Coton sous contrat Coton-Tchad
Transcription
Coton sous contrat Coton-Tchad
P E G Groupe d’Étude des Populations Forestières Équatoriales F 7 Quai Voltaire, 75007 PARIS - France E Tel. 33 1 40 79 34 24 ou 33 1 40 79 38 15 - Fax 33 1 40 79 38 15 e-mail bahuchet@mnhn.fr BASELINE SURVEY SOCIOECONOMIC BASELINE AND CENSUS SURVEY KABAK ISLAND, PORT AREA & ACCESS ROAD FROM MAFERINYA REPUBLIC OF GUINEA A rapport by - Dr. George Koppert (anthropologist, GEPFE), Dr. Maya Leclercq (anthropologist, Anthropolinks) Dr. Catherine Sabinot (anthropologist) - With the participation of Alseny Dia, Séverin Thea, Fodé Mamoudou Keyra, Lansana Sylla, Fodé Mamadou Camara, Mouminatou Diallo, Fatoumata Bah, Souleymane Touré, Lamarana Barry Almamy, Ousmane Yattara, Momo Bangoura and Alpha Saliou Bangoura Paris Final Report March 2013 P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 1 Abbreviations ANAM Agence de Navigation Maritime CNSP Centre National de Surveillance de la Pêche CNSHB Centre National des Sciences Halieutiques de Boussoura GNF Guinean francs 1 US$ = approx. 7.000 GNF at the time of the survey, 1 Euro (€) =10.000 GNF. The report uses kFg for 1,000 Guinean francs IFC International Finance Corporation of the World Bank Group PARC Rio Tinto’s Plan d’Action pour la Réinstallation et la Compensation (Resettlement and Compensation Action Plan) PUAPA Programme d’Urgence pour l’Appui à la Productivité Agricole managed by the Ministry of Agriculture WB World Bank ZEE Zone Economique Exclusive ([coastal] Economic Exclusion Zone) Acknowledgements We would like to thank the local authorities and the population of Kabak and the Port-Maferinya area for their collaboration and their patience during the long questionnaires and meetings conducted by our team. We would like to thank also the support team form Conakry and Kabak who took such careful care of housing and feeding us during the three weeks we spent living in a house on Kabak Island, and in the hotels of Forecariah and Maferinya. We hope that the people are not too disappointed with lack of precision on how this report describes their economy and social life. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 3 Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................................................................ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. 3 TABLES, MAPS AND FIGURES .................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 MAPS 7 FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 8 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 12 2.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES ..............................................................................................................................12 2.2 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................12 3. Socioeconomic Development Index............................................................................................................. 14 Databases ................................................................................................................................................. 15 DEMOGRAPHY .............................................................................................................. 16 3.1 KABAK...............................................................................................................................................16 3.2 PORT AND MAFERINYA ROAD .................................................................................................................18 3.3 ETHNIC GROUPS AND LINEAGES ..............................................................................................................21 3.4 ORIGIN .............................................................................................................................................21 4. Population data ......................................................................................................................................... 18 Population along the Port-Maferinya road.................................................................................................... 19 HUMAN ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................... 23 4.1 HISTORY ...........................................................................................................................................23 4.2 SOCIAL ORGANISATION OF THE ETHNIC GROUPS ........................................................................................24 4.3 LINEAGES ..........................................................................................................................................25 4.4 CULTURAL HERITAGE AND SACRED SITES ..................................................................................................26 4.5 LAND TENURE .....................................................................................................................................26 4.6 TYPES OF LAND: INDIVIDUAL LAND, FAMILY LAND AND LINEAGE LAND ............................................................28 4.7 EXAMPLES OF AGRICULTURAL LAND IN KABAK AND THE PORT AREA ...............................................................29 5. Kabak Island ............................................................................................................................................. 23 Port-Maferinya road area ........................................................................................................................... 24 Tributes and dimes .................................................................................................................................... 28 Titled land................................................................................................................................................. 28 Land acquisition for resettlement ................................................................................................................ 28 GOVERNANCE AND TRADITIONAL STRUCTURES IN THE VILLAGES ........................... 31 Council of elders ........................................................................................................................................ 31 Village organizations .................................................................................................................................. 31 Families, concessions and households ......................................................................................................... 32 6. LIVELIHOOD................................................................................................................. 34 6.1 AGRICULTURE .....................................................................................................................................34 6.2 MAIN CROPS ......................................................................................................................................35 6.3 CULTIVATED AREAS AND RESERVE LAND ...................................................................................................36 Field types ................................................................................................................................................ 34 Rice .......................................................................................................................................................... 36 Market garden crops .................................................................................................................................. 36 Size of plots .............................................................................................................................................. 36 Characteristics of cultivated land ................................................................................................................ 37 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 4 6.4 AGRICULTURE INPUTS ..........................................................................................................................38 6.5 ANIMAL BREEDING ..............................................................................................................................42 6.6 FISHING ............................................................................................................................................42 6.7 SALT WINNING ...................................................................................................................................46 6.8 GATHERING ........................................................................................................................................47 6.9 ARTISANAL MINING .............................................................................................................................48 Credit ....................................................................................................................................................... 39 Agricultural calendar .................................................................................................................................. 39 Fishing areas ............................................................................................................................................. 44 Exploited resources ................................................................................................................................... 44 Fishing gear: boats, nets, hooks ................................................................................................................. 45 Fresh fish: customers and fishing companies ............................................................................................... 46 6.10 CRAFTS AND PETTY JOBS .......................................................................................................................48 7. ACCESS TO SERVICES .................................................................................................. 49 7.1 WATER SUPPLY ...................................................................................................................................49 7.2 EDUCATION ........................................................................................................................................51 7.3 HEALTH SERVICES................................................................................................................................51 7.4 CELL PHONE COVERAGE .........................................................................................................................53 7.5 ELECTRICITY ......................................................................................................................................53 7.6 ROADS AND TRANSPORT .......................................................................................................................53 8. Kabak Island ............................................................................................................................................. 51 Port-Maferinya road area ........................................................................................................................... 51 Kabak Island ............................................................................................................................................. 51 Port-Maferinya road area ........................................................................................................................... 53 GENDER TASK SHARING AND CHILD LABOUR ISSUES ............................................... 54 8.1 TASK SHARING WITHIN THE HOUSEHOLD ..................................................................................................54 8.2 CHILDREN: EDUCATION AND ENTRY INTO ACTIVE LIFE ................................................................................56 8.3 MATRIMONIAL TRADITIONS AND BRIDE PRICE...........................................................................................56 9. Children .................................................................................................................................................... 55 Marriage rules ........................................................................................................................................... 56 Bride price & dowry ................................................................................................................................... 57 Divorces.................................................................................................................................................... 57 Widowhood ............................................................................................................................................... 57 Relationships between co-wives ................................................................................................................. 58 Children’s education .................................................................................................................................. 58 Female circumcision .................................................................................................................................. 58 Beauty ...................................................................................................................................................... 59 SOCIOECONOMIC SURVEY RESULTS ........................................................................... 60 9.1 KEY DEMOGRAPHIC DATA ......................................................................................................................60 9.2 RELIGION ..........................................................................................................................................60 9.3 EDUCATION ........................................................................................................................................60 9.4 ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES .........................................................................................................................63 9.5 HOUSING ...........................................................................................................................................66 9.6 HEALTH INDICATORS ............................................................................................................................69 9.7 INCOME .............................................................................................................................................70 Adult’s education ....................................................................................................................................... 61 Children’s education .................................................................................................................................. 61 Main activities and main sources of income ................................................................................................. 63 All activities and sources of income............................................................................................................. 64 Gender related income............................................................................................................................... 65 Ownership ................................................................................................................................................ 66 Building quality.......................................................................................................................................... 66 Means of cooking and house lighting .......................................................................................................... 67 Housing equipment ................................................................................................................................... 68 Indirect indicators ..................................................................................................................................... 70 Sources of income that provide more than 200 US$ annually ....................................................................... 71 Household income ..................................................................................................................................... 72 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 5 9.8 HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURES ON FOOD......................................................................................................73 9.9 DEBTS ...............................................................................................................................................74 Food expenses .......................................................................................................................................... 73 Insufficiency of rice production ................................................................................................................... 74 9.10 SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INDEX ...................................................................................................75 9.11 VULNERABLE PEOPLE ............................................................................................................................75 Criteria ..................................................................................................................................................... 75 10. OPINIONS .................................................................................................................... 77 10.1 EXPECTATIONS AND FEARS ....................................................................................................................77 Positive opinions and expectations .............................................................................................................. 77 Negative opinions and fears ....................................................................................................................... 77 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................ 78 10.2 VILLAGE PRIORITIES ............................................................................................................................78 Kabak agricultural villages .......................................................................................................................... 78 Kabak fishing villages................................................................................................................................. 79 Port-Maferinya road area ........................................................................................................................... 79 10.3 HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES ........................................................................................................................80 11. ISSUES ......................................................................................................................... 81 11.1 HOW TO INCREASE THE RICE CULTIVATION AREA .......................................................................................81 Quantitative and qualitative inventory of the bogoni .................................................................................... 81 11.2 COMPENSATION AND REPLACEMENT LAND ISSUES ......................................................................................82 12. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ............................................................................................. 84 12.1 BASIS FOR A GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ......................................................................................................84 12.2 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE .....................................................................................84 13. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 86 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................ 87 APPENDIX I – AGRICULTURE ..........................................................................................................................87 Rice varieties............................................................................................................................................. 87 Manpower needs in rice cultivation ............................................................................................................. 87 Yields evaluated in visited fields ................................................................................................................. 88 APPENDIX II – CULTURAL HERITAGE SUMMARY TABLE .........................................................................................89 APPENDIX III – CONSULTATION MEETINGS .......................................................................................................91 Kabak agricultural villages .......................................................................................................................... 91 Kabak fishing villages................................................................................................................................. 91 Port-Maferinya road ................................................................................................................................... 91 APPENDIX IV – QUESTIONNAIRES USED ...........................................................................................................93 Q1. Q2. Q3. Q4. – – – – Household questionnaire ................................................................................................................... 93 Village questionnaire ........................................................................................................................ 93 Focus group discussion field guide..................................................................................................... 93 GPS-mapping observation sheet ........................................................................................................ 93 APPENDIX V – KABAK VILLAGE SHEETS ............................................................................................................95 Village Village Village Village Village Village Village sheet sheet sheet sheet sheet sheet sheet 9 – Yelibane .......................................................................................................................... 95 12 – Bossimiyah .................................................................................................................... 95 13 – Bolimanda ..................................................................................................................... 95 14 – Youlaye ......................................................................................................................... 95 15 – Manke ........................................................................................................................... 95 16 – Kenende ........................................................................................................................ 95 17 – Tonguiron ...................................................................................................................... 95 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 6 Tables, Maps and Figures Tables Table 1 – Summary of total income (in 1,000 GNF) by origin.......................................................................................................... 10 Table 2 – Administrative divisions of Kabak Island ......................................................................................................................... 16 Table 3 – Administrative divisions of the Port-Maferinya road ......................................................................................................... 18 Table 4 – Estimated population of Kabak ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Table 5 – Number of nuclear households per house....................................................................................................................... 19 Table 6 – Estimated population along the Port-Maferinya road ....................................................................................................... 19 Table 7 – Ethnic composition of Kabak and the Port–Maferinya road area ....................................................................................... 21 Table 8 – Main lineages of Kabak and the Port–Maferinya road area ............................................................................................... 21 Table 9 – Origin/reason for arrival of the head of household in Kabak and in the Port–Maferinya road area ...................................... 22 Table 10. Land ownership in the Kabak-Port area .......................................................................................................................... 27 Table 11. Examples of fields cultivated by farmers in Kabak and the port area ................................................................................ 29 Table 12 – Multiple boat ownership in the fishing villages of Kabak ................................................................................................ 32 Table 13. Main crops grown in the Kabak-Port area (% of households) ........................................................................................... 35 Table 14. Median size of cultivated area and reserve land .............................................................................................................. 37 Table 15 – Main agriculture inputs in the Kabak-Port area (% of households) ................................................................................. 39 Table 16 – Seasons recognized on Kabak Island ............................................................................................................................ 39 Table 17 – Seasonal calendar for Kabak obtained through the compilation of 4 farming villages interviews: Yetiyah (Yelibane district), Bossimyah, Kenende (Seydouyah district) and Tonguiron ....................................................................... 40 Table 18 – Calendar of monthly activities for the main food and market garden crops in the Kabak-Port area ................................... 41 Table 19 – Number of animals owned per household in the Kabak and Port-Maferinya road area ..................................................... 42 Table 20 – Summary of questionnaires completed in the fishing villages and rate of success in each village...................................... 43 Table 21 – Tools used by fishing households ................................................................................................................................. 45 Table 22 – Gathering activities (all households) ............................................................................................................................. 47 Table 23 – Sources of drinking water supply ................................................................................................................................. 49 Table 24 – Number of spouses per married head of household....................................................................................................... 58 Table 25 – Key demographic data of the heads of households........................................................................................................ 60 Table 26 – Education level of adult men and women ..................................................................................................................... 61 Table 27 – Competence of adult men and women in reading French .............................................................................................. 61 Table 28 – Education level and school attendance of children aged between 6 and 15 years old ...................................................... 62 Table 29 – Main activities and sources of income........................................................................................................................... 63 Table 30 – All activities of the head of household (main and secondary) and all sources of income of the household members ......................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Table 31 – House ownership, annual rent paid and size of house ................................................................................................... 66 Table 32 – Building material of the main house ............................................................................................................................. 67 Table 33 – Main possessions of the studied households ................................................................................................................. 68 Table 34 – Health indicators ......................................................................................................................................................... 69 Table 35 – Indicators of regular income and recent travel .............................................................................................................. 70 Table 36 – Income of more than 200 US$ annually ....................................................................................................................... 71 Table 37 – Summary of total income (in 1,000 GNF) by origin ........................................................................................................ 72 Table 38 – Summary of debts contracted ...................................................................................................................................... 74 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 7 Table 39 – Summary of the population’s expectations for the Simandou Project .............................................................................. 77 Table 40 – Summary of the population’s fears about the Simandou Project ..................................................................................... 78 Table 41 – Expectation’s priorities in six Kabak agricultural villages ................................................................................................ 79 Table 42 – Expectation’s priorities in five Kabak fishing villages ...................................................................................................... 79 Table 43 – Expectation’s priorities in five villages of the Port-Maferinya road area ........................................................................... 80 Table 44 – Reported human rights violations by gender and age .................................................................................................... 80 Table 45 – Types of human rights violations reported .................................................................................................................... 80 Table 46 – Rice varieties used by farmers in Kabak and the port area ............................................................................................. 87 Table 47 – Example of labour needs for bogoni and dara rice cultivation in Kabak ........................................................................... 87 Table 48 – Yields evaluated for bogoni and dara rice fields in Kabak and the port area .................................................................... 88 Maps Map 1 – Map of the surveyed area ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Map 2 – Administrative divisions of Kabak (date 2001) .................................................................................................................. 17 Map 3 – Map of Kabak Island based on a Landsat satellite picture in 1992, referred to in the “Atlas Infogéographique (2001) ............................................................................................................................................................................. 18 Map 4 – Population on Kabak Island with indication of the main lineages ........................................................................................ 20 Map 5 – Water supply on Kabak Island ......................................................................................................................................... 50 Map 6 – Schools and health centres on Kabak Island ..................................................................................................................... 52 Figures Figure 1 – Income in million Guinean francs by income source ....................................................................................................... 10 Figure 2 – Reported average size of cultivated plots and reserve land (in hectare) .......................................................................... 37 Figure 3 – Main Characteristics of cultivated land .......................................................................................................................... 38 Figure 4. Schematic drawings of major fishing tools described and used in Kabak ........................................................................... 46 Figure 5 – Task sharing between men and women within the married household ............................................................................ 54 Figure 6 – Children’s implication in household tasks and its impact on school attendance ................................................................. 55 Figure 7.– School attendance and entrance into productive life by age - boys and girls - in Kabak and the Port-Maferinya road area......................................................................................................................................................................... 56 Figure 8.– Proportion of school age children who do not attend school of coastal area households ................................................... 62 Figure 9 – Education score of coastal area households.................................................................................................................. 63 Figure 10 – Main and secondary activities of the head of household ............................................................................................... 64 Figure 11 – Main and secondary sources of income of all members of the household....................................................................... 65 Figure 12 – Sources of income earned by men and women ............................................................................................................ 66 Figure 13 – Quality of housing score ............................................................................................................................................. 67 Figure 14 – Possessions score: furniture, bedding, equipment and livestock .................................................................................... 69 Figure 15 – Health related indicators score.................................................................................................................................... 70 Figure 16 – Income related score based on regular income, saving, travels, and sources of more than 200 US$ annual income ............................................................................................................................................................................ 71 Figure 17 – Income in million Guinean francs by income source ..................................................................................................... 72 Figure 18 – Annual income and food expenditures in million Guinean francs ................................................................................... 74 Figure 19 – Socioeconomic Development Score of households ....................................................................................................... 75 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 1. Executive summary The survey was requested to complete the 2008 socio-economic baseline survey which was conducted in villages along a routing that was quite different from Mamou to the coast; the bypass along the Mamou mountain range was moved as well as the access to the coast which was moved from Benty to 1 Kabak area . Purpose – The present report aims to provide the socio-economic baseline for the Kabak Island area and along the access road from Maferinya to the port area (Map 1) in view of the potential location of the port area for the iron ore exportation from the Simandou Project. It is the first of three reports related to the port locations (1) Kabak-Port area; (2) rail area from Maferinya to Oure Kaba and; (3) Kakossa Island and the Morebaya River. The three reports cover half of the length of the projected railroad and port area and provide quantitative and qualitative data on social aspects, livelihoods and economics of the communities potentially affected by the project facilities. The data are presented in a rigorous quantitative tabulated form which can be used for future comparison on the evolution of livelihood, economic and social quality of economic life in the area to be affected by the railroad. Individuals and households directly affected by resettlement through loss of land or housing are not part of this study but will be treated through the PARC process. However, the measurement of economic livelihood and quality of life of these people should be similar enough to allow comparing their socioeconomic evolution with that of the general population. Sample and data – The present survey on Kabak Island and Port area draws on a random sample of 10% to 20% of the households out of a list of all mapped households in the studied villages. The report is based on (a) mapping of households (3,525 in Kabak, 615 along the Port-Maferinya road) and their assets in all visited communities; (b) a socioeconomic questionnaire with some 40 questions applied to 403 households with photographs of their houses and outbuildings; (c) 16 long and 4 short village interviews; (d) two focus group meetings with women, more than 10 interviews with fishing communities; (e) four agricultural calendars, etc. The data have been assembled in (a) this report; (b) 2 attached village summary sheets ; (c) a database with data from the socioeconomic survey and; (d) a © Google earth referenced data base of houses and assets. Main results – The economy of Kabak is completely based on fishing in the fishing communities and on agriculture in the central part of the island. Rice as food and market gardening as cash crop are the main occupations and sources of income. Outside labour, usually paid for but also mutual assistance, are essential parts of local agriculture. Fertilizer was provided to 31% of farmers through a government scheme. Additional income is provided from palm oil extraction, small scale animal breeding, various petty jobs (motorized taxis, construction, carpentry, car and motor repairs, etc.). The Port area around Senguelen is quite different from Kabak as salt harvesting is a much more important activity (41% vs. <10%). Farmers on Kabak and in the port area report an average cultivated land area of 1.9 ha, and 0.6-0.9 ha of reserve land. Fishermen who also farm have only 1.5 ha, and most of this land is tended by women. 1 Following the completion of the field surveys undertaken within the framework of this study, the port location had moved again to Senguelen for terrestrial infrastructure and to the Morebaya River for marine infrastructure. 2 The village sheets of the Kabak fishing communities are part of the Sabinot et al.(2011) Fishing report Kabak; the village sheets in the port and Kakossa area are attached to Koppert et al. Kakossa Rapid Rural Appraisal report); the village sheets for the Kabak agricultural villages are attached to this report (Appendix V). Page 8 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Map 1 – Map of the surveyed area Page 9 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 10 In fishing villages, men fish at sea and women buy up to fish for direct sale or for transformation through smoking. Most households do not farm and buy all their food. Their income is about twice as high as for farmers. Fishermen with their daily earnings from the sea have much poorer housing than farmers for whom investment of their once per year harvest is essential for their livelihood. The economic status of women in the fishing communities is higher than in rural communities as they are cash providers to the men through their fish smoking and fish trading and they are mostly in charge of farming the land. Women “own” 18% of the agricultural land compared to 12% elsewhere in Kabak and 8% along the Port-Maferinya road. Only in the fishing and farming communities of Kabak, land is often reported as jointly owned by men and women. Income and expenditure – Households in the study area estimate their annual income at 11.1 million 3 GNF, or 1,850 US$ . This corresponds to 5.05 US$/day/family or about 0.70 US$ per household member. This income does not take into account the value of the self-produced and consumed agricultural products, which cannot be estimated, in a reliable way, from a survey of this type. Table 1 – Summary of total income (in 1,000 GNF) by origin 2011 baseline Port-road Kabak fishing Kabak agriculture Agriculture + animal breeding 2,782 1,481 4,550 Salaries 273 225 251 Aquatic resources: fish + salt 2,352 12,389 1,850 Other income sources 4,184 3,155 2,562 Average income [kFg] 9,590 17,269 9,213 Median income* [kFg] 6,690 12,530 7,000 N= 128 155 398 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, questions 22 and 23. Income source Average 2011 baseline 3,514 249 4,354 2,997 11,119 7,525 682 Among the Kabak fishermen, income was clearly higher (about 17.3 million GNF) than among the Kabak farmers (9.2 million GNF) and the Port-Maferinya road (9.6 million GNF). Figure 1 – Income in million Guinean francs by income source hunting Income by source 20 fruits (in million Guinean Francs) 17 269 livestock salaries 15 11 637 9 590 10 11 371 remittances 6 954 9 213 salt rice crafts/petty jobs 5 trade-business 10 775 market gardening Agriculture 0 MOF-Road Kabak Fishing Kabak Farming zone 2008 rail No Yes Founding lineage Average total smoked fish fishing Source: Baseline household questionnaire, July 2011, question 23. Acceptance of the project – Globally, the population of Kabak Island tends to be very much in favour of the creation of a port on their island (economic development, better roads and infrastructures are often reported) but they have many fears concerning the eventual impacts. The main fears of the inhabitant’s concern resettlement: they fear losing their land and their homes. Many are also 3 The average exchange rate of the dollar was around 6,000 Guinean Francs during the year before the survey – the period of reference for the annual income. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey concerned for their children (accidents); they fear that crime and prostitution will increase on the island. Many fishermen, especially in Khounyi, the most important fishing village of the Forecariah prefecture, highlight the inconveniences that the construction of infrastructures could cause on fishing activities: noise, destruction of fishing areas, prohibition of fishing in certain areas, accidents at sea. Specific measures to reduce impact and improve fishing activities were described in the fishing report (Sabinot et. al., March 2013). Since the initial drafting of this report in 2011, the port site has moved from its initially planned location near Matakang to the Senguelen area on the mainland. The farmers from Kabak will most likely have little impact from the project, but for the fishing communities on the western and southern coast of Kabak Island the consequences remain of great importance. These consequences have been treated in more details in subsequent reports (Kakossa Rapid Rural Assessment, 2013 and Rainy Season Fishing Survey, 2013). Among the farmers, expectations are related to employment; more social, medical and educational facilities; better accessibility of Kabak Island through a permanent link with the mainland; and improvement of the water management of the rice paddies in order to diminish silting and increase agricultural production. Conclusion – Kabak Island and the Port area, with their agriculture on especially high producing bogoni fields that receive and maintain their fertility by an intricate equilibrium between flooding for fertile mud during the wet season and protection against the salty sea water during the dry season. In the coastal zones of Guinea, Kabak and Senguelen especially, the population benefits from natural conditions of soil, water, and fertility that allows the population to enjoy a better than average economic livelihood within their country, and this without costly external intervention of development agencies and donors. This is a treasure that merits to be protected. Page 11 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 2. Introduction Linear projects like railroads have three phases, (1) the baseline phase of “hope”, where in general the population will do anything in order to have the project to come to their community; (2) the actual “construction” phase, where normally a significant proportion of the population will benefit from construction generated money, and livelihood is usually relatively improved; and (3) the “exploitation” phase, when project employment will wean away, and communities will have to revert to their initial economic livelihood. In cases where project money has been judiciously invested, livelihood or quality of life or both may be improved. Through project-related community investments, for instance water supply, education, health, alphabetisation projects, agricultural extension services, the project may have a positive impact on the communities. 2.1 Study objectives The survey was requested to complete the 2008 baseline survey which was conducted in villages along a routing that was quite different from Mamou to the coast: the bypass along the Mamou mountain 4 range and the access to the coast which was moved from Benty to Kabak area . The objective of the study was to gather socioeconomic data on the pre-project livelihood of the population to be affected by the railroad and the currently proposed Kabak port location. Data gathered should make it possible to assess in a quantitative way the evolution of livelihoods and quality of life among the communities affected by the project facilities. Livelihood refers to the economic earning capacity of the population while quality of life is more linked to possessions, housing and access to communal facilities like education, health, extension services and human rights. The railroad and port project will most likely have a significant impact through land take, physical (housing) and economical (mainly loss of fields) resettlement, in-migration in the communities located near project construction and camp sites, and out-migration from villages further away, changes in the local economic tissue through money circulating from the project, both from direct employment, and from trade opportunities for those who are not employed. The Simfer Project is committed to be a development project, not only for the country as a whole, but also for the affected communities and individuals, and the objective of the baseline study is to gather the information which will allow in the future to assess to which extend the project has attained its development objective. Individuals and households directly affected by resettlement through loss of land or housing are not part of this study but will be treated through the PARC process. However, the measurement of economic livelihood and quality of life of these people should be similar enough to allow comparing their socioeconomic evolution with that of the general population. 2.2 Methodology The field team consisted of three expatriate PhD level scholars, an experienced agronomist in rural development, an archaeologist, 5 university level and thoroughly trained local surveyors, with assistance of a medical doctor and a community liaison officer from Rio Tinto. The team was housed in 5 local hotels or – like in Kabak – in a rented house in the community. The villages were given advanced notice of the survey, during its purpose and methods were explained, and some basic village information was gathered. 4 Following the completion of the field surveys undertaken within the framework of this study, the port location had moved again to Senguelen for terrestrial infrastructure and to the Morebaya River for marine infrastructure. 5 Village names used in this report refer to the government list of October 2011 and may differ from the official name list established by the Project. Page 12 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Sampling – This took place on two levels: villages were randomly selected from a pool of villages, and households were randomly selected in the village. All villages from the SNC-Lavalin database were th numbered, a number of villages to survey assessed, and subsequently every 20 village was visited. If villages owned less than 50 households, the closest neighbouring villages were added to increase the sample. All houses were numbered, and their location assessed with a GPS for mapping purposes. A th th random seed number (a number under 10) was drawn and subsequently every 10 , 5 house 6 surveyed . In the smallest villages (less than 20 houses) two numbers were drawn to intensify the data gathering. In the present survey and household census, the notion of “compound” has not been addressed, but: if more than one household was living in the same house, they were separately counted, annexed buildings without a married head of household were included in the main house, if a head of household lived in a separate building, he was counted separately, even if the house was part of a compound of houses belonging to a separate head of household, in most cases, the house belonged to the head of household. In case more households shared a same house, only the eldest was coded as “owner”, and the others as “free tenants”. This is a simplification as houses may be shared equally among brothers. Survey instruments – The survey instruments consisted of a 4-page household questionnaire, a 4-page village questionnaire and a focus group interview which were based on free ranging discussions. Fishing villages – In fishing villages, a short systematic questionnaire was applied to each household in order to take an exhaustive census of population practicing artisanal fishing, salt production, rice production, and market gardening, fresh and smoked fish trading. Fishing equipment was recorded (boats, motors, sails, types of nets and hooks) and the status of the head of the household: native or migrant (and the year of arrival). Household baseline questionnaire – The questionnaire covered items of household demography, education, housing quality, health aspects (latrines, bed nets, access to health care, infant mortality and infant diseases), household possessions, and household incomes. Household income covered incomes from agriculture and from other activities. The questionnaire consists of eleven main fields: 1. Demographic data: kinship, gender, age, main occupation, education level, place of residence and employment status. 2. 3. 4. Main and secondary occupation of the head of household. Income: main and secondary sources and volume of income, sales, savings and debts. Agriculture and livestock: area, location, land tenure, perceived quality, outside labour and inputs. 5. Housing and equipment: furniture, bedding, home equipment, possessions, sources of fuel and light. 6. Health: access to imported medicines, assistance with childbirth, last year’s deaths in the household, children’s diseases, latrines and mosquito nets. 7. Food security: access to animal proteins, purchase of the main staple of rice, drinking water, weekly food budget. 8. Mobility (travel) of the head of household. 9. Hunting, fishing, mining and pastoralism: areas, tools, main products, income. 10. Society and human rights: membership of organizations, perceived security and human rights issues, and child employment. 6 For instance if the number 6 was drawn, in villages under 50 households the houses 1-6-11-16-21 etc. were surveyed; in villages over 50 households, 6-16-26-36 etc. In very small villages with fewer than 20 households, 4 out of 10 houses (1-4-6-8, 11-14-16-18) were surveyed. Statistical tables in this report have been corrected by weighting for differences in sample density. Page 13 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 11. Gender issues: income sources of men and women, saving, sharing of responsibilities between the spouses. The questionnaire covers a realm of socioeconomic characteristics, and the structuring of the various fields was aimed at addressing simultaneously both synchronically (present stage) and diachronically (evolution over time) dimensions of social life and the development in and around the Project’s areas. Village baseline questionnaire – The questionnaire, administered during a meeting with villagers – usually village chief, village elders, but also other men, women and young people who wished to participate, includes those questions that are more relevant at a community level: Contact information of the village, dependent hamlets, in-and out- migration Ethnicity, religion Water sources, perceived quality and regularity of supply of drinking water Outside contacts through radio, TV, cellular phone network Main type of housing Access to educational and health facilities Trade, commerce, markets, roads Agriculture: land tenure including the presence of titled land, land types and land availability, main crops, rental and selling prices, cost of agricultural labour, local prices of livestock Implication of state services in the village and government taxes Pastoral activities by locals and transhumant herders Developmental priorities of men, women and youth Local organizations and their names Sacred sites and burial sites, and the village opinion on how to deal with them if affected by the project Building costs for a standard house Village history Agricultural and fishing calendar (at least in each socio-economical and ecological area) Data on educational and health facilities in the villages obtained from the local school and health authorities. Focus group interviews – Focus group discussions were conducted with men, women and young. The main problem was to find local female interpreters who could speak sufficiently French. The ones, who spoke French on Kabak, were generally too young to be able to discuss serious matters. Among the items discussed in focus groups were: (1) relationships: marriage, relationship between children and parents, between spouses, between neighbours, between villages; (2) life stories: helping to understand why individuals are in their present situation, especially education (understanding why and how people leave school) followed by how people have gained economic independence from their parents; and (3) livelihood: major issues regarding the economic livelihoods in the villages. Socioeconomic Development Index The questionnaire used to develop the Socioeconomic Development Index is a local adaptation of a questionnaire used in various studies in Cameroon (oil pipeline, hydraulic dam project, aluminium 7 plant, deep sea water port), in Chad (new road, oil development project) , in Democratic Republic of Congo (several mining projects), and in Haiti (inter-regional road, urban resettlement). In these projects, the core questions of the questionnaire allowed for an extremely important distinction between more and less developed regions and towns in the project’s areas. In the various studied A simplified index using the same questions has been used in tropical Africa and Haït (National Highway 3) (Cameroon and Chad). See http://www.ulb.ac.be/socio/anthropo/tchad/CoverSEstudies_fichiers/v3_slide0001.htm for the results of the Chad studies. Page 14 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey sites the resulting index varied from as high as 30 (urban aluminium plant in Cameroon, deep sea water port) to as low as 2 (among Pygmies in Cameroon). In order to obtain an overall index, weighting factors were based on the relative importance of each answer for each question of the questionnaire. Though the choice of a weighting factor is an arbitrary one, it is based on the assumption that each extra (or negative) point means a more (or less) affluent and “developed” household. As long as the same questionnaire and the same weighting indices are used over time and between locations, one can argue that any reproducible index is valid. Weightings are distributed as follows: o Housing: Roof: cement 3 points, aluminium 2 points, and traditional 0 points. Walls: mud 1 point, mud-bricks 2 points, partly cemented wall 4 points, rocks 3 points, completely cemented wall 6 points. Floor: partly cemented floor 1 point, completely cemented floor 2 points, and tiled floor 3 points. o Education: points are gained according to the school(s) the children attend, with a negative point given in case school age children do not attend. Similarly points are distributed according to the education level attained by adults. o Health: a mosquito net yields 1 point, the presence of different kinds of latrines yields between 1 and 5 points and purchased medicines between 1 and 3 points depending on where they are purchased. o Regular revenue: valued between 3 points for salary and 1 point for regular outside help, adherence to a savings group gives 1 point, and each item that obtained at least 200 US$ of yearly revenue gives 2 points. o Equipment, goods and services: owned pre-coded items usually get 1 point each, whereas expensive items such as a generator, a motor bike, and a car up to 6 points. Additional items, not in the initial pre-coded list (second phone, freezer, etc.), are awarded 1 point each. o Children’s health: the prevalence of 0-5 year old children in the total mortality has been given a negative value of–10 points, the prevalence of “diarrhea since 1 week”, “fever since 1 week” and of “skin diseases” has – respectively – a negative value of–1 point. o Extra items taken into account in this study: manufactured bed, mattress, meat consumption, possession of livestock, education level of male and female adults in the household have been added in this survey, but do not basically alter the results of the survey. The prevalence of children’s diseases, the mortality rate of children under five years old, and school attendance are included on the index because they represent good indicators for the quality of life. However, they are not as easily affected by money as other indicators such as housing, furniture, equipment and possessions. Databases All survey information has been entered in several Access databases: 1. Geographical information and simple description of all houses and outbuildings of the surveyed villages, ethnic group and lineage. 2. Socioeconomic baseline and detailed questionnaire, including photographs of all the buildings and structures owned or occupied by the household. 3. Village questionnaire datasheets and databases, have been presented in illustrated individual village sheets, and a database developed in which the text and statistics have been stored. Page 15 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 3. Demography This section gives an overview of the composition of the households, and the number of households in the surveyed villages of Kabak, and along the port and Maferinya road areas. 3.1 Kabak Kabak is one of the smallest rural sub prefectures of Guinée Maritime (Coastal Guinea). The administrative division of Kabak fits to the island characteristics, but not all consulted sources seem to agree on the exact division and limits of each of the districts, sectors, and subsectors. According to the 8 Infogeographic Atlas of the Coastal Guinea , there are 7 districts in Kabak, whereas according to local authorities (including the sub prefect and an agronomist from Kabak), there are 8 districts (Bossimiyah has since become a district, instead of being attached to the Manke district). The Kabak administrative division presented in Table 2 is based on these different sources. Kabak covers an area of 116 square kilometres. The smallest district Tonguiron, represents only 2% of the total area, while the largest one, Youlaye, represents 23% of the sub prefecture. The sub prefecture’s offices are located in the Manke district, in the centre of the island, where most of the infrastructures are also present (primary schools, secondary school, health centre, etc.). Table 2 – Administrative divisions of Kabak Island District Seydouyah Yelibane Manke Sector Kaleyiere Kamalon Seydouyah centre Kenende Keka Konimodiya Fafende Yetiyah Yelibane centre Kalea Tolomalon Manke centre Siremalidiya Kama Sogo Sogo Filikanke Subsectors Sangbon Sourikouye, Krigbere, Kassare Friyah, Dabonkhore or Arapata, Khariyah Kolifiare, Wondima Falede, Tayire Melibon, Kaleyire, Fandilayah, Khadilayah, M’bebadia Bossimiyah Bomodoyah Bossimiah centre Kameme Tonguiron Yelikery Lokoya Tonguiron centre Bolimanda Yomouya Kanrangbane Goore, Filide, Gbiniyire Mouki Menyiere Bolimanda centre Daoudaya, Fodekaleah Youlaye Bakia terre Wondefili, Wonnigbaya Bakia mer Bakia bole, Bakia kameme Kakende Khounyi Youlaye centre Matakang Tatagui 1 Tatagui 2 Sources: Sub prefecture Kabak, village interviews July 2011, Atlas Infogéographique (2001). 8 Observatoire de la mangrove (2001), Atlas infogéographique de la Guinée maritime, CNRS – IRD – CNSHB, 179 pages. Page 16 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Map 2 shows the division as it was presented in the Infogeographic Atlas from 2001. Map 2 – Administrative divisions of Kabak (date 2001) Source: Atlas infogeographique (2001) page 151. Page 17 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 18 Map 3 – Map of Kabak Island based on a Landsat satellite picture in 1992, referred to in the “Atlas Infogéographique (2001) 3.2 Port and Maferinya road The different villages of the Port-Maferinya road areas are located along the road between Maferinya (the sub prefecture) and Touguiyire (the ferry port to Kabak). Table 3 – Administrative divisions of the Port-Maferinya road District Sector Subsector Senguelen Touguiyire Kalaya (Senguelen centre) Bamboukhoun Sounganyah Souguesegni, Fodea, Koniakhori Tougande Sireya Sourima, Gandia, Sampaya Moufoufanye Madinagbe Morifindiya Population data For Kabak, the population data have been compiled per district in Table 4, with the fishing villages, and the small hamlets treated as a separate entity. The total number of households according to the 2010-2011 census is 3,382 which, for an average household size of 7.9 in the agricultural villages and 6.4 in the fishing villages indicates a total population of 25,365 people. Compared to the 1998 census (Atlas Infogéographique, 2001) when the population was estimated at 13,586 inhabitants, the population has almost doubled in 24 years. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 19 Table 4 – Estimated population of Kabak District 2 Bossimiyah 1-2 Hamlets 2 Manke 1-2 Fishermen 2 Serdoua 2 Tongiron 2 Yelibane 1-2 Youlaye Total Number of households Average household size3 Total population % of total population 174 557 292 902 386 141 447 483 3,382 7.9 7.9 7.9 6.4 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 - 1,375 4,400 2,307 5,773 3,049 1,114 3,531 3,816 25,365 5% 17% 9% 23% 12% 4% 14% 15% 100% Source: (1)GPS house census April 2010, and (2)July 2011, (3)data household questionnaires. 9 In most houses (87%) only one household is living, but, as stated before, often a house is shared between brothers, or father and son, as long as they haven’t been able to build a house for themselves. Table 5 – Number of nuclear households per house Area Kabak Port/Maferinya road area Households per house 1 2 3 4 5 87% 8.4% 3% 1% 0.6% 90.8% 4.5% 3.5% 1% 0.2% Source: GPS house census April 2010, and July 2011. 6 0.1% - Average HH/house 1.198 1.157 Total N houses 2,837 707 Population along the Port-Maferinya road The house census survey along the road has inventoried all houses in the area that will potentially be directly impacted by the port: the villages of Touguiyire, Senguelen and Bamboukhoun. However, lack of time limited the survey for the other villages located between the port and Maferinya to those houses that were directly along the road, as they will be directly impacted by the planned access road upgrading. In total 11 km, from the Touguiyire ferry to the Madinagbe-Souguesegni intersection have been completely surveyed, and from there on 9 km only those houses directly located along the road were surveyed. Table 6 shows the population directly impacted through the access road and around the port area: 707 households with an estimated population of more than 4,700 people. Other villages are present in the area, and may be affected by the railroad, because they have their egress through the main road, or because they use land in the presently affected area. Table 6 – Estimated population along the Port-Maferinya road District Senguelen Madinagbe Morifindiya Total Village Touguiyire Touguiyire Hamlets Moufoufanye/Fandiema Senguelen Bamboukhoun Songaya Souguesegni Fodeah* Koniakhori* Tougande* Sireya* Number of households(1) Average household size(3) Total population % of total population 47 17 17 176 62 77 123 65 20 57 46 707 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 67 315 114 114 1,179 415 516 824 436 134 382 308 4,737 7% 2% 2% 25% 9% 11% 17% 9% 3% 7% 8% 100% Source: (1)GPS house census July 2011, (3)data household questionnaires. * Incomplete, includes only houses directly along the road. 9 A “Household” is defined as a husband with more or wives, unmarried children and other dependents, including dependents that are not living together with their spouse(s). F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 20 Map 4 – Population on Kabak Island with indication of the main lineages 1044 Kabak Island grid 2 x 2 km 1042 other structures Limit Camara 1040 Soumah Sylah Bangoura 1038 nsp Other 1036 1034 1032 1030 1028 1026 1024 671 673 675 677 679 681 683 685 Source: house census April 2010 and July 2011. Note: details on lineages were not indicated in the observations from 2010. For the fishing villages, population density is too high to indicate lineages on the scale of the map. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 3.3 Page 21 Ethnic groups and lineages The area is traditionally part of the Soussou heartland. Most of the population declares itself as belonging to the same ethnic group: Soussou. Only in fishing and trading villages other minorities are present: Téméné from Sierra Leone in the fishing villages, Malinke and Peul who often engage in trade and crafts in all villages. All households claiming to belong to the founding lineages of the village were Soussou. Tables 7 and 8 are based on data from the household survey, as the detailed house survey provides globally the same information. Table 7 – Ethnic composition of Kabak and the Port–Maferinya road area Ethnic group Soussou Malinke Téméné (Temne) Peul Konianke Djallonke Others N= Port-road 84% 9% 0% 3% 2% 1% 1% 128 Kabak fishing 67% 7% 16% 7% 0% 0% 4% 155 Kabak agriculture 93% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 5% 402 2008 Baseline 22% 31% 0% 4% 15% 14% 13% 301 Source: Household survey July 2011, question 2. Table 8 – Main lineages of Kabak and the Port–Maferinya road area Lineage Port-road Kabak fishing N= 19% 14% 10% 10% 26% 0% 10% 0% 3% 2% 1% 7% 126 36% 13% 11% 8% 1% 5% 1% 3% 3% 1% 3% 12% 154 Camara Soumah Sylla Bangoura Youla Touré Cissé Fofana Conté Sakho Diallo Others Kabak agriculture 32% 16% 15% 15% 3% 6% 3% 3% 2% 3% 1% 4% 400 Average 30% 15% 13% 13% 7% 5% 4% 3% 2% 2% 2% 6% 681 Founding lineage only 40% 18% 11% 7% 16% 3% 0% 2% 1% 2% 274 Source: Household survey July 2011, question 2. 3.4 Origin As most of non-urban Guinea, the area is inhabited in the great majority by people born in the village: this is the case for 90% of the Kabak farmers and 81% for those in the Port-Maferinya road area. Only in the fishing villages, many people have come for what they call either “fishing” or “employment” but are both related to fishing. It is noteworthy that, in spite of the excellent agricultural opportunities on Kabak, very few people have migrated to the island in search of agricultural land. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 22 Table 9 – Origin/reason for arrival of the head of household in Kabak and in the Port–Maferinya road area Reason Birth Fishing Follow parents Work-employment Commerce-Trade-Business Available land N= Port-road 81% 2% 10% 2% 3% 1% 126 Kabak fishing 52% 25% 4% 11% 7% 1% 147 Kabak agriculture 90% 1% 4% 3% 0% 1% 396 Average 80% 6% 5% 4% 2% 1% 670 Source: Household survey July 2011, question 2. Others have been following relatives already living in the area, and a minority has come to take advantage of the business and trading opportunities, related to fish, market garden crops and rice. Those who were not born in the area have been living in the area since a very long time: on average 16 years: 13 years for the fishermen, 23 years for the Kabak farmers and equally 23 years along the PortMaferenya road. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 23 4. Human environment 4.1 History th Guinea has been part of the Ghanean Empire (750-1076) and the Sosso (Soussou) mpire in the 12 th and 13 century, before the Malian empire took control of the major part of the country after the battle of Kirina in 1235. The present peopling of the area started after the demise of the Malian th empire in the 15 century. th th During the main period of the Mandingue kingdom, in the 9 to the 12 century, the animistic populations of middle and high Guinea migrate towards the South, under the pressure of Islamic Peul, and continue towards the coast (SNC-Lavalin, 2008). Various ethnic groups were involved, but during the centuries they have melted into hybrid mixtures like the Malinke-Toma, Guerze-Kissi). Guinée Maritime – The Soussou arrived only towards the first half of the 19 th century in the Kindia area, where they found unoccupied land. Nowadays, Peul dominate the northern part, while Soussou dominate the southern and coastal areas. Minority groups are Malinke, Guerze, Kissi, and ethnic groups from Sierra Leone, who engage in fishing along the coast. The various wars in Sierra Leone and Liberia have caused many refugees to flee to Guinea, but all but a few have since returned to their own country. The study area covered in this report – the Maferinya-Kabak road including the port area and, Kabak Island – is part of Coastal Guinea. The population is mostly from Soussou ethnic group, with – among the fishermen – a minority of Sierra Leonean Téméné, and – for trade – a Peul minority. The latter also comprise resident and transhumant pastoralists who reside more or less permanently with their cattle outside the villages. Kabak Island On Kabak Island, there are less than 10 Peul permanent pastoralists, most to the North-East of the island. Along the Port-Maferinya road pastoralists are present in small camps on the eastern side of the road. For the present study not all camps have been visited. The foundation of Kabak farming villages is not documented, however according to the little information founded in the Atlas of Coastal Guinea as well as from the village interviews; it is possible to trace different periods of the Kabak history. In general villagers on Kabak know little about their history; sometimes they can cite the first occupants, but rarely the creation date, except for the most recent fishing villages. th The insular tradition says that the Kabak Island was unoccupied until the 18 century. A Mande fisherman, who was going down the Forecariah River is believed to have discovered this unoccupied th land close to the sea, and has created a few settlements. Then, during the 19 century, the invasion of the Sosso (Soussou) lands by the Malinke family of the Tourekalai lead to different migration waves of traditional populations being pushed towards the coastal islands. The first populations (Mande then Sosso (Soussou)) settled on different sheltered sites in the southern part of the island. The southern th villages of Kabak were founded at the end of the 18 century (Bossimiyah, Tonguiron), whereas other th northern villages are said to have been founded later on, at the end of the 19 century (Yelibane, Manke). In Bossimiyah, it was explained that Kabak means “end of the earth, we can’t go further” in Mande language. Most of the original villages on Kabak were founded by the Camara lineage (Yelibane, Manke and Bossimiyah), and Camara are still the largest lineage with a little over one third of the population of Kabak (Table 8). F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey When the fishing villages became bigger, with new arrivals of different lineages, populations started to th mix up and inhabitants started to cultivate the mangroves. During the second half of the 19 century, the Kabak population was subject to a new wave of migration with Senegalese and Sierra Leonean settlers. Nowadays, there is a majority of Sosso, now called Soussou, the Senegalese have certainly been assimilated whereas there remains an important minority of Sierra Leonean Téméné (Temne) in some of the fishing villages. Port-Maferinya road area The common founders of both Madinagbe and Sounganyah (Senguelen district) are called Manga Modou Youla and Manga Sounga Youla (the last one gave his name to Sounganyah). According to people from Madinagbe, the foundation of this village is as old as 8 centuries, which was the height of the Mande kingdom (they give precisely the date of 1235, which corresponds to the great battle of Kirina, where the Malinke Soundiata Keita started the foundation of the Mande empire). Kalaya/Senguelen would have been founded later; it is said about 100 years ago. Lands previously belonged to the Gbereyire-Bafila district. Youla is the founding family, Bangoura family is another important family, and they own most of the lands in the Senguelen district. 4.2 Social organisation of the ethnic groups The basic social unit is the extended family: husband, one or more wives, children, who may be married with their wives and children. Relationship between these individuals (between spouses and between generations) follow prescribed rules which differ on several points between ethnic groups. The family refers to a clan, which shares a common ancestor, respect the same rules and interdictions, and live together. However, during recent generations the clan has gradually lost its importance, which is now taken over by territorial unit of the village where extended families who belong to different clans live together. Malinke – The basis of the organization are the council of elders and the founding lineage of the village. The founding lineage decides about land for the village. The society is divided in castes “noblemen”, “free men”, “men of caste” and “captives”. The soutiyo is the patriarch of the village. In Coastal Guinea very few Malinke are met. Peul – The traditional Peul society is strongly hierachized and divided in casts. It comprises (1) “noblemen” (Alpha, Cheikhou, Modi) descendants of migrated Muslims, chiefs of converted communities, and big cattle owners; (2) non Peul communities converted to Islam who make up the class of free rural land owners, farmers and pastoralists; (3) the cast people: craftsmen and “griots”; and (4) two types of slaves: the home slaves and the farming slaves. Though slaves have disappeared, the Peul society remains strongly socially stratified, and its administrative unit, the missidé, more or less corresponds to a village. In Coastal Guinea Peul are active in trade and in pastoralism. Soussou – The main population of Coastal Guinea are the Soussou, who belong to the Mande group. Social structure is patrilineal, based in the village “ta”, which groups founding families (lineages) who maintain the power. The SNC-Lavalin 2008 report indicates that a “chef de terre” (father of the land) is in charge of distributing the land, and in resolving conflicts as he seems fit. This person is in general the eldest person alive of the founding lineage: the sotikemo, who is both in charge of the material and spiritual activities of the land. This report also indicates that land more and more often gets a monetary value and that the traditional way of acquiring land through the gift of cola nuts, is less and less possible. Page 24 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Téméné – Since the years 1930, Sierra Leoneans are fishing in Guinean waters, and many of them are 10 living in Guinea . On the island of Kabak, the present survey establish for nearly all heads of households in fishing villages their year of arrival in the village, and their origin. 16% of the population 11 in fishing villages of Kabak are Téméné (themnés ) and come from Sierra Leone. In Khounyi, the most important fishing village, 57% of migrants came from Sierra Leone. Some have been present for less than two years, but many have settled long ago (50% of migrants who asserted living in Khounyi for over 20 years are from Sierra Leone). Some of them will spend a few months each year in their country where they may have a wife and children; others do it only one or two months a year to visit their family. Since 2006, there is an Agreement between the “Union nationale des Pêcheurs artisans de 12 Guinée” and the “Sierra Leone Artisanal Fishermen's Union” . It aims among others to meet the standards of fishing in both countries in order to improve livelihoods of communities who depend on fishing. 4.3 Lineages Lineage and age are the basis of Guinean society. The ethnic groups are divided in various related groups, families or clans who are linked to a common ancestor, called lineage. This relationship 13 expresses itself in the family name of the person (patronyme ), such as Camara, Bangoura, Touré, etc. In the Kabak Island, five lineages make up 79% of the population. Land occupation is often based on an ancestor, who arrived a few centuries ago in an area, started to cultivate, and by doing so became the de facto founding family of a village. In later stages, other families, with other patronymes, may have followed the original family, and as in time they became accepted as belonging to the natives of a village. Others, who came, have tried to become founding members of the community, by simply adopting the name of the local patronyme. Though in Soussou Coastal Guinea only a limited number lineage (bonsè) names are present, the fact to share the same lineage name does not automatically include a direct relationship, as other villages and communities may have been founded by different members of the same lineage, and besides the name, also other forms of relationships are needed to confirm that people belong to the same 14 founding lineage of a village , but rather to segments of such lineages, or – in the case of smaller more recent villages, to the extended family under a chief who is the factual (grand) father of the community. Within a village people grouped by “compound”, called fohkhe in Soussou, itself composed of nuclear households (dembaya), in which husband, wives, unmarried children, and other residents live under 15 the authority of a simple chief of household . 10 Source: http://www.tlfq.ulaval.ca/axl/monde/famnigero-congolaise.htm assessed on January 28, 2012. 11 Temne, also spelled Temen or Timni, group of some 1.6 million people of central and northwestern Sierra Leone who speak a language (also called Temne) of the Atlantic branch of the Niger-Congo family. The Temne are mainly farmers whose staple crop is rice, supplemented by peanuts (groundnuts), cotton, cassava, and millet; cash crops are palm kernels and cola nuts. Rice, cattle, and goats are also important. The household consists of a husband and his wife or wives, their children, and other dependents. A Temne settlement contains a central meetinghouse surrounded by circles of mud-and-wattle houses with thatched roofs. Inheritance and succession are governed by patrilineal descent. The Temne are divided into numerous independent chiefdoms, each governed by a paramount chief. Chiefdoms are divided into sections governed by subchiefs and containing one or more villages or hamlets. The village in turn is under the authority of a headman, formerly a descendant of the village founder but now an elected official. The chief’s office is partly religious, and he is sometimes a member of the ragbenle and poro male secret societies. The ragbenle is responsible for curing certain diseases and performing ceremonies to promote the growth of crops. The women’s bundu society mainly prepares girls for marriage. Traditional religious beliefs in a supreme god and in nature and ancestral spirits are declining, being replaced by Christianity and Islam. (see: encyclopedia Britannic:: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/586495/Temne) 12 Convention UNPAG-SLAFU: http://spcsrp.org/medias/csrp/pays/Convention-UNPAG-SLAFU.pdf). 13 « Patronyme » = « Family name ». Denise Paulme, Les Gens du Riz, Les Kissi de Haute-Guinée, Paris. Librairie Plon. 1954, 1970. 324 p. consulted in http://www.webguinee.net/bibliotheque/ethnographie/kisi/dpaulme/chap06.html 14 15 Section based on observations while mapping the village, and general village interviews. See: David Leyle (2010) Bien-être et inégalités en Guinée Maritime: une question d'accès. Un système d'information pour le développement, Thèse soutenue Université Michel de Montaigne - Bordeaux III (22/01/2010), Georges Rossi (Dir.) Page 25 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 4.4 Page 26 Cultural heritage and sacred sites Cultural heritage and sacred sites information was partly obtained from village consultation meetings and partly from research by an archaeologist who joined the team at the end of the survey. The population adhering largely to the Islamic faith, there is a somewhat complicated relationship between religion and traditional beliefs. This was especially obvious when discussing with the villagers what their preferred option was if graveyards would be affected by the project. The official belief is that in Islam, once a body is buried, only the soul remains in heaven, in the body remains an empty shell which, after the funeral, can be forgotten and discarded. Graveyards – Some villagers would react in this way: let the death be forgotten, and don’t bother if there’s damage to graveyards. Other villagers – the majority – allowed that there graveyards might be affected, but wished to perform rituals. In a few villages people were very concerned by an eventual destruction of their graveyards, and could or would not come up with a solution. Cultural sites – The most important cultural sites – which do not directly seem to have a traditional or spiritual meaning – are the step of the giant in Moufoufanye and its corollary, the grave of the giant in Matakang with the two tombstones indicating his head and feet. It may seem that this is an important part of the cultural heritage, which will probably merit to be preserved. Spiritual sites – All water sources and the big “fromager” trees are said to be inhabited by spirits, who merit being appeased, and may be gentle or dangerous. In general, villagers allow such sites to be destroyed by the project, usually after traditional ceremonies. Historical sites – Several historical sites are still visible especially in Matakang, dating back to the 19 century and the first colonial occupants: graves, houses, watchtower, military base. th Sites observed by the archaeologist are cited in Appendix III. 4.5 Land Tenure Most of the data in this section is derived from the 2008 baseline report, as well as the 2010 report on the Benty area, and the INSUCO report (2011), and includes information obtained during 2-3 hour long village interviews which were conducted in selected villages included in the survey. The right to occupy new land is derived from those (families, lineages) who opened and first cultivated the land, the so called “right of the hoe”. However, land is always shared, not only with the people of the own lineage, but also with strangers, as “no farmer can remain without land”. This traditional system is perceived in parallel with the modern legal system, where all land belongs to the state. Land tenure in the study area is mainly based on ownership of land by the founding families, and on heritage: sons inherit fields from their parents. Though the founding lineages, and their allies, are considered to be the formal owners of land, daily management falls on the extended families, and individual households. These founding families, in the past may have allocated land to other lineages, which after some time become the ownership of these lineages. At the present time, the sharing of land between lineages appears as fixed, and within the village, land can be allocated to individual households through inheritance, gifts and lending, and – very rarely – through buying. The lineages can be recognized by their names: Bangoura, Camara, Fofana, Touré, Traoré, etc. In the Kabak area, Camara, Soumah, Sylla and Bangoura are the most numerous (total 70%), in the port area these lineages are preceded by the Youla (26%). Within these families, a sub lineage may be considered as the local population. The existence of a “chef de terre” – a specific chief who is responsible for the lands of a village, hands out new land, and is also in charge of the relations between the community and the ancestors and F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 27 16 spirits – has not been confirmed in the Kabak and port areas . At the village level the representatives of the main lineages are playing that role, as well as the elders of the extended family. Table 10 shows that most of the land is inherited or family land, which can be through paternal and maternal lines. These two types are put together because the interviewed families could hardly distinguish between the two types, as even if it was inherited, it would remain family land, and inversely. Renting land and free occupancy are in general associated with gifts: cola nuts and a small sum of money at the discretion of those who give money. There seems to be tension between what is traditionally expected from villagers: (land belongs to the lineage, but one should give land to everybody who needs it, without asking for compensation) and modern constraints of limited land availability, and relatively high income, for those who have access to free land. That is why in village interviews, people tend to say that there is no market for land, that land is given or borrowed freely, and that any compensation to the owner depends uniquely on the 17 discretion of whoever receives the land . People seem to agree that a foreigner who leaves the village loses his right on the land he acquired, even if the land was bought. Presently, land pressure seems to be on the rise, and in some villages people acknowledged that, with increasing lack of free fertile land, a land market would probably develop in the near future, in which land could be formally rented, bought and sold. Renting is only indicated in few households, and mostly among the fishing communities. Survey data on rent indicate that average rent is 460 kFg for an average plot size of 1.23 ha. Table 10. Land ownership in the Kabak-Port area Ownership Heritage or family land Traditional ownership Free Renting N= Founding Lineage Founding Other lineage lineage 55% 69% 25% 20% 13% 5% 7% 6% 321 255 Area Port and road area 54% 25% 18% 1% 120 Kabak fishing 53% 15% 9% 21% 71 Kabak agriculture 64% 23% 7% 6% 384 Source: 2011 social baseline, question 20. Several payments are traditionally made for the use of land and levied on the harvest. Data from the household survey show that such payments are not taken into account as expenses, and probably not paid. Rental fee – This fee may be paid per year, but more often for the use of land during several years. Traditionally the owner has the right to receive 10% of the harvest. This seems usually to be paid, although very often it is not indicated in the survey. Tribute to the mosque (dime) – This fee is normally 10% of the harvest, but does not appear in the household questionnaires. Head of the lineage – He has also the traditional right to 10% of the harvest. An owner can also contribute 10% of the harvest to his married sisters. 16 17 The role of this traditional person is described in the 2008 rail baseline (page 5.17). A similar observation was made in the 2010 Benty port report: « Sousou don’t like to refer to buying land as this is considered something for town’s people). F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Tributes and dimes All activities demand from the person to share some of the money the person is earning with it: to the village chief, the chief of port, the head of the lineage, etc. The standard rate is 10%, which – according to Islam - has to be given to the poor and the needy as a farila, and though not mandatory will usually be given to the person who has lent the land used for agriculture. Titled land Titled land is extremely rare in the port area and limited to government structures (some schools, health centres, port buildings) and some of the owners of semi-commercial plantations. Though land titling is theoretically available to all Guineans, cost, administrative hassle, as well as ignorance on how it can improve security of land tenure are causing that few people engage in titling their land. In Kabak only one person was indicated as having a title. Along the Kabak-Maferinya road several people are said to own titles for their pineapple and oil palm plantations, some which are on an industrial scale, like the oil palm plantation of a former president whose cultivated area covers 200 ha. Land acquisition for resettlement In cases where economic resettlement (usually through loss of land) is necessary for the project, the greatest challenge will be to ensure the security of land tenure to the new occupier of the acquired land. This security of tenure must be defined in such a way that new land can be managed in the same or better rules than the expropriated land in terms of heritage, sale, lending out, share cropping, etc. This is most likely to be an issue if the resettlement site is not in the same village, on land of the same lineage, so resettling within the own community should be the preferred option. 4.6 Types of land: individual land, family land and lineage land Geographers and the project have extensively studied land tenure in Guinea and in the project's areas, from the mine in the Simandou mountain range to the port in the Forecariah prefecture. The socioeconomic team has discussed land tenure in each of the village meetings, and an agronomist has discussed with individual farmers on how they had obtained their lands. Several conclusions come from these different sets of data: There is no land market, and lands have neither been sold nor bought Lands are easily given to foreigners, but though people tend to say that no payment is required for such rental, at least 10% of the crop and often much more is shared with the owner Lands which are occupied permanently by orchards, perennial crops, or improved by dikes such as bogoni and dara, belong to individual families and households. Wetlands “bas-fonds” are less present on Kabak, but through their high potential agricultural value, they are also owned “privately” On Kabak and in the port area, most of the lands has permanent man-made improvements “mises en valeur”, and may so be regarded as permanently owned by families and households Fields that are part of a rotational cycle (e.g. used for a few years, than left fallow for 5-15 years before they can be again used), remain under the authority of the lineages, or even the founding lineage. The closer a household is to the founding lineage, the more right he has to call fields and fallow land as his own, and return to it every time he needs to farm Uncultivated lands traditionally belong to one of the major family lineages, but appear to be often collectively owned (or claimed) by more or less extended families. Page 28 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 29 The notion of “empty bush land” does not exist; every inch of land in Guinea belongs to someone, so calling an area “bush land” is often regarded as an insult. However, there seems to be some confusion between the notions of “fallow land” (e.g. land which was cultivated, and laid to rest in order to regain its fertility) and “uncultivated land” which has never been cultivated. If a farmer is part of the founding lineage or of one of the closer lineages, fallow land can be reused by him; others will have to ask permission to the lineage elders every time they need a new plot of land. 4.7 Examples of agricultural land in Kabak and the port area From more than 80 field visits made by the team, more detailed information can be drawn about how land management occurs in the daily practice. From these data it becomes also clear that the information obtained during village meetings – that land is rarely rented out against payment – has to be slightly adapted. Table 11 provides some examples of fields cultivated by farmers in Kabak and Senguelen. In cases land is rented it appears that usually part or the entire 10% dime is paid to the owner, but in some cases it may be more than 40% of the harvest. Foreigners appear to receive land under the same conditions as shown by the Sierra Leonean in Senguelen, who only pays the 10% of his crop to the owner. Table 11. Examples of fields cultivated by farmers in Kabak and the port area Area Kabak Number of fields 5 bogoni Surface Specifics of the fields Observations 1.4 ha 10% dime + 40% of the harvest 4 bogoni 1.7 ha Family land, A bogoni may be rented for 600 kFg for two seasons 6 bogoni 0.6 ha 6 dara n/a Family land inherited from the maternal grandmother who cleared the land Tomatoes, cucumbers, leaves Rented for an indefinite time from father in law who has created the fields from the mangroves Fields shared by 4 brothers, 2 living in Kabak and 2 living in Conakry, at harvest time these families share the rice production Shared by two brothers, used for rice and for market garden crops 10 dara ~1 ha Used for rice (rainy season) and eggplants/Okra (dry season) 6 dara 2 ha 4 bogoni 1.5 ha 1 dara 0.14 ha Used for rice (rainy season) and eggplantsOkra-tomatoes (dry season) Bogoni not usable anymore because of saltiness Rented for 10% of the harvest since 10 years 4 bogoni 1.8 ha 2 dara 1.3 ha 1 hill side 0.23 ha Inherited from father since 40 years Inherited from father. Has more fields than he can use, which he lends to parents and neighbors Land received through mother, was fallow for 10 Used by two brothers. From the 6 million Francs harvest, the elder brother receives 4 million, the younger 2 million. Land cleared by father who delimited areas for each of his sons when he died. Uses animal plowing, fertilizer and pest control for market crops (costs: 0.5 million GNF) Income from eggplants (1.6 million GNF) and from Okra (0.6 million GNF). Land cleared by grandfather and inherited from father Market garden: expenditures 1,1 million GNF, revenues 3,0 million GNF Has sown 80 kg rice for a harvest of 50 kg. Has rented several bogoni to his neighbors, who pay him part of the 10% dime. Rice and market crops: Okra/eggplant, expenditures 0.3 million GNF, revenues 0.8 million GNF Rice only Rice Market garden crops: expenditures 0.2 million GNF, revenue 0.9 million GNF Rice, cassava, and market garden crops sown as mixed crops. Net income from F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Area Senguelen Number of fields Surface 2 bogoni 0.7 ha 11 bogoni 4.8 ha Specifics of the fields Observations years, and will be used 2 years Rented by a Sierra Leonean, pays 10% of the harvest Received from paternal grandmother market crops: 64 kFg, rice production only 32 kg. Rice: estimated yield 1,700 kg. Rice only, production estimated at 7.5 T. Source: Agronomist field visits with farmers, July 2011. In Kabak, many fields are used both during the dry season for market garden crops, and the wet season for rice. Some farmers indicated that this was a better way of earning extra income, than through salt winning. Rice yields – In Kabak18, in 3 out of 20 farms visited, rice cultivation had failed due to saltiness of the soil, and invading seawater. In these fields production was evaluated at 60 kg/ha, which did not cover the amount of seeds sown. In the other 15 farms on bogoni land the productivity was evaluated at about 1.5 T/ha, and in the 3 dara farms at 0.93 T/ha. This confirms the general knowledge that dara fields yield much less than bogoni fields. 18 Page 30 Detailed data on yields and more precisions on fields visited are presented in Appendix I – Agriculture F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 5. Governance and traditional structures in the villages 19 Guinea is divided into 8 administrative regions , each headed by a governor, 33 Prefectures headed by a prefect, and 302 subprefectures headed by a sous-préfet. The port area and Kabak are located in Guinée Maritime (Coastal Guinea), Prefecture of Forecariah, and subprefectures of Kabak and Maferinya. These authorities are named by the government. Subprefectures are completed by CRD (Communautés Rurales de Developpement, Rural development Communities) which cover almost always of the same area as subprefectures. Each CRD/Subprefecture is split up in districts, sectors, and sometimes sub-sectors. The president of the executive council of the CRD is elected for 4 years renewable by the community council (based on lower elected officials), but has a secretary named by the government. The budget of the CRD comes from local taxes and from subsidies from the central governments. The presence of industries and companies, obviously allows CRDs a much higher income. Villages in the area are governed by a mixture of administrative and traditional authorities. Administratively the District President and the Sector chief with their dependents are the most important locally. They are locally elected, but with a strong influence of the traditional authorities. The social structure within the villages is based on a patriarchal and patrilineal system, in a gerontocracy like system, where women have a secondary place, and young men only gradually obtain some influence in the community. Village life is organized around the “elders” and a system of mutual assistance (see below). Council of elders Locally, the council of elders, the imam, and the eldest male representative of the founding lineage, the El Hadj (who have made the pilgrimage to Mecca) are the most important persons. During village questionnaires they were usually present. For every decision in the village and for the distribution of land, the lineage elders have to be consulted. Village organizations Many groups and associations are present in each village: associations of fishermen (men), associations of farmers (men and women), associations of fish smokers (women). Associations of young people/youth exist too, notably sport associations. Many rotational saving groups “tontines” are present: each person gives an amount of money regularly (every week, every two weeks or every month); in turn the total amount is given to one of the members of the “tontine”. If an individual or a family needs money for a ceremony, death or illness, it is common for those around them to contribute occasionally. In traditional agriculture, there exist mutual assistance groups “lanyi”. They are made up of men, women and/or young people who work in turn in the fields of each of their members. Fishing villages have some particularities. In particular, they have several chiefs each of whom has his own specific domain in which he rules: One “chef de secteur” (chief of sector) or “chef de sous-secteur” (chief of sub-sector) and his assistant(s) like in other villages of the region – is designed by the president of district (“président de district”). One or several “chefs de port” (chiefs of port) and his assistant(s) – who is appointed for 5 years by the prefect (“préfet”) and ANAM. 19 See SNC-Lavalin (2008) Page 31 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 32 The role of “chef de port” is to arbitrate and settle problems related to fishing: theft of fishing gear (fishing nets), theft or loss of fish at sea, and conflicts between fishermen. Moreover on arriving at port, each team has to present his capture to the chief of port; but this one does not control the amount that is landed. In each village there is a place to discuss problems and find solutions. Sometimes it is around a small table under a tree. More often it takes place in a covered area with a straw roof. The “chef de village” (“district”, “secteur” or “sous-secteur”) handles most issues, except those directly related to sea activities which are treated by the “chef de port”. Some individuals have an important role in the village: religious personalities (Imam, “Marabout”), presidents of associations, and – particularly in fishing villages – owners of several boats and outboard motors. Many people are “dependent” on these boat owners for obtaining work. In the fishing villages surveyed, 23 fishermen have more than one boat (Table 12). Table 12 – Multiple boat ownership in the fishing villages of Kabak Boat ownership Number of owners of several boats Number of outboard motors per owner Konimodiya With 2 boats Friyah With 2 boats Dabonkhore With 2 boats With 2 boats 1 1 4 12 1 0 1 or 2 1 or 2 Khounyi With 3 boats With 10 boats Matakang With 2 boats 1 1 3 3 9 0 Source: 2011 social baseline, village interviews, Fishing report (2011). Most of the time one ship-owner has only one boat and works with 2 to 7-8 workers. These workers have their own houses, or as it is very frequent in Khounyi, Matakang and Dabonkhore, they “rent” a room for free in the house of their boss. Most fishing villages have one or several marine carpenters (workers specialized in making nets), sellers of gasoline (expensive compared to gasoline stations on the mainland: 7,500 GNF on the mainland and 9,000 or 10,000 GNF in Kabak), and little shops (and bar(s) in Dabonkhore, Arapata, Khounyi and Matakang). It is possible to buy on-site commodities such as candles, cigarettes, salt, oil, matches, and boxes of tomatoes, rice and even Maggi cube, smoked and fresh fish. To purchase other supplies and to sell fish and agricultural productions, residents usually go to the market in Sangbon with motorbikes. Families, concessions and households Villages are made up of one or more lineages, and within these villages, lineages are divided into smaller units based on direct relationship of one recent ancestor, his married descendants and his direct kin. In Kabak and the Port-Maferinya road area brothers as well as fathers and sons often live close together in “families”, “concessions” or homesteads – fôkhè in Soussou –, which may be composed of one or several houses, and one or several kitchens. In these concessions one can distinguish “households”, dembaya composed of a married man, his wives and his descendents. Among the Soussou, not only do co-spouses tend to share the same kitchen, the kitchens are often used by spouses of several men. Another shared facility are the latrines: most “families” have access to a latrine (more rarely in fishing villages), but in many cases they are shared between families. Economically, “families” share access to land resources. In such families, there is much solidarity, and people tend to react to the outside as a unit, but in focus groups and other discussions, it becomes clear that each of the married households wants to be considered as a separate economic independent unit. It seems as if there is some tension between the strive to have a “family unit” based on traditional solidarity, common land resources, but privately people strive for independence. As a conclusion, Leyle (2008) considers the concession fôkhè as “living space”, a geographical block where grandfather, sons and their sons live together, share a common F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey land source and under the responsibility of the head of family for conflict management, land 20 distribution, social and territorial organization of the family . The household, dembaya, where people share a house, take their meals in common, from the same kitchen, partially or completely share their monetary resources, and recognize the authority of a single person, the head of household, usually a male (Leyle, 2010). In such household may be included adopted children, cousins, parents, etc. An unmarried son will be part of his father’s household, and adds his workforce, production and earned money to the family. His father can use this to obtain another wife, and so improve his productivity and economic well-being. In order to marry, and obtain the bride price, he has to obtain money separately. His father will not help him, as this affects the father’s economic status. Once the son is married, the father will not help the son anymore, and though the son is still be under the traditional obligation to solidarity with his father, the father will draw much less benefit from the son. The fact that still many children live in their father’s house, and share the same kitchen, and the same land, often means that when the father dies, several sons remain in the parental house. These sons will regard the house as belonging jointly to them, or still to belong to the deceased father. The reasons provided for living together are the lack of resources for each brother to build his own house. The villagers indicated that such co-habitation still left the brothers as single economic units: even if fields were commonly farmed, after the harvest the crop was to be shared, and each brother would be responsible for his own stock. 20 Page 62-63. D. Leyle (2010). Bien être et inégalités en Guinée Maritime: une question d’accès. PhD, ADES-Géographie et aménagement, Université de Bordeaux 3. Page 33 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 6. Livelihood The pillars of livelihood in the area are rice agriculture, fishing, fish trading, market gardening and salt winning. Besides these activities, people earn money from small businesses, motorized transport (by vehicle or boat); a few are active in government services such as education, health and local government. In spite of its importance, rice production is hardly sufficient, for the population. Though harvested in December-January, one third of the households indicate that they have been buying rice in the market since January. This section provides the main elements of each of these sources of income. 6.1 Agriculture Agriculture is based on two types of crop: rain fed rice fields and market garden crops. During a 10 day mission, the agricultural specialist has visited 94 fields belonging to 14 households, randomly selected among the households of the baseline survey. 80% of these households own their fields, 20% rent them. Secondary crops are maize, cassava, cucumbers and bananas. Compared to other parts of Coastal Guinea, peanuts, yams, sweet potatoes, cocoyams are very rarely grown. 21 In 2011/12 the government – through the PUAPA financed by the World Bank – provided fertilizer, pesticides and seeds in Kabak at a subsidized price. Field types Rice is the major crop used both as food and for income, and is valued by farmers as a prestige crop. The land on which rice is cultivated belongs to two types: Bogoni: mangrove area rice fields have a size of about 1/4 to 1/3 ha and are surrounded by dikes. They are in direct contact with the sea and sea arm channels and are used for rice cultivation in the rainy season and if, they can be irrigated year round, for vegetables during the dry season. These fields do not need rotation of crops or fallow period, and are used every year. They are the most fertile fields as they receive silt from the sea, which adds fertility and kills weeds. However, management of the salinity between sea water and rain water is a major constraint. The more it rains, the better it is 22 for the bogoni. The great value of the bogoni fields is due to their fertility, relative rareness, and high productivity without external inputs from the local communities. What makes them a unique economic asset providing significant income that will be difficult to replace. In Kabak and in the port area, many bogoni are unfit for agriculture because of excess of salinity. Others will produce good yields during a year with generous rainfall, but fail if the rains are less. Only bogoni with the best water management will yield good crops every year. A good bogoni crop may 23 yield 2,000-2,500 kg/ha , but more usually observed yields are around 1,200-1,500 kg. Crops cultivated: rice, okra, tomatoes, eggplants, watermelons, cucumbers, leaves. Dara: rice fields are the same as for bogoni – on rain-fed flooded plains land – but are not in direct contact with the sea, and are used mainly for rice cultivation. In some villages, fields are used during 45 years, and then left fallow for 2-4 years, but good fields can be used continuously. In Kabak, the main problems highlighted by local were weeds and lack of fertility and rainfall. There is no problem of 21 Programme d’Urgence pour l’Appui à la Productivité Agricole managed by the Ministry of Agriculture 22 These fields have been often been created generations ago by migrant Balante from Guinea Bissau. 23 2,000 kg of paddy (unhusked rice) corresponds to about 1,250 kg of rice. In Coastal Guinea, an average household member needs at least 100 kg per year. For an average family of 7, this means 700 kg of rice or 1,100 kg of paddy. Page 34 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 35 salinity of the soil, but production seems to be 20-30% lower than on bogoni. In the port area, no dara were observed. Crops cultivated: rice, okra, tomatoes, eggplants, watermelons, cucumbers. Constraints for rice production are numerous: (1) insufficient water management resulting in salinity of the land; (2) lack of credit to pay inputs and labour, and cost of credit provide by the urban rice 24 merchants; (3) lack of inputs (fertilizer and seeds); and (4) lack of mechanization and cost of local labour. Kharé khé - côteaux - Hill-slopes –This type of field is all but absent in the Kabak and port areas. Mainly used for: rice, cassava, cucumbers, oil palms, mango trees, sweet potatoes, and peanut cultivation. Slash and burn agriculture with frequent rotation is practiced: 1-2 years in use followed by 5-6 years of fallow. Mèrè - bas fonds – Wetlands in lower valleys, mainly used for pineapple, oil palms, okra, tomatoes, eggplants, watermelons, cucumbers, and cassava. No rotation, fields are used every year. Home gardens – Bananas, chili peppers, maize, leafy vegetables, tomatoes, are often cultivated in the home gardens. “Tapades” are the fenced home gardens. Farè - plaines non aménagées – This type of field is mostly absent in the area, as all agricultural land has been transformed into dara and bogoni. 6.2 Main crops Crops grown – Crops produced by more than 10% of the population are indicated in the Table 13. 25 Rice and market garden crops are the main ones. In the Port-Maferenyia road area , crops grown are different from Kabak: cassava is the second crop after rice and oil palm the fourth most important variety. Though for 50% of the farmers, oil palms are spontaneous plants, they can be taken care of with a view to increasing yields. 23% of the farmers report growing improved varieties with a much higher yield obtained from the commercial plantations in the area. In general agriculture is more varied in the port-road area, with one third of the farmers reporting sweet potatoes and peanuts as one of their main crops. Table 13. Main crops grown in the Kabak-Port area (% of households) Crop type Rice Market Garden Bananas Maize Local oil palm Cucumbers Cassava Fruits Yams Sweet potatoes Peanuts N= Port-road 84% 66% 36% 38% 50% 22% 69% 32% 19% 32% 34% 124 Kabak fishing 66% 38% 21% 13% 7% 5% 4% 3% 12% 2% 2% 92 Kabak agriculture 93% 88% 59% 46% 24% 31% 15% 25% 25% 18% 4% 394 Average 87% 76% 48% 39% 27% 25% 24% 23% 22% 18% 10% 611 Source: 2011 household baseline survey, question 22. Crops sold – More than 80% of the production is sold by farmers for some crops: market garden crops (57% of the farmers), maize (12%) and cassava (11% of the farmers). In the Port-Maferinya road 24 In 2011 a government sponsored program distributed fertilizer and improved seeds to the farmers provided with a 50% subsidy. The long-term impact of this has not been established. 25 In the area where assets have been inventoried for the pMOF, rice and market garden crops are the most important, as most of the land has been transformed into bogoni, and other land is less fertile, because of the proximity of the sea. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey area 27% of households sell more than 80% of the cassava production and 22% do so for their palm oil production. Rice is a crop that is mostly used for household consumption, but farmers also use it for selling to obtain necessary money for their household. However, farmers sell usually less than 20% of its production: this is reported by 10% of the fishermen, 19% of the Kabak farmers and 13% in the Portroad area. Crops bought – Households indicate that crops they buy most often are peanuts (reported by 43% of the households), palm oil, cassava, beans, sweet potatoes, (each for 35-40%), fruits, yams, cucumbers and maize (33%). Rice was not often named, but other data suggest that most households have to buy rice before the new harvest can be reaped. Rice Rice is the main crop in the area, but its production is insufficient to meet the needs for staple food of most families. Interviews with farmers indicate that yields are usually less than 2,000 kg/ha. Most farmers use local varieties of rice, which are much appreciated for their taste but have lower yield than newer improved varieties. Local rice is sold at higher prices than improved varieties, and imported rice. During the survey, local rice (both local and improved varieties) was sold for 8 kFg/kg, imported rice 5 kFg/kg. In 2011, improved rice varieties and fertilizer were available in Kabak, subsided at a rate of 50%. The amount available for Kabak, 90 T of seeds, was rapidly sold out, as it could be paid at harvest time. Fertilizer was sold cash, also 50% subsidized, but farmers did not have enough money to pay, and most of it was not sold. Before that, people used to use herbicides and fertilizer mostly for the market garden crops, with any surplus used in the rice fields. Market garden crops In Kabak, market garden crops are grown after the rice is harvested, while in the port area it is cultivated only on the wetlands. Market garden crops allow people to earn money during the dry season which is used to buy rice for food and rice seed for planting. The major market garden crops in the area are: watermelons, gumbo (okra), eggplants, tomatoes, chili pepper, fresh maize, and various leafy vegetables. The cultivation of market garden crops is a family matter which engages the effort of both men and women. The sale of these crops is done by women on the Sangbon market, or to middlemen and women who buy in the villages; the money is usually shared by both spouses. As was the case for smoked fish, the further the people can travel to reach the consumers, the better the profits they make. At every stage in the supply chain – the bi-weekly Kabak market in the port of Sangbon, towns such as Maferinya and Conakry – prices increase. The money earned by selling market garden crops is said to be often used to buy the extra rice for the family that the local production is unable to provide. 6.3 Cultivated areas and reserve land Size of plots The size of agricultural land has been investigated by questionnaire; it should be noted that people have difficulties estimating the size of their plots, as they do not take measurements. Traditionally any significance is given to land size by cash crops, and many people are illiterate. From the plot measurements undertaken by the team’s agronomist, it appears that an average bogoni in Kabak is about one-third of a hectare and in the port area between 0.4 and 0.5 ha. Average land holding – Figure 2 shows that members of the founding lineages have about 20% bigger fields than the other farmers, and they also have twice as much reserve land. Page 36 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 37 Famers of Kabak and Port-Maferinya road both have 1.9 ha of cultivated land, but in the latter (PortMaferinya road), farmers have more reserve land. Median land holding – The median value indicates that half of the farmers have more than 1.5 ha, and half less. It also indicates that more than half of the farmers have no reserve land. Total land is 1.5 ha in the port, only 1.0 ha among the fishermen and 2.5 ha among the Kabak farmers. Figure 2 – Reported average size of cultivated plots and reserve land (in hectare) Kabak agriculture: Cultivated and Reserve Land [ha] 3.0 ha 2.5 ha 0.9 ha 0.9 ha 0.6 ha 2.0 ha 0.6 ha 0.6 ha Reserve land 1.5 ha Cultivated land 1.7 ha 2008 baseline NO 0.4 ha 1.5 ha 1.0 ha 0.5 ha 1.9 ha 0.5 ha 1.9 ha 2.0 ha 1.9 ha 1.2 ha MOF-Road Kabak fishing Kabak agriculture Zone Yes Founding lineage man woman Gender head of household Source: Baseline household questionnaire, July 2011, Question 20. Table 14. Median size of cultivated area and reserve land Cultivated land Fallow land Total land N= Port-Maferinya road Kabak fishing 1.4 ha 1.0 ha 0.0 ha 0.0 ha 1.5 ha 1.0 ha 122 72 Source: 2011 household baseline survey. Kabak agriculture 1.5 ha 0.0 ha 2.0 ha 380 Average 1.5 ha 0.0 ha 2.5 ha 574 Characteristics of cultivated land Figure 3 presents graphs which summarize the type of land, who owns the field, the perceived quality and distance to the homesteads. Type of cultivated land – Bogoni is the most frequent type of land, both in Kabak and the PortMaferinya road area. In the latter the rain-fed dara paddies are much less present but fertile “basfonds”, and some dry plains replace them. Members of the founding lineage only have slightly better access to the more fertile bogoni than the others. Gender of land owners – Fields are usually owned by men, but the survey shows that often women also declare owning the field. This is especially the case in the Kabak fishing villages where men are less involved in agriculture, while among the Kabak farmers, joint ownership is relatively common. The data on ownership will become important in the case of project’s land-acquisition, where land and livelihood has to be restored to the directly affected people. Perceived quality of the land – Farmers tend to find that their land is of good quality, or at least of average quality. People from the founding lineages tend to find their land a bit better than others, but the difference is small. This is another important indicator in the case replacement of fields is necessary, and people need to have replacement land that is at least of similar quality. Distance to the fields – Farmers in general have to travel far in order to reach their fields; in most cases at least half an hour, and for many an hour or more. Farmers of Kabak, because of the geography of the island are much better off than the others. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 38 Figure 3 – Main Characteristics of cultivated land 100% 80% Type of cultivated land 1% 13% 2% 40% 45% 10% 64% 4% 4% 39% 35% 37% 53% 57% 56% NO Yes Man 3% 44% Wetland 60% 40% 4% Dry plains Dara 58% 52% Kabak Fishing Kabak agriculture 20% Bogoni 48% 0% MOF-Road 2008 baseline Zone 100% 8% 1% 80% Founding lineage Ownership of cultivated fields 1% 0% 12% 18% 16% 12% Woman Gender head of household 14% 10% 9% 10% 16% 14% Women 59% 60% 40% 99% 91% 76% 72% 70% 0% 78% 74% 20% 41% Men 0% Mof-route Kabak Pêche Kabak agri 2008 baseline Zone 100% 80% 2% 27% NO Yes Man Founding lineage 2% 26% 30% 2% 0% 25% 27% 26% 69% 74% 71% 74% NO Yes man woman 3% poor Woman Gender head of household Reported quality of cultivated land 1% 3% 60% 40% Both 28% average 71% 72% 67% Good 20% 0% MOF-Road Kabak fishing Kabak agriculture 2008 baseline Zone Founding lineage Distance in time to the fields 100% 18% 80% 33% >1 heure 36% 30% 60% 34% 33% 16% 15% 16% 16% MOF-Road Kabak fishing 40% 20% 0% Gender head of household 28% 24% Kabak agriculture Zone >0.5 heure 10-29 min 20% 32% 26% 30% 22% 31% 34% 27% 22% 25% 21% 22% 22% 20% NO Yes man woman <10 min 2008 baseline 29% Founding lineage 17% Gender head of household Source: 2011 household baseline survey, question 20. 6.4 Agriculture inputs Agriculture remains a traditional activity, but in Kabak, one observes some mechanization and modern practices by some of the bigger farmers. This is probably the result of the island having been the subject of several rice growing projects during the last 40 years. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 39 Mechanization is applied by a small minority of the farmers, mainly in Kabak, as is the practice of ploughing with oxen. In spite of the quite intensive agriculture in the Port-road area, most of it is still done traditionally without mechanization, animal traction and little fertilizer. Table 15 – Main agriculture inputs in the Kabak-Port area (% of households) Agriculture input Port-road Kabak fishing Kabak agriculture Tractor mechanization 7% 17% 13% Paid labour 64% 89% 85% Plough and oxen 11% 35% 48% Fertilizer 20% 43% 32% Improved seeds 16% 22% 24% Mutual assistance men 54% 49% 61% Mutual assistance women 37% 43% 61% Agricultural extension services 3% 6% 4% N= 121 72 380 Source: 2011 household baseline survey, question 21. Average 12% 81% 38% 31% 22% 58% 53% 4% 574 Outside labour is important – they use either paid labour (especially on Kabak Island) or mutual assistance groups composed of either men or women – but few farmers work alone. In the Port-road area, less farmers than on Kabak resort to mutual agricultural labour in spite of it being such a productivity improving endeavour. Agricultural extension services are mostly invisible, although a few farmers mentioned them in the context of the fertilizer distribution that was underway on Kabak. There are few agronomists living on Kabak Island (Manke and Youlaye) and the mention of agricultural extension services help can be linked to their private advice rather than to a real intervention of a formal government promoted agricultural extension service. Credit People obtain credit from their neighbours, from merchants (about 30%) and from friends. More than 60% of the farmers indicate they have had recourse to credit; which is mostly used for food (two thirds), health, agriculture and family ceremonies. According to household interviews, interest rates are not high; people have to reimburse only about 106% of what they borrow. Observations from direct interviews with farmers indicate that merchants often charge usurer rates to farmers, when they are reimbursed in kind. Agricultural calendar The agriculture calendar has been widely discussed in Kabak where most of the study took place. Though in general agriculture is somewhat different in the Port-Maferinya road area than on Kabak, practices are relatively similar. Table 16 – Seasons recognized on Kabak Island Sousou Narakharadé Sogué Fouré Niémé Barakha English The cold season The dry season (much warmer) Rainy season Transition season (the end of the rains) Français Saison fraîche Saison sèche chaude Saison des pluies Saison intermédiaire Season December to February March to May June to mid-September mid-September to November Source: 2011 household baseline survey, Village interviews. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 40 Table 17 – Seasonal calendar for Kabak obtained through the compilation of 4 farming villages interviews: Yetiyah (Yelibane district), Bossimyah, Kenende (Seydouyah district) and Tonguiron Month January February March Season Climate Rice activities Other farming activities Narakharadé – cold No rain -dust Fresh and cold Libiti – no sunlight No rain but fog Libiti – no sunlight Hot Sunlight No rain Harvest Rice threshing Transplanting of the market gardening Rice threshing Transplanting of the market gardening Gumbo harvest Market-gardening harvest season Narakharadé – cold season Sogué Fouré – warm season Sogué Fouré – warm season April Sogué Fouré – warm season May Niémé – rainy season June July Niémé – rainy season One of the most rainy month of the year Ploughing and weeding Beginning of the ricetransplanting Rice-transplanting rain Barakha – the end of Falè – rain that happens suddenly Rain is diminishing rain October Barakha – the end of November rain Narakharadé – cold December 26 Ploughing of the rice fields Sowing of the rice nursery Lots of rain season Market-gardening harvest Maintaining of the fields Salt extraction End of the market-gardening harvest Rain – almost every day Niémé – rainy season Barakha – the end of Market-gardening harvest Preparation of the salt pans Preparing of the rice nursery Niémé – rainy season August September Hot Sunlight No rain Rains start mid-May Heat and sun End of the hot season Figifigi – lot of wind Hot Figifigi – lot of wind Rice threshing Clearing and ploughing of the bogoni Levees repairing Clearing of the bogoni Levees repairing Maintaining of the fields Clearing of the bogoni Levees construction Maintaining of the fields Rain is ending Beginning of the frog Fresh and cold Libity – no sunlight No rain Fog and cold All the crops are sprayed with fertilizers and crop protection agents. Weeding Monitoring the fields (from birds and other animals) Clearing the levees for the market-gardening26 Harvest: sweet potatoes, yam, peanuts, maize, fonio, cassava Nurseries for marketgardening Harvest Nurseries for the market crops Beginning of the transplanting of the market crops Source: village interviews Kabak Island Domestic activities Brick making Number of meals per day / Food quality Global level of activities 3 meals Food abundant +++++ 5 out of 5 House building and repairs House building and repairs 3 meals Food abundant +++ 3 out of 5 3 meals Food abundant +++ 3 out of 5 Manufacturing of tools at the blacksmith Fencing home gardens House repairs 2 meals Food abundant ++++ 4 out of 5 2 meals Food abundant ++++ 4 out of 5 1 to 2 meals Reserve stocks are reducing +++ 3 out of 5 1 to 2 meals +++ 3 out of 5 1 meal +++++ 5 out of 5 1 meal Not sufficient +++++ 5 out of 5 1 meal, Food insufficient Khabidounyi – season during we only eat yam Beginning of the harvest 1 meal Food insufficient 3 meals Abundantly ++++ 4 out of 5 ++++ 4 out of 5 +++++ 5 out of 5 Gro F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 41 Table 18 – Calendar of monthly activities for the main food and market garden crops in the Kabak-Port area Crops Jan Feb March Bogoni mangrove rice harvest threshing & transport Cleaning irrigation channels Dara rice harvest threshing & transport Uphill rice April sowing nursery Tomatoes transplanting transplanting watering harvest June July Aug Sept Oct clearing, ploughing, nursery Weeding harvest harvest watering harvest harvest harvest watering harvest Burning & clearing harvest harvest watering harvest harvest harvest harvest Land preparation harvest harvest Mould planting Burning and clearing harvest harvest harvest harvest harvest harvest harvest harvest harvest harvest harvest harvest harvest harvest harvest harvest harvest clearing Gumbo Eggplant May ploughing & sowing harvest harvest harvest weeding Nov Dec surveillance harvest surveillance harvest surveillance harvest harvest Harvest, threshing & transport Clearing & cleaning Clearing & cleaning Clearing & cleaning nursery & ploughing Water melon Peppers transplanting Cassava harvest Cucumbers Coco nuts harvest harvest Oil palms Salt preparation salt pans harvest Clearing & cleaning nursery sowing harvest Source: farmers’ interviews and assessment by a professional agronomist. harvest Cleaning palm stands harvest Cleaning palm stands Gro F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 42 Food quantity From July to November, food starts to become scarce. September is a particularly difficult month because it clearly marks a transition in the calendar, between the harvest of market gardening crops and other crops. December marks the beginning of the abundant food period; it starts with the rice harvest and continues with the market-gardening harvest from February. Food is in sufficient quantity until June. Level of activities There are two peaks in the activities: - In August-September during the rice transplanting - In December-January with the rice harvest and the transplanting of market-gardening 6.5 Animal breeding With most of the population engaged in intensive agriculture, market garden crops and fishing, animal breeding is for them a secondary activity; usually with a few fowl, goats and sheep. A few cattle herders are present in the area, mostly in the north-eastern part of Kabak, outside of the main bogoni and dara agricultural zones. It is noteworthy that some people in the fishing villages declare owing cattle: usually Peul traders, who have their cattle in their region of origin. Data from the 2008 railway baseline survey – between Simandou and Forecariah – show that in other parts of Guinea, cattle are the main form of possessions with an average of almost 5 cattle per household (Table 19). Table 19 – Number of animals owned per household in the Kabak and Port-Maferinya road area Kabak fishing Kabak agriculture Animal type Port-Maferenya road Cattle 0 0.66 0.06 Goats and sheep 1.41 1.42 1.54 Fowl 4.91 5.4 9.09 Score Livestock 0.87 1.55 1.37 Source: Baseline survey, weighted for differences in sample density, July 2011, question 6b. 6.6 2008 rail baseline 4.66 3 3.93 5.80 Fishing 27 Fishing activities in five villages of Kabak Island are described in a separate report . The fishing villages are directly located near the sea; professional fishermen are rare among the other inhabitants of Kabak Island. On the island of Kabak, there are five important “fishing villages”: Khounyi, Matakang, Konimodiya, Friyah and Dabonkhore (the last two villages are subsectors of Konimodiya). Sangbon, a subsector of the district of Seydouyah has a special importance; it is the place for the bi-weekly market of Kabak and the only port of the island with a jetty. From there, whatever the tide conditions, it is possible to take a boat to go on the mainland. Fishing villages represent 769 households (Table 20) for which the fishing, processing and sale of fish is essential. 27 Sabinot C., Koppert G., Leclercq M. (2013) – Simandou – Port and rail project in Kabak. Final report fishing villages: maps and socioeconomical description of fishing villages. Montréal, SNC Lavalin – Paris, GEPFE – Paris, Anthropolinks – Conakry, Rio Tinto Simfer F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 43 Table 20 – Summary of questionnaires completed in the fishing villages and rate of success in each village Village Konimodiya Dabonkhore Friyah Matakang Khounyi Number of households 156 71 26 178 338 Number of Number of fishing household % of households information survey surveyed questionnaires questionnaires 30 20% 148 10 18% 69 5 20% 25 48 17% 119 62 18.5% 306 Source: 2013, Final report fishing villages. % of households surveyed 95% 97% 96% 67% 91% In the fishing villages, fishing is by far the most important livelihood activity, and though many households engage in agriculture (rice and market garden crops), cultivated areas and production are less than in other villages. Among the fishermen there are the richer businessmen who own several boats and have people working for them (receiving part of the catch), individual fishermen, and the workers. In several villages, particularly Khounyi, people from elsewhere (notably from Sierra Leone) play important roles in the fishing economy. The fish caught, besides feeding the family, are partly sold fresh, partly sold to village women; often the spouses of the fishermen. The “best” – most appreciated bigger fish – is sold fresh to Korean fishing companies. These companies are quite active in several villages, where they provide outboard motors, nets, and cooling chambers in exchange of a monopoly on the best fish. Sea fishing is the principal activity of the heads of households in fishing villages of Kabak Island (79% in 28 Konimodiya, 87% in Friyah, 82% in Dabonkhore, 76% in Khounyi, 71% in Matakang) . Fish trading (fresh and smoked) is the second most important and lucrative activity in the fishing villages, it is mainly a women's activity. Fish trading is also a source of income for 28% of the households in fishing villages of Kabak. Other sea related activities are an important source of livelihood, or may complete household incomes: harvest of oysters and other shellfish is done in most villages during the lean period. Some women collect oysters all year long for trading. Besides sea fishing by men, fishing in rivers and the bogoni rice fields is practiced by women and children in most villages with nets and small ringed nets “tete yele”. In some villages such Kenendé on Kabak Island, and also in villages near the port, men fish with cast nets in the rivers. Fishing is conducted with 377 locally built boats (costs about 1-1.5 million GNF) of which 62% are equipped with motors, and others use sails and paddles; fishermen are using various types of nets and hook longlines. When the fish is landed, all women go to the beach and wait to buy fish for drying and for their home consumption. Women in the fishing villages appear to play a more pronounced role in the monetary economy than in the agricultural villages, as through fish smoking and smoked fish trade they engage in lucrative activities, which in turn allows them economic independence. Among the farming communities, fishing is limited to small scale fishing in the rice irrigation channels, the paddies and the harvesting of oysters in the mangroves. Much of this fish is used for home consumption and improves the daily diet, but any surplus is smoked and sold to provide extra income for the household. However, some of the farmers’ wives, buy fish in the fishing villages and transform it by smoking, and sell it subsequently in the local market or outside the island. 28 Source: GPS Inventory June-July 2011 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Fishing areas Artisanal fishing boats are fishing in a large zone between Conakry and the Sierra Leone. During July 2011 interviews, fishermen reported 120 different names of fishing areas: offshore, coastal and estuarial zones. Some fishing areas are very close to the coast of Kabak, others are much further to the West, North or South. According to interviews, rowing boats need a few minutes to 5 hours for reaching their fishing area; motor boats (15 HP, sometimes 25 HP, and exceptionally 40 HP) need 30 minutes to 3 hours for reaching their fishing area. Exploited resources Artisanal fisheries in the Kabak region exploit two types of marine resources: pelagic species and demersal species: Pelagic species – are species living in the open water; the most heavily fished in “Kabak Ocean” is bonga, (Ethmalosa fimbriata). Bonga is probably the most important source of income for fishing villages. It is sold fresh at times but mostly smoked by women. Demersal species – are composed of high commercial value fish species, living near the bottom, such as bars, captains or catfish. These species are sometimes smoked but they are mostly sold to fishing companies that have employees resident in ports. The sale is done by weight or by dozen of fish, depending on the species and the type of sale. Several categories of fish are distinguished by fishermen and Kabak traders, ranging from “vrai 29 poisson” – the high valued big expensive fishes (5 to 6 thousand GNF/kg) kept cool on ice and often sold to the Korean fish trading companies – to fish sold fresh on site, to fish that is transformed locally through smoking, fish “boulettes”, salted fish, and finally fish that is only to be used as bait. Most of the fish caught in the bogoni are intended for home consumption. However, where 30 production is good, especially those who live near the port, part of the capture may be sold . At the time of the survey, it was too early for bogoni fishing which only occurs at the end of the rainy season between September and December. The results from the household questionnaires show that overall in the Kabak-Port area, fishing is the main occupation for 19% of the population, and thus estimated to 760 of the approximately 4,000 households. Fishing is also the main source of income for 16% or 640 households. Fishing is a very important activity for all households regardless of the village where they live. The catch is partly used for home consumption for all households. However, most households sell part of their catch: 56% sell more than half in the fishing villages of Kabak, 22% in the agricultural villages of Kabak, and also 27% in the villages of the port area, which is not negligible. Among the households which reported fishing, only 2% in fishing villages of Kabak do not sell the fish they catch, 10% in the agricultural villages of Kabak, and 26% in the villages of the Port-Maferinya road area. Overall, 25% of households in villages of the Port-Maferinya road area fish in the estuary and the rivers (57% of those who reported fishing), 4% in the fishing villages of Kabak (6% of those who reported fishing), and 28% in the agriculture villages of Kabak (57% of those who reported fishing). Several fishing calendars are available in the fishing report. The best fishing period is for everyone between September and December. 29 30 Boboe, probably Pseudotolithus elongatus. Fagba, probably Cynoglossus senegalensis. Sosoe, probably Pseudotolithus senegalensis. Preliminary information, to be completed with more reliable data. Page 44 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 45 Fishing gear: boats, nets, hooks In the villages of the port area and in the agricultural village of Kabak, three-quarters of the households fish without a boat (Table 21). They usually fish along the rivers or estuary “feet in the water” with a fishing rod, a hand line, a net or a cast net (1/6 of the households use a cast net – generally used by men). Half of the households, fish with keep nets (mainly used by women). Only one in four households uses a boat to fish. These fishermen are those who are fishing in the middle of the Morebaya River; some are fishing at the river's mouth, even a little further forward in the sea (especially in front of Kameme). Table 21 – Tools used by fishing households Fishing gear Port-Maferinya road Kabak fishing Kabak agriculture Boat 22% 88% Outboard motor 6% 62% Sail 2% 6% Fishing rod 13% 0% Multiple hooks line 11% 4% Net 26% 90% Cast net 15% 0% Basket trap 51% 5% Barrage 0% 0% Source: household baseline questionnaire 2011, data weighted for sample density question 31. 28% 3% 2% 1% 9% 31% 16% 49% 3% 31 Activities and gear are specific to each village. Fishermen of Kabak fish with hook lines or with nets . Gboya and founfounyi are used by most of the fishermen (58% of owners of nets have a gboya (also named fanty), 42% have founfounyi), and 21% have a légotine. Only people from Matakang use sifada and balakassa. Only people from Khounyi (and one owner in Dabonkhore) have tannelle. This last net is always a “gift” from a fishing company (cost: 60,000 kFg), but in fact is a credit and an engagement to sell the fish to the company. Today, tannelle are less or not at all used because the ship-owner has to pay a lot for gasoline and needs employees (20-25 fishermen for a single boat!). They prefer fishing with other types of nets. 31 Six different types of sea nets are used. The three most used are founfounyi (driftnet with small mesh - filet maillant dérivant / main target species: bongas and otoliths), gboya (encircling net with small mesh - filet maillant encerclant / main target species: bongas, otholiths, captains, catfish) and légotine (fixed gillnet – filet maillant calé / target species: bongas and otholiths). Sifada (corresponding to two little gboya: nets are implemented jointly by two boats each boarding his net and facilitating then the encirclement of fish / bongas, otholiths, captains, catfish) and balakassa (little driftnet with small mesh often implemented with sailboat) are only used in Matakang. Some fishermen have seines named “tannelles” in Khounyi but they are not often used anymore (implementation is too expensive). F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 46 Figure 4. Schematic drawings of major fishing tools described and used in Kabak 1. Encircling net – a: gboya type; b: sifada type; 2. Driftnet; 3. Gixed gillnet; 4. Castnet; 5. Fishing lines (a. Hand line; b. Longline) Source: http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X6601F/x6601f00.htm#Contents and Domain, Chavance and Diallo 1999. La pêche côtière en Guinée : ressources et exploitation. CNSHB-IRD. Fresh fish: customers and fishing companies Fresh fish is sold to different persons, depending of the species: “La clientèle”, “the clients” – One or several persons, usually women, who have built a business relation and sometimes a financial dependence with the fishermen (fishermen often give credit to their clients). Fish trading companies – Most of these companies are Korean and they only buy big fish, “beaux poissons” (boboe, fagba, sossoe). The product is transported to Conakry in coolers filled with ice. Each company provides the ice produced in Conakry, leaves coolers in the villages for fish storage. The coolers are picked up two or four days later depending on the season, and transported to Conakry. 6.7 Salt winning Salt winning is a major activity for a few households on Kabak Island (reported by 8% as a source of revenue) but especially in the port area, where 40% of the households derive income from salt, and for 16% of them it appears even as the main source of income. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 47 Salt winning is a family activity in which men, women and children participate. People often leave their villages and settle temporarily in camps near the areas where they have their salt pans (Benty rapport, 32 2010 ). The activity takes place between January and May. In theory, bogoni may be used for both salt winning and rice growing, but in a sample of more than 75 fields visited by the team; this had never been the case. In the port area, salt winning is taking place in specific zones, which are unfit for rice growing. In the area directly impacted by the port, only a few fields were inventoried, as most salt winning takes place in other areas to the South-West, where sea water can be more conveniently used. Sea water is let in through a channel that is dug within the dikes of flat field and the soil soaks up the water (through a diffusion process) and as the top layer of the field dries out it becomes gradually very salty. A thin layer of 1-2 cm is gathered every week, filtered over a straw filled strainer like structure; the resulting salt solution is boiled, and salt obtained. Men are in charge of cutting firewood (mango and mangrove wood). Between January and April, the entire household may be involved in regularly forming piles of “dust” (a mixture of salt and ground) by scraping the saltpan. They boil the filtrate obtained from a mixture of seawater and “dust” passed into a large strainer made of straw and wood. It takes three tons of wood to get a ton of salt. The bags of salt are sold cheaply during the production season (February-May), but fetch much higher prices towards November-December, when supply becomes scarce (many households have salt silos to conserve salt during several months). Among 66 households which reported income from the sale of salt, the average obtained was 2.7 million GNF, with the highest revenues between 10 and 20 million GNF. 33 Salt winning consumes important amounts of wood: one author estimated that in order to obtain a 3 daily production of 150 kg of salt, 1 m of firewood is necessary. 6.8 Gathering Gathering activities in the area concern two major products, firewood and oil palms, and many minor ones among which wild fruits and nuts, medicinal plants, straw for roofing of the houses, leaves and spices to be used for cooking. The household questionnaire did not yield much specific data, but 11% of the households mentioned firewood, 6% wild fruits, and 5% medicinal plants, while 83% of the households do not practice gathering at all. Gathering is mainly an activity carried out by women (medicinal plants, foods) and children (fruits). Table 22 – Gathering activities (all households) Gathering activities Port-Maferinya road Kabak fishing Kabak agriculture No gathering 66% 95% 85% Firewood 19% 4% 11% Wild fruits 17% 1% 4% Oil palms 10% 0% 1% Medicinal plants 6% 2% 6% Néré seeds 6% 2% 2% Rattan 2% 1% 2% Sale of gathered items 9% 1% 3% N= 126 150 392 Source: Household baseline questionnaire 2011, data weighted for sample density, question 32. Average 83% 11% 6% 2% 5% 3% 2% 4% 668 Of the households who reported gathering, 22% sold some, usually firewood and fruits such as cola nuts, néré, etc. Unidentified species that were often named were kinkirisi (18 times), moronda (14 times) and moke (11 times). Gathering takes place when products are available; however more fruits ripen during the dry season. 32 33 Rapport Socio-Économique – Zone du port de Benty. Drafted in 2010 by a team of 5 Guinean social scientists for Rio Tinto. Geslin Philippe, 1997: L’innovation et le temps, une approche ethnographique de la réallocation du temps de travail agricole chez les Soussou de Guinée. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 6.9 Artisanal mining Artisanal mining is an important activity in many parts of Guinea. Often people travel from their villages to artisanal mining sites during the dry season when there is less work in the village (SNCLavalin, 2008 baseline report). In the study area, artisanal mining has not been observed among the population of Kabak and the Port-Maferinya road area, nor did anyone indicate that they would travel to such sites seasonally. 6.10 Crafts and petty jobs Many small activities allow people to earn money or add extra income to their household. Among them are: Rice dehuskers – there are many in the village, during the GPS survey the team counted 56 of them on Kabak Island, or one for every 50 households. These machines are expensive, costing several millions Guinean Francs, but for every 13 kg of paddy treated, the owner receives 1 kg of rice. Palm oil extraction – women intensively engage in palm oil extraction and sometimes make soap out of the obtained oil. Motorbikes – especially on Kabak Island, where few cars can come and distances are relatively far, motorbikes are among the most important means of transport, used as paid motor taxis. Marine carpenters – they build boats for the fishermen. Bakeries – many people on Kabak Island engage in bakeries; 27 bakeries were counted on the island. Video clubs – they are extremely popular; 37 video clubs were counted on the island, most of them in simple buildings with straw roofs and walls. Night-clubs and bars – in spite of the strict Muslim culture prevalent on the island, 12 night-clubs and bars were counted. Blacksmiths – six blacksmiths were on the island, mostly in charge of the manufacturing and repair of agricultural tools. Bicycle and motor repair shops – provide work for handy mechanics on Kabak Island. Less visible activities relate to agricultural labor, masonry, carpentry, net repairs, bogoni dike repairs, etc. Page 48 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 49 7. Access to services Services important to the local population are water supply, education, health services, roads and transport, electricity, cell phone coverage, and agricultural extension. 7.1 Water supply Water supply is a major issue, both in Kabak and in the Port-Maferinya road area, where only the more important villages along the road have a reliable supply of clean water. In Kabak, many villages are dependent on open wells, most of which provide all year round or seasonally brackish water or dry up. During the rainy season people often drink rainwater, which is gathered in big cement containers that were provided a few years ago through a development project. During the rainy season survey, people reported that rainwater was the main source of drinking water for 80% of the Kabak population. Other water sources on the island are open wells; many of these traditional. There is a striking difference with the results of the 2008 baseline conducted along the railroad corridor where two-thirds of the households had access to clean drinking water from boreholes. The coastal fishing villages have an even poorer water supply with no boreholes, and people often reported that during the dry seasons they would take their boats to the mainland or Conakry to fetch water, or buy industrial “Coyah” water, which is sold in 0.5 litre plastic bags. Since 10 years, in Konimodiya for example, the wells provide brackish water, so no drinkable water is available in the village. People usually buy drinking water; small bags of industrially prepared water or plastic jerry cans of 20 litres. Traders fill 20-litre cans with water from a cemented well in Karangbanyi (15 km further on the mainland) and sell the can 3,000 kFg in the village (a family of 20 persons needs about 10 cans a week). Otherwise, some fishermen also go to fetch water from a borehole in Conakry. Map 5 shows that especially the south-eastern side of Kabak Island has many problems with water supply. Table 23 – Sources of drinking water supply 2011 baseline Source of water supply 2008 baseline Average 2011 baseline 81% Kabak agriculture 83% - 75% Traditional well 39% 27% 36% 13% 35% Cemented well 13% 12% 21% - 17% Unprotected source 13% 8% 18% - 15% Borehole 24% 2% 13% 66% 13% River or stream Bottled water (or Coyah plastic bags) From other village 29% 1% 1% 20% 7% 0% 6% 1% - 2% 0% 8% 0% - 2% Protected source 0% 2% 0% - 1% N= 119 143 366 290 629 Rain water Port-Maferinya road 42% Kabak fishing Source: Household questionnaire Question 18. July 2011, and 2008 rail road baseline survey, question 18a. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 50 Map 5 – Water supply on Kabak Island 1044 Kabak Island grid 2 x 2 km 1042 other structures 1040 Limit Permanent well 1038 Seasonal well Borehole 1036 Other water source 1034 1032 1030 1028 1026 1024 1022 671 673 675 677 679 Source: GPS survey April 2010 and July 2011. 681 683 685 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 7.2 Education Kabak Island A total of 10 primary schools, 4 French-Arabic schools, and one secondary school are present on Kabak Island as shown on Map 5. The French-Arabic schools are in very bad condition, but most of the other schools are in a reasonable state. Parents have to contribute for school furniture; they have to buy tables (about 100 kFg) at least for every second child they send to school. School fees are high considering the income of the parents: 5 kFg/year/child for the parents association; 5 kFg per child for inscription fees; other schools indicate 10 kFg per year for inscription and parents association. Teachers are paid by the state, but payment often causes problems. Teachers often come from other parts of the country and are supposed to be housed by the local population. As shown in Figure 7 (Section 8.2), school attendance is poor, especially for girls who attend only during a few years. Port-Maferinya road area There are three schools, in Senguelen, Tougande and Madinagbe-Fodea. Each of the schools has a full curriculum. There is also one French-Arabic school in Madinagbe-Fodea. For secondary and further education, children have to go to Maferinya, Forecariah or Conakry. 7.3 Health services Kabak Island The main health centre is in central Kabak, and two more health posts are available in Yatea and on Matakang (Map 6). A small private “case de santé” is also present in the hamlet of Kindia. The first three centre/posts have permanent buildings which are in good state, and clean. The main centre has a doctor, a qualified nurse, and trained midwives. Neither laboratory equipment, nor microscopes are available, so all diagnoses are based on clinical signs. The medical authorities indicate that malaria, intestinal worms and respiratory diseases are the most common ailments for which the centre is consulted. But many people still resort to traditional medicine – which according to the health centre, causes unnecessary delays before looking medical help – or return to traditional medicine when they are not sufficiently helped by the modern system. The centre has great difficulties in obtaining the official medicines from the Conakry office, so the personnel have private stock which is sold to the patients. During the dry season, medical problems are less present than during the wet season, but people have money from rice, vegetables and salt making to pay for consultations. During the rainy season, though malaria, diarrhoeas and other infection become much more important, people have less time and less money to look for assistance. Infant diseases such as malnutrition, measles, and meningitis are normally rarely observed. Although the new president of Guinea decreed that childbirth in hospitals would be free of charge; women 34 don’t come regularly , as still some money is required for soap, razor blades, and the unpaid midwives who expect a gift (around 10 kFg). Though deliveries are free of charge, fear of the hospital, extra charges that will have to be paid, and lack of proper medicines, all contribute to the reluctance to come to the centre. The health centre has a functioning borehole for water supply, but the solar electricity supply does not work (lack of battery), and neither does the radio link with the Forecariah reference hospital. The few medicines available during the survey were salicylic acid, benzyl benzoate, compresses, penicillin and ferrous sulphate; well short of the list of essential medicines that the centre is supposed to have in stock. 34 This is contrary information resulting from the household interviews in which women state that 75% of the children were born in a health facility; only 17 deliveries had taken place in the clinic between January and July 2011. Page 51 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 52 Map 6 – Schools and health centres on Kabak Island Baridabon Khilifili Guéméyire Yonkima Meniyere Yenia Nakiri 1040 BouboudèDabonkanakhi SeriahKala Makaya Kiban Bokaria Manga Kiban 1 Moriya 2N'gadabouya Alamemaya Konde Bambako Yassao Bagafore Bounyi Sangbon Singande Youlayé Sera Touguiyire Senguelen Madenagbe-Fodeah Koniakhori Tougande Sireya Kabak Island grid 2 x 2 km Dabonkhore Kissokou Wondima Kissoki other structures Takakonye 1038 Kakayarida Limit Guemantabhe Friyah Schools Serdoua Centre Konimodia Gore Mireyiré FrenchArabic school Layah 1036 Secondary school Health center village Yelibane-Centre 1034 delete Bendaya Meliboung Bomodiyah Kalea Sèmèn Sémé-Sémé Tolomalon I Codebougni Tolomalon Taakhi Nandeya Khadilayah Manke Centre 1032 Bossimiyah Filidè Gbinyi Yadiya Bembadiya Pomponi Colabougni Khore Bounyi Kitonki Baouria Karomboya Mamoudiyah-Kama Sogo Sogo Kalira Semeya Kameme Dembaya Boumbeya Muyalaya Fode Kolia III Komeya Kaléyre Surima MatouriaMuyuya Fode Kolia II Fode Kolia I Tongiron Daoudaya Mange Soreyah Kindiya Yelikeri Koulande Kanem 1030 Katonko Gore Mabala Khounyi Yomeya Kankeya Tonronya Youlayé-Bakia Bolé Wondima Méyiré 1028 Youlayé-Bambalaya Youlaye Mabala Dabondi Khounyi Yankaya 1026 Matakang 1024 672 674 676 678 Source: GPS surveys April 2010 and July 2011. 680 682 684 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Port-Maferinya road area A small health post exists in Madinagbe, but it is only partially functioning. For proper medical care people need to go to Maferinya for medical assistance, where there is a well-functioning hospital, and a qualified commercial pharmacy. 7.4 Cell phone coverage In spite of the quite high population density and the relatively high purchasing power of the population, there are no cell phone transmitters on Kabak Island. Several villages have specific spots where sometimes the network can be captured, but overall the situation remains quite difficult. Good access to cell phone transmission is important for obtaining transparent prices for fish, agricultural and market garden products. 7.5 Electricity Electricity is not available on Kabak Island, as well as in the port and Maferenyah area. For video clubs and night clubs people use cheap South Asian generators which are present in 15% of the households in the fishing villages and 13% elsewhere. 7.6 Roads and Transport Transport to Kabak Island is supposed to be carried by a ferry that links the mainland in Touguiyire with the Island in Sangbon. The ferry is often in disrepair, and its maintenance costs are so high that most of the time, transport fees are insufficient to cover maintenance costs. Therefore, most transport 35 to Kabak Island is made by boats in which people and motorbikes are transported for a small fee . Most transport on Kabak Island takes place with motorbikes. The roads are useable all year round, but they are not very wide; as motorbikes tend to drive very fast, people often put in speed bumps to slow them down to avoid accidents. Accidents still happen, usually through slipping and falling motorbikes on the sandy roads, where people hurt themselves, or burn on the hot motor or exhaust pipe; but amazingly, only few accidents happen in which children or adults are involved. Between Kabak Island and Matakang, the roads are muddy during the rainy season. The fishing village of Khounyi is not linked to the main island via an all-weather road, but pedestrians and motorbikes can pass over small dikes. Friyah and Dabonkhore can only be reached via the beach at low tide, and for the latter a channel has to be crossed. Hamlets to the North and East of the island are partly isolated during the rainy season. Along the Port-Maferinya road there are no major road problems. The roads are of the all-season type, and many cars take care of the transport between the port of Touguiyire and Maferinya, Forecariah or Conakry. In July 2011, transport fees by car from Touguiyire were: 5-6 kFg to Maferinya, 10 kFg to Forecariah and 15 kFg to Conakry. Motorbikes are not cheaper than cars, but it is easier to find a motorbike than a car, if one needs sudden transport. 35 Passenger 1 kFg, bag of rice 2.5-3 kFg, a basket of fish 5 kFg, a bag of market garden crops 1-1.5 kFg. The “Chef de port” receives per boat 1.5 kFg/day. Page 53 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 54 8. Gender task sharing and child labour issues This chapter discusses the involvement of women and children in the household economy: which tasks are considered for male and female; how and when do children start to participate in the household economy – which is in competition with their formal education in school – and the economic implication of marriages for the head of household and his children. 8.1 Task sharing within the household The Guinean society in general and the Kabak-Port area in particular belongs to traditional ethnic groups, where Islam is the almost unique religion. From village discussions it becomes clear that in such a society, women play a secondary role compared to men. But in daily practice they have an important role to play in food production and food consumption; they manage to earn their own money through fishing in the small rivers and sea arms, transformation of fish and fish trading, harvesting of oysters, commercialisation of the market garden crops, and various petty trade activities. On Kabak Island, especially in the fishing communities, 10 to 15% of the agricultural fields are owned by women. Figure 5 – Task sharing between men and women within the married household 100% MOF area: Task sharing within the household 7% 0% Women only 80% 93% 87% Tending fields Herding 5% 40% 73% 78% 61% 56% 21% 9% Creating fields 10% 88% 28% 0% Household budget Health costs Staple foods 12% Meat and fish School fees Kabak Fishing: Task sharing within the household 8% 6% Women only 80% Both spouses 76% 60% 40% Men only 6% 35% 4% 0% 20% 100% 4% Both spouses 60% 40% 2% 10% 4% 19% 4% 33% 1% Men only 41% 67% 4% 0% 86% 32% 77% 66% 5% 9% 28% 24% Staple foods Meat and fish 5% 20% 67% 19% 18% Tending fields Herding 55% 0% Creating fields 100% 1% 6% 3% Women only 4% 13% Both spouses 60% 93% Health costs School fees Kabak agriculture: Task sharing within the household 80% 40% Household budget 91% 3% 5% 13% 55% 47% 76% Men only 10% 71% 83% 11% 7% 20% 6% 0% Creating fields Tending fields Herding 43% 42% 21% Household budget Health costs Source: Baseline survey, July 2011, question 27. 19% 16% Staple foods Meat and fish School fees F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 55 From the baseline survey data it is not clear how much women are earning, except from smoking and trading fish. These data show that in the fishing households, women earn about as much money from fish smoking and fish trading, than men from the sale of fresh fish (Figure 5). This has been confirmed in village meetings; women are economically more important than fishermen, because they buy the production and resell it at a profit. In the general agricultural work, men bear the main responsibility for the clearing of the fields (>90% of the households) and share with their wives (children or external labour) the maintenance of the fields (~90% of the households). Rarely do women solely bear this, except among the fishermen where women are far more often in charge of preparing and cultivating fields, which – as stated above – they can also own. In the fishing villages, the sharing of responsibilities is slightly shifted towards women, but the survey still points out that for almost all activities, the main person in charge remains the man. Regarding the domestic responsibilities of women, one woman from Konimodiya said: “We have so many responsibilities, that we cannot cite them all …”. That includes among others: agriculture, market gardening, cooking, washing, ironing, collecting firewood, collecting water, etc. Children Children intervene in the household economy especially through herding animals (two-thirds of the households; Figure 6), much more often than men (20%) and women (14%). They also participate regularly in other work such: weeding, guarding the crops against birds, assisting in the salt winning process, etc. Answers to some questions were not easy to interpret: girls do take care of their younger siblings, but do they do so after school or does it prevent them from going to school? Children also guard the rice fields after seeding and during the harvest period, but does this mostly take place during holidays or during schooldays? Finally, it was often upon the field surveyors to interpret that on average for 26% of school age children, economic activities at home prevented them to go to school. This is more the case among the fishermen and farmers’ population of Kabak than among the slightly better educated population along the Port-Maferinya road. Figure 6 – Children’s implication in household tasks and its impact on school attendance Children's Participation in Household Tasks 100% Mof-route 80% 60% Kabak agri 72% 64% 54% 46% 34% 40% 32% 22% 20% 0% Kabak Pêche 0% 0% 30% 18% 1% Creating fields Tending fields Herding % HH with working children Source: Baseline survey, July 2011, question 28. In about one third of the households, children assist with some of the household chores: helping in the fields, herding animals, taking care of their siblings, and earning some money by selling stuff in the markets. Such work can be done – and often is done – during the school holidays and after school time. Such work thus should not forcibly keep children out of school, but still in 30% of the households there are school age children who do not attend school. In fact, work at home is often done by children who do attend school, but who spend their holidays trying to earn some money for school supplies by engaging in small trade. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 8.2 Page 56 Children: education and entry into active life School attendance of boys hovers from 50 to 80% between 8-14 years old, while school attendance of girls peaks when they are 9-10 years old at 60% and then descends much more rapidly than for boys, as girls reach puberty and start their productive life earlier (Figure 7). Figure 7.– School attendance and entrance into productive life by age - boys and girls in Kabak and the Port-Maferinya road area 100% School attendance by age: Boys and Girls 90% Boys Boys 80% 70% Girls 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 6 7 8 9 100% 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Age in years 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 25 Entry into Productive Life by Age and Gender 90% Girls 80% Boys 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 23 24 Age in years Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, demographic data. In Kabak and the port area, working at home is only one of the multiple reasons reported for not attending school. Other reasons are the distance to school, the obligation for every family to buy at least one school table and bench per 2 children, and in general the lack of money, but also the lack of classrooms, the lack of good teachers, etc. 8.3 Matrimonial traditions and bride price Marriage rules Men have to look for a woman preferably in another village to preserve social peace, and avoid incest, but in bigger villages it is not always respected: among 25 women, 10 were born in the village, 11 elsewhere in Kabak, and 4 on the mainland. It is forbidden to marry a woman who has a close parent 36 37 in common but cross-cousin unions are preferred . The cultural system is based on patrilinearity and 36 See for instance http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~anthrop/tutor/marriage/xcuz.html: Relevant rules specify a man must or should marry either: (a) his mother's brother's daughter, matrilateral cross cousin, (b) father's sister's daughter, patrilateral cross cousin, o r(c) under special circumstances, a relative who is simultaneously his mother's brother's and her sister's daughter, bilateral cross cousin. 37 Village interviews in July 2011: Bossimiyah, Konimodiya and Tonguiron. 25 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey virilocality; the child bears his father’s name and the bride has to leave her village to settle in the village of her husband. Virginity at the time of wedding is highly valued. According to the women from Tonguiron who cite the Koran “If a daughter is given virgin in marriage, her parents will go to heaven”. That is a reason why girls are married off between 14 to 17 years old, as soon as they become sexually mature and active. Girls may sometimes get married later (even late in their 20s) but this is quite rare. When a girl becomes pregnant before marriage, either she has to marry the father or she remains at her parents’ house, where she is generally accepted. Though this is considered a problem, the child is always accepted in the community. Cohabitation between a man and a woman before the marriage is not accepted but the youngest women (15 to 18 years old) affirm that they would like to live together with their boyfriend before getting married. Bride price & dowry People explained that the dowry is limited to ceremonial gifts and gifts of value: a calabash of cola nuts; 7 needles wrapped in paper [to repair the union 7 times]; a white cloth; a kerosene lamp; a bag of rice; a suitcase with 20 complete sets of clothing for the fiancé, her mother and her father; and 250 thousand Guinean francs in money. The total value of the dowry can easily reach 1-2 million GNF. Young men will have to find the money or the dowry themselves, by participating in work groups where they can earn some money. Their fathers in general do not help with the dowry, as they do not like to lose a productive member of its households, and may want to have another wife for themselves. In another village, young people explained in a focus group meeting, that polygamy is not “good” but that it helps with the economic development of the family, as more women mean a higher production. Divorces Divorces are said to be rare, and this is confirmed by the household questionnaires: as only 170 out of 4,681 children (3.6%) have divorced parents; and 5 adults out of 400 families have report they are “divorced”. Divorces are avoided: when a couple is on the verge to break up, the family is working for the couple to remain together. Divorce is still a taboo; in Konimodiya, women affirm that there never had been a divorce in the village. In Tonguiron, women admit that some couples have already divorced and they give reasons for them that could legitimate a divorce (from women’s point of view): when a husband beats his wife; when a husband is too impudent and insults his parents-in-law; when a husband does not earn enough money to feed his family (one of the women in Tonguiron has divorced for that reason); when a husband is unfaithful to his wife. The women greatly fear sexually transmitted diseases, but they don’t know any woman who has divorced for that reason. Widowhood When a woman loses her husband, she has to respect a period of mourning, during which she shall be wearing blue clothes. Depending on her age and on her children’s support, a widow can remarry or stay alone. Widowhood is socially accepted, but the community is expected to support widows if they are needy. Widows can be part of their deceased husband heritage and “given” to one of his brothers for marriage. In that case, the woman is under the protection of her new husband but she doesn’t have to move to his place, she can stay in her house. Sometimes she and her husband even live in different villages. In that case the survey considered the woman as a separate head of household, whereas she considered herself to be linked to her husband's household. Page 57 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 58 Relationships between co-wives On Kabak Island and along the Port to Maferenyah road, 52% of men have more than one wife. In polygamous households, in most cases (39%) men have two wives; three or four wives, as is authorized in the Islamic religion are increasingly rare, and only one man had five wives (Table 24). More women are married with advancing age men; the average age of men with only one wife is 42 years old, while by the time men have married 3 or 4 wives, they already have over 55 and 60 years old respectively. Table 24 – Number of spouses per married head of household Number of spouses % of married households Average age of husband in years N= 1 49.2% 2 38.7% 3 9.3% 4 2.6% 5 0.2% Total 100.0% 41.9 206 46.8 162 55.5 39 60.6 11 46 1 45.6 419 Source: Baseline survey household questionnaire July 2011, question 1. According to women’s focus groups, relationships between co-spouses are generally good and based on sharing domestic tasks. A man sometimes marries two sisters, which is often a guarantee of good relationships between them. Co-wives often participate to the same “tontine”, and we have seen some household tontines managed only between some co-wives. Wives take turn to prepare food. If they live in the same house, they have their own room but share the same kitchen. Either they take turn to sleep in their husband’s room, or the husband sleeps in each of his wives’ room in turn. The first woman a man marries stays “the first wife” of the household even after her husband married other women. She is generally the older of the wives and has a bit more authority comparing to her co-wives. Children’s education Women are mostly in charge of children education. According to them, it consists mainly in the following responsibilities: learning kinship relationships and respecting the elders; learning the Koran; going to school (considered more important for boys than for girls); girls have to earn the respect of their future husband notably by learning cooking, washing, ironing, etc. In fishing villages, girls have to learn how to smoke fish and the price of the fish they sell; boys have to learn how to gain respect from the community and how cultivate lands. Women wish that their children evolve beyond their parent’s living standards. According to them, the best way of doing so is of course going to school, but certain jobs are also considered as a symbol of success such as: agriculture; trade; technical apprenticeship (mechanics, driving, etc.); hairdressing and tailoring. Female circumcision Different words are used for female circumcision: Ganyi, Dugitongwe and Sunyi. It is practiced on all girls at an age of 5-6 years onwards, by women who operate girls in the bush. At the health centre in Kabak, the matrons explained that though circumcision can be practiced in the health centre, it is more often done at home. The purpose of the operation is to avoid that girls start sleeping with men. Circumcision always gives problems at child birth, but a girl who is not circumcised, will be in low esteem and even laughed at in the community, something to be ashamed of. It is seen F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey by the village as a rite of passage, on her way to womanhood, and is celebrated with a feast, of which the young girl is the reason. Beauty There are a few beauty parlours on Kabak Island where women tend to plait each other’s hear. This usually happens once a week, lasting between 30 minutes to 2 hours. Girls learn how to plait very young, when they are 6 to 8 years old. Page 59 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 60 9. Socioeconomic survey results 9.1 Key demographic data Of the 403 households interviewed: 38 22 were women and 381 were men; 92% were married; 5% were widow(er), 2% bachelor, 1% divorced or separated; men had on average 1.7 wives as 52 % of them had more than one wife. The average household size of 7.3 members was relatively high, with 38% of the household's members in the productive age-range 16 to 49 years, and 50% under 15 years old (Table 25). Table 25 – Key demographic data of the heads of households Age in years Nb of spouses % polygamy % born in the village Household size Port-Maferinya road Kabak fishing Kabak agriculture Average 46.3 year 1.7/husband 55% 81% 6.7 42.2 year 1.5/husband 42% 52% 6.4 47.5 year 1.8/husband 56% 90% 7.9 46.1 year 1.7/husband 52% 80% 7.3 Port-Maferenya road Kabak fishing Kabak agriculture Average Men 50+ years 6% 4% 6% 6% Men 16-49 16% 19% 15% 16% Women 50+ 6% 4% 7% 7% Women 16-49 22% 25% 22% 22% Children 6-15 28% 25% 29% 28% Children 0-5 21% 22% 20% 21% N= 128 155 402 686 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, populations weighted by sample density, questions 1, 2 and 3. The villages are traditional; 80% of the heads of households were born in the village in which they are currently living. Among the fishermen, this proportion was less, as 52% had come for fishing and 11% for other forms of employment. In the other villages, in-migration was usually related to joining other family members, and for the few employment opportunities in government, education and health services. Heads of households who were not born in the villages had lived there since an average of 16 years. Even the fishermen from Sierra Leone (about 25% of the migrants) reported having lived in the area since an average of 12 years. Many other migrants had come from either other local villages or from the Forecariah-Maferenyah-Kindia area. 9.2 Religion All but two of the 403 households interviewed declared themselves to be Muslims. Religion is the driving force in the communities, with 114 mosques counted on Kabak Island and 22 in the PortMaferinya road area. 9.3 Education Kabak Island has ten primary schools in Yelibane, Konimodiya, Matakang, Bossimiyah, Kenende, Tolomalon, Centre, Kamalon, Boulimanda Mayuya and Youlaye-Bambalaya. Kabak also has French38 In less than 1% of the households, the husband was absent and the wife would be the de facto head of household. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 61 Arabic schools in Yetea (2), Yelibane and Kamalon. The numerous Coranic schools – often practicing in private houses, so less visible – have not been counted. A secondary school, “college” with the first two grades is present in the centre of the island, while for further education; children have to go to Maferinya, Conakry and sometimes Forecariah, where they often live with relatives. As indicated above, many of the more important fishing villages, such as Khounyi, or Dabonkhore do not have schools in spite of the relatively high purchasing power of the fishermen parents. Adult’s education Adult education level was low, especially for women; more than 80% of whom had no formal education whatsoever. Only a few adults had enjoyed several years but incomplete primary education. None of the family adults had finalized secondary education or started university training (Table 26). Among men education level was slightly better, but still most of them had not gone beyond a few years of primary education. Especially in the fishing villages, where one can earn good money without formal education and more migrants from poorer areas were present, male education level was low. Table 26 – Education level of adult men and women Education level Without education Primary incomplete Primary complete Secondary incomplete Secondary complete Vocational training University Coranic school N= Male head of household Eldest spouse or female head of household Kabak Kabak Kabak Kabak Port-road Port-road fishing agriculture fishing agriculture 23% 45% 39% 83% 80% 85% 19% 19% 11% 8% 12% 7% 3% 2% 3% 1% 2% 3% 12% 11% 11% 2% 3% 4% 1% 1% 3% 3% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 42% 19% 33% 5% 3% 2% 121 151 374 120 148 392 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, question 2. The lack of education level expresses itself in the poor competence in French, the local language in which agreements are written; none of the women and a few rare men are able to understand written text (Table 27). Project agreements will thus have to be thoroughly explained, and translation into local language may allow more literate people from the village to explain to the others. Table 27 – Competence of adult men and women in reading French Male head of household French skills Port-road Understands French: A little Completely Knows how to read and write N= Kabak fishing Kabak agriculture Eldest spouse or female head of household Kabak Port-road Kabak fishing agriculture 20% 12% 11% 3% 6% 7% 4% 1% 6% 3% 2% 121 151 374 120 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, question 4ba. 5% 148 2% 1% 392 Children’s education 39 School attendance of children has significantly improved during recent years and more children than before between 6-15 years of the affected households go to school. However, almost 50% of children between 6 and 15 years still don’t go to school (Table 28 and Figure 8). 39 See for instance IMF’s Poverty Reduction Policy Paper on Guinea: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2012/cr1261.pdf . This latest version (2012) was consulted on March 28 2013: F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 62 Table 28 – Education level and school attendance of children aged between 6 and 15 years old Households: % with Number of children children in each category in each category Don't go to school 66% 698 Primary school 74% 1017 Secondary class 1-4 32% 287 Secondary class 5-6 13% 87 Vocational training 6% 4 University 1% 36 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, question 4a. Education level 40 % of children 48.8% 71.1% 20.1% 6.1% 0.3% 2.5% Among those children who go to school, most are in primary education (70%) and their schools were usually present at less than half an hour’s walk for most of the children, while lower class secondary school, present in Kabak, attracted 20% of the children (Table 28). For higher secondary education, children have to move outside their village, and enrolment rapidly diminishes: 6% in “Lycée” and 2.5% attend university. Figure 8 – Proportion of school age children who do not attend school of coastal area households Children of 6-15 years old who do not attend School 80% 49% No 38% 52% 2008 rail 50% 48% Kabak agri 45% 47% 20% 47% 40% 61% 60% 0% Mof-route Kabak Pêche Zone Yes Founding lineage 2011-Men 2011-Women Gender head of household Total Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, question 4a. The education score of children by household and village characteristics is shown in Figure 9. The score for children is an indicator which can be changed in the short term, as more or fewer children pursue primary and secondary education. Overall school attendance is better than during the 2008 survey. In the studied areas, the situation is worst in the fishing villages where the rate of uneducated children is twice as high as in the other villages. But even among the fishing villages, differences appear: both Matakang and the Konimodiya areas have primary schools, but in Konimodiya the rate of children who do not go to school is much lower than in Matakang. 40 Don’t go to school is the % of the 1416 children in the 6-15 year age group, the other percentages refer to the 1431 children who go to school, as at the end of primary school many children are older than 15 years. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 63 Figure 9 – Education score of coastal area households Education score of Children, Men and Women 2.0 -0.76 -0.75 1.36 -0.74 -0.89 -1.0 -1.5 -0.73 1.43 0.00 0.08 0.00 -0.74 0.10 -0.72 -0.49 -0.01 -0.5 -0.77 1.36 1.23 0.90 -0.05 0.0 1.57 1.58 1.12 0.07 0.5 -0.07 1.0 -1.00 1.5 -0.67 Score EduMen Score EduWomen Score eductation children -2.0 Mof-route Kabak Pêche Kabak agri 2008 rail Zone No Yes Founding lineage 2011-Men 2011-Women Gender head of household Total Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, question 4b. Overall in the area, the education score of adults is negative and for children positive, with a slightly better level among the farmers of Kabak, and the households who belong to the founding lineages. 9.4 Economic activities Main activities and main sources of income Agriculture is overall the main activity, both for subsistence and home consumption. However, market garden crops (watermelon, okra, eggplant, etc.) are the main source of income for 27% of the households, fishing and related smoking and selling of fish and other trades engage also 27% (Table 29). General trade and business (14% of income), and crafts and petty jobs (13% of income) precede in importance food crop agriculture (6%) and salt winning (5%) sources of income. For 7% of the households’ income from cash crops (3%), salaries (2%) or remittances from migrated family members are sources of income. Table 29 – Main activities and sources of income Activity Agriculture Fishing Crafts/petty jobs Trade/business Market gardening Salt Other Fish trade Main activities Main source of income 51% 19% 11% 6% 5% 3% 6% N= 673 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, questions 5 and 6. 6% 16% 13% 14% 27% 5% 7% 11% 685 The tendency for most people is to have several activities and several sources of income, which enables them to obtain a basic livelihood in a poor environment. Agriculture is the main activity for agricultural Kabak and the Port-Maferenyah road area (60% and 70% respectively), followed by crafts/petty jobs (about 10%) and trade (Figure 10). In the fishing villages, fishing is the main activity for 59% of the households, followed by agriculture/market gardening, and trading (12%) which is related to the money generated by the fishing economy. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 64 Figure 10 – Main and secondary activities of the head of household 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Main and secondary activities MOF -Mafereniya Road Secondary activities Main activities Agriculture Livestock Trade Hunting Fishing Crafts + petty jobs Market gardening salt winning Smoked fish Main and secondary activities Kabak Fishermen Secondary activities Fishing main activities Agriculture Livestock Trade Hunting Fishing Crafts + petty jobs Market gardening salt winning Smoked fish Main and secondary activities Kabak Agriculture Secondary activities Kabak farmers main activities Agriculture Livestock Trade Hunting Fishing Crafts + petty jobs Market gardening salt winning Smoked fish Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, question 6. All activities and sources of income Market gardening – Overall in the area, market gardening appears as the most prevalent source of income. The activity takes usually place outside the rainy season when food crops are grown and provides income that can be used to buy rice in the market and so offset the insufficient production of the rice crop. Agriculture – For the great majority of people, agriculture is one of their productive activities but is not always a source of income. Agriculture is reported by 61% of the affected households as a source of income. Fishing – Fishing is obviously a main activity in the fishing villages, but it’s also an important secondary activity in the other villages, both for the fishing itself (45%) as for fish smoking and trading (37%). Remittances – Money received from parents – usually within Guinea – represent the major source of income for 2% of the households, and a secondary source of income for another 28% of the households. Business and trade – Commerce is the third most common activity, but in many families it’s a secondary activity in which the women engage, while for men it’s usually the main activity. Additional money is earned by some households through livestock raising, producing and selling charcoal, and through agricultural contract labour. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 65 Table 30 – All activities of the head of household (main and secondary) and all sources of income of the household members Activity All activities All sources of income Agriculture 81% Market gardening 58% Fishing 37% Fish trade Crafts/petty jobs 35% Trade/business 15% Salt 3% Animal breeding 4% Remittances Salaries Others 15% N= 673 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, questions 5 and 6. 61% 67% 45% 37% 37% 42% 12% 7% 30% 4% 11% 685 Figure 11 – Main and secondary sources of income of all members of the household 100% Main and secondary INCOME MOF -Mafereniya Road Secondary income 80% Main income 60% 40% 20% 0% Agriculture Cash crops Fishing Market gardening 100% Livestock Employment Trade Crafts + petty jobs Wood Remittences Salt winning Smoked fish Main and secondary INCOME Kabak Fishermen Secondary income 80% Fishing main income 60% 40% 20% 0% Agriculture Cash crops Fishing Market gardening 100% Livestock Employment Trade Crafts + petty jobs Wood Remittences Salt winning Smoked fish Main and secondary INCOME Kabak Agriculture 80% Secondary income Kabak farmers main income 60% 40% 20% 0% Agriculture Cash crops Fishing Market gardening Livestock Employment Trade Crafts + petty jobs Wood Remittences Salt winning Smoked fish Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, questions 5 and 6. Gender related income Men and women engage both and together in income earning activities such as agriculture and 41 market gardening , but for other sources of income a clear gender differentiation appears (Figure 12): fishing is mostly done by men (men 36% vs. 15% for women), except for the small fishing and sea food 41 For the main sources of income it was asked if men or women provided these sources. The actual amounts of income earned by men and women separately cannot be derived from the present data for most activities. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 66 harvesting in the bogoni, the channels and along the coast; while fish smoking and trading is mostly a feminine source of income (men 2% vs. women 37%). General trade and business benefit women, as many women engage in small trade, while a few men have more important trades such as boutiques, restaurants or are engaged in businesses. Remittances are more often given to men (23%) than to women (9%). Typical male sources of income are thus sea fishing, trading and entrepreneurship, salaried work, remittances from relatives, crafts and petty jobs; Typical women sources of income are fish smoking and trading, small trade, and food preparation; Typical shared sources of income are agriculture, market gardening, salt winning, and animal breeding. Income that women obtain through their own activities is managed by the women themselves, whereas male common income is managed by the men. Figure 12 – Sources of income earned by men and women 100% Male and Female sources of income MOF-Mafereniya Road & Kabak Men 80% 60% 56% 55% 59% 37% 36% 40% 37% 35% 2% Agriculture Market gardening Fishing 23% 19% 15% 20% 0% Women 62% Fish trade 11% 11% 5% Crafts/petty jobs Trade/business Salt 5% 9% 5% Animal breeding Remittances 4% 2% Salaries 0% 4% Prepared food Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, question 6. 9.5 Housing Ownership A little over three-quarters of the people are owners of their house, and most of the others occupy it free of rent, which includes both those who are sharing the house with a family member, and unrelated people (Table 31). Only 12 people paid rent: on average 33 kFg/month but usually between 15 to 30 kFg. Table 31 – House ownership, annual rent paid and size of house Owner Free of rent Tenant Average annual rent Number of rooms Number of buildings N= Port-road Kabak fishing Kabak agriculture 74% 63% 85% 25% 34% 15% 1% 3% 1% 78 kFg/month 20 kFg/month 31 kFg/month 3.7 3.3 5.1 1.10 1.07 1.09 122 150 388 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, question 7. Average 78% 21% 1% 33 kFg/month 4.4 1.09 661 Homesteads are made up on average 1.1 building, and people have 4.4 rooms. People in Kabak have 5.1 rooms, in the port area – where more families share a house – they have 3.7 rooms. Building quality Most houses are built with permanent material for roofs, and traditional materials for walls. Occasionally walls are cement plastered and few houses have cemented floors. In the fishing villages, except for Matakang, housing is generally much poorer: both roofs and walls are often made with F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 67 temporary materials such as tarpaulins, left over Aluzinc sheets and raphia (58%). This type of shanty like housing is virtually absent in other villages. This is also a sign of the more or less temporary nature of the houses in the fishing villages, where many people have a better more permanent house elsewhere. The biggest houses, with up to 10-12 rooms and which can have a surface of up to 200 m², are generally very old. Recent houses typically have 3-4 bedrooms and are often made with mud bricks and Aluzinc roof. Roof – Most houses have permanent roofing of Aluzinc, especially in Kabak. For newer houses such materials are often bought second hand and the sheets are flattened so they can cover a wider area. Walls – The most common type of wall is made with mud bricks. Older houses tend to have been plastered with cement in the past, but often this is partial, with a cement layer in a poor state of repair. Floor – Paved floors are present in one third of the houses in the Port-road area and Kabak. However, in about half of these, only a few rooms have cemented floors. A few people have modern cemented houses with tiled floors. Table 32 – Building material of the main house Material Permanent roof Semi-permanent walls Permanent walls Paved floor N= Port-road Kabak fishing 71% 67% 29% 14% 7% 3% 32% 22% 122 150 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, question 7. Kabak agriculture 87% 15% 10% 32% 388 Overall the housing quality score is similar between Kabak agriculture and the Port-Maferinya road; with the fishing communities having half of the score. Along the railroad (Forecariah to Simandou), a similar low score was observed during the baseline survey of 2008. There appears no difference between the housing quality of houses of men and women-headed households (Figure 13). Figure 13 – Quality of housing score Housing Score 5.0 Score Roof Score Walls Score Floor 0.57 4.0 0.45 0.52 0.31 0.43 0.44 3.0 0.34 1.93 2.20 2.0 0.34 0.32 0.72 1.0 1.95 1.71 1.69 1.33 1.26 1.74 1.42 2.26 1.43 1.17 1.73 1.54 1.69 1.55 0.79 0.0 Mof-route Kabak Pêche Kabak agri 2008 rail Zone No Yes Founding lineage 2011-Men 2011-Women Gender head of household Total Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, question 7. Means of cooking and house lighting Lighting the house in the night has recently gone through a revolution. It is nowadays mostly done (more than 95% of the households) with cheap battery powered LED lamps. Kerosene lamps and candles are used by less than 5% of the households. This is in stark contrast with the 2008 railroad survey where 96% of the households still used kerosene lamps. Most people (94%) cook on wood, but F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 26% also use charcoal. Charcoal is more important in Kabak, where people have to go further to find kitchen fuel, and wet mangrove wood is less readily available for cooking. Housing equipment Several modern comfort items are present in the majority of homes (Table 33): radios, cell phones, bicycles, and a modern bed with a foam mattress. Cheap Chinese motorbikes are also owned by more than a quarter of the population. Table 33 – Main possessions of the studied households Housing equipment Port-road Kabak fishing Kabak agriculture Average Foam mattress 18% 28% 26% 25% Leisure furniture 13% 27% 31% 27% Radio 80% 77% 78% 78% Cell phone 57% 50% 53% 53% Spontaneously mentioned items 43% 66% 52% 53% Bicycle 59% 20% 53% 47% Motorbike 24% 19% 31% 27% Pirogue 13% 53% 17% 24% Fishing net worth > 100$ 13% 54% 15% 24% Outboard motor 2% 17% 1% 5% Plot of urban land 18% 19% 17% 17% Electric generator 13% 15% 13% 13% Livestock worth > 100$ 11% 14% 14% 13% Urban house 11% 17% 12% 13% TV set 9% 11% 10% 10% Second mobile phone 9% 8% 11% 10% Rifle 13% 5% 5% 7% Without any possessions 5% 7% 3% 4% Possession score* 7.02 9.91 8.36 8.46 N= 129 153 396 678 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, questions 8 and 11. The *possession score is based on the monetary value of items or their potential of improving the economic life of the households: between 1 point of items of 100$, to 4 points for cars and outboard motors. The value of livestock is included. Further items cited are urban plots and urban houses (about 1 in 6 households), electric generators (13%) and TV sets (10%), a second mobile phone in the household (10%). Despite reported lack of wildlife in the area, still one out of 8 households owns a rifle in the Port-Maferinya road area. The fishing villages represent a special case, having more items than the agricultural villages through their possessions of boats (cost about 150-200 US$), fishing nets (cost more than 100 US$), and for 1 42 in 6 households own an outboard motor . Livestock can be considered as part of people’s capital and possessions. It is generally limited to a few chickens and goats/sheep as was shown in section 6.5. 42 These items may have been acquired with loans from of the Korean fishing companies, but they were reported as the own possessions of the interviewed households Page 68 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 69 Figure 14 – Possessions score: furniture, bedding, equipment and livestock Score Equipement & Possessions 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 9.9 9.5 8.4 7.8 7.0 8.6 8.5 5.7 2 1 0 Mof-route Kabak Pêche Kabak agri Zone 2008 rail No Yes Founding lineage 2011-Men 2011-Women Gender head of household Total Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, questions 8 and 11. 9.6 Health indicators Health indicators in the survey are based on the presence of latrines, mosquito nets, access to modern health care, children’s diseases, and meat consumption (Table 34). Most households have access to a latrine, but the majority have to share it with their neighbours, increasing the risk of disease transmission. The presence of mosquito nets in households is quite important – probably because the nuisance of mosquitoes is significant in the area. Regarding health care, most people turn to official health facilities; while a minority turn to pharmacies where no qualified medical advice is given, or to street peddlers, in which case the quality of drugs cannot be guaranteed. These results seem to mask a less favourable picture: visits to local health facilities in Kabak show that drugs are rarely available, and results from village meetings indicate that because of lack of good official health care, most people still resort to traditional medicine and buy drugs from street peddlers and in small shops. In the fishing villages, the results are usually less favourable than among the other communities; in spite of better monetary income among fishermen, latrines, mosquito nets and hospital visits are less frequent, and among their children diarrhoea and skin disease appear more prevalent. Obviously their fish consumption is more frequent than in other villages. Table 34 – Health indicators Health indicator Port-road Kabak fishing Latrine 90% 64% Latrine is shared 54% 39% Mosquito net 74% 61% Hospital visit 81% 77% Traditional health care 28% 14% Last year’s childbirth in a health facility 67% 64% Diarrhoea among 1-4 year olds 34% 39% Fever among 1-4 year olds 64% 63% Skin disease among 1-10 year olds 14% 17% Meat consumed yesterday 2% 2% Fish consumed yesterday 90% 98% N= 125 152 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, questions 9, 9a, 13, 14, 15 and 19. Numbers vary according to question as not every household has under-5 year old children. Kabak agriculture 94% 59% 68% 85% 22% 67% 31% 69% 14% 5% 93% 394 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 70 Figure 15 – Health related indicators score Score Health Indicators 10 no data avalable for 2008 rail 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 5.6 5.6 4.3 2 5.3 5.3 5.3 No Yes 2011-Men 6.1 5.3 1 0 Mof-route Kabak Pêche Zone Kabak agri 2008 rail Founding lineage 2011-Women Gender head of household Total Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, questions 9, 9a, 13, 14, 15 and 19. 9.7 Income As most questionnaire surveys are limited in time, income data are quite difficult to obtain and rather unreliable; as people have difficulties to remember their annual income, in particular regarding smaller irregular sources of income, and income from earlier during the year. The questionnaire tries to circumvent this by asking several questions about income sources and amount of income at different times during the interview. Indirect indicators Possessions – Possessions are an important indicator of the relative value of revenue, as surplus revenue is used to buy such items. These items have been discussed in a previous section (Section 9.5). Indicators of regular income – Rare are families who enjoy a salary (total 2%), or who are retired (2%). Only regular remittances are often mentioned by one third of the families. Table 35 – Indicators of regular income and recent travel Indicator Port-road Kabak fishing Regular income Government income 1% 1% Local employer 1% 3% International employer 1% 0% Retirement 2% 1% Remittances 39% 23% No regular income 59% 72% Saving group Saving group 31% 49% - women participate 19% 23% - men participate 6% 25% Saving account and travel Savings account 2% 0% Travel outside the region 59% 72% N= 128 154 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, questions 10, 12 and 17. Numbers of valid observations may change slightly between questions. Kabak agriculture 3% 1% 0% 2% 35% 60% 42% 34% 11% 0% 68% 398 Saving groups – Other indicators of regular income are those who manage to save some of their money through mutual saving groups (31 to 49%). Women participate more in saving groups (on average 28%) than men (13%), except in the fishing villages, where the reverse is true. This is most F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 71 likely caused by the fact that fishermen have a fairly regular income, and if they want to buy more expensive items (among which fishing gear), they will have to save for it. Saving accounts – Savings and bank accounts are almost inexistent except for a few households in the Port-Maferinya road area. Travels – Travel is expensive, and roads are poor in the country, which makes travel an indicator of income. However, the region is not very far from Conakry, and the nation’s capital is where people go usually to visit family members or for trading. Main reasons reported for travelling were family visits (54%), health related (11%), buying fishing equipment (25%) in fishing villages, employment (8%), funerals (7%), and various other minor reasons. Sources of income that provide more than 200 US$ annually Among the important sources of income – defined as activities generating more than 200 US$ during the previous year – market gardening among the Kabak farmers; fishing and fish smoking in the fishing villages; trading and salt winning in the Port-Maferinya area, are the most important (Table 36). Regular agriculture of food crops is thus more an activity to feed the family than to earn money. Table 36 – Income of more than 200 US$ annually Source of income Port-road Kabak fishing Market gardening 26% 14% Fishing 9% 65% Business 31% 19% Fish smoking 12% 64% Food crops 27% 7% Crafts/petty jobs 22% 16% Salt winning 30% 0% Remittances 10% 5% Salaries 7% 7% Cash crops 16% 1% Others 2% 2% No single source of more than 200$ 12% 3% N= 113 151 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, question 16. Kabak agriculture 63% 20% 27% 15% 30% 25% 5% 6% 4% 2% 4% 13% 348 The sum of the indicators of income as presented in Figure 16 shows that fishing villages, households belonging to the founding lineages, and male head of households have a somewhat higher and more secure income pattern, compared to the average household. Figure 16 – Income related score based on regular income, saving, travels, and sources of more than 200 US$ annual income Score Income Indicators 5 no data avalable for 2008 rail 4 3 2 3.8 4.2 3.8 3.7 4.1 3.9 3.2 3.9 1 0 Mof-route Kabak Pêche Kabak agri Zone 2008 rail No Yes Founding lineage 2011-Men 2011-Women Gender head of household Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, questions 10, 12, 16 and 17. Total F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 72 Household income Households in the 2011 baseline study estimate their annual income at 11.1 million GNF, or 1,850 43 US$ (Table 37). This corresponds to 5.05 US$/day/family or about 0.70 US$ per household member. This income does not take into account the value of the self-produced and consumed agricultural products, which cannot be estimated, in a reliable way, from a survey of this type. Among the Kabak fishermen, income was clearly higher (about 17.3 million GNF) than among the Kabak farmers (9.2 million GNF) and the Port-Maferinya road (9.6 million GNF). Details of income 44 sources are presented in the annexed report . Table 37 – Summary of total income (in 1,000 GNF) by origin 2011 baseline Income source 2008 baseline Kabak agriculture Agriculture+animal breeding 2,782 1,481 4,550 1,582 Salaries 273 225 251 33 Aquatic resources: fish + salt 2,352 12,389 1,850 17 Other income sources 4,184 3,155 2,562 1,410 Average income [kFg] 9,590 17,269 9,213 3,072 Median income* [kFg] 6,690 12,530 7,000 1,678 N= 128 155 398 268 Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011, questions 22 and 23. Port-road Kabak fishing Average 2011 baseline 3,514 249 4,354 2,997 11,119 7,525 682 Median income – The income distribution is – as is usual in most populations – skewed by many households with a low income and a few with a high income, often those engaged in businesses. The median income indicates that 50% of the households earn less than 7.5 million GNF or 1,250 US$. Figure 17 – Income in million Guinean francs by income source Income by source 20 hunting (in million Guinean Francs) 18 Agriculture 17.3 mFg fruits 16 livestock 14 salaries 11.6 mFg 12 10.8 mFg 9.6 mFg 10 11.1 mFg remittances salt 9.2 mFg rice 8 carfts/petty jobs tradebusiness smoked fish 6 4 2.8 mFg 2 0 MOF-Road Kabak Fishing Kabak Farming zone 2008 rail No Yes Founding lineage Average market gardening fishing total Source: Baseline household questionnaire, July 2011, question 23. 43 The average exchange rate of the dollar was around 6,000 Guinean Francs during the year before the survey – the period of reference for the annual income. 44 Koppert, Sabinot, Leclercq et al. (2012) Socio-économic Baseline Survey Kabak and MOF : Résultats Bruts des enquêtes. SNC-Lavalin. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Salaries – Salaries provide on average 3% of the total income, the households with salaries reported on average annual earnings of 250 kFg. Fishing – Provides overall 21% of income, representing 7,400 kFg among the fishing villages. Another 5,000 kFg is provided by fish smoking and trading in these villages. Market gardening – Is the main source for earning income outside the fishing villages on Kabak Island. Along the Port-Maferinya road it’s the fourth most important source of income. Trade/business – Is the main activity for earning income along the Port-Maferinya road. This is because of the presence of Touguiyire, a trading village where the ferry and fishing boats cross to Kabak Island; in other villages, there is also quite an active trade community. Crafts and petty jobs – These jobs include masons, daily labourers, various repair men, wood and charcoal producers, motorbike taxi operators, and small boat operators to cross passengers to Kabak Island, etc. This category provides 11% of the average income, and is present in all three types of villages. Salt winning – Salt winning is especially a very lucrative activity in the Port-Maferinya road area, where 40% of the households engage in this activity. A family that practices salt winning earns on average about 3 million GNF. Remittances – Money sent by relatives are a secondary source of income. They provide 2% of the total income. Often people receive bags of rice as a gift from their relatives in town. Agricultural products – Food crop agriculture provides overall 7% of the total income. It’s more important among the Kabak farmers. Rice provides about two-thirds of agricultural income. Animal husbandry – Livestock breeding is not important in the area, and most animals are used for domestic ceremonies and sometimes sold. Income from animal husbandry was only complementary. Only 1% of total income was reported from the sale of livestock and milk. Other income sources – The survey reported very little income from salaries (2%), fruits (2%), hunting (<1%). Average amount was 12.5 kFg. 9.8 Household expenditures on food Estimation of household expenditures in a rural and mostly uneducated society is a very difficult and long exercise, for which results are often imprecise, and so difficult to interpret. That’s why the general baseline only took an indicator of expenditures – amounts regularly spent on food – instead of evaluating them all. Food expenses Figure 18 shows that on average people report spending around 4 million GNF on food, which would mean one third of the average annual income of 11 million GNF. However, the fact that there are so few differences between the zones and household categories indicates that this number may not completely reflect reality, and may not be reliable. Also, if only one third of the money is spent on basic necessities, this would mean that people have much money available for discretionary expenditures, which is not perceptible in the villages. Fishermen have higher expenses than other household categories, but the difference is about 20%; though they produce less rice and so have to buy more, they conversely spend less on buying fish than the others. Page 73 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 74 Figure 18 – Annual income and food expenditures in million Guinean francs Annual Income and Food Expenditures 20 (in millions of Guinean Francs) 18 Total income 17.3mF 16 Food expenses 14 12 10 10.8mF 9.6mF 8 11.6mF 11.4mF 11.1mF 9.2mF 6 7.0mF 4 2 3.7mF 0 MOF- Road 4.4mF Kabak Fishing 3.6mF Kabak Farming zone 3.7mF No 3.9mF 3.8mF Yes Man Founding lineage 3.3mF Woman 3.8mF Average Gender head of household All Source: Baseline household questionnaire, July 2011, questions 23 and 24. Insufficiency of rice production 45 Rice production is insufficient for most of the households: between January and July, 4.6 bags of rice were bought among the farmers of Kabak and the Port-Maferinya road area; while in the fishing village, households reported having bought 6.9 bags of rice. In the fishing villages, 70% of households had to buy rice from January to around the end of harvest time; while this was 42% among Kabak farmers; and 44% in the Port-Maferinya road area. 9.9 Debts Many families have debts, as they run out of staple foods during the pre-harvest lean season, or if they have extra costs to pay for health, family ceremonies, etc. The household survey indicated that half of the fishermen and two-thirds of the farmers have debts. Especially for fishermen, debts are important (1.9 million GNF) as they often invest in fishing gear. Families indicate that almost no interest is paid; information that was not confirmed during farm visits. In fact, farmers can obtain a credit of 2,000 GNF during the year from businessmen, which they will have to reimburse by giving one pot of rice at harvest time, when the rice costs about 5,000 GNF. Other farmers indicate that they receive 20 kFg to be reimbursed by a boussalé of rice at harvest time (a local measure of about 22 kg, worth 100 kFg). Debts are contracted with friends (24% of the households), businessmen (21%) and parents (13%). Table 38 – Summary of debts contracted Port-Maferinya road Kabak fishing Have debts 55% 47% Food 34% 18% Other items 13% 34% Health 6% 6% Agriculture 4% 3% Average amount of debts 750 kFg 1,861 kFg Median amount of debts 255 kFg 650 kFg N= 72 105 % to pay back 101% 101% Source: Baseline household questionnaires, July 2011, question 24a. 45 Baseline household question 24. Kabak agriculture 65% 43% 7% 7% 3% 811 kFg 400 kFg 268 104% F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 75 9.10 Socioeconomic Development Index As described above, the socioeconomic index is an effort to summarize the data from the socioeconomic questionnaire, and to use it as a reference for future monitoring and evaluation. In this first study, the socioeconomic situation within the surveyed areas has been compared; as well as between the 40% of households who belong to the founding lineages and the others, and between the 5% female-headed households and the 95% of male-headed households (Figure 19). Figure 19 – Socioeconomic Development Score of households Socio-Economic index Education [data 2008 rail survey are incomplete and not presented] 25 21.6 20 19.5 18.2 19.3 17.8 17.4 17.0 15 RevenueRevenu Possessions 10 HousingHabitat 5 HealthSanté 0 Mof-route Kabak Pêche Kabak agri Zone No yes Founding lineage Men women Gender head of household Source: Guinea baseline survey coastal area 2011. 9.11 Vulnerable people IFC Performance Standards require the identification of vulnerable people, who, in the case of physical resettlement or economic displacement, will have more problems to cope with the consequences than the average population and who may be differentially negatively affected by the project’s impacts. It is important to identify both individuals and households who are vulnerable prior to project’s impacts – and thus may be less resilient to change – and also those who may become vulnerable by project’s impacts – but who were not vulnerable prior to project’s impacts. Criteria Common criteria for evaluating vulnerable people are single-headed households, households without land, households without regular income, and households with young children. In the Guinean context the following criteria would all need to be considered to identify vulnerable households thorough a point system, in which having several negative criteria at the same time will indicate that households or individuals are vulnerable: Illiterate households more than 25% of the households have no education whatsoever Single-headed households 8% of the households F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Households that derive a significant proportion of income from farming on the affected land can only be assessed directly among affected farmers Households that have only one income earner about 10% of the households Households that report no regular income nor outside assistance ~8% Households headed by children under 16 years none Households headed by women 5% of the households Households headed by elderly people 11% are over 65 years old Households with no land holding, who are not related to the founding lineage, and who are migrants to the area 9% has land for free, and 7% pays rent Households with no declared possessions 4% of the households Women in the process of divorce, and women who enter widowhood after the husband dies varies over time, and has to be closely monitored during resettlement 46 46 For the land loss to be considered as significant, project usually take the cut-off point of 25% of land and income loss. However, the international organizations (IFC, World Bank) haven’t published such a clear cut-off point. Page 76 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 77 10. Opinions 10.1 Expectations and fears Negative and positive opinions about the Simandou rail and port project were asked at the end of the household interviews, through an open-ended question where people could indicate three items, which were coded during data entry. Positive opinions and expectations Many expectations were expressed by the population, with employment as the most important, followed by general improvements in living conditions, as one may expect to come from the governments and development organizations: improvements in educational, health and transport services; improvements of access between Kakak Island and the mainland, as well as better roads on the island. People also often reported development of their current sources of income: agriculture and market gardening for the farmers (dike improvement, general agricultural assistance); improve capture and storage facilities for the fishermen (cold room, outboard motors, etc.). Better access to drinking water is a particularly important expectation, especially in Kabak where people have to resort to rain water during the wet season, and in many places only have access to brackish water during the dry season. Electricity supply was especially mentioned by people along the Port-Maferinya road. New houses, as per compensation and resettlement were named by one sixth of the people. For the social and religious, 20% hoped that the project would build a mosque. Table 39 – Summary of the population’s expectations for the Simandou Project Expectation Employment Education Roads Health/Hospital Drinking water Dikes Electricity Mosque Agricultural assistance Food New houses Cell phone coverage General development Fishing assistance Bridge to main land Outboard motor Assistance trade/commerce Youth house Fish preservation/cooling Latrines Others N= Port-Maferinya road 61% 62% 66% 53% 28% 1% 48% 20% 26% 29% 17% 4% 1% 3% 0% 2% 4% 6% 1% 2% 7% 127 Kabak fishing Kabal agriculture Average 54% 49% 33% 41% 45% 12% 16% 18% 6% 10% 17% 4% 1% 21% 2% 14% 5% 0% 8% 7% 10% 155 60% 50% 50% 39% 43% 40% 21% 23% 15% 14% 12% 11% 2% 1% 9% 2% 2% 3% 0% 0% 6% 398 59% 52% 49% 42% 41% 26% 25% 21% 15% 16% 14% 8% 1% 6% 6% 5% 3% 3% 2% 2% 6% 681 Negative opinions and fears Fears about the project especially relate to resettlement of houses and loss of fields: people fear what they cannot apprehend, and don’t see how they can manage the consequences through the project. A F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 78 second point, that will need to be addressed are safety and security; there is great fear of accidents, and also of increase in civil unrest, thefts and other safety issues related to the influx of newcomers. For the fishing population there was additional fear that the project might impact fishing activities and so lead to the loss of income. Besides these items, there are many others that were only mentioned a few times, among which may be noteworthy “delays” and “broken promises”, as they have heard about many project that never were carried out. A few times, prostitution, new diseases, famine, loss of food crops were named. Table 40 – Summary of the population’s fears about the Simandou Project Fear Loss of fields Accidents Loss of houses Insecurity Resettlement village Loss of income/jobs Loss of natural resources Noise Broken promises Prostitution Delays Diseases unspecified Other reasons N= Port-Maferinya road Kabak fishing Kabal agriculture 60% 30% 72% 58% 48% 43% 21% 30% 33% 16% 12% 13% 15% 5% 8% 7% 10% 1% 0% 12% 0% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2% 6% 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 15% 10% 8% 120 139 374 Source: Baseline household questionnaire, question 26. 2011 average 60% 47% 30% 13% 9% 4% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 10% 633 Conclusion Answers to these questions regarding expectations and fears rather express the hope that the project will come to their villages, and provides as much development as one dares to imagine; and fear that the project is not well enough balanced to compensate people that will be affected by loss of housing, loss of fields and have to find a new life elsewhere. 10.2 Village priorities After each of the village meetings, men, women and young people were asked to state the village priorities as they perceived them, in case Rio Tinto’s had a limited budget in which development actions could be carried out. Kabak agricultural villages Main priorities are agriculture, including rehabilitation of the Kabak dikes. For the youth, employment and youth facilities are of primary importance. Men often cite a new mosque as their first priority, followed by health care. Education, health and drinking water facilities are further named especially by women. In 4 of the 6 villages, women also asked for a market which would help them sell their products. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 79 Table 41 – Expectation’s priorities in six Kabak agricultural villages Expectation Men Women Agricultural assistance/Kabak dike 4 3 Employment 1 Youth centre – sports facilities Hospital – health centre 3 3 Road building, ferry to mainland 2 3 Mosque 4 School 1 2 Drinking water 1 3 Market 4 Cell phone network 1 Public electricity 1 Fishing equipment 1 1 Improved public toilet facilities 1 Source: Village consultation meetings, July 2011. Young people 1 6 7 1 1 1 1 - Total 8 7 7 6 6 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 Kabak fishing villages In the fishing villages, drinking water supply is the main expectation, followed by improvement of fishing gear for the men and fish smoking for the women. Young people favour youth centres and sports facilities, and – probably because fishing already provides them with regular income – less often employment than in the other villages. Table 42 – Expectation’s priorities in five Kabak fishing villages Expectation Men Women Drinking water 3 2 Fishing equipment 5 Youth centre and sports facilities Hospital – health centre 1 2 Fish smokery equipment 4 School 1 1 Employment Market 2 Bridge between Kabak and mainland 1 Dike around Kabak Road building 1 Public electricity Agricultural assistance 1 Better houses 1 Source: Village consultation meetings, July 2011. Young people 5 1 1 2 1 1 1 - Total 5 5 5 4 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 Port-Maferinya road area Priorities are different in the Port-Maferinya road area: on top come the public facilities, such as school, health centre and public electricity. Youths have a preference for leisure activities (youth centre and sport), but also for employment. Women expectation’s priorities are drinking water supply (which is often available too far away), and fish smoking facilities. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 80 Table 43 – Expectation’s priorities in five villages of the Port-Maferinya road area Expectations Men Women School 3 2 Hospital – health centre 2 2 Public electricity 2 2 Youth centre & sporting facilities Agriculture assistance 1 1 Road building 1 1 Employment Drinking water 3 Mosque 2 Market 2 Fish smokery equipment 1 Cell phone network Fishing equipment 1 Source: Village consultation meetings, July 2011. Young people 1 1 1 4 2 1 3 1 - Total 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 10.3 Human rights issues Human rights were addressed through a simple question of peoples opinion on what really was for them an injustice they had lived through during the preceding year. The question was open-ended but pre-coded answers were available to the surveyors and served as examples. One cannot disregard the fact that people sometimes showed some reluctance to reply this question, and the results should be viewed in this context. About three-quarters of the people had not lived through an injustice; for the others it was mainly theft (21%), police fines and arrests (total of 7%) that were considered not justified. In general women suffered twice as often from perceived injustices as men. A few other items were infrequently mentioned: cattle disputes, land disputes, physical violence, and sorcery. Table 44 – Reported human rights violations by gender and age 2011 baseline 2008 baseline Kabak agriculture 74% 76% 69% 44% 26% 24% 30% 56% 14% 8% 13% 24% 7% 4% 7% 16% 1% 6% 7% 1% 125 148 384 275 Source: Baseline household questionnaire, question 25. Port-road None Yes Women Men Children N= 2011 average Kabak fishing 72% 28% 12% 6% 6% 658 Table 45 – Types of human rights violations reported 2011 baseline Kabak agriculture 19% 16% 23% 2% 1% 1% 4% 5% 4% 6% 5% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% 125 148 384 Source: Baseline household questionnaire, question 25. Port-road Theft Farmers-pastoralists conflict Arrest Unjustified fine Confiscated goods Physical violence Confiscated lands Family rights’ conflict Sorcery Other N= Kabak fishing 2008 baseline 2011 average 1% 55% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 276 21% 1% 4% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 658 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 11. Issues 11.1 How to increase the rice cultivation area The mangroves on Kabak Island have good fertility and a high rice producing potential. Several previous improvement and extension projects have failed, but this does not mean that new projects are not necessary. The main issues appear to be the soil salinisation due to unpredictable climatic conditions (water supply from rainfall and saline intrusion from storms at sea) which can only be improved by better hydraulic control of irrigation. 47 Since 1951 , several projects have attempted to increase the rice production on Kabak Island through water control with channels and dikes. Consequences of such controls have mostly been unpredictable, and not always accepted by the local population. The main control has been the construction of a dike in order to gain 1,500 hectares of rice paddies first by China (1975-78) which failed within 2 years; then in 1996 by the Arabic Development Bank which failed 4 years later. The report indicates that the successive failures show the complexity of the hydrosedimental dynamics in the area, and the perpetual changes caused by maritime and fluvial forces. According to the report, in spite of the repeated technical failures and sterilization of the land, improvements in access (ferry and roads), and modernization have had positive effects on the island: income drawn from market gardening on land initially destined for rice growing, and introduction of mechanized agriculture. Quantitative and qualitative inventory of the bogoni There is an urgent need to obtain a good qualitative and quantitative inventory of the rice growing area in the wider area around the port, in order to assess the amount of available land that can be used for displacing people, and the potential for development of existing land. In the port area, approximately 40% of the bogoni parcels inventoried by the ERM PARC team, for the project footprint, had not been used during the current year for agriculture, but no indication is available on which part was related to lack of available manpower/money to cultivate these fields and which part to salinity and insufficient fertility. 48 In the port area , according to preliminary results of the asset survey, rice-growing areas are often not farmed by the traditional owners: 54% were simple users, while 46% farmed their own land. Satellite photos show that most of the mangrove areas along the sea arms have been transformed into bogoni land, but from these images no assessment of the quality of such land can be draws. For the purpose of this report an inventory of available rice-growing land could not be made, but it is urgent that such a study be carried out to answer the following questions: What is the quality of the land: salinity, protection against flooding by seawater? Has the land been cultivated during the last year and last three years, and – if not – for what reasons? Who are the traditional owners of the land and who are the land users? What is the potential for improvement of the land? What is the potential for extension of the bogoni area? How important is bogoni fishing for the local population, and how can fishing in and around the bogoni be replaced? 47 Rossi G. (éd.), Bazzo D., Lauffer M., Moreau Noëlle, Fontana André, Sow M., Diallo I. Atlas infogéographique de la Guinée maritime. Paris (FRA); Conakry: IRD; Ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'Elevage, 2001, 179 p. multigr. 48 ERM/Borealis asset survey MOF area, preliminary data reported on January 24, 2011. Page 81 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 11.2 Compensation and replacement land issues Land ownership will be a major issue for the replacement land due to the loss of productive land from the construction of the Simandou Project: individual farmers will lose crops, and temporary or permanent rights to agricultural land. The INSUCO study has also confirmed that it is not possible to give a market value to a plot of land. Also, for the sake of long-term livelihood restoration, it is far more important to provide each affected farmer with replacement land, whether it is a traditional owner or a traditional user, so that at least each affected farmer can continue to farm. Affected vs. unaffected households – When land is needed for a project – compensation for crops are paid, and replacement land are sought for acquisition – traditional mechanism do not always work. Compensation will be paid for loss of crops, for disturbance, for intermediate livelihood between land take and land replacement, and new land will have to be acquired. Other projects have shown that such compensation may lead to significant jealousy in the village, between what villagers perceive as the “lucky victims” and others. Owner users vs. users – A special issue is expected when land users who are not owners of land are affected: they will receive compensation for loss of crops and transitional assistance; while the land owner will only receive access to replacement land and compensation for permanent assets such as trees, dikes, and other permanent improvements to the land. This usually means that the land-user receives more money than the land-owner – another source of jealousy and perceived injustice – which may influence the possibility that the land-user will be borrowed replacement land in the future. However, the land-user may win on a short-term but lose in the longer term. To avoid this, the land-user needs some formal agreement with the village which grants the rights to keep on farming under the same conditions. Permanently occupied land, fallow land and unused land – For livelihood restoration, permanently occupied land needs to be replaced by land from the village stock or from elsewhere, in order for the farmer to recreate the lost fields and continue its activities. This means that the community (village, lineage, etc.) will lose land for which they deserve compensation. Insofar as this replacement land is uncultivated land, such compensation may be in the form of a fund for community improvements. If the land handed out belongs to individuals and is usually of higher value, some form of individual compensation will probably be necessary to make sure that the land is made available officially and that formal agreements will be signed. Fallow land will be much more difficult to replace as it is reserve land, but problems can be avoided if instead of giving replacement land, the right to cultivate an area dependent on the presently or usually cultivated land is provided to the affected farmer. In the new resettlement area a new cycle of cultivation and fallow land can than start, which should be sustainable. Again, compensation could be based on a mixture of individual compensation to the person/lineage which provides the land and in-kind community compensation for the permanent loss of community land. Unused, not previously cultivated land – In principle, such land cannot be replaced as it would only mean that elsewhere uncultivated land be taken. The value of such land should be recognized by the project and compensated to the affected community in the form of a fund for in-kind improvements. Resettlement within the village vs. resettlement in new communities – The Simandou Project as a linear project will probably only affect a small band of land in most villages; though land fragmentation may be hampered by the railroad, in most communities the total land-loss will be limited to a small percentage of the available land. Page 82 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Bogoni in the port area – Replacement may be difficult when high valued land (like “bas-fonds” or wetlands) or precious bogoni land will be affected in such a way that no equivalent replacement land can be found. Farmers of the port area indicate that not all potential bogoni land is used, and that much of this land produces below its agriculture potential because water and silt management is deficient. The preferred solution for bogoni replacement is to increase the amount of available land by improving the general water management in the area. Page 83 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 84 12. Grievance procedure 49 In the September 2009 Guidance Note , IFC regards the provision of a grievance procedure as one of the pillars of stakeholder engagement for all clients in social risk management and to obtain social license to operate. The grievance procedure is a process for receiving, evaluating and addressing project related grievances from affected people. 12.1 Basis for a grievance procedure Rio Tinto will establish a grievance mechanism for affected farmers. As the areas and the number of affected people are limited, the expectation is that the grievance mechanism can be very straightforward. The mechanism should be culturally appropriate, accessible to all, transparent, and free of coercion or intimidation. The Rio Tinto Project is a fairly straightforward project where few grievances are expected, but this does not mean that there are none. Among the expected grievances are: Farmers who claim that they have not been included in the census Disputes about the size of land, or the part of land taken into account Disputes about who is the rightful owner of the land Grievances about the compensation system. 50 51 52 12.2 Implementation of the grievance procedure Rio Tinto’s grievance mechanism will consist of: A 5-step grievance process – 1) Definition and dissemination of the mechanism; 2) Receive and register grievances and notify of receipt; 3) Review and investigate; 4) Resolution, response and close-out; and 5) Monitor and evaluate. Four resource categories – 1) People and staff; 2) Logging system; 3) Process (written procedure with responsibilities and management oversight); and 4) Allocated budget. For small projects the designation of an individual in the company to act as a point of contact to receive complaints “can foster positive engagement when issues rise”. For the Rio Tinto Project the following should be set up: 49 1. A consultation committee of 6-8 members, elected by the farmers, and representing the guard, men and women, small and bigger farmers. 2. Meetings should be held at key moments of the displacement process: at the presentation of this report and publication of the cut-off date; three months before the effective eviction date; and a week before the effective eviction date. 3. A company official will be in charge of liaison, but a recognized local social specialist should be part of the consultation meetings. http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/sustainability.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/p_GrievanceMechanisms/$FILE/IFC+Grievance+Mechanisms.pdf 50 Farmers were specifically invited to assist to the survey, and notified that rights of absentees could not be considered. In spite of this, these farmers may want to submit a grievance. 51 Some fields were clearly abandoned and were not taken into account in the measurements. Farmers were told this and agreed with it during the survey. 52 Though the guide and neighboring farmers always vetted the farmer who has his name on the present list, experience from other projects shows that other people may pretend, and sometimes rightfully, that they are the land user. F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 4. When grievances are received, the person will be notified of receipt, the Rio Tinto officer in charge investigates the grievance, and – when necessary – once per month during a small meeting at Rio Tinto, with a social specialist, the grievance outcome will be discussed. A Rio Tinto officer informs in writing the grieved person, and registers his acceptance or rejection of the grievance. 5. Grievances may be discussed with the consultation committee, or in front of a plenary meeting with the affected farmers if appropriate. 6. If the formal project grievance mechanism does not provide a satisfactory solution, the complainant has his constitutional right of seeking justice in court. As such action is in general inaccessible to non-affluent populations; it’s preferable to work on solutions acceptable by both Rio Tinto and the complainant. Such a solution might include a neutral mediator paid for by Rio Tinto. Page 85 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey 13. References Cogels S, Koppert G.J.A. (2004).– Socioeconomic Monitoring Survey in the Chad Oil Field Development Area and Pipeline Corridor. GEPFE: Groupe d'Étude des Populations Forestières Équatoriales, Paris. (http://www.ulb.ac.be/socio/anthropo/tchad) Convention entre l’Union Nationale des pêcheurs artisans de Guinée et The Sierra Leone Artisanal Fisherman’s union. Convention UNPAG-SLAFU: http://spcsrp.org/medias/csrp/pays/Convention-UNPAG-SLAFU.pdf consulted March 29 2013 Domain F., Chavance P. and Diallo A. (1999). – La pêche côtière en Guinée : ressources et exploitation. CNSHB-IRD. Consulted March 30, 2013 http://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers09-03/010025006.pdf Encyclopedia Britannica. Temné http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/586495/Temne, consulted January 2012 Geslin Philippe, (1997). – L’innovation et le temps, une approche ethnographique de la réallocation du temps de travail agricole chez les Soussou de Guinée. IRD, Horizon http://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exldoc/pleins_textes/pleins_textes_6/colloques2/010012801.pdf consulted March 29 2013 International Finance Corporation. (2013). – Grievance Mechanisms. Website, consulted March 30, 2013). – http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/sustainability.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/p_GrievanceMechanisms/$FILE/IFC+Grievance+ Mechanisms.pdf International Monetary Fund (2012). – Poverty Reduction Policy Paper on Guinea. Consulted on March 28 2013. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2012/cr1261.pdf. Koppert G. (2010). – Draft Report Value Enhancement Study Rail Road and Port Site. SNClavalin, Gepfe, Rio Tinto, June 29 2010. Koppert G. Leclercq M, Sabinot C., (2011-2012). – Socio Economc Surveys (1) Kabak – MOF, (2) Rail road Maferinyah to Oure Kaba, (3) Kabak, railroad and Kakossa. Results of the socio economic household questionnaires in table form, question by question. SncLavalin, Rio Tinto Parsi-Conakry. Koppert G., Leclercq M., Sabinot C. (2011 December) Socio economical survey. Kabak Island and Kabak – Maferinyah road. Preliminary results of the field survey [covering 100% of the questionnaires], June - July 2011. Republic of Guinea. Montréal, SNC Lavalin – Paris, GEPFE – Paris, Anthropolinks – Conakry, Rio Tinto Simfer Les langues Nigéro-Congolaises. – Source: http://www.tlfq.ulaval.ca/axl/monde/famnigero-congolaise.htm assessed on January 28, 2012. Leyle, David (2010). – Bien-être et inégalités en Guinée Maritime: une question d'accès. Un système d'information pour le développement, Thèse soutenue Université Michel de Montaigne - Bordeaux III (22/01/2010), Georges Rossi (Dir.) Paulme D. (1954, 1970). – Les Gens du Riz, Les Kissi de Haute-Guinée, Paris. Librairie Plon. 324 p. in http://www.webguinee.net/bibliotheque/ethnographie/kisi/dpaulme/chap06.html, consulted March 30, 2013 Rio Tinto (2010). – RAPPORT Socio-Économique ZONE DU PORT B E N T Y. Drafted in 2010 by a team of 5 Guinean social scientists for Rio Tinto. Rossi G. (éd.), Bazzo D., Lauffer M., Moreau Noëlle, Fontana André, Sow M., Diallo I. Atlas infogéographique de la Guinée maritime. Paris (FRA); Conakry: IRD; Ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'Elevage, 2001, 179 p. multigr. Sabinot C., Koppert G., Leclercq M. Simandou (2011, August) – Port and rail project in Kabak. Preliminary report fishing villages: maps and socio-economical description of fishing villages. Montréal, SNC Lavalin – Paris, GEPFE – Paris, Anthropolinks – Conakry, Rio Tinto Simfer. SECK, PA (1979). – Catalogue des engins de pêche artisanale du Sénégal. COPACE/PACE SERIES 79/16(FR) http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X6601F/x6601f00.htm#Contents consulted March 30, 2013 SNCLavalin (2007). – Screening study Railway Corridor and Port Sites Simandou Project. File n° 604917, December 2007. SNCLavalin (2008). – Etude de caractérisation sociale et environnementale de base pour le chemin de fer – Rapport provisoire. File n° 604917, December 2008. University of Manitoba California. Cross cousin mariage. Anthropology website consulted on March 30, 2013. http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~anthrop/tutor/marriage/xcuz.html Page 86 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 87 Appendices Appendix I – Agriculture Rice varieties Rice varieties used around Kabak and the port area are a mixture of local and imported varieties. Local varieties tend to have a longer cycle and produce less but are preferred for their taste. Observations in more than 80 fields indicate that the following varieties were present. Table 46 – Rice varieties used by farmers in Kabak and the port area Variety Cycle (days) 150 120 120 120 150 90 120 120 120 180 180 150 150 Yéguéti Bontichi Tombolia Abou Maalé Taramakhè Kobaya Rock 5 Dembaya ragatè Kouli maalé Foé maalé Tonsèkérényi Mmah maalé Mma Yansanè maalé Kaolaka Condé Sanbgan maalé Fokofoko 150 150 150 150 Type of field Bogoni Bogoni Dara Dara Dara Dara Dara Dara Bogoni Bogoni Bogoni Dara Dara District/village Senguélén Senguélén Kénéndé Kénéndé Kénéndé Kénéndé Kénéndé Kénéndé Kénéndé Manké Manké Khounyi Khounyi CRD Mafèrinya Mafèrinya Kabak Kabak Kabak Kabak Kabak Kabak Kabak Kabak Kabak Kabak/Youlayé Kabak/Youlayé Dara Khounyi Kabak/Youlayé coteau Karangbani Kabak/Seydouya Dara Yélikéri Kabak/Tonguiron Bogoni Kibgéri Kabak / Seydouya Source: Field visits with farmers, July 2011. Origin Introduced Introduced Introduced Introduced Local Introduced Introduced Koba Local Local Local Local Local Local Introduced Introduced Kindia Local Local Manpower needs in rice cultivation Rice cultivation in the area is a very labour intensive activity for which most farmers have to resort to outside labour in the form of mutual groups, hired hands and the family: men, women and children. The following table indicates the kind of labour reported by a farmer for 1 ha of bogoni or dara land. Table 47 – Example of labour needs for bogoni and dara rice cultivation in Kabak February Duration in days 8 Number of workers 2 Men days 16 Cost in kFg 500 kFg July 2 1 2 150 kFg July July July 30 3 2 9 1 3 270 3 6 180 kFg - July 8 3 24 - August 4 3 12 360 kFg November 30 3 90 - Activities Period Irrigation channels clearing mangrove Fight against crabs (mangrove) Labour bogoni et dara Direct sowing Nursery for rice Surveillance Herbicide cleaning of dara Surveillance Harvest Threshing Transport Total December February February 5 10 50 3 7 21 1 7 7 501 Source: Field visits with farmers, July 2011. 194 kFg 210 kFg 1,594 kFg Observations Ballanté workers from Guinea Bissau Chemical products Local workforce Farmer Farmer’s household members Farmer’s household members Hired labourers Farmer’s household members Hired labourers Hired labourers F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 88 Among the labour intensive activities are the cleaning of the irrigation channels, the fight against invading crabs, preparing and sowing nurseries and fields, surveillance against birds, harvesting threshing and transport home. Yields evaluated in visited fields The team’s agronomist, after having measured the fields, evaluated with the farmers the yields obtained. Though this remains a rough estimation, it is indicative of the productivity of the fields. In Kabak, on 3 of the 20 farms visited, rice cultivation had failed due to soil salinity, and invading seawater. In these fields production was evaluated at 60 kg/ha, which did not cover the amount of seeds sown. In the other 15 farms on bogoni land the productivity was evaluated at about 1.5 T/ha, and in the 3 dara farms at 0.93 T/ha. This confirms the general knowledge that dara fields yield much less than bogoni fields. Table 48 – Yields evaluated for bogoni and dara rice fields in Kabak and the port area Village Bossimya Bossimya Karangbany Karangbany Kamème Kamème Kénéndé Khounyi Khounyi Khounyi Tolomalon Tolomalon Tolomalon Tolomalon Fili Kanké Sénguélén Sénguélén Kénéndé Kigbéré Kigbéré Total Surface [ha] Production [T] 1.5 1.5 0.25 1.8 0.4 0.25 0.8 1.9 1.5 0.5 1.8 0.8 0.45 0.35 0.4 0.7 5.2 2.9 0.3 0.9 2.00 5.00 0.032 4.00 0.32 0.20 0.98 1.50 0.05 0.08 0.98 0.98 0.77 0.30 0.65 1.70 7.50 5.40 0.20 0.80 Family days worked 293 92 163 210 58 150 64 114 152 160 86 86 40 94 166 416 76 77 Hired labour days 116 327 32 58 129 555 212 172 35 82 37 39 26 46 340 34 90 364 Mutual assistance men-days 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 160 40 20 80 90 120 20 80 300 20 0 Source: Field visits with farmers, July 2011. Yied failed fields 0.128 0.03 0.02 0.06 Yield bogoni Yield dara Yield per ha (all fields) 1.4 3 2.2 0.8 0.8 1.2 0.8 0.3 1.7 1.6 2.4 1.4 1.9 0.9 1.46 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.93 1.4 3 0.128 2.2 0.8 0.8 1.2 0.8 0.03 0.02 0.5 1.2 1.7 0.9 1.6 2.4 1.4 1.9 0.7 0.9 1.18 F E P E G Groupe d’Étude des Population F 7 Quai Voltaire, 75007 E Tel. 33 1 40 79 34 24 ou 33 1 40 79 e-mail bahuchet@ G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 89 Appendix II – Cultural heritage summary table Location of the villages District Matakang Village Matakang Cemetery and mosques Siminkhounyi, the great cemetery (GPS 299) Manika Wondy, the cemetery for the mandinka people descendants, (GPS 297) Cultural, religious and heritage sites Ancient village sites Other important cultural sites Minadagbon, sacret inlet The grave of a Jewish with a bridge (GPS 296) trader during the British colonisation (GPS 298) Kountounyi is the sacred rock of Matakang (GPS 302 and 303) Meriyah, the old commercial port of the English period (GPS 306) Fishermen villages Farmers villages Bolimanda ? Katonkho Yulaye Khounyi Youlaye Bakia tere Youlaye Youlaye Youlaye Kakende Yelibane Yelibane Yelibane Yetiya Yelibane Konimodiya Farmers village Fishermen village Farmers villages Gbinyi Ancient small English fortress The cemetery of the village Sacred place with the children cemetery The central cemetery of the village (GPS 294) The prayer space for the great religious ceremonies (GPS 295) The Lansanayah cemetery (GPS 460) and the lansanayah mosque (GPS454) The Bo Soryah cemetery (GPS 462) and the prayer space (GPS 463) Cemetery, great mosque and prayer space (selikene) Cemetery (GPS 335) and mosque (GPS 336) The cemetery (GPS 493) Mosque (GPS 337) and cemetery (GPS 338) Mosque and cemetery and Bilidera is a sacred site of the founding family (GPS 461) Sacred worship The ancient village Sourima is a sacred place The old British lighthouse (GPS 304) Tigui gbe is a thermal source of drinking water and a sacred site (GPS 307) Saata Bon, sacred site in high sea (rocks are venerated by few villages) The grave of the legendary giant Naby Yero with two stone steles (GPS 300 and 301) The old British artisanal fishing harbour (GPS 305) Sunken island with old cannons P E G Groupe d’Étude des Population F 7 Quai Voltaire, 75007 E Tel. 33 1 40 79 34 24 ou 33 1 40 79 e-mail bahuchet@ G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Location of the villages District Bolimanda Karangbani Cemetery and mosques contiguous (GPS 324) Mosque (GPS 490) and two cemetery: the ancient cemetery (GPS 492) and the new one (GPS 491) Kondebounyi is a sacred place close to the payer space (GPS 318) Bolimanda Gore The cemetery (GPS 326) Seydouyah Kenende Seydouyah Kenende Bolimanda Bolimanda Village Mouki Keka Seydouyah Manke Kalea Manke Manke Manke Tolomalon Bossimyah Bomodia Farmers villages Yourigbéya Touba Cemetery and prayer space (GPS 328) Cemetery and prayer space (GPS 328) The cemetery and the prayer space (seli kene) (GPS 312) Page 90 Cultural, religious and heritage sites Ancient village sites Other important cultural sites (GPS 325) The colonial house of Sema Sylla (GPS 489) Sacred altar consisting in a termite mound and a tree (GPS 317) N’Gago is a sacred stone at the entrance of the village (GPS 319) Sacred pond (GPS 316) Dara wondy, sacred site with an altar and a cave (GPS 313) Boniya Khounyi, sacred site with two stone steles (GPS 414 et 415) Dicony (the “devil”), sacred site with no access N’Bendiyah, the ancient village (GPS 327) The ancient village is identified by a cotton tree (GPS 331) Mosque (GPS 333) and cemetery (GPS 334) Mosque (GPS 329) Cemetery (FPS330) Cemetery (GPS 331) and the great mosque (GPS 332) Cemetery (GPS 339) The site of the concession founder shows a divinatory stone and a sacred tree (GPS 465) Bari Kide is a sacred site (GPS 320) Yensenyah bosquet is an haunted site (GPS 321) P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Page 91 Appendix III – Consultation meetings Consultation meetings were mainly about understanding the villages, but always started with a short explanation of the project, and any questions dealing with the project were answered, depending on the actual knowledge and information that the survey team had. Kabak agricultural villages Date Village District Type of meeting 17/07/2011 20/07/2011 Yelibane Yetiyah Yelibane Yelibane 5/07/2011 9/07/2011 18/07/2011 Bossimiyah Kenende Keka Bossimiyah Seydouyah Seydouyah 17/07/2011 15/07/2011 19/07/2011 Yulaye Manke Tolomalon Yulaye Manke Manke 18/07/2011 18/07/2011 19/07/2011 17/07/2011 Tonguiron Tonguiton Tonguiron Tonguiron Village questionnaire Abbreviated village questionnaire Village questionnaire Village questionnaire Abbreviated village questionnaire Village questionnaire Village questionnaire Abbreviated village questionnaire Village questionnaire Focus group Karangbani Bolimanda Abbreviated village questionnaire Total 12 consultation meetings Presence during the meeting Men Women Total 34 26 60 ? ? ? 19 30 ? 10 10 ? 29 20 ? 34 55 ? 40 9 ? 74 64 ? 23 0 47 15 70 15 ? ? ? 195 157 332 Observations Informal meeting with key informants Informal meeting with key informants Incomplete Informal meeting with key informants Informal meeting with key informants Type of meeting: abbreviated village questionnaire, village questionnaire, focus group, consultation meeting, etc. Kabak fishing villages Date 6/07/2011 20/07/2011 05/07/2011 District Yelibane Yelibane Yelibane Type of meeting Village questionnaire Focus group Village questionnaire Men 16 0 24 Women 4 16 10 Total 20 16 34 05/07/2011 11/07/2011 07/07/2011 Village Konimodiya Konimodiya Dabonkhore / Rapata Friah Matakang Baridabon Yelibane Matakang Kakossa Village questionnaire Village questionnaire Introduction meeting 20 13 ? 35 9 ? 55 22 ? 9/07/2011 Sangbon Seydouyag Abbreviated village questionnaire Khunyi Yulaye Village questionnaire Total 8 consultation meetings 25 2 27 15 113 13 89 28 202 14/07/2011 Informal meeting with key informants Type of meeting: abbreviated village questionnaire, village questionnaire, focus group, consultation meeting, etc. Port-Maferinya road Date 22/07/2011 23/07/2011 7/07/2011 23/07/2011 22/07/2011 24/07/2011 25/07/2011 Village Kalaya Sounganyah Moufoufanye District Senguelen Senguelen Senguelen Type of meeting Village questionnaire Village questionnaire Abbreviated village questionnaire Madinagbe Madinagbe Village questionnaire Touguiyere Senguelen Village questionnaire Tougande Morifindian Village questionnaire Sireya Morifindian Abbreviated village questionnaire Total 7 consultation meetings Men 8 10 5 Women 3 16 4 Total 11 26 9 51 9 15 6 1 1 57 10 16 ? ? ? 98 31 129 Informal meeting with key informants F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Appendix IV – Questionnaires used Q1. – Household questionnaire Q2. – Village questionnaire Q3. – Focus group discussion field guide Q4. – GPS-mapping observation sheet Page 93 F E P E G G. Koppert Simfer Railroad and Port – Socio-Economic Baseline and Census Survey Appendix V – Kabak Village Sheets The village sheets for the port area are included in the Kakossa report. In this report are included the following village sheets: Village sheet 9 – Yelibane Village sheet 12 – Bossimiyah Village sheet 13 – Bolimanda Village sheet 14 – Youlaye Village sheet 15 – Manke Village sheet 16 – Kenende Village sheet 17 – Tonguiron Page 95 F E