Aegon Saecure 14 NHG
Transcription
Aegon Saecure 14 NHG
SAECURE 14 NHG An Update on the Residential Mortgage Business March 2014 Information for investors Disclaimer This material has been prepared solely on the basis of information provided by Aegon Levensverzekering N.V. (“Aegon Leven”) and Aegon Hypotheken B.V. (“Aegon Hypotheken”, and together with Aegon Leven, “Aegon” or the “Company”). This material is distributed upon the express understanding that no information contained herein has been independently verified by Citibank International plc as arranger (the “Arranger”), ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Bank of America Merrill Lynch, BNP Paribas, London Branch, Citibank International plc and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, the joint lead managers in respect of the Class A Notes, together and with the Arranger, the “Managers” or any other person. Although the information in this material has been obtained from/of sources which the Company and the Managers believe to be reliable, the Managers and the Company make no representation or warranty (express or implied) of any nature, nor do they accept any responsibility or liability of any kind, with respect to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information or opinions in the material. However this shall not restrict, exclude, or limit any duty or liability to any person under any applicable laws or regulations of any jurisdiction which may not lawfully be disclaimed. The Company and the Managers will not be responsible for the consequences of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein or for any omission. This material has been prepared for information purposes only and it does not constitute a prospectus or offering document in whole or in part. The terms of the offering are qualified in their entirety by such a prospectus (the “Prospectus”) which will be issued in respect of the securities (the “Securities”) described in this material and which is expected to be approved by the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (the “AFM”) on or prior to the issuance date of the Securities. The information contained in this material does not constitute an offer of securities to the public for the purposes of any law or regulation implementing Directive 2003/71/EC and any amendment thereto, including Directive 2010/73/EU (together, the “Prospectus Directive”), to the extent implemented in each Member State of the European Economic Area ("Member State") that has implemented the Prospectus Directive. The information contained herein is confidential and is intended for use only by the intended recipient(s) (each a “Recipient”). This material is not intended for U.S investors. Neither this material nor any copy of it may be taken or transmitted into the United States of America, its territories or possessions (collectively, the “United States”) directly or indirectly. Any failure to comply with these restrictions may constitute a violation of U.S. or other securities laws, as applicable. This material and all information contained herein is being provided to you solely for your review during a road show presentation. This material is provided on the basis of your acceptance of the terms of this disclaimer. This material was prepared in order to indicate, on a preliminary basis, the feasibility of a possible transaction and does not carry any right of publication or disclosure to any other person. Neither this material nor any of its contents may be used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of SAECURE 14, the Company and the Managers. If this material has been made available to you in an electronic form, you are reminded that documents transmitted via this medium may be altered or changed during the process of electronic transmission and consequently neither SAECURE 14 NHG B.V. ("SAECURE 14"), the Company, the Managers nor any subsidiaries, affiliates or ultimate holding companies, nor any of the subsidiaries or affiliates of such holding companies, nor any of the respective directors, officers, employees, advisors, representatives or agents of any of the foregoing (together, “Related Parties”) accepts any liability or responsibility whatsoever in respect of any difference between the document distributed to you in electronic format and the hard copy version available to you on request from any of the Managers. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO ANY U.S. PERSON (AS DEFINED BELOW) OR TO ANY PERSON OR ADDRESS IN THE US The Securities have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or with any securities regulatory authority of any state or other jurisdiction of the United States and may not be offered, sold or delivered, directly or indirectly, in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. Persons (as defined in Regulation S under the Securities Act, "U.S. Person"). This material is being distributed only to, and is directed only (i) at persons in Member States who are "qualified investors" within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive and (ii) in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the UK), at qualified investors (a) who have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the "Order") and qualified investors falling within Article 49 of the Order, and (b) to whom this material may otherwise be lawfully communicated . This document must not be acted on or relied on by, nor are the Securities herein referred to available to any other persons. This material is not available to any persons who are subject to US securities laws and it should not be distributed in the US or to any U.S. person nor in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited. By reviewing this material each Recipient represents that it is a person into whose possession the material can be lawfully delivered in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction in which the Recipient is located and that the Recipient may not, nor is it authorised to, deliver this document to any other person. The proposed structure and facilities described in this material are indicative, are meant to develop over time, and are subject to, amongst others, final approval of SAECURE 14 and the Company, satisfactory documentation and relevant contracts, satisfactory legal, tax and accountancy opinions, satisfactory valuation of the underlying assets and due diligence. Material information may have changed since the date the information was compiled in this material. Any historical information is not indicative of future performance. Opinions and estimates may be changed without notice and involve a number of assumptions which may not prove valid. Average lives of and potential yields on any securities cannot be predicted as the actual rate of repayment as well as other relevant factors cannot be determined precisely. No assurance can be or is given that the assumptions on which such information are made will prove correct. Information of this kind must be viewed with caution. 2 Disclaimer This material contains “forward-looking statements”. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance of the Securities, the Company or the Dutch residential mortgage loan industry to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions regarding the Company's present and future business strategies and the environment in which the Company will operate in the future. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. None of SAECURE 14, the Company, the Managers nor their Related Parties have attempted to verify any such statements, nor do they make any representations, express or implied, with respect thereto, nor do they accept any obligation to update the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions, or changes in factors affecting these statements. This material is published solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell the Securities or any other securities or any interest in any securities, and nothing herein should be construed as a recommendation or advice to invest in any securities. It has no regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any Recipient. No representation or warranty, either express or implied or undertaking of any nature, is provided by the Managers, SAECURE 14 or the Company in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained herein. It should not be regarded by Recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgement. Any opinions expressed in this material are subject to change without notice and none of SAECURE 14, the Company, nor the Managers are under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. In addition, institutions mentioned in this material and their Related Parties may make purchases and/or sales as principal or agent or may act as market maker or provide investment banking or other services in respect of the Securities and/or the transactions described in this material (the "Transactions"). None of SAECURE 14, the Company, the Managers nor their respective Related Parties are acting as advisers to, nor owe any fiduciary duty to any Recipient. This material does not purport to identify all of the risks associated with the Transaction(s). None of SAECURE 14, the Company, the Managers nor any of their respective Related Parties makes any representation regarding the provision of advice to any Recipient concerning the appropriate legal treatment, regulatory treatment, accounting treatment or possible tax consequences of an investment in the Securities. Each Recipient of this material should make its own independent evaluation of the Transaction(s) and the risks thereof, and of the relevance and adequacy of the information in this material and should make other investigations as it deems necessary, and consult its own legal, regulatory, tax, business, investment, financial and accounting advisers to the extent that you deem it necessary, and make your own investment, hedging and trading decisions (including decisions regarding the suitability of the Securities) based upon your own judgement and advice from such advisers as you deem necessary and not upon any view expressed in this material. In particular, each Recipient should first read the Prospectus prior to making an investment decision and should base such investment decision solely upon the information contained in the Prospectus. Once approved by the AFM, the Prospectus will be available from the Managers. Reproduction and/or redistribution of this material (in whole or in part) is strictly prohibited and none of SAECURE 14, the Company, the Managers nor their respective Related Parties accept any liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE CIRCULAR 230, PERSONS ARE HEREBY INFORMED THAT ANY DESCRIPTION SET FORTH HEREIN WITH RESPECT TO U.S. FEDERAL TAX ISSUES WAS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE USED, AND SUCH DESCRIPTION CANNOT BE USED BY ANY TAXPAYER FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING ANY PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON THE TAXPAYER UNDER THE U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE CODE. ANY SUCH DESCRIPTION WAS WRITTEN TO SUPPORT THE PROMOTION OR MARKETING OF THE CLASS A NOTES. TAXPAYERS SHOULD SEEK ADVICE BASED ON THE TAXPAYER’S PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES FROM AN INDEPENDENT TAX ADVISOR. Unless otherwise expressly indicated thereon, this material has not been reviewed or approved by any rating agencies or by any regulatory agency. 3 Content 4 Executive Summary Transaction Overview Page 5 8 The Dutch Economy and Housing Market 14 The Dutch Residential Mortgage Market 20 The Dutch RMBS Market in Perspective 35 Aegon‟s Residential Mortgage Loan Origination, Underwriting & Servicing 46 Aegon Highlights 60 Appendix: Portfolio Stratification Tables 64 Appendix: Priority of Payments 86 Executive summary 5 Highlights of SAECURE 14 NHG Aegon is pleased to announce the proposed issuance of securities by SAECURE 14 NHG B.V. as Issuer The intention is to offer notes under the SAECURE 14 NHG transaction which will comprise notes denominated in EUR SAECURE 14 NHG The issue is collateralised by prime Dutch residential mortgage loans originated and serviced by Aegon Levensverzekering and Aegon Hypotheken, which are 100% indirect subsidiaries of Aegon N.V. (“Aegon NV”) Historical performance of Aegon's total residential mortgage loan portfolio has been stable over the last ten years Aegon is one of the top 5 lenders in the Dutch residential mortgage market Aegon NV is an international life insurance, pension and asset management company based in The Hague, the Netherlands, with businesses in over twenty markets in the Americas, Europe and Asia As of the cut-off date 31st December 2013, the portfolio outstanding net principal balance was approximately EUR 1,502 million, WA Loan to Market Value of approximately 95.1 % and WA Seasoning of 2.54 years Prime quality collateral The static portfolio consists of first and sequentially lower ranking secured, owner occupied, Dutch prime residential mortgage loans with a broad geographical diversification The portfolio predominantly consists of fixed rate mortgage loans with long reset periods of typically 10 – 20 years exclusively originated by Aegon Leven and Aegon Hypotheken “Full doc”1 underwriting in line with the Dutch Code of Conduct with respect to the granting of mortgage loans with a focus on affordability 100% of the portfolio relates to mortgage loans that have the benefit of the NHG guarantee 1Full 6 document underwriting is underwriting based on all necessary and verified documentation in accordance with Aegon’s underwriting processes and procedures. All documentation is recorded Preliminary capital structure and transaction features Proposed Note Structure Series Note Size1 Fitch / S&P WAL2 FORD Class A1 EUR 22.8 % [AAAsf / AAA(sf)] [2.0]yrs 30th Jan 2019 3m Euribor+ []bps 3m Euribor+ []bps [10]% Offered Class A2 EUR 68.2% [AAAsf / AAA(sf)] [4.9]yrs 30th Jan 2019 3m Euribor+ []bps 3m Euribor+ []bps [10]% Offered Class B EUR 4.0% [NR / NR] NA 30th Jan 2019 3m Euribor 3m Euribor [6]% Retained [NR / NR] NA 30th 3m Euribor 3m Euribor [1]% Retained [NR / NR] NA 0% 0% [0]% Retained Class C EUR 5.0% Total EUR 100% Class D EUR 1% Coupon until FORD Coupon after FORD Jan 2019 NA Main Features of the Class A1 / A2 Notes 4 3 Status Transaction Parties Application will be made to list the Class A Notes on NYSE Euronext in Amsterdam (Euronext Amsterdam). The other Classes of Notes will not be listed Arranger: Citibank International plc The First Notes Payment Date (“NPD”) is on 30 April 20144 and the Final Maturity Date is on 30 January 20924 Managers and Bookrunners: The First Optional Redemption Date (“FORD”) is on 30 January 20194; if the Class A1/A2 Notes are not redeemed on the FORD then the margin will double ABN AMRO, BNP Paribas, BoAML, Citibank International plc, RBS Cash Advance Facility Provider: Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten (AA+/Aaa/AAA) (S/M/F) Issuer Account Bank: Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten (AA+/Aaa/AAA) (S/M/F) Swap Counterparty: BNP Paribas (A+/A2/A+) (S/M/F) Credit enhancement for the Class A1/A2 Notes is provided via subordination ([9]1%), a reserve fund initially funded by the issuance of the Class D Notes ([1]1%), and an annual excess spread of 50 bps (of the Class A – C Notes minus PDL) provided through the swap Expressed as a percentage of the aggregate of the Class A, B and C Notes Deutsche Bank AG Paying Agent and Principal of [5.0]%, no arrears or losses, no further advances and an assumed call on (Amsterdam) (A/A2/A+) Paying Agent: the First Optional Redemption Date (“FORD”), WALs in the Preliminary Prospectus (S/M/F) 3Credit enhancement shown in table does not include excess spread 4NPDs are on the 30 th day of each January, April, July & October (Modified Following) until redemption Credit ratings accurate as of 3 March 2014. Refer to rating Note: Investors are pointed towards the risk factors section of the Preliminary Prospectus agency websites for additional detail 1 2CPR 7 Credit enhancement Currency Transaction overview 8 SAECURE 14 NHG structure overview SAECURE 14 NHG transaction structure is typical for Dutch RMBS issues Dutch Special Purpose Vehicle (“SPV”) owned by an independent foundation („Stichting‟) Legal title transfer of mortgage loan receivables through silent assignment („stille cessie‟) at closing Mortgage loan receivables and other rights of the Issuer pledged to the security trustee through pledge agreements Only receivables from prime Dutch residential mortgage loans originated by Aegon as collateral No substitution / replenishment2 Interest rate risk hedged through swap agreement SAECURE 14 NHG Structure Diagram1 Stichting Holding SAECURE 14 NHG B.V. Swap Counterparty (BNP Paribas) Seller, Servicer and Sub-Servicer (Aegon Levensverzekering N.V.) Swap Agreement 100% ownership Mortgage Receivables Issuer Purchase Agreement SAECURE 14 NHG B.V. Servicing Agreement Transfer of title to the Mortgage Receivables Servicing Agreement Cash Advance Facility Provider (N.V. Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten) Swap Counterparty (BNP Paribas) Account Bank (N.V. Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten) Issuer Account Agreement Account Bank Note Proceeds Noteholders Notes Parallel Debt Sellers (Aegon Leven / Aegon Hypotheken) Notes proceeds + Deferred Purchase Price Principal and interest on Mortgage loans Issuer SAECURE 14 NHG B.V. Principal and interest Note Proceeds Trust Deed Security Trustee Reserve Account Note Proceeds Notes A1 A2 B C D Preliminary prospectus for the addition of further advances subject to the additional purchase conditions including annual cap of [1]% of the aggregate Outstanding Principal Amount of portfolio mortgage loans 2Except 9 Cash Advance Facility Provider MortgageReceivables Purchase Agreement Seller and Servicer (Aegon Hypotheken B.V.) 1Source: SAECURE 14 NHG Transaction Cash Flow Structure Structural Features Principal Priority of Payments The Notes of each Class rank pari passu without any preference or priority among Notes of the same Class. Payments of principal on the Class A2 Notes are (time) subordinated to, inter alia, payments of principal on the Class A1 Notes. Reserve Account (non-amortising) A Reserve Account (funded by the Class D Notes at closing) at [1.0]% of the principal amount outstanding on the Notes (excluding the Class D Notes) on the Closing Date, will be available The Reserve Account will be replenished in the interest waterfall up to the target level of [1.0]%, if sufficient revenue funds are available Cash Advance Facility The maximum facility available amount will be the greater of 1.5% of the principal amount outstanding of the Class A Notes on the relevant calculation date and 1.0 % of the principal amount outstanding of the Class A Notes on the Closing Date 364-day facility, extendable at the discretion of the cash advance facility provider Commingling risk All borrowers pay into the Seller collection account (held at ABN AMRO (A/A2/A+)1 (S/M/F) by means of direct debit on the first business day of each month On each Mortgage Collection Payment Date 2 each Seller will transfer to the Issuer the scheduled amount of principal and interest and an estimated amount of prepaid principal (120% of the previous month‟s prepayments) Following an Assignment Notification Event3 and expiry of any applicable grace period, the respective Seller undertakes to immediately notify the borrowers, Aegon Leven as the insurance company and any other relevant party, of the assignment of mortgage loans and the beneficiary rights relating thereto whereafter borrowers will make payments directly to the Issuer Set-off risk 10 Fitch and S&P have both considered the potential set-off exposure related to life loans4 in determining the credit enhancement levels Structural features mitigate set-off risk on savings mortgage loans by means of, amongst other things, the participation agreements Set-off risk applies to 4.9% of loan portfolio at the cut-off date Source: Preliminary Prospectus 1Credit rating accurate as of 3 March 2014. Refer to rating agency websites for additional detail. 2The 1 st day of each calendar month or next succeeding Business Day 3Please refer to the Prospectus for a description of the Assignment Notification Events 4Life Loans include Life Mortgage Loans and Universal Life Mortgage Loans under which no principal is paid until maturity but instead the borrower pays a premium to Aegon Leven on a monthly basis. These insurance premiums are invested by the insurance company in certain investment funds. It is the intention that the Life Loans will be fully or partially repaid by means of the proceeds of the Life Insurance Policies. Hedging Arrangements Interest Rate Swap 11 To hedge the risk of a difference between the rate of interest to be received by the Issuer on the Mortgage Receivables and the rate of interest payable by the Issuer on the Class A Notes (which float over 3-month Euribor), the Issuer will enter into an interest rate swap agreement with BNP Paribas The Issuer will pay to the Swap Counterparty the scheduled interest proceeds from the Mortgage Receivables minus senior expenses and minus 50bps excess spread applied to the EUR principal amount outstanding of Class A – C Notes In return, the Swap Counterparty will pay to the Issuer the scheduled interest due on the Class A – C Notes If any payment made by the Issuer to the Swap Counterparty is less than the amount due to be paid, then the corresponding payment obligation of the Swap Counterparty shall be reduced by an amount equal to such shortfall. Furthermore, certain corrections will be made for savings and construction mortgage loans Payments to the Swap Counterparty rank senior to the Class A Noteholders pre- and post-enforcement1 Source: Preliminary Prospectus 1Excluding swap termination payments which rank subordinate to the Class A Noteholders pre- and post-enforcement where there has been an Event of Default relating to the swap counterparty or an Additional Termination Event in relation to the credit rating of the Swap Counterparty SAECURE 14 NHG portfolio highlights Selected eligibility criteria 12 Borrowers were at the time of origination, residents of the Netherlands and not employed by a Seller or any of its group companies First and sequentially lower ranking mortgage loans only At least one (interest) payment has been made prior to the closing date No bridge loans Mortgage loan is fully disbursed or is a fully disbursed construction mortgage loan subject only to the related construction deposit not exceeding 50% of the original outstanding mortgage loan balance Both floating and fixed interest rates Interest payments are scheduled to be paid monthly and in arrear by direct debit No amounts due were overdue or unpaid at cut off date Where compulsory, the mortgage loan has a life insurance or risk insurance policy attached to it No mortgage loans have a legal maturity beyond 2089 100% of the portfolio relates to mortgage loans that have the benefit of the NHG guarantee The aggregate net outstanding principle amount of a mortgage loan does not exceed EUR 1,00,000 and does not exceed the maximum loan amount as stipulated in the relevant NHG conditions2 The mortgage loans did not exceed 110% weighted average original LTMV upon origination Key Portfolio Characteristics (Provisional Portfolio1) Characteristic Value Principal balance EUR 1,574,318,425 Value of saving deposits EUR 72,617,911 Net principal balance EUR 1,501,700,514 Construction deposits EUR 5,731,892 Number of loans 8,030 Number of loan parts 15,637 Average principal balance (borrower) EUR 187,011 Weighted average current interest rate 4.81% Weighted average maturity (in years) 35.5 Weighted average seasoning (in years) 2.54 Weighted average LTMV 95.1% Weighted average LTMV (indexed) 105.1% Weighted average LTFV 105.8% Weighted average LTFV (indexed) 116.9% % NHG 100% Source: Preliminary Prospectus 1Figures relate to provisional pool which has a cut-off date of 31 December 2013. For more detail please refer to the Stratification Tables in the appendix. 2Before 1 July 2009 the limit for NHG mortgages was EUR 265,000. Between 1 July 2009 and 1 July 2012 the limit increased to EUR 350,000. From 1 July 2012 until 1 July 2013 the limit decreased to EUR 320,000. The current maximum loan amount is EUR 290,000 and is expected to decrease to €265,000 from 1 July 2014 onwards. Source: www.rijksoverheid.nl (Official website of the Dutch Government) WAL and CPR Analysis Overview The WAL of the Class A1 and Class A2 Notes, assuming1 a CPR of [5.0]% and an Issuer call on the FORD (NPD falling in Jan 20192), is [2.0] years and [5.0] years, respectively Selected Assumptions3 No regulatory call Seller clean up call exercised at 10% (where no Issuer call on FORD) No mortgage loan is sold or required to be repurchased No further advances No debit balance on the PDL WALs calculated on Actual / 360 basis Savings and bank savings mortgage loans are assumed to be annuity mortgage loans due to the participation agreements Linear mortgage loans are assumed to be annuity mortgage loans No enforcement notice has been served on the Issuer and no Notes Event of Default has occurred Note: Historical performance is not an indicator of future performance which may differ materially Note: The WALs of the notes will be influenced by, among other things, the actual rates of repayment and prepayment of the mortgage loans. The WALs of the Notes cannot be stated, as the actual rates of repayment and prepayment and a number of other relevant factors are unknown. However, calculations of the possible WALs of the Notes can be made based on certain assumptions, some of which are shown above. Source: Preliminary Prospectus 1 In addition to the assumptions contained within the Preliminary Prospectus 2 NPDs are on the 30th day of each January, April, July & October (Modified Following) until redemption 3 Please refer to the Preliminary Prospectus for the full set of assumptions 13 CPR Source: Moody‟s Dutch Prime and NHG RMBS Indices and Aegon Investor Reports SAECURE Series Actual Annualized CPR SAECURE Series Actual Annualized CPR 12 Month Moving Average SAECURE 14 Assumed Annualized CPR 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 WAL Sensitivity to CPR and Issuer Call at FORD Possible WAL of Class A1 Notes 2.5% Assuming Issuer call on FORD [3.0] years CPR Possible WAL of Class A2 Notes [3.2] years Assuming Issuer call on FORD [5.0] years Assuming no Issuer call Assuming no Issuer call [18.4] years 5% [2.0] years [2.0] years [4.9] years [13.4] years 10% [1.1] years [1.1] years [4.5] years [8.1] years 15% [0.7] years [0.7] years [4.0] years [5.6] years 20% [0.5] years [0.5] years [3.5] years [4.2] years 25% [0.4] years [0.4] years [3.0] years [3.3] years 30% [0.4] years [0.4] years [2.6] years [2.7] years The Dutch Economy and Housing Market 14 The Dutch economy Highlights of the Dutch economy Unemployment rate comparison Source: Eurostat, CPB Source: Eurostat 14% One of the most stable and open economies in Europe with one of the highest GDP per capita ► ► ► ► Y-o-Y real GDP growth rate is forecasted to be 0.5% in 2014 and nearly 1% in 20151 Unemployment rate at 7.0% as of December 2013 Expected Sovereign debt of 75.6% of GDP and budget deficit of 3.3% in 2014 International trade is key driver of economy and future economic growth UK 10% 8% 7,2% 6% 7.0% 6.7% 4% 1997 3.1% 2.4% 1.7% 1.2% 0 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Source: OECD US 2 Netherlands UK US Eurozone 11.0% 10 5 1.7% 0 -2 -2.2% -5.1% -5 -4 -6 1 1990 15 12.0% 15 4 US Trade balance (% of GDP) Source: Eurostat Netherlands Eurozone 2% Evolution of Y-o-Y real GDP growth rate Eurozone UK 12% 0% 1995 6 Netherlands 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 -10 1997 1999 2001 Note: Historical performance is not an indicator of future performance which may differ materially 12014 and 2015 GDP growth rates are as forecasted by the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 The Dutch economy (cont’d) Sovereign debt (% of GDP) Deficit (% of GDP) Source: Bloomberg, IMF1 Netherlands UK Source: Bloomberg Germany France Netherlands US Germany France US 108.1% 15 115 105 95 85 75 65 55 45 35 25 92.7% 92.6% 80,4% 74.5% 6.7% 6.3% 10 4.8% 5 4.1% -0.2% 0 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Gross national savings2 (% of GDP) Netherlands UK Germany -5 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 5 Year CDS Sovereign Spread (in USD - bps) Source: Bloomberg, CIA Source: Bloomberg France US Netherlands 35 UK Germany France US 250 30 25 25.5% 23.6% 20 18.5% 15 13.8% 10.8% 10 5 1993 16 UK 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 200 150 55.5 100 40.5 27.8 28 26 50 0 2008 2009 Note: Historical performance is not an indicator of future performance which may differ materially 1IMF forecast figure for 2013 2GNS = GDP – Consumption – Gov Spending 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Dutch household financials Overview Source: Eurostat, Dutch Central Bank The vast majority of household debt in the Netherlands is residential mortgage debt (EUR 645 bn as at Q3 2013) vs. remaining consumer credit (EUR 25 bn as at Q3 2013) The incentive for consumers to maximise their mortgage debt (tax incentives) results in relatively high gross debt to income levels compared to other European countries Dutch household wealth including pension assets far exceeds mortgage debt. Dutch household debt and wealth composition Source: Dutch Central Bank (EUR bn) 149 Consumer Credit 143 Residential Mortgage Debt 1059 970 26 27 28 1017 25 17 632 645 651 Pension Assets 91% 88% 86% 85% 77% 81% 82% 83% Germany 1 France 645 333 344 360 373 380 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 (Q3) 1Deposits 149% 139% 136% 133% UK Life Insurance Deposits 615 242% 251% 248% 250% Netherlands 151 743 25 Source: Eurostat 143 149 835 Gross debt-to-income ratio of households 0% 50% 100% 2009 include overnight deposits, deposits with agreed maturity and deposits redeemable at notice 2010 150% 2011 200% 2012 250% 300% The Dutch housing market: Houseprice Index comparison House price development (2000 values rebased at 100) Source: ECB, S&P/Case-Shiller, Nationwide 300 Netherlands UK Ireland Spain US 250 205 200 157 151 127 114 150 100 50 0 2000 2001 2002 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 18 Moody‟s believes “Property prices in the Netherlands will be flat in 2014, with prices outside the Randstad and Zeeland being softer than those in key urban areas”.1 S&P Expects Dutch house prices to stabilize in the course of 2014. In 2015 the first rise is expected at 2%. Forecasts are based on improving economic conditions, greater fiscal policy certainty, and increased affordability of housing.2 Note: Historical performance is not an indicator of future performance which may differ materially 1Moody’s: “Dutch RMBS: High loan-to-foreclosure values will be key default driver for 2014, but arrears will be relatively low”, 2014 2S&P: “Dutch RMBS Index Report Q4 2013: Severe delinquencies edge higher as the economy stabilizes”, 2014 The Dutch housing market: Supply Supply dynamics Building permits and newly built homes Source: CBS, Ministry of Housing, VROM Source: CBS Supply in the Dutch housing market is relatively inelastic ► Limited land available for housing 120 ► Regulations and planning permissions 100 Construction of new housing is at its lowest level since 1952 Construction unlikely to increase in 2014 in view of the low number of building permits issued up to Nov. 2013 In order to reduce the structural housing shortage, the Dutch Ministry of Housing has estimated that at least 80,000 new houses would be required annually Increase in the Dutch Households Building permit Completed homes 80 60 40 20 0 Number of inhabitants per dwelling is decreasing Source: CBS Source: CBS x million 8 x 1000 2,55 Households Inhabitants per dwelling 2,50 2,45 7,5 2,40 7 2,35 2,30 6,5 2,25 6 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 19 2,20 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 The Dutch Residential Mortgage Market 20 Overview of the Dutch mortgage market Mortgage lending market share in the Netherlands Mortgage debt outstanding (Q4 2013); Source: Land Registry (Kadaster) Source: Dutch Central Bank total mortgage debt outstanding (LHS) EUR bn year-on-year change (RHS) 700 60 600 50 500 40 400 30 300 20 200 10 100 0 0 Other 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: JPM (1 Jan 2010 – 1 Feb 2014) Other 7% Aegon 10% Total = €62bn ABN Amro 21% Obvion 30% NIB Capital 4% Achmea Hypotheken bank 7% BNP Paribas 3% ING Bank Delta Lloyd NV 14% 2% 19,9% 18,3% 17,6% 10,3% 6,5% 5,6% 3,1% 1,5% 0,4% 16,7% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 2013 Dutch Prime RMBS Originators - Market Share SNS Bank 3% Rabobank ING ABN AMRO Aegon Obvion Argenta Delta Lloyd SNS Westland Utrecht Other 0% -10 2007 21 Thousands Thousands EUR bn Overview of the Dutch mortgage market Source: DNB, Land Registry (Kadaster) In Q3 2013, total outstanding residential mortgage debt in The Netherlands was approx. €645bn New mortgage lending in Q4 2013 was €11.4bn Mortgage originators in The Netherlands include banks, insurance companies and specialized mortgage originators Securitization is a key funding source for Dutch mortgage lenders Key characteristics of the Dutch residential mortgage market Predominantly prime, owner occupied Very little buy-to-let, non-conforming and sub-prime Mostly fixed rate mortgage loans Mortgage loans are provided predominantly on the basis of income (LTVs are a less significant basis due to tax incentives) Under writing “Full-doc” underwriting, no self certification of income Industry wide credit database (BKR) Code of Conduct The Code of Conduct aims to encourage lenders to compete on service and price rather than aggressive lending practices Affordability calculation assuming 30 year amortizing loan regardless of product and interest rate risk The NHG program is the public mortgage loan guarantee scheme supporting home ownership in the Netherlands Every person in the Netherlands can obtain a guarantee from the Dutch state guaranteed non-profit organization (Stichting WEW) subject to the applicable terms and conditions Lenders can repossess and sell properties by public auction without a court order Full recourse to the borrower. After foreclosure, any remaining debt remains enforceable until discharged in full Strong social support and pension system Products NHG Framework 22 Source: Aegon Main mortgage products Interest-only mortgage loans – borrowers do not make any principal repayments until maturity Repayment mortgage loans 23 Investment mortgage loans1 – borrowers do not make any principal repayments but select an investment policy, into which they pay a monthly premium, which is expected to repay the mortgage loan at maturity Annuity mortgage loans – fixed monthly payments Linear mortgage loans – principal component comprising an equal, fixed amount each month 1The € 250.000 Loan Amount Savings mortgage loans Life mortgage loans – borrowers do not make any principal repayments but have an insurance policy, into which they pay a monthly premium, which is either expected or guaranteed to repay the mortgage loan at maturity Example of a savings mortgage loan Build up of linked savings account € 200.000 € 150.000 € 100.000 € 50.000 €0 0 After January 1st 2013 Savings mortgage loans – borrowers do not make any principal repayments but instead make payments into a savings account with an insurance company / bank Prior to January 1st 2013 Interest-only mortgage loans origination of Investment mortgage loans has been discontinued as of December 2010 60 120 180 240 Months 300 360 Loan amount at risk after savings account taken into consideration Mortgage loan structure Costs @ 4% = 4 Transfer Tax @ 2% = 2 Taxes and other costs related to the property purchase can also be funded by the mortgage loan Market Value Property = 100 Savings Mortgag e Loan Part = 56 Required for property purchase = 106 Annuity Mortgage Loan = 105 2 Annuity Mortgage Loan = 104 2 Interest Only Mortgag e Loan Part = 50 1 LTMV = 106 / 100 = 106% 24 Before 1-1-2013 As per 1-1-2013 The total mortgage loan may consist of multiple loan parts Additional protection through disability / term life / accidental death / household insurance policies As per 1-1-2014 1As of Aug 2011 a maximum of 50% of market value is allowed to be interest only, remainder 2The maximum allowable LTMV will decrease by 1% per annum to arrive at 100% in 2018 needs some form of repayment or capital savings Code of Conduct: Industry self-regulation Overview of the Code of Conduct The Code of Conduct is endorsed by Aegon as well as almost all banks, savings banks, mortgage banks, insurance companies, pension funds and building funds in the Netherlands ► ► ► 25 Detailed affordability calculations ► Self regulation of the industry in consultation with the government ► Originally established in 2001 The Code of Conduct provides guidelines and best practices for the origination of mortgage loans: ► Selected Code of Conduct guidelines Transparency, information, suitability of mortgage loans for customer Underwriting criteria: LTV, affordability Ensures that lenders compete on service and price, rather than aggressive underwriting The Code of Conduct aims to encourage mortgage lenders to stick to the specified criteria despite consumer pressure ► Regardless of product type, calculates monthly mortgage loan payments assuming a 30 year annuity loan (no benefit for interest only) If fixed interest term <10 years, assumes a mortgage loan rate of 5.00% (Aegon‟s current1 10 year rate for NHG mortgage loans is 4.00%, and 4.75% for non NHG mortgage loans with maximum LTV) References DTI tables from an independent national foundation to determine maximum loan amount LTV ≤ prior to 2013 approx. 106%2, starting January 1st 2013, the maximum LTV will decrease with 1% per year until the maximum LTV is 100% as of January 1st 2018 Interest-only part: From August 2011 max 50% of market value, remainder needs some form of repayment. As per January 1st 2013, new mortgage loans must repay according to, or faster than a 30year annuity loan to be eligible for tax deductibility of interest payments. Existing mortgage loans will be grandfathered, based on their current fiscal treatment. Source: Aegon, NVB, GHF, NIBUD, Fitch (EMEA Criteria Addendum Netherlands, March 2011) 1As of 17 January 2014 2On 1 July 2011 the Dutch government reduced the transfer tax from 6% to 2% to encourage housing market activity. This reduced the LTV limit in the Code of Conduct from 110% to 106%. The current LTV limit is 104% as of 1 January 2014. Affordability calculation based on the Code of Conduct Affordability tables provided by NIBUD Mortgage lenders closely follow the affordability recommendations provided by Nationaal Instituut voor Budgetvoorlichting (“NIBUD”) ► Independent Dutch foundation ► Promotes the rational planning of family finances 26 Mortgage loan rate 4.501%-5% 17.5% 5.001%5.5% 18.0% >5.5% 18.5% 19,500 20,000 17.5% 18.0% 18.5% 19.0% 19.5% For each income bracket, the part of the gross income that can be paid on a mortgage loan is calculated 20,500 … 18.5% 19.0% 19.5% 20.0% 20.5% … … … … … 55,000 26.0% 27.0% 28.0% 29.0% 30.0% 58,000 26.5% 27.5% 28.5% 29.5% 30.5% 61,000 … 27.0% … 28.0% … 29.0% … 30.0% … 31.0% … 75,000 29.5% 30.5% 31.5% 32.5% 33.5% 77,000 29.5% 31.0% 32.5% 34.0% 35.5% 79,000 … 30.0% … 31.5% … 33.0% … 34.5% … 36.0% … 96,000 31.0% 32.5% 34.0% 35.5% 37.0% 110,000 31.5% 33.0% 34.5% 36.0% 37.5% For example, a borrower with a gross income of EUR 55,000 and a mortgage loan with an interest rate of 4 to 4.5% can use 27.0% of his income on interest and principal repayments (based on a 30 year annuity) NIBUD‟s calculations take into account household expenditures (e.g. electricity, gas, water, local taxes, telephone/internet, insurances, transport, school costs for children), other fixed costs and reservation expenditure as well as tax aspects of a mortgage loan Lenders can obtain other financial obligations of applicants in the national credit register (“BKR”) Gross Income 4.001%4.5% 17.0% Affordability tables are included in the Code of Conduct ► Percentage of gross income that can be used for mortgage loan payments <=4% 16.5% ► For borrowers below 65 years of age Average income 2013: € 33.000 Source: Aegon; “Een betaalbare hypotheek, nu en straks.” NIBUD, 2013; NIBUD, Affordability percentages, 2014 Detailed income underwriting is typical for Aegon and the Dutch market Underwriting Process: Stage 1 “Pre-approval” Application tested against Aegon‟s standard criteria, databases for credit history and fraud and, where necessary, subject to an additional review by a credit committee If successful, the application is “pre-approved” and a loan offer is issued to the customer, which remains contingent on the provision of the necessary backing documentation Underwriting Process: Stage 2 “Final approval” Aegon key documentation requirements (similar to market practice) Aegon checks underlying documentation provided by borrower Following final approval, notarial documentation and mortgage loan registration can be completed, and the loan can be disbursed on the day the trade of the property takes place Customer data: ► Extract of credit register (“BKR”) and fraud register (“SFH”) ► Recent pay slip ► Employment contract ► Affordability calculation ► Banking details for direct debit ► Proof of residence (land registry and deed) Self-employed: ► Income: avg. net profit of last 3 years with max most recent year ► IB60 form (formal income statement provided by the Dutch Tax Authorities): at least 3 tax returns required Property related: ► Appraisal report, and/or ► Property tax assessment, and/or ► Building and purchase contract Quality control & audit 27 Aegon checks the completeness of files and the consistency of documents Aegon processes integrate a strict four eye principle Further controls may be made as part of a quality control program to assess the credit risks associated with origination and underwriting A file sample is typically reviewed by individuals independent from the underwriting team (internal or external ) Source: Aegon; Fitch, “Underwriting Practices and Criteria in the Dutch Mortgage Market” 19 October, 2007 Detailed income underwriting typical for the Dutch market (cont’d) Overview of the national credit register (“BKR”) Source: BKR as of November 2012 28 BKR is a non-profit organization which was founded in 1965 by the Dutch finance industry to administer the Central Credit Information System (“CKI”) ► CKI stores data on loans and credit facilities ► BKR informs affiliated organizations on the credit history of consumers ► All of the major Dutch mortgage loan lenders are registered Lenders can obtain data on a consumer‟s credit history from BKR, including details on credit cards and auto loans CKI stores data on negative payment events and bankruptcies ► Records remain in the database for 5 years BKR shares credit histories with the national credit registers of Germany, Italy, Belgium and Austria The social security infrastructure in the Netherlands as of 1 February 2014 Employee Insurance Schemes National Insurance Schemes Other Unemployment Insurance Act (WW) Sickness Benefits Act (ZW) ► ► Work and Income according to Labor capacity Act (WIA) ► Payable from the first day of unemployment One month benefit for every year of employment history (minimum of 3 and maximum of 38 months*) Unemployment benefit equals 75% of the last-earned salary during first 2 months and 70% during the rest of the unemployment period (with a maximum of 38 months*) . Up to a cap ~ €50,000 per annum Employer Pension Plans General Old Age Pensions Act (AOW) Exceptional Medical Expenses Act (AWBZ) Usually both basic pension (AOW) and employment pension received AOW: gross annual amount (including holiday allowance) is €14,034 / €9,716 (single/co-habiting per person) as of 1 February 2014 Surviving Dependants Act (ANW) Employment pension plans are in addition to AOW, and can take various forms, usually calculated as a percentage of the average or last salary earned over a career Healthcare Insurance Act ► ► Currently most pension plans are defined benefits AOW is a funded scheme Basic medical insurance is a legal obligation and insurers are required by law to accept anyone who registers Cost of basic insurance is now approx. €100 per month Covers medical care incl. GP, hospitals, medical specialists, hospital stays, various medical appliances and medicines, ambulance transport, paramedical care Generally medical expenses are covered 100% except there may be deductibles for selected expenses 29 All employees under the age of 65 who meet past service requirements and lose their job receive unemployment benefits Sources: Ministerie van Sociale Zaken & Werkgelegenheid, A short survey of Social Security in the Netherlands, July 2011; Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen (UWV); Sociale Verzekeringsbank (SVB); Kiesbeter (www.kiesbeter.nl); “Bruggen slaan – Regeerakkoord VVD PVDA” 29 October 2012 * From 1 July 2016 the maximum term of 38 months for unemployment benefit will be gradually reduced to 24 months from 2019 onward. * Pensionable age will be gradually increased from 65 to 67 as of 1 January 2014 Tax incentives are the main reason behind higher LTVs Double tax incentive for mortgage loan borrowers 1 Mortgage loan interest expense Savings interest income Interest on the mortgage loan on a borrower‟s residence is deducted from taxable income Income on savings/ insurance / investment policies used to repay “interest-only” mortgage loans is tax free Rational borrower behaviour in the Netherlands: Maximise amount of the mortgage loan secured on prime residence Take out non-amortizing mortgage loans with long maturities Accumulate principal in savings, investment or insurance policies Tax system is a key driver of mortgage loan characteristics: High average LTV levels, before taking into account the related savings, investment or insurance policies Significant collateral in insurance contracts vs. scheduled redemptions Long mortgage loan terms The Dutch tax incentives in perspective This type of tax deduction has been in effect in one form or another since 1893. Some changes have been made in the last years: Reduction of the tax benefit by permitting tax deductibility only for the first 30 years of the mortgage loan term Interest payable on equity extracted in a refinancing is not deductible In June 2011 the government reduced the transaction tax from 6% to 2% to encourage activity in the housing market. In addition, the budget for 2013 as agreed upon by the coalition in October 2012 contains some additional provisions that will affect the interest deductibility, as further described on the next slide Due to tax incentives, Dutch lenders put greater emphasis on strict income underwriting than on LTV ratios. As of January 2013, the maximum LTV for new mortgage loans is decreasing by 1% p.a. 100% in 2018. In 2014 the maximum LTV is 104% 30 1Tax incentives remain in place for existing mortgages under modified government policy Source: Aegon Recent policy developments impacting the housing Tax deductibility ► ► ► New mortgages originated after January 1st 2013 only benefit from tax deductibility if they are fully amortizing For existing and new mortgage loans from 2014 the maximum deduction rate will be reduced from 52% to 42%, in steps of a halfpercent per year The problem of residual debt remaining after property sales will be effectively tackled by making interest payments on residual debt temporarily tax-deductible (for a maximum of ten years) Mortgage lending policies ► The favourable loan facility for starters of the Stichting Volkshuisvesting Nederland (Dutch Foundation for Housing ) was expanded to EUR 100 million ► From 1 January 2013 for new mortgages only amortizing loans are eligible for NHG ► Maximum LTV allowance is 104% in 2014 will be decreased by steps of 1% per year to 100% in 2018 ► Penalty free prepayment up to the current WOZ-valuation (from November 1st 2013 to January 1st 2015) Relevant tax code amendments ► Property transfer tax will be kept at the reduced level of 2% ► The top bracket income tax will be lowered from 52% to 49,5% ► ► The 42% bracket will be lowered to 38% ► ► Lowering in small steps starting in 2018 until 2042 One-off tax-free donation cap raised from €51,407 to €100,000 (can only be used for purchase or rebuilding of house or prepayment of mortgage) ► 31 From 2018 in small steps over a 21 year period Donations now also eligible for others than own children (donation changes applicable from October 1st 2013 to January 1st 2015) Sources: Aegon Leven, www.rijksoverheid.nl Mortgage loan foreclosures in the Netherlands In the fourth quarter of 2013 the number of foreclosures amounted to 554 compared to 669 in the same period in 2012 There were 1,863 forced sales in 2013 (≈ 0.046% of total dwellings) compared to 2,488 forced sales in 2012 (≈ 0.061% of total dwellings) In its preliminary annual results for 2013 NHG states that 65% foreclosures were divorce-related and 17% were driven by unemployment Property foreclosures Source: Land Registry, CBS 600 Number of properties foreclosed per month (LHS) % of total number of dwellings (RHS) 0,0200% 500 0,0150% 400 300 0,0100% 200 0,0050% 100 0 2005 32 0,0000% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 The NHG mortgage loan guarantee NHG (Nationale Hypotheek Garantie) refers to the public mortgage loan insurance scheme supporting home ownership in the Netherlands Every person in the Netherlands can obtain a guarantee from the Stichting WEW, a Dutch state guaranteed non-profit organization, for a mortgage loan amount of up to €290,0001,2 relating to a residential house purchase of up to €273,585 Guarantee coverage: Mortgage loans originated prior to 31 December 2010 are 50% guaranteed by the Dutch state and 50% by the municipalities. Those originated as of 1 January 2011 are 100% guaranteed by the Dutch state ► NHG Guarantee & conditions ► Cost: up-front payment of 100bps of the loan amount as of 1 January 2014 ► Interest rate discount: approx. 10 to 60bps p.a. depending on LTV ► Since 1 January 2013 NHG is only available for amortizing mortgage loans ► For those loan parts originated as of 1 January 2014, the originator is accountable for 10% of the realized loss. The mortgage loan lender is responsible for ensuring that the guarantee application meets NHG conditions ► If the NHG conditions are not satisfied, the lender may not be fully covered by the guarantee ► The NHG guarantee is based on an annuity amortization profile (30 year term) The NHG scheme has specific rules for the level of credit risk that will be accepted The creditworthiness of the applicant must be verified with the National Credit Register (BKR) ► Stichting WEW If accepted, the Stichting WEW registers the mortgage loan and establishes the guarantee The digitalised underwriting process is beneficial to the WEW claim acceptance rate NHG loans predominantly originated since the start of the economic crisis, 80% of origination in first half of 2013 vs. 54% i n 2008 In 2013 a total of 85,200 buyers have used the NHG mortgage loan guarantee. Within the € 290,000 limit more than 90% of buyers have bought with NHG guarantee In 2013 the capital base of the NHG guarantee decreased by € 8 million to € 778 million. This was in line with expectations Moody‟s and Fitch have assigned Stichting WEW a Aaa/AAA rating3 1For comparison, average house price in The Netherlands is € 215,388 Source: Land registry as of December 2013 €290,000 limit is in place since 1 July 2013 and will be reduced to €265,000 as of July 1 st 2014 and to €225,000 as of 2016 (expected) 3Credit rating accurate as of 3 March 2014 2The 33 NHG triggers, requirements and foreclosure process NHG Guarantee Triggers: -Unemployment -Divorce -Disability for work Gather recent income data Income test run (according to NHG Conditions) Compare maximum cost of living with current cost of living Decision NHG Borrower can stay in current house and is able to bear costs Remission or restructuring (part) of loan, so borrower can stay in current house and is able to bear costs.* Start sales process Private sale: minimum proceeds of 95% of the appraised value (market value) Sales process Auction: approval from NHG needed, no minimum proceeds required 34 * On a case by case basis Aegon uses Budget Coaches in order to manage / reduce arrears or losses The Dutch RMBS Market in Perspective 35 The Dutch RMBS market Overview Source: Moody’s, AFME and JP Morgan One of the main primary issuance investment opportunities within the European securitization market AAA rated Dutch RMBS spreads have shown a fair degree of stability between July 2010 and December 2012, but have been tightening since the beginning of 2013 due to limited supply Asset performance has remained strong through the credit crisis ► Cumulative net loss rates of Dutch NHG RMBS for Q3 2013 remain low at approx. 2bps. For Dutch prime RMBS this was 9bps. ► Dutch NHG RMBS recorded a 60+ day delinquency rate in October 2013 at 65bps versus 97bps for Dutch prime RMBS CPRs have fallen from pre-crisis average of approx. 17% (‟06) to approx. 4.1% in September 2013 compared to UK RMBS where CPRs have fallen from pre-crisis of approx. 36% (‟06) to approx. 17.4% in August 2013 Generic AAA ABS market spreads Source: JP Morgan ,450 Dutch RMBS AAA FL 5 Yr ,400 UK RMBS AAA Euro FL 5 Yr ,350 ,300 ,250 ,200 ,150 ,100 74bps 55bps ,50 jan-07 36 jul-07 jan-08 jul-08 jan-09 jul-09 jan-10 jul-10 jan-11 jul-11 Historical performance is not an indicator of future performance and may differ materially jan-12 jul-12 jan-13 jul-13 jan-14 Performance comparison of Dutch RMBS Moody’s Outlook for Dutch RMBS* 60+ day Delinquencies Source: Moody‟s, Dutch Prime and NHG RMBS Indices, September 2013, Moody‟s, UK Prime RMBS Indices, August 2013 and Moody‟s, Jumbo Mortgage Credit Indexes, May 2013 Source: Moody‟s, Dutch Prime and NHG RMBS Indices, September 2013 Moody's collateral outlook for Dutch RMBS is stable 60+ day delinquencies of prime RMBS showed an increase from 0.76% in September 2012 to 0.97% in September 2013. For NHG RMBS the index increased from 0.48% to 0.65% The cumulative defaults index for prime RMBS showed an increase from 0.35% in September 2012 to 0.37% in September 2013. For NHG RMBS it increased from 0.15% 0.28% The cumulative losses index for prime RMBS remained stable, widening slightly to 0.09% in September 2013 from 0.07% in September 2012. For NHG RMBS it increased from 0.01% to 0.02% 10.73% 2.52% 0.97% 37 * Numbers based on Dutch Prime and NHG RMBS Indices Historical performance is not an indicator of future performance and may differ materially. Market characteristics may differ materially between jurisdictions and statistical data across markets may not be entirely comparable. Prime RMBS Cumulative Losses Cumulative Losses (bps) Dutch Prime UK Prime US Prime Typical annual excess spread p.a. in Dutch RMBS 225 200 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 43 50 25 9 0 2004 38 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Source: Aegon; Moody’s, Dutch Prime and NHG RMBS Indices, September 2013, Moody’s, UK Prime RMBS Indices, August 2013 and Moody’s, Jumbo Mortgage Credit Indexes, May 2013 Note: Historical performance is not an indicator of future performance and may differ materially. Market characteristics may differ materially between jurisdictions and statistical data across markets may not be entirely comparable Prepayment rates Dutch prepayments are relatively insensitive to interest rates due to high prepayment penalties: ► ► ► 39 The prepayment penalties are set at levels that compensate the lender for the loss of interest income; The penalty is generally equal to the PV of the interest rate differential over (1) the time to maturity of the loan or (2) the time to the next interest rate reset date Prepayment without prepayment penalty is possible under special circumstances: ► When the property is sold; ► If the property is destroyed; ► When the borrower has deceased; ► At an interest-reset date ► Annual partial prepayments are typically only possible up to 10% of outstanding principal amount without penalty; For the loan balance in excess of the WOZ value of the property (temporary arrangement from November 1st 2013 to January 1st 2015) Prepayment rates Source: Moody‟s, Dutch Prime and NHG RMBS Indices, September 2013, Moody‟s, UK Prime RMBS Indices, August 2013 and Moody‟s, Jumbo Mortgage Credit Indexes, May 2013 80% Dutch Prime (CPR) 70% US Prime (CPR) UK Prime (TRR) 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 23.1% 17.4% 10% 0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Because of the historically low mortgage loan interest rates, the Dutch mortgage loans increasingly have longer fixed interest rate periods (>10 years) Source: Aegon Historical performance is not an indicator of future performance and may differ materially. Market characteristics may differ materially between jurisdictions and statistical data across markets may not be entirely comparable 4.1% Transactions comparison: Selected publicly placed Dutch and UK RMBS Item Deal name Closing date Originator Portfolio stratification Avg. current (market) LTV % IO % fixed interest % in arrears % self employed Max regional concentration Dutch RMBS SAECURE SAECURE SAECURE SAECURE Storm Dolphin Storm Storm Dutch 14 13 12 11 2014–I 2013-2 2013-IV 2013-III MBS XVIII [Mar-14] Aegon Mar-13 Aegon Dec-12 Aegon May-12 Aegon 95,1% 35.7% 96.7% 0.0% 0.0% 21.0% ZuidHolland 92.5% 36.9% 98.3% 0.0% 0.0% 20.8% ZuidHolland 84.5% 47.4% 91.7% 0.0% 3.5% 19.2% ZuidHolland 81.5% 49.9% 91.9% 0.0% 6.5% 18.6% ZuidHolland Feb-14 Oct-13 Obvion ABN Amro 95.1% 57.8% 91.3% 0.0% 5.7% 20.5% NoordBrabant 72,8% 54,9% 95,2% 0.0% 4.5% 27.1% ZuidHolland UK RMBS Albion 2 Lanark 2013-1 Sep-13 Obvion May-13 Obvion Feb-13 Oct-13 Jul-13 Jun-13 NIBC Yorkshire BS Leeds BS Clydesdale 85,6% 59,9% 89,1% 0.0% 6.8% 20.3% NoordBrabant 85.5% 62.5% 88.6% 0.0% 5.2% 19.7% NoordBrabant 75.5% 62.4% 83.5% 0.0% 7.0% 21.3% ZuidHolland % NHG 100% 100% 62% 45% 32.8% 0.0% 33.2% 32.7% 7.5% Portfolio data Original balance (in mln) € 1,502 € 1,233 € 1,468 € 721 € 1,064 € 29,928 € 745 € 1,170 € 526 Average loan (borrower) € 187,011 € 191,172 € 193,464 € 193,974 € 191,608€ 185,945 € 199,410 € 196,850 € 164,583 40 Brass 3 70.2% 66.73% 37.3% 19.38% 61.2% 67.93% 0.0% 0.0% 5.4% 14.07% 56.3% 26.88% South East South East 62.0% 31.3% 31.8% 2.75% 10.1% 24.2% Yorks/ Humb £1,209 £326 £191,045 £133,971 £3,727 £95,383 WA interest rate Avg seasoning (yrs) Avg time to maturity in yrs Final Legal Maturity Date 4.8% 2.5 35.5 4.8% 1.73 40.8 4.8% 2.9 41.1 5.0% 3.3 40.5 4.43% 4.3 23.7 4.7% 7.6 20.9 4.5% 3.9 23.8 4.4% 4.1 23.7 4.8% 9.1 20.1 3.5% 1.6 21.7 3.58% 1.17 22.54 3.66 3.8 16.76 Dec-89 Nov-93 Jul-92 Oct-89 Mar-49 Sep-99 Oct-53 Aug-53 Feb-45 Apr-51 Mar-56 Dec-54 Credit enhancement AAA subordination Reserve fund Total Credit enhancement Excess spread margin 9.0% 1.0% 10.0% 0.50% 8.9% 1.0% 9.9% 0.50% 7.00% 3.00% 10.00% 0.50% 7.50% 1.00% 8.50% 0.50% 6.00% 1.00% 7.00% 0.50% 7.00% 1.10% 8.10% 0.50% 6,00% 1.00% 7.00% 0.50% 6.00% 1.00% 6.00% 0.50% 5.03% 0.51% 5.54% 0.50% 9.75% 2.70% 12.45% 1.20% 8% 3% 11% 2% 14.00% 3.29% 17.29% 1.66% Source: Prospectuses Selected Dutch RMBS – Spreads at issuance – WAL ~ 2 years Spreads at issuance – Transactions with WAL ~ 2 years Source: Prospectuses 130 Arena 2011-II Dutch MBS BV XVI 110Arena BV 2011-1 STORM 2011-IV STORM 2012-1 SAECURE 10 Phedina 2011-1 STORM 2012-2 Orange Lion 2011-6 STORM 2012-3 90 STORM BV 2011-III Dutch MPL IX DMPL X STORM 2012-4 DUTCH MBS XVII 70 HERMES 18 Arena 12-I SAECURE 12 50 STORM 2013-I STORM 2013-IV STORM 2013-II 30 2011 41 SAECURE 13 NHG 2012 2013 2014 Selected Dutch RMBS – Spreads at issuance – WAL ~ 5 years Spreads at issuance – Transactions with WAL ~ 5 years Source: Prospectuses 190 170 Dutch MBS BV XVI Arena 2011-II STORM 2012-3 STORM 2011-IV 150 Orange Lion 2011-6 130 Dutch MPL IX SAECURE 10 Phedina 2011-1 STORM 2012-1 DMPL X STORM 2012-2 SAECURE 11 HERMES 18 STORM 2012-4 STORM 2011-III Dolphin 12-II STORM 2012-5 110 SAECURE 12 Orange Lion 2013-8 Arena 2012-I Lunet 2013-1 STORM 2013-IV Strong 2011-1 90 Storm 2014-1 Phedina 2013-I STORM 2013-I Dolphin 2013-I Storm 2013-II Storm 2013-III SAECURE 13 NHG 70 2011 42 2012 2013 2014 2015 Outstanding net balance of SAECURE RMBS transactions 10 9 SAECURE 1* SAECURE 2* SAECURE 3* SAECURE 4* SAECURE 5* SAECURE 6* SAECURE 7 SAECURE 8 NHG SAECURE 9 SAECURE 10 SAECURE 11 SAECURE 12 SAECURE 13 NHG 8 EUR (Billions) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2006 43 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 * Repaid at FORD Note: Historical Performance is not an indicator of future performance which may vary materially Source: Investor Reports SAECURE transactions 2012 2013 Performance of SAECURE RMBS transactions Overview Arrears (>=2months) across all SAECURE transactions Source: Investor Reports, (bps of curr. balance) (2006 – 2013) Current arrears performance of outstanding SAECURE transactions is very strong Investors are referred to the Prospectus of each transaction for initial portfolio details The portfolios securitised in prior SAECURE transactions are representative of Aegon‟s total portfolio of mortgage loans Due to an increased private sales period the arrears amount in the 6 months bucket is increasing, while the number of arrears in this bucket is showing a slight increase 3,0 2 <= 3 monthly payments 4 <= 6 monthly payments 3 <= 4 monthly payments > 6 monthly payments 2,0 1,0 0,0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Arrears across all SAECURE transactions Source: Investor Reports (December 2013) 44 Total arrears amount (in bps of net current balance) SAECURE 13 NHG <= 1 monthly payment 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 1 <= 2 monthly payments 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.1 2 <= 3 monthly payments 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.5 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.1 3 <= 4 monthly payments 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.4 - 4 <= 6 monthly payments 0.1 0.3 - 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.5 1.0 0.2 > 6 monthly payments 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.8 1.4 1.3 2.1 1.5 1.9 0.9 0.5 0.6 - Total arrears amount Total Portfolio (net principal) (in mln €) 0.7 1.3 1.1 3.0 3.0 2.6 3.4 3.0 4.1 5.4 3.4 3.5 0.9 1,204 1,398 672 1,379 729 1,233 908 1,176 397 333 453 Note: Historical performance is not an indicator of future performance which may differ materially Note: Percentages shown in the table are rounded to 2 decimal places. As such, the total arrears percentage may appear to be below or above the sum of all arrears buckets Note: SAECURE 1 – 6 called at respective FORDs. Values shown in the table above for these transactions are as of FORD Note: SAECURE 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 as of end of 2013 375 350 SAECURE SAECURE SAECURE SAECURE SAECURE SAECURE SAECURE SAECURE SAECURE SAECURE SAECURE SAECURE 12 11 10 9 8 NHG 7 6 NHG 5 4 3 2 1 Performance of SAECURE RMBS transactions (cont’d) No. of defaulted loans across all SAECURE transactions Source: Investor Reports (2006 – 2013) Recovery 70 60 39 50 40 30 41 20 26 35 10 7 0 2006 45 29 15 2007 2008 NHG RMBS 30 17 9 7 8 17 33 13 2009 2010 2011 2012 RMBS (non 100% NHG) Recovery Rate on NHG RMBS (SAECURE 6, 8 and 13) improved from 93% at the end of 2012 to 96% at the end of 20131 Recovery Rate on other RMBS (SAECURE 7,9 10,11 and 12) improved from 81% at the end of 2012 to 83% at the end of 2013 The average loss per mortgage loan for both NHG and non-NHG in 2012 was EUR 38,000 vs. EUR 26,500 in 2013. These are the average losses before submitting a claim to NHG or similar recovered amounts 2013 Loss statistics across all SAECURE transactions Loss statistics across all NHG SAECURE transactions Source: Investor Reports (2006 – 2013) Source: Investor Reports (2006 – 2013) Saecure - Net losses Outstanding net Total net losses Total net balance (EUR (EUR mln) losses (bps of Year mln) net balance) Saecure - Net losses (100% NHG RMBS) Outstanding net Total net losses Total net balance (EUR (EUR mln) losses (bps of Year mln) net balance) 2006 5,463 1.51 2.76 2006 2,000 2007 4,339 1.61 3.71 2007 1,905 0.10 0.54 2008 3,714 1.37 3.68 2008 1,748 0.12 0.68 2009 3,356 1.18 3.51 2009 1,590 0.08 0.53 2010 6,148 1.91 3.11 2010 2,916 0.05 0.18 2011 6,580 0.90 1.37 2011 2,727 0.03 0.12 2012 6,532 1.14 1.74 2012 2,559 0.19 0.75 2013 7,523 1.50 1.99 2013 2,437 0.06 0.24 Note: Historical performance is not an indicator of future performance which may differ materially 1SAECURE 6 called at 27 august 2013. Recovery rates for Saecure 6 are based on end of July 2013 figures - - Aegon’s Residential Mortgage Loan Origination, Underwriting & Servicing 46 Aegon NL organization Aegon NL consists of Business Lines: Business Line Life & Mortgages, Business Line Pension and Business Line Non-Life. Aegon Business Line Life Insurance, the servicer of the mortgage loans, has a team of 140 people (121 FTE) located in Leeuwarden (91 front office and 30 back office) Aegon NL management structure (simplified) Aegon Business Line Life - management structure* Aegon Business Line Life & Mortgages Aegon NL Mortgage Lending Staff Business Line Life & Mortgages Business Line Pension Business Line Non-Life Servicedesk Applications and Underwriting Servicing 1 Servicing 2 * Also simplified: Only department of Mortgage Lending is represented here. 47 Source: Aegon Aegon NL mortgage lending organization Marketing NL Sales BL Life Product development Marketing department Distribution and Sales Sales department Application processing Credit assessment and processing department Financial Services Distribution partners Accepting and monitoring new brokers and distribution partners Debt collection Service unit Registration of loans Arrears management Administration loans Commercial administration Early arrears Late arrears Foreclosure processing Foreclosures department 48 Source: Aegon Aegon NL mortgage lending organization (cont’d) Aegon NL has two entities for its mortgage lending business, Aegon Hypotheken and Aegon Leven, which offer its mortgage loans under the “Aegon” brand name mainly to Dutch citizens with collateral only in the Netherlands ► ► ► Aegon Hypotheken B.V. has outsourced all origination and servicing activities to Aegon Leven. Aegon Hypotheken is fully embedded in Aegon‟s global risk- and capital management framework The mortgage lending business is a powerful cross-selling tool for life insurance products. With approx. 40% of all sold mortgage loans, Aegon also sells an insurance product All mortgage loans are sold through intermediaries ► ► ► ► 49 As of the 1st of April 2011 all newly originated mortgage loans are underwritten by Aegon Hypotheken B.V., a 100% subsidiary of Aegon Nederland N.V. Only professional regional and national parties who adhere to Aegon‟s strict standards and requirements are used as intermediaries The advantage of using intermediaries is to increase the market range and use parties who have strong regional knowledge. Aegon uses a wide range of intermediaries (self-owned as well as other independent financial advisors). All underwriting activities are performed by Aegon NL As of 1 January 2013, new legislation is in force. Unlike before, intermediaries are no longer allowed to receive commissions from the underwriter, instead they will have to charge their fees directly to the client Mortgages are not sold “On-line” but underwriting process at Aegon has been digitalized which lead to efficient internal and client process. Application for withdrawal of construction deposits can be done online. Clients pay their monthly mortgage by “direct debit” Source: Aegon Aegon NL mortgage lending organization (cont’d) The mortgage loans are widely distributed over the whole of the Netherlands and are also well diversified by borrower age ► ► 50 Aegon has defined the following as its key target groups for the sale of mortgage loans: young customers buying their first home (< 35 years), customers moving to another home, customers staying in their current home (refinancing and increased mortgage loans) and to a lesser degree senior citizens Interest rate arrangements range from 1-month for floating rate mortgage loans to up to 30 years for fixed rate mortgage loans Due to its long history in secured funding, Aegon has good access to funding markets All mortgage related processes are periodically reviewed and are regularly audited (including SOX compliance) Source: Aegon Successful Dutch mortgage loan operation The mortgage lending business offers Aegon substantial cross-selling opportunities and synergies ► Cross-selling of life-insurance products ► Natural investment for the life insurance book of Aegon Aegon NL‟s portfolio of prime residential mortgage loans amounted to €24.5bn at the end of the fourth quarter 2013 In 2013, Aegon increased their portfolio by €2.3bn through a combination of new mortgage loans and lower prepayment levels Aegon was very successful in minimizing its lending losses and had a loss rate of 1.99bps across all SAECURE transactions in 2013 ► ► Evidence of its strict arrears and collection procedures Source: Aegon (2006 – 2013) Non NHG Mortgage Loans (LHS) NHG Mortgage Loans (LHS) 1 Outstanding SAECURE securitization program at year-end (RHS)* (€ bn) (% of total book) 25 50% 20 40% 15 30% 10 20% 5 10% 0 0% 2006 The recovery rate on defaulted loans as per ultimo 2013 is 96% for NHG RMBS (SAECURE 6, 8 and 13)1 and 83% on all other RMBS (non 100% NHG) Source: Aegon 51 Mortgage loan portfolio 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 *SAECURE 6 was repaid at FORD (August 2013) and is not included in the outstanding SAECURE programm at end of 2013. 2013 „Gouden Spreekbuis Award‟ 2013 Nominee for Dutch Securitization Award 2013 2012 Performance Award Mortgages and „Zilveren Spreekbuis Award‟ 2011 Aegon „Hypotheekproduct 2011 Award‟ 2009 „Gouden Spreekbuis Award‟ and the Performance Award SAECURE 6 called at 27 august 2013. Recovery rates for Saecure 6 are based on end of July 2013 figures Residential mortgage loan production 70% of Dutch borrowers take out mortgage loans with interest reset periods in excess of 5 years (source: Aegon) Aegon customers are even more risk-averse: > 90% have opted for interest reset dates in excess of 5 years Aegon customers can repay without penalty up to the current WOZ valuation of the property. This option is available November 1st 2013 until January 1st 2015 For Aegon, all mortgage loans are originated via intermediaries 52 Aegon‟s customers are increasingly switching to (longer term) fixed interest rates (especially 10-year interest reset terms) due to the low absolute long term interest rates and uncertainty in the economic situation However, all underwriting decisions are made by Aegon‟s underwriting team based in Leeuwarden Source: Aegon Aegon mortgage loan part production – by interest reset period Source: Aegon (%) January 2013 – December 2013 Aegon mortgage loan part production – by product type Source: Aegon (%) January 2013 – December 2013 Aegon underwriting process Aegon has a robust underwriting process that allows it to make lending decisions on a timely basis Integrated and efficient approach from proposal to disbursement of the mortgage loan, including origination and administration of supplementary insurance products The underwriting process at Aegon has been digitalised, which leads to efficient internal and client processes Underwriting Aegon front office Mortgage broker Preparation of proposals Reviewing of proposals Preparation and sending of proposals Process Aegon mid office Cycle time is max 53 Cycle time is max 2 days Source: Aegon Aegon back office 1 Receipt of signed proposals Verification of docs (customer ID etc) Sending documents to the notary Receiving preliminary deeds & settlements Verification of documents Transfer of money Cycle times Servicing 5 days Aegon back office 2 Receipt of signed deeds Transferring mortgage loans to the back office system Transferring insurance policies to the back office system Cycle time is 5 days Handling of mortgage loan changes Insurance policy changes 98% of all customers pay via direct debit and 2% by bank transfer Cycle time is 5 days 54 Borrower Underwriting criteria based on Code of Conduct criteria Credit searches with BKR (National Credit Register) and SFH (Fraud Register) Collateral Owner occupied properties Mandatory valuation of the property Mandatory damage and fire insurance Additional forms of collateral: life insurance and equity portfolios Loan Underwriting criteria & credit process Underwriting criteria based on Code of Conduct criteria (LTVs, DTIs etc) Mortgage loans with life insurance policies attached are priced more competitively (cross-selling) Aegon Leven‟s underwriting team consists of 46 professionals. 25% of the team have more than 10 years experience Strict lending limits apply to the 5 authorisation levels (e.g. underwriter with average experience = €400,000 limit) Underwriting of loans exceeding €700,000 have to be approved by a senior underwriter and a member of the management team together Approximately 20% of applications are declined immediately, the most common reasons for rejections include bad credit references (BKR) and high loan to income ratios (Aegon Leven follows National Budgeting Institute guidelines for income) Aegon Leven‟s average acceptance rate on loan applications is approximately 66% Source: Aegon Underwriting criteria Before 1 April 2011 all mortgage loan origination was done out of Aegon Leven. As of 1 April 2011 all origination is done by Aegon Hypotheken B.V., a 100% subsidiary of Aegon NL All borrowers must meet Aegon‟s lending criteria which largely focus on collateral and income The approval to lend outside the automatically accepted lending criteria may be granted on a loan-by-loan basis subject to senior underwriter approval Majority of mortgage loan acceptances on income criteria are via the system Additionally, Aegon endorses the underwriting criteria set out by the Dutch Code of Conduct The explain ratio for Aegon is less than 5% Aegon has well defined limits and criteria to whom and under what conditions Aegon can lend to its customers: ► Since 2009 LTVs cannot exceed 109% ► Since 2011 LTVs cannot exceed 106% ► Since 2014 LTV‟s cannot exceed 104% ► Standard CHF criteria state that borrowers cannot borrow more than 4.5x their gross salary. Explain cases are capped at 6.5x gross salary ► Only residential mortgage loans ► If certain LTFV thresholds are exceeded, life insurance is compulsory ► Aegon has the first lien on property with a recourse to the borrower or recourse to NHG ► 55 Since August 2011 the Interest-only part is capped at 50% of market value, remainder needs some form of repayment. This was already applicable for NHG mortgages. Aegon has an automatic valuation system (only for existing mortgage loans). Aegon revaluates the borrower‟s property with the NBWO system to improve their position in Aegon‟s LTFV buckets. At this moment revaluation is done in case of renewal of contracts in the <90% LTFV and <125% LTFV buckets, which results in better retention (currently a retention rate of 87%) Source: Aegon Changes in Aegon underwriting criteria 2008 - Discontinued Aegon KredietHypotheek (Credit mortgage loan) 2009 - LTV cannot exceed 109% 2010 - Discontinued Aegon BeleggingsHypotheek (Investment mortgage loan) 2011 - LTV cannot exceed 106% (entire market) - Introduction Aegon BankspaarHypotheek (Bank savings mortgage loan) - Interest-only part is capped at 50% of market value, remainder needs some form of repayment 2012 - Legal maturity date for Interest only mortgages set at max 30 years, used to be the day the owner turned 100 - Discontinued mortgages for recreational homes 2013 - LTV cannot exceed 105% - Prepayment without penalty for the loan balance in excess of the WOZ value of the property (temporary arrangement from November 1st 2013 to January 1st 2015) 2014 56 - LTV cannot exceed 104% - Existing IO mortgages can be transferred up to a maximum of 50% IO - Residual debt after sale of property can be co-financed. Only for existing Aegon customers and under current underwriting criteria Source: Aegon Focus on foreclosure in the Netherlands 1 Foreclosure Further recourse to other wealth including salary A mortgage loan lender can repossess and sell a property by public auction without court order ► ► ► A lender only needs to adhere to appropriate notice periods and have process run by a public notary In insolvency, the maximum stay that a court can impose is 4 months (court can still allow repossession during this period) If a lender wants to proceed by private sale rather than auction, the consent of the court needs to be requested AEGON’s collection procedures Stage 1: Day 15 Action: Automatic reminder Stage 3: Day 60 Action: Telephone collection list Full recourse to the borrower ► ► After foreclosure, any remaining debt remains enforceable until discharged in full A lender can attach to the borrower’s salary simply by informing the employer via bailiff In insolvency, a debt rescheduling for private individuals (“Wsnp”) can limit recoveries after repossession ► ► Covers a period of 3 years, may be extended to 5 years. A court may at the end render remaining debt unenforceable (“clean sheet”) In AEGON’s experience, Wsnp and personal insolvencies are rare in the Netherlands due to the onerous requirements Stage 5: Day 120 Action: Entire loan declared immediately due and payable a) Induce a final attempt for voluntary payment b) Allow time for drafting of legal documents c) Begin foreclosure process Days in Arrears 6 Months 60 Stage 2: Day 45 Action: Formal written demand 57 Stage 7: Post Sale Action: Post sale review 120 Stage 4: Day 90 Action: Urgent arrears list Stage 6: Foreclosure Process Action: Repossession and sale Source: AEGON 1For non-NHG loans; for NHG loans, a lender first seeks to obtain payment (up to EUR 320,000) under the guarantee Continued on next page Repossession & sale process in the Netherlands Continued from previous page Stage 5c Action to receive payment Stage 6 Sale process Up to 1 Year¹ Stage 7 Post-sale Letter of lien of salary Third party guarantor Yes Joint voluntary sale Borrower cooperation decision Unsuccessful No 58 Foreclosure begins Notary appointed Bailiff appointed to collect any remaining debts² Successful Private sale Sale type decision Auction Source: Aegon ¹This is the average total time from the first missed payment until the actual foreclosure date ²The bailiff works on a no cure no pay arrangement. Extra expenses incurred are added to the default amount as are penalty interests Set-off risk in the Dutch market Savings and insurance vehicles: general remark A Dutch mortgage loan lender can access the linked savings, investment or insurance products in case a borrower defaults ► No discretion on the part of the borrower to divert funds Potential set-off by the borrower & mitigants Source: Moody‟s, Updated Methodology for Set-Off in Dutch RMBS, 12 November 2009 and Fitch, EMEA Criteria Addendum – Netherlands, 8 March 2011 If the insurance company providing the borrower with the insurance policy becomes insolvent, it is possible that the borrower may set-off the value of his or her policy against the outstanding amount of the mortgage loan (insurance setoff) Insurance mortgage loans The risk does not arise in respect of savings products which can form part of an insurance mortgage loan (see below) All rating agencies model the potential set off risk arising from insurance linked mortgage loans Each transaction will be analysed individually, taking into account the loss severity (e.g. capital under insurance policy and recoveries) and the probability of default (e.g. probability of default of the insurance company and the likelihood of set of f by a borrower) Savings mortgage loans and Investment mortgage loans Savings mortgage loans and Investment Mortgage loans could theoretically also lead to borrower set off, however this risk is generally mitigated in Dutch RMBS ► ► For savings mortgage loans, a sub-participation agreement is entered into which allows to transfer the borrowers‟ monthly savings payments from the insurance company to the SPV For Investment mortgage loans, the general set up is that the borrower is investing through a bankruptcy remote securities ac count Savings/current accounts held by the borrower with the Seller: usually covered in Dutch RMBS by cash reserve Other set-off considerations 59 ► Not relevant for Aegon as no deposits taken Construction deposits: usually covered in Dutch RMBS by cash reserve Source: Aegon Aegon Highlights 60 Aegon Underlying earnings before tax by geography* Aegon is an international life insurance, pensions and asset management company based in The Hague Aegon has businesses in over 20 markets in the Americas, Europe and Asia Aegon companies employ over 26,500 people and have millions of customers across the globe Aegon generated underlying earnings before tax of EUR 1,945 million in 2013 Aegon N.V. owns 100% of Aegon Nederland N.V. (“Aegon NL”), which owns 100% of Aegon Levensverzekering N.V. and 100% of Aegon Hypotheken B.V. Source: Aegon Underlying earnings before tax by line of business* Source: Aegon Aegon N.V. credit ratings Source: S&P, Moody’s and Fitch Long-term Rating agency 2013 Short-term Rating Outlook Rating S&P A- Stable A-2 Moody’s A3 Stable P-2 Fitch A Negative F1 ** Aegon NV issuer credit ratings accurate as of 3 March 2014 61 Source: Aegon * Excludes negative contribution from Holdings and Other activities ** Non-life earnings EUR -20mln, therefore not visible in diagram Aegon at a glance Over 26,500 Life PENSIONS ASSET MANAGEMENT insurance EMPLOYEES1 +20 markets THROUGHOUT THE AMERICAS, EUROPE AND ASIA Underlying earnings before tax in 2013 EUR 1.9 billion 62 1) As per December 31, 2013 Revenue-generating investments EUR 475 billion1 Aegon Netherlands N.V. (“Aegon NL”) Underlying earnings before tax Aegon NL is wholly owned by Aegon N.V. and a core member of the Aegon group Aegon NL offers a wide range of financial products and services to its clients, including pensions, insurance (life and non-life), mortgage loans, savings and investment products Beginning April 1, 2011 all newly originated mortgage loans are underwritten by Aegon Hypotheken B.V., a 100% subsidiary of Aegon Netherlands N.V.; mortgage loan servicing will continue to be performed by Aegon Leven In 2013, Aegon NL represented 17% of Aegon‟s total underlying earnings before tax Aegon Leven has a AA- (Stable) IFSR from Standard & Poor‟s ** Source: Aegon EUR millions 2013 Life and Savings 243 Pensions 111 Non-life (20) Distribution 18 Share in underlying earnings before tax of associates 2 Underlying earnings before tax 355 Aegon NL as a % of Aegon Source: Aegon, FY 2013 Simplified Aegon NL Structure Aegon NL Employees 17% Market consistent VNB Sales 83% 27% 100% 95% 17% 0% Aegon N.V. 73% 5% Underlying earnings before tax* 63 Other Entities Aegon Netherlands N.V. 83% 20% 40% 60% 100% 80% 100% Aegon Bank N.V. 100% Aegon Hypotheken B.V. Source: Aegon * Excludes negative contribution from Holdings and Other activities ** Credit ratings accurate as of 3 March 2014. Refer to rating agency websites for additional detail. 100% Aegon Levensverzekering N.V. 100% Aegon Schadeverzekering N.V. Appendix: Provisional Stratification Tables 64 Portfolio stratification Key Characteristics Notes As per reporting date Principal balance 1,574,318,425 Value of saving deposits 1,501,700,514 Construction deposits 5,731,892 Net principal balance excl. construction and saving deposits Number of loans 1,495,968,622 8,030 Number of loanparts 2. The weighted average coupon is based on current interest rate of the Loan Part, weighted by the net principal balance. 3. The weighted average maturity (in years) is based on the legal maturity date of the Loan Part and the cut-off date, weighted by the net principal balance. 4. The weighted average seasoning (in years) is based on the origination date of the Loan Part and the Cut-Off Date, weighted by the net principal balance. 5. The weighted average LTMV is based on the „net principal balance‟ for each Mortgage Loan divided by the „Market Value‟ upon origination of the Mortgage Loan‟, weighted by the net principal balance. 6. The weighted average LTMV (indexed) is based on the „net principal balance‟ for each Mortgage Loan divided by the „Indexed Market Value‟ upon origination of the Mortgage Loan‟, weighted by the net principal balance. The Indexation is based on data from the Land Registry as per December 2013. 7. The weighted average LTFV is based on the „net principal balance‟ for each Mortgage Loan divided by the „Foreclosure Value‟ upon origination of the Mortgage Loan, weighted by the net principal balance. 8. The weighted average LTFV (indexed) is based on the „net principal balance‟ for each loan divided by the „Indexed Foreclosure Value‟ upon origination of the Mortgage Loan, weighted by the net principal balance. The Indexation is based on data from the Land Registry as per December 2013. 9. The Loan-to-Foreclosure-Value of most loans is based on the foreclosure value upon origination of the Mortgage Loans except for a few Mortgage Loans which have been revaluated on a later date. Such a revaluation has exclusively been made in respect of Mortgage Loans which have been increased or decreased and has been based on the foreclosure value upon the day of the alteration. 15,637 Average principal balance (borrower) 187,011 Weighted average current interest rate 4.81 Weighted average Remaining Fixed Rate Period (in years) 65 All totals and balances included in the stratification tables are based on net principal balance (i.e. net of value of saving deposits). 72,617,911 Net principal balance 17.99 Weighted average maturity (in years) 35.5 Weighted average seasoning (in years) 2.54 Weighted average LTMV 1. 95.1% Weighted average LTMV (indexed) 105.1% Weighted average LTFV 105.8% Weighted averageLTFV (indexed) 116.9% Source: AEGON Note: All values in the following stratification tables are as a percentage of current outstanding net balance Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Redemption type Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount Description Annuity % of Total Nr of Loanparts % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV 55,934,216 3.7% 596 3.8% 4.62 28.2 95.7% Bank Savings 496,136,531 33.0% 4,372 28.0% 4.94 26.9 98.0% Interest Only 535,846,356 35.7% 6,820 43.6% 4.60 53.1 93.4% 2,042,712 0.1% 18 0.1% 4.16 22.5 88.5% 73,018,875 4.9% 681 4.4% 4.72 22.2 89.6% 1,220,200 0.1% 14 0.1% 4.34 28.6 89.4% 337,501,625 22.5% 3,136 20.1% 5.04 24.6 94.9% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Investments Life Insurance Linear Savings Total Outstanding loan amount % of Total Nr of Loans % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( > ) Until ( <= ) < 25,000 - - - - - - - 25,000 50,000 50,000 - 1 0.0% 4.95 28.8 23.0% 50,000 75,000 7,013,115 0.5% 109 1.4% 4.39 32.1 50.5% 75,000 100,000 27,042,671 1.8% 302 3.8% 4.70 31.2 71.4% 100,000 150,000 222,734,888 14.8% 1,729 21.5% 4.79 33.0 86.8% 150,000 200,000 477,143,319 31.8% 2,716 33.8% 4.84 34.8 95.2% 200,000 250,000 472,820,067 31.5% 2,123 26.4% 4.85 36.5 97.9% 250,000 300,000 213,513,261 14.2% 791 9.9% 4.78 37.0 99.7% 300,000 350,000 81,383,192 5.4% 259 3.2% 4.73 38.6 101.8% 350,000 400,000 - - - - - - - 400,000 450,000 - - - - - - - 450,000 500,000 - - - - - - - Weighted Average 500,000 > - - - - - - - Minimum 50,000 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Maximum 343,675 Total 66 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount 187,011 Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Origination year Seasoning Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount % of Total Nr of Loanparts % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount % of Total Nr of Loanparts % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( >= ) Until ( < ) From ( >= ) Until ( < ) < 1995 - - - - - - - < 1 year 53,960,262 3.6% 502 3.2% 4.40 29.8 96.0% 1995 1996 - - - - - - - 1 year 2 years 792,098,114 52.8% 7,898 50.5% 4.79 31.6 96.8% 1996 1997 - - - - - - - 2 years 3 years 265,828,890 17.7% 2,737 17.5% 4.81 42.3 95.4% 1997 1998 - - - - - - - 3 years 4 years 95,671,734 6.4% 1,008 6.5% 4.66 41.9 94.5% 1998 1999 - - - - - - - 4 years 5 years 89,271,215 5.9% 993 6.4% 5.50 40.9 95.1% 1999 2000 - - - - - - - 5 years 6 years 74,552,504 5.0% 849 5.4% 5.26 40.6 92.9% 2000 2001 - - - - - - - 6 years 7 years 64,505,455 4.3% 770 4.9% 4.72 38.1 89.9% 2001 2002 - - - - - - - 7 years 8 years 51,860,088 3.5% 692 4.4% 4.34 35.7 82.1% 2002 2003 - - - - - - - 8 years 9 years 13,714,994 0.9% 184 1.2% 4.27 33.6 81.0% 9 years 10 years 237,257 0.0% 4 0.0% 4.34 38.0 100.7% 10 years 11 years - - - - - - - 11 years 12 years - - - - - - - 12 years 13 years - - - - - - - 13 years 14 years - - - - - - - 14 years 15 years - - - - - - - 93.9% 15 years 16 years - - - - - - - 95.5% 16 years 17 years - - - - - - - 96.8% 17 years 18 years - - - - - - - 19 years - - - - - - - 2003 2004 - - - - - - - 2004 2005 - - - - - - - 2005 2006 12,676,233 0.8% 172 1.1% 4.30 33.9 81.1% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 45,639,572 66,618,731 77,800,033 86,867,736 81,925,922 283,568,213 792,132,440 3.0% 4.4% 5.2% 5.8% 5.5% 18.9% 52.8% 608 810 886 969 865 2,919 7,902 3.9% 5.2% 5.7% 6.2% 5.5% 18.7% 50.5% 4.31 4.66 5.24 5.50 4.72 4.80 4.79 35.3 37.8 40.6 41.0 41.8 42.3 31.6 81.2% 89.3% 92.9% 95.1% 2013 2014 54,471,633 3.6% 506 3.2% 4.40 30.0 96.0% 18 years 2014 2015 - - - - - - - 19 years 20 years - - - - - - 2015 2016 - - - - - - - 20 years > - - - - - - - 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Total Weighted Average - Total Weighted Average 2.5 Minimum 2005 Minimum 0.1 Maximum 2013 Maximum 9.0 * Seasoning is defined as the period between the date of origination of the Loan Part and the Cut-Off part 67 Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Legal maturity % of Total Nr of Loanparts % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( >= ) Until ( < ) < 2015 17,596 - 2 0.0% 2.49 0.7 95.6% 2015 2020 266,060 0.0% 11 0.1% 4.59 5.3 75.8% 2020 2025 2,552,232 0.2% 62 0.4% 4.84 8.9 74.4% 2025 2030 19,064,954 1.3% 322 2.1% 4.87 14.1 76.9% 2030 2035 118,666,335 7.9% 1,303 8.3% 4.99 18.9 88.2% 2035 2040 224,980,875 15.0% 2,168 13.9% 5.04 23.6 94.0% 2040 2045 763,722,388 50.9% 7,037 45.0% 4.77 28.5 97.9% 2045 2050 1,535,558 0.1% 16 0.1% 4.24 33.5 39.8% 2050 2055 3,381,509 0.2% 46 0.3% 4.36 38.7 55.1% 2055 2060 9,093,236 0.6% 120 0.8% 4.31 43.6 72.1% 2060 2065 20,170,962 1.3% 269 1.7% 4.59 48.7 81.9% 2065 2070 33,960,652 2.3% 451 2.9% 4.63 53.7 88.5% 2070 2075 50,674,047 3.4% 661 4.2% 4.68 58.5 92.8% 2075 2080 68,187,497 4.5% 872 5.6% 4.71 63.7 95.1% 2080 2085 107,340,887 7.2% 1,339 8.6% 4.77 68.5 96.8% 2085 2090 78,085,726 5.2% 958 6.1% 4.78 73.1 98.3% 2090 2095 - - - - - - - Weighted Average 2095 2100 - - - - - - - Minimum 2014 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Maximum 2089 Total 68 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount - Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Remaining tenor % of Total Nr of Loanparts % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( >= ) Until ( < ) < 1 year 17,596 - 2 0.0% 2.49 0.7 95.6% 1 year 2 years - - - - - - - 2 years 3 years - - - - - - - 3 years 4 years 32,264 - 3 0.0% 3.91 3.5 89.8% 4 years 5 years 28,696 - 2 0.0% 4.62 4.8 49.8% 5 years 6 years 205,100 0.0% 6 0.0% 4.69 5.6 77.2% 6 years 7 years 128,732 0.0% 6 0.0% 4.62 6.6 74.6% 7 years 8 years 520,542 0.0% 13 0.1% 4.61 7.5 73.2% 8 years 9 years 839,116 0.1% 21 0.1% 4.83 8.6 76.1% 9 years 10 years 398,109 0.0% 10 0.1% 5.00 9.5 82.4% 10 years 11 years 665,734 0.0% 12 0.1% 4.99 10.4 68.5% 11 years 12 years 1,111,588 0.1% 18 0.1% 4.75 11.5 76.6% 12 years 13 years 2,270,735 0.2% 35 0.2% 4.52 12.6 70.9% 13 years 14 years 6,271,541 0.4% 127 0.8% 4.96 13.7 72.6% 14 years 15 years 3,725,971 0.3% 61 0.4% 4.84 14.5 77.2% 15 years 16 years 5,685,119 0.4% 81 0.5% 4.97 15.5 83.9% 16 years 17 years 7,444,263 0.5% 104 0.7% 4.89 16.6 82.3% 17 years 18 years 19,470,550 1.3% 219 1.4% 4.99 17.4 87.8% 18 years 19 years 46,066,541 3.1% 505 3.2% 4.93 18.7 85.7% 19 years 20 years 21,081,309 1.4% 236 1.5% 5.01 19.5 91.0% 20 years 21 years 24,603,672 1.6% 239 1.5% 5.09 20.5 92.5% 21 years 22 years 31,739,937 2.1% 324 2.1% 4.90 21.5 93.6% 22 years 23 years 42,922,396 2.9% 425 2.7% 4.70 22.5 93.3% 23 years 24 years 56,453,623 3.8% 537 3.4% 4.87 23.5 93.5% 24 years 25 years 47,752,929 3.2% 457 2.9% 5.24 24.5 93.7% 25 years 26 years 46,111,990 3.1% 425 2.7% 5.47 25.5 95.7% 26 years 27 years 34,707,107 2.3% 301 1.9% 4.94 26.6 95.5% 27 years 28 years 106,159,187 7.1% 931 6.0% 4.88 27.3 96.9% 28 years 29 years 576,072,441 38.4% 5,393 34.5% 4.77 28.7 98.3% 29 years 30 years 46,660,560 3.1% 410 2.6% 4.39 29.5 96.9% 30 years 40 years 4,037,611 0.3% 49 0.3% 4.36 36.1 48.8% 40 years 50 years 25,372,608 1.7% 337 2.2% 4.47 46.2 76.7% 50 years 60 years 79,103,628 5.3% 1,031 6.6% 4.65 55.7 90.5% 60 years 70 years 163,615,824 10.9% 2,085 13.3% 4.73 65.7 95.6% 70 years 80 years 100,423,497 6.7% 1,232 7.9% 4.79 72.5 98.2% 80 years 90 years - - - - - - - 90 years > - - - - - - - Total 69 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Weighted Average 35.5 Minimum 0.6 Maximum 75.9 * The Remaining Tenor is defined as the period between the Cut-Off Date and the legal maturity date of the Loan Part Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Original loan to original foreclosure value % of Total Nr of Loans % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( > ) Until ( <= ) Unknown 0% - - - - - - - < 10% - - - - - - - 10% 20% 55,000 - 1 0.0% 4.30 49.1 17.7% 20% 30% 1,260,996 0.1% 15 0.2% 4.28 40.8 22.1% 30% 40% 4,347,270 0.3% 48 0.6% 4.09 33.8 31.0% 40% 50% 7,820,110 0.5% 76 1.0% 4.15 33.6 39.6% 50% 60% 14,657,460 1.0% 123 1.5% 4.16 32.4 46.9% 60% 70% 18,038,710 1.2% 151 1.9% 4.52 29.9 55.3% 70% 80% 26,045,705 1.7% 191 2.4% 4.65 30.5 63.2% 80% 90% 48,187,099 3.2% 316 3.9% 4.65 31.6 73.0% 90% 100% 86,794,546 5.8% 555 6.9% 4.72 32.0 81.6% 100% 110% 117,594,624 7.8% 652 8.1% 4.72 32.5 90.2% 110% 120% 792,145,030 52.8% 3,923 48.9% 4.85 37.6 98.7% 120% 130% 384,753,965 25.6% 1,979 24.7% 4.88 34.3 103.1% 130% 140% - - - - - - - 140% 150% - - - - - - - 150% > - - - - - - - Minimum 19.6% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Maximum 130.0% Total 70 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount * Original Loan to Original Foreclosure Value is defined as: Original Principle Amount / Original Foreclosure Value Weighted Average 111.9% Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Current loan to original foreclosure value % of Total Nr of Loans % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( > ) Until ( <= ) Unknown 0% - - - - - - - < 10% - - - - - - - 10% 20% 232,488 0.0% 4 0.1% 4.71 25.1 17.6% 20% 30% 1,787,476 0.1% 22 0.3% 4.24 40.9 22.8% 30% 40% 5,498,849 0.4% 59 0.7% 4.15 32.6 32.4% 40% 50% 11,364,012 0.8% 106 1.3% 4.29 31.8 41.4% 50% 60% 17,894,327 1.2% 154 1.9% 4.33 32.1 49.9% 60% 70% 26,621,905 1.8% 206 2.6% 4.60 29.5 58.6% 70% 80% 38,800,041 2.6% 267 3.3% 4.71 30.6 68.1% 80% 90% 77,247,080 5.1% 489 6.1% 4.74 32.3 77.0% 90% 100% 151,436,305 10.1% 876 10.9% 4.85 34.2 85.9% 100% 110% 420,609,906 28.0% 2,131 26.5% 4.91 38.3 95.3% 110% 120% 627,708,147 41.8% 3,087 38.4% 4.81 35.9 102.9% 120% 130% 122,499,978 8.2% 629 7.8% 4.74 31.7 109.6% 130% 140% - - - - - - - 140% 150% - - - - - - - 150% > - - - - - - - Minimum 19.1% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Maximum 128.5% Total 71 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount Weighted Average * Current Loan to Original Foreclosure Value is defined as: (Outstanding Principle Amount – Total Savings Amount) / Original Foreclosure Value 105.8% Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Current loan to indexed(1) foreclosure value % of Total Nr of Loans % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( > ) Until ( <= ) Unknown 0% - - - - - - - < 10% - - - - - - - 10% 20% - - - - - - - 20% 30% 1,397,406 0.1% 18 0.2% 4.32 38.3 20.7% 30% 40% 3,919,418 0.3% 44 0.6% 4.13 32.7 30.1% 40% 50% 7,660,197 0.5% 73 0.9% 4.24 30.8 38.4% 50% 60% 14,533,146 1.0% 131 1.6% 4.29 31.5 46.2% 60% 70% 21,054,305 1.4% 173 2.2% 4.47 30.4 54.5% 70% 80% 26,122,957 1.7% 189 2.4% 4.69 29.8 62.6% 80% 90% 42,349,296 2.8% 290 3.6% 4.74 29.9 71.5% 90% 100% 78,314,416 5.2% 495 6.2% 4.70 31.7 79.5% 100% 110% 121,809,062 8.1% 702 8.7% 4.77 32.5 87.2% 110% 120% 304,219,147 20.3% 1,537 19.1% 4.81 33.6 96.2% 120% 130% 677,566,787 45.1% 3,375 42.0% 4.83 36.7 101.8% 130% 140% 202,754,377 13.5% 1,003 12.5% 4.98 40.6 103.0% 140% 150% - - - - - - - 150% > - - - - - - - Minimum 21.7% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Maximum 135.0% Total 72 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount Weighted Average * Current Loan to Original Foreclosure Value is defined as: (Outstanding Principle Amount – Total Savings Amount) / Original Foreclosure Value ** Indexed Foreclosure Value is defined as: Original Foreclosure Value * Index *** Index is based on Land Registry data up to and including December 2013 (1) Indexation is based on figures from the Land registry as of December 2013 116.9% Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Original loan to original market value % of Total Nr of Loans % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( > ) Until ( <= ) Unknown 0% < 10% - - - - - - - 10% 20% 277,018 0.0% 3 0.0% 4.42 51.3 19.1% 20% 30% 1,859,230 0.1% 21 0.3% 4.04 36.7 25.2% 30% 40% 6,231,901 0.4% 66 0.8% 4.21 33.8 34.3% 40% 50% 12,565,883 0.8% 116 1.4% 4.08 32.6 43.1% 50% 60% 18,547,369 1.2% 154 1.9% 4.38 30.6 52.4% 60% 70% 25,364,148 1.7% 193 2.4% 4.61 30.9 60.8% 70% 80% 48,473,232 3.2% 321 4.0% 4.65 31.1 71.4% 80% 90% 96,848,840 6.5% 619 7.7% 4.71 32.0 81.4% 90% 100% 173,715,000 11.6% 939 11.7% 4.79 34.4 91.6% 100% 110% 924,663,721 61.6% 4,596 57.2% 4.85 36.9 99.7% 110% 120% 193,154,172 12.9% 1,002 12.5% 4.91 34.3 103.9% 120% 130% - - - - - - - 130% 140% - - - - - - - 140% 150% - - - - - - - 150% > - - - - - - - Minimum 17.7% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Maximum 117.0% Total 73 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount - - - - - - * Original Loan to Original Market Value is defined as: Original Principal Amount / Original Market Value ** The Original Market Value is defined as Original Foreclosure Value / 0.9 - Weighted Average 100.6% Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Current loan to original market value % of Total Nr of Loans % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( > ) Until ( <= ) Unknown 0% < 10% - - - - - - - 10% 20% 667,227 0.0% 9 0.1% 4.50 34.9 18.6% 20% 30% 2,918,975 0.2% 33 0.4% 4.02 37.0 26.8% 30% 40% 7,558,737 0.5% 79 1.0% 4.24 32.8 36.0% 40% 50% 16,113,275 1.1% 144 1.8% 4.28 31.6 45.3% 50% 60% 27,032,332 1.8% 218 2.7% 4.51 30.1 55.3% 60% 70% 37,430,765 2.5% 266 3.3% 4.72 30.5 65.6% 70% 80% 76,229,534 5.1% 483 6.0% 4.72 32.1 75.7% 80% 90% 164,954,098 11.0% 963 12.0% 4.84 34.0 85.6% 90% 100% 527,017,883 35.1% 2,634 32.8% 4.89 38.7 96.2% 100% 110% 596,813,679 39.7% 2,973 37.0% 4.80 34.6 104.3% 110% 120% 44,964,009 3.0% 228 2.8% 4.73 31.9 111.4% 120% 130% - - - - - - - 130% 140% - - - - - - - 140% 150% - - - - - - - 150% > - - - - - - - Minimum 17.2% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Maximum 115.7% Total 74 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount - - - - - - - Weighted Average * Current Loan to Original Market Value is defined as: (Outstanding Principal Amount – Total Savings Amount) / Original Market Value ** The Original Market Value is defined as Original Foreclosure Value / 0.9 95.1% Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Current loan to indexed(1) market value % of Total Nr of Loans % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( > ) Until ( <= ) Unknown 0% - - - - - - - < 10% - - - - - - - 10% 20% 51,658 - 1 0.0% 5.60 12.7 17.2% 20% 30% 1,709,611 0.1% 22 0.3% 4.25 39.0 21.8% 30% 40% 6,362,786 0.4% 68 0.9% 4.13 31.6 32.7% 40% 50% 12,307,273 0.8% 115 1.4% 4.25 31.0 42.5% 50% 60% 20,501,001 1.4% 171 2.1% 4.40 31.0 51.6% 60% 70% 26,730,002 1.8% 205 2.6% 4.64 29.8 60.1% 70% 80% 43,030,983 2.9% 294 3.7% 4.74 29.9 70.3% 80% 90% 86,235,785 5.7% 546 6.8% 4.70 31.5 79.2% 90% 100% 146,517,301 9.8% 835 10.4% 4.76 32.2 88.3% 100% 110% 402,220,828 26.8% 2,035 25.3% 4.81 34.0 97.7% 110% 120% 701,669,654 46.7% 3,467 43.2% 4.86 37.9 102.2% 120% 130% 54,363,633 3.6% 271 3.4% 5.09 41.6 102.9% 130% 140% - - - - - - - 140% 150% - - - - - - - 150% > - - - - - - - Minimum 19.5% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Maximum 121.5% Total 75 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount (1) Indexation is based on figures from the Land registry as of December 2013 Weighted Average 105.1% Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Loanpart coupon (interest rate bucket) % of Total Nr of Loanparts % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( > ) Until ( <= ) Unknown 0.00% - - - - - - - < 0.50% - - - - - - - 0.50% 1.00% - - - - - - - 1.00% 1.50% - - - - - - - 1.50% 2.00% - - - - - - - 2.00% 2.50% 47,674,239 3.2% 642 4.1% 2.28 41.4 85.4% 2.50% 3.00% 917,557 0.1% 13 0.1% 3.00 28.2 97.0% 3.00% 3.50% 543,039 0.0% 13 0.1% 3.23 25.7 89.7% 3.50% 4.00% 25,267,293 1.7% 288 1.8% 3.93 30.9 91.5% 4.00% 4.50% 205,361,235 13.7% 2,351 15.0% 4.37 39.6 93.1% 4.50% 5.00% 730,249,421 48.6% 7,430 47.5% 4.80 35.6 97.1% 5.00% 5.50% 386,662,222 25.8% 3,839 24.6% 5.22 33.9 94.4% 5.50% 6.00% 103,906,108 6.9% 1,048 6.7% 5.69 32.0 93.9% 6.00% 6.50% 1,078,248 0.1% 12 0.1% 6.24 21.1 88.5% Weighted Average 4.8 7.00% > 41,152 - 1 0.0% 7.10 5.5 57.0% Minimum 2.1 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Maximum 7.1 Total 76 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Remaining interest rate fixed period % of Total Nr of Loanparts % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( >= ) Until ( < ) < 1 year 52,785,233 3.5% 724 4.6% 2.43 40.5 85.7% 1 year 2 years 4,060,386 0.3% 61 0.4% 4.05 32.9 82.0% 2 years 3 years 11,178,820 0.7% 149 1.0% 4.28 37.8 86.8% 3 years 4 years 11,217,134 0.8% 166 1.1% 4.35 33.0 89.4% 4 years 5 years 9,244,697 0.6% 120 0.8% 4.66 40.8 94.1% 5 years 6 years 8,182,981 0.5% 113 0.7% 4.71 37.4 95.5% 6 years 7 years 18,110,735 1.2% 209 1.3% 4.50 42.0 93.7% 7 years 8 years 112,545,444 7.5% 1,218 7.8% 4.77 43.0 95.4% 8 years 9 years 118,388,355 7.9% 1,303 8.3% 4.62 31.6 97.4% 9 years 10 years 17,471,253 1.2% 182 1.2% 4.31 30.9 95.4% 10 years 11 years 625,313 0.0% 14 0.1% 5.31 33.4 75.6% 11 years 12 years 1,024,278 0.1% 15 0.1% 4.92 16.1 67.4% 12 years 13 years 19,940,749 1.3% 264 1.7% 4.51 35.1 79.9% 13 years 14 years 36,600,461 2.4% 481 3.1% 4.77 30.0 86.1% 14 years 15 years 8,797,639 0.6% 103 0.7% 5.06 33.7 90.8% 15 years 16 years 4,966,272 0.3% 65 0.4% 5.37 19.3 90.3% 16 years 17 years 32,884,556 2.2% 347 2.2% 4.67 38.7 93.9% 17 years 18 years 140,191,727 9.3% 1,369 8.8% 4.88 40.5 95.5% 18 years 19 years 343,833,094 22.9% 3,393 21.7% 4.86 31.3 97.0% 19 years 20 years 33,837,677 2.3% 322 2.1% 4.63 27.9 94.3% 20 years 21 years 10,232,373 0.7% 100 0.6% 5.46 24.1 92.4% 21 years 22 years 7,233,464 0.5% 73 0.5% 5.44 23.4 92.8% 22 years 23 years 24,961,240 1.7% 300 1.9% 4.63 35.1 87.0% 23 years 24 years 55,256,837 3.7% 619 4.0% 4.82 38.3 92.8% 24 years 25 years 64,139,174 4.3% 727 4.7% 5.27 42.4 93.4% 25 years 26 years 66,758,503 4.5% 718 4.6% 5.58 43.4 95.5% 26 years 27 years 24,379,855 1.6% 229 1.5% 5.37 42.2 95.5% 27 years 28 years 14,541,715 1.0% 130 0.8% 5.34 41.1 95.5% 28 years 29 years 236,655,582 15.8% 2,039 13.0% 5.09 33.1 99.3% 29 years 30 years 11,654,968 0.8% 84 0.5% 4.80 32.1 97.5% 30 years Total 77 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount > - - - - - - - 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Weighted Average Minimum Maximum * The Remaining Interest Rate Fixed Period is defined as the period between the Cut-Off Date and the interest reset date of the Loan Part 18.0 29.6 Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Interest payment type Description Fixed Floating Total Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount % of Total Nr of Loanparts % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV 1,452,771,302 96.7% 14,973 95.8% 4.90 35.3 95.5% 48,929,212 3.3% 664 4.3% 2.30 41.1 85.6% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Property description 78 Property Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount Apartment 195,915,014 % of Total Nr of Loans 13.1% 1,291 % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV 16.1% 4.78 34.6 94.8% House 1,305,785,500 87.0% 6,739 83.9% 4.82 35.7 95.2% Total 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Geographical distribution (by province) Province Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount Brabant 216,474,304 14.4% 1,091 13.6% 4.81 35.2 93.9% Drenthe 38,197,044 2.5% 213 2.7% 4.73 37.2 95.2% Flevoland 32,389,950 2.2% 184 2.3% 4.69 36.5 95.5% Friesland 36,846,924 2.5% 221 2.8% 4.65 36.4 91.7% Gelderland 185,145,914 12.3% 960 12.0% 4.79 36.8 95.3% Groningen 59,194,956 3.9% 370 4.6% 4.76 35.3 94.9% Limburg 119,622,256 8.0% 688 8.6% 4.93 34.9 95.7% Noord-Holland 186,880,957 12.4% 963 12.0% 4.79 34.3 95.5% Overijssel 148,281,391 9.9% 776 9.7% 4.80 37.6 95.7% Utrecht 100,294,394 6.7% 492 6.1% 4.79 35.2 94.4% Zeeland 63,749,361 4.3% 383 4.8% 4.92 34.2 96.1% 314,623,063 21.0% 1,689 21.0% 4.85 34.9 95.6% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Zuid-Holland Total 79 % of Total Nr of Loans % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Geographical distribution (by economic region) Economic region NL111 - Oost-Groningen % of Total Nr of Loans % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV 14,367,245 1.0% 94 1.2% 4.70 36.5 96.3% 2,619,791 0.2% 19 0.2% 4.74 35.7 96.6% NL113 - Overig Groningen 39,666,064 2.6% 242 3.0% 4.80 34.9 94.6% NL121 - Noord-Friesland 21,401,252 1.4% 135 1.7% 4.66 35.1 90.7% NL122 - Zuidwest-Friesland 4,801,308 0.3% 27 0.3% 4.89 38.1 93.2% NL123 - Zuidoost-Friesland 10,994,760 0.7% 61 0.8% 4.52 38.2 92.6% NL131 - Noord-Drenthe 17,470,006 1.2% 99 1.2% 4.87 37.0 94.6% NL132 - Zuidoost-Drenthe 11,048,709 0.7% 64 0.8% 4.53 35.1 96.4% NL133 - Zuidwest-Drenthe 11,677,066 0.8% 62 0.8% 4.65 39.0 94.6% NL211 - Noord-Overijssel 58,885,484 3.9% 298 3.7% 4.81 37.8 95.5% NL212 - Zuidwest-Overijssel 24,633,286 1.6% 125 1.6% 4.83 36.4 94.8% NL213 - Twente 64,955,344 4.3% 354 4.4% 4.78 38.0 96.3% NL221 - Veluwe 65,876,784 4.4% 323 4.0% 4.78 37.0 94.9% NL224 - Zuidwest-Gelderland 14,874,250 1.0% 75 0.9% 4.81 36.4 96.0% NL225 - Achterhoek 39,658,139 2.6% 222 2.8% 4.76 35.9 95.4% NL226 - Arnhem/Nijmegen 65,447,370 4.4% 343 4.3% 4.82 37.3 95.4% NL230 - Flevoland 32,389,950 2.2% 184 2.3% 4.69 36.5 95.5% NL310 - Utrecht 99,393,391 6.6% 488 6.1% 4.79 35.3 94.4% NL321 - Kop van Noord-Holland 27,164,904 1.8% 143 1.8% 4.86 35.8 95.3% NL322 - Alkmaar en omgeving 26,232,174 1.8% 135 1.7% 4.86 34.0 95.8% NL323 - IJmond 20,532,070 1.4% 102 1.3% 4.72 34.9 98.3% NL324 - Agglomeratie Haarlem 12,466,488 0.8% 64 0.8% 4.67 36.4 92.4% NL325 - Zaanstreek 14,568,535 1.0% 78 1.0% 4.77 34.1 97.0% NL326 - Groot-Amsterdam 48,906,156 3.3% 244 3.0% 4.77 34.1 96.5% NL326 - Groot-Amsterdam 28,740,188 1.9% 152 1.9% 4.78 32.5 93.5% 8,389,566 0.6% 46 0.6% 4.75 34.8 91.4% NL331 - Agglomeratie Leiden en Bollenstreek 35,799,295 2.4% 177 2.2% 4.79 36.6 94.7% NL332 - Agglomeratie s-Gravenhage 59,313,037 4.0% 338 4.2% 4.82 33.3 95.4% NL333 - Delft en Westland 21,543,444 1.4% 111 1.4% 4.88 34.8 93.5% NL112 - Delfzijl en omgeving NL327 - Het Gooi en Vechtstreek NL334 - Oost-Zuid-Holland 40,526,427 2.7% 203 2.5% 4.89 35.1 96.1% 113,752,461 7.6% 620 7.7% 4.83 35.1 96.4% NL336 - Zuidoost-Zuid-Holland 43,759,651 2.9% 240 3.0% 4.92 35.2 95.4% NL341 - Zeeuwsch-Vlaanderen 16,761,135 1.1% 107 1.3% 4.99 31.4 97.0% NL342 - Overig Zeeland 46,988,226 3.1% 276 3.4% 4.90 35.2 95.7% NL411 - West-Noord-Brabant 57,589,480 3.8% 303 3.8% 4.79 34.6 93.7% NL412 - Midden-Noord-Brabant 43,441,435 2.9% 217 2.7% 4.85 34.6 95.5% NL413 - Noordoost-Noord-Brabant 45,631,332 3.0% 221 2.8% 4.79 37.0 93.6% NL414 - Zuidoost-Noord-Brabant 69,812,057 4.7% 350 4.4% 4.81 35.0 93.5% NL421 - Noord-Limburg 28,021,347 1.9% 154 1.9% 4.92 36.4 92.9% NL422 - Midden-Limburg 32,444,163 2.2% 185 2.3% 4.98 34.7 95.8% NL423 - Zuid-Limburg 59,156,746 3.9% 349 4.4% 4.90 34.2 96.9% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% NL335 - Groot-Rijnmond Total 80 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount * The economic region is determined based on the zip code of the property underlying the Mortgage Loan Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Construction deposits (as a percentage of net principal amount) Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount % of Total Nr of Loans % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( > ) Until ( <= ) < 5.00% 1,466,319,264 97.6% 7,844 97.7% 4.82 35.6 95.2% 5.00% 10.00% 20,190,252 1.3% 110 1.4% 4.71 31.8 93.8% 10.00% 15.00% 5,588,418 0.4% 28 0.4% 4.61 33.5 96.9% 15.00% 20.00% 4,118,402 0.3% 20 0.3% 4.76 35.5 94.5% 20.00% 25.00% 3,060,873 0.2% 16 0.2% 4.86 34.9 93.7% 25.00% 30.00% 1,286,250 0.1% 7 0.1% 4.78 31.8 92.8% 30.00% 35.00% 340,099 0.0% 2 0.0% 5.01 33.6 79.5% 35.00% 40.00% 796,957 0.1% 3 0.0% 4.79 27.0 100.2% 40.00% 45.00% - - - - - - - 45.00% 50.00% - - - - - - - 50.00% 55.00% - - - - - - - Weighted Average 60.00% > - - - - - - - Minimum 0.0% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Maximum 37.1% Total * This is defined as: Construction Deposit Amount / (Outstanding Principal Balance – Total Savings Amount) Occupancy Economic region 81 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount % of Total Nr of Loanparts % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV Owner Occupied 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Total 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% * Occupancy information as of mortgage loan origination date 0.4% Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Loan to income % of Total Nr of Borrowers % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV From ( > ) Until ( <= ) Unknown - < 0.5 - - - - - - - 0.5 1.0 499,417 0.0% 7 0.1% 3.97 26.4 35.7% 1 1.5 6,200,639 0.4% 65 0.8% 4.47 30.7 47.8% 1.5 2.0 17,390,513 1.2% 149 1.9% 4.62 28.7 61.8% 2 2.5 52,371,870 3.5% 357 4.5% 4.79 30.4 78.8% 2.5 3.0 129,907,210 8.7% 763 9.5% 4.82 32.5 89.1% 3 3.5 266,651,062 17.8% 1,419 17.7% 4.86 34.5 94.7% 3.5 4.0 393,577,849 26.2% 2,029 25.3% 4.84 35.6 97.9% 4 4.5 461,812,406 30.8% 2,402 29.9% 4.84 36.3 97.6% 4.5 5.0 173,289,548 11.5% 839 10.5% 4.66 39.5 97.7% 5 5.5 - - - - - - - 5.5 6.0 - - - - - - - 6 6.5 - - - - - - - 7 > - - - - - - - 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% - Total 82 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount Weighted Average 3.76 Minimum 0.67 Maximum 4.99 - - - - * The Loan to Income Ratio is defined as: (Current Principal Balance – Total Savings Amount) / Total Income ** Total Income is defined as the sum of the income of the primary and secondary borrowers *** Income information as of mortgage loan origination date - - Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Debt service to income From ( > ) Until ( <= ) Unknown - < 5.00% % of Total - - 5% 2,664,808 10% 27,225,012 10.00% 15% 15.00% 20% 20.00% Nr of Borrowers % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV - - - - - 0.2% 27 0.3% 2.78 30.1 46.7% 1.8% 225 2.8% 3.90 31.2 61.5% 174,737,824 11.6% 1,059 13.2% 4.49 32.1 87.5% 604,016,591 40.2% 3,145 39.2% 4.78 34.9 97.1% 25% 619,043,790 41.2% 3,181 39.6% 4.94 37.2 97.0% 25.00% 30% 70,470,611 4.7% 372 4.6% 5.24 37.3 96.1% 30.00% 35% 3,160,634 0.2% 18 0.2% 5.19 29.6 86.7% 35.00% 40% 301,883 0.0% 2 0.0% 5.26 21.3 73.9% 40.00% 45% 79,362 0.0% 1 0.0% 5.84 11.8 54.1% 45.00% 50% - - - - - - - 50.00% 55% - - - - - - - 55.00% 60% - - - - - - - 60.00% 65% - - - - - - - 70.00% > - - - - - - - 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Total Weighted Average 83 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount 19.2% Minimum 2.1% Maximum 44.1% * The Debt Service to Income Ratio is defined as: (Debt Service Amount) / (Total Income / 12 months) ** Debt Service Amount is defined as the sum of the monthly scheduled interest and scheduled repayment amount to be paid by the Borrower. *** Total Income is defined as the sum of the income of the primary and secondary borrowers **** Income information as of mortgage loan origination date Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Employment status borrower Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount Description Employed 1,496,806,434 Pensioner Total % of Total 99.7% Nr of Loans 7,990 % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV 99.5% 4.82 35.6 95.3% 4,894,080 0.3% 40 0.5% 3.70 28.4 53.9% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 8,030 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Loanpart payment frequency Description Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount % of Total Nr of Loanparts % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV Monthly 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Total 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Guarantee type (NHG / non-NHG) Description 84 Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount % of Total Nr of Loanparts % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV NHG Guarantee 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Total 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% * Employment status information as of mortgage loan origination date Portfolio stratification (cont’d) Originator Originator Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount AEGON Hypotheken B.V. 893,083,110 59.5% 8,920 57.0% 4.78 31.9 96.5% AEGON Levensverzekering N.V. 608,617,404 40.5% 6,717 43.0% 4.87 40.8 93.1% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Total % of Total Nr of Loanparts % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV Servicer Servicer Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount AEGON Hypotheken B.V. 893,083,110 AEGON Levensverzekering N.V. Total % of Total Nr of Loanparts 59.5% 8,920 % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV 57.0% 4.78 31.9 96.5% 608,617,404 40.5% 6,717 43.0% 4.87 40.8 93.1% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Weighted Average Maturity Weighted Average CLTOMV Capital insurance policy provider Insurance Policy Provider Aggregate Outstanding Not. Amount AEGON Bank N.V. 496,005,903 33.0% 4,372 28.0% 4.93 26.9 97.9% AEGON Levensverzekering N.V. 434,617,180 28.9% 4,052 25.9% 4.97 24.7 94.3% No policy attached 571,077,431 38.0% 7,213 46.1% 4.59 51.3 93.4% 1,501,700,514 100.0% 15,637 100.0% 4.81 35.5 95.1% Total 85 % of Total Nr of Loanparts % of Total Weighted Average Coupon Appendix: Priority of Payments 86 Simplified interest priority of payments (prior to enforcement)1 Available Revenue Funds Mortgage Loan Interest Senior Expenses and Servicing Fee + Interest on Issuer Accounts Proceeds credit insurance (interest) + + Prepayment penalties Net foreclosure proceeds of mortgage receivables (relating to interest) Cash Advance Facility drawings = Cash Advance Facility Interest Rate Swap Payment + Interest on Class A1 /A2 Notes pro rata and pari passu + Replenishment of Class A PDL + Interest on Class B Notes + Replenishment of Class B PDL + Interest on Class C Notes Swap receivables Reserve Account drawings, if any Repurchase or sale proceeds (interest) Post foreclosure proceeds, if any + Replenishment of Class C PDL Replenishment Reserve Account Repayment of Class D Notes 2 Available Revenue Funds Subordinated Swap Payments Gross up amounts under Advance Facility Cash Deferred Purchase Price to Seller 1This 87 is a simplified overview. Please refer to Preliminary Prospectus for full description of priority of payments and of the available revenue funds. FORD only 2After Simplified principal priority of payments (prior to enforcement)1 Available Principal Funds Mortgage Loan Principal repayments and prepayments + Credit insurance proceeds (principal) Net foreclosure proceeds of mortgage receivables (relating to principal) Repurchase / Sale of Mortgage Loans Credits to PDL Participation Increase Switched Insurance Savings Participation (from Conversion to Savings) + + + + + = Purchase of Further Advance Receivables2 Principal on Class A1 Notes until fully redeemed Principal on Class A2 Notes until fully redeemed Principal on Class B Notes until fully redeemed Principal on Class C Notes until fully redeemed + Partial prepayments Available Principal Funds 1This is a simplified overview. Please refer to Preliminary Prospectus for full description of priority of payments and of the available principal funds. to the FORD only and subject to specific criteria identified by the Additional Purchase Conditions including a [1]% cap of the aggregate outstanding balance of portfolio mortgage loans 2Up 88 Selected sources: • Central Bureau of Statistics (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, CBS) • Centraal Planbureau (CPB) • Debt Restructuring Act (Wet Schuldsanering Natuurlijke Personen, Wsnp (www.wsnp.rvr.org) • Dutch Banking Association (Nederlandse Vereniging van Banken, NVB) • Dutch Central Bank (De Nederlandsche Bank, DNB) • European Central Bank (ECB) • Eurostat • Fitch Research • Homeownership Guaranteed Fund (Waarborgfonds Eigen Woningen, WEW) • International Monetary Fund (IMF) • Land Registry (Kadaster) • Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu, VROM) • Moody‟s Analytics • National Credit Register (Bureau Krediet Registratie, BKR) • National Institute for Family Finance Information (Nationaal Instituut voor Budgetvoorlichting, NIBUD) • OECD • Preliminary prospectus • S&P Ratings Direct Economic Research • State of Affairs of Social Security (Ministerie van Sociale Zaken & Werkgelegenheid) WWW.Aegon.COM For questions relating to SAECURE please contact: Ed Beije Senior Vice President of Corporate Treasury T: +31 70 344 8407 E: ed.beije@Aegon.nl Sibylla Bantema Director Mortgage Operations T: +31 58 244 3131 E: sbantema@Aegon.nl Sander Maatman Director Capital Management & Policies T: +31 70 344 7016 E: smaatman@Aegon.nl Niels Roek Manager Funding T: +31 58 244 3491 E: nroek@Aegon.nl For questions relating to AEGON please contact: AEGON Investor Relations T: +31 70 344 8305 E: ir@Aegon.nl WWW.Aegon.COM Bas Warmerdam Corporate Treasury T: +31 70 344 8361 E: bastiaan.warmerdam@Aegon.com Thank you