link to document - El Dorado County Transportation Commission

Transcription

2016 El DORADO COUNTY
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (RTIP)
December 15, 2015
Prepared by:
El Dorado County Transportation Commission
2828 Easy Street, Suite 1
Placerville, CA 95667
(530) 642-5260
www.edctc.org
Regional Transportation Improvement Program Template - Page 1
EL DORADO COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
COMMISSIONERS
Wendy Thomas, Chair .............. Placerville City Council
Brian Veerkamp, Vice Chair ...... El Dorado County Supervisor, District 3
Patti Borelli................................ Placerville City Council
John Clerici ............................... Placerville City Council
Shiva Frentzen .......................... El Dorado County Supervisor, District 2
Ron “Mik” Mikulaco ................... El Dorado County Supervisor, District 1
Mike Ranalli .............................. El Dorado County Supervisor, District 4
Nieves Castro (non-voting) ....... Caltrans District 3
Vacant (non-voting) ................... South Lake Tahoe City Council
EDCTC STAFF
Sharon Scherzinger .................. Executive Director
Jerry Barton .............................. Senior Transportation Planner
Dan Bolster ............................... Senior Transportation Planner
Woodrow Deloria ...................... Senior Transportation Planner
Karen Thompson ...................... Administrative Services Officer
Joni Rice ................................... Executive Assistant/Secretary to the Commission
POLICY ADVISORY TEAM
El Dorado County Transit Authority
El Dorado Air quality Management District
El Dorado County Community Development Agency
Placerville Development and Engineering
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
Caltrans, District 3
City of Placerville
El Dorado County Air Quality Management District
El Dorado County Community Development Agency, Long-Range Planning Division
El Dorado County Community Development Agency Transportation Division
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (SSTAC)
Consolidated Transportation Service Agency
Potential Transit User – 60 years or Older
Potential Transit User – Commuter
Potential Transit User – Handicapped
Social Service Provider – Limited Means
Social Service Provider – Handicapped
Social Service Provider – Seniors
Table of Contents
A. Overview and Schedule
Section 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................ 4
Section 2. General Information ........................................................................................ 5
Section 3. Background of Regional Transportation Improvement Program ...................... 5
Section 4. Completion of Prior RTIP Projects .................................................................. 6
Section 5. RTIP Outreach and Participation .................................................................... 7
B. 2016 STIP Regional Funding Request
Section 6. 2016 STIP Regional Share and Request for Programming ............................. 8
Section 7. Outside Funding Sources included in RTIP .................................................... 9
Section 8. Interregional Improvement Program Funding ............................................... 10
Section 9. Projects Planned Within the Corridor ............................................................ 10
C. Relationship of RTIP to RTP/SCS and Benefits of RTIP
Section 10. Regional Level Performance Evaluation ..................................................... 10
Section 11. Regional and Statewide Benefits of RTIP ................................................... 15
D. Performance and Effectiveness of RTIP
Section 12. Evaluation of the Cost Effectiveness of the RTIP ........................................ 15
Section 13. Project Specific Evaluation ......................................................................... 18
E. Detailed Project Information
Section 14. Overview of Projects Programmed with Regional Funding ......................... 18
F. Appendices
Appendix A: 2016 EDCTC RTIP PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST FORMS
Appendix B: EDCTC 2016 RTIP Resolution
Appendix C: Location Map and Project Illustration
A. OVERVIEW AND SCHEDULE
Section 1. Executive Summary
Executive Summary
For the 2016 RTIP, EDCTC supports maintaining the existing programming level for the
Western Placerville Interchanges (WPI) Phase 2 project. In the 2014 RTIP, the CTC approved a
total of $5,542,000 for the WPI and $500,000 State Route 49 Bridge, South Fork American
River in Coloma: Construction of Bicycle Pedestrian Components. No additional funding is being
requested, only funding previously programmed to ensure the projects remain on schedule for
completion. The Western Placerville Interchanges Phase 2 project Right-of-Way Certification
and full plans, specifications, and estimates will be completed to allow the City of Placerville to
submit the Request for Authorization to Caltrans in June 2016 two months in advance of the
August 2016 CTC meeting. The State Route 49 Bridge, South Fork American River in Coloma:
Construction of Bicycle Pedestrian Components – $500,000, as part of the 2014 STIP, will come
to the Commission for an allocation in the late spring of 2016. Maintaining the current
programming schedule and funding level will ensure the bike and pedestrian elements are
finished in conjunction with the completion of the bridge project.
Critical Reasons for Retaining Current Programming
The project proposed in this 2016 RTIP is consistent with the 2015 El Dorado County Regional
Transportation Plan (RTP) and Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)
Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategies (MTP/SCS).
Western Placerville Interchanges Project is planned for construction in coordination with a parkand-ride lot and Class I bike/ped path all of which is dependent on construction beginning in
September of 2016. The Western Placerville Interchanges Project will support the construction
of the $80 million Placerville Superior Court and justice center adjacent to the project which will
serve as a primary employment and activity center for this area of El Dorado County.
The following outlines the EDCTC 2016 RTIP Proposal:
Western Placerville Interchanges Phase 2 Construction – Eastbound US 50 Off Ramp to
Ray Lawyer Drive and Associated Improvements to Forni Road and Ray Lawyer Drive
and Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities– $5,542,000
Retain Existing Programming Level of $5,542,000 in FY 2016/17
Other State and Local Funding Allocated $11,603,240
EDCTC Planning, Programming and Monitoring – $350,000
Program $70,000 for FY 2016/17, $70,000 for FY 2017/18, and $70,000 for FY 2018/19,
$70,000 for FY 2019/20 and $70,000 for FY 2020/21 for EDCTC Planning, Programming, and
Monitoring activities.
Section 2. General Information
Insert contact information in the text fields below.
-
Regional Agency Name
-
Agency website links for Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP)
and Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). (insert links below)
-
-
-
Regional Agency Website Link:
http://www.edctc.org
RTIP document link:
http://www.edctc.org/RTIP
RTP link:
http://www.edctc.org/3/RTP2015-2035.html
Executive Director Contact Information
Name
Sharon Scherzinger
Title
Executive Director
Email
sscherzinger@edctc.org
Telephone 530-642-5260
RTIP Staff Contact Information
Name
Woodrow Deloria
Title Senior Transportation Planner
Address
2828 Easy Street Suite 1
City/State
Placerville, CA
Zip Code
95667
Email
wdeloria@edctc.org
Fax
Click here to enter text.
California Transportation Commission (CTC) Staff Contact Information
Name
Laurel Janssen
Title Deputy Director
Address
1120 N Street
City/State
Sacramento, CA
Zip Code
95814
Email
laurel.janssen@dot.ca.gov
Fax
916-653-2134
Section 3. Background of Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP)
A. What is the Regional Transportation Improvement Program?
The Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) is a program of highway, local road,
transit, and active transportation projects that a region plans to fund with State and Federal
revenue programmed by the California Transportation Commission in the State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP). The RTIP is developed biennially by the regions and is due to
the Commission by December 15 of every odd numbered year. The program of projects in the
RTIP is a subset of projects in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), a federally mandated
master transportation plan which guides a region’s transportation investments over a 20 to 25
year period. The RTP is based on all reasonably anticipated funding, including federal, state
and local sources. Updated every 4 to 5 years, the RTP is developed through an extensive
public participation process in the region and reflects the unique mobility, sustainability, and air
quality needs of each region and is consistent with the SACOG MTP/SCS.
B. Regional Agency’s Historical and Current Approach to developing the RTIP
Provide narrative on your historical and current approach to developing the RTIP in the text field
below:
The primary planning document which guides transportation planning, investment priorities,
and ultimately delivery is the RTP, updated every five years. The RTP illustrates the regional
transportation goals, objectives, policies, and performance measures within a fiscally
constrained framework of short term and long term transportation projects and programs.
EDCTC staff works very closely with the City of Placerville, El Dorado County, El Dorado
Transit, Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, Caltrans, Air District, Public Health, and
SACOG in the development of the RTP. We also have a RTP Advisory Committee that includes
representatives from the agritourism industry, transit advisory group, police and fire, building,
youth, Chamber of Commerce, Cameron Park CSD, Tax Payers Association, education, Tahoe
Transportation District, TMPO, El Dorado Hills CSD, airport, pedestrian and bicycle advocates,
SAGE, elderly, El Dorado Community Foundation, County Parks and Trails, and trucking
industry. In preparation for each RTIP cycle, EDCTC staff works with these partner agencies
and groups to prioritize projects, included within the current RTP, for consideration in the RTIP.
This efforts has included numerous public hearings held during RTP updates as well as public
forum during Draft 2016 RTIP presentation to the EDCTC Board. Many of the projects
submitted in a RTIP have been part of an ongoing planning process, as outlined, dating back
over multiple RTP cycles. For example, the Western Placerville Interchanges Project dates
back prior to the 2000 RTP process.
Section 4. Completion of Prior RTIP Projects (Required per Section 68)
Provide narrative on projects completed between the adoption of the 2016 RTIP and the
adoption of the previous 2014 RTIP in text field below as is required per Section 68 of the STIP
Guidelines.
El Dorado Trail Class I Bike Path, City of Placerville: Forni Road/Lower Main Street to Ray
Lawyer Drive – $250,000 Completed May 2015. EDCTC and partner agencies have been
moving forward with engineering design and approval documents on time and within budget
since approval of this programming during the 2014 RTIP.
Insert project information for completed projects in table below.
Project Name and
Location
El Dorado Trail Class
I Bike Path, City of
Description
Class I Bike Path from Forni
Road/Lower Main Street to Ray
Lawyer Drive – $250,000
Summary of
Improvements/Benefits
Completion of
approximately one mile
of Class I Bike Path
Placerville
connecting the commercial
core and employment
center reducing GHG and
improving active
transportation options.
State Route 49 Bridge Replacement, South Fork American River in Coloma: Construction
of Bicycle Pedestrian Components – $500,000 Allocation Spring 2016. This project is the
bicycle and pedestrian component of a Caltrans SR 49 Bridge seismic retrofit project. SHOPP
funding is $9,100,000 for the bridge replacement. Maintaining the current STIP programming
level of $500,000 for this project in the Allocation Plan will ensure the bike and pedestrian
elements are finished in conjunction with the completion of the bridge project.
Project Name and
Location
State Route 49
Bridge Replacement,
South Fork American
River in Coloma:
Construction of
Bicycle and
Pedestrian
Components
Description
Construction of Bicycle and
Pedestrian Components
Summary of
Improvements/Benefits
The bike/ped project
connects the commercial,
recreation and residential
areas of Coloma, Lotus and
Marshall State Park. This
project provides active
transportation options,
decreases GHG and
increases safety.
Section 5. RTIP Outreach and Participation
Insert dates below – Regional agencies can add rows to the schedule – Rows included below
should remain for consistency.
A.
RTIP Development and Approval Schedule
Action
EDCTC Adopts 2015 RTP (Including Public Hearings/EIR)
CTC adopts Fund Estimate and Guidelines
Caltrans identifies State Highway Needs
EDCTC Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Review Draft
2016 RTIP
EDCTC approves Draft 2016 RTIP
EDCTC Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Review Final
2016 RTIP
EDCTC adopts 2016 RTIP
Caltrans submits draft ITIP
CTC ITIP Hearing, North
CTC ITIP Hearing, South
Regions submit RTIP to CTC
Caltrans submits ITIP to CTC
CTC STIP Hearing Date – North Hearing
CTC STIP Hearing Date – South Hearing
CTC publishes staff recommendations
CTC Adopts 2016 STIP
Date
September 3, 2015
August 27, 2015
September 15, 2015
October 26, 2015
November 5, 2015
November 23, 2015
December 3, 2015
October 15, 2015
October 28, 2015
November 4, 2015
December 15, 2015
December 15, 2015
January 21, 2016
January 26, 2016
February 19, 2016
March 16-17, 2016
B. Public Participation/Project Selection Process
Provide narrative on your agency’s public participation process and project selection process for
your RTIP in the text field below.
EDCTC has followed the same process as outlined in the historical RTIP process discussed in
Section 3.B of this template. Projects included in the 2016 RTIP were vetted through a public
and stakeholder process. Each project was prioritized and selected through the EDCTC
Technical Advisory Committee as well as public and stakeholder input. The 2005, 2010, and
2015 RTPs involved the City of Placerville, El Dorado County, El Dorado Transit, Shingle
Springs Band of Miwok Indians, Caltrans, Air District, Public Health, and SACOG in the ultimate
development of the 2016 RTIP. We also have a RTP Advisory Committee that includes
representatives from the agritourism industry, transit advisory group, police and fire, building,
youth, Chamber of Commerce, Cameron Park CSD, Tax Payers Association, education, Tahoe
Transportation District, TMPO, El Dorado Hills CSD, airport, pedestrian and bicycle advocates,
SAGE, elderly, El Dorado Community Foundation, Parks and Trails, and trucking industry. In
preparation for each RTIP cycle, EDCTC staff works with these partner agencies and groups to
prioritize projects, included within the current 2015 RTP, for consideration in the 2016 RTIP.
This efforts has included numerous public hearings held during RTP update as well as public
forum during Draft 2016 RTIP presentation to the EDCTC Board. EDCTC staff worked very
closely with Caltrans, the City of Placerville, and El Dorado County staff to prioritize and select
the 2016 RTIP projects for consideration by the public and approval of the EDCTC Board.
C. Consultation with Caltrans District (Required per Section 17)
Insert the Caltrans District Number in the text field below.
Caltrans District: 3
Provide narrative on consultation with Caltrans District staff in the text field below as is required
per Section 17 of the STIP Guidelines.
Caltrans serves as a partner member of the EDCTC Technical Advisory Committee and the
RTP Advisory Committee each of which were heavily involved with the project. EDCTC has
worked extensively with Caltrans District 3 staff on the Western Placerville Interchanges project.
Caltrans serves as a member of the Project Development Team, as well as the approving entity
for the Project Study Report and supplemental EIR.
B. 2016 STIP Regional Funding Request
Section 6. 2016 STIP Regional Share and Request for Programming
Per the STIP Guidelines, the 2016 Fund Estimate indicates that the STIP is already fully
programmed for the entire five years of the 2016 STIP. This is due primarily to the
decrease in the price based excise tax. Projects currently programmed in the STIP will
need to be reprogrammed into later years. The CTC will not be providing regional shares
for the 2016 STIP.
A. 2016 Regional Fund Share Per 2016 STIP Fund Estimate
Insert your agency’s target share per the STIP Fund Estimate in the text field below.
Not applicable for the 2016 STIP Period due to the lack of funding available for
programming. EDCTC is requesting to retain existing 2014 RTIP programming in order
to be successful in the delivery of the proposed projects and leverage existing funding
and partnerships.
B. Summary of Requested Programming – Insert information in table below
Project Name and Location
Project Description
Western Placerville
Interchanges Phase 2
Eastbound US 50 Off Ramp to Ray Lawyer
Drive and associated improvements to
Forni Road, Ray Lawyer Drive and bicycle,
pedestrian, and transit facilities
Planning, Programming, and Monitoring
Efforts
EDCTC Planning, Programming
and Monitoring
Requested
RIP Amount
$5,542,000
Existing 2014
STIP
Programming
$350,000
($70K/year)
Section 7. Overview of other funding included with delivery of Regional Improvement
Program (RIP) projects.
Provide narrative on other funding included with the delivery of projects included in your RTIP.
Insert information in the table below.
Western Placerville Interchanges Project Phase 2
In December of 2013, EDCTC submitted the Regional Transportation Improvement Program
(RTIP) to the California Transportation Commission, including $5,542,000 State Transportation
Improvement Program funds for Phase 2 of the Western Placerville Interchanges Project. The
funding is programmed in fiscal year 2016/17, and construction is anticipated to begin during
that fiscal year. The project phases are currently being designed with SAFETEA-LU and
Appropriations funds programmed to the Western Placerville Interchanges project. On March 6,
2014, EDCTC programmed $1,100,000 in CMAQ funds to this project to support the
construction of bicycle and pedestrian elements including a Class I Bike Path from Ray Lawyer
Drive to connect with the existing trail segment at Forni Road. Additionally Public
Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement funding in the amount
of $1.3 million is being utilized to construct a Park-and-Ride Lot/Transit Center to support transit
service. The Western Placerville Interchanges RTIP funded project also is necessary as access
to a new courthouse that is funded with $80 million in Department of Justice funding (Please
see attached site plan).
Section 8. Interregional Improvement Program (ITIP) Funding – OPTIONAL
The purpose of the Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) is to improve
interregional mobility for people and goods in the State of California. As an interregional
program the ITIP is focused on increasing the throughput for highway and rail corridors of
strategic importance outside the urbanized areas of the state. A sound transportation network
between and connecting urbanized areas ports and borders is vital to the state’s economic
vitality. The ITIP is prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 14526, Streets and
Highways Code Section 164 and the STIP Guidelines. The ITIP is a five-year program
managed by Caltrans and funded with 25% of new STIP revenues in each cycle. Developed
in cooperation with regional transportation planning agencies to ensure an integrated
transportation program, the ITIP promotes the goal of improving interregional mobility and
connectivity across California.
If requesting ITIP funding, provide narrative on your request in the text field below.
N/A
Section 9. Projects Planned Within the Corridor (Required per Section 20)
Provide a description of the project’s impact on other projects planned or underway within the
corridor as required per Section 20 of the STIP Guidelines.
N/A
C. Relationship of RTIP to RTP/SCS/APS and Benefits of RTIP
Section 10. Regional Level Performance Evaluation (per Section 19A of the guidelines)
Provide an evaluation of system performance and how your RTIP furthers the goals of the
region’s RTP, and if applicable, your Sustainable Communities Strategy as required per Section
19A of the STIP Guidelines. Each region that is a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) or
within an MPO shall include an evaluation of overall (RTP level) performance using, as a
baseline, the region’s existing monitored data. To the extent relevant data and tools area
available, the performance measures listed in Table B1 below may be reported.
Regions outside a MPO shall include any of the measures listed in Table B1 (below) that the
region currently monitors. A region outside a MPO (or a small MPO) may request, and Caltrans
shall provide, data on these measures relative to the state transportation system in that region.
As an alternative, a region outside a MPO (or a small MPO) may use the Performance
Monitoring Indicators identified in the Rural Counties Task Force’s Rural and Small Urban
Transportation Planning study dated June 3, 2015. These include: Total Accident Cost, Total
Transit Operating Cost per Revenue Mile, Total Distressed Lane Miles, and Land Use Efficiency
(total developed land in acres per population).
The evaluation of overall performance shall include a qualitative or quantitative assessment of
how effective the RTIP or the ITIP is in addressing or achieving the goals, objectives and
standards which correspond to the relevant horizon years within the region’s RTP or Caltrans
ITSP that covers the five-year STIP period. Caltrans’ evaluation of the ITIP shall also address
ITIP consistency with the RTPs.
In addition, each region with an adopted sustainable communities strategy (SCS) or Alternate
Planning Scenario (APS) shall include a discussion of how the RTIP relates to its SCS or APS.
This will include a quantitative or qualitative assessment of how the RTIP will facilitate
implementation of the SCS or APS and also identify any challenges the region is facing in
implementing its SCS or APS. In a region served by a multi-county transportation planning
organization, the report shall address the portion of the SCS or APS relevant to that region. As
part of this discussion, each region shall identify any proposed or current STIP projects that are
exempt from SB 375.
Regional Level Performance Indicators and Measures (per Appendix B of the STIP
Guidelines).
Use the following table B1 to indicate quantitatively the overall regional level performance of
your Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). For regions outside a MPO, a second table B1(a)
may be used in addition or as a replacement to B1. Table B1(a) is included on the next page.
Table B1
Evaluation – Regional Level Performance Indicators and Measures
Goal
Indicator/Measure
Current System
Projected System
Performance
Performance
(Baseline)
(indicate
timeframe)
Congestion
Vehicle Miles Traveled
37.6
TBD
Reduction
(VMT) per capita.
Percent of congested
N/A
N/A
VMT (at or below 35 mph)
Commute mode share
79% Single/Vehicle
TBD
(travel to work or school)
10% Carpool
2.05% Transit
8.95% Other
Infrastructure
Condition
Percent of distressed
state highway lane-miles
Pavement Condition
Index (local streets and
roads)
Percent of highway bridge
lane-miles in need of
replacement or
rehabilitation (sufficiency
rating of 80 or below)
Percent of transit assets
that have surpassed the
FTA useful life period
27%
(US Hwy 50)
65
TBD
71%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
System
Reliability
Safety
Economic
Vitality
Environmental
Sustainability
Highway Buffer Index (the
extra time cushion that
most travelers add to their
average travel time when
planning trips to ensure
on-time arrival)
Fatalities and serious
injuries per capita
Fatalities and serious
injuries per VMT
Percent of housing and
jobs within 0.5 miles of
transit stops with frequent
transit service
Mean commute travel
time (to work or school)
Change in acres of
agricultural land
CO2 emissions reduction
per capita
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
0
No change
No change
71.5
TBD
0
0
.34 lbs
TBD
Table B1(a) Evaluation
Rural Specific Regional Level Performance Indicators and Measures
Goal
Indicator/Measure
Current System Projected
Performance
System
(Baseline)
Performance
(indicate
timeframe)
Congestion/
Vehicle Miles Traveled per capita,
Delay/
area, by facility ownership, and/or
VMT
local vs tourist
Peak Volume/Capacity Ratio or
Thresholds (threshold volumes
based on HCM 2010)
Mode Share/Split Journey to Work, Work
Trips/commute (drive alone,
carpool, transit, bike/walk (A18)
Safety
Total Accident Cost per capita,
per VMT
Transit
Total operating cost per revenue
mile
Infrastructure
Distressed lane-miles, total and
Condition
percent, by jurisdiction
Pavement Condition Index (local
streets and roads)
Land Use
Land Use Efficiency (total
developed land/population and
rate of urbanization over time.
Also, farmland conversion)
If Part A tables B1 and/or B1(a) are insufficient in indicating how progress towards attaining
goals and objectives contained in each RTP is assessed and measured, include the following
information:
• List your performance measures.
• Provide a quantitative and/or qualitative analysis (include baseline measurement and projected
program or project impact).
• State the reason(s) why selected performance measure or measures are accurate and useful
in measuring performance. Please be specific.
• Identify any and all deficiencies encountered in as much detail as possible
For qualitative explanations, state how progress towards attaining goals and objectives
contained in each RTP is assessed and measured.
EDCTC is not subject to requirements for the development of an SCS as a member agency
within the SACOG region. Consequently, EDCTC relies on the SACOG MTP/SCS to perform
regional air quality conformity analysis and determination as required under SB 375. However,
EDCTC has provided a matrix to illustrate how the 2016 RTIP will achieve the goals and
objectives of the 2015-2035 El Dorado County Regional Transportation Plan. The matrix
illustrates each goal/objective that will be addressed with those capital projects included in the
2016 RTIP in relation to the Performance Measures that will be utilized toward the achievement
of those relevant goals/objectives. In order to provide a qualitative performance evaluation the
following discussion provides an overview of how the capital projects included in the 2016 RTIP
will be monitored with respect to each broad performance measure category. Each
performance measure category has multiple detailed performance measures that will be
reviewed in greater detail for performance evaluation analysis. Those detailed performance
measures are also shown in the RTP performance measure matrix previously discussed and
attached below. EDCTC has and will continue to work with SACOG and other regional partners
to establish baseline data and monitor performance of the system as projects are delivered.
Both projects are consistent with the SACOG MTP/SCS greenhouse gas emission reduction
targets. The performance measures contained within the current RTP which are relevant to the
2016 RTIP projects are listed in the attached matrix below.
El Dorado County Regional Transportation Plan 2015-2035
Qualitative Performance Indicators and Measures (PM) Utilized for Capital Projects within
the 2016 RTIP
PM: Congestion Reduction
Baseline: Currently no transit or bike/pedestrian facilities are located within the limits of the
2016 RTIP project. Furthermore, all intersections in the vicinity of the Western Placerville
Interchanges project operate with severe congestion during both the AM and PM peak
hours, resulting in congestion on US 50 from backups at the off-ramp intersections.
Post Project: The project will increase or create all together new access to transit and
active transportation modes thusly reducing VMT per capita in the region. The Western
Placerville Interchanges project includes a class I bike path and a park-and-ride lot to
support El Dorado Transit commuter and other services. The project will also reduce
congestion, improve travel times, and decrease travel time variability. The project will
support peak hour capacity and improve Level of Service (LOS) at each of the four
intersections.
PM: Reliability
Baseline: All intersections in the vicinity of the Western Placerville Interchanges project
operate with severe congestion during both the AM and PM peak hours, resulting in
congestion on US 50 from backups at the off-ramp intersections. El Dorado Transit service
currently operates in a park-and-ride lot which is subject to this congestion resulting in
lessor levels of highway and transit reliability.
Post Project: Relocating the park-and-ride lot in a more efficient area adjacent the
interchange and the interchange improvements will increase highway and transit time
reliability.
PM: Economic Vitality
Baseline: The Western Placerville Interchange project area is near a large employment
center which has limited east-west access via US Hwy 50 and limited bicycle and
pedestrian facilities supporting the employment center connectivity to Downtown Placerville.
Post Project:
The project, bicycle/ped, park-and-ride lot and transit facilities provide access to
Placerville’s historic downtown and government center. The Western Placerville
Interchanges project will improve mobility and efficiency of the transportation system
through increased connectivity to planned development of employment and commercial
centers. The project will create access to services and amenities for the approximately 500
employees of the existing El Dorado County Government Center as well as the anticipated
279 Justice Center Court staff and18 judicial positions.
PM: Location Efficiency
Baseline: The Western Placerville Interchange project area is near a large employment
center which has limited east-west access via US Hwy 50.
Post Project: The Western Placerville Interchanges project will improve multi-modal
mobility and efficiency of the transportation system through increased connectivity to
planned development of employment and commercial centers. The project will improve
access to services and amenities for the approximately 500 employees of the existing El
Dorado County Government Center as well as the anticipated 279 Justice Center Court
staff and 18 judicial positions. Furthermore, the project will keep courthouse and
government center activities near downtown Placerville and offer multi-modal connections
between downtown and the employment centers.
PM: Reliable Mobility
Baseline: The existing Western Placerville Interchange does not have sufficient capacity
to accommodate peak hour traffic volumes. Each of the four intersections associated
with the Western Placerville Interchanges project will experience LOS F conditions
during peak hours in the design year 2035.
Post Project: The project will reduce congestion, improve travel times, and decrease
travel time variability. The project will support peak hour capacity and improve Level of
Service (LOS) at each of the four intersections. Improved multi-modal transportation
opportunities including better bike and pedestrian connections to transit will improve
mobility of the local community.
PM: Health and Safety
Baseline: US 50 between the Placerville Drive/US 50 Overcrossing and the Ray Lawyer
Drive Overcrossing experiences accident rates at or above the statewide average for
westbound traffic and higher than average accident rates for eastbound traffic.
Furthermore, limited bicycle and pedestrian access is located in the vicinity of Western
Placerville Interchanges project.
Post Project: The project will relieve congestion from the Western Placerville Interchanges
and ultimately will improve congestion related traffic safety on mainline US 50 at and near
the interchange with the construction of the Class I bike path. The Western Placerville
Interchanges project will encourage transit with the development of the transit and parkand-ride facilities.
PM: Environmental Stewardship
Baseline: Congestion, high VMT, and limited multi-modal access and opportunity
contribute to higher levels of vehicle emissions than are desired for the region.
Post Project: The 2016 RTIP includes bike/pedestrian and transit facilities which will
improve emissions and reduce greenhouse gasses. Furthermore, the improvements to
the Western Placerville Interchange will improve operations on US Hwy 50 and surface
streets in the area as well as improve transit service and throughput, all of which will
reduce emissions.
Section 11. Regional and Statewide Benefits of RTIP
Provide qualitative narrative on the Regional and Statewide benefits of RTIP in text field below.
The 2016 RTIP for El Dorado County will provide the following regional and interregional
transportation benefits.
-
-
Provide improved access to and from a primary employment center via US Hwy 50
Create a new park-and-ride and transit center facility to offer modal choices to
employees and other residents
Build upon a growing active transportation system by creating new Class I and II bicycle
routes as well as sidewalks and pedestrian amenities connecting primary government,
employment, and commercial centers
Reduce congestion and potential for accidents and delay by constructing a US Hwy 50
ramp and improving access to active transportation and transit
Improve system performance and reduce VMT to contribute to the emissions reductions
targets desired for the region and the state
D. Performance and Effectiveness of RTIP
Section 12. Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness of RTIP (Required per Section 19)
Per Section 19B and Appendices B of the STIP Guidelines, regions shall, if appropriate and to
the extent necessary data and tools are available, use the performance measures in Table B2
below to evaluate cost-effectiveness of projects proposed in the STIP on a regional level.
EDCTC does not have the data or tools necessary to execute this effort at this time. However,
the current RTP does include the development of performance measures that will, once
baseline data is established, be applied to this analysis.
Table B2 Evaluation
Cost-Effectiveness Indicators and Measures
Goal
Indicator/Measure Current
Projected
Level of
Performance
Performance
Improvement
(Baseline)
(indicate
timeframe)
Congestion
Reduce Vehicle
Reduction
Miles Traveled
Reduce Percent of
congested VMT (at
or below 35 mph)
Change in
commute mode
share (travel to
work or school)
Infrastructure Reduce percent of
Condition
distressed state
highway lane-miles
Improve Pavement
Condition Index
(local streets and
roads)
Reduce percent of
highway bridge
lane-miles in need
of replacement or
rehabilitation
(sufficiency rating
of 80 or below)
Reduce percent of
transit assets that
have surpassed
the FTA useful life
period
System
Reduce Highway
Reliability
Buffer Index (the
time cushion
added to the
average commute
travel times to
ensure on-time
arrival).
Safety
Reduce fatalities
and serious injuries
per capita
Reduce fatalities
and serious injuries
per VMT
Economic
Increase percent of
Vitality
housing and jobs
within 0.5 miles of
transit stops with
frequent transit
service
Reduce mean
commute travel
time (to work or
school)
Environmental Change in acres of
Sustainability agricultural land
CO2 emissions
reduction per
capita
Table B2(a) Evaluation
Rural Specific Cost Effectiveness Indicators and Measures
Goal
Indicator/Measure
Current System Projected
Performance
Performance
(Baseline)
(indicate
timeframe)
Congestion/
Change in VMT
Delay/
Change in peak volumes
VMT
Change in delay
Mode Share/Split
Safety
Transit
Infrastructure
Condition
Land Use
Change in Mode Share/Split
Change in accident cost per
capita and accident cost per
VMT
Change in cost per revenue mile
Change percent of distressed
lane-miles
Change Pavement Condition
Index (local streets and roads)
Change in percentage of
developed land/population.
Reduction in farmland
conversion.
Section 13. Project Specific Evaluation (Required per Section 19)
Each RTIP shall include a project specific benefit evaluation for each new project proposed that
addresses the changes to the built environment, including, but limited to the items listed on page
9 of the STIP Guidelines. A project level evaluation shall be submitted for projects for which
construction is proposed if:
-
The total amount of existing and proposed STIP for right-of-way and/or construction of the
project is $15 million or greater, or (N/A)
The total project cost is $50 million or greater. (N/A)
The project level benefit evaluation shall include a Caltrans generated benefit/cost estimate,
including life cycle costs for projects proposed in the ITIP. For the RTIP, the regions may
choose between the Caltrans estimate and their own estimate (explain why the Caltrans
estimate was not used). The project level benefit evaluation must explain how the project is
consistent with Executive Order B-30-15 (Climate Change).
The STIP Guidelines state that this evaluation should be included in the PPRs (Section 15 of
the RTIP Template).
Detailed Project Information
Section 14. Overview of projects programmed with RIP funding
Provide summary of projects programmed with RIP funding including maps in the text field
below as required per Section 19 of the STIP Guidelines.
Western Placerville Interchanges Phase 2 Construction – Eastbound US 50 Off Ramp to
Ray Lawyer Drive and Associated Improvements to Forni Road and Ray Lawyer Drive
and Bike, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities – $5,542,000
Retain Existing Programming Level of $5,542,000 in FY 2016/17.
EDCTC Planning, Programming and Monitoring – $350,000
Program $70,000 for FY 2016/17, $70,000 for FY 2017/18, and $70,000 for FY 2018/19,
$70,000 for FY 2019/20 and $70,000 for FY 2020/21 for EDCTC Planning, Programming, and
Monitoring activities.
A location map and phasing plans for the project included in the 2016 RTIP are in Appendix C.
The EDCTC 2016 RTIP Project Totals table below illustrates the schedule requested for
programming.
Proposed Projects
Western
Placerville
Interchanges
EDCTC
TOTAL
EDCTC 2016 RTIP Project Totals by Fiscal Year
Programming Schedule
2015/16
2016/17
2017/18 2018/19
Eastbound
US 50 off
ramp to Ray
Lawyer Drive
and
associated
improvements
to Forni Road,
Ray Lawyer
Drive and
bike/ped
facilities
Planning,
Programming,
and
Monitoring
2019/20
$5,542,000
Total
$5,542,000
$70,000
$70,000
$70,000
$70,000
$70,000
$350,000
$70,000
$5,612,000
$70,000
$70,000
$70,000
$5,892,000
APPENDIX A
2016 EDCTC RTIP PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST FORMS
1)
Western Placerville Interchanges; Construction – Eastbound US 50 off ramp to
Ray Lawyer Drive and Associated Improvements to Forni Road, Ray Lawyer
Drive and Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
2)
El Dorado County Transportation Commission; Planning, Programming, and
Monitoring
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ● DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST
DTP-0001 (Revised September 2013)
General Instructions
Amendment (Existing Project)
District
EA
03
County
Route/Corridor
ED
50
Project Manager/Contact
Date:
Project ID
PM Bk PM Ahd
16.5
16.5
Phone
PPNO
1217A
MPO ID
10/1/15
TCRP No.
Project Sponsor/Lead Agency
City of Placerville
MPO
Element
SACOG
CO
E-mail Address
Rebecca Neves
(530)642-5529
rneves@cityofplacerville.org
Project Title
Western Placerville Interchanges Phase 2
Location, Project Limits, Description, Scope of Work
In the City of Placerville, on US 50 at Ray Lawer Drive. Upgrade Interchange. Construct Eastbound US 50
offramp and associated improvements to Forni Road and Ray Lawyer Drive.
Includes ADA Improvements
Includes Bike/Ped Improvements
Implementing Agency
Component
City of Placerville
PA&ED
City of Placerville
PS&E
City of Placerville
Right of Way
City of Placerville
Construction
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the project is to relieve congestion, improve traffic operations and accommodate projected 20year increases in traffic volumes at the Forni Road/Placerville Drive/US 50 Interchange through the provision of
new on- and off-ramps at the existing Ray Lawyer Drive Overcrossing. Currently, all intersections in the vicinity
of the Forni Road/Placerville Drive/US 50 interchange operate with severe congestion during both the AM and
PM peak hours, resulting in congestion on US 50 from backups atthe off-ramp intersections. The project
area's non-standard roadway geometrics and lack of alternative routes cause congestion and reduce traffic
safety for vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian travel.
Project Benefits
Supports Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Goals
Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Existing
Proposed
Project Milestone
Project Study Report Approved
Begin Environmental (PA&ED) Phase
/ /
Circulate Draft Environmental Document
/ /
Document Type EIR
/ /
Draft Project Report
End Environmental Phase (PA&ED Milestone)
11/01/05
Begin Design (PS&E) Phase
09/01/12
End Design Phase (Ready to List for Advertisement Milestone)
01/01/15
Begin Right of Way Phase
01/01/15
End Right of Way Phase (Right of Way Certification Milestone)
06/15/15
Begin Construction Phase (Contract Award Milestone)
07/15/16
End Construction Phase (Construction Contract Acceptance Milestone)
12/01/16
Begin Closeout Phase
01/15/16
End Closeout Phase (Closeout Report)
02/15/17
ADA Notice
For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD
(916) 654-3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Date:
Additional Information
ADA Notice
For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or
TDD (916) 654-3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.
10/1/15
District
03
Project Title:
County
ED , ,
Date:
Route
50, ,
EA
Project ID
PPNO
1217A
10/1/15
TCRP No.
Existing Total Project Cost ($1,000s)
Component
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
Prior
16/17
17/18
18/19
19/20
20/21
21/22+
123
1,840
Total
Implementing Agency
123 City of Placerville
1,840 City of Placerville
City of Placerville
R/W SUP (CT)
City of Placerville
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
5,542
100 City of Placerville
5,542 City of Placerville
5,542
7,605
100
2,063
Proposed Total Project Cost ($1,000s)
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
Notes
123
123
1,840
1,840
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
100
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 1:
2,063
100
5,542
5,542
5,542
7,605
RIP - National Hwy System (NH)
Program Code
20.XX.075.600
Existing Funding ($1,000s)
Component
Prior
16/17
17/18
18/19
19/20
20/21
21/22+
Total
Funding Agency
El Dorado Local Transportation Com
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
5,542
TOTAL
5,542
5,542
5,542
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
Notes
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
5,542
5,542
TOTAL
5,542
5,542
Fund No. 2:
Other State - State Cash (ST-CASH)
Program Code
20.XX.800.200
Component
E&P (PA&ED)
Prior
123
16/17
17/18
18/19
19/20
20/21
21/22+
Total
123
Funding Agency
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
123
123
E&P (PA&ED)
Notes
123
123
123
123
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
District
03
Project Title:
Fund No. 3:
County
ED , ,
Date:
Route
50, ,
EA
Project ID
PPNO
1217A
TCRP No.
Demo - Demonstration-State TEA21 (DEMOS21)
Program Code
20.30.010.680
Component
10/1/15
Prior
16/17
17/18
18/19
19/20
20/21
21/22+
Total
Funding Agency
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
1,840
1,840
100
100
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
1,940
1,940
Notes
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
1,840
1,840
100
100
1,940
1,940
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Program Code
Fund No. 4:
Component
Prior
16/17
17/18
18/19
19/20
20/21
21/22+
Total
Funding Agency
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Notes
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Program Code
Fund No. 5:
Component
Prior
16/17
17/18
18/19
19/20
20/21
21/22+
Total
Funding Agency
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Notes
Complete this page for amendments only
District
03
County
ED
Route
50
Date:
EA
Project ID
PPNO
1217A
10/1/15
TCRP No.
SECTION 1 - All Projects
Project Background
Programming Change Requested
Reason for Proposed Change
If proposed change will delay one or more components, clearly explain 1) reason the delay, 2) cost increase related
to the delay, and 3) how cost increase will be funded
Other Significant Information
SECTION 2 - For TCRP Projects Only
Alternative Project Request (Please follow Instructions at http://www.dot.ca.gov/tcrp/LETTERguidelines)
Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) (Please follow Guidelines at http://www.dot.ca.gov/tcrp/docs/042706.pdf)
Approvals
I hereby certify that the above information is complete and accurate and all approvals have been obtained for the processing
of this amendment request.*
Name (Print or Type)
Signature
Title
Date
Attachments
1) Concurrence from Implementing Agency and/or Regional Transportation Planning Agency
2) Project Location Map
General Instructions
Amendment (Existing Project)
District
EA
Project ID
03
0312000299
County
Route/Corridor PM Bk PM Ahd
ED
Project Manager/Contact
9/16/13
TCRP No.
Date:
PPNO
0L14
Phone
(530)642-5260
Sharon Scherzinger
Project Title
Planning, Programming and Monitoring
Location, Project Limits, Description, Scope of Work
Planning, programming and monitoring
MPO ID
ELD15710
Project Sponsor/Lead Agency
El Dorado Local Transportation Commission
MPO
Element
SACOG
LA
E-mail Address
sscherzinger@edctc.org
Includes ADA Improvements
Includes Bike/Ped Improvements
Implementing Agency
Component
Caltrans
PA&ED
Caltrans
PS&E
Caltrans
Right of Way
El Dorado Local Transportation Commission
Construction
Purpose and Need
Funding for eligible Planning, Programming, and Monitoring (PPM) activities.
Project Benefits
Supports Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Goals
Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Project Milestone
Existing
Proposed
Project Study Report Approved
Begin Environmental (PA&ED) Phase
Circulate Draft Environmental Document
Document Type
Draft Project Report
End Environmental Phase (PA&ED Milestone)
Begin Design (PS&E) Phase
End Design Phase (Ready to List for Advertisement Milestone)
Begin Right of Way Phase
End Right of Way Phase (Right of Way Certification Milestone)
Begin Construction Phase (Contract Award Milestone)
End Construction Phase (Construction Contract Acceptance Milestone)
Begin Closeout Phase
End Closeout Phase (Closeout Report)
ADA Notice
For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD
(916) 654-3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Date:
Additional Information
ADA Notice
For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or
TDD (916) 654-3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.
9/16/13
District
03
Project Title:
Date:
County
ED , ,
Route
, ,
EA
Project ID
0312000299
PPNO
0L14
9/16/13
TCRP No.
Planning, Programming and Monitoring
Existing Total Project Cost ($1,000s)
Component
Prior
14/15
15/16
16/17
17/18
18/19
19/20+
Total
E&P (PA&ED)
Implementing Agency
Caltrans
PS&E
Caltrans
R/W SUP (CT)
Caltrans
CON SUP (CT)
El Dorado Local Transportation
Caltrans
R/W
CON
1,942
TOTAL
1,942
69
140
2,151 El Dorado Local Transportation
69
140
2,151
Proposed Total Project Cost ($1,000s)
Notes
Spread the total $350,000 over the
five year 2016 STIP.
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
1,942
70
70
70
70
70
2,292
TOTAL
1,942
70
70
70
70
70
2,292
Fund No. 1:
RIP - State Cash (ST-CASH)
Program Code
20.30.600.670
Component
Prior
14/15
15/16
16/17
17/18
18/19
19/20+
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
1,942
69
TOTAL
1,942
69
Total
Funding Agency
El Dorado Local Transportation Com
$60 CON voted 01/21/99
$97 CON voted 08/26/99
$59 CON voted 07/01/00
$59 CON voted 07/01/01
$120 CON voted 10/03/02
2,151 $100 CON voted 02/26/04
2,151 $100 CON voted 03/03/05
$110 CON t Notes
d 08/18/05
E&P (PA&ED)
140
140
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
1,942
70
70
70
70
70
2,292
TOTAL
1,942
70
70
70
70
70
2,292
Program Code
Fund No. 2:
Component
Prior
14/15
15/16
16/17
17/18
18/19
19/20+
Total
Funding Agency
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Notes
Complete this page for amendments only
District
03
County
ED
Route
Date:
EA
Project ID
0312000299
PPNO
0L14
9/16/13
TCRP No.
Project Background
Programming Change Requested
Reason for Proposed Change
If proposed change will delay one or more components, clearly explain 1) reason the delay, 2) cost increase related
to the delay, and 3) how cost increase will be funded
Other Significant Information
SECTION 2 - For TCRP Projects Only
Alternative Project Request (Please follow Instructions at http://www.dot.ca.gov/tcrp/LETTERguidelines)
Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) (Please follow Guidelines at http://www.dot.ca.gov/tcrp/docs/042706.pdf)
Approvals
I hereby certify that the above information is complete and accurate and all approvals have been obtained for the processing
of this amendment request.*
Name (Print or Type)
Signature
Title
Date
Attachments
1) Concurrence from Implementing Agency and/or Regional Transportation Planning Agency
2) Project Location Map
APPENDIX B
EDCTC RESOLUTION 15/16.12
2828 Easy Street, Suite 1, Placerville, CA 95667 www.edctc.org 530.642.5260
Councilmembers Representing City of Placerville: Patty Borelli, John Clerici, Wendy Thomas
Supervisors Representing El Dorado County: Shiva Frentzen, Ron Mikulaco, Mike Ranalli, Brian Veerkamp
RESOLUTION 15/16.12
RESOLUTION OF THE EL DORADO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
ADOPTING THE 2016 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code, Title 7.95, Section 67950, the El Dorado
County Transportation Commission (EDCTC) was created as a local planning agency to provide
regional transportation planning for the area of El Dorado County, exclusive of the Lake Tahoe Basin;
and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 29532.1(g) identifies EDCTC as the designated
regional transportation planning agency for El Dorado County, exclusive of the Lake Tahoe Basin; and
WHEREAS, EDCTC desires to improve the transportation system in El Dorado County; and
WHEREAS, EDCTC has reviewed regional projects, considered comments from member jurisdictions
and considered public comment and correspondence regarding transportation projects; and
WHEREAS, State law requires the adoption of a Regional Transportation Improvement Program
(RTIP) by each Regional Transportation Planning Agency every two years for consideration by the
California Transportation Commission (CTC) as a component of the State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that EDCTC hereby certifies that the following project
nominations and recommendations constitute the El Dorado County 2016 RTIP and that the
Executive Director is authorized to submit the RTIP to the CTC:
Planning, Programming, and Monitoring (PPM)
$350,000
Fiscal Year 2015/16
$70,000
Fiscal Year 2016/17
$70,000
Fiscal Year 2017/18
$70,000
Fiscal Year 2018/19
$70,000
Fiscal Year 2019/20
$70,000
Transportation Alternatives Program (TE/TAP) 2014
State Route 49 Bridge: Construction of Bike/Ped Elements
South Fork of the American River in Coloma
$500,000
$500,000
APPENDIX C
LOCATION MAP AND PROJECT ILLUSTRATION
1)
Western Placerville Interchanges; Construction – Eastbound US 50 off ramp
to Ray Lawyer Drive and Associated Improvements to Forni Road and Ray
Lawyer Drive

link to document - El Dorado County Transportation Commission

Transcription

Similar documents

The Board of Directors of Qatar Fuel (WOQOD) is pleased to invite

Tree Mortality Workshop in El Dorado County

Annonce S1

Press Release-Scooby

Property Tax Allocation—El Dorado County

waiver guidelines jakarta incident

shopper guide.indd

Summer Reading 2016 - Mendon-Upton Regional School District

Internship Presentation

annual summer social - Pikes Peak Paralegals

View Flyer - Tottenham Hotspur

Collines en Forme - Municipalité de Val-des