10. Presentation by T. Rowe Price Investment Services (Large Value
Transcription
10. Presentation by T. Rowe Price Investment Services (Large Value
10. Presentation by T. Rowe Price Investment Services (Large Value) - Annual Performance Review as of December 31,2010 10 U.S. Large-Cap Value Strategy Presentation To: Mark S. Finn, CFA, CPA Portfolio Manager 410-345-7660 mark_finn@troweprice.com John D. Linehan, CFA Director of U.S. Equity 410-345-4605 john_linehan@troweprice.com 13 April 2011 William D. Nolan Portfolio Specialist 410-345-4817 bill_nolan@troweprice.com John D. Plowright, CFA Institutional Client Service Executive 415-772-1117 john_plowright@troweprice.com United States 100 East Pratt Street Baltimore, MD 21202 United States +1.410.345.2000 United Kingdom 60 Queen Victoria Street London, EC4N 4TZ United Kingdom +44.20.7651.8200 Denmark Lautrupsgade 7 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark +45.33.36.05.00 Singapore 290 Orchard Road 14-04 Paragon Singapore 238859 +65.6836.8987 Luxembourg 35 Boulevard Prince Henri L-1724 Luxembourg Grand Duchy of Luxembourg +352.27.47.251 Hong Kong 1 Connaught Place Room 2101-2120 Jardine House, 21st Floor Central Hong Kong +852.2536.7800 Australia Level 50, Governor Phillip Tower 1 Farrer Place, Suite 50B Sydney NSW 2000 Australia +61.2.8667.5700 the Netherlands Strawinsklylaan 1047 1077 XX Amsterdam the Netherlands +31.20.333.62.00 Dubai International Financial Centre P.O. Box 482023 The Gate, Level 15, Office 24 Dubai United Arab Emirates +971.4.4019266 Switzerland Dreikoenigstrasse 31a 8002 Zurich Switzerland +41.44.208.3905 Argentina Carlos Pellegrini 1149 Piso 12 Buenos Aires C1009ABW Argentina +54.11.4394.4089 Japan NBF Hibiya Bldg, 20th Floor 1-7, Uchisaiwai - cho 1 - chome Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-0011 Japan +81.3.3504.1810 Canada Brookfield Place - TD Canada Trust Tower 161 Bay Street, Suite 2700 Toronto, ON M5J 2S1 Canada +1.416.572.2580 Issued in the USA by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD, 21202, which is regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The material is not intended to be a solicitation for any product or service not available to U.S. investors, including the T. Rowe Price Funds SICAV, and may be distributed only to institutional investors. Issued in Japan by T. Rowe Price International Ltd, Tokyo Branch (“TRPILTB”) (KLFB Registration No. 445 (Financial Instruments Service Provider), JSIAA Membership No. 011-01162),located at NBF Hibiya Building 20F, 1-7, Uchisaiwai-cho 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0011. This material is intended for use by professional investors only and may not be disseminated without the prior approval of TRPILTB. Issued in Canada by T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc. T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc. enters into written delegation agreements with affiliates to provide investment management services. T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc. is not registered to provide investment management business in all Canadian provinces. Our investment management services are only available to select clients in those provinces where we are able to provide such services. This material is intended for use by accredited investors only. Issued in Australia by T. Rowe Price International Ltd (“TRPIL”), Level 50, Governor Phillip Tower, 1 Farrer Place, Suite 50B, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia. TRPIL is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Financial Services license (“AFSL”) in respect of the financial services it provides in Australia. TRPIL is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Services Authority (the “FSA”) under UK laws, which differ from Australian laws. This material is not intended for use by Retail Clients, as defined by the FSA, or as defined in the Corporations Act (Australia), as appropriate. Issued in New Zealand by T. Rowe Price International Ltd (“TRPIL”). TRPIL is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Services Authority under UK laws, which differ from New Zealand laws. This material is intended only for use by persons who are not members of the public, by virtue of section 3(2)(a)(ii) of the Securities Act 1978 and is not intended for public distribution nor as a solicitation for investments from members of the public. This material may not be redistributed without prior written consent from TRPIL. Issued outside of the USA, Japan, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand by T. Rowe Price International Ltd, 60 Queen Victoria Street, London EC4N 4TZ, which is authorised and regulatedby the UK Financial Services Authority (the “FSA”). This material is not intended for use by Retail Clients, as defined by the FSA. T. Rowe Price, Invest With Confidence and the Bighorn Sheep logo are registered trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. in the United States, European Union, Australia, Canada, Japan, and other countries. This material was produced in the United Kingdom. Table of Contents Section A: Company Overview Section B: Investment Discipline and Process Section C: Market Overview Section D: Performance Review Section E: Portfolio Review and Characteristics Section F: Fee Schedule Section G: Additional Information and Disclosures Section H: Performance Statistics Glossary Section I: Biographical Backgrounds 91083 (5/2010) Section A: Company Overview 1 T. Rowe Price — Presenters Portfolio Management Mark S. Finn, CFA, CPA Vice President — Portfolio Manager • 20 years investment experience; • 20 years with T. Rowe Price. Director of U.S. Equity John D. Linehan, CFA Vice President — Director of U.S. Equity and Portfolio Manager • 21 years of investment experience; • 12 years with T. Rowe Price. Portfolio Specialist William D. Nolan Vice President — Portfolio Specialist • 19 years investment experience; • 1 year with T. Rowe Price. Client Service John Plowright, CFA Vice President — Institutional Client Service Executive • 19 years experience in fixed income and institutional client service; • 6 years with T. Rowe Price. 2 T. Rowe Price Update As of 31 Dec 2010 Figures Shown in U.S. Dollars Long Tenure Perpetuates Our Philosophy and Investment Approach Continued Investment in Our Global Research Team 400 300 330 Portfolio Manager Average Tenure $500 14 years 339 $400 Portfolio Manager Average Investment Experience 256 237 250 200 3852 $300 202 191 $200 150 19 years Billions Investment Professionals 350 PMs, PM/Analysts, Portfolio Specialists Analysts, Associate Analysts, Specialty Analysts All Others 285 Total Assets Under Management1 Management Committee Average Tenure 20 years 100 Management Committee Average Investment Experience $100 50 0 25 years 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 $0 0 5 10 15 20 25 • Financial Strength and Strategic Investment: - Strong balance sheet with $1.6 billion in cash and no outstanding long-term debt - Steady growth in global assets, with a compound annual growth rate of 11.2% in total AUM over 10 years - Diversity of assets: U.S. Equity 60.2%, Non-U.S. Equity 14.6%, U.S. Fixed Income 21.1%, and Non-U.S. Fixed Income 4.1% • Measured Growth of our Investment Team in 2010: - Fixed Income hired 1 associate portfolio manager, 6 quantitative analysts, 5 credit analysts (2 in the U.S., 2 in London, and 1 in Hong Kong), 2 traders, and 2 trading assistants - Equity hired 1 portfolio manager in Australia, 1 portfolio specialist in London, 6 analysts in the U.S., 2 analysts in Singapore, 1 analyst in Hong Kong, and 5 analysts in London - 9 Equity and 2 Fixed Income 2010 MBA interns were located in Baltimore, Hong Kong, London, and Singapore, and 7 of the 11 interns received full-time offers - Expanded investment management and research capabilities in Sydney and Hong Kong offices - Opened a representative office in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) to serve clients based in the Middle East The combined assets under management of the T. Rowe Price group of companies as of 31 December 2010. The T. Rowe Price group of companies includes T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, Inc., T. Rowe Price Global Investment Services Limited, and T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc. 2 76 portfolio managers, 20 portfolio manager/analysts, 123 research analysts/Credit Analysts, 24 quantitative analysts, 11 asset allocation analysts, 4 investment risk management analysts, 2 distribution management specialist/analysts, 23 associate analysts, 16 portfolio specialist/generalists, 2 specialty analysts, 54 traders, 2 economists, 20 portfolio modeling associates, and 8 management associates. 1 5 3 T. Rowe Price Perspectives and Research As of 31 Dec 2010 Institutional Website Content • Investment Dialogues/Viewpoints: - Scott Berg, Global Large-Cap Equity Strategy portfolio manager, on Emerging Markets Equities - China: Investing for the Long-Term Structural Story • Web Videos: - Fixed Income portfolio managers Steve Huber and Mike Conelius outlook for 2011 - Equity portfolio managers David Giroux’s and Ray Mills’ views on sustainability of the market rally in 2011 - Chief Economist Alan Levenson’s views on economic momentum in 2011 • Select 2011 Outlook Commentary from T. Rowe Price Press Briefing: - William Stromberg, Director of Global Equity and Global Equity Research - Today’s scary macro environment contrasts with an encouraging micro environment. The result is a mixed but largely positive outlook for 2011. - Corporations will remain fiscally disciplined — but we expect some catch-up capital spending. - Corporate earnings have been resilient — but growth will be harder to come by. - Alan Levenson, Chief Economist on U.S. Economy - The economic recovery is poised to keep moving forward, despite the lingering restraints from the financial crisis. - Although mortgages still pose a risk, relative stability in house prices suggests pressures are easing. - An inflation trough is coming into view. - Larry Puglia, U.S. Large-Cap Core Growth Portfolio Manager on U.S. Equities - U.S. large-cap stock valuations are reasonable; however, small-caps may face some valuation risks. - Companies generating consistent growth could become more rare and valuable in a lackluster environment. - Robert Smith, International Growth Portfolio Manager on International Equities - Valuations of high-quality companies in developed markets are reasonable but not super-compelling. - Valuations in emerging markets are a bit high but fair, given the superior growth expectations. - Tim Parker, Natural Resources Portfolio Manager on Commodities - Natural resources stocks do not fully reflect the sector’s positive long-term fundamentals. - Natural resources demand from emerging markets is strong, driven by industrialization and domestic consumption. - Steve Huber, Fixed Income Portfolio Manager on Fed Policy and the U.S. Dollar - Federal Reserve policy likely will keep short-term interest rates near zero through 2011. - The 30-year decline in interest rates may be ending, despite the slow-growth outlook. - The dollar likely will continue to depreciate over the long term. Visit our institutional website at troweprice.com/institutional for news and updates. 6 4 Assets Under Management U.S. Large-Cap Value Assets: U.S. Large-Cap Value Strategy: $51.1 Billion1 $5.5 Billion As of 31 Dec 2010 Figures Shown in U.S. Dollars U.S. Value Strategy 28.4% U.S. Large-Cap Value Strategy 10.8% Value Strategy Large Cap Value Taxable Large Cap Equity Incom U.S. Large-Cap Value Taxable Strategy 0.1% Large Cap Value Strateg U.S. Large-Cap Equity Income Strategy 60.7% 1 The combined U.S. large-cap value assets of the T. Rowe Price group of companies. 5 Large-Cap Value Investment Team As of 31 Dec 2010 U.S. Large-Cap Value Strategy Portfolio Management Team Stability | Depth | Collaboration John D. Linehan, CFA Portfolio Manager Brian C. Rogers, CFA, CIC Portfolio Manager • 21 years of investment experience; • 12 years with T. Rowe Price. - BA, Amherst College - MBA, Stanford University • 31 years of investment experience; • 28 years with T. Rowe Price. - AB, Harvard College - MBA, Harvard Business School Mark S. Finn, CFA, CPA Portfolio Manager William Nolan Portfolio Specialist • 19 years of investment • 20 years of investment experience; experience; • 20 years with T. Rowe Price. • 1 year with T. Rowe Price. - BS, Johns Hopkins - BS, University of Delaware University Equity Research Team 123 Research Professionals | Industry Specialists1 Extensive collaboration among investment professionals enhances idea generation. 1 9 portfolio managers/analysts, 85 research analysts, 23 associate research analysts, 4 quantitative analysts, and 2 specialty analysts. 7 6 Representative U.S. Client List 31 Dec 2010 As of December 31, 2010 Corporate 3M ABB, Inc. Avaya, Inc. BASF Becton, Dickinson & Co. Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. Cargill, Inc. Carpenter Technology Corporation Caterpillar, Inc. Dow Corning Corporation Entergy Services, Inc. GlaxoSmithKline Goodrich Corporation Invensys, Inc. ITT Industries, Inc. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. Kaman Corporation Merck & Co., Inc. National Grid Owens Corning Corporation Pitney Bowes, Inc. Public Service Company of New Mexico Raytheon Company The Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. Saint-Gobain Corporation Textron, Inc. Union Pacific Corp. The Williams Companies Public Nonprofit Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation Alaska Retirement Management Board Arlington County Employees’ Retirement System Commonwealth of Massachusetts Deferred Compensation Plan Dallas Employees’ Retirement Fund Delaware Public Employees’ Retirement System Hawaii Employees’ Retirement System Illinois Teachers’ Retirement System Imperial County Employees’ Retirement System Maryland State Retirement & Pension System Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Minnesota State Board of Investment Nebraska State Investment Council New York City Deferred Compensation New York City Retirement System Public Employees’ Retirement System of Idaho Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi Texas Tomorrow Funds Vermont State Retirement System Virginia Retirement System Alfred I. duPont Testamentary Trust University of Arkansas Foundation, Inc. Baycare Health System Board of Pensions of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Brooklyn College Foundation Charles A. Frueauff Foundation, Inc. The Church Foundation Colby College Dartmouth College Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System, Inc. Goucher College The Henry Luce Foundation, Inc. Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati John A. Hartford Foundation, Inc. Knights of Columbus Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, Inc. Lucile Packard Foundation Meyer Memorial Trust Museum of Fine Arts, Boston New Church Investment Fund Presbyterian College Richard King Mellon Foundation Sisters of Mercy of North Carolina Foundation Swarthmore College The Walters Art Museum Wheaton College William T. Grant Foundation Taft-Hartley Greyhound Amalgamated Trusts IAM National Pension Fund Operating Engineers, Local #18 Plumbers and Pipefitters, Local #74 The clients listed represent a sample based on asset size and those who have given their approval for inclusion in these materials. The clients have not been selected based on the performance of their accounts. Not all clients are invested in the same strategy and the inclusion of a client does not constitute an endorsement of the investment management services provided by any of the T. Rowe Price companies. 3 7 Your Institutional Team Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Primary Contact: John D. Plowright, CFA Institutional Client Service Executive Phone: 415-772-1117 Fax: 415-772-1111 E-mail: john_plowright@troweprice.com Serves as your main point of contact and provides a link to the resources of T. Rowe Price. Conducts portfolio reviews, coordinates reporting, and gets answers to your questions. Secondary Contact: David B. Orlando Instituational Client Service Executive Phone: 415-772-1103 Fax: 415-772-1111 E-mail: david_orlando@troweprice.com Available to address your questions and concerns when your primary contact is unavailable. Operations: Anne Momberger Institutional Client Operations Manager Phone: 410-345-2268 Fax: 410-345-2829 E-mail: anne_momberger@troweprice.com Addresses contributions and distributions to and from your account, works closely with your primary client service contact and investment support to resolve operational issues, and coordinates review of legal agreements. Your client service team is your partner in getting you the information you need. 8 Section B: Investment Discipline and Process 9 Equity Research Team Director of Global Equity Research Technology Kamran Baig Media/Telecom Nalin Yogasundram Thomas H. Watson Alison Yip Medtech, Dental, Orthopedic Daniel Martino, CFA1 Also has portfolio Also has portfolio management responsibilities. 2 management responsibilities. 9 portfolio manager/analysts, 2 985portfolio researchmanager/analysts, analysts, 23 85 research analysts, 23 associate research analysts, associate research analysts, 4 quantitative analysts, and 42 quantitative analysts, and specialty analysts as of 231specialty analysts December 2010.as of December 31, 2010. 1 Natural Resources Hospital Supply, Life Sciences and Ophthalmology Rouven Wool-Lewis, Ph.D. Health Care Services Health Care Services David M. Lee, CFA1 Eric C. Moffett Jason Polun, CFA Hwee Jan Ng, CFA Kathryn Mongelli Money Center Banks, Specialty Finance Mitchell Todd, CA Christopher T. Fortune Sridhar Nishtala European Banks Telecom Services & Cable Japan Telecom Services Real Estate Asia Ex-Japan Financials Ian C. McDonald, CFA Asia Ex-Japan Real Estate Europe Media, Telecom Services Frederick Rizzo, CFA Credit Card Processors Gabriel Solomon Asia Telecom Services Europe Insurance/Financials Eric L. Veiel, CFA1 Life Insurance, Asset Managers, Investment Banks Marta Yago Yoichiro Kai Canadian Insurance Companies; Asia Ex-Japan Insurance Exchanges Daniel Flax Andrew Fones Inigo Mijangos Joshua B. Nelson Clark R. Shields Paulina Amieva Archibald Ciganer, CFA Michael Lasota Robert T. Quinn, Jr. Jonty Starbuck, CFA Information Technology, Consulting, Market Research Payroll Processors, Staffing, Education Multi-line, P&C Insurance Europe Business Services Francisco M. Alonso Japan Food & Beverage, Tobacco, Cruise Lines, Commercial Home Personal Care, Retail Brokers, Lodging Ira W. Carnahan, CFA Barry Henderson Peter J. Bates, CFA Jonathan Chou Payroll Processors, Staffing, Education Jessie Ding Soft Goods, Hard Goods, Discount Stores, Textiles, Apparel Consumer Discretionary Ian C. McDonald, CFA Food, Beverage, Tobacco, Personal Care, Cosmetics, Conglomerates (Multi-Cap) Soft Goods, Toys, Nutrition, Diet Hard Goods, Discount Stores, and Direct Sellers, Outdoor Gaming Equipment Sridhar Nishtala European Retail and Luxury Goods Amit Seth Asia Ex-Japan Conglomerates, Retail, Food & Beverage, Tobacco, Branded Apparel, Footwear Home Personal Care, Leisure & Gaming Environmental Services, Railroads, Industrial Manufacturing, Agriculture Equipment, Capital Goods, Mega Conglomerates Automobile Manufacturers, Distributors Jin Jeong Europe Capital Goods, Auto Archibald Ciganer, CFA Jeremy Kokemor Andrew Davis Lillian Y. Li, CFA Haider Ali Vitaliy Elbert Steven D. Krichbaum Martin Baylac Latin America Generalist José Costa Buck1 Jeneiv Shah, CFA Airlines Curt J. Organt, CFA Japan Industrial Manufacturing Shawn T. Driscoll Emerging Europe, Middle East, and Africa Generalist David L. Rowlett, CFA Sridhar Nishtala Asia Ex-Japan Infrastructure Asia Ex-Japan Infrastructure Shinwoo Kim Ulle Adamson, CFA Susanta Mazumdar1 Small- and Mid-Cap Generalist, Distribution Archibald Ciganer, CFA Japan Utilities Sebastian Schrott Housing Small- Mid-Cap Metals Asia Ex-Japan Oil and Gas, Bulk Metals & Mining Commodities, Non-ferrous Metals Mark S. Finn, CFA, CPA1 Ryan N. Burgess Utilities - Electric & Power Chemicals, Utilities Generation, Coal Latin America Generalist 10 Taymour R. Tamaddon, CFA Jason Nogueira, CFA Health Care Services Hari Balkrishna Paul D. Greene Exploration & Production, Coal, Engineering & Construction Regional Generalists Asia Ex-Japan Generalist Wenli Zheng Railroads 1 Graham M. McPhail Alternative Energy Christopher Whitehouse Transport 31 Dec 2010 AsAsofofDecember 31, 2010 Software Internet Infrastructure, Cable, Canadian Telecom Services Latin America Retail Industrials U.S. Pharmaceuticals & Biotech Japan Generalist Semiconductors & Equipment Justin P. White Japan Financials/Real Estate Kes Visuvalingam, CFA Kris H. Jenner, MD, D. Phil1 Small- and Mid-Cap Generalist Hiroaki Owaki, CFA Japan Internet, Media & Advertising Real Estate Director of Equity Research, Asia Andrew R. Hyman, MD Archibald Ciganer, CFA O.U.S. Pharmaceutical Financial Services Nina Jones, CPA Consumer/Retail Small-Cap Generalist O.U.S. Biotech, Medtech, Pharmaceuticals Banks (Smaller)/Thrifts Business Services PC Hardware, Storage Melissa Gallagher, Ph.D. Europe Banks Director of Equity Research, North America Jason B. Polun, CFA Joshua K. Spencer, CFA Hiroaki Owaki, CFA Advertising, Diversified Media, Radio, TV, Publishing Director of Equity Research, North America Charles G. Pepin Shalin Mody Rhett K. Hunter Mark Bussard, MD Health Care Director of Equity Research, North America Anna M. Dopkin, CFA Daniel Flax David J. Eiswert, CFA1 Software U.S. & Europe Communications Equipment William J. Stromberg, CFA Director of Equity Research, EMEA and Latin America Kennard W. Allen1 Energy Services Small-Cap Utilities Ben Landy Austin M. Powell, CFA Susanta Mazumdar1 Global Energy Majors, Heather K. McPherson, CPA1 Exploration and Production, Refining Paper, Forest Products Rick de los Reyes1 Inigo Mijangos Utilities Metals & Mining Timothy E. Parker, CFA 1 Transaction Processors, Financial Services Related, Other Europe Food, Beverage, Tobacco, Personal Care, Gaming, Lodging Ashley R. Woodruff, CFA Restaurants, Supermarkets Eunbin Song Steel, Shipbuilding, E&C, Power Equipment, Tech Materials Eastern Europe Autos, Transport, Kwame Webb, CFA Trucking, Airlines, Air Freight, Airlines Logistics (Small-Cap) John C. A. Sherman Aerospace and Defense, Transport, Christopher Yip, CFA Asia Ex-Japan Industrial Logistics Manufacturing Clark R. Shields Wenli Zheng Air Freight, Logistics Asia Ex-Japan Power Equipment Aerospace and Defense Craig Pennington Asia Ex-Japan Utilities European Real Estate, Asset Managers and Brokerage Firms, Rating Agencies Naoto Saito Energy Service, Exploration and Japan Energy, Chemicals, Production, Global Energy Majors Trading Companies Ami Shah Europe Utilities Jeneiv Shah, CFA Eastern Europe Mid-Cap Oils John C. A. Sherman Chemicals John Williams Energy Nalin Yogasundram Alternative Energy Fertilizer, Industrial Gases Simon Cheng, CFA Mark Lawrence, CFA Joseph Rohm1 Greater China Small-Cap Generalist Middle East and Africa Generalist Emerging Europe, Middle East, Sebastien Mallet and Africa Generalist Uebe Rezeck Filho Europe Small-Cap Generalist Europe Small-Cap Generalist Francisco Sersale Ben Griffiths, CFA Leigh Innes, CFA1 Latin America Generalist Europe Small-Cap Generalist Emerging Europe, Middle East Miki Takeyama, CMA and Africa Generalist Japan Small- and Mid-Cap Generalist 123 Equity Research Professionals worldwide.2 Sindee Tan, CFA Europe Small-Cap Generalist Verena Wachnitz, CFA Latin America Generalist Hiroshi Watanabe, CFA Japan Small- and Mid-Cap Generalist Equity Research • Research is the lifeblood of our organization - Investment idea generation - Professional development: focused mentoring effort nurtures investment talent — career analyst or portfolio management track • Fundamental approach to research — analysts are industry specialists across capitalization and style - Understanding impact of all competitors within an industry group is key to assessing the outlook for any individual company - Ideas leveraged across styles as valuation opportunities arise • Formal and informal communication channels foster a collaborative research approach - Multiple signaling tools communicate analysts’ conviction and urgency — company rankings, blue sheets, analyst portfolios, and weekly meetings - Ongoing informal interaction between the portfolio managers and analysts is also central to the process • Rigorous performance and contribution review drives compensation - Key retention tools include performance-based bonus and equity participation Extensive analyst interaction across industry groups, sectors, and asset classes promotes a broad perspective and timely decision-making. 11 5 Value Distortions and Investor Psychology Large-cap companies are at times inefficiently priced Stock Price Mispriced Intrinsic Value Mispriced Controversy causes investor anxiety Resolution restores investor confidence Corrective strategies implemented Time 11 12 Investment Philosophy and Approach U.S. Large-Cap Value Strategy • Focus on relative value relationships to opportunistically identify attractively valued companies • Fundamental research is key to uncovering companies with potential for stock price mean reversion • A long-term orientation allows for the full exploitation of valuation anomalies • Diversified portfolios help to manage portfolio risk profile 13 12 Investment Process Universe Market Caps Generally Greater than $5B Initial Screening • Relative Valuation Filter • Analyst Research Investment Candidates Compelling valuation relative to historic norms Quantitative Analysis Fundamental Analysis • Evaluate company projections and financial outlook • In-depth financial statement and relative valuation analysis • Assess the potential for change in investment sentiment • Are current issues facing the company correctable? • Use absolute valuation metrics to confirm investment appeal • Assess competitive positioning, quality of assets and management Balance Valuation Appeal and Quality of Company Portfolio Construction (70-80 stocks) 13 14 Qualitative Dynamics Investment Process U.S. Large-Cap Value Strategy Buy Criteria • Identify candidate companies whose earnings and dividend streams appear mispriced • Integrate fundamental research assessment - Focus on improving financial outlook • Apply qualitative overlay - Potential for improved investor perception • Verify relative valuation anomalies through quantitative analysis - Focus on relevant valuation metrics • Balance valuation analysis versus qualitative overlay Sell Criteria • Upside achieved — valuation gap narrows • Significant change in fundamental assessment • Deterioration in financial strength 15 14 Portfolio Construction U.S. Large-Cap Value Representative Portfolio1 As of 31 Dec 2010 Number of Holdings 30 U.S. Large-Cap Value Representative Portfolio1 20 10 0 0.00-0.50% 0.51-1.00% 1.01-1.50% 1.51-2.00% >2.01% Concentrated positions are avoided to control portfolio risk profile. 1 15 16 The representative portfolio is an account in the composite we believe most closely reflects current portfolio management style for the strategy. Performance is not a consideration in the selection of the representative portfolio. The characteristics of the representative portfolio shown may differ from those of the composite and of the other accounts in the composite. Information regarding the representative portfolio and the other accounts in the composite is available upon request. Supplemental information. Portfolio Construction Diversified Portfolio Structure • 70-80 stock portfolio • Individual position sizes range to 5% — average position size of 1% to 2% • Sector weights will typically vary from 0.5X to 2.0X of primary value sectors of the S&P 500 Index and of the primary sectors of the Russell 1000 Value Index • Reserves will range from 0% to 2% 17 16 Client Objective Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Retirement Plan: Total Assets = $433,425,674 As of 28 Feb 2011 Inception Date: 1 Oct 2004 Inception Amount: $248,180,297 Health Benefits Plan: Total Assets = $62,319,621 As of 28 Feb 2011 Inception Date: 15 Sep 2009 Inception Amount: $41,982,244 Figures Shown in U.S. Dollars Objective • The objective is to provide substantial dividend income as well as long-term capital appreciation through investments in common stocks of established companies. Mandate • U.S. Large-Cap Value: Separately Managed Portfolio Strategy Assets as of 31 Dec 2009: $5.5 Billion Benchmark • Russell 1000 Value Index Investment Guidelines • Cash will not exceed 5% of portfolio. • No more than 5% of the portfolio or 125% of a security’s index weighting shall be invested in a single issuer. • No single issue shall represent more than 10% of the portfolio. • Shares may not be purchased in the portfolio if T. Rowe Price holds on aggregate more than 10% of that issuer’s outstanding shares. 18 Section C: Market Overview 19 Wide Divergence Between Sector Performance Russell 1000 Value Index Sector Performance From 1 Jan 2000 to 31 Dec 2003 From 31 Dec 2003 to 31 Dec 2010 Consumer Staples s Financials s 33.6 Health Care e 32.4 29.5 Industrials and Bus. Servs.s. 42.5 28.7 Energy y Utilities s 86.5 Materials s 75.4 57.1 42.4 23.1 7.5 -7.2 -36.2 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 -28.5 183.0 Consumer Discretionary y 29.2 Information Technology y 24.6 Telecom Services -57.2 97.2 50.2 . -100 -50 0 Percent 50 100 150 200 250 Percent Performance differentials among sectors have been large. Sources: Wilshire, T. Rowe Price. T. Rowe Price uses the MSCI/S&P Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) for sector and industry reporting. Each year, MSCI and S&P make changes to the GICS structure. The last change occurred on 1 July 2010. T. Rowe Price will adhere to all future updates to GICS for prospective reporting. Sample Footnote.eps 20 Q4 2010 Global Equity Markets Overview As of 31 Dec 2010 U.S. stocks rose briskly in Q4 2010: Markets. U.S. stocks rallied in the fourth quarter, closing near their highest levels of the year. The S&P 500 Index rose 10.8% for the quarter and 15% for the year. Equities were buoyed by the Federal Reserve’s implementation of a second round of quantitative easing (QE2), the economy’s reacceleration from its mid-year pause, and the extension of the Bush-era tax cuts. The S&P500 Index has now risen 86% since the March 2009 low. Stock Sectors. Each S&P 500 sector rose in Q4 and 6 of the 10 sectors delivered double digit returns with Energy (+21%) and Materials (+19.%) leading the way – benefiting from rising commodities prices. Health Care (+4%) and Utilities (+1%) lagged as they have done throughout this bull market. . Economy. Inflation remains subdued, with consumer prices rising only 0.1% in November. Consumers are beginning to feel a bit more optimistic about their job prospects and the direction of the economy. The government reported that the U.S. economy grew at an annualized rate of 2.6% in the third quarter, slightly faster than was previously estimated. The unemployment rate remained stubbornly high at 9.8%. Fiscal and Monetary Policy. Fiscal and monetary policy remained expansionary. QE2, the extension of existing tax rates, and passage of a payroll tax cut were each designed to bolster confidence and foster growth. International stocks also advanced in Q4 2010: Markets. International markets also advanced in Q4 - but by less than in the U.S. Japan rose 12%, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index rose 7% while developed markets, as measured by the MSCI EAFE Index, gained 7%. In the past three months, developed stocks in Europe have lagged other regions due to investor concerns about the European debt crisis. Economies. Euro-zone growth began to struggle as the debt crisis reasserted. Government bond yields have soared in many countries within the euro-zone, and the major credit agencies signaled that Spain, Portugal, and possibly Belgium face near-term credit ratings downgrades. Emerging market economies remained very strong – especially the large growth engines of China and India. The central banks of both countries have raised interest rates and bank reserve requirements to try and reduce budding speculation and inflation. Currency and Commodities. The U.S. dollar reversed trend and gained against most major currencies in Q4, climbing almost 7% versus the Euro. Commodities prices rose again during Q4 as investors continued to buy hard assets in anticipation of a possible spike in inflation down the road. Gold continued to rally, ending the quarter near record levels. 21 2010 — A Roller Coaster Year As of 31 Dec 2010 S&P 500 and the 10-Year Treasury Yield 4.5 1400 November General Motors IPO 1300 November European fears returned, this time centred on Ireland 4 1200 S&P 500 March Health care reform bill passed 1000 April Rig explosion and oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico 900 May Bailout package for Greece announced 800 700 July Financial reform bill passed November Quantitative Easing 2 announced 3.5 3 10-Year Treasury Yield 1100 2.5 S&P 500 10 Year Treasury Yield 600 Dec-09 Sources: Factset, Standard & Poor’s. Feb-10 Apr-10 Jun-10 Aug-10 Oct-10 2 Dec-10 22 U.S. Equities Total Return Performance By Style and Capitalization As of 31 Dec 2010 By Style Growth outperformed value for quarter and year By Market Capitalization Small-caps lead for the year Total Return (%) Total Return (%) 35 Quarter 30 One Year One Year 30 29.1 26.9 25.5 25 26.4 24.8 25 24.5 20 20 15 16.1 15.4 15.5 12.2 17.1 16.7 11.8 10.5 10 10 5 5 0 RUSSELL 1000 VA LUE 23 15 14.0 RUSSELL M ID CA P VA LUE Source: T. Rowe Price. RUSSELL 2000 VA LUE RUSSELL 1000 GROWTH RUSSELL M ID CA P GROWTH RUSSELL 2000 GROWTH 0 RUSSELL 1000 RUSSELL MIDCAP RUSSELL 2000 U.S. Equities Total Return Performance By Sector As of 31 Dec 2010 S&P 500 Sector Returns 30% 27.7% 25% 26.7% 22.1% Total Return % 20.5% 19.0% 20% 14.1% 15% 15.1% 12.1% 10.2% 10% 5.5% 5% 2.9% itie s Ut il ar e C He al th St ap le s s Se rv ice m Co ns um er at io n In fo rm 12 Months Te le co m Te ch no lo gy na nc ia ls Fi Sv Bu s & ria ls In du st Di sc Co ns um er cs re t io na ry at er ia ls M En er gy 0% S&P 500 12 Months S Sources: T. Rowe Price and Wilshire. 24 Commodities Rise. Credit Spreads Narrow. Volatility Subsides. As of 28 Feb 2011 800 CRB Spot Price Index 800 22 700 700 Spread Ͳ BAA Corporate Bond / US TͲBond 10 YR Spread Ͳ Hi Yield Corporate Bond / US TͲBond 10 YR 20 Baa and High Yield credit spreads continue to narrow in Q1. 18 Commodity prices continue to rise in Q1. 600 500 600 500 400 300 300 200 100 200 '02 '03 '04 '05 CBOE VIX Volatility Index '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 70 60 90 80 70 40 40 30 30 18.35 10 0 0 Source: Factset. 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 '0 5 '06 '07 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 0 112 112 108 108 104 '0 8 '09 '10 '11 104 USD has started to slide again in Q1. 100 96 92 92 88 88 84 84 80 80 76 76 72 72 20 10 '04 12 10 96 50 '03 14 8 100 50 '0 2 16 10 60 20 25 100 18 US $ Trade Wtd Ͳ Major Currency Volatility Index continues to be at more normal levels. 80 14 Last 10 Years Max: 80.86 (20ͲNOVͲ08), Min: 9.89 (24ͲJANͲ07), Last: 18.35 (28ͲF EBͲ11) 90 16 12 400 22 20 68 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 68 Equity Valuations Still Reasonably Attractive. As of 28 Feb 2011 24 S&P 500 Index with Operating EPS (SPX) Price / YearͲForward EPS Price to Est. EPS S&P 500: 1,327 2011E Consensus EPS $94.87 22 20 18 24 22 20 16 14 14 12 12 10 10 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 8 S&P 500 Index (SPX) Price / YearͲForward EPS Ͳ Scale Inverted (Left) US Treasury Bond 10 Yr (%) (Right) 6.3 10 Price to Est. Cash Flow 16 16 14 14 12 12 10 10 8 8 6 6 4 4.5 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 4 '10 S&P 500 Index with Operating EPS (SPX) Price / Book Value 4.5 4 5.6 14 3.5 16 3.5 4.9 18 3 20 22 3 4.2 2.5 24 26 2.5 3.5 2 28 30 Earnings Yield vs. Treasury Yield 32 34 Source: Factset. 18 4 12 36 S&P 500 Index with Operating EPS (SPX) Price / Cash Flow 18 16 8 18 2.8 2.1 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 2 Price-to-Book 1.5 1 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 1.5 '08 '09 '10 '11 1 26 Cyclical Sectors Have Rebounded With Recovery, Ex-Housing As of 30 Nov 2010 27 Source: JPMorgan Asset Management. Consumer Confidence Still Below Average, But Recovering As of 31 Dec 2010 Source: JPMorgan Asset Management. 28 Summary and Outlook: Economies, Earnings, and Markets As of 31 Dec 2010 ¾ U.S. Consensus expects gradual strengthening of the U.S. economy (+3.0-3.5% real GDP) with resilient EPS growth (+9-11% for S&P500 Index). This seems reasonable with long term deleveraging and cost-cutting headwinds offset by renewed stimulus. Watching financial stocks for signs of increasing loan demand and lessening credit issues. Profit margins are already high and can improve but at a diminishing rate. Valuations look reasonable but less compelling after an 86% run in 22 months. M&A expected to be robust. 2012 earnings expectations will become increasingly important to stocks as 2011 progresses. ¾ Europe and Japan remain dogged by large structural deficits and aging demographics but are cyclically improving and benefiting from emerging market exposure. Expect positive but sub-par earnings growth. Markets look cheap in aggregate but investors are paying up for growth stocks more so than in the U.S. Our portfolios remain generally underweight. ¾ Emerging market economies (China, India, Brazil…) could slow as central banks apply brakes but we still expect robust growth (+7-9%) to carry the global economy. Markets are digesting central banks’ attempts to slow things down and keep inflation in check. Most believe they will succeed. Our portfolios remain overweight EM but many pm’s expect some choppiness until it becomes clear that inflation is under control. Long term bulls on EM despite vast outperformance over last 10 years.… 29 Large-Cap Value Outlook As of 31 Dec 2010 Cautiously optimistic Valuations still reasonable, but less compelling than at the start of 2010 Finding value in: Sectors that have lagged (Health Care, Consumer Staples, Utilities) Select cyclical names (General Motors, Vulcan Materials, Boeing) Need economic growth to sustain rally 30 Section D: Performance Review 31 Compliance Certificate 32 Compliance Certificate 33 Total Return Performance Periods Ended 28 Feb 2011 Figures Shown in U.S. Dollars Annualized Quarter-toDate One Year Three Years 7.15% 22.93% 3.39% 4.28% 6.32% Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Retirement Plan (Net of Fees) 7.09 22.53 3.05 3.93 5.96 Russell 1000 Value Index 6.03 22.16 0.22 1.57 4.61 Value Added (Net of Fees) 1.06 0.37 2.83 2.36 1.35 Quarter-toDate One Year Since Client Inception 15 Sep 2009 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Health Benefits Plan (Gross of Fees) 7.34 22.87 19.88% Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Health Benefits Plan (Net of Fees) 7.28 22.47 19.48 Russell 1000 Value Index 6.03 22.16 18.77 Value Added (Net of Fees) 1.25 0.31 0.71 Sample Footnote.eps 1 October 2004 through 31 December 2004. 1 Since Client Inception 1 Oct 2004 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Retirement Plan (Gross of Fees) Annualized 34 Five Years Total Return Performance Calendar Years 20041 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Retirement Plan (Gross of Fees) 9.07% 6.13% 22.39% 2.87% -35.53% 27.96% 14.98% Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Retirement Plan (Net of Fees) 8.97 5.78 21.98 2.53 -35.77 27.55 14.61 Russell 1000 Value Index 10.38 7.05 22.25 -0.17 -36.85 19.69 15.51 Value Added (Net of Fees) -1.41 -1.27 -0.27 2.70 1.08 7.86 -0.90 20092 2010 Calendar Years 1 2 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Health Benefits Plan (Gross of Fees) 5.71% 14.76% Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Health Benefits Plan (Net of Fees) 5.60 14.39 Russell 1000 Value Index 4.89 15.51 Value Added (Net of Fees) 0.71 -1.12 1 October 2004 through 31 December 2004. 15 September 2009 through 31 December 2009. 35 Total Return Performance Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Retirement Plan Since Account Inception1 through 28 Feb 2011 Figures Shown in U.S. Dollars Percent 100 75 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Retirement Plan (Gross of Fees) Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Retirement Plan (Net of Fees) Russell 1000 Value Index 50 25 0 -25 -50 10/04 12/04 36 Sample Footnote.eps 1 October 2004. 1 12/05 12/06 12/07 12/08 12/09 12/10 2/11 Total Return Performance Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Health Benefits Plan Since Account Inception1 through 28 Feb 2011 Figures Shown in U.S. Dollars Percent 40 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Health Benefits Plan (Gross of Fees) Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Health Benefits Plan (Net of Fees) Russell 1000 Value Index 30 20 10 0 -10 9/09 1 15 September 2009. 12/09 12/10 2/11 37 Attribution Analysis Los Angeles Department of Water and Power vs. Russell 1000 Value Index — Retirement Plan One Year Ended 28 Feb 2011 Figures Shown in U.S. Dollars 5 Total Value Added Value Added from Stock Selection Value Added - Percent Value Added from Sector Weight 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 Total Over (Under) Weight Energy Financials Consumer Discretionary Consumer Staples Telecom Services Health Care Materials Information Technology Utilities Industrials & Bus. Servs. -- 3.8 -6.3 5.1 -2.6 -1.8 -3.7 0.6 2.0 -2.1 5.0 Portfolio Weight (Ending) 100.0 17.3 21.4 13.2 6.8 3.0 8.4 3.8 7.4 4.5 14.3 Index Weight (Ending) 100.0 13.5 27.7 8.1 9.4 4.8 12.1 3.2 5.5 6.6 9.3 Portfolio Performance 23.2 45.1 17.1 36.0 12.6 28.3 3.5 30.3 18.9 5.8 18.7 Index Performance 22.0 45.6 16.2 35.1 12.1 29.5 6.4 36.2 22.1 17.8 29.0 Numbers may not add to 100% due to rounding; all numbers are percentages. Analysis represents the equity-only performance of the portfolio as calculated by the Wilshire Atlas attribution model, and is exclusive of cash, trusts, mutual funds, de-listed securities and other non-equity holdings. Returns will not match official TRP performance because Wilshire uses different pricing and exchange rate sources and does not capture intra-day trading or fair-value pricing. Returns in U.S. dollars. Source: Wilshire Atlas, MSCI/S&P GICS Sectors; Analysis by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. T. Rowe Price uses the MSCI/S&P Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) for sector and industry reporting. Each year, MSCI and S&P make changes to the GICS structure. The last change occurred on 1 July 2010. T. Rowe Price will adhere to all future updates to GICS for prospective reporting. Figures are shown gross of fees. Past performance cannot guarantee future results. 38 Performance Attribution Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Significant Absolute Contributors One Year Ended 28 Feb 2011 Stock 1 39 % of Portfolio Industry Company Description1 Chevron 5.0% Oil, Gas, and Consumable Fuels Chevron Corporation is an integrated energy company with operations in countries located around the world. ExxonMobil 4.6 Oil, Gas, and Consumable Fuels Exxon Mobil Corporation operates petroleum and petrochemicals businesses on a worldwide basis. Time Warner Cable 2.9 Media Time Warner Cable Inc. offers cable television subscription services. Weyerhaeuser 2.4 Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) Weyerhaeuser Company is an integrated forest products company with offices or operations worldwide. Baker Hughes 2.3 Energy Equipment and Services Baker Hughes Incorporated supplies reservoir-centered products, services, and systems to the worldwide oil and gas industry. GE 2.2 Industrial Conglomerates General Electric Company is a diversified technology, media and financial services company. Time Warner 2.2 Media Time Warner Inc. is a media and entertainment company. Honeywell International 1.0 Aerospace and Defense Honeywell International Inc. is a diversified technology and manufacturing company with operations around the world. Union Pacific 1.6 Road and Rail Union Pacific Corporation is a rail transportation company. IBM 2.1 IT Services International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) provides computer solutions through the use of advanced information technology. Source: Bloomberg. The specific securities identified and described above do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for the portfolio, and no assumptions should be made that the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable. The information shown does not reflect any ETFs that may be held in the portfolio. Performance Attribution Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — Significant Absolute Detractors One Year Ended 28 Feb 2011 Stock 1 % of Portfolio Industry Company Description1 Bank of America 2.5% Diversified Financial Services Bank of America Corporation accepts deposits and offers banking, investing, asset management, and other financial and risk-management products and services. Merck 2.0 Pharmaceuticals Merck & Co., Inc. is a global pharmaceutical company that discovers, develops, manufactures, and markets a broad range of human and animal health products. Raytheon 1.3 Aerospace and Defense Raytheon Company operates in defense, homeland security and other government markets. Microsoft 2.3 Software Microsoft Corporation develops, manufactures, licenses, sells, and supports software products. Southwest Airlines 1.5 Airlines Southwest Airlines Co. is a domestic airline that provides primarily short-haul, highfrequency, point-to-point service. Amgen 0.8 Biotechnology Amgen Inc. discovers, develops, manufactures, and markets human therapeutics based on cellular and molecular biology. H&R Block 0.9 Diversified Consumer Services H&R Block, Inc. provides a wide range of financial products and services through its subsidiaries. Medtronic 0.0 Health Care Equipment and Supplies Medtronic, Inc. develops therapeutic and diagnostic medical products. NRG Energy 1.1 Independent Power NRG Energy, Inc. owns and operates a diverse portfolio of power-generating Producers and Energy Traders facilities, primarily in the United States. Avon 0.8 Personal Products Avon Products, Inc. manufactures and direct sells beauty and related products. Source: Bloomberg. The specific securities identified and described above do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for the portfolio, and no assumptions should be made that the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable. The information shown does not reflect any ETFs that may be held in the portfolio. 40 Total Relative Performance Value Added in Los Angeles Department of Water and Power vs. Russell 1000 Value Index — Rolling Three-Year Periods (Annualized Gross of Fees) Calculated Monthly from 1 Oct 2004 to 28 Feb 2011 Figures Shown in U.S. Dollars Percentage Points 12 Value Added vs. Russell 1000 Value Index 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 9/07 41 12/07 12/08 12/09 12/10 2/11 Each bar measures the difference in performance between the portfolio and the benchmark for a three-year annualized period. Figures shown gross of fees. Returns would have been lower as the result of the deduction of applicable fees. Past performance cannot guarantee future results. Total Relative Performance Three-Year Rolling Returns (Annualized Gross of Fees) — Los Angeles Department of Water and Power vs. Russell 1000 Value Index Calculated Monthly from 1 Oct 2004 to 28 Feb 2011 Figures Shown in U.S. Dollars -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Percent 60 -10 0 50 Portfolio Outperformance 40 30 20 Portfolio Underperformance 10 -10 10 20 30 40 50 60 Russell 1000 Value Index -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 Each point represents the performance of the portfolio and its benchmark for a three-year annualized period. Points above the diagonal represent outperformance relative to the benchmark. Points below the diagonal represent relative underperformance. Figures shown gross of fees. Returns would have been lower as the result of the deduction of applicable fees. Past performance cannot guarantee future results. 42 Section E: Portfolio Review and Characteristics 43 Style Consistency Zephyr StyleADVISOR: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. Zephyr StyleADVISOR: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. 36-Month Moving Windows, Computed Monthly October 2004 through February 2011 Large Value Large Growth Zephyr Size Coordinate Russell 1000 Value Russell 1000 Growth 1 LA DEPT OF WATER AND POWER EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN - LCV 0 Russell 1000 Value Russell Generic Corners -1 Russell 2000 Value Russell 2000 Growth Small Growth Small Value -1 0 1 Zephyr Style Coordinate Zephyr StyleADVISOR performs a constrained quadratic optimization to determine the portfolio’s (style, size) coordinate relative to the indices shown. This rolling window analysis displays the smaller data points to represent the oldest time period and larger data points to represent the most recent time period. T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., and Zephyr Associates, Inc., are not affiliated companies. 44 10 Largest Absolute Portfolio Holdings Los Angeles Department of Water and Power As of 28 Feb 2011 Market Capitalization Shown in U.S. Dollars Company % of Portfolio Market Capitalization (Millions) Chevron 5.0% $208,273 ExxonMobil 4.6 425,854 Exxon Mobil Corporation operates petroleum and petrochemicals businesses on a worldwide basis. JPMorgan Chase 3.2 182,572 JPMorgan Chase & Co. provides global financial services and retail banking. Time Warner Cable 2.9 24,786 Bank of America 2.5 144,631 Bank of America Corporation accepts deposits and offers banking, investing, asset management, and other financial and risk-management products and services. Weyerhaeuser 2.4 13,090 Weyerhaeuser Company is an integrated forest products company with offices or operations worldwide. Pfizer 2.4 153,828 3M 2.4 65,650 Microsoft 2.3 223,335 Baker Hughes 2.3 30,854 Total 1 Company Description1 Chevron Corporation is an integrated energy company with operations in countries located around the world. Time Warner Cable Inc. offers cable television subscription services. Pfizer Inc. is a research-based, global pharmaceutical company that discovers, develops, manufactures, and markets medicines for humans and animals. 3M Co. conducts operations in electronics, telecommunications, industrial, consumer and office, health care, safety, and other markets. Microsoft Corporation develops, manufactures, licenses, sells, and supports software products. Baker Hughes Incorporated supplies reservoir-centered products, services, and systems to the worldwide oil and gas industry. 30.1% Source: Bloomberg. The specific securities identified and described above do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for the portfolio, and no assumptions should be made that the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable. The information shown does not reflect any ETFs that may be held in the portfolio. Numbers may not total due to rounding. 45 Significant Portfolio Overweights Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Relative to the Russell 1000 Value Index As of 28 Feb 2011 1 46 10 Largest Overweights % of Portfolio ExxonMobil 4.6% 0.5% 4.1% Exxon Mobil Corporation operates petroleum and petrochemicals businesses on a worldwide basis. Time Warner Cable 2.9 0.4 2.5 Time Warner Cable Inc. offers cable television subscription services. 3M 2.4 0.0 2.4 3M Co. conducts operations in electronics, telecommunications, industrial, consumer and office, health care, safety, and other markets. Weyerhaeuser 2.5 0.2 2.3 Weyerhaeuser Company is an integrated forest products company with offices or operations worldwide. Chevron 5.0 2.9 2.1 Chevron Corporation is an integrated energy company with operations in countries located around the world. IBM 2.1 0.0 2.1 International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) provides computer solutions through the use of advanced information technology. Baker Hughes 2.3 0.3 2.0 Baker Hughes Incorporated supplies reservoir-centered products, services, and systems to the worldwide oil and gas industry. Home Depot 1.9 0.0 1.9 The Home Depot, Inc. is a home improvement retailer that sells building materials and home improvement products. Time Warner 2.2 0.5 1.7 Time Warner Inc. is a media and entertainment company. Illinois Tool Works 1.7 0.0 1.7 Illinois Tool Works Inc. designs and manufactures fasteners and components, equipment and consumable systems, and a variety of specialty products and equipment. Source: Bloomberg. Numbers may not total due to rounding. % of Index Difference Company Description1 Significant Portfolio Underweights Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Relative to the Russell 1000 Value Index As of 28 Feb 2011 10 Largest Underweights 1 % of Portfolio % of Index Difference Company Description1 Berkshire Hathaway 0.0% 2.2% -2.2% Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is a holding company owning subsidiaries in a variety of business sectors. Verizon Communications 0.0 1.5 -1.5 Verizon Communications Inc. is an integrated telecommunications company that provides wire line voice and data services, wireless services, Internet services, and published directory information. Wells Fargo 0.8 2.3 -1.5 Wells Fargo & Company is a diversified financial services company providing banking, insurance, investments, mortgage, leasing, credit cards, and consumer finance. Procter & Gamble 1.2 2.5 -1.3 The Procter & Gamble Company manufactures and markets consumer products in countries throughout the world. Walt Disney 0.0 1.3 -1.3 The Walt Disney Company is an entertainment company that conducts operations in media networks, studio entertainment, theme parks and resorts, consumer products, and interactive media. Occidental Petroleum 0.0 1.0 -1.0 Occidental Petroleum Corporation explores for, develops, produces, and markets crude oil and natural gas. Citigroup 0.6 1.5 -0.9 Citigroup Inc. is a diversified financial services holding company that provides a broad range of financial services to consumer and corporate customers around the world. Kraft Foods 0.0 0.8 -0.8 Kraft Foods Inc. is a food and beverage company. UnitedHealth Group 0.0 0.7 -0.7 UnitedHealth Group Incorporated owns and manages organized health systems in the United States and internationally. Apache 0.0 0.7 -0.7 Apache Corporation is an independent energy company. Source: Bloomberg. Numbers may not total due to rounding. 47 Recent Portfolio Changes Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Year to Date Ended 28 Feb 2011 Major Purchases 1 2 48 % of Portfolio Company Description1 Allstate 0.7% The Allstate Corporation, through its subsidiaries, provides property-liability insurance, as well as other types of insurance in the United States and Canada. Boeing2 0.4 The Boeing Company, together with its subsidiaries, develops, produces, and markets commercial jet aircraft, as well as provides related support servic Cisco Systems2 0.4 Cisco Systems, Inc. supplies data networking products for the Internet. AT&T 2.1 AT&T Inc. is a communications holding company. 3M 2.4 3M Co. conducts operations in electronics, telecommunications, industrial, consumer and office, health care, safety, and other markets. Avon 0.8 Avon Products, Inc. manufactures and direct sells beauty and related products. PepsiCo2 0.2 PepsiCo, Inc. operates worldwide beverage, snack and food businesses. Kellogg 0.9 Kellogg Company manufactures and markets ready-to-eat cereal and other convenience foods. Johnson & Johnson 2.3 Johnson & Johnson manufactures health care products and provides related services for the consumer, pharmaceutical, and medical devices and diagnostics markets. Southwest Airlines 1.6 Southwest Airlines Co. is a domestic airline that provides primarily short-haul, high-frequency, point-to-point service. Source: Bloomberg. New holding. The information shown does not reflect any ETFs that may be held in the portfolio. Numbers may not total due to rounding. Recent Portfolio Changes Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Year to Date Ended 28 Feb 2011 Major Sales 1 2 % of Portfolio Company Description1 Newell Rubbermaid 0.1% Newell Rubbermaid Inc. manufactures and markets branded consumer products which are sold through a variety of retail and wholesale distribution channels. Bank of New York Mellon 0.1 Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BNY Mellon) is a global financial services company. Honeywell International 1.0 Honeywell International Inc. is a diversified technology and manufacturing company with operations around the world. Ameriprise Financial 0.2 Ameriprise Financial, Inc. is a financial planning and services firm. Home Depot 1.9 The Home Depot, Inc. is a home improvement retailer that sells building materials and home improvement products. Philip Morris International 0.7 Philip Morris International Inc., through its subsidiaries, affiliates and their licensees, produces, sells, distributes, and markets a wide range of branded cigarettes and tobacco products in markets outside of the United States of America. Lockheed Martin 0.7 Lockheed Martin Corporation is a global security company that primarily researches, designs, develops, manufactures, and integrates advanced technology products and services. Dell 0.9 Dell Inc. offers a wide range of computers and related products. CA 0.2 CA, Inc. designs, develops, markets, licenses, and supports standardized computer software products. Sunoco2 0.0 Sunoco, Inc. is a petroleum refiner and marketer and chemicals manufacturer with interests in logistics and cokemaking. Source: Bloomberg. Eliminated. The information shown does not reflect any ETFs that may be held in the portfolio. Numbers may not total due to rounding. 49 Sector Diversification Los Angeles Department of Water and Power As of 28 Feb 2011 Consumer Discretionary Industrials and Business Services Energy Information Technology Materials Telecommunication Services Utilities Consumer Staples Health Care Financials -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Percent Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Russell 1000 Value Index Over/Underweighting T. Rowe Price uses the MSCI/S&P Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) for sector and industry reporting. Each year, MSCI and S&P make changes to the GICS structure. The last change occurred on 1 July 2010. T. Rowe Price will adhere to all future updates to GICS for prospective reporting. 50 Portfolio Characteristics Los Angeles Department of Water and Power As of 28 Feb 2011 Market Capitalization Shown in U.S. Dollars 1 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Russell 1000 Value Index Projected Earnings Growth Rate1 10.3% 9.0% Price to Earnings 12 Months Forward1 12 Months Trailing 12.7X 16.1X 13.0X 16.3X Return on Equity (Last 12 Months) 17.6% 12.9% Price to Book 2.1X 1.8X Long-Term Debt as % of Capitalization 35.6% 35.6% Unweighted Median Market Capitalization (Millions) $28,508 $5,161 Investment Weighted Median Market Capitalization (Millions) $46,847 $39,493 Investment Weighted Average Market Capitalization (Millions) $95,607 $74,902 Number of Holdings 82 665 20 Largest Holdings 50.2% 35.9% Turnover (Last 12 Months) 17.6% N/A Source: IBES. Statistics are Investment Weighted Median unless otherwise noted. 51 Full Portfolio Holdings Los Angeles Department of Power and Water — Retirement Plan As of 28 Feb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ull Portfolio Holdings Los Angeles Department of Power and Water — Retirement Plan As of 28 Feb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ull Portfolio Holdings Los Angeles Department of Power and Water — Retirement Plan As of 28 Feb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ull Portfolio Holdings Los Angeles Department of Power and Water — Retirement Plan As of 28 Feb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ull Portfolio Holdings Los Angeles Department of Power and Water — Retirement Plan As of 28 Feb 2011 6HFXULW\1DPH $VVHWV $FFUG 87,/,7,(6 (OHFWULF8WLOLWLHV (75 (QWHUJ\ (;& ([HORQ )( )LUVW(QHUJ\ ,QGHSHQGHQW3RZHU3URGXFHUV(QHUJ\7UDGHUV 15* 15*(QHUJ\ 0XOWLXWLOLWLHV 1, 1L6RXUFH 7RWDO0NW9DO$FFUG86' 5RXQGLQJPD\FDXVHILJXUHVWRYDU\IURP 56 Full Portfolio Holdings Los Angeles Department of Power and Water — Health Benefits Plan As of 28 Feb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ull Portfolio Holdings Los Angeles Department of Power and Water — Health Benefits Plan As of 28 Feb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ull Portfolio Holdings Los Angeles Department of Power and Water — Health Benefits Plan As of 28 Feb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ull Portfolio Holdings Los Angeles Department of Power and Water — Health Benefits Plan As of 28 Feb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ull Portfolio Holdings Los Angeles Department of Power and Water — Health Benefits Plan As of 28 Feb 2011 6HFXULW\1DPH (OHFWULF8WLOLWLHV $VVHWV $FFUG (75 (QWHUJ\ (;& ([HORQ )( )LUVW(QHUJ\ 33/ 33/ ,QGHSHQGHQW3RZHU3URGXFHUV(QHUJ\7UDGHUV 15* 15*(QHUJ\ 7RWDO0NW9DO$FFUG86' 5RXQGLQJPD\FDXVHILJXUHVWRYDU\IURP 61 Performance Statistics Risk/Return Characteristics Three Years Ended 28 Feb 2011 Figures Shown in U.S. Dollars Average Annual Return (%) 4 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 2 ● 0 Russell 1000 Value Index -2 -4 21 25 23 Average Annual Standard Deviation (%) Three Years Los Angeles Department Russell 1000 of Water and Power Value Index Annualized Total Return 3.39% 0.22% 22.83% 23.06% Historical Tracking Error 2.72% 0.00% Beta 0.98 1.00 R-Squared 0.99 1.00 Alpha 3.15% 0.00% Sharpe Ratio 0.12 -0.01 Information Ratio 1.16 0.00 Annualized Standard Deviation 62 Statistics based on monthly gross returns. Returns would have been lower as the result of the deduction of applicable fees. Past performance cannot guarantee future results. Performance Statistics Risk/Return Characteristics Five Years Ended 28 Feb 2011 Figures Shown in U.S. Dollars Average Annual Return (%) 6 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 4 2 ● Russell 1000 Value Index 0 -2 17 Average Annual 21 Standard Deviation (%) 19 Five Years Los Angeles Department Russell 1000 of Water and Power Value Index Annualized Total Return 4.28% 1.57% 18.65% 18.83% Historical Tracking Error 2.53% 0.00% Beta 0.98 1.00 R-Squared 0.98 1.00 Alpha 2.65% 0.00% Sharpe Ratio 0.11 -0.03 Information Ratio 1.06 0.00 Annualized Standard Deviation Statistics based on monthly gross returns. Returns would have been lower as the result of the deduction of applicable fees. Past performance cannot guarantee future results. 63 Section F: Fee Schedule 64 Fee Schedule City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Employees’ Retirement Plan — U.S. Large-Cap Value Strategy First $20 Million 50 Basis Points Next $30 Million 40 Basis Points When Assets Exceed $50 Million, the Fee is a Flat 40 Basis Points on All Assets When Assets Exceed $200 Million, the Fee is a Flat 35 Basis Points on All Assets1 When Assets Exceed $250 Million, the Fee on the portion of the assets above $250 Million is 30 Basis Points1 1 A transitional credit is applied to the fee schedule as assets approach or fall below the breakpoint. 65 Section G: Additional Information and Disclosures 66 Total Return Performance U.S. Large-Cap Value Composite Periods Ended 31 Dec 2010 Figures Shown in U.S. Dollars Annualized Three Months One Year Two Years Three Years Four Years Five Years U.S. Large-Cap Value Composite (Gross of Fees) 10.74% 13.97% 21.04% -2.10% -1.00% 3.20% 5.45% 5.01% U.S. Large-Cap Value Composite (Net of Fees)1 10.61 13.41 20.44 -2.59 -1.49 2.69 4.93 4.49 Russell 1000 Value Index 10.54 15.51 17.58 -4.42 -3.38 1.28 4.14 3.26 0.20 -1.54 3.46 2.32 2.38 1.92 1.31 1.75 S&P 500 Index 10.76 15.06 20.63 -2.86 -0.83 2.29 3.85 1.41 Value Added3 -0.02 -1.09 0.41 0.76 -0.17 0.91 1.60 3.60 Value Added2 Seven Years Ten Years Net of fees performance reflects the deduction of the highest applicable management fee (“Model Net Fee”) that would be charged based on the fee schedule appropriate to you for this mandate, without the benefit of breakpoints. Please be advised that the composite may include other investment products that are subject to management fees that are inapplicable to you but are in excess of the Model Net Fee. Therefore, the actual performance of all the portfolios in the composite on a net fee basis will be different and may be lower than the Model Net Fee performance. However, such Model Net Fee performance is intended to provide the most appropriate example of the impact management fees would have by applying management fees relevant to you to the gross performance of the composite. Past performance cannot guarantee future results. 2 Value Added is shown as U.S. Large-Cap Value Composite (Gross of Fees) minus Russell 1000 Value Index. 3 Value Added is shown as U.S. Large-Cap Value Composite (Gross of Fees) minus S&P 500 Index. 1 67 Supplemental information. See “GIPS® Disclosure” for additional performance information. 21 GIPS® Disclosure U.S. Large-Cap Value Composite Period Ended December 31, 2010 Figures Shown in U S Dollar Gross Annual Returns (%) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 -0.09 -13.86 30.68 16.91 5.94 21.87 2.39 -35.96 28.54 13.97 Net Annual Returns (%)¹ -0.59 -14.30 30.04 16.33 5.41 21.27 1.88 -36.29 27.91 13.41 Russell 1000 Value Index (%)² -5.59 -15.52 30.03 16.49 7.05 22.25 -0.17 -36.85 19.69 15.51 S&P 500 Index (%)² 15.06 -11.89 -22.10 28.68 10.88 4.91 15.79 5.49 -37.00 26.46 Composite Dispersion 1.90 0.16 0.19 N/A 0.10 0.25 0.48 0.56 0.50 0.38 Comp. Assets (Millions) 299.6 259.4 349.5 900.1 926.8 2,341.9 1,684.6 1,407.6 3,156.0 4,567.3 # of Accts. in Comp. Total Firm Assets (Billions) 6 6 7 11 13 21 17 18 21 25 130.4 121.1 165.9 212.2 244.4 294.8 341.2 244.5 340.3 415.5 ¹Reflects deduction of highest applicable fee schedule without benefit of breakpoints. Investment return and principal value will vary. Past performance cannot guarantee future results. See below for further information related to net of fee calculations. ²Primary benchmark is Russell 1000 Value Index and secondary benchmark is S&P 500 Index. T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. ("TRPA") has prepared and presented this report in compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®). TRPA has been verified for the 10-year period ended June 30, 2010 by KPMG LLP. A copy of the verification report is available upon request. TRPA is a U.S. registered investment management firm and holds itself out as such to potential clients for GIPS purposes. TRPA further defines itself under GIPS as a discretionary investment manager providing services primarily to institutional clients with regard to various mandates, including all U.S. and certain global strategies of T. Rowe Price Global Investment Services Limited (“TRPGIS”), an investment manager registered with the FSA and other regulatory bodies, but excluding the services of the Stable Asset Management group and the Private Asset Management group. The TRPGIS strategies were included in the TRPA firm definition effective January 1, 2009 as a result of an internal reorganization. Management believes this change represents the most appropriate Firm definition. The firm has not included any non-fee paying portfolios in its composites. Non-fee paying portfolios are included under the firm’s total assets. The minimum asset level for equity portfolios to be included in composites is $5 million. Prior to January 2002, the minimum asset level for composite inclusion was $1 million. The minimum asset level for fixed income and asset allocation portfolios to be included in composites is $10 million. Prior to October 2004, the minimum asset level for composite inclusion was $5 million, and prior to January 2002, the minimum asset level for composite inclusion was $1 million. Valuations are computed and performance reported in U.S. dollars. Gross performance returns are presented before management and all other fees, where applicable, but after trading expenses. Net of fees performance reflects the deduction of the highest applicable management fee ("Model Net Fee") that would be charged based on the fee schedule appropriate to you for this mandate, without the benefit of breakpoints. Please be advised that the composite may include other investment products that are subject to management fees that are inapplicable to you but are in excess of the Model Net Fee. Therefore, the actual performance of all the portfolios in the composite on a net fee basis will be different, and may be lower, than the Model Net Fee performance. However, such Model Net Fee performance is intended to provide the most appropriate example of the impact management fees would have by applying management fees relevant to you to the gross performance of the composite. Gross and net performance returns are presented net of nonreclaimable withholding taxes. Dispersion is measured by the standard deviation across asset-weighted portfolio returns represented within a composite for the full year. Dispersion is not calculated for the composites in which there are five or fewer portfolios. Supplemental performance history may be presented. Additional information regarding the firm's policies and procedures for calculating and reporting performance results is available upon request. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date and interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Withholding taxes, whether or not refundable, are accrued for equity securities at the time of dividend accrual and, where applicable, are accrued daily for fixed income securities. Where capital gains taxes apply, aggregate security value is reduced to net realizable value, considering holding periods, potential loss carry-forwards, and other relevant factors that may vary from country to country. Some accounts may trade futures and options, potentially high-risk derivatives. Futures and options contracts may be bought or sold for any number of reasons, including managing exposure to changes in securities prices and foreign currencies, as an efficient means of adjusting overall exposure to certain markets, in an effort to enhance income, as a cash management tool, or to protect the value of portfolio securities. Purchases and sales of futures and options are only affected in accordance with individual client portfolio guidelines and generally represent less than 10% of a portfolio. Benchmarks are taken from published sources and may have different calculation methodologies, pricing times, and foreign exchange sources from the composite. Composite policy requires the temporary removal of any portfolio incurring a client initiated significant cash inflow or outflow greater than or equal to 10% of portfolio assets. The temporary removal of such an account occurs at the beginning of the measurement period in which the significant cash flow occurs and the account re-enters the composite on the last day of the current month after the cash flow. Additional information regarding the treatment of significant cash flows is available upon request. These results are intended to be used in the institutional market only. Consultants are advised to use this data in accordance with SEC guidelines. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal will vary. Where lawfully permitted, persons may access T. Rowe Price mutual fund information and T. Rowe Price Funds SICAV information at www.troweprice.com. A complete list and description of all of the Firm's composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS® standards are available upon request. This material is not to be distributed or disseminated without the express written consent of TRPA. A portfolio management change occurred effective February 24, 2010. There were no changes to the investment program or strategy related to this composite. 68 Monitoring and Risk Management Elements • Equity Steering Committee Oversight - Periodic review by senior investment professionals promotes consistency of the strategy’s investment process and portfolio construction. • Quantitative Risk Management Tools - Wilshire Variance Analysis enables portfolio managers to review performance attribution versus benchmarks from a holdings-based perspective. - Barra risk analysis provides managers with a common risk factor tool to analyze their strategy versus a benchmark. - Zephyr returns-based style analysis allows portfolio managers to analyze the style and size consistency of their strategy versus a benchmark. 69 28 Section H: Performance Statistics Glossary 70 Performance Statistics Glossary Alpha – A measure of a strategy’s risk-adjusted performance. Alpha represents the difference between a strategy’s actual returns and its expected performance, given its level of risk as measured by beta. The difference is expressed as an annualized percentage. Beta – A measure of the market risk of a strategy showing how responsive the strategy is to a given market index, such as the S&P 500 Index (an index for equity strategies) or the Barclays Capital Government/Corporate Bond Index (an index for fixed income strategies). By definition, the beta of the benchmark index is 1.00. A strategy with a 1.10 beta is expected to perform 10% better than the index in up markets and 10% worse in down markets. Usually, higher betas represent riskier investments. Earnings Growth Rate (Current Fiscal Year) – Measures the annualized percent change in earnings per share from the prior fiscal year to the current fiscal year. Historical Tracking Error – Standard deviation of the strategy’s excess return over the market benchmark. Information Ratio – A measure of the significance or quality of alpha. It is defined as the ratio of alpha to the standard deviation of alpha. A larger number is better – either a very strong alpha score or a consistent alpha with low standard deviation. Market Capitalization – A measure of a company’s total value and is equal to the total dollar value of all outstanding shares. Median – Represents the midpoint of market capitalization of stocks in a portfolio where 50% of holdings are above the value. Investment-Weighted Median – Represents the breakpoint where 50% of the weights are above the value. Investment-Weighted Average – Sum of each holding’s market capitalization multiplied by its weight in the portfolio. Price to Book Ratio – Used to compare a stock’s market value to its book value. It is calculated by dividing the current closing price of the stock by the latest quarter’s book value (book value is simply total assets minus intangible assets and liabilities). Price-to-Earnings Ratio (12 Months Forward) – P/E is a valuation measure calculated by dividing the price of a stock by the analysts’ forecast of the next 12 months expected earnings. The ratio is a measure of how much investors are willing to pay for the company’s future earnings. The higher the P/E, the more investors are paying for a company’s earnings growth in the next 12 months. Price-to-Earnings Ratio (Current Fiscal Year) – P/E is a valuation measure calculated by dividing the price of a stock by its reported earnings per share from the latest fiscal year. The ratio is a measure of how much investors are willing to pay for the company’s earnings. The higher the P/E, the more investors are paying for a company’s current earnings. Price-to-Earnings Ratio (Next Fiscal Year) – P/E is a valuation measure calculated by dividing the price of a stock by its estimated earnings for the next fiscal year. The ratio is a measure of how much investors are willing to pay for the company’s future earnings. The higher the P/E, the more investors are paying for the company’s expected earnings growth in the next fiscal year. Projected Earnings Growth Rate (IBES) – A company’s expected earnings per share growth rate for a given time period based on the forecast from the Institutional Broker’s Estimate System, which is commonly referred to as IBES. Return on Equity (Current Fiscal Year) – ROE is a valuation measure calculated by dividing the company’s current fiscal year net income by shareholders’ equity (i.e., the company’s book value). Return on equity measures how much a company earns on each dollar that common stock investors have put into the company. It indicates how effectively and efficiently a company and its management are using stockholder investments. R-Squared – Measures the percentage of a strategy’s movement that is explained by movements in the benchmark index. R-Squared helps indicate the accuracy of a strategy’s alpha and beta. Sharpe Ratio – A risk-adjusted measure, which is calculated using standard deviation and excess return to determine reward per unit of risk. The higher the Sharpe ratio, the better the strategy’s historical risk-adjusted performance. Standard Deviation – Indicates the volatility of a strategy’s total returns as measured against its mean performance. Unlike alpha, beta, and R-Squared, which are compared with a benchmark index, standard deviation is strategy-specific. In general, the higher the standard deviation, the greater the volatility or risk. Turnover – A measurement of how frequently assets within a fund are bought and sold by the managers. 71 1 Section I: Biographical Backgrounds 72 Biographical Backgrounds T. Rowe Price — Presenters Mark S. Finn, CFA, CPA Mark Finn is the portfolio manager of the Value Strategy. He is also a co-manager of the U.S. Large-Cap Value Strategy and is a member of the U.S. Structured Research Strategy team. Mr. Finn is a vice president of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. Mr. Finn has 20 years of investment experience, all of which have been with T. Rowe Price. From 2005 to 2009, Mr. Finn was an equity research analyst specializing in electric power generation, utilities, and coal. Prior to this, he was an analyst in T. Rowe Price's Fixed Income Division, where he also covered utilities and power generation. From 1998 to 2001, Mr. Finn worked with the T. Rowe Price Recovery Fund team, where he evaluated financially distressed companies. Mr. Finn began his career with T. Rowe Price in 1990 in the Finance Division, where he served as controller of T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., and as the principal accounting officer for the T. Rowe Price Realty Income Funds. Prior to joining the firm, he had five years of auditing experience with Price Waterhouse LLP, where he worked on engagements for both public and private companies. Mr. Finn earned a B.S. from the University of Delaware and has obtained the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and the Certified Public Accountant accreditation. John D. Linehan, CFA John D. Linehan is head of the T. Rowe Price Equity Division, chairman of the Equity Steering Committee, and a member of the firm’s Management Committee. He is also portfolio manager of the U.S. Large-Cap Value Strategy in the U.S. Equity Division. Mr. Linehan is a vice president of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. Mr. Linehan has 21 years of investment experience, 12 of which have been at T. Rowe Price. He started at the firm in 1998 as an equity analyst covering the paper and forest products and airline industries. Between 1990 and 1996, he was an executive in the oil trading and consulting industry, first as vice president and managing director for Delaney Petroleum, then as vice president and managing director for E.T. Petroleum. He began his investment career in 1987 while at Bankers Trust NY Corporation, where he served as an associate in mortgage-backed securities trading. 73 Mr. Linehan attended Amherst College, where he earned a B.A. in economics. He earned an M.B.A. from Stanford University Graduate School of Business. While at Stanford, he was the Henry Ford II Scholar, an Arjay Miller Scholar, and the winner of the Alexander A. Robichek Award in finance. He also has earned the Chartered Financial Analyst designation. Biographical Backgrounds T. Rowe Price — Presenters William D. Nolan William D. Nolan is a portfolio specialist in the U.S. Equity Division of T. Rowe Price. He acts as a proxy for equity portfolio managers with institutional clients, consultants, and prospects. Mr. Nolan supports T. Rowe Price's large-cap value strategies, focusing on the Equity Income and Value Strategies. He is a vice president of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. Mr. Nolan has 19 years of investment experience. Before joining the firm, he was most recently a managing director of institutional equity sales for Wachovia Corporation where he also served as director of institutional research marketing. Prior to this, Mr. Nolan was director of equity institutional sales for Alex Brown and was the Washington, D.C., branch manager in the National Accounts Division of IBM. Mr. Nolan earned a B.S. in social and behavioral sciences from Johns Hopkins University John D. Plowright, CFA John Plowright is a vice president of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. He is a client service executive for Global Investment Services, the organization responsible for the firm’s institutional business worldwide. John has 19 years of investment experience, six of which have been at T. Rowe Price. Before joining T. Rowe Price in 2004, he was a director of client services with RCM Capital Management, and prior to that, he was a director and fixed-income specialist with RCM Capital Management. John earned a B.A. in religion from the Earlham College, cum laude, and a master’s degree in international management from American Graduate School of International Management. John has earned the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and is a Series 7 and 63 registered representative. 74