3.14.2011

Transcription

3.14.2011

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
March 14, 2011
By Electronic Mail and Hand-Delivery
The Honorable Phil Mendelson
Chairman, Committee on Public Safety and the Judiciary
1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Re:
Responses to March 3, 2011 Inquiry
Dear Councilmember Mendelson:
In response to your letter of March 3, 2011, I am providing responses to the questions you have
posed in connection with the Judiciary Committee’s March 18, 2011 oversight hearing on the
Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).
1.
Please describe every grant the agency is, or is considering, applying for this fiscal year.
None.
2.
Please provide the name of each employee on administrative leave in FY 2010, and thus
far for FY 2011. In addition, for each employee identified, please provide: (1) their
position; (2) a brief description of the reason they were placed on leave; (3) the dates they
were on administrative leave; (4) whether the leave is paid or unpaid; and (5) their
current status.
Please see attached chart. By way of background, the OAH Act requires that Administrative Law
Judges (ALJs) participate in continuing legal education opportunities for their professional
development which, in turn, helps them better serve the District. See generally D.C. Official
Code§§ 2-1831.03(a)(4) and 2-1831.09(a)(1). It is OAH policy to allow ALJs and other staff
administrative leave for approved travel and training related to their professional development.
In recognition of Administrative Professional’s Day in April, 2010, all support staff were given
four hours of administrative leave. In addition, through its “Shining Star” award program, OAH
has granted one day of administrative leave to selected staff once a quarter for exemplary
service, and all staff received an administrative leave day on November 12, 2010 for their efforts
as part of the office-wide Operation Clean Slate backlog reduction initiative.
3.
How many grievances have been filed by labor unions against agency management?
Please list each of them by year FY 2009 – FY 2011 (to date), and by union, if more than
one union. Give a brief description of each grievance, and the outcome as of March 1,
2011.
One Judiciary Square, 441 Fourth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001-2714 • (202) 442-9094 (P) (202) 442-4789 (F)
Committee on Public Safety and the Judiciary
March 14, 2011
Page 2 of 20
None.
4.
(a) D.C. Law prohibits chauffeurs, take-home vehicles, and the use of SUVs (see D.C.
Code 50-203, 50-204). Is your agency in compliance with this law? Please explain
any exceptions.
OAH is in full compliance with this law. OAH does not now have, nor has it ever had, a
government leased or purchased vehicle assigned to the agency.
(b) If there are exceptions, please provide the following: (1) Type of vehicle (make,
model, year); (2) individuals (name/position) authorized to have the vehicle; (3)
jurisdictional residence of the individual (e.g., Bowie, MD); and (4) justification for
the take-home status.
Not applicable.
5.
As of March 1, 2011, please list: each Administrative Law Judge by name; the number of
cases pending before him/her; the total number of cases before him or her since October
1, 2010; the number of cases heard starting October 1, 2010; the number of final
decisions written since October 1, 2010; the total number of final decisions written since
October 1, 2010 for cases heard.
The chart that follows reflects only those cases that are entered into OAH’s new case
management system. Therefore, the numbers underestimate the total number of hearings held,
final orders written and, for some judges, total cases assigned. Cases being cleared as part of
Operation Clean Slate were generally in the old ProLaw system and are not reflected in these
numbers.
Open Cases
(as of 3/9/11)
Total cases
(10/1/10 - 2/28/2011)
Hearings Held
(10/1/10 – 2/28/11)
Final Orders
(10/1/10 – 2/28/11)
Final Orders for
Cases Heard
(10/1/10-2/28/11)
Dean, John P.
(3/22/04-Principal ALJ)
78
128
47
50
39
McDonald, Calonette M.
(3/22/04)
104
225
100
121
113
Poindexter, Mark D.
(3/22/04-Deputy Chief
ALJ)
0
74
0
74
0
Sharkey, Robert E.
(3/22/04)
22
91
34
69
38
Handy, Paul B.
(7/26/04)
160
397
190
237
157
Yahner, Ann C.
312
585
2
273
2
ALJ (listed by
appointment date)
March 14, 2011
Page 3 of 20
Open Cases
(as of 3/9/11)
Total cases
(10/1/10 - 2/28/2011)
Hearings Held
(10/1/10 – 2/28/11)
Final Orders
(10/1/10 – 2/28/11)
Final Orders for
Cases Heard
(10/1/10-2/28/11)
England Jr., William L.
55
137
62
82
80
Nash, Beverly Sherman
(8/9/04)
38
120
102
130
112
Harmon, Jr., James C.
(10/1/04)
28
145
103
117
108
Wilson-Taylor, N. Denise
(10/1/04)
164
212
49
48
43
Little, E. Savannah
(10/8/04)
156
246
77
90
55
Goode, Jesse P.
(6/20/05)
24
162
111
138
125
Barber, Claudia
(8/15/05)
59
266
130
207
114
Davenport, Joan
(8/15/05)
89
252
158
163
130
Jenkins, Audrey J.
(8/15/05)
100
344
142
244
137
Masulla, Mary
(8/15/05)
61
183
43
122
46
Tucker, Wanda R.
(8/15/05)
59
98
10
39
16
Cobbs, Nicholas H.
(8/29/05)
46
113
52
67
58
Goodie, Sharon E.
(8/29/05)
24
134
96
110
101
Harvey, Scott A.
(8/29/05)
48
169
56
129
72
Teal Arabella W.
(8/29/05)
10
137
98
127
113
Burnett, Louis L.
32
131
12
99
21
Long, Jennifer M.
30
46
6
16
7
ALJ (listed by
appointment date)
March 14, 2011
Page 4 of 20
Open Cases
(as of 3/9/11)
Total cases
(10/1/10 - 2/28/2011)
Hearings Held
(10/1/10 – 2/28/11)
Final Orders
(10/1/10 – 2/28/11)
Final Orders for
Cases Heard
(10/1/10-2/28/11)
51
239
113
188
129
9
36
8
27
14
Pierson, Erika L.
(12/11/06)
46
140
89
94
94
Figueroa, Elizabeth
(12/11/06)
69
239
139
170
105
Rooney, John Thomas
(1/8/07)
18
148
128
130
123
Mangan, Margaret A.
(1/22/07)
67
139
35
72
33
Crichlow, Claudia A.
(11/26/07)
114
202
110
88
81
Hines, Caryn L.
(4/28/08)
41
73
31
32
29
Walker, Mary Oates
(1/4/10 - Chief ALJ)
0
0
0
0
0
ALJ (listed by
appointment date)
Wellner, Steven M.
(5/30/06)
McClendon, Sam
(12/04/06-Principal ALJ )
6.
Please provide a breakdown by jurisdiction of the backlog of cases, if any, as of October
1, 2010 and March 1, 2010. If a backlog exists, please identify what OAH is doing to
address any problems in this area.
Despite historical shortages in support staff and significant increases in case filings, OAH has
aggressively reduced its backlog in FY10. In 2QFY10, OAH launched Operation Clean Slate.
The goal of Operation Clean Slate was to eliminate by the end of FY10 all backlogged cases
filed though March 2010 that were ripe for decision.
The Operation Clean Slate initiative was a great success. From June 2010 through December
2010, OAH reduced its open and pending cases by approximately 14,600 cases, or 80%. Of the
remaining 3,577 cases, OAH expects to resolve about 50% in large groupings through
consolidated hearings and mediation. The following chart reflects the jurisdiction breakdown of
these cases as available.
March 14, 2011
Page 5 of 20
Jurisdiction
Open Cases as of
August 2010
Open Cases as of
October 2010
Open Cases as of March
2011
All
10,128
4,437
3,577
Dep’t of Public Works
5,938
4,859
1,286
Dep’t of Employment
Servs.
8
2
0
Dep’t of Consumer &
Regulatory Affairs
226
74
0
Dep’t of Human Servs.
(includes Shelter cases)
355
126
115
Dep’t of Health
417
185
10
2,813
2,058
2,150
Dep’t of the
Environment
70
13
2
Taxicab Commission
9
0
0
45
9
0
41
22
0
12
3
1
13
6
1
4
4
9
3
3
0
0
0
Dep’t of Transportation
Metropolitan Police
Dep’t
Fire & Emergency
Med.Servs.
Office of Tax &
Revenue
Office of Planning
Dep’t of Mental Health
Child & Family Servs.
Agency
Dep’t of Insurance,
Securities & Banking
March 14, 2011
Page 6 of 20
Jurisdiction
Open Cases as of
August 2010
Open Cases as of
October 2010
Open Cases as of March
2011
Dep’t of Housing &
Community
Development
143
62
0
Dep’t of Health Care
Finance
9
8
7
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
2
Office of the Attorney
General
Office of the State
Superintendent of
Education
Dep’t of Disability
Servs.
7.
What is the status of efforts to mediate District Department of Transportation cases
previously identified in OAH’s backlog?

DDOT/WASA Mediation
There are currently approximately 886 pending cases filed by DDOT against WASA at OAH. In
November 2010, DDOT and WASA, through their attorneys, agreed to mediate the cases
through OAH’s mediation program. An Administrative Law Judge, who is also a certified
mediator, was assigned as the mediator. The first in a series of mediations was held on
November 30, 2010. Since then, two other mediation sessions have been held on December 21,
2010 and February 7, 2011. Upon the granting of a continuance at the request of the parties, the
next mediation session is scheduled for April 8, 2011. As a result of these efforts thus far, 95
cases have been dismissed and 30 cases settled, for a total of 125 resolved cases.

DDOT/Washington Gas Light Mediation
There are currently approximately 1,834 pending Notices of Violation issued by DDOT against
Washington Gas Light (“WGL”). During 2008 and 2009, DDOT and WGL participated in
numerous mediation sessions that were ultimately unsuccessful. On May 25, 2010, the parties
appeared for a status conference before an ALJ, after which they were to report to this
administrative court on their willingness to return to mediation.
On June 2, 2010, DDOT sent a Notice of Status of Discussions Regarding Mediation (the
“Notice”) to update the court. In the Notice, DDOT indicated that the agency required additional
time to consult with the DDOT Director before making a decision as to mediation.
March 14, 2011
Page 7 of 20
During a status conference on June 15, 2010, WGL stated that it was willing to continue
mediation discussions. However, DDOT was not interested in pursuing mediation at that time.
Since DDOT would not agree to mediate, OAH began to adjudicate the cases on the merits on a
weekly basis. In light of renewed concerns by the parties over the time and expense associated
with litigating these cases, on March 8, 2011, OAH convened a status conference to ascertain if
the parties were willing to return to mediation. The parties, through their legal counsel, informed
OAH that they would like to continue the status conference for 30 days to give them an
opportunity to negotiate a settlement of all the Notices of Violation that were issued to WGL
from 2007 to 2009, and possibly 2010. The request was granted, and the parties are required to
provide OAH with a status report on the negotiations by March 25, 2011, followed by a status
conference on April 2, 2011.
8.
Please provide the following with regard to transcripts:
a. A status update on the issue of transcripts. If there is a backlog, identify the reasons
for this and explain what OAH is doing to resolve it.
OAH is required by rules of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals to file the “record” in any
OAH case appealed to the Court of Appeals. The record consists of all the papers filed in the
case and a transcript of any hearings in which evidence has been taken. OAH generally has 60
days in which to prepare and file the record after an appeal has been filed with the Court of
Appeals.
OAH has made a significant push through its Office of the General Counsel to timely file the
record in cases appealed to the Court of Appeals. Since the beginning of FY11, we have filed
the record in approximately 74 cases. There are 25 cases in which a transcript is due.
There are two ongoing resource challenges which affect OAH’s ability to promptly file the
record with the Court of Appeals. The first is a shortage of staff members to gather the files,
copy the audio recordings of hearings onto CDs, prepare the cover papers, and copy and file the
record with the Court of Appeals. OAH has solicited and obtained a volunteer from a local law
school to assist in the preparation of records and hopes to recruit additional volunteer law
students this summer to assist with this ongoing effort.
b. In table format, please break out all OAH’s costs to process transcripts in fiscal years
2009, 2010, and 2011 to date.
Transcript Costs
FY 2009
FY 2010
$43,590
$40,000
FY 2011
(through 3/1/11)
$21,553
March 14, 2011
Page 8 of 20
9.
Please provide the following with regard to OAH’s adjudication of unemployment
insurance cases:
a. The agency’s level of compliance with current federal guidelines for unemployment
cases, by month, for fiscal years 2010 and 2011 to date.
The United States Department of Labor (DOL) has standards for the number of cases that should
be decided within certain timeframes. DOL’s regulations provide that 60 percent of all cases
should be decided within 30 days of filing; 80 percent of all cases should be decided within 45
days of filing; and 95 percent of cases should be decided within 90 days of filing. Please see
attached chart.
b. What steps is OAH taking, or has taken, to meet these guidelines, if any.
OAH has taken a number of steps to meet DOL standards. In February 2009, because of an
increase in filings, OAH increased the number of hearings scheduled.
In June 2009, OAH revised its methods of processing these cases and assigned legal assistants
and ALJs to work in teams. Since that change was implemented, and with some additional ALJs
assigned to work part-time in the area, OAH has met the standards more consistently. As can be
seen from the attached charts, OAH met or substantially exceeded the most stringent 30-day/60%
standard in 8 of the 12 months of FY10, with a fiscal year average of 64%, well above the DOL
standard.
c. In table format, please list the amount of intra-District funding dedicated to
employment insurance cases in OAH’s budget for each fiscal year in which the
agency has had jurisdiction of these cases. Also identify the amount of funding that
has actually been transferred to the agency in each fiscal year.
DOES IntraDistrict
Budget
Amount
Transferred
FY 2011
FY 2010
FY 2009
FY 2008
FY 2007
FY 2006
1,023,780
1,024,437
703,984
928,606
1,164,000
1,164,000
256,105
1,013,901
0
152,617
1,070,356
369,584
d. The amount of funding OAH budgeted and spent on UI cases for fiscal year 2010 and
fiscal year 2011.
FY 2011
(through 3/1)
FY 2010
UI Budget
1,023,780
1,024,437
UI Expenditures
256,105
1,199,975
(salary & fringe, only)
March 14, 2011
Page 9 of 20
Please provide the following with regard to OAH’s adjudication of rental housing cases:
10.
a. In table format, please provide the following for fiscal years 2009, 2010, and 2011 to
date:
(1) the total number of rental housing cases filed with OAH;
(2) the total number of orders issued by OAH in rental housing cases;
(3) with regard to the number of orders issued in rental housing cases, the number
of final orders and the number of interlocutory orders; and
(4) the number of open and pending rental housing cases.
Fiscal
Year
Cases
Filed
2009
2010
314
220
2011
30
Rental Housing Cases
Interlocutory
Final
Final and
Orders
Orders
Interlocutory
Issued
Issued
Orders
675
343
1018
843
274
1117
224
64
288
Open
Cases
Pending
Cases
51
240
48
category no
longer
captured
category no
longer
captured
213
(to 3/9/11)
b. Please provide, as an attachment, a list of all open and pending rental housing cases
identified in number (4) above.
Please see attached listing for open Rental Housing cases as of 3/9/11.
11.
OAH has adopted a performance accountability target of 85 percent of case dispositions
within 120 days of filing (non-UI cases). In table format, provide by case jurisdiction for
fiscal years 2010 and 2011 to date: (1) the total number of cases within the jurisdiction;
(2) the number of cases that have met this target; and (3) the percentage of cases that
have met the target.
As part of its FY10 Performance Plan, OAH adopted two standards relating to case processing:
(1) 95% of Unemployment Insurance cases resolved in 90 days from the filing date; and (2)
75%-85% (depending on the fiscal year in question) of non-UI cases resolved within 120 days of
the filing date. In FY10, OAH substantially met the UI standard at 93%. The chart that follows
reflects all non-UI cases that were entered into the new case management system which was
phased in during 1QFY10.
Jurisdiction
Dep’t of Public
Works
FY10
Total Cases
Filed
FY10
Cases Closed
w/in 120 days
1QFY11
Cases Filed
1QFY11
Cases Closed
w/in 120 days
2QFY11 (to
2/28) Cases
Filed
2QFY11
(to 2/28)
Cases Closed w/in 120
days
17,668
3420/4036
85%
2,737
959/1615
59%
1303
868/1355
64%
March 14, 2011
Page 10 of 20
Jurisdiction
FY10
Total Cases
Filed
FY10
Cases Closed
w/in 120 days
1QFY11
Cases Filed
1QFY11
Cases Closed
w/in 120 days
2QFY11 (to
2/28) Cases
Filed
2QFY11
(to 2/28)
days
Dep’t of
Employment
Servs.
3,123
2551/2616
98%
947
766/779
98%
446
551/580
95%
Dep’t of
Consumer &
Regulatory
Affairs
1,595
282/582
48%
276
141/291
48%
42
174/339
51%
Dep’t of Human
Servs. (incl.Shel)
864
476/528
90%
236
152/173
88%
154
143/161
89%
Dep’t of Health
573
30
1,324
29/91
32%
39/122
32%
31
Dep’t of
Transportation
141/198
71%
46/58
79%
17/71
24%
18/44
41%
5/20
25%
12
112
38
Dep’t of the
Environment
106
15/41
37%
12
Taxicab
Commission
1
0/1
0%
0
Metropolitan
Police Dep’t
11
9/9
100%
7
3/3
100%
5
4/4
100%
Fire &
Emergency
Med.Servs.
64
9/20
45%
2
2/9
22%
4
1/10
10%
Office of Tax &
Revenue
42
15/21
71%
27
3/6
50%
4
6/6
100%
Office of
Planning
38
4/10
40%
3
3/8
38%
3
1/4
25%
Dep’t of Mental
Health
15
6/6
100%
0
0
1/2
50%
Child & Family
Servs. Agency
1
0
0
1
1/1
100%
Dep’t of
Insurance,
Securities
Banking
Dep’t of Housing
0
0
0
269
12/94
39
6/10
60%
0
10/43
30
10/43
March 14, 2011
Page 11 of 20
Jurisdiction
FY10
Total Cases
Filed
& Community
Development
(Rental Housing)
FY10
Cases Closed
w/in 120 days
1QFY11
Cases Filed
13%
1QFY11
Cases Closed
w/in 120 days
2QFY11 (to
2/28) Cases
Filed
2QFY11
(to 2/28)
days
23%
23%
Dep’t of Health
Care Finance
110
61/68
90%
24
12/22
54%
25
8/16
50%
Office of the
Attorney General
17
12/13
92%
1
2/2
100%
2
0
Office of the
State
Superintendent
of Education
9
7/7
100%
0
2
1/2
50%
Dep’t of
Disability Servs.
4
1/1
100%
6
3
1/1
100%
12.
1/2
50%
The agency has instituted a number of new committees, and reinvigorated a number of
existing committees to address issues with agency operations.
a. Please provide a list of all committees in the agency, and the membership of the
committees.
b. Provide a description of each committee’s purpose, deliverable goals, and action plan,
if available.
c. Provide the planned or anticipated meeting schedule.
d. If the committee has deliverable goal(s), what is the timeframe for the deliverable(s)?
In FY10, internal committees provided support to many OAH functions. Most committees are
chaired by ALJs and have ALJs as members, with support staff participation where appropriate.
Summaries of the activities of OAH’s major operations committees follow.
Rules Committee
Chair: Judge John Dean
Members: Judges Erika Pierson, Elizabeth Figueroa, Nicholas Cobbs, Jesse Goode, Ann
Yahner, Jennifer Long; Attorney-Advisor Meredith Saladyga
The purpose of the Rules Committee was to undertake a comprehensive review and overhaul of
the OAH procedural rules. Proposed rules were issued in September and November, 2010. The
proposed rules were a result of a cooperative effort between OAH and stakeholder groups, with
the Committee producing an initial draft of the rules and sharing the draft with more than 40
private and governmental stakeholders, comprising a cross-section of individuals and groups
who regularly appear before OAH. The Committee held a series of meetings with the
March 14, 2011
Page 12 of 20
stakeholders and revised the proposed rules in light of suggestions and comments received at
those meetings and through comments submitted from the public and OAH ALJs and AttorneyAdvisors. After considering comments received, OAH published final revised procedural rules
in December 2010, which became effective January 1, 2011. The Committee also developed and
administered several internal and external training sessions on the new rules. During the
preparation of the revised rules, the Committee met weekly, sometimes twice-weekly to meet the
timetable requested by the Council for the promulgation of new rules. The Committee now
meets as needed to address any procedural rule matters.
Mediation Committee
Chair: Judge Beverly Nash
Members: Judges Elizabeth Figueroa, Caryn Hines, E. Savannah Little, Margaret Mangan and
Wanda Tucker
The purpose of the Mediation Committee is to expand the use of alternative dispute resolution at
OAH, thereby increasing the efficiency in which matters are resolved, as well as litigant
satisfaction associated with that resolution. Towards that end, the Committee coordinated the
opening of the newly-acquired OAH Mediation Center located on the seventh floor of OJS,
which includes conference and break-out rooms. The OAH Mediation Center opened in August
2010, and resolution of cases through mediation has increased significantly with this new
resource. The Committee analyzed OAH’s current mediation program and has gathered data
relating to the types of cases mediated and outcomes. The Committee also reviewed and
proposed revisions to the OAH draft rules on mediation and collected information about other
mediation programs and policies to develop the OAH program. The Committee is updating
forms to be used in the Mediation Center and plans to complete revisions by June 2011.
Recruitment Committee
Chair: Judge Louis Burnett (three-year term ended February 2011); succeeded by Judge Caryn
Hines
Members: Judges Joan Davenport, Audrey Jenkins, Margaret Mangan, Samuel McClendon, and
Arabella Teal; Attorney-Advisors Meredith Saladyga and Janell Smith
The Recruitment Committee’s purpose is to recruit legal interns to support the judges and the
Office of the General Counsel by conducting legal research, drafting and editing memoranda and
opinions, observing hearings and mediations conducted by Administrative Law Judges. The
Committee also coordinates a Summer Intern Program which includes having interns attend
Council hearings, proceedings in Superior Court and oral arguments at the Court of Appeals.
The Committee coordinates mentor assignments and conducts training seminars for the interns
on topics such as deference to agency decisions, evidence, mediation, and how a bill becomes a
law. During the fall semester 2010, two volunteer law clerks were placed. Goals include the
following placements: spring semester 2011, 5-7 part-time interns; summer 2011, 15 full-time
interns; fall 2011, 5-6 participants from local university externship programs.
Committee members attend recruitment and career fairs at local universities, partner with
professors at Catholic University, Howard University School of Law and University of the
District of Columbia School of Law, and cultivate relationships with university career services
directors outside of the region such as McGeorge University, University of Miami, and Vermont
School of Law. The Committee also partners with the judicial council of a local bar association
March 14, 2011
Page 13 of 20
which sponsors a legal internship program at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. The
Committee is planning monthly meetings.
Training Committee
Chair: Judge Paul Handy
Members: Judges Nicholas Cobbs, Arabella Teal, Elizabeth Figueroa and William England;
Legal Assistant Starr Gantt
The Training Committee provides professional development opportunities for ALJs and staff
members. During FY10, the Committee met quarterly and accomplished the following: (1)
partnership with the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) for ALJs and attorneys to attend
OAG’s Inns of Court programs; (2) development of a full-day in-house training program for
legal assistants; (3) cross-training of all judges in DPW cases; (4) coordination of general
training with the Workforce Development Administration; (5) facilitation of brown-bag lunch
discussions on legal issues for judges; (6) arrangement of bi-weekly legal assistant training
sessions led by ALJs.
Performance Measures Committee
Chair: Deputy Chief ALJ Mark D. Poindexter
Members: Judges E. Savannah Little and Robert Sharkey
In FY10, the Performance Measures Committee reviewed OAH’s existing performance
measures, researched and reviewed the performance standards adopted by other court systems,
and issued an extensive report providing recommendations to the Chief ALJ for enhanced FY
2011 agency performance measures to be tracked. During the preparation of its report, the
Committee scheduled bi-weekly meetings. The Committee will be expanding its ranks with new
volunteers and, working with the Case Management Committee, will be focusing on the
development of more individualized performance measures. The Committee expects to meet
monthly with additional recommendations issued by OAH’s consolidation in July 2011.
Ethics Committee
Chair: Judge John Dean
Members: Judges Joan Davenport, Robert Sharkey, James Harmon, Jesse Goode, and Sam
McClendon
In FY10, the Ethics Committee members responded informally to various requests for advice
from ALJs concerning the application of the OAH Code of Ethics for Administrative Law
Judges. The Committee’s work is on-going, and it meets as needed in response to ethics
inquiries.
Revenue Committee
Chair: Judge Wanda Tucker
Members: Judges Jesse Goode, Sharon Goodie, E. Savannah Little, Erika Pierson, Arabella Teal
and Steven Wellner; Attorney-Advisor Meredith Saladyga
The purpose of the Revenue Committee is to pursue revenue growth opportunities. OAH
identified the need for 11 additional Legal Assistant positions to operate efficiently. OAH first
requested funding for these positions its FY08 budget submission. The positions were not
funded and the Revenue Committee was charged with identifying funding sources.
March 14, 2011
Page 14 of 20
The OAH Establishment Act permits agencies, boards, and commissions to refer cases to OAH
for adjudication with the approval of the OAH Chief Administrative Law Judge. D.C. Official
Code § 2-1831.03(c)(1). Prior to the establishment of the Committee, there were standing
Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) between OAH and other agencies that referred cases
under this authority. To ensure that local funds allocated for adjudication in the agencies’
budgets followed the function, the MOUs required agencies to transfer local funding to OAH
using the intra-district transfer process. The Committee was charged with negotiating the
continuation of those MOUs in FY10. This responsibility was transferred to the Office of the
General Counsel for FY11.
The Committee’s primary focus is the development of a reimbursement rate and billing
convention that would allow OAH to claim federal funds for public benefit cases typically
referred to as “fair hearings” under federal law. While federal funds are available to cover a
substantial share of the salaries and administrative costs attendant to adjudicating these cases, the
District government did not claim these funds after the OAH Establishment Act transferred
responsibility for adjudicating these cases from the District government’s human services and
health care finance agencies to OAH. For FY10, the Committee shepherded the development of
a contract with Innovation Cost Solutions (ICS) for the development of a time reporting tool and
reimbursement rate that would withstand federal audit. The intent is to have OAH invoice the
District’s health care finance and human services agencies, who would claim the federal costs of
providing the adjudication services from the federal government and then transfer the federal
funds obtained to OAH. The Committee meets twice per month.
Website Committee
Chair: Attorney-Advisor Holly Kirk
Members: Judges Sharon Goodie, Nicholas Cobbs and John Rooney; Attorney-Advisors Janell
Smith and Meredith Saladyga; and IT Manager Phillip Fauci
The purpose of this Committee is to review the current website, update it and add new material.
Recently, the Office of the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) has scheduled OAH for website
migration to a new Content Management System. OAH is using this opportunity to review,
rewrite, and reorganize all of the content on the website to make it more user-friendly to parties.
The Committee ordinarily meets monthly. However with the current website migration project,
the Committee recently has been meeting weekly to meet an aggressive migration schedule.
OCTO had set a launch date for the new website of March 17, 2011. In early February, OCTO
informed OAH that the launch of the new website must be postponed while OCTO reviews the
stability of the servers hosting the new websites. OAH has not been informed of a new launch
schedule.
Case Management Committee
Chair: Judge Steven Wellner
Members: Judges Nicholas Cobbs, Elizabeth Figueroa, Jesse Goode, Audrey Jenkins, Margaret
Mangan, Beverly Nash, John Rooney, Ann Yahner; Attorney-Advisor Janell Smith; and IT
Manager Phillip Fauci
The Case Management Committee works to refine the court’s electronic case management
system that was implemented in 1Q 2010. The Committee’s objective is to help OAH meet case
processing goals based on legal standards for promptness and fairness and reasonable
expectations of government officials and the public. The Committee has made significant
progress in streamlining case processing through the development of electronic templates for
March 14, 2011
Page 15 of 20
orders and notices. The Committee has also greatly improved case tracking and reporting
functions. Committee members participate in weekly conference calls with the case
management system vendor about specific modifications to the case management and document
management systems, and the full Committee meets monthly.
Pro Bono Committee
Chair: Judge Sharon Goodie
Members: Judges Claudia Crichlow and Beverly Nash; Attorney Karim Marshall (Capital City
Fellow)
The Pro Bono Committee is responsible for the expansion of OAH’s Language Access program.
Before FY11, the agency relied on Language Line, a service that provides interpreters by
telephone. Beginning in 1Q FY11, interpreters are onsite two days per week to provide
interpretation in Spanish, Portuguese and Italian. The Committee also worked to help put in
place a contract for onsite interpreters for other languages. OAH has recently started translating
critical documents and forms into Spanish and Braille, and the Committee is in the process of
developing a protocol to prioritize the order in which to translate key documents.
Recommendations will be completed by summer 2011.
The Committee also manages the Pro Bono Panel which provides student lawyers from four area
law school clinics (American, Catholic, Georgetown and George Washington) to represent
parties at OAH. The Panel is already operating in the Unemployment Insurance jurisdiction, and
will be expanded to include public benefit matters from the Department of Human Services by
summer 2011. The Committee will also explore including law firm associates and government
attorneys on the Pro Bono Panel.
The Committee has also collaborated with Professor Faith Mullin of Catholic University’s
School of Law to design and implement the OAH Resource Center. Specific tasks on this
project include: (a) working with the D.C. Access to Justice Commission and the D.C. Bar to
recruit volunteer attorneys to work in the Resource Center assisting litigants in preparing for
their hearings; (b) designing and drafting fact sheets and information booklets for various
jurisdictions as well as for specific procedures, such as requesting a hearing; and (c) working
with the Office of Cable Television to produce two instructional videos directed at selfrepresented litigants that will be accessible on the OAH website as well as in the Resource
Center.
13.
The Committee had previously requested that OAH “commence bi-monthly stakeholder
meetings regarding access to justice.” OAH stated to the Committee a year ago that it
had started meeting with the Access to Justice Commission.
a. Do these bi-monthly meetings continue to take place?
b. Please provide the dates on which OAH met with stakeholders during the previous 12
months.
c. Are any other stakeholders invited and/or take part in these meetings?
d. What positive developments can be reported from these meetings?
March 14, 2011
Page 16 of 20
OAH has had regular meetings with Access to Justice Commission members, including meetings
in February 2010, April 2010, and October 2010. Most recently, on February 15, 2011, OAH
met with Commission members including DC Court of Appeals Judges Inez Smith Reid and
Anna Blackburne-Rigsby to discuss Access to Justice initiatives, particularly as they relate to the
development and staffing of the OAH Resource Center. This meeting included a tour of Phase 1
of OAH’s new hearing facility. These meetings have been invaluable in gaining insight into the
needs of self-represented litigants, particularly as OAH develops and staffs its Resource Center.
Through these meetings, OAH has also developed various contacts for the various Pro Bono
Committee projects outlined above. In addition, through regular meetings of OAH’s various
operations task force meetings, we receive regular feedback from public and private stakeholders
on all operations issues, including Access to Justice issues.
14.
What is the status of Prof. Faith Mullen’s 2-year fellowship (Bellow Fellowship) aimed at
assisting OAH in becoming more accessible to unrepresented litigants? Are there
specific deliverables for this project? Please explain.
The two-year Bellow Fellowship for Professor Faith Mullen of Catholic University’s Columbus
School of Law ended in 1QFY11. Through this Fellowship, Professor Mullen and her staff
provided invaluable support in increasing Access to Justice at OAH, including developing
informational materials and forms, facilitating several OAH stakeholder focus group meetings,
and conducting surveys and analyses of the impact of certain OAH procedures on selfrepresented litigants. Although her Fellowship has now ended, Professor Mullen continues to
offer her expertise and assistance in the development of the OAH Resource Center and the OAH
website, as well as placing volunteer law students. Upon the completion of her first year of the
Fellowship in 2009, Professor Mullen submitted an interim report summarizing her activities to
date. A copy of that report is attached. Professor Mullen expects to complete her final report on
or about April 30, 2011.
15.
The Committee report for PR 18-694 included a number of tasks for OAH with specified
deadlines. The last of these tasks was to be completed by February 2011. A chart
containing these tasks is copied below. For each task, please explain what OAH is doing,
or has done, to address the issue. Please also identify whether the task is completed, and
if not, when it will be.
TASK
DEADLINE
STATUS
- Appoint Rules
Revision Committee
Immediate
- Appoint committee on
case processing
Immediate
- Appoint committee to
prepare for move
- Commence bi-monthly
stakeholder meetings re:
access to justice
Immediate
Completed – OAH has convened a Rules Revision Committee
which promulgated revised procedural rules, effective January
1, 2011.
Completed – OAH has convened a Case Processing Committee
which conducted a nationwide survey of case processing
standards. A report/recommendation was issued in September
2010.
Completed – OAH convened a Relocation Committee to plan
for its swing-space and permanent moves.
Completed – OAH has met regularly with representatives of
the Access to Justice Commission and other stakeholders and
will continue a bi-monthly meeting schedule.
Immediate
March 14, 2011
Page 17 of 20
TASK
DEADLINE
STATUS
- Obtain executed MOU
with DOES
Immediate
- Evaluate space needs
of the agency
- Complete plan for
expanding alternative
dispute resolution
Immediate
Completed (FY 2010)/Pending (FY 2011) – On March 8, 2010,
DOES and OAH executed a MOU for 1QFY10 and on March
17, 2010 executed a Final FY2010 MOU. No MOU for
FY2011 has been executed. The FY2011 Budget Request Act
specifically provided for specified payment by DOES to OAH
for UI appeals. OCFO transferred funding for 1QFY11 to OAH
on March 9, 2011.
Pending – OAH continues to request from DRES additional
space on the 4th Floor, OJS.
Completed – OAH has convened a Mediation Committee to
develop its alternative dispute resolution plan and has
promulgated rules permitting directed mediation in all
jurisdictions. In addition, OAH opened its Mediation Center in
August 2010.
Completed – OAH moved to swing space on the 10th floor of
OJS in March 2010.
Completed – OAH convened a Case Management Committee
to work directly with the vendor to refine case tracking and
reporting needs, as well as increase utilization of electronic
templates in the preparation of orders and notices. Various
reporting and case tracking updates have been completed.
Completed – OAH completed initial recommendations for case
processing standards in September 2010
April 1, 2010
- Agency moves to
swing space
- Committee finishes
evaluation of case
tracking system
April 1, 2010
- Committee completes
drafting case processing
time lines
- Rules revision
committee completes its
work plan
May 1, 2010
- Complete plan
developing access to
legal assistance for
litigants
June 1, 2010
- Agreement with
Superior Court
accessing its multi-door
program
July 1, 2010
May 1, 2010
May 1, 2010
- Finish evaluating
office structure and
staffing plan
August 1, 2010
- Second/final move of
agency into
consolidated space
- Comply with
requirements of
October 1, 2010
October 1, 2010
Completed – In collaboration with more than 40 public and
private stakeholders, OAH promulgated revised procedural
rules, effective January 1, 2011.
Completed – OAH is hosting a Capital City Fellow dedicated
to the Access to Justice program and who has led the
development of OAH’s plan for increasing legal assistance for
litigants. Several initiatives have been launched including the
development of plain-language fact sheets and booklets,
implementing the use of in-person interpreters/translators, and
developing videos directed at self-represented litigants.
Pending – The OAH Mediation Committee has engaged
representatives of the Superior Court’s multi-door program but
the agency lacks funding for this mediation service. The
Committee is exploring alternative mediation sources, including
retired attorneys and supervised law students.
Ongoing – In FY10, OAH was restructured to include
dedicated Principal ALJs for Administration and DPW and
DDOT cases, as well as combining the Executive Director and
Clerk of Court positions. In preparation for the move in July
2011, OAH is assessing the operational efficiencies relating to
the consolidation of its offices, including cross-training
initiatives for all staff-levels.
Pending – Phase 2 of the construction is scheduled to be
completed in July 2011.
Completed – OAH has always been in compliance with both
the letter and spirit of the District’s Language Access Act, and
March 14, 2011
Page 18 of 20
TASK
DEADLINE
Language Access Act
- Implementation of
plain-language rules
February 1, 2011
- Compliance with OIG
September 2009 report
No date
- Update agency website
No date
- Finish review of
quality assurance
process
No date
16.
STATUS
in FY11 added in-person language interpretation and translation
capabilities for the public.
Completed – In collaboration with more than 40 public and
private stakeholders, OAH promulgated revised procedural
rules, effective January 1, 2011.
Completed – OAH has submitted all required compliance
documentation to the OIG relating to the September 2009
report.
Pending – OAH has updated its current website to include
revised forms and procedural rules. Working with OCTO,
OAH expects to launch its revised site, which will include OAH
cases, writable forms and information videos in 3QFY11.
Ongoing – In FY10, OAH shifted its staffing model to include
a Principal ALJ for Administration. Part of the responsibilities
of this position is to review court operations and implement
process improvements to promote greater efficiency and quality
assurance. Through its Case Management and Performance
Measures Committees, OAH continues to develop initiatives to
improve quality and efficiency in issuing decisions. In addition,
OAH has implemented regular training sessions for all stafflevels.
Please list all sources of Intra-District funding received by the OAH in fiscal year 20072011. For the current fiscal year list actual receipts and budgeted receipts.
Office of Administrative Hearings (FS0)
FY
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011*
DDOE
Budget Revenue
$ - $ $ - $ $ 75,000 $ 73,673
$ 43,220 $ 11,794
$ 73,955 $ 22,000
DOES
Budget
Revenue
$ 1,163,606 $ 1,050,356
$ 928,606 $ 152,617
$ 703,984 $
$ 1,024,437 $ 1,013,901
$ 1,023,780 $ 251,106
Intra-District Funds (0700)
CSSD (OAG)
DCLB
Budget Revenue
Budget Revenue**
$
- $
- $
- $
$
- $
- $
- $
$ 9,220 $ 9,220 $
- $
$ 9,220 $ 9,220 $ 11,000 $ 11,000
$ 10,265 $
- $ 11,000 $
-
OSSE
Budget
Revenue
$
- $
$
- $
$
- $
$ 10,437 $ 10,200
$
- $
-
$
$
$
$
$
Agency - FS0
Budget
Revenue
1,163,606 $ 1,050,356
928,606 $
152,617
788,204 $
82,893
1,098,314 $ 1,056,115
1,119,000 $
273,106
*Financial Information provided as of March 10, 2011 (SOAR)
**DCLB paid with a check of $11,000 but was returned because no cases were heard by OAH.
17.
Please provide the name of each “O-type” fund the OAH controls. The committee knows
of at least one. For each, provide for fiscal years 2007-2011 (to date): the opening
balance, expenditures, revenues, and closing balance. Also explain the purpose of the
fund. Should it be continued? If it is a non-lapsing fund, and it is continued, why should
it remain non-lapsing?
OAH controls one “O-Type” fund, Adjudication and Fees. This is a non-lapsing account that was
created to support the administrative adjudication services performed by OAH. Revenue for this
fund comes from one source: “reasonable filing, copying and other fees.” D.C. Official Code
§ 2-1831.05(b)(8). Such fees cannot be charged to the D.C. government or the U.S. government,
and include charges for transcription services, FOIA requests, and digital recordings of hearings.
The Adjudication and Fees “O-type” should fund be continued as a non-lapsing fund. Though
nominal, this fund allows for OAH to recover administrative costs associated with the
March 14, 2011
Page 19 of 20
adjudication of cases. Given the infrequent nature of requests, we also recommend that this fund
remain as a lapsing fund as it will be difficult to obligate the funds by a date certain.
Office of Administrative Hearings (FS0)
"Other" type Fund (0600)
Fiscal Year
Beginning Bal
Expenditures
Revenue
2007
0.00
185,169.12
48,862.50
2008
134,580.50
7,130.09
3,149.08
2009
1,379.46
15,107.26
7,169.07
2010
0.00
3,043.19
6,673.00
*2011
0.00
5,643.29
1,595.25
*Financial Information provided as of March 10, 2011 (SOAR)
18.
Closing Bal
134,580.50
1,379.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
The OAH is moving into newly built-out space. There was at one time a plan with
multiple phases. The Committee has been concerned whether the OAH would have
enough space, and whether it would be able to expand. Please comment, in detail, on the
move, the adequacy of the space, what is left to be done, and what else should be done.
Phased Relocation
On January 14, 2011, OAH and DRES convened a status meeting to discuss the phased
relocation approach. During this meeting, OAH reiterated the operational inefficiencies
associated with a two-phased move, particularly since the second phase of the move had not been
determined at the time. OAH currently occupies temporary space on four disparate floors (5, 7,
8 and 10) of OJS. OAH communicated concern with the negative impact to agency operations
that would result, particularly when the agency is already temporarily displaced.
DRES agreed to consolidate the proposed phased move approach to one move. The original date
for Phase 1 relocation was scheduled for February 18, 2011 with Phase 2 still yet to be
determined. DRES committed to honoring the agency’s request and revised the move date to
July 22, 2011.
Phase 1 construction continued as planned and was completed on February 25, 2011. OH and
DRES agreed that after this date, the Suite (450N) would remain locked and inaccessible until
Phase 2 is complete. DRES communicated that Phase 2 construction is slated to start on May 15,
2011 and conclude no later than July 7, 2011.
Adequacy of Space
When completed, Phases 1 and 2 of the construction will be adequate to meet OAH’s current
space needs, but not its needs in the immediate future. OAH wants to ensure that the new
location will not only be able to accommodate FTEs, but also the significant number of
volunteers that complement our staff. Although our agency is understaffed, we have made every
effort to identify free resources to augment our staff. This includes high school, undergraduate
and law school interns, ex-offender volunteers through DOES’ Project Empowerment program
and a Capital City Fellow.
March 14, 2011
Page 20 of 20
Throughout the selection process for OAH’s consolidated hearing facility, a recurring concern
raised by this Committee was whether the selected space would permit for expansion of OAH’s
operations. Whether by legislation or requests from sister agencies, OAH is continually
expanding the scope of its caseload. In addition, future initiatives relating to foreclosure
mediation and increasing Access to Justice for litigants will require additional space. DRES
repeatedly represented that OAH could expand on the 4th floor as needed. Given the delays
associated with the build-out of Phase 2 of the consolidated project – delays due primarily to the
need to relocate and build-out facilities for existing tenants – the flexibility envisioned with
expanding OAH’s operations at this location is less clear. OAH stands ready to cooperate with
the Executive and Council to resolve these space issues.
Outstanding Items
OAH is currently engaged with the Office of the Chief Technology Officer’s (OCTO) Server
Operations (Server Architecture), IT Servus (IT Support) and DC NET (Voice/Data
Connectivity) groups to define requirements, verify costs and services and establish an MOU for
the provision of services. OAH anticipates the execution of the MOUs no later than the end of
March 2011 to ensure that the agency will be fully operational by the July 22, 2011 move date.
The number of volunteers will vary, but at full capacity we would need to accommodate
approximately 90-100 staff.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at
442-9099.
Very truly yours,
Mary Oates Walker
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Attachments
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS -- FY2010 Administrative Leave Report
EMPLOYEE NAME
Barber,Claudia A
TITLE
Administrative Law Judge
Brinkley,Tanya L
Legal Administrative Specialist
Burnett,Louis J
Bussey,Linda
Butler,Tyrone T
Cash,Darrell A
Cobbs,Nicholas
Legal Administrative Specialist
Legal Assistant (Court)
Crichlow,Claudia A.
Crumpley,Steve
Davenport,Joan
Dawson,Anita C
Executive Assistant
Dean,John P
Donnelly,Darrell
Supvy Clerk of Court
England Jr.,William Luke
Fauci,Phillip
Inform Tech Specialist
Figueroa,Elizabeth D
Gantt,Starr T
Goode,Jesse Paul
Legal Administrative Specialis
Goodie,Sharon E
Handy,Paul Brooks
Harmon,James C
Harrington,Lolitha F
Harvey,Scott A.
Hill,Lakisha
Legal Assistant (OA) (Court)
Supvy Legal Assistant (Court)
Hines,Caryn L
Jackson,Lateefah N
Jenkins,Audrey
Johnson,Charlotte M
Kirk,Holly B
Lassiter,Sheila L
Lee,Lonneshia R
Little,Elsie S
Staff Attorney
Legal Admnistrative Specialist
Long,Jennifer M
DATES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
10/13/2009 - 10/16/2009
02/03/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
3/12/2010
2/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
6/1/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
12/21/2009 - 12/31/2009
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
11/04/2009 - 11/05/2009
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/03/2010 - 02/09/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
9/30/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
5/21/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
07/01/2010 - 07/16/2010
2/8/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
04/01/2010 - 04/19/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
2/8/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
06/15/2010 - 06/16/2010
10/8/2009
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
09/24/2010 - 09/30/2010
11/03/2009 - 11/06/2009
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
05/24/2010 - 05/28/2010
6/14/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
11/3/2009 - 11/5/2009
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
10/15/2009 - 10/16/2009
11/03/2009 - 11/6/2009
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
11/05/2009 - 11/06/2009
2/8/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
03/11/2010 - 03/12/2010
REASON FOR THE LEAVE
NAWJ Conference
ABA Mid-Year Conference
Gov't Closure Due to Weather
NAWJ Mid-Year Conference
Supreme Court Swearing In Ceremony
Administrative leave following notice of termination
NAALJ Convention
Administrative leave following notice of suspension
Teaching Development
Gov't Late Arrival Due to Weather
Administrative Leave Pending Investigation
Teaching obligation - NITA
Jury Duty
NAALJ Conference
Teaching obligation at Trinity University
NJC Training
NAALJ Convention
ABA Conference
NAALJ Conference
National Bar Issues Symposium
NAWJ Mid-Year Conference
STATUS OF LEAVE
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
STATUS
Current
Current
Current
Current
Separated
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Separated
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Separated
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Separated
Current
Current
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS -- FY2010 Administrative Leave Report
EMPLOYEE NAME
TITLE
Mangan,Margaret A.
Masulla,Mary
McClendon,Samuel
McLaughlin,Marc C.
Program Analyst
Mcdonald,Calonette M
Nash,Beverly
Pierson,Erika L
Poindexter,Mark D
Rhames,Beneddta A
Rivers,Beverly D
General Counsel
Rooney,John T
Saladyga,Meredith J
Staff Attorney
Sharkey,Robert E
Sigler,Amber M
Smith,Janell T
Staff Attorney
Stevenson,Cynthia
Stewart,Lorenzo J
Teal,Arabella W.
Tucker,Wanda R
Wagner,Cecilia B
Mgmnt Liaison Specialist
Staff Attorney
Walker,Mary O.
Weaver,Brandon W
Wellner,Steven M
Wess,Elizabeth J
White,Brittani L
Williams,Tyrone A
Wilson Taylor,N Denise
Yahner,Ann Catherine
DATES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
06/07/2010 - 06/15/2010
10/14/2009 - 10/15/2009
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
3/12/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
07/07/2010 - 07/23/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
10/14/2009 - 10/15/2009
11/03/2009 - 11/6/2009
2/8/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
3/12/2010
4/7/2010
4/23/2010
06/01/2010 - 06/02/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
3/12/2010
06/14/2010 - 06/18/2010
10/19/2009 - 10/23/2009
11/13/2009
12/22/2009
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
08/16/2010 - 08/17/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
11/04/2009 - 11/5/2009
02/03/2010 - 02/08/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
4/13/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
3/26/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
4/13/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
2/8/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
7/23/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
11/03/2009 - 11/06/2009
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
4/9/2010
02/10/2010 - 02/11/2010
NBA Meeting
NAWJ Conference
NAWJ Conference
Admin Leave Pending Conclusion
of Investigation
NAWJ Conference
NAALJ Conference
NAWJ Conference
DAG Mediation Training
Ethics & Mediation Training
NAALJ Mid-Year Conference
NAWJ Conference
NJC Training
NJC Training
DOL Quality Review
OAH transition meetings
Lecturer for the NAWC Judiciary College
Nat'l Bar Association Conference
D.C. Bar Course
JFBA Moot Court Competition
Ethics Course for DC Bar
unknown
NAALJ Conference
DC Judicial Bar Conference
STATUS OF LEAVE
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
STATUS
Current
Current
Current
Separated
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Separated
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Separated
Current
Current
Current
Current
Separated
Current
Current
Current
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS (FS0) -- FY2011 Administrative Leave Report
EMPLOYEE NAME
Barber,Claudia A
TITLE
Brinkley,Tanya L
Burnett,Louis J
Bussey,Linda
Carroll,Maryann
Cash,Darrell A
Cobbs,Nicholas
Program Analyst
Coffer,Rodney Q
Crichlow,Claudia A.
Crumpley,Steve
Davenport,Joan
Dawson,Anita C
Executive Assistant
Dean,John P
England Jr.,William Luke
Fauci,Phillip
Inform Tech Specialist
Figueroa,Elizabeth D
Fuller,Yohance S
Gantt,Starr T
Goode,Jesse Paul
Executive Director
Goodie,Sharon E
Handy,Paul Brooks
Harmon,James C
Harrington,Lolitha F
Harvey,Scott A.
Hill,Lakisha
Hines,Caryn L
Jackson,Lateefah N
Jenkins,Audrey
Johnson,Charlotte M
Kirk,Holly B
Attorney-Advisor (General)
Lane,Tyrell T
Lassiter,Sheila L
Lee,Lonneshia R
DATES OF ADMIN LEAVE
10/19/2010 - 10/20/2010
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
10/12/2010 - 10/14/2010
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
10/12/2010 - 10/14/2010
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
10/12/2010 - 10/13/2010
1/27/2011
10/1/2010 - 10/8/2010
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
10/12/2010 - 10/14/2010
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2010
10/04/2010 - 10/08/2010
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
NAWJ Bar to Bench Conference
Late Arrival Due to Weather
NAALJ Annual Conference
Placed on Admin Leave after receipt of
of Suspension Notice
STATUS OF LEAVE
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
STATUS
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Separated
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Curent
Separated
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS (FS0) -- FY2011 Administrative Leave Report
EMPLOYEE NAME
Little,Elsie S
Long,Jennifer M
TITLE
Mangan,Margaret A.
Masulla,Mary
McClendon,Samuel
Mcdonald,Calonette M
Muttamara,Doungamon Fon
Nash,Beverly
Oden,Kiyo D.
Pierson,Erika L
Poindexter,Mark D
General Counsel
Rhames,Beneddta A
Rooney,John T
Saladyga,Meredith J
Sharkey,Robert E
Sigler,Amber M
Smith,Janell T
Stevenson,Cynthia
Mgmnt Liaison Specialist
Stewart,Lorenzo J
Teal,Arabella W.
Tucker,Wanda R
Walker,Mary O.
Weaver,Brandon W
Wellner,Steven M
Wess,Elizabeth J
White,Brittani L
Williams,Tyrone A
Wilson Taylor,N Denise
Yahner,Ann Catherine
DATES OF ADMIN LEAVE
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
03/10/2011 - 03/11/2011
10-13-2010 - 10-22-2010
10/12/2010 - 10/15/2010
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
02/10/2011 - 02/11/2011
10-12-2010 - 10-13-2010
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/18/2011
1/27/2011
10-07-2010 - 10-22-2010
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
1/27/2011
Nat'l Conference of Women Judges
Nat'l Assoc. of Women Judges Conf.
NAALJ Conference
American Assoc. Mid-Year Conference
NAWJ & NAALJ Annual Conference
STATUS OF LEAVE
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
STATUS
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Separated
Current
Current
Current
FY10-FY11 OAH UI Appeals Data
Fed Std
Cases Filed
30=<
45=<
90=<
Total
Closed*
60%
80%
95%
Oct-09
Nov-09
Dec-09
Jan-10
Feb-10
296
75%
87%
95%
262
68%
84%
94%
280
69%
82%
93%
236
53%
74%
90%
203
57%
83%
94%
246
232
278
222
173
Quarterly 30
day average
71%
Mar-10
Apr-10
May-10
Jun-10
Jul-10
Aug-10
Sep-10
217
59%
83
213
65
82
289
68
83
262
72
91
229
52
76
257
63
80
290
68
82
93
89
93
95
93
93
92
223
188
175
219
229
226
168
56%
68%
61%
84%
80
85%
*Includes only cases closed by decision as defined by DoL.
Note: In February 2010, the government was closed for two days and transportation restricted for three additional days.
80%
Quarterly 45
day average
Fed Std
Cases Filed
30=<
45=<
90=<
Total
Closed*
Quarterly 30
day average
Quarterly 45
day average
60%
80%
95%
Oct-10
Nov-10
Dec-10
Jan-11
Feb-11
3/1/2011
(Partial)
347
75%
89%
98%
301
61%
80%
98%
295
19%
79%
97%
226
13%
69%
92%
220
38%
67%
91%
40
56%
67%
94%
234
251
213
261
263
104
52%
83%
*Includes only cases closed by decision as defined by DoL.
Apr-11
May-11
Jun-11
Jul-11
Aug-11
Sep-11
OPEN RENTAL HOUSING CASES AS OF MARCH 9, 2011
Case Name
Singletary, Richard v. Tenants of 1838 Maryland Ave., NE
Hamilton, Gail vs. Gelman Mgmt Co.
Rosenberg, Erica vs. Potomac Property Mgmt
Haskins, John vs. Kirkland, Gustas
Denny, Phyliss vs. Deutsche Bank National Trust
c/o Specialized Asset Mgmt, LLC
Reese, Vivian vs. Urban Investment Partner, LP
Simms, Thomas L. vs. Gaines Real Estate Mgmt
5741 Colorado Ave. NW Tenant Assn, Inc. vs.
Washington Communities, Inc.
Singletary, Richard vs. Tenants of: 1834 Maryland Ave., NE
Schaertel, Holly vs. Watassa Mgmt, LLC
Cruel, Faythe vs. Watassa Mgmt, LLC
Kelley, Ryan vs. Watassa Mgmt, LLC
Manfredo, Joseph vs. Watassa Mgmt, LLC
Reyes, Pedro vs. Watassa Mgmt, LLC
Foster, Nikolas vs. Watassa Mgmt, LLC
Horowitz, Alex vs. Watassa Mgmt, LLC
Danoff, Alex vs. Watassa Mgmt, LLC
Dimovska, Donika vs. Wataasa Mgmt, LLC
Phelan, Todd vs. Watassa Mgmt, LLC
Warner-Osborne, Liz vs. Watassa Mgmt, LLC
Hodges, Darin vs. McKnight, Jermaine
Martin, Dameian vs. Gaskins, William A.
Kelsey, Serita vs. MPM Mgmt
Reamer, Andrew D. vs. B.F. Saul Co. and Klingle Corp.
Richard Mancini, et al vs. Hagner Mgmt Corp.
Berhan Hago, et al vs. Dorchester House et al
Johnson, Wilbur vs. Parcell 13 Associates LP
Rapid Funding Corp. Profit Sharing and Trust vs. Ealley, Joni
Blakeney, Michele Renee vs. Blance Heard-Smith
Sutton, Christopher T. vs. Highland
Hale, Gwendolyn vs. Novo Development Corp.
Chaney, Arlena vs. American Rental Mgmt Co., Inc
Summers, Carol Nadeen vs. McCain, Jaret
Case Number
2011-DHCD-CI 20,834
2011-DHCD-TP 30,043
2011-DHCD-TP 30,042
2011-DHCD-TP 30,041
Category
Capital Improvement
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Open Date
02/03/11
02/16/11
02/16/11
02/16/11
2011-DHCD-TP 30,040
2011-DHCD-TP 30,039
2011-DHCD-TP 30,038
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
02/14/11
02/14/11
02/14/11
2011-DHCD-RP-2010-00009
2011-DHCD-CI 20,835
2011-DHCD-TP 30,035
2011-DHCD-TP 30,034
2011-DHCD-TP 30,033
2011-DHCD-TP 30,032
2011-DHCD-TP 30,031
2011-DHCD-TP 30,030
2011-DHCD-TP 30,029
2011-DHCD-TP 30,028
2011-DHCD-TP 30,027
2011-DHCD-TP 30,026
2011-DHCD-TP 30,025
2011-DHCD-TP 30,037
2011-DHCD-TP 30,036
2011-DHCD-TP 30,024
2007-DHCD-TP 29,018
2008-DHCD-TP 12,085
2008-DHCD-TP 11,552
2011-DHCD-TP 30,023
2011-DHCD-TP 30,022
2011-DHCD-TP 30,021
2009-DHCD-TP 29,593
2008-DHCD-TP 29,431
2006-DHCD-TP 28,366
2008-DHCD-TP 29,445
Declaratory Relief
Capital Improvement
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
01/05/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
02/03/11
08/05/07
11/07/08
11/02/07
01/28/11
01/28/11
01/28/11
05/19/09
09/15/08
07/01/05
09/29/08
B.F. Saul Co. vs. Tenants of 3133 Connecticut Ave., NW
Nelson, Blake vs. B.F. Saul Co. and Klingle Corp.
Fabian, David vs. N Street N.W. Associates, LLC / Dreyfuss Mgmt
Birnbawn, Soledad vs. Dreyfuss Mgmt
Daly, Gregory vs. Tippett, James T.
Daly, Gregory vs. Tippett, James T.
Gregory Daley vs. Tippett, James T.
Alaron, Jairon vs. NUYEN, DAVID
McFadden, Ezekial vs. Dahlgreen Court, LLC
Van Ness South Tenants Assn, Inc vs. Archstone-Smith Properties
Lederer, Brian vs. Archstone-Smith Properties
Stewart, Carlos vs. Young, Raymond
Kennedy Warren Resident Assn, Inc. vs. B.F. Saul Co. and Klingle
Corp.
Molina, Maria vs. NUYEN, DAVID
Kennedy Warren Resident Assn, Inc. vs. B.F. Saul Co. and Klingle
Corp.
James, Marietta vs. Gates, Hudson & Associates, Inc.
Morris, Jayme vs. Phifer Realty, Inc.
Thaxton, Velda A. vs. Stancie, Delores
Ruina, Ellen vs. B.F. Saul Co. and Klingle Corp.
Thomas Ivancie vs. Estate of Lewis H. Curd
1433 T Street Tenants' Assn c/o Concepcion Majano vs. 1433 T
Street Associates LLC
Hernandez, Jose vs. Park Road Associates/Morris Mgmt
Baca, Rudolfo vs. 4000 Massachusetts Ave. Partners, LLC
The 1445 Spring Road Tenants' Assn vs. The Barac Co.
Sergreti, Mario J. vs. Deiulis, Luke
Randolph, Stanley vs. Bojan Mgmt Corp.
Burwen, Dale vs. Archston-Smith Communities
Barrigan, Maria vs. Horning Brothers
Avila, Juan A. vs. Mollie Rosendorf
Chaney, Arlena vs. American Rental Mgmt Co.
Fabian, David vs. N Street N.W. Tenant Assn, LLC
Ravenel Tenant Assn vs. Carmel Partners, LLC
Wind, Amy vs. Archston-Smith Communities
Jones, II, Myran D. vs. Brooks, Rose
2006-DHCD-CI 20,797
2006-DHCD-TP 28,724
2007-DHCD-TP 28,942
2007-DHCD-TP 28,929
2007-DHCD-TP 27,718
2006-DHCD-TP 28,804
2008-DHCD-DR 2008 00008
2008-DHCD-TP 29,191
2011-DHCD-TP 30,020
2007-DHCD-TP 28,221
2007-DHCD-TP 28,202
2011-DHCD-TP 29,159
Capital Improvement
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Declaratory Relief
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
10/04/06
10/04/06
04/20/07
04/06/07
10/10/06
10/10/06
07/21/09
02/25/08
01/19/11
03/08/07
03/08/07
01/18/08
2008-DHCD-TP 29,171
2008-DHCD-TP 29,192
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
02/04/08
02/22/08
2007-DHCD-TP 29,125
2007-DHCD-TP 29,120
2007-DHCD-TP 29,046
2007-DHCD-TP 29,035
2007-DHCD-TP 29,017
2007-DHCD-TP 28,989
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
12/17/07
12/06/07
08/31/07
08/16/07
08/01/07
06/14/07
2009-DHCD-TP 29,664
2007-DHCD-TP 28,978
2007-DHCD-TP 28,896
2009-DHCD-TP 29,663
2009-DHCD-TP 29,580
2007-DHCD-TP 28,891
2009-DHCD-TP 29,564
2007-DHCD-TP 28,828
2006-DHCD-TP 28,799
2009-DHCD-TP 29,560
2006-DHCD-TP 28,784
2006-DHCD-TP 28,748
2009-DHCD-TP 29,545
2009-DHCD-TP 29,531
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
09/21/09
06/04/07
02/17/07
08/19/09
05/12/09
03/21/07
04/23/09
04/02/07
09/29/06
04/09/09
09/07/06
08/04/06
03/23/09
02/26/09
Rice, Tresa A. vs. UDR/ Clarence Kelly
Burkhardt, Christine vs. B.F. Saul Co. and Klingle Corp.
Johnson, Campbell vs. MPM Mgmt
Cleveland House Tenant Assn, Inc. vs. Charles E. Smith
Alexander, Andrea A. vs. A & A Marbury LLC
Wassem, Don vs. B.F. Saul Co. and Klingle Corp.
Kennedy Warren Tenant Assn vs. B.F. Saul Co. and Klingle Corp.
Tenants' of 6000 13th Street, NW vs. Ahmed, Inc.
Seyoum, Mengistu vs. Ahmed, Inc.
Farried Jassiem vs. Milby, Joe
Jackson, Carlita vs. Mallard, Albert
NCPTTA President vs. American Rental Mgmt Co.
Delazo, Ana vs. Opmax LLC
Opmax, LLC vs. Viera, Edifonso
Opmax, LLC vs. Clara, Crescencio
Lazo, Juan vs. Opmax LLC
Ortiz, Felipe vs. Opmax, LLC
1630 Park Road Tenant Assn, Inc. vs. Tenacity Fleetwood LLC
Nelson, Blake vs. B.F. Saul Co.
Martin, Alex Cleveland House Tenants Assn vs. Smith Property
Holding
Wassem, Don vs. B.F. Saul Co. and Klingle Coporation
Shulman, Lisa vs. Tenants of: 4000 Massachusetts Ave., NW
James Tippett Revocable Trust vs. Daly, Gregory
Ballard, James vs. MPM Mgmt
Segreti, Mario J. vs. Deiulis, Mr Luke
Escobar et al, Luz Maria vs. The Barac Co.
Hartsfield, Harvest vs. Lofland, James
2008-DHCD-TP 29,508
2006-DHCD-TP 28,708
2009-DHCD-TP 27,294
2006-DHCD-TP 28,700
2008-DHCD-TP 29,454
2006-DHCD-TP 28,649
2006-DHCD-TP 28,524
2008-DHCD-TP 29,344
2008-DHCD-TP 29,343
2008-DHCD-TP 29,324
2008-DHCD-TP 29,320
2008-DHCD-TP 29,302
2008-DHCD-TP 29,288
2008-DHCD-TP 29,287
2008-DHCD-TP 29,286
2008-DHCD-TP 29,285
2008-DHCD-TP 29,284
2008-DHCD-TP 29,271
2008-DHCD-TP 29,205
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
01/06/09
07/14/06
03/10/09
07/11/06
10/15/08
06/08/06
01/31/06
07/02/08
07/02/08
06/10/08
06/10/08
05/27/08
05/12/08
05/12/08
05/12/08
05/12/08
05/12/08
04/28/08
03/10/08
2006-DHCD-TP 28,222
2006-DHCD-TP 28,220
2007-DHCD-CI 20,821
2008-DHCD-TP 29,241
2008-DHCD-TP 29,274
2008-DHCD-TP 29,216
2006-DHCD-TP 28,326
2008-DHCD-TP 29,212
10/04/06
10/04/06
11/29/07
03/31/08
05/07/08
03/24/08
10/04/06
03/17/08
Nwanze, G. & A. vs. Tenants of: 912 Gallatin Street, NW
Dorchester House Associates, LLC vs. Tenants of: 1329-1337 Ft.
Stevens Drive, NW
Lopez, Roberto vs. NUYEN, DAVID
Opmax LLC vs. Flores, Blanca
1841 Columbia Road Custodian, LLC vs.
Tenants of: 1841 Columbia Road, NW
Angelos, Maya vs. The DeFabio Co.
2008-DHCD-SR 20,114
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Capital Improvement
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Substantial
Rehabilitation
2009-DHCD-SF 20,098
2008-DHCD-TP 29,198
2008-DHCD-TP 29,194
Services and Facilities
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
02/26/09
03/04/08
02/25/08
2006-DHCD-CI 20,819
2011-DHCD-TP 30,017
Capital Improvement
Tenant Petition
10/19/06
01/06/11
03/10/08
Cazares, Leticia vs. Brannen, Edward
Luther, Rahsaan vs. Wilson, Lillian
Kelly, Joseph Creed vs. Ankh Het Auset Property Mgmt
Jenkins, Michael vs. Hardy, Sandra
Gordon, Tamela vs. Fred A. Smith Co.
Laurena Young vs. Dudley Pro Realty
Gaston, Renee vs. Washington Property Mgmt
Finneran, Brian J. vs. Malhotra, Savita
Roth, Lars vs. Metro Real Estate Properties, LLC
Venson, Wanda L. vs. Borger Mgmt, Inc.
Tiefenbacher, Wendy vs. B.F. Saul Co.
Venable, Debra Knight vs. Diplomat Mgmt
Jolly, Darnesha vs. Edwards, Adolphe
Ghebretensaie, Rezene vs. Teklu, Mekonnen
Tekleab, Michael vs. Teklu, Makonnen
Beene, Mozel C. vs. Tenants of: 4022 9th Street, NE
Crosbie, Amanda vs. Mcleod, Tracey D.
Reddick, William vs. TMS Investments, LLC
Sokol, Devleta D. vs. Vision Realty Mgmt, LLC
Monroe, Shawnette vs. Vista Ridge Limited Partnership
Rashid, Fatima R. vs. Muhammad, Fitrah
Foos, David vs. Kids Konnection
Bowlds, Anthony vs. Joseph, Carlton
Dyes, Sylvia vs. Peabody & Theoharis Mgmt
The Klingle Corp. vs. , Tenant of 3133 Connecticut Ave., NW
Colchamiro, Eric vs. Lucey, Richard and Susan
Dahlgreen Courts Tenant Assn vs. Columbia Mgmt
Callas Vaughan vs. Urban Investment Partners
Thomas, Gregory vs. Lipinski, Donald
Kelly, Ella Mizzell vs. Peter N. G. Schwartz Mgmt Co., Inc.
Harper, Adam vs. Seyoum, Hagos
Vega Investment Corp. / C.H. Houston Apartments vs.
Tenants of 1712 16th Street, NW
Lopez, Harold vs. Solloso, Manuel
Mitchell, Carlotta vs. Broom, Paul
Elliott Randolph, Zelpha vs. Metropolitan Cooperative Associates
2011-DHCD-TP 30,018
2010-DHCD-TP 30,012
2010-DHCD-TP 30,010
2010-DHCD-TP 30,009
2010-DHCD-TP 30,008
2010-DHCD-TP 30,007
2010-DHCD-TP 30,004
2010-DHCD-TP 30,003
2010-DHCD-TP 30,002
2010-DHCD-TP 30,001
2010-DHCD-TP 30,000
2010-DHCD-TP 29,999
2010-DHCD-TP 29,997
2010-DHCD-TP 29,996
2010-DHCD-TP 29,995
2010-DHCD-SF 20,101
2010-DHCD-TP 29,992
2010-DHCD-TP 29,991
2010-DHCD-TP 29,990
2010-DHCD-TP 29,986
2010-DHCD-TP 29,984
2010-DHCD-TP 29,983
2010-DHCD-TP 29,982
2010-DHCD-TP 29,980
2010-DHCD-00187
2010-DHCD-00184
2010-DHCD-00183
2010-DHCD-00182
2010-DHCD-00181
2010-DHCD-00180
2010-DHCD-00179
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
01/06/11
12/21/10
12/15/10
12/10/10
12/10/10
12/06/10
12/06/10
11/24/10
11/24/10
11/24/10
11/24/10
11/24/10
11/10/10
11/10/10
11/10/10
11/10/10
11/02/10
11/02/10
11/02/10
10/27/10
10/27/10
10/13/10
10/13/10
10/06/10
09/28/10
09/27/10
09/27/10
09/27/10
09/27/10
09/27/10
09/27/10
2010-DHCD-00174
2010-DHCD-00172
2010-DHCD-00171
2010-DHCD-00169
Capital Improvement
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
09/03/10
09/13/10
09/13/10
09/01/10
Alexandrer, Paris vs. Metropolitan Cooperative Associates
Elliott, Annie G. vs. Metropolitan Cooperative Associates
Sullivan, Terence vs. Metropolitan Cooperative Associates
Feemster, Romann vs. Kids Konnection
Linder, Crystal vs. Kids Konnection
Simonton, Tracie vs. UIP Property Mgmt, Inc.
Wiiliams, Roland vs. Metropolitan Cooperative Associates
Wiiliams, Roland vs. Metropolitan Cooperative Associates
Few, Julie vs. Richmond, Roger
Smith, Mercy vs. UIP Mgmt
Metrakas, Eugenia vs. Joseph Mgmt, LLC
Haddad, Edward vs. Johnson, Jerald E.
Tafazzoli, Sheiba vs. Small, Georgette
Anthony, Noah vs. Dreyfuss Real Estate Co.
Anderson, Rodney vs. Doby, Caryl
Washington, Tonica vs. A & A Marbury, LLC
and Urban Investment Partners
Woodard, McKinley vs. Shingler, Felicia
Gutstein, Dan vs. Peterson, Christine
Cunningham, William vs. Sonka, Joe
Ingram, Calvin vs. Mount Sinai Baptist Church
White, Tracey vs. Doyle, Adam
Saunders, Montee vs. New Parkchester
Housing Cooperative, Inc.
Howell, Charisma vs. Borger Mgmt, Inc.
Lamey, Deborah vs. Capitol City Property
Braga, Jennifer Jaci vs. Simmons, Edward
Johnson, Eric vs. Dudley Pro Realty
Toney, Curtis vs. Dudley Pro Realty
Spencer, Anna vs. Dudley Pro Realty
Ugbangim, Agbanim vs. Won Ho Choi
Solano, Lilia vs. Lanier Associates
Pawlik, Theodore vs. Lanier Associates
Assalaam, Ahmed vs. Home Realty, Inc
Watson, Felicia vs. The Pleasant Park Cooperative, Inc.
Atchole, Badebana vs. Royal, Craig
Abdul-Alim, Jamaal vs. Ward, Cynthia
2010-DHCD-00168
2010-DHCD-00167
2010-DHCD-00166
2010-DHCD-00165
2010-DHCD-00164
2010-DHCD-00163
2010-DHCD-00160
2010-DHCD-00159
2010-DHCD-00155
2010-DHCD-00154
2010-DHCD-00151
2010-DHCD-00149
2010-DHCD-00148
2010-DHCD-00145
2010-DHCD-00141
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
09/01/10
09/01/10
09/01/10
09/01/10
09/01/10
09/01/10
09/01/10
09/01/10
08/20/10
08/09/10
08/02/10
08/02/10
07/19/10
07/26/10
07/19/10
2010-DHCD-00132
2010-DHCD-00130
2010-DHCD-00129
2010-DHCD-00127
2010-DHCD-00126
2010-DHCD-00125
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
07/12/10
07/12/10
07/07/10
07/07/10
07/07/10
07/07/10
2010-DHCD-00123
2010-DHCD-00120
2010-DHCD-00119
2010-DHCD-00118
2010-DHCD-00116
2010-DHCD-00114
2010-DHCD-00113
2010-DHCD-00109
2010-DHCD-00108
2010-DHCD-00107
2010-DHCD-00105
2010-DHCD-00100
2010-DHCD-00099
2010-DHCD-00098
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
06/18/10
06/21/10
06/21/10
06/21/10
06/18/10
06/18/10
06/18/10
06/08/10
06/08/10
06/08/10
06/08/10
05/27/10
05/27/10
05/13/10
Collins, Deborah vs. Tilahun, Henok
Hubbard, Angela vs. Parker, Tracey G.
Jerome, Jerry vs. Foley Properties
Holmes, Kyana D. vs. Bishop, Jacqueline
Kenneth A. Mazzer vs. Klingle Corp.
Tenants of 3133 Connecticut Ave., NW vs. Klingle Corp.
Block, Marc David vs. B.F. Saul Co.
Tyler, Billie vs. Lanier Associates
Diana Prieto vs. Lanier Associates
Kaplan, Ross vs. Lanier Associates
Graham, Mary vs. Lanier Associates
Dais, Leila vs. Treetops LLC
Eagle Maintence Services, Inc. vs. Gonzalez, Maria
Weeks, Vivian O. vs. Murtaugh, Everett
Goodine, Ulysses S. vs. Twepen LLC
Jerome, Jerry vs. Vanderbilt Mortgage
Jerome, Jerry vs. Vanderbelt Mortgage
Alston, Lateaqua vs. Roman, Patricia
Batson, Melinda S. vs. UIP Mgmt Co.
Terrell, Karee vs. Leftwich, Curtis
Hamilton, Gail vs. Gelman Mgmt Co.
Carpenter, Jo vs. The Markswright Co., Inc.
Catalano, Julie vs. McKnight, Erica
Pimble, Hattie vs. Proctor, Leroy
Kryzwick, Thomas vs. Charles H.W. Verbeck
Bradshaw, Robin vs. JB Dorsey and Associates
Wood, Barbara vs. 76 M, Inc.
Hubbard, Angela vs. Parker, Tracey G.
Frazier, Terry Kidd vs. St. James Mutual Homes. Inc.
Qualls, Anthony vs. Swartz, Robert
1773 Lanier Place, NW Tenants Assn vs. Lanier Associates
Masam, Ilika vs. Garcia, Jose I.
Henry, Liane vs. Watson, Michael
Sulla, Olga vs. Taboroff, June
Kimani, Harry M. vs. Shega, Inc.
Williams, Rudolph vs. Shega, Inc.
2010-DHCD-00097
2010-DHCD-00095
2010-DHCD-00092
2010-DHCD-00087
2010-DHCD-00083
2010-DHCD-00082
2010-DHCD-00081
2010-DHCD-00079
2010-DHCD-00078
2010-DHCD-00077
2010-DHCD-00076
2010-DHCD-00073
2010-DHCD-00069
2010-DHCD-00063
2010-DHCD-00061
2010-DHCD-00059
2010-DHCD-00058
2010-DHCD-00054
2010-DHCD-00053
2010-DHCD-00052
2010-DHCD-00048
2010-DHCD-00046
2010-DHCD-00042
2010-DHCD-00036
2010-DHCD-00033
2010-DHCD-00029
2010-DHCD-00027
2010-DHCD-00026
2010-DHCD-00012
2010-DHCD-00009
2010-DHCD-00006
2010-DHCD-00005
2010-DHCD-00001
2009-OAH-DHCD-0000071
2009-OAH-DHCD-0000065
2009-OAH-DHCD-0000064
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
05/13/10
05/13/10
05/13/10
05/13/10
04/21/10
04/21/10
04/21/10
04/21/10
04/21/10
04/21/10
04/21/10
04/21/10
04/21/10
04/21/10
04/21/10
04/21/10
04/21/10
04/01/10
04/01/10
04/01/10
03/18/10
03/18/10
03/18/10
03/18/10
03/18/10
02/17/10
02/17/10
02/17/10
01/20/10
01/20/10
01/20/10
12/30/09
12/30/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
Shega, Inc. vs. Wiiliams, Fredericks
Lewis, Antione vs. Hercules Pitts
Kiana Dixon vs. Bronson, Khadijah
Nuevelle, Taylar vs. Harvey, Janette
Dreck S. Wilson vs. Eminent Properties, LLC
Cowans, Audrey vs. WHH Trice
Tibbs, Cynthia vs. 1907 19th Street, SE, LLC
2009-OAH-DHCD-0000063
2009-OAH-DHCD-0000059
2009-OAH-DHCD-0000054
2009-OAH-DHCD-0000053
2009-OAH-DHCD-0000041
2009-OAH-DHCD-0000028
2009-OAH-DHCD-0000020
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
Tenant Petition
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
11/18/09
10/27/09
10/20/09

3.14.2011

Transcription

Similar documents

D-547 Initiating Docs and Map

Flat 1, Serre Chevalier

Forest Ridge Forest Ridge Times - Forest Ridge | Ravenna, Ohio

Paseo Colorado 11x17 Lease Plan COMPLETE

Campsite Business Park

5 Clos Des Mielles - Sarnia Estate Agents

Weslayan Plaza - Regency Centers

Property Management - HarperPropertyManagement.com

Buy to let-Tips for investors

Potter County Sales - Potter