L`asthme chez l`enfant revisité
Transcription
L`asthme chez l`enfant revisité
L’asthme est la maladie chronique la plus fréquente chez l’enfant 7 à 10% des enfants scolarisés sont asthmatiques, soit 2 à 3 enfants par classe de 25 à 30 enfants (1) Enquête (1999) réalisée auprès de 73.880 familles dans 7 pays européens (2) 28% des enfants asthmatiques ont leur sommeil perturbé ≥1X/semaine (2) 30% des enfants asthmatiques ont un retard scolaire de 1 à 3 ans (1) ASTHME ~ 38% des enfants ont des symptômes diurnes 1X/semaine (2) Seulement 5,8% des enfants asthmatiques ont un asthme parfaitement contrôlé (2) (1) C. Karila et al. L’enfant asthmatique en milieu scolaire. Archives de pédiatrie 2004; 11:120S-123S (2) Rabe et al. Clinical management of asthma in 1999: the asthma insights and reality in Europe (AIRE) study. Eur Respir J 2000;16:802-807 Asthme de l’enfant • Maladie inflammatoire chronique des voies aériennes impliquant de nombreuses cellules inflammatoires • Symptômes intermittents de sifflement, de toux nocturne, d’essoufflement déclenchés par des irritants spécifiques (allergènes…) ou non spécifiques (stress, effort…) • Obstruction diffuse ,variable, fixée ou non, réversible partiellement ou totalement avec ou sans traitement • Diagnostic clinique avant 5 ans – souvent transitoire (60 % OK à âge scolaire) • Traitement des crises+/- traitement de fond Asthma phenotypes Phenotype Allergy Family history Characteristics Transient/ early wheezer - - Non-atopic or viral induced wheezer - - Atopic wheezer + + Risk factors: • Intra uterine/postnatal exposure to tobacco smoke • Prematurity • Exposure to siblings, children at day care center ● Virus induced narrowing (RSV) ● 3-5x more wheeze at age 6 ● No increased risk at age 12 ● Reversibility at spirometry at 12 years Protective factors: exposure to: • Pets/farm animals < age of 1yr • Siblings • Children at day care center Martinez et al. PRACTALL EAACI / AAAAI Consensus Report Identification of Asthma Phenotypes Is Critical Asthma Phenotypes in Children >2 Years of Age Is the child completely well between symptomatic periods? Yes Are colds the most common precipitating factor? No No Is exercise the most common or only precipitating factor? No Does the child have clinically relevant allergic sensitization? Yes Yes Yes No Virus-induced asthmaa Exercise-induced asthmaa Allergen-induced asthma Unresolved asthmaa,b aChildren bDifferent may also be atopic. etiologies, including irritant exposure and as-yet not evident allergies, may be included here. Adapted from Bacharier LB, et al. Allergy. 2008;63(1):5–34. PHYSIOPATHOLOGIE • anomalies immunologiques Th1/Th2, interleukines, cell. T régulatrices, cellules dendritiques (présentent AG aux cell. T) • atopie IgEN + symptômes Î 80% • remodeling inévitable même si ICS (cfr…) • inflammation bronchique ~ HBR • inflammation nasale (adultes > enfant ?) • cell. Inflammatoires neutro ++ < inf. virale < sévérité éosino ++ < asthme atopique < symptômes persistants • obstruction VA (triade classique) • HBR < asthme,mucoviscidose, inf. virale mais ++ = sévérité ++ Effet des CSI sur le développement des symptômes d’asthme et l’évolution de la fonction respiratoire Proportion of episode-free Days Etude prospective randomisée en double-aveugle, chez 285 enfants entre 2 et 3 ans avec index prédictif positif de l'asthme. Observation d’1 an sans traitement après 2 ans sous fluticasone 88µg bid ou placebo. Critère primaire = proportion de jours sans épisode* au cours de l’année d’observation P = NS *Jour sans épisode = pas de symptôme d'asthme, pas de visite non programmée auprès d'un médecin pour des symptômes respiratoires, et pas de recours à des médicaments supplémentaires contre l'asthme, y compris l'albutérol avant l'effort. ⇒ “Chez les enfants en âge préscolaire à haut risque d’asthme, 2 ans sous CSI n’ont pas eu d’effet sur l’apparition de symptômes d’asthme et la dégradation de la fonction respiratoire pendant une 3ème année sans traitement.” (5). TW Guilbert et al., NEJM, vol 354, n°19: 1985-1997, 2006 DIAGNOSTIC = récidive et/ou persistance des symptômes = follow-up = ΔΔ (cfr. ) = réponse BD DIAGNOSTIC (2) 1/ Anamnèse familiale et personnelle (cfr. MAPI) 2/ Histoire clinique wheezing / toux / effort (cfr. ΔΔ toux) 3/ Examen clinique 4/ Tac (à répéter 1/an si symptômes persistants) 5/ RAST (eczéma étendu, anti H, choc anaphylactique) 6/ Thorax ( systématique 1 x dans le follow-up) 7/ DEP, spirométrie, oscillations forcées + réversibilité FEV1 > 12% 8/ eNO ~ infl. Éosino Æ évaluation du degré d’inflammation (4-17 ans) Æ ICS NP ‘Asthma Predictive Index’ • History of > 3 episodes of wheezing, at least one of which confirmed by a doctor and • one major criteria or 2 or 3 minor criteria Major criteria: • One of the parents has asthma (medical diagnosis) • Personal antecedents of diagnosis of atopic dermatitis • Allergenic sensitisation ≥ 1 aeroallergen Minor criteria • Allergic sensitisation to milk, eggs or peanuts • Wheezing unrelated to a respiratory viral disease • Blood eosinophilia ≥ 4% Castro-Rodriguez, 2000;Guilbert, 2004 Lack of eosinophilia can predict remission in wheezy infants ? Clin Exp Allergy. Mar. 2008 Just J. et al. •N=219 infants < 30 months •Reevaluation at the age of 6 Lack of eosinophilia (>470/mm³) : 91% Lack of eosinophilia + absence of allergic sensitization : 96.9% PRACTALL EAACI / AAAAI Consensus Report Management Avoidance measures Pharmacotherapy Immunotherapy Education Adapted from Bacharier LB, et al. Allergy. 2008;63(1):5–34. PRACTALL EAACI / AAAAI Consensus Report Avoidance Measures • Recommended with sensitization and clear association between allergen exposure and symptoms Allergen testing (at all ages) Avoidance of exposure to tobacco smoke Balanced diet and avoidance of obesity Exercise should NOT be avoided Adapted from Bacharier LB, et al. Allergy. 2008;63(1):5–34. PRACTALL EAACI / AAAAI Consensus Report Pharmacotherapy Recommendations for Children 0 to 2 Years Asthma diagnosis: >3 episodes of reversible bronchial obstruction within 6 months Intermittent β2agonists First choice despite conflicting evidence LTRA Daily controller therapy for viral wheezing (long- or short-term treatment) Nebulized or inhaled corticosteroids Daily controller therapy for persistent asthmaa Oral corticosteroidsb Acute and frequently recurrent obstructive episodes First-line treatment when there is evidence of atopy/allergy aEspecially if severe or requiring frequent oral corticosteroid therapy; beg, 1 to 2 mg/kg/day prednisone for 3 to 5 days during acute and frequently recurrent obstructive episodes. Adapted from Bacharier LB, et al. Allergy. 2008;63(1):5–34. PRACTALL EAACI / AAAAI Consensus Report Step down if appropriate Step down if appropriate Step Up Therapy to Gain Control Pharmacologic Treatment (Children >2 Years) ICS LTRAa OR (Dose depends on age) (200 µg BDP equivalent) INSUFFICIENT CONTROLb Increase ICS dose (400 µg BDP equivalent) OR Add ICS to LTRA INSUFFICIENT CONTROLc Increase ICS dose (800 µg BDP equivalent) OR Add LTRA to ICS OR Add LABA INSUFFICIENT CONTROLc aLTRA cCheck Consider other options • Theophylline • Oral corticosteroids may be particularly useful if the patient has concomitant rhinitis; bCheck compliance, allergy avoidance, and reevaluate diagnosis; compliance and consider referring to specialist. ICS=inhaled corticosteroids; LTRA=leukotriene receptor antagonist; BDP=beclomethasone dipropionate; LABA=long-acting β2-agonist. Adapted from Bacharier LB, et al. Allergy. 2008;63(1):5–34. PRACTALL EAACI / AAAAI Consensus Report Immunotherapy Recommendations • Requires appropriate allergens for allergic asthma • Use in addition to appropriate environmental control and pharmacotherapy • Not recommended when asthma is unstablea • Sensitization to more than 1 allergen not a contraindicationb • Age not an absolute contraindicationc • Patients also need to comply with other treatments aOn the day of treatment, patients should have few, if any, symptoms and pulmonary function (FEV1) of at least 80% of the predicted value. can reduce its efficacy due to the need to limit the allergen dose when several allergens are being administered concurrently. cCan be used in patients from the age of 3 although this is well below the current licensed age limit. bBut Adapted from Bacharier LB, et al. Allergy. 2008;63(1):5–34. DEVICE adapté à l’âge PRACTALL EAACI / AAAAI Consensus Report Education Recommendations • Affected people – – – Child Parents Caregivers • Health care professionals – – – – Primary care physicians Nurses Pharmacists Health-education workers and patient support groups • Health authorities and politicians Adapted from Bacharier LB, et al. Allergy. 2008;63(1):5–34. Le “contrôle” est l’objectif du traitement de l’asthme Diagnostic Evaluer le contrôle Instaurer un traitement initial Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACTTM) Vérifier le contrôle* Adapter le traitement * tous les 3-4 mois Réf. 1: Pocket Guide for asthma management and prevention in Children, GINA revised 2006, www.ginasthma.org Questions de 1 à 4: à remplir par l’enfant (sur une échelle de 4 points) avec l’aide d’un de ses parents1 Questions de 5 à 7: à remplir par le parent (sur une échelle de 5 points)1 Interprétation du score total du C-ACTTM L’asthme de votre enfant est sans doute bien contrôlé L’asthme de votre enfant n’est peut-être pas aussi bien contrôlé qu’il pourrait l’être. PRACTALL EAACI / AAAAI Consensus Report Summary of Key Recommendations 9 Identification of asthma phenotype is critical 9 Comprehensive asthma management must include avoidance measures and education 9 Treatment of airway inflammation leads to optimal asthma control 9 ICS and LTRAs are recommended as initial controller therapy for persistent asthma 9 Until further evidence of effectiveness and long-term safety is available, LABAs should not be used without an appropriate ICS dose 9 Immunotherapy in addition to environmental control and pharmacotherapy Adapted from Bacharier LB, et al. Allergy. 2008;63(1):5–34. ”éduquer”
Similar documents
Eosinophilies avec atteinte pulmonaire
Poorly defined subpleural nodules are also seen in right upper lobe (C).
More information