Barend van der Heijden Embajada del Reino de los Países Bajos

Transcription

Barend van der Heijden Embajada del Reino de los Países Bajos
Mm"te, '0 dpl/\mb,,'nte
San Isidro,
Ot.cio N°
"Decenio de las Personas con Discapacidad en el Perú"
"Ano de la Consolidación E<¡OIl6mica YSocial del Perú"
o7 OCT. 2010
/'31-), -2010-SG/MINAM
•
Señor Embajador
Barend van der Heijden
Embajada del Reino de los Países Bajos
Presente.­
Proyecto Foro Perú Holanda sobre Gestión del Agua
Asunto
. Referencia
a) Su Carta sIr) de fecha 02 de agosto 2010
(Registro N° 9290-2010)
b) Informe N° 200-201 O-SG/DGCCDRH/DVMERN/MINAM
De mi especial consideración,
.Es grato dirigirme a usted para saludarlo cordialmente en relación al documento de la
referencia, Adenda al Acuerdo suscrito con la Representación a su cargo para la
ejecución
de la actividad del Proyecto "Foro Perú Holanda sobre Gestión del Agua".
.
.
Al respecto, la Dirección General de Cambio Climático Desertificación y Recursos Hídricos del Ministerio del Ambiente, mediante ·ellnforme de la referencia b) sustenta la reproglJilmací6n del presupuesto del Proyecto, consignándose los recursos que aportará el MINAM para la realización del "Foro Perú- Holan.da sobre Gestión del Agua" el cual tendrá lugar los días 21 y 22 de octubre del 2010, así como la vigencia del Acuerdo hasta diciemhre del 2010.
Se adjunta copia Qel informe y de la reprogramación presupuesta!. Sobre el particular, el Ministerio del Ambiente expresa su conformidad con el contenido de la citada Adenda la cual suscribo en dos ejemplares, haciendo llegar uno de ellos a su Representación para los· fines del caso. Sin otro particular y agradeciendo por el apoyo brindado para la realización de tan importante evento, hago propicia la ocasión para expresarle los sentimientos de mi especial consideración y estima personal Atentamente,
Secretario General
CVlCEF
ce: OCNII DGCCDRH
GOROON ANO BETTY
MOORE
Guillermo Castilleja
Chief Program OfficCI',
Environment
FOUNOATION
gui Uermo.casíi Ileja@n100fe.org
1
110
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
April 22, 2010
Dr. Antonio Brack Egg Ministro del Ambiente, Perú Av. Javier Prado Oeste 1440, San Isidro LimaPeru Email: abrack@minam.gob.pe
Ms. Julia Justo Executive Director, Fondo Nacional del Ambiente Calle Hermanos Quinteros 103 Urb. La Castellana, Santiago de Surco Lima 33 - PERU
/ ..¿;ú.Ei::¡>~mail: jjusto@fonamperu.org
I;g;~~;¡.)\"~ ~ ;'I')'.rf'4~..{
¡ ¡"c ,~"
~
' ~:
\"
,"­
,
Grant Award Letter Agreement for Ministerio del Ambiente, Republica del Peru
.ffi'ri
;;i"
t
\ .·<~/;'f:I~::'~~',;:'/
(#2242)
"''::':!._:::~'/' Dear Minister Brack and Ms. Justo:
On behalf of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (the "Foundation"), it is a pleasure to
inform you that the Ministerio del Ambiente, Republica del Peru ("MINAM") has been
awarded a grant in the amount ofPEN S/5,600, 166 (Five Million Six Hunrlred Thousand One
Hundred Sixty-Six Peruvian Nuevo Soles) the equivalent of US$1,972,931 (One Million
Nine Hundred Seventy-Two Thousand Nine Hi.mdred Thirty-One Dollars) ("Grant"). This
Grant is in support of the development of the instítutíonal, legal and technical capacíty of
MINAM and other relevant institutions involved in developing a Reduction in Emissions due
to Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) program in Peru. This grant will support the
preparatory phase of a national strategy to reduce emissions from deforestation, forest
degradation, and other forest sector activities (REDD+), as well as the selection and
implementation ofrelated activities REDD+ in several regions ofPeru.
Fondo Nacional del Ambiente (FONAM) ("Agent") has agreed to act as agent for the
F oundation for this Grant.
Gordon and ~etty Moore Foundation
Te!. 650-213-3000
1661 Page Mill Road
www.moore,org
Palo Alto. CA 94304
Fax 650-213-3003
.. Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, MINAM
Ms. J\llia Justo, FONAM
April13,2010
This Grant is to be used to aehieve the outeomes and/or outputs deseribed in Attaehment 1
(eolleetively "Purposes"), in aeeordanee with the payments and requirements plan in
Attaehment 2, and the budget in Attaehment 3 (the "Budget"). ~is grant award letter
agreement (ineluding all attaehments), is colleetively referred to as the "Grant Agreement."
By signing this Grant Agreement; MINAM and Agent agree to the following terms
eonneetion with the Foundation's Grant:
1.
In
Disbursement of Funding to Agent:
(a) Grant funds will be disbursed by the Foundation to an aeeount designated by
Agent aeeording to the schedule in Attachment 2, subject to the eonditions of
this Grant Agreement, and sueh funds will be used solely in eonformity with
the terms of this Grant Agreement.
(b) No gift or grant to Agent is ¡ntended by the Foundation's transfer to Agent of
the Grant funds pursuant to this Grant Agreement.
(e) Agent will provide the Foundation with funding instructions from its financial
institution, and will advise its financial institution that the Foundation's
ordering bank will be The Northem Trust Company. Ifthe Grant funds need
to go through an intermediary bank(s), Agent will provide this information to
the Foundation in the requisite order, with the reeeiving bank listed last.
Agent will provide all necessary bank codes, aeeount numbers and aeeount
names for eaeh institution, along with the name and telephone number of a
eontaet at Agent's organization who can answer questions regarding the
banking
information supplied
to Blake Barthold,
Aeeountant
(Blake.Barthold@moore.org).
(d) Grant funds will be disbursed in US Dollars to Agent according to the
schedule shown in Attaehment 2 subject to the conditions of this Grant
Agreement. The US Dollar disbursements will be the equivalent ofthe Nuevo
Soles payment amounts shown in Attachment 2 at the time of wire. The US
dollar equivalent of the Nuevo Soles payments may inerease or deerease over
time due to fluctuations in the foreign currency exehange rate, but in no event
will the Foundation disburse funds under this Grant having an aggregate US
dollar value in exeess ofUS$2,367,518 (120 percent ofthe US dollar value of
this Grant at the time of the award). To determine the aggregate value of all
disbursements for the purpose of the aboye limitation, the Foundation will use
the US dollar amount of eaeh disbursement ealculated as of the time it is
disbursed to Agent by the Foundation. Agent will exehange US dollars for
Nuevo Soles pursuant to the terms and eonditions in the Operations Manual
agreed to by Agent and MINAM and approved by the Foundation. Upon each
oeeasion that Agent exehanges Foundation funds through a contraet with its
bank, Agent will send a eopy of the official transaction doeument, stating the
exaet exehange rate and total value in Nuevo Soles, to Ana Villegas, Program
Offieer
(ana.villegas@moore.org) with a eopy to K.ristin Gilliss
(kristín.giJliss@moore.org).
2
(Gran! # 1956)
Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, MfNAM
Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM
April13,2010
(e). Funding for MINAM will not eonstitute part of the national budget of Peru
nor of any state therein.
2.
Payments; Disbursement ofFunding to MINAM:
(a) Payment Disbursements: Grant funds will be disbursed by Agent to MINAM
aeeording to Agent's policies and proeedures for hiring and proeurement as
defined in the Operations Manual, subjeet to the terms and eonditions of this
Grant Agreement.
.
(b) Use of Grant funds: Grant fundswiH be used solely for the purposes
deseribed in this Grant Agreement. Agent will repay to the Foundation any
portion of the amount granted that is not used for these purposes. Any ehange
in the purposes for which Grant funds are spent must be approved in writing
by the Foundation before implementation. Moreover, MINAM and Agent
must obtain the prior approval of the Foundation for any budget modification
that results in a variance to any subtotal line item in the Budget that exceeds
the lesser of 20 pereent or $500,000, whether or not the requested varianee
willaffect the Grant purposes. Subtotal Une items inelude salaries, eontract
fees, expenses and equipment. In addition, no reaHocation of Grant funds
may be made to a category of Overhead or Indirect Costs. MINAM
understands that this Grant is not a "gift," and understands and agrees that
funds are being granted to MINAM through Agent to pursue the Purposes
outlined in this Grant Agreement.
(e) Payment Contingencies: The Foundation's funding of future payments is
contingent upon (i) the Foundation's review ofMINAM's work in connection
with this Grant and its determination that satisfactory progress and
performance of the expected purposes is occurring, (H) the Foundation's
timely receipt and the Foundation's review and approval of Grant Reports and
other documentation to besubmitted by MINAM and Agent, and (iii)
MINAM's compliance with aH applicable laws and the terms and conditions
of this Grant Agreemenl. Grant funding may be curtailed or discontinued and
any advancements must be repaid if at any time Grant purposes are not meto
(d) Right to Curtail or Terminate Grant: The Foundation reserves the right to
eurtail or terminate the Grant if at any time the Foundation determines that the
Grant Purposes or terms and conditions of the Grant Agreement are not being
met or are unlikely to be mel. The Foundation will endeavor to give MINAM
reasonable written notice prior to curtailment or termination to discuss the
Foundation's concems, but the determination to continue, curtail or terminate
the Grant will remain in the Foundation's sole discretion. Any unspent or
uncommitted funds as ofthe date ofthe Foundation's notice must be repaid to
the Foundation.
3
.
,(
r
.
•
(Grant #1956)
Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, MINAM
Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM
April13,201O
3.
Agency:
4.
(a) Agent declares thát it has no beneficial interest in the Grant funds and that it
has no authority to charge, offset for purposes of indemnification or otherwise
sell, transfer, or deaI with the Grant funds or any interest or benefit derived
from the Grantfunds except as provided under the terms of this Grant
Agreement. Any benefits derived from the Grant funds do not in any manner
belong to Agent.
(b) Agent acknowledges that, in dealing with the Grant funds and any ¡nterest or
benefits derived from the Grant funds, under the terms of this Grant
Agreement, Agent will be merely fulfilling its obligation as agent for the
Foundation and will not exercise any power, authority. or discretion in dealing
with the Grant funds but only act as directed or as required under the terms of
this Grant Agreementor other agreement, memorandum of understanding, or
instructions executed by the Foundation.
(c) Agent assumes full responsibility for the use of Grant funds in accordance
with this Grant Agreement.
(d) Agent shall invest 'the Grant funds and the interest eamed thereon in cash or
cash equivalents in insured, interest-bearing accounts and otherwise in
accordance with Agent's current investment policy. Any interest eamed on
the Grant funds by Agent from the investment of such funds should be used
by MINAM to cover project-related activities supporting ,the Purposes of the'
Grant.
(e) Agent shall keep the Grant funds separate from and may not commingle it
with any other funds, under its controL
(t) The Foundation reserves the right to terminate the agency of the Agent, and
the Foundation and MINAM will jointly work together to designate a new
agent to carry out the terms ofthis Grant Agreement.
(g) Agent will receive afee for its services pursuant to the Grant Budget.
Reporting and Notifications:
(a) J
... t .
,
'i'
i
-',
A"
,,/,',.}'
'
'
"
Grant Reports: MINAM and Agent will deliver written reports to the
Foundation (each a "Grant Report"), according to the schedule in Attachment
2 and directions in the Operations Manual. The Grant Report will contain a
detailed narrative report by MINAM and financial report by the Agent. Grant
Reports will be submitted to the Foundation, by electronic mail where
possible, to the attention of Ana Cristina Villegas, Program Officer, (Ana~
Villegas@Moore.org)
and
Grants
Adrninistration,
(GrantsAdmin@moore.org).
4
(Grant #1956)
Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, MINAM
Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM
April 13, 2010
(b) Narrative Reports: The narrative report should describe what was
accomplished by this Grant as of the date of the Grant Report, outlining the
activities that were undertaken by MINAM, the strategic choices that were
made as a result of the Grant, and achievement of Grant Purposes described in
Attachment l. In addition, the narrative report should also inelude the
outcome table with' the percentage of the activities that have been
accomplished by the time of the report and the actual dates they are expected
to be deliver if different from the initial date stated. The narrative report
should also inelude the documents or materials produced with grant funds that
are identified with a check mark in the outcome tableo
(c) Financial Reports: The financial report should reflect the expenditures of the
Grant funds, and any income eamed thereon, in accordance with the Budget,
as of the end of the reporting period and cumulative across the Grant term (in
nuevos soles). The financial reports should inelude an analysis of Budget
versus actual spending by outcome or output at the level of detail contained in
the Budget, and include a narrative explanation of the Budget variances. Total
project spending, in addition to Foundation Grant spending, will also be
provided. In addition, the financial reports must ¡nclude proposed Budget
revisions for future years, if applicable .
(d) Grant Report Follow~up: The Foundation may request in-person meetings
with MINAM and/or Agent to discuss details of the Grant Report, and if any
Reports are deemed inadequate in the Foundation's reasonable discretion, the
Foundation may require additional supporting documentation or clarifications
to the Grant Report prior to release of the next scheduled payment. Upon
completion of the Grant, MINAM and Agent will submit a Final Grant Report
according to the schedule in Attachment 2. If any funds are remaining to be
expended after the reporting period, MINAM and Agent will submit one or
more additional Grant Reports until all Grant funds are expended in full or the
Grant is otherwise closed.
(e) Notification for Collaborative Projects: MINAM and Agent will notify the
Foundation in writingof any substantive issues or concems that may develop
between MINAM, Agent, other Foundation grantees andlor other MINAM
partners that have the potential to significantly impair or impact the Purposes,
progress or schedule ofthis Grant.
'(f) Notification of Change.in Key Personnel: MINAM and Agent will notify the
Foundation immediately of any change in their respective executive staff, key
Grant staff or consultants responsible for achieving the Grant Purposes. In
addition, if Eduardo Durand, Director of the Climate Change office, leaves his
position the foundation should be notified immediately. Any hiring or change
in personnel should follow the specifications and procedures agreed on in the
Operations Manual for the project.
5
1
,·1
- ,",
•.
-.
,
f-
r.
.'. ....
.
(Grant #1956)
Dr. Antonio "Srack Egg, MINAM
Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM
April 13,2010
(g) Grant Modifications: The terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement may
not be amended or modified, except as agreed to by the parties in writing.
Any change in the Purposes for which Grant funds are spent must be approved
in writing by the Foundation before implementation.
5. Maintenance of Financial Records: Agent and MINAM will maintain financial books
and records in such a fashion that each can provide the Foundation with sufficient detail
to substantiate all expenditures related to the Grant. Agent and MINAM will make such
books and records available to the Foundation at reasonable times. Agent and MINAM
will keep copies of all books and record s and aH reports to the Foundation for at least
three years after completion of the use of Grant funds.
6. Selection of Entities by MINAM: MINAM retains full discretion and control over the
identification and selection, of any consultants, contractors, subgrantees or other entities
("Entities") to assist (either individually or collectively) in carrying out the Purposes of
the Grant. There is no agreement, written or oral, by which the Foundation may cause
MINAM to choose any of these Entities. MINAM agrees to identify, select and engage
other Entities pursuant to the terms and conditions in the Operations Manual.
Compliance with Laws:
(a) MINAM and Agent agrees to comply fully with aH laws and regu'lations
(national, regional and local) applicable to any of its activities associated with
this Grant.
(b) MINAM and Agent specificaHy agrees to comply with prOVISlOns of the
United States Internal Revenue Code ("Code") ~nd regulations applicable to
MINAM as a government agent and as a tax exempt organization,
respectively. This Grant is not earmarked for lobbying (within the meaning of
Section 4945(d)(l) of the Code). Neither MINAM nor Agent nor the
Foundation has entered into any agreement, written or oral, nor made any
representation to the effect that any portion of the funds to be provided under
this Grant may be earmarked for lobpying. MINAM and Agent will not use
any portio n of the Grant funds to influence the outcome of any specific
election for candidates to public office or to carry on any voter registration
drive except as provided in Section.4945(f) ofthe Codeo
6
.:,'
(
)JI'
.........•
(Gran! # 1956)
Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, MINAM
Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM
Apríl 13, 2010
8.
Publicity and Acknowledgements:
(a) Foundation Reporting and Website Publication: The Foundation may include
basic information about this Grant in its periodic public reports, ¿nce the
Foundation receives a fully~executed Grant Agreement.
AddiHonally,
information will be posted on the Foundation's website immediately following
receipt of the fully~executed Grant Agreement, unless the parties t¡lake
altemative arrangements.
.
(b) Publicity and Acknowledgements by MINAM:
AH press releases,
announcements, publicity or other references to the Gordon and Betty Moore
Foundation eoneerning the Grant, ineluding use ofthe Fouridation's logo must
be approved inadvanee by the Foundation's Communications Department
(eommunicatións@moore.org or 650-213-3000).
AdditionaUy, MINAM
agrees to obtain advariee written approval from the Foundation's
Communieations Department of any eommunication that may reasonably be
understood to represent the views of the Foundation and to provide the
Foundation with reasonable opportunity to review, eomment and approve the
eommunieation in advance.
(e) Pre-Approved Attribution Language:
MINAM may use the foHowing
standard language in making attributions for funding without prior approval of
the Communieations Department. However, aH other referenees to the
Foundation in press releases or other Grant publieity will require advanee
written approval ofthe Foundation's Communieations Department:
(i)
About the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation:
"The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundatiori, established in 2000,seeks
to advanee environmental eonservation and eutting-edge scientifie
researeh around the world and improve the quality of life in the San
Francisco Bay Area. For more information, visit www.moore.org."
(ii)
Attributionfor full Grantfunding:
"This (researeh, publieation, projeet, Web site, report, etc.) is funded
by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation."
(iii)
Attribution for partial Grant funding:
"This (researeh, publieation, projeet, Web site; report, etc.) is funded
in part by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation."
7
(Gran! #1956)
Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, MINAM
Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM
April13,2010
(d) Logo: The Foundation encourages the use of its lago in connection with
Grant Publicity. Various file formats may be obtained by contacting the
Foundation's Communications Department at cornmunications@moore.org
650-213-3000. Supported uses of the lago include presentation materials,
papers, symposia and conference brochures; use of the lago for promotional
materials or commercial use (e.g., caps, jackets, mugs, tote bags, etc.) are not
permitted.
MINA M may use the Foundation logo in connection with Pre­
Approved Attribution Language without the prior approval of the
Communications Department. MINAM will obtain the Foundation's advance
written approval from the Communications Department for all other uses of its
lago.
9. Information and Data Sharing: The parties understand that a material condition of this
Grant Agreement is that MINAM makes thedata, research, knowIedge and other
information deveIoped with any Grant funds freely accessibIe to the Foundation, other
grantees of the Foundation and the public generally. MINAM understands and agrees
that any delay in the release of sorne or aH of the data, research, knowledge and other
information developed with any Grant funds foIlowing its completion must be approved
in writing by the F oundation
10. Tax-exempt Status. By entering into this Grant Agreement, MINAM confirms that it is
an agency of the Government of Peru. The Foundation has determined that expenditure
responsibility is not required with respect to this Grant based on the fact that MINAM is
an agency ofthe Peruvian government. MINA M will notify the Foundation immediately
/."..~
ofany change in MINAM's status as an agency ofthe Peruvian government .
/.1,
f~,~
'''''''''-'
.~"\;:?"~'\
"o.~\
'" MütRN,l.,~1
No Promise of Future Funding:
",'"
MINAM acknowledges that the Foundation and its
\7-.,
1r:¡ representatives have made no actual or implied promise of funding except for the
\,,~ cé¿;1:';j~:~>/ amounts specified by this Grant Agreement. However, the foregoing is not intended to
"-..;';.~~'"
'prohibit the Foundation from providing a future grant to MINAM, if the Foundation in
its sale discretion determines that a future grant is appropriate.
12. MisceHaneous Provisions: This Grant Agreement supersedes any prior oral or written
understandings or communications between the parties and constitutes the entire
agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter. Any dispute arising
from or related to this Grant Agreement will be resolved by the laws of and in the State
of California.
If this Grant Agreement correctly sets forth your understanding of the terms of this Grant,
pIease indicate your organization's agreement to its terms by having an authorized officer of
MINAM and an authorized officer of Agent sign a copy of this letter and return it to the
Foundation by electronic mail to (GrantsAdmin@moore.org), orby fax (866-913-8929). We
will arrange for the first payÍnent of th~ Grant, by wire transfer to Agent within two weeks of
8
"
.
" ,·':·'~'
rf
;' :
'
jo
\
',"
,
(Grant #1956)
Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, M1NAM
Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM
April 13,2010
our receipt of the countersigned copy of this Grant Agreement and subject to completion of
any contingencies in Attachment 2.
Congratulations on yourGrant. On behalf of the Foundation, 1 extend every good wish for
the success of containing deforestation in the Peruvian Amazon.
Best regards,
Guillermo Castilleja
ChiefProgram Officer, Environment
cc: Mr. Eduardo Duran, Director General de Cambio Climático, Desertificación y
Recursos Hídricos
Email: edurand@minam.gob.pe
Aftachments 1, 2 a,nd 3 Enclosure (Request for Wire Transfer Form) Title:
Date:
o
SECRETARIO GENERAL
J'i-00~
AGREED AND ACCEPTED for Fondo Nacional del Ambiente (FONAM)
By:
Title:
Date:
9
(Gran! #1956)
ATTACHMENT 1
OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242)
¡Outcome: Government of ,Peru has the technícal, instltutional and legal capacity to put in place a REDD program and contribute sígnificantly to reducing
~eforestation.
•
~
...
_------------
Output 1.: Project governance and inter-institutlonal participation fully defined and operational.
Expected Date: June 2010
SulrOUtputs
Activities Ilndicators
Reportíng
Expected Monitor
,/
Completion Date Progress
Actual Date
(% Complete)
1. Project structure established and implementation
plan designed and refined.
'. '; .
J
',,'
.'
.".­
,',"',
.~~
1. Implement project structure
2. Approve (approval by steering committee) the
operationsmanual.
3. Refine work plan and timetable for project
implementation.
4. Establish and approve plan for inter­
institutional coordination for project
implementation by steering committee.
Indícators:
(1) Work plan and operations manual defined
and implemented.
(2) Steering and technical committees formed
and functioning.
(3) Plan for inter-institutional coordination
approved.
1.
Identify key personnel requirements and job
2. Key personnel for implementation of the projec
descrlptions.
identified, recruited, hired and trained a5
2. Contract key personnel for project
appropriately.
implementation.
3. Complete training for key personnel in
technical and management aspects as needed.
'
10 April2010
.r
April2010
.r
June 2010
.r
--------
ATTACHMENT 1
OUTCOME PLAN (#
2242)
putput 1: Project governance and inter-institutional participation fully defined and operational.
Expected Date: June 2010
Sub-Outputs
Activities / Indicators
Reporting
Expected
Completion Date
Monitor
Progress
./
(% Complete)
Indicators:
(l)Terms of references for key personal
(2) Personnel hired
(3) Personnel trained
rr-""'-"'"
Á\O:.iGrl~
v<;'~,./\(í\k· -v .\-,:; ~¡A o\.
-l'
f4;~l~i"'"
. ;~';~~ñ\
""ul:R" .•, Z)
\~:~~O!~;~e,,,:é~~~ ¡e"."
.
,.­
.~ ,J¡;\~,
,,,_.,,""-
,- . .,. fA
;'
......
~.
:;
",;':;.
~'I
11 Apr2010
Apr 2010
Ago 2010
.r
.r
Actual Date
AITACHMENT
1
OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242)
putput 2: Methodologles for Peru's national system for the measurement, reporting and verificatlon (MRV) of forest carbon compJeted,
land a plan for its implementation developed, and forest-c:arbon baselines establlshed.
Expected Date: February 2010
Sub-Outputs
Activities /Indicators
-----------­
1. Conceptual frameworks for establishing baseline
seenarios (eurrent and projeeted) from
deforestation and forest degradation defined and
relevant national and regional data on forests and
land use compiled
Monitor
Progress
./
11% Complete)
1. Revise, consolidate and analyze existing information
on:
(a) deforestation and forest degradation;
(b) GIS and remote sensing monitoring of deforestation
(remote and field);
(e) modeling of detorestation and forest degradation
using GIS and remote sensing;
2. Conduct 2 workshops with international and national
experts to assess and agree on criteria tor conceptual
framework, data requirements, methods, information
teehnology and software needs tor establishing baseline
seenarios (eurrent and projeeted) from deforestation
and forest degradation.
Indicators:
(1) A document eontaining the conceptual framework
for establishing baseline scenarios (eurrent and
projeeted) from deforestation and forest degradation.
(2) Assessment of eurrent and outstanding data needs.
2. Conceptual frameworks for the quantification
and eeonomie valuation of earbon stoeks defined
and relevant national and regional data on torest
earbon stoeks compiled
Expected
Completion
Date.
Reporting
1. Revise, consolidate and analyze existing information
on:
(a) torest inventories;
(b) earbon stocks¡
2. Conduct 2 workshop with ínternational and I or
national experts to assess and agree on eriteria about
the conceptual framework, data, methods, information .
technology and software tor:
12 Nov 2010
Jul2010
~
~
,
Actual Date
ATTACHMENT 1
OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242)
Output 2: Methodologies for Peru's national system for the measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) of forest carbon completed,
¡and a plan for its implementation developed, and forest-carbon baselines established.
~xpected Date: February 2010
Sub-Outputs
~
Activities / Indicators
(a) inventory development, assessment and monitoring
of carbon stocks.
(b) quantification and economic valuation of
environmental services of carbon sequestration and
carbon stock.
(c) estímate of the costs associated wíth implementing
REDD (e.g. opportuníty costs, implementatíon cost).
3. Define the National conceptual framework for forests
carbon stocks inventory, and monitoring.
4. Define the conceptual framework for economic
valuation of environmental services of carbon
sequestration and forest carbon stocks and calculate the
opportunity and implementation cost of conservation of
these services.
Indicators:
(1) A document containing the National conceptual
framework for ferest and carbon stocks inventory and
monítoring.
(2) A document containing the conceptual framework
for economic valuation of environmental services of
carbon sequestration and forest carbon stocks and the
calculation of the opportunity and implementation cost
of conservation of these services.
13 Expected
Completion
Date
Monitor
,¡'
Reporting
Progress
.
% Complete}
Nov 2010
ti'
Nov 2010
ti'
Actual Date
ATTACHMENT 1
OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242)
Output 2: Methodologies tor Peru's national system tor the measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) of forest carbon completed,
~nd a plantor its implementation developed, and forest-carbon baselines established.
Reporting
Expected Date: February 2010
Sub-Outputs
,¿ÓOEL~'>-,
(~~i;;;'\':'\ ' ":,:f:!~~\
p:"~\{,,nfRN,
',:Z\)
\:!¡:; " :.",' ',l~;,
\~,.<:r;JE~:;;:-' ~/
""l:""
..
..
if,
,
'
,
-"
,",
'.,g
'. -,~
~~'
3. Teehnieal proeedures for the establishment of a
system for the monitoring, verification and
reporting (MRV) of REDD projeets at national and
sub national sea les defined.
Activities / Indicators
l.Conduet workshops and/or expert revJew panels with
national and international experts on:
(a) teehnieal evaluation of resourees and skills to
estimate and monitor earbon stoeks;
(b) identifieation and agreement on methodologies for
national forest inventory;
(e) identifieation and agreement on methodologies for
remote sensing and GIS applied to the analysis of
deforestation and forest degradation;
(d) identifieation of available remote sensing methods;
(e) definition of the required training for image
proeessing and ehoosing the best teehnology for the
eountry;
(f) agreement on the seleetion of images required, seale
of analysis and proeessing teehniques;
(g) projeetion models of deforestation and forest
degradation.
2. Establish proeedures for forest inventory, assessment
and monitoring that allows for quantification of the
environmental serviees of earbon sequestration and
storage.
3. Establish proeedures for estimating the eeonomie
value of environmental services of carbon sequestration
and storage.
4. Establish proeedures to projeet seenarios of
deforestation and forest degradation in REDD projeets
at national and sub national seales.
14 Expected
Completion
Date
Monitor
./
Progress
11% Complete)
.
Actual Date
ATTACHMENT 1
OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242)
Output 2: Methodologies for Peru's national system for the measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) of forest carbon completed,
and a plan for its implementation developed, and forest-carbon baselines established.
Expected Date: February 2010
Sub-Outputs
Actillities Ilndicators
Expected
Completion
Date
Monitor
4. Current and projected scenarios of deforestation
and forest degradation developed and validated,
and spatial information available.
. . :.?.'.
JfJ': . .
1. Develop and validate current and projected scenarios
of deforestation and forest degradation and make
spatial information available.
2. Design and implement the plan for improving national
capacities for the establishment of baseline scenarios
for deforestation and forest degradation.
3. Conduct training workshops on methods for
projecting deforestation and monitoring avoided
deforestation and degradation.
4. Conduct multi-temporal analysis of land use and land
use changes (includes acquisitíon of satellite imagery,
field verification and online GIS platform).
5. Perform multí-temporal analysis of changes in forest
15 Feb 2011
Progress
./
1/% Complete}
5. Establish procedures to monitor and verify
deforestation and forest degradation at national and
sub natíonal scales.
6. Adjust procedures and methodologies with the
Nationallnformation and Monitoring System for
Greenhousé Gases.
7. Establish procedures for monitoring, verification and
reporting (MRV) of REDD projects at sub-national scale.
8. Establish a national registry of REDD projects.
Indicators:
(1) Documents containing technical procedures
established in activities 2 to 7.
Reporting
"
Actual Date
ATTACHMENT
1
OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242)
Output2: Methodologies for Peru's national syste!11 for the measurement, reportíng and veríflcation(MRV) of forest carbon completed,
and a plan for its implemen~atlon developed, and forest-carbon baselines established.
Expected Date: February 2010
Sub-Outputs
Actillities Ilndicaton
Expected
Completion
Date
Monitor
(1) National forest / non-forest map.
(2) Nationál carbon map tier 2
(3) National data on historical deforestation and
emissions.
(4) Capacities developed in 5 regions to establish curren
and projected scenarios of deforestation and forest
degradation.
(5) Information on current and projected scenarios of
deforestatfon and forest degradation available on web
platform.
(6) Geospatial information available on Vleb platform.
Jun 2011
Jun 2011
Jun 2011
% Complete)
I.C, ... JjJr,
16 .r
.r
.r
Jan 2012
.r
Jan 2012
.r
Feb 2012
.r
---­
Progress
./
cover (1990-2000-2005-2008) through remote sensing
at national scale.
6. Elaborate scenarios of GHG emissions from
deforestation and forest degradation for 2 or more
regions.
Indicators:
Reporting
Actual Date
ATTACHMENT 1
OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242)
Output 3: Institutional and legal framework for the implementation of REDD aetivities at National and Sub National seales
proposed for Peru.,
ExpectedDate: Deeember 2010
//;o:;Q~I.." :<11,
,ir<:~\.,.f')~N\
-:'l.:'
/~"l
'C;~~t~
l'~,~; VMt FRN ~~
.$
\::,,,"~\
',i"'~;í"'l,,l~~
~dif.!fJ·;!:
/~
",~.';"",.:,~.~~:;.,~, __ -1'
'
"
;/
,
Activities / Indicators
;"IJ,,',
1
.'
Sub-Outputs
-...........
.:.
-,'
1. Strengths and weaknesses of legal and
institutional issues related to land use rights,
environmental services, forest governance
and payment of ecosystem benefits
distribution identified for Peru.
Expected
Completion
Date
Monitor
17 Progress
Actual Date
,/
(% Complete)
1. Review and analysis of current institutional
and legal framework in Peru on land use rights,
forest policy, governance (definition of roles
and institutional responsibilities).
2. Review and analysis of the implementation of
technical and policy tools for forest
conservation, zoning and land management.
3. Identify policy necessary for implementing
the REDD strategy (e.g. ownership of
environmental services, taxation, distribution of
benefits related to REDD) developed and with
input from a diverse group of stakeholders
4. Refine policy needs based on input from (3)
and vetted with stakeholders again.
Indicators:
(1) Gap analysis of legal framework for
ecosystem services and REDD.
(2)Policy needs for REDD implementation
ideritified
Reporting
I
Nov 2010
,/
Dec 2010
,/
ATTACHMENT
1
OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242)
----------
Output4: Economic and institutional feasibility of REDD at National and Sub National scales evaluated and its implementation
in priority areas promoted by MINAM.
ExpectedDate: January 2012
Sub-Outputs
1. Ex-ante evaluation of economic and
institutional feasibility of REDD in Peru.
;/
.......,:,. .
"
.
.
f
.
Actlvities / Indicators
Expected
Completian
Date
Monitor
18 Feb 2011
Feb 2011
Progress
y"
(% Complete)
1. Conduct workshops on economic and
financial tools for REDD feasibility analysis
at sub-national scale.
2. Identify economic, financial and
institutional preconditions for REDD
feasibility at national scale.
3. Macro-scale spatial analysis of the
opportunity costs of REDD.
4. Evaluate economic, financial and social
feasibility tor REDD at national and sub­
national scales and under different
scenarios (e.g. carbon price and land use).
5. Evaluate the need for a taxation and
institutional bilis to facilitate the
implementation of projects on avoided
deforestation and degradation at national
and sub-national scales.
Indicators:
(1) A document containing the results of
the economic, institutional and financial
feasibility analysis of REDD at national and
sub-national scales.
(2) A document containing the results of
the opportunity and implementation costs
of REDD analysis at national and sub­
national scales.
Reporting
y"
.,/
Actual
Date
I
ATTACHMENT l'
OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242)
Output4: Economicand institutionalfeasibility of REDD at National and Sub National scalesevaluated and its implementation
in priority areas promoted by MINAM.
Expected Date: January 2012
Sub-Outputs
2. Classification of areas for sub-national REDD
projects and prioritization or suitable REOD
pilot projects.
Actillities / Indicators
,-'\
• ""
)
','"
-
M
I!­
3. Implementation of pilot projects promoted by
MINAM .
Monitor
Progress
,/
Actual
Date
(% Complete)
1. Conduct workshops wíth regional
governments, MINAM and MINAG on
selection criteria and methodology for the
implementation of REDD projects.
2.Refine the criteria for selecting suitable
areas for REDD projects (e.g. areas of high
importance for biodiversity).
3. Identify criteria for prioritizing areas for
implementing REDD projects (e.g.
biodiversity, poverty).
4. Identify priority areas (map) for the
implementation of REDD pilot
demonstration projects.
Indicators:
(1) Criteria for priorization of areas for
implementing REOD projects.
(2) Map of prioritized areas for
implementation of REDD át sub-national
scale.
···71":'''·
....·· .·.'.· ..
Expected
Completion Date Reportíng
1. Conduct information and consultation
processes with key stakeholders and local
communities in prioritized areas for REDD.
2. Technical support for participatory
design and implementation of (at least 2)
REOD pilot projects.
19 Nov 2010
,/
April2011
,/
)
1
OUT COME PLAN (# 2242) ATTACHMENT
Output 4~ Economic and institutional feasibilityofREDD atNational andSub National scalesevaluated and itsimplementation
in priority areas promoted by MINAM.
Expected Date: January 2012 .
Sub-Outputs
Activities / Indicators
Expected
Completion
Date
Monitor
."
20 Sep 2011
."
Dct 2011
Jan 2012
Progress
(% Complete)
3. Validate at REDD pilot project level
proposed procedures (e.g. distribution of
profits, carbon accounting, etc.).
4. Provide training at local scale according
to the needs and requirements identified
as priority areas to implement REDD
activities.
5. Develop strategies to address
deforestation and forest degradation
agents (e.g" sustainable forest
management projects, improve forest law
enforcement, etc.).
6. Develop community I local monitoring
procedures of REDD projects to track the
socio-environmental indicators agreed by
the community.
7. Systematization and analysis of REDD
experiences and potential for replication:
Indicators:
(1) Co design and technical support of two
REDD projects at sub-national scale.
(2) Validation of proposed procedures at
sub-national scale.
(3) A document containing the
systematization of REDD experiences at
sub-national sea le.
Reportíng
."
Actual
Date
..
ATTACHMENT
1
OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242)
Output 4: Economic and institutional feasibility of REDD at NationalandSub National scales evaluated and itsimplementation
in priority areas promoted by MINAM.
Expected Date: January 2012
Sub-Outputs
Activities / Indicators
(4) A map containing potential areas for
extrapolation of REDD experiences at sub­
national scale.
21 Expected
Completion
Date
Jan 2012
Monitor
o/
Reporting
Progress
(% Complete)
,/
Actual
Date
ATTACHMENT
1
OUTCOME PLAN
(# 2242)
Output 5: Project results dlsseminatedand contributlng to the skills and capacities to negotiate the Peruvian position in the context
of theUnited Natlons Framework Convention on elimate ehange (UNFeCC).
Expected Date: February 2012
Sub-Outputs
1. Peruvian delegates to the UNFCCC are
knowledgeable about key poliey and teehnical
issues of REDD implementation in PERU and ean
effectively apply information to UNFCCC
negotiations.
Actillities /Indicators
JI; Monitor
.r
Jul2010
Nov2010
.r
.r
Feb 2012
F.eb 2012
.r
.r
1. Disseminate project results such as:
(a) quantification of carbon stoeks;
(b) rates of deforestation ano forest
degradation;
(e) modeling of deforestation;
(d) monitoring, verifieation and reporting of
avoided
deforestation
and
forest
degradation of REDD projects.
Indicators:
(1) Workshops in the 5 regions of focus.
(2) Publie report to summarize and disseminate
results of the project in MINAM web-pages.
22 Progress
(% Complete)
1. Identify any gaps in policy or teehnical
knowledge related to REDD within the Peruvian
negotiation team to the UNFCCC. .
2. Develop training material and hold workshop
to inform Peruvian delegation about gaps
identified in (1).
Indicators:
(1) Training materials developed
(2)10 negotiators trained.
2. Project results disseminated with the five regions
of focus for REDD implementation in Peru and
public in general.
Expected
Completion
Date
Reporting
I Actual Date
ATTACHMENT 2 PAYMENTS & REQUIREMENTS PLAN (# 2242) Year
Other
1
Projecie4" ,;.15infllJpi'!fIJa"afive
.
.
.
~c~eIJ~fld
.~~~1~led
.
.
.
.
.
. <.(Conditiom,jor PaymentIOther
AntDunt1':~nt ·.. ·R¡itDue1 Rpt DutlActurttiesor Mt;etm(l pate .
Date
.
Events
p:qYnzent
Payment#1
FulIy Executed Grant Agreement
4/16
1,144,325
PEN
First complete draft of Operations
Manual submitted to and accepted
by the F oundation.
2010
7/30
Check-in meeting/conference call
with Steering committee to review
progress, personnel hiring status
and approve Operations ManuaL
'1
,J.{
2010 I Payment #2
Not to exceed
2,416,400
PEN
9/30
9/1
Payment contingent on grantee
submitting revised budget
compared to original budget
detailing necessary resources for
satellite equipment and images.
"fIIl~ 1 Financial
2
Report should ¡nelude budget vs. actual accofding to Budget Plan Attachment
Narrative Report should ¡nelude progress updates to Grant Outcome Plan attachment.
•
23 ATTACHMENT 2 PAYMENTS & REQUIREMENTS PLAN (# 2242)
.
. l'"
Year
Payment
Amount
Projected . Filiancial
Payment RptDue l '
Date ,
."
20lO
Payment #3
11/30
10/30
,
11/15
10/30
1,061,255
PEN
Interim Narrative and Financial
Report (reporting on 6 mo. period
through 9/30/10) and cash balance
statement.
Check-in meeting! conference call
scheduled for 7/30 and approval of
refined work-plan and budget are
contingencies for this payment.
1---­
2011
2011
.'
Oth'er Narrative " Schedllled ~chediíled
\. Co~ditions Jor Payment IOther
RptDue2 .Aétivitiesor Meeting Date
,
.
Events>'
,.".
1/14
PaymeI)t #4:
6/30
6/1
Check-in meeting! conference call
with Steering committee to review
progress.
Annual NaÍTative and Financial
Report (reporting on períod
through 4/30/11) and cash balance
statement.
6/1
611,366 PEN
Check-in meeting! conference call
scheduled for 1/14 is a contingency
for this payment.
'" \
ji
"
,' ,
"
6/30
2011
.~ '.'..:~-
'"' ,:' / ".. "
'
"
24 Check-in meeting/conference call
withSteering committee to review
progress.
I
'. ATTACHMENT 2 P AYMENTS & REQUIREMENTS PLAN (# 2242) ,()f~,.
.'
"
Year
Payfnent
Amount
Projected '
I Final1cial
Payment
RptDue 1
Date
Natrative
RptDui'
'Schedll'ed ", Si;heduled
' ConditionsforPaymi!nt jOther
Activitlesor Mi!eiing.1Jate
Events
"'.'
2011
Payment#5:
11/30
10/31
11115
10/31
366,820PEN
'i'iit/¡~
.rw.""'":-.
~) 2012
5/31
d
,,""
"k
".'
Check-in meeting/conference cal!
with Steering committee to review
progress.
Final Narrative andFinancial
Report
5/31
,
:
.'
Intedm Narrative and cash balance
statement (reporting on 6 mo.
period through 9/30/11)
,
~;;~! I
"
.'
"
:,'
,'t
25 ATTACHMENT 3
BUDGET (#2242)
--
YEAR 1 (Perlod: mm/yy • mm/yy)
OUTPUT 1: Project govemance and inter-institutional parti~pation fu"y
defined.
CÚRRENC·y·:·SOLES..·.. ·· ..·..·................·..·.................................... CURRENT USO EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80
SUB-OUTPUT 1,1: Project
structure established and
implementation plan designed .and
refined.
.í-~~~L~
~~";'i'-¡.;.
.';,~:'~1~:i
,'0
f :~~"/''I,'l~r,J('
\~
\,
~,~
.'.; ....
"
,:~onnel
,
,.
,.. ."r.,.,.·
OTHER
TOTAL
'~::)Dire~r Ejecutivo O
O
O
O
; NI Administrador
~, ! Comunicador
/ Responsable Componente (3)
Procesadores de Imagenes
Beneflts
spec!fy:
Subtotal Peraonnel Salaries
Consultanta and Contractora
National Consultants
International Consultants
Subtotal Consultant and Contractor Fees
Other Dire¡;t Exeen§es l!lle gIQl!!ll!D/:1
Travel (Transportation & Lodging)
Training, Conferences and wor1<shops
Communication & Publications
Field Supplies
Other Supplies
Computers/Software/Salellite imagery
Su btotal Other Dlrect Expenses
Caeital Exeenditures & Egulllmenll§ee glos§aD/:)
Scientific Equipment Vehicles (boats, trucks, motorcycles)
Infraslructure/renovation
Subtotal Equipment & Expenditures
Fm
TOTAL
speclfv:
108,000
72,000
72,000
192,000
~
96,000
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
444,000
108,000
72,000
72,000
288,000
96,000
540,000
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
84,000
22,400
O
106,400
O
134,800
24,520
84,000
22,400
O
O
O
106,400
Note #
18,080
18,080
134,800
24,520
O
O
O
O
O
O
18,080
O
18,080
O
11,200
170,520
O
11,200
170,520
Nota' O
O
O
O
1 .. 4.0%
Total Costa
IFiscal Agent Fee
OTHER
Noto'
Total Direct Costa
Indirect Costs
GBMF
Note # "'~.'?;:I .·.t.~\'
~~~.!;~ ,
.
·<·.i c
fIJ' '.
GBMF
Bud!let :, :D.etalled Annual Budget
SUB-OUTPUT 1.2: Key peraonnel for
implementation of !he project
identified, recruited, hired and lrained
as appropriately .
'6:0%1
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
18,080
O
18,080
720,920
96,000
816,920
28,837
O
723
18,803
96,000
846,757
723
18,803
1,086
749,767
28,837
43,256
26. ATIACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) 1
OUTPUT 2: Methodologie. 10r Pen.!'. natlonal.ayatem 10r tila rneaaurement, nlportlng and varificatlon (MRV) of 10raat carbon
daveiopad, and a plan 10r ImplementationOftha ayatem aatabllahed.
... " ............................
CÜRRENCy':sóLes'
CURRENT uso EXCHANGE AATE: 2.80
"'""
..... "., .. " ... " ....
SUB-oUTPUT 2.1: Conceptual
¡tramewOrkS for establishing
baseline scenarios (current aOO
projected) from deforestation and
forast degradation delined and
reievantnatíonal and regional data
on forasls and latid Úse compRed,
SUB-oUTPUT 2.2: Conceptual
frameworks for the quantification
and economic valuatíon of carbon
stocks defined and relevan!
national and regional data onforast
carbon·stocks compilad
SUB-oUTPUT 2.3: Technical
proceduras for tIle establishment,
of a $ystam for tIle monitoring,
lIerificatíon and reporting (MRV) of
REDOproject:s al natíona1 anó sub
nationálsca/es definad;
SUB-oUTPUT 2.4: Current and
projected scenarios of deforastatíor
and torest degradatíon developed
and validalad, and spatia!
inforrnatíon available.
.....
Detailed Annual Budgat
Personnal
Director Ejecutivo
Administrador
Comunicador
Responsable Componente (3)
Procesadores de Imagenes
Benaflts
specity.
Subtotal Paraonnel Salaria.
Consultan1s and Contracto...
Natíonal Consultants
Intamational Consultanls
v·!' ·'.:.l"v;
.'
'.
.",~
Subtotal Consultant and Contractor Feas
Oth!!r QiWil ElSl!eOSeS Isee gIQ!!saCt:1
Travel (Transportalion & Lodging)
Traíniog, Conferences and workshops
Communicatioo & Publications
Field Supplies
Otller Supplies
Computérs/SoftwarelSatellite imagery
Subtotal Other Olrect E!E!;oses
Cal!ltal EXl!!!ngltll!!!I , Egllill!Il!nt IlIee glolluCt:1
ScientiflC Equipment
Vehides (boats, trucks, motorcydas)
InfrastructureJrenovation
Subtotal EQulpment & ExDenditures
GBMF
OTHER
TOTAL
GBMF
TOTAL
OTHER
GBMF
GBMF
TOTAL
OTHER
OTHER
TOTAL
Note'
O
O
O
O
O
O
~
O
O
O
O
O
O
O.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
118,80C
O
O
O
118,800
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
59,400
O
O
O
59,400
Note'
9,900
33,600
43,500
O
9,900
33,600
O
O
43,500
9,900
67,200
9,900
67,200
O
118,800
e
77,100
O
77,100
118,800
O
60,000
20,000
59,400
59,400
Note.
O
80,000
80,000
60,000
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
80,000
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
80,000
O
20,000
60,000
O
60,000
20,000
O
O
O
O
1,178,800
20,000 1,178,800
1,178,800
O 1,178,800
Not..#
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
123.500
O
123,500
137,100
O
137,100
138,800
O
138.800 1,238.200
O 1.238200
4940
5,4841
142,584
01
O
6.484
142,584
5,6521
144,362
01
6,55
49.5281
144,352 1,287,728
O 1,287,728
O
"""
TotalOirectCos1s
lodirect Coste
Total Coste
!Flscal
speclfV:
. ,4.0%
4.940
128,440
Agent F e e o & ( O m r , 4 1 0
O
128.440
8,226
8,328
27
O
un
1
74,292
1';~,.n28
ATTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) CÚRREÑ·CY":·sóLes·················....................................................
CURRENT USO EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80
Detalled Annual Budget
Personnel
Director Ejecutivo
Administrador
Comunicador
Responsable Componente (3)
Procesadores de Imagenes
Beneflts
speclfy:
Subtotal Personnel Salaries
Consultants and Contractors
National Consultants
Intemational Consultants
p'>t.. :
I.c•.
Subtotal Consultant and Contractor Fees
Oth!!r Di[ect Ex(!enses Isee glossa!:ll)
Travel (Transportation & Lodging)
Training, Conferences and workshops
Communication & Publications
Field Supplies
Other Supplies
Computers/Software/Satellite imagery
Subtotal Other Direet Expenses
Ca(!iml Ex(!en!!itur!!!i & Egul(!!!lent Isee glossa!:ll)
Scientific Equipment
Vehides (boats, trucks, motorcydes)
Infrastructure/renovation
Subtotal Equipment & Expenditures
OUTPUT 3: Institulional and legal
framework for !he implementation of
REDD activities at National and Sub
National scales proposed for Peru.
SUB-OUTPUT 3.1: Strangths and
weaknesses of legal and institutional
issues related lo land use rights,
SUB-OUTPUT 4.1: Ex-ante
environmental services, forest
evaluation of economic and
govemance and benefits distribution
institutional feasibility of REDD in
identified for Peru.servicios
Peru.
ambientales, gobemanza forestal y
distribucion de beneficios identificadas
para el Perú.
GBMF
sDecifv:
OTHER
TOTAL
GBMF
OTHER
SUB-OUTPUT 4.2: Classification of
areas for sub-national REDD projects
and prioritization orsuitable REDD pilo
projects.
TOTAL
OTHER
GBMF
TOTAL
SUB-OUTPUT 4.3: 3.
Implementation of pilot projects
promoted by MINAM.
GBMF
OTHER
TOTAL
Note'
O
O
O
F7.O%
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
29,700
O
19,800
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
19,800
O
19,800
O
O
O
O
O
Note'
29,700
29,700
O
29,700
O
O
O
22,600
O
O
19,800
O
O
O
O
19,800
O
19,800
O
19,800
O
19,800
Note'
O
O
14,500
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
22,600
O
O
O
22,600
O
22,600
14,500
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
14,500
O
14,500
O
O
O
O
Note'
1~:i;itiQ""
Total Costs
IFiscal Agent Fee~~%1
O
O
O
O
O
Total Direet Costs
Indirect Costs
OUTPUT 4: Economic and institutional feasibility of REDD at National and Sub Nationat scales evaluated and
its implementation in prlority araas promoted by MINAM.
O
O
O
01
O
O
O
O
O
29700
O
29,700
22,600
O
22,600
34300
O
34,300
19800
O
19,800
1,1881
30,888
01
O
1,188
9041
23,504
01
O
904
23,504
1,3721
35,672
01
O
1,372
7921
20,592
01
O
20,592
1,782
30,888
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O'
O
1,356
28
2,058
35,672
, 1,188
792
A TTACHMENT 3
BUDGET (#2242)
OUTPUT 5: Project results disseminated and c::ontríbuting lo Ihe skills
and capadties to negotiate the Peruvian position -in the c::ontext of the
United Natíons Framework Convention on Climate Changastrengthened.
SUB-TOTAL YEAR 1
CURRENCy'·SOlES .. ·· ..··....... " .. " ..................................
CURRENT USO EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80
SUB-OUTPUT 5.1: Peruvian
delegates lo tIle UNFCCC are
knowledgeable about key policy
and technical issues of REDD
implementation in PERU and can
effectively apply information to
UNFCCC negotiations.
Detalled AnnuaJ Budget
Personnel
Director Ejl!cutivo
Administrador
Comunicador
Responsable Componente (3)
Procesadores de Imagenes
Beneflts
speclfy:
Subtotal Personnel Salarles
Consultants and Contractors
National Consultanta
Intemational Consultants
/"~..".~'
J)J~l'~
.
GBMF
:
r::o:G'%
OTHER
TOTAL
GBMF
TOTAL
OTHER
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
108.000
72,000
72,000
192,000
O
O
444,000
O
O
O
96,000
O
108,000
72,000
72,000
288,000
O
O
O
96,000
540,0001
O
410,700
123,200
Note~
59,400
59,400
O
59,400
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
59,400
O
O
O
124,000
124,000
4,480
410,700
123,200
O
O
O
533900
O
O
O
O
533,900'
134,800
324,900
4,480
O
124,000
O
134,800
448,900
4,480
O
O
Note'
O
O
85,200
85,200
O
4,480
o
O
O
O
O 1,190,000
O
O
O
85,200 .
O
85,200
4,480
124,000
128480 1,654,180
o
O
O
O 1,190,000
124,000 1,778,180
Note'
L'é¡;íf:o%
Total Costa
IFiscal AVení Fea
GBMF
TOTAL
O
O
O
O
Total Dlrect Costs
BD8Clfv:
~
Note.
Subtotal Conaultant and Contractor F_
Qlh!![ !;!I[!!!t.t ¡¡liRID!!!! (S!!!! glossaIXI
Travel (Transportstion & Lodging)
Traíning, Conferences and workshops
Communication & PUblications
Fíeld Supplíes
Other Supplies
ComputersJSoftware/Satellite imagerv
Subtotal Other Dlrect Expenses
C!!Rim! ElSR!!ndj!u[!!1 & EgulRm!!m lIt!!!! gI2HIIX)
Scientific Equípment
Vehicles (boats. trueks, molorcycles)
Infralltructure/renovation
Subtotal Equlpment & Expenditures
Indirect Costa
OTHER
SUB-OUTPUT 5~2: Project results
disseminated with· Ihe five regións
of tocus tor REOO implementation
in Peru and public in general.
1:
6.0%1
O
O
O
O
O
O
144,600
O
144,600
4,480
124,000
5,7841
01
5784
49601
150,384
O
160,384
1791
4,659
8,676
O
O
128,960
269
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
128480 2632,080
5139
105,2831
133,619 2,737,363
157,925
29 O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O'
220,000 2,862,080
8,8001
114,083
228,800 2,966,163
ATTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) YEAR 2 Period: mmlvv • mmlyy:
OUTPUT1: ProJed govemance and inler-instHutlonal participetlon tuUy
defined.
CÜ·¡¡RENCy·;·SOi:is···......·····....···..·..····....·..··..··········.......................
CURRENT USD EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80
SUB-OUTPUT 1.2: Key personnal for
'!11p!ementatlOn oflhe project
klentlfied, recruited,l1ired end treinad
as approprlately.
SUB-OUTPUT 1.1: Project
structure estsbli9hed end
implernentstlon plan designad end
refinad •
. .p'~-::~r.:.>-'i "1 "
t -'"
/;"t'ii\\\\ ""\~ít~
/."'"
P
'{{iR' t!!¡ I
'\~,::~¿~
GBMF
Budaet
Oetalléd Annual Budget
PelSonnel
Director Ejecutivo
Administrador
Comunicador
Responsable Componenle (3)
Procesadores de Imagenes
OTHER
-~
....."":
Benefils
Subtotal PelSonnel Salarie.
Consultanls and Contractors
Natlonal Consultanls
Intematlonal Consullanls
ro:o%
O
O
GBMF
Budoet
TOTAL
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
OTHER
TOTAL
108,000
72.000
72,000
192,000
96,000
O
444,000
96,000
108.000
72,000
72,000
288,000
O
O
540,000
O
84,000
22,400
O
O
106,400
O
·134,800
O
O
O
O
11,200
146,000
¡
-~
O
O
O
84,000
22,400
O
¡f'
Subtotal Consultant and Contnlctor Feas
Q!Il!r Oirect EXl!!!nses !see glossa!l!l
T ravel (T ransportation & Lodging)
Training, Conferences and worksoops
Communication & Publicallons
Field Supplies
Other Supplias
CompulerslSotlwareJSalelli1e inlaAer¡
Subtotal Olher Dlreet Expenses
Cae!!!! ~ndltut!!! & ESl!ll!lDa!l! ¡sea gIOSS8!l!1
Scíentific Equipment
Vellidas (bOals, trucks, moloo:ycle9)
Infraslruclurelrenovatlon
Subtotal EqulPIIIllnt & Expendltures
O
specffv:
106,400
134,800
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
11,200
146,000
Nole'
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
696.400
96000
792400
O
O
O
4.0%
Total Costs
IFiscall Agaot Fea
O
Nole'
Total Direct Costs
Indirect Costs
O
0.061
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
278561
724,256
3,840
31696
99,840
824,096
41,784
30
ATTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) OUTPUT 2: Metbodologles ro.. Peru's nallonal system for lbe measunrment, nrportlng and verlflcatlon (MRV) of forat carbon
developed, and a plan foI'lniplémantatlon ofthe systam establlshed.
CÜ·RRENCy·:·SruS········..·..,··....·....····..···......·····..·.... ·...................
CURRENT USO EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80
SUB.()UTPUT 2.1 : Conceplual
ffamewor1<s lor estab!lshing
basellne scenanos (currenl and
projected) from deforestation and
fores! degradation defined and
relevanl national and regional data
on forests and land use compiled.
~~
y",.,./L$.t"
if~:t:/¡W¡'Df?~"~
"\:"~~'-;?:"y\
¡ ;:;, .;
,:¡" .,--.'
1
{>-'
.ii~
","
~f
"~~:~!}~J~~:'> ,J(,,"
¡P" Detaited Annual Sudg.!
Personnel
Director Ejecutivo
Administrador
Comunicador
Responsable Componente (3)
Procesadores de Imagenes
BenefllS
spe<:lly:
Subtotal Personnel Salaries
COlI$ultanlS and Contractors
Natlonal Consultants
Inlemational Conaultants
Subtotal Consultant and Contractor F_
Qther Dlreet Ex!!!n!!es ¡aee glossa~
Travel (Transportation & Lodging)
Training, Conferences and workshops
Communication & Publicalions
Field Supplies
Olhar Supplies
Computers/Software/SateRile imagery
Subtotal Olber Direct Expenses'
CaelHl !iillll!nditures & Eguiement ¡see glossa!:l(l
Scientific Equipment
Vellidas (boats, truck •• moton::ycles)
lnfraslrudure/renovalion
Subtotal Equlpment & EXJ)8ndltl.lres
-­
(O:ii%
Nold
soeeifv:
O
O
O
a
a
a
o
SUB-OUTPUT 2.3: Technical
procedures for Ihe establishment,
and economic valuation 01 carbon 01 a system for lhe monilorlng,
stocks defined and relevan1
verificalion and reportlng (MRV) 01
naOonal and regional dilla on foresl REDD projects at national and sub
cernon stocks compiled
natlonal seales delined.
GBMF
Budoet
TOTAL
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
o
o
o
O
o
O
OTHER
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
O
O
O
O
4.0%
0.061
O
O
o
o
01
o
o
o
o
O
O
O
o
o
o
O
o
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
o
o
01
o
o
o
o
o
01
o
o
o
o
o
·0
o
O
o
o
o
o
o
o
O
a
O
O
O
19,800
134,400
154,200
O
154,200
O
o
o
o
58,000
58,000
o
a
o
o
O
O 1237600
O 1,295.600
O
a
1,237,600
1,295,600
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
19,800
134,400
a
o
31
TOTAL
O
O
O
O
Nolol
o
OTHER
O
a
a
a
O
GBMF
Budget
TOTA,L
a
O
O
o
SUB..oUTPUT 2.4: Currenl and
proje<:;ted scenarios 01
defotllstation and fores!
degredation deveIoped and
valldated, and spúl information
available.
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
01liER
o
O
O
O
GBMF
Budllet
TOTAL
O
TotalCosts
!Flscar AgentF¡¡e-­
OTHER,
-~
Total Oirect Costa
Indirect Costa
GBMF
Budget
SUB-OUTPUT 2.2: Conceptual
ffameworks for Ihe quantl1k:ation
a
O
O
O
o
o
1449800
o
1449 800
679921
O
67992
o
1,501,7112
86,988
o 1,507792
ATTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) - - ­
OUTPUT 3: Institutional ene! legal
framework for \he implemantállOfl
ot REDD aCtIvlties al Natlonal and OUTPUT 4: Economic and institulional teasibilltyot REDD at Nalioilal and Sub National scales evaluated and
lis Implementation in príority areas promated by MINAM.
Sub NatlOnal scaléII proposed for
Peru.
·CURRE¡;ic'¡:-;SOLES· .. ······......·..·.......... ··....·......,..·,......·..................
SUB-OUTPUT 3.1: Slrengths and
weaknesses ot legal and
Institutionallssues related lo land
use rights, envlronmenlal servlces,
foresl govemance and banelils
dislribution idenlilied tor
Pero.servlcios ambientales,
gobemanza forestal y dísmbución
de beneficios identificadas para el
Perú.
CURRENT USO EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80
h ""-'..,
"1":'.
/1~~\"\
* ~v.?:;P'~~~"i\
/~:~;{'\
'
.:~'~t
f ..","~, '"¡ERI\! ~~_
t%~,~
'\">""
-~''s
.~,.:; .,.:~"" ~
etl:,\j,~';'~ ~/
',,-\
~.~ ~,::Z:t~~~~
.~
...
.¡,c"
/Al
"
OetaUad AnRual Budgat
Personnel
Director Ejecutivo
Administrador
Comunicador
Responsable Componente (3)
Procesadores de Imagenes
Beneflls
••odIY:
SuMotal Personnel Salaries
Consultants and Contractors
National Consultanls
Inlamational Consultants
,
GBMF
Budget
TOTAL
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
~
~
O
-,
í"i.ii%
GBMF
Budget
OTHER
SUB-OUTPUT 4.3: 3.
Implemenlation of pilol projects
promoted by MINAM.
GBMF
Budge'
TOTAL
TOTAL
OTHER
O
O
O
O
a
O
e
o
O
O
O
49,500
o
O
O
O
49.500
19.800
O
o
49,500
o
O
22,600
O
O
O
O
22,600
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
19.800
118,800
o
O
O
o
118,800
O
O
O
118,800
O
o
o
O
O
49500
O
O
e
o
O
O
O
19,800
O
19,800
118,800
o
o
o
O
Noo.,
o
O
O
o
22,600
o
o
O
O
O
O
22,600
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
o
o
O
O
O
O
!l
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
118800
NoteN
I 4.0%
0,061
~
O
O
O
O
O
Total Cosls
IFlScalAgentFee
OTHER
SUB-OUTPUT 4.2: Classificadon ot
areas tor sub-national REDD projects
and priorltization orsuitáble REDD pilol
projeds.
NoteN
Total Dlrect Costs
soecifv:
GBMF
Budget
TOTAL
~
Subiotal Consultant and Contractor F_
QlI!er OIn¡et E!l!!nses ¡see glossaw
Trave! (TranspOrietion & lodging)
Trainlng, Confe<'ences and wortshops
Communícatlon & PUbllcations
Field Supplíes
Other Supplles
ComllularslSoftwarelSatellite lmagerv
Subtotal Other Direct Expenses
Caeltal Emendltures & Egulement (see glossaDl:I
Scientific Equlpment
Vehicles (boats, lruells, motorcyc/es)
Infraslructurelrenovatlon
Subtotal Equlpment & Expenditures
Indirect Costs
OTHER
SUB-OUTPUT 4.1: Ex-anla
evaluatlOn ot economic ane!
Institutional feaslbillly ot REDD in
i'elU.
e
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
o
o
72100
19,800
o
19800
118800
01
01
2,884
7921
01
792
o
o
o
o
o
o
72100
01
o
20592
28841
74,984
o
74,98
4,326
20,592
1,188
32
4,7621
123,652
7,128
01
4752
o
123,652
ATTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) OUTPUT 5: ProjecI results disseminaled and conlribuling lo Ihe
skills and capacities lo negotiale !he Peruvian position -in Ihe
conlext of Ihe Unlled Nalipns Framework Conventlon on Climale
Changa- slrenglhened.
SUB·TOTAl YEAR 2
CÚRREN'Cy':soLiüi"'''' '.................................................................. CURRENT USD EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80
.",...--­
/"
n~,
~t~~:
~""I!.,¡,,,,\)
i"!!!:~
SUB-OUTPUT 5.1: Peruvian
delegales 10 Ihe UNFCCC are
knowledgeable aboul key policy
and lechnical issues of REDD
implementalion in PERU and can
effectively apply infonmation lo
UNFCCC negotiations.
~-,.,
,,,4t\
"',;":1;',>\
, Xc ~,; 1
GBMF
Budget
" O<¡taU8d Annual Budget
~rii~nel
1 ' ~¡rector Ejecutivo
~,
Administrador
Comunicador
Responsable Componenle (3) {;1-.:8:
I.i.¡'i!:
o
(1')8. V
t:z\
\ ::~¡..
-...; : "1)
\
1....
~t~
~ ~z
'''~\'
i-¡
:;frt;
.(~c,\'d'" /
~
P
'\'''-' '!L:
-l.!
::.Lr:
r-'.
OTHER
TOTAL
TOTAL
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Sub!o!al Consultan! and Contrac!or Fees
Other Direc! Exeanses Isee glossa!lll
Traval (Transportation & Lodging)
Training, Conferences and workshops
Communication & Publicalions
Field Supplies
Olher Supplies
Compulers/Software/Salellile imagery
Subtotal Other Direct Expenses
Caeital Exeenditures & Egulement Isee glossa!lll
Scientific Equipmenl
Vehicles (boals, trucks, mOlorcycles)
Infrastructure/renovation
Subtotal Equipment & Expenditures
ro:D% GBMF
Budge!
TOTAL
OTHER
sDecifv:
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
108,000
72,000
72,000
192,000
O
O
O
96,000
108,000
72,000
72,000
288,000
O
O
O
Ó
444,000
O
96,000
O
540,000
331,500
156,800
O
O
488,300
O
331,500
156,800
O
O
488,300
Noto.
39,600
39,600
39,600
O
O
O
O 39,600
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Not.~
O
58,000
4,480
O
O
O
O
O
62,480
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
39600
O
39,600
62,480
1584
O
1584
2499
41,184
O
41,184
O
O
O 134,800
58,000
138,600
4,480
4,480
O
O
O
O
O 1,248,800
62,480 1,526,680
O
134,800
O
138,800
4,480
O
O
O
O
O
O 1,248,800
O 1,526,680
Note #
Total Direct Costs
4.0'10
Total Costs
[FIscal Agent Fee
OTHER
O
O
O
O
Procesadores de Imagenes Indirect Costs
GBMF
Budge!
Noto.
Banetlts
specify:
Subtotal Personnel Salaries Consultants and Contracto,,"
Nalional Consultanls
Inlemational Consultanls
4-é;,.~)";
SUB-OUTPUT 6.2: Projecl
results disserninaled wllh Ihe five
regions of focus for RED O
implementalion in Peru and
public in general.
0.06!
2,376
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
62,480 2458,980
96,000 2,554 980
64,979
'98359
01 2,499
O 64,979 2,557,339
99,840 2,657,179
3,749
147,539
O
33 38401
102,188
=-::J
ATTACHMENT 3
BUDGET (#2242)
TOTAL IYears 1 - 2)
,
,'"
yEAR 1 IPerlod: mmlYl ~,lÍIín!yYt ,VEAR 2lPértod:
mm/Yy-mtrum
/::"~l
,~,\\
1 Del. A~'
!~?~?"", ."''',:::~~
-,
~
\"':,
'(
"j;""i~
,
,\ ~I'\.,
~
::,;:ít",
"
CURRENT USO EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80
Detalled Budget Total
Personnel
• Director Ejecutivo
Administrador
Comunicador
Responsable Componente (3)
Procesadores de Imegenes
Beneflts
Subtotal Personnel Salarles
Consultants aOO Contractors
Natíonal Consultants
Intematíonal Consultents
~,~~
,¡;)'?!;'.
-_ ¡
"rti'
8;"0\/"//
o1iN¡i;t~/"
.........,.,,~....."'.~ • .¡; I
Subtotal Consultan! and Contractor F_
Sub-Grants
Subtotal Other Dlrecl Expenses
Equlpment & Capital Expendltures
Scienlific Equípment
Vehicles (boals, trucks, motorcyclesJ
Infraslructurelrenoyation
Subtotal Equlpment & Expendltures
Total Dlrect Costs
IOOlrect Costs
JrP'
J:'J',
'
GElMF
OTHER
~1l-tCJtal: MINAM
,.'
,
TOTAL
GBMF
OTHER
O
O
O
96,000
O
O
96,000
108,000
72,000
72,000
288,000
O
540,000
108,000
72,000
72,000
192,000
O
O
444,000
410,700
123,200
O
O
533,900
O
O
O
O
410,700
123,200
O
O
533,900
331,500
156,800
O
O
488,300
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
220 000 2 862 080
2,458,980
114,083
98,359
O
O
O
2,737.363
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
105,28~
O
O
O
O
O
O
124,000
2.6~2,080
O
O
134,800
134,800
448,900
138,600
4,480
4,480
O
O
O
O
1,190,000 1,248,800
O
O
1,778,180 1,526,680
134,800
324,900
4,480
O
O
1,190,000
O
1,654,180
O
O
96,000
O
O
96,000
o
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
124,000
O
O
O
8,800
o
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
,
'T'V'
TOTAL
o
o
.o
O
O
c
"".:'
",
108,000
72,000
72,000
192,000
O
O
444,000
O
Subtotal Sub-Grants
Other Dlrect Expenses
Trayel (Transportalion & Lodging)
Training, Conferences and Workshops
Communication & Publlcatlons
Field Supplies
OIher Supplíes
Computers/SoftwarelSatellite ímagery
TÓTAL ('lears 1 - 2)
','
CÜRRENCY;'SOÚ¿S" ,". '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ..",......,..,.. ,,,
GBMF
108,000
72,000
72,000
288,000
O
OTHER
216,000
144,000
144,000
384,000
O
O
888,000
216,000
144,000
O 144,000
192,000. 576,000
O
O
O
O
192,000 1,080,000
742,200
331,500
280,000
156,800
O
O
O
O
488,300 1,022200
742,200
O
280,000
O
O
O
O
O
O 1,022,200
e
54O,OOC
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
o
o
o
O
289,600
567,500
8,960
O
O
2,438,800
O
3,304,860
134,800
269,600
138,600
463,600
8,960
4,480
O
O
O
O
1,248,800 2,438,800
O
O
1,526,680 3,180860
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
98359
203,642
96,000 2,653,339 5,294,702
228,1l1lll 2,966,163 2,551,339
•
34
O
O
e
96,000 2,654 980 5091,060
O
TOTAL
124,000
O
O
O
O
O
124,000
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
316 000 5 407 060
8800
212442
324,800 5,619,502
ATTACHMENT 3
BUDGET (#2242)
Geospatial Component
5/.2.80000
Estimated Cost (in USO)
Satellite Images
Alos images
$
360,000
Image processing
$
144,000
Sub-total
$
504,000
Field Veritication
Sampling of observation points
$
98,000
Conversion to PEN
Notes
SI. 1,008,000 Imágenes Alos Multiespectral (70x70Km). Resolution: aprox.
10m (total 401 imágenes a costo unitario de USS 900 c/u)
. Fecha Toma: 2006-2009
SI. 403,200 destinado en hombres/mes para el procesamiento de las
imágenes durante 18 meses
SI. 1,411,200
5/.274,400 Para el muestreo de aproximadamente 50 a 70 puntos de
observación en cada una de las 14 zonas o regiones con
cobertura de la región Amazónica, a razón de US$ 7000 por zona.
~",,_:_.
Trucks for field work
$
SI. O Compra de 02 camionetas para trabajos de campo a razón de
$
SI. O
SI. O
/::.;é\?,f;~"l~
..··c
I ~;.:/"" '.'
"\~.,~ck maintenance
I~~ \}r11n¡:fi~~ .~:..
,.;!'
US$ 35,000 cada una
.
$
,iííiJtotal
$
98,000
S/, 274,400
$
50,000
SI. 140,000 equipos PC Work Station, plotter, escáner y dispositivos de
almacenamiento de datos.
SI. 168,000 software de procesamiento y análisis de imágenes satelitales
(ENVio Similar que incluye la extensión Feature Extraction)
SI. 112,000 para la actualización de la plataforma ArcGlS Server que es el
sistema.en el que se soporta los servicios geoespaciales del
MINAM por 02 años.
SI. 140,000 para la programación de sistemas que desarrollen mecanismos
de acceso y distribución de información.
5/.84,000 para la adquisición de equipos móviles para recolección de datos
en campo y acceso a base de datos, teniendo en cuenta la
tecnologla y el soporte de Google.
SI. 78,400 en capacitación en procesamiento digital de imágenes aplicado al
\.,',i'.J.~s, ; /.'
~ .'1:;'if.jt~~~yGIS Platform
":¡."¡fNl\ \'
'~,-~_.•-
equipment (PC Work Station,
plotter, scanner, storage device)
processing software and analysis of $
satellite ¡mages
$
ArcGIS Server
pi
o
,
"
.
,
60,000
40,000
Systems for information access and $
distribution
$
Field equipmeat
50,000
$
28,000
Training in digital processing of
images
30,000
levantamiento de cobertura de la tierra; y en Análisis y
Modelamiento SIG para aplicaciones en medio ambiente. Cada
curso es de 02 semanas en ellGAC-Colombia
"
':.,
­
Sub-total
$
258,000
S/, 722,400
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
$
860,000
SI. 2,416,400
5/.8,400
35