Former Paragon Terminal/Apollo Street Creek Parcels 2011 Annual

Transcription

January 31, 2011
Mr. Edward Hampston, P.E.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Division of Environmental Remediation
Remedial Bureau D – 12th Floor
625 Broadway
Albany, NY 12233-7013
Re:
Former Paragon Oil Terminal and
the 100-120 Apollo Street Property
Texaco Facility #304209
Greenpoint Section – Brooklyn, New York
2011 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarter Status Report
October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011
Dear Mr. Hampston:
SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC (SAIC), on behalf of Texaco Inc. (Texaco),
respectfully submits to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(NYSDEC) the 2011 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarter Status Report for 2011. The report
summarizes the corrective action activities completed on both of the above referenced properties
for 2011. All work has been completed in accordance with the amended order on Consent Case
No. D2-1111-01-09AM between Texaco and NYSDEC dated May 15, 2009.
If you have any questions concerning the information presented in this report, please do not
hesitate to contact either Ms. G. M. Harris of Chevron Environmental Management Company
on behalf of Texaco at 713-432-2248 or Mr. Peter Cagnetta of SAIC at 717-901-8841.
Sincerely,
SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC
Peter J. Cagnetta, CPSS
Senior Project Manager/Soil Scientist
PJC:pr
cc:
G.M. Harris (Texaco)
Neil Fletcher (Texaco)
Stan Luckoski (Texaco)
Jerry Ross (Pillsbury)
Sal Geneva (Empire Merchants)
Elizabeth Knaur (SPR)
Steve Malinowski (CA Rich)
Justin Kennedy (Roux)
Steve Trifiletti (ExxonMobil)
Nick Onufrak (BP)
Joe White (NYSDEC)
Kevin Lumpe (Steel Equities)
Ivy Marvel (Brooklyn Public Library)
6310 Allentown Boulevard / Harrisburg, PA 17112 / tel: 717.901.8100 / www.saic.com
2011 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
AND 4TH QUARTER STATUS REPORT
(OCTOBER 1, 2011 TO DECEMBER 31, 2011)
FOR THE
FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL
AND THE
100-120 APOLLO STREET PROPERTY
GREENPOINT, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK
FACILITY #304209
Prepared for:
Texaco Inc.
4800 Fournace Place
E520A
Bellaire, Texas 77401
Prepared by:
6310 Allentown Boulevard
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17112
January 31, 2011
6310 Allentown Boulevard / Harrisburg, PA 17112 / tel: 717.901.8100 / www.saic.com
Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209
& Apollo St. property
January 31, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0
Introduction .............................................................................................................................1
2.0
4th Quarter Status Report.........................................................................................................2 2.1 Landside Recovery System ............................................................................................2 2.1.1 Total Fluids Recovery System Operations ....................................................... 2 2.1.1.1 October 2011 ...................................................................................... 2 2.1.1.2 November 2011 .................................................................................. 3 2.1.1.3 December 2011 .................................................................................. 4 2.1.1.4 Total Fluids Recovery System Maintenance ..................................... 4 2.1.2 PSH Thickness and Groundwater Elevation Monitoring.................................. 6 2.1.3 Treated Water Discharge Monitoring ............................................................... 6 2.1.4 Indoor Well Inspections and Slab Maintenance ............................................... 7 2.1.5 Sub-Slab Depressurization System ................................................................... 7 2.2 Newtown Creek Containment Booms ...........................................................................8 2.2.1 Former Paragon Oil Terminal ........................................................................... 8 2.2.2 100-120 Apollo Street Property ........................................................................ 9 2.2.3 Creekside Bulkhead Inspection and Resealing ................................................. 9 2.2.4 Containment Boom Enhancements ................................................................. 10 2.3 Site Characterization Activities ...................................................................................10 2.3.1 Regional Groundwater and PSH Gauging ...................................................... 10
3.0
Annual Progress Report ........................................................................................................11
3.1 Landside Recovery System ..........................................................................................11 3.1.1 Total Fluids Recovery System Performance and Maintenance ...................... 11 3.1.2 PSH Thickness and Groundwater Elevation Monitoring................................ 13 3.1.3 Treated Water Discharge Monitoring ............................................................. 14 3.1.4 Indoor Well Inspections and Slab Maintenance ............................................. 14 3.1.5 Sub-Slab Depressurization System Performance............................................ 15 3.2 Newtown Creek Containment Booms .........................................................................16 3.2.1 Former Paragon Oil Terminal ......................................................................... 16 3.2.1.1 Summary of Containment and Absorption System Monitoring ...... 16 3.2.1.2 Summary of Seep Mitigation ........................................................... 17 3.2.2 100-120 Apollo Street Property ...................................................................... 17 3.2.2.1 Summary of Containment and Absorption System Monitoring ........ 17 3.2.2.2 Summary of Seep Mitigation ........................................................... 17 3.2.3 Summary of Bulkhead Inspections and Resealing.......................................... 18 3.2.4 Containment and Absorption System Enhancements ..................................... 18 3.3 Summary of Additional Activities ...............................................................................18 3.3.1 Summary of Regional Groundwater and PSH Gauging ................................. 18 SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC
January 31, 2011
3.3.2 Nuisance Odor Control Measures ................................................................... 19 3.3.3 Oil-Water Separator Upgrade ......................................................................... 19 3.3.4 Ambient Air Monitoring Program .................................................................. 19 3.3.5 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Event ......................................................... 20 3.3.6 Removal of Tree from Newtown Creek.......................................................... 21
4.0 Activities Planned for 2012 ..................................................................................................22 4.1 Continued Operation of the Landside Recovery System .............................................22 4.1.1 Continued Operation of the TFR System........................................................ 22 4.1.2 Installation of TFR System Recovery Wells .................................................. 22 4.1.3 PSH Thickness and Groundwater Elevation Monitoring................................ 23 4.1.4 Treated Water Discharge Monitoring ............................................................. 23 4.1.5 Monthly Indoor Well Inspections and Slab Maintenance............................... 23 4.1.6 Sub-Slab Depressurization System ................................................................. 23 4.1.7 Installation and Start-up of the Vapor-Phase Recovery System ..................... 23 4.2 Continued Operation of the Newtown Creek Containment Booms.............................24 4.3 Planned Site Characterization Activities .....................................................................24 4.3.1 Annual Groundwater Monitoring ................................................................... 24 4.3.2 Semiannual Ambient Air Monitoring ............................................................. 24 SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC
January 31, 2011
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1
Figure 2
Site Location Map ................................................................................ Following Text
Location of Site Monitoring Wells and
Total Fluids Recovery System ............................................................. Following Text
Figure 3
Total Fluids Recovery System Process Flow Schematic .................... Following Text
Figure 4
4th Quarter Recovered PSH and Maintenance Timeline ...................... Following Text
Figure 5
Cumulative and Weekly PSH Recovered ............................................ Following Text
Figure 6a 4th Quarter Lower Bulkhead Monitoring Wells,
PSH Thickness vs. Time ...................................................................... Following Text
Figure 6b 4th Quarter Upper Bulkhead Monitoring Wells,
Figure 7
Sub-Slab Depressurization System ...................................................... Following Text
Figure 8
Sub-Slab Depressurization System Process Flow Schematic .............. Following Text
Figure 9
Plan View of Boom Containment and Absorption System ................ Following Text
Figure 10a Annual Lower Bulkhead Monitoring Wells,
Figure 10b Annual Lower Bulkhead Monitoring Wells,
Figure 10c Annual Upper Bulkhead Monitoring Wells,
Figure 11 Sheen Detections in the Boom Systems from 2008 to 2011 ................ Following Text
Figure 12 Ambient Air Sample Locations ........................................................... Following Text
Figure 13 Location of Replacement Recovery Well Installations
Proposed for 2012 ................................................................................ Following Text
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
Table 9
Table 10
Summary of Total Fluids Recovered on a Weekly Basis .................... Following Text
4th Quarter Total Fluids Recovery System Operation .......................... Following Text
4th Quarter Summary of Estimated Individual Well Flow-Rates ......... Following Text
4th Measured Quarter PSH Thicknesses in Bulkhead Monitoring
and Recovery Wells ............................................................................. Following Text
4th Quarter NYCDEP Discharge Permit Compliance Results ............. Following Text
4th Quarter Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Results ................. Following Text
4th Quarter Summary of Sub-Slab Depressurization System
Monitoring Results............................................................................... Following Text
4th Quarter Newtown Creek Containment Boom System Activities Paragon Site ......................................................................................... Following Text
4th Quarter Newtown Creek Containment Boom System Activities Apollo Street Site ................................................................................. Following Text
Annual Summary of Total Fluids Recovered ...................................... Following Text
Table 11
Table 12
Table 13
Table 14
Table 15
Table 16
Table 17
Table 18
January 31, 2011
Annual Summary of Fluids Removed from System during
Equipment Cleaning Activities ............................................................ Following Text
Annual Measured PSH Thickness in Bulkhead Monitoring
and Recovery Wells ............................................................................. Following Text
Annual Summary of NYCDEP Discharge Permit
Compliance Results ............................................................................. Following Text
Annual Summary of Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Results ... Following Text
Summary of Ambient Air Sampling Results,
February and September 2011 ............................................................. Following Text
Summary of Groundwater Chemistry Results for NYSDEC STARS
Gasoline Range and Fuel Oil Range Hydrocarbons, 2010 & 2011 ..... Following Text
Summary of Groundwater Chemistry Results for Target
Contaminant List Compounds, 2010 & 2011 ...................................... Following Text
Summary of Groundwater Chemistry Results for PCBs, RCRA
Dissolved Metals, and Total Dissolved Solids, 2010 & 2011 ............. Following Text
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
NYCDEP Treated Groundwater Discharge Permit ............................ Following Text
Photographs of OWS Upgrade Activities........................................... Following Text
Recovered Fluids Transportation and Recycling Documentation ...... Following Text
2011 Organoclay and Carbon Waste Profile Laboratory Reports...... Following Text
Completed Boom Inspection Forms ................................................... Following Text
Photographs of Tree Removal Activities ............................................ Following Text
LIST OF PLATES
Plate 1
Plate 2
Plate 3
Plate 4
Groundwater Contour Map, December 7, 2011.......................................... In Back Pocket
PSH Thickness and Extent, December 7, 2011 .......................................... In Back Pocket
2011 Quarterly PSH Extent ........................................................................ In Back Pocket
Extent of Groundwater Exceedances in 2010 & 2011 ................................ In Back Pocket
2011 Annual Status Report and 4th Quarter Status Report
-1-
January 31, 2011
1.0 INTRODUCTION
SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC (SAIC), on behalf of Texaco Inc.
(Texaco), respectfully submits to the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYSDEC) the 4th Quarter Status Report and 2011 Annual Progress Report for
the corrective action activities performed at the former Paragon Oil Terminal property
located at 16, 42, and 50 Bridgewater Street, Brooklyn, New York (Paragon site) and the
adjacent 100-120 Apollo Street property (Apollo Street site).
Figure 1 presents the regional site setting and identifies the site. The Paragon Oil Company
operated a petroleum bulk storage terminal on the Paragon site from 1934 to 1958, and Texaco
operated a petroleum bulk storage terminal on the Paragon site from 1958 to 1968. Neither the
Paragon Oil Company nor Texaco ever owned or maintained operations on the Apollo Street
site. In May 2009, Texaco signed an amended Order on Consent Case No. D2-1111-01-09AM
for the implementation of site-wide corrective action on both properties. This report presents
corrective action activities completed from October 1, 2011, to December 31, 2011 (4th Quarter
Status Report) and summarizes activities for 2011 (Annual Progress Report).
2011 Annual Status Report and 4th Quarter Status Report
-2-
2.0
January 31, 2011
4TH QUARTER STATUS REPORT
This section summarizes the activities completed on the Paragon and Apollo Street properties
from October 1, 2011, to December 31, 2011. The activities include the performance,
maintenance, enhancement, and monitoring of both the landside recovery system and the
Newtown Creek containment system.
2.1 Landside Recovery System
This section presents operational details concerning the performance, maintenance, and
monitoring of the total fluids recovery (TFR) system, which has been operational since
September 14, 2007. The TFR system currently operates along bulkheads bordering Newtown
Creek (Figure 2) on both sites. This is the location of a former phase-separated hydrocarbon
(PSH) seep through the bulkhead. The primary objective of the TFR system is to maintain a
zone of capture in this area for groundwater and PSH and to prevent migration of PSH and
groundwater into Newtown Creek.
2.1.1
Total Fluids Recovery System Operations
During the 4th quarter of 2011, 205 gallons of PSH were recovered by the TFR system, and
2,475,512 gallons of groundwater were recovered and treated at an average rate of
31,352 gallons of water per day (gpd). This discharge rate is in compliance with the New York
City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP) dewatering permit discharge limit of
43,200 gpd. Figure 3 provides a process flow diagram for the TFR system. The NYCDEP
permit documentation is presented in Appendix A.
Figure 4 presents the weekly and cumulative recovered PSH values, as well as key upgrade and
maintenance activities completed this quarter. Figure 5 presents the weekly and cumulative
recovered PSH values since the recovery system became operational in September 2007.
Table 1 presents weekly total system volumes of treated effluent water and recovered PSH this
quarter.
2.1.1.1 October 2011
During the month of October, 82 gallons of PSH and 980,965 gallons of water were recovered.
The fluids were processed through the treatment system at an average rate of approximately
23 gallons per minute (gpm) (33,340 gpd). Twelve of the 13 TFR wells were operational during
the month of October. CMW-64R remains off-line, pending replacement of the well. A total
system uptime of 94.9% was maintained during October 2011. A summary of individual
-3-
January 31, 2011
recovery well uptimes is presented in Table 2. The following is a list of operational
enhancements and maintenance activities completed during October 2011:



October 18 – Replaced the nuts and bolts on the single-chamber bag filter unit in the
filtration building. This task was completed to increase the corrosion resistance of the
unit and to maintain optimal performance of the bag filter.
October 19 – Installed new 316 stainless steel nuts and bolts on the 6-chamber bag filter
unit in the oil-water separator (OWS) building. This task was completed to increase the
corrosion resistance of the unit and to maintain optimal performance of the bag filter.
October 31 – Replaced the drive belt on the SM10 air compressor to maintain efficient
operation of the TFR pumps.
2.1.1.2 November 2011
During the month of November, 45 gallons of PSH and 560,475 gallons of water were recovered.
21 gpm (30,230 gpd). Twelve of the 13 TFR wells were operational during the month of
October. CMW-64R remains off-line, pending replacement of the well. A total system uptime
of 100%, not including planned downtime for the OWS upgrade, was maintained during
November 2011. Total system uptime, including the planned downtime of 61.8%, was
maintained during November 2011. The following is a list of operational enhancements and
maintenance activities completed during November 2011:







November 1 – The TFR pump in CMW-17R was pulled and cleaned and the regulator
was serviced.
November 6 – The TFR system was taken off-line for the scheduled upgrade of the
coated steel OWS with a corrosion-resistant fiberglass model.
November 17 – The TFR system was restarted to check all critical devices that control
the operation of the system. The float stem in the untreated water tank was replaced as a
result of these system checks.
November 18 – The TFR system resumed full-time operations.
November 22 – MW-74R and MW-75R were taken off-line for the long holiday weekend
to prevent a total suspended solids (TSS) buildup in the system that could have caused an
unplanned shutdown.
November 28 – MW-74R and MW-75R resumed operations.
November 29 – The TFR pump in MW-75R was pulled and cleaned and the hose clamps
were replaced.
Between November 6 and November 18, 2011, SAIC completed the upgrade of the coated steel
OWS to a new corrosion-resistant fiberglass model with the internal finish sealed with resin.
The upgrade was completed to improve oil-water separation performance. The coated steel
OWS was removed, and a new corrosion-resistant fiberglass OWS was installed. In addition to
being corrosion-resistant, two major performance enhancements with the new OWS were the
presence of a sludge chamber below the coalescing plates and improved coalescing plates. The
sludge chamber will prevent sediments and sludge from backing up into the coalescing plates
-4-
January 31, 2011
and reducing flow. The new coalescing plates have an increased surface area over the previous
OWS, increasing the separation performance of the oil and water passing through them.
Additionally, during the OWS upgrade, the secondary containment pan of the OWS building
underwent maintenance to improve its corrosion resistance. The floor was cleaned using
Marine-CleanTM and prepared using Prep & ReadyTM. The secondary containment pan was then
coated with three coats of POR-15® rust-preventative epoxy paint. To add a second layer of
protection, an additional three coats of Flexcote® chemical resistant topcoat were applied. The
resurfaced secondary containment pan was allowed to cure for over 72 hours before the new
OWS was placed in the building. Photographs are presented in Appendix B.
2.1.1.3
December 2011
During the month of December, 78 gallons of PSH and 934,072 gallons of water were recovered.
21 gpm (30,131 gpd). Twelve of the 13 TFR wells operated during December 2011. CMW-64R
remained off-line pending replacement of the well. A total system uptime of 100% was
maintained during December 2011. The following is a list of operational enhancements and
maintenance activities completed during December 2011:


2.1.1.4
December 13 – The TFR pumps in MW-73R and PW-2R were pulled, cleaned, and
serviced.
December 20 – The TFR pumps in CMW-17R, CMW-43R, CMW-53R, CMW-59R,
CMW-63R, MW-68R, MW-70R, MW-74R, MW-75R, and PW-1R were pulled, cleaned,
and serviced.
Total Fluids Recovery System Maintenance
A vacuum truck was utilized three times for TFR equipment maintenance during the 4th quarter.
During this reporting period, all vacuum truck services were contracted through Atlantic
Response, Inc., of East Brunswick, New Jersey. A vacuum truck was used to complete the
following activities:



Removal of recovered PSH from the product holding tank;
Removal of accumulated sludge in the OWS and the pre-OWS fractionation tank; and
Removal of accumulated backwash sediment in the backwash tanks.
The primary objective of these cleaning events was to maintain optimal performance of the
coalescing media in the OWS, to limit sludge buildup in the PSH transfer pumps, and to clean
and confirm the functionality of the various float switches in the process equipment.
-5-
January 31, 2011
Removal and cleaning activities were completed on October 18, November 6, and
December 15, 2011. An estimated 8,030 gallons of recovered fluids were transported to FCC
Environmental in Wilmington, Delaware, for recycling. The bills of lading and receiving reports
for the transportation of the recovered fluids are presented in Appendix C.
Weekly inspections were performed on recovery wells to confirm that the air pressure regulators
and cycle counters associated with each pump (located in the well vault) were operational. Cycle
counter readings were collected during these weekly inspections and used to calculate an
estimated flow rate per recovery well. A summary of the weekly TFR flow rates per well is
presented in Table 3. TFR pumps that were identified as potentially not operating properly were
inspected and serviced by removing them from the well to verify the integrity and proper
operation. The pumps were put back in service once the proper operation was verified.
Zinc anodes are utilized on each of the TFR pumps to limit the effects of corrosion from the
brackish groundwater. The anodes are installed below the pumping water level in each well and
replaced every one to two months, as needed, during regularly scheduled maintenance.
The organoclay and granular-activated carbon (GAC) filtration media were replaced on
October 19, 2011. The spent carbon (3,000 pounds) and spent organoclay (1,000 pounds)
remained on-site through the end of the 4th quarter pending off-site regeneration of the carbon
and disposal of the organoclay.
The spent organoclay generated from the treatment of the groundwater since September 2007
had been classified as characteristically hazardous and disposed of off-site as a hazardous waste.
The spent organoclay was characteristically hazardous for benzene, which had exceeded the
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) criteria for benzene when the waste profile
was first developed in 2007. Since 2007, the untreated influent water entering the organoclay
has contained much lower concentrations of benzene. Untreated influent water was as high as
2,200 micrograms per liter (µg/L) in 2007 and currently is approximately 100 µg/L. During the
4th quarter, the spent organoclay was containerized on-site in new 55-gallon drums and sampled
for TCLP volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The results presented in Appendix D indicate
that the spent organoclay is not a hazardous waste. SAIC is currently working with Waste
Management, Inc., to finalize the nonhazardous waste profile for the organoclay. The 1st quarter
2012 report will contain the current nonhazardous waste profile and any nonhazardous manifests
associated with the off-site transport of the waste.
The spent organoclay and the spent carbon that were changed out on October 19, 2011, were also
analyzed for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), specifically arochlors. Analytical laboratory
reports are presented in Appendix D and indicate that PCBs are not present in either the spent
organoclay or carbon.
-6-
January 31, 2011
2.1.2 PSH Thickness and Groundwater Elevation Monitoring
Monitoring wells along the upper and lower bulkheads were gauged at least once per month this
quarter using an oil-water interface probe for depth to water and PSH thickness. PSH thickness
observations for bulkhead monitoring and recovery wells are provided in Table 4. PSH
thickness observations in the upper bulkhead monitoring wells are presented in Figure 6a, and
lower bulkhead monitoring wells are presented in Figure 6b.
A measureable thickness of PSH in the upper bulkhead monitoring wells was limited to
CMW-54, where the thickness ranged from non-detect to 0.85 feet. The five other monitoring
wells on the upper bulkhead (MW-72, CMW-23S, CMW-23D, CMW-55, and CMW-56) did not
contain PSH in the 4th quarter of 2011.
PSH was present in four out of five monitoring wells on the lower bulkhead. Both the maximum
(1.29 feet) and the minimum (non-detect) PSH thicknesses this quarter were measured in
CMW-57. PSH thicknesses in the remaining monitoring wells fell between these values. The
monitoring wells that contain PSH on the lower bulkhead (MW-67, MW-69, CMW-57, and
CMW-58) are within the capture zone of the recovery wells. Monitoring well MW-66, bordering
the eastern end of the capture zone, did not contain PSH and historically has not contained PSH.
The hydraulic and PSH containment and capture induced by recovery wells MW-68R and
MW-70R have prevented sheens from appearing in the creek in the boom compartments fronting
the area of the lower bulkhead during this quarter. Sheens have been absent in compartment C1
since November 2008 (37 months) and in compartment C2 since January 2009 (35 months).
SAIC began removing PSH on July 7, 2011, from CMW-54 on the upper bulkhead and
CMW-57, CMW-58, MW-67, and MW-69 on the lower bulkhead using a peristaltic pump. PSH
removal from the monitoring wells along the bulkhead continued through the 4th quarter of 2011.
PSH thicknesses measured prior to purging are included in Table 4 and Figures 6a and 6b. Since
manual removal of the PSH began in July 2011, the ensuing gauged thicknesses in the wells have
been declining.
2.1.3 Treated Water Discharge Monitoring
In accordance with a June 14, 2011, approval letter from NYCDEP, Texaco is conditionally
authorized to discharge 43,200 gpd of treated effluent to the combined sewer. Compliance with
the discharge permit requires one sample to be collected quarterly from the final treated
discharge and analyzed for the list of constituents presented in Table 5. The final treated
discharge sample port is identified as TS-4. The required quarterly compliance sample was
submitted for analysis on November 30, 2011. Permit compliance has been maintained through
the 4th quarter of 2011 (Table 5).
-7-
January 31, 2011
Additional internal quality assurance (QA) sampling events for benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) were used to
monitor the influent chemistry (mass loading) and to assist in scheduling organoclay and
carbon change-outs. Table 6 presents the analytical data from the internal QA performance
monitoring samples collected this quarter. BTEX and MTBE samples were collected from the
following locations:
 TS-1: Untreated Influent;
 TS-2: Post-Organoclay Unit;
 TS-3: Post-GAC Unit 1; and
 TS-4: Final Treated Discharge (Post-GAC Unit 2).
The system effluent met NYCDEP effluent standards for all permitted analytes.
2.1.4 Indoor Well Inspections and Slab Maintenance
Monthly inspections of all indoor monitoring wells were completed. The purpose of each
inspection was to ensure the structural integrity of the steel lids and the compression caps to
prevent the possibility of vapor migration. Components examined included the steel well flushmount lids, gaskets, and compression plugs. Individual components were replaced, as necessary,
to maintain the integrity of the surface seals. After the inspection had been completed, the flushmount lids were re-caulked to create an airtight seal with the floor, further reducing the potential
for vapor migration from the subsurface. On December 7, 2011, new flush-mount lids were
installed on CMW-4, CMW-5, and CMW-18, and new compression plugs were installed in
CMW-5 and CMW-61.
2.1.5
Sub-Slab Depressurization System
The voluntary Sub-Slab Depressurization (SSD) system operates while SAIC personnel are
on-site (10 hours per day, 4 days per week). The SSD system is composed of three lateral and
seven vertical extraction points that can be individually controlled. Currently, two of the laterals
(H-1 and H-3) are actively extracting sub-slab air while the remaining points are used for
monitoring. Monitoring occurs once per week, with the measurement of induced subsurface
vacuum values at vertical points E-1 through E-7 and lateral H-2. Methane and photoionization
detector (PID) concentrations were determined at the header manifold and at both vapor-phase
carbon units. Air velocity readings are determined at the manifold and each actively extracting
lateral. Figure 7 shows the locations of each of the extraction points and laterals. Figure 8
shows a process flow schematic for the SSD system.
The system was designed to achieve a minimum of 0.01 inches of water column (in. WC) in the
subsurface while effectively capturing hydrocarbon vapors. The system operated at an average
induced vacuum of 0.039 in. WC, which is above the subsurface design vacuum of 0.01 in. WC.
The average extraction flow rate is 9 cubic feet per minute (cfm). The concentration of methane
in the final discharge to the atmosphere remains below the discharge limit of 1% (or 20% of the
-8-
January 31, 2011
lower explosive limit [LEL]). Table 7 summarizes the field monitoring parameters collected
during the 4th quarter of 2011. Effective capture of any hydrocarbon vapors under the office
floor continues to be maintained.
2.2 Newtown Creek Containment Booms
The Newtown Creek boom containment systems are installed along 360 linear feet of Newtown
Creek fronting the Paragon site and 67 feet of the Apollo Street site. This boom system is
maintained by Texaco. The 427 linear feet of globe boom (primary containment) is divided into
5 watertight compartments, with compartments 1 to 4 (C1-C4) fronting the Paragon site and
compartment 5 (C5) fronting the Apollo Street site. A fence boom extends the entire 427 feet
along both properties (secondary containment).
An additional three-compartment containment boom system (SE1, SE2, and SE3), installed by
ExxonMobil and maintained by Texaco, extends from the western terminus of the secondary
containment fence boom to the west end of Apollo Street, with SE1 adjacent to C5 and SE3
adjacent to Apollo Street. Figure 9 presents a plan view of the two boom systems.
During the 4th quarter of 2011, a total of 4 sheens independent of the boom system were
observed in the channel of Newtown Creek outside of the secondary containment fence boom.
Two sheens were observed in October 2011, and two sheens were observed in December 2011.
No sheens were observed in Newtown Creek in November 2011. The sources of these sheens
are unknown, and they were not associated with the Paragon and Apollo Street sites.
2.2.1
Former Paragon Oil Terminal
Compartments C1 to C4 were inspected and photographed once daily at least four days per week.
A summary of these inspections revealed that:

Sheens were absent in C1, C2, C3, and C4 this quarter.
There has been no sheen present in C4 for 10 months. The most recent sheen in C4 was present
on March 1, 2011. A sheen has not been observed in C1 since November 2008 (37 months)
or in C2 since January 2009 (35 months). A sheen has not been observed in C3 since
August 2010 (16 months). Table 8 provides a summary of details of the boom containment
system fronting the Paragon site. Completed boom inspection forms for this quarter are included
as Appendix E.
-9-
2.2.2
January 31, 2011
100-120 Apollo Street Property
Compartment C5 is inspected and photographed once per day at least four days per week, and
interconnected compartments SE1, SE2, and SE3 are inspected when visible from land and
photographed during monthly creekside bulkhead inspections. The location of the threecompartment boom system often prevents taking daily photographs from land due to the sloped
earthen embankment and associated vegetation above the Apollo Street site concrete gravity
wall. A summary of the inspections reveals that:



Sheens were absent in C5 this quarter.
One sheen was present in both SE1 and SE2 on October 24, 2011.
Sheens were absent in SE3 this quarter.
There have been no sheens present in C5 and SE3 in 2011. Table 9 provides a summary of
details of the boom containment system fronting the Apollo Street site. Completed boom
inspection forms for the quarter are included in Appendix E.
2.2.3
Creekside Bulkhead Inspection and Resealing
Once every six weeks, a creekside inspection of the containment boom systems along both sites
is completed by boat. The inspection includes the floating boom systems in Newtown Creek
along both sites, the steel bulkhead and epoxy-sealed seams on the Paragon site, and the concrete
gravity wall and barrier membrane fronting C5 on the Apollo Street site. The purpose is to
confirm the integrity of the containment systems, ensure they are performing as designed, and
maintain or repair them, as needed.
The containment boom systems were inspected for possible rips, tears, and other deficiencies in
the high density polyethylene (HDPE) liner. In addition, the booms were checked to ensure no
restriction to travel with the tides on their vertical anchoring points and that they were in good
general condition.
A seam-by-seam visual inspection of the Paragon site steel bulkhead and the Apollo Street site
membrane barrier was conducted concurrently with the boom maintenance activities on
November 21, 2011. The portions of the steel bulkhead and barrier membrane above mean sea
level were inspected by boat. During the November 21 inspection, no supplemental epoxy was
added to any of the previously sealed bulkhead seams.
Creekside photographs of the containment boom sections along the Paragon site (C1 through C4)
and along the Apollo site (C5, SE1, SE2, and SE3) were taken during the November 21
creekside inspection.
- 10 -
January 31, 2011
On December 9, 2011, the tree that had previously fallen over the globe boom of SE1 was cut
and removed from Newtown Creek, the temporary absorbent booms were removed, and the
globe boom was restored to its original location. The tree was cut from the bulkhead in pieces to
preserve the integrity of the globe boom and towed to the lower bulkhead by Atlantic Response,
Inc., where the pieces were lifted from the water and cut into two-foot sections by Greenleaf
Landscaping and Tree Care, Inc. The cut pieces of the tree are currently being stored on-site
pending final disposition off-site. The tree sections were sampled and analyzed for total PCBs
(Method 8082), Target Compound List (TCL) VOCs (Method 8260B), TCL semi-volatile
organic compounds (SVOCs) (Method 8270C), and TCLP Metals (Methods 6010B and 7470A).
A nonhazardous waste profile is currently being developed with Waste Management, Inc.
Photographs of the tree removal are presented as Appendix F.
2.2.4 Containment Boom Enhancements
No enhancements were needed for the Paragon site and Apollo Street site containment boom
systems. Currently, solidifier booms occupy all compartments in the containment boom systems
on both sites.
2.3
Site Characterization Activities
Site characterization activities in the 4th quarter of 2011 consisted of on-site and regional well
gauging.
2.3.1
Regional Groundwater and PSH Gauging
A regional monitoring well gauging event coordinated between BP, ExxonMobil, and Texaco
was conducted on December 7, 2011. Regional monitoring well gauging events are scheduled to
coincide with a high or low tide. The 4th quarter event coincided with a high tide. Wells that
have been identified as being influenced by the tide from Newtown Creek were gauged between
one hour before and one hour after the designated National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) predicted high tide. The wells that are not influenced by the tide from
Newtown Creek were gauged the same day, as close to the NOAA-predicted high tide as
possible.
The gauging data from the December 7, 2011, event were used to construct a regional
groundwater contour map, which is presented as Plate 1. Groundwater elevations observed are
generally consistent with those observed in the past. The hydraulic gradients and interpreted
groundwater flow direction remain away from Newtown Creek (at both high and low tide) and
toward the TFR system. A PSH thickness and extent map is presented as Plate 2. The lateral
extent of the PSH is generally consistent with previously observed data.
- 11 -
3.0
January 31, 2011
ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
This chapter summarizes the activities completed from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2011.
The activities summarized are related to the landside recovery system and the Newtown Creek
containment system.
3.1 Landside Recovery System
This section presents operational details concerning the annual performance, maintenance,
enhancements, and monitoring of the TFR system.
3.1.1 Total Fluids Recovery System Performance and Maintenance
Nine hundred ninety gallons of PSH and 9,828,447 gallons of water, treated at an average rate of
28,922 gpd, were recovered by the TFR system in 2011. The NYCDEP dewatering permit was
renewed on June 14, 2011, decreasing the permitted limit from 57,600 gpd to 43,000 gpd.
Permit compliance has been maintained throughout 2011. Table 10 presents the recovered fluids
for 2011 by month. The TFR system has recovered 31,561 gallons of PSH since start-up in
September 2007, and prior to operation of the TFR system, 11,697 gallons of PSH were
recovered from bulkhead monitoring wells.
As shown in Figure 5, the cumulative PSH recovery from the TFR system has declined in what
appears to be an asymptotic curve. With the groundwater table depressed along the bulkhead
and PSH recovery slowing, the phase-change recovery technology of vapor-phase recovery
(VPR) is planned to increase the mass removal of residual-phase PSH from the dewatered zone
along the bulkhead. SAIC has previously submitted design documents for the planned
installation of a VPR system to operate in conjunction with the TFR system. This system is
scheduled for start-up in the 1st quarter of 2012.
A vacuum truck was utilized periodically during 2011 for TFR system maintenance. All vacuum
truck services were contracted through Atlantic Response, Inc., of East Brunswick, New Jersey.
A summary of the off-site removal activities in 2011 is presented in Table 11. A total of
35,644 gallons of recovered liquids were transported to FCC Environmental in Wilmington,
Delaware, for recycling in 2011.
The organoclay and carbon filtration media were replaced twice during the year—on June 9, 2011,
and October 19, 2011. A total of 1,000 pounds of organoclay were incinerated at the Veolia
- 12 -
January 31, 2011
Environmental Services facility in Port Arthur, Texas, and 3,000 pounds of spent carbon were
reactivated at Siemens Industry, Inc., in Darlington, Pennsylvania, in 2011.
As of
December 31, 1,000 pounds of organoclay and 3,000 pounds of spent carbon remained on-site,
pending off-site disposition, as discussed in Section 2.1.1.4 of this report.
In addition to the standard operational maintenance activities performed during 2011, many
operational enhancements were completed. These operational enhancements were implemented
with the purpose of increasing operational efficiency, reducing maintenance time and costs, and
repairing or upgrading existing equipment. The following operational enhancements and basic
maintenance activities were implemented in 2011:

















January 6 – Replaced check valve on fluid intake to TFR pump in CMW-59R.
January 11 – Repaired the air line that operates the TFR pumps in CMW-17R and
CMW-43R.
January 27-31 – Repaired the TFR pump in MW-74R. The pump was not operating
properly on January 27 but was stuck in sediment at the bottom of the well. The pump
could not be serviced until it was removed from the sediment using a tripod and hoist on
January 31. The pump was repaired and made operational on January 31.
February 21 – The TFR pump in MW-75R was not operating and was replaced with an
on-site spare QED Tall AP-4/TL pump.
March 3 – Repaired the TFR pump in CMW-53R after pump was not operating properly.
March 17 and 30 – Installed sound-dampening insulation on a section of the HDPE
discharge line that runs above the 50 Bridgewater Street office space.
March 28 – Replaced the two drums of vapor-phase carbon used to remove nuisance
odors from the OWS building. The spent carbon was removed from the site in April.
April 5 – The cycle counter on PW-1R was repaired.
April 27 – The hose clamps on the fluid line and the fluid intake screen on CMW-73R
were replaced.
May 5 – The cycle counter and regulator on PW-1R was replaced.
May 9 – A new TeflonTM line for the Verox-8 biocide chemical feed was installed.
May 24 – The pneumatic valve for the pre-OWS tank transfer pump was cleaned, and the
two-inch 316 stainless steel true union was replaced.
May 26 – Due to a disproportionate amount of TSS entering the TFR system from
MW-74R and MW-75R, these two recovery wells were taken off-line between May 26
and May 30 to maintain a total system uptime through the long holiday weekend.
June 7 – The regulator and cycle counter on PW-2R were replaced and repaired,
respectively.
July 26 – Cleaned the auto-drain on the SM-10 air compressor that powers the 13 TFR
wells.
August 2 – Replaced the hose clamps on both the fluid and air lines for the TFR pump in
PW-1R.
August 3 –The TFR pumps in CMW-53R, CMW-17R, and MW-70R were cleaned and
maintained.
- 13 -


















January 31, 2011
August 9 – Cleaned the auto-drain on the SM-10 compressor and ordered a replacement.
Replaced the float stem in the untreated water holding tank.
August 15 – Replace auto-drain on SM-10 compressor. Cleaned and maintained the TFR
pumps in CMW-53R and CMW-63R.
August 16 – Replaced hose barb for air line on the TFR pump in PW-1R.
August 18 – Replaced the pressure gauge on the bag filter unit in the treatment building.
August 25-30 – TFR system operations were temporarily suspended during Hurricane
Irene. Operations resumed August 30 after an extensive system component inspection
and test of all critical devices.
September 13 – While attempting to remove the TFR pump in CMW-64R, the pump
became stuck in the well. The pump was taken off-line for the remainder of the quarter,
pending repair or replacement of the well.
October 18 – Replaced the nuts and bolts on the single-chamber bag filter unit in the
filtration building. This task was completed to increase the corrosion resistance of the
unit and to maintain optimal performance of the bag filter.
October 19 – Installed new 316 stainless steel nuts and bolts on the 6-chamber bag filter
unit in the OWS building. This task was completed to increase the corrosion resistance
of the unit and to maintain optimal performance of the bag filter.
October 31 – Replaced the drive belt on the SM10 air compressor to maintain efficient
operation of the TFR pumps.
November 1 – The TFR pump in CMW-17R was pulled and cleaned and the regulator
was serviced.
November 6 – The TFR system was taken off-line for the scheduled replacement of the
coated steel OWS with a corrosion-resistant fiberglass model.
November 17 – The TFR system was restarted to check all critical devices that control
the operation of the system. The float stem in the untreated water tank was replaced as a
result of these system checks.
November 18 – The TFR system resumed full-time operations.
November 22 – MW-74R and MW-75R were taken off-line for the long holiday weekend
to prevent TSS buildup in the system that could have caused an unplanned shutdown.
November 28 – MW-74R and MW-75R resumed operations.
November 29 – The TFR pump in MW-75R was pulled and cleaned and the hose clamps
were replaced.
December 13 – The TFR pumps in MW-73R and PW-2R were pulled, cleaned, and
serviced.
December 20 – The TFR pumps in CMW-17R, CMW-43R, CMW-53R, CMW-59R,
CMW-63R, MW-68R, MW-70R, MW-74R, MW-75R, and PW-1R were pulled, cleaned,
and serviced.
Monitoring and recovery wells along the upper and lower bulkheads were gauged using an oilwater interface probe for depth to water and PSH thickness periodically during 2011. The tidal
- 14 -
January 31, 2011
cycles of Newtown Creek regularly influence the depths to water and PSH thickness in the wells
along the bulkhead. PSH thickness observations for all upper and lower bulkhead wells for 2011
are provided in Table 12 and Figures 10a, 10b, and 10c.
During 2011, the measured PSH thicknesses in the wells on both the upper and lower bulkhead
have, on average, decreased. This can be seen in Figures 10a, 10b, and 10c, where the linear
trend lines show the general behavior of the PSH thicknesses. On July 7, 2011, weekly PSH
bailing commenced in the five monitoring wells that contained PSH in 2011. Bailing continued
through the end of the 4th quarter of 2011.
The analytical results from quarterly and additional internal QA sampling events for 2011 are
presented in Tables 13 and 14, respectively. All analytical results for TS-4 from permit
compliance samples have satisfied the NYCDEP permit criteria.
3.1.4 Indoor Well Inspections and Slab Maintenance
SAIC, on behalf of Texaco, performs monthly inspections of all indoor wells. Components that
are examined include well vault lids, gaskets, and compression plugs. Individual components are
replaced as necessary to maintain the integrity of the wells. After each well has been inspected,
the flush-mount vault lids are caulked to create an airtight seal with the floor, thus reducing the
potential for vapor migration from the subsurface. On December 7, 2011, new flush-mount lids
were installed on CMW-4, CMW-5, and CMW-18, and new compression plugs were installed in
CMW-5 and CMW-61.
On July 18-21, 2011, during the annual two-week warehouse shutdown, slab maintenance
activities were completed on the floor of the 16, 42, and 50 Bridgewater Street warehouses,
along with the 100-120 Apollo Street warehouse. A total of 135 cracks, seams, and joints,
totaling an estimated 2,522 linear feet, were sealed using 3M DP-600 concrete epoxy, Rockite
cement, or Sikaflex Self Leveling Sealant, depending on the location.
A comprehensive PID survey of the building was conducted concurrently with the slab
maintenance. PID measurements were collected along all interior and exterior walls, along the
majority of the cracks and seams throughout the warehouse (prior to sealing), and in the
breathing zone throughout the warehouse. No breathing zone PID measurements were observed
above background levels.
- 15 -
January 31, 2011
Roughly 500 PID measurements were collected during the initial survey. Thirty-one of the
500 measurements were above background levels, and of those, 21 were below 5 parts per
million (ppm). Each of the locations resulting in a measurement above background levels was
sealed using epoxy or sealant. A second survey was conducted several weeks later to confirm
that any PID measurements along cracks and seams were mitigated by the sealing process. The
maximum initial PID reading was 40.8 ppm, and after sealing, the reading was 0.0 ppm. All
31 measured PID responses were mitigated by the slab maintenance activities. These activities
were completed to further reduce the potential for vapor migration.
Additionally, a total of approximately 6,115 feet of interior and exterior walls were surveyed,
and a total of 5 seams and cracks (included in the above total of 31 PID measurements above
background) were identified, all located in the 42 Bridgewater Street warehouse. Each of these
five locations was treated using sealant or epoxy. The following summarizes the findings in each
building:

16 Bridgewater Street, 50 Bridgewater Street, and 100-120 Apollo Street (a total of
approximately 4,965 linear feet) had no PID measurements above background along the
interior and exterior walls.

42 Bridgewater Street (a total of 1,150 linear feet) had 5 PID measurements above
background along the interior and exterior walls. The highest of these was 11.8 ppm.
The primary purpose for sealing cracks in the warehouse floors and walls is a precautionary
measure to further reduce the potential for any hazards associated with possible vapor migration.
The results of the ongoing indoor air monitoring program conducted by CA Rich on behalf of the
property owner from 2005 through 2009 and the 2010 to 2011 data collected by SAIC have
indicated that no indoor air hazards associated with subsurface impacts are present. The sealing
of the floor seams and cracks serves to further reduce the potential for any hazards.
3.1.5
Sub-Slab Depressurization System Performance
The voluntary SSD system continued to perform above design specifications in 2011. The
average induced vacuum in 2011 was 0.11 inches of water (in. WC), which was above the design
specification 0.01 in. WC. The system operated with an average applied vacuum of 2.5 in. WC
and an average system flow rate of 11.7 cubic feet per minute (cfm). The methane concentration
in the effluent was, on average, 0.029%, which remains below the discharge limit of 1%. The
carbon in the two 1,000-pound vapor-phase GAC units was replaced on April 12, 2011, and
transported that day by Siemens Industry, Inc., to their Darlington, Pennsylvania, facility for
recycling and reactivation.
- 16 -
January 31, 2011
3.2 Newtown Creek Containment Booms
This section presents operational details concerning the annual performance, maintenance,
enhancements, and monitoring of the Newtown Creek containment booms.
Observations of the surface water within the boom system were made during 201 days of 2011.
For 198 days, a sheen was absent from the surface water in the boom system. Therefore, a sheen
was not present 98.5% of the days observed.
Two sheens were observed in C4
(February 16, 2011, and March 1, 2011), and one sheen was observed in each SE1
(October 24, 2011) and SE2 (October 24, 2011) in 2011.
During 2011, a total of 11 sheens were observed on Newtown Creek that were not associated
with the Peerless project area. The sources of these sheens were unknown as they were not
associated with the Paragon or Apollo Street sites. The sheens observed in Newtown Creek
are summarized by quarter below:




3.2.1
4 sheens were observed during the 1st quarter
3 sheens were observed during the 2nd quarter
0 sheens were observed during the 3rd quarter
4 sheens were observed during the 4th quarter
3.2.1.1 Summary of Containment and Absorption System Monitoring
During 2011, observations of boom compartments C1 to C4 revealed that:




No sheens were observed in C1 in 2011 across 201 observation days. Sheens were absent
100% of the observed time.
Two sheens were observed in C4 in 2011 across 201 observation days. Sheens were
absent 99% of the observed time.
Observations in C1 through C4 began on January 1, 2008. Figure 11 shows sheen detections in
compartments C1 through C4 within the boom containment system of the Paragon and Apollo
Street sites along Newtown Creek from 2008 to 2011 by quarter. There has been a significant
reduction in the number of sheens observed in 2011. The number of sheens observed were
- 17 -
January 31, 2011
highest in the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2008 and decreased steadily into 2011. A total of
484 sheens were observed in 2008 in compartments C1 through C4, compared to a total of
2 sheens observed in 2011 in compartments C1 through C4. This is a 99.6% reduction of
observed sheens in the boom containment system along the Paragon site from 2008 to 2011. The
reduced frequency of sheens is attributable to the continued operation of the landside TFR
system, the installed grout wall, and the completion and maintenance of the Paragon site
bulkhead seam sealing.
3.2.1.2
Summary of Seep Mitigation
The visual condition of the water in compartments C1 through C4 has been improving steadily
since the construction of the grout wall in the 4th quarter of 2006, the start-up of the TFR system
in September 2007, and the sealing of the bulkhead seams of the Paragon site in September 2008.
3.2.2
100-120 Apollo Street Property
3.2.2.1 Summary of Containment and Absorption System Monitoring
During 2011, observations of boom compartments C5, SE1, SE2, and SE3 revealed that:



One sheen was observed in SE1 and SE2 in 2011. Both were observed on October 24, 2011.
Sheens were absent 99% of the observed time in SE1 and 98% of the observed time in
SE2.
SE3 was visible 58 times in 2011. No sheens were observed in SE3 in 2011. Sheens
were absent 100% of the observed time.
Sheen observations in C5 began on January 1, 2008 and in SE1, SE2, and SE3 on January 1, 2009.
Figure 11 shows the sheen detections in the boom systems of the Paragon and Apollo Street sites
along Newtown Creek from 2008 to 2011 by quarter. The number of sheens detected were
highest in the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2008 and decreased significantly into 2011. A total of
250 sheens were observed in 2008 in C5, compared to no sheens observed in 2011. A total of
33 observed sheens in SE1, 9 observed sheens in SE2, and 2 observed sheens in SE3 in 2009 are
compared to 1 observed sheen in SE1, 1 observed sheen in SE2, and no sheens observed in SE3
in 2011. This is a significant reduction in the observation of sheens in the boom containment
system along the Apollo Street site.
3.2.2.2
Summary of Seep Mitigation
- 18 -
January 31, 2011
The absence of sheens fronting C5 is attributed to the ongoing operation of CMW-43R as a
recovery well, the completion of the Apollo Street site barrier membrane in December 2008, and
the continuing operation of CMW-17R as a recovery well. Compartments SE1, SE2, and SE3
are outside of the zone of the historic PSH seep; however, the water quality in these
compartments has improved between 2009 and 2011, as evidenced by the decrease in observed
sheens.
3.2.3 Summary of Bulkhead Inspections and Resealing
During the monthly inspections, areas where supplemental epoxy was needed were noted on the
inspection forms. These areas were reinforced during the bulkhead inspections or soon
thereafter. A summary of the 2011 bulkhead and/or barrier application activities follows:




1st quarter – No additional epoxy required for the seams in the steel bulkhead nor the
seals in the Apollo Street membrane.
2nd quarter – 28 seams in the steel bulkhead and none of the seals in the Apollo Street
membrane required additional epoxy.
3rd quarter – three seams in the steel bulkhead and none of the seals in the Apollo Street
membrane required additional epoxy.
4th quarter – No additional epoxy required for the seams in the steel bulkhead nor the
seals in the Apollo Street membrane.
These preventive maintenance measures contribute greatly to the continued decline and absence
of sheens.
3.2.4
Containment and Absorption System Enhancements
No enhancements were needed for the Paragon site and Apollo Street site containment boom
systems in 2011. Currently, solidifier booms occupy all compartments in the containment boom
systems on both sites.
3.3
Summary of Additional Activities
The following is a summary of additional activities performed in 2011.
3.3.1
Summary of Regional Groundwater and PSH Gauging
Three regional monitoring well gauging events were coordinated between BP, ExxonMobil, and
Texaco during 2011. These events were completed on March 18, June 29, and December 7, 2011.
One regional monitoring well gauging event was coordinated between ExxonMobil and Texaco
- 19 -
January 31, 2011
on September 13, 2011. BP was unable to coordinate with the September event and conducted
their gauging on September 21, 2011. The September 21 BP data were not considered in the
generation of the regional groundwater and PSH maps.
The gauging data were used to construct regional groundwater contour maps and PSH thickness
and extent maps. The maps created from the most recent quarterly gauging data of
December 7, 2011, are presented as Plates 1 and 2. The data depicted on these plates are
consistent with historical data and provide an indication of the potential groundwater movement
in the area. The interpreted groundwater flow and lateral PSH extent are consistent with
previously reported data.
3.3.2 Nuisance Odor Control Measures
SAIC continued to monitor and maintain the nuisance odor control measures that were
implemented in 2010. Maintenance activities included the replacement of fittings and gaskets, as
well as the continued use of the existing 55-gallon carbon drums to remove nuisance odors from
inside the OWS building.
3.3.3
Oil-Water Separator Upgrade
Starting on November 6, 2011, SAIC began the scheduled upgrade of the coated steel OWS to a
corrosion-resistant fiberglass model with the shutdown of the TFR system and the dismantling of
the requisite piping and infrastructure. In addition to being corrosion-resistant, the new OWS
has a sludge chamber below the coalescing plates and improved coalescing plates. The steel
OWS was removed from the building on November 7 by American Hauling and Rigging, Inc.
Following the removal of the OWS, the steel secondary containment pan was cleaned and
resurfaced using POR-15® products (cleaners, epoxy paint, and chemical-resistant topcoat) to
inhibit rust formation. The fiberglass OWS was installed on November 14 by American Hauling
and Rigging, Inc., and immediately thereafter, the piping and infrastructure were reinstalled.
Testing of critical devices occurred on November 17, and TFR system operations resumed on
November 18, 2011.
3.3.4
Ambient Air Monitoring Program
Ambient air quality monitoring events occurred at the Empire Merchants warehouses and office
spaces at 16, 42, and 50 Bridgewater Street and at the 100-120 Apollo Street warehouse on
February 26-27, 2011, and September 17-18, 2011. A total of 17 SUMMATM canisters were
deployed across the site during the February sampling event, and a total of 18 SUMMATM
canisters were deployed across the site during the September sampling event. Fourteen
SUMMATM canisters were located inside the warehouses and office buildings during the
February event, and 15 SUMMATM canisters were deployed inside the warehouses and office
- 20 -
January 31, 2011
buildings during the September event. During both events, three SUMMATM canisters were
located outside the buildings at ground level. The locations of collected air samples are
presented in Figure 12.
The laboratory results for both ambient air quality monitoring events in 2011 are summarized in
Table 15. Breathing zone air quality was also monitored using a PID during SUMMATM canister
deployment. There were no detections above background levels with the PID. The laboratory
data indicate that the subsurface hydrocarbons are not adversely affecting air quality.
3.3.5
Annual Groundwater Monitoring Event
Groundwater was sampled from a total of 37 monitoring wells on the Paragon and Apollo Street
sites between June 4 and July 19, 2011. Samples were collected from monitoring wells that did
not contain PSH and were collected using low-flow collection protocols (United States
Environmental Protection Agency, Standard Operating Procedure for Low-Stress [Low
Flow]/Minimal Drawdown Ground-Water Sample Collection, June 16, 2010). All samples were
analyzed for the NYSDEC Spill Technology and Remediation Series (STARS) gasoline and fuel
oil contaminants. In addition, eight of the samples were analyzed for TCL, dissolved Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, and total dissolved solids (TDS), and six of the
samples were analyzed for PCBs. The samples were analyzed by TestAmerica Laboratories
using Methods 8260B, 8270C, 8082, 6010B, 7470A, and 2540C.
The results of the monitoring event are presented in detail in the SAIC document entitled “3rd
Quarter Status Report (July 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011) for the Former Paragon Oil Terminal
and the 100-120 Apollo Street Property, Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY,” dated October 31, 2011.
Tables 16, 17, and 18 summarize the 2010 and 2011 groundwater monitoring events. The
following conclusions have been presented in the October 2011 report:




Analytical results from the 2011 annual groundwater monitoring event are similar to the
2010 results in both magnitude and spatial distribution throughout the site.
The groundwater that contains exceedances of New York State Ambient Water Quality
(NYSAWQ) Standards is proximal to the PSH extent (see Plates 3 and 4).
Samples from 15 of the 37 monitoring wells had no exceedances of the NYSAWQ
Standards. These wells were predominantly located in the areas where PSH is absent on
the properties.
Arochlor 1016 was detected at an estimated concentration of 0.18 µg/L at MW-26 along
Bridgewater Street south of the Apollo Street site. No other PCBs were detected during
the sampling event.
- 21 -
3.3.6
January 31, 2011
Removal of Tree from Newtown Creek
On August 30, 2011, following Hurricane Irene’s landfall in New York City, a tree was
discovered to have fallen across the globe boom of SE1. The tree remained rooted in the earthen
embankment on the Apollo Street site, with the trunk and branches submerging a short section of
the SE1 globe boom under water. Atlantic Response placed absorbent booms around the
compartment until the tree could be removed. On December 9, Atlantic Response and Greenleaf
Landscaping and Tree Removal, Inc., together with SAIC, removed the tree from SE1 and
returned the globe boom to its original configuration. The tree was cut and lifted onto the lower
bulkhead, where it was cut into two-foot lengths. The remains of the tree are stored on-site until
proper disposal can occur in the 1st quarter of 2012. Photographs of the tree removal process are
presented as Appendix F. Disposal through Waste Management, Inc., as a nonhazardous waste
is pending.
- 22 -
January 31, 2011
4.0 ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR 2012
This section summarizes the site characterization and remedial measures planned for 2012.
4.1 Continued Operation of the Landside Recovery System
The existing landside recovery system at the Paragon and Apollo Street sites will continue to
operate through 2012. The following sections summarize specific enhancements and planned
operations for the upcoming year.
The spent carbon from the October 19, 2011, change-out was removed from the site by Siemens
Industry, Inc., for reactivation at their Darlington, Pennsylvania, facility on January 5, 2012. The
spent organoclay profile has been approved, and the manifest is being prepared for shipping the
material off-site to be disposed of as nonhazardous waste.
4.1.1 Continued Operation of the TFR System
Operation of the TFR system will continue through 2012 at the Paragon and Apollo Street sites
with the primary objective of maintaining the reversed gradients for continued mitigation of the
seep. Treated effluent will continue to be discharged to the combined sewer system under an
NYCDEP discharge permit.
4.1.2 Installation of TFR System Recovery Wells
Installation of two replacement recovery wells for the TFR system will occur in 2012 (see
Figure 13). The first replacement recovery well, CMW-65R, is planned to be installed directly
between MW-74R and MW-75R on the upper bulkhead. The majority of the TSS entering the
TFR system comes from these two wells, which were monitoring wells that were later converted
into recovery wells. By replacing these two wells with a properly constructed recovery well, it is
anticipated that the TSS loading into the TFR system will be reduced significantly while still
maintaining the reversed gradient at both high and low tide.
The second replacement well, CMW-67R, will be installed near the water treatment building.
This well is planned to replace the angled well, CMW-64R, which ceased operating in
September 2011 due to the likely collapse of the screen and the subsequent loss of the pumping
equipment inside the well.
- 23 -
January 31, 2011
Throughout 2012, monitoring of the PSH thickness and groundwater elevation in the upper and
lower bulkhead wells will continue on a monthly basis. These data will be used to evaluate the
performance of the TFR system.
Regional groundwater monitoring events will continue throughout 2012 on a quarterly basis.
Regional gauging data will be used to evaluate the lateral extent of PSH in the area of the
Paragon and Apollo Street sites.
SAIC will continue to monitor the TFR system effluent throughout 2012 and ensure
compliance with the existing NYCDEP discharge permit. SAIC will renew the discharge
permit in the 2nd quarter of 2012.
4.1.5 Monthly Indoor Well Inspections and Slab Maintenance
SAIC, on behalf of Texaco, will continue to perform monthly inspections of all indoor wells in
2012. In addition, SAIC will continue to perform inspections of indoor warehouse slabs on the
Paragon and Apollo Street sites. Cracks and seams will be visually inspected and monitored for
any vapor seepage with a PID. Cracks and seams will be sealed using a combination of concrete
sealant and concrete epoxy during scheduled warehouse shutdowns.
4.1.6
Sub-Slab Depressurization System
Operation of the SSD system will continue through 2012 at the Paragon site. The system will
continue to operate utilizing the two laterals (H-1 and H-3) as the extraction points, with the
vertical points and remaining lateral (H-2) used to monitor the performance of the system.
4.1.7
Installation and Start-up of the Vapor-Phase Recovery System
Installation and start-up of the VPR system are tentatively scheduled for the 1st quarter of 2012.
This includes the completion of VPR piping, the installation of an extraction blower, and the
installation of a catalytic oxidizer to treat the off-gas. The objective of the VPR component is to
ensure long-term mitigation of the seep.
- 24 -
January 31, 2011
The VPR will be a component of the existing TFR system and will be operated concurrently with
TFR. The purpose is to remove residual PSH in the vapor phase. System design specifications
were present in the Phase II Vapor Phase Recovery System Design letter submitted on
July 1, 2009. A construction completion report will be submitted to NYSDEC after start-up of
the VPR component.
4.2
Continued Operation of the Newtown Creek Containment Booms
Operation of the existing Newtown Creek containment booms will continue through 2012 at the
Paragon and Apollo Street sites. The primary goal of the boom system remains preventing the
intermittent sheens from entering Newtown Creek. There are currently no enhancements
planned in 2012 to the boom observation schedules or the creekside inspections. The use of
solidifier booms in all of the boom compartments will be continued through 2012.
4.3
Planned Site Characterization Activities
The following are site characterization activities planned for 2012.
4.3.1
Annual Groundwater Monitoring
In 2010, SAIC, on behalf of Texaco, began a groundwater sampling program for wells not
containing PSH. These wells will be sampled one time in 2012 for NYSDEC STARS gasoline
and fuel oil parameters, and approximately 15% of the wells not containing PSH will be sampled
for RCRA metals, TDS, PCBs, and TCL VOCs, and SVOCs.
4.3.2
Semiannual Ambient Air Monitoring
In 2012, SAIC, on behalf of Texaco, will continue to implement the existing ambient air
sampling program for the Paragon and Apollo Street sites. Ambient air monitoring will occur on
a semiannual basis, in February and August of 2012. SUMMATM canisters will be deployed at
previous sampling locations during each monitoring event. Breathing zone air quality will be
monitored using a PID during SUMMATM canister deployment. EPA Methods TO-15 and 3C
will be used to analyze the air samples. Results from the ambient air sampling events will be
reported in the quarterly progress reports.
- 25 -
January 31, 2011
Report Limitations
This technical document was prepared on behalf of Texaco and is intended for its sole use and
for use by the local, state or federal regulatory agency that the technical document was sent to by
SAIC. Any other person or entity obtaining, using, or relying on this technical document hereby
acknowledges that they do so at their own risk, and that SAIC Energy, Environment &
Infrastructure, LLC (SAIC) shall have no responsibility or liability for the consequences thereof.
Site history and background information provided in this technical document are based on
sources that may include interviews with environmental regulatory agencies and property
management personnel and a review of acquired environmental regulatory agency documents
and property information obtained from Texaco and others. SAIC has not made, nor has it been
asked to make, any independent investigation concerning the accuracy, reliability, or
completeness of such information beyond that described in this technical document.
Recognizing reasonable limits of time and cost, this technical document cannot wholly eliminate
uncertainty regarding the vertical and lateral extent of impacted environmental media.
Opinions and recommendations presented in this technical document apply only to site
conditions and features as they existed at the time of SAIC’s site visits or site work and cannot
be applied to conditions and features of which SAIC is unaware and has not had the opportunity
to evaluate.
All sources of information on which SAIC has relied in making its conclusions (including direct
field observations) are identified by reference in this technical document or in appendices
attached to this technical document. Any information not listed by reference or in appendices
has not been evaluated or relied upon by SAIC in the context of this technical document. The
conclusions, therefore, represent our professional opinion based on the identified sources of
information.
Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarter Status Report
January 31, 2011
Figures
East River
Apollo Street
Site
Former Paragon
Oil Terminal Site
Newto
w n Cre
ek
Greenpoint
yn
kl
o
o
Br
Q
s
en
ue
Ex
pr
sw
es
ay
NOTE: Aerial photography was collected in April 2004 by the USGS at 0.5 meter resolution and is natural color.
0
1,000
2,000
4,000
Feet
Legend
110-120 Apollo Street
Former Paragon Terminal
³
AND APOLLO ST. PROTERTY
TEXACO FACILITY #304209
Map Location:
GREENPOINT, BROOKLYN, NY
Site Location Map
drawn AGM
checked
date
date
10/27/2010
job no.
initials
26011A045A
date
JAK
11/2/2010
approved
date
file no.
revision
PJC
11/2/2010
Site_Location_2012-01-06
figure no.
1
Treatment System Layout
Legend
CMW-42
CHEMICAL FEED SHED
WATER TREATMENT
BUILDING
´
"
´
"
Recovery Well
´
"
Monitoring Well
OIL WATER SEPARATOR BUILDING
´
"
Treatment System Building
CMW-17R
Fence
UNTREATED WATER TANK
Tank
´
"
RIMW-01
PRE OIL WATER SEPARATOR TANK
Piping
CMW-43R
CONCRETE PAD
´
"
New
two
PW-1R
PSH TANK
´
"
´
" CMW-55
COMPRESSOR SHED
CMW-64R
MW-73R
´
"
BACKWASH TANK
´
"
nC
reek
TRANSFER PUMP CONTAINMENT BOX
CMW-23 S/D
"
´
" ´
´
"
MW-74R
MW-21
´
"
Bulkhead
´
"
CMW-56
CMW-39
´
" CMW-63R
PW-2R
MW-72
´
"´
"
´
" CMW-59R
RECOVERY PIPES
CMW-54
´
"
´
"
MW-75R
CMW-53R
MW-70R
´
"
´
"
CMW-58
Regional View
´
"
´
"´
"
" ´
"´
´
"
´
"´
"
´
"
MW-69
´
"
CMW-41 S/D
MW-1
CMW-16
MW-88D
´
"´
""
´
" ´
"
´
""
´
"´
"´
´
" ´
´
"´
"´
"
" ´
´
" ´
"´
´
"
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"
´
"
´
"
"
"
´
" ´
´
" ´
´
"
MW-88S
CMW-42
RIMW-02
CMW-40
MW-56
CMW-17R
CMW-43R
CMW-22
RIMW-01
PW-1R
CMW-64R
EE
T
ST
R
´
"
AP
OL
LO
´
"
PW-2R
CMW-63R
CMW-23 S/D
MW-72
MW-74R
CMW-59R
CMW-57
won C
CMW-53R
MW-75R
CMW-58
MW-69
MW-67
MW-68R
reek
´
"
CMW-57
MW-68R
CMW-38
´
"
CMW-19 S/D
´
"
CMW-45
MW-32
MW-66
CMW-12
´
"
CMW-8
CMW-33
´
"
CMW-38
´
"
CMW-44
´
"
CMW-13
´
"
CMW-34 S/D
CMW-18
MW-57
´
"
´
"
CMW-14
MW-2
´
"
MW-64
´
"
CMW-4
CMW-9
´
"
CMW-35
´
"
CMW-47 S/D
´
"
CMW-62 S/D
´
"´
"
RW-25
APO LLO
CMW-36 S/D
CMW-24 S/D
GE
T
M STREE
VAN DA
WA
TE R
CMW-32
´
"
CMW-10
´
"
ET
´
"
CMW-5
CMW-61
´
"
CMW-31
CMW-1
´
"
CMW-29 S/D
´
"
´
"
CMW-6
´
"
´
"
R
KE
EE
M
CMW-2
CMW-28
´
"
U
EN
AV
E
MW-60
´
"
CMW-27
CMW-30
VARICK
´
"
CMW-26
STREET
´
"
MW-61
125 250
MW-3 7
0
500
IC
K
ST
R
EE
T
NU
AVE
ART
VA
R
Greenpoint, NY\2011\Projects\Treatment System\TS_20110909.mxd
12.5
25
Feet
Feet
W
STE
AVE NUE
MW-62
MW-63
0
NAS SAU
´
"
´
"
´
"
CMW-46
MW-59
STR
E
CMW-15
CMW-60 S/D
´
"
BRID
´
"
MW-78
MW-58
STREET
´
"
´
"
"
´
" ´
´
"
´
"
´
"
"
´
"´
MW-77
MW-26
´
"
CMW-25 S/D
MW-76
CMW-37
´
"
MW-70R
CMW-54
CMW-39
CMW-20
Newt
CMW-55
MW-73R
CMW-56
CMW-21
MW-2 3
MW-76
50
£
Location of Site Monitoring Wells
and Total Fluids Recovery System
drawn AGM
checked
date
date
1/19/2010
job no.
initials
LAB
LAB
LAB
26011A045A
JAK
7/29/2010
revision
date
7/25/11 Update data frame positions
Correct fluid line location
9/9/11
11/17/11 Update logo/job #
approved
date
PJC
7/29/2010
file no.
TS_20110909
Figure No.
2
´
"
E
TOTAL FLUIDS RECOVERY SYSTEM
PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC
3
Figure 4
4th Quarter Recovered PSH & Maintenance Timeline
Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property
Greenpoint, Brooklyn, New York
46,000
100
Cumulative Recovered PSH (gal)
45,000
Weekly Recovered PSH (gal)
90
Equipment Cleaning Event
Upgrade Event
44,000
80
43,000
70
42,000
60
41,000
50
40,000
40
39,000
30
Carbon/Clay
change-out
10/19/11
38,000
20
11/6/11 - TFR System offline
for OWS upgrade
11/6/2011
12/15/2011
10/18/2011
37,000
10
11/18/11 - TFR System online
36,000
9/30/2011
0
10/12/2011
10/24/2011
11/5/2011
11/17/2011
Date
11/29/2011
12/11/2011
12/23/2011
Weekly PSH Recovere
ed (gallons)
Cumulative PSH Recov
vered (gallons)
Carbon/Clay Change-Out
Figure 5
Cumulative & Weekly PSH Recovered
G
i t B
kl
N
k
Greenpoint,
Brooklyn,
New Y
York
45,000
1,500
Cumulative Recovered PSH (gal)
Weeklyy Recovered PSH (gal)
(g )
40,000
30,000
1,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
500
10 000
10,000
43,258 gallons of PSH recovered To Date
205 gallons of PSH recovered in the fourth quarter of 2011
990 gallons of PSH recovered in 2011
5,000
0
10/5/07
0
3/23/08
9/9/08
2/26/09
Note: Cumulative PSH Recovery includes 11,697 gallons recovered during interim recovery activities that
occurred between July 2005 and September 2007. Weekly PSH values were calculated on a Sunday
to Saturday week.
week
8/15/09
2/1/10
Date
7/21/10
1/7/11
6/26/11
12/13/11
Weekly PSH Recovere
ed (gallons)
Cumulattive PSH Recov
vered (gallons)
35,000
Figure 6a
4th Quarter Lower Bulkhead Monitoring Wells PSH Thickness vs. Time
October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011
Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY
4
3.5
3
PSH Thickn
ness (ft.)
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
9/30/2011
10/15/2011
10/30/2011
Note:
Gauging data collected on 10/5, 10/11, 10/18, 10/25, 11/3, 11/28, 12/6, 12/12, 12/21, and 12/29 were collected during PSH bailing activities. The wells were gauged prior to bailing PSH from the wells.
11/14/2011
11/29/2011
12/14/2011
12/29/2011
Date
CMW‐57
CMW‐58
MW‐67
MW‐69
MW‐66
Figure 6b
4th Quarter Upper Bulkhead Monitoring Wells PSH Thickness vs. Time
October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011
4
3.5
3
PSH Thickn
ness (ft.)
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
9/30/2011
10/15/2011
Note:
Gauging data collected on 10/5, 10/11, 10/18, 10/25, 11/3, 11/28, 12/6, 12/12, 12/21, and 12/29 were collected during PSH bailing activities. The wells were gauged prior to bailing PSH from the wells.
10/30/2011
11/14/2011
11/29/2011
12/14/2011
12/29/2011
Date
CMW‐23S
CMW‐54
CMW‐55
CMW‐56
MW‐72
NEW
TOW
NC
REE
K
AND APOLLO STREET SITE
SUB-SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM
7
AND APOLLO STREET SITE
SUB SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM
PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC
PLAN VIEW OF BOOM
CONTAINMENT AND ABSORPTION SYSTEM
KEY PLAN
9
Figure 10a
Annual Lower Bulkhead Monitoring Wells PSH Thickness vs. Time
January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011
4
3.5
3
PSH Thickn
ness (ft.)
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
1/1/2011
4/1/2011
6/30/2011
9/28/2011
Date
Note: PSH bailing activities began on July 7, 2011 in wells CMW‐57 and CMW‐58. CMW‐57
CMW‐58
12/27/2011
Figure 10b
Annual Lower Bulkhead Monitoring Wells PSH Thickness vs. Time
4
3.5
3
PSH Thickn
ness (ft.)
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
1/1/2011
4/1/2011
6/30/2011
9/28/2011
Date
Note: PSH bailing activities began on July 7, 2011 in wells MW‐67 and MW‐69. MW‐67
MW‐69
MW‐66
12/27/2011
Figure 10c
Annual Upper Bulkhead Monitoring Wells PSH Thickness vs. Time
4
3.5
3
PSH Thickn
ness (ft.)
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
1/1/2011
4/1/2011
6/30/2011
9/28/2011
Date
Note: PSH bailing activities began on July 7, 2011 in well CMW‐54. CMW‐23S
CMW‐54
CMW‐55
CMW‐56
MW‐72
12/27/2011
Figure 11
Sheen Detections in the Boom Systems from 2008 to 2011
Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY 100
Newtown Creek
C1
90
90
85
C2
C3
C4
C5 (Apollo St Site)
SE1 (Apollo St Site)
2008
Note: 1. The number associated with each location indicates the number of sheens observed during that quarter.
2. Sheen observations in Newtown Creek were not recorded until January 1, 2009. Sheens in Newtown Creek are independent of the boom containment system located along the bulkhead of the Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street sites. 3. Sheen observations in compartments C1‐C5 did not begin until January 1, 2008. 4. Sheen observations in compartments SE1‐SE3 did not begin until January 1, 2009.
2009
85
83
2010
2011
• 4 Sheens in 201 observations (across only 3 days).
• Sheen was absent 98.5% of the days.
• The 2 4th quarter sheens were both detected on October 24, 2011.
• Sheen was absent 100% of t+he time in the 2nd & 3rd Quarters.
80
70
70
Number of Sheen
n Observations
66
60
51
50
42
39
40
35
30
24
22
20
17
13
3
1st Quarter 2008
2nd Quarter 2008
7
4
0
0
4th Quarter 2008
11
1
1st Quarter 2009
12
11
11
8
3
00
1
8
7
5
4
0
3rd Quarter 2008
10
6
5
2
11
10
9
10
13
12
11
1
2nd Quarter 2009
3
2
00
0 00
3rd Quarter 2009
00
5
4
1
5
2
2
0
4th Quarter 2009
000 0
2
2
0
1st Quarter 2010
Quarter
5
00 0
11
2
0
2nd Quarter 2010
1
2
4
2
4
3
1
0 00
1
00 0 0 000
000 0000
000 00000
000 000000
3rd Quarter 2010
4th Quarter 2010
1st Quarter 2011
2nd Quarter 2011
3rd Quarter 2011
00
000 00
11
0
4th Quarter 2011
AMBIENT AIR SAMPLE LOCATIONS
FOR 2011
12
Legend
CMW-42
´
"
´
"
!
´
Proposed Replacement Recovery Wells
´
"
Recovery Well
´
"
Monitoring Well
CMW-17R
Treatment System Building
Fence
´
"
RIMW-01
Tank
CMW-43R
´
"
Piping
CMW-67R
!
´
´
"
´
" CMW-55
PW-1R
CMW-64R
MW-73R
´
"
´
"
CMW-23 S/D
"
´
" ´
´
"
´
"
CMW-56
MW-74R
CMW-39
MW-21
´
"
´
" CMW-63R
PW-2R
MW-72
´
"´
"
CMW-54
´
" CMW-59R
CMW-65R
!
´
´
"
´
"
CMW-53R
MW-75R
MW-70R
´
"
´
"
CMW-58
Regional View
´
"
´
"´
"
" ´
"´
´
"
´
"´
"
´
"
MW-69
´
"
CMW-41 S/D
MW-1
CMW-16
MW-88D
´
"´
""
´
" ´
"
´
""
´
"´
"´
´
" ´
´
"´
"´
"
" ´
´
" ´
"´
´
"
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"
´
"
´
"
"
"
´
" ´
´
" ´
´
"
MW-88S
CMW-42
RIMW-02
CMW-40
MW-56
CMW-17R
CMW-43R
CMW-22
RIMW-01
PW-1R
CMW-64R
EE
T
ST
R
´
"
PW-2R
CMW-63R
MW-72
CMW-59R
´
"
MW-70R
CMW-54
CMW-57
CMW-53R
MW-75R
CMW-58
MW-69
MW-67
CMW-57
MW-68R
CMW-38
´
"
CMW-19 S/D
´
"
CMW-45
MW-32
MW-66
CMW-12
´
"
CMW-8
CMW-33
´
"
CMW-38
´
"
CMW-44
´
"
CMW-13
´
"
CMW-34 S/D
CMW-18
MW-57
´
"
´
"
CMW-14
MW-2
´
"
MW-64
´
"
CMW-4
CMW-9
´
"
CMW-35
´
"
CMW-47 S/D
´
"
CMW-62 S/D
´
"´
"
RW-25
APO LLO
CMW-36 S/D
CMW-24 S/D
GE
T
M STREE
VAN DA
WA
TE R
CMW-32
´
"
CMW-10
´
"
ET
´
"
CMW-5
CMW-61
´
"
CMW-31
CMW-1
´
"
CMW-29 S/D
´
"
´
"
CMW-6
´
"
´
"
R
KE
EE
M
CMW-2
CMW-28
´
"
U
EN
AV
E
MW-60
´
"
CMW-27
CMW-30
VARICK
´
"
CMW-26
STREET
´
"
MW-61
125 250
MW-3 7
0
500
IC
K
ST
R
EE
T
NU
AVE
ART
VA
R
Greenpoint, NY\2011\Projects\2012 Proposed RWs.mxd
190
380
Feet
Feet
W
STE
AVE NUE
MW-62
MW-63
0
NAS SAU
´
"
´
"
´
"
CMW-46
MW-59
STR
E
CMW-15
CMW-60 S/D
´
"
BRID
´
"
MW-78
MW-58
STREET
´
"
´
"
"
´
" ´
´
"
´
"
´
"
"
´
"´
MW-77
MW-26
´
"
CMW-25 S/D
MW-76
CMW-37
´
"
MW-68R
CMW-23 S/D
MW-74R
CMW-39
CMW-20
AP
OL
LO
´
"
CMW-55
MW-73R
CMW-56
CMW-21
MW-2 3
MW-76
760
£
Location of Replacement Recovery Well
Installations Proposed for 2012
drawn AGM
checked
date
date
1/19/2010
job no.
initials
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
26011A045A
date
7/25/11
9/9/11
11/17/11
1/6/12
JAK
01/06/2012
revision
Update data frame positions
Correct fluid line location
Update logo/job #
Add prop. wells.
approved
date
PJC
01/16/2012
file no.
2012 Proposed RWs
Figure No.
13
´
"
E
January 31, 2011
Tables
Table 1
Summary of Total Fluids Recovered on a Weekly Basis
September 14, 2007 through December 31, 2011
Date
Cumulative
Groundwater
Treated (gal)
Cumulative
PSH Recovered
(gal)
Interim Vac Truck Recovery
(June 2005 to July 2007)
Not Recorded
11,697
TFR System (9/14/2007 to 9/30/2011)
31,778,810
31,356
10/1/2011
31,811,765
31,357
10/8/2011
32,032,420
31,378
10/15/2011
32,243,940
31,394
10/22/2011
32,431,925
31,411
10/29/2011
32,685,075
31,432
11/5/2011
32,932,165
31,450
11/12/2011
32,963,520
31,452
11/19/2011
33,025,575
31,462
11/26/2011
32,932,165
31,450
12/3/2011
33,421,801
31,488
12/10/2011
33,644,953
31,501
12/17/2011
33,864,230
31,521
12/24/2011
34,075,943
31,541
12/31/2011
34,254,322
31,561
TFR System Recovery in 4th Quarter of 2011
2,475,512
205
Cumulative Recovery
(9/14/2007 to 12/31/2011)
34,254,322
31,561
Total PSH Recovery From June 2005 to December 31, 2011
43,258
Page 1 of 1
Table 2
4th Quarter Total Fluids Recovery System Operation
Well ID
% Uptime
October 2011
Maintenance Notes
November 2011
Maintenance Notes
% Uptime
% Uptime
December 2011
Maintenance Notes
CMW-17R
94.9%
Wellhead components operating correctly; No downhole pump
inspection performed due to components operating properly.
61.7%
Pump pulled, cleaned, and regulator serviced on Nov 1, 2011; System was
offline during OWS upgrade between Nov 6 and Nov 18, 2011
99.9%
Pump pulled, cleaned, and serviced on Dec 20, 2011.
CMW-43R
94.9%
61.8%
Wellhead components operating correctly; System was offline during OWS
upgrade between November 6 and November 18, 2011
99.9%
CMW-53R
94.9%
61.8%
100.0%
CMW-59R
94.9%
61.8%
100.0%
CMW-63R
94.9%
61.8%
100.0%
CMW-64R
0.0%
Pump stopped working on September 13, 2011. Pump is stuck in well due to
sediments; could not remove with water jetting & tripod hoist.
0.0%
Not operating.
0.0%
Not operating.
MW-68R
94.9%
61.8%
99.9%
Pump pulled, cleaned, and serviced on Dec 20, 2011;
Replaced hose clamps on Dec 20, 2011.
MW-70R
94.9%
61.8%
99.8%
MW-73R
94.9%
61.8%
99.9%
MW-74R
94.9%
42.6%
99.9%
MW-75R
94.9%
42.5%
100.0%
PW-1R
94.9%
61.8%
100.0%
PW-2R
94.9%
61.8%
99.9%
System uptime
94.9%
upgrade between Nov 6 and Nov 18, 2011; Well throttled back over
Thanksgiving weekend due to high sediment loading
upgrade between Nov 6 and Nov 18, 2011; Well throttled back over
Thanksgiving weekend due to high sediment loading
61.8%
Total operational uptime
100.0%
Operational uptime taking planned OWS upgrade into account
100.0%
Notes:
1. "Percent Uptime" is a measurement of the amount of time a recovery pump operated in the given period. On occasion, individual pumps may be shut down for
maintenance or repairs. 100% uptime is determined as continuous operation for 24 hours per day for the entire month.
2. System uptime calculation for November 2011 does not include the planned downtime for the OWS upgrade.
Page 1 of 1
Table 3
4th Quarter Summary of Estimated Individual Well Flow-Rates
CMW-17R
CMW-43R
CMW-53R
CMW-59R
CMW-63R
CMW-64R
MW-68R
MW-70R
MW-73R
MW-74R
MW-75R
PW-1R
PW-2R
Date of Estimation
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
(gpm)
10/3/2011
2.62
3.15
2.59
3.17
3.59
0.00
2.03
3.97
1.52
0.40
1.03
2.22
0.98
10/10/2011
2.76
3.17
2.58
3.23
3.37
0.00
1.19
3.81
1.46
0.37
0.92
2.08
0.92
10/18/2011
2.83
3.04
3.41
2.69
0.09
0.00
1.66
3.85
1.07
0.38
0.93
1.78
1.28
10/24/2011
2.57
2.82
4.37
4.04
0.42
0.00
1.36
3.51
1.16
0.34
0.84
1.55
1.85
11/15/2011
3.00
3.18
3.69
3.82
1.74
0.00
1.56
3.56
1.25
0.45
1.10
1.81
1.68
11/21/2011
3.01
3.55
3.81
5.83
4.21
0.00
1.47
3.95
0.87
0.44
12.08
1.60
4.95
12/1/2011
2.52
2.73
3.56
2.05
3.43
0.00
1.79
3.42
1.33
0.20
2.07
1.74
4.64
12/7/2011
3.51
3.67
3.42
4.54
4.18
0.00
1.27
3.88
1.30
0.53
1.35
1.63
4.74
12/13/2011
2.70
3.35
3.09
4.00
4.09
0.00
1.26
3.64
0.89
0.44
0.96
1.44
4.54
12/20/2011
2.60
3.37
3.27
3.28
3.47
0.00
1.43
3.72
1.03
0.44
0.95
1.55
2.29
12/29/2011
2.10
2.75
3.22
1.92
2.89
0.00
1.53
3.30
1.03
0.32
0.90
0.37
1.81
Note:
1. Flow rates are estimated based on total system uptime and individual well cycle counter readings.
Page 1 of 1
Table 4
4 Quarter Measured PSH Thicknesses in Bulkhead Monitoring and Recovery Wells
Phase II
Recovery Wells
Phase I
Recovery Wells
Monitoring Wells
th
Location
Units
CMW-23D
CMW-23S
CMW-54
CMW-55
CMW-56
CMW-57
CMW-58
MW-66
MW-67
MW-69
MW-72
MW-68R
MW-70R
MW-73R
MW-74R
MW-75R
PW-1R
CMW-17R
CMW-43R
CMW-53R
CMW-59R
CMW-63R
CMW-64R
PW-2R
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
10/5/11
NM
NM
0.02
NM
NM
1.09
0.15
NM
0.82
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
10/11/11 10/18/11 10/25/11
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
NM
ND
0.01
ND
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
NM
0.24
1.21
ND
0.24
0.27
0.13
NM
ND
NM
0.31
1.00
0.52
0.57
0.58
0.04
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
ND
NM
11/3/11
NM
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
0.14
NM
0.65
0.06
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
Date
11/15/11 11/28/11
ND
NM
ND
NM
NM
ND
ND
NM
ND
NM
0.17
ND
0.15
0.23
ND
NM
0.34
0.70
0.03
0.05
ND
NM
ND
NM
ND
NM
ND
NM
NM
NM
ND
NM
ND
NM
ND
NM
ND
NM
ND
NM
ND
NM
ND
NM
NM
NM
ND
NM
12/6/11
NM
NM
0.85
NM
NM
1.21
0.99
NM
0.80
0.77
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
12/7/11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26
0.21
ND
0.29
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NM
NM
ND
12/12/11 12/21/11 12/28/11
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
0.18
0.34
0.30
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
0.04
0.74
0.30
0.79
0.53
0.48
NM
NM
NM
0.76
0.55
0.46
0.29
0.19
0.04
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
Notes:
1. Recovery wells were operating at the time of measurement.
2.
3.
ND
NM
Indicates PSH was not detected.
Indicates a well was not measured.
4. Gauging data from 10/5, 10/11, 10/18, 10/25, 11/3, 11/28, 12/6, 12/12, 12/21, and 12/29 were collected during PSH bailing activities from the 5 monitoring wells
that regularly contain PSH along the upper and lower bulkheads.
5. CMW-54 and MW-74R were not gauged on 11/15/11 because they were covered by OWS upgrade equipment.
6. CMW-64R has been offline since September 2011 when the well screen apparently collapsed.
NM
NM
Table 5
4 Quarter NYCDEP Discharge Permit Compliance Results
th
Analyte
NYCDEP
Concentration Limit
Daily
Monthly
TS-4 Post GAC 2:
Treated Effluent
(11/30/2011)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane (ug/L)
<10
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene (ug/L)
<9.6
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (ug/L)
<10
Aroclor 1016 (ug/L)
<0.058
Aroclor 1221 (ug/L)
<0.058
Aroclor 1232 (ug/L)
<0.058
Aroclor 1242 (ug/L)
<0.058
Aroclor 1248 (ug/L)
<0.058
Aroclor 1254 (ug/L)
<0.058
Aroclor 1260 (ug/L)
<0.058
Benzene (ug/L)
134
Cadmium - Total (mg/L)
2
57
<10
0.00096J
Carbon Tetrachloride (ug/L)
<10
Carbonaceous Biochemical
Oxygen Demand (mg/L)
16.4b
Chloride (mg/L)
10,100B
Chloroform (ug/L)
Copper - Total (mg/L)
<10
5
0.055
Ethylbenzene (ug/L)
380
Flashpoint (°F)
>140
142
>176.0
<10
Hexavalent Chromium Total (mg/L)
5
0.014
Lead - Total (mg/L)
2
0.0089
Mercury - Total (mg/L)
0.05
<0.00020
Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (ug/L)
50
Naphthalene (ug/L)
47
Nickel - Total (mg/L)
3
<10
19
0.012
Nitrate-Nitrite (mg/L-N)
pH, Field (S.U.)
<4.8
<0.050
5-12
6.63
Phenol (ug/L)
<4.8
SGT Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
50
<5.0
14.4
Temperature, Field (°C)
<150
Tetrachloroethene (ug/L)
20
Toluene (ug/L)
74
<10
28
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (mg/L-N)
<10
0.95
Total Residue, at 103°C (mg/L)
19,700
Total Suspended Solids (mg/L)
350
Total Xylenes (ug/L)
74
Zinc - Total (mg/L)
5
<4.0
28
<20
1.5
Zinc - Total (mg/L)
Page 1 of 1
Table 6
4th Quarter Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Results
Location
Date Sampled Time Sampled
Benzene
(ug/L)
Ethylbenzene
(ug/L)
Methyl-t-Butyl
Ether (ug/L)
Toluene
(ug/L)
Total Xylenes
(ug/L)
TS-1 Untreated Influent
11/30/2011
14:20
15J
16J
<25
<25
18J
TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent
11/30/2011
14:00
<10
<10
<10
<10
<20
25
12/20/2011
9:05
18
23
<4.0
2.6J
TS-2 Post OC
12/20/2011
9:10
17
23
<4.0
2.6J
25
TS-3 Post GAC 1
12/20/2011
9:15
5.6
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10
12/20/2011
9:20
New York City Effluent Standards, applicable to TS-4 only
<2.0
134
<2.0
380
<2.0
50
<2.0
74
<4.0
74
Note:
1. Compliance with NYCDEP discharge criteria is specific to the treated effluent only (TS-4).
Page 1 of 1
Table 7
4th Quarter Summary of Sub-Slab Depressurization System Monitoring Results
Date
Location
Type of Reading
Units
10/4/11
10/10/11
10/18/11
10/24/11
10/31/11
11/8/11
11/16/11
11/21/11
11/29/11
12/5/11
12/12/11
12/21/11
12/28/11
"WC
0.245
0.25
0.25
0.06
0.1
0.19
0.2
0.18
0.25
0.195
0.25
0.22
0.25
"WC
0.165
0.18
0.18
0.19
0.11
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.25
0.19
0.235
0.2
0.25
CFM
5.4
14.1
14.9
8.2
2.8
11.5
11.8
3.4
9.4
3
11.1
4.8
15.5
E-1
"WC
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.025
0.025
0.03
0.35
0.08
NM
0.02
E-2
"WC
0.085
0.07
0.065
0.025
0.04
0.055
0.05
0.05
0.16
0.07
0.085
NM
0.035
E-3
"WC
0.035
0.03
0.025
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.02
0.02
0.065
0.03
0.033
NM
0.045
"WC
0.015
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.01
0.01
NM
0.055
"WC
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.02
0.015
0.015
0.06
0.02
0.015
NM
0.03
E-6
"WC
0.065
0.07
0.06
0.07
0.045
0.08
0.075
0.075
0.19
0.07
0.075
NM
0.1
E-7
"WC
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.01
0.045
0.015
0.015
NM
0.015
H-2
"WC
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.015
0.015
NM
0.045
H-1
Active Vacuum
H-3
Manifold
E-4
E-5
Flow Rate
Induced
Subsurface
Vacuum
Post GAC 2
Methane
%
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.04
NM
0.02
0.03
Post GAC 2
PID Reading
ppm
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0
0.1
0
Notes:
1. NM - Not Measured
2. Post GAC 2 location is the final treated discharge to the atmosphere
3. Methane discharge limit is 1%
4. The most recent spent vapor phase carbon changeout occurred on April 12, 2011
5. "WC - Inches of water column
6. CFM - Cubic feet per minute
7. ppm - parts per million
Page 1 of 1
Table 8
4 Quarter Newtown Creek Containment Boom System Activities (Paragon Site)
th
November 2011
October 2011
Component Name
Type
Location
Date Installed
Compartment 1
Solidifier Boom
Inside Globe Boom
Compartment 2
Solidifier Boom
Compartment 3
December 2011
Activity & Frequency
Condition
Condition
Condition
March 2, 2010
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
(17 total observations)
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Inside Globe Boom
March 2, 2010
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Solidifier Boom
Inside Globe Boom
March 2, 2010
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Compartment 4
Solidifier Boom
Inside Globe Boom
March 2, 2010
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Globe Boom
(C1-C4)
Hard Boom
(Primary Containment)
Parallel to Bulkhead
July 2005
Inspection - Daily
Functional
Inspection - Daily
Functional
Inspection - Daily
Functional
Fence Boom
Hard Boom (Secondary
Containment)
Outermost Component
May 2006
Inspection - Daily
Functional
Inspection - Daily
Functional
Inspection - Daily
Functional
Notes:
1. 4 sheens not associated with the Paragon and Apollo Street sites have been present on Newtown Creek beyond the fence boom and of unknown origin. A total of 4 sheens were observed in Newtown Creek
during the fourth quarter, with monthly occurrences as follows:
• October 2011 - 2 (10/26/2011 & 10/27/2011)
• November 2011 - 0
• December 2011 - 2 (12/7/2011 & 12/21/2011)
Page 1 of 1
Table 9
4th Quarter Newtown Creek Containment Boom System Activities (Apollo Street Site)
October 2011
Component Name
Type
Location
Date Installed
Compartment 5
Solidifier Boom
Inside Globe Boom
Globe Boom
(For C5)
Hard Boom
Fence Boom
November 2011
December 2011
Condition
Condition
Condition
March 2, 2010
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Parallel to Bulkhead
July 2005
Inspection - Daily
Functional
Inspection - Daily
Functional
Inspection - Daily
Functional
Hard Boom (Secondary
Containment)
Outermost Component
May 2006
Inspection - Daily
Functional
Inspection - Daily
Functional
Inspection - Daily
Functional
Compartment SE1
Solidifier Boom
Inside Globe Boom
March 2, 2010
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen observed once
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Compartment SE2
Solidifier Boom
Inside Globe Boom
March 2, 2010
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen observed once
(4 total observation)
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Compartment SE3
Solidifier Boom
Inside Globe Boom
March 2, 2010
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
(5 total observation)
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Changeout - None
Inspection - Daily
Sheen not observed
Globe Boom
(For SE1-SE3)
Hard Boom
Inspection - Daily
Fallen tree over globe boom
in SE1. Absorbent boom
installed around SE1.
SE2 & SE3 are functional
Inspection - Daily
Fallen tree over globe boom
in SE1. Absorbent boom
installed around SE1.
SE2 & SE3 are functional
Inspection - Daily
Tree Removed on December 9
and Globe Boom was restored
to original position
Parallel to bulkhead
2006
Notes:
1. Texaco never owned or operated on the 100-120 Apollo Street Property.
2. 4 sheens not associated with the Paragon and Apollo Street sites have been present on Newtown Creek beyond the fence boom and of unknown origin. A total of 4 sheens were observed in Newtown Creek
during the fourth quarter, with monthly occurrences as follows:
• October 2011 - 2 (10/26/2011 & 10/27/2011)
• November 2011 - 0
• December 2011 - 2 (12/7/2011 & 12/21/2011)
Page 1 of 1
Table 10
Annual Summary of Total Fluids Recovered
Month
Groundwater Treated (gal)
During Period
PSH Recovered (gal)
Period
January
745,500
50
February
632,915
65
March
762,995
84
April
832,145
81
May
978,645
119
June
937,800
85
July
919,475
99
August
723,585
130
September
819,875
72
October
980,965
82
November
December
560,475
934,072
45
78
Total Recovery in 2011
9,828,447
990
Total Recovery with Current
System
9/14/2007 to 12/31/2011
34,254,322
31,561
Total Interim Recovery From
June 2005 to July 2007
NA
11,697
Total PSH Recovery From June 2005 to 12/31/2011
Notes:
1. NA = Not Applicable
43,258
During
Table 11
Annual Summary of Fluids Removed from System during Equipment Cleaning Activities
Date of Cleaning Event
1/26/2011
3/1/2011
4/17/2011
5/16/2011
5/31/2011
7/19/2011
8/9/2011
8/10/2011
8/22/2011
9/28/2011
10/18/2011
11/6/2011
12/15/2011
Total Recovery
in 2011
Total Fluids Recovered
(gallons)
3,105
2,175
3,000
2,732
2,718
2,985
2,538
2,795
2,526
3,040
2,639
2,601
2,790
Calculated Volume of Water
(gallons)
3,012
2,110
2,910
2,650
2,664
2,925
2,462
2,683
2,425
2,949
2,560
2,523
2,706
Calculated Volume of PSH
(gallons)
93
65
90
82
49
60
76
112
101
91
79
78
84
35,644
34,579
1,060
Notes:
1. Calculated volumes of recovered water and PSH are based on estimated percentages provided by the recycling
facility.
2. The volumes recorded in this table are included in the total volumes recovered as presented in tables 1 and 10
of this report.
3. Fluids are transported by Atlantic Response for treatment by FCC Environmental.
Phase II
Recovery Wells
Phase I
Recovery Wells
Monitoring Wells
Table 12
Annual Measured PSH Thicknesses in Bulkhead Monitoring and Recovery Wells
January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011
Location
Units
CMW-23D
CMW-23S
CMW-54
CMW-55
CMW-56
CMW-57
CMW-58
MW-66
MW-67
MW-69
MW-72
MW-68R
MW-70R
MW-73R
MW-74R
MW-75R
PW-1R
CMW-17R
CMW-43R
CMW-53R
CMW-59R
CMW-63R
CMW-64R
PW-2R
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
1/5/11
NM
NM
0.45
ND
ND
0.88
NM
ND
0.84
NM
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01
0.71
ND
1/11/11 1/17/11 1/26/11
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
0.25
0.69
NM
ND
ND
NM
ND
ND
NM
0.97
0.81
NM
NM
2.12
NM
ND
ND
NM
1.10
0.75
NM
0.85
0.82
NM
ND
ND
NM
ND
ND
NM
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.24
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NM
ND
ND
NM
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05
ND
0.01
1.60
0.96
1.69
ND
ND
Notes:
1. Recovery wells were operating at the time of measurement.
2.
3.
ND
NM
Indicates PSH was not detected.
Indicates a well was not measured.
4. Gauging data from PSH bailing activities is not included in this table.
ND
2/1/11
NM
NM
ND
ND
ND
0.76
NM
ND
1.01
NM
NM
ND
ND
ND
0.02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.00
2/7/11
ND
ND
0.25
ND
ND
NM
NM
ND
1.09
NM
NM
ND
ND
ND
0.74
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.90
2/16/11
ND
ND
0.54
ND
ND
1.13
NM
ND
1.06
NM
NM
ND
ND
ND
0.82
0.03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.40
3/8/11
ND
ND
0.58
ND
ND
0.70
2.47
ND
1.08
1.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.66
ND
ND
ND
ND
3/15/11 3/18/11 3/22/11 3/30/11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.63
0.01
0.61
0.86
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.49
0.82
0.60
0.86
2.39
2.37
2.38
1.47
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.02
1.11
1.04
1.24
0.88
1.23
1.39
1.30
ND
ND
ND
ND
NM
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.95
1.60
2.54
2.20
ND
ND
ND
ND
Date
4/5/11
ND
ND
0.59
ND
ND
0.37
2.75
ND
1.05
1.38
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.05
ND
4/14/11
ND
ND
0.57
ND
ND
0.56
3.09
ND
0.88
1.19
ND
NM
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.15
4/19/11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.89
2.76
ND
0.72
0.85
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.00
5/24/11
ND
ND
0.31
ND
ND
0.74
2.58
ND
0.13
0.41
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.75
6/29/11
ND
ND
0.10
ND
ND
0.96
2.40
ND
0.40
0.52
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.20
7/25/11
ND
ND
0.11
ND
ND
0.71
0.24
ND
0.60
0.96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9/13/11
ND
ND
0.25
ND
ND
0.61
0.01
ND
0.60
0.33
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NM
10/18/11
ND
ND
0.01
ND
ND
1.21
0.27
ND
1.00
0.58
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NM
11/15/11
ND
ND
NM
ND
ND
0.17
0.15
ND
0.34
0.03
ND
ND
ND
ND
NM
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NM
12/7/11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26
0.21
ND
0.29
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NM
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Table 13
Annual Summary of NYCDEP Discharge Permit Compliance Results
Janaury 1, 2011 Through December 31, 2011
Texaco Facility # 304209
NYCDEP
Concentration Limit
TS-4 Post GAC 2:
Treated Effluent
(11/30/2011)
TS-4 Post GAC 2:
Treated Effluent
(3/1/2011)
TS-4 Post GAC 2:
Treated Effluent
(6/13/2011)
TS-4 Post GAC 2:
Treated Effluent
(9/8/2011)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane (ug/L)
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene (ug/L)
<49
<9.9
<9.4
<9.6
Analyte
Daily
Monthly
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (ug/L)
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10
Aroclor 1016 (ug/L)
<0.058
<0.057
<0.057
<0.058
Aroclor 1221 (ug/L)
<0.058
<0.057
<0.057
<0.058
Aroclor 1232 (ug/L)
<0.058
<0.057
<0.057
<0.058
Aroclor 1242 (ug/L)
<0.058
<0.057
0.15
<0.058
Aroclor 1248 (ug/L)
<0.058
<0.057
<0.057
<0.058
Aroclor 1254 (ug/L)
<0.058
<0.057
<0.057
<0.058
Aroclor 1260 (ug/L)
<0.058
<0.057
<0.057
<0.058
<5.0
<5.0
27
<10
0.001
0.00078J
0.00064J
0.00096J
Carbon Tetrachloride (ug/L)
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10
Carbonaceous Biochemical
Oxygen Demand (mg/L)
16.3
3.7b
18.7
16.4b
Chloride (mg/L)
13,100
9,450B
5,050
10,100B
Chloroform (ug/L)
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10
<0.010
<0.010
0.0085J
0.055
Benzene (ug/L)
134
Cadmium - Total (mg/L)
2
Copper - Total (mg/L)
57
5
Ethylbenzene (ug/L)
380
<5.0
<5.0
1.2J
<10
Flashpoint (°F)
>140
142
>176.0
>176.0
>176.0
>176.0
Hexavalent Chromium Total (mg/L)
5
0.02
<0.010
<0.010
0.014
Lead - Total (mg/L)
2
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
0.0089
Mercury - Total (mg/L)
0.05
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (ug/L)
50
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10
Naphthalene (ug/L)
47
<25
<5.0
<4.7
<4.8
Nickel - Total (mg/L)
3
0.0017J
0.0035J
0.0015J
0.012
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
6.74
6.63
6.7
6.63
<25
<5.0
<4.7
<4.8
<4.9
7.5
3.2J
<5.0
19
Nitrate-Nitrite (mg/L-N)
pH, Field (S.U.)
5-12
Phenol (ug/L)
SGT Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (mg/L)
50
Temperature, Field (°C)
<150
8.8
20.5
22.9
14.4
Tetrachloroethene (ug/L)
20
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10
Toluene (ug/L)
74
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (mg/L-N)
2.7
2.3
1.6
0.95
Total Residue, at 103°C (mg/L)
21,800 B
23,500
12,700
19700
<4.0
<4.0
<4.0
<4.0
<10
<10
1.1J
<20
0.01
0.075
0.033
1.5
Total Suspended Solids (mg/L)
350
Total Xylenes (ug/L)
74
Zinc - Total (mg/L)
5
28
28
Table 14
Annual Summary of Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Results
Location
Benzene
(ug/L)
Ethylbenzene
(ug/L)
Methyl-t-Butyl
Ether (ug/L)
Toluene
(ug/L)
Total Xylenes
(ug/L)
1/5/2011
11:40
88
130
<1
9.3
180
TS-2 Post OC
1/5/2011
11:45
76
77
0.93J
6.1
120
TS-3 Post GAC 1
1/5/2011
11:50
19
13
<1
1.3
20
1/5/2011
11:55
<1
<1
<1
<1
<2
2/8/2011
9:15
100
150
<2
13
310
TS-2 Post OC
2/8/2011
9:10
89
120
0.82J
11
220
TS-3 Post GAC 1
2/8/2011
9:05
24
3.7
<1
0.67J
4.5
2/8/2011
9:00
18
4.2
<1
0.57J
5.8
3/16/2011
15:05
83
94
<2
9.6
150
TS-2 Post OC
3/16/2011
15:10
81
85
<2
8.6
110
TS-3 Post GAC 1
3/16/2011
15:15
55
34
<1
4
44
3/16/2011
15:20
1.3
1.1
<1
<1
1.2J
4/6/2011
9:00
93
130
<10
16
280
TS-2 Post OC
4/6/2011
9:05
96
110
<10
15
200
TS-3 Post GAC 1
4/6/2011
9:10
72
39
<10
<10
62
4/6/2011
9:15
3.6J
<5
<5
<1
<10
4/19/2011
10:30
100
88
<10
12
210
TS-2 Post OC
4/19/2011
10:35
92
53
<1
8.2
94
TS-3 Post GAC 1
4/19/2011
10:40
82
36
<1
6
62
4/19/2011
10:45
33
9.6
<1
1.7
16
4/27/2011
10:50
87
100
<2
15
220
TS-2 Post OC
4/27/2011
10:55
69
94
<1
12
150
TS-3 Post GAC 1
4/27/2011
11:00
69
50
<1
7.9
75
4/27/2011
11:05
22
2.1
0.76J
0.61J
2.1
5/12/2011
7:30
95
86
<10
13
190
TS-2 Post OC
5/12/2011
7:35
79
69
<5
10
130
TS-3 Post GAC 1
5/12/2011
7:40
74
46
<5
8.2
85
5/12/2011
7:45
40
16
<5
2.8J
24
5/18/2011
9:40
100
84
<5
15
180
TS-2 Post OC
5/18/2011
9:45
95
87
<5
14
160
TS-3 Post GAC 1
5/18/2011
9:50
94
52
<2
9.7
89
5/18/2011
9:55
48
6.5
<1
1.6
8.9
7/6/2011
11:45
88
94
<40
<40
240
TS-2 Post OC
7/6/2011
11:50
83
78
<10
13
210
TS-3 Post GAC 1
7/6/2011
11:55
27
14
<2
2
35
7/6/2011
12:00
<1
<1
<1
<1
<2
Note:
Page 1 of 2
Table 14
Annual Summary of Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Results
Location
Benzene
(ug/L)
Ethylbenzene
(ug/L)
Methyl-t-Butyl
Ether (ug/L)
Toluene
(ug/L)
Total Xylenes
(ug/L)
8/10/2011
12:30
170
130
<5
17
230
TS-2 Post OC
8/10/2011
12:35
180
100
<2
15
190
TS-3 Post GAC 1
8/10/2011
12:40
96
15
<2
4.3
21
8/10/2011
12:45
5.1
<1
<1
<1
<1
9/8/2011
9:00
51
84
<25
6.6J
120
1.1J
9/8/2011
9:20
27
1.2J
<5
<5
11/30/2011
14:20
15J
16J
<25
<25
18J
11/30/2011
14:00
<10
<10
<10
<10
<20
12/20/2011
9:05
18
23
<4.0
2.6J
25
TS-2 Post OC
12/20/2011
9:10
17
23
<4.0
2.6J
25
TS-3 Post GAC 1
12/20/2011
9:15
5.6
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10
12/20/2011
9:20
New York City Effleunt Standards, applicable to TS-4 only
<2.0
134
<2.0
380
<2.0
50
<2.0
74
<4.0
74
Note:
Page 2 of 2
Table 15
Summary of Ambient Air Sampling Results
February and September 2011
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
Methane (%)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene, Total
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Butadiene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dioxane
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Chlorotoluene
2-Hexanone
3-Chloropropene
4-Ethyltoluene
4-Isopropyltoluene
Acetone
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
Bromodichloromethane
CAS
74-82-8
71-55-6
79-34-5
79-00-5
75-34-3
75-35-4
120-82-1
95-63-6
106-93-4
95-50-1
107-06-2
540-59-0
78-87-5
108-67-8
106-99-0
541-73-1
106-46-7
123-91-1
540-84-1
78-93-3
95-49-8
591-78-6
107-05-1
622-96-8
99-87-6
67-64-1
71-43-2
100-44-7
75-27-4
Note:
1. Methane results are presented in % volume.
16 Bridgewater Street Warehouse
IA-5
IA-15
IA-1
3
Result (ug/m )
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.054
<0.064
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<3.7
4.5
2.5
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
13
1.1
4.1
6
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
1.2
<1.1
17
32
4.2
0.82
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
3
Result (ug/m )
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.06
<0.068
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<J
1.5
1.6
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
31
1.4
2.8
2.9
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
12
16
2.8
1.4
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
IA-16
3
Result (ug/m )
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.067
<0.11
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<J
<0.98
<0.98
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
3.6
0.95
2.1
4.1
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
<12
22
1.5
1.1
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
NS
<0.062
NS
<1.1
NS
<1.4
NS
<1.1
NS
<0.81
NS
<0.79
NS
<J
NS
1.2
NS
<1.5
NS
<1.2
NS
<0.81
NS
<0.79
NS
<0.92
NS
<0.98
NS
<0.44
NS
<1.2
NS
<1.2
NS
<18
NS
<0.93
NS
5.8
NS
<1
NS
<2
NS
<1.6
NS
<0.98
NS
<1.1
NS
33
NS
0.7
NS
<1
NS
<1.3
Page 1 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
Bromoethene
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroethane
Cumene
Cyclohexane
Dibromochloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
Ethanol
Ethylbenzene
Freon 22
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexane
Isopropyl alcohol
m,p-Xylene
methyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl methacrylate
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
n-Butane
CAS
593-60-2
75-25-2
74-83-9
75-15-0
56-23-5
108-90-7
75-00-3
67-66-3
74-87-3
156-59-2
10061-01-5
98-82-8
110-82-7
124-48-1
75-71-8
76-14-2
64-17-5
100-41-4
75-45-6
87-68-3
110-54-3
67-63-0
m,p-Xylenes
108-10-1
80-62-6
1634-04-4
75-09-2
91-20-3
106-97-8
Note:
IA-5
IA-15
IA-1
3
Result (ug/m )
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.3
1.3
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
51
6.2
<1.7
<1.7
2.7
2.9
<1.4
<1.4
2600E
2300E
3.2
1.7
3
5.1
<2.1
<2.1
38
4.2
<12
20
10
4.1
<2
<2
13
<2
<0.72
<0.72
2
1.9
<2.6
<2.6
38
10
3
Result (ug/m )
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
1.5
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.2
1.2
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
30
3.9
<1.7
<1.7
2.6
3
<1.4
<1.4
3500E
5500E
5
1.6
2.3
9.7
<2.1
<2.1
48
4.9
<12
19
13
4.1
<2
<2
6.8
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
62
9.6
IA-16
3
Result (ug/m )
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.1
1.2
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
7
2.6
<1.7
<1.7
2.6
2.6
<1.4
<1.4
3300E
4100E
0.96
0.97
<1.8
4.2
<2.1
<2.1
8.9
3.3
<12
12
2.8
2.2
<2
2.3
<2
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
12
6
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
NS
<0.87
NS
<2.1
NS
<0.78
NS
<1.6
NS
<1.3
NS
<0.92
NS
<1.3
NS
<0.98
NS
1.2
NS
<0.79
NS
<0.91
NS
<0.98
NS
3
NS
<1.7
NS
2.7
NS
<1.4
NS
1800E
NS
1.5
NS
5.3
NS
<2.1
NS
2.3
NS
22
NS
4.2
NS
<2
NS
<2
NS
<0.72
NS
<1.7
NS
<2.6
NS
11
Page 2 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
n-Butylbenzene
n-Heptane
n-Propylbenzene
o-Xylene
sec-Butylbenzene
Styrene
tert-Butyl alcohol
Tert-Butylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trichlorotrifluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes, Total
CAS
104-51-8
142-82-5
103-65-1
95-47-6
135-98-8
100-42-5
75-65-0
98-06-6
127-18-4
109-99-9
108-88-3
156-60-5
10061-02-6
79-01-6
75-69-4
76-13-1
75-01-4
1330-20-7
Note:
IA-5
IA-15
IA-1
3
Result (ug/m )
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
13
2.4
<0.98
<0.98
3.4
1.3
<1.1
<1.1
0.99
0.95
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
2.6
<15
<15
21
26
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
1.4
1.6
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
13
5.4
3
Result (ug/m )
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
15
2.2
<0.98
<0.98
2.9
1.3
<1.1
<1.1
<0.85
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
2.5
2.5
<15
<15
9.4
18
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
1.6
2
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
16
5.4
IA-16
3
Result (ug/m )
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
2.9
1.8
<0.98
<0.98
0.86
<0.87
<1.1
<1.1
<0.85
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<15
<15
5.4
15
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
1.5
1.8
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
3.7
3.1
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
NS
<1.1
NS
1.9
NS
<0.98
NS
1.2
NS
<1.1
NS
<0.85
NS
<15
NS
<1.1
NS
3.1
NS
<15
NS
13
NS
<0.79
NS
<0.91
NS
<1.1
NS
1.5
NS
<1.5
NS
<0.51
NS
5.4
Page 3 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
Methane (%)
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Butadiene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dioxane
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Chlorotoluene
2-Hexanone
3-Chloropropene
4-Ethyltoluene
4-Isopropyltoluene
Acetone
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
CAS
74-82-8
71-55-6
79-34-5
79-00-5
75-34-3
75-35-4
120-82-1
95-63-6
106-93-4
95-50-1
107-06-2
540-59-0
78-87-5
108-67-8
106-99-0
541-73-1
106-46-7
123-91-1
540-84-1
78-93-3
95-49-8
591-78-6
107-05-1
622-96-8
99-87-6
67-64-1
71-43-2
100-44-7
75-27-4
Note:
IA-2
16 Bridgewater Street Office
IA-3
IA-4
42 Bridgewater Warehouse
IA-6
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.077
<0.065
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<3.7
1.1
1
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
1.3
<0.93
2.7
4.3
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
15
25
1.4
0.79
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.07
<0.07
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<3.7
1.2
<0.98
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
1.3
<0.93
3.3
4.6
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
22
25
1.4
0.67
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.067
<0.071
1.2
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<3.7
1.2
1.3
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
1.9
<0.93
2.5
3.2
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
17
17
1.7
0.64
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.053
<0.072
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<J
1.1
1.1
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
71
2.3
4.1
1.9
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
22
14
4.6
5
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
Page 4 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
Bromoethene
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroethane
Cumene
Cyclohexane
Ethanol
Ethylbenzene
Freon 22
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexane
Isopropyl alcohol
m,p-Xylene
Methyl methacrylate
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
n-Butane
CAS
593-60-2
75-25-2
74-83-9
75-15-0
56-23-5
108-90-7
75-00-3
67-66-3
74-87-3
156-59-2
10061-01-5
98-82-8
110-82-7
124-48-1
75-71-8
76-14-2
64-17-5
100-41-4
75-45-6
87-68-3
110-54-3
67-63-0
m,p-Xylenes
108-10-1
80-62-6
1634-04-4
75-09-2
91-20-3
106-97-8
Note:
IA-2
IA-3
IA-4
IA-6
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.2
1.3
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
5.7
2.9
<1.7
<1.7
10
9.8
<1.4
<1.4
3100E
790E
1.1
1
280D
140
<2.1
<2.1
10
1.8
74
37
3.4
2.7
<2
<2
<2
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
13
4.9
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.2
1.5
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
4.9
2.5
<1.7
<1.7
6.3
8
<1.4
<1.4
2800E
910E
1.1
<0.87
160D
94
<2.1
<2.1
9.4
1.7
65
33
3.4
2.3
<2
<2
<2
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
12
5.7
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.2
1.3
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
6.1
2.3
<1.7
<1.7
5
6.6
<1.4
<1.4
2700E
770E
1.1
0.87
83
75
<2.1
<2.1
12
1.4
62
33
3.3
2.7
<2
<2
<2
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
14
4.6
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.2
1.1
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
35
19
<1.7
<1.7
2.5
2.6
<1.4
<1.4
3200E
5300E
9.1
1.1
3.2
4.7
<2.1
<2.1
40
22
<12
<12
22
2.4
<2
<2
7.3
<2
<0.72
<0.72
2
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
51
19
Page 5 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
n-Butylbenzene
n-Heptane
n-Propylbenzene
o-Xylene
sec-Butylbenzene
Styrene
tert-Butyl alcohol
Tert-Butylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes, Total
CAS
104-51-8
142-82-5
103-65-1
95-47-6
135-98-8
100-42-5
75-65-0
98-06-6
127-18-4
109-99-9
108-88-3
156-60-5
10061-02-6
79-01-6
75-69-4
76-13-1
75-01-4
1330-20-7
Note:
IA-2
IA-3
IA-4
IA-6
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
3.8
2.4
<0.98
<0.98
1.1
0.92
<1.1
<1.1
<0.85
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<15
<15
9.6
6.5
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
1.6
1.4
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
4.6
3.6
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
3.4
2.7
<0.98
<0.98
1.1
<0.87
<1.1
<1.1
<0.85
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<15
<15
7.6
5.3
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
1.6
1.6
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
4.6
3.1
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
4.5
2.1
<0.98
<0.98
1.1
0.97
<1.1
<1.1
<0.85
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<15
<15
8.1
6.5
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
1.6
1.5
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
4.4
3.7
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
11
5.3
<0.98
<0.98
4.8
<0.87
<1.1
<1.1
0.83
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
4.3
1.5
<15
<15
16
22
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
3.8
11
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
26
3.2
Page 6 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
Methane (%)
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Butadiene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dioxane
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Chlorotoluene
2-Hexanone
3-Chloropropene
4-Ethyltoluene
4-Isopropyltoluene
Acetone
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
CAS
74-82-8
71-55-6
79-34-5
79-00-5
75-34-3
75-35-4
120-82-1
95-63-6
106-93-4
95-50-1
107-06-2
540-59-0
78-87-5
108-67-8
106-99-0
541-73-1
106-46-7
123-91-1
540-84-1
78-93-3
95-49-8
591-78-6
107-05-1
622-96-8
99-87-6
67-64-1
71-43-2
100-44-7
75-27-4
Note:
50 Bridgewater Office
IA-7
IA-8
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.06
<0.065
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<J
<0.98
<0.98
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
1.3
<0.93
<1.5
<1.5
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
<12
<12
1.4
0.83
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.064
<0.07
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<J
1
<0.98
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
2.7
2.7
1.7
2.9
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
<12
24
3.7
4.1
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
50 Bridgewater Rear Offices
IA-9
IA-10
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.059
<0.055
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<J
<0.98
<0.98
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
50
<0.93
3.1
1.7
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
13
<12
1.5
<0.64
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.071
<0.076
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<J
<0.98
<0.98
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
<0.93
<0.93
2.8
1.7
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
<12
<12
1.3
<0.64
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
Page 7 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
Bromoethene
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroethane
Cumene
Cyclohexane
Ethanol
Ethylbenzene
Freon 22
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexane
Isopropyl alcohol
m,p-Xylene
Methyl methacrylate
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
n-Butane
CAS
593-60-2
75-25-2
74-83-9
75-15-0
56-23-5
108-90-7
75-00-3
67-66-3
74-87-3
156-59-2
10061-01-5
98-82-8
110-82-7
124-48-1
75-71-8
76-14-2
64-17-5
100-41-4
75-45-6
87-68-3
110-54-3
67-63-0
m,p-Xylenes
108-10-1
80-62-6
1634-04-4
75-09-2
91-20-3
106-97-8
Note:
IA-7
IA-8
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.1
1.9
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
1.9
2.5
<1.7
<1.7
4.9
6.7
<1.4
<1.4
500E
110
<0.87
<0.87
<1.8
3.5
<2.1
<2.1
2.3
1.6
<12
12
<2.2
2.6
<2
<2
<2
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
10
11
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.1
1.2
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
38
36
<1.7
<1.7
2.6
2.7
<1.4
<1.4
3200E
4700E
<0.87
1.3
<1.8
4.4
<2.1
<2.1
38
25
<12
<12
<2.2
<2.2
<2
<2
7.2
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
28
19
IA-9
IA-10
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.3
1.4
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
7.8
1.6
<1.7
<1.7
4.4
2.8
<1.4
<1.4
290E
220E
6.9
<0.87
8.6
2.1
<2.1
<2.1
3.8
0.72
20
<12
17
<2.2
<2
<2
4
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
26
2.7
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.1
1.4
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
6.5
1.4
<1.7
<1.7
5
3
<1.4
<1.4
220E
210E
<0.87
<0.87
12
2.6
<2.1
<2.1
3.5
0.89
<12
12
<2.2
<2.2
<2
<2
2.8
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
9.4
3.5
Page 8 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
n-Butylbenzene
n-Heptane
n-Propylbenzene
o-Xylene
sec-Butylbenzene
Styrene
tert-Butyl alcohol
Tert-Butylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes, Total
CAS
104-51-8
142-82-5
103-65-1
95-47-6
135-98-8
100-42-5
75-65-0
98-06-6
127-18-4
109-99-9
108-88-3
156-60-5
10061-02-6
79-01-6
75-69-4
76-13-1
75-01-4
1330-20-7
Note:
IA-7
IA-8
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
1.3
1
<0.98
<0.98
<0.87
<0.87
<1.1
<1.1
<0.85
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
1.9
<15
<15
2.7
3.2
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
1.4
1.4
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
2.3
3.5
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
7.6
5.8
<0.98
<0.98
<0.87
<0.87
<1.1
<1.1
<0.85
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<15
<15
4.4
32
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
3.5
6.8
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
2.8
2.8
IA-9
IA-10
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
5.1
<0.82
<0.98
<0.98
3.6
<0.87
<1.1
<1.1
0.94
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
3.1
<1.4
<15
<15
8.6
2
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
1.5
1.2
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
20
1.1
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
2.8
<0.82
<0.98
<0.98
<0.87
<0.87
<1.1
<1.1
<0.85
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<15
<15
2.5
1.2
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
1.4
1.4
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
2.7
<0.87
Page 9 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
Methane (%)
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Butadiene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dioxane
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Chlorotoluene
2-Hexanone
3-Chloropropene
4-Ethyltoluene
4-Isopropyltoluene
Acetone
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
CAS
74-82-8
71-55-6
79-34-5
79-00-5
75-34-3
75-35-4
120-82-1
95-63-6
106-93-4
95-50-1
107-06-2
540-59-0
78-87-5
108-67-8
106-99-0
541-73-1
106-46-7
123-91-1
540-84-1
78-93-3
95-49-8
591-78-6
107-05-1
622-96-8
99-87-6
67-64-1
71-43-2
100-44-7
75-27-4
Note:
IA-AP1
100-120 Apollo Street Warehouse
IA-AP2
IA-AP3
16 Bridgewater Outside
OA-3
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.069
<0.076
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<J
1.3
<0.98
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
<0.93
1.7
2.1
3.4
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
<12
29
4.7
2.1
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.062
<0.068
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<J
1.2
<0.98
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
31
1.8
2.9
2.6
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
15
20
3.1
2.4
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.054
<0.066
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<J
<0.98
<0.98
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
<0.93
0.96
<1.5
<1.5
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
<12
<12
1.3
1.1
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.061
<0.057
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<3.7
<0.98
<0.98
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
12
<0.93
<1.5
1.6
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
<12
13
0.85
<0.64
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
Page 10 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
Bromoethene
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroethane
Cumene
Cyclohexane
Ethanol
Ethylbenzene
Freon 22
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexane
Isopropyl alcohol
m,p-Xylene
Methyl methacrylate
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
n-Butane
CAS
593-60-2
75-25-2
74-83-9
75-15-0
56-23-5
108-90-7
75-00-3
67-66-3
74-87-3
156-59-2
10061-01-5
98-82-8
110-82-7
124-48-1
75-71-8
76-14-2
64-17-5
100-41-4
75-45-6
87-68-3
110-54-3
67-63-0
m,p-Xylenes
108-10-1
80-62-6
1634-04-4
75-09-2
91-20-3
106-97-8
Note:
IA-AP1
IA-AP2
IA-AP3
OA-3
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.1
1.1
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
62
18
<1.7
<1.7
2.7
<2.5
<1.4
<1.4
3900E
2700E
1.4
1.2
<1.8
2.4
<2.1
<2.1
52
11
<12
<12
4.1
<2.2
<2
<2
11
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
40
10
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.2
1
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
30
21
<1.7
<1.7
2.5
2.6
<1.4
<1.4
3200E
3000E
3.7
0.94
1.9
3
<2.1
<2.1
25
15
<12
<12
9.4
<2.2
<2
<2
5.5
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
34
12
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.2
1.2
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
6.5
8.5
<1.7
<1.7
2.6
2.8
<1.4
<1.4
1300E
1300E
<0.87
1.1
<1.8
4.2
<2.1
<2.1
5.5
5.9
<12
<12
<2.2
2.8
<2
<2
<2
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
9.6
9.5
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.1
1.1
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
<0.69
1.2
<1.7
<1.7
2.5
2.6
<1.4
<1.4
29
45
<0.87
<0.87
<1.8
3.3
<2.1
<2.1
0.89
<0.7
<12
<12
<2.2
<2.2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
6.8
4.4
Page 11 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
n-Butylbenzene
n-Heptane
n-Propylbenzene
o-Xylene
sec-Butylbenzene
Styrene
tert-Butyl alcohol
Tert-Butylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes, Total
CAS
104-51-8
142-82-5
103-65-1
95-47-6
135-98-8
100-42-5
75-65-0
98-06-6
127-18-4
109-99-9
108-88-3
156-60-5
10061-02-6
79-01-6
75-69-4
76-13-1
75-01-4
1330-20-7
Note:
IA-AP1
IA-AP2
IA-AP3
OA-3
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
11
2.8
<0.98
<0.98
1.2
<0.87
<1.1
<1.1
<0.85
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<15
<15
5.6
89
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
3
3
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
5.3
2.9
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
7.1
3.3
<0.98
<0.98
2.4
<0.87
<1.1
<1.1
<0.85
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
1.8
<1.4
<15
<15
9
52
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
2.4
3.6
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
12
2.4
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
1.6
1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<0.87
0.88
<1.1
<1.1
<0.85
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
2.1
<15
<15
1.9
20
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
1.8
2.4
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
1.9
3.6
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
<0.82
<0.82
<0.98
<0.98
<0.87
<0.87
<1.1
<1.1
<0.85
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
1.6
<15
<15
2.4
1.9
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
1.3
1.3
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
2.3
2
Page 12 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
Methane (%)
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Butadiene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dioxane
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Chlorotoluene
2-Hexanone
3-Chloropropene
4-Ethyltoluene
4-Isopropyltoluene
Acetone
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
CAS
74-82-8
71-55-6
79-34-5
79-00-5
75-34-3
75-35-4
120-82-1
95-63-6
106-93-4
95-50-1
107-06-2
540-59-0
78-87-5
108-67-8
106-99-0
541-73-1
106-46-7
123-91-1
540-84-1
78-93-3
95-49-8
591-78-6
107-05-1
622-96-8
99-87-6
67-64-1
71-43-2
100-44-7
75-27-4
Note:
OA-5
100-120 Apollo St. Outside
OA-8
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.066
<0.07
<1.1
<2.2
<1.4
<2.7
<1.1
<2.2
<0.81
<1.6
<0.79
<1.6
<3.7
<J
<0.98
<2
<1.5
<3.1
<1.2
<2.4
<0.81
<1.6
<0.79
<1.6
<0.92
<1.8
<0.98
<2
<0.44
<0.88
<1.2
<2.4
<1.2
<2.4
<18
<36
1.6
<1.9
<1.5
<2.9
<1
<2.1
<2
<4.1
<1.6
<3.1
<0.98
<2
<1.1
<2.2
<12
<24
1.1
<1.3
<1
<2.1
<1.3
<2.7
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.062
<0.058
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
<1.4
<1.1
<1.1
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<3.7
<J
<0.98
<0.98
<1.5
<1.5
<1.2
<1.2
<0.81
<0.81
<0.79
<0.79
<0.92
<0.92
<0.98
<0.98
<0.44
<0.44
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<1.2
<18
<18
<0.93
<0.93
<1.5
4.1
<1
<1
<2
<2
<1.6
<1.6
<0.98
<0.98
<1.1
<1.1
<12
18
1.2
<0.64
<1
<1
<1.3
<1.3
Page 13 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
Bromoethene
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroethane
Cumene
Cyclohexane
Ethanol
Ethylbenzene
Freon 22
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexane
Isopropyl alcohol
m,p-Xylene
Methyl methacrylate
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
n-Butane
CAS
593-60-2
75-25-2
74-83-9
75-15-0
56-23-5
108-90-7
75-00-3
67-66-3
74-87-3
156-59-2
10061-01-5
98-82-8
110-82-7
124-48-1
75-71-8
76-14-2
64-17-5
100-41-4
75-45-6
87-68-3
110-54-3
67-63-0
m,p-Xylenes
108-10-1
80-62-6
1634-04-4
75-09-2
91-20-3
106-97-8
Note:
OA-5
OA-8
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<1.7
<2.1
<4.1
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<3.1
<1.3
<2.5
<0.92
<1.8
<1.3
<2.6
<0.98
<2
1.1
<2.1
<0.79
<1.6
<0.91
<1.8
<0.98
<2
2.5
<1.4
<1.7
<3.4
2.6
<4.9
<1.4
<2.8
21
<19
<0.87
<1.7
<1.8
<3.5
<2.1
<4.3
3.7
<1.4
<12
<25
<2.2
<4.3
<2
170
<2
<4.1
<0.72
<1.4
<1.7
<3.5
<2.6
<5.2
8.2
2.4
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<0.87
<0.87
<2.1
<2.1
<0.78
<0.78
<1.6
<1.6
<1.3
<1.3
<0.92
<0.92
<1.3
<1.3
<0.98
<0.98
1.1
1.3
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<0.98
<0.98
1.3
2.1
<1.7
<1.7
2.6
2.8
<1.4
<1.4
16
42
<0.87
0.95
<1.8
4.6
<2.1
<2.1
1.8
0.75
<12
<12
<2.2
2.7
<2
<2
<2
<2
<0.72
<0.72
<1.7
<1.7
<2.6
<2.6
13
7.5
Page 14 of 15
Table 15
Location:
Sample ID:
Analyte
n-Butylbenzene
n-Heptane
n-Propylbenzene
o-Xylene
sec-Butylbenzene
Styrene
tert-Butyl alcohol
Tert-Butylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes, Total
CAS
104-51-8
142-82-5
103-65-1
95-47-6
135-98-8
100-42-5
75-65-0
98-06-6
127-18-4
109-99-9
108-88-3
156-60-5
10061-02-6
79-01-6
75-69-4
76-13-1
75-01-4
1330-20-7
Note:
OA-5
OA-8
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<2.2
1.9
<1.6
<0.98
<2
<0.87
<1.7
<1.1
<2.2
<0.85
<1.7
<15
<30
<1.1
<2.2
<1.4
<2.7
<15
<29
2.1
<1.5
<0.79
<1.6
<0.91
<1.8
<1.1
<2.1
1.3
<2.2
<1.5
<3.1
<0.51
<1
1.8
<1.7
Result (ug/m3)
Feb 2011
Sept 2011
<1.1
<1.1
0.94
<0.82
<0.98
<0.98
<0.87
<0.87
<1.1
<1.1
<0.85
<0.85
<15
<15
<1.1
<1.1
<1.4
2.9
<15
<15
2.7
2.7
<0.79
<0.79
<0.91
<0.91
<1.1
<1.1
1.3
1.3
<1.5
<1.5
<0.51
<0.51
2.2
3.5
Page 15 of 15
Table 16
Summary of Groundwater Chemistry Results for NYSDEC STARS Gasoline Range and Fuel Oil Range Hydrocarbons
2010 and 2011 Results
Location ID:
CMW-1
CMW-4
Sample ID:
CMW-1-0/0-01
CMW-4-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/22/10 12:50
6/4/11 16:05
7/22/10 8:05
6/4/11 13:30
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
95-63-6
5
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
1U
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
81
29
5U
1U
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
35
38
5U
1U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
4.8J
3.5J
10U
2U
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
1U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
1U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
5.3
8
5U
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
46
50
5U
1U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
1U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
5U
4.4J
5U
1U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
8.6
7.8
5U
1U
Fuel Oil Range
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
0.85J
1.3J
9.6UJ
5.2U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
4.8U
5.1U
9.6UJ
5.2U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
5.1U
9.6UJ
5.2U
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.8U
5.1U
9.6UJ
5.2UJ
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
5.1U
9.6UJ
5.2UJ
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
5.1U
9.6UJ
5.2UJ
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
5.1U
9.6UJ
5.2UJ
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
4.8U
5.1U
9.6UJ
5.2U
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
0.39J
5.1U
9.6UJ
5.2U
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
5.1U
9.6UJ
5.2UJ
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.8U
5.1U
9.6UJ
5.2U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
4.8U
5.1U
9.6UJ
5.2U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
4.8U
5.1U
9.6UJ
5.2U
Note:
1. When human health risk and aesthetic standards both exist for
groundwater, human health risk standards were used.
2. Yellow indicates an exceedance of the associated groundwater standard.
3. J indicates an estimated result.
4. U indicates a non-detect. The reporting limit was reported for all non-detects.
5. NS indicates that no sample was collected.
6. NA indicates that the analyte was not analyzed.
Page 1 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-5
CMW-9
Sample ID:
CMW-5-0/0-01
CMW-9-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/26/10 2:25
6/4/11 12:35
7/21/10 1:05
6/4/11 11:05
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
5U
1U
10U
1U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
5U
1U
78
10
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
5U
1U
10
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
25
4.8
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
10U
2U
12J
2.4
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
1U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5U
1U
7.2J
0.71J
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
8.8J
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
5U
1U
34
6.9
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5.1J
1.2
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
1.6
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
5U
1U
9.9J
1.4
Fuel Oil Range
4.9U
4.7U
9.6U
0.76J
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
9.6U
0.36J
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
9.6U
4.8U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
9.6U
4.8UJ
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
9.6U
4.8UJ
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
9.6U
4.8UJ
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
9.6U
0.32J
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
0.58J
0.63J
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
9.6U
0.67J
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
9.6U
4.8UJ
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
2.6J
4.8U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
1.4J
1.6J
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
0.62J
0.7J
Note:
Page 2 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-13
CMW-14
Sample ID:
CMW-13-0/0-01
CMW-14-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/23/10 9:35
6/5/11 12:15
7/23/10 8:35
6/14/11 18:30
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
5U
1U
5U
1U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
1U
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
1U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
10U
2U
10U
2U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
8.8
25
5U
1U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
1U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
1U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
1U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
1U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
1U
Fuel Oil Range
5U
4.8U
5U
4.7U
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
5U
4.8U
5U
4.7U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
5U
4.8U
5U
0.34J
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
5U
4.8UJ
5U
4.7U
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
5U
4.8UJ
5U
4.7U
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
5U
4.8UJ
5U
4.7U
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
5U
4.8UJ
5U
4.7U
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
5U
4.8U
5U
4.7U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
5U
4.8U
5U
4.7U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
5U
4.8UJ
5U
4.7U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5U
4.8U
5U
4.7U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
5U
4.8U
5U
4.7U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
5U
4.8U
5U
4.7U
Note:
Page 3 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-15
CMW-16
Sample ID:
CMW-15-0/0-01
CMW-16-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/26/10 10:00
6/5/11 10:15
7/26/10 9:10
6/14/11 12:00
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
5U
1U
1U
1U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
5U
2.8
1U
1U
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
5U
0.87J
1U
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
5U
2.3
1U
1U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
10U
0.66J
2U
2U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
5U
2.2
1U
1U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
5U
1.2
1U
1U
Fuel Oil Range
4.8U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
4.8U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
4.8U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.8U
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
4.8U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.8U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
4.8U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
4.8U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
Note:
Page 4 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-19D
CMW-21
Sample ID:
CMW-19D-0/0-01
CMW-21-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/21/10 8:50
6/4/11 17:00
7/20/10 12:10
2011
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
4U
10U
20U
NS
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
4U
10U
20U
NS
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
4U
120
210
NS
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
4U
18
27
NS
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
4U
130
150
NS
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
8U
22
23J
NS
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
4U
10U
20U
NS
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4U
96
130
NS
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
4U
28
36
NS
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
4U
180
210
NS
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
4U
10U
20U
NS
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
4U
19
20
NS
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
4U
18
20
NS
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
4U
10U
20U
NS
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
4U
15
22
NS
Fuel Oil Range
0.79J
5.2
6.7
NS
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
4.9UJ
1.2J
2.4J
NS
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
4.9UJ
0.7J
1.3J
NS
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.9UJ
4.7UJ
0.66J
NS
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.9UJ
4.7UJ
0.54J
NS
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7UJ
4.7U
NS
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.9UJ
0.79J
1.4J
NS
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
4.9UJ
1.5J
3.1J
NS
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
4.9UJ
6.3
9.3
NS
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.9UJ
4.7UJ
4.7U
NS
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.9U
82
88
NS
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
4.9UJ
11
19
NS
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
4.9U
1.7J
3.7J
NS
Note:
Page 5 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-22
CMW-23D
Sample ID:
CMW-22-0/0-01
CMW-23D-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/20/10 2:40
6/5/11 9:08
7/27/10 11:20
6/16/11 10:30
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
2.2
3.3
5U
1U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
1U
0.82J
5U
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
56
55
5U
1U
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
1.3
1.1
5U
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
11
9.8
5U
1U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
5.6
8.4
10U
2U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
26
29
5U
1U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
2.6
1U
5U
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
10
7.5
5U
1U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
1.5
2.1
5U
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
0.54J
1U
5U
1U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
1.5
1.1
5U
1U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
5
5.2
5U
1U
Fuel Oil Range
18
7.3
5
7.1
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
4.9U
5.6U
5U
4.7U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
4.9U
5.6U
5U
4.7U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
5.6UJ
5U
4.7U
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.9U
5.6UJ
5U
4.7U
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
5.6UJ
5U
4.7U
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
5.6UJ
5U
4.7U
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
5.6U
5U
4.7U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
1.9J
0.85J
5U
4.7U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
5.6UJ
5U
4.7U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
12
2.6J
5U
4.7U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
0.69J
5.6U
5U
4.7U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
4.9U
0.38J
0.43J
4.7U
Note:
Page 6 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-23S
CMW-24D
Sample ID:
CMW-23S-0/0-01
CMW-24D-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/27/10 10:10
6/16/11 11:25
7/28/10 9:50
6/15/11 11:40
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
5U
1U
1U
5U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
5U
1U
15J
12
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
10U
2U
1.6J
10U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
5U
1U
1.3
21
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Fuel Oil Range
0.57J
4.7U
2.3J
1.5J
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
4.8U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
4.8UJ
0.38J
0.35J
4.8U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
4.8U
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
4.8U
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
4.8U
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
0.33J
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
4.8UJ
0.48J
4.8U
4.8U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
4.8U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
4.8U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
4.8U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
4.8U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
0.45J
0.78J
4.8U
4.8U
Note:
Page 7 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-24S
CMW-25D
Sample ID:
CMW-24S-0/0-01
CMW-25D-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/28/10 8:30
6/15/11 10:10
7/23/10 10:00
6/5/11 10:25
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
8.2J
5.2
1U
1U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
10U
5U
1U
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
1300J
780
2.5
1U
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
25
59
1U
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
19
12
1U
1U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
35
19
2U
2U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
91
74
1U
1U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
29
6
1U
1U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
10U
4.7J
1U
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
30
18
1U
1U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
9.9J
5U
1U
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
10U
5U
1U
1U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
10U
5U
1U
1U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
10U
5U
1U
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
19
14
1U
1U
Fuel Oil Range
60
24
4.7U
4.8U
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
1.6J
0.32J
4.7U
4.8U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
0.39J
0.36J
4.7U
4.8U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
4.8UJ
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
4.8UJ
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
4.8UJ
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
0.31J
4.7U
4.8UJ
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
0.45J
0.41J
4.7U
4.8U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
19
5.5
4.7U
4.8U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
4.8UJ
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
3.4J
7.8
4.7U
4.8U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
28
1.4J
4.7U
4.8U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
0.5J
0.33J
4.7U
4.8U
Note:
Page 8 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-25S
Sample ID:
CMW-25S-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/23/10 8:50
6/5/11 9:15
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
5U
1U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
5U
1U
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
5U
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
10U
2U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
3.2J
2.2
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5U
1U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
5U
1U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
5U
1U
Fuel Oil Range
4.8U
4.7U
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
4.8U
4.7U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
4.8U
4.7U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
4.7UJ
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.8U
4.7UJ
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
4.7UJ
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
4.7UJ
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
4.7U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
4.8U
4.7U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.8U
4.7UJ
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.8U
4.7U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
4.8U
4.7U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
4.8U
4.7U
Note:
Page 9 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-26
Sample ID:
CMW-26-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/28/10 9:10
7/28/10 12:00
6/16/11 20:00
6/16/11 20:00
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
1.6
1.4
1U
1U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
23J
21J
2.8
2.7
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
3.5
3.3
1U
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
1U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
1.6J
1.5J
2U
2U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
1U
1U
1.4
1.4
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.4
4.3
1U
1U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
1U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
1U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
1U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
4.4
4
1U
1U
Fuel Oil Range
2.4J
2.6J
4.7U
4.8U
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
4.7U
4.8U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
4.7U
4.8U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
4.7U
4.8U
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
4.7U
4.8U
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
4.7U
4.8U
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
4.7U
4.8U
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
4.7U
4.8U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
0.52J
0.48J
4.7U
4.8U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
4.7U
4.8U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
3J
3.2J
4.7U
4.8U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
0.47J
9.4U
4.7U
4.8U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
4.7U
4.8U
Note:
Page 10 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-27
CMW-28
Sample ID:
CMW-27-0/0-01
CMW-28-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/28/10 7:10
2011
2010
6/4/11 14:25
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
68
NS
NS
1U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
10U
NS
NS
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
1500
NS
NS
1U
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
20
NS
NS
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
10U
NS
NS
1U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
57
NS
NS
2U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
10U
NS
NS
1U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
9.9J
NS
NS
1U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
10U
NS
NS
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
10U
NS
NS
1U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
36
NS
NS
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
10U
NS
NS
1U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
10U
NS
NS
1U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
10U
NS
NS
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
93
NS
NS
2.7
Fuel Oil Range
5.2U
NS
NS
4.7U
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
5.2U
NS
NS
4.7U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
1.2J
NS
NS
4.7U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
1.9J
NS
NS
4.7UJ
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
5.2UJ
NS
NS
4.7UJ
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
5.2UJ
NS
NS
4.7UJ
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
5.2U
NS
NS
4.7UJ
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
5.2U
NS
NS
4.7U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
0.54J
NS
NS
4.7U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
1.3J
NS
NS
4.7UJ
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5.2U
NS
NS
4.7U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
5.2U
NS
NS
4.7U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
1J
NS
NS
4.7U
Note:
Page 11 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-29D
CMW-32
Sample ID:
CMW-29D-0/0-01
CMW-32-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/22/10 11:30
2011
7/22/10 9:25
2011
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
1U
NS
190
NS
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
1U
NS
130
NS
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
1.5
NS
4800
NS
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
1U
NS
900
NS
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
1U
NS
41
NS
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
2U
NS
970
NS
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
0.71J
NS
5U
NS
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
1U
NS
230
NS
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
1U
NS
5U
NS
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
1U
NS
61
NS
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
1U
NS
36
NS
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
1U
NS
5.2
NS
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
1U
NS
5U
NS
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
1U
NS
5U
NS
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
1U
NS
100
NS
Fuel Oil Range
2.5J
NS
2.1J
NS
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
4.7U
NS
0.31J
NS
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
4.7U
NS
5U
NS
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
NS
5U
NS
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.7U
NS
5U
NS
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
NS
5U
NS
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
NS
5U
NS
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
NS
5U
NS
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
4.7U
NS
1.5J
NS
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
NS
5U
NS
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.7U
NS
77
NS
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
4.7U
NS
1.8J
NS
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
4.7U
NS
0.51J
NS
Note:
Page 12 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-34D
CMW-41D
Sample ID:
CMW-34D-0/0-01
CMW-41D-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/21/10 9:40
6/4/11 15:40
7/26/10 11:35
6/14/11 13:35
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
5U
1
5U
5U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
96
75
5U
5U
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
5.5
7.8
5U
5U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
5U
3
5U
5U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
10U
1.6J
10U
10U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
6.7
14
5U
3.3J
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
72
54
5U
5U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
5U
1.5
5U
5U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
5U
1.6
5U
5U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
5U
4.9
5U
5U
Fuel Oil Range
120
140J
4.7U
4.8U
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
0.99J
0.81J
4.7U
4.8U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
5U
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
5U
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
5U
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
5U
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
5U
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
3.1J
3J
4.7U
4.8U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
45
37J
4.7U
4.8U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
5U
4.8UJ
4.7U
4.8U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
32
28J
4.7U
4.8U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
20
16J
4.7U
4.8U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
1.4J
1.6J
4.7U
4.8U
Note:
Page 13 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-41S
CMW-42
Sample ID:
CMW-41S-0/0-01
CMW-42-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/26/10 10:35
6/14/11 14:35
7/26/10 8:00
6/13/11 16:20
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
5U
1U
5U
5U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
10U
2U
10U
10U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
5U
1U
5U
5U
Fuel Oil Range
4.7U
4.8U
0.84J
4.8U
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
4.7U
0.35J
4.7U
4.8U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
0.35J
4.7U
4.8U
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
4.8U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
4.7UJ
4.8U
Note:
Page 14 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-46
CMW-47D
Sample ID:
CMW-46-0/0-01
CMW-47D-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/28/10 7:15
6/15/11 12:25
7/21/10 1:55
6/4/11 10:15
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
19
120
5U
1U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
10U
9.6
5U
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
620J
2100
72
16
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
48
190
5U
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
10U
14
5U
1U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
24
240
10U
2U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
130
5U
200
81
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
10U
32
5U
1U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
10U
3.3J
5U
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
10U
18
5U
1U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
10U
21
5U
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
10U
3J
5U
1U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
10U
5U
5U
1U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
10U
5U
5U
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
11
44
5U
1U
Fuel Oil Range
17
11
5.7
2.8J
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
5U
0.26J
4.8U
4.7UJ
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
5U
4.7U
4.8U
4.7UJ
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
5U
4.7U
4.8U
4.7UJ
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
5U
4.7U
4.8U
4.7UJ
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
5U
4.7U
4.8U
4.7UJ
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
5U
4.7U
4.8U
4.7UJ
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
5U
4.7U
0.43J
4.7UJ
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
3.1J
1.4J
1J
0.54J
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
0.89J
4.7U
4.8U
4.7UJ
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
26
25
4.8U
4.7UJ
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
0.49J
4.7U
0.67J
4.7UJ
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
5U
0.33J
0.49J
0.49J
Note:
Page 15 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-55
Sample ID:
CMW-55-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/27/10 9:00
6/16/11 14:00
6/16/11 14:00
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
5U
1U
1U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
10U
2U
2U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
Fuel Oil Range
0.76J
0.39J
0.46J
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
4.9U
4.7U
4.7U
Note:
Page 16 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
CMW-62D
MW-2
Sample ID:
CMW-62D-0/0-01
MW-2-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/21/10 10:20
6/5/11 16:35
7/22/10 3:30
6/5/11 11:25
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
1U
1U
5U
1U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
1U
0.74J
5U
1U
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
2U
2U
10U
2U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
1U
0.67J
5U
1U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
1U
0.68J
5U
1U
Fuel Oil Range
0.69J
2.1J
4.8U
4.8U
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
4.9U
4.9U
4.8U
4.8U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
4.9U
4.9U
4.8U
4.8U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.9UJ
4.8U
4.8UJ
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.9U
4.9UJ
4.8U
4.8UJ
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.9UJ
4.8U
4.8UJ
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.9UJ
4.8U
4.8UJ
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.9U
4.8U
4.8U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
4.9U
0.7J
4.8U
4.8U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
4.9UJ
4.8U
4.8UJ
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.9U
4.9U
4.8U
4.8U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
4.9U
0.63J
4.8U
4.8U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
4.9U
4.9U
4.8U
4.8U
Note:
Page 17 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
MW-26
MW-62
Sample ID:
MW-26-0/0-01
MW-62-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/27/10 2:35
7/19/11 9:05
7/26/10 1:00
6/5/11 9:05
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
5U
NA
5U
10U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
NA
5U
10U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
1900J
970
1500
410
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
18
30
4J
9.5J
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
35
57
24
13
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
16
NA
11
14J
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
10U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
3.3J
NA
5U
10U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
5U
NA
8
10U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
40
NA
36
12
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
6.6
NA
5U
10U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
NA
5U
10U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
3.8J
NA
3.9J
10U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
NA
5U
10U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
31
40
10
6.7J
Fuel Oil Range
1.6J
2.6J
1.2J
1.3J
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
0.5J
0.74J
4.8U
4.8UJ
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
0.37J
0.46J
4.8U
4.8UJ
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.8U
4.8UJ
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.7U
0.38J
4.8U
4.8UJ
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.8U
4.8UJ
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
0.39J
0.64J
4.8U
4.8UJ
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
1.5J
1.6J
4.8U
0.44J
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
1.9J
2.5J
1.7J
1.6J
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.8U
4.8UJ
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.7U
11
4.8U
4.8UJ
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
3.9J
4.8
1.7J
1.1J
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
1.5J
1.8J
0.4J
0.46J
Note:
Page 18 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
MW-63
MW-64
Sample ID:
MW-63-0/0-01
MW-64-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/23/10 10:55
6/5/11 11:05
7/22/10 2:05
6/5/11 11:45
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
5U
1U
1UJ
1U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
4.8J
1.4
1.1
1U
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
5U
1.6
1U
1U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
10U
2U
2U
2U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
5U
1.2
1U
1U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
5U
0.63J
1U
1U
Fuel Oil Range
4.7U
4.8U
10U
4.8UJ
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
10U
4.8UJ
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
10U
4.8UJ
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
4.8UJ
10U
4.8UJ
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.7U
4.8UJ
10U
4.8UJ
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
4.8UJ
10U
4.8UJ
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
4.8UJ
10U
4.8UJ
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
10U
4.8UJ
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
10U
4.8UJ
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
4.8UJ
10U
4.8UJ
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
10U
4.8UJ
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
10U
4.8UJ
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.8U
10U
4.8UJ
Note:
Page 19 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
MW-66
Sample ID:
MW-66-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/23/10 10:35
7/23/10 10:40
6/14/11 15:40
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
5U
5U
5U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
79
110
370
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
4.2J
5.9
5
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
4.2J
5.3J
17
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
19
19
5U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
5U
5U
7.8
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
3J
4J
11
Fuel Oil Range
5.1
4.9J
1J
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
0.67J
0.63J
0.38J
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
0.94J
0.95J
4.7U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
0.65J
0.55J
4.7U
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
0.65J
0.49J
4.7U
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
5U
4.7U
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
0.99J
0.83J
4.7U
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
1.8J
1.5J
4.7U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
0.57J
0.56J
4.7U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.9U
5U
4.7U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.9U
5U
4.7U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
0.58J
5U
4.7U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
1.8J
1.8J
4.7U
Note:
Page 20 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
MW-72
MW-88D
Sample ID:
MW-72-0/0-01
MW-88D-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/27/10 1:20
6/16/11 9:25
7/27/10 11:30
6/17/11 10:50
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
5U
1U
10U
2U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
2U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
5U
1U
140
150
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
2U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
13
21
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
10U
2U
20U
11
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
2U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
2U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
2U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
5U
1U
7.4J
12
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
3.5
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
2U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
1.7J
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
10U
2U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
5U
1U
7.5J
8.6
Fuel Oil Range
1.6J
2.1J
0.84J
0.92J
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
0.41J
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
9.9U
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
9.9U
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
9.9U
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
9.9U
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
9.9U
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
1.1J
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
9.9U
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
9.9U
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
9.9U
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
0.53J
4.7U
4.8U
4.7U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
1.1J
0.34J
4.8U
4.7U
Note:
Page 21 of 22
Table 16
Location ID:
RIMW-01
RIMW-02
Sample ID:
RIMW-01-0/0-01
RIMW-02-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Gasoline Range
7/20/10 9:45
6/4/11 11:05
7/20/10 11:15
6/4/11 10:04
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
5U
10U
1U
1U
95-63-6
5
ug/L
108-67-8
5
ug/L
5U
10U
1U
1U
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ug/L
360
28
1U
1U
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
5
ug/L
8.4
10U
1U
1U
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
5
ug/L
63
44
1U
1U
m,p- Xylene
m,p- Xylene
5
ug/L
10U
20U
2U
2U
1634-04-4
10
ug/L
5U
10U
1U
1U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
5U
10U
1U
1U
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
5
ug/L
6.9
10U
1U
1U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
5
ug/L
37
10U
1U
1U
o- Xylene
95-47-6
5
ug/L
5U
10U
1U
1U
p-Cymene
99-87-6
5
ug/L
5U
10U
1U
1U
sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
5
ug/L
8
8.2J
1U
1U
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
5
ug/L
5U
10U
1U
1U
Toluene
108-88-3
5
ug/L
8.3
10U
1U
1U
Fuel Oil Range
2.5J
1.7J
1.5J
0.93J
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
20
ug/L
0.54J
0.66J
9.4U
4.7U
Anthracene
120-12-7
50
ug/L
4.7UJ
4.9U
9.4U
4.7U
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
4.9U
9.4U
4.7UJ
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
ND
ug/L
4.7UJ
4.9U
9.4U
4.7UJ
205-99-2
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
1.5J
9.4U
4.7UJ
207-08-9
0.002
ug/L
4.7U
0.35J
9.4U
4.7UJ
Chrysene
218-01-9
0.002
ug/L
0.39J
4.9U
9.4U
4.7U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
50
ug/L
Fluorene
86-73-7
50
ug/L
1.4J
4.9U
9.4U
4.7U
193-39-5
0.002
ug/L
4.7UJ
4.9U
9.4U
4.7UJ
Naphthalene
91-20-3
10
ug/L
4.7U
4.9U
9.4U
4.7U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
50
ug/L
3.6J
3.1J
9.4U
4.7U
Pyrene
129-00-0
50
ug/L
0.41J
0.73J
9.4U
4.7U
Note:
Page 22 of 22
Table 17
Summary of Groundwater Chemistry Results for Target Contaminant List Compounds
Location ID:
CMW-1
CMW-5
CMW-14
CMW-24S
Sample ID: CMW-1-0/0-01
CMW-5-0/0-01 CWM-14-0/0-01 CWM-24S-0/0-01
Date & Time:
Volatile Organic Compounds
6/4/11 16:05
6/4/11 12:35
6/14/11 18:30
6/15/11 10:10
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
71-55-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
79-34-5
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
76-13-1
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
79-00-5
1
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
5U
1U
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
5
ug/L
5U
1U
120-82-1
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
96-12-8
0.04
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
1,2-Dibromoethane
106-93-4
0.0006
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
0.6
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
1
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
3
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
2-Butanone
78-93-3
50
ug/L
17J
10U
10U
50U
2-Hexanone
591-78-6
50
ug/L
25U
5U
5U
25U
Acetone
67-64-1
50
ug/L
43J
10U
3.4J
27J
75-27-4
50
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Bromoform
75-25-2
50
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Bromomethane
74-83-9
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Carbon Disulfide
75-15-0
60
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Carbon Tetrachloride
56-23-5
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Chloroethane
75-00-3
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
3.6J
Chloroform
67-66-3
7
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
6
Chloromethane
74-87-3
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
156-59-2
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
24
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
0.4
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
124-48-1
50
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
75-71-8
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
m-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
3
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Methylene Chloride
75-09-2
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
o-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
3
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Styrene
100-42-5
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
156-60-5
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
10061-02-6
0.4
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
75-69-4
5
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
5U
Vinyl Chloride
75-01-4
2
ug/L
5U
1U
1U
14
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
Trichloroethene
120-83-2
5
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
10
ug/L
10U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
5
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
5
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
2-Chloronaphthalene
91-58-7
10
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
5
ug/L
10U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
5
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
5
ug/L
10U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
5
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
5
ug/L
10U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
Atrazine
1912-24-9
7.5
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Biphenyl
92-52-4
5
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
5
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
111-44-4
1
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
108-60-1
5
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
117-81-7
5
ug/L
5.1UJ
4.7UJ
4.7U
4.7U
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
50
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
50
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
50
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
50
ug/L
0.34J
4.7U
0.38J B
0.4J B
Di-n-octyl phthalate
117-84-0
50
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
0.04
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
0.5
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
77-47-4
5
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
5
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Isophorone
78-59-1
50
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
0.4
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
50
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
2
ug/L
10U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
Phenol
108-95-2
2
ug/L
5.1U
4.7U
4.7U
2.6J
Note:
3. U indicates a result of non-detect.
5. Shading indicates an exceedance of the associated groundwater standard.
Page 1 of 5
Table 17
Location ID:
CMW-55
MW-26
Sample ID:
CWM-55-0/0-01
MW-26-0/0-01
Date & Time:
6/16/11 14:00
6/16/11 14:00
7/19/11 9:05
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
71-55-6
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
79-34-5
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
76-13-1
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
79-00-5
1
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
5U
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
5
ug/L
1U
1U
120-82-1
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
96-12-8
0.04
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1,2-Dibromoethane
106-93-4
0.0006
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
0.6
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
1
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
3
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
2-Butanone
78-93-3
50
ug/L
10U
10U
50U
2-Hexanone
591-78-6
50
ug/L
5U
5U
25U
Acetone
67-64-1
50
ug/L
10U
10U
28J
75-27-4
50
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
Bromoform
75-25-2
50
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
Bromomethane
74-83-9
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
Carbon Disulfide
75-15-0
60
ug/L
0.32J
0.36J
5U
56-23-5
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
5
ug/L
1U
1U
30
Chloroethane
75-00-3
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
Chloroform
67-66-3
7
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
Chloromethane
74-87-3
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
156-59-2
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
10061-01-5
0.4
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
124-48-1
50
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
75-71-8
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
m-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
3
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
Methylene Chloride
75-09-2
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
o-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
3
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
Styrene
100-42-5
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
156-60-5
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
10061-02-6
0.4
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
75-69-4
5
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
Vinyl Chloride
75-01-4
2
ug/L
1U
1U
5U
Trichloroethene
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
120-83-2
5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
10
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
5
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
5
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
2-Chloronaphthalene
91-58-7
10
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
5
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
91-94-1
5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
5
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
5
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7UJ
Atrazine
1912-24-9
7.5
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Biphenyl
92-52-4
5
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
111-91-1
5
ug/L
111-44-4
1
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
108-60-1
5
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
117-81-7
5
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
2.2J
85-68-7
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
2J
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
84-74-2
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
0.79J B
117-84-0
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
0.04
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
0.5
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
77-47-4
5
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
5
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Isophorone
78-59-1
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
0.4
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
86-30-6
50
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
2
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
Phenol
108-95-2
2
ug/L
4.7U
4.7U
5.6
MW-66
CWM-66-0/0-01
6/14/11 15:40
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
50U
25U
18J
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
4.7U
9.5U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
9.5U
4.7U
9.5U
4.7U
9.5U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
0.33J B
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
9.5U
4.7U
Note:
Page 2 of 5
Table 17
Location ID:
RIMW-01
CMW-4
CMW-9
Sample ID: R1MW-01-0/0-01 CMW-4-0/0-01
CMW-9-0/0-01
Date & Time:
6/4/11 11:05
7/22/10 8:05
7/21/10 1:05
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
71-55-6
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
79-34-5
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
76-13-1
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
79-00-5
1
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
10U
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
5
ug/L
10U
5U
120-82-1
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
96-12-8
0.04
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
1,2-Dibromoethane
106-93-4
0.0006
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
0.6
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
1
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
3
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
2-Butanone
78-93-3
50
ug/L
100U
50U
100U
2-Hexanone
591-78-6
50
ug/L
50U
25U
50U
Acetone
67-64-1
50
ug/L
100U
50U
100U
75-27-4
50
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
Bromoform
75-25-2
50
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
Bromomethane
74-83-9
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
Carbon Disulfide
75-15-0
60
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
56-23-5
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
Chloroethane
75-00-3
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
Chloroform
67-66-3
7
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
Chloromethane
74-87-3
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
156-59-2
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
10061-01-5
0.4
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
124-48-1
50
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
75-71-8
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
m-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
3
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
Methylene Chloride
75-09-2
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
o-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
3
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
Styrene
100-42-5
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
156-60-5
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
10061-02-6
0.4
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
75-69-4
5
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
Vinyl Chloride
75-01-4
2
ug/L
10U
5U
10U
Trichloroethene
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
120-83-2
5
ug/L
9.8U
9.6UJ
9.6U
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
10
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
5
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
5
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
2-Chloronaphthalene
91-58-7
10
ug/L
9.8U
48UJ
48U
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
5
ug/L
4.9U
19UJ
19U
91-94-1
5
ug/L
9.8U
48UJ
48U
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
5
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
5
ug/L
9.8U
48UJ
48U
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
5
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
Atrazine
1912-24-9
7.5
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
Biphenyl
92-52-4
5
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
111-91-1
5
ug/L
111-44-4
1
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
108-60-1
5
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
117-81-7
5
ug/L
4.9UJ
9.6UJ
1.8J
85-68-7
50
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
50
ug/L
4.9U
0.74J
9.6U
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
50
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
84-74-2
50
ug/L
0.34J
0.65U
0.74U
117-84-0
50
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
0.04
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
0.5
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
77-47-4
5
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
5
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
Isophorone
78-59-1
50
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
0.4
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
86-30-6
50
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
48UJ
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
2
ug/L
9.8U
48U
Phenol
108-95-2
2
ug/L
4.9U
9.6UJ
9.6U
CMW-19S
CMW-19S-0/0-01
7/20/10 2:45
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
200U
100U
200U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
47U
19U
47U
9.4U
47U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
0.8U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
9.4U
47U
9.4U
Note:
Page 3 of 5
Table 17
Location ID:
CMW-26
MW-64
Sample ID:
CMW-26-0/0-01
MW-64-0/0-01
Date & Time:
7/28/10 9:10
7/28/10 12:00
7/22/10 2:05
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
71-55-6
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
79-34-5
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
76-13-1
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
79-00-5
1
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
5
ug/L
0.84J
0.81J
1U
1U
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
5
ug/L
1U
1U
120-82-1
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
96-12-8
0.04
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
1,2-Dibromoethane
106-93-4
0.0006
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
0.6
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
1
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
3
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
2-Butanone
78-93-3
50
ug/L
10U
10U
10U
2-Hexanone
591-78-6
50
ug/L
5U
5U
5U
Acetone
67-64-1
50
ug/L
10U
3.2J
10U
75-27-4
50
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
Bromoform
75-25-2
50
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
Bromomethane
74-83-9
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
Carbon Disulfide
75-15-0
60
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
56-23-5
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
Chloroethane
75-00-3
5
ug/L
5.6
5.2
1U
Chloroform
67-66-3
7
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
Chloromethane
74-87-3
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
156-59-2
5
ug/L
51
51
1U
10061-01-5
0.4
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
124-48-1
50
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
75-71-8
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
m-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
3
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
Methylene Chloride
75-09-2
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
o-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
3
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
Styrene
100-42-5
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
156-60-5
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
10061-02-6
0.4
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
75-69-4
5
ug/L
1U
1U
1U
Vinyl Chloride
75-01-4
2
ug/L
62
61
1U
Trichloroethene
9.4U
9.4U
10U
120-83-2
5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
10
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
2-Chloronaphthalene
91-58-7
10
ug/L
47U
47U
52U
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
5
ug/L
19U
19U
21U
91-94-1
5
ug/L
47U
47U
52U
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
5
ug/L
47U
47U
52U
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
Atrazine
1912-24-9
7.5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
Biphenyl
92-52-4
5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
111-91-1
5
ug/L
111-44-4
1
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
108-60-1
5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
117-81-7
5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
85-68-7
50
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
50
ug/L
1J
0.89J
0.63J
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
50
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
84-74-2
50
ug/L
0.3U
0.61J B
0.49U
117-84-0
50
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
0.04
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
0.5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
77-47-4
5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
5
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
Isophorone
78-59-1
50
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
0.4
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
86-30-6
50
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
2
ug/L
47U
47U
52U
Phenol
108-95-2
2
ug/L
9.4U
9.4U
10U
MW-72
MW-72-0/0-01
7/27/10 1:20
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
50U
25U
50U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
5U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
50U
20U
50U
9.9U
50U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
1.2U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
9.9U
50U
9.9U
Note:
Page 4 of 5
Table 17
Location ID:
RIMW-02
Sample ID: RIMW-02-0/0-01
Date & Time:
7/20/10 11:15
Analyte
CAS
Standard
Units
71-55-6
5
ug/L
1U
79-34-5
5
ug/L
1U
76-13-1
5
ug/L
1U
79-00-5
1
ug/L
1U
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
5
ug/L
1U
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
5
ug/L
1U
120-82-1
5
ug/L
1U
96-12-8
0.04
ug/L
1U
1,2-Dibromoethane
106-93-4
0.0006
ug/L
1U
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
0.6
ug/L
1U
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
1
ug/L
1U
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
3
ug/L
1U
2-Butanone
78-93-3
50
ug/L
10U
2-Hexanone
591-78-6
50
ug/L
5U
Acetone
67-64-1
50
ug/L
10U
75-27-4
50
ug/L
1U
Bromoform
75-25-2
50
ug/L
1U
Bromomethane
74-83-9
5
ug/L
1U
Carbon Disulfide
75-15-0
60
ug/L
1U
56-23-5
5
ug/L
1U
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
5
ug/L
1U
Chloroethane
75-00-3
5
ug/L
1U
Chloroform
67-66-3
7
ug/L
1U
Chloromethane
74-87-3
5
ug/L
1U
156-59-2
5
ug/L
1U
10061-01-5
0.4
ug/L
1U
124-48-1
50
ug/L
1U
75-71-8
5
ug/L
1U
m-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
3
ug/L
1U
Methylene Chloride
75-09-2
5
ug/L
1U
o-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
3
ug/L
1U
Styrene
100-42-5
5
ug/L
1U
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
5
ug/L
1U
156-60-5
5
ug/L
1U
10061-02-6
0.4
ug/L
1U
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
5
ug/L
1U
75-69-4
5
ug/L
1U
Vinyl Chloride
75-01-4
2
ug/L
1U
Trichloroethene
9.4U
120-83-2
5
ug/L
9.4U
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
10
ug/L
9.4U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
5
ug/L
9.4U
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
5
ug/L
9.4U
2-Chloronaphthalene
91-58-7
10
ug/L
47U
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
5
ug/L
19U
91-94-1
5
ug/L
47U
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
5
ug/L
9.4U
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
5
ug/L
47U
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
5
ug/L
9.4U
Atrazine
1912-24-9
7.5
ug/L
9.4U
Biphenyl
92-52-4
5
ug/L
9.4U
111-91-1
5
ug/L
111-44-4
1
ug/L
9.4U
108-60-1
5
ug/L
9.4U
117-81-7
5
ug/L
9.4U
85-68-7
50
ug/L
9.4U
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
50
ug/L
9.4U
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
50
ug/L
9.4U
84-74-2
50
ug/L
0.83U
117-84-0
50
ug/L
9.4U
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
0.04
ug/L
9.4U
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
0.5
ug/L
9.4U
77-47-4
5
ug/L
9.4U
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
5
ug/L
9.4U
Isophorone
78-59-1
50
ug/L
9.4U
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
0.4
ug/L
9.4U
86-30-6
50
ug/L
9.4U
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
2
ug/L
47U
Phenol
108-95-2
2
ug/L
9.4U
Note:
Page 5 of 5
Aroclors
Analyte
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Aroclor-1262
Aroclor-1268
Total PCBs (Sum)
Metals
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Total Dissolved Solids
Table 18
Summary of Groundwater Chemistry Results for PCBs, RCRA Dissolved Metals, and Total Dissolved Solids
Location ID:
CMW-1
CMW-5
CMW-14
CMW-24S
CMW-5-0/0-01 CWM-14-0/0-01 CWM-24S-0/0-01
Date & Time:
6/4/11 16:05
6/4/11 12:35
6/14/11 18:30
6/15/11 10:10
CAS
Standard
Units
12674-11-2
ug/L
NS
NS
0.47U
0.47U
11104-28-2
ug/L
NS
NS
0.47U
0.47U
11141-16-5
ug/L
NS
NS
0.47U
0.47U
53469-21-9
ug/L
NS
NS
0.47U
0.47U
12672-29-6
ug/L
NS
NS
0.47U
0.47U
11097-69-1
ug/L
NS
NS
0.47U
0.47U
11096-82-5
ug/L
NS
NS
0.47U
0.47U
37324-23-5
ug/L
NS
NS
0.47U
0.47U
11100-14-4
ug/L
NS
NS
0.47U
0.47U
0.09
ug/L
NS
NS
ND
ND
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-43-9
7440-47-3
7439-92-1
7439-97-6
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
25
1000
5
50
25
0.7
10
50
TDS
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
0.015
2.8
0.00047J
0.004U
0.0032J
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
0.01U
0.25
0.00059J
0.0013J
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
0.01U
0.42
0.00074J
0.004U
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
0.012
0.86
0.0007J
0.004U
0.0044J
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
mg/L
1700
936
6060
1540
Note:
Page 1 of 4
Aroclors
Analyte
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Aroclor-1262
Aroclor-1268
Total PCBs (Sum)
Metals
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Table 18
Location ID:
CMW-55
MW-26
MW-66
RIMW-01
Sample ID:
CWM-55-0/0-01
MW-26-0/0-01 CWM-66-0/0-01 R1MW-01-0/0-01
Date & Time:
6/16/11 14:00
6/16/11 14:00
7/19/11 9:05
6/14/11 15:40
6/4/11 11:05
CAS
Standard
Units
12674-11-2
ug/L
0.47U
0.47U
0.18J
0.47U
0.48U
11104-28-2
ug/L
0.47U
0.47U
0.49U
0.47U
0.48U
11141-16-5
ug/L
0.47U
0.47U
0.49U
0.47U
0.48U
53469-21-9
ug/L
0.47U
0.47U
0.49U
0.47U
0.48U
12672-29-6
ug/L
0.47U
0.47U
0.49U
0.47U
0.48U
11097-69-1
ug/L
0.47U
0.47U
0.49U
0.47U
0.48U
11096-82-5
ug/L
0.47U
0.47U
0.49U
0.47U
0.48U
37324-23-5
ug/L
0.47U
0.47U
0.49U
0.47U
0.48U
11100-14-4
ug/L
0.47U
0.47U
0.49U
0.47U
0.48U
0.09
ug/L
ND
ND
0.18J
ND
ND
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-43-9
7440-47-3
7439-92-1
7439-97-6
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
25
1000
5
50
25
0.7
10
50
TDS
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
0.01U
0.024
0.00099J
0.004U
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
0.01U
0.025
0.00098J
0.004U
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
0.01
0.73
0.00082J
0.004U
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
0.01U
0.73
0.00075J
0.004U
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
0.0097J
0.81
0.00094J
0.0034J
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
mg/L
23700
21900
2040
6610
21300
Note:
Page 2 of 4
Aroclors
Analyte
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Aroclor-1262
Aroclor-1268
Total PCBs (Sum)
Metals
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Table 18
Location ID:
CMW-4
CMW-9
CMW-19S
CMW-26
CMW-9-0/0-01 CMW-19S-0/0-01 CMW-26-0/0-01
Date & Time:
7/22/10 8:05
7/21/10 1:05
7/20/10 2:45
7/28/10 9:10
CAS
Standard
Units
12674-11-2
ug/L
0.47U
0.48U
0.49U
0.47U
11104-28-2
ug/L
0.47U
0.48U
0.49U
0.47U
11141-16-5
ug/L
0.47U
0.48U
0.49U
0.47U
53469-21-9
ug/L
0.47U
0.48U
0.49U
0.47U
12672-29-6
ug/L
0.47U
0.48U
0.49U
0.47U
11097-69-1
ug/L
0.47U
0.48U
0.49U
0.47U
11096-82-5
ug/L
0.47U
0.48U
0.49U
0.47U
37324-23-5
ug/L
0.47U
0.48U
0.49U
0.47U
11100-14-4
ug/L
0.47U
0.48U
0.49U
0.47U
0.09
ug/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-43-9
7440-47-3
7439-92-1
7439-97-6
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
25
1000
5
50
25
0.7
10
50
TDS
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
0.0079J
0.236
0.001U
0.004U
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
0.01U
0.229
0.001U
0.004U
0.005U
0.0001J
0.015U
0.003U
0.0116
0.929
0.001U
0.004U
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
0.0101
0.195
0.001U
0.004U
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
mg/L
913
2480
2210
1040
Note:
Page 3 of 4
Aroclors
Analyte
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Aroclor-1262
Aroclor-1268
Total PCBs (Sum)
Metals
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Table 18
Location ID:
MW-64
MW-72
RIMW-02
Sample ID:
MW-64-0/0-01
MW-72-0/0-01 RIMW-02-0/0-01
Date & Time:
7/22/10 2:05
7/28/10 12:00
7/27/10 1:20
7/20/10 11:15
CAS
Standard
Units
12674-11-2
ug/L
0.48U
0.47U
0.5UJ
0.49U
11104-28-2
ug/L
0.48U
0.47U
0.5UJ
0.49U
11141-16-5
ug/L
0.48U
0.47U
0.5UJ
0.49U
53469-21-9
ug/L
0.48U
0.47U
0.5UJ
0.49U
12672-29-6
ug/L
0.48U
0.47U
0.5UJ
0.49U
11097-69-1
ug/L
0.48U
0.47U
0.5UJ
0.49U
11096-82-5
ug/L
0.48U
0.47U
0.5UJ
0.49U
37324-23-5
ug/L
0.48U
0.47U
0.5UJ
0.49U
11100-14-4
ug/L
0.48U
0.47U
0.5UJ
0.49U
0.09
ug/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-43-9
7440-47-3
7439-92-1
7439-97-6
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
25
1000
5
50
25
0.7
10
50
TDS
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
0.01U
0.117
0.001U
0.004U
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
0.0089J
0.194
0.001U
0.004U
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
0.01U
0.0797B
0.001U
0.0011J
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
0.0324
0.659
0.001U
0.0012J
0.005U
0.0002U
0.015U
0.003U
mg/L
1760
1120
24700
25600
Note:
Page 4 of 4
January 31, 2011
Appendices
APPENDIX A
NYCDEP TREATED GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT
APPENDIX B
PHOTOGRAPHS OF OWS UPGRADE ACTIVITIES
Fig. B-1: Old Oil-Water separator inside building. Picture taken 11/7/2011.
Fig. B-2: Removing the old OWS from the building. Picture taken 11/7/2011.
Fig. B-3: Removing the old OWS from the building. Picture taken 11/7/2011.
Fig. B-4: OWS containment pan before cleaning and resurfacing. Picture taken 11/9/2011.
Fig. B-5: OWS containment pan after cleaning and resurfacing. Picture taken 11/14/2011.
Fig. B-6: New polyolefin OWS inside building. Picture taken 11/15/2011.
APPENDIX C
RECOVERED FLUIDS TRANSPORTATION AND RECYCLING
DOCUMENTATION
APPENDIX D
2011 ORGANOCLAY AND CARBON WASTE PROFILE
LABORATORY REPORTS
1
2
3
4
ANALYTICAL REPORT
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TestAmerica Buffalo
10 Hazelwood Drive
Amherst, NY 14228-2298
Tel: (716)691-2600
TestAmerica Job ID: 480-12273-1
Client Project/Site: Texaco - Greenpoint
For:
Chevron Environmental Management Corp.
Bellaire Office Building, E536C
4800 Fournace Road Bellaire
Attn: Gesele Harris
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Authorized for release by:
11/15/2011 11:27:27 AM
John Schove
Department Manager I
john.schove@testamericainc.com
The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited
parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full,
and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager
at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is
intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
Client: Chevron Environmental Management Corp.
Project/Site: Texaco - Greenpoint
2
Table of Contents
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 2 of 15
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Definitions/Glossary
1
2
3
Qualifiers
GC Semi VOA
Qualifier
Qualifier Description
X
Surrogate is outside control limits
4
5
Glossary
6
Abbreviation
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
☼
Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
%R
Percent Recovery
CNF
Contains no Free Liquid
DL, RA, RE, IN
Indicates a Dilution, Reanalysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
EDL
Estimated Detection Limit
EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ML
Minimum Level (Dioxin)
ND
Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL
Practical Quantitation Limit
RL
Reporting Limit
RPD
Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF
Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ
Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 3 of 15
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Case Narrative
1
2
3
Job ID: 480-12273-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Buffalo
4
Narrative
5
Job Narrative
480-12273-1
6
Comments
No additional comments.
7
Receipt
All samples were received in good condition within temperature requirements.
8
9
GC Semi VOA
Method(s) 8082: The laboratory control sample (LCS) for batch 480-38909 (LCS 480-38909/2-A), has one Surrogate outside recovery
limits, though the secondary surrogate is within limits.
10
No other analytical or quality issues were noted.
11
Organic Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted.
12
13
14
15
Page 4 of 15
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Detection Summary
1
2
Client Sample ID: TS-C-0/0-05
Lab Sample ID: 480-12273-1
No Detections
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 5 of 15
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Client Sample Results
1
2
Date Collected: 11/02/11 11:30
Date Received: 11/03/11 09:30
Matrix: Solid
Percent Solids: 57.8
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
PCB-1016
ND
400
78 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:44
1
PCB-1221
ND
400
78 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:44
1
PCB-1232
ND
400
78 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:44
1
PCB-1242
ND
400
87 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:44
1
PCB-1248
ND
400
79 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:44
1
PCB-1254
ND
400
85 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:44
1
PCB-1260
ND
400
190 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:44
1
Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (7AR)
ND
400
87 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:44
1
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
4
5
Method: 8082 - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography
Analyte
3
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
DCB Decachlorobiphenyl
59
34 - 148
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:44
Dil Fac
1
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
58
35 - 134
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:44
1
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 6 of 15
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Surrogate Summary
1
2
3
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
4
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
DCB1
TCX1
(34-148)
(35-134)
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
480-12273-1
TS-C-0/0-05
59
58
LCS 480-38909/2-A
Lab Control Sample
127
139 X
MB 480-38909/1-A
Method Blank
108
122
5
6
7
Surrogate Legend
DCB = DCB Decachlorobiphenyl
8
TCX = Tetrachloro-m-xylene
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 7 of 15
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Lab Sample ID: MB 480-38909/1-A
Matrix: Solid
Analysis Batch: 39125
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Prep Type: Total/NA
Prep Batch: 38909
MB MB
Analyte
Prepared
Analyzed
PCB-1016
Result Qualifier
ND
210
RL
MDL Unit
41 ug/Kg
D
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
Dil Fac
1
PCB-1221
ND
210
41 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
PCB-1232
ND
210
41 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
PCB-1242
ND
210
45 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
PCB-1248
ND
210
41 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
PCB-1254
ND
210
44 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
PCB-1260
ND
210
98 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
ND
210
45 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
%Recovery Qualifier
108
34 - 148
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
122
35 - 134
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 480-38909/2-A
Matrix: Solid
Dil Fac
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Prep Type: Total/NA
Prep Batch: 38909
Spike
Analyte
Added
LCS LCS
Result Qualifier
%Rec.
Unit
D
%Rec
2140
2790
ug/Kg
131
59 - 154
PCB-1260
2140
2670
ug/Kg
125
51 - 179
LCS LCS
%Recovery Qualifier
6
7
8
9
Limits
127
34 - 148
139 X
35 - 134
Page 8 of 15
11
12
13
14
Limits
PCB-1016
Surrogate
5
10
MB MB
Surrogate
4
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
15
QC Association Summary
1
2
3
GC Semi VOA
Prep Batch: 38909
4
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
480-12273-1
TS-C-0/0-05
Total/NA
Solid
3550B
LCS 480-38909/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
3550B
MB 480-38909/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
3550B
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
480-12273-1
TS-C-0/0-05
Total/NA
Solid
8082
38909
LCS 480-38909/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
8082
38909
MB 480-38909/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
8082
38909
5
6
Prep Batch
General Chemistry
7
8
9
10
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
480-12273-1
TS-C-0/0-05
Total/NA
Solid
Moisture
Prep Batch
11
12
13
14
15
Page 9 of 15
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Lab Chronicle
1
2
3
Matrix: Solid
Percent Solids: 57.8
4
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Prep
3550B
38909
Total/NA
Analysis
8082
1
39125
Total/NA
Analysis
Moisture
1
38981
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
Prepared
or Analyzed
Analyst
Lab
11/04/11 09:36
CM
TAL BUF
11/06/11 11:44
JM
TAL BUF
11/04/11 13:40
ZLR
TAL BUF
Laboratory References:
5
6
7
8
TAL BUF = TestAmerica Buffalo, 10 Hazelwood Drive, Amherst, NY 14228-2298, TEL (716)691-2600
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 10 of 15
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Certification Summary
1
2
Laboratory
Authority
Program
EPA Region
Certification ID
TestAmerica Buffalo
Arkansas
State Program
6
88-0686
TestAmerica Buffalo
California
NELAC
9
1169CA
TestAmerica Buffalo
Connecticut
State Program
1
PH-0568
TestAmerica Buffalo
Florida
NELAC
4
E87672
TestAmerica Buffalo
Georgia
Georgia EPD
4
N/A
TestAmerica Buffalo
Georgia
State Program
4
956
TestAmerica Buffalo
Illinois
NELAC
5
100325 / 200003
TestAmerica Buffalo
Iowa
State Program
7
374
TestAmerica Buffalo
Kansas
NELAC
7
E-10187
TestAmerica Buffalo
Kentucky
Kentucky UST
4
30
TestAmerica Buffalo
Kentucky
State Program
4
90029
TestAmerica Buffalo
Louisiana
NELAC
6
02031
TestAmerica Buffalo
Maine
State Program
1
NY0044
TestAmerica Buffalo
Maryland
State Program
3
294
TestAmerica Buffalo
Massachusetts
State Program
1
M-NY044
TestAmerica Buffalo
Michigan
State Program
5
9937
TestAmerica Buffalo
Minnesota
NELAC
5
036-999-337
TestAmerica Buffalo
New Hampshire
NELAC
1
2337
TestAmerica Buffalo
New Hampshire
NELAC
1
68-00281
TestAmerica Buffalo
New Jersey
NELAC
2
NY455
TestAmerica Buffalo
New York
NELAC
2
10026
TestAmerica Buffalo
North Dakota
State Program
8
R-176
TestAmerica Buffalo
Oklahoma
State Program
6
9421
TestAmerica Buffalo
Oregon
NELAC
10
NY200003
TestAmerica Buffalo
Pennsylvania
NELAC
3
68-00281
TestAmerica Buffalo
Tennessee
State Program
4
TN02970
TestAmerica Buffalo
Texas
NELAC
6
T104704412-08-TX
TestAmerica Buffalo
USDA
USDA
TestAmerica Buffalo
Virginia
NELAC Secondary AB
3
460185
TestAmerica Buffalo
Virginia
State Program
3
278
TestAmerica Buffalo
Washington
State Program
10
C1677
TestAmerica Buffalo
Wisconsin
State Program
5
998310390
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
P330-08-00242
Accreditation may not be offered or required for all methods and analytes reported in this package. Please contact your project manager for the laboratory's
current list of certified methods and analytes.
Page 11 of 15
3
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Method Summary
1
2
Method
Method Description
Protocol
Laboratory
8082
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography
SW846
TAL BUF
Moisture
Percent Moisture
EPA
TAL BUF
3
4
5
Protocol References:
EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency
6
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 12 of 15
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Sample Summary
1
2
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Matrix
480-12273-1
TS-C-0/0-05
Solid
Collected
Received
11/02/11 11:30
11/03/11 09:30
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 13 of 15
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 14 of 15
11/15/2011
1
Login Sample Receipt Checklist
2
Client: Science Applications International Corp
Job Number: 480-12273-1
Login Number: 12273
List Source: TestAmerica Buffalo
List Number: 1
3
4
5
Creator: Wienke, Robert
6
Question
Answer
Comment
Radioactivity either was not measured or, if measured, is at or below
background
True
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
True
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
tampered with.
True
8
Samples were received on ice.
True
Cooler Temperature is acceptable.
True
9
Cooler Temperature is recorded.
True
COC is present.
True
COC is filled out in ink and legible.
True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information.
True
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
True
There are no discrepancies between the sample IDs on the containers and
the COC.
True
Samples are received within Holding Time.
True
Sample containers have legible labels.
True
Containers are not broken or leaking.
True
Sample collection date/times are provided.
True
Appropriate sample containers are used.
True
Sample bottles are completely filled.
True
Sample Preservation Verified
True
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
MS/MSDs
True
VOA sample vials do not have headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4") in
diameter.
True
If necessary, staff have been informed of any short hold time or quick TAT
needs
True
Multiphasic samples are not present.
True
Samples do not require splitting or compositing.
True
Sampling Company provided.
True
Samples received within 48 hours of sampling.
True
Samples requiring field filtration have been filtered in the field.
N/A
Chlorine Residual checked.
N/A
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
SAIC
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 15 of 15
11/15/2011
1
2
3
4
ANALYTICAL REPORT
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TestAmerica Buffalo
10 Hazelwood Drive
Amherst, NY 14228-2298
Tel: (716)691-2600
Client Project/Site: Texaco - Greenpoint
For:
Chevron Environmental Management Corp.
Bellaire Office Building, E536C
4800 Fournace Road Bellaire
Attn: Gesele Harris
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Authorized for release by:
11/15/2011 11:49:06 AM
John Schove
Department Manager I
john.schove@testamericainc.com
The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited
parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full,
and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager
at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is
intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
2
Table of Contents
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 2 of 17
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Definitions/Glossary
1
2
3
Qualifiers
GC/MS VOA
4
Qualifier
J
Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
5
GC Semi VOA
Qualifier
X
Surrogate is outside control limits
6
7
Glossary
Abbreviation
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
☼
Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
%R
Percent Recovery
CNF
Contains no Free Liquid
DL, RA, RE, IN
Indicates a Dilution, Reanalysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
EDL
Estimated Detection Limit
EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ML
Minimum Level (Dioxin)
ND
Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL
Practical Quantitation Limit
RL
Reporting Limit
RPD
Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF
Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ
Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 3 of 17
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Case Narrative
1
2
3
Job ID: 480-12274-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Buffalo
4
Narrative
5
Job Narrative
480-12274-1
6
Comments
No additional comments.
7
Receipt
All samples were received in good condition within temperature requirements.
8
9
GC/MS VOA
Method(s) 8260B: The following sample(s) was diluted due to the nature of the TCLP sample matrix: TS-OC-0/0-05 (480-12274-1), (LB
480-39294/1-A). Elevated reporting limits (RLs) are provided.
10
11
GC Semi VOA
Method(s) 8082: The laboratory control sample (LCS) for batch 480-38909 (LCS 480-38909/2-A), has one Surrogate outside recovery
limits, though the secondary surrogate is within limits.
12
13
14
Organic Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted.
15
Page 4 of 17
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Detection Summary
1
2
Client Sample ID: TS-OC-0/0-05
No Detections
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 5 of 17
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Client Sample Results
1
2
Matrix: Solid
4
5
Method: 8260B - TCLP Volatiles - TCLP
Analyte
3
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
6
Benzene
ND
0.010
0.0041 mg/L
11/10/11 19:00
10
ND
0.010
0.0027 mg/L
11/10/11 19:00
10
Chlorobenzene
ND
0.010
0.0075 mg/L
11/10/11 19:00
10
Chloroform
ND
0.010
0.0034 mg/L
11/10/11 19:00
10
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
0.010
0.0021 mg/L
11/10/11 19:00
10
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
0.010
0.0029 mg/L
11/10/11 19:00
10
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
0.050
0.013 mg/L
11/10/11 19:00
10
Tetrachloroethene
ND
0.010
0.0036 mg/L
11/10/11 19:00
10
Trichloroethene
ND
0.010
0.0046 mg/L
11/10/11 19:00
10
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.010
0.0090 mg/L
11/10/11 19:00
10
10
Dil Fac
11
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
89
66 - 137
11/10/11 19:00
10
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
88
71 - 126
11/10/11 19:00
10
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
82
73 - 120
11/10/11 19:00
10
PCB-1016
Result Qualifier
ND
RL
250
MDL Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
50 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:59
Dil Fac
1
PCB-1221
ND
250
50 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:59
1
PCB-1232
ND
250
50 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:59
1
PCB-1242
ND
250
55 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:59
1
PCB-1248
ND
250
50 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:59
1
PCB-1254
ND
250
54 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:59
1
PCB-1260
ND
250
120 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:59
1
ND
250
55 ug/Kg
☼
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:59
1
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
61
34 - 148
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:59
1
63
35 - 134
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 11:59
1
Page 6 of 17
8
9
12
13
Analyte
7
Dil Fac
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
14
15
Surrogate Summary
1
2
3
Method: 8260B - TCLP Volatiles
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
4
12DCE
TOL
BFB
(66-137)
(71-126)
(73-120)
Lab Control Sample
90
89
85
Lab Control Sample
90
89
84
MB 480-39779/5
Method Blank
91
89
84
MB 480-39980/5
Method Blank
91
88
82
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
LCS 480-39779/4
LCS 480-39980/4
5
6
7
Surrogate Legend
8
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
9
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
10
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
12DCE
TOL
BFB
(66-137)
(71-126)
(73-120)
TS-OC-0/0-05
89
88
82
Method Blank
90
89
83
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
480-12274-1
LB 480-39294/1-A LB
11
12
13
14
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
15
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
DCB1
TCX1
(34-148)
(35-134)
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
480-12274-1
TS-OC-0/0-05
61
63
LCS 480-38909/2-A
Lab Control Sample
127
139 X
MB 480-38909/1-A
Method Blank
108
122
Surrogate Legend
DCB = DCB Decachlorobiphenyl
TCX = Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Page 7 of 17
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Lab Sample ID: MB 480-39779/5
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
5
MB MB
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Benzene
ND
0.0010
0.00041 mg/L
11/10/11 12:38
1
ND
0.0010
0.00027 mg/L
11/10/11 12:38
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
0.0010
0.00075 mg/L
11/10/11 12:38
1
0.0010
0.00034 mg/L
11/10/11 12:38
1
Chloroform
0.000450 J
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
0.0010
0.00021 mg/L
11/10/11 12:38
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
0.0010
0.00029 mg/L
11/10/11 12:38
1
ND
0.0050
0.0013 mg/L
11/10/11 12:38
1
0.0010
0.00036 mg/L
11/10/11 12:38
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
Tetrachloroethene
0.000501 J
Trichloroethene
ND
0.0010
0.00046 mg/L
11/10/11 12:38
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.0010
0.00090 mg/L
11/10/11 12:38
1
6
7
8
9
10
11
MB MB
Surrogate
4
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
12
91
66 - 137
11/10/11 12:38
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
89
71 - 126
11/10/11 12:38
1
84
73 - 120
11/10/11 12:38
1
13
Prep Type: Total/NA
14
Lab Sample ID: LCS 480-39779/4
Matrix: Solid
Spike
LCS LCS
15
%Rec.
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit
Benzene
0.0250
0.0247
mg/L
D
%Rec
99
Limits
71 - 124
Chlorobenzene
0.0250
0.0230
mg/L
92
72 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.0250
0.0244
mg/L
98
75 - 127
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.0250
0.0246
mg/L
98
65 - 138
Tetrachloroethene
0.0250
0.0225
mg/L
90
74 - 122
Trichloroethene
0.0250
0.0242
mg/L
97
74 - 123
LCS LCS
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
90
66 - 137
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
89
71 - 126
85
73 - 120
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
MB MB
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Benzene
ND
0.0010
0.00041 mg/L
11/11/11 12:51
1
ND
0.0010
0.00027 mg/L
11/11/11 12:51
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
0.0010
0.00075 mg/L
11/11/11 12:51
1
0.0010
0.00034 mg/L
11/11/11 12:51
1
Chloroform
0.000352 J
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
0.0010
0.00021 mg/L
11/11/11 12:51
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
0.0010
0.00029 mg/L
11/11/11 12:51
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
0.0050
0.0013 mg/L
11/11/11 12:51
1
0.0010
0.00036 mg/L
11/11/11 12:51
1
Tetrachloroethene
0.000375 J
Trichloroethene
ND
0.0010
0.00046 mg/L
11/11/11 12:51
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.0010
0.00090 mg/L
11/11/11 12:51
1
Page 8 of 17
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Method: 8260B - TCLP Volatiles (Continued)
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
5
MB MB
Surrogate
4
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
91
66 - 137
11/11/11 12:51
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
88
71 - 126
11/11/11 12:51
1
82
73 - 120
11/11/11 12:51
1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 480-39980/4
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Spike
LCS LCS
6
7
8
9
%Rec.
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit
Benzene
0.0250
0.0246
mg/L
D
%Rec
98
71 - 124
Chlorobenzene
0.0250
0.0227
mg/L
91
72 - 120
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.0250
0.0238
mg/L
95
75 - 127
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.0250
0.0245
mg/L
98
65 - 138
Tetrachloroethene
0.0250
0.0223
mg/L
89
74 - 122
Trichloroethene
0.0250
0.0241
mg/L
96
74 - 123
10
Limits
11
12
13
LCS LCS
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
14
Limits
90
66 - 137
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
89
71 - 126
84
73 - 120
15
Lab Sample ID: LB 480-39294/1-A LB
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
LB LB
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Benzene
ND
0.010
0.0041 mg/L
11/11/11 13:52
10
ND
0.010
0.0027 mg/L
11/11/11 13:52
10
Chlorobenzene
ND
0.010
0.0075 mg/L
11/11/11 13:52
10
Chloroform
ND
0.010
0.0034 mg/L
11/11/11 13:52
10
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
0.010
0.0021 mg/L
11/11/11 13:52
10
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
0.010
0.0029 mg/L
11/11/11 13:52
10
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
0.050
0.013 mg/L
11/11/11 13:52
10
0.010
0.0036 mg/L
11/11/11 13:52
10
Tetrachloroethene
0.00424 J
Trichloroethene
ND
0.010
0.0046 mg/L
11/11/11 13:52
10
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.010
0.0090 mg/L
11/11/11 13:52
10
LB LB
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
90
66 - 137
11/11/11 13:52
10
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
89
71 - 126
11/11/11 13:52
10
83
73 - 120
11/11/11 13:52
10
Page 9 of 17
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Lab Sample ID: MB 480-38909/1-A
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Prep Batch: 38909
MB MB
Analyte
Prepared
Analyzed
PCB-1016
Result Qualifier
ND
210
RL
MDL Unit
41 ug/Kg
D
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
Dil Fac
1
PCB-1221
ND
210
41 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
PCB-1232
ND
210
41 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
PCB-1242
ND
210
45 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
PCB-1248
ND
210
41 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
PCB-1254
ND
210
44 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
PCB-1260
ND
210
98 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
ND
210
45 ug/Kg
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
%Recovery Qualifier
108
34 - 148
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
122
35 - 134
11/04/11 09:36
11/06/11 10:09
1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 480-38909/2-A
Matrix: Solid
Dil Fac
Prep Type: Total/NA
Prep Batch: 38909
Spike
Analyte
Added
LCS LCS
Result Qualifier
%Rec.
Unit
D
%Rec
2140
2790
ug/Kg
131
59 - 154
PCB-1260
2140
2670
ug/Kg
125
51 - 179
LCS LCS
%Recovery Qualifier
6
7
8
9
Limits
127
34 - 148
139 X
35 - 134
Page 10 of 17
11
12
13
14
Limits
PCB-1016
Surrogate
5
10
MB MB
Surrogate
4
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
15
QC Association Summary
1
2
3
GC/MS VOA
Leach Batch: 39294
4
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
480-12274-1
TS-OC-0/0-05
TCLP
Solid
1311
LB 480-39294/1-A LB
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
1311
Prep Batch
5
6
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
480-12274-1
TS-OC-0/0-05
TCLP
Solid
8260B
LCS 480-39779/4
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
8260B
MB 480-39779/5
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
8260B
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
LB 480-39294/1-A LB
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
8260B
LCS 480-39980/4
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
8260B
MB 480-39980/5
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
8260B
Prep Batch
7
8
9
Prep Batch
10
11
12
GC Semi VOA
Prep Batch: 38909
13
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
480-12274-1
TS-OC-0/0-05
Total/NA
Solid
3550B
LCS 480-38909/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
3550B
MB 480-38909/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
3550B
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
480-12274-1
TS-OC-0/0-05
Total/NA
Solid
8082
38909
LCS 480-38909/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
8082
38909
MB 480-38909/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
8082
38909
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
480-12274-1
TS-OC-0/0-05
Total/NA
Solid
Moisture
14
15
Prep Batch
General Chemistry
Page 11 of 17
Prep Batch
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Lab Chronicle
1
2
Matrix: Solid
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
TCLP
Leach
1311
TCLP
Analysis
8260B
Total/NA
Prep
3550B
Total/NA
Analysis
8082
1
Total/NA
Analysis
Moisture
1
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
10
Prepared
or Analyzed
Analyst
Lab
39294
11/07/11 18:02
KV
TAL BUF
39779
11/10/11 19:00
RJ
TAL BUF
38909
11/04/11 09:36
CM
TAL BUF
39125
11/06/11 11:59
JM
TAL BUF
38981
11/04/11 13:40
ZLR
TAL BUF
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 12 of 17
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Certification Summary
1
2
Laboratory
Authority
Program
EPA Region
Certification ID
TestAmerica Buffalo
Arkansas
State Program
6
88-0686
TestAmerica Buffalo
California
NELAC
9
1169CA
TestAmerica Buffalo
Connecticut
State Program
1
PH-0568
TestAmerica Buffalo
Florida
NELAC
4
E87672
TestAmerica Buffalo
Georgia
Georgia EPD
4
N/A
TestAmerica Buffalo
Georgia
State Program
4
956
TestAmerica Buffalo
Illinois
NELAC
5
100325 / 200003
TestAmerica Buffalo
Iowa
State Program
7
374
TestAmerica Buffalo
Kansas
NELAC
7
E-10187
TestAmerica Buffalo
Kentucky
Kentucky UST
4
30
TestAmerica Buffalo
Kentucky
State Program
4
90029
TestAmerica Buffalo
Louisiana
NELAC
6
02031
TestAmerica Buffalo
Maine
State Program
1
NY0044
TestAmerica Buffalo
Maryland
State Program
3
294
TestAmerica Buffalo
Massachusetts
State Program
1
M-NY044
TestAmerica Buffalo
Michigan
State Program
5
9937
TestAmerica Buffalo
Minnesota
NELAC
5
036-999-337
TestAmerica Buffalo
New Hampshire
NELAC
1
2337
TestAmerica Buffalo
New Hampshire
NELAC
1
68-00281
TestAmerica Buffalo
New Jersey
NELAC
2
NY455
TestAmerica Buffalo
New York
NELAC
2
10026
TestAmerica Buffalo
North Dakota
State Program
8
R-176
TestAmerica Buffalo
Oklahoma
State Program
6
9421
TestAmerica Buffalo
Oregon
NELAC
10
NY200003
TestAmerica Buffalo
Pennsylvania
NELAC
3
68-00281
TestAmerica Buffalo
Tennessee
State Program
4
TN02970
TestAmerica Buffalo
Texas
NELAC
6
T104704412-08-TX
TestAmerica Buffalo
USDA
USDA
TestAmerica Buffalo
Virginia
NELAC Secondary AB
3
460185
TestAmerica Buffalo
Virginia
State Program
3
278
TestAmerica Buffalo
Washington
State Program
10
C1677
TestAmerica Buffalo
Wisconsin
State Program
5
998310390
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
P330-08-00242
Accreditation may not be offered or required for all methods and analytes reported in this package. Please contact your project manager for the laboratory's
current list of certified methods and analytes.
Page 13 of 17
3
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Method Summary
1
2
Method
Method Description
Protocol
Laboratory
8260B
TCLP Volatiles
SW846
TAL BUF
8082
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography
SW846
TAL BUF
Moisture
Percent Moisture
EPA
TAL BUF
Protocol References:
3
4
5
6
EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 14 of 17
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
Sample Summary
1
2
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Matrix
480-12274-1
TS-OC-0/0-05
Solid
Collected
Received
11/02/11 11:40
11/03/11 09:30
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 15 of 17
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/15/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 16 of 17
11/15/2011
1
Login Sample Receipt Checklist
2
Client: Science Applications International Corp
Job Number: 480-12274-1
Login Number: 12274
List Source: TestAmerica Buffalo
List Number: 1
3
4
5
Creator: Wienke, Robert
6
Question
Answer
Comment
Radioactivity either was not measured or, if measured, is at or below
background
True
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
True
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
tampered with.
True
8
Samples were received on ice.
True
Cooler Temperature is acceptable.
True
9
Cooler Temperature is recorded.
True
COC is present.
True
COC is filled out in ink and legible.
True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information.
True
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
True
There are no discrepancies between the sample IDs on the containers and
the COC.
True
Samples are received within Holding Time.
True
Sample containers have legible labels.
True
Containers are not broken or leaking.
True
Sample collection date/times are provided.
True
Appropriate sample containers are used.
True
Sample bottles are completely filled.
True
Sample Preservation Verified
True
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
MS/MSDs
True
VOA sample vials do not have headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4") in
diameter.
True
If necessary, staff have been informed of any short hold time or quick TAT
needs
True
Multiphasic samples are not present.
True
Samples do not require splitting or compositing.
True
Sampling Company provided.
True
Samples received within 48 hours of sampling.
True
Samples requiring field filtration have been filtered in the field.
N/A
Chlorine Residual checked.
N/A
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
SAIC
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 17 of 17
11/15/2011
APPENDIX E
COMPLETED BOOM INSPECTION FORMS
APPENDIX F
PHOTOGRAPHS OF TREE REMOVAL ACTIVITIES
Fig. F-1: Tying off fallen tree in preparation for cutting. Picture taken 12/9/2011.
Fig F-2: Preparing to cut the branches from the fallen tree. Picture take 12/9/2011.
Fig. F-3: Tree branch secured to boat to be towed to lower bulkhead. Picture taken 12/9/11.
Fig. F-4: Towing cut branches to the lower bulkhead. Picture taken 12/9/11.
Fig. F-5: Lifting the cut branches from Newtown Creek with a grapple truck. Picture taken
12/9/2011.
Fig. F-6: Cut tree branches awaiting disposition onsite. Picture taken 12/9/2011.
January 31, 2011
Plates
5
4
1
2
"
´
ARW-7
1.04
Legend
2
ARW-12
-1 -5.12
"
´
"
´
4
AMW-10
-0.54
5
-1
AMW-9
"
2.25 ´
"
´
(CMW) Texaco Monitoring Well
AOW-10
"
´
ExxonMobil and BP Monitoring Wells
"
´
(CMW-R,MW-R, PW-R) Texaco Recovery Well
"
´
(RW) ExxonMobil and BP Recovery Wells
"
´
Not Gauged
XÏ
(NC) Newtown Creek Gauging Location
3
"
´
" ARW-3
´
-1 -8.26
AMW-12
-0.58
"
´
ARW-13
-3.94
ARW-11
-6.16
AMW-8
" -0.14
AMW-19
-0.61
´
"
´
"
´
GE
WA
TER
STRMW-59
EET
-1.8
"
´
-2.96
"
´
"
´
0
ET
-3
-3
"
´
MW-40
-1.42
-4
-4
"
´
MW-93
IC
K
ST
"
´
RW-C
-3.97
"
´
MW-25
-0.09
´
MW-116
2.33
MW-113
MW-119
MW-24
1.25
1.1
"
´
"
´
"
´
MW-117
1.18
MW-35
1.6
MW-7
-0.19
"
´
MW-99
0.35
"
´
Former ExxonMobil Properties
MW-22
1.4
"
´
"
´
RW-K
-6.73
THO
-5
MW-23
2.46
MW-97
0.83
AV
E
REE
MW-36
-1.02
ER
EE
K
M
T
-3
-2
T
4
BRO
Q
YN
OK L
U EE
NS
5
8
14
9
-1
T
REE
MW-16
-1.2
"
´
MW-30
0.7
0
S TR
EET
MORGAN
185
370
MW-100
-1.41
740
SCALE IN FEET
NU
AVE
10
E
AVENUE
STREET
UE
T
WAR
STE
SUTTON
ND AVEN
"
´
WAY
ESS
R
P
EX
ICK
VAR
KINGSLA
ST
RRY
CHE
"
´
MW-4
-2.46
MW-20
16.82
MW-91
2.75
´
T
NOTE:
1.) The location of CMW wells obtained from surveys conducted by
Borbas Surveying for Texaco. All non-CMW well locations
provided by ExxonMobil or BP.
2.) Well identifiers are included on maps only if data for well is
available.
3.) This regional gauging event was coordinated among
ExxonMobil, BP and Texaco personnel to gauge tidally
influenced wells within an hour of the projected high tide at
approximately 13:08 PM.
4.) Within the tidally influenced zone on the Former Parargon
and Apollo sites, the wells were gauged at approximately at
high tide (~13:08 PM)
5.) ExxonMobil monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-64 as well as
Texaco monitoring wells CMW-19D, CMW-23D, CMW-25D,
CMW-60D, and CMW-62D are screened in the deeper
semi-confined aquifer of the Paragon and Apollo St. sites and
are not considered in this interpretation.
REE
"
´
"
´
ST
MA S
K ST
RW-L
-4.14
"MW-39
´
"
´
RW-F
-1.82
MW-61
-0.41
"
´
MW-28
-0.95
IC
VAR
-3
N STREE
HA U S M A
"
´
"
´
-1
"
´
"
´
-3
1
11
12
"
´
Currently BP Terminal
E
RW-E
ER ´
"-´
"
EK
4 -4.9
EMW-29
M
-2
-0.71
E
RW-A
-4.84
MW-31
-2.28
MW-60
-0.22
NU
AVE
TREET
10
"
´
AV
U
EN
"
´
MW-111
2.86
Former Paragon Oil
MW-115
1.82
MW-3
"
-0.1 ´
2
T
WAR
STE
MW-15
-2.5
MW-112
STREET
S
APOLLO
"
´
"
´
RW-D
-3 -4.59
"
´
-4
VAN DAM
9
"
´
RW-I
-3.17
ExxonMobil Off-Site PlumeREET
-3
"
´
-2
-3
8
-4
MW-90
-1.59
VA
R
MW-RWB
"
´
´
Apollo Street Site
MW-118
2.89
"
´
-4
RW-24 P RW-24 W
-4.65
-9.44
ENUE
NASSAU AV
"
´
RW-G
MW-62
2.45
NC-2
RW-J
-4.96
ENUE
´
CMW-26
-0.83
CMW-1
3.7
CMW-2
1.75
CMW-27
0.8
"
´
"
´
E
-2
NASSAU AV
MW-63
3.54
´
1
N
U
6
7
"
´
"
´
MW-38
-2.14
MW-37
-2.56
"
´
"
´
´
"
´
MW-14
3.46
"
´
-6
-5
STREET
E
"
´
"
MW-27 ´
-1.5
"
´
-2
"
´
-2.51
"
´
3
CMW-30
-1.3
0
RE
VARICK ST
HAUSMAN
5
D AVENU
TREET
AVENUE
S
SUTTON
N
KINGSLA
-3
CMW-6
-1.32
RW-H
-2.95
"
´
-2
-5 RW-23
-7.19
"
´
CMW-50
CMW-15
3.25
MW-107
" 2.8
´
CMW-28
4.46
2 1
TREET
1
CMW-31
-1.62
"
´
"
´
" CMW-29S
´
2.93
4
2
"
´
"
´
Former Paragon Oil
Terminal Site
CMW-5
-0.41
-1.58
MW-34
-1.6
MW-64
´
"
"´
´
RW-26 W
RW-22
-5.04
-4
"
´
CMW-32
2.08
" CMW-61
´
RW-26 P
-2.01
CMW-4
2.45
"
´
"
´
"
´
CMW-14
2.93
SW
AY
CMW-33
1.34
Well Identifier and Groundwater Elevation
(Feet AMSL)
ES
"
´
MW-58
-1.59
"
´
MW-2
"
´
"
´
"
´
"
´
CMW-1
3.36
CMW-13
1.68
PR
BR
ID
CMW-25S
2
CMW-46 CMW-47S
CMW-24S -1.19 ´
" -1.01
-1.28 ´
"
"´
" CMW-60S
´
MW-78 ´
" Dry
-1.42
CMW-10
" -1.53
´
M O RG A N
"
´
CMW-36D
-2.02
S
VAN DAM
4
MW-92
6.38
CMW-62S
-1.52 ´
"
Interpreted Groundwater Flow Direction
MW-66
-0.59
"
´
MW-77
" 0.36 CMW-9
´
" 1.29
´
CMW-35
"
-1.48 ´
MW-5
-1.6
CMW-57
"
´
-0.65
-2 ´
" ´
"´
" ´
"
CMW-8
" 1.08
´
CMW-34S
"
´
1.15
-2
TREET
"
´
CMW-12
-1.09
CMW-18
-1.44
RW-25
-2.75
-1
CMW-56
CMW-54 0
MW-76
0.02
0.88 ´
"
-1
-2 CMW-36S
"´
" -1.83
´
S
APOLLO
-3
"
´
"
´
"
´
CMW-37
"
-1.16 ´
MW-26
-1.61
"
´
" CMW-38
´
0.74
CMW-45
-1.07
"´
´
"
CMW-53R
-7.62
EX
"
´
"
´
CMW-44
-1.22
-2
MW-9
Dry
"
´
MW-57
-1.63
MW-33
-1.72
RW-21
-3.1
MW-75R
-3.75
Groundwater Contour (Feet AMSL)
MW-67
-0.78
NS
"
´
CMW-49
-1.62
"
´
CMW-59R
" -0.78
´
"
´
UE
E
"
´
CMW-19S
" -0.55
´
MW-32
-1.33
Apollo Street
Site
"
´
MW-74R
-2.19
"
´
"0
´
-Q
"
´
"
´
CMW-39
1.21
"
"´
´
"
´
"´
´
"
Inferred Groundwater Contour (Feet AMSL)
MW-68R
-8.47
O
KL
YN
MW-105
-1.63
MW-106
-1.46
"
´
MW-69
-1.23
MW-70R
-4.31
BR
O
ST
"
´
"
´
AMW-3
-1.45
-1
"
´
"
´
-4
AMW-1
2.34
MW-95
3.09
ARW-5
-8.01
CMW-21
"
1.61 ´
MW-72
0.03
PW-2R
-0.78
2
"
´
ARW-9
-2.16
"
´
"
´
CMW-64R
"´
-1 ´
""
´
Groundwater Contour (Feet AMSL)
CMW-58
-1.76
CMW-63R
-0.96
2
MW-81
6.29
AMW-20
-1.44
"
´
CMW-22
-0.73
CMW-55
-0.65 CMW-23S
-0.54
1
"
´
3
"
´
AGP-8
19.68
AOW-8
-1.34
"
-2 ´
RIMW-01
1.99 ´
"
CMW-20
" -0.53
´
-2
"
´
"
´
"
´
RIMW-02
2.01
"
´
MW-56
-0.72
CMW-17R
-1.46 CMW-43R
-3.59
"
´
3
"
´
AGP-7
3.81
AMW-21
-1.56
"
´
RE
4
AMW-2
-1.22
-3
"
´
"
´
AOW-4
7.08
"
´
MW-88S
3.5
AMW-4
-0.89
3
5
AGP-6
" Dry
´
"
´
6
CMW-40
3 ´
"
MW-73R
-0.67
CMW-42
-0.75
-1
AGP-5
7.66 ´
"
AMW-22
-1.06
1
"
´
MW-88D
" -0.57
"´
´
2
PW-1R
-2.09
CMW-16
-0.78
-2
2
"
´
"
´
1 2
"
´
AMW-6
0.1
"
´
"
´
MW-1
"3
3.27 ´
AOW-7
-0.46
CMW-41S
-0.69
-1
1
0
ARW-1
-1.13
AMW-5
2.37
"
´
BP Terminal
AGP-3
2.67
AGP-4
2.62 ´
"
AOW-3A
1.82 ´
"
0
ET
"
´
"
´
AOW-11 ´
"
-0.63
ARW-8
-1.43 ´
"
0
-3
"
´
0
1
ARW-4
-4.08 ´
"
AOW-3
1.98
O
AGP-2
Dry
AOW-9
-0.51
-1
-2
LL
AMW-7
0.32 0
-1
"
´
ARW-6
-7.74
AP
O
"
´
"
´
-2
´
AOW-6
-0.42
-1
"
´
AGP-1
AOW-1A
7.02
-2.19
-2
ARW-10
" -6.47
´
NEWTOWN CREEK
6
-1
0
2.05
"
´
"
´
"
´
1 ARW-2
"
´
3
MW-98
4.96
"
´
ANT
H ON
Y
EE
S TR
T
N
AVE
7
ENUE
DRIGGS AV
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR MAP
December 7, 2011
MW-18
4.55
TE R
PO R
15
16
6
UE
RD
MB A
Y ST
R EE
T
checked
date 01/04/2012
date
job no.
initials
T
OOR
"
´
MW-19
16.63
LO
ERV
S
E
D
VAN
N
AVE
UE
N
LY
EN
PR
13
GAN
MO R
N
AVE
K
OO
R
B
E
QU
EX
AY
W
S
S
drawn LAB
26011A045A
date
JAK
01/06/2012
approved
date
01/16/2012
file no.
revision
PJC
Dec_2011_GW
plate no.
1
UE
AOW-3
1.94
AOW-9
0.18
!
«
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
ARW-4
0.34
AOW-11
3.71
!
+
!
µ
AOW-3A
ARW-8
AMW-5
0.03
!
µ
!
µ
BP Terminal Site
CMW-41S
!
µ
² CMW-41D
MW-1
!
µ
! MW-88D
²
!
µ
MW-88S
AOW-7
0.07
!
+
CMW-16
CMW-55
RIMW-02
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
CMW-22
!
µ
CMW-43R
!
µ
CMW-20
0.81
!
µ
AMW-2
0.97
AMW-20
0.09
!
µ
CMW-39
0.09
Apollo Street
Site
AMW-21
0.78
!
µ
!
µ
MW-72
!
µ
CMW-59R
!
CMW-53R µ
!
µ
MW-70R
CMW-37
!
µ
0.46
!
µ
CMW-12
0.05
!
µ
CMW-58
0.21
MW-69
! 0.08
µ
MW-67
!
µ
0.29 MW-66
! µ
µ
MW-68R
!
!
µ
CMW-57
0.26
!
µ
!
µ
CMW-25S
!
µ
² CMW-25D
MW-76
CMW-34S
0.68
! CMW-34D
µ
²
CMW-8
1.37
!
µ
!
µ
CMW-33
3.03
!
µ
!
µ
CMW-13
MW-2
!
µ
MW-57
0.35
CMW-18
2.03
!
µ
MW-77
2.6
!
µ
CMW-44
1.17
!
µ
!
µ
CMW-35
1.99
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
CMW-9
!
µ
CMW-24S
! CMW-46
!
²µ
CMW-24D µ
!
µ
MW-78
! CMW-60D
²
0.2
CMW-62S
!
²
1.27 µ
CMW-62D
MW-58
! 1.8
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
CMW-4
!
µ
NC-2
CMW-15
MW-63
!
µ
RW-G µ
!
MW-118
MW-62
Former Paragon Oil
Terminal Site
"
´
!
µ
CMW-10
! 3.24
µ
!
µ
RW-26 P
0.48
!
«
!
+
!
MW-59 µ
RW-26 W
0.15
!
µ
"
´
MW-64
CMW-32
! CMW-61
µ
0.84
MW-5
0.12
CMW-14
"
´
CMW-47S
!
µ
² CMW-47D
MW-26
CMW-36S
RW-25
! µ
!
² 3.04
1.46 µ
CMW-36D
2.86
RW-21
1.9
!
²
!
µ
MW-33
0.41
CMW-49
0.88
CMW-63R
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
+
CMW-45
0.27
!
µ
MW-105
0.7
PW-2R
!
µ
CMW-19S
!
µ
² CMW-19D
MW-32
0.54
AMW-3
0.53
MW-106
0.5
!
+
!
²µ
CMW-56 µ
!
µ
!µ
µ
!
MW-74R CMW-54
CMW-38
0.07
!
«
!
µ
CMW-23D
MW-75R
ARW-9
0.34
!
µ
ARW-5
0.78
CMW-21
!
µ
AOW-8
0.39
CMW-23S
PW-1R
!µ
µ
!
!
µ
CMW-64R ´
!
"
+
!
µ
AOW-4
MW-73R
CMW-17R
RIMW-01
!
«
0.01
MW-56
1.24
AMW-4
2.89
!
µ
CMW-42
CMW-40
!
µ
!
µ
!
+
NOTE:
Legend
1.) PSH- Phase Separated Hydrocarbon
Monitoring, Observation, Recovery, and Sump Wells
2.) PSH Thickness values are in Feet and
represent in-well thicknesses and not formation thicknesses.
!
+
No PSH Measured and No Well Construction Information Available
3.) The location of CMW and PW wells obtained from surveys
!
µ
No PSH Measured, Water Level Within Screened Interval
conducted by Borbas Surveying for Texaco.
All non-CMW or PW well locations provided by ExxonMobil
!
²
No PSH Measured and Water Level is Above Screened Interval
or BP.
!
«
PSH Measured and No Well Construction Information Available
4.) Recovery wells (PW-1R, PW-2R, CMW-43R, CMW-53R,
MW-68R, MW-70R, MW-73R, MW-74R, and MW-75R)
!
¡
Only PSH Measured, Water Not Detected
are actively recovering PSH and groundwater with total
!
²
PSH and Water Level Measured Above the Screened Interval
fluids recovery pumps, where the fluid level in each
well under pumping conditions is generally maintained at the
!
µ
PSH Measured and Water Level is Within Screened Interval
pump intake. This condition allows for the immediate removal
"
´
Not Gauged, Dec. 2011
of PSH as it enters the well and does not allow PSH to
accumulate in the well. Therefore, these wells are coded red.
PSH Extent, Dec. 2011
5.) Recovery wells (CMW-17R, CMW-59R and CMW-63R) are
Apollo Street Site
actively recovering groundwater with total fluids recovery pumps.
However, prior to their conversion to recovery wells,
Former Paragon Oil
PSH was generally not present in the wells. Therefore,
Currently BP AmocoTerminal
these wells are coded green.
6.) Monitoring wells (CMW-23S, CMW-55, and CMW-56) would
have measurable PSH thicknesses if not for the nearby recovery
wells. Therefore, they are considered part of the PSH extent,
despite the absence of measurable PSH thicknesses in these wells.
MW-112
!
µ
!
µ
MW-107
MW-115
MW-111
MW-3
1.44
CMW-5
!
µ
CMW-29S
!
µ
² CMW-29D
!
µ
CMW-1
CMW-31
0.17
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
CMW-6
!
µ
CMW-28
MW-25
1.48
CMW-2
1.58
!
µ
MW-29
!
µ
MW-34
0.9
"
´
MW-113
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
! RW-E
µ
1.64
MW-60
1.4
CMW-30
0.17
!
µ
MW-116
MW-27
!
µ
RW-F
1.07
CMW-27
!
µ
!
µ
MW-119
!
µ
!
µ
MW-24
CMW-26
RW-H
2.5
!
µ
!
µ
MW-61
Trace
MW-117
MW-35
1.05
!
µ
!
µ
ExxonMobil Off-Site Plume
MW-90
0.95
MW-40
0.38
!
µ
RW-22
0.91
RW-D
1.22
!
µ
RW-I
1.12
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
RW-23
2.88
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
MW-7
MW-99
!
µ
MW-22
MW-93
!
µ
CMW-50
1.04
RW-J
2.1
!
µ
MW-37
1.09
!
µ
!
µ
MW-38
2
!
µ
"
´
MW-RWB
MW-28
0.32
!
µ
RW-24 P
!
µ
!
1.07 ²
!
µ
MW-23
0
75
RW-C
3.72
!
µ
!
µ
RW-24 W
150
300
SCALE IN FEET
MW-97
MW-15
1.71
!
µ
PSH Thickness and Extent
December 7, 2011
RW-A
1.3
!
µ
RW-K
1.58
"
´
!
µ
MW-31
1.25
MW-36
0.45
!
µ
!
µ
drawn LAB
checked
date
date
01/03/2012
job no.
initials
26011A045A
date
JAK
01/04/2012
MW-4
approved
date
PJC
plate no.
01/16/2012
2
file no.
revision
Dec_2011_PSH_Thick.mxd
!
+
!
«
!
+
!
«
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
«
!
²
!
+
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
²
!!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
+
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
«
!
µ
!µ
µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
+ !
!µ
µ
²
!+ µ
µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!µ
µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
«
+
!!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!µ
µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
PSH Extent 1st Quarter 2011
March 18, 2011
!
µ
PSH Extent 2nd Quarter 2010
June 29, 2011
"
´
Not Gauged
Former Paragon Oil
!
+
!
«
"
´
"
´
NOTE:
1.) PSH- Phase Separated Hydrocarbon
2.) PSH Thickness values are in Feet and
represent in-well thicknesses and not formation thicknesses.
3.) The location of CMW and PW wells obtained from surveys
conducted by Borbas Surveying for Texaco.
All non-CMW or PW well locations provided by ExxonMobil
or BP.
4.) Recovery wells (PW-1R, PW-2R, CMW-43R, CMW-53R,
MW-68R, MW-70R, MW-73R, MW-74R, and MW-75R)
are actively recovering PSH and groundwater with total
fluids recovery pumps, where the fluid level in each
well under pumping conditions is generally maintained at the
pump intake. This condition allows for the immediate removal
of PSH as it enters the well and does not allow PSH to
accumulate in the well. Therefore, these wells are coded red.
5.) Recovery wells (CMW-17R, CMW-59R and CMW-63R) are
actively recovering groundwater with total fluids recovery pumps.
However, prior to their conversion to recovery wells,
PSH was generally not present in the wells. Therefore,
these wells are coded green.
6.) Monitoring wells (CMW-23S, CMW-55, and CMW-56) would
have measurable PSH thicknesses if not for the nearby recovery
wells. Therefore, they are considered part of the PSH extent,
despite the absence of measurable PSH thicknesses in these wells.
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
"
´
!
µ
PSH and Water Level Measured Above the Screened Interval
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
"
´
!
¡
PSH Extent
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
«
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
Apollo Street Site
!
µ
!
µ
!
²
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!µ
µ
!
"
´
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
"
´
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
«
!!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
+
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
²
!
µ
!
²
!µ
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
! µ
µ
!µ
! µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!µ
µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
+ !
!µ
µ
²
!+ µ
µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!µ
µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
«
!
µ
!
µ
!
²
!
µ
!
²
!µ
µ
!
²
!
µ
!
+
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
+
²
!!
µ
!
«
! µ
µ
!µ
! µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
+
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
«
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
Legend
!
²
!
+
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
«
!
µ
!
µ
!
+
!
«
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
«
!
+
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
"
´
"
´
"
´
"
´
"
´
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
"
´
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
+
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!µ
µ
!
!
!
" µ
´
+
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
+ !
!
µ
²µ
!+ µ
µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!µ
µ
!
!
µ
!
²
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
²
!
µ
!
²
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
²
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!µ
µ
!
!
µ
!
²
µ
!µ
µ
!
!
²
µ
!µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
0
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!µ
µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
+
!«
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
²
!
µ
!
²
!µ
µ
!
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
! µ
µ
!µ
! µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
SCALE IN FEET
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
2011 Quarterly
PSH Extent
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
drawn LAB
checked
date
date
01/10/2012
job no.
initials
!
µ
!
µ
PSH Extent 3rd Quarter 2010
September 13, 2011
!
µ
PSH Extent 4th Quarter 2010
December 7, 2011
680
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
340
!
µ
!
µ
"
´
170
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
! !
+
!µ
µ
²
!+ µ
µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
+
"
´
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!µ
µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
«
!
µ
!
µ
!
«
!
µ
«
+
!!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
²
!
µ
!
²
!µ
µ
!
²
!µ
µ
!
²
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
+
!
+
"
´
! µ
µ
!µ
! µ
!
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
²
!
!²
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
²
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
!
+
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
«
!
µ
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
!
+
!
µ
"
´
"
´
!
«
!
µ
!
µ
!
+
!
!²
µ
"
´
"
´
!
µ
!
²
µ
"
´
"
´
!
µ
!
µ
26011A045A
date
JAK
01/10/2012
approved
date
PJC
plate no.
01/16/2012
3
file no.
revision
2011_PSH_extent
AOW-3
1.94
AOW-9
0.18
Location ID: CMW‐41S Sample ID: CMW‐41S‐0/0‐01
Date & Time: !
«
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
ARW-4
0.34
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
!
+
!4.7U
µ
4.7U
!
µ
BP Terminal Site
Sample ID: Date & Time: 140
13
20U
7.4J
7.5J
4.8UJ
!
+
150
21
11
12
8.6
CMW-22
RIMW-01
!
«
0.01
CMW-21
CMW-20
0.81
AMW-20 CMW‐22‐0/0‐01
0.09
7/20/10 2:40 6/5/11 9:08
Sample ID: !
µ
Volatile Organic Compounds ARW-5
Benzene
0.78
Isopropylbenzene
!
µ
Result (ug/L)
56
11
5.6
26
10
5
m,p‐Xylene
Naphthalene
n‐Propylbenzene
Toluene
Result (ug/L)
MW-105
120.7
!
µ
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds Naphthalene
Location ID: CMW‐19D
Sample ID: CMW‐19D‐0/0‐01
Date & Time: !
µ
Volatile Organic Compounds CMW-49
Benzene
0.88
4U
MW-106
0.5
CMW-44
1.17
!
µ
MW-33
0.41
Sample ID: CMW‐19S‐0/0‐01
!
µ
MW-26
7/20/2010 2:45 2011
Date & Time: Result (ug/L)
Volatile Organic Compounds Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Isopropylbenzene
m,p‐Xylene
n‐Butylbenzene
n‐Propylbenzene
Toluene
460
32
130
39J
15J
140
28
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds CMW-37
!
µ
0.46
PW-2R
!
+ CMW-63R
!
²µ
CMW-56 µ
!
+
!
µ
!
µ
!µ
µ
MW-72
!
MW-74R CMW-54
0.42J
0.4J
!
µ
CMW-59R
0.94J
0.65J
0.99J
0.95J
0.49J
0.83J
Date & Time: 7/23/10 9:35 6/5/11 12:15
Volatile Organic Compounds Result (ug/L)
Methyl tert‐Butyl Ether
8.8
25
4.7U
4.7U
4.7U
7/23/10 10:00 6/5/11 10:25
Result (ug/L)
CMW-58
! 0.21
µ
! MW-69
MW-70R µ
! 0.08
µ
MW-67
!
µ
0.29
! µ
µ
MW-68R
!
!
µ
CMW-57
MW-66
0.26
!
µ
CMW-12
0.05
2.5
1U
Location ID: MW‐64
Sample ID: MW‐64‐0/0‐01
Date & Time: Volatile Organic Compounds Sample ID: RIMW‐01‐0/0‐01
Benzene
!
µ
Ethylbenzene
Isopropylbenzene
n‐Butylbenzene
n‐Propylbenzene
CMW-36S
RW-25
sec‐Butylbenzene
! µ
!
² 3.04
1.46 µ
Toluene
CMW-36D
2.86
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds NS
NS
NS
NS RW-21
1.9
NS
!
µ
NS
NS
Chrysene
360
8.4
63
6.9
37
8
8.3
CMW-8
1.37
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
CMW-9
CMW‐14
Sample ID: CMW‐14‐0/0‐01
!
µ
5U
!
µ
MW-64
CMW-15
!
µ
CMW-32
MW-63
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
CMW-29S
!
µ
² CMW-29D
CMW‐15
7/26/10 10:00 6/5/11 10:15
Result (ug/L)
5U
2.8
RW-G µ
!
CMW-6
!
µ
CMW-28
"
´
Result (ug/L)
MW-3
1.44 4.8J
MW-112
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
MW-29
1.4
MW-60
1.4
CMW-30
0.17
RW-E
Benzene
1.64
Isopropylbenzene
n‐Butylbenzene
n‐Propylbenzene RW-F
1.07
Toluene
!
µ
!
µ
MW-27
!
µ
CMW-27
!
µ
!
µ
81
35
5.3
46
8.6
MW-119
CMW-26
!
µ
MW-61
Trace
Date & Time: MW-35
1.05
"
´
29
38
8
50
7.8
MW-113
MW-24
!
µ
MW-117
7/22/10 11:30 2011
Result (ug/L)
1.5
NS
2011
Result (ug/L)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Result (ug/L)
1.3J
0.54J
1.4J
88
NS
NS
NS
NS
Date & Time: ExxonMobil Off-Site Plume
7/27/10 2:35 7/19/11 9:05
RW-23
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene 2.88
!
µ
Isopropylbenzene
m,p‐Xylene
CMW-50
1.04
n‐Propylbenzene
!
µ
o‐Xylene
Toluene
Result (ug/L)
1900J
NS
18
35
16
40
6.6
31
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds Result (ug/L)
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Naphthalene
0.37J
4.7U
0.39J
4.7U
970
30
30
57
NS
NS
NS
40
MW-15
1.71
!
µ
RW-J
2.1
Volatile Organic Compounds !
µ
Date & Time: MW-37
1.09 Benzene
!
µ
0.46J
0.38J
0.64J
11
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
!
µ
!
µ
!
µ
15J
1.3
12
21
Location ID: Result (ug/L)
0.35J
4.8U
Acenaphthene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Sample ID: 4.8U
0.33J
CMW‐24S‐0/0‐01
Date & Time: Volatile Organic Compounds 7/28/10 8:30 6/15/11 10:10
Result (ug/L)
8.2J
1300J
NS
25
19
35
91
29
30
9.9J
19
NS
5.2
780
24
59
12
19
74
6
18
5U
14
14
CMW‐9
Sample ID: CMW‐9‐0/0‐01
Date & Time: CMW‐46
7/22/10 9:25 2011
CMW‐46‐0/0‐01
7/28/10 7:15 6/15/11 12:25
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Isopropylbenzene
m,p‐Xylene
m‐Dichlorobenzene
MW-28
0.32
!
µ
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
n‐Butylbenzene
RW-C
n‐Propylbenzene
3.72
p‐Cymene
!
µ
Toluene
Result (ug/L)
19
10U
620J
48
10U
24
130
10U
10U
10U
11
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds Result (ug/L)
0.89J 4.7U
26
120
9.6
2100
190
14
240
5U
32
18
21
44
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds 9.6U
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds CMW‐47D
MW-31
1.25
MW-36
0.45
!
µ
!
µ
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Volatile Organic Compounds 1,2,4‐Trimethylbenzene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
m,p‐Xylene
o‐Xylene
Toluene
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds Benzo(a)anthracene
Indeno(1,2,3‐cd)pyrene
7/28/10 7:10 2011
Result (ug/L)
68
1500
20
57
36
93
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Result (ug/L)
1.2J
1.3J
NS
NS
!
µ
MW-23
0
75
150
300
SCALE IN FEET
77MW-97
NS
CMW‐26
CMW‐26‐0/0‐01
7/28/10 9:10 7/28/10 12:00 6/16/11 20:00 6/16/11 20:00
Volatile Organic Compounds 7/21/10 1:55 6/4/11 10:15
!
µ
CMW‐27‐0/0‐01
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compunds Standard (ug/L)
1,1'‐Biphenyl
5
2,4‐Dichlorophenol
5
2,4‐Dimethylphenol
50
2,4‐Dinitrophenol
10
2,4‐Dinitrotoluene
5
2,6‐Dinitrotoluene
5
2‐Chloronaphthalene
10
2‐Nitroaniline
5
3,3'‐Dichlorobenzidine
5
3‐Nitroaniline
5
4‐Chloroaniline
5
4‐Nitroaniline
5
Acenaphthene
20
Anthracene
50
Atrazine
7.5
Benzo(a)anthracene
0.002
0.002
0.002
Bis(2‐chloroethoxy)methane
5
Bis(2‐chloroethyl)ether
1
Bis(2‐chloroisopropyl) ether
5
Bis(2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate
5
50
Chrysene
0.002
Diethyl phthalate
50
Dimethyl phthalate
50
Di‐n‐butyl phthalate
50
Di‐n‐octyl phthalate
50
Fluoranthene
50
Fluorene
50
Hexachlorobenzene
0.04
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.5
5
Hexachloroethane
5
0.002
Isophorone
50
Naphthalene
10
Nitrobenzene
0.4
N‐Nitrosodiphenylamine
50
Phenanthrene
50
Pyrene
50
!
µ
Sample ID: Location ID: 72
200
Sample ID: MW-22
0.32J
25
Benzene
CMW‐27
410
9.5J
13
14J
10U
12
6.7J
Result (ug/L)
Naphthalene
Location ID: Volatile Organic Compounds RW-K
1.58
10
1U
4.8
2.4
NS
1U
NS
0.71J
1U
6.9
1.2
1.4
190
130
4800
900
41
970
230
61
36
5.2
100
!
µ
Location ID: 1500
4J
24
11
8
36
10
Result (ug/L)
Chrysene
Date & Time: 24
0.36J
0.31J
Result (ug/L)
78
10
25
12J
10U
10U
10U
7.2J
8.8J
34
5.1J
9.9J
Result (ug/L)
1,2,4‐Trimethylbenzene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Isopropylbenzene
m,p‐Xylene
Naphthalene
n‐Propylbenzene
o‐Xylene
p‐Cymene
Toluene
7/21/10 1:05 6/4/11 11:05
Volatile Organic Compounds 1,2,4‐Trimethylbenzene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Isopropylbenzene
m,p‐Xylene
Naphthalene
n‐Propylbenzene
o‐Xylene
Toluene
Naphthalene
Result (ug/L)
60
0.39J
4.9U
CMW‐32‐0/0‐01
Volatile Organic Compounds Location ID: MW-99
Date & Time: CMW‐32
Sample ID: 1,2,4‐Trimethylbenzene
Benzene
cis‐1,2‐Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
Isopropylbenzene
m,p‐Xylene
Naphthalene
n‐Propylbenzene
o‐Xylene
Toluene
Vinyl Chloride
Location ID: 7/28/10 9:50 6/15/11 11:40
CMW‐24S
Volatile Organic Compounds MW-7
Sample ID: Location ID: Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds RW-A
1.3
!
µ
MW-93
"
´
"
´
MW-RWB
RW-24 W
RW-D
1.22
!
µ
!
µ
Date & Time: !
µ
MW-40
0.38
RW-I
1.12
MW-38
2
RW-24 P
!
µ
!
1.07 ²
MW-90
0.95
!
µ
MW-115
Volatile Organic Compunds
Standard (ug/L)
1,1,1‐Trichloroethane
5
1,1,2,2‐Tetrachloroethane
5
1,1,2‐Trichloro‐1,2,2‐trifluoroethane
5
1,1,2‐Trichloroethane
1
1,1‐Dichloroethane
5
MW-116
1,1‐Dichloroethene
5
!
µ
1,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene
5
5
1,2‐Dibromo‐3‐chloropropane
0.04
1,2‐Dibromoethane (EDB)
0.0006
1,2‐Dichlorobenzene
3
1,2‐Dichloroethane
0.6
1,2‐Dichloropropane
1
5
3
3
2‐Butanone (MEK)
50
2‐Hexanone
50
Acetone
50
Benzene
1
50
Bromoform
50
Bromomethane
5
Carbon disulfide
60
5
Chlorobenzene
5
Chloroethane
5
Chloroform
7
Chloromethane
5
5
cis‐1,3‐Dichloropropene
0.4
50
5
Ethylbenzene
5
Isopropylbenzene
5
m,p‐Xylenes
5
Methylene Chloride
5
Methyl‐t‐Butyl Ether (MTBE)
10
m‐Xylene & p‐Xylene
5
Naphthalene
10
n‐Butylbenzene
5
n‐Propylbenzene
5
o‐Xylene
5
p‐Cymene
5
sec‐Butylbenzene
5
Styrene
5
tert‐Butylbenzene
5
Tetrachloroethene
5
Toluene
5
trans‐1,2‐Dichloroethene
5
trans‐1,3‐Dichloropropene
0.4
Trichloroethene
5
5
Vinyl chloride
2
CMW‐1
CMW‐1‐0/0‐01
MW-25
Date & Time: 7/22/10 12:50 1.48
6/4/11 16:05
!
µ
Volatile Organic Compounds Result (ug/L)
!
µ
Result (ug/L)
MW-111
!
µ
CMW-2
1.58
7/26/10 1:00 6/5/11 9:05
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Isopropylbenzene
m,p‐Xylene
n‐Butylbenzene
n‐Propylbenzene
Toluene
MW-118
MW‐63
CMW-1
!
µ
210
27
150
23J
130
36
210
20
20
22
Date & Time: Volatile Organic Compounds Sample ID: !
µ
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Naphthalene
Not Gauged, Dec. 2011
CMW‐15‐0/0‐01
MW‐63‐0/0‐01
MW-107
7/23/10 10:55
! 6/5/11 11:05
µ
Location ID: RW-H
2.5
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds "
´
Sample ID: Sample ID: Benzene
CMW-5
!
µ
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
RW-22
Isopropylbenzene
0.91
m,p‐Xylene
!
µ
Naphthalene
n‐Butylbenzene
n‐Propylbenzene
p‐Cymene
sec‐Butylbenzene
Toluene
Location ID: !
µ
7/20/10 12:10
!
µ
Location ID: Volatile Organic Compounds !
µ
Volatile Organic Compounds PSH and Water Level Measured Above the Screened Interval
MW-62
Date & Time: CMW-10
!
3.24µ
!
µ
CMW-61
0.84
!
µ
Date & Time: !
²
!
µ
Former Paragon Oil
Terminal Site
MW-34
0.9
CMW‐21‐0/0‐01
0.34J
Benzene
NC-2
!
µ
Sample ID: !
¡
Result (ug/L)
Date & Time: CMW-4
!
µ
CMW‐21
0.17
Location ID: !
«
7/23/10 8:35 6/14/11 18:30
"
´
!
µ
Former Paragon Oil
Location ID: MW-2
!
²
CMW-24S
! CMW-46
!
²µ
CMW-24D µ
!
µ
MW-78
! CMW-60D
²
0.2
NS
NS
!
²
"
´
RW-26 P
0.48
!
«
!
+
!
MW-59 µ
RW-26 W
0.15
!
µ
MW-5
0.12
1U
! CMW-13
µ
CMW-33
3.03
!
µ
²
1.5J
0.35J
!
µ
Apollo Street Site
1.1
CMW-47S
CMW-47D
28
10U
44
CMW-62S
10U
!
²
1.27 µ
10U
CMW-62D
8.2J
10U
Result (ug/L)
MW-58
!
µ
4.7U 1.8
4.7U
!
µ
CMW-25S
!
µ
² CMW-25D
!
µ
7/20/10 9:45 6/4/11 11:05
CMW-35
Result (ug/L)
1.99
!
+
Result (ug/L)
CMW-14
RIMW‐01
PSH Extent, Dec. 2011
Date & Time: MW-77
2.6
!
µ
Location ID: Legend
7/22/10 2:05 6/5/11 11:45
Benzene
MW-76
CMW-34S
0.68
! CMW-34D
µ
²
Result (ug/L)
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
370
5U
5
5U
17
5U
7.8
11
CMW‐13‐0/0‐01
Result (ug/L)
Date & Time: !
CMW-53R µ
!
µ
!
µ
Volatile Organic Compounds 1.2
CMW‐19S
110
NS
5.9
5U
5.3J
19
5U
4J
Sample ID: Notes:
1.) Only samples that had at least one exceedance in 2010 or 2011
are included.
2.) Only analytes that had an exceedance in either 2010 or 2011
are shown.
3.) Yellow highlight indicates a NYSDEC Ambient Water Quality
Standard exceedance.
4.) A qualifier of "U" indicates a non-detect.
5.) A qualifier of "J" indicates an estimated value.
6.) "NS" indicates that the well was not sampled.
7.) When human health risk and aesthetic standards both exist
for groundwater, human health risk standards were used.
8.) PSH Extent and thickness is from Dec. 2011 gauging event.
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds Date & Time: !
µ
!
µ
Location ID: 79
NS
4.2J
5U
4.2J
19
5U
3J
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds CMW-23D
CMW-18
2.03
!
µ
Result (ug/L)
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Isopropylbenzene
m,p‐Xylene
o‐Xylene
Toluene
CMW‐13
!
µ
MW-57
0.35
7/21/10 8:50 6/4/11 17:00
140J
28J
Result (ug/L)
Location ID: Benzo(a)anthracene
Apollo Street
Site
2.6J
7/23/10 10:35 7/23/10 10:40 6/14/11 15:40
CMW-45
0.27
!
µ
AMW-3
0.53
!
µ
Date & Time: CMW-23S
!
µ
CMW-19S
!
µ
² CMW-19D
MW‐66‐0/0‐01
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
MW-75R
!
µ
55
9.8
8.4
29
7.5
5.2
120
32
CMW-38
0.07
MW-32
0.54
Result (ug/L)
MW-73R
!µ
PW-1R µ
!
!
µ
CMW-64R ´
!
"
+
!
µ
CMW-39
0.09
!
µ
!
µ
ARW-9
0.34 !
«
75
7.8
14
54
CMW-42
CMW-17R
!
µ
CMW-43R µ
!
MW‐66
Sample ID: Volatile Organic Compounds 96
5.5
6.7
72
Acenaphthene
Naphthalene
CMW-55
RIMW-02
Location ID: Result (ug/L)
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Naphthalene
0.38J
!
µ
AOW-8
0.39
7/21/10 9:40 6/4/11 15:40
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds !
µ
!
µ
CMW‐34D‐0/0‐01
MW-56
1.24
AMW-4
2.89
CMW‐22
Date & Time: AMW-21
0.78
Result (ug/L)
Benzo(a)anthracene
!
µ
AMW-2
Location ID: 0.97
!
µ
!
µ
Result (ug/L)
Benzene
Isopropylbenzene AOW-4
!
+
m,p‐Xylene
n‐Propylbenzene
Toluene
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds !
µ
CMW‐34D
Sample ID: Date & Time: CMW-41S
!
µ
² CMW-41D
MW-1
Location ID: 7/27/10 10:10 6/16/11 11:25
CMW-40
!
µ
7/27/10 11:30 6/17/11 10:50
Volatile Organic Compounds AMW-5
0.35J
0.03
0.35J
! MW-88D
²
!
µ
MW-88S
AOW-7
0.07
MW‐88D
!
µ
MW‐88D‐0/0‐01
Location ID: !
µ
CMW‐23S‐0/0‐01
ARW-8
AOW-3A
CMW‐23S Sample ID: 7/26/10 10:35 6/14/11 14:35
Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds AOW-11
3.71
Location ID: 16
81
Benzene
Chloroethane
Vinyl Chloride
Result (ug/L)
23J
5.6
51
62
21J
5.2
51
61
2.8
NS
NS
NS
Extent of Groundwater
Exceedances in 2010 & 2011
2.7
NS
NS
NS
"
´
drawn LAB
checked
date
date
01/10/2012
job no.
initials
26011A045A
date
JAK
1/10/2012
MW-4
approved
date
PJC
plate no.
01/16/2012
4
file no.
revision
GW chem 2010 & 2011

Former Paragon Terminal/Apollo Street Creek Parcels 2011 Annual

Transcription

Similar documents

Site Characterization Report for the Former Ithaca Gun Factory

Remedial Action Plan

Dental Chairs - US Dental Depot

online product catalog