Stockholm Jan 27th 2016 – The situation in Denmark
Transcription
Stockholm Jan 27th 2016 – The situation in Denmark
Public Service Hearing – Stockholm Jan 27th 2016 – The situation in Denmark Lasse Jensen – b. 1946. Journalist. Danish National News Agency 1968, Danish Broadcasting 1970 foreign news reporter: Biafra, Vietnam, Indo-Pak War, Wars in Central America and Africa USA-Correspondent 1979 Head of DR TV-News 1983-87 Bureau Chief, EBU New York 88-93 News and Programmes Executive TV2 and DR 1993-97 Independent Producer from 1997 Editor/Host Media Magazine, DR Radio 2001-2014 Media Columnist ”Information” from 2007 Associate Professor, Journalism University Of Southern Denmark Member of Government Public Service Committee from 2015 Sonnenberg 2016 © Roald Als 1985 Danish Media Debate The extremely short version Denmark is not fundamentally different from other Nordic countries with regard to basic structures for Public Service Media and Commercial media. Unlike the rest of Scandinavia, the Danish debate is sharp, bordering the aggressive. Trench Warfare with lots of noise,a few casualties but no new ground conquered by ither side. Commercial media, spearheaded by Newspapers are demanding considerable changes in regulation, scope and size of DR, the largest license-financed institution. DR has responded with minor concessions but has generally remained royally aloof attitude: “Business as usual”. The minister of Culture has asked both sides to engage in a meaningful dialogue, so far in vain. Public Service Broadcasting (DR & TV2) has increasingly become market oriented the debate rages about “broad” or “narrow” PS-Broadcasting (“X-Factor or Mozart”) Denmark is fundamentally different from other Nordic countries in having a governmentowned, commercially operated PS-station, TV 2, which– so far – has flown completely under the radar in the debate over PSM. NORTH KOREA ? DANISH TV MARKET (SHARE) TV2 DR MTG GROUP DISCOVERY NTWRKS OTHERS STATE OWNED/LICENSE FINANCED RADIO DOMINATES MARKET WITH DANISH RADIO MARKET (SHARE) DR P4 DR P3 DR P1 DR P5 NOVA FM DR P7 MIX POP FM 24SYV VOICE Web usage Denmark November 2015 Danske Medier Statistik Page views Nov 2015 300000000 250000000 200000000 150000000 100000000 50000000 0 ekstrabladet BT TV2 DR Politiken Jyllands Posten MetroXpres Berlingske Who threatens who ? Inter ne t – Goo gl – PAID 3 MILL e approx 2,2 b ION IN TAXES illion DKK IN 201 4 Danish Media Policy is regulated every 4 years. Present Media Agreement among ALL political parties expires end of 2018. Parliament formed independent expert committee (no reps from PSB or private media) to map media landscape and present media scenarios Present Government is increasingly attentive to demands from commercial sector, which include include downsizing DR, login on dr.dk, restrictions on webnews and more Public Value tests. Also debate about license vs Subscription or direct tax- financing. Flat fee media license seen as socially unfair At the center of the debat - the main puzzle: What is Public Service? What is Public Service? The definition is ultimately a political choice. The official brief to the PS Committee from the Ministry of Culture states: “Public Service Media has a very special role in contributing to the democratic debate in Danish society and is – unlike other media – legally committed to factuality and impartiality. The framework and demands to Public Service providers are laid down in Law and Public Service Contracts. According to the Law, The total Public Service output via tv, radio and internet must provide a broad offer of programmes and services including news, information, education, art and entertainment” “In the new individualized and fragmented media reality viewing and listening is spread over many channels and more and more choose on-demand services….there is a need to decide how PS Media can or should help making available and encourage viewing and listening of quality content not only on radio and tv, but on all the platforms that the Danish population use in order for (the Danes) to use and support a democratic debate, based on Danish values” Is “Public Service for private money” a contradiction in terms? Has the PS institutions become too big, too selfish, too arrogant? Should they be forced to share? (archives, production facilities, external vs internal production etc) Should “Public Service” just be replaced with “licens-financed services”? Public Service and “Publicistik” Public Service Media are today license-financed (DR, Radio 24syv, TV2-Regional Stations) or state-owned, commercially financed media (TV 2). They are must be independent and legally separated from direct government/parliamentary control over content and management. Their services should be universally available to the public. The definition of Public Service is, therefore, only valid for license-financed media. TV 2 is no longer universally available, because they demand subscription payment for viewing. Another contradiction.. The “private”/commercial media content can often be governed by “publicistik” (a wonderful swedish ord, virtually intranslatable to English). The definition is much broader than “public service” and contains not only journalism and public information but also the general public conversation and debate in and about society. Publicistik does not require impartiality, editorial independence, factuality or fair and balanced output. Public Service and “Private” Media have many roles in common, but Public Service Media (=license financed) has a “higher” obligation to contribute to “the public good” especially in areas where the market does not do it. And especially in supporting the cohesiveness of the nation and the national language and at the same time contributing to outward-looking awareness The work of the PS-Committee in Denmark Gather information and views from both Danish and foreign studies, experts, Private Industry, PS Broadcasters and others Hold public hearings and collect views an analysis from media players. Next hearing in March on children, youth and media Work on a contemporary definition of Public Service Broadcasting in view of the changing landscape. Assembling scenarios for the future (next ten years)