kozmin wlkp

Transcription

kozmin wlkp

CENTRE FOR REGIONAL AND LOCAL
ANALYSES
REGIONAL
INVESTMENT
ATTRACTIVENESS
2012
Greater Poland voivodship
Dr hab. Hanna Godlewska-Majkowska, Ph. D. university
professor at the Warsaw School of Economics
Agnieszka Komor, Ph.D.
Patrycjusz Zarębski, Ph.D.
Magdalena Typa, M.A.
2012
Warsaw, October 2012
1
Regional investment attractiveness 2012
Introduction
This report has been prepared thanks to the application of results of scientific research
conducted since 2002 by the Institute of Enterprise, Collegium of Business Administration of
the Warsaw School of Economics, under the supervision of Prof. H. Godlewska-Majkowska,
Ph.D. All Authors are core members of the team that develops the methodology of calculating
regional investment attractiveness in order that important characteristics of regions are
captured as closely as possible both in general terms and from a point of view of specificity of
a given kind of business activity as well as a size of investment.
Potential investment attractiveness (PAI) indices measure the location-specific
advantages of regions. In their simplified version they are calculated for territorial units of
various levels of statistical division of the country (gminas/communes, poviats/counties,
subregions, voivodships/regions). These are PAI1 indices, which refer to the whole
regional/national economy (PAI1_GN) and selected sections: C – manufacturing industry, G
– trade and repair, I – tourism and catering, M – professional, scientific and technical services.
Besides, some indices are only calculated for voidoships on the basis of much more
characteristics available on the regional or macroregional level. This allows us to evaluate
their investment attractiveness in a much broader context. These are PAI2 indices, which are
calculated both from a general point of view and with reference to the above mentioned
sections of the economy (PAI2_C, PAI2_G, PAI2_I, PAI2_M).
What is more, real investment attractiveness ranks are used in this report, which relates
to the inflow of capital (in the form of investments) and the effects of investments considered
from a point of view of productivity and returns on the outlays previously made.
The measurements in use are subject to annual review thanks to consulting them with
foreign investor assistance institutions and direct contact to territorial self-government units as
well as organisations of entrepreneurs. A description of methodological approach to
measuring investment attractiveness of Polish regions, counties and communes can be found
online on the Web site of the Institute of Enterprise : www.sgh.waw.pl/instytuty/ip, on the
Web site of the Centre for Regional and Local Analyses, which cooperates with the Institute
of Enterprise: www.caril.edu.pl, as well as in numerous scientific publications and expert
opinions
2
1. The profile of regional economy of Greater Poland voivodship
Greater Poland voivodship is one of the economically best-developed voivodships of
Poland. It is characterised by a high concentration of foreign capital invested in Poland and
high investment outlays per capita.
The main advantages of the voivodship are:
-
its balanced economic development with a high degree of industrialisation and a high
level of technology,
-
the high potential of human resources is shaped by the presence of the best universities
in Poland (ranked in the category 1 by the Ministry of Science and Technology): the
Poznań University of Technology, the Poznań University of Economics, Poznań
Medical Univeristy, the Poznań University of Life Sciences,
-
good transport connections among others through A2 highway, which connects
Western Europe with Russia and Eastern countries, as well as good plane connections
(a domestic and international airport) and water connections (the Oder waterway),
-
Poznań is one of Poland's oldest and largest cities, it is a historical capital of the region
of Greater Poland and a important centre of industry, trade, culture, higher education
and research, it also belongs to the leading Polish cities in economic terms,
-
the voivodship was ranked high in terms of potential investment attractiveness for
almost every section of economy: industry, trade, tourism, financial intermediation,
business services and education.
3
Additional information
Chart 1. General characteristics of the economy of Greater Poland voivodship
Feature
Greater Poland voivodship
Poland
Share [%]
Market Potential
GDP per capita (PLN/person) in
2009
37,424
35,210
-
Population (persons) on 31
December 2011
3,455,477
38,538,447
9
Human Resources Potential
Higher education institutions
graduates (persons) in 2011
46,232
492,646
9.4
Secondary schools graduates
(persons) in 2011
40,426
421,724
9.6
Number of employed persons on 31
December 2011
1,350,237
13,911,203
9.7%
agriculture 13.8%
industry 34%
services 52.2%
Structure of employed persons in
2011
agriculture 12.7%
industry 30.6%
services 56.7%
Investment outlays and capital of companies with foreign capital participation in the voivodship
Investment outlays (PLN mln) in
2010
Capital of companies (PLN mln) in
2010
6,155.5
61,600.3
10
15,524.2
18,8812.4
8,2
Special economic zones (SEZs) in the voivodship
-
The Kostrzyn-Słubice SEZ, subzones: Buk, Chodzież, Krobia, Nowy Tomyśl, Przemęt, Stęszew, Swarzędz,
Wronki, Poznań(city),
The Wałbrzych SEZ, subzones: Jarocin, Kościan, Krotoszyn, Rawicz, Śrem, Września, Kalisz (city),
Leszno (city),
The Łódź SEZ, subzones: Nowe Skalmierzyce, Opatówek, Ostrzeszów, Przykona, Słupca, Koło (city),
Turek (city),
The Kamienna Góra SEZ, subzone: Ostrów Wlkp.(city)
The Słupsk SEZ, subzone: Rogoźno,
The Pomeranian SEZ, subzone: Piła (city)
Investment attractiveness
Potential investment attractiveness (location-specific
advantages evaluation)
Real investment attractiveness (economic effects
evaluation)
National economy class C
Capital-intensive industry class C
Labour-intensive industry class C
Trade class B
Tourism class C
Education class C
National economy class C
Industry class C
Trade class B
4
Tourism class C
Professional science and technical activities class C
Poviats and gminas distinguished according to the Potential Attractiveness Index for the national economy
Class A
Poznań (city), Leszno (city), Konin (city), Kalisz (city), Poznań
Poviats
Class B
Class A
Gminas**
Class B
Tarnowo Podgórne (2), Kościan (1), Leszno (1), Turek (1), Suchy Las (2),
Czarnków (1), Poznań (1), Chodzież (1), Konin (1), Piła (1), Komorniki (2),
Luboń (1), Ostrów Wielkopolski (1), Wągrowiec (1), Gniezno (1), Puszczykowo
(1), Kalisz (1), Dopiewo (2), Swarzędz (3), Słupca (1), Kórnik (3), Złotów (1),
Koło (1), Czerwonak (2), Kleszczewo (2), Kępno (3), Śrem (3), Rokietnica (2),
Przykona (2), Kleczew (3), Buk (3), Środa Wielkopolska (3), Gostyń (3)
Ostrzeszów (3), Nowy Tomyśl (3), Pobiedziska (3), Grodzisk Wielkopolski (3),
Mosina (3), Jarocin (3), Międzychód (3), Murowana Goślina (3), Rawicz (3),
Margonin (3), Oborniki (3), Wolsztyn (3), Baranów (2), Łubowo (2), Krotoszyn
(3), Stęszew (3), Kostrzyn (3), Szamotuły (3), Pniewy (3), Chodzież (2),
Pakosław (2), Kościan (2)
In 2009 Greater Poland voivodship made a contribution of 9.5% to the GDP of Poland. .
Calculated per capita, it amounted to PLN 37.424 with the average for Poland PLN 35,210.
With this result the voivodship occupies the fourth place in the country. The GDP growth rate
in the period 2003-2007 amounted to 164,1%, while the national average reached 168.5%.
In comparison with the whole country the structure of employment in the voivodship is
characterised by a relatively low share of the service sector (52.2%) whereas a share of the
agricultural and industrial sectors is respectively 13.8% and 34% (CSO, RDB 2012).
The number of inhabitants of the voivodship amounts to 3,455,477 (as of 2011), which
makes up 9% of the population of Poland. The age structure of the voivodship in 2010 was as
follows: 16.1% of the population at pre-reproductive age, 68.6% at reproductive age and
15.3% at post-reproductive age (for Poland, respectively, 15.1%, 68.1% and 16.8%). The
registered unemployment rate in the voivodship in August 2012 was 9.1%, compared to
12.4% in Poland1. The average gross monthly remuneration in enterprises sector in the first
six months of 2012 amounted to PLN 3,368.9, which is 91.4% of average remuneration in
Poland.
The main potential for human capital creation in the voivodship is constituted by 40
higher education institutions in which 159.7 thousand students study, which makes up 9.2% of
all students Poland-wide. Moreover 9.5 % of pupils of secondary schools attend technikum
schools and 11.7% vocational schools.
The regional development strategy of Greater Poland voivodship till 2020 does not
mention strategic sectors but suggests creating favourable conditions for the functioning of
companies (branches, sectors) or instruments of support. The strategy does not describe
market behaviours of business subjects nor it formulates goals whose accomplishment
requires macroeconomic solutions, legislative or fiscal changes, nor mentions goals and tasks
in the fields which cannot be subject to successful public intervention. It refers particularly to
industrial sectors and branches.
1
The unemployment rate in voivodships, subregions and poviats in August 2012 is based on the data of Central
Statistical Office.
5
Preferential conditions of conducting business activities are offered in this voivodship
i.a. by the following 5 special economic zones (in Polish: Specjalne Strefy Ekonomiczne,
hence abbreviation SSE):
-
Kostrzyńsko-Słubicka SSE (Kostrzyn-Słubice special economic zone), subzones: Buk,
Chodzież, Krobia, Nowy Tomyśl, Przemęt, Stęszew, Swarzędz, Wronki, the city of
Poznań,
-
Wałbrzyska SSE (Wałbrzych special economic zone), subzones: Jarocin, Kościan,
Krotoszyn, Rawicz, Śrem, Września, the city of Kalisz, the city of Leszno,
-
Łódzka SSE (Łódź special economic zone), subzones: Nowe Skalmierzyce, Opatówek,
Ostrzeszów, Przykona, Słupca, the city of Koło, the city of Turek,
-
Kamiennogórska SSE (Kamienna Góra special economic zone), subzone: the city of
Ostrów Wlkp,
-
Słupska SSE (Słupsk special economic zone), subzone: Rogoźno,
-
Pomorska SSE (Pomeranian special economic zone), subzone: the city of Piła.
6
2. Region’s rank in terms of investment attractiveness in Poland
Greater Poland voivodship is characterised by a very high level of universal investment
attractiveness, which demonstrates itself in its rank (Class B) according to the main potential
investment attractiveness index for the whole national economy PAI 2_GN. The region also
ranked very high in terms of potential investment attractiveness for sections: capital-intensive
industry (Class C), labour-intensive industry (Class C), trade and repairs (Class B), tourism
(Class C), professional, scientific and technical activities (Class C).
Investment attractiveness can also be determined on the basis of indices of real
investment attractiveness (RAI), based on such microclimates as: returns on tangible assets,
labour productivity, self-financing of self-government territorial units and investment outlays.
The region ranked above the average in terms of RAI indices for the national economy (Class
B), industry (Class B), trade and repairs (Class B), tourism (Class B) and professional,
scientific and technical activities (Class B).
Potential and real investment attractiveness in reflected in the decisions of investors on
the flows of capital. This is shown in Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1. Regional structure of investment outlays in the companies in 2010 in
comparison with the share in the population (percentage of country’s population)
40%
35%
Population according to the domicile (persons)
30%
Investment outlays in the companies in total
Investment outlays in the industrial and construction companies
25%
Investment outlays in the companies in the service sector
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Note: these are the most up-to-date data.
Source: Authors on the basis of the Local Data Bank (downloaded 23.10.2012)
7
The Greater Poland region took the fourth place when it comes to the investment
outlays in companies (8.3% of its total value in all voivodships), while its share in Poland's
population was 9%. Relatively underinvested companies are more frequent in services sector
(the share of Greater Poland voivodship in the value of investment outlays of service
companies in 2010 was 7.2%).
On the other hand, the investment level in Greater Poland's agricultural companies is
definitely above average (analogically 18.5%), which is related to the high level of agriculture
technology. A high demographic potential, in comparison with other voivodships, hasn't
found any reflection in the inflow of direct foreign investments - see Exhibit 2.
Exhibit 2. Regional structure of capital in the companies with foreign capital
participation in comparison with a share in population (% national population)
60%
50%
40%
30%
Population according to the domicile (persons)
Share capital (equity) in the companies with foreign capital participation
National capital in the companies with foreign capital participation
Foreign capital in the companies with foreign capital participation
20%
10%
0%
Note: these are the most up-to-date data.
8
Greater Poland voivodship has 8.3% of the total value of accumulated share capital in
the companies with foreign capital participation, out of which most is foreign capital. This is
little, compared to 9% share of Poland's population. This phenomenon is particularly visible
when it comes to national capital (3.9%). In the years 2003-2009 the voivodship improved its
competitive position on the direct foreign investments market, because in those years the
share of Greater Poland in the value of basic capital of companies with foreign capital
participation rose from 8.2% to 8.2% - see Exhibit 3.
Exhibit 3. Regional competitive rank in terms of investments with foreign capital
participation according to the value of share capital of the companies with foreign
capital participation in 2003 and 2010 (percentage of national representation)
60,00%
50,00%
2003
2010
40,00%
30,00%
20,00%
10,00%
0,00%
Competitive rank, measured as a region’s share in a number of employees of entities
with foreign capital participation increased in the years 2003-2010 from 11.9% to 13.45%.
This shows the voivodship is making use of its competitive advantages related to the factor of
labour.
An opportunity for Warmian-Masurian voivodship lies in neatly prepared investment
offers. Self-government units of Warmian-Masurian voivodship should seek opportunities in
careful preparation of offers of investment areas in accordance with their location-specific
advantages.
9
3. Internal diversification of regional investment attractiveness
Poviats (counties)
The following poviats are considered most attractive in Greater Poland voivodship: the
city of Kalisz, the city of Konin, the city of Leszno, poznański, the city of Poznań - see Chart
2.
Chart 2. Potential investment attractiveness of poviats of Greater Poland voivodship for
the national economy and selected sections
Poviat
The city of Poznań
The city of Leszno
The city of Konin
The city of Kalisz
poznański
turecki
pilski
chodzieski
śremski
PAI1_GN
0,383
0,370
0,353
0,321
0,319
0,279
0,275
0,266
0,265
PAI1_GN
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
C
C
PAI1_C
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
C
C
PAI1_G
A
A
A
A
A
D
C
D
C
PAI1_I
A
A
A
C
A
D
C
D
C
PAI1_M
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
C
C
Source: Authors’ own materials.
The following poviats should be distinguished: the cities of Poznań and Konin as these
units attained Class A in their potential investment attractiveness for all sections of the
national economy under scrutiny in this research.
In reference to the sections mentioned below the following poviats should be
additionally distinguished:
-
Turecki, chodzieski, pilski, śremski (Class C) for section C,
-
Pilski, śremski (Class C) for section G,
-
The city of Kalisz, nowotyski, pilski, szamotulski, śremski (Class C) for section I,
-
Turecki, chodzieski, pilski, średzki, śremski (Class C) for section M.
Synthetic evaluation of potential investment attractiveness of poviats of Greater Poland
voivodship is presented in Exhibit 4.
10
Exhibit 4. Spatial diversification of potential investment attractiveness of poviats of
Greater Poland voivodship with consideration of the most attractive sections
Gminas (communes)
Like poviats, gminas are also very much diversified in terms of investment
attractiveness. The highest ranked gminas are: Tarnowo Podgórne (2), Kościan (1), Leszno
(1), Turek (1), Suchy Las (2), Czarnków (1), Poznań (1), Chodzież (1), Konin (1), Piła (1),
Komorniki (2), Luboń (1), Ostrów Wielkopolski (1), Wągrowiec (1), Gniezno (1),
Puszczykowo (1), Kalisz (1), Dopiewo (2), Swarzędz (3), Słupca (1), Kórnik (3), Złotów (1),
Koło (1), Czerwonak (2), Kleszczewo (2), Kępno (3), Śrem (3), Rokietnica (2), Przykona (2),
Kleczew (3), Buk (3), Środa Wielkopolska (3), Gostyń (3). It is also reflected in their high
ranks (Class A or B) for all analysed sections – see Chart 3.
11
Chart 3. Potential investment attractiveness of gminas of Greater Poland voivodship for
Gmina
Tarnowo Podgórne (2)
Kościan (1)
Leszno (1)
Turek (1)
Suchy Las (2)
Czarnków (1)
Poznań (1)
Chodzież (1)
Konin (1)
Piła (1)
Komorniki (2)
Luboń (1)
Ostrów Wielkopolski (1)
Wągrowiec (1)
Gniezno (1)
Puszczykowo (1)
Kalisz (1)
Dopiewo (2)
Swarzędz (3)
Słupca (1)
Kórnik (3)
Złotów (1)
Koło (1)
Czerwonak (2)
Kleszczewo (2)
Kępno (3)
Śrem (3)
Rokietnica (2)
Przykona (2)
Kleczew (3)
Buk (3)
Środa Wielkopolska (3)
Gostyń (3)
PAI1_G
N
0,292
0,286
0,281
0,281
0,278
0,277
0,277
0,274
0,270
0,269
0,266
0,261
0,260
0,255
0,251
0,247
0,246
0,246
0,244
0,242
0,240
0,237
0,237
0,235
0,232
0,232
0,231
0,228
0,228
0,226
0,226
0,224
0,223
PAI1_GN
PAI1_C
PAI1_G
PAI1_I
PAI1_M
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
B
A
A
C
A
B
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
A
B
B
A
C
A
B
B
A
A
B
A
C
B
B
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
B
A
A
A
(1) – urban commune, (2) – rural commune, (3) – rural-urban commune
Source: Authors’ own material.
Attractive are also such gminas which belong to Class B according to the PAI1_GN index
as: Ostrzeszów (3), Nowy Tomyśl (3), Pobiedziska (3), Grodzisk Wielkopolski (3), Mosina
(3), Jarocin (3), Międzychód (3), Murowana Goślina (3), Rawicz (3), Margonin (3), Oborniki
(3), Wolsztyn (3), Baranów (2), Łubowo (2), Krotoszyn (3), Stęszew (3), Kostrzyn (3),
Szamotuły (3), Pniewy (3), Chodzież (2), Pakosław (2), Kościan (2). The location-specific
advantages are also universal in these gminas, which makes them attractiveness for all kinds
of business activity in question.
12
In reference to the sections mentioned below the following gminas of Class C should be
distinguished:
-
Perzów (2), Sulmierzyce (1), Koźmin Wielkopolski (3), Zduny (3), Nowe Skalmierzyce
(3), Odolanów (3), Raszków (3), Doruchów (2), Grabów nad Prosną (3), Pleszew (3),
Czerniejewo (3), Gniezno (2), Kiszkowo (2), Witkowo (3), Kłodawa (3), Kazimierz
Biskupi (2), Stare Miasto (2), Ślesin (3), Ostrowite (2), Powidz (2), Słupca (2),
Władysławów (2), Miłosław (3), Nekla (3) *, Września (3), Krobia (3), Poniec (3),
Granowo (2), Lipno (2), Rydzyna (3), Włoszakowice (2), Sieraków (3), Opalenica (3),
Zbąszyń (3), Jutrosin (3), Pakosław (2), Przemęt (2), Siedlec (2), Budzyń (2), Połajewo
(2), Trzcianka (3), Kaczory (2), Ujście (3), Skoki (3), Rogoźno (3), Obrzycko (1),
Duszniki (2), Kaźmierz (2), Wronki (3), Krzykosy (2), Zaniemyśl (2) – for section C,
-
Baranów (2), Łęka Opatowska (2), Sulmierzyce (1), Zduny (3), Odolanów (3), Raszków
(3), Doruchów (2), Ostrzeszów (3), Kłodawa (3), Kazimierz Biskupi (2), Stare Miasto
(2), Ślesin (3), Brudzew (2), Nekla (3), Września (3), Granowo (2), Kościan (2),
Międzychód (3), Sieraków (3), Kuślin (2), Opalenica (3), Zbąszyń (3), Pakosław (2),
Rawicz (3), Siedlec (2), Wolsztyn (3), Budzyń (2), Chodzież (2), Margonin (3), Połajewo
(2), Trzcianka (3), Wieleń (3), Kaczory (2), Łobżenica (3), Ujście (3), Skoki (3), Złotów
(2), Oborniki (3), Rogoźno (3), Buk (3), Kostrzyn (3), Stęszew (3), Obrzycko (1),
Kaźmierz (2), Pniewy (3), Wronki (3), Krzykosy (2), Zaniemyśl (2) - for section G,
-
Jarocin (3), Baranów (2), Bralin (2), Łęka Opatowska (2), Krotoszyn (3), Nowe
Skalmierzyce (3), Ostrzeszów (3), Grzegorzew (2), Rzgów (2), Stare Miasto (2), Słupca
(1), Władysławów (2), Września (3), Kościan (1), Lipno (2), Rydzyna (3), Święciechowa
(2), Międzychód (3), Kuślin (2), Opalenica (3), Rawicz (3), Wolsztyn (3), Wieleń (3),
Szydłowo (2), Złotów (2), Kostrzyn (3), Pobiedziska (3), Rokietnica (2), Stęszew (3),
Krzykosy (2), Dolsk (3) - dla sekcji I,
-
Kotlin (2), Żerków (3), Opatówek (2), Baranów (2), Perzów (2), Sulmierzyce (1),
Koźmin Wielkopolski (3), Nowe Skalmierzyce (3), Odolanów (3), Ostrów Wielkopolski
(2), Przygodzice (2), Doruchów (2), Grabów nad Prosną (3), Kobyla Góra (2), Mikstat
(3), Gołuchów (2), Pleszew (3), Trzemeszno (3), Witkowo (3), Ślesin (3), Powidz (2),
Słupca (2), Przykona (2), Nekla (3), Borek Wielkopolski (3), Krobia (3), Pępowo (2),
Piaski (2), Poniec (3), Kamieniec (2), Rakoniewice (3), Czempiń (3), Śmigiel (3),
Krzemieniewo (2), Lipno (2), Rydzyna (3), Kwilcz (2), Sieraków (3), Zbąszyń (3),
Bojanowo (3), Miejska Górka (3), Pakosław (2), Przemęt (2), Siedlec (2), Budzyń (2),
Chodzież (2), Szamocin (3), Krzyż Wielkopolski (3), Szydłowo (2), Ujście (3), Wysoka
(3), Skoki (3), Krajenka (3), Rogoźno (3), Obrzycko (1), Duszniki (2), Kaźmierz (2),
Wronki (3), Nowe Miasto nad Wartą (2), Brodnica (2) – for section M.
Synthetic evaluation of potential investment attractiveness of gminas of Greater Poland
voivodship is presented in Exhibit 5.
13
Exhibit 5. Potential investment attractiveness of gminas of Greater Poland voivodship
14
4. Voivodship’s institutional support for investors and
entrepreneurs
The development of business surrounding in a region is a vital component of its
investment attractiveness. The institutions that support entrepreneurship, pro-investment
solutions, research commercialization and innovativeness are of special importance. Among
the voivodeship’s business-supporting institutions one should mention: Poznań Technology
and Research Park, Innovation, Development and Technology Transfer Centre of Poznań
University of Technology, Polska Izba Gospodarcza Importerów, Eksporterów i Kooperacji in
Poznań, Wielkopolska Izba Przemysłowo – Handlowa in Poznań, Wielkopolska Izba
Budownictwa in Poznań, Izba Przemysłowo-Handlowa Południowej Wielkopolski w
Ostrowie Wielkopolskim, Fundacja Kaliski Inkubator Przedsiębiorczości, Wielkopolska
Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości Sp. z o.o. in Poznań, Agencja Rozwoju Regionalnego w
Koninie, Wielkopolski Klub Techniki i Racjonalizacji in Poznań, Polska Izba Przemysłu
Targowego in Poznań, Stowarzyszenie „Ostrzeszowskie Centrum Przedsiębiorczości”,
Inkubator Przedsiębiorczości, Centrum Edukacji i Zarządzania Korporacja „Romaniszyn” in
Piła, Wielkopolska Okręgowa Izba Inżynierów Budownictwa in Poznań, Izba Gospodarcza
Północnej Wielkopolski in Piła, Wielkopolska Okręgowa Izba Architektów in Poznań,
Wielkopolskie Centrum Zaawansowanych Technologii, Innovation and Technology Transfer
Centre of Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznański Akademicki Inkubator Przedsiębiorczości,
Akademicki Inkubator Przedsiębiorczości Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznański Park
Technologiczno – Przemysłowy, Eureka Technology Park Dopiewo k/Poznania, Klaster
ITelligence Technology Poznań, Klaster Kotlarski w Pleszewie, Klaster PoligraficznoReklamowy in Leszno, Wielkopolski Klaster Chemiczny, Wielkopolski Klaster
Teleinformatyczny Poznań, Zachodni Klaster Tworzyw Sztucznych PLASTOPOLIS, Klaster
Spożywczy Południowej Wielkopolski – Stowarzyszenie in Kalisz, Poznański Klaster
Edukacyjny, Klaster Turystyczny Północnej Wielkopolski „Dolina Noteci”.
Poznański Park Naukowo – Technologiczny (Poznań Technology and Research Park)
offers office, training, conference and laboratory spaces, services of a Virtual office,
organisation of conferences, seminars, meetings and other events. It provides a range of
research services (in the fields of chemistry, archaeology, IT, physics, geology and economic
sciences) as well as consulting and training services. The consulting covers international
cooperation (operating in EU, promoting a firm’s profile in the EEN database, seeking
partners and clients, technological auditing, market analysis, organisation of international
cooperation meetings), technology transfer (establishing trade/technological partnerships,
review of available technologies), commercialisation, legal advice on drafting agreements,
intellectual property management, creating innovativeness rules, research and innovativeness
financing (as part of the Regional Contact Spot for EU Programmes run by the Park). The
Park houses a complex of Hi-Tech Incubators, which include an office-laboratory complex for
innovating businesses as well as a range of research and other services that support their
development. There is also a kindergarten in the Park.
15
(www.ppnt.poznan.pl/, 05.10.2012.).
Centrum Innowacji, Rozwoju i Transferu Technologii Politechniki Poznańskiej
(Innovation, Development and Technology Transfer Centre of Poznań University of
Technology). The Centre offers advice and consulting on acquiring EU funding and external
domestic funding (search for partners, application preparation, project management),
intellectual property and patents (preparing documentation, intellectual property protection),
research results implementation (analysis of technology demands of a given firm, technology
transfer, intellectual property pricing). The Centre offers a possibility of organising trainings,
trade missions, conferences, meetings etc. Its website contains a database of Poznań Institute
of Technology resources, which includes a database on Staff and on the range of currently
conducted research. (www.ciritt.put.poznan.pl/, 05.10.2012.).
Polska Izba Gospodarcza Importerów, Eksporterów i Kooperacji in Poznań
(Polish Chamber of Importers, Exporters and Cooperation in Poznań) supports the
development of S&M enterprises by offering IT, training and consulting services, which
include seeking business partners (external markets analysis, potential clients analysis),
technological auditing, technology transfer (preparing offers or demands, review of potential
clients/partners, establishing of contacts, drafting of agreements, monitoring of technology
implementation), cluster initiatives financing advice, strategic planning, establishing contacts
between the research and business sectors (cooperation possibility analysis, organisation of
meetings), export auditing. The Chamber offers IT services related to establishing or closing a
business and acquiring public funding, as well as consulting services related to acquiring
external funding, export promotion (preparation of an exporting plan, advice on entering
external markets, financing of exports) and business operations (choice of legal status,
business plan preparation). (http://www.pcc.org.pl/, 05.10.2012.).
16
Special economic zones in Wielkopolskie voivodeship - effects
There are six special economic zones (SSE) in Lubelskie voivodeship:
Kamiennogórska, Kostrzyńsko-Słubicka, Łódzka, Pomorska, Słupska and Wałbrzyska. At the
end of 2011 the areas of SSE were part of 7 cities and 20 gminas (counties). (Exhibit 6).
Exhibit 6. The location of SSE in Greater Poland voivodeship
Source: Authors’ own calculations.
First SSE were established only in 2005. The enterprises operating in the zones have
until 2011 invested 2,1 billion PLN which constitutes 3% of all economic zone capital
expenditures in Poland. In the same period the enterprises have created 4,9 thousand jobs,
which constitutes 3% of all new jobs created in economic zones - cf. table 4.
17
Table 4. Effects of special economic zone functioning at the end of 2011.
SSE/ Gmina
Kostrzyńsko-Słubicka SSE, Buk (3)
Kostrzyńsko-Słubicka SSE, Chodzież (2)
Wałbrzyska SSE, Jarocin (3)
Wałbrzyska SSE, Kalisz (1)
Łódzka SSE, Koło (1)
Wałbrzyska SSE, Kościan (2)
Kostrzyńsko-Słubicka SSE, Krobia (3)
Wałbrzyska SSE, Krotoszyn (3)
Wałbrzyska SSE, Leszno (1)
Łódzka SSE, Nowe Skalmierzyce (3)
Kostrzyńsko-Słubicka SSE, Nowy Tomyśl (3)
Łódzka SSE, Opatówek (2)
Kamiennogórska SSE, Ostrów Wielkopolski (1)
Łódzka SSE, Ostrzeszów (3)
Pomorska SSE, Piła (1)
Kostrzyńsko-Słubicka SSE, Poznań (1)
Kostrzyńsko-Słubicka SSE, Przemęt (2)
Łódzka SSE, Przykona (2)
Wałbrzyska SSE, Rawicz (3)
Słupska SSE, Rogoźno (3)
Łódzka SSE, Słupca (2)
Kostrzyńsko-Słubicka SSE, Stęszew (3)
Kostrzyńsko-Słubicka SSE, Swarzędz (3)
Wałbrzyska SSE, Śrem (3)
Łódzka SSE, Turek (1)
Kostrzyńsko-Słubicka SSE, Wronki (3)
Wałbrzyska SSE, Września (3)
Leading industries (capital
Cumulated
New
expenditure larger than
capital
jobs
20% of overall capital
expenditure
created
expenditure in the subzone)
in million PLN
Chemicals
122
111,4
Furniture
0
19,1
Data unavailable
Electric circuits
115
2,9
Sanitary
225
81,7
Non-metallic mineral resources
13
88,3
Food processing
28
21,1
Metal products
711
371,9
Data unavailable
Furniture
517
402,1
Electric and optical equipment
690
117,2
Food processing
250
80,0
Metal products, transport
89
12,8
equipment
Construction
157
29,5
Automotive
Data unavailable
Data unavailable
Data unavailable
Data unavailable
Data unavailable
Chemicals
Food processing
Chemical
Data unavailable
Data unavailable
Synthetic materials
1 335
229,3
3
286
219
38,0
158,3
203,2
156
161,9
Source: Authors’ own calculations based on PAIiIZ data.
The largest investments have been made in Nowe Skalmierzyce and Krotoszyn. In
Nowe Skalmierzyc: CORRECT, K.Błaszczyk i wspólnicy S, ka Komandytowa (Poland,
furniture, synthetic mattresses), L.Correct Sp. z o.o. (Poland, furniture), in Krotoszyn:
„MAHLE
Polska”
Sp.
z
o.o.
(Germany,
diesel
engine
parts),
DINO KROTOSZYN Sp. z o.o. (Poland, logistics, baking).
According to the SSE development plans the voivodeship wishes to attract investors:
 From machinery hi-tech industries, cooperating with research institutions, from foodprocessing and construction industries and investors interested in technology transfer – in
Kamiennogórska SSE,
 Representing hi-tech industries and cooperating with research institutions, operating in
data processing and logistics branches – on Kostrzyńsko-Słubicka SSE, Łódzka SSE,
Pomorska SSE and Wałbrzyska SSE,
 From synthetic materials, metal and food processing industries – in Słupska SSE.
18
‘A’ Commune
Student Scientific Organisation for Entrepreneurship and Regional Analyses affiliated
to the Institute of Enterprise of the Warsaw School of Economics, has again published the
results of its research into the quality of investor assistance given by the communal
authorities. The subject of this study of investment attractiveness is: an audit of Web sites and
audit of e-contact in Polish and English with communal authorities. The effect of this study is
a ranking ‘A’ Commune, which is thought to distinguish best performing self-government
territorial units in terms of the use of means of electronic communication in their assistance.
The research is carried out using the mystery client method. In this year’s edition all gminas
belonging to Class A according to the PAI 2010 index were subject to query.
As a result 70 gminas have been distinguished; this includes 8 gminas situated in
Lubusz voivodship.
Chart 5. Gminas in Greater Poland voivodship distinguished as the ‘A’ Communes
Gmina
Piła (1)
Wolsztyn (3)
Gostyń (3)
Luboń (1)
Śrem (3)
Leszno (1)
Swarzędz (3)
Środa Wielkopolska
(3)
Poviat
pilski
wolsztyński
gostyński
poznański
śremski
Leszno
poznański
średzki
wielkopolski
Audit of Web
sites
Audit of econtact in Polish
Audit of econtact in
English
Sum
10
8,5
9,5
9
9
9
8,5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
13,5
13,5
13
13
13
12,5
8,5
4
0
12,5
What makes the Web sites of all communes in question is their presence in social media
networks and foreign language versions (prevalence of the German and French languages).
Wolsztyn offers interesting means of communication on its Web site, i.e. through an online
inquiry form, in which a particular department of local authority office can be indicated. In
direct contact Piła took the lead. In an e-mail a link to a Web site dedicated to conducting
business activity was sent as well as a resolution of a city council regarding real estate tax
exemptions. Both Piła and Wolsztyn offered personal contact regarding an investment.
5. Region’s strengths and weaknesses
Greater Poland voivodship has its unique character and clear specificity which
influences its strengths and weaknesses. If divided according to the main factors of location
and location conditions classified into microclimates composing potential and real investment
attractiveness, they can be grouped into strengths (microclimates ranking A, B or C) and
weaknesses (microclimates ranking D, E or F) – see Chart 6.
19
Chart 6. Strengths and weaknesses of Greater Poland voivodship
Strengths of the region according to the
Weaknesses of the region according to
microclimates by IP SGH
the microclimates by IP SGH
National economy
Microclimate Human Resources Class A
Microclimate Administration/Governance
Microclimate Technical Infrastructure Class B Class E
Microclimate Social Infrastructure Class B
Microclimate Social Capital Class C
Microclimate Market Class C
Microclimate Innovativeness Class C
Labour productivity in enterprises Class C
Returns on tangible assets Class B
Profitability of enterprises Class B
Self-financing of self-government units Class C
Investment outlays Class C
Capital intensive industry
Microclimate Social Capital Class AD
Microclimate Technical Infrastructure Class B Microclimate Administration/Governance
Microclimate Social Infrastructure Class A
Class E
Returns on tangible assets Class A
Labour intensive industry
Microclimate Technical Infrastructure Class B Class F
Microclimate Social Infrastructure Class B
Returns on tangible assets Class A
Trade
Microclimate Social Infrastructure Class D
Microclimate Technical Infrastructure Class C Microclimate Administration/Governance
Class E
Returns on tangible assets Class B
Labour productivity in enterprises Class A
Investment outlays Class A
Tourism
Microclimate Social Capital Class D
Microclimate Technical Infrastructure Class B Microclimate Administration/Governance
Class F
20
Investment outlays Class D
Returns on tangible assets Class C
Professional, scientific and technical activities
Microclimate Human Resources Class B
Microclimate Technical Infrastructure Class B Class E
Returns on tangible assets Class C
Investment outlays Class B
Source: Authors on the basis of the results of research of the Institute of Enterprise of the Warsaw
School of Economics (IP SGH).
21
APPENDIX
Exhibit 1. Potential investment attractiveness of Polish voivodship broken down by basic
sections of the national economy
22
Exhibit 2. Real investment attractiveness of Polish voivodship broken down by basic
sections of the national economy
23
KUYAVIAN-POMERANIAN
LUBLIN
LUBUSZ
ŁÓDŹ
LESSER POLAND
MASOVIAN
OPOLE
SUBCARPATHIAN
PODLASKIE
POMERANIAN
SILESIAN
ŚWIĘTOKRZYSKIE
WARMIAN-MASURIAN
GREATER POLAND
WESTERN POMERANIAN
PAI1 GN
A
E
F
C
D
C
A
E
D
E
B
A
F
D
B
C
PAI2 GN
A
E
F
D
C
B
A
D
D
E
C
A
F
E
C
D
RAI GN
A
D
F
E
B
C
A
C
F
F
B
B
E
E
B
C
PAI1 C
A
D
F
C
C
C
A
D
E
E
B
A
F
E
C
C
PAI2 C KAPITAŁ
A
E
F
D
D
B
A
D
D
E
B
A
F
F
C
E
PAI2 C PRACA
B
D
F
D
C
B
A
E
E
F
C
A
E
E
C
D
RAI C
A
D
F
D
D
C
A
D
F
F
B
A
D
E
B
E
PAI1 G
A
E
F
C
D
B
A
D
E
F
B
A
F
C
C
C
PAI2 G
B
C
F
E
C
B
A
D
E
E
C
A
F
E
B
D
RAI G
C
C
F
E
B
C
A
C
E
F
C
B
E
F
B
D
PAI1 I
B
E
F
B
E
B
A
E
D
E
B
D
F
B
C
A
PAI2 I
A
E
F
C
E
B
A
E
E
E
B
D
F
C
C
A
RAI I
B
C
E
E
A
E
A
E
E
E
E
C
E
B
C
D
PAI1 M
A
E
F
C
D
C
A
D
D
F
B
B
F
D
B
C
PAI2 M
A
E
E
D
D
C
A
D
D
E
C
B
F
E
C
D
RAI M
A
D
E
D
D
C
A
D
F
F
C
A
F
E
B
C
Voivodship
LOWER SILESIAN
Chart 1. List of investment attractiveness indices for voivodships
Source: Authors on the basis of the results of statutory research carried out in the Collegium of Business
Administration under the guidance of H. Godlewska-Majkowska.
24
Chart 2. Potential investment attractiveness of poviats of Greater Poland voivodship for
Poviat
PAI1_GN
The city of Poznań
The city of Leszno
The city of Konin
The city of Kalisz
poznański
turecki
pilski
chodzieski
śremski
0,383
0,370
0,353
0,321
0,319
0,279
0,275
0,266
0,265
PAI1_GN_
klasy
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
C
C
PAI1_C_
klasy
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
C
C
PAI1_G_
klasy
A
A
A
A
A
D
C
D
C
PAI1_I_
klasy
A
A
A
C
A
D
C
D
C
PAI1_M_
klasy
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
C
C
Source: See Chart 1.
Chart 3. Potential investment attractiveness of gminas of Greater Poland voivodship for
Gmina (commune)
Tarnowo Podgórne (2)
Kościan (1)
Leszno (1)
Turek (1)
Suchy Las (2)
Czarnków (1)
Poznań (1)
Chodzież (1)
Konin (1)
Piła (1)
Komorniki (2)
Luboń (1)
Ostrów Wielkopolski (1)
Wągrowiec (1)
Gniezno (1)
Puszczykowo (1)
Kalisz (1)
Dopiewo (2)
Swarzędz (3)
Słupca (1)
Kórnik (3)
Złotów (1)
Koło (1)
Czerwonak (2)
Kleszczewo (2)
PAI1_GN
PAI1_GN_classes
PAI1_C_
classes
PAI1_G_
classes
PAI1_I_
classes
PAI1_M_
classes
0,292
0,286
0,281
0,281
0,278
0,277
0,277
0,274
0,270
0,269
0,266
0,261
0,260
0,255
0,251
0,247
0,246
0,246
0,244
0,242
0,240
0,237
0,237
0,235
0,232
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
B
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
A
B
B
A
C
A
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
25
Kępno (3)
Śrem (3)
Rokietnica (2)
Przykona (2)
Kleczew (3)
Buk (3)
Środa Wielkopolska (3)
Gostyń (3)
Ostrzeszów (3)
Nowy Tomyśl (3)
Pobiedziska (3)
Grodzisk Wielkopolski (3)
Mosina (3)
Jarocin (3)
Międzychód (3)
Murowana Goślina (3)
Rawicz (3)
Margonin (3)
Oborniki (3)
Wolsztyn (3)
Baranów (2)
Łubowo (2)
Krotoszyn (3)
Stęszew (3)
Kostrzyn (3)
Szamotuły (3)
Pniewy (3)
Chodzież (2)
Pakosław (2)
Kościan (2)
Kaczory (2)
Opalenica (3)
Kazimierz Biskupi (2)
Września (3)
Włoszakowice (2)
Zaniemyśl (2)
Doruchów (2)
Władysławów (2)
Ślesin (3)
Ujście (3)
Stare Miasto (2)
Grabów nad Prosną (3)
Zduny (3)
Obrzycko (1)
Powidz (2)
Trzcianka (3)
Rogoźno (3)
0,232
0,231
0,228
0,228
0,226
0,226
0,224
0,223
0,220
0,217
0,217
0,215
0,215
0,214
0,214
0,212
0,211
0,210
0,210
0,210
0,209
0,209
0,208
0,207
0,206
0,206
0,205
0,204
0,203
0,202
0,201
0,201
0,200
0,200
0,199
0,199
0,199
0,198
0,198
0,197
0,197
0,195
0,195
0,195
0,195
0,195
0,194
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
C
B
A
C
B
B
B
B
B
C
B
C
C
C
C
C
B
B
C
C
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
D
C
C
B
C
C
C
E
C
C
A
C
C
B
A
C
B
B
B
B
A
C
B
C
B
B
C
C
B
C
B
B
C
C
B
C
C
C
A
B
B
D
D
D
C
D
C
D
D
D
C
B
D
C
E
B
D
B
B
E
A
A
A
C
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
A
B
A
A
B
B
B
C
B
A
B
B
B
B
C
C
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
D
C
C
B
C
B
C
C
B
C
26
Słupca (2)
Budzyń (2)
Granowo (2)
Jutrosin (3)
Siedlec (2)
Nekla (3)
Witkowo (3)
Raszków (3)
Zbąszyń (3)
Krobia (3)
Sieraków (3)
Krzykosy (2)
Rydzyna (3)
Przemęt (2)
Miłosław (3)
Koźmin Wielkopolski (3)
Duszniki (2)
Połajewo (2)
Lipno (2)
Kłodawa (3)
Pleszew (3)
Wronki (3)
Odolanów (3)
Tuliszków (3)
Brudzew (2)
Skoki (3)
Kaźmierz (2)
Sulmierzyce (1)
Kobyla Góra (2)
Poniec (3)
Perzów (2)
Nowe Skalmierzyce (3)
Rakoniewice (3)
Łęka Opatowska (2)
0,194
0,194
0,194
0,193
0,192
0,192
0,191
0,190
0,189
0,188
0,188
0,188
0,187
0,187
0,187
0,187
0,186
0,186
0,186
0,185
0,185
0,185
0,185
0,185
0,184
0,184
0,184
0,184
0,183
0,183
0,183
0,183
0,183
0,183
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
D
D
C
C
C
D
C
C
C
D
D
D
C
C
D
C
C
D
C
C
D
C
C
D
E
D
D
D
C
D
C
D
C
C
D
C
C
C
C
D
D
D
D
D
C
D
B
E
E
D
B
D
D
B
E
B
C
C
E
B
E
D
D
C
D
D
B
E
D
E
D
D
D
D
D
D
C
E
C
C
C
B
B
C
C
C
D
C
C
C
D
C
C
D
C
C
D
C
D
C
C
C
D
D
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
D
Source: See Chart 1.
Note: all indices in this report have been computed on the basis of the most up-to-date data from the Local Data
Bank (2012).
27

kozmin wlkp

Transcription

Similar documents

representatives of institutions supporting the

Contrast Effects and Judgments of Physical - Beauty

Polish Film Festival Flyer 8_5x5_5

PBM 2/2014 - Polish Business Magazine

INSIDER SPECIAL - Stockholm School of Economics in Riga

Tomasz Zarycki ATTITUDES TOWARDS WEST AND EAST AS THE

PKP strike causes national havoc

Daily Bulletin - European Bridge League

Doctor sows love into family garden

Cracow Incentive - Maestro Meetings and Incentives sp. z oo

Women on Waves abortion sends drone to Poland

project to discover schenectady eastern european roots newsletter

Untitled

Enter the title of the paper

full text - Queen Margaret University