August 2011 Edition
Transcription
August 2011 Edition
August 2011 Edition EDITORIAL Great Expectation in Railway Sector The topic of this current issue of SUSTAINING PARTNERSIHP magazine covers the discussion about the railway sector. In many countries, railways have become the primary mode of mass transportation to reduce traffic congestion. On the other hand, railways are proven to be the most efficient mode in land transportation system both for passengers and cargo. In China, the government has a big ambition to continuously develop thousands of kilometers of railway routes for high speed railway. China having vast lands, is dreaming of linking its cities with high speed rail. Not only for domestic use, high speed railways will also be constructed to link Western China to India and Southern China to Singapore. It seems that transportation in Asia will soon be rebuilt. If other countries fail to grow and follow the changes in the transportation sector, they will lose a opportunity. As a consequence, other countries will occupy their transportation sector. What about Indonesia? Of course, Indonesia must also begin to improve. However, when government budget to develop railway infrastructures is limited, how can we find a solution? A system must be developed to allow active participation of relevant parties. Law Number 23 Year 2007 regarding Railways is designated to eliminate monopoly and encourage competition which would improve the quality of services. Private investment in the railway sector is running very slow. New investments only exist in new projects such as in East Kalimantan. In this project, Ras Al-Khaimah and Middle East Coal (MEC) have entered into a partnership to develop coal trains. How about the existing routes? Are there any investors, private or government, carrying fresh funds? It seems that it may take many years until an investor is brave enough to invest in the existing railway routes. ADVISOR Deputy Minister for Infrastructure Affairs, Bappenas DIRECTOR Director for Public Private Partnership Development, Bappenas CHIEF EDITOR Jusuf Arbi BOARD OF EDITORS Delthy Sugriady Simatupang, Gunsairi, Rachmat Mardiana, Novie Andriani, Mohammad Taufiq Rinaldi, Ade Hendraputra MANAGING EDITOR B. Guntarto REPORTER/RESEARCHER Sandra Kaunang, Agus Supriyadi Hidayat It is not that easy to open the market for the railway sector. It is even difficult to identify the limitations between the regulator and operator. For example, when a train caught fire in Rangkasbitung Railway Station, Banten, there was a debate on which party has the authority to maintain the train. Should PT Kereta Api Indonesia (KAI) sterilize the rail tracks or should the Directorate General of Railways do it? PHOTOGRAPHER Arief Bakri Furthermore, will the private sector “dare” to run and operate a new railway company if, subject to Decree of the Minister of Transportation Number 219 Year 2010, the authority to operate and maintain railways has been delegated to PT KAI? How will other candidate railway companies be certain of fair treatment in the operation and maintenance of railway tracks? What about infrastructure businesses? TRANSLATOR FROM INDONESIAN VERSION Setiana Some of the articles in this issue of Sustaining Partnership Magazine of will further discuss this issue. Please enjoy reading the magazine. Editor 2 SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP - August 2011 Edition GRAPHIC DESIGNER Indrie Soeharyo Infrastructure Reform Sector Development Program (IRSDP) BAPPENAS Jl. Tanjung No.47 Jakarta 10310 websites: www.irsdp.org Tel. (62-21) 3925392 Fax. (62-21) 3925390 CONTENT HEADLINE NEWS 4 THE FUTURE OF INDONESIAN RAILWAY SECTOR 7 1001 ISSUES IN THE RAILWAY SECTOR IN INDONESIA THE STUMBLING COMMUTER RAILWAY 10 WAITING FOR ARGO CAHAYA 12 Sarana Multi Infrastruktur 16 POTENTIAL PPP PROJECT Railway Outside Java 19 POTENTIAL PPP PROJECT PPP PARTNER PROFILE Minimizing Traffic Congestion PT SMI (Sarana Multi Infrastruktur) Government Prepares Monorail Project 22 PPP PROGRAM EDUCATION 21 25 FIGURE - Ignasius Jonan Learning From The Implementation Of Railway Issues Become My Homework PPP In India 27 NEWS AT GLANCE > ‘2011 Public Private Partnership Book’ Launching > Socialization Of PPP Regulation On Infrastructures August 2011 Edition - SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP 3 HEADLINE NEWS THE FUTURE OF INDONESIAN RAILWAY SECTOR The railway sector in Indonesia will revive although it is analog to a “locomotive” which has slow acceleration and could not run as fast as we want. However, we could see a light at the end of this dark tunnel as several railway projects are offered with the Public Private Partnership (PPP) scheme. Kalimantan, Kuala Kurun-Palangkaraya-Pulau Pisang-Kuala Kapuas Railway in Central Kalimantan, Jakarta Monorail, Integrated Railway Station in Gedebage Bandung, and Bangkuang-Lupak Dalam Railway in Central Kalimantan. In 2011 for instance, the Ministry of Transportation has offered 10 railway projects with a total value of USD 9.78 billion. This is the largest portion of all infrastructure projects which includes sea port, airport to terminal which was offered by the Ministry of Transportation in 2011 totaling USD 15.5 billion. Based on the Master Plan of Indonesia Economic Development Corridors (IEDC) as excerpted by Aviliani, from the total infrastructure investment needs of USD 76.2 billion (priority I: 2010–2015), the railway sector needs up to USD 29.9 billion. The ten projects include Soekarno-Hatta Airport Railway, Puruk Cahu-Bangkuang Railway in Central Kalimantan, Tumbang Samba-Nanga Bulik Railway in Central Kalimantan, Padang Monorail, Maratuhup-Kalipapak-Balikpapan Coal Railway, the terminal in East Kalimantan, Kudangan-Kumai Railway in Central 4 SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP - August 2011 Edition Aviliani, a Senior Economist from Institute for Development of Economic and Finance (Indef), in the 7th Annual Capital Market Update 2011 (19/7/2011) held by Citi Indonesia Securities and Fund Services; also presented railway potentials. Likewise, from the total infrastructure investment needs of USD 856.5 billion (Priority II:2016-2030), the railway sector took the largest portion of up to USD 342.2 billion. It is clearly stated there is strong enthusiasm to encourage the railway sector in Indonesia. RAILWAY DEVELOPMENT The acceleration of the development of the railway sector has been encouraged since 2007 in accordance with the enactment of Law Number 23 Year 2007 regarding Railways. This Law supersedes the former Railway Law Number 13 Year 1992. The fundamental issue of the new Railway Law is dividing of infrastructure and facility. As for infrastructure, it is the responsibility of the government to develop railway tracks, stations and operating facilities such as the signaling and electrification system. While, it is the private sector who is responsible for the purchase, operation and maintenance of locomotives, trains and passenger cars (Article 31). If no private company is interested, the local government alone will operate the railway facilities (Article 31 paragraph 2). The incorporation of a company requires government licenses (Article 32 paragraph 1), while the operating license will be granted according to the type of railway network to be constructed (Article 32 paragraph 2). Operating license for interprovince railway network is granted by the Directorate General of Railways, while the city or district government will issue licenses only for district/city railway networks. “The government will make breakthroughs in the tender of infrastructure projects including railways” Bambang Susantono said. One of the breakthroughs is the application of right to match in tender for project initiators if required. The Vice Minister of Transportation explained that right to match will be further regulated in the revised Presidential Regulation Number 13 Year 2010 in conjunction with Presidential Regulation Number 67 Year 2005 regarding the Cooperation between the Government and Business Entities in Infrastructure Provision. Tender is not required for Special Economic Zones (KEK) because acceleration is prioritized. After the coordination meeting at the office of the Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs, Jakarta (15/7/2011), the Vice Minister of Transportation informed that the government has assigned PT Kereta Api Indonesia (PT KAI) to develop the Soekarno-HattaManggarai Commuter Train. The commuter train will cross Duri-Tangerang Double Track with a length of 19.31 kilometers. To reach Soekarno-Hatta International Airport from Duri-Tangerang, a new railway with length of 7 kilometers will be constructed. PT KAI was also appointed to construct and operate those new tracks. The value of the project is approximately Rp 1.25 trillion which will be funded by the State Budget. The appointment was supported by a specific presidential regulation which demonstrates strong enthusiasm of the government to accelerate the development of the railway sector. “PT KAI was appointed since it is the only competent railway enterprise. PT KAI is given a right to select its own partner but they should engage the local government,” Bambang Susantono said. There is an impression that the government is becoming serious with the railway sector. Until 2013, the Directorate General of Railways targets to complete the double track in the North of Java. Out of a total of 727 kilometers from Jakarta-Semarang-Surabaya, Only 295 kilometers have been completed. The remaining 432 kilometers will be constructed with funds amounting to Rp. 9.01 trillion. The development of this double track railway will start from Cirebon-Brebes, Although four years has passed since the enforcement of the new Railway Law, not many investors have been involved in the development of new railway networks. There are merely very few new players which can be counted by hand, even only with one hand. Vice Minister of Transportation Bambang Susantono, when interviewed (12/7/2011) in his office, said that the government is trying as hard as it could to accelerate the implementation of railway projects. Vice Minister of Transportation Bambang Susantono (left), Vice Minister of Trade Mahendra Siregar (right), and Vice Minister of PPN/Vice Head of Bappenas Lukita Dinarsyah Tuwo (center), visited the dry-port project in Jababeka, Cikarang, West Java (21/6/2011). Photo: KOMPAS/Haryo Damardono August 2011 Edition - SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP 5 HEADLINE NEWS Pekalongan-Semarang and SemarangSurabaya. Upon completion, it is expected that container trains will operate and the burden of traffic roads will reduce. The completion of the double track railway in the Northern Coast of Java should be regarded as an opportunity for investors to develop their own railway companies, both for passenger and cargo trains. And hopefully, the government could provide fiscal incentives for the growing railway companies. Why? It is obvious that a train is equal to 20 units of trailer trucks. Fuel consumption of trains is only 0,002 liter per kilometer per person or in short; six times more efficient than a bus. Train emission is also the lowest compared to aircrafts and cars which is only 51.28 kg CO2 per 1.000 kilometers. IS IT PROFITABLE? Questions such as “Is doing business in the railway sector profitable?” may arise. Japan Railway East showed that railway business is profitable. In Fortune Global 500: The World’s Largest Corporations 2011, Japan Railway Company ranked 323rd with a profit of USD 890 million. How can JR East become a leading company? Having awareness that the Japanese Government would not subsidize the railway sector, JR East immediately developed non-core businesses to serve the community. There are three segments of non-core business of JR East which are: utilization of station shopping centres and offices; other services such as hotels, advertisements, fitness centers, and credit card services. In Indonesia, PT KAI is also capable of earning hundreds of billions of Rupiahs 6 SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP - August 2011 Edition although it has yet to optimize the six “gold mines”. First, passenger tickets. Second, businesses in the station such as kiosk or hotel room rentals. Third, business developed along the railway track such as installment optic fiber networks by Excelcomindo. Fourth, the use of space above the railway. Offices or overpass toll roads could be built above the tracks. Fifth, use of space under the railway tracks. For instance a shopping centre could be built below the railway tracks. Sixth, advertisement placed on train walls. To this date, placement of ads on the train wall and use of space along 4,675 km of railway tracks has not been done yet. Another business such as cargo transportation and utilization of space beneath railway tracks has been conducted although it is still unsatisfactory. Looking at the large potential of the transportation business, PT KAI is moving fast to invest in facilities. With a loan amounting to Rp 4.02 trillion from BNI and BRI, as agreed on March 2011, PT KAI has ordered 144 locomotives and 2,400 cargo cars. personal vehicles, and only 1.3 percent is transported by train. At the end of this year, the subsidy for fuel is predicted to exceed Rp 120 trillion. Amid the growing economic, there is also an increasing need for energy while there is stagnation of oil production. Well, the question is, how much hundred of trillions of Rupiahs will this country provide for fuel subsidy? When the government relies on the selling price of fuel to the market, railway transportation will become attractive. The question is what kind of transportation mode could be relied on to quickly transport cargo in large amount?. Now is definitely the right time–even as soon as possible, to develop the railway sector including with all of its facilities in Indonesia. When the time comes, railway transportation in Indonesia could become the vein of passenger and cargo mobility (HARYO DAMARDONO, KOMPAS daily journalist) If the future of the railway sector is unprofitable, big investors such as Warren Buffet would not invest substantial amount of money in Burlington Northern Santa Fe, a cargo railway company. The investment or acquisition of USD 34 billion was mentioned to be the largest “bet” ever made in the railway sector. Speaking about potentials, there is also big room for the railway business to grow. Based on the information from the Ministry of Transportation, 92.23 percent of cargo is transported by truck and only 0.96 percent is transported by the railway sector. As for land passengers, 98.8 percent is transported by bus and Vice Minister of Transportation (third from the left wearing a hat) visits the Cargo Railway Track in Tanjung Priok, Jakarta HEADLINE NEWS 1001 ISSUES in the RAILWAY SECTOR in INDONESIA It has been months since the Letter of the Minister of Transportation Number KA.005/1/5 Phb-2010 has not been replied by the Minister of Finance. In essence, the letter sent on July 2010 asked for equality in the treatment of railway and land transportation with a purpose to increase the role of railway transportation in Indonesia. Based on data from the Ministry of Transportation, about 92.23 percent of cargo is transported by truck and only 0.96 percent is transported by train. For land passengers, about 98.7 percent are transported by bus and personal cars and 1.3 percent is transported by train. The large portion of passengers transported by motor vehicles and overloaded trailer trucks has damaged public roads and caused fuel subsidy to swell. In his letter, the Minister of Transportation asked the Ministry of Finance to re-assess the implementation of non-subsidy fuel for the railway sector. When the letter was made, railway transportation paid 40 percent higher on non-subsidy fuel compared to trucks. In March 2011, the price of non-subsidy fuel for trains is 212 percent higher than solar for trucks. Fuel price constantly increases due to increasing demand. In addition, not so long ago, some Middle Eastern countries have suffered politic instability. The letter also explained that other than consuming higher priced fuel, railway transportation is also subjected to 10 percent Value Added Tax (VAT) and 13 percent track access charge. In December 2010, the President Director of PT KAI sent a letter to the Minister of Finance. PT KAI stated that they are ready to support the conversion of cargo transportation from public road to the railway under the condition that VAT is exempted. Law Number 18 Year 2000 and Government Regulation Number 144 Year 2000 regarding Taxation stipulates that only land and water transportation are not affected by VAT. “If the government wishes for better competitiveness of the railway sector, we propose for an exemption from VAT,” said President Director of PT KAI Ignasius Jonan in his letter number KU.301/XII/39/KA-2010. Until June 2011, no pro-railway sector policies have been issued. The railway sector must purchase non-subsidy Fuel and trucks are permitted to purchase subsidy fuel. There is no VAT exemption for the railway sector albeit it could August 2011 Edition - SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP 7 HEADLINE NEWS Previously, the Ministry of Transportation hoped that the packed drinking water transportation could have become the pioneer in railway cargo transportation and could have started to operate in the second semester of 2010. “Budget is limited, therefore, infrastructure can only be constructed the following year as we must wait for the budget,” stated Vice Minister of Transporation Bambang Susantono. The Director General of Railways visits rail track reparation in Jember, East Java provide a positive impact on the development of the railway sector. It is impossible to shift cargo transportation to the railway sector, especially when railway transportation costs are more expensive than trucks. In North Sumatera, due to higher cost, transportation of crude palm oil by railway could not compete with trucks. REDUCED LENGTH OF RAILWAY TRACKS The railway sector must face reality that it was defeated by land transportation in the competition. No wonder that the length of tracks in Indonesia has not grown but even reduced. In Indonesia, based on data collected by the Ministry of Transportation, there are about 6,714 kilometers of railway tracks in 2010. However, only 4.678 kilometers are in operation. There is also an additional of 300 kilometers of new tracks constructed during the era of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono but they are double tracks not new tracks. In terms of railway length, Indonesia is left behind. There are 91,000 kilometers of railways in China and about 65.000 kilometers in India. Thousands of kilometers of high speed rail is being constructed in China. 8 SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP - August 2011 Edition Ironically, although railway length is limited, land intended for railway development is occupied. The flyover pillars in Diponegoro-Pasar Kembang in Surabaya for instance, will “demolish” a part of land for the KarangpilangDermaga Ujung tram. Article 401 of Government Regulation Number 56 Year 2009 regarding Railway Administration regulates that “All inactive railway tracks are ‘temporarily closed’ not “permanently closed.” Several railway projects must be postponed due to unavailability of budget or obstacles which have yet to be solved by the government. For example, the operation of cargo trains for the transportation of packed drinking water is postponed and will proceed in 2012. The reason is because the Directorate General of Railways of the Ministry of Transportation has not completed the construction of the infrastructure. The Bogor-Sukabumi Railway track still uses the R33 model made by the Dutch colony. Therefore, it must be replaced to support passing locomotives. The length of this track is 26 kilometers costing Rp 15 billion up to Rp 20 billion per kilometer. In other words, additional funds amounting to Rp 520 billion is requried. At present, the residents of Sukabumi complain about traffic congestion in Ciawi-Sukabumi toll road. This is because the road is damaged due to the heavily passing trailer trucks carrying mineral water. No wonder that it takes 1-2 hours to travel a distance of 7 kilometers. A packed drinking water manufacturer in Mekarsari, Sukabumi, mobilizes 400 trucks every day. In other words, there is one truck in every four minutes. This will result in traffic congestion. Cargo trains operating on this route are needed not only for packed drinking water but also for containers. Meanwhile, although the Ministry of Transportation has completed the construction of three railway tracks in the dry port at Cikarang, West Java; it does not guarantee that PT KAI will optimally operate container trains to Tanjung Priok. Vice Minister of Transportation hopes that cargo trains to Tanjung Priok port could start operating in July or August 2011. “It is impossible to reach Tanjung Priok as railway track cannot reach Jakarta International Container Terminal (JICT),” said Commercial Director of PT KAI, Sulistyo Wimbo. In the meantime, Wimbo said, cargo trains are directed to Surabaya. The cargo railway route to JICT is blocked by the “Mbah Priok” site. An emplacement for cargo trains and a toll gate to Tanjung Priok will be built at the said location. It seems as though the government did not take part in Tanjung Priok so we doubt that the issue could be resolved soon. Development Law which is expected to cope with slow land acquisition has not been endorsed yet by the House of Representatives of RI. RE-INVESTMENT BUDGET GAP Lack of attention to railway sector can be easily identified by the existence of budget gap. For example in 2010, the Directorate General of Railways received Rp 4 trillion, while the Directorate General of Highways of the Ministry of Public Works received Rp 18 trillion. In 2011, the Directorate General Railways still received the same amount while the Directorate General of Highways received Rp 23 trillion. The ambiance in the women only car In terms of budget, it is not the first or second time the Ministry of Transportation “sold” the railway sector in order to be noticed by the Ministry of Finance. However, there is still no maintenance funds so don’t be surprised if the tracks are “bent” which causes vibration when the locomotive is running fast. What should we do when public investment funds are very limited? Liberalization could be proposed through Law Number 23 Year 2007 regarding Railways. People might sarcastically say that this law is used to conceal “injustice” in state funds. In contrast, the government denies it by stating that the law is meant to eliminate monopoly and encourage competition to improve the quality of services. In fact, it is not easy to apply liberalization. The limits between regulator and operator are hard to identify. Furthermore, will the private sector “dare” to run and operate a new railway company if, subject to Decree of the Minister of Transportation Number 219 Year 2010, the authority to operate and maintain railways has been delegated to PT KAI? How will other candidate railway companies be certain of fair treatment in the operation and maintenance of railway tracks? What about infrastructure businesses? It is not easy for new investors to construct new tracks if they wish to construct a separate route. In this Republic, land acquisition is hard to predict. The Land Acquisition for “Are there any other railway companies?” asked Taufik Hidayat, a researcher of railways from the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI). He will strongly request the Government to provide serious support to PT KAI. “To whom should they provide support to if not PT KAI?” he expressed. Taufik complained about the lack of seriousness of the government. The government, said Taufik, has never fulfilled any request for subsidy funds for Public Service Obligation (PSO) of PT KAI. While in fact, those funds can be used to operate economic trains as a form of the government’s obligation to its people. In 2010, funds requested for PSO were Rp 670 billion. On the other hand, only Rp 535 billion was disbursed. In 2011, Rp 775 billion was proposed but only Rp 639 of budget is planned to be allocated. It must be admitted that we are still a long way from satisfying the passengers. Although the root of the problem is PT KAI’s position which demands it to satisfy two bosses, the Minister of Transportation and the Minister of State Owned Enterprises. The Minister of Transportation often asks for the prioritization of services and safety rather than profit. Nevertheless, does the Ministry of State Owned Enterprises share the same opinion? Rules concerning profit must be written in black and white and investments for the sustainability of the operation of trains must be recorded as an achievement made by the board of directors. If not, PT KAI will prefer to store their profit to the Ministry of State Owned Enterprises. If the government favors its citizens, all profits of PT KAI totaling to Rp 240 billion in 2009 and Rp 280 billion in 2010 should be returned for railway investment. If profit made in two years amounting to Rp 520 billion is returned to PT KAI, there is no guarantee that our railway sector will revive. Why? Based on Article 214 of Law Number 23 Year 2007, the government must still fulfill the backlog of infrastructure funds amounting to Rp 17.47 trillion. There are so many issues in the railway sector. We can say “1001 issues in the railway sector”. If we want our railways to succeed, radical changes with a clear status is required. Without such change, our locomotive will remain to run slowly. Which no one knows until when? (*) August 2011 Edition - SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP 9 HEADLINE NEWS The Stumbling Commuter Railway In 1960, Washington DC commuter railway designer, Warren Quenstedt, started the construction of mass transportation in the capital of the United States with one question: “What kind of city do we need?” It seems that this kind of question asked by the visionary has never been asked to city residents in Indonesia. Blok M–Antasari and Kampung Melayu– Tanah Abang nontoll road flyover. Wouldn’t it be better if those funds were to be used to construct an flyover or underpass for trains to handle railway intersection problems? Rather than developing transportation network which reflects the city’s image, our cities have a messy transportation network since it follows the amoeba like city landscape. In general, transportation networks are not connected, as a result, we seem to have run out of ideas in serving the mobility needs of the growing population. The investment value for those six routes is also fantastic reaching up to Rp 40 trillion. With such amount of funds, we can buy 10,000 units of articulated buses and 5,000 unites of electric trains. If there is a question, can the provincial government of DKI Jakarta buy a train? Yes, if it intends to as it is permitted by Law number 23 Year 2007 regarding Railways. Ignoring the development of mass transportation will lead Jakarta to the death. However, we can mathematically count the life cycle of Jakarta which remains only 2-4 years from 2011. At that time, it doesn’t matter if you have a Porsche Cayenne Turbo 4.806 cc or Bajaj which is slightly more powerful than a coconut grating machine; you won’t be going anywhere with the severe traffic jam. Academics, observers and office employees who are bus and railway lovers have no idea why city development deviates from the theory of transportation. “Roads are continuously built, but railways are ignored”, said Anthony Landjar, Secretary of the Association of Railway Passengers (Aspeka). Jakarta – for example, is different. While many cities in the world are demolishing flyovers, Jakarta is constructing the 10 SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP - August 2011 Edition Moreover, when infrastructures are constructed to mobilize passengers but not for vehicles, DKI Jakarta keeps on dreaming of constructing six toll road routes in the city. While in fact, toll roads will potentially cause traffic congestion. Jakarta is a city with a widely distributed population. of the Electric Trains in Jabodetabek, Emperor Akihito donated 72 units of Air-Conditioned Electric Trains series 6000. Now, used trains from Tokyo Subway are operating in Jabodetabek. MASS RAPID TRANSPORTATION A commuter train at Skogskyrkogården Station, Stockholm, Swedia; Photo HD How can we extend the age of our city? Vice Minister of Transportation, Bambang Susantono confirmed that it could be extended with additional Trans Jakarta units and Electric Trains (KRL) as soon as possible. Interestingly, history recorded that in the hands of the Dutch East Indie government, transportation in Batavia was highly regarded. Since April 10, 1899, Batavia Electrische Tram Maatschappij (BETM) had operated electrified trams which inspired electric trains. Electrified trams in the Netherland, was firstly operated in 1899. However, in 1900s, transportation in other cities grew very rapidly. In December 1927, the first subway operated from Asakusa to Ueno Station. In that same year, Jakarta residents were still using Menteng–Harmony or Menteng–Gunung Sahari–Kota Bawah electric trams. In 2016, it is planned that Jakarta residents will enjoy phase I of Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) from Lebak Bulus–Bundaran Hotel Indonesia (15,2 kilometers). Eighteen sets of trams–each carrying six cars, are projected to transport 340,000 passengers per day. With MRT, the trip from Lebak Bulus–Hotel Indonesia will take only 30 minutes. The headway or distance between each tram ranges between five (busy hours) up to ten minutes. For phase I MRT, government will invest Rp 15 trillion with a loan from Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) ”Jakarta MRT is not a Public Private Partnership (PPP) because the government alone made the investment,” said the Vice Minister. However, the Vice Minister of Transportation added that, this project can be shifted to the PPP scheme if after construction is completed, it is tendered to the private sector,” Bambang Susantono said. Probably through tender, the government will obtain funds to expand the MRT network in Jakarta. Moreover, MRT network in Jakarta will stretch about 110.3 kilometers divided into two corridors which are the Southern-Northern corridor from Lebak Bulus–Kampung Bandan (23.3 kilometers) and Western-Eastern Corridor (87 kilometers). It will require not only funds for development of approximately Rp 1 trilion per kilometer but also hard work to realize it. ELECTRIC TRAIN Then, what about the passengers from the middle to lower class? With regards to railway based transportation, in Jakarta and its surrounding areas, economy class Electric Trains are the main choice although it is now being pushed aside by the Electric Commuter Line. As Makmur Syaheran, Corporate Secretary of PT KAI Commuter Jabodetabek said, a week after the implementation of the single operation system, the average number of Now, there are nine subway lines in Tokyo Metro Line (Ginza, Marunouchi, Tozai, Chiyoda, Yurokucho, Hanzomon, Namboku and Fukutoshin Line), and four subway lines in Toei Line (Asakusa, Mita, Shinjuku and Oedo Line). In contrast, Jakarta has none. In 2000, after seeing the poor condition A commuter train in Japan; Photo HD August 2011 Edition - SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP 11 HEADLINE NEWS commuter line passengers is 75-80 percent of the total Electric Train passengers. Makmur admited ”In terms of travel, the commuter line travels more which can reach 384 trips per day. On the other hand, the economy KRL only travels 112 times per day”. It is clear that, economy class trains are being pushed aside. An in depth survey is therefore required to identify whether there has been a shift from economy class trains to Electric Commuter Lines. Or, whether economy class train passengers have chosen to use motorcycles instead? We all wish that there would not be any major shifts to motorcycles since it could instigate a significant amount of externality starting from fuel subsidy, pollution, until traffic congestion. The application of the new operating system for the Commuter Line that started since July 2, 2011 showed several weaknesses. The matter of single operation should not be debated. It is a general and standard practice in the world that the metro network (city tram and commuter) stops at each station. KRD Bumi Geulis; Bandung–Cicalengka and KRD Patas; Surabaya–Sidoarjo and KRD Susi(Surabaya–Sidoarjo); and Yogyakarta–Solo and KRDE Prameks (Prambanan Express). We could not put too much hope in these commuters. KRD Susi for example, only consists of 3-4 passenger cars. KRD Sulam from Lamongan to Surabaya only departs two times per day. It is probable that KRDE Prambanan Express is the only adequate one as it has high travel frequency. What more can we do now? Factually, it has been four years since the liberalization of the railway sector but there aren’t any new investors willing to invest. In addition to the MRT project in Jakarta, there hasn’t been a single word regarding the development of railway transportation by a new investor. There is nothing, not even a plan for the operation or development of infrastructures and facilities. Even for other modes like monorail. Probably, prospective investors are ”afraid” about growing number of motorcycles in the our cities. Without adequate subsidy to minimize the ticket price, there will be low number of passengers of commuter railways as it must compete with motorcycles which use subsidized fuel. The problem is, for example in the city of Jakarta, the remaining time is two years. Jakarta must take revolutionary action–not only thinking–to significantly reduce traffic congestion. If funding issues arise, funds must be allocated more intelligently for transportation which should be prioritized. People will need Electric Trains rather than city parks, decorative lightings, or statues. Income earned from vehicle tax in Jakarta is Rp 5.5 trillion per year. It is better that this income should be reinvested in Electric Trains. Especially since the Railway Law allows room for investment by Local Government. We must not delay the development of commuter railway as the costs for traffic congestion will increase. (*) What must be brought to attention is the issue of tariff and its relevance with the minimum standard. Lots of passengers will be willing to pay Rp 7,000 for the Commuter Line which is higher than Rp 5,500 (AC economy class train) provided that it delivers satisfactory services. What kind of services must be provided? Punctuality, clear and real time information, and availability of adequate facilities. Nevertheless, without competitors, it is clear that PT KCJ and PT KAI will not be driven to optimize its services. Not only in Jakarta, PT KAI monopolies the commuter service in other cities. For example, Bogor–Sukabumi and 12 SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP - August 2011 Edition An Economy-Class Train Entering The Platform of Mangarai Station HEADLINE NEWS Waiting for Argo Cahaya A white-orange bullet train runs very fast along the western coastlines of Taiwan. It crosses the bridge, runs through the hills departing from Taipei to Kaohsiung. Local residents call it “Gaosu Tielu”. That’s the Shinkansen of Taiwan bearing the official name Taiwan High Speed Rail (THSR). Just like Shinkansen in Japan, Gaosu Tielu is very representative and comfortable with wide passenger cabin, soft train suspension, good-looking interior, reclining seats, wide leg space as well as clean and hygienic toilets. The passengers of THSR will of course feel more comfortable compared to economy class airplane passengers. THSR passengers should not make themselves busy by checking in the airport as THSR station is mostly situated in the center of the city which enable the mobilization of passengers. Getting on Gaosu Tielu railway train will deliver distinguished sensation. We will hear a thundering sound when entering a tunnel and feel the vibrating train body when passing by another train. In spite of high speed, passengers will remain comfortable doing their activities such as reading, typing on their iPad and sleeping. For passengers from third world countries who mostly have no high-speed railway network will find it exciting to see the speedometer screen in the passenger cabin. Especially since the digital instrument shows 300 kilometer per hour. Vice Minister of Transportation Bambang Susantono, in early June 2011, also rode on Gaosu Tielu from Taipei to Kaohsiung. At that time, the Vice Minister of Transportation was about to represent Indonesia in the 19th Intelligent Transportation System for Asia Pacific Region meeting. He stared at the speedometer screen although his thought may fly somewhere else. “Then, I asked myself whether it is possible to construct high-speed rail in the northern coast of Java island,” he said when interviewed at his office (12/7/2011). The corridor of north coast Java from Jakarta to Surabaya is the only one out of six economic corridors set by the government. Of course, it will require the vein of transportation to “link” the economic centers. Taiwan’s experience in linking its island of economy can be seen as a lesson. Until 1978, the economy of the two major cities which are Taipei in the north and Kaohsiung in the south (345 kilometers) had been linked with public roads and railways with a travel time of 1 day. Then, from 1978 until 2006, the Taiwan Freeway had enabled movement within five hours and starting from 2007, THSR has enabled the same distance to be reached in 90 minutes. “The August 2011 Edition - SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP 13 HEADLINE NEWS high-speed rail is the first massive investment in railway transportation mode. A total of 220,9 billion Yuan (Rp 290,6 trillion) has been disbursed for the Beijing–Shanghai highspeed rail network and for the period 2011–2015, 2.8 trillion Yuan will be budgeted for the development of 45,000 kilometers of high-speed rail network throughout China. As a comparison, Indonesia now only has 6.714 kilometers of railway network (year 2010). As a matter of fact, only 4,678 kilometers is being actively operated including the 3,333 kilometers of railway in Java and 1,345 kilometers of railways in Sumatera. The minimum railway network in Indonesia is straightly comparable to the minimum availability of State Budget and Expenditure for railway sector which is only Rp 4 trillion per year in average. The ambience in a Shinkansen train, Japan; Photo: HD economy in Taiwan island is now united,” the Vice Minister of Transportation said. At the beginning, THSR will be constructed and developed using government fund. However, there is an anxiety that I would burden the state finance which will potentially increase the tax rate. Therefore, it was decided to develop it under the Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) scheme. The construction of THSR is worth about USD 18 billion. Taiwan High Speed Rail Consortium who won the tender in September 1997 was granted concession rights for the operation of the high-speed railway for 35 years and a concession of 50 years for the operation of the railway station. CHINA HIGH-SPEED RAIL Still in the Asian region, in concurrence with the 90th anniversary of the China Communist Party, on June 13, 2011, China began operating its new railway train. CRH380A, a high-speed train manufactured by China linked Beijing with Shanghai (1.318 kilometers) for travel time of less than five hours. Previously, it would take about 11 hours. The two primary economic zones of China, Bohai and Yangtze River Delta are linked by the high-speed rail. It is also expected that high-speed rail will increase the economic growth in those two regions. For five hour travel, the ticket rate is 410 Yuan (Rp. 543,000) up to 1,740 Yuan (Rp 2.3 million). 220,000 passengers can be transported daily. As quoted form the news agency Xinhua, the Vice Minister of Railway Transportation of China Hu Yadong in Beijing confirmed that the opening of the Beijing–Shanghai super 14 SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP - August 2011 Edition Interestingly, China is not only planning to develop highspeed rail in its territory, it has greater ambition as recorded in the Article “China New Silk Railroad” written by Lee Chor Pharn and Sim Phei Sunn in Global Asia Journal, Spring Edition 2011. As a matter of fact, China has a big dream to linking BeijingKunming-Delhi-Teheran (East-West Corridor) and BeijingKunming-Hanoi-Ho Chin Minh–Bangkok–Kuala Lumpur–Singapore (North-South Corridor) with high-speed rail. The issue is, in the article, as quoted from the opinion of Research Institute of Applied Economics in the University of Barcelona; the rapid growth of high-speed rail in Europe and Japan might not improve the economic growth. The argumentation is, high-speed rail only relocates the centre of growth. The cities through which high-speed rail is constructed will enjoy the benefit, on the other hand, the economy of the medium-class cities have been absorbed to bigger and more dynamic cities. “Some cities will win, and some will lose,” wrote Lee Chor Pharn. This is true. Yet, the question is whether we want to join in the Asian high-speed railway system in Asia, where its development was initiated by China so we can enjoy the benefits? Or would we just pull ourselves away from the network? ARGO CAHAYA So, when will Indonesia build and operate its own highspeed rail? It is a difficult question to answer. Building a high-speed rail would need huge amount of investment. Besides, we still have to import high-tech equipment which we have not mastered yet. The infrastructures must be developed from zero to prevent single railway intersections and to ensure safety of the community living near the railway network. “From long time ago, we have planned to build high-speed rail Argo Cahaya from Jakarta to Surabaya. With a speed of 300 kilometers per hour, the travel time will be 2,5–3 hours,” he said, who is also the Chairman of the Railway Forum of the Indonesian Transportation Society, Djoko Setijowarno. If we follow the road map study of the Indonesian railway sector, it is theoretically assumed that Indonesia high-speed rail start operating in 2020. The study has been prepared by Japan Transportation Consultants as funded by Japan Bank for International Corporation. It is planned that Argo Cahaya will only stop in major cities such as Cirebon, Semarang and Surabaya. “However, it is not a cheap project. As a matter of fact, many infrastructures are not built yet. About the rates, we will discuss it to avoid expensive rate,” Djoko said. Due to high investment for high-speed rail, it is inevitable that the government will think of using APBN. Vice Minister of Transportation signaled that Argo Cahaya can be realized only through Public Private Partnership (PPP). “If any investor is interested in developing Argo Cahaya high-speed rail, I think the Ministry of Transportation should not wait long to issue the permit,” Bambang Susantono said. While we are still dreaming and studying, on February 2007, Vietnam announced the commencement of the development of Hanoi-Ho Chi Minh City High-Speed Rail project (1.630 kilometers). The investment will be 33 billion. Why Shinkansen? Why not Les Trains Grande Vitesse (TGV) manufactured by France or Inter City Express as operated by German? INKA is closer to Nippon Sharyo, the manufacturer of Shinkansen. Since its establishment on August 29, 1981, INKA has been trained by Nippon Sharyo. Japan was able to become a role model due to excess from Japan’s loans through Overseas Economic Fund in the amount of USD 525 million. From the loan, 400 cargo cars have been manufactured. While manufacturing, there is also transfer of technology. The first generation workers of INKA were assigned to Japan who among other include Roos Diatmoko who is now working as the President Director of INKA. If high-speed rail is to be realized, INKA will cooperate with Nippon Sharyo to manufacture Shinkansen type N-700. Shinkansen can transport 1,323 passengers in one trip which is equal to the capacity of 12 Boeing 737,300. Just like Taiwan High Speed Rail which is also operating Shinkasen, is it true that we will also operate Shinkansen–with the trademark Argo Cahaya? We are not sure yet. It depends on the investor or more exactly, the way our government can persuade the investors. (*) It seems that this republic must act strictly like China and even Vietnam. We must consider whether it is possible to build high-speed rail using State Budget or to give a “red carpet” to private investors to develop high-speed rail for us. Frankly speaking, many parties are impatiently waiting for the realization of Argo Cahaya. The long check-in process and congestion to Soekarno-Hatta Airport, has made so many groups of communities long for high-speed rail from the center of town in Gambir to Semarang or Surabaya. Moreover, some parties actually have expertise but without financial capacity. PT Industri Kereta Api (INKA) for example, who has enthusiastically promoted high-speed rail. In one of the corners at Indonesian Japan Expo 2008, INKA demonstrated the Shinkansen bullet train simulation which has been operating in Japan since October 1964. Shinkansen train; Photo: HD August 2011 Edition - SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP 15 POTENTIAL PPP PROJECT Until the end of 2011, coal production of PT Bukit Asam Tbk was targeted to reach 17,7 million tons higher compared to last year which was 12,5 million tons. The increase of transporting capacity of coal railway is the key factor to increase production. Moreover, there is no other transportation mode better than railway to transport the coal from mining sites. In other words, there is symbiosis of mutualism between PT Bukit Asam and PT Kereta Api Indonesia (PT KAI). No coal will be sold if no coal railway is present from Tanjung Enim, on the contrary, KAI will receive no substantial revenue without the coal transportation contract. The revenue from coal is so important for PT KAI. Moreover, it should be understood that passenger railway will not generate high profit. It is not surprising that PT KAI is even encouraged to borrow funds for investment to purchase the facilities and even to build the infrastructures. In the near future, on July 2011, there was a commitment for an addition of 40 units of coal cars. The facility aims to increase the transporting capacity from Tanjung Enim (South Sumatera) to Tarahan Port (Lampung) and Tanjung Enim to Kertapati Port (Palembang, South Sumatera). On January 2011, there are two state-owned banks, BNI and BRI, committed to provide loan in the amount of IDR 4,025 trillion to PT KAI. The fund will be applied to finance the purchase of 144 new locomotive units and 2,400 coal and cargo carts. “Out of 144 locomotives, 44 will be allocated to Sumatera and 100 to Java, while the cars purchased will consist of 1,200 coal cars and 1,200 cargo cars,” President Director of KAI, Ignasius Jonan said. From the previous order placed for locomotives, in September 2011, six CC205 locomotives are scheduled to be delivered 16 SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP - August 2011 Edition in September. While, from the ordered 20 CC 204 locomotives, 12 units have been delivered. “The remaining, eight units of locomotives will be handed over in September, VP corporate Communications of PT KAI Sugeng Priyono said. The CC 205 series Locomotive is a powerful locomotive manufactured by General Motors in Canada. The locomotive is operated in countries especially to pull cargo cars. Tempted by the huge profit derived from coal, PT KAI asked the permission of the government to work on the construction of double track in South Sumatera on its own. The Government, in this matter – Directorate General of Railways, Ministry of Transportation, has no adequate fund to construct railway infrastructures. In the initial stage, a 20 km double tracks railway will be constructed from X6 Station in Prabumulih to Niru Station. The first stage of the double track will be completed in November 2011. In the next stage, the 20 km double track is waiting for the detailed design. The 40 km long project will be tendered this year so it could be completed in early next year. PT KAI is also enthusiastic to develop and manage Srengsem Coal Terminal in Lampung. However, the intention and step undertaken by PT KAI has exhibited the presence of private partnership to increase coal production of Bukit Asam State Owned Enterprise. Its dividends will be used for state development. In Sumatera Island, there are plenty of coal potentials which could not be explored due to limited transportation facilities. In Riau, there is deposit of 15 million tons of coal, in West Sumatera, there is 26 million tons, in Riau, there is 36 million tons, and in Jambi there is 9 million tons. by using the road as the vein of human and cargo mobility. On the other hand, coal exploration is facilitated. Teras Narang does not only prohibit coal trucks to operate, but to offer a solution in form of a coal railway development project. When we were about to transport 22.7 million tons of coal in South Sumatra–there are actually a deposit of 2,65 billion tons of coal in the earth in South Sumatera. Moreover, there 22.24 billion tons of coal in South Sumatera. PPP IN KALIMANTAN BEST TRANSPORTATION Lessons on how mining operations are performed in a responsible manner must be learned from Kalimantan. In other words, it is not only to enrich the company but also empowering the local community. As a minimum, it will not disturb the people around the mine. Before the prohibition of coal transportation through state roads in South Kalimantan in July 2009, the people in South Kalimantan had experienced traffic difficulties due to the damaged Trans-Kalimantan road in Kandangan–Banjarmasin through which around 3,000 brick transporting trucks pass the roads. The damaged roads are not only wavy or holed, but there are also large holes in the middle of the road. The size of holes is not only some square meters, but the size of a truck. In May 2009, the Provincial Government of Central Kalimantan initiated the Puruk Cahu – Bangkuang Coal Railway Project with length of 185 kilometers. This project is offered under the Public Private Partnership (PPP) scheme. The new Railway Law Number 23 Year 2007 permits the provincial government to tender railway projects in the province. This is the era of liberalization in the railway sector. It is expected to realize the development of various railway infrastructures. It must no longer depend on the government to develop railway infrastructures. The estimated funds required for the development of the railway project in Central Kalimantan is USD 1.5 billion. The concession offered is about 30 years with an estimated economic internal rate of return of 279 percent. The costs for land acquisition will be borne by investors as part of investment. In spite of this, the provincial government of Central Kalimantan is committed to support the acquisition of 16 million square meters of land. It is not a surprising that trucks must travel in days only to reach tens kilometers. There were also cases where merchants who were trying to get profit but only suffered losses due to the demise of livestock transported by the truck. State funds disbursed for road asphalting is a waste without trace. There is a classic cause, damaged state road, and eroded asphalt by coal transporting trucks and due to excessive load. The strict stance of the Provincial Government of South Kalimantan has urged coal companies to construct industrial roads. If you travel from Banjarmasin–Batu Licin–to Balikpapan, we can see coal roads separated from state roads. The governor of Central Kalimantan, Agustin Teras Narang, is trying to protect the quality of roads in the province. The objective is to maintain economic growth PT Bukit Asam coal mining in South Sumatra. Photo: HD. August 2011 Edition - SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP 17 POTENTIAL PPP PROJECT between the Provincial Government of East Kalimantan, Ras Al Khaima Minerals and Metals Investment with an investment of USD 900 Million. The 3rd railway track from Tabang–Lubuk Tutung (185 kilometers), will be constructed by PT Gunung Bayan with investment value of USD 1 billion. OBSTACLES IN COAL RAILWAY There is a possible question, with abundant coal deposit in Indonesia, why were coal railways not constructed from long time ago? First, there the Railway Law was not as liberal as nowadays. Secondly, there was no preference to railway transportion. Transportation of freight goods in Manggarai Railway Station, Jakarta. Especially since 70 percent of the land required involves state land. Investors are requested to participate in the construction of railways, bridges and signaling system and to build station, service center, railway depot and coal loading and unloading facility. The operation and management is also subcontracted to investors in order for them to build the system. In Indonesia International Infrastructure 2011 Conference and Exhibition in Jakarta Convention Center, on 14 April2011, the Governor of East Kalimantan, Awang Faroek Ishak, also offered investments in the railway sector for coal transportation. East Kalimantan, is very rich of coal. Coal resources in this province will reach about 19 trillion tons, distributed in East Kutai Regency, Kutai Kertanegara, West Kalimantan, Penajam Paser Utara, Berau, Bulungan and Nunukan. The production is 150 million tons per year. One of the first PPP projects offered in this Republic is the railway in East Kalimantan. Even foreign investors such as from United Arab Emirates, Ras Al-Khaimah were successfully engaged. The investment released by Ras Al-Khaimah for Muara Tuhup-Kalipapak–Kota Bangun–Samarinda–Balikpapan (361 kilometers) reached USD5 billion. . The 2nd railway track from Muara Wahau–Lubuk Tutung (150 kilometers) was implemented in cooperation 18 SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP - August 2011 Edition In North Sumatera for example, Crude Palm Oil (CPO) Transporter Trains failed to compete with trucks due to the lower rates offered by trucks. This is because there is a subsidy for fuel for trucks while the industrial engine fuel rate applies to the railway sector. On July 2010, the Minister of Transportation applied equal treatment to both the railway and land transportation sector by equalizing the fuel prices. As referred to in the Letter of Minister of Transportation Number KA.005/1/5 Phb-2010, the Ministry of Transportation plans to convert the mode of transportation to railway. Based on data of the Ministry of Transportation there is imbalance in the transportation sector. At present, 92.23 percent of cargo is transported by trucks and only 0,96 percent by railway. “If the government wishes for better competitiveness of the railway sector, we recommend exemption from VAT for the railway sector,“ stated the President Director of PT KAI Ignasius Jonan in his letter No. KU.301/XII/39/KA-2010. Law No. 18 Year 2000 and Government Regulation No. 144 Year 2000 regarding Taxation define that land and water public transportation is exempted from VAT, but VAT still applies to the railway sector. If there is clear competition between trains and trucks, there should be an exemption from VAT, the process of land acquisition for railways should be simplified, and more PPP projects in the railway sector for coal transportation should be granted. More coal can be explored, under a condition that it is for the welfare of the republic (*) POTENTIAL PPP PROJECT MINIMIZING TRAFFIC CONGESTION Government Prepares Monorail Project The transportation sector plays an important role in promoting national economic growth. Specifically, local transportation plays an essential role in mobilizing the economy, development and social activities of the local community. A good transportation system is expected to improve the local community’s welfare. Central and local governments have created a solution to minimize traffic congestion in all major cities in Indonesia. For example, the railway sector as set forth in Law Number 23 Year 2007 is designated to long distance land transportation and congested areas. In order to minimize traffic congestion, the government has implemented several innovations including the operation of Trans Jakarta and a mass transit system that uses a single rail called monorail. Jakarta as the pilot project for monorail development has received serious attention from the government recalling that the project has commenced since 2004, but was terminated due to the considerable amount of investments required. The Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs, Hatta Rajasa, has recently confirmed that the government is ready to provide financial support for the development of stalled infrastructure projects due to lack of funds. “To resolve the issue of traffic congestion in Jakarta, the government is now ready to provide financial support to the Jakarta monorail mega project,” he emphasized. The total cost required for monorail development is USD 475 million or approximately Rp 4.5 trillion consisting of rail construction totaling about USD 255 million and the development of rolling stock, telecommunications and signal which costs USD 220 million. Funding support which has been disbursed by the Government includes compensation payment for construction costs amounting to Rp 204 billion to PT Jakarta Monorail. Another contribution from the central government is the financing of 42% of the total construction cost. Private companies as investors are also engaged to fulfill the funding needs through the Public Private Partnership PPP) program. A number of foundation pillars for rail tracks along Asia Afrika street, Gelora street to HR Rasuna street have been erected since 2007. Some of these pillars have been concreted while on the some other pillars, you can still see the steel structures due to incomplete work. The government only needs to continue working on the existing foundation pillars for the construction of the monorail tracks. In the future, the project will be fully assigned to the Provincial Government of DKI Jakarta as the developer and operator. August 2011 Edition - SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP 19 POTENTIAL PPP PROJECT Monorail pillars in Patal Senayan, Jakarta. Based on the time of implementation, construction work will take place in 20112013 and the monorail is expected to operate in 2014. “The central government is willing to provide assistance because Jakarta requires roads, trains including the acceleration of the implementation of the circle line. Now we are waiting for action,” said Hatta Rajasa. As a region aiming to become a world class city, it is now the time for Jakarta to have its own monorail. Many people consider that monorail is the most effective solution to cope with traffic congestion in Jakarta. Another advantage is that monorail is more environmentally friendly. Moreover, monorail will reduce the rate of accidents since it has no intersections. The monorail in Jakarta consists of two lines. Firstly, the green line with a length of 14.3 kilometers, will run through the triangle area routed Casablanca–Semanggi–Gelora Bung Karno DPR/MPR Building-Karet Sudirman–Casablanca. Secondly, the blue line routed Kampung Melayu-TebetCasablanca-Karet Sudirman-Cideng-Roxy spans for 12.7 kilometers. It is estimated that the monorail is capable of transporting 270,000 passengers per day. BANDUNG AND PADANG As a matter of fact, not only Jakarta is planning to implement the monorail system. The governments of Bandung city and West Sumatera also have the same intention. Although the cost is more expensive than busway since the government must construct a separate line, monorail has added value as it utilizes road width more efficiently. In addition, when compared to other vehicles, the level of fuel consumption is significantly more efficient. Likewise, it also emits lesser quantity of gas compared to personal cars and buses. In Bandung, the monorail is planned to be constructed for 11.2 kilometers long stretching from Northern to Southern Bandung with 13 stations. The monorail will run from Dago Bengkok to Pasirluyu. It will also be a part of the revitalization project of Cikapunding River with a main target to revitalize the river and reduce traffic congestion. The monorail will be supported by 16 fleets ready to transport 10,000 passengers every 3-5 minutes. The total capacity of passengers served will reach 26.8 million passengers in a year. The total cost required for Bandung City monorail is about USD 414.40 million. Assuming that monorail could generate revenue of about USD 82.88 million. Thus, the break even point of investment will be achieved within 5 years. The Mayor of Bandung City, Dada Rosada admitted that the Bandung City Monorail Project is urgently required to be implemented to resolve traffic congestion in Bandung City. He is waiting for policy and financial support from Bappenas. ”We will discuss it over later. We don’t know the distribution of costs between the central and city government,” he said. He has recently requested assistance from Bappenas for the monorail project with an amount of Rp 500 billion. Meanwhile, a number of foreign companies have expressed their willingness to participate as a partner because Bandung Monorail is considered to be a very potential investment. Some of those foreign companies come from Malaysia, Taiwan and Canada. A private company called Panghegar Group was granted license to carry out construction work including the procurement of budget and operation of transportation services. “Many foreign investors put their interest in the Bandung Monorail Project. The matter of who will be elected as the partner will be governed by the applicable rules. This will be awarded through tender,” the Managing Partner of Panghegar Group, Joko Cahyono said. Despite this fact, the realization of Bandung City Monorail Project is waiting for a green light from Bappenas. Meanwhie, the monorail project in Padang is a plan of West Sumatera Government in order to reform its mass transportation system on an integrated basis. This project which will stretch for 31 kilometers covers Bayur Port Bay, business center district, government center, Minangkabau International Airport and a few universities in Padang. This is also a part of the government’s plan to realize Padang New City. The estimated amount of budget cost for the project is USD 465.00 million. The preparation of this new project will commence this year and will be followed by tender and contract signing in 2012. Construction work will start from 2012 to 2016 and the monorail in Padang is expected to start operating in 2017 (*). Monorail pillars in Rasuna Said Street, Jakarta. 20 SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP - August 2011 Edition PPP PARTNER PROFILE PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (PT SMI) was incorporated on February 26, 2009 as an effort made by the government to promote the acceleration of national infrastructure development. PT SMI was incorporated due to the condition of the global economy, the vital role of infrastructure development in promoting economic growth, financing gap and the need to promote infrastructure development. As a company where 100% of its shares are owned by the Ministry of Finance, PT SMI is one of the government’s effort to attract private companies to invest in infrastructure programs. In addition, the government has also established Indonesia Infrastructure Guarantee Fund (PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (Persero)) and coordinated with several countries to seek for funding. Acceleration aims to ensure the smooth implementation of Public Private Partnership (PPP) by revising policies to favor PPP; regulatory reform which includes general regulation on PPP, procedures for obtaining government support and guarantee and tax incentives; the establishment of PT SMI, PT Indonesia Infrastructure Finance ( PT IIF) and PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (PT PII); and capacity building. The scheme of government support and guarantee in PPP projects is illustrated in the chart below. PT PII provides guarantee for certain investment risks to expand the project opportunity of PPP projects and to improve the security of private investors. PT SMI and PT IIF provide funding support for infrastructure projects. The three institutions (PT SMI, PT PII and PT IIF) play a role to accelerate the development of infrastructure projects through consultation services on project feasibility studies, funding schemes and et cetera. They can also provide recommendations to the Government of RI based on actual issues in the form of fiscal policy, policy reform and et cetera. In addition, the three institutions have also conducted socialization through forums such as investor and infrastructure forums. Through Decree of the Minister of Finance No. 126/KMK.01/2011, the government has assigned PT SMI to support two infrastructure projects. Their job is to facilitate the preparation of PPP in the development of the Soekarno-Hatta Airport–Manggarai railway infrastructure and Umbulan Water Supply, East Java. In their presentation at IIICE 2011, another project supported by PT SMI in East Indonesia includes Air Terang Modo Project in Central Sulawesi, Tanjung Pinang Project in Gorontalo, Murphy Semai Oil Logistic Plant Project in Fakfak Regency Papua, MalalaTolitoli Project in Central Sulawesi, Regional Irrigation Project in Sorong Regency, West Papua and Stage IV of the Marissa Project in Sorong Regency, West Papua. August 2011 Edition - SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP 21 PPP PROGRAM EDUCATION LEARNING FROM THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PPP IN INDIA Indonesia is actually already familiar with and has been implementing the Public Private Partnership (PPP) Scheme in the development of infrastructures since 1990s. Nevertheless, the government has just realized that in the last five or six years, to manage the gap in infrastructure funding, the participation of private sector is required. In the past, the government has already applied PPP but in such a sophisticated manner that merely the elite could receive an offer to implement a project. The economic crisis which struck most countries in Asia in 1997 has materially changed almost all aspects in Indonesia. Political reform has created a new socioeconomic environment that caused many PPP projects to be cancelled. As a consequence, the level of our infrastructures is poor. In the 2005–2009 National Midterm Development Plan, the government realized that to attain the 22 SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP - August 2011 Edition targeted economic growth level of 7 percent per year, better infrastructures are needed. Adequate infrastructures are mostly needed for development. In early 2005, the President announced that the Government had no funds to resolve infrastructure issues, thus, the participation of private sector is a must. Through the enactment of a Presidential Regulation, the Committee for the Acceleration of Infrastructure Provision (KKPPI) was established. KKPPI is chaired by the Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs with the Minister for National Development Planning / Head of National Development Planning Agency as the executive chairman. INDIA’S EXPERIENCE At present, India is implementing its infrastructure development program costing more than USD 500 billion. As a developing country, India is now the focus of global investment. Domestic investors and local developers are acting as the locomotive for infrastructure investment with an average Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) totaling to 10 percent except in particular sectors such as airport and seaport where FDI is significantly higher. In addition, India is relatively successful in managing all aspects related to infrastructure development under the scheme of partnership with the private sector. India and Indonesia have many similarities. Both countries experience a relatively stable economic growth and are striving to maintain the level of economic growth. With such condition, Indonesia can learn from India’s experience in the implementation of PPP. Examples of PPP project in India: > Airport in Delhi, Mumbai, Hyderabad & Bangalore > Jaipur-Kishengarh and Delhi-Gurgaon Toll Roads > Mumbai and Hyderabad Metro Railway > Sasan(MP), Mundra (Gujarat), Krishnapatnam (AP) and Tilaiya (Jharkhand) Power Plants > JNPT, Chennai & Tuticorin Container Terminals > 15 Container Railway Operating Concession > Power Transmission in Jhajjar, Haryana > 161 National Toll Roads (12,005 km) > 137 Local Toll Roads (8,862 km) > 22 National Ports and 57 Local Ports. India, like Indonesia, is a democratic country which has adopted the decentralized government system. A India will require large investments in network infrastructure, http://pppinindia.com robust economy and substantial needs of infrastructures for backup is required to stimulate growth. As a result, the participation of the private sector is required to fulfill the large funding needs to maintain growth momentum. The experience of India in implementing PPP is divided into four main categories. First, the shift of paradigm for all shareholders which has been successfully conducted. Initiative reformation which relies on universal leadership by the head of government was also successfully conducted. Infrastructure reformation in India is led by the Cabinet Committee of Infrastructure (CCI) and chaired by the Prime Minister. PPP received wide support from all government agencies. India has the second largest road network in the world, http://pppinindia.com Second, funding for the provision of infrastructures. Similar to Indonesia, there is competition in demanding budget resources for public programs such as infrastructures, health, education and rural development. On the other side, budget allocation cannot be increased more than 9 percent per year. In the real condition, dependence on private investment is unavoidable. In india, private equity is not viewed as an obstacle and the market has responded positively towards it. Loan required by the public sector and private companies is about USD 247 billion in 11 years (2007-2012). An annual growth of 12-15% for passenger traffic has been projected, http://pppinindia.com Unfortunately, bank loan period is less adequate as their deposit account is short or medium term. Differences in liabilities and assets arise as serious problem inflicting regulations on long-term financing facilities by banks. Short Term Loans will increase the cost (retribution) and the bank must be very prudent in transacting with the borrowers for project funding. Third, good governance. The typical problems related to good governance in India are the perspective of the ruling officials, the reluctance to surrender control in construction and operation projects, objection towards ranking, inability and inefficiency of projects and bigger demand for PPP projects compared to the existing supply. One of the major steps taken by the government to improve good governance is the establishment of CCI which is chaired by the Prime Minister. CCI is supported by a PPP evaluation committee that evaluates and provides recommendations for all national PPP projects for the central government. This evaluation committee has completed 205 projects with an investment value of up to USD 43 billion. CCI is also supported by an empowerment committee to evaluate and approve proposals from state or local governments to obtain funding due to the Viability Gap Funding (VGF). This committee has performed 65 projects valued USD 11 billion. Last but not least, the clear and transparent procedure in PPP process. For all stakeholders and most investors, clear and transparent documentation of PPP is highly essential. PPP GOOD GOVERNANCE In India, PPP has been integrated into the planning process. Ministries still play their own roles, but maintain coordination with CCI to develop and implement world class infrastructures. Coordination among ministries and multidiscipline dialogs are carried out to enrich the results and to minimize potential conflicts. Consultation with stakeholders, including users and investors must be accompanied with the simplification and standardization August 2011 Edition - SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP 23 PPP PROGRAM EDUCATION of documents and processes of PPP implementation. The government continuously promotes the creation of a lucrative environment for private investments. In supporting this, a standard document to accelerate the flow of investment and to ensure competitive and adequate services is used. The improvement of the implementation of PPP also utilizes budget and Loan/Grant. It also includes the acceleration of PPP project preparation and long term funding support for the infrastructure sector. The aim is to provide world class infrastructure service. In order to develop the capacity of human resources involved in the PPP scheme, it is necessary to see successful examples of PPP projects, resource persons with broad and in depth knowledge, a clear concept and procedure for PPP process either domestic or overseas. The government must provide trainings starting from decision makers at the upper levels to field technical operators. It is also necessary to strengthen the correlation between disciplines in scientific studies where its implementation is expressed in the Project Development and Management document including the feasibility study. It is also necessary to carry out an in depth study on infrastructures and financial institutions. At the conclusion, it is necessary to seek comprehensive solution for the people and private investors. KEY FACTORS TO THE SUCCESS OF PPP The key factor to the success of PPP is the commitment of the highest authority (President or Prime Minister) which is implemented in the form of government support through Viability Gap Funding. The source of funding of VGF derives from 24 SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP - August 2011 Edition There has been a significant uptrend in domestic and international air travel, http://pppinindia.com the central and state government budget where each provides a maximum of 20% of the project cost payable upfront. The management of this financing facility must be carried out by the Empowered Committee under the authority of the Minister of Finance who will evaluate and approve the request of National PPP Projects who wish to secure VGF. India requires an additional 100,000 MW of generation capacity by 2012, http://pppinindia.com The central government provides security for regional PPP projects as credit enhancement to build and improve the trust of banks in project funding. The government also provides long term subordinate loans such as quasi equity to reduce mismatch with commercial banking which does not provide long term loans. In addition, the government also provides other incentives such as tax holidays, import tax exemption for particular equipments used for infrastructure development, loosen the regulation regarding the limitation of the participation of foreign investors and et cetera. As for land acquisition for toll road projects, NHAI (National Highway Authority of India) acquired approximately 80 percent of land. Previously, it was fixed to 50 percent before the construction of projects. The remaining will be completed during the construction. The government applies strict selection for projects. The aim is to shorten and simplify the appraisal and approval process for PPP project. For such purpose, the PPP Appraisal Commitee (PPPAC) is chaired by the first echelon official of the Ministry of Finance and its members comprise of first echelon officials of the Planning Committee and other Ministries. PPP project proposals will be evaluated or assessed by the Planning Commitee and the approval will be issued by PPPAC. PPPAC will only approve financially feasible national PPP project proposals. This means that projects have high level of demand and wide commercial prospect will be approved. In general, India also struggle to implement PPP. In order to reach the objectives of infrastructures provision for improved development, Indonesia must follow the way of other countries. As an illustration, India is a good example for us to learn. (*) References: > “Public Private Partnership (PPP) in India: Lessons Learned for PPP in Indonesia”, Directorate of Public Private Partnership Development, Bappenas. > “Learning from India’s PPP”, by Eko Wiji Purwanto, Jakarta Post, 15 April 2011. FIGURE President Director of PT KAI Ignasius Jonan RAILWAY ISSUES BECOME MY HOMEWORK Working at PT KAI (Persero) is a new experience for Ignasius Johan. However, we should tolerate this since he has always dealt with banks. He was the President Director of PT Bahana Pembinaan Usaha Indonesia (2001-2006) and managing director of Citigroup (20062008). Jonan, being his nickname, was appointed by the State Minister for State Owned Enterprises as the President Director of PT KAI on February 25, 2009. “I used to deal with bankers, but now I have to manage passengers. I used to spend my days in the bank, but now in the railway station. So funny isn’t it? He joked. “What should I do next? This is the government’s decision, I have to take it,” he added. I will continue the targets set by the former Board of Directors,” expressed this man who was born on June 21, 1964, winner of Sanggraha Krida trophy from Minister of Sports and Youth in 2010 in Jakarta. According to Jonan, discussing about railways will be very complex as there are many related aspects. The government aspect acts as regulator, the train and rail aspect acts as infrastructure – including railway tracks – the station aspect acts as supporting infrastructure until the community aspect as the end user of railway services. All aspects will need serious attention and synergy. many objectives by creating sense of security, punctuality and convenience, it is not, however, an easy job. It requires careful and attentive measures. Now, how can Jonan deal with such situation? ”I already told you many times that it could not be dealt at once. At the moment, we are focusing on the improvement of services, security and punctuality. When this can be realized, we will then begin to handle other aspects,” affirmed the man who attended The commitment of the Government to create railway as mass transportation with satisfactory services will cover Jonan is not the follower type. Despite having little experience in the railway sector, he is a strongly motivated person. He seriously studied information on policy, regulation, development and condition related to railway sector. There is a simple consideration behind this. “How can I make decisions if I understand nothing,” he said. As a result, albeit his different background, he could professionally manage PT KAI. ”The important thing is, August 2011 Edition - SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP 25 FIGURE Commuter line in Depok station, West Java. the Senior Managers in Government Program at Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, USA. The first simple thing is the appearance of trains. If trains appear nice, without graffiti on its walls has clean toilets and stations, it will create a satisfactory first impression in the community. The appearance of the train is one of the important aspects in services. It is unavoidable that the first measure adopted by Jonan is the cleaning of dirty trains. This can be seen from the trains which look cleaner now. The station now looks tidier and cleaner. Safety is an important element since it is could affect the company’s image. Whatever the services, if accidents still occur, this will mean nothing. Therefore, Johan always reminds the operators to perform their duties in a professional manner. intended to enable each division to work with focus and more optimally. Public Private Partnership (PPP) scheme in the provision of infrastructures. Furthermore, what about infrastructures at present? Jonan admitted that it is not a wrongful mindset that trains are used for long distance transportation. However, nowadays, the problem of traffic congestion has become more severe. Hence, trains must also serve as short distance transportation. ”The term is commuter, which is operated within the city,” he explained. On the other side, KAI is still surrounded by classical issues to which a solution must be sought such as the traffic flow during Lebaran day, minimum fund allocation for Public Service Obligation (PSO) to operate economicclass trains and issues related to financial losses sustained by the company. Jonan admitted that this is his “homework” which must be completed. PT KAI will immediately construct the Soekarno Hatta Airport–Manggarai commuter project. This step is taken to minimize traffic congestion in the city of Jakarta and toll road to the airport. The double railway track of Duri–Tangerang will also be constructed. “Those are listed in my agenda. However, my obsession is how the railway sector, with support from all relevant stakeholders, could become a mass transportation which one could be proud of due to its exceptional services, safety, and provide satisfaction to everyone,” Ignasius Johan added. ”We have coordinated with the relevant parties”. We have made the preparations,” he said. The development of Soekarno Hatta–Manggarai railway commuter with a length of 7 km will require investments of about Rp 2.25 trillion, while the double track railway of Duri–Tangerang with a length of 19.31 km will require double amount of cost. It is planned that the realization of the projects will be carried out under the In general, another major homework is to make cargo transportation as an alternative primary service of PT KAI. Aside from being cheaper, this will also prolong the life of roads which are usually damaged due to passing heavy vehicles. Just imagine, at present, more than 92% of cargo is transported by truck yet those transported by train is less than 1%. It is definitely not an easy homework. (*) “If safety is achieved, punctuality must be achieved as the second priority. Thereafter, services and comfort,” he said. One of the disaster prevention steps is to enforce the No Go Item policy which obligates fleets to comply with standards. Another breakthrough made by this art collector is to separate PT Komuter Indonesia and appoint it as a subsidiary of PT KAI that specifically handles railways in Jabodetabek. This is mainly 26 SUSTAINING PARTNERSHIP - August 2011 Edition Situation of special railway coach for women in Jakarta.