Standard of Cover - Loveland

Transcription

L OVELAND -S YMMES F IRE D EPARTMENT
Standards of Response Coverage & Risk Analysis
A PPROVED B Y THE L.S.F.D. B OARD OF D IRECTORS
FEBRUARY 25TH, 2013
Table of Contents
Organizational Philosophies
3
Master Strategic Goals
4
Community Description
5
Area Description
8
Disaster Potentials
10
Services Provided
12
Current Deployment
15
Community Response History
17
Risk Assessment
18
Community Expectations & Performance Goals
32
Reliability Factors
35
Performance Objectives & Measurement
38
Appendix
47
2
O RGANIZATIONAL P HILOSOPHIES
Mission
TO PROVIDE THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE WITH THE HIGHEST TRAINED PROFESSIONALS AND TO
DELIVER THAT SERVICE TO OUR CUSTOMERS WITH LOYALTY AND COMPASSION.
Vision
TO PROVIDE THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF SERVICE TO OUR RESIDENTS IN THE MOST EFFICIENT AND COST EFFECTIVE MANNER THROUGH
INNOVATION, PROFESSIONALISM, PARTNERING, AND A COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE.
Values
For the Community:






We provide the residents the very best that we can offer at all times.
We are a part of the community and will always operate as a community oriented organization
We act to resolve problems or issues in the most expeditious way possible.
We interact with the citizens in a manner that reflects well upon the City of Loveland, Symmes Township and our
organization.
We are committed to providing quality service to the community through the most innovative use and
development of resources.
We are dedicated to meeting the increasing service demands with minimal financial impact to the citizens.
For the Department:




We support the Mission Statement by being the very best.
We recognize that fire suppression, fire prevention, public education, hazardous materials, and emergency medical
services are of equal importance.
We maintain a positive and professional attitude.
We respect individuals and their unique contributions.
M A S T E R S TR A T E G I C G O A L S
Develop Planning and Staffing Models to Provide the Highest Level of Service Possible Based on Accurate Statistical
Information and Trending
Provide the Highest Level of Service Possible at a Cost the Communities can Afford
Long Term Service and Program Sustainability
Meeting Industries Best Standards
Maximize Customer Satisfaction
3
INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Loveland Symmes Fire Department has defined and developed its Community Risk Analysis and Standards of
Coverage (SOC) document after careful consideration of factors unique to the community and the expectation for the
timely and professional mitigation of emergency incidents should they occur. The document has been written to provide
the reader a general understanding of the following:
•
•
•
•
•
The community
The fire service agency
The risks present in the community
Common SOC terminology and concepts
Overall evaluation: proposed Standard of Coverage Statements by risk type
It is our hope that the creation of this comprehensive Standards of Coverage document will provide elected officials and
citizens with significant facts about the risks in the community, agency operations and service levels which can be
expected.
Executive Summary
The Loveland Symmes Fire Department prides itself on being a progressive emergency service organization. In order to
accomplish this, our organization acknowledges the need to be responsive to the needs of the community, understanding
community’s hazards and providing the community with defined levels of service. The agency utilizes the Community Risk
Analysis and Standards of Coverage document to provide the community, municipal administrators and agency personnel
this information. In addition, this dynamic document is utilized as an aid in budget preparation, determining annual goals
and objectives, forecasting future expenditures, and Strategic Planning.
The following document will present a historical look at the municipality’s emergency service needs, potential disasters,
customer expectations, daily operational considerations including deployment of personnel and equipment and the levels
of service which can be expected for the community.
Annually, the agency evaluates this document and corresponding information to ensure that the Loveland Symmes Fire
Department is meeting established baselines and to support development of strategies aimed to exceed our customer
expectations.
4
A. Description of Community Served
Legal Basis
The Loveland-Symmes Fire Department functions under the authority granted to it by the Ohio Administrative Code,
Ordinances of the City of Loveland and Resolutions of Symmes Township Ohio. The Fire Board of Trustees structure which
oversees the Department includes 6 members, The Fire Chief who is the President of the Board, The Assistant Fire Chief
who is the Vice President and four other members Two members appointed by the Symmes Township Trustees and One
member appointed by the City of Loveland and one member appointed by the general membership who represents the
retired members. These individuals, through department Bi-laws, recommend, approve, review and guide the operations
of the Department.
History of the Agency
The Loveland-Symmes Fire Department has a rich and varied history in the fire service. Dating back to its beginnings in the
late 1800's the department has experienced a wealth of changes throughout its long heritage.
On February 12, 1876, approximately 85 residents of Clermont County petitioned to have about 800 acres incorporated
into a village. Originally settled by Thomas Paxton in 1795, the newly incorporated village was named after the town's
original postmaster, James Loveland. Soon after incorporation, village residents recognized the need for fire protection. On
August 12, 1877, two sets of ladders and 36 rubber buckets were purchased and a group of village residents were
appointed to oversee and use the equipment. One ladder and 18 buckets were placed on Jackson Street (present-day
Loveland Avenue) and the other ladder & 18 buckets on Broadway Street. Although no record clearly shows a specific
name, the group of residents that provided Loveland's first fire protection was commonly referred to as the "Ladder &
Bucket Brigade". The "Ladder and Bucket Brigade" obtained water for firefighting from eight fire cisterns located
throughout the village. These cisterns were all operated with wooden hand pumps.
As Loveland grew, so did the need for better fire equipment. Requests by citizens and businesses prompted Loveland to
purchase a hand-drawn, hand-powered pumping unit. Purchased from "Rumsley & Company" in Seneca, New York, this
unit was also equipped with 200 feet of fire hose. However, soon after its arrival in Loveland, the "Ladder and Bucket
Brigade" came to the realization that this unit was impractical and it was soon returned to the manufacturer.
Shortly thereafter, a committee was established and sent to Cincinnati to look at steam powered equipment. A rebuilt,
horse drawn steam pumper equipped with a hose reel was purchased from the "Ahrens Fox Company", a Cincinnati based
fire engine manufacturer. The Loveland-Symmes Fire Department still owns the steamer today. It resides in the bay at
Station 63 located at the corner of East Loveland Avenue and Second Street. It can easily be seen through the bay windows
while sitting at the traffic light on North Second Street.
Loveland's first official "fire department" was established in March of 1885 under the direction of Chief Archibald B. Brock.
Known as the "Miami Steam Fire Company", the department was led by Chief Brock until 1895. In 1886 due to a lack of
funds from the village council, "Miami Steam Fire Company" members made a deal with a local blacksmith to build a ladder
wagon. The money was raised solely by the firemen to purchase this unit. Shortly after that, firefighters were outfitted
with rubber coats & boots and more hose and a hose wagon were acquired.
5
A shortage of funds to purchase apparatus was not the only challenge that faced the newly established fire company. With
every piece of equipment (except the hose reel) being horse drawn, the fire company needed horses to pull their apparatus
to a fire. Unfortunately, the village council also made it clear that Loveland was unable to purchase horses for the fire
company. Fortunately, local merchants came to the rescue. A deal was struck between the village and local merchants
where the village agreed to pay any merchant that responded to a fire alarm with the merchant's team of horses to pull the
apparatus to the fire. Two of the horses used, which were owned by the L.W. Nisbet Company, were named "Old Dan" &
"Joe".
During this period, firefighters were summoned to the fire station for the report of a fire by a large bell that was taken
from the "Reuben Springer" steam boat. The bell was acquired from a local resident, who had spent time serving as a
riverboat captain. This bell, which currently sits atop of the Loveland Firefighter's Memorial, served as the call to the
firemen until 1934 when it was replaced by a electronic siren that was operated by phone from any one of four different
firefighter's homes.
Throughout the era of prohibition, illicit liquor traffic was extremely prevalent in Loveland. In response to this, the village
council established "Liquor Court." Fines earned in "Liquor Court" were used to purchase new firefighting equipment. In
1921, Loveland purchased its first motorized fire truck. The Bierderman-manufactured fire truck was equipped with a
350-gallon per minute pump and two chemical tanks mounted on solid rubber tires. This truck served the community well
until 1929 when Loveland purchased two trucks from the Prospect Fire Engine Company located in Prospect, Ohio.
In 1928, the department became known as the "Loveland Fire Department." Upon the retirement of Chief Liebold,
Laurence Brock assumed the duties of fire chief. Being the grandson of Loveland's first chief, Archibald Brock, and serving
with his uncle "Chic" Brock, firefighting was definitely in Laurence Brock's blood. During his five years as the fire chief,
Chief Brock was able to get firefighters on the village payroll for the first time. The firefighters received $2.00 per call.
About a decade later, then-Mayor Cutler made the decision to forbid the "Loveland Fire Department" to respond to fires
located outside the village limits, citing a lack of funds. A large fire occurred on Loveland-Miamiville Road (outside of the
village) soon after and the firefighters went to help out anyway, despite knowing that they would be facing punishment
upon their return. With the help of attorney John Undercoffer, the membership of the "Loveland Fire Department" formed
the "Loveland Community Fire Department" on March 6, 1938. If they wished, members of the village-operated "Loveland
Fire Department" were automatically counted in the membership of the "Loveland Community Fire Department." The
members were paid for fires they responded to in the village of Loveland while fires that were made with the Community
Fire Department were done without compensation.
The Loveland Community and Loveland Village Fire Departments worked together to protect Loveland and its
surrounding communities for years. However, in 1967 it was recommended that the City Fire Department (formerly the
Village Fire Department) be disbanded. By 1971, the Loveland Community Fire Department took over fire protection
duties for the city of Loveland while still providing service to neighboring towns that needed additional help.
In 1972, a major fire destroyed Loveland City Hall which was located on the present site of Station 63 on the corner of East
Loveland Avenue and Second Street. The Loveland Fire and Police Departments were also housed in this building, which
was deemed a total loss. This event forced the fire department to rebuild from the ground up. Our department forefathers
rebounded from this adversity strongly and we are extremely proud of the department that we have today.
6
Loveland firefighters have always shown great concern for their neighbors. This is still evident today as we currently
provide fire and EMS services for the City of Loveland and Symmes Township. In 1989, the "Loveland Community Fire
Department" took over fire protection for Symmes Township and became known as the "Loveland Symmes Fire
Department." We currently operate as a private fire company, governed by the LSFD Board of Directors, that contracts fire
and EMS services to Loveland and Symmes Township. We operate four fire stations (two in Loveland & two in Symmes
Township) that are staffed with firefighter/paramedics 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.
Financial Basis
The Fire Department is funded through dedicated Fire, EMS and Public Safety Levies. On an annual basis, Fire Board meets
to discuss agency programs and financial obligations. A budget for the Fire Department operations is developed and
approved based on contractual agreements between contracting entities’ based upon strategic goals descried in the
Strategic Plan. A capitol and line item budget is then developed for each contracting entity and submitted for their
approval to include Capitol, Fleet and line item operations. The Fire Department, City and Township work from a three
year Performa based on revenues versus expenditures and levy projections
2012 Appropriation- $4.04million
2011 Actual Expenses- $4.04 million
2010 Actual Expenses - $3.73 million
7
Area Description
Topography
The City of Loveland and Symmes Township cover 13.25 square miles in South Western Ohio. Geographically, Loveland
and Symmes Township is located roughly 9 miles to the north of the City of Cincinnati. The City of Loveland and Symmes
Township have both low lying areas near creeks and rivers and rolling high hills. The terrain does not hinder response
and seldom causes any incident with the exception of some minor flooding in low lying areas.
Climate
Loveland and Symmes Township is a four season climate. Annually, Loveland and Symmes Township residents and
visitors experience the hot days of summer, the cold, snow filled days of winter, the rainy spring months and fall, when
leaf raking it at its peak. All seasons present their own unique response considerations and can present a multitude of
calls for service, which can vary as widely as the seasons. For example, severe storms which have the ability to spur
tornadoes are one of the weather features which can influence the jurisdiction. Annually, severe storms and tornadoes
are reported throughout Ohio. These storms possess high winds, damaging hail and lightning. Occasionally with rapid
rain fall we will experience flooding in low lying areas from the creeks and rivers.
Area Characteristics
Symmes Township, Hamilton County, Ohio





Land area: 8.6 sq. mi.
Water area: 0.2 sq. mi.
Population: 14,771 (99% urban, 1% rural), Males: 7,289 (49.3%), Females: (50.7%) 7,482
Occupied houses/apartments: 14,677
Races in Symmes Township:
o White Non-Hispanic: 85.7%
o Black: 4.4%
o American Indian and Alaska Native: 0.1%
o Asian: 6.4%










Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander: 0.0%
Hispanic or Latino: 1.8%
Two or more races: 1.2%
Some other race: 0.3%
Median age of males: 36.3 Median age of females: 36.7
Average household size: 2.82
Symmes Township: 2.8 people Ohio: 2.5 people
Average family size: 3.21
Estimated median household income in 2008: $99,484 ($84,906 in 1999) This township: $99,484 Ohio: $47,987
Estimated median house or condo value in 2008: $315,053 (it was $230,600 in 2000) $315,053 ( $230,600 )
Symmes Township: $315,053 Ohio: $140,200 Lower value quartile - upper value quartile: $193,657 - $435,707
Detached houses: $355,474 Here: $355,474 State: $174,862
Townhouses or other attached units: $179,806 Here: $179,806 State: $167,324


8






In 3-to-4-unit structures: $182,897 Here: $182,897 State: $129,681
In 5-or-more-unit structures: $152,382 Here: $152,382 State: $142,452
Mobile homes: $19,583 Here: $19,583 State: $32,066
Population density: 1726 people per square mile (very high).
Residents with income below the poverty level in 2008: This township: 2.2% , Whole state: 10.6%
Residents with income below 50% of the poverty level in 2008: This township: 1.2% , Whole state: 4.8%
Loveland, OH, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren Counties















Incorporated in 1961
Population in 2010: 12,081.
Population change since 2000: +3.5%
Males: 5,781 (47.9%) Females: 6,300 (52.1%)
White alone - 11,100 (91.9%)
Hispanic - 295 (2.4%)
Black alone - 246 (2.0%)
Two or more races - 204 (1.7%)
Asian alone - 198 (1.6%)
Other race alone - 18 (0.1%)
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone - 11 (0.09%)
American Indian alone - 9 (0.07%)
Estimated median household income in 2009: $64,860 (it was $52,738 in 2000) Loveland: $64,860 Ohio: $45,395
Estimated per capita income in 2009: $30,192
Estimated median house or condo value in 2009: $165,473 (it was $128,500 in 2000) Loveland: $165,473 Ohio:
$134,600
o Mean prices in 2009:
o All housing units: $194,895;
o Detached houses: $203,592;
o Townhouses or other attached units: $148,630;
o In 2-unit structures: $127,671;
o In 3-to-4-unit structures: $212,576;
o In 5-or more-unit structures: $119,480
o Median gross rent in 2009: $890.
o Elevation: 584 feet
o Land area: 4.65 square miles.
o Population density: 2600 people per square mile
Disaster Potentials
The Loveland Symmes Fire Department recognizes that there are emergencies which occur outside of structure fires and
emergency medical calls that affect a larger number of people and possibly the entire community. These emergencies or
disasters are either man made or caused by an extreme natural event. Below are brief descriptions of disasters that could
present themselves in Loveland and Symmes Township.
9
Tornadoes: On average, Ohio annually experiences an average of 16 tornadoes that result in more than a dozen injuries
and five fatalities. Between 2008 and 2010 there were 46 tornadoes that affected the state. (Source National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration) Typically, tornadoes travel across the State of Ohio from Southwest to Northeast, but they
have been known to travel in any direction. The City of Loveland and Symmes Township experienced a tornado in April of
1999 that was classified as an EF-4 tornado.
Thunder Storms/Wind Storms: Another weather event which annually affects Loveland and Symmes Township are
thunder/wind storms. These storms which usually occur during the spring or fall with the change of the seasons produce
downed power lines and trees. Damage from these storms can be limited or affect thousands of people within the
community.
Winter Storms: Winter in Loveland and Symmes Township runs from November through to February and the coldest
month is January, when daytime temperatures drop to around 2°C / 35°F. Snowfalls occur during this season. During this
season we will receive an occasional storm with Blizzard type conditions. We often times have ice storms during this
season also.
Earthquakes: Ohio is on the periphery of the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Due to this Ohio is at risk of earthquakes and has
in the past felt some of the movement from earthquakes along this zone.
Hazardous Material Spills: The response area of the agency is vulnerable to incidents involving hazardous material spills.
These incidents historically have been low in frequency but could produce potentially severe consequences. The
jurisdiction of the agency contains I 275 and I 71 both of which are heavily traveled with Hazardous Materials. In addition
to the hazardous materials transportation route, there are several facilities within the community which utilize varying
quantities of hazardous materials. To prepare for these emergencies the agencies has trained its personnel in hazardous
materials response and has contracted with the Greater Cincinnati Hazardous Materials response team in the event the
incident is beyond the capabilities of the agency.
Utility Failure: The municipalities vulnerable to utility failure in the form of natural gas, phone, water and electric failure.
The risk is moderate and has been prepared for. The community has experienced periods of time without electric due to
winter storms and spring time thunder storms. Due to the vast size and duration of the failure, the municipality’s water
supply was also affected. To prepare for a similar event the agency has purchased generators, maintains a supply of
potable water, and a resource list of other possible logistical items.
Terrorism: The response area has several potential risks of terrorism. Kings Island amusement park sits just 1 mile
north of the district. The city of Cincinnati has many potential areas that are threats that could role over into this agencies
area. Within the agencies areas some high end business, large shopping areas exist that could pose a potential risk. The
Little Miami 275 Bridge poses a risk of potential travel issues if the bridge were to be damaged. The City of Loveland has
its own water treatment plant.
Transportation:
The City of Loveland and Symmes Township contain several major road ways through the 3 counties that the
communities occupy.
 Interstate 275 Loop around Cincinnati
 Interstate 71 major North South Interstate
 State Route 22 and 3 major north south artery
 State Route 48 winding through all 3 counties
The amount of traffic present on these roadways leading to these intersections present challenges to responding units and
are given consideration when developing response plans. The northwestern corner of the response area is fully developed
with retail shops and restraints contributing to extended response times. The agency has addressed this through mutual aid
10
Area Development
Because the City of Loveland and Symmes Township is relatively built-out, we are committed to exploring redevelopment
opportunities to grow our economic base. In October 2010 the City of Loveland engaged Resurgence Group and its
strategic consulting and design partners to study redevelopment opportunities throughout the City. Resurgence Group is
working closely with the City’s Downtown Development Resource Committee and the Redevelopment Advisory Committee
on this initiative. Symmes Township is actively looking at redevelopment of some of the major road corridors. Symmes
Township is currently working on redevelopment on Loveland Maderia Road in the Remington area. They are also
working on redevelopment of the Harpers Point area on Montgomery Road. In both communities several buildings are
undergoing remodeling and expansions.
Demographic Features
The City of Loveland and Symmes Township presents some unique and desirable demographic features which lends itself
to being a sought after location for living or establishing a business. First, Loveland and Symmes Township are located
within close proximity to several major interstates. Interstate 275, Interstate 71 and State Route 22 and 3. In addition to
interstate routes, Loveland and Symmes Township primary roads allow commuters to travel to downtown Cincinnati in
approximately 15 minutes.
Community features which attract residents include outstanding municipal services and a low tax rate. Loveland And
Symmes Township provides its residents with a multitude of programs for both young and old. The Parks and
Recreations Departments in both of these communities provide great facilities and opportunities for kids sports and
activities. The City of Loveland and Symmes Township Public works department is another municipal department which
caters to the community. The department maintains a technologically advanced fleet of equipment utilized to maintain and
improve the streets, sidewalks, parks and sewers within Loveland and Symmes Township. Lastly, The Loveland Police
Department and Hamilton County Sherriff’s Office provides security to the residents and visitors of both communities. The
combination of the above services provides an attractive environment for working and living.
11
B. Services Provided
The Loveland Symmes Fire Department considers itself to be an all hazards emergency response agency. The agency
provides fire suppression and emergency medical services (Rescue). In addition, its members respond to hazardous
materials incidents, technical rescues (rope, water, ice, confined space and trench), weapons of mass destruction (WMD)
emergencies. Non-emergency services include, fire prevention plan review and inspection, public education and injury
prevention.
Service Delivery Programs
Fire Suppression
Fire Suppression services are provided through a combination of fire apparatus and emergency medical units which
are staffed with firefighters. Current inventory of apparatus includes:
Pumpers
Engine 11 (E60)
Manufacturer: Sutphen
Year: 2008
VIN # 1S9A1BLD881003074
Pump Capacity (G.P.M.): 1500
Tank Capacity (Gallons): 500
Engine 12 (E63)
Year: 2009
VIN # 1S9A1BLD791003133
Engine 13 (E63-2)
Manufacturer: International /Sutphen
Year: 1994
VIN # 1HTSDAARXRH586031
Engine 14 (E62-1)
Year: 1997
VIN # 1S9A1BBD7V1003014
Engine 15 (E61)
Year: 1997
VIN # 1S9A1BBDXV1003038
Ladders
T61
Year: 2001
VIN # 1S9A3JLE621003076
Aerial Device: 100’
Quint 62
Year: 2004
VIN # 1S9A7LLD642003003
Aerial Device: 75’
Rescue
The fire service agency defines Rescue as incidents such as trench rescue, confined space rescue, rope rescue (both high
and low angle), tower rescue, collapse rescue, water rescue, dive rescue and ice rescue. To effectively mitigate these
incidents, the agency has personnel which participate in the regional technical rescue team; Hamilton County USAR.
Rescues
R61
Manufacturer: Super Vac
Year: 1999
VIN # 4S7AW4Z98XC030313
Crane Device: 51’
Pump Capacity (G.P.M.): N/A
Tank Capacity (Gallons): N/A
Medical
The most widely used service that the Loveland Symmes Fire Department provides to the community is Advanced Life
Support response and transport. The agency maintains a fleet of 4 ALS transport squads. In addition, each fire station has a
fire apparatus with BLS first responder equipment. Due to the municipality’s close proximity to interstates and main
routes of travel, the agency can transport to various healthcare facilities ensuring that appropriate definitive care is
rendered. The Loveland Symmes Fire Department has been accredited for 14 years through the Commission on
Accreditation of Ambulance Service.
13
Ambulances
M60
Body Manufacturer: Braun
Chassis Manufacturer: Kenworth
Year: 2011
VIN # 2NKHHM5XXBM279518
M61
Body Manufacturer: Horton
Chassis Manufacturer: GMC C4500
Year: 2008
VIN # 1GBE4V19X9F407102
M62
Body Manufacturer: Wheeled Coach
Chassis Manufacturer: International 4400
Year: 2002
VIN # 1HTMRAAM33H560148
M63
Body Manufacturer: Wheeled Coach
Chassis Manufacturer: International 4300
Year: 2008
VIN # 1HTMNAAM88H667568
Hazardous Materials
The Loveland Symmes Fire Department has the ability to respond to and mitigate small hazardous material incidents.
When the size or the complexity of the incident exceeds the capabilities of the agency, the Greater Cincinnati Hazardous
Materials Response Team can be contacted for assistance. Agency personnel are trained to the Operations Level at
minimum, but it should be noted that a majority of personnel have Technician Level certification. The agency also utilizes
surrounding communities for initial Hazardous Materials Response.
14
Current Deployment
Points of Service Delivery, Response Areas and Resources

Station 60: located at 9425 Loveland Maderia Road covers all of the area in the south west corner of the District.
This are also has an island area that is covered under contract by Milford Community Fire Department. This
station is the maintenance facility also. This station has Engine 60 Class A Pumper, Medic 60 ALS equipped squad,
Mass Casualty 60, and Utility 60 which is an EMS equipped utility vehicle.

Station 61: located at 8871 Weekly Lane covers the North Western corner of the response area. This station has
Tower 61 Sutphen 100 foot platform, Engine 61 Class A Pumper, Rescue 61 Heavy Rescue Unit, Medic 61 ALS
equipped squad. The Special Operations Chief works out of this station also.

Station 62: located at 126 South Lebanon Road covers the center corridor of the 2 communities. This station is
located nearly right in the middle of the entire response area. This station is also fire headquarters as well as the
home of the Police department and the communications center.. The Fire Chief, Assistant Chief, Operations Chief,
Chief Financial officer and Human Resources officer all work within this building. This station houses Quint 62 75
foot mid mount quint, Medic 62 ALS equipped squad, and Engine 62 Class a pumper. The on Duty District Chief
also responds from this station.

Station 63: located at 100 East Loveland Avenue covers the Western side of the response district. This station has
E-63 Class A pumper, Engine 263 Spare pumper, Medic 63 ALS equipped squad, and Brush 63.
15
16
Community Response History
Analysis of the response history of the agency reveals an obvious demand for emergency medical services, although the
agency does respond to a wide variety of calls for service. Below is a statistical description of response history for the
service programs which the agency provides.
Overall Response Area:
For reporting purposes, the Loveland Symmes Fire Department separates incidents into two categories; Fire and EMS
(emergency medical services). These categories can be further broken down and queried to extract specific response data.
The charts below depict historical response data.
Community Risk Assessment and Risk Levels and Risk Assessment Methodology
The methodology that the agency employs during its risk analysis involves weighing probability and consequence.
All incident types which the agency responds to are categorized utilizing the above pictured assessment tool.
Planning Areas/CAD Zones
The agency has divided its response area into 10 distinct areas. The 10 districts are made up of 60A, 60B/275, 61A,
61/88/I71, 62A, 62B, 62C, 63A, 63B, and 63C.
17
Risk Assessment
Fire Suppression Services
The agency’s risk assessment identifies 3 fire risk categories; low risk, medium risk and high risk.
Low is defined as those occupancies which when involved in fire require less than 750 GPM of water and have minimal
exposure threats. Moderate/Low Probability with Low Consequence. Examples: detached residential garages, out
buildings, commercial structures remote from other buildings requiring less than 750 GPM.
Medium hazards are those which require between 751 and 3000 GPM. The agency has identified 3000 GPM as the
maximum GM which can be supplied by normal on duty staffing. Medium hazards in the event of a fire usually have
damage which is limited to the occupancy and its occupants. This is the most common hazard within Loveland and
Symmes Township. Moderate Probability, Moderate Consequence. Examples: detached single-family homes, older attached
multi-family two story dwellings, and industrial complexes of less than 10,000 square feet.
High hazard class can be defined as occupancies of substantial size or an occupancy containing a predominant
concentration of properties presenting a high or substantial risk of life loss, loss of economic values to the community or
large loss damage to property in the event of fire. In addition, the required fire flow for these occupancies surpasses the
amount capable by initial responding LSFD apparatus (3000 gpm). High Probability, High Consequence. Examples: main
shopping and business centers, Mid-Rise buildings without fire suppression, strip shopping malls, nursing home, infrastructure
facilities (city halls, fire and police stations, schools).
Emergency Medical Services
The fire service agency has identified both statistically and through a customer centered strategic plan that emergency
medical services are critical to the community. Statistical data substantiates that this is the highest level of service demand
in all response zones. Although the consequence of an individual incident may not be high (typically limited to a single
individual), the probability of these incidents occurring is. This ultimately lends the agency to identifying emergency
medical services as a high level of service importance. Incidents themselves can be broken into two major categories:
1. Routine or Single Patient Emergencies –These incidents can be typically handled by one ALS Rescue Squad,
although at times they may require additional assistance of an ALS Engine Company for manpower or equipment.
2. Mass Casualty-These incidents exceed the “normal” response capabilities of the agency with the assistance of two
mutual aid departments.
18
Risk Assessment by Response CAD Cards
19
60 A
Overview:
The 60 A response area is made up of mostly medium risk structures. Most of the buildings in this response area range
from 1500-2000 square feet. There are few new homes that range from 2500-3000 square feet in this response area. This
response area has hydrants throughout. Unique to only this response area LSFD has a contract with the Milford Fire
Department to send and engine and a ladder on all emergencies in this area.
High Fire Risk (S): DerbyShire Stables is a large metal barn that is full of hay and straw. This facility is used to board
horses and is also a training facility for different types of horse riding events.
Medium Fire Risk (S): Residential properties, small commercial properties with limited fire load, Schoolhouse restaurant
is a very large ordinary construction 3 story building that was once a school house and has been converted into a
restaurant. The building has no protection or alerting devices. A fire occurred in this building on June 25 th 2010 resulting
in $50,000 damage. The building was not occupied when the fire occurred.
Low-Fire Risk (S): Several out buildings exist in this response area along with some detached garages and sheds.
Non-Fire Risk (S): Recreational accidents on the Little Miami River with canoes and horseback riding incidents occur in
this area.
20
Historical Data
2010
2011
2012
Fire Responses
13
17
12
EMS Responses
48
32
29
Total Responses
61
49
41
Property Loss
$50,000
$40,000
$0
60 B / 275
Overview:
The 60B / 275 response area is made up of mostly medium risk structures. Most of the buildings in this response area
range from 1500-2500 square feet. There is a portion of this response are off of Humphrey Road with homes ranging in
size from 2500-3500 square feet. This response area has hydrants throughout. This response area also has a couple of
standalone apartment buildings and multifamily units. Also spread throughout this response area are also some small
standalone commercial buildings all well under 10,000 square feet.
High Fire Risk (S): None found in this area
Medium Fire Risk (S): Residential properties, standalone multifamily units, standalone light commercial and retail
buildings.
Low-Fire Risk (S): Throughout this response area several outbuildings and detached garages can be found.
Non-Fire Risk (S): The 60B area includes a stretch of Interstate 275 both east and west bound. The risk of high speed
auto accidents exists in this response area. The 275 loop serves as an alternate truck route for Interstate 71 and 75. Many
trucks take the 275 loop to avoid Cincinnati traffic.
21
Historical Data
2010
2011
2012
Fire Responses
74
68
86
EMS Responses
92
116
96
Total Responses
166
184
182
Property Loss
$0
$0
$0
22
61 A
Overview:
The 61A response area is made up of mostly medium risk structures. Most of the residential buildings in this response
area range from 1500-2500 square feet. The majority of all of these residential buildings have some type of fire alarm
system. This response area also has several apartment and condo complexes that would be considered moderate risk.
Within this response area is Harpers Point apartments which would be of high risk due to the extended hose lays and
building construction issues. Throughout this response area several strip malls exist. This response area has hydrants
throughout.
High Fire Risk (S): Harpers Point apartments would be the highest risk in the 61A response area. The Harpers Point
apartments are 2 story multifamily wood frame apartments with cedar shake roofs. Some of the buildings have been
covered with vinyl siding over the years. Within this complex we have several areas with limited access and egress. Some
hose lays in this complex exceed 350 feet.
Medium Fire Risk (S): All of the properties within this response area excluding Harpers Point would be of medium risk.
Low-Fire Risk (S): This area does not have any low risk structures
Non-Fire Risk (S): EMS response and response to Motor Vehicle accidents make up a good number of runs in this
district. We are seeing some redevelopment and construction taking place in this response area which increases
the potential of collapse and trench accidents.
23
Historical Data
2010
2011
2012
Fire Responses
263
117
91
EMS Responses
565
361
382
Total Responses
828
478
473
Property Loss
$2500
$555,000
$86,000
61/88-I-71
Overview:
The 61/88-I-71 response area is made up of mostly medium risk structures. Most of the residential buildings in this
response area range from 1500-2500 square feet. The majority of all of these residential buildings have some type of fire
alarm system. This response area also has several apartment and condo complexes that would be considered moderate
risk. These buildings all have sprinkler systems built in. Throughout this response area several strip malls exist.
Additionally there are a few large anchor stores such as Kohls, Sams, and JCPenny. This response area has hydrants
throughout.
High Fire Risk (S): Kohls, Sams Club, JCPenny, Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy are all high risk occupancies with this
response area. The area also has several 3 and 4 story office buildings that are filled to capacity on a daily basis.
Medium Fire Risk (S): Strips Malls, residential homes, condominiums, and some small stand alone commercial
businesses make up the majority of this response district.
Low-Fire Risk (S): This area does not have any low risk structures
Non-Fire Risk (S): EMS response and response to Motor Vehicle accidents make up a good number of runs in this district.
We are seeing some redevelopment and construction taking place in this response area which increases the potential of
collapse and trench accidents. Response to high speed motor vehicle accidents on the interstate are increasing with the
development of the land around this district.
24
Historical Data
2010
2011
2012
Fire Responses
39
194
200
EMS Responses
56
266
272
Total Responses
95
460
472
Property Loss
$5000
$1000
$1000.00
25
62 A
Overview:
area range from 1500-2000 square feet. There are few new homes that range from 2500-3000 square feet in this response
area. This response area has hydrants throughout. This response area also has several apartment and condo complexes
that would be considered moderate risk. Throughout this response area several strip malls exist also. The Loveland
Elementary School and Intermediate school are both in this response area.
High Fire Risk (S): Loveland Intermediate School and Loveland Elementary School are both in this response district.
Both of these schools have protection and detection systems.
Medium Fire Risk (S): All of the buildings minus the few out buildings and the 2 schools would be of medium risk in this
response area
Low-Fire Risk (S): Spread throughout this response area several small garages and storage buildings exist.
Non-Fire Risk (S): General Emergency medical calls make up the majority of non fire risk details. This area does have an
aging population.
26
Historical Data
2010
2011
2012
Fire Responses
168
152
203
EMS Responses
465
402
517
Total Responses
633
556
720
Property Loss
$225,000
$0
$71,000
62 B
Overview:
The 62B response area is made up of mostly medium risk structures. Most of the residential buildings in this response
area. This response area has hydrants throughout. This response area also has several apartment and condo complexes
that would be considered moderate risk. Throughout this response area several strip malls exist also. The industrial park
lies within this response area and all buildings are fully sprinklered, which is on Northeast Drive and Commerce
Boulevard. The Lodge Care Center and is a nursing home that is within this response area. This 1 story facility if fully
protected by sprinklers and detection devices.
High Fire Risk (S): The Lodge Care Center would be of high risk in this response area. Most of the patients are not
mobile. The staff does do a great job at isolating and sheltering in place.
Medium Fire Risk (S): The majority of all of the buildings in this response area fall into the Medium risk category. There
are a few manufacturing facilities within this response area but they have both detection and fire protection systems built
in.
Low-Fire Risk (S): Within this response area there are a few detached garages, barns, and out buildings.
Non-Fire Risk (S): The Lodge Care Center tends to produce a lot of general emergency medical transport details. We are
seeing some redevelopment and construction taking place in this response area which increases the potential of collapse
and trench accidents. This area does also have a water tower and several radio towers that could pose a technical rescue
potential.
27
Historical Data
2010
2011
2012
Fire Responses
105
69
113
EMS Responses
528
435
398
Total Responses
633
504
511
Property Loss
$5000
$0
$295,000
62 C
Overview:
The 62C response area is made up of mostly medium risk structures. Most of the residential buildings in this response
area. This response area has hydrants throughout. The only commercial building in the 62C response area is the Loveland
High School. This building is newer construction and is fully protected by sprinklers throughout. There are a few small to
medium churches in this response district that do not pose any additional threat.
High Fire Risk (S): There are none
Medium Fire Risk (S): This entire response district falls into the medium fire risk category except the few building listed
in low.
Low-Fire Risk (S): This response area has a few out buildings, storage buildings, and shelters.
Non-Fire Risk (S): We are seeing some redevelopment and construction taking place in this response area which
increases the potential of collapse and trench accidents. This area does also have a water tower and several radio towers
that could pose a technical rescue risk.
28
Historical Data
2010
2011
2012
Fire Responses
27
25
23
EMS Responses
53
65
61
Total Responses
80
90
84
Property Loss
$0
$0
$0
29
63 A
Overview:
area. This response area has hydrants throughout. The 63A response area has a few small apartment buildings that are
standalone and don’t pose any additional risk or threat. In this response area is also a church and school that pose not
additional threat. The Loveland City building sits within this response area also.
High Fire Risk (S): The Loveland Administration Building poses the highest risk in this district due to its importance in
the day to day operations of the community.
Medium Fire Risk (S): Most all of the buildings throughout this response are pose a medium risk.
Non-Fire Risk (S): We are seeing some redevelopment and construction taking place in this response area which
increases the potential of collapse and trench accidents.
30
Historical Data
2010
2011
2012
Fire Responses
95
92
102
EMS Responses
218
199
218
Total Responses
313
291
320
Property Loss
$0
$0
$0
63 B
Overview:
The 63B response area is made up of mostly medium risk structures. Most of the residential buildings in this response
area. This response area has hydrants throughout. The 63B response area has a few small apartment buildings that are
standalone and don’t pose any additional risk or threat. The Loveland Health Care Center is in this response area and is
the only building that poses any unusual risk.
High Fire Risk (S): Loveland Health Care Center is a single story nursing home facility that is fully protected by
sprinklers.
Medium Fire Risk (S): All of this response area is medium risk except as listed below.
aging population. The Loveland Bike Trail also runs through this district and poses a threat for injured bikers and runners
with limited access to trail.
31
Historical Data
2010
2011
2012
Fire Responses
19
10
11
EMS Responses
85
66
78
Total Responses
104
76
89
Property Loss
$0
$0
$0
63 C
Overview:
The 63C response area is made up of mostly medium risk structures. Most of the residential buildings in this response
area. This response area has hydrants throughout. The 63C response area has a few apartment buildings that are
standalone and don’t pose any additional risk or threat. Within this response are is also a few small commercial buildings
that are well under 10000 square feet and pose not additional risk.
High Fire Risk (S): None
Medium Fire Risk (S): All of this response area is medium risk except as listed below.
aging population. The Loveland Bike Trail also runs through this district and poses a threat for injured bikers and runners
with limited access to trail
32
Historical Data
2010
2011
2012
Fire Responses
10
13
20
EMS Responses
73
80
76
Total Responses
83
93
96
Property Loss
$0
$0
$0
Community Expectations and Performance Goals
Community Expectations
In order to assess the community’s expectations, the agency actively participates in activities throughout the community.
The agency also utilizes a survey card system where the customers in the community are sent a survey card for both fire
and ems details. These cards are returned to the agency and reviewed to enhance our service. These comments and
survey cards were documented and utilized by agency administration during Strategic Plan development.
Performance Expectation Goals
Mission Statement
To provide the most technologically advanced Fire and Rescue Service with the highest trained Professionals and
to deliver that service to our customers with loyalty and compassion.
Concentration Factors
CFAI defines concentration as the spacing of multiple resources (close enough together) so that an initial “effective
response force” can be assembled on scene within adopted public policy time frames. An initial “effective response force”
is the number of responders which is needed to stop the escalation of the emergency for each risk type. An initial
“effective response force” is not necessarily the total number of units or personnel needed if the emergency escalated to
the maximum potential.
The fire service agency has derived its concentration configuration from:




Risk assessment
Call volume
Population
Critical task assignments
The agency strives to maintain the following staffing at each station:
13 personnel on duty
Fire Station Sixty:
Engine Company (3 personnel)
Fire Station Sixty One:
Tower Company (4 personnel)
Fire Station Sixty Two:
Quint Company (2 personnel)
District Chief
(1 person)
Fire Station Sixty Three
33
Fire Station Sixty:
District Chief (1 person)
Fire Station Sixty Three
Fire Station Sixty:
District Chief (1 person)
Fire Station Sixty Three:
34
All of the above stations also staff an EMS transport unit with the staffing above on a first emergency first basis. The
exception is that the Tower crew will split 2 on the EMS Unit and 2 on the Tower.
It should be noted that the Loveland Symmes Fire Department has not had an instance in the past 3 years where it did not
have a unit available to respond.
The agency provides the following table to assist in illustrating the effective response force typically needed to control
specific events.
Type of Emergency
Number of
Responders
Responding Apparatus
Low Hazard Structure Fire
17
3 Engines, 2 Quints, 1 EMS, 1 Command
Medium Hazard Structure Fire
17
High Hazard Structure Fire
19
Medical Emergency
3
1EMS, 1 Command
Motor Vehicle Crash Interstate
11
1 Rescue, 1 Engine, 2 EMS, 1 Command
Motor Vehicle Crash
6
1 Engine 1 EMS 1 Command
Hazardous Materials Release
13
Multiple Casualty Incident
13
1 Engine, 1 Rescue, 2 EMS, 1 Command, 1 Mass
Casualty Unit, Mutual Aid
Technical Rescue (Rope, Trench,
Water, Tower)
19
4 Engines, 2 Quints, 1 EMS, 1 Command Regional
USAR Response
Suspicious Odor Indoors (Gas Leak)
13
2 Engines, 1 Quint, 1 EMS, 1 Command
Suspicious Odor Outdoors
5
1 Engine, 1 Command
Carbon Monoxide No Illness
4
1 Engine 1 Command
Carbon Monoxide Illness Reported
6
1 Engine, 1 Rescue Squad, 1 Command
35
3 Engines, 2 Quints, 1 EMS, 1 Command, Haz-Mat
Team
The agency’s initial response force and “effective response force” is accomplished through on duty personnel and/or
activation of the automatic mutual aid (AMARS). The AMAR system can further be explained as follows. The AMAR system
is an agreement between the Fire Chief’s and their respective communities to provide mutual aid in predetermined
locations. The locations are community specific based upon hazards. Each agency then determines what equipment they
would like to request and from what community it will respond from. Each municipality’s dispatch retains a copy of AMAR
alarms in the region. Local dispatch centers are responsible for dispatching the first and second alarms for each AMAR
area by individually contacting mutual aid agencies.
The Loveland Symmes Fire Department receives automatic mutual aid on all emergencies where more than 13 personnel
are needed.
The fire service agency strives to have department apparatus and equipment available to respond to and initiate
mitigation actions and or emergency medical care depending on the nature of the incident. The chart below depicts the
number of incidents that required assistance from other agencies. This does not mean that a Loveland Symmes apparatus
did not respond, just that additional resources were needed.
Reliability Factors
The fire service agency strives to have department apparatus and equipment available to respond to and initiate
mitigation actions and or emergency medical care depending on the nature of the incident. The chart below depicts the
number of incidents that required assistance from other agencies. This does not mean that a Loveland Symmes Fire
apparatus did not respond, just that additional resources were needed.
Historical Mutual Aid
Received Data
2010
2011
2012
Fire Responses
174
182
122
EMS Responses
11
18
3
Total Responses
185
200
223
*** ALL STRUCTURAL FIRE/ALARM RESPONSES RECEIVE AUTO OR MUTUAL AID ***
36
UNIT RELIABILITY
2010
2011
2012
STATION 60
542 Calls – 97%
532 Calls- 97%
606 Calls – 96.6%
STATION 61
1338 Calls – 92.3%
994 Calls – 94.4%
1261 Calls – 92.9%
STATION 62
1604 Calls – 91.1%
1732 Calls – 90.2%
1708 Calls – 90.3%
STATION 63
861 Calls – 96.1%
1427 Calls – 91.9%
954 Calls – 94.6%
Comparability Factors
When the agency is determining station location, apparatus placement, personnel, and performance standards, NFPA 1710
and the ISO (Insurance Services Office) Fire Suppression Rating Scale are used as references. NFPA 1710 section 5.2.4.2.1
recommends a travel time of 240 seconds for fire suppression incidents. Section 5.3.3.3.3 of NFPA 1710 also recommends
a travel time of 240 seconds for Advanced Life Support arrival. Both of the above sections further state that units should
accomplish this for 90% of all responses. ISO awards points in their Fire Suppression Rating Schedule for engine
companies located with a maximum first due area of 1.5 road miles and ladder companies with a maximum first due area
of 2.5 road miles. During the agency’s last ISO evaluation, the agency received a rating of 2.
37
38
F.
Performance Objectives and Measurement -
THE LSFD IS AN SUBURBAN FIRE AGENCY PER THE FESSAM CHART PAGE 70-71
The fire service agency utilizes NFPA 1221, NFPA 1710, and baselines and benchmarks found on page 71 of the CFAI Fire &
Emergency Service Self-Assessment Manual (FESSAM) 8th Edition in the development of agency specific baselines. As a
result, the agency has adopted the following baselines and benchmarks to ensure the community is aware of the service
delivered by the agency.
Performance Objectives – Benchmarks – FUTURE GOALS FOR RESPONSE TIMES!
Call Processing
It should be noted that the Loveland Symmes Fire Department maintains its own dispatch center. The dispatch center is
known as the North East Communications center.
 For 90% of all emergency calls to the NECC, the call will be answered and dispatched to the appropriate unit(s)
within 70 seconds for EMS and 80 seconds for fire calls.
Turnout Time
 For 90% of all emergency calls, personnel will initiate response in 80 seconds or less from time of notification
Fire Suppression Services Program
 For 90% of all calls which require fire suppression apparatus (non-structure fire) response, the first unit shall
arrive within 7:15 minutes total response time.
 For 90% of all calls for structure fires, the first arriving unit shall arrive within 7:15 minutes total response time.
The first unit shall be capable of the following:




Establish Command (1 officer- incident commander)
Size-up situation
(Incident commander)
Call for additional resources if necessary (Activate additional Alarm)
Establish Attack Engine Company (1 pump operator)
 For 90% of calls which are for low hazard structure fires, apparatus shall arrive on scene within 13 minutes total
response time, completing the ERF, this is the same ERF as a medium hazard structure fire.
39
The ERF for low hazard structures shall be capable of the following:









Deploy attack hose line
Establish water supply
Pump Operator
Perform Search and Rescue
Rapid Intervention Team
Ventilation
Deploy back-up hose line
Incident Commander
Safety Officer*
Total:
(2 firefighters)
(1 firefighter)
(1 firefighter)
(2 firefighters)
(4 firefighters)
(2 firefighters)
(2 firefighters)
(1 Officer in charge)
(1 Incident Commander)
17 responders
THERE HAVE BEEN NO STRUCTURAL FIRES IN THE LOW HAZARD RISK FOR THE PAST 3 YEARS!
 For 90% of calls which are for medium hazard structure fires, apparatus shall arrive on scene within 13 minutes
total response time, completing the ERF.
The balance of the ERF for medium hazard structures shall be capable of the following:










Pump Operator
Aerial Operator
Ventilation
Incident Commander
Safety Officer*
Total:
(2 firefighters)
(1 firefighter)
(1 firefighter)
(1 firefighter)
(2 firefighters)
(4 firefighters)
(2 firefighters)
(2 firefighters)
(1 Chief Officer)
17 responders
ALL WORKING STRUCTURAL FIRES HAVE FALLEN IN THE MEDIUM HAZARD RISK FOR THE PAST 3 YEARS!
40
 For 90% of all incidents which are for high hazard structure fires, apparatus shall arrive on scene within 16
minutes total response time, completing the ERF.
The balance of the EFR for high hazard structures shall be capable of the following:










Deploy attack hose line(s)
Pump Operator
Aerial Operator
Ventilation
Deploy back-up hose line(s)
Incident Commander
Safety Officer
(2 firefighters)
(1 firefighter)
(1 firefighter)
(1 firefighter)
(4 firefighters)
(4 firefighters)
(2 firefighters)
(2 firefighters)
(1 company officer)
Total:
19 responders
THERE HAVE BEEN NO STRUCTURAL FIRES IN THE HIGH HAZARD RISK FOR THE PAST 3 YEARS!
Emergency Medical Services Program
 For 90% of all calls for emergency medical service, the first ALS unit will arrive within 6:45 minutes total response
time.
This ERF shall be capable of the following:





Survey the scene for the need for additional units.
Conduct patient primary survey
Conduct secondary survey
Initiate ALS treatments per protocol
If the unit is a transport unit, initiate transport to a definitive care facility.
Additional levels of EMS Response are listed below:
41
Type of Emergency
Number of
Responders
Responding Apparatus
Medical Emergency
3
1EMS, 1 Command
Motor Vehicle Crash Interstate
11
1 Rescue, 1 Engine, 2 EMS, 1 Command
Motor Vehicle Crash
6
1 Engine 1 EMS 1 Command
Multiple Casualty Incident
13
1 Engine, 1 Rescue, 2 EMS, 1 Command, 1 Mass
Casualty Unit, Mutual Aid
Motor Vehicle Crash – Interstate
 For 90% of all calls for Motor Vehicle Crashes on the Interstates, the first ALS unit will arrive within 7:30 minutes
total response time and the ERF of 11 will arrive within 8 minutes








Establish fire control
Establish vehicle extrication
Establish scene blocking
Incident Command
Motor Vehicle Crash
 For 90% of all calls for Motor Vehicle Crashes, the first ALS unit will arrive within 6:30 minutes total response time
and the ERF of 11 will arrive within 7:30 minutes








Establish minor vehicle extrication
Incident Command
Mass Casualty Incident
 For 90% of all calls for Motor Vehicle Crashes on the Interstates, the first ALS unit will arrive within 6:45 minutes
total response time and the ERF of 11 will arrive within 13 minutes






Establish Triage/Treatment/Transport Groups
Incident Command
Hazardous Materials Services Program
 For 90% of all calls for hazardous materials releases and spills, the first arriving unit shall arrive within 7:15
minutes total response time.
The ERF shall be capable of the following, in addition to completing the above:
42







Establish staging area
Evacuate effected areas
Set up appropriate decontamination equipment
Dispatch regional response team
Provide Rescue Squad (Ambulance) for response personnel
Suppress related fires
Incident Command
 For 90% of all hazardous materials releases and spills which require an ERF, the ERF shall arrive on scene in 30
minutes or less.
The Loveland Symmes Fire Department has not had a hazardous materials release that required the ERF response
in the last 3 years.
Technical Rescue Services Program
 For 90% of all calls for technical rescue, the first arriving unit shall arrive within 7:15 minutes total response time.





Establish Command
Size-up situation
Call for additional resources if necessary (Activate AMARS)
Activate Regional Rescue Team
Establish safe working area
 For 90% of all calls for technical rescue, the technical rescue team shall arrive on scene within 30 minutes or less
with enough personnel to complete the ERF.
The Loveland Symmes Fire Department has not had a technical rescue response that required the ERF response in
the last 3 years.
Performance Objectives – Baselines
Call Processing
 For 90% of all emergency calls to the North East Communications center, the call will be answered and dispatched
to the appropriate unit(s) within 1:11 seconds for EMS calls and 1:33 for Fire Calls
Turnout Time
 For 90% of emergency medical service calls, personnel will initiate response in 1:50 seconds.
 For 90% of all non-emergency medical service calls, personnel will initiate response in 1:32 seconds or less from
time of notification.
43
Fire Suppression Services Program
 For 90% of all calls for which require fire suppression apparatus response (non-structure fire), the first arriving
unit shall arrive within 7:19 minutes total response time.
 For 90% of all calls for structure fires, the first arriving unit shall arrive within 7:19 minutes total response time.




Establish Command
(1 officer- incident commander)
Size-up situation
(Incident commander)
Call for additional resources if necessary
(Activate MABAS Alarm)
Establish Attack Engine Company
(1 pump operator)
The agency currently does not have a baseline established for low hazard structure fires. The structure fires
that have occurred in the jurisdiction since 2010 have taken place in occupancies classified as medium
hazards.
 When required, to provide an ERF of 17 firefighters to medium hazard structure fires within 13 minutes total
response time, 90% of the time.
The balance of the ERF for medium hazard structures shall be capable of the following:










Pump Operator
Aerial Operator
Ventilation
Incident Commander
Safety Officer*
Total:
(2 firefighters)
(1 firefighter)
(1 firefighter)
(1 firefighter)
(2 firefighters)
(4 firefighters)
(2 firefighters)
(2 firefighters)
(1 Chief Officer)
17 responders
The agency currently does not have a baseline established for high hazard structure fires. The structure fires
that have occurred in the jurisdiction since 2010 have taken place in occupancies classified as medium
hazards.
Emergency Medical Services Program
 For 90% of all calls for emergency medical service, an ALS unit will arrive within 6:58 minutes total response time.



44


If the unit is a transport unit, initiate transport to a definitive care facility.
Motor Vehicle Crash – Interstate
 For 90% of all calls for Motor Vehicle Crashes on the Interstates, the first ALS unit will arrive within 7:30minutes
total response time and the ERF of 11 will arrive within 8:24 minutes








Establish vehicle extrication
Incident Command
Motor Vehicle Crash
 For 90% of all calls for Motor Vehicle Crashes, the first ALS unit will arrive within 6:15 minutes total response time
and the ERF of 11 will arrive within 6:36 minutes








Establish minor vehicle extrication
Incident Command
Mass Casualty Incident
The agency currently does not have a baseline established for technical rescues. The agency has not had a technical rescue
that required the ERF.
Hazardous Materials Services Program
For ninety percent of all calls for hazardous materials, the first arriving unit shall arrive within 7:19 minutes total
response time.




45
Establish Command
Size-up situation-Identify material or substance
Call for additional resources if necessary (Activate MABAS Alarm)
Initiate evacuation of immediate area (if necessary)

Deploy containment equipment for spills/leaks which do not require Haz-mat Team equipment (oil and
fuel spills).
The agency does not have baselines established for effective response forces for hazardous materials incidents due to all
incidents since 2010 having been handled by initial responding personnel.
Technical Rescue Services Program
The agency currently does not have a baseline established for technical rescues. The agency has not had a technical rescue
that required the ERF since 1999.
46
THE LSFD IS AN SUBURBAN FIRE AGENCY PER THE FESSAM CHART PAGE 70-71
FRACTAL TIMES - EMS
90th Percentile Times - E.M.S.
Call Processing
Time
Pick-Up to Dispatch
71 Seconds
Baseline
70 Seconds
Benchmark
Turnout Time
Turnout Time - 1st Unit
110 Seconds
Baseline
80 Seconds
Benchmark
Travel Time
Travel Time - 1st Unit
5 Minutes 27
Seconds
Baseline
5 Minutes 15
Seconds
Benchmark
Total Response
Total Response Time 1st
Time
Due
6 Minutes 58
Seconds
Baseline
6 Minutes 45
seconds
Benchmark
FRACTAL TIMES - FIRE
90th Percentile Times - Fire
Call Processing
Time
Pick-Up to Dispatch
93 Seconds
Baseline
80 Seconds
Benchmark
Turnout Time
Turnout Time - 1st Unit
92 Seconds
Baseline
80 Seconds
Benchmark
Travel Time
Travel Time - 1st Unit
5 Minutes 2
Seconds
Baseline
5 Minutes
Benchmark
Total Response
Total Response Time 1st
Time
Due
7 Minutes 19
Seconds
Baseline
7 Minutes 15
Seconds
Benchmark
47
2010
2011
2012
0:01:52 0:01:38 0:01:11
90.0%
58.00% 71.00% 89.0%
0:01:41 0:01:32 0:01:50
90.0%
80.00% 84.50% 72.0%
0:05:42 0:05:51 0:05:27
90.0%
86.00% 86.00%
88.0%
0:08:10 0:07:53 0:06:58
90.0%
74.4%
79.1%
83.6%
2010
2011
2012
0:02:22 0:02:05 0:01:33
90.0%
61.0%
67.0%
81.0%
0:01:37 0:01:34 0:01:32
90.0%
80.0%
84.5%
80.0%
0:05:47
0:05:02
83.90% 78.70%
90.0%
89.0%
0:08:20 0:08:05 0:07:31
90.0%
79.7%
81.7%
86.0%
L OVELAND ‐S YMMES F IRE D EPARTMENT WORKINGSTRUCTUREFIRETOTALCOMPLEMENTTIME‐90thPercentile
Alarm
TotalComplement
TotalResponse
RunDate
Address
Time
Time
Time
District
8031GlendaleMilford
6/25/2010 Road
810
823 13Minutes
60A
7/3/2010 8754WalesDrive
817
829 12Minutes
61/88
7/25/2010 10094FoxChase
815
821 6Minutes
62A
10/13/2010 1087StratfordCourt
1124
1137 13Minutes
62B
12/13/2010 8667Totempole
256
308 14Minutes
61A
4/8/2011 11320Montgomery
1740
1748 8Minutes
61/88
9/26/2011 11456EnyartRoad
247
257 10Minutes
61A
1/20/2012 9024SymmesKnoll
01:06:11
01:19:34 13:23
61A
8/7/2012 218Wildwood
21:05:28
21:18:24 12:56
62A
8/10/2012 12185SycamoreTerrace
14:10:44
14:22:10 11:36
61‐88
CURRENTLYTHESETIMESAREONLYAVAILIBLEINFULLMINUTESDUETOONEDISPATCHCENTERINVOLVED
NOTSAVINGTAPESANDONLYTRACKINGWHOLEMINUTES
HistoricalResponseData
2010
District
FireDetails
EMS Details
DollarLoss
60A
60B/275
61A
61/88‐I71
62A
62B
62C
63A
63B
63C
13
52/74
263
14/39
168
105
27
95
19
10
48
67/92
565
42/56
465
528
53
218
85
73
$50,000
$0
$2500
$5000
$5000
$225,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
48 L OVELAND -S YMMES F IRE D EPARTMENT
2011
District
Fire Details
EMS Details
Dollar Loss
60A
60 B/275
61A
61/88-I 71
62A
62B
62C
63A
63B
63C
17
45/68
117
157/194
152
69
25
92
10
13
32
96/116
361
226/266
402
435
65
199
66
80
$40,000
$0
$555,000
$1000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
The 61/88 district was expanded in the beginning of 2011. That is why the numbers are so different.
2012
49
District
Fire Details
EMS Details
Dollar Loss
60A
60 B
61A
61/88
62A
62B
62C
63A
63B
63C
12
86
91
200
203
113
23
102
11
20
29
126
91
272
517
398
61
218
78
76
$0
$0
$86000
$1000
$71000
$295000
$0
$0
$0
$0
LOVELAND-SYMMES FIRE DEPARTMENT
126 S. LEBANON RD. LOVELAND, OHIO 45140
513-583-3001
WWW.L.S.F.D.ORG
50
Appendix
51
2012 Loveland EMS
2012 Miami Township EMS
1% 3%
6%
5%
7%
Auto Accident
29%
Cardiac Emergency
16%
9%
32%
0%
1%
Respiratory Difficulty
Medical Emergency
Medical Emergency
Trauma Non Highway
Trauma Non Highway
0%
Sick Person/Illness
14%
Assist Fire/EMS/Bed
Assist Calls
36%
DOA's
DOA's
Cardiac Arrests
Cardiac Arrests
No Patient Contact
No Patient Contact
Iv Starts
Iv Starts
2012 Symmes Township EMS
5%
Cardiac Emergency
Sick Person/Illness
20%
Auto Accident
21%
2012 Mutual Aid EMS
3%
Auto Accident Auto Accident
26%
16%
Cardiac Emergency Cardiac Emergency
Respiratory Diﬃculty 31% 35% Respiratory Difficulty
Medical Emergency Medical Emergency
Trauma Non Highway Trauma Non Highway
6%
11%
5%
26%
Sick Person/Illness Sick Person/Illness
Assist Calls Assist Fire/EMS/Bed
DOA's
Cardiac Arrests
0% 7% 6% 4% 16% 1% DOA's Cardiac Arrests No Patient Contact
No PaMent Contact Iv Starts
Iv Starts 2012 Loveland Fire
1% 3% 7% 6% 2012 Miami Township Fire
0% Structure Fires/RIT 6% Structure Fires/RIT 7% Open/Grass/Mulch Fires Open/Grass/Mulch Fires Vehicle Fires Vehicle Fires 20% Flushed/Spilled Fluids 40% Moveup/Assist Fire/Ems 21% 34% 0% Emergency to Property Auto Accidents Auto Accidents Smoke Scare Smoke Scare 4% 6% 27% CO Alarms 8% 4% Fires/Elec./Appl./Other Fires/Elec./Appl./Other 2012 Mutual Aid Fire
0% Moveup/Assist Fire/Ems Open/Grass/Mulch Fires Vehicle Fires 8% Vehicle Fires Flushed/Spilled Fluids Structure Fires/RIT 6% Open/Grass/Mulch Fires 0% Flushed/Spilled Fluids 6% Moveup/Assist Fire/Ems Haz. Materials Release Haz. Materials Release 38% 5% Emergency to Property Emergency to Property Auto Accidents Auto Accidents Smoke Scare 20% CO Alarms Alarm AcNvaNon 1% Alarm AcNvaNon Customer Service Structure Fires/RIT 17% CO Alarms Customer Service 2% 2% 5% 5% 2% 6% Alarm AcNvaNon 2012 Symmes Township Fire
3% Moveup/Assist Fire/Ems Haz. Materials Release Haz. Materials Release Emergency to Property Flushed/Spilled Fluids Smoke Scare 78% CO Alarms Alarm AcNvaNon Customer Service Customer Service Fires/Elec./Appl./Other Fires/Elec./Appl./Other LSFD Yearly Statistical Report
EMS Incidents
City of Loveland
Nature of Call
Symmes Township
Auto Accident
Cardiac Emergency
Medical Emergency
Trauma Non Highway
Sick Person/Illness
Assist Fire Company
DOA's
Cardiac Arrests
No Patient Contact
Iv Starts
Ped Runs < 8
YTD
82
97
113
410
258
204
62
7
17
35
1
21
YTD
271
58
56
263
110
164
49
7
11
33
0
19
Total EMS Details
1286
1022
Advanced Life Support
Basic Life Support
Non-Transport
638
324
325
401
213
408
Total Non-Residents
459
554
Aver. EMS Response
04:31
05:20
Miami Township
YTD
3
0
0
5
0
2
0
0
0
4
0
0
14
Contracted Runs
4
Mutual Aid
Given
YTD
22
1
4
11
3
5
0
0
0
25
0
0
71
Type of Call
4
4
6
15
16
40
Total EMS Incidents
YTD
2393
LSFD Yearly Statistical Report
Mutual Aid (Given) Summary
Fire Incidents
Nature of Call
RIT Request
Grass/Mulch Fires
Vehicle Fires
Flush/Spilled Fluids
Assist Calls/Wires Down
Haz. Materials Release
Emergency to Property
Auto Accidents
Smoke Scare
CO Alarms
Alarm Activations
Total Incidents
Blue Ash
YTD
9
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
Sycamore
Milford
YTD
26
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
6
36
Miami Twp
YTD
29
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
Sharonville
YTD
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
YTD
89
0
3
0
13
0
0
16
0
0
10
16
131
Total MA Fire Incidents
EMS Incidents
Nature of Call
Auto Accident
Cardiac Emergency
Medical Emergency
Trauma Non Highway
Sick Person/Illness
No Patient Contact
Assist Fire Company
Blue Ash
YTD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sycamore
Milford
YTD
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Miami Twp
YTD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sharonville
YTD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
YTD
222
Other
YTD
20
1
4
19
2
4
28
0
Total EMS Details
0
7
0
0
78
Type of Call
Basic Life Support
Non-Transport
0
0
0
0
1
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
18
40
Total MA EMS Incidents
YTD
85
Fire Incidents
City of Loveland
Nature of Call
Symmes Township
Miami Township
Structure Fires/RIT
Grass/Mulch/Open Fires
Vehicle Fires
Flushed/Spilled Fluids
Assist EMS/Fire
Auto Accidents
Smoke Scare
CO Alarms
Alarm Activation
Customer Service
Fires/Elec./Appl./Other
YTD
2
23
3
12
137
0
17
31
26
15
84
26
29
YTD
3
31
13
13
243
0
6
126
31
15
109
21
32
YTD
6
0
1
0
4
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
Total Incidents
405
643
15
Initial Inspections
Plan Reviews
PIA'S
Hydrants
Public Educations
392
3
96
1827
55
528
97
45
1964
38
Aver. Fire Response
04:16
04:52
Mutual Aid
Given
YTD
163
0
1
0
12
1
0
17
0
0
13
0
1
208
Prevention Activity
Total Fire Incidents
YTD
1271
Total Incidents
YTD
3664
EMS Incidents
City of Loveland
Nature of Call
Symmes Township
Auto Accident
Cardiac Emergency
Medical Emergency
Trauma Non Highway
Sick Person/Illness
Assist Fire Company
DOA's
Cardiac Arrests
No Patient Contact
Iv Starts
Ped Runs < 8
YTD
91
97
120
421
276
279
33
7
11
18
6
44
YTD
344
49
49
253
155
141
73
5
7
34
0
27
Total EMS Details
1359
1110
Basic Life Support
Non-Transport
573
374
341
300
232
537
Total Non-Residents
749
496
Aver. EMS Response
4:27
5:11
Miami Township
YTD
10
0
0
2
1
3
0
0
0
8
0
1
24
Contracted Runs
14
Mutual Aid
Given
YTD
16
2
1
12
4
5
4
0
0
16
0
0
60
Type of Call
3
7
14
2
14
44
Total EMS Incidents
YTD
2553
Fire Incidents
Nature of Call
RIT Request
Grass/Mulch Fires
Vehicle Fires
Auto Accidents
Smoke Scare
CO Alarms
Alarm Activations
Total Incidents
EMS Incidents
Nature of Call
Auto Accident
Cardiac Emergency
Medical Emergency
Trauma Non Highway
Sick Person/Illness
No Patient Contact
Assist Fire Company
Blue Ash
YTD
10
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
1
15
Blue Ash
YTD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sycamore
YTD
44
0
5
0
1
0
0
20
1
0
18
89
Sycamore
YTD
2
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
Miami Twp
YTD
22
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
27
Miami Twp
YTD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sharonville
YTD
14
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
3
21
Sharonville
YTD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total EMS Details
0
6
0
0
Type of Call
Basic Life Support
Non-Transport
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
YTD
63
5
2
1
11
0
0
14
0
0
15
111
YTD
263
Other
YTD
18
2
2
20
4
3
24
2
75
3
23
45
YTD
81
Fire Incidents
City of Loveland
Nature of Call
Symmes Township
Miami Township
Structure Fires/RIT
Vehicle Fires
Assist EMS/Fire
Auto Accidents
Smoke Scare
CO Alarms
Alarm Activation
Customer Service
YTD
2
24
3
18
110
1
8
35
23
16
66
17
26
YTD
3
23
17
26
141
0
8
98
31
15
134
19
43
YTD
4
1
1
1
2
0
0
5
0
0
1
0
1
Total Incidents
349
558
16
Initial Inspections
Plan Reviews
PIA'S
Hydrants
Public Educations
403
4
177
1624
32
638
52
290
2461
18
Aver. Fire Response
4:07
4:50
Mutual Aid
Given
YTD
149
4
6
0
20
0
0
32
2
0
38
0
1
252
Prevention Activity
YTD
1175
Total Incidents
YTD
3728
2%
2010 Loveland EMS
1%
1%
1% 0%
0%
7%
7%
Auto Accident
Auto Accident
Cardiac Emergency
Cardiac Emergency
21%
9%
Medical Emergency
33%
Medical Emergency
42%
Trauma Non Highway
20%
31%
Sick Person/Illness
Sick Person/Illness
Assist Fire/EMS/Bed
Assist Calls
DOA's
DOA's
Cardiac Arrests
Cardiac Arrests
13%
No Patient Contact
No Patient Contact
4%
Iv Starts
1%
Trauma Non Highway
8%
Iv Starts
2010 Mutual Aid EMS
3%
7%
Auto Accident
Auto Accident
Cardiac Emergency
Cardiac Emergency
31%
13%
Medical Emergency
Medical Emergency
Trauma Non Highway
Trauma Non Highway
Sick Person/Illness
Sick Person/Illness
Assist Fire/EMS/Bed
14%
4%
4%
3%
7%
DOA's
Cardiac Arrests
23%
27%
27%
No Patient Contact
Iv Starts
1%
8%
7%
20%
Assist Calls
DOA's
Cardiac Arrests
No Patient Contact
Iv Starts
2010Sycamore Fire
2010 Blue Ash Fire
7%
7%
RIT Request
RIT Request
Grass/Mulch Fires
Grass/Mulch Fires
20%
Vehicle Fires
6%
Moveup/Assist Fire/Ems
Vehicle Fires
1%
49%
13%
67%
Auto Accidents
Alarm Activations
Auto Accidents
Smoke Scare
6%
Alarm Activations
2010 Mason Fire
RIT Request
Grass/Mulch Fires
Vehicle Fires
10%
9%
67%
CO Alarms
0% 1%
2010 Sharonville Fire
14%
23%
Smoke Scare
CO Alarms
RIT Request
4%
Grass/Mulch Fires
15%
Vehicle Fires
Auto Accidents
Auto Accidents
Smoke Scare
CO Alarms
Alarm Activations
81%
Smoke Scare
CO Alarms
Alarm Activations
2010 Miami Township Fire
2010 Loveland Fire
1%
5%
7%
1%
Structure Fires/RIT
Structure Fires/RIT
7%
Grass/Mulch Fires/Open Burn
5%
6%
Vehicle Fires
6%
Vehicle Fires
25%
19%
31%
7%
31%
Auto Accidents
5%
6%
Smoke Scare
7%
CO Alarms
10%
13%
8%
4%
5%
2010 Mutual Aid Fire
Structure Fires/RIT
Structure Fires/RIT
Vehicle Fires
15%
1%
Vehicle Fires
24%
25%
13%
8%
Smoke Scare
6%
1%
Alarm Activation
Customer Service
59%
Auto Accidents
Smoke Scare
CO Alarms
CO Alarms
18%
Auto Accidents
3%
Smoke Scare
Alarm Activation
2010 Symmes Township Fire
3%
Auto Accidents
CO Alarms
Alarm Activation
2%
3%
6%
2%
2%
Alarm Activation
Customer Service
EMS Incidents
City of Loveland
Nature of Call
Symmes Township
Auto Accident
Cardiac Emergency
Medical Emergency
Trauma Non Highway
Sick Person/Illness
Assist Fire Company
DOA's
Cardiac Arrests
No Patient Contact
Iv Starts
Ped Runs < 8
YTD
43
96
99
434
228
198
34
6
3
24
1
31
YTD
242
55
67
298
136
124
75
4
7
25
0
22
Total EMS Details
1166
1033
Basic Life Support
Non-Transport
575
322
269
376
229
438
Total Non-Residents
502
544
Aver. EMS Response
4:29
5:18
Miami Township
YTD
12
2
0
9
0
2
2
0
1
8
0
2
36
Contracted Runs
14
Mutual Aid
Given
YTD
9
2
4
19
4
2
1
0
0
15
0
2
56
Type of Call
4
8
24
15
17
24
Total EMS Incidents
YTD
2291
Fire Incidents
Nature of Call
RIT Request
Grass/Mulch Fires
Vehicle Fires
Auto Accidents
Smoke Scare
CO Alarms
Alarm Activations
Total Incidents
EMS Incidents
Nature of Call
Auto Accident
Cardiac Emergency
Medical Emergency
Trauma Non Highway
Sick Person/Illness
No Patient Contact
Assist Fire Company
Blue Ash
YTD
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Blue Ash
YTD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sycamore
YTD
22
0
0
0
13
0
1
1
0
3
9
49
Sycamore
YTD
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Mason
YTD
35
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
38
Mason
YTD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sharonville
YTD
9
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
Sharonville
YTD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
YTD
66
1
1
0
19
0
1
3
0
0
11
102
YTD
214
Other
YTD
20
3
1
23
2
0
23
1
Total EMS Details
0
1
0
0
73
Type of Call
Basic Life Support
Non-Transport
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
22
37
YTD
74
Fire Incidents
City of Loveland
Nature of Call
Symmes Township
Miami Township
Structure Fires/RIT
Vehicle Fires
Assist EMS/Fire
Auto Accidents
Smoke Scare
CO Alarms
Alarm Activation
Customer Service
YTD
0
26
5
21
111
0
20
21
31
8
60
17
31
YTD
3
22
13
15
279
0
9
112
26
23
136
28
32
YTD
8
0
1
0
5
0
1
1
0
0
3
1
0
Total Incidents
351
698
20
Initial Inspections
Plan Reviews
PIA'S
Hydrants
Public Educations
376
1
189
1632
49
596
87
181
1867
23
Aver. Fire Response
4:12
4:48
Mutual Aid
Given
YTD
159
3
0
0
29
0
0
4
0
0
18
1
0
214
Prevention Activity
YTD
1283
Total Incidents
YTD
3574
2011 Loveland EMS
3% 1%
2%
4%
8%
Auto Accident
Auto Accident
22%
Cardiac Emergency
17%
8%
Cardiac Emergency
33%
Medical Emergency
Medical Emergency
Trauma Non Highway
3%
Trauma Non Highway
Sick Person/Illness
6%
Sick Person/Illness
Assist Fire/EMS/Bed
20%
Assist Calls
6%
DOA's
37%
DOA's
5%
Cardiac Arrests
Cardiac Arrests
25%
No Patient Contact
No Patient Contact
Iv Starts
Iv Starts
2011 Mutual Aid EMS
1% 2%
Auto Accident
Auto Accident
7%
16%
Cardiac Emergency
24%
27%
12%
Cardiac Emergency
3%
Medical Emergency
Medical Emergency
7%
Trauma Non Highway
5%
13%
7%
Sick Person/Illness
Assist Fire/EMS/Bed
DOA's
Cardiac Arrests
29%
Sick Person/Illness
2%
4%
Trauma Non Highway
Assist Calls
7%
DOA's
34%
Cardiac Arrests
No Patient Contact
No Patient Contact
Iv Starts
Iv Starts
2011 Miami Township Fire
2011 Loveland Fire
1%
9%
Structure Fires/RIT
7%
Structure Fires/RIT
5%
5%
6%
Vehicle Fires
15%
Vehicle Fires
40%
17%
5%
32%
2%
9%
Auto Accidents
Smoke Scare
Smoke Scare
4%
5% 3%
5%
Alarm Activation
Customer Service
Customer Service
2010 Mutual Aid Fire
2010 Symmes Township Fire
2%
CO Alarms
25%
Alarm Activation
6%
Auto Accidents
CO Alarms
6%
5%
1%
2%
2%
Structure Fires/RIT
Structure Fires/RIT
8%
Vehicle Fires
Vehicle Fires
20%
14%
40%
3%
1%
Auto Accidents
Auto Accidents
Smoke Scare
4%
CO Alarms
16%
Alarm Activation
Customer Service
1%
74%
Smoke Scare
CO Alarms
Alarm Activation
Customer Service
2011Sycamore Fire
2011 Blue Ash Fire
RIT Request
RIT Request
Grass/Mulch Fires
18%
Vehicle Fires
Grass/Mulch Fires
Vehicle Fires
45%
6%
2%
2%
100%
Auto Accidents
Smoke Scare
Auto Accidents
27%
Smoke Scare
CO Alarms
CO Alarms
Alarm Activations
Alarm Activations
2010 Mason Fire
2010 Sharonville Fire
0%
0%
0%
RIT Request
90%
8%
RIT Request
Grass/Mulch Fires
Grass/Mulch Fires
Vehicle Fires
Vehicle Fires
Auto Accidents
Auto Accidents
Smoke Scare
Smoke Scare
92%
CO Alarms
CO Alarms
Alarm Activations
Alarm Activations

Standard of Cover - Loveland

Transcription

Similar documents

Symmes Township Day In The Park

LOVELAND, CO - Poag Shopping Centers

Township of Wall Regional Bike Path Central Section Map Map 3 of

YOU`RE SO HOT! SUMMER BRINGS HEAT

Loveland-Symmes Fire Department 2015 Annual Report

loveland-symmes fire department

Vol. 37, No. 9 - The Group, Inc.