Oglesby v. Pleasantville, Atlantic County Superior Court Docket No
Transcription
Oglesby v. Pleasantville, Atlantic County Superior Court Docket No
CASTELLANI LAW FIRM, LLC 450 Tilton Road, Suite 245 Northfield, New Jersey 08225 (609) 641-2288 Attorne s fox ti s CHARLES OGLESBY SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ATLANTIC DIVISION LAW COUNTY CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE; CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF DUANE COMEAUX; CAPTAIN JOSE RUIZ, SGT. DANNY ADCOCK.; MAYOR RALPH PETERSON; JESSE TWEEDLE; CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT, MARVIN HOPKINS, CITY ADMINISTRATOR; AND JOIN DOE, pi- PASANTVILLE EMPLOYEES 1-10, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES OF DEFENDANT CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE Docket No.; Civil Action 01-C - 10 COMPLAINT Defendants, Plaintiff; Charles Oglesby, currently residing in the Township of Egg Harbor, County of Atlantic by way of Complaint against the Defendants says as follows: nal' COUNT 1. In or around the year of 2006 plaintiff Charles Oglesby was No. 1 on the Certified list to be promoted to the position of q Sergeant within the defendant Pleasantville Police Department. 2, At the time, plaintiff alleges that false disciplinary Charges were lodged against 1 him by the individual defendants, Chief Duane Com.eaux, Captain Jose Ruiz, Sgt, Danny Adcock, Mayor Ralph Peterson and Jesse Tweedle,, Marvin Hopkins and John Doe Pleasantville Employees 1-10. 3, At all times mentioned herein, the actions of the individual defendants, Comeaux, Ruiz, Adcock, Peterson, Tweedle, Hopkins and John lloe Pleasantville Employees 1-10 were complained of herein taken under color of State Law and within the scope of employment with defendant City of Pleasantville, and Pleasantville Police Department and individually. 4. The false disciplinary charges concerning allegations of plaintiff stealing gas and another incident which were eventually dismissed as unfounded. 5. These allegations as to conduct attributed to the plaintiff, Charles Oglesby, prevented his promotion to the position of Sergeant within the City of Pleasantville Police Department at the time. 6. Thereafter, on March 3, 2008, plaintiffwas again scheduled to be promoted on a Monday night at the City Council meeting within the defendant City of Pleasntville. 7. On March 3, 2008, while waiting to be prOmoted at the City Council meeting, plaintiff was asked to go to an office within the defendant, City of Pleaeantville Police Station where Atlantic County Prosecutor's investigators were present requesting he be interviewed. At that time, plaintiff wa-9 informed that he was being suspended pending an investigation gainst the plaintiff. concerning allegations of criminal charges against' 8. It is further alleged that at the time, no criminal charges were filed against the plaintiff nor had any Internal Affairs administrative charges or investigations taken place to that date, despite the fact that the alleged incident giving rise to the alleged criminal charges took place well before 45 days of the date of plaintiff's suspension on March 3, 2008. 9. Previous to plaintiffs suspension on March 3, 2008, plaintiff was called to defendant, Captain Ruiz's O5e0 and was requested 'by defendant Captain Ruiz to obtain support of the Masons and the PHA of which plaintiff Charles Oglesby was member and shop steward for the Mayorial candidate, Len Green. Plaintiff Charles Oglesby informed the defendant. Ruiz that the'Meiloos and the ETA were not political entities and that he would not solicit such political support. 10. It is further alleged that defendant Captain Ruiz attempted to solicit plaintiff to slander City Administrator defendant Marvin Hopkins which plaintiff also refUsed to do as he reasonably believed that it wms unethical and unconstitutional. 1U. Defendant Ruiz,responded to Sergeant Oglesby's refusals o him that "this ow you career gets hurt, ROW get the fuck out of here", 12. Plaintiff Oglesby had a vested property in his position as a Police QI lker with the •defendant City of Pleasantville and inhis right to a promotion under both the United States Constitution Due Process clause of the 5 th and 14 th Amendments and the New Jersey State Constitution, Article 1, Section 1,as well as through the Civil Service rules and regulations within the State of New Jersey as codified through the New Jersey Constitution, Article 1, • Section 19. 13. It is further alleged that the defendants, and each of them, conspired to violate plaintiff Oglesby's Federal and State CORstitutiorwil Rights to Freedom of Speech, Association, Political Association and further retaliated against the plaintiff kir his union activity as a Union representative and union based activity. 14. It is further alleged, that the defendants, and each of them, violated plaintiffs Union's Collective Bargaining Agreement with the defendant City of Atlantic City, Artigld 7 concerning Discipline and DisCharge and Aitide 9 concerning Policeman's Rights in suspending plaintiff and denying plaintiffs promotion as a result of plaintiff's lawful exercise with Constitutional Rights including his rights under the United States Coristitutiou, First Amendment ov.-17 740 . ,• and New Jersey Constitution relating to Article I, paragraph 5 and 6 relating to Political speech and Political : Association and Freedom of Speech, as well as Article 1, paragraph 19 concernin g plaintiff's rights to participate in union activity and to file and maintain grievances. 15, The defendants, and each of them; further violated plaintiffs State and Federal Procedural due process rights protected by the 5 th and 14'' Amendments, in failing to be provided notice of the charges against him and for failure to provide him an opportunity to be heard with respect to any such charges prior to suspending the plaintiff. 16. It is further alleged that the defendants, and each of them, violated plaintiff's substantive due process rights under both Federal and State Constinition in depriving plaintiff of . his liberty interests in his good name and reputation within the community as a result of the filing, prosecution and publication of the false allegations including criminal conduct to the plaintiff 17. It is alleged that the defendants, and each of them, greed and conspired to violate plaintiff's rights under both Unites States and New Jersey Constitutions all in violation of 42 USC 1983 and the New Jersey Civil Rights NJSA 10:64 et. seq. by instituting a false investigation and prosecution against the plaintiff, including the filing of false statements in support of plaintiff's criminal prOsecution 18. Defendant, City of Pleasantville is responsible and vicariously liable for the actions of the individual defendants as set forth above on the principles of respondeat superior. 19. It is further alleged, that defendant City of Pleasantville is responsible for the conduct of the individual defendants as these defendants were acting pursuant to a custom policy and/or long standing practice of political retaliation and anti union activity which had the force of law. OU7 20. 740 74(U r.ub It is further alleged that the individual defendants were all del egated . policy making positions within the defendant Pleasantville City Police Department and were solely responsible for the decisions to bring both inter departmental and criminal charges against the plaintiff, 21. As a direct and proximate result of the actions of the defendants, and each of them as aforementioned, plaintiff was wrongttilly suspended and/or terminated from his position as a • Police Officer within the City of Pleasantville, denied a promotion -, Tattered other economic damages, suffered dannageslo his reputation and standing in the community,. was embarrassed, shocked and humiliated, all to his detriment. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment against these defendants, jointly and/or severally for damages, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs Of suit and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. SECON,p COUNT • 1. Plaintiff repeats the allegations set forth in Count One of this Complaint as if set forth at length herein 2. ' The actions of the defendants and each of them in violating the terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement in place between the plaintiff's, local 'BA Union and the. defendant City of Pleasantville constitute a breach of contract in violation of the New Jersey i'nployer Employees Relation Act 3. 34:13A-1-21 et. seq. It is further.alleged the defendants violated the SERA in suspending and discharging and failing to promote plaintiff because of his union activity. 4. As a direct and proximate result of the defendants violation of terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement as atbrementioned, plaintiff -was suspended. and denied ou7 7G0 7G(U r.u.J ; promotion as well as his rights under the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the PBA and the defendant, City of Pleasantville of whiCh he was a benefiCiary, WHEREFORE, plaintiffs demands judgment against the defendants and each of them, jointly, severally and in the alternative for damages, interest, costs of suit, attorney's fees and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. THIRD COuNx 1. Plaintiff repeats the allegations set forth in Count one and Two of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein at length. 2. Tie -actions of the defendants in suspending, failing to promote and/or terminating plaintiff from his employment with defendant City of Pleasantville were in violation of the public policy of the State of New Jersey relating to New.Jersey Constitutions Protection of political affiliation, political speech, right to Elie grievances and participate in union activity, and the protections of a Merit System under the Civil Service as well as other ourries of public policy including the Employer.mployees Relations Act, 3.* As a direct and proximate result of the actions of the defendants, and each of them, in violation of public policy, plaintiff was suspended ancVor temiinated from his position as a City of Pleasantville Police Officer, was caused to suffer economic loss, embarrassment, shock, humiliation and other ClatnageS7all to his detriment. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants and each of them jointly, severally and in the alternative fur damages, punitive damages, interest, costs of suit and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. I LLLEESOTT 1, Plaintiff repeats the allegations set forth in Counts One through Three of thi s Complaint as if fully set forth herein at length. 2. It is alleged that the individual defendants including John Doe City of Pleasantville Employees 1-10 both individually and as part of their conspiracy agreed to provide false testimony and statements concerning allegations that the plaintiff participated in criminal conduct, all for purposes of obtaining prosecution of the plaintiff without probable cause eventually resulting in the indictment of the plaintiff on. criminal charges. 3. The defendants' actions as set forth above constitute the tort of malicious prosecution and malicious abuse of process as well as false light invasion of privacy, intrusion into seclusion of the private affairs of the plaintiff all for the purpose of damaging his reputation, both personal and business and good standing in the community. 4. As a direct and proximate result of the actions of the defendants, and each of them, as set forth above, plaintiff was caused to suffer severe emotional distress, mental anguish, shock and embarrassment, humiliation and caused severe and permanent damages to his reputation both personal and business within the surrounding community all to his detriment. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment agairtSt the defendants and each of theta jointly, severally and in the alternative for damages, punitive damages, interest, costs of suit and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper, FIVIlicousrr 1. Plaintiff repeats the allegations set forth in Counts One through Four of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein at length. 2 The defendants' conduct as set forth in the previous Counts of this Complaint and spact.ackilly in violation of the terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement and•the rights of Police Officers such as the plaintiff contained therein, was done intentionally and in bad faith and the constituted breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing inherent in all employment contracts in the State of New Jersey, S. As a direct and proximate result.of the defendants, and cachof them, im pli covenant and for good faith in fair dealing, the plaintiff was caused to suspended in eventually termina ted from his employment witb..the defendant Pleasantville Police Depaitrnent, caused economic damage, damage to his reputation, emotional distress, mental anguish and such other damages all to his detriment. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants on this Count, jointly, severally and in the alternative for damages, punitive damages, interest, costs of suit and such other relief as•the Court deems just and proper. . 1. Kral COUNT Plaintiff repeats the allegations set fOrth in Counts One through Five of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein at length. 2. • The individual defendants with a malicious intent took the actions set forth in the prevlons Counts of this Complaint all for the purposes of interfering with plaintiffs contract and prospective economic advantage with the defendant City of fileasantville,.in his right to be • promoted, to continue and maintain public employment 3. As a direct and proximate result of the defendants' actions and tortiously faring with the prospective economic advantage and contract between the defendant City of Pleasantville and the plaintiff, plaintiff was caused to be suspended; and eventually terminated from his position, caused economic damages, suffer emotional distress, mental an guish, detriment. 4. It is further alleged the defendants conduct constituted intentional infliction, of emotional distress against the plaintiff. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants jointly severally and hi the alternative for damages, punitive damages, ; iterest, costs of suit and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper By: Dated: March 2010 JURY DEMAND Plaintiffs hereby demand trial by jury on all issues herein: CERTIFICATION I, DAVID R. CASTELLANI, ESQUIRE, hereby certify, pursuant to New Jersey Court Rule 4;5-1, that to the best of my knoWledge, the claims raised herein are not the subject of any other action pending in any Court or. the subject of any arbitration proceeding, and no such other action or arbitration is contemplated. I certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true to my personal knowledge. I am aware that if any of the foregoing statements made by me are willfully false, I am subject to punishment for perjury. Dated: OR I TERR I 0 I( ANS WFA Iii Plaintiffs hereby demand that defendants answer form c uniform interrogatories as contained in Appendix U of the New Jersey Rules of • Court in lieu of services of the Interrogatories themselves pursugut to. k4: 7-10)04 C 0 jtaL.SQUAnb PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that David R, Castellani, Esquire, is hereby designated as trial counsel in the above captioned litigation for Rule 4:25-4. Dated: Castellani Law Firm, LLC, pursuant to A. Michael Barker, Esquire Barker, Scott 8s Gelfand A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Linwood Greene - Suite 12 210 New Road Linwood, New Jersey 08221 (609) 601-8677 AMBarker@BarkerLawFirm.net Our File Number: 47733-183 Attorney for Defendants, City of Pleasantville, City of Pleasantville Police Department, Chief of Police Duane Comeaux, Captain of Police Jose Ruiz, Mayor Ralph Peterson, City Council President Jesse Tweedle - Jointly, Severally, or in the Alternative UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY - CAMDEN VICINAGE CHARLES OGLESBY Plaintiff, Civil Action Number 10-cv 3271 (NLH/ AMD) VS. CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE; CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF OF POLICE DUANE COMEAUX CAPTAIN JOSE RUIZ; SERGEANT DANNY ADCOCK; MAYOR RALPH PETERSON; CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT JESS TWEEDLE; CITY ADMINISTRATOR MARVIN HOPKINS; JOHN DOE PLEASANTVILLE EMPLOYEES (1-10), Individually and in their Offici Capacity as Agents, Servants, and Employees of the City of Pleasantville Defendants Civil Action NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT and GENERAL RELEASE 1. Parties. The parties to this Negotiated Settlement Agreement and General Release (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "Agreement") arc Charles Oglesby, his heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and representatives (hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as "Relcasor"); arid, the City of Pleasantville, City of Pleasantville Police Department; Chief of Police Duane Comeaux; Captain Jose Ruiz; Sergeant Danny Adcock; Mayor Ralph Peterson; City Council President Jesse Tweedle; and, City Administrator Marvin Hopkins, and any officers, directors, employees, attorneys, agents, servants, representatives, assigns, successors, and insurance carriers of the City of Pleasantville, City of Pleasantville Police Department; Chief of Police Duane Comeaux; Captain Jose Ruiz; Sergeant Danny Adcock; Mayor Ralph Peterson; City Council President Jesse Tweedle; and, City Administrator Marvin Hopkins (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Releasee"). This Agreement is the product of negotiation and compromise August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 2 BARKER, SCOTT, GELFAND & JAMES . .A-PROVESSIONAI, CORPORATION ' LINWOOD, --NEW JERSEY 08221 between Releasor and Releasee. 2. Background. Releasor and Releasee have chosen to enter into this Agreement in order to avoid further proceedings with respect to any claims of Releasor against Releasee, for anything which has happened up until the time of the execution of this Release, including but not limited to any claims brought in the United States District Court in the matter of Charles Oglesby v. the City of Pleasantville, City of Pleasantville Police Department; Chief of Police Duane Comeaux; Captain Jose Ruiz; Sergeant Danny Adcock; Mayor Ralph Peterson; City Council President Jesse 'rweedle; and, City Administrator Marvin Hopkins: John Doe Pleasantville Employees (1-10), individually and in their official capacity as agents, servants, and employees of the City of Pleasantville, Civil Action Number 10-cv-3271. Releasor and the Releasee wish to resolve, finally and completely, all actual or potential disputes, differences, controversies, or claims (collectively hereafter sometimes referred to as "claims"), which arise out of, refer to, or relate to the service or employment of Releasor with Releasee, or otherwise, which claims August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 3 BARKER, BCOTT,_GELFAND.86.JAMES-A-PROFESSIONAL-CORPORATION • LINWOOD -,- NEW JERSEY 08221 Releasor has, or may have had, concerning or arising out of the service or employment of Releasor with Releasee, or otherwise, the termination of the service or employment of Releasor with Releasee, including but not limited to any and all claims of Releasor pursuant to New Jersey common law under any theory of tort or contract, the Ncw Jersey Law Against Discrimination (11.J.S.A. 10:5-1, et seq.], the New Jersey Conscientious Protection Act [N.J.S.A. 34:19-1, et seq.], the Federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act 129 U.S.C. §621, et seq.], the Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act 129 U.S.C. §626], the New Jersey Workers' Compensation Act and any and all other claims under ERISA or for any benefits or under any health plan provided by Releasee to Releasor, and any and all claimed rights for the continuation of health insurance coverage from, by, or through Releasee, and any and all claims pursuant to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, or the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 104 Stat. 327, 42 USC §12101, et seq. (2000 Ed. and Supp. IV). 3. No Admission and No Admissibility. Releasor does August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 4 BARKER, SCOW, C1ELFAND & JAMES • A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LINWOOD, NEW JERSEY 08221 understand and agree that Releasee denies each and every allegation of wrongdoing made by Releasor in any and all matters, or proceedings, including but not limited to those currently pending in the United States District Court, entitled Charles Oglesby v. the City of Pleasantville, City of Pleasantville Police Department. Chief of Police Duane Comeaux; Captain Jose Ruiz; Sergeant Danny Adcock; Mayor Ralph Peterson; City Council President Jesse Tweedle; and, City Administrator Marvin Hopkins; John Doe Pleasantville Employees (1-10), individually and in their official capacity as agents, servants, and employees of the City of Pleasantville, Civil Action Number 10-cv-3271. Releasor does understand and agree that the making of this Agreement shall not, in any way, be construed or considered to be an admission by Releasee of any guilt, wrongdoing, or noncompliance with any Federal, State, or local law, or any collective bargaining agreement, or rule or regulation or of any other wrongdoing whatsoever; and, Releasor does understand and agree that the making of this Agreement shall not, in any way, be admissible in evidence in any subsequent proceeding, except for the August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 5 __ BARKER, SCOTT, GELFAND & JAMES -A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • LINWOOD, NEW JERSEY 08221 enforcement of this Agreement. This Agreement is entered into solely to avoid the continuing expense and distraction of litigation, and disputes involving personnel issues. 4. Releasor's Representations and Warranties. Releasor hereby represents and warrants to Releasee that: a. Read Agreement. Releasor has read this Agreement in its entirety; b. Discussions with Counsel. Releasor has hereby been advised, in writing, by Releasee, pursuant to the Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act, to discuss, and has had the opportunity to discuss, all aspects of this Agreement with an attorney, and Releasor has, in fact, discussed all aspects of this Agreement with legal counsel of his own choosing, and Releasor fully understands all provisions and the legal and practical effect of all provisions of this Agreement and Releasor has had sufficient time to consider this Agreement and agrees with everything in the agreement; c. Voluntary Acts. Releasor is signing this Agreement freely and voluntarily, without coercion of any kind, and with full knowledge and understanding of its contents, and Releasor is aware that, under the Older Worker& Benefit Protection Act, Releasor has seven (7) days from the execution of this Agreement to revoke it; after the expiration of such seven (7) day period, the Agreement is binding; d. No Assignment of Transfer. Releasor has not assigned or transferred, or purported to assign or transfer, any claim covered by this Agreement, or August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 6 BARKF,R o .Scurr, GELFAND & JAMES--A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • LINWOOD, NEW JERSEY 08221 any portion thereof, or any interest therein, to any person or entity; 5. e. Binding Effect. This Agreement, and each and every provision thereof, is valid and binding upon Releasor, and enforceable against Releasor, in accord with the terms of this Agreement; f. No Claims Filed. Except for the matter of Charles Oglesby v. the City of Pleasantville, City of Pleasantville Police Department; Chief of Police Duane Comeaux; Captain Jose Ruiz; Sergeant Danny Adcock; Mayor Ralph Peterson; City Council President Jesse Tweedle; and, City Administrator Marvin Ho kins• John Doe Pleasantville Em lo ees (1-10), individually and in their official capacity as agents, servants, and employees of the City of Pleasantville, Civil Action Number 10-cv -3271 . Releasor has not filed, and will not file, any charges, complaints or other claims against Releasce, not in any other federal, state, or local court, or agency; g. Taxes. In the event taxes or penalties are assessed upon any portion of the payment transferred to Releasor pursuant to this Agreement, then Releasor agrees that Release& will pay when due the appropriate taxing authority any and all taxes and penalties which Releasor may owe as the recipient of any sums paid to Releasor under this Agreement. Release of Specific Claims, In exchange for the promises made by and between Releasor and Releases herein, Releasor: a. agrees to the dismissal with prejudice, and without any award of costs or attorneys' fees, of the Complaint filed in the matter of Charles Oglesby v. the City of Pleasantville, City of Pleasantville Police August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 7 BARKER, SCOTT,-GELFAND & .JAMES.• -A-PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • I.INWO011, NEW JERSEY 08221 Department; Chief of Police Duane Comeaux; Captain Jose Ruiz; Sergeant Danny_ Adcock; Mayor Ralph Peterson; City Council President Jesse Tweedle; and, City Administrator Marvin Hopkins; John Doe . Pleasantville Employees (1-10), individually and in their official capacity as agents, servants, and employees of the City of Pleasantville, Civil Action Number 10-cv-3271; b. agrees to unconditionally and irrevocably discharge and release Releasec of and from any and all claims, known or unknown, that Releasor has, or may have had, against Releasee, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, including but not limited to any and all claims set forth in Charles Oglesby v. the City of Pleasantville, City of Pleasantville Police Department; Chief of Police Duane Comeaux; Captain Jose Ruiz; Sergeant Danny Adcock; Mayor Ralph Peterson; City Council President Jesse Tweedle; and, City Administrator Marvin Hopkins . JohnDePlastviEmpoy(1-0), individually and in their official capacity as agents, servants, and employees of the City of Pleasantville, Civil Action Number 10-cv-3271, or otherwise arising out of the employment of Releasor with Releasee, including but not limited to any alleged violation of: • • • • • • • • • The National Labor Relations Act; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act; The Civil Rights Act of 1991; §§1981 through 1988 of Title 42 of the United States Code; The Retirement Income Security Act; The Fair Credit Reporting Act; The Americans with Disabilities Act; The Rehabilitation Act; The Age Discrimination in Employment Act; August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 8 BARKER, SCOTT, GELFAND & JAMES • A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 7-1,11‘1W000, Nt,:w JERSEY 08221 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • c. Executive Order 11246; The Fair Labor Standards Act; The Occupational Safety and Health Act; The Family and Medical Leave Act; The Equal Pay Act; Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act; The New Jersey Workers' Compensation Act; The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination; The New Jersey Family Leave Act; The New Jersey State Wage and Hour Law; The New Jersey Conscientious Relcasor Protection Act; The New Jersey Equal Pay Law; The New Jersey Occupational Safety and Health Laws; The New Jersey Smokers' Rights Law; The New Jersey Genetic Privacy Act; New Jersey Laws regarding Political Activities, Lie Detector Tests, Jury Duty, Employment Protection, Consumer Reports, Discrimination; and, any other federal, state, or local civil rights law or any other local, state, or federal law, regulation or ordinance; Any public policy, contract (express, written or implied), tort, or common law claim; Any agreement for vacation, sick or personal leave pay or payment pursuant to any practice, policy, handbook, manual, Collective Bargaining Agreement, or contract of the Townsend; Any grievance under any Collective Bargaining Agreement; or, Any allegation for entitlement to fees, costs, or other expenses, including penalties. Releasor agrees he is not entitled to any further remuneration or compensation of any type from August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 9 BARKER, SCOTT, GELPAND & JAMES••-A-PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • LINWOOD, NEW JERSEY 08221 Releasee relating to any claim for any wages or for any other employment-related benefit. 6. General Release of Claims. In consideration of the promises and actions by Releasee described herein, Releasor has, by executing this Agreement, remised, released, and forever discharged Rclasee of and from all and every manner of judgment, action, cause, suit, debt, grievance, sum of money, account, reckoning, bond, bill, collective bargaining claim, covenant, contract, controversy, agreement, damage, claim, execution and demand of every type whatsoever, in law or in equity, which Releasor ever had, or now has, against Relesee, for anything that has happened up until now, including but not limited to any claims arising out of the service or employment of Relesor with Releasee; and, including but not limited to any claim for severance pay, back pay, grievance of any type, compensatory damages, punitive damages, or other compensation arising out of the employment or volunteer relationship between Releasor and Releasee;; and, including but not limited to any claims arising out of the New Jersey Workers' Compensation Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act, Title V11 August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 10 13ARKER, SCOTT, GLLFANI) & JAMES-A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • LINWOOD, NEW JERSEY 08221 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Rehabilitation Act, ERISA, the Americans with Disabilities Act, New Jersey statutory or common law, including but not limited to the Conscientious Employee Protection Act [N.J.S.A. 34:19-1, et seq.), and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination [N.J.S.A. 10:5-1, et seq.]. 7. Releasor Consideration. Releasor specifically agrees: a. to not return to the property or the building of the Pleasantville Police Department for any purpose, directly or indirectly, without prior notice to and agreement of legal counsel for both Releasor and Releasee, unless it is necessary for Releasor to appear in a public area of the Pleasantville Police Department in order to conduct some official business or to carry out some official purpose in a public area of the Pleasantville Police Department; b. to satisfy any and all lien(s) related to or arising from any clairn(s) made by Releasor against Releasee; c. not to file any claim(s) or lawsuit(s) or action(s) of any kind or type for any benefits or damages against Releasee for anything which may have occurred up to the time of execution of this Agreement; d. not to apply for employment, or for re-employment with any Releasee; 8. Releasee Consideration. In exchange for the promise made by Releasor, and the execution by Releasor of this Agreement, August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 11 BARKER, SCOTT,-GELFAND 86-JAMES • A -PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • LINWOOD, NEW JERSEY 08221 and the execution by Rcleasor of any document, record, order, affidavit, or other writing necessary to effectuate dismissal of any claim(s) made by Releasor against Releasee in any court whatsoever, or before any administrative or regulatory body, Releasee agrees not to object to payment by insurers of Relcasee to Releasor and his attorneys in accord with the terms of this agreement, within forty (40) days following the full and proper execution of this Agreement by Releasor. The consideration of or on behalf of Releasee shall be the following. • Twelve Thousand Dollars, by check payable to Castellani Law Firm, LLC, as Trustee for Charles Oglesby, which check shall be issued by and on behalf of the insurer for Releasee; and, IRS forms 1099 in the amount of Twelve Thousand Dollars will be issued to Castellani Law Firm, LLC, 450 Tilton Road, Suite 245, Northfield, New Jersey 08225. • Additional consideration of Eight Thousand One Hundred Forty Six Dollars and Seventy-Seven Cents, less appropriate payroll deductions, will be paid by the City of Pleasantville to Charles Oglesby. 9. Releasor represents and warrants that he is unaware of and has not received notice or any liens, (including but not limited to, Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security), assignments, subrogations, encumbrances, garnishments, security interests, 13ARKER, scorr, GELVAN I) tit. August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 12 JAMES • A PROFESSK INAL CORPORAT1614M1NWOOD, NEW JERSEY 08221 claims, suits, causes of action, judgments, fees, costs, attorneys fees or any other right of any person or entity to all or any part of the monetary payment made to him pursuant to this Agreement including, but not limited to, any such claims by any health care provider (including but not limited to Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security), and any state or other governmental body, any employer, worker's compensation carrier, or any attorney (other than the attorney fee to which David Castellani, Esquire is entitled) that would give such a person or entity a claim to recover all or a portion of the payments made pursuant to this Agreement. Nonetheless, Relcasor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Releasees from any past, present or future lien, assignment, subrogation, encumbrance, garnishment, security interest, claim, suit, cause of action, judgment, fees, attorneys fees, costs, or any other right of any person or entity to all or any part of the monetary payment; and, (b) Except as necessary to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, Releasor for himself and on behalf of all Releasors referred to in this Agreement, understands and agrees to indemnify and hold Releasces harmless with respect to all past, present and future demands, claims, suits, causes of action, August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 13 BARKER, SCO'll. ,-GELPAND &JAMES • A -PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION *- LINI,V001), NEW JERSEY 08221 liabilities, liens or judgments of any kind whatsoever by Releasor and or his successors or assigns arising out of or in any way related to released claims which are the subject matter of this Agreement; and, (c) Pursuant to Section 111 of the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services must be provided Releasors full address, Social Security Number, date of birth, gender, and, if available, his Medicare Health Insurance Claim Number (HICN). Provision of this information by Releasor to The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services is a material condition of this settlement. Spaces are provided in Exhibit A at the end of this Release for compliance; and, (d) Specifically, Releasor for himself and on behalf of all Releasors named in this Agreement further understands and agrees that any and all Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security, hospital, medical insurance coverage subrogation claims and/or any and all other types of liens or interest that is and/or could be claimed by any person and/or entity, will be fully paid, satisfied and released from the settlement proceeds paid herein, in trust, unless and until such time as said liens and/or claims have been fully paid, satisfied or released; and, (e) Releasor for himself and on behalf of all Releasors named in this Agreement agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Releasees from any claim by, through and/or under Rleeasor including, but not limited to, any direct claim by Medicare, Medicaid and/or social Security for reimbursement of any funds paid by them relating to and/or arising out of August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 14 BARKER, SCOW, GELFAND & JAMES • A PROFESSIONAL- CORPORATIOW-LINWOOD, NEW JERSEY 08221 the lawsuit of Releasor referred to in this Agreement. 10. Seeking Reference Releasor Shall direct prospective future employers of Releasor, with inquiries about the dates of employment of Releasor with Releasee to: Alfred R. Scerni, Jr., Esquire City of Pleasantville Solicitor c/o Parker McCay P.A. 1809 Pacific Avenue Atlantic City, New Jersey 08401 11. Confidentiality. • Relcasor agrees to keep the terms, amounts, and fact of this Agreement completely confidential, other than to say, if asked, that all matters relating to the service or employment of Releasor with Releasee have been resolved and Releasor further agrees that he will not hereafter state the fact and terms of this Agreement to anyone including, but not limited to, any past, present or prospective applicant for employment with Releasee. This provision shall not prohibit Relcasor from disclosing the terms, amounts and fact of this Agreement to his attorneys and accountants, provided said attorneys and accountants are made aware of this confidentiality provision and agree to abide by its terms. 12. Breach of Agreement August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 15 BARKER, SCOTT, GELFAND & JAMES-, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 'LINWooD;-NEW ,ItitsEY 08221 Upon any breach of this Agreement by Releasor, Releasec may institute an action to specifically enforce the terms of this Agreement and seek damages resulting from such breach including return of the consideration paid hereunder. Should Releasee prevail in such action, Releasee will be entitled to an award of attorneys' fees and costs in addition to any other legal equitable relief. 13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement between Rcleasor and Releasee„ and fully supersedes any prior agreement(s) or understanding(s) between Rcleasor and Releasee. Releasor acknowledges that he has not relied on any representations, promises, or agreements of any kind in connection with the decision to sign this Agreement, except for those set forth in this Agreement. 14. Modification. This Agreement may not be modified, except upon express written consent of both Releasor and Releasee, wherein specific reference is made to this Agreement. 15. Joint Negotiation. This Agreement is a product of joint negotiation of Releasor and Releasee, and their respective counsel, August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 16 BARKER, SCOW, GELFAND JAMES-*-A-PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION"'LINWOOIVNEW-JERSEY 08221 and is not to be construed for or against either Releasor or Relesee by virtue of the fact that Releasor or Releasee, or their respective counsel, prepared this Agreement. 16. Enforceability and Severability. In the event that any provision(s) contained in this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, and cannot be modified to be enforceable, excluding the general release language, such provision(s) shall immediately become null and void, leaving the remainder of this Agreement in full force and effect.. Moreover, if any such provision(s) determined to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable can be made valid, legal, or enforceable by modification thereof, then the party for whose benefit the provision(s) exists may make such modification(s) as necessary to make the provision(s) valid, legal, and enforceable. 17. New Jersey Law. This Agreement shall be governed and conformed in accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey and any subsequent litigation to enforce all or any part of this agreement shall take place in the United States District Court. 18. Satisfaction with Counsel. Releasor acknowledges that he August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 17 BARKER, SCOTT, GEMINI) 86•JAMES- A-PROFESSIONAL:CORPORATION • LI ► WOOD, NEW JERSEY 08221 is satisfied with the services of his attorney with respect to all advice and counsel which he has received from his attorney with respect to all aspects of his employment or service with Releasee, including but not limited to all aspects, terms, and conditions of this Agreement and the decision to execute and be bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 19. Evidence. This Agreement shall not be used as evidence in any other action or proceeding other than as evidence in a proceeding by, or between, Releasor and Releasee to enforce the terms of this Agreement. 20. the p This Agreement has been executed by Charles Oglesby on e/ii. day of , 2012. Sworn to and Subscribed before Ile this Pt. 91' day of _ 2012. , -Notaly'Public My Commission Expires: g/z3/2.00- -- August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 18 BARRER, SCOTT, GELFAND 85 JAMES•A- PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION'iLINWOODTNEW JERSEY 08221 21. This Agreement has been executed by /1/4 ./ Of< -.24-4 on the _pi-- day of (? )c 416K "- 4" , 2012. City of Pleasantville Sworn to and Subscribed before me this / sr- day nc.7-2166,- __, 2012. of Notary blic My Commission Expires: GLORIA V. GRIFFIN NOTARY PUBLIC OF NEW JERSEY My Commission Expires December 13, 2014 August 20, 2012 11:10 A.M. Page 19 BARKER,_SCOIT, GELEAND & JAMES • A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • LINWOOD, NEW JERSEY 08221. 7 1' 4? °LC