BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT AGENDA
Transcription
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT AGENDA
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT AGENDA Council Chambers, 141 North Ross Street Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 4:30 P.M., Regular Meeting ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES BZA Meeting – December 7, 2011 CHAIRMAN'S OPENING REMARKS “Any persons aggrieved by any decision of the Board may within fifteen (15) days after such decision appeal to the Circuit Court having jurisdiction according to Section 908.02 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Auburn, Alabama”. OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS Variance to Section 605.01, Freestanding Signs, of the City of Auburn Zoning Ordinance PL-2011-00924 Applicant: Nelson Properties, LLC General Location: 590 North Dean Road Zoning District: Comprehensive Development District (CDD) Action Requested: Variance to the required minimum front property line setback of 10 feet for a freestanding sign in order to allow a sign to be placed on the front property line OTHER BUSINESS CHAIRMAN’S COMMUNICATION ADJOURNMENT BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT December 7, 2011 - Regular Meeting MINUTES The Auburn Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) met in a regular session on December 7, 2011 at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at the Public Safety Building. PRESENT Joan Penrod, Trey Rankin, J.R. Smith, Tom Vaughan, Jay Jennings ALSO PRESENT Forrest Cotten, Matt Mosley, Amber English ABSENT Robert Cochran, Sean Foote APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Vaughan made a motion to approve the minutes of the August 3, 2011 meeting. Mr. Jennings seconded the motion. The motion passed with a vote of 5-0. T CHAIRMAN'S COMMUNICATION Mr. Rankin read the following statement for the record: AF "Any persons aggrieved by any decision of the Board may within fifteen (15) days after such decision appeal to the Circuit Court having jurisdiction, according to Section 908.02 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Auburn, Alabama.” R “The Board consists of five regular members and two supernumeraries. The supernumeraries participate in all discussions but only vote when necessary to assure four voting members and have a board consisting of five members, when possible. All decisions are made with a roll call vote and a concurring vote of four members is required to approve an application for a variance.” All members in attendance would vote. D OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS Variance to Section 507, Accessory Uses, of the City of Auburn Zoning Ordinance PL-2011-00505 Mr. Cotten stated the request was for two variances to accessory structure requirements for property located at 401 Airport Road in the Comprehensive Development District (CDD) zoning district. The specific requests included: • • a variance of 30 feet to the requirement that an accessory structure be placed no closer than 10 feet to the rear of the front building line in order to allow an accessory structure to encroach 20 feet in front of the principal structure a variance of 45 percent to the requirement that the total area of all accessory structures on a residential lot shall not exceed 50 percent of the floor area of the principal structure in order to allow the total area of the accessory structures to be 95 percent of the principal structure Mr. Cotten explained that the specific regulations were written to apply more towards accessory structures in residential neighborhoods. In this case, the subject property was approximately 7.5 acres and not similar to parcels in more conventional neighborhoods. Additionally, there were topographical Page 2 Board of Zoning Adjustment Minutes December 7, 2011 challenges with placing the proposed accessory structure elsewhere on the property. No correspondence was received. Rob Young represented the applicant. He reiterated the property had topographical challenges, and a great deal of grading would be required to set the structure back further. He explained that as few trees as possible would be cleared, and one would not be able to see the structure from either the road or the principal residence. Mr. Jennings asked if the City had any landscaping requirements for the accessory structure. Mr. Cotten said the existing mature vegetation would obviate the need for any additional buffering. Ms. Penrod asked if the building would be one story. Mr. Young said yes. Mr. Rankin asked what type of cladding the building would have. Mr. Young said the building would be red iron. Mr. Smith made a motion to approve Case PL-2011-00922, 401 Airport Road, a request for a variance of 30 feet to the requirement that an accessory structure be placed no closer than 10 feet to the rear of the front building line in order to allow an accessory structure to encroach 20 feet in front of the principal structure. AF • T Mr. Rankin opened the public hearing. After no comments were received, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Jennings seconded the motion. A vote was taken, and the motion passed with a vote of 5-0. R Ms. Penrod made a motion to approve Case PL-2011-00922, 401 Airport Road, a request for a variance of 45 percent to the requirement that the total area of all accessory structures on a residential lot shall not exceed 50 percent of the floor area of the principal structure in order to allow the total area of the accessory structures to be 95 percent of the principal structure. D • Mr. Vaughan seconded the motion. A vote was taken, and the motion passed with a vote of 5-0. OTHER BUSINESS CHAIRMAN’S COMMUNICATION STAFF COMMUNICATION The meeting was adjourned at 4:44 p.m. ________________________________ Trey Rankin, Chairman ________________________________ J.R. Smith, Vice Chairman BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CITY OF AUBURN PL-2011-00922 APPLICANT: L. Gene Young REQUEST: Variance to Section 507.03(G), Use Limitations, of the City of Auburn Zoning Ordinance of 30 feet to the requirement that no accessory structure shall be placed closer than 10 feet to the rear of the front building line in order to allow an accessory structure to encroach 20 feet in front of the principal structure LOCATION: 401 Airport Road T CASE NO: ACTION OF BOARD AF BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Auburn, Alabama, that the application from L. Gene Young requesting a variance to Section 507.03(G), Use Limitations, of the City of Auburn Zoning Ordinance of 30 feet to the requirement that no accessory structure shall be placed closer than 10 feet to the rear of the front building line in order to allow an accessory structure to encroach 20 feet in front of the principal structure is APPROVED. R I, Forrest E. Cotten, Director of Planning, of the City of Auburn, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Auburn at its December 7, 2011 meeting, and as same appears on record in the Official Minutes of said Board. D GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL of the Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Auburn this the 20th day of December, 2011. Forrest E. Cotten, AICP, Director of Planning BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CITY OF AUBURN PL-2011-00922 APPLICANT: L. Gene Young REQUEST: Variance to Section 507.03(J), Use Limitations, of the City of Auburn Zoning Ordinance of 45 percent to the requirement that the total area of all accessory structures for a residential lot shall be no more than 50 percent of the floor area of the principal structure in order to allow the total area of the accessory structures to be 95 percent of the principal structure LOCATION: 401 Airport Road T CASE NO: ACTION OF BOARD R AF BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Auburn, Alabama, that the application from L. Gene Young requesting a variance to Section 507.03(J), Use Limitations, of the City of Auburn Zoning Ordinance of 45 percent to the requirement that the total area of all accessory structures for a residential lot shall be no more than 50 percent of the floor area of the principal structure in order to allow the total area of the accessory structures to be 95 percent of the principal structure is APPROVED. D I, Forrest E. Cotten, Director of Planning, of the City of Auburn, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Auburn at its December 7, 2011 meeting, and as same appears on record in the Official Minutes of said Board. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL of the Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Auburn this the 20th day of December, 2011. Forrest E. Cotten, AICP, Director of Planning City of Auburn Board of Zoning Adjustment PL-2011-00924 ‘590 North Dean Road’ Review Date: December 20, 2011 Property Owner(s): Nelson Properties, LLC Owner Address: 960 Pebble Court Auburn, AL 36830 Authorized Representative: Request: Zoning Ordinance Requires: Trey Ayers, Effective Signs Company The request is for a variance to allow a freestanding sign to be placed on the front property line requiring a variance of ten (10) feet. Section 605.01A, General Business Signs, requires a minimum setback of ten (10) feet from any side lot line and ten (10) feet from the front or any street property line. Location: 590 North Dean Road, Jewelry By Design Review by: Katie Robison, Zoning Enforcement Officer Current Zoning: Comprehensive Development District (CDD) Surrounding Zoning: North: Comprehensive Development District (CDD) Lark Associates, Inc – The Growing Room property South: Commercial Conservation (CC) Dyas Properties – Lynch Chevrolet/Cadillac property East: Commercial Conservation (CC) and Comprehensive Development District (CDD) Dyas Properties – Lynch Chevrolet/Cadillac property West: Comprehensive Development District (CDD) Conner Charter, LLC – vacant property and Breckenridge Group Auburn Alabama, LLC – Aspen Heights multi-family residential property Site Visit: December 19, 2011 PL-2011-00924 ‘590 North Dean Road’ Page 2 of 5 Adjoining Property Owners Notified: Four (4) Property Description: The property is located in the Central Park Subdivision, 10th Addition (Lot 42) along N. Dean Road, just north of Opelika Road. The property is approximately 1.06 acres in size with a jewelry store and associated parking. Prior Action Related to this Site: Date Action August 2005 The sign ordinance is amended. One of the amendments requires all freestanding signs be setback at least 10 feet from all property lines including the front/street property line. December 2006 Administrative site plan approval of a commercial retail use June 2007 The Certificate of Occupancy was issued for the completion of the construction. June 2007 A sign permit was issued for building signage only. Freestanding signage was not requested at this time Analysis: The zoning ordinance requires that the applicant meet the following requirements: A. The granting of the variance shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the regulations imposed by this Ordinance on the district in which it is located and shall not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The applicant states that if this variance is granted then the sign will in no way be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Staff comment: Article VI, Section 601 discusses the purpose and scope of the sign ordinance and establishes regulations for the control of signage within the City. The ordinance intends to: • Support and promote the use of signs to aid the public in the identification of businesses and other activities, • Assist the public in its orientation within the City, to express the history and character of the City, • Promote the community’s ability to attract sources of economic development and growth, and • Serve other informational purposes. PL-2011-00924 ‘590 North Dean Road’ Page 3 of 5 • Protect the public from the confusion created by the objectionable effects of advertising excesses, from the danger of unsafe signs, and from the degradation of the aesthetic qualities of the City.” The proposal appears to be consistent with the intent of the sign ordinance. B. The granting of the variance will not permit the establishment of any use, which is not permitted in the district. The applicant states that this variance, if granted, is not to allow the establishment of any use which is not permitted in the district. Staff comment: Freestanding signs are allowed in the zoning district in conjunction with a development. The current language in Section 605.01.A states: Freestanding signs on any individual development site shall not exceed 100 square feet in area for one sign or 130 square feet in area for two (2) signs, unless specifically allowed or further limited by this Section. The combined height of the base and sign shall not exceed 16 feet in height. Freestanding signs are limited to one (1) per parcel, unless otherwise allowed by this Section. Such signs shall have a minimum setback of ten (10) feet from any side lot line and ten (10) feet from the front or any street property line. A conceptual drawing shows the sign being ten (10) feet in height and 66.5 square feet in area. C. There must be proof of unique circumstances: There must exist special circumstances or conditions fully described in the findings, applicable to the land or buildings for which the variance is sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to land or buildings in the district, and which circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such land or buildings. The applicant states that this variance request is being sought because this particular situation is a special condition which is unique to this particular problem and property. PL-2011-00924 ‘590 North Dean Road’ Page 4 of 5 Staff comment: Because this site was developed after the ten (10) foot front setback requirement for freestanding signs became effective, any freestanding sign would be required to meet this setback. However, at the time of site plan approval, a freestanding sign was not contemplated or noted on the site plan. The southern end of the property has sufficient space to construct a freestanding sign and meet the setback requirements, however, there is a change in grade on that end of the property and in order for the sign to be constructed on level ground, it would actually require moving the sign further than ten (10) feet from the property line. D. There must be proof of unnecessary hardship. It is not sufficient proof of hardship to show that greater profit would result if the variance were granted. Furthermore, the hardship complained of cannot be selfcreated; nor can it be established on the basis by one who purchases with or without knowledge of the restrictions; it must result from the application of this Ordinance; it must be suffered directly by the property in question; and evidence of other variances granted under similar circumstances shall not be considered. The applicant states that the property in question has an unnecessary hardship due to circumstances completely out of the control of the subject property – the neighbor’s trees blocking visibility from the south and the curvature of the road blocking visibility from the north. Staff comment: Any hardship on this property would be associated with the constraints mentioned in the previous section. Again, because the site was not configured to accommodate a freestanding sign in an optimal location, the only available space to locate the sign would be further than ten (10) feet from the property line. E. That the granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance as granted by the Board of Zoning Adjustment is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose. The applicant states that granting the variance of ten (10) feet would be the minimum which would allow the needed visibility from the road due to the curve in the road and the neighbor’s trees. PL-2011-00924 ‘590 North Dean Road’ Page 5 of 5 Staff comment: General business signage is a reasonable use for all commercial uses. The sign could be constructed in a location to meet the required setback. If the variance is granted, the sign would be constructed within a drainage and utility easement. Water Resource Management will require the execution of a hold harmless agreement prior to the construction of the sign. The Public Works department would also need to review the location of the sign for any visibility issues. F. That the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the adjacent neighborhood. The applicant states that the proposed variance will not impair adequate supply of light and air or increase congestion, fire, or diminish property values of neighbors. Staff comment: The variance will not impair the supply of light and air to adjacent property substantially, nor will it increase the congestion in the public streets, the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety. Because all properties are allowed a freestanding sign in this area, staff does not anticipate that a new sign will diminish property values. G. That the granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by the Ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. The applicant states that all other lands, structures or buildings in the same district have the same rights to apply for a variance of similar situations if similar situations should exist. Staff comment: Variances are considered on a case-by-case basis and the granting of a variance does not establish any precedent. 590 NORTH DEAN ROAD BZA CASE #PL-2011-00924 DEKALB ST CDD AS PE N CDD HE IG HT S LN CC N DEAN RD CDD Subject Property IK EL P O DEKALB ST Note: The entire BZA packet can be found at www.auburnalabama.org There is a direct link on the home page. N DEAN RD ST HARPER AV C STAGE RD ANNALU E DR BIRCH CIR DR THORPE ST LE TEMP LINCOLN ST IK EL OP D AR D LAN ER B UM D AR CC ¯ The applicant is requesting a variance to Section 605.01.A. General business signs are required to be set back ten (10) feet from any side lot line and ten (10) feet from the front or any street property line. The variance request is to allow a freestanding sign to be placed on the front property line, requiring a variance of ten(10) feet. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT WILL MEET WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 4, 2012 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 141 N. ROSS ST. AT 4:30 P.M. PLEASE CALL THE CITY OF AUBURN PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT (334) 501-3040 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. The City of Auburn, Alabama does not guarantee this map to be free from errors or inaccuracies. The City of Auburn, Alabama disclaims any responsibility or liability for interpretations from this map or decisions based thereon. This information contained on this map is a general representation only and is not be used without verification by an independent professional qualified to verify such information. , /// I _................. ( // \) ·----- ·--A---UJ:E SILT - ---- -------..... .... __ -....__ ------.... --- ' .........._ F -.... - ·6'>. ... / ... +r.'LE.=717.o~'/ b ~ .<:::) 'N9E (TYP.) {:[~ L----- ----.. . .t; - - / 1/ SWALE (SEE !ETAIL) ~f I \.:: ~ ............ ....... ~ I ',......_, '--.... ----------. . . . ...._, !::..~J... ....... ....... //- // ... I • ... I / / I f / // // I // I/ / / / BU!~D!NC / PROPOSED &i}TA!L 26_{}0--sf 1 r--.FFE-718.0'I '-....J (\ ~ !\ v DUMPSTER MUST BE ~ PER SECTION 433 OF OF AUBURN ZONING 0 / ~- / c.9;.- // // - I ' / / / -fiH'LE.=716.80' / '-. -.... ..... ---- ---- ____ __.. / ........ <"--- "' ....... "' ' --·- -----'' '' -- -- ..... \ ...... \ \ \ _ -. ---------- -. \\ -...... \ \ ---'"""- ', ------- '---·- --..___ " PROI2{JSEJJ 4" SS'LATERAL ....... -- ....... -----------~ ....... ...._ PROPGSE-D- S._$. MH ......... (BY OTHERS) ------.:: . . . . '--~ - \.... ~- - ....... ....... ..................... ---- ..... '--- -MOVE $XISTINC HEADWALL NEW 4 CRAT$ INLET RIM == 714.00 INVERT OUT == 710.55' (24" PIPE) INVERT IN-710.80' (24' PIPE) THERE ARE NO EXISTING CURB CUTS WITHIN 300' OF THE PROPOSED SITE. - e.