Architectural Coatings
Transcription
Architectural Coatings
Journal of Architectural Coatings Vo l u m e 1 SPECIAL REPORT ON GREEN COATINGS COATING SYSTEMS FOR SPORTS FACILITIES AIR-DRY FLUOROPOLYMERS SPRUCE UP OFFICE BUILDINGS / Number 2 April 2005 M E E T E X P E C T A T I O N S W I T H O U T C O M P R O M I S E . You can rely on Sherwin-Williams to help you meet your green coating specifications and satisfy all your quality expectations. And to help you identify our environmentally preferable coatings that provide maximum performance, we’ve developed the GreenSmart symbol. Products carrying this mark meet our highest standards for air quality, VOC emissions, life cycle cost efficiency, durability, color, and coverage. So with GreenSmart, you’ll never have to compromise to meet all your requirements. See your Sherwin-Williams Architectural Account Executive or call our Architect & Designer Answerline at 1-800-321-8194. www.sher win-williams.com ©2005 The Sher win-Williams Company april 2005 journal of architectural coatings / contents 17 ECOMANIASpecial report on green coatings 59 Joe Maty, Editor Methods of certifying coatings as “green” are described and critiqued by architects, certifying organizations, and coatings industry experts. Coating company initiatives in creating environmentally friendly coating products are reviewed, and a directory lists and describes “green” coating products from 40 companies. 42 Kevin Knight, Retro-Specs Consultants, Canada Selection of material, application, and quality control procedures are described for this major project in Cambridge, MA. The right calls on coatings John Williams, HOK Sport + Venue + Event The author describes how to select coating systems for various exposure environments in sports facilities and reviews the elements of good practice in surface preparation, paint application, and maintenance repainting of stadiums and ball parks. 55 Great expectations- Air barrier system crafted to measure up to expansive vision for major new research center at MIT project profiles Mega-makeover delivers… more than a pretty façade 69 JAC staff columns 3 Editor’s Word- Collaborative effort required to fix certification system for green coatings 4 Contributors- Zielnik, Helsel, Williams, Knight 6 news USGBC issues draft of LEED system for new construction; AIA to invade Vegas for convention JAC staff The aluminum curtain walls of three office buildings were successfully refurbished with an airdry fluoropolymer producing appearance properties equivalent to the initial factory finish. Eye to the future- Polysiloxane technology enlisted to give millennium landmark a long-term lease on London skyline 15 The Concept Stage- Research shows promise for sustainable polymer materials 41 Getting It Right- Tips on specification writing for coating materials, surface preparation, and paint application 63 On the cover: Albuquerque Isotopes baseball park Photo courtesy of HOK Sport + Venue + Event Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 72 Passing the Test- How to measure sunlight resistance and evaluate UV test data Ad Index and Calendar 1 #FDBVTFJOTQJSBUJPO DPNFTJOFWFSZDPMPS 0REMIER&INISHES FEATURING&LUORONAR FROM4NEMECAVAILABLEIN OPAQUESANDMETALLICS"RILLIANT COATINGSFORBRILLIANTDESIGNS #ALLORVISIT PREMIERFINISHESCOM !NDBEINSPIRED editor’sword Journal of Architectural Coatings Editor Joe Maty jmaty24156@aol.com Assistant Editor Daryl L. Fleming dfleming@protectivecoatings.com Contributing Editor Kevin Knight kknight@kta.com Art Director Peter Salvati psalvati@protectivecoatings.com Production Manager Milissa Bogats mbogats@protectivecoatings.com Production Assistant Daniel Yauger dyauger@protectivecoatings.com Circulation Manager Andy Folmer afolmer@paintsquare.com Vice President, Advertising Gina Fleitman gfleitman@paintsquare.com Advertising Sales James Oot jim@boja.com.com Bernadette Landon bzlandon@aol.com Business Manager Suzanne Sheehan ssheehan@protectivecoatings.com President/Publisher Harold Hower hhower@paintsquare.com The Journal of Architectural Coatings is published quarterly by Technology Publishing Company, 2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh, PA 15203; Telephone 412/431-8300; fax 412/431-5428. The office of the Editor is at 402 Portland Avenue, Belleville, IL 62220. Copyright by Technology Publishing; Reproduction of the contents, either in whole or in part, is forbidden without the written permission of the Publisher. Postmaster: Send address changes to the Journal of Architectural Coatings, 2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh, PA 15203 Subscription Rates: $24 per year (USA); $40 (non-US); single issue, $10. Printed in the USA Dreams of ‘green’ peace and other Utopian notions C an’t we all just get along? OK, that’s way too simplistic, particularly when the participants are so diverse—business managers and coatings formulators here, coatings users there, architects and specifiers over this way, and “green-leaning” designers and activists over that way. Quite a broad spectrum of people when it comes to this greenbuilding crowd. Their viewpoints can be just as diverse and conflicting, as you’ll see in our special report on green coatings in this, our second edition of the Journal of Architectural Coatings. It’s simplistic, maybe, but perhaps not completely unrealistic to believe we can all get along, this assortment of chemistry wizards and huggers of trees, creative types and lions of the bottom line. You may say I’m a dreamer, but let’s hope I’m not the only one. The green-building express, if not a runaway train, certainly is on a roll. It might be difficult to persuade the U.S. Green Building Council and other leaders of the movement to apply the brakes. New rating systems under the Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) tent are being developed or approved faster than you can say “sustainable,” it would seem. Looming on the horizon is a new version of LEED, version 2.2 for new construction, hard on the heels of the recently issued LEED for Existing Buildings and LEED for Commercial Interiors. No doubt the aims of LEED and the green-building policymakers carry a great deal of merit. Everyone wants better indoor air and a cleaner atmosphere. But why not make sure the credit programs and regulations are as effective as possible while ensuring that the paint doesn’t flunk the performance test? As Master Painters Institute President Barry Law says in our report, “Lack of performance is not environmentally friendly.” Even Chris Dixon, a Seattle architect and member of a key Green Building Council advisory committee, acknowledges that LEED is in need of some serious repairs, as reported in our coverage. And yet, LEED 2.2 looks to be steaming toward approval by the USGBC membership with little recognition of the role of product lifecycle or other important considerations that should go into the crafting of “green” policies. It may be too late to slow down the LEED 2.2 engine enough to allow significant attention to some of these questions. Let’s hope, however, that the USGBC and other arbiters of green-building ways and means revisit these issues sooner rather than later, and make the needed revisions. It may be dreaming to think everyone involved in the green-building debate can all get along. It should be perfectly reasonable, however, to believe the various players can talk to one another—and listen. www.paintsquare.com Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 Joe Maty Editor, JAC 3 Contributors Allen Zielnik Allen Zielnik (Passing the test, p. 26) leads the technical consulting operation of Atlas Materials Testing LLC, where he also serves as the director of strategic sales. In Kevin Knight addition, Zielnik is a member of Chemical the Kevin Knight (Great Expectations, p. 59) is president of Retro- American Society, Specs Consultants Canada, a company that provides on-site the Society of Plastics Engineers, the Institute for Environmental Sciences, and the Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology (FSCT). He is an active member of numerous technical committees in ASTM International dealing with the weathering and durability of materials, and he frequently advises standards and trade groups on technical issues. inspections, testing, and critiques of building-envelope problems for architects, engineers, owners, builders, and manufacturers. He is an authority on building-envelope technolo- gies, with 25 years of experience in the field, as a researcher, and in training programs. He has collaborated with federal John C. Williams John C. Williams, CSI, CCS (The Right Calls on Coatings, p. 42), is director of specifications for HOK Sport + Venue + Event, Kansas City, MO. He has more than 32 years of experience in the development of documents for design and construction of major facilities, ranging from power plants to sports facilities. Since joining HOK in 1999, he has been responsible for all specifications for an extensive portfolio of sports- and provincial governments, utilities, and private-sector companies on many projects and is the co-inventor of patented testing equipment used for finding leaks in air/vapor-barrier and roofing membranes. He is the author of numerous published papers and is a frequent lecturer on building-envelope science. He is a founding member of the Air Barrier Association of America (ABAA). facility projects undertaken by the firm, including Heinz Field and PNC Park in Jayson Helsel Pittsburgh; the New England Jayson Helsel (Getting it Patriots’ Gillette Stadium; the right, p. 30), a senior coatings Arizona Cardinals Stadium; consultant with KTA-Tator, the San Diego Padres’ Petco manages failure investiga- Field; and Reliant Stadium in tions and coating projects Houston. With HOK and dur- and is involved with coating ing a previous 27-year career with Black & Veatch, he has been surveys and inspection of involved in the design of coatings systems for a wide range of industrial projects and environments. He is a member of SSPC and the holds an MS in chemical Construction Specifiers Institute, and is president of the engineering Education Foundation of the CSI chapter in Kansas City. He University of Michigan, is a has a Bachelor’s degree in architecture from the University of registered professional engi- Kansas, and is a registered architect and certified construction neer, and a NACE Coatings specifier. Inspection Technician. 4 structures. from He the Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 News USGBC issues draft of new LEED system for new construction The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) recently issued a “first public-comment draft” of a proposed new green-building rating system for new construction and major renovations, or “LEEDNC.” The action follows the recent approval of new LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) greenbuilding rating systems for Existing Buildings (LEED-EB) and Commercial Interiors (LEED-CI). The council is in the process of accepting and reviewing comments on the draft LEED for new-construction. The draft document calls for the issuance of greenbuilding credits for the use of a range of “low-emitting materials,” including paints and coatings. To earn credits, the paints and coatings used must be applied on-site and must not exceed the VOC limits nor include any of the chemical components limited or restricted by the following standards: • Topcoat paints: Green Seal Standard GS-11; continued on page 8 Bayer, Tnemec showcase polyacrylic coatings technology Bayer MaterialScience and Tnemec Co. Inc. collaborated for one calendar year to eval- to develop a polyacrylic coatings system formulated to pro- uate performance. The com- vide a combination of adhesion, weatherability, corrosion pany said the tested coating resistance, and color and gloss retention. system met performance crite- The technology was highlighted at the recent World of ria, in addition to offering low Concrete show in Las Vegas, NV, and a coatings system based volatile organic compound on the technology has been applied to Building 8 at Bayer (VOC) content and low odor. MaterialScience’s corporate headquarters in Pittsburgh, PA. Bayer MaterialScience said a key objective in the formula- The coating system consists of a single-component mois- tion of the coating material was adhesion to existing coatings ture-cure polyurethane primer to minimize the cost of surface preparation. A test patch was supplied by Tnemec, which is applied to the building in 2003 and was allowed to remain reported to provide adhesion to steel, rust, and aged coatings. The topcoat is described as a new waterborne, air-dry composition that incorporates an aliphatic polyacrylic dispersion and an aqueous hydroxylfunctional polyacrylic dispersion, both supplied by Bayer MaterialScience. Stripe detail on the building was coated with an aliphatic acrylic polyurethane from Tnemec. Painting contractor Richard Lempenfield Painting Inc. prepared the surface by power washing the building with biodegradable detergent; sanding and minor hand tooling were Paint is applied to metal surfaces on Building 8 at the Bayer MaterialScience corporate office complex in Pittsburgh, PA. 6 also performed to eliminate rust in worn areas. Exposed areas were spot primed, then paint was applied by roller and brush. Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 Want to make a lasting impression? PSX 700. Used on architectural structures where long-term aesthetic ® appeal is most important. “We recommend PSX® 700 to our clients due to its time saving ease of application and phenomenal color retention of deep and ultra deep base colors. The cured product results in a smooth, easily cleanable, hard finish.” Jim Codde, Owner, Bay Cal Commercial Painting, Inc. “When I need a performance coating to adhere to fluorinated acrylic coatings or powder coatings that we have previously used and which will hold up to abuse, with excellent gloss and color retention, I select PSX® 700. In five years of applications it has never let me down.” Dan Collins, President DC Painting PSX® 700 is a revolutionary siloxane-epoxy coating offering performance that exceeds the adhesion, toughness, corrosion and chemical resistance of the best epoxies and also gives you better weatherability, exterior gloss and color retention than that of the best aliphatic polyurethane–all in one coating. Ameron International Performance Coatings & Finishes Group 13010 Morris Rd, Suite 400 Alpharetta, GA 30004 T: 678-393-0653 F: 678-566-2699 www.ameroncoatings.com Ameron BV Performance Coatings & Finishes P.O. Box 6 4190 CA Geldermalsen The Netherlands T: +31-345-587-587 F: +31-345-587-551 www.ameron-bv.com Ameron (Australia) Ltd. 183 Prospect Highway Seven Hills NSW 2147 Sydney, Australia T: 61-2 9421-8000 F: 61-2 9674-6224 www.ameron.com.au Ameron (New Zealand) Ltd 5 Monahan Road Mt. Wellington Auckland, New Zealand T: 64-9 573-1620 F: 64-9 573-1201 www.ameron.co.nz PCF2 We invite you to contact your Ameron representative for more information or visit us at www.ameroncoatings.com. News continued from page 6 • Anticorrosion and anti-rust paints: Green Seal Standard GS-03; and • All other architectural coatings, primers, and undercoats: South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1113, based on provi- sions in effect on Jan. 1, 2004. Similar low-emitting paint and coatings provisions are included in the recently launched LEED-CI system for commercial interiors. The LEED-EB for existing building systems provides credits for low-emitting paint and coatings YOU KNOW BLASTRAC FOR SHOT BLASTING. THINK MORE. Blastrac is more than just shot blasting. We use our 30-plus years of experience and knowledge of your surface preparation requirements to offer more than simply the most preferred brand of shot blasting equipment available. We continually improve on our technology to give you Blastrac® systems and Sawtec® hand tools that are The Blastrac 2-20D: • 20" path • Prepares 350 to 3,500 sq.ft/hr. • Advanced separation system • Simple operation • More reliable • More productive • More supported: with training, technical support and overnight parts availability With Blastrac and Sawtec, you also get more surface preparation technologies and expertise than with any other manufacturer. Get more. 800-256-3440 | www.blastrac.com Shot Blasting | Grinding | Polishing | Scarifying | Scraping | Milling | Cutting | www.blastrac.com © 2005 International Surface Preparation Group, Inc. Blastrac and Sawtec are registered trademarks owned by International Surface Preparation Group, Inc. 8 that meet the Green Seal GS-11 standard, but does not require compliance with the SCAQMD’s Rule 1113 on architectural coatings. Rule 1113 is considered the nation’s most stringent VOC regulation on architectural and industrial maintenance coatings. In announcing the launch of the LEEDEB rating system for existing buildings, Green Building Council President and CEO Rick Fedruzzi said the LEED-NC system for new construction “is rapidly transforming the design and construction of new buildings to sustainable practicers. Now with LEED-EB approved, the USGBC has the tools in place to start transforming the existing-buildings market to sustainable practices as well.” Commenting on the new LEED-CI system for commercial interiors, Fedruzzi noted that the commercial interiors market is “16 times larger than the new commercial construction market. With the challenge of taking on the commercial interiors market also comes a unique opportunity to shape this sector.” AIA issues program plans for annual convention, expo The American Institute of Architects has issued program details for the 2005 AIA National Convention and Design Exposition, scheduled for May 19–21 at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center, Las Vegas, NV. The AIA said the event is expected to draw more than 22,000 architects and professionals in the building industry. The exhibition will feature more than 800 exhibitors of products, services, and technologies, the AIA said. The designated theme for the convention and exposition is “The Power of Architecture: Imagine, Create, Transform.” Plans for the event include more than 15 pre-convention workshops, scheduled for May 18. Seminars scheduled for May 19–21 will include Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 slide and video presentations, panel discussions, and lectures. AIA Las Vegas announced plans for more than 35 district professional tours, including visits to a variety of destinations. Program tracks at the convention will address the topics of clients and partnering; business and planning; delivery and process; design and services; and the profession of architecture. Reduced fees for advanced registration are being offered until April 15. Complete details on the Design Exposition and Convention are posted on the AIA Web site, located at www.aia.org. CSI Show to offer programs on new ‘MasterFormat’ edition ers. The revised program encompasses the entire facility life cycle, focuses on work results, and addresses building operations and maintenance and heavy civil and process engineering construction, the institute said. Said to be of particular interest to owners is the new edition’s expanded scope, which includes a section for specifications for project performance. Separate MasterFormat 2004 Edition forums are scheduled for April 20 for specifiers, architects and engineers, contractors, construction product manufacturers, building owners, and facility managers. Each session will address specific interests about how the new edition enhances operations, tactics for adopting the new version, and best practices. At the April 20 opening general ses- sion of the show and convention, a panel of industry experts from various design and construction disciplines will discuss their specific MasterFormat implementation issues. The panel’s moderator is Dennis Hall, chairman of the group that developed the MasterFormat 2004 Edition. Also planned on April 23 are two continuing-education sessions on the new MasterFormat edition, “Introduction to the MasterFormat Application Guide” and “Keynoting with MasterFormat 2004 Edition.” MasterFormat 2004 Edition presentations are also planned each day of the show on the exhibit floor at the CSI booth, No. 1842. Paid registrants attending The CSI Show & Convention’s education program receive on site a free copy of MasterFormat The Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) will offer a series of educational and training programs for the institute’s recently issued MasterFormat 2004 Edition during the 49th annual CSI Show & Convention. The convention and exhibition are scheduled for April 20–23 at McCormick Place in Chicago, IL. The institute announced plans for an all-day pre-convention seminar to train accredited MasterFormat 2004 Edition instructors, scheduled for April 19, and eight continuing-education sessions for users, scheduled during the conference and exhibition. The MasterFormat 2004 Edition is the new version of the U.S.-Canadian standard for organizing building specifications and other project information. The April 20 opening general session also addresses MasterFormat 2004 Edition. CSI said the MasterFormat 2004 Edition is significantly expanded to accommodate marked advances in construction technologies and materials and the evolving priorities of building ownJournal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 9 News continued from page 10 2004 Edition, a $159 value. The show and convention will offer 132 continuing-education programs for professionals in commercial construction, with the sessions covering the entire facility life cycle, CSI said. More information on the programs and the CSI Show & Convention is available from the CSI website, located at www.thescishow.com, or by calling 800-689-2900. Also scheduled in conjunction with the CSI show are the Total Facility Management (TFM) Show and the Masonry Showcase. People in the news Glenn Higgins joins HMS Architects Glenn Higgins has joined HMS Architects, New Orleans, LA. The firm said Higgins will play a key role in expanding its practice in the areas of health care and medical architecture. Higgins formerly headed his own architecture firm, Glenn C. Higgins-Associates, which completed a range of educational, municipal, commercial, and residential projects. He is a member of the American Institute of Architects (AIA), and AIA Louisiana. HMS Architects is a specialty and general-practice architectural firm, with specializations in performing-arts projects, hospitality and multi-family projects, and industrial facilities. Product pipeline Exterior-paint line ICI Paints has announced the launch of the “This Old House™” brand of exterior paint. Described as premium, 100% acrylic, waterborne paints, the product line incorporates a urethane-polymer network designed to enhance application and appearance properties. Product attributes include a balance of sag resistance and flow, resulting in an even finish that hides brush marks and minimizes surface imperfections, the company says. A thick, one-coat-coverage formula is designed to provide drip resistance on the brush and surface, and the paint also provides resistance to fading; peeling; chipping and cracking; and mildew and algae, the company says. The paint is offered in a full range of gloss levels and a 320-color palette. ICI Paints (www.icipaints.com/NA), Cleveland, OH 10 Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 Performance art. Your customers want beauty. You want performance. Now, get both – with Muralo’s scrubbable Ultra Ceramic matte paint. Engineered with our blend of uniquely calibrated resins, polymers and micro-ceramic pigments, Ultra Ceramic delivers maximum hiding that minimizes your work time. Makes touch-ups easy. Eliminates yellowing. And creates an impenetrable surface film that stands up to the most rigorous scrubbing. As the most burnish-resistant matte paint on the market, Ultra Ceramic is truly a masterpiece. To learn more about our products and dealers, call us today at 1-800-631-3440. Or visit www.muralo.com. The Muralo Family of Products: • • Adhesium All registered trademarks of The Muralo Company. News Coatings products The Sherwin-Williams Co. has introduced the Loxon XP™ direct-to-concrete, high-build masonry coating, reported to require no primer. Recommended applications include use on tilt-up, precast or poured-in-place concrete and CMU, cement block, and stucco surfaces. The company said the product offers resistance to alkali, efflorescence, and wind-driven rain. Other recent introductions include the company’s Sher-Color™ Advanced Color Technology Systems for color formulations and tint dispensing; the ProMar 200 XP™ interior flat latex paint, offering a highbuild finish for maximum hiding and coverage; and the AMROSEAL® ExpressPatch Fast Dry Urethane Patch Kit, a low-odor, water-borne patching material for concrete repair. Also introduced was Duration Home™ interior latex coating, reported to offer enhanced washability and burnish resistance. The company says the product is formulated with a patented crosslinking technology that prevents stains from penetrating, resulting in improved washability and stain and burnish resistance. The product is described as offering low odor, low VOC content, and resistance to mold and mildew. The Sherwin-Williams Co. (www.sherwin-williams.com), Cleveland, OH JAC We partner with our customers to develop complete weathering test solutions that most accurately predict their materials’ service life. We’ve made a science out of seeing the future. We understand weathering inside and out. With the world’s most accurate line of accelerated weathering test instruments and the largest outdoor exposure network spanning the globe, we can tailor a solution to answer your unique weathering needs. All of our instruments, services and facilities are designed to help our customers reach their ultimate goals – a quality product, a competitive edge, a faster time to market. For a representative in your area visit http://www.atlas-mts.com/contacts Experience. T h e A t l a s D i f f e r e n c e. 12 Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 Innovation. Selection. Quality. Performance. Providing Quality Solutions • Quality Commercial Paint Solutions • Exceptional Consumer Products • Superior Industrial Coatings • Fine Wood Care Applications 50 Holt Drive P.O. Box 694 Stony Point, NY 10980 Tel: 845.786.5000 Fax: 845.786.5831 www.insl-x.com ©2005 Insl-X Products Corporation. The STAR Program, by creating a total safety culture can reduce workers’ compensation claims costs for employers and can increase profitability. This is especially important in the construction industry, which generates more workers compensation claims than any other industry. The Painters and Allied Trades Labor Management Cooperation Initiative (P&AT LMCI) meets the challenges of our industry. S A F E T Y T R A I N I N G AWA R D S R E C O G N I T I O N Safety is an employee and employer benefit that creates a competitive advantage. 1-888-934-6474 www.LMCIonline.org Click our Reader e-Card at paintsquare.com TheConceptStage New research suggests continued progress in development of ‘sustainable’ raw materials R USM project details synthesis, evaluation of soybean oil-based ‘macromonomer’ ecently published coatings research carried out at the University of Southern Mississippi (USM) offers promise for continued advances in the development of water-borne architectural coatings that incorporate materials derived from vegetable oils. The work marks a continuation of a longstanding R&D priority at USM’s highly regarded Department of Polymer Science: the development of high-performance coatings that deliver an enviable environmental profile while making use of “bio-based,” or plant-derived (a.k.a. sustainable), raw materials. This new research is described in a paper presented at the recent Waterborne, High-Solids and Powder Coatings Symposium, a widely respected conference for coatings technology held annually in New Orleans. The symposium is sponsored by USM. The paper, titled “Property Development in Latexes Using Soybean Oil Acrylated Macromonomer,” describes research conducted by the Thames-Rawlins Research Group. The authors are Sandiphan Dutta, Catherine Blackwell, Nick Gariano, James W. Rawlins, and Shelby F. Thames, the latter a legendary USM polymer science professor and now president of the university. The paper reviews an ambitious research project in which the authors designed and synthesized a novel class of vegetable oilbased monomers for incorporation into water-borne emulsions. The soybean oil-based monomers are termed “macromonomers” and were found to improve the cure and performance of latex architectural paints, according to the published work. The project demonstrated that incorporation of the soybean oil-based monomers “improved latex coalescence, and afforded good wet adhesion, block resistance and scrub resistance,” the authors reported. “The performance properties suggest promise for soybean oil based [macromonomers] in architectural coatings, and promote the use of natural resources in waterborne coatings.” In the paper, the authors say the soybean oil-based monomers “act as a very effective, non-fugitive plasticizer to facilitate film formation at sub-ambient temperatures.” To allow effective incorJournal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 poration of the oil-based monomer into a water-borne emulsion, the research group created a water-dispersible soybean-oil acrylate macromonomer. The monomer was evaluated as a comonomer in coatings based on all-acrylic polymers and as an additive or reactive diluent in a styrene-acrylic latex. A significant challenge, and the focus of a good portion of the research project, involved the evaluation of various “complementary chemistries” in an effort to improve cure rate and performance properties of the coating film. Evaluations of semigloss and flat coatings formulations indicated Evaluations of semigloss that incorporation of the and flat coatings soybean oil macromonformulations indicated omers resulted in improved latex coales- that incorporation of cence without the use of the soybean oil coalescent solvents that macromonomers are traditionally added to water-borne coatings to resulted in improved facilitate film formation. latex coalescence The evaluations were based on comparisons without the use of with similar formulations coalescent solvents. that did not include the soybean oil monomers. Strong performance properties were evident in formulations where use of the latexes incorporating the oil-based monomers was optimized by means of combinations with diacetone acrylimide (DAAM) and adipic dihydrazide (ADH), the paper reported. The researchers said the solvent resistance of resulting coatings films “improved significantly” with the incorporation of DAAM and ADH, due to increased crosslink density of the coating film. “The results justify our approach of designing latexes using [soybean oil monomers] that combine all the desirable properties required of a universal latex for architectural coatings,” the authors conclude. JAC 15 Journal of Architectural Coatings April 2005 Special Report: Green Coatings ECOMANIA: Special Report on Green Coatings Contents Status of the Technology • 18-36 Green Portfolio Conde Nast Building • 19 ECHO Aquarium • 20 Fallingwater • 23 Green Products Recycled Paint • 25 Sustainable Raw Materials • 26 Self-certification of Coating Line • 29 W By Joe Maty, Editor, JAC hen the coatings conversation gets around to the subject of environmental friendliness, in the context of “green” building objectives and standards, general agreement emerges on one central theme: designers, specifiers, and coatings users have seen a significant improvement in the selection and quali- ty of products offered by coatings manufacturers. After that, dissenting views quickly surface among those involved in coatings- Green Seal Standard • 30 related aspects of the mushrooming green-building marketplace. It might be said that coatings suppliers, their customers, green-building organizations, industry associations, and government agencies disagree more than they agree on such issues as green-building guidelines and standards; the capa- Product Directory • 36 On the Special Report Cover and photo above: Sherwin-Williams Harmony® (0 VOC) interior coatings were used in the painting of the office building and hotel lobby. Photos courtesy of Sherwin-Williams 18 bility of coatings formulators and manufacturers to make products that will meet performance needs as environmental regulations and green-building standards become increasingly rigorous; and the effectiveness of existing certification programs in defining what really constitutes “green” products. Take the strong opinions voiced by Chris Dixon, a Seattle architect, specifi- Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 Coatings technologies respond to green-building phenomenon, but critics take swipes at obstacles in the way of ‘eco-efficiency’ er, and member of the Material and Dixon, despite his position on a key LEED program’s IEQ credits for low- Resources Technical Advisory Group of USGBC advisory panel, scoffs at some of emitting materials, with the benchmark the U.S. Green Building Council the provisions in the current LEED for paint based on a certification stan- (USGBC). The council is responsible for Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) dard issued more than 10 years ago by the development and establishment of a standards, saying they miss the mark if the Green Seal organization. Dixon says green-building rating system that evalu- the target is improved indoor air quality. the Green Seal standard—GS 11— ates and certifies new buildings on the basis of their environmental friendliness—the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program. Coatings, he says, offer a prime example of these shortcomings. “It’s wrong to focus on a handful of products,” he says, referring to the addresses only flat and nonflat interior topcoats and fails to take into account the chemical content or emissions of a range of other coatings products, such G r e e n T P o r t f o l i o CONDÉ NAST Building rior coatings used in the struche glittering, glass and ture’s spectacular common steel Conde Nast skyareas and offices. Winning the scraper in New York, contest for the role of coatings home to the high-flying supplier for these interior porpublishing empire of the same tions was Benjamin Moore & name, made its debut on the Co.’s Eco Spec interior latex Manhattan skyline in 1999 with paint, a zero-VOC, low-odor the kind of fanfare one might product formulated to deliver expect from the media powerthe appearance and applicahouse that counts the glossy tion characteristics of top-ofVogue and glitzy Vanity Fair the-line premium paints. among its star vehicles. The building has been But under that glamorous, hailed as the first project of its postmodernist curtain-wall size to embrace an ambitious facade at 4 Times Square lies a Photo courtesy of Benjamin Moore & Company environmental agenda for functional building design that reduced energy use, indoor air quality, recycling systems, and puts a premium on environmental friendliness, as conceived sustainable design. A New York Times review praised the Fox and executed by the noted New York architectural firm Fox & & Fowle design as “a piece of urban theater, with a cluster of Fowle. neon signs at the base and an eruption of high-technology This focus on environmental correctness encompassed a myrhardware popping out of the top.” iad of building functions and materials, right down to the inte- Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 19 Special Report on Green Coatings as clear finishes, coatings applied to fur- ment should embrace a niture, primers and sealers, and other more “holistic” approach, The USGBC is in the coatings. and address the emissions process of developing an profile of the building inte- updated version of LEED addressed,” he says. “The problem isn’t rior as a whole, including for New Construction, really what’s covered; it’s what isn’t.” all the components and called LEED V2.2, but materials. Dixon says the revisions “A lot of material isn’t even being “Architects, green-building consultants, other uninformed people are time to fix it,” he says. Dixon acknowledges that preaching that if you construct a space the Green Building Council using products in accordance with recognizes its share of the LEED low-emitting materials credits, responsibility—and the you will have good indoor air quality. blame—for what’s wrong Good IAQ has little to do with that.” with current LEED low- Instead, Dixon says, programs to improve air quality and the environ- G r e e n will only begin to address the shortcomings of the standards. Architect Dixon agrees that LEED needs more work. “All they’ve really been able to handle was to up the bar a little bit and emitting materials standards. “They recognize that, but it will take make it more clear as to what’s included. But they realize there’s much more P o r t f o l i o ECHO aquarium and science center A Envirotoner no-VOC colorants. A number of high-perforclear water-borne polyurethane mance water-borne was used to seal faux-finished coatings supplied by walls in high-traffic areas. The Sherwin-Williams For the ceilings, Finishing Co. helped a green-leaning archiTouches used Sherwin-Williams’ tectural firm in Vermont design the Bond-Plex water-borne acrylic state’s first LEED-certified building— coating. Though designed for the $14.5 million ECHO aquarium direct application to metal siding, and science center in Burlington. the acrylic met the project’s Marty Sienkiewycz, of Smith, requirements for low VOCs and Alvarez, Sienkiewycz Architects in delivered the desired finish for Burlington, said his firm designed the ceilings, said Mike Talbot, the 28,000-square-foot ECHO cenFinishing Touches president. ter with a number of goals in mind Photo courtesy of The Sherwin-Williams Company “Bond-Plex has excellent dryfall for indoor environmental quality. characteristics,” he said. “We have continued to use it for this The first coatings requirement: Only water-borne coatings purpose since this project. It’s nice because we can get it in could be used, with each product meeting strict standards for most of the colors in the Sherwin-Williams palette, and the VOC content. coverage is outstanding.” The architects worked closely with painting contractor Those involved in the ECHO aquarium and science center Finishing Touches Painting and Sherwin-Williams to specify project see the combination of high-performance, low-VOC products that would meet these criteria. Harmony, a high-percoatings and other environmentally friendly construction formance, low-odor interior latex with no measurable VOCs, methods and materials as a testament to the ideals behind was used on 90 percent of the walls. To achieve some deep the acronym that forms the facility’s name: “Ecology, Culture, reds and purples, the specs called for Sherwin-Williams’ History, and Opportunity.” ColorAccents interior latex tinted with the company’s 20 Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 that needs to be done.” On a positive note, Dixon adds Business Group, Rust-Oleum Corp., pounds),” Paich says. “The answer is says making paint with fewer VOCs zero as far as we are concerned.” that the council has gotten the message and fewer toxics has benefited the that the LEED system needs some work. industry. Revisions to the LEED standard for “We’re very positive about what’s happening in the industry. We see it as “From Rust-Oleum’s point of view, a good thing that more and more com- carpeting offer a good example of the question was how low can we go panies are offering these products. The changes needed elsewhere, focusing on with VOCs (volatile organic com- public and other coatings users are overall emissions rather than simply VOC content and a handful of prohibited chemicals. The draft LEED 2.2 program significantly expands the range of carpeting materials that can affect air quality and sets ceilings for several chemical constitutents, he points out, adding, “That’s exactly what will have to happen for every material in the building.” Manufacturers respond with new technologies Dixon also has some blunt words for coatings companies that complain about regulations, standards, and certification programs that they say go beyond the realm of the technologically possible. When circumstances dictate, the coatings industry has demonstrated that it can work wonders in developing new, low-VOC and less-toxic products that also meet performance requirements, Dixon says. “Most manufacturers have eagerly accepted the challenge,” he says. “I have learned from several manufacturers that in changing paint formulations to be lower in VOC content, significant improvements in performance have been realized. Now we have acrylics that perform far better than alkyds, where once alkyds were the gold standard for quality for interior coatings. I now have a range of products to choose from that are low- or zero-VOC that I routinely specify for various interior substrates.” Some in the coatings industry testify on behalf of the case made by Dixon. Brian Paich, brand manager, Industrial Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 21 No VOC. No odor. No worries. Sierra’s full line of superior-performance coatings are the only industrial epoxies and acrylics that have no odor, no VOC, no hazardous air pollutants and no solvents. Nothing to harm the environment. And since they’re from Rust-Oleum, you can trust in their durability. So if you want to help protect the indoor air quality of your buildings – there’s a Sierra Performance coating just for you. And the world around you. For industrial grade coatings that truly are a breath of fresh air, call 800-769-6565. www.rustoleum.com © 2005 Rust-Oleum Corporation NO SOLVENTS. JUST SOLUTIONS. TM Special Report on Green Coatings demanding them. The more manufac- made aggressive marketing of its turers there are offering products like “Horizon” line of Green Seal-certified in the Northwest, but even where a pro- this, the more raw materials there are interior and exterior paints a corner- ject is not necessarily LEED specified, available to formulate them. It just stone of an overall “green” market we have enough architects who have strengthens the industry.” strategy. In the Pacific Northwest, he worked on LEED projects or are familiar says, green building and the LEED pro- with LEED concepts, that they include Marketing for Rodda Paint Co., gram are regarded as gospel in the low-VOC paint in their master specs. Portland, OR, says his company has design and construction business. And we agree with that,” Braden says. Todd Braden, vice president of “LEED is a widely understood practice G r e e n P o r t f o l i o Frank Lloyd Wright’s FALLINGWATER A t “Fallingwater,” coatings resins and other Frank Lloyd material components to proWright’s acclaimed duce the company’s first higharchitectural icon performance zero-VOC paint. in the Laurel Highlands of “It was a combination of Pennsylvania, environmental conthings, and making sure cerns rank high on the priority everything in the paint system list of the Western Pennsylvania was zero VOC,” including Conservancy, the non-profit additives, pigments, thickenorganization that operates the ers, and biocides used to give historic site. the paint the needed hiding These concerns were evident in power, gloss, mold and the choice of interior paint for mildew resistance, and applirestoration work at Wright’s mascation flow and leveling charterpiece in 2002. acteristics. “It all had to blend Photo courtesy of Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Fallingwater, one of the most together,” Wasik said. highly recognizable examples of Wright’s genius in designing Before its commercial introduction with the Fallingwater buildings that blend with their environment, straddles a stream application, the new product was put through the paces at another western Pennsylvania historic site with a noteworthy and waterfall in the leafy Laurel Highlands southeast of environmental connection—the one-time home of the pioneerPittsburgh. ing ecologist Rachel Carson, author of the groundbreaking Site curators and project architects selected a then-brandbook “Silent Spring.” The use of Pure Performance in the intenew coating developed by PPG Industries Inc., “Pure rior of the small, wooden home suggested that PPG’s developPerformance,” for interior painting work at Fallingwater. The ment objectives had been met—environmental friendliness specification at Fallingwater marked the formal launch of the combined with premium-grade appearance and application paint, a low-odor and zero-VOC water-borne acrylic posiproperties, Wasik said. tioned as a premium interior paint and sold under PPG’s Wasik said development programs for zero-VOC coatings Pittsburgh Paints label. have resulted in marked advances in the technology. “The first “It’s environmentally friendly and high-quality, and met the ones that came on the scene 10 to 15 years ago were not of requirements for sheen, color, durability, and overall appearhigh quality,” he said. “Adhesion was sometimes marginal, ance,” said Jim Wasik, a PPG development chemist who and scrub resistance was low. There have been significant played a key role in the formulation of the product. improvements in both raw materials and formulation.” Wasik said PPG employed “novel technology” involving Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 23 Special Report on Green Coatings With the “Horizon” label, Rodda says it is the first coatings company to earn Green Seal certification for both low-odor and non-HAP (hazardous air pollutant). and raw materials . Paich, however, says offering green Rust-Oleum, as with other compa- products for architectural applications nies offering no-VOC products, is no guarantee that the coatings com- declines to elaborate on proprietary pany will prosper in the LEED era. brand in his company’s portfolio of chemistries and formulations. In gen- Color and design issues remain para- environmentally friendly coatings is eral, Paich says, a key to the environ- mount, as does performance. The big Sierra Performance Coatings, a busi- mental and performance profile of the sea change in recent years, however, is ness acquired in 2002. Paich says the Sierra product line is successfully the marked advance in the quality of product line is somewhat unique in emulsifying oil and water in a stable green coatings. that it comprises coatings designed for mixture. Coalescence and cure of the more demanding applications in coating film is accomplished by means about green paint, there was a stigma industrial settings, once the exclusive of advances in formulation technology attached due to the perception that interior and exterior coatings. Rust-Oleum’s Paich says he flagship the coatings did not work,” he says. domain of solvent-borne products. The company says the low-odor products contain no measurable VOCs. The Sierra product line features “Beyond,” a multipurpose, 100% acrylic water-borne product. The line also includes water-borne acrylic urethanes, acrylic primers, epoxies, and acrylic epoxies, all billed as no-VOC, 24 “Previously when people would talk Sea Change- “When these products were first intro- A marked advance in the what it is today, so that made users duced, performance was nowhere near quality of green coatings, says Rust-Oleum’s Paich. leery.” “That has changed. That stigma is no longer present. The end user can have great color and performance, and with all the environmental benefits.” Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 G r e e n C P o r t f o l i o Kelly-Moore Paint’s ECOAT an recycled paint California, where state agencies based on post-conare ostensibly required to make sumer, or leftover, sure products with recycled content water-borne paint account for 50 percent of their shed its status as the Rodney paint procurements. The catch: The Dangerfield of architectural coatrequirement can be circumvented if ings—getting no respect from the product with recycled content is would-be customers? not equal to or superior in quality Yes, says a representative of a to non-recycled products. Current major California-based manufacspeculation in California suggests turer of architectural coatings that that, for recycled paint, the amount has been making and selling coatpurchased by state agencies is ings with recycled content for closer to 15 percent of the total more than 10 years. But, adds procured. Walter Leclerc of Kelly-Moore Despite losing a sales contract for Paint Co., government agencies recycled paint with the state a few Photo courtesy of Kelly-Moore Paint Company and other parties with an interest years ago to a lower-priced bid, in “closing the loop” with the use Kelly-Moore soldiers on with proof recycled products must take steps to set some rules on duction and marketing efforts for “ecoat” (e for “enviro”), the quality and content. company’s paint with recycled content. Leclerc says Kelly“The problem is, there are no genearally accepted perforMoore rigorously maintains its own performance and quality mance standards” for recycled paint, Leclerc says, adding that standards for ecoat, which contains a minimum of 50 percent some type of generally accepted program of standards and recycled post-consumer paint. certification is needed to ensure that recycled paint is safe to The company says the product is “completely re-manufacuse and won’t fail miserably in its intended purpose. Leclerc’s tured” in a process where paint destined for recycling is sortresponsibilities include the operation of ecoat Recycled Paint ed and tested, filtered, mixed, and adjusted for quality. New Products, a division of Kelly-Moore. ingredients are added to assure consistency in quality, color, Other manufacturers and industry organizations agree, and and performance. The paint is made at Kelly-Moore’s recythey have succeeded in getting a hearing from government cling facility in Sacramento, CA, and sold throughout the agencies involved with issues of household hazardous waste Kelly-Moore store network. The product line includes interior and product stewardship. and exterior flat and semigloss paints offered in a full color The lack of any sort of accepted product standards, Leclerc range. says, serves to discourage sales of recycled paint to the most logiLeclerc says Kelly-Moore is committed to environmentally cal customers—government agencies charged with encouraging responsible operations and programs, a philosophy reflected recycling and the use of recycled products. Reluctance to purin the ecoat product line. “It’s not a profit center,” he said of chase recycled paint on the part of governments, in turn, causes the recycled-paint business. But he expresses frustration about a chilling effect on consumer interest in the products, he says. the failure of government agencies to fix what’s wrong with “If governments aren’t buying, there’s a chain reaction—the the marketplace for recycled-paint. public’s not buying,” Leclerc says. He points to the situation in “Governments need to take the lead,” he says. Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 25 Special Report on Green Coatings G r e e n P o r t f o l i o SOUTHERN DIVERSIFIED: Seeds of growth S outhern Diversified Products L.L.C. arrived on the parts of the country, says Rocky Prior, vice president and coatings manufacturing scene a little more than general manager. two years ago, but the maker of environmentally “One of our guiding philosophies is not to introduce a friendly paint has already landed at least one cusproduct unless it provides a unique solution or property relatomer with a high profile and immense clout: The Pentagon. tive to other products on the market,” Prior says. Reflecting Southern Diversified, based in Hattiesburg, MS, was this thinking, the company is at work on the development of launched by the School of Polymers and High-Performance an exterior paint line that will offer improved durability and Materials at the University of Southern Mississippi (USM), resistance qualities, he says. recognized as one of the nation’s top coatings and polymers In its marketing approach, Prior says Southern Diversified programs. has emphasized product quality as opposed to an exclusive Legislation enacted by the focus on the paint’s “green” Mississippi legislature allows the attributes. “We offer a premium creation of such companies to product at a lower price with the license and commercialize the added benefit that it’s green,” he results of university research prosays. Also in keeping with this grams as a tool of economic strategy, the company downplays development. USM’s reputation as a leader in Emerging early on from the the development of technologies company’s pipeline for product based on renewable or “biodevelopment was the American based” raw materials derived Photo courtesy of Southern Diversified Products L.L.C. Pride® line of zero-VOC, minifrom soybean and castor oils. mal-odor interior paint, touted by Southern Diversified as forPrior says some potential paint users continue to view such mulated to compete with the “best of the best” in the markettechnologies as being inferior in quality. place for architectural coatings. Then, more recently, the Sales are expanding rapidly, and the company is seeking company rolled out a new paint line targeting the contractor to triple its sales volume in 2005, he says. Marketing efforts market, “American PROT.” will be stepped up to target more sales at stores specializing The company scored a major coup early in the game with in “green” building products, and Prior says architects and a deal to sell up to 10,000 gallons of American Pride a year specifiers figure to be increasingly important as LEED buildfor use at the Pentagon. The paint line’s customer portfolio ing projects gain momentum. also includes the renowned Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. “The architectural community is looking more and more at The product line is Green Seal-certified, listed as an our products, and we expect to see more specification of the approved product by the Master Painters Institute, and was products,” he says. named a “Top 10” award winner by Building Green magaIn addition to architectural coatings, products winding zine in 2003, the company says. The product line includes a their way through Southern Diversified’s development drywall primer; a ceiling paint; and flat, eggshell and semipipeline include an agricultural-based water-borne latex gloss finishes. The semigloss version incorporates ceramic used to treat permanent-press camouflage uniforms for the microspheres to boost washability and toughness of the paint Marine Corps; a low-VOC water-borne coating to replace film. the traditional navy haze-gray topcoat; a formaldehyde-free Sold originally in independent paint stores in Mississippi, adhesive for particleboard; and a water-borne water repelAmerican Pride is experiencing rapid sales growth in other lent that contains natural materials. 26 Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 Problems With Your Concrete? Find out for yourself or have KTA do the work! Purchase or rent equipment from KTA for the non-destructive determination of: Still, Paich agrees that zero VOC doesn’t work in every case. “We believe that as a corporation we can support both green and conventional coatings. It doesn’t have to be one versus the other. It can be ‘what’s the best coating for that application?’ There are cases where you don’t need low-odor, low-VOC, and other prodPhoto courtesy of PROCEQ. ucts are better suited.” Green means more than holding the line on VOCs A parade of coatings manufacturers has rolled out versions of low- or no-VOC Call KTA today to learn more. introduced the first “zero-VOC” paints SPRED 2000 and LIFEMASTER 2000 interior latex paints. And manufactur- Rebar placement and concrete cover Permeability of cover Rebar corrosion Chloride contamination Compressive strength Uniformity Crack and cavity detection Moisture detection Relative humidity & tensile strength (destructive) As an alternative, KTA professionals can conduct the evaluation and provide recommendations and specifications for concrete repair, including appropriate sealants or coatings. Inspectors are also available across the country to provide oversight of each step of the repair or replacement process. architectural coatings since ICI Paints in the early 1990s with its Glidden KTA-Tator, Inc., 115 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15275 1-800-245-6379/FAX (412) 788-1306 Email: info@kta.com/Website: www.kta.com ers also have learned a few lessons Quality & Integrity Since 1949 along the way. One of these lessons from the school of market realities was that loudly trumpeting “low VOC” in promotional campaigns didn’t galvanize paint customers, particularly do-it-yourself (DIY) consumers. Far more persuasive was the Spillane says repositioning of ‘Eco Spec’ has paid off. “low-odor” or “nearly noodor” feature of these revolutionary new paints. “It didn’t resonate with consumers,” Scott Lewis, ICI Paints product technical manager, says of the arrival of noVOC paint. The company eventually discontinued the SPRED 2000 brand, which was sold under the Glidden label at mass-market outlets catering to DIY customers. The LIFEMASTER label continues to be marketed through ICI’s company-owned stores, targeting proJournal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 27 Special Report on Green Coatings fessional painters. has accelerated interest in low-odor, zero-VOC coating, “Pristine,” and low-VOC coatings in these markets, replacing it with the current name, the benefit of low odor was a mar- and coatings companies have gotten “Eco Spec.” The product also was repo- ketable commodity, particularly on the bandwagon. sitioned as part of the company’s coat- Other companies also found that among specifiers and paint users One major maker of architectural responsible for painting hospitals, coatings, Benjamin Moore & Co., schools, offices, and other public responded to this market reality by buildings. The coming of the LEED era dropping the name originally given its ings product line for the commercial marketplace. “To be honest, back then there was not a lot of passion about the environment and green products,” says Jeff Spillane, senior marketing manager for Want to find out more about green coatings? We wrote the book on it . Benjamin Moore’s Professional product line. The repositioning strategy has paid off with expanding sales to users concerned about odor and indoor air quality. “As the green movement has gotten bigger and bigger, demand has taken off,” Spillane says. “Five years ago, you couldn’t find a ‘green’ trade show. There’s about seven of them now.” He says Eco Spec sales are increasing faster than the company’s overall coatings sales. Spillane says specifiers, architects, and commercial and institutional paint users will continue to drive growth in the green-coatings segment. “I’ve heard architects say that by 2010, they will write specs only for green buildings,” he says. The green theme has expanded to include a variety of coatings products, some of them formulated for more demanding applications and exposures, and others offering a specific functional benefit such as energy conservation. ICI Paints, for example, says its portfolio of green products features lowVOC, low-odor epoxies, block fillers, Our Green Building Guide was created for architects and designers who are developing projects with a green focus in the Southwest. It contains all the information you need about various green programs and the superior performing Dunn-Edwards products that meet their specifications. Call (888) DE PAINT for your free copy of our Green Building Guide. and direct-to-metal primers and finishes. Ameron International Inc., a maker of high-performance coatings for demanding applications, says its product offerings include epoxy siloxane, epoxy mastic and aliphatic polyurethane coatings that deliver a positive environmental profile based on low solvent content and absence of ©2005 Dunn-Edwards Corporation. All rights reserved. 28 Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 heavy-metal pigments and other unde- dients such as raw materials derived Polymers business incorporates recy- sirable materials. from plants, or recycled content. cled glass, contains no VOCs, and The range of products carrying A colossus in the field of architectur- delivers “unsurpassed life cycle.” strong green credentials in terms of al coatings, The Sherwin-Williams Co., low or no VOCs, low odor, no heavy has coined its own green pedigree for also are produced by two major region- metals, and other benefits continues to products that meet certain criteria, and al coatings companies based in expand. These include intumescent says the designation takes into account California: Dunn-Edwards Corp., Los fire-resistant coatings; water-borne product content and lifecycle issues. Angeles, and Kelly-Moore Paint Co., epoxies; materials for air barriers; (See related story.) This “GreenSmart” San Carlos. (See related story.) Dunn- waterproofers; concrete sealers; decora- designation has been affixed to a zero- Edwards’ product line includes no- tive flooring materials; traffic-deck VOC, low-odor, silica-free interior latex VOC, low-odor interior paints, and the coatings; water-borne polyurethanes; paint and a low-VOC, low-odor interi- company plans to roll out a new, commercial floor coatings; and a num- or paint that offers “ultimate washabil- upgraded zero-VOC product line this ber of other specialty coatings and fin- ity and burnish resistance” to reduce summer. ishes. (See buying-guide directory the need for frequent repainting. accompanying this report.) Other entries in the green coatings derby incorporate “sustainable” ingre- Coatings made with recycled content Coatings with a job to do In another market segment, SherwinWilliams says an epoxy terrazzo floor- In addition to formulating products ing product offered by its General designed to do no harm to the envi- G r e e n N P o r t f o l i o Sherwin-Williams’ GREENSMART ot inclined to settle for someone else’s seal of approval, The SherwinWilliams Co., a colossus in the field of architectural coatings, has staked out its own identity in the expanding green-building marketplace. The company unveiled the GreenSmart designation for its “environmentally preferred products,” and said the name would apply to coatings that offer longterm durability, low VOCs and low odor, and meet or exceed the criteria listed in the Green Seal organization’s GS 11 standard for paint and coatings. Photo courtesy of The Sherwin-Williams Company Two Sherwin-Williams prodresistance, and a high level ucts have been given the GreenSmart designation: the soap. “Harmony” and “Duration” interior latex coatings. Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 In announcing the launch of GreenSmart, Sherwin-Williams said the designation goes “beyond most third-party certification,” and “takes into account product performance and a variety of other criteria that impact the environment.” The company says Harmony is a zero-VOC, silica-free product that is low in odor and is formulated to offer antimicrobial properties to resist mold and mildew. The product is offered as a primer and in flat, eggshell, and semigloss topcoats. The Duration product is described as a low-VOC coating formulated to offer low odor, antimicrobial properties, burnish of washability with water or mild 29 Special Report on Green Coatings And manufacturers aren’t complete- ronment, coatings manufacturers chal- long-term durability and extend the lenge specifiers and users to make note life of a metal roof by reducing ther- ly alone in taking this view. Barry Law, of technologies that contribute to the mal expansion and contraction. The president of the increasingly influen- green cause in other, “functional” fluoropolymer chemistry is described tial Master Painters Institute (MPI), ways. In the health and safety catego- as “extremely inert” and highly resis- voices some of the strongest opinions ry, suppliers offer coatings for lead tant to ultraviolet light, heat, and heard anywhere about the green revo- abatement and antimicrobial paints moisture. The finishes are factory- lution in building and environmental designed to prevent mold and mildew applied by means of the coil-coating initiatives as it affects coatings. The growth. process and are reputed to offer long- MPI is considered a leading authority term durability in the 20-year range. on the evaluation of coatings perfor- Elsewhere, reflective and highly mance and guidelines on effective durable roof coatings and materials for liquid-applied air barriers are designed Performance vs. ‘friendliness’ application methods, and has issued to boost the energy efficiency of build- Even while compiling an impressive product standards that are recognized ings, another LEED priority. record of progress in coatings technol- by the U.S. and Canadian govern- ogy that has produced this growing ments. A recent entry in the marketplace for “cool-roof” technology is PPG array of green products, coatings man- Law’s targets include government Industries Inc.’s “Duranar SPF,” which ufacturers continue to express reserva- regulators and green-building organi- makes use of “infrared” ceramic pig- tions that initiatives and environmen- zations. The Green Building Council’s ments to reflect sunlight and reduce tal regulations for green building can LEED standards, he says bluntly, “were heat buildup. go beyond the bounds of the reason- something designed by well-meaning able into the realm of the ill-con- people who don’t know anything high-performance fluoropolymer resin ceived, counterproductive, and merely about paint.” LEED and Green Seal technology, formulated to provide unrealistic. guidelines, and some regulations The SPF coatings are based on PPG’s G r e e n T P o r t f o l i o LEED Credits for Coatings he Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program of the U.S. Green Building Council gives credits for interior coatings that meet the Green Seal GS 11 standard for paints. The following is a summary of the GS 11 standard. The complete standard can be viewed under the standards section of the Green Seal web site, www.greenseal.org. VOCs (in grams per liter) Nonflats 150 g/L Flats 50 g/L Performance Requirements Scrubbability (abrasion resistance), based on ASTM D2486-89 Hiding power (opacity), based on ASTM D2805-88 Washability (stain removal), based on ASTM 4828-91 Prohibited Chemical Components methylene chloride 1,1,1-trichloroethane benzene toluene ethylbenzene vinyl chloride methyl phthalate dimethyl phthalate isophorone antimony cadmium hexavalent chromium lead 30 naphthalene 1,2-dichlorobenzene di (2 ethylhexyl) phthalate butyl benzyl phthalate di-nbutyl phthalate di-n-octyl phthalate diethyl phthalate mercury formaldehyde methyl ethyl ketone methyl isobutyl ketone acrolein acrylonitrile Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 Special Report on Green Coatings imposed by California consideration not just rior products lead to more frequent authorities on air quality, what’s emitted but what recoating, Wendoll says. Painting he says, don’t begin to the compounds are, and more often, in turn, consumes more address the question of also the question of lifecy- raw materials, energy, and containers, product performance, par- cle analysis, or how long putting additional demands on sup- ticularly in light of the will it last and what does ply-chain resources and generating wide range of service con- it take to make it and use increased volumes of solid metal or ditions and environments it?” plastic waste. encountered in the field. On the other hand, “Well-meaning people designing the regulations and environmentally MPI’s Law campaigns for performance standards friendly programs have not LEED certification requirements Wendoll says certification “were intended to address general programs for green build- house-type paints,” Wendoll says, and ing need major changes to “were never intended to be a standard address aspects of perfor- for architects and specifiers who need to this point embraced a performance mance and lifecycle of coatings mate- to deal with the whole range of coat- standard” for paint, he says. He asks rials. ings.” LEED “doesn’t take into account whether a zero- or low-VOC paint is “I think the U.S. Green Building the complexity of the industrial main- really contributing to cleaner air or Council is well aware that the system tenance coatings category, where you lifecycle benefits if it’s applied several needs a great deal of revision, and have difficult substrates under times as often as a higher-VOC paint. continual revision, to improve its demanding exposure conditions.” Other complaints from Law and the accuracy and usability in terms of MPI are aimed at alleged shortcomings actually identifying the eco-efficiency in methods for measuring VOCs, VOC of products and processes.” standards, and the need to take into NPCA joins the fray The National Paint & Coatings “Unfortunately, the Green Seal stan- Association (NPCA), which represents account differences in VOCs in terms dard as it stands now is just a VOC- of their varying rate of chemical reac- limiting standard, with aggressive campaign call- tivity. The level of reactivity deter- some minimal perfor- ing for more attention to mines a specific compound’s impact mance requirements and performance issues in the on the formation of low-level atmos- prohibition of a number development of standards pheric ozone pollution, or smog. of compounds. The key and programs for green ingredient that makes building. The campaign is Wendoll, one of the coatings indus- paint eco-efficient is its currently directed at a try’s most knowledgeable and outspo- performance, particularly new version of the ken authorities on regulatory and in terms of coverage and USGBC’s LEED program environmental issues, paints a “good durability.” for new construction, cur- Dunn-Edwards Corp.’s Robert news, bad news” picture of the green- coatings manufacturers, has waged an Lifecycle analysis, rently nearing approval. Dunn-Edwards’ Wendoll champions ‘eco-efficiency.’ building scenario. He says he is Wendoll says, takes prod- encouraged by the professed willing- uct performance and ness on the part of green-building durability into account organizations to take into account and offers a much more comprehen- required by law to navigate legally product lifecycle and performance sive assessment of “eco-friendliness.” mandated processes for public com- issues in charting a course for future He says architects and specifiers he’s ment that allow “stakeholders” to par- standards and programs. talked to “are aware of the idea that ticipate. “For too long, air-quality regulations Among other complaints, the NPCA says LEED standards are not VOCs alone are not an accurate indi- “They need to be consensus-based have more or less captured the field, cator of a coating’s environmental and more scientifically sound,” and did so solely for the sake of pre- impact. We can make a strong case Allison Keane, an NPCA government sumed air-quality benefits,” he says. that the lowest-VOC coatings may not affairs counsel, says of LEED stan- “What I like about the green-building be the most eco-efficient.” dards. “We want to make sure the movement is that they are willing to take a wider perspective, taking into 32 A profile of “eco-efficiency” should take into account the reality that infe- standards are scientifically based and that we have a say, and so far that Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 Environmentally Gentle • Green Seal Class A certification • Zero VOCs • Ideal for “green building” projects • Minimal odor during painting and drying • Paint today, occupy tonight Superior Performance • Easy application • Durable finish • High hiding • Excellent adhesion • Bright, clean white • Available in in over 1,800 colors from the Voice of Color® design system • Mold and mildew resistant on the paint film ENVIRONMENTALLY GENTLE PAINT THAT DELIVERS SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE For more information about Pittsburgh® Paints, visit www.pittsburghpaints.com or call 1-800-PPG-SPEC Special Report on Green Coatings hasn’t really happened.” The NPCA currently is calling for a Green-building leaders recognize shortcomings an ASTM Task Force on Environmentally Preferable Products. number of revisions in the USGBC’s Representatives of the USGBC and draft for version 2.2 of its LEED stan- Green Seal don’t dispute the merit of coatings users, and manufacturers dards for new construction. A key tar- complaints from coatings suppliers would all benefit from a universally get of the NPCA’s complaints is a pro- and users. accepted, comprehensive program that posal to base VOC limits and prohibi- Arthur Weissman, president of Ritchie says architects, specifiers, would address all the important envi- tions of certain chemicals on Green Green Seal, says performance provi- ronmental and performance issues Seal standards for interior topcoats sions in GS 11, the organization’s involving architectural coatings and and anticorrosion coatings and the standard for paint and coatings, are related materials. She says the Master South Coast Air Quality Management “always open to revision. But based on Painters Institute (MPI) has done District’s Rule 1113 for “all other experience, we think the criteria are “some interesting work” in this area in architectural coatings, primers and adequate.” The organization also con- an effort to quantify that “this paint undercoaters.” siders GS 11’s VOC levels to be “still really works.” The South Coast district, which sets policies for air-quality regulations in the Los Angeles area, has long held a pretty good as far as defining a leader- MPI President Law says his organization is up to the challenge of bringing ship level.” Calls for the Green Seal standard to logic and order to this hotly debated nationwide reputation as being home be expanded to address performance matter of green coatings and related to the toughest environmental stan- and composition specific to various performance issues. The MPI currently dards on coatings. applications would require the devel- is arguing its case to the USGBC for a opment of a totally new standard, and “simpler way” to establish environ- plaints about these provisions in the “we don’t have the funding for that,” mental and performance objectives, draft LEED 2.2 document, including Weissman says. “I wish we did, but and Law says his organization could the following: that’s a matter of resources.” supply the details in short order. The NPCA makes a number of com- • The proposal incorporates, in effect, Kirsten Ritchie, vice chairman of the The MPI already maintains a certifi- parallel, privately run, voluntary certi- USGBC’s Material and Resources cation program of its own for green fications with a regulatory scheme Technical Advisory Group, agrees that products, complete with a database of that is in force in one geographically better standards are needed for paint approved products. To qualify, prod- small and environmentally unique and coatings. The Green Seal stan- ucts must meet current USGBC limits area of the country; dard’s VOC levels of 50 grams per liter on VOCs, contain no known carcino- • Green Seal “provides its proprietary (g/L) for flat coatings and 150 g/L for gens or crystalline silica, and meet the certification in exchange for product- nonflats are “just a gross measure. It’s institute’s more extensive performance evaluation fees”; more important to know what the dif- requirements. • Green Seal’s list of “banned” chemi- ferent compounds are,” she says. cals was developed using “unknown Law says that without performance The challenge, Ritchie says, is to measures, any green program fails to criteria and contains numerous chemi- develop a more effective regime that give a true assessment of a product’s cals that vary widely in toxicity and also is user friendly. environmental friendliness. Under potential for environmental harm.” The NPCA lauds the USGBC for tak- “What we want to do is come up current Green Seal and LEED pro- with methodology that’s quick and grams, he says, “A gray paint would ing steps toward the incorporation of smart. What we have now is quick test as white.” lifecycle analysis into the LEED rating and cheap, but we know it is a crude system. But the association says lifecy- tool and we need to be smarter at it.” cle analysis was not used as the basis Ritchie is the director the for ratings in the proposed version Environmental Claims Certification 2.2. The ratings, therefore, “are based Program at Scientific Certification on scientific criteria that continue to Systems (SCS). The company, based in inappropriately discriminate against California, independently verifies the certain buildings materials,” the asso- accuracy of environmental claims on ciation says. products. Ritchie also is chairman of 34 “Lack of performance is not environmentally friendly,” he says. JAC Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 M Directory of Green Coatings anufacturers known to supply architectural coat- Thirty-six companies responded with information that ings were invited to complete a "Green Coatings includes product name, type, certifications acquired (such as Product Survey," listing and describing the prod- Green Seal), and attributes of the product that make it ucts which they market as "green" or environmentally "green." The responses are shown in the table below. Contact friendly. information for each company is given following the table. COMPANY Alistagen Corporation Ameron Ameron Ameron Benjamin Moore PRODUCT NAME Caliwell/BNA PSX 700 Amerlock Series Amershield Series Eco Spec® Cass Polymers, Inc. Cass Polymers, Inc. Coronado Paint PolyMax PM 400 Supercoat Liquid Flooring Air Care Coronado Paint Coronado Paint Dayton Superior Corp. Dayton Superior Corp. Super Kote Tough Walls Perma Primer Intraseal Dayton Superior Corp. Day-Chem Sure Hard J-17 Dayton Superior Corp. Dayton Superior Corp. Dayton Superior Corp. Diamond Vogel Paints Permacoat Permalastic Perma Block Filler Health-Kote Diamond Vogel Paints Dunn Edwards Aqua Pox Sierra Dunn Edwards Dunn Edwards Recover Ecoshield DuPont Industrial Coatings Imron® 1.5 PR™ Waterborne Polyurethane Copolymer Primer Tufcote® LV FT™ Flat Waterborne White Acrylic Tufcote® 1.9 HG-D™ High Gloss Waterborne Acrylic DTM Imron® 1.5 ST-D™ Waterborne Polyurethane Copolymer DTM Imron® 1.2 HG™ High Gloss Waterborne Polyurethane Copolymer Imron® 1.8 FT-C ™ Flat Clear Waterborne Polyurethane Copolymer Imron® 1.2 HG-C™ High Gloss Clear Waterborne Polyurethane Copolymer Duromar High Performance Linings Duromar Maintenance Repair Compounds RSP Tru-Glaze® WB 4408 Tru-Glaze® WB 4406 Tru-Glaze® WB 4015 Devflex™ 659 Devflex™ 4020 PF Tru-Glaze® WB 4030 DuPont Industrial Coatings DuPont Industrial Coatings DuPont Industrial Coatings DuPont Industrial Coatings DuPont Industrial Coatings DuPont Industrial Coatings Duromar Inc. Duromar Inc. Engineered Polymers ICI Paints ICI Paints ICI Paints ICI Paints ICI Paints ICI Paints TYPE Architectural anti-microbial paint Epoxy siloxane Epoxy mastic Aliphatic polyurethane Primer/sealer, flat, eggshell, and semi-gloss wall paint Waterborne epoxy Waterborne epoxy Acrylic primer, flat, eggshell and semi-gloss wall paints Water-based interior wall paints and primers Acrylic wall paints Clear primer Penetrating water-based reactive siliconate for concrete floors Penetrating water-based reactive siliconate for concrete floors High build acrylic High build elastomeric acrylic Exterior acrylic block filler Latex flat, eggshell, and semi-gloss wall paint Waterborne epoxy Sealer/undercoater, flat, eggshell, and semi-gloss wall paint Interior, exterior flat wall paint Sealer/undercoater, flat, low sheen and semi-gloss interior wall paint High performance primer CERTIFICATION Green Seal, Green Guard ATTRIBUTES 0 VOC, no odor, antimicrobial low VOC, isocyanate-free, non-toxic pigmentation low VOC, non-toxic pigmentation low VOC, non-toxic pigmentation low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor Greenspec MPI MPI low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor recycled 0 VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor, no HAP's Exterior flat latex Direct-to-metal high gloss acrylic very low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor High performance, satin finish direct-to-metal coating High performance, high gloss topcoat low VOC, low odor, no HAP's low VOC, low odor, no HAP's High performance flat clear low VOC, low odor, no HAP's High performance, high gloss clear low VOC, low odor, no HAP's Epoxy Epoxy Silicone-modified polyurea Waterborne epoxy, gloss, for floors and walls Waterborne epoxy, semi-gloss, for floors and walls Waterborne epoxy, block filler Waterborne acrylic DTM enamel Waterborne acrylic DTM primer and flat Waterborne epoxy polyamide primer for metal and flat masonry 0 VOC, low odor, no HAP’s 0 VOC, low odor, no HAP’s 0 VOC, 0 HAP's, 0 free isocyanates low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor continued on next page Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 35 COMPANY Kelly-Moore Paint Co. PRODUCT NAME Enviro-Cote Kelly-Moore Paint Co. e-coat recycled paint products Key Resin Company Lauren Coatings & Composites Key Enviroglas Epoxy Terrazzo Python WH Fluorolast WB Python FS Fluorolast SB Low VOC Enviropure Flat Enviropure Eggshell Enviropure Semi-Gloss Elasto-Deck 6500 Series Elasto-Deck B.T. 100% Solids Tuffrez 232 AR Tuffrez 200 LT Tuffrez 236 Pittsburgh® Paints-Pure Performance® Pittsburgh® Paints-Pure Performance® Duranar® SPF Coatings Coraflon™ ADS Coatings Mega Seal Floor Coatings Pro-Hide Gold, Interior Latex Low Odor Prime Coat Seamless System Aqua-Rock Granit-Rock Quartz Flooring Dura-Flake Flooring Horizon Beyond Metalmax Griptec S16/S22 S 50/51/40/42/70/71 SE-110 Penetrating Stabilizer SE-120 Protective-Skin TPX-85 nano TiO2 photocatalytic coating General Polymer® Epoxy Terrazzo Floors/Sherwin-Williams Duration Home™ Harmony™ Series 287 Enviro-Tread Series 297 Enviro-Glaze Lauren Coatings & Composites Lauren Coatings & Composites M.A. Bruder & Sons, Inc. M.A. Bruder & Sons, Inc. M.A. Bruder & Sons, Inc. Pacific Polymers Pacific Polymers Polyspec L.P. Polyspec L.P. Polyspec L.P. PPG Industries PPG Industries PPG Industries PPG Industries PPG Industries Pratt & Lambert Paints Prime Coat Corp. Rock-Tred Corp. Rock-Tred Corp. Rock-Tred Corp. Rodda Paint Rust-Oleum Corp. Rust-Oleum Corp. Rust-Oleum Corp. Rust-Oleum Corp. Rust-Oleum Corp. Safe Encasement Systems Safe Encasement Systems Safe Encasement Systems Sherwin-Williams Sherwin-Williams Sherwin-Williams Tnemec Company, Inc. Tnemec Company, Inc. Tnemec Company, Inc. Tnemec Company, Inc. Tremco Inc. Tremco Inc. Tremco Inc. Tremco Inc. Tremco Inc. Tremco Inc. Tremco Inc. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Series 1080 Endura-Shield WB Series 156 Enviro-Crete ExoAir™ Fluid-Applied Air and Vapor Barrier Membrane Tremproof® 260 Spray-Applied Waterproofing Membrane ExoAir® WB Primer Vulkem Deck Coatings-white Vulkem Aromatic 950NF/Aliphatic 951NF/360NF 348/NF 346/NF Spertrem Silicone Sealants Tremkor 120 EP Primer InstaCure™ UV-Cured Floor Coating Eco-Protekt™ Cementitious Trowel Overlay System Eco-EDS™ Static Dissipative Epoxy Coating System Eco-TCU™ Thick-Coat Urethane Topcoat Eco-Shield™ High-Wear Epoxy Eco-Hard-N-Seal™ Concrete Hardener and Sealer TYPE Interior, primer-sealer, flat wall paint, eggshell and semi-gloss enamels Flat and semi-gloss interior and exterior acrylic paints Epoxy terrazzo flooring Polyurea Fluoroelastomer Polyurea Fluoroelastomer Vinyl acetate/acrylic latex Vinyl acetate/acrylic latex Vinyl acetate/acrylic latex Elastomeric traffic deck coating Elastomeric waterproof membrane Waterborne polyurethane Low temperature epoxy topping binder Waterborne polyurethane Flat, eggshell, semi-gloss interior wall paint Primer Exterior coating Fluoropolymer exterior coating Self-leveling floor coating Primer, flat, eggshell and semi-gloss 100% solids, epoxy wall, floor & ceiling Waterbased epoxy concrete sealer Epoxy floor coating Epoxy floor coating Interior and exterior paints, full line Water-based acrylic urethane Water-based acrylic urethane Water-based acrylic primer Acrylic epoxy Water-based epoxy Primer for lead-based paint abatement Top-coat for lead-based paint abatement Top-coat to prevent mold growth Flooring Interior latex Interior latex Water-based epoxy floor coating Ceramic-modified, water-based polyurethane floor coating Water-based polyurethane exterior coating Modified, water-based acrylate Air barrier membrane CERTIFICATION ATTRIBUTES Green Seal, MPI, low VOC, low odor USDA California, US recycled content, 50% minimum recycling requirements low VOC, 75% recycled content, long life cycle low VOC, low odor, 100% solids low VOC, low odor, waterborne, chemical-resistant low VOC, low odor, 100% solids low VOC, chemical resistance Green Seal 0 VOC, low odor Green Seal 0 VOC, low odor Green Seal 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, 100% solids 0 VOC, low odor, 100% solids low VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor Green Seal-Class A low VOC, low odor Green Seal-Class A low VOC, low odor heat reflective long life expectancy 0 VOC, hygienic 0 VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor Green Seal low VOC, low odor, non-toxic pigmentation 0 VOC, no odor, no HAP's 0 VOC, no odor, no HAP's 0 VOC, no odor, no HAP's 0 VOC, no odor, no HAP's 0 VOC, no odor, no HAP's low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, sustainable and recycled raw materials, long life cycle low VOC, low odor, antimicrobial, burnish resistance 0 VOC, low odor, antimicrobial, silica-free low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor, high performance low VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor, green functionality (energy savings) Waterproofing low VOC, low odor Primer for air barrier Deck, industrial and roof coating Deck, industrial and roof coating Energy Star low VOC, low odor, green functionality (energy savings) Reflectivity low VOC, low odor Sealant, caulking Primer Industrial and commercial flooring Industrial flooring 0 VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor, 0 isocyanate 0 VOC, low odor, water based Industrial flooring low VOC, low odor Industrial floor coating Industrial floor coating Industrial floor coating low VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor continued on next page 36 Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 COMPANY Tennant Co. PRODUCT NAME Eco-PT™ 250 Power-Trowel Epoxy Resurfacer Eco-MPE™ Multi-Purpose Epoxy Eco-FSE™ Fast-Set Epoxy Eco-RCE™ Rapid-Cure Epoxy Eco-PJS™ Polyurea Joint Filler Eco-CRE™ Chemical Resistant Epoxy Eco-HF™ 250 High-Fill Epoxy Resurfacer Eco-FPE™ Fast Patch Epoxy Resurfacer Eco-HT™ 250 High-Temperature Epoxy Overlay resurfacer Eco-EG™ Epoxy Grout Eco-EJF™ Epoxy Joint Filler Eco-RS™ 60/125 Self-Leveling Resurfacers CAFCO SprayFilm-WB2 TYPE Industrial floor coating CAFCO SprayFilm-WB3 Durashield Roof Mate Water-based, intumescent, fire-resistive coating for interiors Water-based, intumescent, fire-resistive coating for exteriors Elastomeric acrylic (roof and wall) Elastomeric roof coating United Coatings Arathon Elastomeric roof coating United Coatings Canyon Tone Stain Concrete stain W. R. Meadows, Inc. W. R. Meadows, Inc. W. R. Meadows, Inc. Zinsser Co., Inc. Zinsser Co., Inc. Zinsser Co., Inc. Zinsser Co., Inc. Zolatone Interior Finishes Zolatone Interior Finishes Zolatone Interior Finishes ZRC Worldwide Mel-Rol LM Liqu-Hard Air-Shield LM B-I-N® Bulls Eye® Shellac Bulls Eye® French Polish Bulls Eye® SealCoat™ Polomyx® by Zolatone® Lluminations™ by Zolatone® Airless™ by Zolatone® Zero VOC ZRC Cold Galvanizing Compound Waterproofing Concrete densifier, sealer Air barrier Pigmented, shellac-base, primer-sealer 100% shellac-base finish and sealer 100% shellac-base padding and wiping finish 100% dewaxed shellac-base sanding sealer Multi-color interior paint Light reflective specialty finish Airless-applied multi-color paint Inorganic zinc-rich coating Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. Tennant Co. U.S. Mineral, dba.Isolatek International U.S. Mineral, dba.Isolatek International U.S. Mineral, dba.Isolatek International UCSC United Coatings CAFCO SprayFilm-WB-4 CERTIFICATION ATTRIBUTES 0 VOC, low odor Industrial floor coating Industrial floor coating Industrial floor coating Industrial floor coating Industrial floor coating Industrial floor coating Industrial floor coating Industrial floor coating 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor Industrial floor coating Industrial floor coating Industrial floor coating Water-based, intumescent, 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor low VOC, low odor, HAP's-free, no halogens, no heavy metals fire-resistive coating for interior low VOC, low odor, HAP's-free, no halogens, no heavy metals low VOC, low odor, HAP's-free, no halogens, no heavy metals 0 VOC, water-based water-based, reflective surface UL UL UL Energy Star, CDRC UL, FM, ICBO, Energy Star UL, FM, ICBO Energy Star UL, FM, ICBO, Energy Star water-based, reflective surface water-based 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor 0 VOC, low odor sustainable raw materials sustainable raw materials sustainable raw materials sustainable raw materials low VOC, antimicrobial low VOC, antimicrobial low VOC, antimicrobial 0 VOC, HAPS-free, low odor Company Contact Information Alistagen Corporation Ten Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 Tel: 212-317-0100 Fax: 212-289-5118 Contact: Bryan Glynson Email: information@alistagen.com Ameron 13010 Morris Rd, Suite 400 Alpharetta, GA 30004 Tel: 800-926-3766 Fax: 678-566-2697 Contact: L.E. Marquez Email: lmarquez@ameron.com Benjamin Moore 51 Chestnut Ridge Road Montvale, NJ 07645 Tel: 201-573-9600 Contact: Danielle Perrotto M.A. Bruder & Sons, Inc. 600 Reed Road Broomall, PA 19008 Tel: 610-353-5100 Fax: 610-353-8189 Contact: George Przybylski Email: georgep@mabpaints.com Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 Cass Polymers, Inc. 12005 N. Virginia Avenue Oklahoma City, OK 73120 Tel: 405-755-8448 Fax: 405-755-8449 Contact: Brian Blake Email: bblake@casspolymers.com Dayton Superior Corp. 4226 Kansas Avenue Kansas City, KS 66106 Tel: 562-254-5260 Fax: 310-830-4566 Contact: J.V. “Van” Crary Email: vancrary@daytonsuperior.com Coronado Paint 308 Old County Road Edgewater, FL 32132 Tel: 386-428-6461 X161 Fax: 386-428-8654 Contact: Aaron Dhawan Email: aaron.dhawan@insl-x.com Diamond Vogel Paints 1110 Albany Place S.E. P.O. Box 380 Orange City, IA 51041 Tel: 712-737-8880 Fax: 712-737-4998 Contact: Perry Foreman 37 Preparation Contractor Specifier Coating Manufacturer Application Contractor Specialty Coatings is a complex business. All projects involve specification of a system, substrate preparation, and installation of a manufacturer’s coating. Each step is critical for the ultimate success of the system. That’s why Prime Coat Coating Systems integrates all of these steps to deliver turnkey coating solutions. Floors, walls, ceilings and a wide variety of proprietary coatings – guaranteed from a single source! Dunn-Edwards 4885 E. 52nd Place Los Angeles, CA 90040 Tel: 323-771-3330 Fax: 322-826-2669 Contact: Phillip Hain Email: phain@dunn-edwards.net DuPont Industrial Coatings BMP21-1130, 4417 Lancaster Pike Wilmington DE 19805 Tel: 302-992-4928 Fax: 302-892-5693 Contact: Carol Hatch Email: carol.l.hatch-1@usa.dupont.com Duromar Inc. 35 Pond Park Road Hingham, MA 02043 Tel: 781-749-6992 Fax: 781-749-0021 Contact: Raymond J. Jaworski info@duromar.com Engineered Polymers 2842 Progress Road Madison, WI 53716 Tel: 608-661-7800 Fax: 608-661-2817 Contact: Stuart B. Smith Email: ssmith@engineeredpolymers.net ICI Paints 16651 Sprague Road Strongsville, OH 44136 Tel: 440-826-5144 Fax: 440-826-5521 Contact: Vijay Datta Email: vijay_data@ici.com Kelly-Moore Paint Co. 987 Commercial Street San Carlos, CA 94070 Tel: 800-874-4436 Fax: 650-592-7012 Contact: Mark Zielinski Email: mzielinski@kellymoore.com Decorative and Defensive Coating Solutions from a Single Source 877-362-5111 www.primecoat.com Key Resin Company 4061 Clough Woods Drive Batavia, OH 45103 Tel: 513-943-4225 Fax: 513-943-4255 Contact: Eric Borglum sales@keyresin.com Lauren Coatings & Composites 2162 Reiser Avenue New Philadelphia, OH 44663 Tel: 330-308-7362 Fax: 330-308-7370 Contact: Edward H. Reisinger Email: ereisinger@laurencc.com W.R. Meadows Inc. P.O. Box 338 Hampshire, IL 60140 Tel: 800-342-5976 Fax: 847-603-4544 Contact: Glenn Tench Email: wrmil@wrmeadows.com Pacific Polymers 1227l Monarch Street Garden Grove, CA 92841 Tel: 714-898-0025 Fax: 714-898-5687 Contact: Kimberly Groscot Email: kimg@pacpoly.com Polyspec L.P. 6614 Gant Road Houston, TX 77106 Tel: 281-397-0033 Fax: 281-397-6512 Contact: Lysa Young Email: lyoung@polyspec.com PPG Industries One PPG Place – 37W Pittsburgh, PA 15272 Tel: 412-434-4175 Fax: 412-434-2282 Contact: Susan Bardusch Email: bardusch@ppg.com Prime Coat Corp. 510 N. First Street Libertyville, IL 60048 Tel: 847-362-5111 Fax: 847-362-5149 Contact: Chris O’Brien cobrien@primecoat.com Pratt & Lambert Paints 101 W. Prospect Avenue Cleveland, OH 44115 Tel: 216-566-3056 Fax: 216-566-1655 Contact: Andrew J. Rzicznek Call About Our Manufacturer’s Rep. Opportunities! 38 Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 Rock-Tred Corp. 3415 Howard Street Skokie, IL 60076 Tel: 800-762-8733 Fax: 847-679-6665 Contact: Jim Selcke Email: sales@rocktred.com Rodda Paint 12000 SW Garden Place Portland, OR 97223 Tel: 503-521-4300 Fax: 503-737-6004 Contact: Todd Braden Email: txbraden@roddapaint.com Rust-Oleum Corp. 11 Hawthorn Parkway Vernon Hills, IL 60614 Tel: 847-573-7844 Contact: Brian Paich Email: bpaich@rustoleum.com Safe Encasement Systems 7860 Dana Point Ct. Las Vegas, NV 89117 Tel: 888-277-8834 Fax: 888-277-8835 Comtact: John Thoburn Email: thoburn@safeencasement.com Tremco Sealant/ Weatherproofing Division 3735 Green Road Beachwood, OH 44122 Tel: 216-292-5189 Fax: 216-766-5543 Contact: David Breimeier Email: dbreimeier@tremcoinc.com UCSC 3010 W. Lincoln Street Phoenix, AZ 85005 Tel: 602-269-9711 Fax: 602-269-2176 Contact: Lela Wright Email: lwright@buyucsc.com United Coatings 19011 E. Cataldo Spokane Valley, WA 99016 Tel: 509-926-7143 Fax: 509-928-1116 Contact: Joy Warden Email: joy@unitedcoatings.com U.S. Mineral, dba. Isolatek International 41 Furnace Street Stanhope, NJ 17874 Tel: 800-631-9800 Fax: 973-347-9170 Contact: Charles A. Nuzzo Email: cnuzzo@isolatek.com ZRC Worldwide 145 Enterprise Drive Marshfield, MA 02050 Tel: 781-319-0400 Fax: 781-319-0404 Contact: Steven Collins Email: info@zrcworldwide.com Zolatone Interior Finishes 400 Charter Way Billerica, MA 81862 Tel: 978-663-0050 Fax: 978-667-1980 Contact: Charlie Kelliher Email: ckelliher@zolatone.com Zinsser Co., Inc. 173 Belmont Drive Somerset, NJ 08875 Tel: 732-652-2298 Fax: 732-652-2491 Contact: Katie Sikorski katie.sikorski@zinsser.com Sherwin-Williams 101 Prospect Avenue, N.W. Cleveland, OH Tel: 216-515-4313 Fax: 216-566-1392 Contact: Bill Rafie Email: bill.g.rafie@sherwin.com Tennant Co. 701 N. Lilac Drive Minneapolis, MN 55440 Tel: 763-540-1568 Fax: 763-513-1829 Contact: Bill Bault Email: bill.bault@tennantco.com Tnemec Company, Inc. 6800 Corporate Drive Kansas City, MO 64120 Tel: 816-483-3400 Fax: 816-483-3969 Contact: Mark Thomas Email: marketing@tnemec.com Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 39 Com us a e visi CSI t the t SHO W! With EcoSpec paint, every color is “green”. ® With virtually zero VOCs and low odor, EcoSpec® paint shows off your design sense and your common sense. The EcoSpec® line, from Benjamin Moore, was created in response to the demand for “green” products from our community. We’re proud that EcoSpec® has received both GREENGUARD® and Green Seal® certification. And the EcoSpec® line - a primer, and three finishes – is available in thousands of colors, even green. For more information, call 1-888-BEN-MOOR or visit benjaminmoore.com. ©2005 Benjamin Moore. Benjamin Moore, EcoSpec, the triangle “M” device and the triangle “M” symbol are registered trademarks, licensed to Benjamin Moore & Co. GREENGUARD Indoor Air Quality Certified is a registered trademark of the GREENGUARD Environmental Institute, and Green Seal is a registered certification mark of Green Seal, Inc. GettingItRight The Spec- Blueprint for success By Jayson L. Helsel, P.E. T he success of a coatings project Specification document substrate materials) or whether the condition of the depends on many factors, including existing coatings varies widely. done right covers all the painting specification. A complete, For steel or concrete substrates, established industry clear, and concise specification will standards, such as SSPC and NACE standards, the bases of product give a project a solid foundation for success. should be referenced. When abrasive blast cleaning is selection, surface Writing a complete specification is not a simple utilized for metal substrates, an adequate surface protask, but there are established formats and guidelines file should be specified, including an acceptable propreparation, and published by organizations such as the Construction file range (e.g., 2 to 3 mils instead of 2.5 mils). The Specifications Institute (CSI) and SSPC. profile should also be consistent with coating manucoating application Once the framework of a specification is in place, it facturers’ recommendations. is important to recognize areas where many specifications are defiGuidance for the preparation of other surfaces, such as wood or cient, including product recommendations, details of surface prepaplaster, is more difficult to find, and industry-wide standards for ration, and guidelines on coating application. A brief summary of surface preparation generally do not exist. Here, adequate surface potential problems follows. preparation can be specified with descriptions of good painting practices such as proper cleaning to remove dirt and other foreign Product selection materials, removing loose coatings, and feathering or sanding The coatings required for a project should be identified as comadherent coatings to provide a smooth interface with any areas of pletely as possible. In most cases, the term “coatings” refers to mulexposed substrate. Coatings manufacturers can also be consulted tiple coats of different products that comprise a coating system. for specification language on surface preparation prior to use of Unless a single coat is specified, there must be proven compatibilitheir products. ty among the individual products in a coating system. A general rule for specifying coating systems is that all products Coatings application must come from the same manufacturer. Additionally, manufacturThe portion of the specification concerning coatings application ers should be contacted for confirmation of specific product recomshould address acceptable ambient conditions, coating application mendations for the given project conditions and requirements. methods, and acceptable ranges of coating thicknesses. Other When a project involves painting over existing coatings, the new items, such as caulking or stripe coating, may be applicable to coatings must also be compatible with the existing coatings. The recsome projects. ommended approach for overcoating includes applying and evaluThe ambient conditions are typically more of a concern for the ating representative test patches of candidate coating systems prior application of coatings outdoors, but still need to be considered to the final selection of coatings. indoors, particularly if dealing with new construction, where a strucCoatings for a project are often selected from a pre-established ture may not be heated. Cold temperatures or the presence of too qualified products list (QPL). If there is no QPL, coatings should first much moisture may prevent coatings from being properly applied or be identified by their generic type (e.g. alkyd, acrylic, epoxy, etc.), cured. Product information from the manufacturer should give then referenced by several (at least three) manufacturers’ specific acceptable temperature and humidity ranges for application, includproducts. ing the amount of time needed for curing and recoating. Note that drying times are lengthened at lower temperatures. Surface preparation The particulars of the job site or structure may also dictate whether Specifying the proper surface preparation is another critical step certain application methods are preferable or required. For coating toward achieving project success. The specifier must consider all thickness, a range should be specified versus a nominal thickness applicable job-site conditions, which may include the nature of the (e.g., 3 to 5 mils instead of 4 mils). facility, the complexity of a structure, or any other unique condiA successful painting specification must be complete and cover all tions that may impact the coating work. Consideration should be project details. Careful attention in addressing common problem given to whether multiple methods of surface preparation are warareas will improve the specification and help a project get started in ranted for different parts of a facility or building (e.g., different the right direction and be completed in a more efficient manner. JAC Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 41 Coors Field, home of the Colorado Rockies Photos courtesy of HOK Sport + Venue + Event The right calls on coatings Exposed structural steel in sports facilities presents variety of issues, challenges in devising a winning game plan for finishes D By John C. Williams esigners of sports facilities strive to enhance the fan becomes the focal point of the facility in the eye and mind of the spectator. To ensure that the facility’s aesthetics experience at ath- stand the test of time, a number of letic events by important considerations should be providing a venue taken into account when analyzing the that is attractive, clean, comfortable, and exciting. The public will rarely see many of the private types and quality of liquid coatings systems applied to these structural steel design elements. Key criteria for the selection and spaces within a stadium or arena, such application of high-performance protec- as team locker rooms. But fans do see tive coatings systems for structural steel and/or use concession stands, public in public facilities include: restrooms, concourses, stairs, ramps, • The environment; playing fields, scoreboards, and seating • Initial cost; bowls. • Coating system and color selection; A major design element of many of • Lifecycle cost; these facilities is the exposed structural • Sequencing of coatings application— steel that has been chosen to serve as shop versus field; and an integral part of the overall architec- • The ability of the owner to provide tural design. A striking design for the maintenance. steel structure conveys an image that The different environments and M & T Bank Stadium, home of the Baltimore Ravens 42 Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 FedEx Field, home of the Washington Redskins exposure conditions that are encoun- ing system is an inexact science and is facilities, with selection generally deter- tered in these facility settings can vary, dependent on many issues, but the mined by the needs dictated by specific and can include chemical contamina- most important are the quality of the locations, environments, and stadium tion from adjacent industrial facilities; original coating system, the quality of elements. In new projects, the options physical abuse from subsequent con- shop and field application practices, include the use of several coatings sys- struction and public use; weather and and the quality and frequency of pre- tems and application methods based exposure to ultraviolet light ; and abra- ventative maintenance. on a division of the structure into three sion and erosion caused by blowing Although interior structural steel zones—the roof and lighting structures, may not be subject to the same long- the primary building frame, and the Many major sports facilities are term exposures as exterior steel, it will building frame in public areas. located in environments that are less be exposed during the normal, extend- than ideal. Many of the principal cities ed construction periods, with full vice in both exterior and interior sur- of this country have been established enclosure of the facility taking up to faces are listed in Table 1. Discussion of based on access to water, in many two years. This short-term exposure these alternatives follows. cases salt water. Another factor is the should be considered for color and presence of heavy industry, a situation gloss issues only. If properly applied, Primers that has become more commonplace the corrosion protection of the coating Acrylic, polyurethane, fluoropolymer, due to the preference of keeping sports system should not be compromised and epoxy systems A, B, C, D, and F stadiums in downtown areas. These during this short-term exposure. (Table 1) include an organic zinc-rich dirt and sand. locations with marine and industrial Stadiums with operable roofs present Coatings systems that have seen ser- primer based on either an epoxy or a exposures create some of the harshest an additional dilemma for both interi- polyurethane resin or binder. The environments for life expectancy of or and exterior steel. This steel is choice of binder is not as important as coatings systems, particularly with exposed during construction, and the concentration—the size, shape and regard to aesthetics. much of it is exposed when the roof is distribution of the pigment—and elec- open after the facility is completed and trical conductivity of the zinc particles. in use. SSPC defines organic zinc-rich primers Coatings systems for structural steel in public sports facilities must be designed to provide both a high degree of corrosion protection and an appearance that will remain attractive as containing zinc dust at a minimum Coatings systems offer some options for an appreciable length of time. Life A variety of coatings systems have expectancy of an applied exterior coat- been specified for use in public sports Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 of 93 percent by weight of pigment and 77 percent by weight of total solids. The polysiloxane system (E) allows the use of a higher-performance inor43 ganic zinc primer; however, organic plete cure. Subjective tests, such as a unless the product coat has a tested zinc may also be suitable. SSPC defines “nickel-rub” test, have been used to Class B rating. inorganic zinc primers as containing approximate the degree of cure. zinc dust at a minimum of 87 percent Inorganic zinc is also prone to exces- Exterior finish coats by weight of pigment and 74 percent sive film build. Four different possibilities for exterior by weight of total solids. finish coat materials include acrylic, Exterior intermediate coats polyurethane, fluoropolymer, and poly- jects, primers must be tested and For the three-coat polyurethane (C) siloxane coatings. These are reviewed approved for use as having a Class B and fluoropolymer (D) systems, the below. slip coefficient for slip-critical bolted intermediate coats provide additional • High-performance acrylic (System A): connections. corrosion and erosion protection for This is a one-component topcoat that the steel as well as better hiding for provides good color and gloss retention zinc-rich primer instead of inorganic aesthetic purposes. Application of the for exterior applications. It is available zinc is the definable cure period based intermediate coat over the primer is in either high-gloss or semigloss finish. on temperature and humidity, which not a difficult task. The primer must be This coating is relatively easy to touch allows effective subsequent application adequately dry for recoating in accor- up due to its availability as a single- of an intermediate coat with confi- dance with the manufacturer’s instruc- component product. Appearance of the dence of full primer cure. Inorganic tions, based on the ambient condi- touched-up area may be a concern, zincs, which are more significantly tions. Primed surfaces of slip-critical however, due to slight color and texture affected by temperature and humidity, bolted connections must be masked for variations. come with no clear parameters of com- application of the intermediate coat, To qualify for many stadium pro- The advantage of using an organic In one example illustrating the utili- ty of this type of finish coat, the owner mitigate unsightly touch-up irregulari- coating materials used for prefinished of a recently completed spring-training ties, but will not eliminate the potential metal wall and roof panels. Conditional facility specifically requested a coating spottiness. Still, this is the primary extended warranties may be available in system that could be touched up by his material for finish coats used on struc- cases where the applicators have been own maintenance personnel with tural steel in many sports facilities, approved by the manufacturer. paint purchased at the corner store. thanks to long service life at a reason- Controlled testing by the manufacturers The choice of finish coat in this case able cost. demonstrates quite remarkable perfor- was an acrylic coating over an organic For System C, a polyamide epoxy is mance, although the cost may be signif- zinc primer. used as the intermediate coat. (See icantly higher than that of top-quality • Acrylic aliphatic polyurethane (Systems Interior Finish System F.) polyurethane products. B and C): This is a two-component high- • Fluoropolymer (System D): This is a build topcoat that provides excellent proprietary topcoat product, with ver- polyurethane intermediate coat. (See color and gloss retention for exterior sions available from a few manufactur- Exterior Finish System B.) applications. It provides a hard, chemical- ers, and is generally applied over a com- • Polysiloxane (System E): This is a pro- and abrasion-resistant film and is avail- plete System B. This system features an prietary topcoat material, again with able in either a high-gloss or semigloss air-dry fluoropolymer coating that pro- versions offered by a few manufacturers. finish. Due to its hardness, however, spot vides enhanced color and gloss reten- The system, inorganic zinc plus topcoat, touch-up is problematic, and entire sur- tion, and is available in a full range of is advertised as meeting many of the faces may need to be repainted to achieve sheens, from satin to high gloss. The properties of zinc epoxy-aliphatic uniform appearance. system’s superior color and gloss reten- polyurethane systems, while requiring tion is comparable to the baked-on coil only two coats. Conditional extended The use of a semigloss finish helps to This topcoat is applied over a these surfaces should be coated with the system providing the longest life— the fluoropolymer or polysiloxane systems. Due to the fact that the roof and lighting structures often tower more than 150 feet into the air, the aesthetic condition of the painted surfaces may be less critical. An advantage here is that both fluoropolymer and polysiloxane systems yield a surface that repels dirt and other contaminants. Periodic high-pressure water washing may be Reliant Stadium, home of the Houston Texans required, but other maintenance would be minimal. For more accessible surfaces, warranties may be available to applica- component topcoat, this system is tors that have been approved by the unsuitable for exterior applications polyurethane systems would be appro- manufacturer. due to poor color and gloss retention, priate. For portions of the building but is appropriate for use as an exteri- frame that are exposed, surfaces above polysiloxane system outperformed a or intermediate coat and for interior 50 feet high will present the biggest polyurethane in accelerated weather- applications where UV exposure is not challenge, but the vertical surfaces of ing. An applied two-coat system with a a factor. This coating can be water- or the building may be accessed by stag- polysiloxane topcoat is generally less solvent-borne, and yields a hard, ing slung from the roof. expensive than an applied three-coat chemical-resistant and abrasion-resis- system consisting of zinc, epoxy and tant film. It is available in a wide lic, such as the concourses and entry polyurethane. The polysiloxane also range of gloss levels. Entire surfaces areas, the acrylic system would be resists stains, graffiti, and dirt accumu- may need to be repainted, however, to appropriate in that the stadium opera- lation due to its hard, smooth surface. achieve uniform appearance. tor may prefer to repaint on a more In tests conducted in Florida, the For areas easily accessed by the pub- This is an appropriate coating for regular schedule for aesthetic reasons. also is available that can be used to locker rooms and toilet facilities, and The acrylic system offers ease of appli- repair physical damage or to change can be applied over organic zinc- cation and recoatability. colors when recoating previously primed steel, masonry, and gypsum applied polysiloxanes. board-type substrates. An epoxy top- A single-component polysiloxane Aesthetics and maintenance Maintaining acrylic and polysilox- coat of this type will deliver long life Architecture is part art and part sci- ane systems is significantly easier than expectancy in these interior settings, ence. The art establishes what the aes- maintaining the other systems because and recoating is required primarily for thetics of a new facility will be. The most maintenance personnel are able aesthetic reasons or to repair physical structural steel frame is often expressed to prepare a damaged surface area and damage. Rarely, if ever, will corrosion in the completed project and must apply a single-component product of be an issue, barring physical damage remain as an attractive element. this type by brush or roller. The other to the surfaces in a potentially wet Unfortunately, designers can’t always systems require a higher degree of area. control choice of color or sheen. A sports stadium project completed expertise involving mixing and application techniques, making it necessary Playing the zones in 1997 was designed with a final color to enlist painting professionals to do In dividing a new sports facility into scheme of fire engine red for the roof the work. three zones, coatings selection can take and light structures. After less than six into account variations in service con- years the owner was not happy with Interior finish systems ditions and future maintenance and the pink-colored steel that had For interior coatings, a polyamide repair requirements. emerged in place of the original red. epoxy (System F) offers an excellent performance profile. Commonly a two46 The roof and lighting structures will be the least accessible, and therefore, Needless to say, pink is not an acceptable color for professional sports teams. Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 The solution to this revolting develop- Application Xs and Os is not recommended due to time con- ment was the application of a new coat The recommended preparation of struc- straints and the potential for human of high-build polyurethane and an addi- tural steel prior to finishing is equiva- error and inconsistency. tional enhanced UV-inhibitive lent to SSPC-SP 6, Commercial Blast polyurethane clearcoat. Cleaning, which can be achieved with able. This standard requires that the sur- the use of centrifugal wheel-blasting face be free of all mill scale and visible equipment. Manual surface preparation contaminants and that random staining Another case where maintenance decisions failed to score points was seen Anything less than SP 6 is not accept- in a project where the dark-green polyurethane finish was touched up with a dark-green alkyd coating. Of course, the alkyd faded much more quickly than the higher-performing polyurethane. In an example of the importance of aesthetics over corrosion protection, many owners opt to repaint large parts of their facilities every year just to pro- (;3(&7025( )520<285)/225 vide a fresh, clean look as a new season starts. The fabrication factor The quality of shop fabrication of structural steel has an impact on the overall quality and performance of the coating system. Edge conditions are best if slightly chamfered to eliminate sharp edges. Back-to-back coated surfaces should be avoided. Architecturally Exposed Structural Steel (AESS), though not absolutely required for public structures, constitutes an enhancement that should be considered for areas of highest visibility and importance to the image of the facility. AESS properties and attributes include the following: 3FMJBOU4UBEJVNt)PVTUPO5FYBT • One-half the straightness tolerances of standard camber and sweep; • Minimized weld show-through; • Copes, miters, and butt cuts with uniform gaps of 1/8 inch; • Butt and plug welds that do not project more than 1/16 inch; • Special care in unloading, handling, and erecting of the steel; and • Members that are plumbed, leveled, and aligned to within one-half the erection tolerances permitted for standard 5VGG3F[ ¥)JHI1FSGPSNBODF'MPPSJOH4ZTUFNT "FTUIFUJD1FSGPSNBODF7FSTBUJMJUZ t 4FBNMFTTQPMZNFSJDTZTUFNTBWBJMBCMFJOBEJWFSTFTFMFDUJPOPG MPOHXFBSJOHDPMPSTEFDPSBUJWFmOJTIFTBOETVSGBDFUFYUVSFT t &BTZUPNBJOUBJOMPOHMBTUJOHBOEDPTUFGGFDUJWFBMUFSOBUJWFUPDBSQFU WJOZMTUPOFBOEPUIFSDPOWFOUJPOBMnPPSTVSGBDFT t 'MFYJCMFXBUFSQSPPmOHNFNCSBOFTBOEDSBDLSFQBJSQSPEVDUT t &YDFMMFOUBCSBTJPODIFNJDBMJNQBDUSFTJTUBODF t *EFBMGPSDPNNFSDJBMJOTUJUVUJPOBMJOEVTUSJBMBSFBT -FBSONPSFBUXXXQPMZTQFDDPN PSDBMM GPSNPSFJOGPSNBUJPO structural steel. Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 47 The Cleveland Browns Stadium Table 1-Coating Systems Exterior Structural Steel System A – Three-Coat System with Acrylic Topcoats 1 coat organic zinc-rich primer at 2.5 to 3.0 mils dft. 2 coats high-performance industrial acrylic emulsion at 2.0 to 3.0 mils dft, each. System B - Two-Coat System with Polyurethane Topcoat 1 coat organic zinc-rich primer at 2.5 to 3.0 mils dft. 1 coat high-build aliphatic acrylic polyurethane at 3.5 to 5.0 mils dft. System C - Three-Coat System with Polyurethane Topcoat 1 coat organic zinc-rich primer at 2.5 to 3.0 mils dft. 1 coat high-build polyamide epoxy at 3.0 to 5.0 mils dft. 1 coat high-build aliphatic acrylic polyurethane at 3.5 to 5.0 mils dft. System D – Three-Coat System with Fluoropolymer Topcoat 1 coat organic zinc-rich primer at 2.5 to 3.0 mils dft. 1 coat high-build polyurethane at 3.5 to 5.0 mils dft. 1 coat fluoropolymer at 1.5 mils dft. System E – Two-Coat System with Polysiloxane Topcoat 1 coat inorganic zinc primer at 3.0 mils dft. 1 coat proprietary polysiloxane at 5.0 mils dft. Interior Structural Steel System F - Two-Coat System with Polyamide Epoxy Topcoat 1 coat organic zinc-rich primer at 2.5 to 3.0 mils dft. 1 coat high-build polyamide epoxy at 3.0 to 5.0 mils dft. be limited to no more that 33 percent considered for structural steel in sports coat. Touch-up is generally needed for of each 9 square inches of surface. With facilities: 20 to 40 percent of the coated surface. a primer thickness of 3 mils, the blast • Method 1—Shop-applied primer and profile should be approximately 1.5 topcoat; field-applied touch-up; is that aesthetic considerations may mils. • Method 2—Shop-applied require, to provide uniformity, a com- primer/intermediate coat; field-applied plete recoating of a surface from a clear preparation to an SP 10, Near White topcoat; and edge. It is not out of the question to Blast Cleaning, is generally not an • Method 3—A combination of shop encounter projects where virtually the option due to cost constraints and a and field application based on accessi- entire steel structure was overcoated doubtful payoff in terms of extended bility and subsequent construction before the owner took possession. coating service life. This standard activities. Application of multiple coats in the Increasing the quality of surface requires that the surface be free of all Application Method 1: With both A downside to Application Method 1 shop also presents timing issues, where mill scale and visible contaminants and primer and topcoats applied in the the fabricator, in an effort to facilitate 95 percent free of staining. The process shop, requirements for field application steel delivery, may not allow full cure is the same as with SP 6, but the steel will be limited to touch-up of damaged before topcoating. Topcoat delamina- member is rolled through the rotary areas and application of topcoats on tion is a possibility for shop-applied shot-blast equipment at a slower rate. bolts and surfaces of connections. A multiple-coat systems. Class B primer would be applied to all Application Method 2: Applying Application-method options surfaces that are slip-critical and bear- primer/intermediate coats in the shop There are three basic methods of appli- ing connections, which are then and a complete topcoat in the field cation of coating systems that may be masked prior to application of the top- should provide the best coating system 48 Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 PRESERVE AND PROTECT WITH from an aesthetic standpoint. Touch-up This hybrid approach may appear of the primer/intermediate coat is pro- somewhat simplistic, but a high level of vided in the field after bolting is com- coordination is required among the pleted and after subsequent construc- construction manager, fabricator, and tion—i.e., mechanical, electrical, HVAC, field painter. Contract packaging is also hangers, and welding—is completed. critical in the assignment of responsi- The field-applied finish coat will pro- bilities. COLOR AND TEXTURE vide complete and uniform coverage over all the surfaces. Regarding methods for applying a Coating service life and maintenance issues finish coat, spray application is pre- The projected life of an applied coating ferred for appearance reasons. system is determined by a number of Overspray, however, can present a factors, including quality of surface major nuisance and can damage fin- preparation; quality of coating materi- ished surfaces throughout the stadium als; application techniques; environ- as well as adjacent surfaces outside of mental conditions; regular, periodic the stadium. Final painting is usually inspection; and regular repair and performed after all the seats are in touch-up of damaged areas. Inspection place, making overspray even more of a requires a specific focus on critical areas problem. such as bolt heads, edges of members, To avoid overspray problems, topcoats used in stadiums are usually and surfaces of back-to-back members. As a rule, coating service life is mea- applied by roller or brush. The required sured as the time elapsed until 100 per- dry-film thickness is difficult to control cent repainting is required, when theo- in one coat, however, and the surface retically rust may cover as much as 10 appearance may be less than accept- percent of the surface area. But before able. A compromise is necessary to bal- rust is present and apparent, the sur- ance the demands of appearance and faces of coated steel begin to break logistics. down through erosion and exposure, Permacoat coatings, provided through Conspec, Dayton Superior, and Edoco brands are waterbased acrylic textured coatings that provide a protective weatherproof and aesthetic finish for concrete and masonry. The high-build coating disguises surface defects. Application Method 3: A combina- leaving additional surface areas subject • VOC Compliant in all states tion of application approaches will gen- to chemical attack and the initiation of • Excellent Adhesion erally be the most successful in the corrosion. • Warrantable with our Bond Breaker Products overall construction sequence. For a recent project in Pittsburgh, Control of excessive corrosion on the steel substrate is the primary purpose of structural steel that would be consid- projecting service life. Although aes- ered inaccessible following erection was thetics are important, particularly to an finished following Method 1, with all owner, aesthetics are generally not coats applied in the shop. These areas taken into consideration when estimat- included lighting and roof structures ing service life. Degradation of the sur- and trusses supporting the upper decks. face appearance does not clearly indi- For all those areas where the structural cate onset of corrosion. steel was in the center of construction • Ideal for Tilt-up and precast • Smooth Texture can be applied with airless equipment 877-416.3439 www.daytonsuperior.com Periodic inspections can identify or required a higher degree of aesthet- physical damage or underfilm corrosion ics, Method 2 was followed. The primer before a situation becomes serious. The was completely applied in the shop, regular repair of damaged areas will construction continued after erection, prolong the expected life of a coating the field painters repaired the construc- system. Waiting until active rusting is tion and erection damage, and then clearly visible results in the need for applied the complete finish coat. costly repair and repainting. Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 A Division of Dayton Superior 49 Polyaspartics • Fast cure • High film build (25 mils) • Non yellowing • Color and gloss retention 2K Waterborne Polyurethane Resins • Corrosion protection • Aliphatic topcoat • Ultra-high solids • High productivity www.PolyasparticCoatings.com • Odorless • 4-hour cure time • Abrasion resistant • 0-250 g/l VOC • UV light stable • High gloss • Ultra-high solids • Weatherability www.WaterbornePolyurethanes.com Call your coatings supplier for more information on polyaspartic and waterborne polyurethane coatings. Bayer MaterialScience LLC 100 Bayer Road • Pittsburgh, PA 15205-9741 • Phone: 1.800.662.2927 © 2004, Bayer MaterialScience LLC ALWAYS HIDE YOUR CRACKS BEFORE AFTER PETCO Park, home of the San Diego Padres Recommended touch-up methods does not necessarily require removal of include surface preparation and proper all existing paint materials. Intact, tight- application of the matching topcoat. ly adhered existing paint should not be Excessive film build at these stages of removed unless a survey determines maintenance should be avoided, since it that the coating is brittle or excessively will cause problems in subsequent thick. The new paint system should be repair procedures or repainting. fully compatible with the existing surface to prevent intercoat adhesion prob- Total repaint game plans lems. Permalastic coatings, provided through Conspec, Dayton Superior, and Edoco brands are a highbuild coating system that provides long-lasting weatherproof color with elastomeric properties that keeps dynamic cracks hidden on concrete, stucco, and masonry walls. • Water-based VOC Compliant • Smooth Texture can be applied with airless equipment • Available in several textures • Warrantable and compatible with our restoration systems At the end of the effective service life of A likely repaint approach includes a coating system, a complete repainting spot touch-up with primer and applica- 877-416.3439 of a facility will be required. The extent tion of a full topcoat. The spot touch-up www.daytonsuperior.com of work involved will be minimized if of the existing surface will address the periodic inspection and proper repair effects of physical damage and corro- procedures have been faithfully carried sion. The full topcoat will restore the out. appearance and corrosion protection of The first step in developing a scheme the entire system. This is also a pre- for repainting is a complete survey of ferred approach in areas of limited the facility to determine actual condi- access. tions of each element. It must be understood that repainting Cleaning of surfaces can be accom- A Division of Dayton Superior plished with an alkaline cleanser and Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 51 PLIOTEC LATICES: FOR DURABLE CONCRETE FLOOR COATINGS, SEALERS AND STAINS WITH UV, CHEMICAL AND TIRE PICK-UP RESISTANCE Pliotec latices are produced using a unique technology that ensures a waterborne paint formulation with high performance. Chemical and water resistance, hardness and abrasion resistance, and strong adhesion are among the key strengths of the Pliotec technology. Pliotec resins have been very successful for many years in the floor coating market in the U.S. THE PLIOTEC® LOGO IS THE SIGNATURE OF PAINTS MEETING HIGH QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE TESTS. Floor coating paints, particularly for driveways and garage floors, are over exposed to traffic, water, UV rays, oil, hot tire pick-up, and gasoline. Concrete stains and sealers need to protect from UV rays, alkali & acid, and water while at the same time provide excellent adhesion. Coatings formulated with durable Pliotec can withstand the assaults of these tough environments. Let’s share the future. Eliokem is a global company with manufacturing, sales & marketing, research & development all across the world. New product and application developments are primary focuses of Eliokem. Our expertise and commitment to product innovation make Eliokem the best partner for all its customers. Contact: Valerie Johnson valerie.johnson@eliokem.com Phone: + 1 330-734-1223 Fax: + 1 330-734-1151 HIGH-END LOOKS WITH LOW-END COST Beaver Stadium Expansion, home of the Penn State Nittany Lions high-pressure potable water washing, although, of course, this presents a less- The end zone- Being part of the team scores points difficult chore in an outdoor stadium In summary, selection of coatings sys- than in a fully enclosed space. The tems for structural steel in sports and potable water washing helps to remove other public facilities should be based peeling or otherwise damaged coatings. on a variety of considerations. Waste from potable water washing of Combining aesthetic with corrosion newer structures should not be haz- protection and durability criteria nar- ardous and can either be collected sepa- rows the choices for designers and rately or allowed to flow into the facili- specifiers to a number of specialty ty’s wastewater system. high-performance systems offered by The likelihood of encountering haz- coatings manufacturers. These suppliers can deliver both generic and ing cannot easily be determined ahead unique products that can be incorpo- of time. The coatings that are described rated into the overall coatings matrix here utilize current technology with for the facility. tent. Minimal lead content may be and exposure conditions, the designer required for color purposes, but content and specifier must be concerned with will be less than or equal to current coatings system selection, application governmental regulations. The direc- methods and color selection. To be tion of future statutes or EPA regula- most successful, the designer should tions is difficult to predict, but it would become a part of the decision-making appear that no special abatement process to the greatest extent possible. process should be required for future ings discussed here are employed. Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 • Dozens of Color combinations • Provides deep, permanent color 877-416.3439 After determining environmental repainting of facilities where the coat- • Can be used on new or existing concrete • Horizontal or vertical surfaces ardous materials during future repaint- either lead-free or minimal lead con- Low-cost concrete floors have always been natural gray. Using our Pro Patina penetrating reactive stains, you can produce the natural shadings and color effects of stone and masonry at a fraction of the cost. www.SuperiorColors.com A Division of Dayton Superior JAC 53 any [ratio. pressure. time.] Give us your toughest coatings and we’ll give you the best equipment to apply it! Our equipment is designed to handle the tough stuff - polyurea, polyurethane, spray foam, elastomerics, epoxies and 100% solids. We can move it, pump it and apply it all! At any ratio from 1:1 to 1:10, at any pressure up to 7250 psi, and at any cure time from as low as 2 seconds! Equipment solutions designed to get the job done right! For more information on Graco | Gusmer plural-component equipment, visit us at www.graco.com/coatingsandfoam or call us at 1.877.844.7226. ©2005 Graco Inc. 336813D 2/05 ProjectProfile Mega-makeover delivers… More than a pretty facade Promise of long-term exterior durability motivates choice of By Joe Maty, JAC Editor N obody said it would be easy, and it sure wasn’t. For that matter, nobody said it would be cheap. But then, fluoropolymer finish for trio of aging office buildings near DC anyone Photos courtesy of PPG Industries, Inc. who ever gave a passing thought to the notion that quality comes easy or cheap probably never rehabbed Pegues said that at first glance, the turgid brown of the or repainted the exterior of a large office building with the Skyline trio gave the impression that an original black color expectation that the job would hold up for a good long had chalked and dulled. The custom-tinted “Beaver Creek” stretch of years. shade chosen for the repainting—in the beige or tan color The Washington, DC-based Charles E. Smith Co. certainly rejected any idea of doing the job on the cheap when it family—has made the buildings less of a misfit alongside their newer, brighter-hued neighbors. came time to rejuvenate the aluminum-clad exteriors of the “They wanted something that tended to blend with other company’s three “Skyline” office buildings at Bailey’s colors,” Pegues said of Charles E. Smith representatives. Crossroads, near Arlington, VA. “They wanted them to blend in, be a little more contempo- In sizing up the project, the Smith company’s objective rary” rather than “standing on end like dominoes.” was to keep the 1970s-vintage buildings relevant in an Coatings supplier PPG Industries Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, and increasingly upscale suburban environment. The company architect Pegues agreed on a coating combination headlined realized it would require a hefty investment, said architect by a fluoropolymer resin-based topcoat—a top-of-the-line William Pegues, FCIC, of the Washington architectural firm architectural-coating material that commands a steep price Weihe Design Group (WDG), who served as project archi- but comes with a promise of unparalleled long-term durabil- tect for the Skyline repaint jobs. ity, gloss, and color retention. “Here were three big obelisks of dark chocolate brown, very Roger Mabe, PPG national sales and marketing manager, dated in the quality of the coating,” Pegues said in recalling Building Restoration Products, said the company’s sales the situation faced by the architects and the property owner. pitch in cases such as Skyline emphasizes the long-term ben- Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 55 each of the three structures, which combined consisted of 450,000 square feet of surface to be coated. The fluoropolymer coating, since changed to the brand name “Coraflon,” sold for around $275 per gallon at the time of the project. The repainting of Skyline One was done in 2001, with Skyline Two and Three completed in late 2002. A daunting prep and painting task The restoration of the exteriors of the three buildings, each 15 stories high, began with the oldest of the structures, “Skyline One.” The original coating, a shop-applied fluoropolymer-based material of the Kynar-resin variety, had predictably lost its pizzazz after more than 20 years of exposure, and the aluminum cladding had been repainted every few years during the 1990s with a conventional alkyd resinbased enamel. Clearly, a longer-term solution was needed to give the building— and eventually its younger siblings—an appearance mirroring changing architectural currents and the area’s subsequent commercial development. Project planning started in 2000 with the writing of the specifications for Skyline One, and preparation and application work spanned a five-month period in 2001. Considerable discussion went into The Skyline office buildings at Bailey’s Crossroads in northern Virginia. Recoating of Building One, in foreground, is completed, with work under way on Buildings Two and Three. the development of a warranty agreement, a crucial part of the pro- efit when the talk gets around to price. “These kinds of pro- ject for both property owner and coating supplier. In the jects aren’t for the faint of heart,” Mabe said in a frank negotiations, PPG agreed to issue a 10-year “material only” assessment of the cost issue. warranty covering adhesion, color retention and chalk resis- Mabe pegged the project cost for each of the buildings in tance, and provided the building owner with a list of con- the “seven-figures” range, with labor accounting for perhaps tractors that PPG believed possessed the capability to suc- 80% of the total—a typical breakdown for professional coat- cessfully do the job. ing work. He estimated that approximately 300 gallons of Universal Building Service, Germantown, MD, won the PPG’s “Megaflon” fluoropolymer topcoat was applied to contract for Skyline One. John B. Conomos, Bridgeville, PA, 56 Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 secured the contracts for buildings Two and Three. technology, with the newer version offering a reformulated Preparation work for Skyline One started with “a hand- solvent mix to provide lower volatile organic compound wipe,” or stripping, with the solvent acetone to remove the (VOC) content. The coatings comply with an EPA rule that layers of repaint down to the original fluoropolymer coat- governs VOCs in architectural and industrial maintenance ing or, in some places, down to bare aluminum. Use of coatings in most of the country, he said. mechanized sanding was scratched due to noise generation PPG is at work on further reformulation that will result in that would aggravate tenants. The stripping included the VOC levels that will meet new, tougher restrictions in aluminum curtain-wall panels and the horizontal and verti- California and several Mid-Atlantic and northeastern states, cal window extrusions. Mabe said. The original fluoropolymer finish was in generally good PPG has produced fluoropolymer-resin-based coatings for shape, and the sanding yielded a roughening of the surface more than 40 years, but obtained the technology for air-dry to provide “teeth” to facilitate adhesion of new coatings. systems with the acquisition of Keeler & Long in 1997, open- The initial stripping and sanding was followed by another ing the door to field-application possibilities and restoration hand solvent wipe. jobs such as Skyline. Where the stripping and sanding exposed bare metal, a The fluoropolymer resin technology employed by PPG conventional acid-based wash primer was applied by brush was pioneered by Asahi Glass of Japan in the early 1980s, and roller. All the surfaces were then painted with a recoat- and coatings based on the technology have compiled an able epoxy primer, followed by the air-dry fluoropolymer impressive track record of 20-years-plus service life in topcoat. The application method on Skyline One was air- demanding settings such as bridge railings, PPG says. assisted electrostatic spray. Airless spray was used on Skyline Two and Three. A notable advance with new fluoropolymers, Mabe said, is the clarity of the resin and the resulting color strength and The restoration project also required removal of old window gloss capability of the coating. These attributes, combined caulking in stages to prevent water leakage while the work was with the well-documented UV resistance of fluoropolymers, in progress. For this, a portion of the old caulking was deliver a field-applied finish quality on a par with the instal- removed, the painting was done, and then new caulking was lation of all-new cladding carrying a shop-applied coating, applied. Painting over caulk would inevitably lead to coating Mabe asserts. failure due to the expansion and contraction of the caulk. “That’s the real beauty of this. You’re going to restore the The caulk supplier—in this case Dow Corning—was sent original fluoropolymer durability with a field-applied coat- a sample of the coating to match the topcoat shade. “If you ing versus pulling the skin off the building and putting a go to these buildings and look at them, you can’t tell where new one up there. That’s probably 10 times more expensive the caulk joints start and where the paint starts, unless you than doing the field application.” get right up on it,” Mabe said. These advanced coatings systems are recommended for Masking of windows also presented a challenge during high-end architectural applications where UV resistance, the project, as plastic sheeting employed on Skyline One color and gloss retention over the long haul are a priority. caused breakage of nearly 50 windows due to thermal Use is not advised in highly corrosive or other extreme envi- expansion and contraction, the result of daytime-to-night- ronments, where heavy-duty industrial maintenance coat- time temperature swings. A strippable coating of the type ings are specified. used in spray-paint booths for shop-applied coating was “For the uses we’re recommending—primarily architectur- used as masking on Buildings Two and Three, and the glass- al metal—you’re not going to find a coating that is more aes- breakage issue was largely neutralized. thetically pleasing for a greater number of years,” Mabe said. The preparation and application processes for Skyline Skyline architect Pegues said the air-dry fluoropolymer Two and Three were generally identical to the Skyline One technology answered the Skyline project’s need for an project, with the notable exception that the initial solvent- updated look that will last. “This was a great coating and a stripping step was not required due to the relatively good 10 year warranty,” he said. “I thought we got great results.” shape of the existing coating surface. Pegues and others involved in the project agree that while the Skyline trio may not warrant the title of Glitzville, it cer- Fluropolymer technology: Color for the long haul Mabe said Skyline marked PPG’s first exterior-restoration project using the Megaflon/Coraflon fluoropolymer coating Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 tainly can no longer be derided as Dullsville. JAC 57 WATERPROOFING / AIR BARRIER FOR EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS Mold is a growing problem. You can see where it starts before your wall system is finished. ® Avoid costly call-backs. Where sheet wraps leak, Sto Guard is seamless. Liquid-applied Sto Guard is the superior waterproofing / air barrier for exterior walls. ® ® Sto Guard : - Reduces the risk of condensation and mold caused by a leaking wall system - Provides a seamless and ”structural“ air barrier when applied over sheathing - Provides breathability for proper vapor diffusion and condensation control Take the “I Know Sto” Challenge. Call us with specs on your next project at 888-552-4111. We’ll help you with the bid process and prove how cost effective Sto Guard® can be. We’ll also send you a FREE “I Know Sto” t-shirt. Locate the distributor nearest you at www.stocorp.com/stoguardgc. ProjectProfile- Air Barriers Great expectations Air-barrier system crafted to measure up to expansive vision for major new research center at MIT T By Kevin Knight he new 400,000 square-foot Brain and Cognitive Sciences Project (BCSP) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, MA, brings together three distinct research entities to create a world-class center for brain research. Intended to house a wide array of both wet and dry laboratories for research and teaching, supporting biology, biochemistry, neurobiology, and behavioral and cognitive research, the center is designed around a multi-story daylit atrium defined by tea rooms, faculty offices, and open seating areas to foster interaction among the scientists. As part of MIT’s commitment to sustainable design, the BCSP incorporates a wide array of strategies for reducing energy use and preserving resources. Such features as high-performance building envelope systems, wastewater recovery and reuse, heat recovery from exhaust fans, and daylight-balanced lighting contribute to an integrated, sustainable design. This article examines the specification and application of a liquid-applied air-barrier system, a key component of the buildingenvelope design for the new research center. Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 Early contruction as viewed from Main Street Photo courtesy of Goody Clancy A design tailored for tight urban site The building’s design addresses a major aspect of the tight urban site with a bold architectural stroke. A live rail and transit corridor bisects the site longitudinally; the building bridges this right-of-way to create a single unified complex and to establish MIT’s presence with its first major building on Main Street. At the campus-design level, the building extends MIT’s linked system of pedestrian paths and points toward future growth to the north. Clad exclusively in limestone and an elegantly detailed glass curtain wall, the complex presents a strong, sweeping façade that features materials that are subtly varied among the three principal street elevations. Each of the research entities is expressed differently on the exterior with its own special feature, such as a reading room or conservatory. The laboratory floors will provide unparalleled flexibility to support evolving research needs and to accommodate changing boundaries among the various research groups—the McGovern Institute for Brain Research, the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, and the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences. The circulation system incorporates a dedicated set of elevators and secure corridors that will separate animal (and animal 59 Application of liquid Perm-A-Barrier at window detail Photo courtesy of KTA-Tator, Inc. researcher) movement from the general public. Special technical considerations include mitigation systems to deal with low-frequency vibration that would otherwise disrupt sensitive imaging and research equipment. “In forging a truly collaborative creative relationship, the team has realized MIT’s goals for the BCSP,” said Roger Goldstein, FAIA, of the architectural firm Goody Clancy and principal in charge of the project. “Early on we identified several key issues in the master-planning stage that were critical in informing the design process. As a result, the BCSC’s design boldly frames an important entrance to this part of the campus, integrates the active rail line that passes through the building, and effectively defines the surrounding street edges. “It is a state-of-the-art research facility that will bring scientists together for interaction and exchange.” Liquid-applied system gets nod as barrier choice An air barrier is a material or a combination of materials that acts as a unified system to conBuilding with stone installed trol the movement of air through Photo courtesy of KTA-Tator, Inc. the building envelope or between dissimilar environments within the building. The lack of a functional airbarrier system can result in various forms of premature damage to building-envelope components, particularly when these components are under constant exposure to certain interior conditions such as high pressure or temperature differentials between the interior and exterior and/or high interior humidity. Air-barrier functionality and 60 Testing for air leakage of the air-barrier membrane Photo courtesy of KTA-Tator, Inc. performance is also significant in buildings in which the intended function requires strict control of these interior conditions. Given the high-performance requirements of the BCSP’s building-envelope system, it was necessary to incorporate an effective air-barrier system into the design, and as such, it was imperative that the requirements of airtightness, continuity, structural integrity, and durability, as specified in the Massachusetts energy code, were met. The air barrier also is required to function in conjunction with other building-envelope components such as the roofing system, curtain walls, windows, and connective materials, which together combine to provide a continuous air-barrier envelope over the entire structure. With numerous air-barrier materials on the market such as bitumen sheet membranes, liquid membranes, urethane foams, and rigid boards, one of the first Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 decisions to be made concerned what “family” of material would be selected. Spray-applied liquid membrane was eventually chosen as the air-barrier material for this project, as these membranes provide a structurally sound, durable, and airtight barrier when installed in accordance with specification requirements. Additionally, with the variety of substrates used on the project, including steel, poured-in-place concrete, and concrete block, and the “irregular” surfaces over which the membrane would have to be applied, it was thought that it would be easier to install the spray-applied membrane than a sheet membrane. W. R. Grace Perm-A-Barrier® Liquid, a two-part fluid-applied self-curing synthetic rubber-based membrane, was selected as the air-barrier material. The two parts are mixed together on-site prior to use and cold-applied to the substrate. The barrier material cures within 24 to 48 hours to form a monolithic, flexible rubber membrane that can be sprayed at temperatures as low as 20 F. Mark DerMugrditchian of Grace Construction Products, discussing the company’s collaboration with the architect on the air-barrier system, said a great deal of attention was paid to application details. Air barriers being produced currently are designed to work in a specific fashion, and application technicians may not be fully trained to understand all of the functional aspects of the barrier system. Thus, clarity of installation guidelines is crucial. Pre-job meetings were conducted to set the installation expectations for the air barrier. “We worked with the general contractor and sub-contractor,” DerMugrditchian said. “What was learned was that even with the attention to details, new issues developed that could now be discussed ahead of time and before installation began, like how plumb the wall needs to be, the different building components and how these different components work together, and how the transition tape needs to work to keep the air barrier-system continuous.” Quality assurance puts project to the test A comprehensive inspection and testing quality-assurance protocol, comprised of Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 visual observation during installation supported by a variety of in-process and postinstallation tests, was employed to ensure that the installation would result in a longlasting air barrier. Ambient application conditions, material thickness, tensile strength of adhesion between membrane 61 and substrate, and airtightness were verified during the application of the liquid membrane. Determining ambient conditions was important in order to verify that the material was applied within specific temperature and humidity conditions as per speci- fication requirements and the manufacturer’s recommendations. Thickness readings were taken to confirm that a sufficient coating of membrane had been applied to the substrate during the spray installation. As Perm-A-Barrier generally shows no shrinkage during the The RCI Foundation Pre sents: CUTTING THROUGH THE GLARE TH T HE ED A UC O TI N AL E N VE T OF 0 20 5 E PR OS & CO NS FR OM TH E May 12 & 13, 2005 PR OS Hyatt Regency Hotel Peachtree Street , Atlanta, GA In a continuing effort to support research, education and the dissemination of information on issues important to the roofing industry, the RCI Foundation, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and National Research Council Canada announces Cool Roofing…Cutting Through the Glare. This symposium will focus on evolving philosophies concerning the most effective methods to address cool roofing, including: • Cool Roofing Overview • Reflective Roofing Systems • Codes and Standards • Alternatives to High Reflectance Roofing Systems • Energy Savings • Field Studies • Roof Coatings • Roof System Aging • Field Studies • Roof Gardens RCI Foundation • 1500 Sunday Drive • Raleigh, NC 27607-5041 • Phone: 800-828-1902 62 curing process, the resultant dry film thickness was approximated by measuring the wet-film thickness. Tensile strength of adhesion between the membrane and substrate was tested in general accordance with ASTM D 4541, “Standard Test Method for Pull-Off Strength of Coatings Using Portable Adhesion Testers.” The membrane generally was required to withstand a minimum tensile load of 16 pounds per square inch, applied perpendicular to the test area, to “pass”—a measure that the Perm-ABarrier easily exceeded. The overall airtightness of the opaque wall system was verified using a combination of visual examination and qualitative and quantitative testing practices. ASTM E 1186, “Standard Practices for Air Leakage Site Detection in Building Envelopes and Air Retarder Systems,” and ASTM E 783, “Standard Test Method for Field Measurement of Air Leakage Through Installed Exterior Windows and Doors” test methods were used to test both the airtightness of individual details and the system as a whole. The MIT Brain and Cognitive Sciences Project project represents a prime example of a liquid-applied air barrier being used as a high-performance component within a building envelope. The building is designed not only as a world-class research center, but also as a monument and landmark for Cambridge. In the rapidly growing air-barrier marketplace, liquid-applied systems have proven to be a primary choice among designers and contractors involved in crafting buildingenvelope systems for major structures such as the MIT Brain and Cognitive Sciences Project. These liquid-applied systems offer structural soundness, durability, and airtightness, and can be applied to varied and irregular building substrates. Editor’s Note: This article was prepared with assistance from KTA-Tator, Inc., Goody Clancy, and the W.R. Grace Co. JAC Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 Durability UV resistance- Just the tip of the iceberg for testing of coatings durability W Frenel solar concentrators, pictured here, are the most commonly used outdoor testing devices. Photos courtesy of Atlas Materials Testing Technologies L.L.C. hen it comes to outdoor durability of definition, a coating—as opposed to a “paint”— an architectural coating, most peoPassing the test functions to protect the substrate. The substrate may ple immediately lock in on UV (ultrabe steel, aluminum, composites, concrete, brick or –Allen Zielnik violet) resistance as the single most stone masonry, wood, or any other material. To persignificant indicator of long-term performance. This form this function, the coating must remain adhered to the substrate, view is justified, as UV stability is indeed an imporact as a barrier to agents that can affect the substrate, and itself tant component of the durability of coatings. remain undamaged for the intended service life—quite a lot to ask! That said, it would be a mistake to ignore numerSometimes the term “protective coating” is used to emphasize the ous other factors that can also influence the durability and perforprotective nature of specialized coatings systems such as antifouling mance of coatings. Predicting the durability of coatings cannot be marine or industrial tank coatings. In the world of architectural coataccurately done without a thorough analysis of all other factors, ings, we almost always face an additional burden, an aesthetic one. and, as you will see, accomplishing this is no small task. In other words, the coating not only has to protect the substrate and Accordingly, this article will review the many different consideraitself remain intact, but it must also continue to look good doing so. tions that must be taken into account when forecasting how coatings The physical functionality of a coating is primarily provided by will respond to UV influences over the course of time. In particular, the chemistry of the binder system. This binder, or “vehicle,” is what the following will be covered: eventually becomes the dry coating film. The binder consists pri• The purpose of coatings and how they function on structures; marily of resins, solvents, and functional additives such as crosslink• Factors that affect the durability of architectural coatings; ing agents, among many others. The binder system can determine • Industry standards that govern how various durability tests should some appearance properties, such as the gloss level, but mostly be conducted; contributes adhesion to the substrate and film formation to bind the • Overview of the three primary types of UV weathering tests; pigments and other functional additives such as mildewcides, UV • Three considerations involving accelerated tests; absorbers, etc. • Guidelines to evaluate weathering statements and specifications Many binder chemistries are used in architectural coatings: for coatings; and Acrylics, polyesters, phenolics, alkyds, urethanes, epoxies, and flu• Tips on where to start. oropolymers, to name just a few. Each of these chemistries possesses inherent strengths and weaknesses in terms of durability, and The purpose of coatings and how these properties are extensively documented in technical literature they function on various substrates devoted to coatings formulation, if one is interested. When we speak of the durability of coatings, two important aspects While some general rankings can be put forth on the relative generally come to mind, though they are not necessarily related. By durability of various coatings types, exceptions—often obtained Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 63 In this xenon-arc accelerated weathering test device, the entire sample rack rotates around the xenon lamp to maintain proper irradiance, temperature, and humidity levels. through performance-enhancing additives—can make such rankings misleading for specifying architectural coatings. In addition, performance differences can occur, based on the substrate and whether the coating is shop or field applied. And many newer technologies such as powder coatings, UV/radcure, etc., don’t rely on traditional binder chemistries. Factors that affect the durability of architectural coatings When it comes to evaluating the durability of architectural coatings, a number of factors have to be examined: how and where the coating is to be applied and where the product will be used in service; the variability of the substrate; the weather and climate factors that can affect the binder; the stability of the colorant system, and so on. The definition of what constitutes acceptability and failure in a coating is not a hard and fast test and specification issue, but rather a murky and complicated landscape. So how, then, are architectural coatings tested for weathering and durability? Well, that depends. At first thought, you might say that if you want an coating that will last at least 10 years without maintenance, you’d simply paint a test piece and put it outside for 10 years to see what happens. And, at least to a point, you’d be right, but perhaps fall a bit behind on your project! And certainly the coatings manufacturers have already done that for you, right? Well, in many cases you’d be correct—or at least partially so. A review of key industry standards The American Architectural Manufacturers Association some time ago issued a set of performance standards for “good” (AAMA Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 603) and “better” high-performance (AAMA 605) architectural coatings applied to aluminum panels and extrusions. These standards have been superceded by the following three new voluntary standards. • AAMA 2603, intended primarily for interior light-commercial and residential-grade coatings. This standard provides specifications for color acceptance; gloss; impact, chemical and corrosion resistance; and other performance measures. A one-year South Florida outdoor weathering test to verify the degree of checking, crazing, adhesion loss, chalking, and fading is optional, and specimens should show no adhesion loss and only slight chalking or fading. Coatings typically conforming to AAMA 2603 include those based on acrylic latex, high-solids polyesters and baked enamels. • AAMA 2604, designed primarily for high-performance commercial- and architectural-grade applications. This standard includes additional test methods and acceptance criteria for abrasion and weathering resistance. Weathering tests evaluate color (<5 _E max), gloss retention (≥ 30%), chalking (ASTM D4214, rating 8), and film erosion (<10% film loss) after five years of south Florida outdoor weathering. For those not familiar with E color terminology, it constitutes combined fade and color-shift measurement. Most people cannot detect a color change less than a ?E of 3, so a 5 is barely perceptible. Examples of coatings meeting AAMA 2604 include high-performance silicone polyester enamels and systems containing 50% fluoropolymer, such as polyvinylidene flouride (PVDF). • AAMA 2605, which recognizes a new class of “superior” architectural coatings. Performance requirements after 10 years of outdoor South Florida weathering are similar to those in AAMA 2604, but AAMA 2605 also requires better gloss retention (≥ 50%). Currently, coatings based on fluoropolymers are the primary materials performing at this level. Coatings meeting AAMA 2605 requirements are almost always applied in two or three coats (for example, primer, finish coat, and a clear protective topcoat) based on 70% fluoropolymer resin such as PVDF or FEVE. In addition to these three, AAMA has issued performance specifications for coil-coated aluminum and coatings on plastics. But what if the substrate isn’t aluminum? And what if the project isn’t located in southern Florida? This is where UV resistance and weatherability testing and specification become more challenging. Generalities are always dangerous because of the exceptions, but sometimes we need to make them. Weathering-related failures of coatings occur principally due to the failure of the bulk of the binder resulting from exposure to light (particularly the ultraviolet component), moisture and temperature effects, or some synergistic combination of these factors. Pollution, acid rain, ozone, bird droppings, mildew, salt spray, and other factors can also loom large, but heat, light, and moisture are usually the most significant. Appearance changes such as color fade, gloss loss, chalking, 65 “accelerated” exposure techniques were developed. These primarietc., result from degradation of the pigment colorant or discolly involved “follow the sun” tracking racks to maximize the solar oration or erosion of the binder surface. Pigments, especially those energy deposited each day. The culmination of accelerated outdoor based on organic compounds, can be highly UV- and even visible testing resulted in special solar tracking and Fresnel mirror-concenlight-sensitive and this can result in fade or hue shift. The binder surtrator systems used in the dry Arizona desert. The most sophisticatface can degrade from the effects of UV and moisture, even if most ed of these systems incorporate water sprays to simulate Miami of the binder remains intact. moisture and controlled daytime and nighttime temperatures to minWhat this means is that we may see different changes to a coatimize seasonal temperature variations in exposure. These devices ing exposed to different environments. For example, a coating can generate peak summertime acceleration factors as high as six may show severe color fade in the high-UV desert Southwest but to eight times in real-time terms compared to test-fence exposures show chalking in the moist Southeast. Therefore, most coatings are and can greatly reduce testing times. tested in at least three climates, such as south Florida, Arizona, One reality of outdoor testing is that while climate changes occur and northern industrial sites, such as the conditions in Ohio. on a very long time scale, weather can vary considerably from one Coatings destined for the global market may require additional year to another. For example, South Florida experienced a very exposure testing in other aggressive environments, and as a result cloudy and wet 2005 hurricane season. coatings companies operate large exposure While annual variations in weather tend to be “farms” or utilize commercial exposure sites. minimized in long (10-year or more) expoSo does the 10-year AAMA 2605 specifisures, shorter durations can be highly varication assure that coating color change (_E < able, making comparisons between tests con5) will be no worse in Phoenix or Singapore ducted in different years a problem. than in south Florida? No, not at all. But it To provide greater control over the main does provide a common method for estabfactors of material weathering (heat, light, lishing a minimum coating performance and and moisture), various laboratory accelerata basis for comparison. ed “artificial weathering” instruments have Numerous test-method and performancebeen developed. These were originally based setting organizations that evaluate the duraon the intense UV output of electrically burnbility of architectural coatings exist in the ing carbon-arc lamps and were first pioU.S. and Canada, with a dizzying array of neered in 1915 (Fade-Ometer®, Weathersuch organizations found internationally. Ometer®, Xenotest, and SUNTEST are some Most test methods (protocols) prescribe how trade names). Subsequent improvements in to perform a weathering test in terms of the The exposure area in this UV test chamber has a slope of the spectral match to sunlight were made, first mechanics, but stop short of providing per5 degrees to accurately simulate outdoor weathering in the 1940s with the open-flame “Sunshine” formance requirements such as the AAMA and rainwater runoff. carbon-arc devices, then again in the 1950s specs. Many material specifications (such as with full-spectrum xenon-lamp and filter technology. those in ASTM and ISO, for example) are specific to the chemistry Alternative technologies came out in the 1970s, based on inexof the coatings and thus make it difficult to compare products with pensive fluorescent lamps (QUV, UVCON, UV2000) and again in different requirements. And many specifications use questionable the 1980s with specialized metal halide lamps (SolarClimatic). test methods or leave the exposure type and duration to the discre[Note: QUV is a trade name of Q-Panel Lab Products]. tion of the manufacturer to report. Three primary types of UV weathering tests Three considerations for accelerated tests Three major types of UV/weathering tests exist, along with several variations. The most common type is the natural, outdoor “direct weathering” test in which test panels are placed on exposure racks in a “standard reference” location such as subtropical south Florida. One basic tenet is that a 10-year-exposure test takes, well, 10 years. That means the coatings that today meet the AAMA 2605 requirement are technologically 15-20 years old and newer materials may actually perform better. To decrease the testing time in outdoor exposures, a number of Each of these accelerated techniques possesses unique characteristics that must be viewed in relation to specific material chemistries to allow an understanding of the acceleration and correlation issues, and therefore to successfully predict service life performance based on a relatively short test. Such a discussion is far too involved to be undertaken here, but a few explanatory and cautionary notes are appropriate. The first point to make is that all accelerated-weather testing changes the natural balance of the factors (heat, light, and moisture) 66 Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 and excludes others (pollutants, mildew, ozone, etc.). Therefore, all accelerated testing has the potential to inaccurately reproduce real weathering performance. It is tempting to assume that accelerated weathering test methods would simply hasten the naturally occurring outdoor degradation. The reality is that the test condition is only half of the equation, the other half being the unique material response to those stress factors. It’s like suffering from a peanut allergy—if you don’t have it, you can enjoy PB&J sandwiches. If you are allergic, you end up in anaphylactic shock. But the peanut butter is still the same. The same is true of test methods and individual material sensitivity, and these can’t always be predicted in advance. Therefore it takes skilled researchers to understand the results of accelerated testing and predict future durability performance. The second point to make here is that skepticism should be exercized when viewing simplistic statements such as “passed 1,000 hours in QUV” or “2,000 hours G26 testing is equivalent to 5 years Florida testing.” Out-of-context or erroneous statements are often found in marketing literature. Comparative data, including the accelerated type, that show coating performance over time against known benchmark products is far more revealing. One reason for this is that coating degradation is usually not linear with time or exposure, and single-point “snapshots” often say little about actual material performance over time. The third point: results from different accelerated techniques or test methods, or exposure sites or times, usually cannot be directly compared. Current coatings research and development, however, simply couldn’t exist without accelerated testing to screen formulations and provide interim weathering data. Top coatings companies usually employ multiple exposure techniques combining outdoor natural and accelerated exposures, along with artificial accelerated laboratory weathering, to gain greater confidence in coating service-life projections. Guidelines to evaluate statements and specifications on the weathering of coatings So how do you evaluate coatings-weathering statements and develop specifications? Here are some guidelines. • The most reliable coatings data will be based on real-time outdoor weathering on the same substrate in a climate similar to or more severe than the end-use location. Realize that this data takes time to develop, and reliance on real-time weathering may preclude the use of more modern, advanced coatings. Test results should state the exposure conditions and, preferably, the ultraviolet radiant energy or starting and ending dates, as there can be considerable seasonal differences, especially on short (< 2 year) exposures. • The next most reliable data is that from outdoor accelerated tests, especially from the latest generation of controlled-temperature Fresnel solar-concentrator devices. The test cycle used should be Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 appropriate for the end use, such as a “Miami” cycle with high moisture for hot, humid locales. Exposure durations should be reported in units of ultraviolet radiant energy, but may also be given in “equivalent years” of regular outdoor exposure. Test cycles and conditions should be reported. • A third and next-best alternative in terms of correlation to realworld conditions is data from laboratory accelerated artificial weathering based on full solar-spectrum light sources such as xenon arc or metal halide with controlled temperature and moisture. There are many test cycles and conditions available and they should be specifically referenced. Exposure duration should be reported in radiant energy dosage units in the ultraviolet wavelength region, as these are the most damaging. If “equivalent years” of exposure are used, the basis for the calculated comparison should be stated. • A fourth-best option is data from older carbon-arc weathering devices, which should be viewed with caution as they often show poor correlation to outdoor performance. This is often particularly true for more recently introduced coatings chemistries and highchroma organic pigments. The exception to this rule is evaluation of fluoropolymer coatings using unfiltered open-flame “sunshine” carbon arc; the UV severity of this test appears to be necessary to stress these high-performance coatings within a reasonable time frame, and correlation with field performance has typically been shown to be high. Data should state the test conditions or test standard and hours of exposure; “outdoor equivalence” has not been universally established. • Number five in this hierarchy is data from fluorescent condensation laboratory devices, which should be based on the use of UVA-340 lamps. Previously, UVB-313 lamps were commonly used to provide greater acceleration, but these have shown “reversals” from outdoor weathering and their use is specifically discouraged in the ASTM G154 standard for weathering tests. Controlled-irradiance devices should be used as older non-light monitoring equipment were subject to considerable variability. Note that fluorescent condensation tests using UVA-340 lamps are best suited only for testing binders and pigments that degrade from <340nm UV radiation and are not full weathering tests; test data should be regarded as provisional unless confirmatory outdoor or more rigorous accelerated weathering tests are conducted. Data should be reported in ultraviolet radiant energy units, because “equivalent outdoor” correlations are questionable; if “hours” of exposure are reported, the irradiance level, test-cycle conditions and lamp type should be stated. Tips on where to start So how does one start to establish a weathering spec for a project or evaluate a coatings weatherability statement? First, as they say in real estate, “location, location, location.” Where is the coating to be used? The most severe U.S./Canada locations are going to be sub67 tropical south Florida or the desert Southwest. You’ll ideally want weathering data (outdoor or laboratory) for that environment. The Southwest will see higher UV, by about 20%, and higher maximum temperatures; Miami will see wet times approaching 50%. Northern-tier cities will typically see moderately high temperatures and about half the solar radiation and weathering rates, and most of Europe will see even less. Next, what is the geometry of the architectural project? South-facing facades will see more solar radiation, while those that are westfacing will see high solar radiation at the hottest part of the day. Horizontal and inclined surfaces will see higher levels of sunlight than vertical ones. Apart from mechanical coatings failure, how much appearance change can you accept? The AAMA guidelines are a good basis for coatings on metals. If data on appearance change vs. exposure exists, you can get a sense of how much difference you can expect on different facades. Uneven appearance changes are more easily noticed than overall, even change. You’ll want to see data for color, as colorants possess greatly varying light stability. What is the minimum accepted coating life? Based on the above points and available geographical UV data, a radiant-energy dosage over the service life can be established. Accelerated test data to that endpoint, or real-time outdoor weathering, can provide a good indication of coatings durability performance for your project. Make sure all this data on coatings measures up If you weren’t already aware of the staggering amount of data that can be generated to predict a coating’s durability, you should be now. Indeed, sorting through this data can constitute an arduous and confusing task, and presents multiple opportunities for error by pegging purchasing claims to erroneous data. The most important thing to do is make sure you know all the significant details of how and where a coating will be applied. Then, make sure your coatings vendor has subjected its products to multiple testing methodologies that conform to a uniform set of standards. Durability claims become much more reliable when a product has been subjected to numerous tests conducted by experts who have compiled a proven track record in the industry. Editor’s note: This is the second in a series of columns on assessing the durability of coatings by Allen Zielnik, Atlas Materials Testing Technologies L.L.C. JAC Featured in the July issue of the Journal of Architectural Coatings ... SPECIAL REPORT on the Beautification and Protection of Concrete A comprehensive report on the state of the art in materials used to beautify and protect concrete: stains, coatings, floor toppings, and other materials, for interiors and exteriors, walls, and floors. Plus, Coatings for Schools, Graffiti Resistance, and Wood Coatings A new read on high-end commercial and architectural coatings technology 68 Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 ProjectProfile Eye to the future Polysiloxane technology enlisted to give millennium landmark a long-term lease on London skyline T he British Airways London Eye, which lays claim to being the world’s largest observation wheel, offers spectacular views across London from its site along the south bank of the River Thames. It has become Britain’s most popular tourist attraction, drawing approximately four million visitors a year. Though it was originally conceived and built as a temporary structure to mark the turn of the millennium, the BA London Eye proved far too popular to be considered a mere throwaway, and it was decided that the attraction should remain a part of the London skyline on a permanent basis. As a result, the structure’s owners and operators realized that a total repaint job was needed to ensure that the structural integrity and appearance remain intact. The choice of materials for the project comprised a three-part Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 coatings system topped by an acrylic polysiloxane finish coat formulated to provide long-term retention of aesthetic properties such as gloss and color. Epoxy primer and intermediate coatings serve to provide enhanced corrosion protection and overall performance benefits. Coatings supplier International Protective Coatings, a marketing division of International Paint and part of Netherlands-based Akzo Nobel, said the choice of the acrylic polysiloxane reflected a number of important considerations for the project, including health and safety issues, ease of use, environmental impact, long-term color and gloss retention, and mechanical properties. Evolution of the ‘Eye’ Constructed to mark the turn of the millennium, the BA London Eye was conceived and designed by Marks Barfield Architects to represent the turning of time. The wheel measures around 135 meters (approximately 450 feet) in diameter and weighs in at a mammoth 1,900 metric tons, the majority of which is composed of the hub and spindle, the A-frame legs, and the steel cables. The construction process for the eye was quite unique. Once the 69 sections were completed and brought up the Thames to the site by barge, it was compiled flat and rested on temporary platforms that had been created to hold the immense weight of the structure. The steel circle at the outer edge of the wheel was pieced together with the A frame, spindle, and hub, and connected using steel cables. Once this section was complete, the wheel was smoothly lifted to the correct position using the hinged legs. The Eye is owned by The British Airways London Eye Company, a consortium comprising British Airways, the Tussauds Group, and Marks Barfield, the structure’s architects. Tussauds is the operator of the Eye. The main steel structure was fabricated in The Netherlands by Hollandia, the capsules were made in France, the glass panels and cables in Italy, the main bearing in Germany, and other components in the Czech Republic. The steel is from Britain. International Paint supplied the structure’s original coating system. The contract for the repaint project was awarded to F.A. Clover & Son Ltd. Industrial Painting Contractors. Capsule with a view The 32 fully enclosed passenger capsules, or “pods,” each holding up to 25 people, are positioned on the outside of the wheel for an unobstructed view, and are kept level by a motorized motion-capability system. Passengers can sit or walk around freely in air-conditioned or heated comfort. Camera and radio links run from each capsule to the ground, and an audio commentary describes the famous landmarks on view. Up to 800 passengers at a time can take in 360-degree views of London and the surrounding countryside as far as 25 miles away during a ride that lasts for approximately half an hour. Taking its place among other modern architectural landmarks such as the Swiss Re building, designed by Foster and Partners, and Canary Wharf, the Eye also offers views of historic architectural icons such as Tower Bridge and the Houses of Parliament. At night, the whole wheel is illuminated by an imaginative lighting scheme. The rim literally “breathes” as the intensity of the light pulses slowly 16 times each minute. Capsules are lit on embarkation and gradually fade into darkness during the night “flight.” Drawing on technologies more commonly associated with buildings and vehicles, the architects David Marks and Julia Barford and their design team created an “intelligent structure” able to respond to weather conditions and thus ensure that passengers always enjoy a safe and smooth journey. The UK Health and Safety Executive designated the wheel a “fairground attraction” and thus attention to safety was absolute. 70 In the event of a system failure that would cause the pods to tip over, the glass ceilings are strong enough to withstand the weight of 50 people. Each capsule is equipped with a total back-up system to allow for any failures. Even lightning conductors were included in the design. The glass on the capsules has been subjected to artificial lightning strikes in a laboratory used to test F111 fighter planes. The giant wheel was initially intended to be a temporary project for the millennium celebrations, much as the Eiffel Tower was conceived as a temporary structure at the turn of the previous century. With this is mind, the original finish coat specification was crafted for a service life only as long as the structure’s projected operating life of around five years, in line with temporary planning permission. The original specification called for a coating system comprising a shop-applied zinc-rich epoxy primer, an epoxy barrier—or intermediate—coat, and a field-applied polyurethane finish coat. Interestingly, a final topcoat was never applied due to a tight schedule for the startup of operation. Following the decision that the Eye should remain part of the London experience, it was determined that the visual aesthetics should be upgraded. In particular, the situation called for an environmentally friendly finish that would retain its gloss, color, and integrity for as long as possible. The scope of the preparation and finishing job encompassed the entire structure, including: • The pier, its two brows and anti-collision booms; • The complete wheel structure itself, including the central hub and spindle construction; • The 80-meter- (approximately 260-foot)-high supporting “Aframe” legs; and • The loading and unloading ramps and associated hand railing, the two restraint towers and the riverbed piling. The total area of steelwork to be coated was approximately 13,000 square meters, or about 42,000 square feet on abovewater areas and 2,000 square meters, or approximately 6,500 square feet, on areas that see service below water. International Protective Coatings carried out an Interplan® survey, or pictorial site and corrosion survey, to determine the specification and maintenance requirements. The Interplan document contained a detailed inspection report, including photographs, and a complete specification. The company won out in the bidding to supply the coatings for the project with a threepart coating system composed of epoxy primer, epoxy intermediate coat and acrylic polysiloxane finish coat. The system is designed to provide extended corrosion protection and longterm durability and retention of aesthetics such as color and gloss. The three parts are all two-component products. Specifically, the system consisted of International’s Patch Prime-Interplus® 256 low-VOC surface-tolerant epoxy for the Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 primer, Interseal® 670HS low-VOC high-solids surface-tolerant epoxy intermediate coat, and Interfine® 979 low-VOC, highperformance acrylic polysiloxane for the finish coat. For areas below the tidal water line of the Thames, the specification called for application of Interzone® 954, a low-VOC, high-solids epoxy with underwater-curing capability. The company prefers to estimate VOCs for the project on an “emissions per square meter” basis, and gives a figure of less than 60 g/m2. The challenge of application The application work was executed by two teams, one operating during the day and the other at night after operation of the Eye closed. The application technicians were specially trained and experienced in working on high structures, allowing the Eye to continue operating during its busiest period with minimal disruption to the wheel or the enjoyment of visitors. The bulk of the project was carried out between May and October of 2003, with the balance completed in the summer of 2004. Access to the structure posed interesting challenges, and required a combination of different application tactics. These methods included the employment of roped access, M.E.W.P.S (also known as “cherry pickers”); a huge, 72-meter Bronto Skylift truck-mounted access hoist; existing mechanical arms mounted on the London Eye restraint towers; an intricate scaffold to the underside of the Eye capable of coping with the tidal forces of the Thames; a Unifloat pontoon; a variety of boats, and a jack leg, or “spud” barge. In addition to the usual hazards faced on high-elevation painting jobs, one of the unique challenges of the “Eye” contract was executing the project in the midst of one of London’s busiest locations. The huge volume of pedestrian and tourist traffic meant that by the end of the project, the contractor’s personnel became adept at fielding a wide variety of questions about the Eye and surrounding tourist attractions, as well as giving directions to all parts of the capital. Polysiloxane technology formulated to offer balance of key properties International Protective Coatings says the patented acrylic polysiloxane finish coat offers several key performance benefits, including long-term UV resistance and abrasion and impact resistance that minimizes damage due to construction work and activities encountered during service. The flexibility of the cured film also is seen as an advantage when it is applied to structures subject to movement because it helps to reduce cracking and premature coating failure in “stress point” areas such as welds and edges, International says. From an environmental and health-and-safety standpoint, Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 assets of the acrylic polysiloxane include low VOC content and the absence of isocyanates in the coating composition. Recommended applications for the acrylic polysiloxane include new construction and repaint work, with spray, roller, and brush application possible. International Protective Coatings says R&D efforts involving the polysiloxane technology spanned more than 10 years, and the company describes its current technology as a “second generation” version. The company’s initial offerings were primarily epoxy-modified polysiloxanes, with newer products boasting enhanced performance properties, the company says. The term polysiloxane describes a generic chemistry based on the Si-O-Si bond, as opposed to the more traditional C-C bonds of coatings such as polyurethanes. The strength of these Si-O-Si bonds is reputed to produce the technology’s superior UV resistance. Modification of the polysiloxane backbone with organic components based on C-C bonds is needed to produce viable coatings compositions. Three important variables that dramatically affect the performance of the final coating are the type of modification—e.g., acrylic versus epoxy; the level of modification, with higher levels generally diluting the benefits of the polysiloxane chemistry; and the modification method—blend versus chemical graft. Polysiloxane coatings currently seeing use come with a complete range of these modifications, which can significantly affect coatings application and performance properties such as longterm adhesion, gloss and color retention, and long-term mechanical performance. Also playing important parts in the quality and performance of the coating are pigments employed to provide color. Combining lesser-quality pigments with a polysiloxane polymer system formulated to provide UV resistance will lead to inferior performance. In addition to the BA London Eye, International Protective Coatings’ acrylic polysiloxane technology has been used on a number of high-profile projects around the world, including Barcelona’s iconic Hotel Arts, Singapore’s Changi Airport extension, Vancouver’s Broadway Station project, the Ganghui Plaza in Shanghai, and the Melbourne Gateway in Australia. The technology’s project portfolio also includes roller coasters, bridges, stadia, and office buildings in countries ranging from the United States and Mexico to China and Sweden. International Protective Coatings is headquartered in Newcastleon-Tyne, U.K., with regional offices located in London; Shanghai; Brisbane, Australia; and Houston. More information is available at www.polysiloxane.net JAC 71 AdIndex Air Products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 Ameron International Protective Coatings Group . . . . . . . . . . . .7 The ArmaKleen Company . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 Atlas Material Testing Technology . . . . . . .12 Bayer Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47 Benjamin Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40 Blastrac . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 Cargill Industrial Oils & Lubricants . . . . . .21 Coronado Paint / Insl-X . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13 Crown Polymers, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44-45 Dayton Superior . . . . . . . . . . . . .49, 51, 53 Diamond Vogel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24 DuPont Industrial Coatings . . . . . .Back Cover Dunn-Edwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 Eliokem, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52 Graco Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54 ICI Devoe . . . . . . . . . . . . .Inside Back Cover Journal of Architectural Coatings . . . . . . . .68 KTA-Tator, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27 Kelly-Moore Paint Company . . . . . . . . . . .31 LMCI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 Muralo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 PPG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5, 33 PolySpec L.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47 Prime Coat Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38 RCI Foundation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62 Rodda Paint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39 Rubber Polymer Corporation . . . . . . . . . . .61 Rust-Oleum Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22 SSPC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64 Sherwin-Williams . . . . . . .Inside Front Cover Sto Corp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58 Tnemec Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 United Coatings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 ZRC Products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27 Calendar April 20-23 Annual CSI Show and Convention Construction Specifications Institute McCormick Place Chicago 800/689-2900 www.csinet.org Sept. 6-7 IV ACI/CANMET International Conference American Concrete Institute/IBRACO—Brazilian Concrete Institute Olinda, Brazil +55 11 3767 4106 www.furnas.com.br/hpc2005 May 19-21 The AIA National Convention and Design Exposition American Institute of Architects Mandalay Bay Convention Center Las Vegas 800/242-3837 www.aiaconvention.com Sept. 12-14 HRC International Historic Preservation Education Symposium American Institute of Architects Historic Resources Committee University of Bath Bath, UK 800/242-3837 or 202/626-7300 www.aia.org June 8-10 Nanotechnology in Coatings: Realizing the Potential Conference Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology (FSCT) Seattle 610/940-0777 www.coatingstech.org fax: 610.940.0292; email: fsct@coatingstech.org). June 10-11 BETEC 2004 Spring Symposium Membranes in Enclosure Wall Systems Building Environment & Thermal Envelope Council National Institute of Building Sciences Crystal City Marriott Hotel Arlington, VA 202/289-7800 www.nibs.org June 25-28 BOMA International Congress and Office Building Show Building Owners and Managers Association International and Realcomm Anaheim, CA 202/408-2662 www.boma.org 72 Sept. 15-17 AISC Annual Meeting 2005 American Institute of Steel Construction St. Regis Monarch Beach Dana Point, CA 312/670-5438 www.aisc.org Sept. 17-23 Prague: 20th Century Architecture in Transition— From Monarchy to Democracy, from Communism to Civil Society American Institute of Architects Hotel Alcron Prague, Czech Republic 800/242-3837 or 202/626-7300 www.aia.org Sept. 25-27 Coating Wood and Wood Composites Conference (FSCT Advances in Coatings Series) Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology Marriott Charlotte Executive Park Charlotte, NC 610/940-0777 www.coatingstech.org Oct. 19-22 AAH Fall Conference: Realizing a Sustainable Architecture for Health American Institute of Architects Westin Century Plaza Hotel & Spa Los Angeles, CA 800/242-3837 or 202/626-7300 www.aia.org Oct. 23-25 NPCA 2005 Annual Meeting National Paint & Coatings Association Cleveland, OH 202/462-6272 www.paint.org Nov. 3-4 ICRI 2005 Fall Conference International Concrete Repair Institute J.W. Marriott Hotel New Orleans, LA 847/827-0830 www.icri.org Nov. 6-9 Biennial Western Coatings Symposium and Show Western Coatings Societies and Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology (FSCT) Westin Casuarina Hotel & Spa Las Vegas, NV 610/940-0777 www.coatingstech.org Nov. 6-10 ACI Fall Convention American Concrete Institute 248/848-3795 www.concrete.org Nov. 7-11 Greenbuild 2005 U.S. Green Building Council Atlanta, GA 202/828-7422 www.greenbuildexpo.org Journal of Architectural Coatings / April 2005 DEVFLEX Flexible Acrylic Adhesion ™ Take the STRE SS O ut o f A COMPLETE LINE OF Main tenanc e Painting ACRYLIC PRIMERS & FINISHES Devflex™ Acrylic Primers and Finishes offer you "flexibility" of choosing the right acrylic coating for your maintenance requirements. The Devflex range of waterborne acrylic coatings offers you a choice of finishes and performance features to match your project needs. Easy Use • Waterborne technology • Low Odor • Soap & Water Cleanup • Easy application Time & Money Savings Colors & Whites Stay Bright • Interior & Exterior uses • Non-Yellowing • Multiple surface uses • Chalk resistant • Multiple uses – residential, commercial & industrial applications • Keeps its color • Durable finish • Good color & gloss retention • Fewer products needed for a project • Moisture & UV resistant • Less waste • Flexible film THE POWER 8 0 0 - 6 5 4 - 2 6 1 6 • w w w. d evo e c o a t i n g s . c o m © 2003 ICI Paints, All Rights Reserved Performance TO PROTECT