Establishing of common user-centric framework for the
Transcription
Establishing of common user-centric framework for the
ARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar “How to better involve end-users throughout the research process to foster innovation-driven research for a sustainable Mediterranean agriculture at the farm and local scales.” 30 May - 3 June 2016, Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier (IAMM), France Establishing of common user-centric framework for the management and usage of soil data in Mediterranean region Dr. Panagiotis Tziachris (tziachris@ssi.gov.gr) ELGO-DEMETER, Greece 1 SOIL DATA INFRASTRUCTURE [2] } } } Spatial data infrastructure: hierarchical model [1] 2 ARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar, 30 May - 3June 2016, Montpellier, France THE PROBLEM Multiple soil data resources/efforts National (public sector, private laboratories, universities, research etc.). Europe (GS Soil, European Soil Database & soil properties, European Soil Data Centre, INSPIRE, LUCAS database) World (ISRIC - World Soil Information) However National: Multiple disparate resources, incompatible-closed systems (silos), different procedures and parameters, vague status of owing and sharing data (copyrights/licensing etc). Between countries: Similar issues. Limited detailed soil data in Europe (mostly exploratory surveys.) 3 ARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar, 30 May - 3June 2016, Montpellier, France CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Current “soil data flow” Intermediate/proposed bottom to top “soil data flow” Ideal future “soil data flow” 4 ARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar, 30 May - 3June 2016, Montpellier, France OBJECTIVES Strategic goal: Establish a common user-centric framework for the management and usage of soil data in Mediterranean region Research question: Could a shift towards a user-centric approach regarding soil data, initiate increased demand, sharing and usage? With what parameters? Objectives Define a user-centric approach in soil data. Investigate priorities, parameters, assessment. Propose benefits – added value. Evaluate assumptions by usage (use cases). 5 ARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar, 30 May - 3June 2016, Montpellier, France KEY POINTS User centric approach: Users as priority Volunteered Geo Information [3]. Minimum viable product [4]. Network Externalities/effect [5]. Social aspects. Other: Open source-low cost solutions. Multidisciplinary approach Integration between research and implementation 6 ARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar, 30 May - 3June 2016, Montpellier, France METHODOLOGY Core approach: Working from the “bottom to top” Real, immediate benefits for users (clear value proposition) “Grasp” soil data information User participation, trust, network Consensus in core issues (procedures, privacy, copyright etc). Involvement of stakeholders: Agreement/definition of new (user-centric) priorities Define applications of soil data in core user issues Minimum common procedures (soil data collection – analysis). Institutional issues (copyright/licensing of data, security) 7 ARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar, 30 May - 3June 2016, Montpellier, France EXPECTED RESULTS / IMPACT Increase the quantities of available digital soil data Provide real value for users More user involvement – interaction - awareness Intensify research - collaboration Energize harmonization Augment private’s sector participation Enhance innovation 8 ARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar, 30 May - 3June 2016, Montpellier, France RELEVANT EXISTING WORK OF THE INSTITUTE Soil Map Fertilization Software (SoilMFS) Web implementation Messaging bots 9 ARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar, 30 May - 3June 2016, Montpellier, France Thank you for your attention! 10 1. Williamson, I., Rajabifard, A., & Feeney, M.-E. (2003). Developing spatial data infrastructures: from concept to reality London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. 2. Tóth, G., Jones, A., & Montanarella, L. (2013). LUCAS Topsoil Survey: Methodology, Data and Results: Publications Office. 3. Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211-221. 4. Moogk, D. R. (2012). Minimum viable product and the importance of experimentation in technology startups. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(3), 23. 5. Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American economic review, 75(3), 424-440. 11 ARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar, 30 May - 3June 2016, Montpellier, France