Record of Site Condition # 216529 Record of Site

Transcription

Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 216529
Record of Site Condition
Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act
Summary
Record of Site Condition Number
Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry
Certification Date
Current Property Use
Intended Property Use
Certificate of Property Use Number
Applicable Site Condition Standards**
Property Municipal Address
216529
2015/01/19
2014/09/03
Industrial
Residential
No CPU
Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,
with Non-potable Ground Water, Coarse
Textured Soil, for Residential property use
130 YORKLAND BOULEVARD, TORONTO,
ON, M2J 1R5
Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence
This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has
access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings
with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental
condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.
Contents of this Record of Site Condition
This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from
the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been
submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.
Filed Record of Site Condition # 216529 on 2015/01/19
1 of 19
PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS
Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC
Owner Name
130 YORKLAND JV INC.
Authorized Person
BABAK SARSHAR
Mailing Address
120, 5050 DUFFERIN STREET, TORONTO
ONTARIO, CANADA
Postal Code
M3H 5T5
Phone
(416) 739-9300
Fax
(416) 739-9593
Email Address
bsarshar@formatgroup.ca
2 of 19
RSC Property Location Information
Municipal Address(es)
130 YORKLAND BOULEVARD, TORONTO, ON M2J 1R5
Municipality
Toronto
Legal Description
See Attached Lawyer’s Letter
Assessment Roll
Number(s)
1908111-25000080
Property Identifier
Number(s)
10085-0033 (LT)
RSC Property Geographical References
Coordinate System
UTM
Datum
NAD 83
Zone
17
Easting
634,108.69
Northing
4,847,795.15
RSC Property Use Information
The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community
use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.
Current Property Use
Industrial
Intended Property Use
Residential
Certificate of Property
Use has been issued
under section 168.6 of the
EPA
No
3 of 19
Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC
The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank
4 of 19
PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S
STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS
Qualified Person's Information
Name
DAVOR ALEXANDER FISHER
Type of Licence Under
Professional Engineers
Act
Licence
Licence Number
14273015
QP Employer Name
FISHER ENVIRONMENTAL LTD.
Mailing Address
400 ESNA PARK DRIVE, MARKHAM
ONTARIO, L3R 3K2 CANADA
Phone
(905) 475-7755
Fax
(905) 475-7718
Email Address
fisher@fisherenvironmental.com
Municipal Information
Local or Single-Tier
Municipality
Toronto
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office
District Office
Toronto District Office
District Office Address
5775 Yonge St., 8th floor, North York ON M2M 4J1
5 of 19
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Report
Document used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates
in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components
of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a)
of O. Reg. 153/04)
(YYYY/MM/DD)
Type of
Report
Report Title
Date of Report
(YYYY/MM/DD)
Name of Consulting
Company
P1 ESA
Phase One ESA, 130 & 180 Yorkland Blvd., Toronto, ON
2014-09-04
Author
of Report
David Fisher,
P. Eng.
2014-09-02
FISHER
ENVIRONMENTAL LTD.
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment
Reports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or
otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment
Report Title
Date of Report
(YYYY/MM/DD)
Author
of Report
Name of Consulting
Company
N/A
6 of 19
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Report
Document used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates
in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation
components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a)
of O. Reg. 153/04)
Type of
Report
Report Title
Date of Report
(YYYY/MM/DD)
P2 ESA
Phase Two ESA, 130 & 180 Yorkland Blvd., Toronto, ON
2014-09-22
Author
of Report
David Fisher,
P. Eng.
(YYYY/MM/DD)
2014-09-03
Name of Consulting
Company
FISHER
ENVIRONMENTAL LTD.
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment
Reports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of
Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment
Report Title
Date of Report
(YYYY/MM/DD)
.
Author
of Report
Name of Consulting
Company
N/A
7 of 19
Environmental Condition
Section 41 applies?
No
Section 43.1 applies?
No
Site Condition Information
Certification date (YYYY/MM/DD)
2014/09/03
Total area of RSC property (in hectares)
0.75401
Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property
Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC
property
Soil Texture
Coarse
Assessment/Restoration Approach
Full Depth Generic
Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water?
Yes
Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or
under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?
Yes
Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under
the property which is used in the RSC?
Yes
Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or
sediment
FISHER ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
Ground water condition (potable, non-potable)
Non-potable
Applicable Site Condition Standard
TABLE 3
Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date
2014/08/21
8 of 19
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Contaminant
Name
Maximum
Concentration
Applicable Site
Condition Standard
0.7
Unit of
Measure
1
Electrical Conductivity
0.54
mS/cm
2
Sodium Adsorption Ratio
3.9
3
Acenaphthene
<
0.05
7.9
µg/g
4
Acenaphthylene
<
0.05
0.15
µg/g
5
Anthracene
<
0.05
0.67
µg/g
6
Benz[a]anthracene
<
0.05
0.5
µg/g
7
Benzo[a]pyrene
<
0.05
0.3
µg/g
8
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
<
0.05
0.78
µg/g
9
Benzo[ghi]perylene
<
0.1
6.6
µg/g
10
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
<
0.05
0.78
µg/g
11
Chrysene
<
0.05
7
µg/g
12
Dibenz[a h]anthracene
<
0.1
0.1
µg/g
13
Fluoranthene
<
0.05
0.69
µg/g
14
Fluorene
<
0.05
62
µg/g
15
Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene
<
0.1
0.38
µg/g
16
Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) ***
<
0.05
0.99
µg/g
17
Naphthalene
<
0.05
0.6
µg/g
18
Phenanthrene
<
0.05
6.2
µg/g
19
Pyrene
<
0.05
78
µg/g
20
Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1****
<
10
55
µg/g
21
Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2
<
10
98
µg/g
22
<
50
300
µg/g
23
<
50
2800
µg/g
24
Benzene
<
0.02
0.21
µg/g
25
Ethylbenzene
<
0.05
2
µg/g
26
Toluene
0.45
2.3
µg/g
27
Xylene Mixture
<
0.05
3.1
µg/g
28
Acetone
<
0.5
16
µg/g
29
Bromomethane
<
0.05
0.05
µg/g
30
Carbon Tetrachloride
<
0.05
0.05
µg/g
31
Chlorobenzene
<
0.05
2.4
µg/g
32
Chloroform
<
0.05
0.05
µg/g
33
Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-
<
0.05
3.4
µg/g
34
<
0.05
4.8
µg/g
35
<
0.05
0.083
µg/g
5
...Continued on next page
9 of 19
Continued from previous page....
Contaminant
Name
Maximum
Concentration
Applicable Site
Condition Standard
Unit of
Measure
36
Dichlorodifluoromethane
<
0.05
16
µg/g
37
Dichloroethane, 1,1-
<
0.05
3.5
µg/g
38
<
0.05
0.05
µg/g
39
Dichloroethylene, 1,1-
<
0.05
0.05
µg/g
40
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis-
<
0.05
3.4
µg/g
41
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans-
<
0.05
0.084
µg/g
42
Dichloropropane, 1,2-
<
0.05
0.05
µg/g
43
Dichloropropene,1,3-
<
0.05
0.05
µg/g
44
Ethylene dibromide
<
0.05
0.05
µg/g
45
Hexane (n)
<
0.05
2.8
µg/g
46
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
<
0.5
16
µg/g
47
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
<
0.5
1.7
µg/g
48
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
<
0.05
0.75
µg/g
49
Methylene Chloride
<
0.05
0.1
µg/g
50
Styrene
<
0.05
0.7
µg/g
51
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2-
<
0.05
0.058
µg/g
52
<
0.05
0.05
µg/g
53
Tetrachloroethylene
<
0.05
0.28
µg/g
54
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-
<
0.05
0.38
µg/g
55
<
0.05
0.05
µg/g
56
Trichloroethylene
<
0.05
0.061
µg/g
57
Trichlorofluoromethane
<
0.05
4
µg/g
58
Vinyl Chloride
<
0.02
0.02
µg/g
59
Bromodichloromethane
<
0.05
13
µg/g
60
Bromoform
<
0.05
0.27
µg/g
61
Dibromochloromethane
<
0.05
9.4
µg/g
62
Antimony
<
1
7.5
µg/g
63
Arsenic
2.1
18
µg/g
64
Selenium
1.1
2.4
µg/g
65
Barium
116
390
µg/g
66
Beryllium
4
µg/g
67
Boron (total)
120
µg/g
68
Cadmium
1.2
µg/g
69
Chromium Total
26
160
µg/g
70
Cobalt
8
22
µg/g
<
2
11
<
1
10 of 19
Contaminant
Name
Maximum
Concentration
71
Copper
72
Lead
73
Molybdenum
74
Nickel
75
Silver
<
0.5
76
Thallium
<
1
77
Uranium
78
79
Applicable Site
Condition Standard
Unit of
Measure
17
140
µg/g
<
10
120
µg/g
<
2
6.9
µg/g
100
µg/g
20
µg/g
1
µg/g
1.6
23
µg/g
Vanadium
34
86
µg/g
Zinc
58
340
µg/g
22
11 of 19
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Contaminant
Name
Maximum
Concentration
Applicable Site
Condition Standard
Unit of
Measure
1
Bromodichloromethane
<
2
85000
µg/L
2
Bromoform
<
5
380
µg/L
3
Dibromochloromethane
<
0.5
82000
µg/L
4
Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1****
<
25
750
µg/L
5
<
100
150
µg/L
6
390
500
µg/L
7
<
100
500
µg/L
8
Benzene
<
0.5
44
µg/L
9
Ethylbenzene
<
0.5
2300
µg/L
10
Toluene
3.1
18000
µg/L
11
Xylene Mixture
<
0.5
4200
µg/L
12
Acetone
<
30
130000
µg/L
13
Bromomethane
<
2
5.6
µg/L
14
Carbon Tetrachloride
<
0.2
0.79
µg/L
15
Chlorobenzene
<
0.5
630
µg/L
16
Chloroform
<
1
2.4
µg/L
17
<
0.5
4600
µg/L
18
<
0.5
9600
µg/L
19
<
0.5
8
µg/L
20
Dichlorodifluoromethane
<
2
4400
µg/L
21
<
0.5
320
µg/L
22
<
0.5
1.6
µg/L
23
Dichloroethylene, 1,1-
<
0.5
1.6
µg/L
24
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis-
<
0.5
1.6
µg/L
25
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans-
<
0.5
1.6
µg/L
26
Dichloropropane, 1,2-
<
0.5
16
µg/L
27
Dichloropropene,1,3-
<
0.5
5.2
µg/L
28
Ethylene dibromide
<
0.2
0.25
µg/L
29
Hexane (n)
<
5
51
µg/L
30
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
<
20
470000
µg/L
31
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
<
20
140000
µg/L
32
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
<
2
190
µg/L
33
Methylene Chloride
<
5
610
µg/L
34
Styrene
<
0.5
1300
µg/L
35
<
0.5
3.3
µg/L
12 of 19
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Contaminant
Name
Maximum
Concentration
Applicable Site
Condition Standard
Unit of
Measure
36
<
0.5
3.2
µg/L
37
Tetrachloroethylene
<
0.5
1.6
µg/L
38
<
0.5
640
µg/L
39
<
0.5
4.7
µg/L
40
Trichloroethylene
<
0.5
1.6
µg/L
41
Trichlorofluoromethane
<
5
2500
µg/L
42
Vinyl Chloride
<
0.5
0.5
µg/L
43
Antimony
<
0.5
20000
µg/L
44
Arsenic
2.4
1900
µg/L
45
Selenium
6.8
63
µg/L
46
Barium
1,133
29000
µg/L
47
Beryllium
67
µg/L
48
Boron (total)
45000
µg/L
49
Cadmium
0.5
2.7
µg/L
50
Chromium Total
34
810
µg/L
51
Cobalt
3.5
66
µg/L
52
Copper
<
5
87
µg/L
53
Lead
<
1
25
µg/L
54
Molybdenum
6.8
9200
µg/L
55
Nickel
15
490
µg/L
56
Silver
<
0.3
1.5
µg/L
57
Thallium
<
0.5
510
µg/L
58
Uranium
17
420
µg/L
59
Vanadium
9.4
250
µg/L
60
Zinc
17
1100
µg/L
<
0.5
3,024
<
13 of 19
Remedial Action and Mitigation
Remediated Soils
Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location
either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes
used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.
Soil Remediation Process
Estimated Quantity of Soil
(in-ground volume in m³)
Description of Remediation
Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.
Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned
Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)
Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³)
Soil Brought to the Property
Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any
soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.
Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property
(in-ground volume in m³)
14 of 19
Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures
Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of
submitting the RSC for filing.
Ground water control or treatment measures were not required for the site.
Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.
Ground water control or treatment measures were not required for the site.
Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres)
15 of 19
Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures
Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or
otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
No constructed works were conducted at the site prior to the certification date.
Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known
existing contaminants at the RSC property.
No constructed works were conducted at the site after the certification date.
Monitoring or Maintenance
Soil Management Measures
Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known
existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
Ground Water Management Measures
Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or
known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From
Near Property Boundary
Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC
property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?
No
16 of 19
Qualified Person’s Statements and Certifications
As the qualified person, I certify that:
A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a
records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the
regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered
from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance
with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions
between and beyond the sampling points may vary.
As of 2014/09/03, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and
the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants
in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of
property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.
Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the
supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written
notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local
municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the
property is located.
As of 2014/09/03, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments
and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition
standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation
in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any)
specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified
in a Risk Assessment.
As of 2014/09/03, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground
water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1,
Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.
I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.
I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.
I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are
filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the
Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental
condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.
The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted
principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline
practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.
I do not hold and have not held and my employer FISHER ENVIRONMENTAL LTD.
does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property
which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment
or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based
To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC
are true as of 2014/09/03.
By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.
By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, DAVOR ALEXANDER FISHER, a
qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/01/19:
a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and
b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.
I Agree
17 of 19
Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or Agent
The following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change
as part of the record of site condition
Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner
Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property
Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired
A Current plan of Survey
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property
Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model
Owner or agent certification statements
5.2.6
18 of 19
19 of 19
Request ID:
017130754
Demande n° :
Transaction ID: 56216837
Transaction n° :
Category ID:
CT
Catégorie :
Province of Ontario
Province de l'Ontario
Ministry of Government Services
Ministère des Services gouvernementaux
Date Report Produced: 2014/12/10
Document produit le :
Time Report Produced: 15:42:10
Imprimé à :
CERTIFICATE OF STATUS
ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE
This is to certify that according to the
records of the Ministry of Government
Services
D'après les dossiers du Ministère des
Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons
que la société
130 YORKLAND JV INC.
Ontario Corporation Number
Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario)
001908958
is a corporation incorporated,
amalgamated or continued under
the laws of the Province of Ontario.
est une société constituée, prorogée ou née
d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la
Province de l'Ontario.
The corporation came into existence on
La société a été fondée le
DECEMBER 18 DÉCEMBRE, 2013
and has not been dissolved.
et n'est pas dissoute.
Dated
Fait le
DECEMBER 10 DÉCEMBRE, 2014
Director
Directeur
The issuance of this certifcate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services.
La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.
Philip Edward Brent
Barrister & Solicitor
suite zro-48oo Dundas st. west,
Ioronto Ont. MgrA rltr
Iel: 416-zo3-149 For: 416-zo j-rT7z
email : philip@brenl:ayt. com
October 16,2OL4
Brownfields Filing and Review
Environmental Assessment and Approvals Branch
Ontario Ministry of the Environment
2 St. Clair Avenue West, Floor L24
Toronto, ON M4V 115
Attention:
To Whom
lt May Concern
-andtoFisher Environmental Ltd.
400 Esna Park Drive
Markham, ON L3R 3K2
Attention:
Mr. David Fisher
-andto130 Yorkland JV lnc.
5050 Dufferin Street, Suite 120
Toronto, ON, M3H 5T5
Attention:
Re:
Mr. Babak Sarshar
130 Yorkland JV Inc. filing of a Record of Site Condition with the Ministry of the t.nvironment in
respect of the property legally described as Part of Pin 1,0085-0033(LT) being Part of Block H,
Registered Plan76t2, designated as Parts 3,4,5 and 6 of Plan 66R-27583, City of Toronto.
Dear Sirs,
We are the solicitors for 1-30 Yorkland JV Inc. and confirm that 130 Yorkland JV Inc. is ther registered
owner of the RSC Property and that the legal description for the RSC Property is set out below:
130 Yorkland Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario
Part of Block l{; Pl;n 76i.2 worttr Vork as in NY770696,9 ruVSa8SgO,
/, i=0;:i,*1. *.
or rnnlr ld#d:F et a+,
Seeris*.M*tt48r,Fa*of ,L-iB;,'Fidn,ee{vt ,2as,Ug:sign*f $uaspart+8,
66Rt$9 .
Y.orMl:rlo*trrcr&.cltfof,lf$.fgil*A tn;fmign-at,,as
,Exee$..m,
W.offdffito.
The Plan 66R-27583 of Survey was prepared by KRCM,\R, signed by
Patrick Woolley and dated August 6,2OL4.
Part of Block H, Registered Plan76t2, designated as Prrrts 3, 4,5 and 6,
Plan 66R-27583, City of Toronto.
7,54O.lO square metres
lf you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Regards,
Philip Edward Brent
Jun.30. 2014 11:35AM oeel
LRO #
tltle
N0.0338 P, I
80 Trln3fer
Receipted as AT362O458 on 20'14 06 30
The aPplieant(s) hereby applies lo the Land Registrcr,
yyyy mm
at
dd
11:32
Page 1
ol2
Properties
1OOE5 - OO33 LT
PIN
lntetes/Estsle Fee Simple
Desc.nption PTBLK H PL 7612 NORTH YORKAS lN Ny77o69a & Ny54a59o, EXcEpT Ny67ao1o:
TORONTO (N YORK) , CITY OF TORONTO
13O'I 80 YORKLAND BOULEVARD
TORONTO
Add'E.sS
PIN
1OOa5 - OO4O LT
tntercst/Estdte Fee Simpte
Description PARCEL B-4, SEcTloN M1248 PART LOT B , PLAN aGM1248,
66R7693 T\^/P ()F YORK/NORTH YORK, CITY OF TORONTO
TORONTO
Address
DESTGNATED AS pT 4a,
Consideratlon
Considerdtion $ 7,4OO,OOO.OO
Transferor(s)
The transferor(s) hereby transfers the land to the transferee(s).
METROPOLITAN TORONTo PoLlcE ASSOCIATION
Name
Address fo,' Servr'c€ 2OO-2O75 KENNEDY RD
SCARBOROUGH ON
M1T 3V3
I, Michael McCormack. President, have the authority to bind the corporation.
This document ia not authorized under Power of Attorney by this party.
Capacity
Transferee(s)
NamE
13O YORKI.AND
Addrcss for
Se^/ice
Share
JV INC-
12O-5O5O Dufferin Street
Toronto, Ontario
M3H 5T5
STATEMENT OF THE TRANSFEROR (S): The transferor(s) verifies that to the best of the transferor's knowledge and belief, this
transfer does not contravene the Planning Act.
STATEMENT OF THE SOLICITOR FOR THE TRANSFEROR (S): I have explained the effect of the Planning Act to the transferor(e)
and I have made inguiries of the transferor(s) to delermine that this transfer does not contravene that Ac,t and based on the
information supplied by the trans$eror(s). to the best of my knowledge and belief, this transfer does not contravene that Act. I am an
Ontario solicitor in good standing.
STATEMENT OF THE SOLICITOR FOR THE TRANSFEREE (S); I have investigated the title to thls land and to abutling land where
relevant and I am Batisfied that the title records reveal no contravention aa set out in the Planning Ac-t, and to the best of my
knowledge and belief this transfer does not contravqn€ the Planning Act. I ac-t independently of the solicitor for the transferor(s) and I
am an Ontario solicilor in good standing.
Signed By
Mark Randolph
McMackin
151 Yonge Street, Suite
Toronto
180O
MsC 2W7
Tel
Fax
acting for
Tranaferor(s)
416-3e2-4567
416-362-441O
I am the solicitor forlhe transferor(s) and I am not one and the same as the solicitor for the transferee(s).
I have the authority to sign and regisler the document on behalf of the Transferor(s)-
Signed
2014 OA 30
Jun.30. 2014
LRO #
80
11:36AM
peel title
No, 0338
Tranefer
Recelpted as 4'T3620458 on 2o14 O6 30
The applicant(s) hercby dpplies lo the Land Reglristrar.
Philip Edward Brenl
yyyy mm
21O-480O Dundas St. West
Toronto
MgA 181
Tel
Fax
10
acting for
Transferee(s)
Signed
dd
at
11..32
Page 2 ol 2
2014 06 30
416.203-1449
416.-203-1772
I am the solicitor for the
I have the authority
iransferee(s) and I am not one and the same aa the soticilor for the transferor(s).
to sign and register the document on behalf of the Transferee(s).
Submitted By
PHILIP EDWARD BRENT
Tel
Fax
21G48O0 Dundas St. West
Toronto
MgA 181
416-203-1445
416-203-1772
Fees/TaxedPayment
Statutory Registration Fee
$60.oo
Provincial Land Transfer Tax
slo9,475.oo
Municipal Land Transfer Tax
$108,725.Oo
Total Paid
$21a,2AO.OO
Flle Number
Ttansfetor Client File Number
:
350S-OO1
2014 0€ 30
PHASE ONE AND TWO
PROPERTY
RSC PROPERTY
TWO
"TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN" (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)
Area of Potential
Environmental
Concern (APEC)
APEC A
Location of APEC on
Phase One Property
Northwest Corner and
Southeast Portion of the
RSC property.
Potentially Contaminating
Activity (PCA)
PCA-30 Importation of Fill
Materials of Unknown
Quality.
Location of PCA
(on-site or off-site)
On-site.
Contaminants of
Potential Concern (CPC)
Metals, Petroleum
Media Potentially
Impacted
(Groundwater, soil
and/or sediment)
Soil.
Hydrocarbons (PHC)
Fractions 1-4 (F1-F4),
Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAH).
APEC B
North Portion of the RSC
property (near former
paint booth location).
PCA-2 Adhesives and
Resins Manufacturing,
Processing and Bulk
Storage.
On-site.
Volatile Organic
Groundwater and
Compounds (VOC),
Soil.
Electrical Conductivity
(EC), Sodium Adsorption
Ratio (SAR), and pH.
APEC C
West Portion along the
west RSC property
boundary.
PCA-39 Paints
Manufacturing, Processing
and Bulk Storage.
On-site.
PCA-2 Adhesives and
Resins Manufacturing,
Processing and Bulk
Storage.
Off-site
PCA-17 Dye Manufacturing,
Processing and Bulk
Storage.
Off-site
VOC and BTEX.
Groundwater and
Soil.
VOCs
Groundwater and
Soil.
220 m north of property
line.
Metals, BTEX and VOCs.
Groundwater and
Soil.
line.
PCA-31 Ink Manufacturing,
Processing and Bulk
Storage.
Off-site
line.
Page 1 of 2
Metals, VOCs and pH.
Groundwater and
Soil.
"TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN" (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)
Area of Potential
Environmental
Concern (APEC)
Location of APEC on
Phase One Property
Potentially Contaminating
Activity (PCA)
PCA-39 Paints
and Bulk Storage.
Location of PCA
(on-site or off-site)
Off-site
Contaminants of
Potential Concern (CPC)
Metals and BTEX.
Media Potentially
Impacted
(Groundwater, soil
and/or sediment)
Groundwater and
Soil.
210 m and 220 m north
of property line.
PCA-43 Plastics (including
Fibreglass) Manufacturing
and Processing.
Off-site.
Metals, PHCs and VOCs.
Groundwater and
Soil.
150 m and 220 m north
of property line.
PCA-47 Rubber
Manufacturing and
Processing.
Off-site.
Metals, BTEX and VOCs.
Groundwater and
Soil.
line.
PCA-51 Solvent
and Bulk Storage.
Off-site.
line.
Page 2 of 2
VOCs.
Groundwater and
Soil.
"TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY" (Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04)
Year
Name of Owner or
Occupant
Description of
Property Use
Property
Use
Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire
Insurance Plans, etc.
130 Yorkland Boulevard, Toronto, ON
Part of PIN: 10085-0033 (LT)
Parts 3, 4, 5 and 6, Plan 66R-27583
1842/09/26
1896/05/01
1903/04/09
1921/04/29
1934/12/18
1960/12/30
1965/07/30
1966/08/19
1968/05/06
Crown to John Henry
Agricultural Use or
Agricultural or
Undeveloped
other use
Agricultural Use or
Agricultural or
Undeveloped
other use
Agricultural Use or
Agricultural or
Undeveloped
other use
Agricultural Use or
Agricultural or
Undeveloped
other use
Agricultural Use or
Agricultural or
Undeveloped
other use
Agricultural Use or
Agricultural or
Undeveloped
other use
Agricultural Use or
Agricultural or
Undeveloped
other use
The Hydro-Electric Commission
of the Borough of North York
Agricultural Use or
Agricultural or
Based on the 1966 aerial photograph, the RSC property appears
Undeveloped
other use
to be undeveloped land.
Fred T. Reisman and Associates
Limited
Single tenant light
Industrial use
Based on the Opta Property Underwriters Reports the RSC
James Henry
Michael O’Sullivan
Thomas Boyd
Florence Boyd
Philips
Ltd.
Electronics
Industries
Yorkland Development Limited
industrial building
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
property (130 Yorkland Building) was constructed in 1968 with
1 of 2
"TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY" (Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04)
Year
Name of Owner or
Occupant
Description of
Property Use
Property
Use
Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire
Insurance Plans, etc.
an industrial building and a paint booth was located at the northcentral portion of manufacturing plant.
1968/12/12
Yorkland Development Limited
1968/12/12
Metropolitan
Association
1970/01/14
Same
Industrial use
None
Police
Same
Industrial use
None
Sheila Construction Company
Ltd.
Same
Industrial use
None
Hans-Joachim Handreke
Limited
Same
Industrial use
Based on the 1974 aerial photograph, the RSC property appears
1979/10/31
Metropolitan Toronto Police
Association
Same
Industrial use
None
2014/06/30
130 Yorkland JV Inc.
Unoccupied industrial
Industrial use
Based on the Site visit on August 21, 2014, the RSC building
1979/02/16
Toronto
to be developed with a present-day industrial building.
building
was unoccupied.
2 of 2
130 Yorkland Blvd., Toronto, Ontario
Page 1 of 12
PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
Introduction
Phase One & Two ESAs were conducted to support the filing of a Record of Site Condition considering
the proposed change of property use. The reports were completed for entire property addressed as 130
& 180 Yorkland Blvd. and legally described as Parts 1 to 10, Registered Plan 66R-27583.
The phase one and two property (130 and 180 Yorkland Blvd.) was utilized as commercial and industrial
from 1968 to up to 2014. Currently, site’s buildings are vacant.
The Record of Site Condition portion (130 Yorkland Blvd. “the Site”) of the phase one and two property
was utilized for industrial purposes from 1968 to up to 2014. The proposed future land use is residential,
and a Record of Site Condition (RSC) is required to satisfy the proposed severance of the Site. An
application for change of property use from industrial to residential would be made for 130 Yorkland
Blvd. for future site redevelopment.
This Phase Two Conceptual Site Model (CSM) has been prepared based on information and data
collected to date as part of Fisher’s Phase One ESA and Phase Two ESA field and analytical works
conducted at the Site in August – September 2014. The Phase Two CSM provides a narrative, graphical
and tabulated description, integrating information related to the Site's geologic and hydrogeologic
conditions, areas of potential environmental concern/potential contaminating activities, the presence and
distribution of contaminants of concern, contaminant fate and transport, and potential exposure
pathways. These components are described in the following sections. The Phase Two ESA CSM makes
reference to the drawings mentioned in section CSM Figures of this report.
Site Description
The property that is subject to the present RSC is municipally addressed as 130 Yorkland Boulevard,
Toronto, Ontario, and it is part of the larger phase one and two property addressed as 130 & 180
Yorkland Blvd.
The entire phase one and two property is legally described as Part of Block H, Plan 7612 North York as
in NY770696 & NY548590, Except NY678010, Toronto (North York, City of Toronto; and Parcel B-4,
Section M-1248, Part of Lot B, Plan 66M1248, designated as Part 48, 66R7693, TWP of York/North
York, City of Toronto, both designated as Parts 1 to 10, Plan 66R-27583, City of Toronto, with the PIN
10085-0033 (LT) and10085-0040 (LT) . Please refer to Legal Survey drawing. The Plan 66R-27583 of
Survey was prepared by KRCMAR, signed by Patrick Woolley and dated August 6, 2014.
The RSC property is legally described as Parts 3 to 6, Registered Plan 66R-27583, City of Toronto, with
the PIN 10085-0033 (LT). Please refer to Legal Survey drawing. NAD 83 Datum for the centroid of the
property is 17-634108-4847795.
The phase one and two property is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Yorkland
Boulevard and Consumers Road, approximately 130 m west of Consumers Road in Toronto (North
York).
Project No. FE-P 14-7018, September 2014
Page 2 of 12
The phase one and two property is a trapezoidal-shaped property that is developed with two vacant
buildings: a one-storey light industrial building located at 130 Yorkland Blvd. (Site Building A), and a twostorey office building with a basement located at 180 Yorkland Blvd. (Site Building B). The entire
property has an area of approximately 1.2 hectares.
The RSC property (Site) is an L-shaped property that is developed with a vacant one-storey light
industrial building located at 130 Yorkland Blvd. (Site Building A) and a parking lot. The RSC Site has an
area of 0.75401 hectares.
The RSC property is bounded by commercial buildings to the north and east and Yorkland Blvd. to the
south and west.
The Phase One and Two property has historically been used for industrial and commercial purposes. At
the time of the Phase Two ESA investigation, the Site was unoccupied.
The Site has gas, water, sanitary sewer, hydro (underground) and Bell services.
The natural gas supply service runs east-west along the northern wall of Site Building A to the main
supply pipe on Yorkland Blvd.
The potable water supply service runs east-west from west wall of the building to the main supply pipe
on Yorkland Blvd.
Runoff is collected in three catch basins located at the Site, separately connected to the municipal sewer
system underneath Yorkland Blvd. Roof runoff is also collected and discharged into the storm sewer
system.
Domestic wastewater is reportedly discharged into the municipal sanitary sewer system running from the
western portion of the building toward the municipal sewer system underneath Yorkland Blvd.
Hydro cables are running underground from the utility room of the building, located at the north side of
the building to one on-site transformer and from there into main Hydro supply line located on the west
and partially south sides of Yorkland Blvd.
Physical Settings
a.
Site topography is generally flat with ground elevation of approximately 171 m asl. Landscaped
areas were observed west of Building A (130 Yorkland Blvd.) and along south boundary. Run-off
drainage/infiltration is expected to be directed towards on-site and street catch basins.
b.
Description of the subsurface conditions encountered at the borehole locations is presented below
and in the attached Geological Cross-sections Figures 9 and 10.
Fill Materials
Asphalt followed by granular material was found at the surface of boreholes 2 – 6, 8 and 9. Surface
topsoil and granular materials were underlain by fill soils generally comprised of dark brown or brown
sandy silt or clayey silt with sand, trace gravel and organic material extending up to 1.6 m below ground
surface.
Page 3 of 12
Unit I
The fill materials were underlain by Unit I of overburden consisting of greyish brown to grey sandy silt till,
trace clay, extending from approximately 1.50 m up to 6.10 m bgs.
Unit II (the aquifer)
Unit II (the aquifer) consisted of a deposit of grey sandy silt till, extending from approximately 4.60 m up
to 8.50 m bgs.
Unit III (the aquitard)
Unit III (the aquitard) consisted of grey clayey silt till, trace sand or silty clay till extending from
approximately 8.50 m up to 9.10 m bgs, (investigated depth).
c.
Bedrock (Upper Ordovician grey shale of the Meaford-Dundas Formation, interbedded with
siltstone and minor grey fossiliferous limestone) is expected at a depth of approximately 120 m
below grade.
Investigated Aquifer
Based on the visual examination of the soil samples and ground water levels measurements, we
consider that the ground water exists in the wet layers embedded in the grey sandy silt till, having a
thickness of approximately 2.5 m . Perched water may also be present in the fill. The water encountered
in the monitoring wells probably represents the ground water from the moist layers. The local
groundwater appears to vary from 165.90 to 168.14 m asl, based on geodetic elevation measurements
and calculation.
The sandy silt till, trace sand matrix of the aquifer indicate a range of hydraulic conductivity of 10-6 - 10-8
m/s.
Based on the field measurements, the ground water flow direction at the Site is calculated to be west
towards Don River located approximately 1,100 m southwest of the Site.
The localized shallow ground water flow direction may be influenced by the presence of on-site and/or
off-site underground utilities, building foundations, variations in vertical and horizontal stratigraphy,
seasonal water level variations, depth of wells’ screened intervals and/or well trauma.
The ground water elevation contours and interpreted ground water flow direction are illustrated in Figure
8 included in CSM Figures section.
Investigation of this first encountered aquifer was deemed necessary due to the potential for direct
discharge/migration of petroleum/paint/solvent/adhesives products into the native soils and migration
through natural groundwater flow, or along building’s foundations and utilities as transport pathways,
considering a typical depth of 1.5 m to 4.0 m below grade.
Groundwater Hydraulic Gradients
Horizontal hydraulic gradient is the slope of the water table or potentiometric surface. Linear hydraulic
gradient was calculated based on the ground water elevation data of the monitoring wells BH2(MW),
Page 4 of 12
BH3(MW) and BH6(MW). These three (3) monitoring wells were installed at the depths of 7.62, 6.17 m
and 6.11 m below ground surface, respectively. Horizontal and vertical groundwater gradients and
groundwater flow direction were measured on a scaled site plan with monitoring well locations. To
estimate the hydraulic gradient all installed wells were completed in the same aquifer.
Horizontal hydraulic gradient measured between wells BH2(MW) and BH6(MW) was
IH = ∆h / ∆s = (96.15 – 95.49) / 51.6 = 0.0128.
Horizontal hydraulic gradient measured between wells BH3(MW) and BH6(MW) was
IH = ∆h / ∆s = (97.55 – 95.49) / 51.15 = 0.0403.
Vertical hydraulic gradient is the difference in water head over the difference in wells’ bottom elevation.
Vertical hydraulic gradient measured between wells BH3(MW) and BH6(MW) was
IV = ∆h / ∆z = (97.55 – 95.49) / (95.49 – 94.24) = 2.06 / 1.25 = 1.648.
Investigated Aquitard
Based on the lithological description provided in this section and the boreholes distribution across the
Site, the first encountered aquitard was noted between depths of approximately 8.5 m to 9.10 m bgs.
The aquitard comprises of grey clayey silt till, trace sand or silty clay till, it appears to have a minimum
thickness of approximately 0.60 m, and an estimated hydraulic conductivity of 10-7 - 10-8 m/sec.
Considering the thickness, low permeability and high organic content of the aquitard, it is expected that,
if solvents and/or petroleum distillates have escaped into surface and/or subsurface soil and
groundwater at the northern neighboring properties and at the former on-site paint booth, potentially
limited vertical and lateral migration of contaminants would have occurred from the northern and central
portions of the Site to the southwestern portions of the property.
Site Condition
In view of the fact that the Site and other properties located within 250 m of the boundaries of the Site
are supplied by a municipal drinking water system, the non-potable ground water Site Condition
Standards (Table 3 SCSs) are applied to the Site. Considering the soil types encountered at the
borehole locations, the distribution of boreholes across the Site, and the fact that no grain size analysis
was conducted, the applicable SCCs has been applied as if soil is coarse textured.
In accordance with Section 41 of the regulation, the Site is not an environmentally sensitive area. The
Site is not located within an area of natural significance and it does not include land that is within 30
metres of an area of natural significance.
Soil pH samples collected from the Site were also within the acceptable range of surficial and subsurface
soil for the application of MOE Table 3 SCS.
Page 5 of 12
The Site is not a shallow soil property as defined in Section 43.1 of the regulation; nor does it include all
or part of a water body or is adjacent to a water body or includes land that is within 30 metres of a water
body.
Assessment of PCAs, APECs and Subsurface Structures
Based on the findings of the Phase One investigation, three (3) potentially contaminating activities were
identified at the Site, namely Adhesives and Resins Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage (PCA
2), Paints Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage (PCA 39) around the former paint booth area,
and Importation of Fill material of Unknown Quality (PCA 30) used during property development in 1968.
Additionally, off-site potentially contaminating activities have occurred within the Phase One Study Area,
namely, Solvent Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage (PCA-51) at the 200 Yorkland Blvd.
located approximately 55 m to the north of the Site; Plastics (including Fibreglass) Manufacturing and
Processing (PCA-43) and Rubber Manufacturing and Processing (PCA-47) at 270 Yorkland Blvd.
located approximately 150 m north of the Site; Adhesives and Resins Manufacturing, Processing and
Bulk Storage (PCA 2), Paints Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage (PCA-39) and Plastics
(including Fibreglass) Manufacturing and Processing (PCA-43) at 271 Yorkland Blvd. located
approximately 20 m north of the Site; and Dye Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage (PCA-17),
Ink Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage (PCA-31) and Paints Manufacturing, Processing and
Bulk Storage (PCA-39) located at 279 Yorkland Blvd, located approximately 210 m north of the Site.
Based on the location of PCAs, three (3) areas of potential environmental concern (APEC A, APEC B
and APEC C) were identified. Refer to Table 1 below and to the attached Figure 7, Phase Two CSM
Figures section, for presentation of PCAs and APECs locations.
Table 1: APECs, PCAs and CPCs
Area of
Potential
Environmental
Concern
APEC A
Location of
APEC on Phase
One Property
Potentially
Contaminating
Activity (PCA)
Northwest Corner
PCA-30
Importation of Fill
Materials of
Unknown Quality.
and Southeast
Portion of the
Location
of PCA
(on-site
or offsite)
Contaminants
of Potential
Concern (CPC)
Media
Potentially
Impacted
(Groundwater,
soil and/or
sediment)
On-site.
Metals,
Soil.
Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
RSC property.
(PHC) Fractions
1-4 (F1-F4),
Polycyclic
Aromatic
Hydrocarbons
(PAH).
APEC B
North Portion of
PCA-2 Adhesives
and Resins
On-site.
Volatile Organic
Groundwater
Area of
Potential
Environmental
Concern
Location of
APEC on Phase
One Property
the RSC property
(near former paint
booth location).
Page 6 of 12
Potentially
Contaminating
Activity (PCA)
Location
of PCA
(on-site
or offsite)
Manufacturing,
Processing and
Bulk Storage.
Contaminants
of Potential
Concern (CPC)
Media
Potentially
Impacted
(Groundwater,
soil and/or
sediment)
Compounds
and Soil.
(VOC),
Electrical
Conductivity
(EC), Sodium
Adsorption
Ratio (SAR),
and pH.
APEC C
West Portion
along the west
RSC property
boundary.
PCA-39 Paints
Manufacturing,
Processing and
Bulk Storage.
On-site.
PCA-2 Adhesives
and Resins
Manufacturing,
Processing and
Bulk Storage.
Off-site
VOCs and
Groundwater
BTEX.
and Soil.
VOCs.
Groundwater
and Soil.
220 m
north of
property
line.
PCA-17 Dye
Manufacturing,
Processing and
Bulk Storage.
Off-site
210 m
Metals, BTEX
Groundwater
and VOCs.
and Soil.
Metals, VOCs
Groundwater
and pH.
and Soil.
Metals and
Groundwater
BTEX.
and Soil.
north of
property
line.
PCA-31 Ink
Manufacturing,
Processing and
Bulk Storage.
Off-site
210 m
north of
property
line.
PCA-39 Paints
Manufacturing,
Processing and
Bulk Storage.
Off-site
210 m and
220 m
north of
property
Area of
Potential
Environmental
Concern
Location of
APEC on Phase
One Property
Page 7 of 12
Potentially
Contaminating
Activity (PCA)
Location
of PCA
(on-site
or offsite)
Contaminants
of Potential
Concern (CPC)
Media
Potentially
Impacted
(Groundwater,
soil and/or
sediment)
Metals, PHCs
Groundwater
and VOCs.
and Soil.
Metals, BTEX
Groundwater
and VOCs.
and Soil.
VOCs.
Groundwater
line.
PCA-43 Plastics
(including
Fibreglass)
Manufacturing
and Processing.
Off-site.
150 m and
220 m
north of
property
line.
PCA-47 Rubber
Manufacturing
and Processing.
Off-site.
150 m
north of
property
line.
PCA-51 Solvent
Manufacturing,
Processing and
Bulk Storage.
Off-site.
55 m north
and Soil.
of property
line.
The scope of work for the Phase Two ESA was prepared in order to assess the environmental quality of
soil and/or ground water at the identified APECs.
The Phase Two ESA investigation includes nine (9) boreholes advanced on August 25, 2015. Five (5) of
the boreholes were completed as monitoring wells, BH1(MW), BH2(MW), BH3(MW), BH6(MW), and
BH7(MW).
Seven (7) boreholes were advanced at the RSC portion of the Site. Three (3) of the boreholes were
completed as monitoring wells, BH2(MW), BH3(MW) and BH6(MW). Refer to the attached Figure 7,
Phase Two CSM Figures section, for borehole and monitoring wells locations.
The boreholes were drilled within the APECs in the vicinity of subsurface structures and utilities
(buildings foundations, storm sewer), and at the areas of suspected imported fill materials.
Graphic Representation of Phase Two CSM
The presentation of the Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model makes reference to the following
attached drawings:
Page 8 of 12
CSM Figures
Figure 6: Site Plan of the Phase One Study Area that shows buildings, surface and sub-surface
structure, water bodies, drinking water wells, areas of natural significance, roads, uses of properties
adjacent to the phase two property, and areas where any PCAs have occurred.
Figure 7: Site Plan of the Phase Two property with PCAs, APECs, human/ecological receptors (HR and
ER), transport pathways (T) and boreholes/monitoring wells (BH and MW) locations.
Figure 8: Site Plan with Ground Water Elevations Contours and Interpreted Groundwater Flow
Direction.
Figure 9: Cross-Section A-A’ approximately parallel to the inferred groundwater flow direction. The crosssections illustrate the stratigraphy, boreholes/monitoring wells locations, depths and construction, depths
at which soil samples were taken, and groundwater table static level elevation.
Figure 10: Cross-Section B – B’ approximately perpendicular to the inferred groundwater flow direction.
The cross-section illustrates the stratigraphy, boreholes/monitoring wells locations, depths and
construction, depths at which soil samples were taken, and groundwater table static level elevation.
Figure 11: Cross-Section C-C’ approximately perpendicular to the inferred groundwater flow direction.
The cross-section illustrates the stratigraphy, boreholes/monitoring wells locations, depths and
construction, depths at which soil samples were taken, and groundwater table static level elevation.
Refer to Figures 6 to 11 attached to the CSM.
Site Condition Standards, Identification, Source, Distribution and Migration of COCs
As indicated in the APECs and CPCs Table above, the analytical program of the Phase Two ESA
included testing of soil and groundwater for Metals, PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, EC, SAR and/or pH
parameters. For the purpose of this Phase Two CSM, CPCs were identified by screening analytical
results reported for the soil and groundwater samples collected at the Site against the MOE Table 3: Full
Depth Generic Site Condition Standards (SCS) in a Non-Potable Ground Water Condition for
Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property Use and coarse textured soil, as presented in the MOE “Soil,
Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act’,
dated April 15, 2011.
Soil & Groundwater Analytical Results
Chemical analyses were conducted by Fisher Environmental Laboratories. Fisher Laboratories is
accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation (CALA) and meet the requirements
of Section 47 of O.Reg. 153/04 certifying that the analytical laboratory be accredited in accordance with
the International Standards ISO/IEC 17025 and with standards developed by the Standards Council of
Canada.
Page 9 of 12
The laboratory analytical results indicate that all of the soil and groundwater samples met the applicable
MOE Table 3 SCS for the all tested parameters.
Should CPCs were present in soil and groundwater at on-site and off-site PCAs locations, it appears that
the relevant transport mechanisms have not contributed to exceeding concentrations of CPCs in soil and
groundwater at the RSC property, or that it is unlikely that CPCs have been discharged into the natural
environment at the RSC property.
Soil Vapor Intrusion in Surface and Subsurface Structures.
No volatile COCs were encountered at the Site.
Tabulated Narrative Form of the Phase Two CSM
1. Table 2: Phase Two CSM
Areas where Potentially
Contaminating Activities
have occurred:
a. PCA-2 Adhesives and Resins Processing and Storage, and
b. PCA-39 Paints Processing and Bulk Storage.
The rear portion of the 130 Yorkland Blvd. building was used as an office
furniture manufacturing plant from approximately 1968 to 1991. A spray
booth was located at north-central portion of the manufacturing area.
c. PCA-30 Importation of Fill Materials of Unknown Quality.
Fill materials of unknown quality may have been used during property
development underneath the parking lot.
d. PCA-51 Solvent Bulk Storage.
200 Yorkland Blvd., Toronto, ON - Union Gas Limited and Centra Gas
Ontario Inc., located approximately 115 m northwest of the centroid of the
Site, were waste generators registered for Halogenated Solvents from 1994
to 2001.
e. PCA-43 Plastics Processing, and
f.
PCA-47 Rubber Processing.
270 Yorkland Blvd. - Polyphalt Inc., a manufacturer of paving and roofing
materials from recycled rubber and plastics, located approximately 175 m
north of the centroid of the Site, was a waste generator registered for
Petroleum Distillates and Photoprocessing Wastes from 1997 to 2004.
g. PCA-2 Adhesives and Resins Processing and Storage,
h. PCA-39 Paints Processing and Bulk Storage, and
i.
PCA-43 Plastics Processing.
271 Yorkland Blvd., Toronto, ON - Architectural Moldings Inc., a
manufacturer of Plaster and Polyurethane Moldings, located approximately
275m north of the centroid of the Site, was a registered under NPRI for
emissions of Toluene, Xylene, Methanol and MEK in air, in 2004.
j.
PCA-17 Dye Processing and Bulk Storage,
Page 10 of 12
k. PCA-31 Ink Processing and Bulk Storage, and
l.
PCA-39 Paints Processing and Bulk Storage.
279 Yorkland Blvd., Toronto, ON - Crook and Grant Lithographers, a
commercial printing and lithography company, located approximately 280 m
north of the centroid of the Site, was a waste generator registered for
Aliphatic and Aromatic Solvents, Petroleum Distillates, Waste Oils &
Lubricants and Alkaline Wastes – Other Metals, from 1983 to 2012.
Surface and sub-surface 1.
The north and east sides of the Building A foundation located at 130
structures that may affect Yorkland portion of the phase one property.
contaminant distribution and
2.
Storm sewers at the east parking and south of the building.
transport on-Site and from
neighbouring properties:
Type and locations of
The current Phase Two ESA program involved the drilling of nine (9)
samples taken at the phaseboreholes, five (5) of which were completed as monitoring wells. Seven (7) of
one property as part of thisthe boreholes were drilled at the RSC property, three (3) of which were
Phase Two ESA:
completed as monitoring wells. Soil samples were collected from each of the
seven (7) boreholes and were submitted to the lab for Metals, PHCs, VOCs,
PAHs, EC, SAR, and/or pH analysis. Soil samples were collected from the
boreholes in the top 0.50 m below grade, at or immediately below the depths
of identified transport pathways, within the capillary fringe and from the water
bearing formation. Groundwater samples were collected from each of the
three (3) monitoring wells installed during this investigation and submitted for
Metals, PHCs and VOCs analysis. Refer to attached Figure 7 - Site Plan with
BH and MW Locations.
Type and locations of
Not applicable.
remaining impacts noted at
the phase one property
considering previous
investigations:
Geological and
hydrogeological
interpretations:
The surficial geology at the Phase Two property encountered during
boreholes drilling was found to correspond to the general geology in the area
characterized as Young tills (Halton, 3b): clayey silt till deposits.
Geologic cross-sections based on Site boreholes are presented in Figures 9,
10 and 11. The surface fill materials and the soil in the vadose zone were
coarse textured and were described as layers of dark brown or brown sandy
silty or clayey silt with sand, trace gravel and organic materials extending up
to 1.6 m bgs.
The soil in the capillary fringe were medium to fine textured and were
described as brown to grey sandy silt till, trace clay. The first encountered
overburden aquifer consisted of a deposit of grey sandy silt till, moist,
extending from approximately 4.60 m up to 8.5 m below grade. The aquitard
comprises of grey clayey silt till, trace sand or silty clay till, extending from
approximately 8.5 m to 9.10 m bgs, and an estimated hydraulic conductivity
-7
-8
of 10 - 10 m/sec.
Page 11 of 12
Groundwater static level measurement was taken at the monitoring well
locations on September 3, 2014, and it was noted at depths ranging from 5.1
m bgs in BH6(MW) to 2.86 m bgs in BH3(MW), as summarized in Table 1.
The groundwater level in the overburden is subject to seasonal variations.
Based on the field measurements, the ground water flow direction at the Site
is inferred to be west towards Don River. Refer to Fig 8 attached in Figures
section of this report.
The regional and Site hydrogeological conditions indicate a typical range of
-4
-6
hydraulic conductivity for the encountered overburden soils of 10 – 10
cm/sec.
Should CPCs were present in soil and groundwater at on-site and off-site
PCAs locations, it appears that the relevant transport mechanisms have not
contributed to exceeding concentrations of CPCs in soil and groundwater at
the Phase Two property, or that it is unlikely that CPCs have been discharged
into the natural environment at the Phase Two property.
Contaminants of Potential Based on the results of the analytical program, no CPC are carried forward
Concern (CPC) and Releaseas COCs in soil and groundwater underneath the Phase Two property or
mechanisms
RSC property.
Transport pathways
The characteristics of the released liquid and of soil matrix will greatly
influence the migration pathways, extent of travel, and persistence of the
released contaminants. For example, a considerable mass of a contaminant
that is only slightly soluble in water may travel large distances in the
subsurface as a constituent of an organic liquid. Complementary, the inflow of
leaked contaminants into the groundwater and its soil matrix results in
changes of the fluid phases flow regime. Water phase in the pores of the soil
matrix will partially be displaced by liquid phases with different density and
miscibility. These displacement processes are influenced by various
parameters that characterize the aquifer’s soil matrix, such as: wettability,
permeability, relative permeability, capillary pressure and others.
When favorable conditions exist, petroleum hydrocarbons escaped into
subsurface may travel through naturally permeable soils, or through
preferential pathways described by highly permeable fill materials
surrounding underground services, building foundations and other subsurface
structures.
Beside the natural groundwater flow underlying the Site, petroleum products
may preferentially travel through the gas pipe trench and fuel transport pipes
trench from the east portion to southeast portion of the subject property.
Additionally, the storm sewer and sanitary sewer pipes trenches, as well as
building foundations weeping tiles may act as contaminants transport
pathways from the north portion of the Site towards east and southeast
areas.
Wind and runoff water may also represent carriers for vapours and
particulates of contaminants across the Site and neighboring properties.
Human and/or ecological Human receptors consist of personnel conducting work on-site and/or
receptors
Page 12 of 12
trespassers.
Ecological receptors at the Site consist of herbaceous vegetation, shrubs,
trees, soil invertebrates, terrestrial and aerial invertebrates, aquatic
microorganisms, phytoplankton, zooplankton, aquatic plants, aquatic
invertebrates, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals.
Exposure points
Indoors exposure points at the Site may be found in basement areas,
elevator shafts, isolated rooms, confined spaces, floor drains. Outdoors
exposure points may be identified near utilities manholes or catch basins.
Outdoors exposure points were not identified at this stage, as the most area
surrounding the building was asphalt/concrete-paved.
Routes of exposure
Human receptors at the Site can be exposed to contaminated media directly
through inhalation of vapours and/or dust, ingestion and/or dermal contact.
Ecological receptors can be exposed to surface contaminated media directly
through ingestion of contaminated vegetation, water, and prey; incidental
ingestion of soil; or through physical contact or inhalation. However,
inhalation and physical contact are considered to play minor roles in the
exposure to surface contamination. Other exposure mechanisms may
include: adsorption / desorption, atmospheric deposition, bioconcentration,
degradation, diffusion, dilution, dispersion, evaporation, foliar fixation, gas /
particulate partitioning, etc.
Contaminants in subsurface soil can be transported to ecological receptors
by plant uptake and translocation by burrowing animals. Contaminants at
depths greater than 3 m (10 ft) are considered inaccessible to ecological
receptors because that depth generally is below the root zone of plants and
the burrowing depth of ground-dwelling animals. Insects and burrowing
animals have the potential for bringing contaminated subsurface soils and
buried waste to the surface. Once contaminated soil is brought close to the
surface, transport and exposure scenarios for ecological receptors are the
same as for surface soil. For subsurface contamination, inhalation and direct
contact (by burrowing animals) are more important exposure routes than for
surface contamination. These receptors include burrowing animals and deeprooting plants. Because subsurface soil contamination may be translocated to
the surface by burrowing animals and plant uptake, other terrestrial species
also have some potential for exposure through this pathway.
Uncertainty or absence of It is inferred that subsurface conditions at the phase one property approach
information:
the regional geological and hydrogeological conditions. The actual
contribution of natural (or anthropogenic) pathways to contaminant transport
and distribution under the phase one property is uncertain and could affect
the conclusions of this report.
Location of subsurface fill materials across the Site is assumed at this time
therefore distribution of contaminants within fill may be highly heterogeneous.
Soil and groundwater quality underlying the on-site buildings was assumed to
be consisted with that at the tested locations.

Record of Site Condition # 216529 Record of Site

Transcription

Similar documents

88TH RSC HOW TO GUIDE FOR DTS INVITATIONAL

Technical Sheet - Microbes Biosciences

and Print - RSC Custom Graphics

Revel Casino News 2013

Angiosperm Latin Name: Callisia fragrans Common Name: Basket

AZOMITE granular - Down To Earth Fertilizer

NEW SOLUTION

Record of Site Condition # 215432 Record of Site

MT55 | Mini Tracked Loaders

Bromeliaceae