Hugh Hefner Is No Longer on Top at Playboy
Transcription
Hugh Hefner Is No Longer on Top at Playboy
Hugh Hefner Is No Longer on Top at Playboy 57,746 VIEWS FEB 16, 2011 @ 08:17 AM Jeff Bercovici FORBES STAFF I cover technology with an emphasis on social and digital media. FOLLOW ON FORBES (1287) Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own. FULL BIO Watson Health: Cogn... Learn more about this story Using data analytics to speed up clinical drug trials Check out the IBM Watson press kit Conversation 2h IBM Watson @IBMWatson Hugh Hefner may not be the big dog at Playboy anymore, but he still enjoys certain perks. Image via Wikipedia Last month, Playboy Enterprises announced that “a limited partnership controlled by Hugh M. Hefner” had made a $207 million Using #ChefWatson & @bonappetit's app, @NatGeo whipped up Black Tea BlueberryBasil Granita. bit.ly/1RgQ6qR http://t.co/UxKWc1QjnI Reply Retweet Favorite 4h Follow @IBMWatson Enhance apps with Watson APIs. Register for the web series #BuildingWithWatson for IBM Watson @IBMWatson deal to buy out the company’s shares and take it private. To most observers, this meant that Hefner once again owned the magazine he founded back in 1953. That was the thrust of dozens of news stories about the transaction, anyway. Recommended by Forbes MOST POPULAR Photos: The 10 Best And Worst States To Make A Living In 2015 TRENDING ON LINKEDIN 7 Ways To Blow Your Boss's Mind Northwestern MutualVoice: 3 Rules For Starting A Business With A Friend In fact, Playboy sources say that Hefner’s postacquisition control of the famed brand is largely honorary. Practically speaking, Hefner is decidedly the junior partner in the new venture, called Icon Acquisition Holdings LP. That’s certainly true in terms of ownership: Moody’s Investors Service estimated the size of his stake at 37 percent in a debt rating issued Friday. That’s against the 60 percent stake held by Rizvi Traverse Management, the private equity firm that backed him in the buyout. (Playboy CEO Scott Flanders owns the remaining piece.) How can Hefner supposedly be the controlling partner when he’s also the minority partner? A Playboy spokeswoman declined to answer that question, saying she could only discuss information that has been publicly disclosed in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Those documents don’t reveal anything about the ownership makeup of Icon Acquisition Holdings. They do, however, include Hefner’s employment agreement. Under the terms of his $1 millionayear contract, the 84year old is guaranteed full editorial control of the magazine and the right to continue living in the Playboy Mansion for a nominal rent. The contract automatically renews after five years, and provides for Hefner to stay in the mansion even if he leaves the company. Those concessions, according to the Playboy insiders, were the most important ones to Hefner in any deal and the ones he focused on in negotiations with Rizvi and other potential suitors. ADVERTISING Hefner’s employment agreement also bestows upon him “the right to approve the overall image, costume and promotional outfits used by Playboy Bunnies.” It ensures he’ll have “meaningful consultation rights” over the design of Playboy casinos. And it grants him “the right to approve the creative content, marketing and packaging of Alta Loma Entertainment productions,” which include “The Girls Next Door,” his reality show. The agreement doesn’t say anything, however, about Hefner having authority over Playboy’s other television or radio operations or its website, or any input at all into businessside operations. In fact, a confidential presentation created last year for the special committee charged with evaluating the competing bids for Playboy laid out a “base case” assumption in which the digital and television businesses are sold in 2012. Although Hefner only owned a minority of the public shares of Playboy Enterprises — which yesterday reported a $14.7 million loss for its last quarter as a public company — he maintained control of the company through his ownership of nearly 70 percent of the Class A voting shares. A twotier share structure is a common mechanism for owners who want to tap the public markets without surrendering control. But that would be highly unusual for a private entity like the one that was formed to acquire Playboy, says David Bank, managing director of global media and Internet research at RBC Capital Markets. “The majority of the equity capital being contributed to the transaction is coming from Rizvi,” says Bank. “Ultimately, operating control tends to be fairly closely associated in a goprivate transaction with equity contribution.” Carl Salas, the Moody’s analyst who prepared the report on Playboy, says that in private companies, “certain minority shareholders can have veto rights on certain things. That is not too uncommon.” But, he adds, “in this instance, I don’t have any information related to that.” Salas says Playboy reviewed the Moody’s report he prepared in advance of publication and did not dispute his estimates for the size of the partners’ stakes. Comment on this story Report Corrections Reprints & Permissions SEE ALSO TOP 10 PRIVATE HOW TO START PRIVATE BUSINESS EFFECTIVE SMALL SOCIAL MEDIA Promoted Stories 1. Buffett Tells You How To Turn $40 Into $10 Million 2 months ago fool.com The Motley Fool Fool.com (sponsored) 2.