Kukla Mearuing mothering
Transcription
Kukla Mearuing mothering
Measuring Mothering Author(s): Rebecca Kukla Reviewed work(s): Source: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, Vol. 1, No. 1, Doing Feminist Bioethics (Spring, 2008), pp. 67-90 Published by: Indiana University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40339213 . Accessed: 16/03/2012 10:09 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Indiana University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. http://www.jstor.org MEASURING MOTHERING Rebecca Kukla Abstract As a culture, in termsofa setofsigwehavea tendency to measuremotherhood and anxiety; nal moments thathavebecomethefocusofspecialsocialattention abilities. we interpret theseas emblematic ofwomen'smothering summations can seem to exhaust the Women'sperformances these moments story during ofmothering, and mothers ofteninternalize thesemeasuresand evaluatetheir in termsofthem."Good"mothersarethosewho pass a series ownmothering oftests-theybondproperly theydo screening, duringtheirroutineultrasound birth notleta sipofalcoholcrosstheirlipsduringpregnancy, theygive vaginally without theirchildan artificial nippleduring painmedication, theydo notoffer mealswith thefirstsix months,theyfeedtheirchildrenmaximally nutritious and of has so on. This reductive bite, every understandingmothering had counmeasures effects health care andpolicy, terproductive upon practice encouraging thatpenalizemothers who do notliveup to culturalnormsduringsignalmoofhealthy ments,whilefailingto promoteextendednarratives mothering. "Asmartwomanwholovesherunbornchildwillavoid havinga c-sectionifat all possible.Onlya self-absorbed wimpwouldchoose toput herbabyin harm'swayso thatshe doesn'thave toalterher THE INTERNATIONALJOURNALOKFEMINIST APPROACHES TO BIOETHICS Vol. 1,No. 1 (SPRING2008).© 2008 68 TO <^&W*^L< j7nte**™U*&*t€*£&*€*****£QRFEMINISTAPPROACHES 1:1 don tgetany scheduleorfeelanypain. Thesewomendefinitely respect fromme" ASHLEY, 2006 birthslovetheirbabies.Love is not "Manymotherswhohave difficult It's theopposite, a contraction. forme.A veryslowopening." LAUREN, 2004 mothergavebirthto me at theendof 1969,aftera difficult pregnancy healthinsuranceallowedheronly duringwhichhergraduate-student care.1A hippywithdegreesinliterature, minimalprenatal drama,andeducation, anda preschooler: Shenourished foran infant shewasan idealmother myevery in mypersonality food,and quirks,fedmehealthy delighted sparkofcreativity, did thatgoodparenting taughtmetoreadbythetimeI wastwo.Firmbelievers becameintimately sheandmyfather notrequirea hiatusfromlifeandadventure, familiarwiththeplaygrounds, zoos, and ponyridesofEuropeand northern motherofan olderchild.Shewas cona was she Africa.However, problematic andderidedmydesires whenI showedsignsofindependence andfearful trolling for tofitinwithmypeergroups.Myparentspulledmeoutofschoolrepeatedly andschoolalmostevery monthsata timeandmovedmetoa newneighborhood ofhomeownertheresponsibilities without year,so thattheycouldtravelfreely mymother despitethesedisruptions, ship.SeeingthatI excelledacademically life.Later, and social emotional totheireffects showedlittlesensitivity uponmy and myfailureto accepthervisionoflifeat facevalue oncemyindependence forme,leaving shemoreorlessrelinquished becameundeniable, responsibility on.Yetshehasturnedouttobe a wonfrommymid-teens metosupportmyself derfulmotherofan adultchild.Afterwe each settledintoacceptanceofour ofmychoicesanda careshebecamea staunchsupporter mutualindependence, as wellas a devoted, audienceformyaccomplishments, fuland appreciative she mother Thejuryis outonwhatkindofelderly creative grandmother. playful, in turn. her children willbecomelater,aftershebecomesdependent upon Aristotle saidthata man'shappiness So wasmymothera "goodmother"? couldbe measuredonlyoncehe was dead;happinessand unhappinessreside in hislifenarrative onlytakenas a whole(1941,BookI, Chapter10).Similarly, narrative. an entireparenting can onlythrough goodmothering be constituted be univocal. will it ever nor is not narrative mother's yetcomplete, My REBECCA KUKLA 69 wehavea tendency tomeasuremotherhood, notinextended Yetas a society that we as but a set of moments emblematic testsand narratives, by interpret signal ofwomen's abilities. Women's summations performances mothering duringthese Mothersofteninternalize moments can seemtoexhaustthestoryofmothering. intermsofthem.These"definandevaluatetheirownmothering thesemeasures - indeed,several come in the narrative moments" tend to veryearly mothering ing orevenbeforeconception. ofthemcomeduringpregnancy ethics hascometorefer almostexcluConsiderhowthephrasereproductive faced or of discrete choices to ethical pregnancy evenearlier. during sively analyses in ethics include abortion, pre-implantation geneticdiKeytopics reproductive is us as strange. medicine. Thisoughttostrike Reproduction agnosis,andfertility Renewpeopleandbuildingfamiliesand communities. theprocessofcreating andcaringfornewgeneratotheethicsofcreating ethicsoughttorefer productive ourundertions.Thisis a processthatextendsacrossthelifespan.Ifwerestrict notonly andpregnancy, totheprocessesofconception ofreproduction standing thecreation andsociallaborthatconstitutes willweignoremuchofthematerial thesocialandethical riskdistorting ofnewpeople,butwesurely andsustenance it would be odd to think That of meaningoftheseearlystages reproduction. is, orconcepofpregnancy theethicsorsocialsignificance thatwecan understand the oflonger first and foremost as them tionwithout beginnings understanding in once mothers interest lose bioethicists Yetmainstream narratives. consistently to bioethical attention no We little or is over. narrative their of thebeginning give I notto mentionolderchildren. childrenafterinfancy, theethicsofmothering has had of claimthatthisreductive counterproductive understandingmothering measuresthatpenalize effects encouraging uponhealthcarepracticeandpolicy, whilefailing norms to cultural whodo notliveup mothers duringsignalmoments ofhealthy narratives extended toencourage mothering.2 bioethicsis to turn tasksforfeminist I believethatone oftheimportant notonlyhappensin thebioethicalspotlightupon thefactthatreproduction women'sbodies,butthroughwomen'songoing,richlytexturedlabor- labor withmedicalinstituthat,afterall,does notescapea complicated relationship andlate-night offices From ends. tionsandspacesafter pediatrician's pregnancy ofchildren's medicalization the to rooms negotiating increasing emergency relationtheir and in behaviorandbodies,womenmother complicated through evenwhentheyresist and possibilities, judgment, shipsto medicalauthority, our currentage ofinin even this it should be or not Whether so. way, doing a bear mothers shared duties, responsibildisproportionate parenting creasingly 70 ^,t^rnt*/^+i**/ TO 6&;*><*//*i<±i 1:1 <Z**+in*t/W FEMINISTAPPROACHES contactwithprofessional healthinstitutions, ityformanagingtheirchildren's their health at the domestic level maintaining (throughfeedingand hygiene practicesand thelike),and trainingthemin safetyand self-care. Correspondmothers arehelddisproportionately fortheirchildren's physiresponsible ingly, cal andmentalhealthimperfections.3 Justas bioethicsmisrepresents pregnancy and conceptionwhenitseversthemfromtherestofmothering, likewiseaccountsoftheethicsoffamilyrelationships missa pressing dimensionofmotheringiftheyfailtobringthetoolsofmedicalethicsto bear. In thefollowing, I explorethreeexamplesofsignalmomentsthatwe interpret as displaysand testsofwomen'smaternaladequacy;I thenturnto thelarger culturaland ethicalimpactofmeasuring in theseways. mothering Respondingproperlyto ultrasoundimages to ritualsvaryfromcountry Althoughtheritualsand theaccompanying for fetal abnorMitchell and ultrasound (cf., 1997), country Georges screening malitiesduringapparently routine hasbecomecompletely healthy pregnancies in manycountries. In Canada and theUnitedStates,forinstance,itis standard tohavesuchan ultrasound aroundtheeighteenth weekofpregnancy. screening The eighteenth-week ultrasoundindeedhas becomeso routinethatcouples oftenwaituntiltheyhavehadittoannouncethepregnancy tofriends andfamconsent,is ily(Mitchell2001;Weir1998).Theprocedurerequiresno informed rarelyrefusedbywomen,and is generally precededbylittleorno discussionof themedicalpurposesofthetest,itsprovenrisksorbenefits, ortheoptionsthat willbe availableifan anomalyis detected.(In fact,therehasbeenno persuasive datashowingimproved outcomesforindividual mothers orbabiesfromroutine ultrasound and an ultrasound screening, although atypical mayleadtoa recommendationformoretesting, thereare almostno conditionsdetectableon the ultrasound screenthatcan be treated ormanagedinutero.Reported reductions in neonatalmorbidity and mortality due to routineultrasoundscreeningare basedon termination canhardlybe countedas an option rates,andtermination thatimproves thehealthofa fetus.) themedicalexpectations thetestmaybe vague,the Although surrounding webofnormative andsocialexpectations inwhichitis embeddedis not."Good" mothers areexpectednotonlytohavetheultrasound, buttobutlookforward to itas a keymoment on thepathtomotherhood. Theprimary of the test, purpose as itis represented in ourculture, is notdiagnostic butsocial.Pregnant women REBECCA KUKLA 71 momentduringwhichtheywill totreattheeventas a treasured areencouraged withtheimageoftheirfetus, time.Whenconfronted "meetthebaby"forthefirst manifest loveandamazement andreaffirm thatthetesthashelped "good"mothers areaccompanied tothe the"reality" ofthebaby.Goodmothers themunderstand The husbands and fathers-to-be. heterosexual ultrasound jointatbysupportive screenas motherand father, directed to theinscrutable oftheexpectant tention and properties ofthe"baby," theultrasoundtechnicianrattlesoffthefeatures unit.Attheendof thenormative nuclearfamily andforeshadow servestoaffirm a photototakehomewiththem,which, thecoupleusuallyreceives thescreening, LisaMitchell as medicalethnographer (2001)hasshown,servessociallyas "babys havetakena back first Indeed,themedicalpurposesoftheultrasound picture." seatto itssocialpurposesto suchan extentthatmanywomenfindthemselves results ultrasound fortheemotional impactofproblematic unprepared completely (cf.,Yaqub2005). is thattheprimary Lestweremainunconvinced purposeoftheultrasound clinics ultrasound weneedonlyturntothecommercial thanmedical, socialrather in thepastdecade.Fora fee, thathavesprungup in mallsacrossthecontinent andprovide a photoofyourbabyina cute an ultrasound theseclinicswillperform decorated frame. Theyalso sellvariousothertypesofmerchandise baby-themed to istheextent formypurposes, withyourultrasound image.Whatis significant, that rhetoric theirservices clinicsadvertise whichthesecommercial sugthrough theirultrawillwanttopreserve thatgoodmothers expectation gestsa normative an aptlynamed toRemember," AnUltrasound "FetalMoments: soundexperience. "customkeepsake clinicin a suburbanAtlantamall,recommends purchasing photo(see fig.1).Accordingto their yourbaby'sultrasound jewelry"featuring witha wonderful to is here Moments Website,"Fetal provide youandyourfamily foryears thatyoucantreasure a uniqueultrasound through bondingexperience medicaladviceordiagnoses, declinestooffer Whiletheclinicexplicitly tocome."4 ifrequested," determination, alltheirpackagesincludea DVD andphotos, "gender friends." and to and"room bringyourfamily bonafidestothetest. ritualservestoputwomen'smaternal Theultrasound We can seethismostclearly, bylookingatwhathappenswhenwomen perhaps, "fail"thistest.For example,Lisa MitchellfoundthatCanadian ultrasound towhat whoreferred mothers corrected andobstetricians technicians expectant theysawon thescreenas a fetusinsteadofa baby.Whenwomendidnotmaniwiththe festthe"proper"levelofemotionorthe"proper"formofengagement to motherand ultrasoundimage,techniciansweresuspiciousoftheirfitness 72 ,J^rf^i#««/^^^/^#>#«^/()I FEMINISTAPPROACHES TO ^#/^*5<^L* 1:1 for"FetalMoments"ultrasoundstudio(www.fetalmoments.com) Figure1. Advertisement theircommitment tothepregnancy. Technicians also weresuspiciousofwomen whoshowedtoo muchor notenoughinterest in thehealthofthefetusor too muchornotenoughinterest initssex.Theyweresometimes directly judgmental towardexpectant inthesex,tellingthemthat parentswhowere"too"interested outthesexisn'timportant. Themostimportant "finding thingis thatthebaby is healthy." in such cases and when thewomanwas Occasionally, particularly notCaucasian,thetechnicians wouldevenlie abouttheirabilityto detectthe sexofthefetus(Mitchell2001,381). Thustheultrasound testisculturally framed notonlyas a socialritualduring whichyoumeetyourbaby,butalso as an earlymomentat whichan expectant mothersabilityto engageand bondwithherbabyand to arrangeforitsproper socialreception is measured.One ofMitchell's interviewees toldherthestoryof howherownultrasound had goneand thenasked,"Howdid I do?"(ibid.,epiOn the television sitcomFriends, RachelGreene-oneofthemain graph). popular whois alreadymarkedas a nonstandard motherwhenshebecomes characters, REBECCA KUKLA 73 whilesingleafterspendinga drunkennightwithherex-boyfriendpregnant burstsintotearsduringherultrasound, mother!" because wailing"I'ma terrible the on when shecannotsee fetus thescreen thetechnician pointsitout.5Although theultrasound areculturally variantandrelatively theritualssurrounding recent, forhowwomenwillactandfeelduringtheseritualsarealready ourexpectations in ourfolkculture.6 Itis acceptable fora woman quiterigidandwell-entrenched the about sexofthebaby,forexample,butonly to refuseorto seekinformation theinformation becauseshewantsthesexto fortherightreasons:shecan refuse she is but not because shecanfindout be a wonderful uninterested; surprise, just thesexbecauseshewantstostartcontentedly gender-coded babygear, purchasing a childofonesex(although, butnotbecauseshewouldgreatly prefer interestingly, forfathers). One can refuse seemtobe moresociallyacceptable suchpreferences will to that one want on the theultrasound carrythebabyto altogether grounds ofanyanomaliesand"loveitthesamewayno matter termregardless what,"but in thatthereis notbecauseoneis simplyuninterested thetestand unconvinced totheprocedure. anymedicalbenefit forulIn thefaceofthedearthofmedicalevidenceforconcretebenefits has been that for its routinization thestandard trasoundscreening, justification ithelpswomenbondwiththeirunbornchildren(cf.,Sedgmenetal. 2006).This dubiousat best (cf., is scientifically is so despitethefactthatsuchan effect to havethenormative woman who fails a et al. 2007). Byimplication, Lapaire deficient. reactionsto theultrasoundeventis maternally whywe Interestingly, womenbondwiththeirfetuseshas gonemostly or notpregnant carewhether It is a assumption-and one forwhichI have empirical major unquestioned. -that bondingwithone'sfetusmakes evidencewhatsoever foundno scientific one anymorelikelyto bondwithone'sactualbaby.Indeed,we mightimagine thatbondingwithsomething completely portablethatwe havemetonlyvia an infantthatmuchmoreofa a of make the will screaming spitting, reality image womenarealreadygoingto extreme shock.Mostpregnant lengthsto monitor women minimize to behavior their and discipline risk;pregnant obsessively controltheirdiets,exerciseregimes,emotionalstates,haircareproductuse, andjustabouteveryotheraspectofdailylife.We hardlyneeda toolsuchas the thisalreadyexcessivephenomenon. ultrasoundto heighten Meanwhile,pregsuch as behaviors in who women nant drugabuse are engage seriouslyrisky thana suggestive morehelpful someintervention tostopwithout image unlikely and a sternwarning.It seemsto me thatourvaluationofthematernal-fetal intoa normative affair motherhood bondstemsfromourdesiretostartturning 74 j£*2WW£»**<*/^«**#wf OF FEMINISTAPPROACHES TO {J&dvttf&o*1:1 as earlyas possibleand likewiseto startmeasuringa woman'smaternaladequacyas earlyas possible. Birthas a maternalachievementtest Laborand delivery takelessthana day;somewomenlaborforas typically lastsformanydecades.Within however, longas a fewdays.Mothering, typically mostmothering birthmakesupa tinyspeck.Adoptive mothers do not narratives, birth to their children. Yet have the of we elevated importance birth give symbolic tothepointwhereitappearstoserveas a make-or-break testofa woman'smotherIfshemanagesherbirth"successfully," risk-adverse, ingabilities. makingproper, to doctorsand bothproperdeference choices,and maintaining self-sacrificing controloverherownbody,thensheproveshermaternal bonafidesandinitiates a lifetime ofpropermothering. If,ontheotherhand,shefailsatthesetasksduring as selfish orundisciplined andrisksdeforming herbaby's labor,sherevealsherself andemotional whileputting herbondwithherchild character, health, well-being, inpermanent jeopardy. toourculturalmythos, delivervaginally withAccording "good"mothers outpainmedication, after advanceplanningandappropriate education. prenatal Second-best mothers submitregretfully butdocilelytowhatever medicalinterventionsthedoctorsrecommendto correctand controltheirunrulybodies. "Bad"mothers makeother, "selfish" choices,suchas givingbirthathome,seeka vaginalbirthaftera ingoutan epiduralor a cesareansection,or attempting "bad" mothersmayjustfailto demonstrate previousc-section.Alternatively, sufficient control overtheirbirths. andthereby Theymaylabor"unproductively" "failto progress"or otherwisefailto proceedin a timelyfashiontowardan birth.7 In somehospitals, womenthatendup receiving cesarean uncomplicated sectionsresulting in healthy babiesareroutinely on literature givenunsolicited to them their of failure and loss at not grieving help through feelings having achieveda normative birth.8 successfully Whenwomenwerefirst encouragedtodrawup birthplansin whichthey theirpreferences whowouldbe allowed specified concerning painmedication, in theirroomsduringlabor,and otherbasicaspectsoftheircare,thelaudable ideawastohelpwomenbecomeatleastpartialagentsoftheirownbirths, rather thanpassively tomedicalmanagement. overtime,formuHowever, submitting latinga birthplanhas movedfroman empowering optionto a socialduty.In theadvice column,"AskAmy,"a recentletter-writer was appalledthather friend was not childbirth classes: "She saidthatsheandher pregnant attending REBECCA KUKLA 75 husbandweregoingto"wingit"andthatthenursesknewwhattheyweredoing. womanwouldhavesucha casual I was a bitstunnedthatthiswell-educated also said that This mom attitude theyweregoingto flipa cointo expectant These decidewhetherto havean epidural.I thinkthisis veryirresponsible. North American a level of risk/'9 do Contemporary pregnant procedures carry womenare expectedto plan outtheirbirthswiththeelaborateprecisionand brideplanningherweddingday,and theyareexpectedto careofa traditional "In thehappyhaze ofearly recommends: do itearly.One Web siteperversely faroff-which seem and birth of labor ... the extremely may reality pregnancy timeto startplanningforthearrivalofyourbabywith makesthistheperfect birthplan" One fairly a birthplanthatdetailsyourwishes."10 typical"interactive is a seven-pageformthatasks thatcan be downloadedfromchildbirth.org and severalsubdifferent to detailtheirchoicesin eighteen mothers categories to thespecific in the the from room, lighting coveringeverything categories, to the thatmaybe usedin caseofcomplications, instruments laboringpositions thattheywill adopt.We can pushtheanalogybetweenbirthplanningand as womenarecalleduponto planand designtheir weddingplanningfarther: as thefirst to think ofbirth,notprimarily invited are births, dayoftherest they tenureas their which oftheirchildren's lives,butas their"specialday,"during andputon display, foreshadowed willbe symbolically mothers justas weddings atwhich moment areoftenframedas thebride'sspecialdayandas thesymbolic a as is the of theperfection (orimperfection) marriage performed spectacle. Such elaboratebirthplans set up completelyunrealisticexpectations howmuchcontrolone can possiblyhaveoverthelaboringprocess, concerning lackofconfidence, offailure, womenup forfeelings disappointsetting thereby to not do when maternal and ment, go according plan,even things inadequacy whenmotherand babyend up healthy. Theyalso givewomentheimpression thatiftheydo nothavestrongopinionssevenmonthsin advanceconcerning howtheywouldliketheirlaborroomlitand whether theywishto availthemnot are then foot of selves engaged,consufficiently they pedalsduringlabor, entire the cernedmothers-to-be. Furthermore, phenomenonofthe although all women "birthplan"is pervadedbytherhetoricofchoiceand autonomy, makesomechoicesbutnotothers.Forinstance,indiknowthatgoodmothers attheearliestmedically possiblemoment catingthatonewantspainmedication availableon the it is a choice is nota sociallyacceptablechoice,eventhough form.LaurenSlater(2004) writes,"Our [prenatal]teacherbelievedthatbirth was fullofchoices.'You shouldwritea birthplanand giveittothenurses,'she 76 TO {jSd&ttf&c* 1:1 <7,tJeirva/t'o,*a/ &*€*****£OK FEMINISTAPPROACHES said. 'You shouldrefuseall pain medication.Refusea heartmonitor.Refuse ' Pitocin Our instructor also informed us thatbirthinterrupted bytechnologyequalsa motherlessableto bondwithherbaby." orriskfailTheideathatwomenhadbetter managetheirbirthssuccessfully of motherhood corto bond with babiesand risk a narrative their ing thereby atwith the from the momentis tenacious. first ruptedirreparably Beginning tachment movement (1969,1983,and1988) parenting spearheaded byJohn Bowlby fromboth andWilliamandMarthaSears(1993)inthe1970sand 1980s,alarmists have medicalcommunity thenaturalchildbirth movement and thetraditional in hour will not the first that mothers who do not breast-feed for argued, instance, ofbirth bondwiththeirbabies,thatmothers whoarenotfully lucidatthemoment duetopainmedication willnotbondwiththeirbabies,andso forth.11 Typically, mothers thenominalconcernofthosewhoraisesuchworries istoprotect against interventions. of overzealous medical these to bond because losing opportunities infact,suchclaimsredoundagainstmothers reason, who,forwhatever However, do notmanagetoorchestrate theirmaternal thesefirst moments correctly, putting successintoquestionfromthestart.Forexample,notedbirthanthropologist motherwhodoes nothearherbaby's claims,"Asemi-conscious Jordan Brigitte first infant whosereactions areweakareofftoa badinteraccryanda narcotized a birthinwhichthe tionalstart"(1992,79).Shethentellsthestoryofwitnessing terrorized too medical much intervention, mother, stoppedbeing purportedly by and instead"gaveup"duringlabor.Hercontractions stopped,her "courageous" laborwasartificially andherbabywasbornwiththehelpofforceps. restimulated, endsthedramatic talebycommenting "I hopeshestilllovesherbaby"(ibid. Jordan ofmedicalizedbirthprac112-13).Thepassageis supposedtobe an indictment ticesin theUnitedStates,butthenormative languageoffailureaimedat the motheris clear,as is Jordan's beliefthatthiswoman'sfailedperformance during - however themoment ofbirth muchitcanbe blamedonherdoctorsandtheinstitutionalized ritualsofthehospital-portends a lifetime ofdeficient maternity. In popularculture,thedistasteformotherswhodo notbehaveproperly andexplicit, as istheimplication thatthisbadbehavduringtheirbirthsisstrong iorreflects oftheirmothering. Women'schoicestohaveornot upontheentirety tohavecesareansectionshaveparticularly mobilizedthisdiscourse. Notoriously labeled"tooposhtopush,"mothers whochooseelective cesareans fornon-medical reasonsarevilified In an articleentitled bythemediaand in onlinediscussions. "TooPoshtoPushMomsSetBadExampleforSociety," theVancouver Suneditorializes,"PitypoorSeanPrestonSpearsFederline His momcouldn'tevenbe REBECCA KUKLA 77 bothered to suffer a littlepainfora lotofgainon thedayofhiscelebrated birth. birth the old-fashioned hurts. to Welcome motherhood" Yes,giving (Fralic way c-section-which, 2005).Here,Britney Spearsselective giventhewaysofabdominalsurgery, didinvolvemorethan"a littlepain"- is takenas reflecting probably her entire tomotherhood, whereaspropermaternity is relationship upon directly and a willingness to bearpain.Meanwhile,on a associatedwithself-sacrifice theethicalacceptability of bulletinboarddiscussionconcerning babycenter.com similar toAshley, whowrites, entries sentiments elective c-sections, express typical c-sections A smartwomanwholovesherunborn "I amtotally againstelective childwillavoidhavinga c-sectionifat all possible.Onlya self-absorbed wimp wouldchooseto putherbabyin harm'swayso thatshedoesn'thaveto alterher fromme."12 don'tgetanyrespect orfeelanypain.Thesewomendefinitely schedule a global birtharetakentoindicate choicesconcerning Hereagain,non-normative and love ofmaternal competence. deficiency liketheseis thecomplete meaboutcomments Partofwhatinterests vaguewould whatsortsofgainsandharmsareatstake.Whatexactly nessconcerning who elect mothers how are and a birth, exactly Britney gainbyattemptingvaginal a is this Of "in harms their babies c-sections complexsciway"? course, putting aimedatpinningdown ofongoingresearch entific question,andthereis plenty modes andbabiesofdifferent formothers anddisadvantages theexactadvantages witha hostofothermundane Whatwedo knowisthat,incomparison ofdelivery. allofthestandard inhistory, moments toallprevious andincomparison activities, vaginalbirthsafterceoptionsforbirthin developednations(cesareansections, safeformotherandbabyalike. waterbirths)areextremely sarean,homebirths, than a c-section chanceswithherbabybyscheduling surelytakesfewer Britney walk than a ride rather a car is that whochoosesa preschool doesa mother away fromherhome.13 we castcesareansectionsorvaginalbirthsas therisky, In fact,whether selfishoptionvariesin accordancewithcontext,notin accordancewiththe womenwhohave actualrisksinvolved.Not onlyhavesome(mostlyindigent) cesareansectionsoccasionallybeen served resistedmedicallyrecommended withcourtorders(orin thecase ofMelissaRowlandin SaltLakeCityin 2004, an elective butevenwomenwhowishtoattempt withhomicidecharges), vaginal withdraconian faced are birthaftera previouscesareansection increasingly (Schneider2005; Grady2004) and thesame chargesof hospitalrestrictions thattheirpeerswhoseekelectivecesareansections and risk-taking selfishness womenfromattempting forpreventing standard The face. vaginal justification 78 iW FEMINISTAPPROACHES TO (J&iottf&c* 1:1 <y,tJ&i+t<*&o,t<*/<7*>t***t<*/ birthsaftera cesareanis based on theriskofcatastrophicoutcomesdue to uterine Notonlyis theriskofuterine but- ironically-this rupture. rupture tiny, riskturnsout to be roughlyequivalentto theriskofuterineruptureduring (Smithetal. 2002).Meanwhile,repeatcesareansare, primary vaginaldelivery ofcourse,no saferthanprimary cesareans;indeed,quitetheopposite.In other or an attempted whether a scheduled cesarean words, vaginalbirthis thesomaternal"choicedependson whetheror notthe ciallysanctioned,"properly motherhada previouscesareanornot.Butthefactofa previouscesareanin no hereour social wayreversestherelativeriskofthesetwooptions.Therefore, attitudestowardpropermaternalchoiceare cutfreeofanybasisin objective relative risks.14 to Butinanycase,therealrisksandtheirsizesdo notseemtobe ofinterest withhand-wavwhoappearquitecontent thelaycritics birthchoices, ofmothers' arenotreto gainsand harms.Especially becausethesecritiques ingreferences toanyspecific, sizablerisks,itishardnottoconcludethatthemainnorsponsive that mativestandards atplayareideological, notmedical:Ourculturalinsistence overtheirbirthnarrawomenmake"proper" birthchoicesandmaintaincontrol ourdesiretomeasure tivesis notaboutminimizing realrisks;rather, itsupports exercised in termsofwomen'spersonalchoicesand ofself-discipline mothering an image but What is at stake is not the health of babies moments. duringsignal as a ofpropermotherhood, combinedwiththeideathatbirthshouldfunction of motherhood. such spectacle symbolic Even moments. Wemustremember thatmothering isnotdennedbyitsfirst is a a mother thebestbondbetween andhertwenty-minute-old meaningless baby shadow of a genuine mother-childbond of the sort that sustains good mothering. You are whatyourchild eats to childrenand eatingwellduring Providing high-quality earlynutrition ofgoodmothering. Children's areundeniably important components pregnancy nutritional statusdependson eatinghabitsthatareestablished overtime.Howthatpurportedly ever,our cultureis repletewithimagesoffeedingmoments both children and in mothers some corrupt permanent way. Thelogicofthesinglecorrupting biteshowsvividlyin a recentarticleby "MemotoNanny:No JuiceBoxes." JodiKantorin theNewYorkTimesentitled Kantorwrites,apparently "Thecurrent wisdomsays withoutirony, nutritional thatwhatchildreneatmaysettheirtastesin placepermanently. In thisview,a REBECCA KUKLA 79 hotdog is neverjust a singletubeofmeat,becauseitwilllead to thousandsof lunchesto come."Heretheseemingly salty,processed,who-knows-what-filled and encapbeyonditself, determining singlehotdog is picturedas extending ofpooreatinghabitsratherthanremaining singular.Byalsulatinga lifetime lowinga hotdogto slipintoherchildin a momentofweakness,a mothercan thechild'stastesand eatingpracticesforever, thereby undoingmonths pervert oryearsofdevotionto purchasing organicfood,avoidingtransfats,and planforherchildoutoffreshingredients. balanced meals and preparing ning andI havearguedthat testsandbirthareidiosyncratic Ultrasound events, events.Thelogicof these mothersare measuredbytheirperformance during one mustfeedone'schildoverand overagain,and different: feedingis slightly thereis no discretemomentat whichone can proveone'spropermaternality a mother On theotherhand,atanymoment mayproveherself feeding. through Hence this is a testthatone can an act of mother an improper feeding. through hundreds ofonKantor's articlereceived neverpassbutis alwaysatriskoffailing. in favor of more of them from linecomments mothers, many arguing immediately One mother comrules. and stricter anddiscipline surveillance maternal eating to a How can parentsgivesuchdiscretion mented,"Thisarticleis frightening. thanrelying theirjobsrather described Commentators upon quitting babysitter?" toavoidhotdogs,refined be trusted whocouldn't nanniesandgrandparents flour, in hercomments whoadmitted withtracesofpeanuts.One mother orproducts flamedby was infant formula of one bottle at least to owning immediately others.15 testveryearlyon. Manyparenting Indeed,one can failthefeeding guides artificial suck on an one her that or claim outright allowing baby single suggest relationchancesfora successful a mother's breast-feeding nipplemaywelldestroy isathighriskforfailure (andinturn,thata babywhoisnotbreast-fed shipforever andhealthproblems).16 behavioral lowIQ, andmultiple tobondwithitsmother, materials NorthAmericanbreast-feeding emphasize consistently promotional as opposedtothemoreproductive exclusive messagethatthemore breast-feeding, makethatmuch "Doesonebottleofformula thebetter. breastmilkbabiesreceive, statesLa LecheLeague,rather We wishwe couldsaythatitdoesn't," difference? intheirbreast-feeding guide,"butwecan't"(1997,90).According disingenuously, and can trigger of formula tothisguide,a singlebottle life-threatening allergies, cancausenippleconfusion, withartificial nipples(bottlesorpacifiers) anycontact In fact, onto a breast. to latch or able thebabyisnolonger wherein although willing fedfroma bottlemayrejectthebreastorlose itistruethata babywhois regularly 80 ^t^trt^/t^ri^/ ^etrri^/ TO (£irx<>//ii<*1:1 AW FEMINISTAPPROACHES from theskilloflatching ontoit,thereisnoevidence fornippleconfusion resulting Lawand Inch 1996 theoccasionaluseofartificial Fisher and Neifert, nipples(cf. outinbreast-feeding rence,and Seacat1995).A 1992studyfoundno difference andthosewho breast-fed whowereexclusively comesbetweennewborninfants received onebottledaily(Cronenwett, Stukel,and Kearney1992).Thepervasive cultivated fearofinstantnippleconfusion bythemedical amongnewmothers, Nations the United WorldHealthOrganization establishment/the (WHO) and ofthepowerofthe is itself indicative Children's Fund(UNICEF),amongothers, of the moment.17 singlecorrupting logic morethanjustan infant's Artificial as corrupting nipplesareportrayed as a whole.In WhattoExpect: theirstaincan infect practices; mothering feeding TheFirstYear(thesequelto theubiquitousand unforgiving queen ofguidebooks, Whatto ExpectWhenYou'reExpecting),we findout how,despitea ofan artificial mother's thatfirst offer bestintentions, nipplecan initiatea processthatcorrodesnearlyall aspectsofmothering: abuse.Whatstartsoutas Be awarethatpacifier use easilyslipsintopacifier s. Thereis theever-present thebaby'scrutchcan easilybecomethemother fortheattention substitute to use thepacifieras a convenient temptation motherwho to herchild.Thewell-meaning sheherself shouldbe providing offers thepacifier. . . maysoon findherselfpoppingin a pacifierthemoto determine thereason insteadof trying ment[herbaby]becomesfussy, forthefussingor iftheremaybe otherwaysofplacatinghim.She mayuse to ensurequiet itto getthebabyoffto sleepinsteadofreadinghima story, whileshe'son thephoneinsteadofpickinghimup and consolinghimwhile she'schatting, to buyhis silencewhileshe'spickingouta pairofnewshoes Theresultis oftena babywhocan himintheinteraction. insteadofinvolving in his be with mouth,and who is unableto comfort something only happy and or to sleep.(Murkoff, entertain himself himself, himself, get Hathaway, 2003,117) Eisenberg Afterherinitialofferof thepacifier, themotherin thispassageis sweptpasofbad mothering overwhichshehas littleor no control; sivelydowna current forherown thepacifier led intotemptation, shesoon findsherself substituting activities withmarkedly activities ofmothering. Shereplacespropermothering the trivialtasks:chatting on thephoneand shoeshopping. Although gendered, first suckmaybe bothtempting andfleeting, itsconsequence is an orallyfixated, child.18 emotionally crippled REBECCA KUKLA 81 a pivotalchoicebetweenrisk Theideathateachfeedingmomentpresents WhattoExpect extends into backwards andmaternal pregnancy. responsibility bite counts: Before close WhenYoureExpecting warns,"Every you yourmouth 'Is thisthebestbiteI can givemybaby?'Ifitwill offood,consider, on a forkful Ifit'llonlybenefit chew benefit yoursweettoothor appease baby, away. your and Hathaway2002, down" fork (Murkoff, Eisenberg, putyour yourappetite, of womenin chat the wrath incurs which This 80). pregnant regularly passage roomsand on bulletinboards- demandsthatmothersdisciplinetheireating selfish bitethatis not withliterally everybiteoffood,avoidingthecorrupting, is because one Here, ("to hungry appeaseyour eatingsimply baby-directed. betrayal. appetite")is akinto maternal economic thatarisefrommothers' Therisksandbenefits ongoinglifestyle, benefits risks and the far foods to and access outweigh high-quality security, offeeding orsuck.Ourfocuson theimportance thatattachtoanysingleforkful momentsratherthanon long-term eatingpatternsbetraysour entrapment ratherthan maternalperformance, withinan ideologicalpictureofnormative a reasonableconcernwithchildren's well-being. in moments ofmeasuring Theeffects mothering a routine activitiesthreematernal ultrasound, I havedescribed undergoing I that have or fetus one's and child)arguedserve baby(or givingbirth, feeding In each are measured. bona maternal women's testsduringwhich as cultural fides colludeinassessing themselves themedia,andmothers case,medicalinstitutions, The howmothers signalmoments. normatively-regulated duringheavily, perform will that one on the moments these hand, rhetoric they desuggests, surrounding the narrative thesuccessofthefuture termine (whether motherwill mothering ofsecure thebabywilldevelopa lifetime withherbaby;whether bondproperly the reveal that on the other and and hand, habits) they eating relationships healthy selfis she tomother truthabouta woman'sfitness (whether engaged, sufficiently risk-adverse, etc.). disciplined, sacrificing, behaviorduringthesetestsarenot Ourculturalimagesofpropermaternal withrespect to a woman's neutral. Rather, "properly" ability perform politically andethnic status socioeconomic marked are and toprenatal care,birth, feeding by Consider: identity. womeninCanadawere,notsurprisfoundthatimmigrant (1)LisaMitchell Nothavingbeen the follow to less scriptduringtheirultrasounds. ingly, likely the rituals cultural trainedon thecontingent surrounding event,oftencoming APPROACHES TO(/i<«<>//t«^1:1 82 ,7, t/*i,,«/<«,i« /</„„<, i«/ <>\FEMINIST or fromcountries wherethereis no routinescreening pregnancy, duringhealthy is treatedas a clinicalratherthana social fromcountries wherethescreening theimageon thescreen,bringalong event,theywerelessinclinedto personify ultrasound theirspouses,expectkeepsakephotos,and so forth.Accordingly, thantheir thesewomenless medicalinformation technicianstendedto offer socialized and the technicians followed ultrasound who etiquette, counterparts insuffiwomen seemed thatthe lesswiththesefetalimages.Later,theyreported withandexcitedabouttheirbabies(Mitchell concerned 2001,185). ciently to birth that (2) An unmedicated goesaccording a predetermined vaginal I argued.Buta woman'schances birthplanistakenas thematernal goldstandard, ofhavingsucha birthdependheavilyuponherownhealth,heraccessto highwithherpreferwhois familiar continuous healthcarewitha provider quality, will herwishesin a waythathealthprofessionals ences,herabilityto articulate or birth an of her center), understand, mastery English(in Anglophone hospital andherlevelofsupport tohirean advocatesuchas a doulaormidwife, herability fromfamilymembersand otherswhocan speakforherduringthebirth.The evenwhenmeditoinsistthata birthplanbe respected staff, bythehospital ability andperof a confidence, requires highdegree education, normally callypossible, variesbysocioeconomic ceivedsocialauthority. position. Everyoneofthesefactors Womenwhomanageto havea "natural"birthmayfeelthattheyaresomehow butinfact,theynormally withtheirmythical sisters, pre-industrial communing accessto state-ofand theirimmediate drawheavilyupontheirsocialprivilege inenacting theirbirthnarratives. the-art interventions technological diversefoods,andlesstime (3) Poorwomenhavelessaccesstohigh-quality, women to preparemealsforthemselves and theirchildren.Poorand minority Weknow thanfinancially securewhitewomen.19 havelowerratesofbreast-feeding of in women'sknowledgeofthebenefits thatthisis notbecauseofdifferences facother and Zimmerman 2000). (Guttman determining Among breast-feeding womenarelesslikelyto havejobs thatprovideenough tors,poorand minority or privatespacesin whichto nurse. leave to establish maternity breast-feeding Theyaremorelikelytobe singleparentsandtoworklonghours.20 Thustotheextent thatwetake"proper" maternal performance duringthese a a we will re-inscribe social moments as measure of as whole, key mothering We will read deficient maternal character into the bodies and actions a privilege. women ofunderprivileged andsociallymarginalized women,whereasprivileged withsociallynormative homeandworkliveswilltendto serveas ourmodelsof tests character. Yetitis likelythatwomenpassthesemothering propermaternal REBECCA KUKLA 83 lessbydintoftheirinherently maternal character andtheirresponsible commitmenttotheirchildren thanbecausetheyhavetheright kindofeducation, financial and healthinsurance structure, jobs. resources, plans,family at signalmomentsis partofa larger Our focuson howmothersperform in America atleast,publicethicaldiscourse cultural North and Britain, sensibility: andwill-power tendstofocusheavilyon personalresponsibility as itis displayed on fails to be at discrete rather than thestructural (or choice-points, displayed) conditions thatenableorundermine peoples abilityto makegoodchoicesover to turnpublicattention to theenvironmental, thelongterm.It is difficult ecothatcanmakevariouschoicesandbehaviors difficult nomic,andsocialconditions madeup ofnotions oreasy;insteadwe tendtoemploya conceptualrepertoirethatinherently isolates suchas character, choice,andresponsibilitywill-power, determinants. individuals as ethicalagentsandoccludessuchcontextual thatfocuson inThisindividualist policiesandinitiatives logicencourages ratherthanon makeatparticular thechoicesthatmothers moments, fluencing narratives ofhealthy motherthatfoster extended conditions structural creating States for the United service announcements the For Departing. example, public "Babieswereborn mentofHealthandHumanServicesbreast-feeding campaign, in absurdly womenengaging launchedin 2005,showpregnant tobe breast-fed," followed andbull-riding, suchas log-rolling activities bythetext, riskyone-time exBreast-feed start after? born. takerisksbefore "Youwouldn't Why yourbaby's from exclusive breast-feedfor six months."21 Here,anysingledeparture clusively I have choice.Elsewhere, self-indulgent risky, ingis equatedwitha dramatically on mothers' choices,usingthe pointedoutthatthiscampaignfocusesentirely toadvocatefor andblame,without rhetoric ofpersonalresponsibility anyattempt of or forbreast-feeding tolerance members, members family amongemployers, thepublic,orforstructural leave,orurban rules,maternity changesinworkplace viable for morewomen exclusive make such that would breast-feeding planning (Kukla2006). whenitcomesto alcohol Consideralso our emphasison zero-tolerance toldthatthatthereis Womenare repeatedly consumption duringpregnancy. "noprovensafelevel"ofalcoholconsumption indeed,inthe duringpregnancy; is that General of the UnitedStates,theofficial anyalcohol position Surgeon number ofother and a is growing consumption duringpregnancy unacceptable, countriesare adoptingsimilarpositions.22 Althoughextensiveresearchhas on fetusesfromwomen'slight effects failedtoturnup anyevidenceofnegative theideathata singledrink as partofa healthy tomoderatedrinking lifestyle,23 84 ,j£««fe*««/l«««/^«i#*«/<>K FKMINISTAPPROACHES TO (£;<><>//ti<yl 1:1 SPECIALTY SECTION: Critical Care One DrinkCan Last a Lifetime Womenwhoconsumealcohol duringpregnancy puttheirbabiesat riskfora multitude of lifelongproblems APRN ByCarolNelkeDimbar, April11,2005 Figure2. FromNurseWeek,April11,2005 bothrevealsmaternalirresponsibility influand can havea lifelong corrupting enceis pervasive. In a publicserviceannouncement the Ad Counproducedby a hipyoungblackwomantellsheraudience,"Ifyoudrinkalcoholwhile cil,24 you'repregnant, youmaybe ruining yourbaby'schancesofeverhavinga normal In figure2, a headlesspregnantbellyappearsto be gearingup to suck life!"25 backa giantglassofwinedirectly intothewomb.Thearticleheaderemploys thelanguageofriskand blame("women. . . puttheirbabiesat risk"),while thescientifically inaccurateideathata singledrinkcan undermine reinforcing an entiremothering narrative (onedrinkcan "lasta lifetime"). RKBKCCA KIKLA 85 Ourdetermination toprevent womenfromeverdrinking duringpregnancy, andourdemonization ofthosewhodo,hascomeatthecostofeducating pregnant toalcohol womenaboutthedifference betweenhealthy andabusiverelationships The and thedifference betweentheoretically and substantially riskybehaviors. avoidanceofalcoholhasnotbeenaccompublichealthemphasisuponcomplete women.Theimplicit forpregnant assumppaniedbysubstanceabuseprograms zerotionwouldappearto be thatgood motherswillfollowtheno-safe-level, tolerance rule,whereaswomenwhoviolatethisrulealreadyhaveproventhemselvesto be bad motherswhoarebeyondsaving.Epidemiologically speaking, are much risk factors for social and stress, havinga baby poverty, smoking bigger withFetalAlcoholSyndrome thanis occasionaldrinking 2003),but (Armstrong ourfocuson momentsofmaternalchoiceoccludesthesesocialdeterminants. andperScaretacticsunderscored character, bythelanguageofchoice,maternal not at riskfor sonalresponsibility women who are convince many pointlessly of an occasional with Fetal Alcohol to the babies having Syndrome forgo pleasure glassofwine,whilesurelyinducinglittleotherthanguiltin alcoholicwomen whosebabiesareatseriousrisk. As a culture,then,we privilegeearly,discretemomentsofchoiceas the relationmeasuresofmothers, as opposedto ongoingpatterns and developing chances at if in or secure our child's ships as we can bond a moment, destroy ina moment, ina moment. Andyet,whilethereis orfailatmothering well-being will to have the that a decision turn out always possibility poor tragicconsequences decisiontoleavethreetoddlers McCann'smuch-discussed (suchas KateandGerry - a decisionthathas been alonein a hotelroomwhiletheywentoutfordinner castbythemediaas Katesrather thanthecouple's), singleeventsrarely universally andsucin will turn or how a role how a child out, healthy play large determining cessfula mothering narrativewillbe. My suggestionis thatwe need to view as a workinprogress untiltheveryend.Whenitcomestohealthpromothering motionandpolicy, weshouldshift ourattention performances awayfrommothers' at keymoments, and ontoproviding familieswiththesystematic supportthat Such ofgoodmothering. wouldenablewomento engagein ongoingnarratives full access decent leave; maternity supportwouldincludefoodandjob security; accesstodecenteducation to family universal planning;a cleanerenvironment; aroundtheassumpandhealthcare;workplaces andlaborlawsthatarestructured tionthatmanyworkers willhavesubstantial commitments, including parental APPROACHES TO(/^/^/At'^i 1:1 86 ^£x*t*a****€*lj&>*4*n**lw FEMINIST accessibleinterventions for and to fathering; to breast-feeding commitments and a mentalillness,or othersocialstresses; withaddiction, womenstruggling forall children. safe,competent, publicschoolsystem junk-food-free a decades-long is typically theideathatreproduction Ifwe takeseriously a biologicaleventinvolving socialand materiallaboroflove,and nevermerely andthebioethical rights, eggs,sperm,andwombs;thentheseareall reproductive and limits is ethics. consideration oftheircontours reproductive Hencethereoriwoulddramatically thatI havebeenurging entation ofattention changethescope ethics ethics.In thefirstinstance,reproductive and methodsofreproductive and medicalchoicesmadebefore wouldnolongerconcernparticular conception wouldbe largerquestionsofsocial, Itsprimary subjectmatter duringpregnancy. ratherthanjustas an afeconomic,and environmental justice,and inevitablytreats ethicsgenerally reproductive equity.Contemporary terthought-gender sourcesofgeneticmaterialand gestational mothersas fleeting environments, toa handfulof is summedupbyandconfined whoseethicalroleinreproduction we must lives.As feminists, choicesmadeatorbeforethestartofourchildren's tobe whole,sociallysituated takemothers insistthatbioethicists peoplewithendecades of several tirelifenarratives, mothering. including typically Notes attheAmericanSocietyforBioethics ofthispaperwerepresented 1.Earlyversions and theHumanitiesannual meetingin Denver,Colorado in October2006 and as a in theAgeofIntensiveParParents:Childrearing keynoteaddressat the"Monitoring Forwonderful in 2007. of Kent the at conference June, supportand University enting" Ellie Colleen to Lee,MereI Fulton, am Charles, conversations, Sonya grateful helpful and especiallythemembersof dithMichaels,TriciaShivas,an anonymousreviewer, Lisa RiskResearchGroup:ElizabethM. Armstrong, theObstetricsand Gynecology Lisa Mitchell. and Anne Miriam Little, Harris, DrapkinLyerly, Margaret Kuppermann, Research wassupported Thisresearch bya grantfromtheSocialScienceandHumanities CouncilofCanada. referee 2. As an anonymous pointedout,1do notmakeanyseriousattempt rightly in this to definegoodorhealthy paper.Surelywomencan be betterorworse mothering criticaldistancefrom(whatI seeas) one is in here interest mothers. However, gaining my and deratherthanwithforging mothering, wayofmeasuring hegemonic problematic, moral serious is of ethics of the alternative a specific Mothering mothering. picture fending mother takes to what it however, consider to need well; we do hence and hopefully, work, canbe measuredinanyuniform theideathatmothering wecan transcend way. 3. 1 elaborateand defendtheclaimthatmothersplaysucha crucialrolein the healthcaresystemin Kukla2006. 4. www.fetalmoments.com 15,2007). (accessedSeptember REBECCAKUKLA 87 5. "TheOne WhereRachelTells.. .",first airedOctober11,2001. 6. 1 cannot,in anyformalsense,provideempiricalevidencethattheseattitudes are entrenched in our folkculture;itis oftenin thenatureoffolkattitudesnotto be documented or articulated. formally 7. Severalfeminist scholarshavepointedouthowthelanguageoffailingand defective women'sbodiespervadesourdiscussions ofbirth.Cf.Harrison1982;Davis-Floyd 2006. 1994;and Lyerly 8. ThiswasthepracticeatOttawaCivicHospital,whereI gavebirthtomyperfectly sonbycesareansection.I do notknowhowmanyhospitalsdo this,however itis healthy easytofindpamphlets designedforthispurposeonline.See forinstancewww.birthrites. (accessedNovember12,2007). See www.plus-size-pregnancy. org/Bookletlndex.html (accessedNovember12,2007)for org/CSANDVBAC/csemotionalrecov.htm#References a largeclearinghouseofliterature designedto aid emotionalrecoveryaftercesarean section. A recentNew 9."AskAmy," August29,2007,accessedatwww.chicagotribune.com. theconcernaboutwomen YorkTimesarticle,"TheEndofChildbirth 101?",underscores thatsuch classesexpressedbythisletter-writer, whodo nottakechildbirth worrying whoexplainedeach ofhavinghada teacher womenwillnotbe ableto"reapthedividends possibleintervention." 10.www.kidshealth.org. studies(e.g.,Kennel, scientific 11.Bowlby's programspawnedvarioussympathetic to debunkhim(inbacklashattempting Trause,and Klaus 1975),as wellas a scientific Lozoff 1983). cluding PostedSeptember 12.www.babycenter.com. 28,2006. 13. 1 could notpossiblydocumentor compareall thepossiblerisksofroutine andofbeingbornbyscheduledcesareansection.Butforpurposesofillustration, driving the2003rateofautomobile considerthataccordingtotheNationalCenterforStatistics, fatalities in theUnitedStateswas 8.34/1000population,whereasthe accident-related rateofperinataldeathassociatedwithscheduledcesareansectionsin theUnitedStates is 1.3/1000 population(Landonetal. 2004). in 14.Theargumentofthisparagraph,differently worded,appearedpreviously al. 2007. et Lyerly 15.News.blogs.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/memo-to-nanny-no-juice-boxes. lactation 16.Cf.,e.g.,La Leche1997andTamaro1998,as wellas thestandard nursing thisadvice. Lawrence1994,whichrecommends textbook, givingnewmothers 17.Cf.,e.g.,AmericanAcademyofFamilyPhysicians2000. UNICEF and the whichexplicitly WHO jointlysponsortheBabyFriendly promotes HospitalsInitiative, thetotalavoidanceofartificial nippleconfusion.Cf.www. nipplesin orderto prevent (accessedNovember13,2007). babyfriendlyusa.org suck,as it 18.In Kukla2005,Chapter5, 1 documentthislogicofthecorrupting journalarticles,in quitea bitof appearsin popularmedia,guidebooks,and scientific detail. accessedNovem19.www.cdc.gov/MMWR/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5512a3.htm, ber13,2007. 88 j£**S^Wi»##«/^*4*Wr0F 1:1 FEMINIST TO(/><«<>//t«,i APPROACHES 20. Fordetaileddiscussionsofwhypoorand minority womenbreast-feed atlower rates,cf.Blum2000,and Kukla2006. 21. PSAs available at www.4women.gov/breastfeeding/index. cfm?page= adcouncil. lawsthatwould 22. AustraliaandNewZealandareintheprocessofimplementing labelssimilarto thoseused in theUnitedStates(www.amavic. requirezero-tolerance its com.au,accessedNovemberl3, 2007),and New Zealand has recently strengthened of alof Health which avoidance have from Ministry guidelines, recommending gone coholduringpregnancyto urging"totalabstinence"duringpregnancy(www.otago. accessedNovember13,2007). ac.nz/news/news/2006/13-07-06_press_release.html, womenshouldavoid SomeCanadianprovincesrequirewarningsstatingthatpregnant of all alcoholto be postedin licensedestablishments. In May 2007,thegovernment their Britainand theRoyalCollegeofObstetricians and Gynecologists "strengthened" ofalcoholconsumption Whereastheformer warningsconcerning duringpregnancy. toone ficialBritish recommendation wasthatpregnant womenlimittheirconsumption to twodrinksperweek,thenewguidelinesadvisethatwomenshould"stopdrinking (Bennett2007). duringpregnancy altogether" 2003. 23. Foran exhaustivereviewoftheevidence,cf.Armstrong 24. Inventors ofMcGruff theCrimeDog, SmokeytheBear,and the Babieswere Bornto be Breastfed" materials. campaign,amongothersocialmarketing 25. PSA availableatwww.nofas.org/MediaFiles/PSA/PSA.wmv. References American ofFamilyPhysicians. andsupporting 2000.Promoting Academy breast-feeding. AmericanFamilyPhysician 20000401/2093. 61(7).Availableatwww.aafp.org/afp/ html.AccessedNovember13,2007. Aristotle.1941.Nicomacheanethics.Trans.W. D. Ross.In ThebasicworksofAristotle. Ed. R. McKeon.NewYork:RandomHouse. E. M. 2003.Conceiving Fetalalcoholsyndrome risk,bearingresponsibility: Armstrong, and thediagnosisofmoraldisorder. Press. Baltimore: JohnsHopkinsUniversity R. 2007.Zero- Thenewalcohollimitin pregnancy. TheTimes.May25. Bennett, in thecontemand motherhood Blum,L. 2000.Atthebreast:Ideologiesofbreastfeeding United States. Boston: Beacon Press. porary NewYork:BasicBooks John.1969and 1983.Attachment. Bowlby, . 1988.A securebase:Parent-child humandevelopment. attachment and healthy NewYork:BasicBooks. Cronenwett, L., T. Stukel,and M. Kearney.1992.Singledailybottleuse in theearly weekspost-partum and breastfeeding outcomes.Pediatrics63: 760. Robbie.1994.Thetechnocratic modelofbirth.In Feminist and the Davis-Floyd, theory Eds. S. Hollis,L. Pershing, and M. J.Young.Champaign:Unistudyoffolklore. ofIllinoisPress. versity TheEnd ofChildbirth101?2007.New YorkTimes.November12.Well.blogs.nytimes. com/2007/1 AccessedNovember13,2007. l/12/the-end-of-childbirth-101. REBECCAKUKLA 89 C. and S. Inch.1996.NippleConfusion-Who is Confused?Journal Fisher, ofPediatrics 129(l):174-5. Fralic,Shelley.2005. Too posh to pushmomssetbad exampleforsociety.Vancouver 29. Sun.September Grady,D. 2004.Tryingtoavoida secondcesarean:Manywomenfindchoiceisn'ttheirs. NewYorkTimes.November29,Al. N. and D. R. Zimmerman. 2000.Low-income mothers' viewson breastfeedGuttman, and Social Science Medicine 50:1457-73. ing. NewYork:Penguin. Harrison,Michelle.1982.A womanin residence. 2nded. LongGrove,IL: WavelandPress. 1992.Birthinfourcultures. Jordan, Brigitte. Kantor,Jodi.2006. Memo to nanny:No juice boxes.New YorkTimes.September28. AccessedNovember20, www.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/fashion/28nanny.html. 2007. Kennel,J.H., M. A. Trause,and M. H. Klaus. 1975.Evidencefora sensitiveperiodin 33:87-101. thehumanmother.Ciba FoundationSymposium and mothers' bodies.Lanham, Medicine,culture, Kukla,Rebecca.2005.Mass hysteria: MD: Rowmanand Littlefield. . 2006. Ethicsand ideologyin breastfeeding advocacycampaigns.Hypatia:A 21(1):157-80. Journal Philosophy ofFeminist 6thed. New 1997.Thewomanlyartofbreastfeeding. La Leche League International. York:PlumeBooks. Landon,M. B.,et al. 2004. Maternaland perinataloutcomesassociatedwitha trialof labor afterpriorcesarean delivery.New EnglandJournalofMedicine 351: 2581-89. and S. Tercanli.2007.Two-versusthreeW. Holzgrave, Lapaire,O., J.Adler,R. Peukert, ofpregnancy: dimensionalultrasoundin thesecondand thirdtrimester Impact and maternal-fetal on recognition of pilotstudy.Archives bonding.A prospective and Obstetrics 276(5):475-79. Gynecology 4thed. NewYork: A guideforthemedicalprofession. Lawrence,R. 1994.Breastfeeding: MosbyInc. Medicine societies.Developmental B. 1983.Birthand'bonding'innon-industrial Lozoff, 595-600. and ChildNeurology 25(5): Phibirth.Hypatia:A JournalofFeminist AnneDrapkin.2006. Shame,gender, Lyerly, 21(l):101-18. losophy L. Harris,R. Kukla,M. Kuppermann, A. D., L. M. Mitchell,E. M. Armstrong, Lyerly, and M. Little.2007.Risks,values,and decisionmakingsurrounding pregnancy. and Gynecology Obstetrics 109(4):979-84. ofTorontoPress. Mitchell,L. 2001.Baby'sfirstpicture.Toronto:University GreekandCanadianwomen's L. andE. Georges.1997.Cross-cultural Mitchell, cyborgs: Studies23(2): 373-401. Feminist discourseson fetalultrasound. 2002. Whattoexpectwhenyoureexpecting. andS. Hathaway. H.,A. Eisenberg, Murkoff, 3rded. NewYork:WorkmanPublishing. 2003. Whattoexpectthefirst and A. Eisenberg. Murkoff, H., S. Hathaway, year.2nded. NewYork:WorkmanPublishing. 90 ,y,itri,,«/tw«/ ^7 <7««i,trt/OFFEMINIST TO(/ii^/At^i 1:1 APPROACHES and J.Seacat.1995.NippleConfusion:Towardsa formaldefiNeifert, M.,R. Lawrence, nition.Journal ofPediatrics126(6):125-29. M. E. 2005.Insurers 1. setcriteria forVBACcoverage. OB GYNNews.February Schneider, BrownandCo. Sears,WilliamandMarthaSears.1993.Thebabybook.NewYork:Little, 2006.Theimpact B.,C. McMahon,D. Cairns,R.J.Benzie,andRL. Woodfield. Sedgmen, oftwo-dimensional versusthree-dimensional ultrasoundexposureon maternalfetalattachment and maternalhealthbehaviorduringpregnancy.Ultrasound obstetrics and oynecolooy 27(3):243-44. Slater,Lauren.2004.Whenlovedoesn'tcomeeasily.Selfmagazine.April. Smith,G. C, J.P.Pell,A.D. Cameron,and R. Dobbie.2002. Riskofperinataldeathassociatedwithlaborafterpreviouscesareandelivery in uncomplicated termpregnancies.JAMA287:2684-90. basics.Avon,MA: AdamsMedia. Tamaro,J.1998.So thats whattheyrefor!Breastfeeding Weir,L. 1998.Pregnancyultrasoundin maternaldiscourse.In Vitalsigns:Feminist ofthebio/logical reconfigurations body.Ed. M. Shildrick.Edinburgh:University ofEdinburghPress. PostMagazine.April10. Yaqub,ReshmaMemon.2005.Hardlabor.Washington