang berjauhan sesama sendiri menyukarkan Orang Asli bertemu dan berhubung sesama sendiri. Kalau mereka ingin berjumpa pun ianya akan mengambil masa dan duit yang banyak untuk tambang untuk pergi dari satu kampung ke satu kampung Orang Asli. Sekarang masalah begitu tidak wujud lagi setelah kewujudan internet. Internet merupakan satu media yang paling banyak digunakan oleh Orang Asli pada masa kini selain telefon bimbit dan dengan menggunakan internet mereka boleh berjumpa dengan rakan-rakan mereka dari tempat dan kampung yang berjauhan secara maya. Sekarang ini walaupun mereka tinggal berjauhan namun mereka akan terasa berada amat berdekatan antara satu sama yang lain. Contohnya di sebuah penempatan Orang Asli yang bernama Desa Temuan yang terletak di Damansara Perdana, Selangor amat menggilai internet dan dari yang kecil sampai yang dewasa selalu mengunjungi kafe internet yang terletak di situ semata-mata untuk berkomunikasi sesama rakan-rakan mereka yang berada di tempat yang berjauhan melalui internet. Ada juga para remaja Orang Asli menggunakan internet sebagai panduan untuk membuat tugasan yang diberikan oleh cikgu kepada mereka dan ada juga yang melayari internet semata-mata untuk menghilangkan kebosanan dalam hidup dengan berkomunikasi dengan kawan-kawan mereka melalui laman sosial Facebook, MySpace dan laman-laman sosial yang lain. Uwang Asli kitak gamai gunak laman sosial Facebook pasal deket Facebook kitak dapat genung banyak persatuan Uwang Asli kitak, contoh nyak Member Orang Asli Se Facebook, Rakan Orang Asli Semenanjung dan Anak Anak oa genen. Gamai bodok-bodok Uwang Asli kitak daik sekulah gendah , menengah dan samapai yang tuhik gemar gunak berkomunikasi laman sosial Facebook. Nin pasal Facebook memang senang nak layau kawan-kawan bahauk sesamak Uwang Asli kitak. Gamai jugak uwang kitak yang berkomunikasi dengan meng- Orang Asli banyak menggunakan laman sosial Facebook di internet. Kalau kita lihat banyak aktiviti-aktiviti yang dibuat oleh anak muda Orang Asli di laman web sosial Facebook contohnya penubuhan Member Orang Asli Se 70 Selain ituk uwang kitak jugak menggunakan internet untuk mebacak tentang perkembangan terkini. Berite dan sebagai nya. Adak jugak uwang kitak belaja seca’ak online dengan menggunakkan internet. Contoh nyak adak yang belajar main gitar deket internet. Didik yang nak belajar nin pegik deket laman web belajar. Adak juga uwang kitak yang sukak belajar deket Youtube pasal senang seken belajar pasal deket YouTube nin kitak bulih belajar dengan genung video. Banyak jugak kegunaan internet untuk Uwang Asli kitak nin tai. Selain da’ikpadak untuk kegunaan berhubung sesamak uwang kitak dan jugak untuk tujuan hiburan uwang kitak jugak menggunakan internet untuk tujuan belaja. Contoh nyak kalau kitak nak masak nasik hayam. Walaupun kitak nyap tahuk nak masak nasik hayam padak mulak nyak, kitak bulih amin resepi masak nasik hayam deket internet. Bukan hajak resepi masakan yang kitak bulih cayau deket internet, tapik da’ik padak bagaibagai lagik. Bagih bodok-bodok yang tengah belaja deket sekulah-sekulah atau universiti, internet adaklah siku bendak yang penting padak masak didik nak buat kejak sekulah. Banyak bahan kajian yang bulih didik amin deket sinin, da’ikpadak bidang pengurusan sampailah ke bidang perubatan. Facebook, Rakan Orang Asli Semenanjung dan Anak-Anak OA Genen. Ramai anak muda Orang Asli hingga yang berumur menyukai laman sosial Facebook kerana ianya amat mudah untuk digunakan. Facebook menyediakan aplikasi di mana ahlinya boleh meletakan gambar untuk ditatapi dan dikomen oleh sesama ahli Facebook. Selain menggunakan laman sosial Facebook Orang Asli juga gemar menggunakan Yahoo Mesengger untuk bersembang sesama mereka di alam cyber. Selain daripada sembang dengan secara menaip perkataan, mereka ada juga membuat sembang secara video. Internet juga digunakan oleh para anak muda Orang Asli untuk memuatkan data seperti gambar ahli keluarga mereka untuk dikongsi sesama mereka dan ada juga Orang Asli menggunakan internet untuk hiburan contohnya mereka dapat mendengar muzik dan menonton video kegemaran mereka di internet. Banyak juga kegunaan internet untuk masyarakat Orang Asli pada masa kini. Selain menggunakan internet untuk tujuan berkomunikasi dan tujuan hiburan Orang Asli juga menggunakan internet untuk mendapatkan informasi. Bagi anak muda Orang Asli yang sedang belajar samada di sekolah rendah, menengah atau pusat pengajian tinggi, internet adalah satu media yang paling penting bagi mereka untuk membuat tugasan yang diberikan oleh para guru atau pensyarah. Selain daripada itu Orang Asli juga boleh mengakses internet jikalau mereka ingin mempelajari sesuatu benda contohnya cara untuk memasak nasi ayam. Resepi memasak nasi ayam boleh diperolehi di internet dan berbagai-bagai lagi bidang boleh dipelajari di internet daripada bidang pengurusan sehinggalah bidang perubatan. Musik Muzik Uwang kitak jugak dah adak musik kitak sendi’ik. Contohnyak namak band-band music uwang kitak yang popular macam Ramsa, Khazanah, E Semai 2, Selindung Jingga, Ramsa. Desa Temuan Bukit Lanjan lah yang banyak membuat musik-musik uwang kitak. Kelahiran Orang Asli juga sudah mempunyai industri muzik mereka sendiri. Mereka juga sudah mempunyai lagu-lagu dan band-band mereka sendiri contohnya band Ramsa, Khazanah, E Semai 2, Selindung Jingga dan lain-lain lagi. Penempatan Orang Asli yang paling banyak menghasil- gunakkan internet. Didik banyak gunak Yahoo Messenger untuk caht dengan buat call video. Selain da’ikpadak untuk berkomunikasi, internet jugak de gunakan ulih uwang kitak untuk mengupload gambar. Gamba nin bulih di kungsi sesamak kitak. Nyap ki’ak da’ikpadak gamba keluarge atau gamba biasak, kitak bulih genung gamba kawan kitak deket internet nin tai. 71 band-band musik uwang kitak nin banyak de bantuk ulih radiu Uwang Asli kitak ia ituk siaran radiu Asyik FM. Rediu Asyik FM jugak banyak mencungkil bakat-bakat uwang kitak daikpadak pelbagai kampung. Contoh segmen didik buat iak lah juara Asyik FM 2009, segmen Gradung Gradeng, dan lain-lain segmen lagik yang telah mengcungkil bakat-bakat penyanyik uwang kitak. Uwang Asli kitak niak siaran khas deket TV jadik uwang kitak cumak be’gantung deket rediu Asyik FM hajak untuk kelingai lagu-lagu bahauk Uwang Asli kitak. Siaran redui Asyik FM ninboleh kitak kelingai deket deket gelumbang pendek kebangsaan 49 meter (6025), de mulak tahun 1959 (boleh diikuti kesemuhak nega’ak). FM 89.3, FM 91.1, FM 102.5, FM 105.1. Asyik FM de ketuhak ulih Pengurus dan deket bawah penjagak’an Bahagian Rancangan Rediu, pengarah siaran rediu dan pengarah penerbitan rediu Malaysia. Selain ituk Uwang Asli kitak ju- gak bulih belik album artis uwang kitak dalam bentuk VCD atau CD yang dijual seca’ak kampung ke kampung oleh pengedar CD-CD dan VCD uwang kitak. Pengedaran CD-CD dan VCD lagu uwang kitak nin da’ik satu kampung ke satuk kampung mendapat sambutan hangat da’ikpadak pembelik uwang kitak. Ternyatak uwang kitak sendi’ik yang bagih sokongan sesamak artis uwang kitak supayak industri hiburan Uwang Asli kitak te’us berkembang maju. kan muzik pada satu tempat adalah di Desa Temuan, Bukit Lanjan. Kelahiran band-band muzik Orang Asli ini banyak dibantu oleh siaran radio Orang Asli Asyik FM yang boleh didapati pada frekuensi 91.1. Radio Malaysia Asyik FM banyak juga mencungkil bakat nyanyian Orang Asli contohnya mereka telah mengadakan program cari bakat seperti segmen Gradung Gradeng, Juara Solo Asyik FM dan lain-lain program lagi. Orang Asli tiada rancangan televisyen mereka sendiri jadi mereka cuma boleh mengharapkan siaran Radio Malaysia Asyik FM untuk mendengar lagu-lagu dari artisartis mereka. Siaran radio Malaysia Asyik FM boleh didapati pada gelombang pendek kebangsaan 49 meter (6025), boleh diikuti keseluruh negara dan juga boleh didapati pada gelombang FM 89.3, FM 91.1, FM 105.1. Asyik FM mulai siaran daripada pukul 8 pagi hingga 10 malam. Asyik fm diketuai oleh Pengurus / Penyelia dan di bawah pengawasan Pengarah Bahagian Rancangan Radio, Pengarah Siaran Radio dan Pengarah Penerbitan Radio Malaysia. Selain daripada siaran Radio Malaysia Asyik FM Orang Asli juga boleh membeli VCD atau CD yang dijual oleh syarikat penerbitan milik Orang Asli sendiri. VCD atau CD lagu-lagu Orang Asli ini dijual dari kampung ke kampung dan mendapat sambutan hangat daripada peminat yang terdiri daripada masyrakat Orang Asli sendiri. Ternyatalah industri muzik Orang Asli semakin maju di atas sesokongan sesama mereka sendiri. Peralatan Musik Peralatan Muzik Untuhik kitak maen tek gunak buluh sewang bilak adak upaca’ak atau pesta kampung. Biasa nyak buluh sewang nin di ketuk ulih duak atau lebih uwang setiap kalik upaca’ak sewang diadak’kan. Buluh sewang nin tedi’ik da’ikpadak duak batang buloh. Satu batang buluh panjang dan satuk lagik batang buluh yang pendek. Batang buluh yang panjang nin digunakan untuk bagih nada yang tinggik bilak di ketuk manakalak yang buluh pendek untuk bagih nada yang pendek. Biasak nyak keduak- Orang Asli pada masa dahulu cuma mengunakan buluh sewang iaitu dua batang buluh diketuk di atas kayu atau lantai sebagai alat muzik mereka pada semua pesta keramaian yang mereka raikan. Buluh sewang mempunyai saiz berbeza, satu batang buluh panjang untuk menghasilkan nada yang tinggi dan satu batang buluh pendek untuk menghasilkan nada yang rendah. Para penari sewang akan menarimenari mengikut rentak buluh sewang yang dimainkan dan diringi juga oleh nyanyian vokal. 72 duak buloh sewang nin akan de ketuk atas catal yang tedi’ik daipadak kayuk atau beluti untuk bagih diak kelua bunyik. Kadang-kadang buluh sewang nin akan diketuk atas semen hajak. Penari-penari sewang akan menari mengekot alunan rentak buloh sewang. Semasak buluh sewang de ketok uwang yang membuat persembahan tok akan nyanyik lagu sewang seca’ak suwang atau begamai-gamai. Lepas tuk uwang kitak adak gunak biola dan pukul gong pasal pengaruh dengan uwang Jobok. Padak masak nin dalam zaman 60an ke 80an uwang kitak main alat tradisional uwang Jobok macam gong, biola, kompang. Alat musik nin de main padak ha’ik nikah uwang kitak dan jugak de mainkan masak sewang. Tapik uwang kitak masih lagik mengekalkan mengetuk buluh sewang. Buluh sewang yang de ketuk akan de ekot ulih gong dan biola dan kadang-kadang kompang. Tapi dalam duniak moden nin kitak banyak de pengaruh de budayak uwang lua iakituk budaye uwang putih. Uwang Asli kitak dah mulak belajar main alat-alat musik moden padak tahun 80an. Tuk pun didik main deket kendu’ik uwang nikah hajak. Didik nyap adak lagi niat untuk jadik artis rakaman ketika ituk. Tapik kini padak tahun 2009 gamai band-band anak mude Uwang Asli kitak menerbitkan album didik sendi’ik. Album yang de terbitkan dijual sesamak uwang kitak da’ik padak satuk kampung ke satuk kampung. Antarak alat moden yang de sukak ulih Uwang Asli kitak nyap kiak tuhik atau mudak ialah gitar. Gamai jugak Uwang Asli kitak yang adak gitrar kapuk deket umah didik. Gitar kapuk nin mu’ah hajak untuk de beli nyap mahal pun. Kalau kitak adak duit bawah rm 100 kitak dah bulih belik gitar kapuk. Lagipun gitar kapuk nin jimat pasal diak nyap payah gunak karan macam gitar karan. Lagik satuk kelebihan gitar kapuk adaklah iak nyak bulih de bawai ke manak-manak hajak. Gitar kapuk biasak nyak de main deket tepik-tepik jalan padak masak gegelap pasal masak nin lah Uwang Asli kitak duduk berehat pasal bagih hilang tension pasal didik penat bekejak padak aik siang. Didik Pada zaman 60-an hingga 80-an perlatan muzik Orang Asli banyak dipengaruhi oleh peralatan muzik orang Melayu di mana mereka akan menggunakan, gong, kompang dan biola untuk pesta keramaian. Alat musik ini juga digunakan bersama-sama buluh sewang pada hari pesta perkahwinan Orang Asli. Buluh sewang akan diketuk dan diringi oleh biola dan gong. Sekarang pada zaman moden pula banyak peralatan muzik Orang Asli dipengaruhi oleh budaya barat. Peralatan muzik Orang Asli mula dipengaruhi oleh budaya barat pada tahun 80-an. Pada masa inilah banyak kugiran-kugiran atau band-band Orang Asli akan membuat persembahan pada majlis-majlis kenduri kahwin. Walaupun begitu tiada lagi mana-mana band Orang Asli membuat rakaman album mereka sendiri pada ketika itu. Kini pada zaman sekarang ramai juga anak muda Orang Asli yang mempunyai band muzik mereka sendiri dan mulai menerbitkan albumalbum mereka sendiri untuk pasaran sesama mereka. Antara peralatan muzik moden yang digemari oleh Orang Asli tidak mengira yang tua ataupun yang muda adalah gitar. Kebanyakan Orang Asli mempunyai sebuah gitar kapuk di rumah. Gitar kapuk menjadi kegemaran Orang Asli kerana ianya cuma berharga RM 100 ke bawah dan mampu dimiliki oleh mereka. Lagipun gitar kapuk lebih jimat dari segi ekonomi kerana tidak memerlukan kuasa elektrik dan mengunakan pembesar suara tidak seperti gitar elektrik. Gitar kapuk juga digemari kerana ianya mudah untuk di bawa ke mana-mana. Biasalah gitar kapuk akan dimainkan pada waktu malam untuk menghilangkan segala rasa kebosanan setelah penat bekerja di siang hari. Orang Asli yang yang agak berada pula lebih gemar membeli gitar elektrik, drum dan keyboard. Bila mereka semua memiliki alatan muzik yang lengkap mereka mula mencipta lagu. Agak sedikit juga jumlah Orang Asli mempunyai peralatan muzik yang lengkap kerana harganya begitu mahal sekali. Mungkin di dalam satu perkampungan Orang Asli cuma satu orang sahaja yang mempunyai set alatan muzik 73 petik gitar mengekot irama yang didik sukak. Bagih uwang kitak yang adak duit banyak seken didik dah mulak belik guitar karan, drum dan keyboard. Didik dah setat buat band didik sendiik dan didik setatlah menciptak laguk Uwang Asli kitak. Tapik kuang jugak Uwang Asli kitak mampu belik alat-alat musik yang mahal macam drum, gitar karan dan keyboard. Mungkin dalam satuk kampung Uwang Asli kitak cuma satuk umah hajak yang adak band didik sendi’ik. Adak jugak uwang kitak yang bejaye bukak studio kitak sendi’ik contohnya di studio di kawasan Gombak dengan Banting. Studio yang didik bukak nin mengenakan caj yang lebih mua’h daikpadak studio uwang lua. Gamai jugak band-band Uwang Asli kitak gunak studio-studio milik Uwang Asli kitak sendi’ik pasal nak menyokong sesamak uwang kitak dan jugak caj bayaran studio yang lebih gendah daikpadak studio uwang lua. yang lengkap. Ada juga Orang Asli yang telah berjaya membuka studio rakaman mereka sendiri. Studio rakaman yang dimiliki oleh Orang Asli ini mengenakan caj yang agak murah kepada anak muda Orang Asli yang ingin menerbitkan album berbanding menggunakan studio rakaman orang luar. Sudio rakaman album muzik Orang Asli ini terletak di Gombak dan Banting, Selangor. Alat Moden Peralatan Moden Uwang Asli kitak mimang sukakan hiburan. Pasal ituklah gamai uwang kitak yang melanggan perkhidmatan Astro iak ituk siaran TV berbaya. Walaupun umah deket kampung atau deket nuak hutan uwang kitak gamai yang adak Astro. Kalau kitak ke kampung-kampung uwang kitak, kitak bulih genung kualik-kualik Astro deket atas bumbung didik. Kadang-kadang walaupun umah pakai buluh dan daun bertam adak jugak kualik Astro deket atas bumbung umah uwang kitak. Biasak nyak didik amin pakej biasak hajak dalam Astro. Selain daikpadak astro uang kitak jugak adak TV dan mini hifi deket umah. Adak jugak gamai uwang kitak yang dah belik LCD TV. LCD TV adaklah TV yang nipis tuk. TV adaklah alat yang penting untuk meyatuk padukan dikalangan keluarge kitak dan genung citak yang kitak sukak besamak-samak keluarga kitak. Nin akan menggapatkan hubungan kekeluargaakn sesamak keluarge kitak. Kalau deket kampung yang agak jauh jauh da’ik bandar pulak, TV juga dianggap sebagai alat perpaduan. Pasal deket kampung yang nuak pendalaman didik Orang Asli memang sukakan hiburan dan oleh itu ramai yang melanggan siaran televisyen berbayar iaitu Astro. Walaupun tinggal di kawasan pendalaman ramai Orang Asli sudah melanggan perkhidmatan siaran televisyen berbayar. Kalau dilihat pada setiap perkampungan di atas bumbung rumah diperkampungan Orang Asli mesti ada careka gelombang penerima siaran televisyen berbayar. Kadang-kadang Orang Asli yang mendiami rumah buluh dan atap bertam juga mempunyai careka gelombang penerima siaran televisyen berbayar di atas bumbung rumahnya. Selain melanggan siaran televisyen berbayar, Orang Asli juga memiliki set televisyen dan mini hi-fi di rumah masing-masing. Ada juga Orang Asli sudah memiliki set televisyen LCD (skrin nipis). Set televisyen amatlah penting kerana ianya adalah satu alat untuk bersantai bersamasama keluarga setelah penat membuat aktivitiaktiviti samada belajar atau bekerja pada waktu siang. Kalau di kawasan kampung yang amat miskin, televisyen lah menjadi alat perpaduan di mana orang kampung tersebut akan berkumpul 74 nyap mampu nak belik TV jadik manak umah uwang yang adak TV akan jadik tumpuan. Nin jugak akan mengapatkan hubungan sesamak uwang kitak. Bagih semuhak pelaja-pelaja uwang kitak deket institu pengajian tinggik gomen atau swasta didik mesti adak lap top atau pun komputer. Komputer de genung sebagai alat yang penting dalam komuniti seka’ang. Gamai jugak uwang kitak yang adak komputer, nyap kiaklah komputer desktop atau yang laptop. Komputer adaklah satu alat yang penting untuk kegunaan Uwang Asli kitak jaman seka’ang pasal diak menghubungan antarak sesamak Uwang Asli kitak dalam duniak cyber. Selain da’ikpadak berhubung sesamak uwang kitak, komputer jugak bulih digunak kan untuk tujuan belaja. Seka’ang banyak ilmu yang kitak bulih belaja deket komputer nempuh lah internet. Taip hajak apak bendak kitak nak belaja atau apak bendak kitak nak tahuk. Mesti kitak dapat info yang kita nak nempuh lah komputer. Kenderaan adaklah satu alat yang membulihkan kitak bibas pegik kuluk kili. Contoh nyak kalau kitak nak pegik belik ba’ang deket kedai yang jauh daikpadak umah kitak. Kalau kitak niak kenderaan susah jugak kitak nak pegik ke manak-manak. Padak zaman serba moden nin, payah kitak nak genung uwang kitak yang jalan kakik atau naik bas. Koman-koman pun uwang kitak adak satu moto padak setiap siku umah uwang kitak, nyap kiak yang tinggal deket kampung atau yang tinggal deket bandar. Mesti umah didik adak satuk atau duak moto. Gamai jugak uwang kitak yang adak kite. Kite lebih selesa bawai kelurga daikpadak moto. Kalau motor kitak cumak bulih bawai dua uwang hajak, tapik kalau kite kitak bulih bawai gamai uwang naik contohnyak satuk keluarge. Moto atau kite adaklah jugak satuk alat yang menghubungkan uwang kitak yang duduk deket jauh antarak satuk samak yang lain terutamak nyak bilak adak seda’ak kitak yang nikah atau padak masak sambutan Aik Gayak Muyang. beramai-ramai di rumah orang yang memiliki televisyen untuk mereka menonton rancangan kegemaran meraka bersama-sama. Lain pula ceritanya dengan para pelajar Orang Asli di pusat pengajian tinggi. Para pelajar Orang Asli di pusat pengajian tinggi pula memiliki komputer riba untuk memudahkan mereka membuat tugasan yang diberikan kepada mereka. Komputer juga merupakan satu alat yang penting untuk kegunaan pada masyarakat Orang Asli sekarang kerana ianya menghubungkan sesama mereka di dalam dunia cyber. Selain daripada kegunaan berhubung sesama sendiri, komputer juga digunakan untuk tujuan pembelajaran. Orang Asli pada zaman sekarang ini boleh belajar segala ilmu mengikut minat masing-masing melalui komputer (internet) atau melalui pembelajaran secara CD-ROM. Kenderaaan juga merupakan satu benda alat moden yang penting kepada kehidupan seharian-harian masyarakat Orang Asli. Jarang juga dilihat Orang Asli berjalan kaki atau menaiki bas kalau mereka ingin pergi dari satu tempat ke satu tempat yang lain pada zaman sekarang. Ramai Orang Asli pada masa kini sudah memiliki motorsikal. Jika dilihat pada setiap rumah Orang Asli sudah pasti di setiap rumah mempunyai sebuah motorsikal atau lebih. Ada juga Orang Asli sudah mampu memiliki kereta. Kereta juga diminati oleh Orang Asli kerana ianya boleh membawa ramai penumpang seperti ahli keluarga mereka sendiri untuk bergerak, contohnya semasa mereka ingin membeli barang-barang dapur di pekan atau semasa mereka ingin balik ke kampung halaman masing-masing. Berbeza pula dengan motorsikal mereka di mana ianya cuma boleh membawa dua orang penumpang sahaja. Kenderaan memang satu alat yang penting bagi menghubungkan Orang Asli yang tinggal berjauhan antara satu sama lain. Mereka boleh menggunakan kenderaan mereka samada motorsikal atau kereta untuk menghadiri majlis perkahwinan saudara mereka di tempat lain dan juga untuk menghadiri Hari Moyang yang diadakan pada setiap hujung tahun pada sesetengah perkampungan Orang Asli yang meraikannya. 75 Gaye Hidup Moden Uwang Asli kitak seka’ang banyak menikmati gayak hidup yang moden samak dengan uwang lua. Banyak kampung uwang kitak dah di bangunkan menjadik banda. Sebagai contonh nyak kampung Uwang Asli kitak deket Bukit Lanjan dah dibangunkan menjadik banda. Jadik uwang deket Bukit Lanjan dapat hidup yang moden dan didik punyak umah pun nampak mewah. Kalau kitak pegik deket kampung-kampung Uwang Asli kitak mesti setiap uwang kampung tek ada satuk handphone atau kekadang suwang uwang kampung adak duak handphone. Bagih uwang kitak yang tinggal deket banda tek contohnya uwang lanjan (Desa Temuan), uwang Aii Kuning (Bukit Bandaraya, Shah Alam) dan lain-lain tempat yang jadik banda didik dapat menikmati hidup yang lebih moden lagik. Uwang kitak yang tinggal deket banda dapat menikmati kemudahan bagai-bagai. Uwang kitak yang tinggal deket banda dapat nenala shopping deket pasaraya besa macam Tesco, Ikea, 1Utama dan lain-lain lagik. Didik jugak dapat menikmati kemudahan bekalan elektrik dan bekalan aii. Contoh kemudahan yang didik nikmati iak lah kemudahan deket dengan hospital, sekulah dan bagai-bagai kemudahan yang lain lagik. Uwang kitak yang tinggal deket banda dapat menikmati gayak hidup yang moden. Padak zaman moden nin uwang kitak nyap lagik pakai baju kulit te’ap dalam kehidupan haik-haik. Didik pakai baju kulit te’ap masak adak persembahan sewang hajak. Seka’ang uwang kitak pakai bajuk macam uwang lua lain juga macam t-shirt, jeans dan bagai-bagai. Gaya Hidup Moden Orang Asli kini banyak menikmati gaya hidup moden sama seperti kaum lain di Malaysia. Banyak perkampungan Orang Asli telah dibangunkan menjadi bandar. Contohnya kampung Orang Asli Bukit Lanjan yang terletak di Selangor telah dibangunkan menjadi bandar. Oleh yang demikian Orang Asli yang tinggal di situ telah dapat menikmati kehidupan moden sama seperti kaum lain di Malaysia. Kalau dilihat ke kawasan-kawasan kampung Orang Asli mesti semua orang di situ memiliki telefon bimbit. Kadang-kadang seorang individu di sana memiliki bukan sahaja satu tapi dua telefon bimbit. Telefon bimbit di lihat sebagai satu alat moden yang digemari dan selalu digunakan oleh Orang Asli. Orang Asli yang tinggal di kawasan perbandaran juga dapat menikmati kemudahan yang pelbagai, contohnya mereka dapat membeli belah di pasaraya besar, pendidikan yang lebih sempurna dan lain-lain lagi kemudahan. Manakala dari segi pakaian Orang Asli juga berubah mengikut zaman. Jikalau dahulu kala masyarakat Orang Asli cuma memakai baju daripada kulit kayu daun terap, tetapi kini cara pemakaian baju mereka berubah mengikut zaman. Contoh pakaian yang digemari oleh Orang Asli pada zaman sekarang ialah seluar jeans dan baju t-shirt. Gayak Uwang Asli Perayaan Orang Asli Walaupun dah hidup dalam era moden, uwang kitak nyap lupak dan nyap meninggalkan menyambut aik gak kitak sendidik. Contoh nyak sambuatan Jis Pai (bermaksud tahun bahauk dalam bahase Semai) deket Perak, Aik Gayak Muyang deket Pulau Carey dengan kawasan di Walaupun sudah hidup di dalam era yang serba moden, Orang Asli tidak melupakan dan tidak meninggalkan perayaan yang mereka warisi sejak turun temurun. Contoh perayaan Orang Asli adalah Jis Pai (yang bermaksud Tahun Baru dalam bahasa kaum Semai) di Perak dan juga 76 sekitar kampung uwang kitak deket Banting, Selangor. Sambutan Aik Gayak Muyang de buat padak setiap hujung tahun sebagai tandak timak kasih deket Muyang yang menjagak kitak dan bagih kitak hidup yang bibas daikpadak bencane dan jugak pe’ang. Aik Gayak Muyang jugak mengapatkan hubungan sesamak Uwang Asli kitak deket manak Uwang Asli kitak daikpadak kampung lain datang berkompol dalam satuk tempat agar didik dapat besamak megayakkan Aik Gayak Muyang. Pada masak Aik Gayak Muyang, kitak bagih makan deket Muyang kitak. Lepas tek penonton akan ditangingkan persembahan sewang iaituk tarian Uwang Asli kitak. Padak masak nin jugak penonton dapat makan-makan deket tempat makan yang di sediak kan. sambutan Hari Moyang di kampung-kampung Orang Asli sekitar Pulau Carey, Banting (suku Mah Meri) dan lain-lain tempat lagi. Sambutan Moyang diadakan oleh Orang Asli pada setiap penghujung tahun sebagai tanda berterima kasih kepada Moyang kerana telah melindungi mereka daripada bencana dan memberikan mereka hidup dengan selesa. Hari Moyang juga telah merapatkan hubungan sesama Orang Asli di mana mereka datang dari setiap kampung yang berbeza dan turut bersama meraikannya. Kebudayaan Asli Deket Duniak Luar Kebudayaan Orang Asli tersebar di dunia luar Kebudayaan Uwang Asli kitak bukan hajak di genung ulih kitak tapi kebudayaan kitak jugak dah de genung ulih uwang lua samaadak deket dalam atau lua nega’ak. Sebagainya contohnya ukiran patong Muyang ulih Uwang Asli kitak da’ik sukuk kaum Mah Meri dah diiktiraf ulih Unesco (Pertubuhan Pendidikan Saintifik dan Kebudayak’an Bangsak-Bangsak Besatuk). Ukiran patung Muyang ulih Uwang Asli kitak da’ik suku Mah Meri kampung Sungai Bumbun adak nilai senik yang ditinggik dan de minati ulih uwang luar terutamak nyak umputih. Selain tuk Uwang Asli kitak deket kampong Sungai Bumbun adak jugak buat ayaman daikpadak mengkuang. Contoh ayaman yang didik buat adaklah bujam, tika, alat perhiasan macam gelang, beg duit daikpadak mengkuang dan bagai-bagai lagik. Kebudayaan Orang Asli bukan sahaja ditatapi oleh masyarakat Malaysia tetapi ianya juga telah ditatap dan dihargai oleh masyarakat antarabangsa. Sebagai contohnya seni ukiran patung kayu yang diukir oleh Orang Asli dari suku kaum Mah Meri telah diiktiraf oleh Unesco (Pertubuhan Pendidikan Saintifik dan Kebudayaan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu). Seni ukiran patung Mah Meri dari kampung Orang Asli Sungai Bumbun di Pulau Carey amatlah diminati dan disukai oleh para pelancong asing. Selain daripada ukiran patung Muyang seni ayaman Orang Asli juga amat digemari oleh para pelancong asing. Contoh barangan ayaman Orang Asli adalah bujam (tempat isi sirih), tikar, perhiasan ayaman gelang tangan, beg duit mengkuang dan berbagai lagi barangan ayaman yang lain. Selain daripada ukiran patung dan ayaman, persembahan tarian sewang Orang Asli juga amat digemari oleh para pelancong asing. Tarian Sewang pada mulanya hanyalah digunakan oleh para dukun atau bomoh Orang Asli untuk mengubat pesakitnya tapi kini tar- Selain daikpadak ukiran patung Muyang dan ayaman. Uwang Asli kitak jugak di kenali ulih uwang luar dengan tarian unik uwang kitak iak ituk ‘Tarian Sewang’. Maen tuk tarian sewang 77 nin di gunak’kan untuk mengubat uwang sakit tapik kinin Tarian Sewang di tarikan untuk aikaik untuk menyambut Aik Gayak Muyang dan jugak untuk di tangingkan deket uwang lua teutamak nyak untuk de genung ulih pelancung asing. Tarian Sewang nin nyap lagik digunakan untuk tujuan perubatan, iaknyak lebih kepadak tujuan komersial. Tarian nin nenala di tarikan padak Aik Gayak Muyang padak setiap hujung tahun. Tempat utamak yang menarikan Tarian Sewang nin adaklah deket nuak Pulau Carey iak ituk deket kampung Sungai Bumbun. Tarian nin jugak ditarikan deket kampung uwang kitak Temuan deket nuak Banting dan jugak deket kawasan Perak semasak sambutan Jis Pai. Uwang lua samadak dalam atau lua negeik dalam genung kebudayaan kitak melalui ukiran kayuk, ayaman dan Tarian Sewang dan kebudayaan Uwang Asli kitak nyap hilang de telan ulih arus moden. Kesenian dan kebudayaan uwang kitak kenak te’us supayak anak cicit kitak isuk dapat mengekalkan tradisi uwang kitak. Selain untuk menangingkan kebudayaan kitak deket uwang lua, uwang kitak jugak bulih menambah pendapatan didik. ian ini tidak lagi digunakan untuk mengubat pesakit tetapi digunakan secara komersial di mana ianya kerap dipersembahkan kepada para pelancung asing. Kesan Gayak Hidup Moden Kesan Gaya Hidup Moden Kesan gaye hidup moden terdapat baik dan nyahat nyak. Kesan baik nyak adaklah Uwang Asli kitak dah bejaye besaing dengan bangsak lain deket Malaysia da’ik segi pelajaran, kejak bisnes dan lain-lain lagik. Semuhak kejayaan Uwang Asli nin dah membukak matak uwang lua. Didik pun nyap panang Uwang Asli kitak nin macam maeh tek lagik dah. Maen tek uwang lua ingat Uwang Asli kitak nin adaklah satuk kumpulan uwang yang tinggal deket dalam hutan dan be’kejak deket hujan hajak untuk mencayau makan. Tapik ginin Uwang Asli kitak yang berjaye telah membukai matak uwang lua supayak genung Uwang Asli kitak samak taraf dengan didik. Uwang kitak yang hidup deket jaman yang moden nin bulih berhubung sesamak sendiik melalui kemudahan internet. Nyap kiaklah samak adak lokasi Selain daripada dipersembahan kepada pelancong asing tarian ini juga dipersembahkan semasa menyambut Hari Moyang iaitu pada setiap penghujung tahun. Tarian ini kerap kali dipersembahkan di Pualu Carey di mana ianya adalah kawasan tempat tumpuan pelancong asing. Tarian ini juga selalu dipersambahakan pada hari Muyang di kampung Orang Asli kawasan Banting dan juga semasa sambutan Jis Pai (tahun baru) di Perak. Kebudayaan Orang Asli seperti ukiran patung muyang, ayaman dan tarian sewang adalah penting untuk ditonjolkan dan diamalkan oleh Orang Asli agar seni ini tidak hilang ditelan oleh zaman. Selain daripada untuk mengekalkan kebudayaan Orang Asli supaya tidak hilang di telan oleh zaman, ianya juga boleh digunakan untuk menjana sumber ekonomi Orang Asli itu sendiri. Kesan gaya hidup moden memberikan kebaikan dan keburukan kepada masyarakat Orang Asli. Kesan baik terhadap Orang Asli moden adalah Orang Asli sudah menikmati kehidupan yang sama seperti kaum lain di Malaysia dan telah berjaya dalam bidang pelajaran, perkerjaaan, perniagaan dan lain-lain bidang lagi. Semua kejayaan ini telah membuka mata orang luar dan sekaligus menangkis bahawa Orang Asli masih lagi hidup dalam kemunduran. Pada zaman yang serba moden ini Orang Asli boleh berhubungan sesama sendiri walaupun tinggal berjauhan dengan menggunakan kemudahan internet. Tidak kiralah walau di mana pun mereka berada, asalkan mereka ada sebuah komputer dan akses internet, mereka boleh berhubung pada bila-bila masa. Gaya hidup moden sudah berjaya menyatukan Orang Asli melalui dunia 78 kampung Uwang Asli kitak berjauhan antarak satuk samak yang lain pasal asalkan kitak adak komputer dan akses internet. Gaya hidup moden dah berjaye menghubungan uwang kitak yang tinggal bertaburan deket dalam semenanjung Malaysia. Kesan nyahat nyak pulak upacare Tarian Sewang yang duluk nyak di gunakan untuk perubatan dah lamak ditinggalkan ulih uwang kitak. Tarian Sewang padak jaman moden nin cumak di jadikkan sebagai satuk tarian komersial yang di persembahkan di tempat tertentu seperti di hotel, dewan-dewan dengan tujuan untuk cayau duit. Nyap macam untuhik maen yang menggunakan sewang untuk be’ubat uwang sakit. Padak jaman moden nin, umah kitak samak hajak dengan bangsak lain deket Malaysia. Maeh tuk untuhik gunakan daun bertam, nipah untuk buat umah tapi seka’aang uwang kitak dah gunakan papan atau batukbate untuk buat umah. Makak hilanglah identiti dalam seni membuat umah tradisi Uwang Asli kitak. Muju lah adak sesetengah Uwang Asli kitak yang nak jagak lagi tradisi umah uwang kitak dengan membuat umah pondok atap nipah deket sebelah umah didik sebagai pangkin tempat rehat masak pepetang. Kesimpulan nyak walaupun uwang kitak dah hidup dengan moden pahaulah kitak lupakan asal usul kitak nin tai. siber. Keburukan kemodenan terhadap Orang Asli adalah Orang Asli jarang menggunakan perubatan tradisional mereka lagi. Upacara tarian sewang pula bukan lagi satu kaedah untuk perubatan tetapi cuma dijadikan tarian komersial di hotel, dewan-dewan untuk tatapan para pelancong. Ini tidak sama sekali dengan tarian sewang diamalkan oleh masyrakat Orang Asli pada masa dahulu untuk tujuan perubatan. Pada zaman moden ini juga rumah Orang Asli kelihatan sama seperti rumah kaum lain di Malaysia. Dahulunya rumah Orang Asli diperbuat daripada daun bertam, nipah dan buluh mempunyai ciri-ciri dan identiti Orang Asli. Bila rumah Orang Asli sama seperti kaum lain di Malaysia, hilanglah seni dan identiti rumah Orang Asli. Mujurlah ada segelintir Orang Asli yang mahu mengekalkan tradisi Orang Asli membina tempat rehat yang bercirikan rumah Orang Asli dahulukala. Kesimpulannya walaupun hidup di zaman yang serba moden ini Orang Asli tidak seharusnya melupakan jati diri mereka sendiri. 79 A MONGST THE EXILES: REFLECTIONS OF A REFUGEE LAWYER Sumitra Visvanathan Ah, well I know how exiles feed on hopes of their return. - Aeschylus from Agamemnon I have spent the better part of the last two decades obsessed with protecting people in forced exile. Over the years I have talked to scores of people about what was going on in their country, what created despair and fed fears for their safety, and what turned them to living in a state of exile, fearful and unable, on account of that fear, to return home. People seeking a more secure future, having been driven from their homes because of war and persecution have a special, protected place in international law. They are considered refugees. Nations of the world, acting singly and in concert since the end of the last world war, have created international, regional and domestic legal regimes to ensure and enforce protection for refugees. I, myself, have a small role in this regime of refugee protection. Through this, I visit refugee worlds. I have worked with refugees for the better part of the last two decades. Vast numbers of refugees have told me intimate details about their lives. Refugees speak not just of their reasons for leaving their homelands, but most volubly of the immense void engendered by the deprivation of home. The anguish of loss is made immediate by the profound and persistent sense of physical and emotional insecurity that is the hallmark of forced displacement. The refugee’s story has always been the sharpest statement of loss. It simply isn’t possible to fully appreciate the sharp edge of this loss without personal experience, try as one might. 80 The refugee experience of exile is an unfinished circle, closed and completed only when safe and dignified return to the abandoned homeland becomes possible. I remember a man who spent his middle age and old age avoiding a war that was fought in his country for more than 30 years in pursuit of a political ideal.1 He spent years in a state of displacement within his own country, fleeing as the country fractured and fragmented into two barely stable parts. The war eventually morphed into an unjust peace where, post-conflict, people of his political opinion were pursued and persecuted. The conflict spilled into the first country where he fled to seek asylum. A savage genocidal regime then rose up there, killing every member of his family. He survived and sought asylum in another neighbouring country, even as the first asylum country sank into a state of disintegration and degradation. I met with him in a refugee camp and recorded his statement. “I need protection from you now but I will go home when they leave”, he said, “My home is there”. He was about 80 years old at the time, with a raft of experiences that no human should experience. He was exiled and living in a state of continuing insecurity. Yet, he still retained the will to close the circle. Yes, refugees would go home, if they could. Return was not possible for him. He was resettled in yet another country. I can but imagine the void left by the permanent loss of his homeland for this brave and dignified man. When the regaining of the homeland is denied, people and places that recall the events of the refugee’s history can fade into the dim corners of recollection. Yet, I have seen how the denial of home strengthens the will to survive, and how memory can sometimes be better blotted out. Traumatic memories flow from the experience of persecution. In that same refugee camp lived a man who was detained for 16 years in a succession of re-education camps in his country, ostensibly to encourage him towards abandoning his political beliefs. He harbored persistent memories of inhumanity. He spoke of an incident where he was taken out of his cell into the courtyard of the re-education camp and made to kneel. A camp official placed a gun at the back of his neck and pulled the trigger. There was a click – the gun was not loaded. He collapsed from shock and the watching officials laughed. He also told of an unsuccessful group attempt to escape from the camp. “They shot a few people on the spot. The rest of us had to dig holes about 7 feet wide and as deep. They tied us up and made us jump in and covered the hole. I don’t know how long I spent in this hole but when they uncovered us, I was the only one still alive.” A quiet, self-possessed man, he would speak with great pride of his ability to retain control of his own mind, throughout the experience of the brutal excesses of his government and from the persistent memories of such overwhelmingly atrocious harm. While living as a refugee in the camp, he worked as a volunteer, providing counselling for other survivors of trauma. There is much to learn from the refugee experience of exile. Another man in that camp, an elderly former soldier, had sage advice for a young refugee worker. “Be careful of what possessions you think you need”, he said. “You do not need what you cannot carry on your own back.” He lived his life in a state of constant readiness, first to fight battles in the war and then to flee harm when that war was lost. Being aware of the fragility of “home”, he feared it. His statement so impacted me that it took me another decade before I could settle into creating a home for myself. Even now, looking around the many possessions I have accumulated in my own home, I am able to recognize that there is very little I truly need. This man was spare of frame, wiry and spry. He ran a few kilometers through the refugee camp each morning to keep fit. In readiness for what other trials that 1 ue to strict confidentiality clauses, the author is unable to specify the names of any countries or individuals. It is hoped that the reader D will be able to use a mix of educated guess-work and knowledge of regional and global affairs to guess the likely countries in question [Editor’s Note]. 81 were yet to come, perhaps. He was also resettled. I remember that he shed unexpected tears at the pier when embarking on the long journey to yet another country. This was close to 20 years ago. The geographical, numeric and temporal dimensions of the refugee situation are astonishingly large. Having spent many years working to protect refugees, I am appalled by the elusiveness of a peaceful global society that will turn away from separating people and communities through the illusory devices of borders, nationalities, ethnicity, religions and ideologies. Testimonies of forced exile are about exclusion in the face of the human need to belong – a break in a circle that should be whole. Recently, I spent time in an immigration detention center in a country where many refugees are detained. A very young refugee boy there helped me feed a kitten. The kitten is a baby, he told me, and we need to treat him carefully. Detained simply for crossing the border without official permission, the child was seemingly oblivious to his own need for careful treatment. I had earlier interviewed his mother. She told me something which made me put my pen down and gaze at her with dismay. “What makes you think you are better than me?” she asked. “How is it that you can come here from your own country without any problems? Why am I stopped from moving to another country, when I have a greater need?” Why, indeed. Some nations talk about “pull-factors”, that people leave their countries in order to seek “better lives” in those countries offering a hope of resettlement for refugees. The position argued is that these people would not otherwise leave their countries and seek protection as refugees, absent the promise of resettlement in a Western nation. Discourses on refugee pull-factors should pay equal attention to push-factors. The child’s mother described being caught in a web of internal armed conflict and displacement in her country – constantly on the move with her two children, avoiding indiscriminate shelling and arbitrary killing, hunger and sickness. She spoke of surviving phosphorus bombs, a weapon that is not banned but which harms civilians in prohibited ways.2 She spoke of witnessing family members die in camps for internally displaced people, unprotected from fighting between the non-state armed group and the state’s armed forces. She went on to describe the fear and insecurity of subsequently living in an internment camp in her country, where civilians are mysteriously disappeared in the night because they share a common ethnicity with the armed group that was waging war with the state. Then, midway in her testimony came a clear memory of savagery. She wept as she described passing a military checkpoint, then rounding a corner and coming across a large roadside mound of dead male bodies rotting in the sun. Unarmed men killed on suspicion of being fleeing fighters – a heinous human rights violation and a war crime. Given what is known about the perpetration of such wartime criminal acts, these bodies would probably have later been burnt to hide evidence of the crimes. The only remaining evidence is in one woman’s persistent memory, captured within her refugee testimony. “Acts of injustice done, between the setting and the rising sun, in history lie like bones, each one” – a quote from W.H. Auden. Her refugee flight to safety from her country not only protects her and her children from harm, it carries the weight of a memory of an atrocious act of injustice that could potentially hold war criminals to account. 2 hite phosphorous was reportedly used during the U.S. assault on Falluja, Iraq (2004) and by Israeli forces in the Gaza War (2008W 2009). It produces serious to fatal chemical burns, though the U.S. military claims it is primarily used a form of flare or smokescreen. 82 In the war refugee’s experience, evil is beyond banal. It is a dangerous fact of an unsafe life. Especially for war refugees, the search for safety beyond national borders is often the only means to preserve life. Nations consumed with fears of “pulling” such refugees to their shores should take the time to study refugee testimonies. There resides the push factor, outweighing any and all other considerations. Yet, even with the still-fresh trauma of experiencing war in her country, this young mother spoke of her wish for her children to access education in the asylum country, so that they will grow up to be successful people when they return home. There, again, is the will to close the circle of exile. I have often felt that the condition of being in forced exile carries a particular form of hardship for political activists. Yet another clear memory I harbour is of a lawyer, seeking asylum due to his membership of a political movement, which was marginalised and prohibited by his government. He had written an articulate and compelling account of his need for refugee protection, which included a suggested time-frame for his refugee protection needs. He believed that he only needed shelter from his country for a few months, until his profile was relegated to being beneath the notice of the internal security authorities in his country. This man would often turn up simply to talk about his country and his political struggle. He would come to visit bearing literature – treatises, books and pamphlets on the political situation in his country. Even in exile, he could not stop advocating for political change, even to a clearly disinterested audience. He returned home before his self-imposed time-frame was up. The pull to end the exile and effect political change in his country was too strong. I think often of his fervour and hope he is safe. Sometimes, the will to end exile is so powerful that return occurs even when conditions are precarious and cannot safely support such a return. I am reminded of too many years of speaking with too many refugees from a certain Southwest Asian country, which continues to be a marginally failed state to this day. These refugees would traipse across barren, wintry wastelands to seek protection in neighbouring asylum countries that were barely tolerant of their presence there as refugees. I remember one family of five who encountered equally precipitous lives in the asylum country on account of their religion. They subsequently embarked on a search for more meaningful refugee protection that involved an epic, circuitous journey by train across an entire continent, only to end up, at the end of that long trek, in a bustling, modern Asian metropolis by the sea. “I never knew the world is so large and so kind”, the father told me. He had wanted to get as far away as possible from his own country, but to remain in Asia. So he studied the atlas and bought train tickets. Unsure of exactly where they were or what to do, the father led his family to a police station to ask for help. The policemen and women at the station were amazed at the journey undertaken, the nationality of the refugees, and the story they recounted, giving them hot meals, fresh clothes and the contacts for organisations that could assist them. This family spent many years in that metropolis, and eventually returned home, partly in hope that the peace that had been wrought by the warring factions there would hold. That hope was not borne out by later events. I often think of this family and know with utter certainty that they have now resumed living refugee lives, somewhere in the world. I remember this family most poignantly on account of their young son, who, in his own refugee testimony, declared his fervent wish for his countrymen to be “stylish like the Italians”, much to the merriment of my colleagues. We bought him a pair of shoes, made in Italy. That brutalised country has experienced numerous, successive periods of significant population movements within and outside it, rooted in internal strife, armed conflict and deteriorating physical security for civilians. These mass displacements have routinely been followed by so-called “asylum- 83 country fatigue”, juxtaposed with international efforts at conflict-resolution and peace-building, resulting in facilitation of refugee and displaced person returns and reintegration. Often, borders with neighbouring countries were closed and deportation exercises carried out even when return to the country of origin continued to be unsafe due to on-going armed conflict and consequent risk of harm to civilians. All too often, those returns have been voluntary. The yearning for home was too strong to resist. Testament to the enduring nature of that refugee outflow, I recently spoke with yet another refugee from that country, who had been detained and then released by the asylum country. He had been detained for crossing the border without official documentation. The trauma from experiencing long-term armed conflict was vividly reflected in his words and actions. He described being a witness to an incident of suicide bombing. Midway through his testimony, he stopped and looked down at the front of his shirt. There was a silence of a few moments. Then he looked up at me and said, “I can still see the blood on my shirt.” This man’s trauma had been further compounded by his arrest and detention in the asylum country, owing to the fact that he had been smuggled into that country as part of his refugee journey to yet another country, further eastward, which many refugees perceive as the safest haven. Recent refugee movements and regional responses to those movements have placed a spotlight on the phenomenon of people smuggling. Refugee workers are well aware that all too often, refugees are compelled to cross borders illegally, and such crossings are facilitated by people smugglers. Frequently, the smuggling of the refugee is accompanied with gross human rights abuses, including forced labour and sexual abuse. The illegality of this activity overshadows the keenly apparent international protection needs of the smuggled refugees. Refugees are thus detained for crossing borders illegally in the company of people smugglers. International law prohibits the detention of refugees for illegal entry and stay. It especially prohibits the deportation of refugees, which amounts to returning the refugee to the frontiers of the country of persecution. All nations are bound by this principle, regardless of whether the nation is a state party to the 1951 Refugee Convention.3 In the face of this, refugees continue to be detained and made vulnerable to forced return to their countries. How a State treats its citizens is a legitimate concern of international law. Equally relevant is how it treats non-citizens on its territory. International refugee law aims to protect those non-citizens who are refugees – unable or unwilling to return home owing to a well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group and political opinion. Refugee protection steps in when the citizen-state relationship fractures from the impact of the inevitable conflict that arises when the citizen harnesses the right to assert her religious, cultural and political identity, in the face of the state’s intolerance and disrespect for that right. Yet, even as they flee in search of meaningful protection, people caught in a situation of forced exile for refugee reasons can sometimes find equally harsh lives in asylum countries. 3 Three quarters of the world’s states have signed the 1951 Refugee Convention and its Protocol. The Convention’s principle of nonrefoulement, of not forcibly returning refugees to places where their lives or freedoms could be threatened, has the force of customary international law owing to its presence in a vast number of international treaties. It has also been adopted as a principle by Southeast Nations in 1975 under the Bangkok Principles, and is further enshrined in Article 14 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights [Editor’s Note]. 84 Perhaps the most compelling memory I have of this is the experience of a woman whom I will call Khatijah. She was a refugee, arrested along with her young daughter for illegal stay in the asylum country. She faced long-term detention in an immigration facility well known for its harsh conditions. Khatijah managed to bribe her way out of detention, a process which involved her transportation by bus to the border with another country, where she was to be handed over to a people smuggler. That people smuggler would then demand a fee, or forced labour in lieu of such a fee, to facilitate her re-entry to the initial asylum country, where she would continue residing illegally as a refugee. Officials of both countries are known to be complicit in such buying and selling of humans, a modern form of slavery to which refugees living in undocumented situations are particularly vulnerable. During this process of being bused over the border, Khatijah lost track of her daughter. She had been placed in a different vehicle. Frantic, she demanded to be allowed to search for her daughter. The people smuggler threatened to shoot her if she refused to disembark from the bus. She was taken to an orchard, where she had to provide unpaid labour tending fruit trees. Khatijah escaped. She spent the next six months travelling around the country, mostly on foot, making contact with refugee communities there, in search of her daughter. She finally tracked down the child in the northern reaches of the country. Re-united, they then trekked back southwards and re-entered the initial asylum country, where she recounted her experience to refugee workers. Khatijah’s horrifying trek in search of her daughter is evocative of the tales of persecution from the last world war. One can and should ask if this points to a failure of the international refugee protection regime put in place since that time, despite it being constantly re-affirmed by the community of nations. The right to seek and enjoy, in other countries, asylum from persecution is one of the cornerstones of the international human rights regime. It is right there, in that grand old lady of human rights standards, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1946. The granting of asylum is a friendly and non-political act, so closely entwined with, and giving meaning to, the fundamentals of a civilized state. Why, then, are stories like Khatijah’s rife? Regard how a community treats people in need, and you will have placed your finger directly on the major artery that travels all the way to the heart of the community. Many nations who have no domestic legal regime for protecting refugees often find themselves taking on the de facto role of asylum countries. They speak of the sacrifices that asylum countries make on behalf of refugees tolerated within their borders. They point to the fact that some of the poorest nations are also host to the world’s largest refugee populations. These views frequently fail to take into account that all too often, refugees provide for their own care and succor, without the need for nations to dip into their own coffers. Refugees need to work to support themselves and their families and so end up providing much-needed labour in the notorious 3-D category of employment which citizens are often loath to take on – dirty, dull and dangerous jobs. In countries where organisations like the United Nations’ Refugee Agency have a presence, there is impetus for the international burden sharing of the refugee issue. This translates into internationally-funded programmes for the care and maintenance of refugees within the host country, including resettlement to donor countries. My document case was often filled with refugee stories similar to Khatijah’s. When you think of it, it seems there can be no end to the anguish of exile for refugees, caught in a cycle of repeating hardship and strife, even in countries of asylum. The additional difficulty for Khatijah was that she had no home to go home to, even if she wished to go home. In addition to having been persecuted 85 in her own country on account of her race and religion, she was stripped of her nationality. This was done by the government of the country in which she was born, again for reasons of race and religion. Khatijah existed squarely within that most marginalised of human communities – the stateless refugee. As a young refugee worker, I was confronted with the case of a man, born in the same country as Khatijah, and in the same situation of statelessness. The government of his country had passed legislation that stripped him of his nationality. Hardship naturally follows the deprivation of nationality. This man’s life was hard, for many reasons, including on account of serious discrimination due to his race and religion. Principal of his woes, according to him, was that this statelessness made it impossible for him to earn a living in his country. He left his country and moved across the border to work. Here, he engaged in work as a street trader. He was frequently arrested for his illegal status. He then decided to stowaway on a boat, taking his chances as to where he would eventually end up. He disembarked in a port city that was extremely intolerant of refugees. He was detained. Many months passed and the immigration authorities had no option but to release him into the community, as all attempts to deport him back home failed. His country of birth had refused to acknowledge him as a citizen. I remember his constant lament: “I don’t want charity, please let me work to earn my own money.” The laws of the country of asylum, however, penalized people who worked illegally, including harsh penalties for their employers. No one would employ him, even informally. A few years later, I returned to that country. To my dismay, I found that he was still around and making the same lament. When I left again, strident attempts were being made to find him a durable solution. I returned again after a lapse of a few years. He was still there, and still without a solution. He continued to be hopeful that he would find a job. It was the one sustaining hope for this man. I have heard recently that he had been resettled to a Western country. He should now be able to work in exile. But as I sieve through my memories, I am reminded that the refugee experience of exile is not entirely about irretrievable loss. I remember, also, many gainful successes. I remember a very large caseload of refugees, bearing blood curdling stories of military torture and degrading treatment. These refugees have all returned home, the internal armed conflict resolved into a lasting peace that was made imperative by a cataclysmic natural disaster. I remember recently arrived refugees, crossing borders in large numbers, fearfully huddling in reception centers, but who were provided shelter and protection until it was safe to return home. I remember refugees stranded and in limbo at international airports, successfully protected from deportation. I also remember receiving letters from resettled or returned refugees, speaking of much hope for future happiness. Mostly, I am compelled by stories of child refugees, resettling in other countries, and then returning to homelands as adults to rebuild countries shattered and recovering from wars and other forms of strife. These are good stories, which close the circle with a satisfying snap. People are often surprised to learn that there are refugees in Malaysia. As a nation, we have hosted refugee communities for decades, usually with the Malaysian government acting to enable the work locally of international organizations with humanitarian mandates like the United Nation’s Refugee Agency. The list of nationalities given shelter within Malaysian borders over the past four decades is impressive and mirrors armed conflicts that occurred globally in that period – principally Vietnamese, Cambodians, Bosnians, Burmese, Iraqis, Afghans, Sri Lankans. 86 Our own country has been buffeted and buttressed by centuries of migration. Migration continues. Energy is created by new migration weaving its way through settled human communities. The infusion of new identities and new cultures jolts a settled community out of stagnation. Within this larger canvas is one of the greatest contemporary dramas of migration – when persecution experienced or apprehended sentences a person to uproot and leave their homeland. Refugee exile. For refugees, migration is forced. Refugees are people who have lost their lands, homes, futures and identities in the search for safety and protection. The pain of loss is countered by a fixed purpose to rebuild lives across borders. Civilised nations, respectful of international norms and standards, give shelter to refugees in recognition of a responsibility to protect this purpose. This forces the simple question: do we aspire to be such a nation? As you read of the refugee experience, you will feel some of the deep and piercing loss that every refugee carries. Are you momentarily sympathetic and then feel nothing more and so do nothing? Will you insist that, as a bare minimum, our nation should adopt our own legal regime for the recognition, documentation and protection of refugees within our borders? There is the choice of compassion or callousness. The humanitarian imperative is for making the right choice of compassion. It is the basic measure of a civilised society. A fear of returning home colours the refugee’s story with desperation, and, almost paradoxically, with despair from the loss of that home. At the end of the day spent recording refugee statements, I would be holed up in offices, refugee camp staff barracks, in hotels rooms, in my own study at home, writing up and evaluating these experiences. My role is to filter out non-refugees from the refugee population. Not an easy task. In my time, I have created thousands of files on these individual cases, each file crowded with stories and the legal assessment of those stories. Within the sphere of my own comfortable middle-class existence, I evaluate these experiences and their relevance to refugee protection needs. My obsession to protect has had impact on many lives, but on the larger global scale of refugee needs, amounts to the merest fraction of a sliver of the slightest impact. The lasting impact on myself is the persistent memory of refugee experiences, impossible to forget. Words and images from my brief visits to refugee worlds are the many little pieces of memory which I carry everywhere, and which colour my own life and choices. Now, there is the need to mine these memories and speak of refugee experiences, albeit second-hand, to contribute a little to the understanding of refugees and their forced state of exile. There is no greater sorrow on earth than the loss of one’s native land, as Euripedes wrote more than two millennia ago. If I have helped you understand a bit of what this means, my job is well-done. 87 Coping with Disasters: Refugees and Displaced Persons in South-East Asia A young Vietnamese refugee resting at the Pulan Bidong refugee camp in Malaysia. This camp has about 36,000 Vietnamese refugees. 01 August 1979 Malaysia Photo # 84451 UN Photo/* Korean Refugees An endless column of refugees cross the provisional bridge over the Han River built beside the damaged span of the bridge. 01 December 1950 Republic of Korea Photo # 103323 UN Photo/* Children Play at Sosmaqala IDP Camp in Afghanistan Children play in the newly established Sosmaqala Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) Camp in northern Afghanistan. The camp is comprised of recently returned Afghans following many years as refugees in neighbouring Iran. 30 August 2009 Sar-e-Pul, Afghanistan Photo # 407796 UN Photo/Eric Kanalstein 88 Somalis Displaced to Refugee Camp in Yemen A Somali child, displaced by fighting in capital Mogadishu, now lives in Kharaz Refugee Camp, 140 km outside Yemeni city Aden. 07 December 2009 Yemen Photo # 440809 UN Photo/Philip Behan 89 Bios Yin Shao Loong is an environmental policy advisor and political scientist. He writes occasionally on arts, culture, and the finer points of sci-fi geekery in the online portal ARTERI [www. arterimalaysia.com] and was a contributor to the much-missed current affairs magazine Off the Edge. A long-time human rights and environment activist, he is also a board member of Amnesty International, Malaysia. His research has focused on how the combination of counterinsurgency institutions, ethnic prejudices, and development ambitions keeps certain minorities and migrants disadvantaged and stigmatised in Malaysia. Wong Chin Huat is a political scientist by training from University of Essex UK, a journalism lecturer by trade at Monash University Sunway Campus and a fashion trendsetter by accident thanks to the Perak Constitutional Coup. He sees Malaysia as an electoral one-party state that needs a second independence to end the internal colonisation by UMNO. In 1999, he coined the line “People are the boss” as a reply to arrogant politicians who demanded gratitude of the citizens. Since 2009, his favourite pastime is theorizing and experimenting ways of creative protests that needs no police permit yet are perfectly legal. Simon Soon is an independent curator and researcher on contemporary art in Southeast Asia. Clarissa Lee is a graduate student at a Southeastern university of the U.S. working in the fields of science studies, feminist theory and comparative media. During her free time (which does not quite exist except when she is asleep, talking, attending soirees or exercising), she tries to pretend that she’s not a graduate student, but just a normal person (though this is rather hard to do, when she is documented as a non-resident alien on a student visa for tax purposes). She blogs at scandaloudthoughts.wordpress.com. Mor Ajani is a writer, comic book artist, and graphic designer. He works towards preserving Orang Asli customs and folk stories through videos and written works. Sumitra Visvanathan worked for the United Nations’ Refugee Agency (UNHCR) for a total of 14 years. She is an experienced practitioner in International Refugee Law, and has conducted work in a multitude of UNHCR missions and refugee camps across the region, most notably in Indonesia, the Hong Kong SAR and in Malaysia, where she served as the senior National Officer between 2003 and 2009. She currently retains a consultative role for UNHCR within the SE Asian region. NEW MALAYSIAN ESSAYS 3 breaks from the norm by being released only as a free e-book! Take notes while Wong Chin Huat teaches you how to become a good demonstrator; take in the conflicted sweep of post-1969 cultural policy with Simon Soon; take a tour of the non-heterosexist nation that Clarissa Lee imagines from Merdeka to the present; and take stock of the situation of Peninsular Malaysia’s indigenous people with Mor Ajani. We end with Sumitra Visvanathan inviting us to take refugees into our definition of what ‘Malaysia, Truly Asia’ could possibly be.