HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH

Transcription

Facilities Engineering Seminar
Panel III: Terminal Technology – Not Just for Containers anymore
Technology in Container Handling – but more to come!
Dr. -Ing. Felix Kasiske, Partner, Head of Terminal Development & Design
Vancouver, BC 6th November 2013
© HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH
1
Agenda
Introduction
History & State-of-the-Art in Container Handling Technology
Scope of Technology Application – Big Bang vs. incremental Path
Outlook
2
Introduction
3
Introduction
HHLA Container Terminals in Hamburg
CTT Container Terminal Tollerort
Unikai Empty Container Storage (LZU)
CTB Container Terminal Burchardkai
CTA Container Terminal Altenwerder
March 2007 © Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG
4
Introduction
HPC Services
Container Terminal Automation Planning
Conceptual planning
- System selection
- System calibration
Concept validation
Assessment
Design &
Planning
Preparation
Full
Service
Provider
Realization
- Static assessments
- Dynamic simulations
2
Equipment definition
-
Specification
Tender Support
Construction supervision
3
IT + TOS selection
Commissioning
& Operations
Improvement
1
- Business Process Definition (BPM)
- Specification
4
- Tender support
Integration / Commissioning
- IT + equipment integration support
- Commissioning support
5
- Operations Optimization
5
Agenda
Introduction
Outlook
6
History of Technology Development
In Container Terminal Handling
2014 : APMT Maasvlakte II
2005 : Patrick AutoStrad Terminal, Brisbane
2001: HHLA Container Terminal Altenwerder
90s: DGPS Tracking
1993: ECT Rotterdam – first automated
container terminal
80s: Terminal Operating Systems
60s: typical container handling equipment
50s/60s: Malcom McLean’s idea and the twist-lock system
7
State-of-the-Art in Quayside Equipment
 Ship-to-Shore Container Cranes
Single Trolley
 Automated Twistlock Handling
Double Trolley
 Spreader
Single (Twin)
Tandem 40‘
Source: ZPMC
Source: Ramspreader
 Quaside Technology has Potential to be improved
8
State-of-the-Art in Horizontal Transport
 End of the 1980s Introduction at ECT Delta Terminal Rotterdam
 Lift AGV
Source: Gottwald/Terex
 2005 Adoption of Diesel-Electric Drives
 2007 Lift-AGV Concept (Decoupling)
 Since 2009 Battery AGV Test-Trial at CT Altenwerder Hamburg

Battery-Driven AGV
Diesel-Electric AGV8-12 hours of operation
Automated rapid battery changing & charging station
low exhaust
emissions
 Terminal Tractor
 Cassette AGV
Source: TTS
Source: Gottwald/Terex
Source:
Shuttle Carrier
Cagotec
Source: Cargotec
 To achieve higher Degree of Efficiency & Low Fuel Consumption in the Terminal
9
State-of-the-Art in Storage Yard Equipment
 ASC – Automated Stacking Crane
 Hybrid RTG with Ultracapacitor
 E-RTG
 Cable Reel System
Source: Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries
 Conductor Bar System
Source: Siemens
 High Performance, electrically Drives
 Store & Re-use braking Energy
Source: Conductix-Wampfler
 Electrification avoids On-Site Pollution
 Terminal “Electrification” requires Public Grid Capabilities !
10
CTA Hamburg – the last Milestone (2001)

Source HHLA

Manual twist-lock handling

Source HHLA





Source HHLA
 CTA had set the state for more than a decade of
terminal development
11
APMT Maasvlakte II – the next Step (2014)


Twist-lock handling?

Source APMT





 APMT Maasvlakte II is expected to set the new state by end of 2014
12
Agenda
Introduction
Outlook
13
Technology Application Criteria
Operator
External Drivers
Meeting Point
Environmental
Requirements
Labour availability
& reliability
Internal Goals
Improve safety and labor
conditions
Technology
Application
Lowering life cycle costs
Performance and
Reliability Requirements
Reduce equipment damage
Increasing traffic
vs.
limited area sizes
Increase the level of service
Equipment evolution &
technology
Customer
Satisfaction
Increase stacking density
14
Civil Structures
Civil Structures
Terminal Equipment
Terminal Equipment
Terminal Equipment
Layout and
Operations Validation
Operating Layout
Operating Layout
Operating Layout
Operations
Operations
Process
Planning
Terminal
Automated Terminal
Process
PlanningProcess
TerminalPlanning
Conventional
Automated
Technology changes Paradigms
From manual handling
and decision making
Source HHLA
Source HHLA
To robotics and
automated decisions
Source HHLA
Source HHLA
From freely adaptable
Source HHLA
To fixed configurations
Source HHLA
 Automated Terminals are long term running Machines with inherent Processes!
15
Trade-offs in Technology Application
 Productivity and operating cost gains
 Quality improvement
 Process stabilisation and reliability
 Electrification and emission reduction
 Safety improvement
 Image gains
Benefits
 Investment cost
 Training cost
Cost
Ability
 TOS capabilities
 Ability to integrate
 M&R cost
 Complexity management
 Cost of operations breakdown
 Usability
 Opportunity cost for reduced flexibility
 Safety and regulatory frameworks
 System Decisions Trade-Offs determine long term Capacity, Performance and Cost
16
Cumulative costs
Complexity of Technology Implementation
 Cost behavior resulting from increased complexity
 Sum of individual component implementation cost
Scope of Automation
 Complexity is THE automation cost driver
 Bing Bang solution require very professional management!
17
General Approach
Aspects to be considered
connection
to rail
terminal
also
automated?
Source
Gottwald
Source
Cargotec
remote
controlled
or automated
truck handover?
Source HHLA
Source HHLA
semi-automated
main trolley?
back reach handling
vs. portal served?
single vs. twin 20?
single vs. double 40?
single trolley vs.
double trolley?
All System Component Capacities must be balanced
All System Decisions determine a long term, difficult-to-change Investment
18
Big Bang vs. Incremental Approach
Greenfield Project
–
–
–
–
Political framework conditions and set timelines
Commercial performance expectations
Cost structures of competing players
Volume and complexity challenges
 Application of State-of-the-Art
Technology is Survival Decision
Conversion Project
– Scope of technology application and resulting
process changes
– Adequate sequencing of conversion steps
– Proper phasing of conversion of capacities
– Acceptance within existing labour organisation
 Application of State-of-the-Art
Technology incrementally or evolutionally
 Initial Situation determines Degree of Freedom in Design
19
Required Resources
Simulate
Feedback
Feedback
Consultants
Designers
Emulate
Data Input & Planning
Design
Feedback
Decision Makers
Decisions
Consultants &
Operators
Analyse & Evaluate
 Technology Application requires experienced Professionals
20
Agenda
Introduction
Outlook
21
Approach to Terminal Planning & Design
Off-the-Shelf “Integrated Solutions” ?
Off-the-Shelf/
Integrated




Reduced complexity
Faster implementation
Responsibility/liability can be
passed over to suppliers
Integration MAY BE less costly
and faster
Taylor Made/
Customer-driven
vs.



If done right, terminal remains
adaptable to market changes
Due to higher involvement of
operator, resources for
continuous optimization are
available inhouse
Options remain with terminal
operator to create a competitive
advantage
 Every Terminal is a unique Terminal and requires a specific Solution!
 Integrated Offers are not necessarily creating synergies at the customer
but for sure at the supplier site
22
HPC HAMBURG PORT CONSULTING GMBH
CONTACT ADDRESS
Dr.-Ing. Felix Kasiske
Container-Terminal Altenwerder
Am Ballinkai 1
D-21129 Hamburg
Germany
Phone:
+49 40 74008 132
Fax:
+49 40 74008 133
f.kasiske@hpc-hamburg.de
23

HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH

Transcription

Similar documents

Präsentation (nur englisch)

PRODUCT AND SERVICE GUIDE

polzug intermodal group - Logistik Sachsen

PORT OF HAMBURG

20140201-CSAVServiceNetwork

teco lines as

Simplex pile - FRANKI Grundbau