WW Apr - Jun 2011 - American Association of Small Ruminant
Transcription
WW Apr - Jun 2011 - American Association of Small Ruminant
In this Issue Letter from the President . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 AASRP Board Minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Amimal Welfare Committee Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 AVMA CPAC Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Wool& Wattles AVMA Delegate Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Legislative Advisory Committee Constituent Report . . . . . 5 Proposed Changes to Scrapie Flock Certification Program . 6 Parasite Control Webinar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 The AASRP Newsletter April-June 2011 Volume 39, Issue 2 Upcoming Meeting Announcements . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Drugs and Biologics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Student Externship Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Practice Tip – Pregnancy Diagnosis without Ultrasound . . . 9 AASRP-L Q&A – CIDR Protocols in Canada . . . . . . . . . 9 Mission Statement of AASRP Lama_Med Q&A – Dosing Interval for Excede® . . . . . . . 9 “To improve the health and Lama_Med Q&A – Treating Zinc Responsive Dermatitis . . . 9 AASRP-L Q&A – Footrot Vaccine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 AASRP-L Q&A – Selenium Levels in Free Choice Minerals . 10 welfare of sheep, goats, camelids and cervids, AASRP-L Q&A – Pregnancy Diagnosis in Camels . . . . . 10 to further the professional Precautions for Prevention of Zoonotic Disease . . . . . . 11 development of the members, Pharmacokinetics of Meloxicam in Goats . . . . . . . . . 11 provide resources to elevate Fetlock Hyperextension in Llamas . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 the standards of small ruminant Pharmacokinetics of Excede® in Goats . . . . . . . . . . 12 Enzootic Nasal Tumor Virus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Preventing Zoonotic Disease Transmission on Farm Visits . 13 Eliminating CAE and MV (OPP) from Herds in the UK . . . 13 Tannins in Sericea lespedeza for Worm Control . . . . . . 14 Efficacy of Copper Oxide Wire Particles against Haemonchus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Clinical Findings in Camelids with Round Cell Tumors . . . 14 Nutritional Diseases of Camelids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Rayless Goldenrod (Isocoma) Poisoning of Goats . . . . . 16 Self Suckling in Dairy Goats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Mycoplasma haemolamae Infection of Crias . . . . . . . . 16 Temperature Sensitive Microchips . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Potential Eradication of Peste des Petis Ruminants . . . . 17 Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae Pneumonia in Goats . . . . . 17 practice and to be the voice for small ruminant issues.” Letter from the President AASRP has 960 members, an impressive Board of Directors, an effective nationally known management company, with a great executive director, 35 different committees, delegates in the AVMA, and we have you. AASRP has certainly grown since our humble beginnings in 1960. In 1960 the only AVMA specialty group dealt with small animals, but there was talk of an equine and swine group. In the living room at Dr. George Crenshaw’s home, Dr. Don Bailey, and other veterinarians, decided there was a need for a specialty group for sheep and goats. The American Association of Sheep and Goat Practitioners were organized and their first national meeting was held at the Flamingo Hotel in Las Vegas. Dr. Bailey’s wife, Betty, managed the organization from her kitchen for years and years. Today our organization is known globally as a leader in small ruminant issues. We cannot thank Dr. Bailey and his wife Betty, enough. They still raise sheep and cattle in retirement in Oregon. As AASRP moves into the future we are in very capable hands. Dr. Joan Bowen, Colorado, and Dr. Joanie Dean Rowe, California, become President and President- elect. When I took office two years ago my goal was to work hard for you, do my best, and be an excellent representative of your interests, whether you dealt with camelids, deer and elk, or sheep and goats. Another goal of mine, when I accepted this privilege was to be able to say “nothing bad happened while I was in charge.” To that end I wish all future leaders of AASRP to be able to say those words. Thank you everyone for all your talent, friendship, and great advice along the way. I will end these two years with a great respect for AASRP and all its members. Thank you for letting me serve as your President. Respectfully, Jim Fallen, DVM, President AASRP, Albuquerque, New Mexico FallenDVM@aol.com 1-505-897-3787 STUDENT EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES We receive many requests from veterinary students for information about externship opportunities. We are asking AASRP Veterinary members if they are interested in hosting primarily 4th year students for 2-4 weeks. Information that the students desire includes: - Small ruminant species seen in your practice, - Busiest months of the year relevant to small ruminant work, - Practice location, - Availability of housing, and - Preferred contact information for externship requests. Based on student feedback, we see a need to update externship opportunity information from the membership. Thus we are asking for those of you who wish to host Student externs to contact me directly via email using the following Subject line: AASRP Externships. Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you. Cindy Wolf, DVM wolfx006@umn.edu 2 Management Report Your Board of Directors works diligently to provide valuable service to our members. We are looking forward to working with the new members of the Board and your new president Dr. Bowen. Thank you to Drs. Fallen, Mobini and Snyder for welcoming Franz Management as a part of the management team for AASRP. It has been a pleasure to work with them. I greatly admire their expertise and passion for small ruminant medicine. We are excited to initiate, in the near future, an e-newsletter to improve our communications with AASRP members. If you have suggestions for topics and/or material for the e-newsletter, please let us know. Franz management was disappointed to terminate AASRP membership for over 240 previous members. Please ask those that are not members to consider membership in AASRP. If there are services we can provide to make your membership more valuable, we welcome any suggestions you may have. Thank you for your support, as we strive to meet the mission of AASRP. Respectfully submitted, Tom Johnson, DVM Executive Director 2011 ELECTION RESULTS Dr. William P. Shulaw re-elected as Director of Region 1 – Dr. Shulaw is a Professor and Extension Veterinarian for cattle and sheep in the Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine at the Ohio State University. His research and Extension interests center around infectious and parasitic diseases of food producing animals and their effect on herd and flock health. Currently he has active projects focusing on diagnosis of Johne’s disease and control of gastrointestinal parasites in sheep. He currently serves on the board and is beginning a second term. Dr. Patty Scharko elected as Director of Region 2 – Dr. Scharko is the field/extension veterinarian in animal health programs for beef cattle, small ruminants, foreign animal disease diagnostician (FADD), designated scrapie epidemiologist for South Carolina and professor at Clemson University. DVM from UGA 1983, MPH from UNC-Chapel Hill 1989, and Diplomate of American College of Preventive Medicine 1994. Dr. Annika Rogers elected as Director of Region 4 - Dr. Rogers is a private practitioner and co-owner of Rogers Veterinary Service, a mobile mixed animal practice that covers the mid-Willamette and coastal regions of Oregon. As a 2008 graduate from Oregon State University, she is pursuing her dream of becoming a small ruminant veterinarian. Such a dream sprung from 10 years of raising her own crossbred sheep and purebred Southdowns before entering veterinary school. Currently, she is striving to develop a practice that caters to the unique needs of small ruminants and her dedication to this community is evidenced by her investment in student groups, grower associations, and teaching local seminars. Dr. Joan Dean Rowe elected as President Elect – Dr. Rowe is a Professor in Population Health and Reproduction at the University of California, School of Veterinary Medicine at Davis where she is a clinician in Food Animal Reproduction & Herd Health. She has current research interests in CAEV, infectious abortion, reproductive performance and small ruminant drug approvals. Dr. Rowe was the 2007 recipient of the Dr. Don E. Bailey Small Ruminant Practitioner of the Year. She also raises Toggenburg dairy goats. Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 WELCOME NEW MEMBERS 2nd Quarter Full Members Dr. Matthew Clement Dulka Dr. Rachael Emerson Dr. Paul David Erwin Dr. Scott Essex Dr. Jennifer L. Fife Dr. Trina Hadden Dr. Rebecca Hall-Cross Dr. Sam Harbo Dr. Jennifer Hochstedler Dr. Teresa Hoxworth Dr. Kammy Johnson Dr. Cynthia Jeane Johnson-Larson Dr. Angela Marie King Dr. Sherry Lannoy Dr. Grace Lidl Dr. Jennifer Mayer Dr. Elizabeth O. McEvoy Claire Mikolayunas Dr. Robert Mulligan Dr. Jennifer Olmstead Dr. Lisa K. Pearson Dr. Laura Pylman Dr. Lisa Rehm Dr. Warren Lee Waybright Dr. George Anthony Wiseley Dr. Pam Zaabel Student Members Ginger Bailey – Auburn Univ. Ashley Rae Cockrell – UC Davis Crystal DeGroot – Michigan State Jacob Helmick – Mississippi State Kaitlyn Inhoff – Univ. of MN John Robert Killey – Univ. of Georgia Rachel Lawson – Auburn Univ. Stephanie Nicole Lundquist – Ross Univ. Rachel Oman – Colorado State Anna Ozio – Louisiana State Amanda Paulhamus – Ohio State Taryn Pearson – Univ. of Glasgow Jennifer Towner – Univ. of Georgia Samuel B. Guss Memorial Fund The Front Range Dairy Goat Association Dr. Becky Childers Dr. Samuel B. Guss (1916-1984) In order to assist senior veterinary students interested in small ruminant medicine, AASRP provides grants each year to help student members of AASRP undertake extern opportunities. It is not required that the experience be with small ruminants exclusively, but it should provide at least some chance to observe a modern veterinary practice working with one or more of the small ruminant species. Over one hundred AASRP-member practitioners throughout the United States – as well as Australia, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Israel and Puerto Rico – offer externships to students seeking experience in small ruminant medicine. To learn more about the AASRP Student Externship Program, call the AASRP Management Office at 334-517-1233, or log on at aasrp.org *Donations for the Sam Guss fund can now be made on line without having to go thru the membership renewal. Here is the link: http://aasrp.org/displayemailforms.cfm?emailformnbr=143762 2011 Student Grant Recipients Due to the continued contributions to the Samuel B. Guss Memorial Fund, the following senior veterinary students have been selected and are able to receive grants to help assist with the cost of the externships. Thank you to all of the donors. Your contribution truly makes a difference! Student Externship Jennifer Towner – Univ. of Georgia Rachel Lawson – Auburn Univ. Gretel Schlegel – Univ. of Minnesota Averl Sauder – UW-Madison Chris Winslow – St. Matthews Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 Dr. Paul Jones, Woodburn Veterinary Clinic Mountain Large Animal Hospital USDA Sheep Experiment Station Buckeye Veterinary Service Dr. Robin Skillman 3 Board of Directors Quarterly Summary Summary of AASRP Board of Directors meetings for April and May 2011 The Board of Directors of AASRP met on April 26 and May 24. The nominating committee reported appointments to AVMA committees as referenced in Dr. Jone’s report contained in this issue of Wool and Wattles. Dr. Joe Snyder was appointed chair of the AVMA Animal Welfare Committee. The Continuing education committee has suggested speakers for AABP 2011, NAVC 2012, and AVMA Annual convention 2012. The student education opportunity committee evaluated and approved student grants noted in this issue of the newsletter. The Board contacted members who have not renewed their membership and on May 24 reluctantly voted to terminate the membership of over 240 members. The Board sent a letter of support for funding for FARAD to Senators involved with funding FARAD. The Board has asked management to begin an enewsletter. Dr. Snyder will serve as the Board’s liaison to management for the enewsletter. Due to a lack of eligible nominations, The Board elected to not award the Don E. Bailey Practitioner of the Year award for 2011. The Board continues to monitor the financial situation of AASRP and is exploring ways to reduce costs and increase income while expanding member services. The Board reconfirmed AASRP policy regarding membership information. AASRP does not provide/sell member’s information to unrelated parties. ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT 2011 As your representative to the AVMA Animal Welfare Committee I attend two meetings a year in Schaumburg with a diverse and dedicated group of veterinarians who represent every corner of contemporary veterinary medicine. More recently, I was asked to be the “food animal” representative to the Management Subcommittee which helps make critical decisions between meetings and does the planning and agenda management for the larger committee, requiring an extra day at each meeting plus an additional face to face meeting and one or more conference call meetings during the year. This spring I have accepted the position of Chair-Elect and will inherit the chair next year if all goes well. AASRP, therefore, has a good position on the committee. AVMA has made animal welfare one of its high priority concerns on the strategic plan. Our goal is to become the most respected voice for reasoned, 4 science based information and advice on issues involving animal welfare. While most of the work is done by the division director, Dr. Gail Golab and her excellent staff, the committee is immensely valuable as a resource for the kind of information and awareness only veterinarians working a specific field can supply. Recently, we have revised the policy on tail-docking of lambs to include language recommending practices that reduce pain through the use of appropriate analgesia. This policy can be seen on the AVMA website, along with the “backgrounder” which supplies the data used to make the decision. No other small ruminant specific policies have been addressed recently, but we continue to address assaults on our profession and attempt to provide leadership in this field. We have considered addressing the issue of sheep and goats used for training herding dogs, but there seemed neither a sense of urgency coming from AASRP nor an adequate body of data on the subject. We did manage to revise the Veterinarian’s Oath to include mention of welfare and prevention of pain and suffering, an action of which we are particularly proud. We continue to work on producing a list of research topics that are needed to further our knowledge in the field of welfare. Any suggestions in this area would be much appreciated. The revised Euthanasia Guidelines will be out soon. This large undertaking has been completed by a task force under Animal Welfare supervision, and should improve the already excellent guidelines currently in print. I feel that this is a very important committee for AASRP and veterinarians in general and hope that we can continue to provide effective representation. I am very grateful that you have given me the opportunity to do this work. Yours respectfully, Joe Snyder AVMA CPAC (CLINICAL PRACTITIONERS ADVISORY COMMITTEE) REPORT 2011 Andrea Mongini, DVM MS, June 20, 2011 CPAC is the Clinical Practitioners Advisory Committee, which meets twice per year at the AVMA headquarters in Illinois. I was asked to serve as the AASRP representative last summer and attended the Fall 2010 meeting. I was unable to attend the Spring 2011 meeting due to illness (Influenza) which began two days before the meeting was scheduled. I was available via teleconference for phone voting and to stay abreast of the topics discussed. CPAC has worked on a number of issues this past year related to animal agriculture and drug usage. The group speaks via email on a daily to weekly basis depending on what topics and timelines are on the table. We have discussed and put together responses to: The FDA proposed changes to cephalosporin usage which would limit their use ONLY to the approved route, dosage, and diseases specified. (AVMA does not support the decision made with insufficient evidence of resistance and inability to accurately monitor possible resistance in the future) The DEA requirement for a license and physical address in each state where a veterinarian practices (AVMA asked DEA to clarify this requirement for ambulatory veterinarians who do not have an actual clinic but work on farms) The FDA is revising how ‘unapproved animal drugs’ are classified. This would have an impact on food animals and small ruminants since FDA may not allow drugs like electrolytes, injectable vitamins, fluids, etc to be used by veterinarians if they require a NADA number. CPAC, working with COBTA, put together a list of guidelines they would like FDA to consider in their decision. We are currently awaiting FDA’s response. AVMA has revised and updated their hazardous drugs disposal information to assist veterinarians in disposing of controlled and or hazardous drugs/ chemicals safely and legally. CPAC and COBTA worked on these revisions and their content. AVMA drafted a letter to the state of OK regarding taxation of veterinary services. CPAC advised AVMA not to support any taxation of veterinary services. There was extensive discussion about how to handle future taxation issues that will likely be coming up around the country. There have been numerous small animal related topics that have also been discussed. I am not including them but would be happy to if there is interest. These include but are not limited to revising the AVMA stance Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 on puppy socialization (at what age and how much), proposing a waiver on Rabies vaccination in some dogs with health issues making vaccination dangerous or life-threatening, and voting to oppose HR 1406- Fairness to Pet Owners Act which would allow clients to purchase drugs through human pharmacies. AVMA HOUSE OF DELEGATES and AASRP NOMINATING COMMITTEE I serve as the Delegate for AASRP in the AVMA House of Delegates. The House of Delegates will meet July 14th and 15th in St Louis, Missouri. We will be considering amendments to the AVMA bylaws and resolutions proposed by members of the House. Members of the House of Delegates will also elect a President-Elect for AVMA, Members of the House Advisory Committee, and representatives for several AVMA Councils. Dr Joan Bowen, Alternate Delegate for AASRP, and I are assigned to reference committees that will discuss a newly prepared strategic plan for AVMA, including the vision of AVMA in 2020. A summary of actions taken by the House of Delegates in St Louis will be submitted to the AASRP Board of Directors and will be prepared for publication. As Chairman of the AASRP nominating committee I submit recommendations to fill AVMA Council and AVMA committee vacancies to the AASRP Board. If these recommendations are approved by the Board, the names are sent to the AVMA Executive Board for discussion and appointment. The following is a list of AVMA Committees and AASRP representatives that have been appointed by AVMA Executive Board. Animal Agriculture Liaison Committee Delegate: Dr Jeanne Rankin, term expires July 2014 Alt. Delegate: Dr Amy Robinson, term expires July 2014 Clinical Practitioners Advisory Committee Delegate: Dr Andrea Mongini, term expires July 2013* Alt. Delegate: Dr Jonathan Bergmann, term expires July 2014* Legislative Advisory Committee Dr Seyedmehdi Mobini, term expires July 2014* Delegate: Alt Delegate: Dr Kelly Still Brooks, term expires July 2014* Committee on Environmental Issues Delegate: Dr Peregrine Wolff, term expires July 2012 Committee on Disaster and Emergency Issues Delegate: Dr Peregrine Wolff, term expires July 2014 Animal Welfare Committee Delegate: Dr Joseph Snyder, term expires 2013 Alt. Delegate: Dr Peregrine Wolff, term expires July 2013 Food Safety Advisory Committee Dr Christine Navarre, term expires July 2012 Delegate: Alt. Delegate: Dr Joan Bowen, term expires 2013 I also nominate for AASRP Positions, which as of July 18, 2011 will be: President: Dr Joan Bowen, term expires July 2013 President-elect: Dr Joan Dean Rowe, term expires July 2013 Immediate Past President: Dr Jim Fallen, term expires July 2013 Board Secretary: will be nominated by President Bowen, term expires July 2013 Board Treasurer: will be nominated by President Bowen, term expires July 2013 Director Region One: Dr William Shulaw, term expires July 2012* Director Region Two: Dr. Patty Scharko, term expires July 2013* Director Region Three: Dr Cliff Shipley, term expires July 2012* Director Region Four: Dr Annika Rogers, term expires July 2013* AVMA Delegate: Dr Paul Jones, 4 year renewable term* Alt AVMA Delegate: Dr Joan Bowen, 4 year renewable term* Governance Committee Chair: Nominating Committee Chair: College Liaison Committee Chair: (Committee Chairs Nominated by President Bowen) Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 SEO Committee Chair: Sam Guss Fund Chair: CE Committee Chair: Dr Joan Dean Rowe, term expires July 2013 USAHA Board of Directors: Dr Paul Jones (no term limit-elected by USAHA)* * Indicates eligible for renewal Submitted by, Dr. Paul L. Jones LEGISLATIVE ADVISORY COMMITTEE CONSTITUENT REPORT LaRue W. Johnson DVM, PhD The American Association of Small Ruminant Practitioners has approximately 1000 members being primarily mixed veterinary practitioners, researchers or academicians united by their involvement with either/or sheep, goats, camelids and cervids. I will have served 2 three-year terms as the AASRP representative to the AVMA’s Legislative Advisory Committee and have found it to be a very stimulating and rewarding experience. For that I give my thanks to the AASRP membership. While usually composing my report from my personal perspective, I sent an e-message to the membership for their input. Following are the highlights of their responses: Perpetuation and adequate funding of the Food Animal Residue Avoidance Databank (FARAD) remains high on their priority list. One bit of ammunition if you didn’t see it. FARAD had really good information about clearance of radioactive iodine, cesium, and strontium out within days of the Fukoshima catastrophe. Where else can you get that? FARAD needs to be secured so we don’t have to fight for its funding/existence every few years. The threat against FARAD is contrary to producing safe food and animal welfare. We need to counter continued pressure to limit antibiotic use, including restriction on extra label use ... since almost all of our use is extra label, and add a related concern about drugs--especially analgesics and eye preparations. Seems that manufacturers don’t want to provide affordable products for veterinary use. I think it is shameful that we essentially have no FDA-approved drugs available for use to relieve pain in any food animal species. I understand that this situation is driven by economics and that it is not feasible for pharmaceutical companies to seek approval for products when they cannot hope to recoup their R & D expenses for doing so in product sales, but rather than just throw up our hands in disgust and say there is nothing we can do about it I think we should continue to push for alternate solutions, whether they might involve modification of the procedure required for approval to reduce its cost, a petition process whereby licensed prescribers could essentially force a manufacturer or allied group of manufacturers to seek approval, or cultivating an alternate source of funding for the approval process (contributions from funds established by veterinary organizations, “check-off ” type programs for producers, etc— let our imaginations run wild. We need secure funding to finish scrapie eradication, i.e. 18 million per year through 2017. Because of (regional?) regulations, we have a very hard time disposing of dead small ruminants. The only rendering service won’t pick them up, it’s illegal to bury them, illegal to put them in the dump, and cremation takes a LOT of wood (and burning in general requires a permit). The local crematorium will handle small ruminants but the cost is as prohibitive to the one that may have kept the animal alive in the first place. Quite a few folks end up taking them out onto BLM land and dumping them for the coyotes, my biggest concern there being that they often get lazy and don’t go far enough out of town. Faster approval for the Minor Use Minor Species drugs…. ECG/PMSG especially for all those CIDR users that need it! My replacement presumably will be Dr. Seyedmehdi Mobini who is currently serving as the Region 1 AASRP board member. His AASRP appointment is subject to the AVMA Executive Board Approval that will be forthcoming. 5 USDA Veterinary Services Considering Changes to the Scrapie Flock Certification Program (SFCP) Individuals or organizations that wish to comment on any of the options listed, suggest an additional option not listed, or receive updates on the changes being discussed should email Dr. Alan Huddleston, Associate National Scrapie Program Coordinator, at alan.r.huddleston@aphis.usda. gov. Dr. Huddleston can also receive mail at 4700 River Road, Riverdale, MD 20737. USDA Veterinary Services’ National Scrapie Eradication Program (NSEP) is considering a variety of possible changes to its Scrapie Flock Certification Program (SFCP). In light of the current budget reality, Veterinary Services is assessing how to get the most benefit from the money the American people provide for scrapie eradication activities. Since 2002, the National Scrapie Eradication Program (NSEP) has reduced the prevalence of scrapie in the United States by 85%. We’re getting close, but to fully eradicate scrapie from our country every remaining case must be found followed by a period of continued high level surveillance to confirm disease freedom. PARASITE CONTROL WEBINARS AND FIELD DAY Veterinary Services has identified the following activities as contributing the most to scrapie eradication: surveillance testing; animal ID compliance activities such as providing free eartags to sheep and goat producers and compliance activities at concentration points; and disease investigation and flock clean up. These activities are mandatory elements of the NSEP, and they have been the main factor in reducing the prevalence of scrapie in the United States. Over the last several years several extension educators, researchers, and farmers in Ohio and West Virginia have been involved in various projects to develop or demonstrate strategies to assist in controlling internal parasites. During the last two years we have been funded by a North Central Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education grant to determine whether forage chicory might have activity against internal parasites under conditions typical of farms in our region. We have learned a lot about chicory and made some very interesting observations about parasite survival over winter and during summer grazing as well as the potential use of nontraditional grazing strategies. This summer we will offer a series of three internet-based meetings followed by a field day at one of our project farms to discuss and demonstrate parasite biology, managing management of drug resistant worms, and various grazing strategies, including use of chicory and other plants, to help control worms. Veterinary Services is considering dedicating fewer resources to the SFCP as the scrapie budget is decreased. Veterinary Services values the commitment of the producers who participate in the program; however, changes to the SFCP are under consideration for the reasons discussed below. 1. 2. 3. 4. The SFCP is a voluntary component of the NSEP. Currently there are 1,549 participating flocks; this makes up approximately 1% of the total number of sheep flocks and goat herds in the United States. Since 2007, participation in the SFCP has declined by approximately 25%. The SFCP is not as efficient at detecting scrapie cases as the activities listed above. The majority of scrapie cases identified in the United States in the past 9 years have been found through the Regulatory Scrapie Slaughter Surveillance (RSSS) program and the resulting flock investigations and clean up. Furthermore, most scrapie cases that have been found in SFCP flocks were detected through the RSSS program or through traces from infected or source flocks; very few have been identified through SFCP flock inspections or owner reported or submitted animals. The annual inspections for the three categories of the SFCP -Selective, Complete and Export – are the primary cost for the program. To ensure sufficient funding for surveillance, animal ID compliance, and flock investigations and clean up, Veterinary Services is considering possible changes to the SFCP. The three options currently under consideration include the following: 1. 2. 3. Eliminate the Selective and Complete categories. Maintain all three categories, but use accredited veterinarians to perform inspections and sampling for all flocks in the SFCP, at the producers’ expense. Maintain all three categories with modifications to the inspection and sampling requirements for the selective and complete categories, so that the selective and complete categories focus on surveillance with a reduced emphasis on inspections and the export category continues to focus on surveillance and maintaining inspections at the level needed to meet OIE recommendations in order to facilitate exports. An important point to emphasize is that in any of the options under consideration Veterinary Services will maintain the Export category in a form that meets OIE requirements so that sheep and goat producers who wish to export their animals and germplasm have the opportunity to do so. VS is soliciting input on these possible changes from stakeholders. 6 Internal parasite control continues to be one of the most important and difficult to manage health issues for sheep and goat farmers. Traditional control strategies involving preventive or suppressive treatments with dewormers have led to widespread resistance of parasites to the drugs we currently have available. The internet-based meetings will be held from 7-9 pm on Thursday evenings, beginning on August 4. The second session will be held on August 18 and the third session is scheduled for August 25. On-site presentations will be given sequentially in Morrow, Athens, and Wayne Counties, but other physical sites where people can participate will also be available throughout Ohio. People can also access these meetings from home if they have a high-speed internet connection and a telephone connection. A field day concluding the series is set for August 27th at the John Anderson farm near Wooster, OH. At the field day attendees will have a chance to receive hands-on FAMACHA training, learn about using non-traditional forages in a grazing program for managing parasitism, and see examples of various forages and fencing options. In addition, other presentations on selecting sheep, sheep nutrition, and biosecurity and animal health will be given. The sponsors for these events are OSU Extension, NCR SARE, the Ohio Sheep Improvement Association, and the Ohio Heartland Sheep Improvement Association. The Ohio Veterinary Medical Licensing Board has approved continuing education credit on an “hour for hour” basis (2 hours per Internet-Based Meeting and 4 hours for the Field Day). Specific information about locations for attending the evening sessions, connecting to the sessions from other sites, and program and field day topics will be posted soon on the OSU Extension Sheep Team website: http://sheep.osu.edu/ You can also contact Dr. Bill Shulaw shulaw.1@osu.edu , Mr. Jeff McCutcheon mccutcheon.30@osu.edu , or Mr. Rory Lewandowski lewandwoski.11@ osu.edu for more information. ANNOUNCEMENTS Small Ruminant Symposium, August 13, 2011, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Hilton Milwaukee City Center, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm. As part of the Society for Theriogenology conference and symposia to be held in Milwaukee, WI in August of 2011, Dr. Clifford Shipley has assembled an outstanding program of speakers on small ruminant topics. Speakers and topics include: Dr. Sherrie Clark - Deener (Reproductive anatomy and physiology of whitetail deer and other select cervids, sheep and goats); Dr. Manoel Tamassia (Synchronization of estrus of whitetail deer and other select cervids, sheep and goats); Dr. Jordyn Boesch (Anesthesia of whitetail deer and others for transcervical AI, laproscopic AI and semen collection); Dr. Clifford Shipley (Equipment and techniques for transcervical AI and laproscopic AI in small Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 ruminants); Dr. Manoel Tamassia (Collecting and processing semen from cervids, sheep and goats); Dr. Jacques Fuselier (Epididymal sperm harvest and freezing); Kim Kensell, CVT (Semen handling for insemination in the field. Splitting straws, loading the equipment and juggling 8 straws at one time). Cost is $170.00 (includes lunch) if registered prior to July 1 and $195.00 after July 1. This program is open to all veterinarians and more information may be found at www.therio.org. The American Embryo Transfer Association is offering a small ruminant embryo tranfer wet-lab as part of its annual meeting in San Antonio, August 25-27. The lab will be held on the morning of Thursday August 25th from 8:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. It will be hosted by Dr. Sam Castleberry at his facility, 30 minutes from the Mariott Rivercenter, in Castroville, Texas. Dr. Castleberry is one of the leading experts in the practice of small ruminant embryo transfer, having performed thousands of collections and transfers and this is a chance to participate and ask questions in his own facility, where you can see how it is done in a practical and clinic setting. This will be a hands-on presentation including superovulation, anesthetizing, surgical collection, and recovery of donor goats; surgical evaluation and transfer of embryos to synchronized recipients. Dress should be for working in clean surgical environment. Transportation will be provided from the hotel and lunch will be provided on site. Attendees will be returned in time to participate in the “Timely Topics” discussions. The attendance will be limited to a maximum of 25 participants with a minimum of 12 registered by July 1st to proceed with this wet lab. Registration for the small ruminant wet lab will entitle the participant to attend the “Timely Topics” session from 2:00 p.m to 5:00 p.m. which will have extensive basic embryology stations as well as several other topics of interest to the beginning embryo practitioner and allow registration to the AETA/CETA conference at the member rate even if not a member of either organization. You may register online at: www.aeta.org The Alpaca Registry, Inc. and Alpaca Research Foundation announce that the Second International Conference on Camelid Genetics and Reproductive Biotechnologies will be held in Houston, Texas, on September 16-18, 2011. The conference is open to veterinarians, scientists and all those interested in genetic improvement and reproductive biotechnologies. The conference includes invited plenary sessions as well as research abstract presentations/posters. More information on the program of the conference and details for research abstract submission may be found under call for abstracts\download on the conference website <http://www. camelidconference.com/>. AASRP will present three educational small ruminant sessions during the AABP Annual Meeting to be held September 22 through 24 in St. Louis, Missouri. When you register for the meeting, please check that you are a member of AASRP as we receive a portion of the profits from the AABP meeting based on how many AASRP members identify themselves as such. You can register as both a member of AASRP and AABP if you belong to both organizations. On Thursday, September 22, Dr. Mike Huber from Oregon State University will present three topics from 8 to 10 am including: regional perfusion of antimicrobial treatment, simple techniques for handling complicated fractures and practical analgesia for small ruminants. From 8 am to noon on Friday September 23, Dr. Douglas Wagner, whose veterinary practice works exclusively with white tail deer, will be talking about chemical immobilization, farm management and economics and field medicine and surgery of white tail deer. On Friday, September 23 from 1:45 to 3:45 pm, Dr. Pam Ruegg from the University of Wisconsin will be talking about the mammary mysteries of mastitis in sheep and goats. Further information about the complete program as well as registration and housing are available at www.aabp.org. The 16th Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symposium will be held November 11-13, 2010 at the Eau Claire Ramada Inn and Convention Center in Wisconsin. There will be talks for producers and sheep milk processors as well as tours of a dairy sheep farm and farmstead cheesemaker. Of special interest to veterinarians will be “Selecting lamb milk replacer and lamb rearing” (Robin Rastani), “Mastitis in dairy sheep” (Pamela Ruegg) and “Antibiotic testing in sheep milk” (Dan Scruton). Additional information can be found at <http://www.dsana.org/symposia.html>. The XI International Conference on Goats will be held at Gran Canaria, Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 Spain from September 24 to 27th of 2012. The organizers promise to do their utmost to ensure that the XI International Conference on Goats will leave you unforgettable memories not only in terms of Goat Science but also a great experience overall. Keeping abreast of the latest developments in Goat research could help those in the industry maintain or increase their profit margin, so vital to the success of the industry. The conference has a webpage at <http://iga2012.ulpgc.es/IGA_2012/IGA2012.html>. The International Goat Association has moved to <http://www.iga-goatworld. com/> The International Sheep Veterinary Congress (ISVC) Organising Committee has revised plans for the 2013 ISVC, originally to be held in Christchurch, New Zealand February 18th-22nd. Unfortunately, the Convention Centre and nearby hotels have been severely damaged by the recent earthquake, and with only two years to go before the congress, the organizing committee investigated other possible venues. It was determined that Rotorua, on the North Island of New Zealand, would be the best fit. The website <http://conference.intsheepvetassoc.org/> will be a good source of updates in the coming months. Add this site to your “Favourites” folder of website addresses for easy future reference. The website includes a feature to sign up for email updates at <http://conference.intsheepvetassoc. org/notifications/> and we strongly recommend that you do this so you can be kept up to date with all the congress arrangements as they happen. In addition to a superb scientific programme, the Congress will feature tours incorporating visits of both farming and tourist/scenic interest through both the North and South Islands of New Zealand. Preliminary outlines of these tours (now ending at Rotorua) are already available on the website at <http://conference.intsheepvetassoc.org/pre-congress-tours/>. DRUGS AND BIOLOGICS The AVMA biologic subcommittee recently put together an alert for veterinarians concerning the need to follow vaccine mixing directions per the label. That article has been published in JAVMA now: http://www.avma. org/onlnews/javma/jun11/110615i.asp. Dr. Lynne White-Shim <Lwhite@ avma.org> has also done an AVMA@Work blog post about this: http:// atwork.avma.org/2011/05/31/veterinarians-urged-to-follow-vaccine-labeldirections/. Even though AASRP members are unlikely to use a rabies vaccine as a diluent for another vaccine for sheep or goats, they need to be aware that some veterinarians have been mixing MLV canine distemper with rabies vaccine, thereby bringing into question the protection status of the animals that received the unapproved and untested combination. BOOKS, BULLETINS, AND COMPUTER WEBSITES For a day brightener, try saying it in llama at <http://llamafont.com/> AVMA members can now access a comprehensive waste disposal website titled: Waste Disposal by Veterinarians: What Goes Where? This website was designed to provide a comprehensive collection of information and key resources pertaining to waste disposal and related regulatory compliance issues relevant to the veterinary community, including topics such as hazardous waste, regulated medical waste, carcasses, and much more. The site is broken down into the following categories; Definitions, Federal Regulations, State Regulations, AVMA Resources and Clinical Resources. These six categories cover virtually every topic related to solid waste disposal. Wastes Generated by Animals and the Veterinary Profession, is one of the three focus areas of the AVMA Committee on Environmental Issues (CEI). The Committee worked with AVMA staff on the concept of the website; to have a central location where veterinarians could easily find current information pertaining to waste disposal issues. The site is user friendly and is a great resource. Check it out at: <http://www.avma.org/ issues/environment/wastedisposal/default.asp> A national workshop to review the management of Chronic Wasting Disease in Canada was held in Edmonton, Alberta, on 9-10 February 2011. It addressed past practices, current conditions, current science and future risks and options. The report from this workshop is now available for download as a PDF file from the following site: http://www.ccwhc.ca/ 7 article_cwd_report.php Dr. Clifford Shipley’s Fawn Care Guidelines are posted on the Illinois Deer Farmers website at http://www.ildfa.com/ . Look under Animal Health for detailed instructions for bottle-rearing fawns, including antibiotics and vitamin supplements that might be needed. The instructions are intended for commercial deer farmers but might be of help to wildlife rehabilitators and their veterinarians. Part Two of the Goat 2009 NAHMS Report: Reference of Goat Health and Marketing Practices in the United States 2009 is now available. Copies can be obtained from Ms. Abby Fienhold, 970-494-7000, NAHMS@aphis.usda.gov. Chapter titles include: goat diseases, goat health management & biosecurity, marketing & movement, identification, needs assessment, sampling & estimation, data collection, data analysis, and sample evaluation. There are also some very interesting tables on populations by breed and use. The report summarizes survey results of 2484 goat operations in 21 states. Data is analyzed according to herd size (very small at fewer than 10, small at 10 to 19, medium at 20 to 99, or large at 100 or more goats) and primary production (meat, dairy, fiber, or other). One of the most telling findings is that only 1 in 3 of the operations had consulted with a veterinarian in the preceding 12 months, and the only explanation suggested was a difficulty finding a veterinarian experienced in working with goats. Producers were asked about their level of familiarity (very familiar, somewhat familiar, not familiar) with various diseases. Consultation with veterinarians would seem to be warranted, as 57% of producers were not familiar with CAE, 51% were not familiar with CLA, 63% with Johne’s disease, 44% with soremouth, and 76% were not familiar with Q fever. Only 41% of operations that had visitors enter the goat production area in the last 12 months followed any type of biosecurity measure, and that was most often just to have visitors park away from the goats. Incoming adult goats or kids were never isolated from the primary herd in 40% of operations. The FAMACHA card was unknown to 75% of producers, with little difference across the country. The most common individual reasons for culling bucks were breeding performance (16.6%), poor genetics or conformation (11.1%), old age or teeth problems (10.7%). For does, the reasons were most often old age/teeth problems (24.4%), low productivity (14.3%), poor genetics or conformation (8.7%), poor mothering (4.9%), thin or unthrifty (4.7%) and mastitis (2.8%). Even though scrapie tags and applicators are provided free by the USDA, only 27% of operations and 51% of animals had some type of herd identification, while 40% of operations and 63% of animals had individual animal ID. Ear notches were used to identify 15% of animals and scrapie tags were used for 26%. Some of the future reports from the 2009 NAHMS goat survey will address Goat disease and death, Biosecurity and disease practices, and Parasites and anthelmintic resistance. STUDENT EXTERNSHIP REPORTS Woodburn Veterinary Clinic Externship I spent two weeks in March, 2011, at Woodburn Veterinary Clinic in Woodburn Oregon, with Dr. Paul Jones and the rest of the staff. Woodburn is a mixed animal practice with a significant camelid and small ruminant clientele. Since it was spring, many of the appointments involved herd health check-ups. Western Oregon has an impressive number of both llama and alpaca farms. We also saw a sizable number of goats. We visited all sizes of farms, from those with just a few animals, to breeding facilities with hundreds of animals. The herd health check-ups allowed ample practice in body condition scoring, subcutaneous injections, and oral deworming. In addition, there were many opportunities for toenail and hoof trimming, as well as teeth trimming and the occasional euthanasia. 8 Additionally, we spent two mornings at local dairies where my less-thanstellar palpation skills were put to the test. Fortunately for the farmers and the cows, Drs. Jones and Block had the last word on whether or not a particular cow was pregnant. Being a mixed animal practice, I also had an opportunity to spend a couple days in the small animal clinic, where I could observe and discuss cases and surgeries with the doctors. This externship experience is highly recommended for anyone with a small ruminant interest and especially those with a camelid interest. The clinic provides housing on-site (where you’ll have the company of “Stumpy”, the friendly house cat), and you have use of a truck during the off hours if it’s not being used by the on-call vet. Dr. Jones has been working with externs for many years and gives you every opportunity to gain hands-on experience during the farm calls. The entire staff is friendly and accommodating, and the Oregon countryside is beautiful. Greg Closter University of Minnesota Class of 2011 Oregon State University Sheep and Goat Medicine and Surgery Rotation Dr. Villarroel, a farms department clinician at Oregon State College of Veterinary Medicine, is in charge of the sheep and goat rotation at the university. The idea of the course is to intensively expose students to handson and student based teaching concerning small ruminant medicine and surgery. Fourteen students enrolled in the course. The first day consisted of a course introduction and expectations coupled with lectures about physical exam, normal values and procedures, nutritional diseases, neurology and diseases in dairy goats. Students were asked to divide into 7 groups of two people, then asked to pick a topic that concerns sheep and goat medicine such as: herd health and husbandry, neonatal care, c-section, castration and teaser animal surgical and chemical techniques, and lameness. The group was then responsible for establishing an hour long lecture to teach classmates about the specific topic. These presentations were delivered in the mornings throughout the 2 week long course. Other lecture topics included peri-parturient disease, diseases of lambs, applied nutrition, diagnosis of abortion, male and female reproduction and predators. Aside from in class room teaching, the techniques taught in the classroom were immediately shifted to clinical and field situations. This was an invaluable portion of the course. Within the two week period the entire class traveled to four different farms to gain hands-on practice along with informative sessions with the producers. Three sheep farms were visited where hoof trimming, ultrasounding for pregnancy, lamb processing, blood collection and c-section were performed. Each farm had different management techniques that worked for their production type. One goat farm was visited as well for ultrasounding for pregnancy along with cases of lameness, hair loss and breeding problems. Three labs were established concerning dehorning and disbudding, ultrasounding for pregnancy, castration and c-section. Students working in pairs and were supervised by overseeing faculty. Clients were signed up for the labs in advance and offered free service to allow students to gain the experience for the above procedures. A necropsy lab was also arranged where the students necropsied adults sheep (3), kids (5) and lambs (3). Students gained experience in practicing through post-mortem exam and were given instruction on proper tissue collection. Cadaver testicles were also used to practice epididymectomies. The two week course was packed with great hands-on experience and information concerning the care and veterinary practice on sheep and goats. I would recommend this course to any student wishing to gain more experience and information while working with knowledgeable and friendly clinicians and staff. Candice Turnlund, University of Illinois class of 2011 Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 PRACTICE TIP from AABPL Pregnancy Diagnosis without Ultrasound When I find myself without an ultrasound in the far reaches of the practice and am wondering about a possible pregnancy in a goat, I often grab a red top tube full of blood and submit it for a BioPryn pregnancy diagnosis. It’s often cheaper than returning for a second call, although it only works well if the owners have kept reasonable records of when the doe may have been exposed to the buck. The company recommends the test (for pregnancyspecific protein B) 30 days or more after breeding. Jess McArt, Cornell University, Ithaca NY AASRP-L QUESTION AND ANSWER CIDR Protocols in Canada Question: Pfizer’s Easy Breed progesterone sheep inserts have just become available in Canada. What hormone and quantity is used in conjunction with it please? Answer 1: Small Ruminant Veterinarians of Ontario (SRVO) had a great talk from Chris Bushbeck a few weeks ago on using CIDRs in sheep with Canadian protocols. Contact Joceyln Jansen for the proceedings. The label directions are sadly very unhelpful - as a result of using US data and label information. I will try to summarize the notes the best I can. If a CIDR is to outlast all CLs present during the natural breeding season the CIDR needs to be in for 14 days. If prostaglandin (PG) is given (0.75 cc Estrumate or 2 cc Lutalyse) the CIDR time can be reduced to as short as 10 days with PG given 2 days before CIDR removal. Virtually all CIDR use in Canada will be in conjunction with PMSG (400-500 IU). The New Zealand label recommends CIDR removal at day 12 with PMSG at removal for sheep AI 48 ± 4 hrs. later. The New Zealand goat label recommends 200-400 IU PMSG at day 16 and CIDR removal at Day 18, breed 48 hours later. Again this can be shortened with the use of PG. For out of season breeding in the US I believe that PG600 is the drug of choice to stimulate follicle production - it is really too bad you don’t have access to PMSG legally. Rex G. Crawford, Orangeville, ON, Canada Answer 2: In our experience I would decrease the dose of PMSG in highly prolific breeds such as Romanov, Finn, and Rideau. Especially if the synchronization is in season, I would go with 300 IU in these breeds. Ileana Wenger, Bowden, Alberta LAMA_MED QUESTION AND ANSWER - Dosing Interval for Excede® Question: I’m in New Zealand. Recently we have started using Excede LA (200 mg/ml ceftiofur crystalline free acid) for some chronic skin infections that require extended periods of treatment. Can anyone tell me the recommended dose intervals in camelids for this drug? In cattle we use it once for a 6 day treatment and every 4 days in horses. I have read that it is used every 3 days in goats. I understand that this drug has been available for a while in the U.S and South America. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Answer: I performed a small study looking at Excede in alpacas (healthy, young, research animals) and presented an abstract of the findings at the International Camelid Health Conference in Oregon this year. The study looked at the pharmacokinetics of 3 treatments at 5 day intervals using cattle Excede (200 mg/ml) administered at 6.6 mg/kg SQ. Excede treatment results in very modest serum ceftiofur levels, so you need to be targeting fairly susceptible bacteria. I would modify the dose intervals depending on the bacteria you are treating. Based on the MIC data obtained from camelid Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 cultures in our hospital and the Excede data from our study, a dose interval of 5 days was appropriate for 79% of gram positive bacteria, but only 50% of gram negative bacteria. A dose interval of 2.5 days was appropriate for 90% of gram positive bacteria and 80% of gram negative bacteria. The long dosing intervals reported for other species are based on extremely susceptible bacteria, such as streptococci. Personally, I have used 6.6 mg/kg SQ at 3-day and 5-day dosing intervals with minimal side-effects. Currently, I only use Excede for known susceptible infections, mild infections, or very selective circumstances. Julie E. Dechant, UC Davis LAMA_MED QESTION AND ANSWER - Zinc Responsive Dermatitis Treatment Question: I have a small herd of alpacas with chronic skin problems and among other things found are relatively low zinc values (yes we did do the sampling properly)! These animals are on minimal extra feed at the moment and do have galvanized feed and water troughs. What experience does anyone have of licks, in feed minerals etc in raising zinc levels in alpacas? What is the best way of ensuring all animals receive sufficient supplementation? Answer: The easiest way is to slap zinc ointment in either the axillary/ inguinal areas, or between the buttocks. Areas where there is little fiber. That way there is no problem with trying to get them to drink zinc supplemented in the water troughs, or zinc sprinkled over hay, or added to their pellets and get them to eat it. It is not very palatable (used in prevention of facial eczema in New Zealand). The blob of zinc ointment slapped on is not very scientific, and I haven’t actually measured zinc levels, but it solves the zinc responsive skin problems almost overnight. Note that zinc responsive conditions do not have to be due to zinc deficiency .... The response in alpacas is such that I always give it a go, as it is such an easy and available method to deal with a problem and it won’t do any harm. Monique Koning, New Zealand AASRP-L QUESTION AND ANSWER - Footrot Vaccine Question: Anyone know where I can get a sheep footrot vaccine this year? I’m pretty sure we had some available last year but now none of the catalogs lists it. Answer: The information provided by another member about making your own footrot vaccine is not as simple as it sounds. Prof Egerton and Richard Whittington achieved eradication in Nepal using a monovalent boutique vaccine because they only had one strain present in the flocks. The monovalent strain gave much longer protection against the disease than the multivalent vaccines that were available commercially. The monovalent vaccines is being trialled in some states in Australia, where there is no organised control and eradication program. However there are very few flocks where they could be expected to produce good results. The reason for this is that in most flocks, there are several strains of D. nodosus present. Similar findings have been reported in other countries. This is why the commercial vaccines are multivalent, containing 8 to 10 strains. There was no cross protection between strains and the greater the number of strains in the vaccine, the shorter the length of protection. Before one gets involved in a major exercise preparing a boutique monovalent vaccine for use in a flock, one wants to be sure that there are not several strains present. This is an interesting statistical exercise for the following reasons: - When sampling from the flock, swabs are taken from a small number of infected feet from different sheep (we have used 5). We have to assume that the feet contain all the strains present in the flock. - When cultured, a small number of cultures are taken to grow up to produce the material for serotyping. Again we have to assume that the cultures selected cover all the strains present in the flock. It comes back to numbers and costs. 9 Flocks on Kangaroo Island are involved in a field trial, but there were only a small number of flocks where only one or two strains were present. In these flocks, the vaccine produced good results in controlling the spread and providing an extended period when eradication inspections could be carried out. However, in other flocks where the monovalent vaccine did not cover other strains of D. nodosus present in the flock, then the results were similar to that seen with the older vaccines. Finally, I would be very hesitant to rely on vaccination alone to eradicate the disease. If farmers were prepared to vaccinate the flock every year, then they would control the disease. However, the great benefit of vaccination in our program was that it reduced the prevalence of the disease in infected flocks to a level where the chances of eradication were greatly improved. Footrot vaccines have not been used in New South Wales for a number of years. There may have been limited use in other States, but I doubt that there is a commercially viable market for them in Australia. consent, to give Se by SC injection. Note also that the ewe/doe actively moves Se into the fetus, so supplementing her will actually produce higher Se levels in the offspring than the dam at the time of birth. BUT, there is little or no Se in milk. Therefore, some have suggested that the really most important time to be giving Se to lambs and kids in deficient areas is at 1-2 months of age, when maternal supplies are waning. We’ve noted that the young don’t often start hitting the mineral until they’re a little older. This, of course, assumes that the mamas are getting some kind of reasonable supplement. Joe Snyder, Myrtle Point OR AABP-L QUESTION AND ANSWER Pregnancy Diagnosis in Camels We eradicated the disease from our flocks using the information that had been available for many years. John Plant, New South Wales, Australia AASRP-L QUESTION AND ANSWER - Selenium Levels in Free Choice Minerals Question: One of my clients lost two lambs to ‘low selenium’ (ie white muscle dz) although he did booster the ewes with Bo-Se prior to delivery and has loose mineral salt with 32 ppm available at all time. He did not give the lambs any Bo-Se at birth. How much selenium should be in the mineral mix for small ruminants in a selenium deficient area? Answer 1: The legal level in mineral mixes is 90 ppm selenium and in selenium-deficient areas, I would recommend you go the full amount. Giving BoSe to pregnant ewes is not recommended due to adverse reactions i.e. sudden death. However, making sure they are eating their mineral mix and giving BoSe at birth should certainly prevent white muscle disease. You might consider collecting a few liver samples from lambs dying of other problems and having them analyzed for selenium. A selenium problem more common than white muscle disease is the immune depression that is seen with low levels of selenium high enough to prevent white muscle disease. So it might be a good idea to monitor levels even after you institute your selenium supplement program. Marie Bulgin, Caldwell, Idaho Answer 2: We have consistently used 90 or higher. Sometimes have to get custom mixes to do what we want. Note that it’s pretty hard to get Se toxicity with traditional Se Selenite mixes. With some of the new chelated or yeast based products, one would have to be a bit more careful. Note also, if you’re not following this with your clients, that animals will put down the mineral like candy for a while, then go off and leave it and hardly consume any, then go back and eat some more. These cycles last from weeks to months and can really confuse estimates of consumption. Also, consumption can be driven by different factors. In many places, animals are salt hungry enough to eat the mineral based on salt content. However, in, for example, our coastal climate, the air and forage are salty enough that a salt product will not necessarily generate sufficient interest, so some kind of grain product or sweetener has to be added to drive consumption. It may take some trial and error to get an appropriate mixture in a given area. Also note that in any band/flock/herd there will be at least one animal that is afraid of the mineral and won’t go near the feeder. You just have to live with it. And finally, regarding selenium injections in late pregnancy (or any other time in adult ewes and does). I was once taught that the bad reactions occur with IM injection. There have been countless thousands of doses of BoSe or MuSe given to pregnant ewes in this area subcutaneously without any problems that have been brought to my attention. So certainly in a situation where lambs/kids are dying, it would be an option, with informed 10 The photo above shows a pregnant camel being teased by a male. Question: I have two camels to pregnancy check this morning - Can anyone give some guidance as to how to do this since I have never worked on these creatures before? Can you just rectal them like a cow or do you need to use the ultrasound with the probe extender? How do you control them to get the job done? Answer: Restraint approach depends on tractability of animals. Trained animals tolerate palpation. Some can be palpated standing in equine chute if trained, most will tolerate if they can sit on command in a sternal position. Sternal position is the safest for the operator if the animal is not trained. Xylazine alone is sufficient if animal is not tractable, the dose is 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg IV (0.3 -0.4 mg/kg IM), can be reversed with yohimbine if needed. Palpation technique: care should be more like a mare (they bleed easily and they can have colonic injuries although not as frequently as in the mare). The uterus and pregnancy anatomy is between that of the cow and that of the equine (the wonders of comparative Theriogenology). Diagnosis difficulty depends on how far along the pregnancy is. You cannot use the membrane slip technique as in cattle because the placentation is more like the equine (microcotyledonary diffuse epitheliochorial), fluid may be felt starting at 35 days (very similar feel as in cattle at the same stage because the uterus is relaxed and thin-walled under progesterone as in cattle), the pregnancy is established exclusively in the left uterine horn, asymmetry is present with fluid predominantly in the left horn starting at 32 days. Do not attempt to palpate the amniotic vesicle. The corpus luteum palpates just like that of the bovine. Fetus is difficult to palpate until mid-pregnancy. If it is late pregnant, you will not feel the fetus unless the animal is in sternal position. Fetal movements are very limited in late pregnancy. Ultrasound technique: This is the best approach; very similar to the technique in cattle. If you do this regularly in cattle you should not have any problem. Pregnancy diagnosis is very accurate starting at 16 days post-mating. Fetal heart beat visualized at 25 days. More than 25 days very obvious, Transabdominal ultrasonography is very accurate from 4 months but camels do not like to be touched under the belly. Other techniques for pregnancy diagnosis: Behavior: Pregnant camels assume a very peculiar stance with head held high up and tail curled in presence of a male. They can display this behavior Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 even when approached by a person. This is 100% accurate sign for high progesterone and 86% accurate for pregnancy. Hormone assays: Progesteronemia is a good indicator unless there is a persistent CL or luteinized hemorrhagic follicle. Estrone sulfate is very good in the last half of pregnancy. There are no chorionic gonadotropins known in this species: PSPB, eCG tests will not work Ahmed Tibary, Pullman, WA ABSTRACTS COMPENDIUM OF VETERINARY STANDARD PRECAUTIONS FOR ZOONOTIC DISEASE PREVENTION IN VETERINARY PERSONNEL The purposes of the compendium are to raise awareness of zoonotic disease risks in veterinary medicine and to outline routine best practices to minimize the transmission of zoonotic pathogens from patients to veterinary personnel in private practice. Zoonotic diseases are an occupational hazard to veterinary personnel on a daily basis, as 868 of the 1,415 known human pathogens are zoonotic. Documented zoonotic infections transmitted in veterinary practice include salmonellosis, cryptosporidiosis, plague, sporotrichois, methicillin-resistant staphylococci, psittacosis, dermatophytosis, leptospirosis, and Q fever. In the 2003 African monkeypox outbreak, 18 of 71 infected people were veterinary personnel. Elimination of all risks associated with zoonotic pathogens in veterinary practice is not possible, but the compendium provides reasonable guidance for minimizing disease transmission. Some of the highlights of this document follow. Practices should refuse to provide care for species for which they are not equipped. Employers should demonstrate and promote safe work habits and properly train their employees. Consistent hand hygiene is the single most important measure to reduce disease transmission. This includes hand washing with soap and running water, using liquid or foam products rather than bars than might be cross-contaminated. Refillable containers should be cleaned and dried before refilling, to avoid creation of a bacterial reservoir. Alcohol-based hand rubs are effective against bacteria and enveloped viruses, but less effective against caliciviruses, feline panleukopenia virus, canine parvovirus, anthrax and clostridial spores, and cryptosporidia. The rubs also lose efficacy when organic material is present, so hand washing is preferred and should be done between examinations of individual animals or animal groups and after contact with exudates and body fluids. If running water is not available, clean soiled hands with a moist wipe before applying the alcohol rub. Gloves should be worn when handling exotic species or animals suspected to have an infectious disease, also when there is contact with feces, exudates, open wounds, or diagnostic specimens. Hands should be washed immediately after glove removal, as they may be contaminated from unsuspected microperforations. Facial protection should be used to protect the mucous membranes of the eyes, nose and mouth when lancing abscesses or flushing wounds or when performing dentistry, obstetrical procedures or necropsies. A face shield or goggles worn with a surgical mask usually supplies adequate protection. Respiratory tract protection such as the use of N-95 masks (with annual fit testing of the user) is advised when working with ill psittacines, abortion storms in small ruminants (Q fever), or animals with tuberculosis. Laboratory coats, aprons, coveralls, and nonsterile protective gowns should be changed when soiled and not worn outside the work environment. Footwear should be impermeable to liquid and easy to clean, with care taken to clean before leaving a farm or returning to the clinic or home. Visible organic material should be removed before using a footbath or mat. Needlestick injuries are best prevented by placing the needle and syringe directly into a puncture- and leak-proof medical waste container after use, thereby avoiding recapping. If the cap must be replaced, it is preferred to use forceps or the 1-handed scoop method. Gloves, sleeves, facial protection and impermeable outerwear should be used during obstetrical procedures, to avoid common pathogens such as C. burnetti, Listeria, and Brucella spp. Never attempt to resuscitate a neonate by blowing directly into its nose or mouth. Similar protection should be worn for necropsies, and nonessential persons should Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 not be present when necropsies are performed. Gloves and protective outerwear should be used during wound management, and dressings and bandage scissors should be considered infectious and handled accordingly. Hospitals should create a written checklist for cleaning and disinfection of equipment and surfaces, with attention to frequency of cleaning, products used, disinfection procedures and staff responsible. Gloves and protective outerwear should be worn when handling soiled laundry. Laundry should not be considered clean until it is completely machine dried. Integrated pest management techniques are advised, including sealing potential rodent entry points with steel wool or metal lath, storing feed in tightly covered containers, eliminating clutter that would afford nesting sites and removing standing water sources to eliminate mosquito breeding areas. Records should be kept for all employees of rabies preexposure vaccination and serologic testing for titers (every 2 years). A single booster dose of vaccine is given if the titer falls below 1:5, and 2 doses of vaccine are recommended (days 0 and 3) following rabies exposure. Tetanus vaccine should be given every 10 years, with a booster if a contaminated wound is incurred more than 5 years after the last booster. Influenza vaccines are recommended, especially if working with poultry or swine. Practices should have a written infection control plan, which is reviewed and updated regularly and as clinical practices change. New staff should be trained in the procedures and behavior of all staff monitored to insure compliance with the protocols. National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians JAVMA 237:1403-1422, 2010 PHARMACOKINETICS OF MELOXICAM IN ADULT GOATS AND ITS ANALGESIC EFFECT IN DISBUDDED KIDS A daily dose of 0.5 mg/kg is suggested. Oral absorption is good but peak levels are not reached for 15 hours. This study from Sweden attempted to evaluate the suitability of meloxicam for analgesia in goats, with special consideration for dosage by the oral route so that caretakers could easily medicate the goats. In the first trial, 8 Swedish Landrace goats (1.5 to 3 years old, average weight 44 kg) were given a single intravenous or oral dose of meloxicam, at 0.5 mg/kg. The same goats received the drug by the alternate route after a 7 to 10 day washout period. Intravenous catheters were placed to allow frequent samplings to determine meloxicam concentration in plasma. The terminal half life was 12 hours after oral and 11 hours after IV administration. Oral absorption averaged 79% and absorption was slow, with an average T max of 15 hours. Four hornless kids, 25 days old, were given a single IM dose of meloxicam at 0.5 mg/kg. The halflife for the drug was 14.4 hours. Finally, 11 kids about 17 days old were disbudded under xylazine and ketamine anesthesia. Before they recovered from the anesthesia they were given meloxicam at 0,5 mg/kg IM or isotonic saline as a placebo. The treatments were repeated once daily at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. The trough value for meloxicam was 1343 ng/ml 24 hours after the third dose and is an approximation of steady state. Behavior could not be monitored on the day of surgery because the kids were still recovering from the effects of the general anesthetic, but thereafter they were observed for activity and for behaviors that might indicate pain such as vocalization, head shaking, teeth grinding, scratching, straw picking, and tail flicking. There were few differences in behavior the day after disbudding between meloxicam and placebo kids but the kids that received meloxicam showed less pain on a visual analogue scale. No differences could be detected on following days. Cortisol and glucose were not elevated 24 hours after disbudding in any of the goats. This suggests that no long term stress response occurred after cautery disbudding under general anesthesia. The 0.5 mg/kg dose provided plasma concentrations well above those estimated to be therapeutic in other species, but further research is needed to verify efficacy and safety of this dose of meloxicam in goats. C. Ingvast-Larsson et al. J Vet Pharm Therap 34:64-69, 2011 11 PHARMACOKINETICS OF CEFTIOFUR CRYSTALLINE FREE ACID AFTER SINGLE SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION IN LACTATING AND NONLACTATING DOMESTIC GOATS (Capra aegagrus hircus) MOLECULAR, HISTOLOGIC, AND TRACE MINERAL CHARACTERIZATION OF METACARPOPHALANGEAL AND METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT HYPEREXTENSION IN JUVENILE LLAMAS The cause of this debilitating condition remains elusive, but elongation of the sesamoid ligament may be involved. Hyperextension of the fetlock joints is most often detected in adult llamas but has been seen in juvenile animals. Unlike the congenital tendon laxity seen in young foals, the condition in llamas does not improve with age or strengthening of muscles, tendons, and ligaments. An initial study detected increased serum zinc concentrations and decreased liver copper concentrations in affected llamas. It was hypothesized that because copper is essential for proper cross-linking of collagen via the enzyme lysyl oxidase, excessive heavy minerals in soil or feed could produce a copper deficiency and thereby damage the tendons. A subsequent study detected no evidence of injury or degeneration to the suspensory ligament of adult animals with fetlock hyperextension. The current study used 6 affected animals 3 years of age or younger and 6 sex- and age-matched control llamas, to evaluate a more acute form of the condition. All were males or geldings. Standing computed radiographs were used to evaluate the P1-to-ground angle, which was reduced in affected limbs. Affected forelimb angles averaged 35 degrees (range 17 to 35), compared with a normal of 65 degrees (range 59 to 70). Hindlimb pastern angles of affected limbs averaged 40 degrees (range 34 to 48), as compared with normal values of 67 degrees (range 57 to 74). Distal displacement of the proximal sesamoid bones was seen in 5/6 affected but 0/6 control llamas. This results from elongation of the sesamoid ligament. Degenerative arthritis was seen in 3/6 affected animals and in none of the controls. Ultrasonography of the tendons was not tolerated without sedation, so xylazine (0.22 to 0.33 mg/kg IV) and butorphanol (0.007 to 0.01 mg/kg IV) were used to encourage recumbency. Lesions were detected in 2 of the affected animals and none of the controls but this difference was not statistically significant. Gene expression of collagen type III (indicates ongoing matrix repair) was increased in sesamoid ligament samples of affected juvenile llamas. However, based on qualitative evaluation of stained samples, collagen content and orientation of fibers in the superficial and deep flexor tendons and the sesamoid ligament did not differ. Affected animals did have a greater number of blood vessels and septa and increased amount of muscle tissue in the sesamoid ligament which might have decreased tensile strength. The affected animals had increased serum molybdenum and decreased liver cobalt compared with normal controls, but the decreased copper did not reach statistical significance. S.A.. Semevolos and S.K. Reed AJVR 72:550-555, 2011 12 Meat withdrawal data is not yet available, but the drug appears to achieve adequate blood concentrations to treat goats for pneumonia caused by susceptible bacteria. This study was undertaken as a first step in gathering information with the eventual goal of achieving FDA approval for the long-acting ceftiofur product ‘Excede’ for goats. The pharmacokinetics of the drug were investigated in 6 lactating dairy goats (4 to 5 months into lactation) and in 6 nulliparous yearling dairy goats. The dose used, 6.6 mg/kg, was the same dose approved for cattle but the injection site differed. Cattle are injected in the middle third of the ear or in the loose skin at the base of the ear. There is minimal subcutaneous space in the pinna of goats, and instead the injection was placed subcutaneously behind the elbow. A swelling was still detectable at the injection site 2 weeks later in 11 of the 12 goats. Multiple blood samples were collected to determine the disposition of the drug and milk samples were collected from the lactating goats twice daily. The mean parameters for the nonlactating goats (maximum serum concentration 2.3 ug/ml, time to maximum concentration 26.7 h, and terminal elimination half life 36.9 h) did not differ statistically from the means for the lactating goats (maximum 1.5 ug/ml in 46 h with half life of 37.3 h). Ceftiofur and desfuroylceftiofurrelated metabolites were only detectable in one milk sample, taken at 36 hours after treatment. The residue detected in this sample was below the cattle milk tolerance of 0.1 ppm. The related antibiotic ceftiofur sodium (‘Naxcel’, Pfizer) is labeled for daily intramuscular injections to treat respiratory disease in goats caused by Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica. If approved, the long-acting formulation would save labor costs and decrease stress on the treated goats. In this study, the concentration of ceftiofur crystalline free acid remained above the targeted MIC for these organisms of 0.2 ug/ml (in cattle) for 6.7 days in nonlactating goats and 7.5 days in lactating goats, which compares with an average of 9.1 days in beef cattle and 8.5 days in dairy cows. By comparison with the ‘Excede’, ‘Naxcel’ (ceftiofur sodium) reaches a substantially higher maximum concentration (4.57 ug/ml) much earlier, at 1.173 h, with a half life that is 15 times less. [The editor wonders if it might be appropriate to initiate treatment with both drugs simultaneously, but this approach was not discussed.] E. Doré et al. J Vet Pharm Therap 34:25-30, 2011 FULL-LENGTH GENOME SEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF ENZOOTIC NASAL TUMOR VIRUS REVEALS AN UNUSUALLY HIGH DEGREE OF GENETIC STABILITY Future efforts will involve application of a PCR protocol for preclinical diagnosis of ENTV-1 from nasal swabs and construction of an infectious molecular clone of the virus for subsequent pathogenesis studies. Enzootic nasal adenocarcinoma and ovine pulmonary adenocarcinoma (OPA, Jaagsiekte) are contagious neoplasms of sheep and goats. Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus (JSRV), an ovine betaretrovirus, is known to be the cause of OPA and two distinct betaretroviruses (ENTV-1 in sheep and ENTV-2 in goats) have been associated with enzootic nasal tumor. Diagnosis and control of the tumors has been hampered by a lack of circulating antibodies to them in affected animals. The ovine genome contains numerous endogenous retroviral sequences that have a high degree of sequence homology Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 with JSRV and ENTV, and it has been proposed that expression of the endogenous JRSV proteins in the fetal thymus results in immune tolerance to the exogenous viruses. Only one full-length sequence of ENTV-1 has been created (from a natural case of enzootic nasal tumor in Europe) and there are currently no culture systems that permit growth of either ENTV or JRSV. The present study reports the sequencing of virus obtained from 10 spontaneous enzootic nasal tumors in sheep in 5 geographically distinct flocks in Ontario, Canada and one flock in Minnesota. The sheep were females of the Dorset, Suffolk and Border Leicester breeds. They were 1.5 to 7 years of age and presented with signs of weight loss, chronic nasal discharge and difficulty breathing. At necropsy a mass was typically found in the ethmoidal area of the nasal cavity, usually bilateral, ranging from 2 to 10 cm in diameter. The masses did not penetrate the cribriform plate. Cranial portions of the tumor gradated from hyperplastic to papillary to glandular in appearance, while caudal portions were more anaplastic. The North American isolates are genetically stable and closely related to (more than 96% sequence identity with) the one European virus that has been sequenced. Additionally, multiple tumor cell clones were established from the neoplasms studied and one of them continued to express provirus after multiple passages. Photographs of tumors and the phylogenetic tree for the viruses are included in the paper. S.R. Walsh et al. Virus Research 151:74-87, 2010 PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF ZOONOSES ON FARMS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC Presume that many of these agents are present on the farm, provide warning signs, and provide plenty of hand washing facilities. Farm enterprises frequently open their premises to the visiting public, for educational purposes or as a source of income. Veterinarians need to help their clients mitigate the risks of zoonotic disease in the visitors, many of whom lack previous contact with livestock and also are unaware of the dangers on the farm. The list of zoonotic diseases to consider includes (in the UK): Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter fetus; Chlamydophila abortus (enzootic abortion); Coxiella burnetii (Q fever); Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis (caseous lymphadenitis); Cryptosporidium parvum; Leptospira species; Mycobacterium bovis; Orf (parapox) virus; Dermatophytes (ringworm); Salmonella species; Toxoplasma gondii; Verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VTEC) O157 and other strains; Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Rabies must be included in the United States. Outbreaks of verogenic E coli and cryptosporidiosis are perhaps the most common and are reported worldwide, but the other diseases can also cause serious health issues and engender public distrust of farms. In April 2009, an outbreak of cryptosporidiosis affected about 50 per cent of 380 school children who visited a dairy farm in Cumbria containing infected calves and goats. The ongoing outbreak of Q fever in the Netherlands (2007 to 2011) is another example. This has been attributed to the exposure of a high density nearby human population to infected aerosols and contaminated dust particles from possibly the highest concentration of dairy goat herds worldwide. There were 2357 reported cases in humans in 2009, mainly among those living within 5 km of infected farms. The most important aspect of prevention of many of these zoonotic diseases is hand washing, using soap and water, preferably with foot or knee operated pedals. Hand gels do NOT control cryptosporidia. Provision of protective clothing is often impractical, but visitors should be encouraged to wear waterproof boots. Incoming adult animals should be quarantined for a month and observed or vaccinated for potential diseases. Young animals, often introduced for the ever popular bottle feeding programs, should be quarantined for as many days as possible and not put on display if diarrhea or zoonotic skin diseases are present. They should be managed all in - all out, with thorough cleaning and disinfection between groups. A wide range of species have been shown to shed VTEC O157 in addition to cattle, including sheep, pigs, goats, horses, donkeys, ponies, deer, alpacas and llamas. Goats, cattle and sheep appear to be the most common sources of human infection. Screening for verogenic E coli, Campylobacter, or cryptosporidia is NOT recommended, as these organisms are intermittently Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 shed and no treatment is available if a positive result is obtained. Test and cull is not recommended. Instead, the animals should be assumed to be infectious and appropriate hygienic measures put in place, stressing hand washing and separation of animals from eating areas. Ringworm spores and orf viruses can persist in the environment for months, so again inspection of animals, removal of contaminated bedding, and disinfection of facilities are necessary. Chlamydophila abortus and Coxiella burnetii are serious threats to visitors, especially pregnant women. Spores of the Q fever organism remain in the bedding for months, and aerosols from areas used for ruminant parturitions (not necessarily abortions) present a significant hazard to farm workers and visitors. Available vaccines (leptospirosis, Q fever in Europe and the UK) should be used to lessen these risks. G. Pritchard In Practice 33:242-251, 2011 ELIMINATION OF SMALL RUMINANT LENTIVIRUS INFECTION FROM SHEEP FLOCKS AND GOAT HERDS AIDED BY HEALTH SCHEMES IN GREAT BRITAIN Using the ELISA test hastened eradication, compared with AGID, but the process was more difficult in dairy herds. There are a number of small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLV) that can infect both sheep and goats and be transmitted from one species to the other. There is even evidence of recombination when the same animal is concurrently infected with two different strains. The clinical signs seen seem to depend more on the host than the origin of the virus. Thus any eradication or control scheme needs to address all small ruminants on the farm, not just sheep for OPP (ovine progressive pneumonia, also referred to as MV, Maedi-Visna) or goats for CAE (caprine arthritis-encephalitis). In Great Britain the diseases are rarely diagnosed but infection, as evidenced by a serologic response, is widespread. Great Britain, like many northern European countries, has voluntary control schemes, and approximately 3000 herds (mostly elite pedigreed herds) are enrolled. To become accredited, the herd must adhere to strict herd security measures to prevent contact with any non-accredited sheep or goats. They also must undergo two qualifying serologic tests of all stock at a 6- to 12-month interval, followed by regular periodic serologic testing. An accredited herd is allowed to trade animals with other accredited herds. Any positive reaction in an accredited herd causes the loss of the accredited status and the ability to trade. Any animals that have already been sold are traced to limit the spread of the infection. Infection is eliminated from participating herds by standard measures, including: total slaughter and restocking with MV/CAE-accredited animals, testing and culling all reactors and their offspring, establishing an elite flock kept in isolation from all other sheep or goats, snatching lambs/kids at birth and rearing them artificially or on MV/CAE-accredited foster dams, and embryo transfer into MV/CAE-accredited recipients. The AGID test is the prescribed test for regulatory purposes but has a sensitivity of only 50 to 76%; a more sensitive ELISA test is recommended at 3 month intervals in known positive herds to detect infected animals sooner and hasten the eradication process. The ELISA consistently detects infection at an earlier stage than the AGID. The cut-off optical density (OD) for a positive ELISA is determined by positive and negative controls, and a ratio of sample OD to cut-off OD of 1.0 or greater is positive according to the manufacturer. It was determined that specificity of the test could be improved to 99.86% in sheep and 100% in goats by designating ratios of 3.5 or higher as reactors. This greatly decreased the risk of false positives that would result in loss of accreditation. In stage 1 of disease control, if 2% or more of the flock was infected the ratio of 1.0 in the ELISA test was deemed positive. When the proportion of reactors in the herd reached and stayed below 2%, ratios of 3.5 or greater were reported as positive while ratios from 1.0 to 3.5 were deemed inconclusive reactors. They could be treated as reactors or they could be kept in isolation until the next test. If positive at the next test, the animal and its offspring were slaughtered. If the ELISA ratio was below 3.5 on the next qualifying test and the AGID was negative, the animal was classified as negative. The herd regained accreditation status if it passed two qualifying tests 6 and 12 months after the removal of all reactors and their 13 offspring. An additional whole herd ELISA test was done 1 year later, then biennially. Between 1996 and 2007, 31 MV-accredited sheep flocks and two CAE-accredited goat herds lost accredited status due to the introduction of a SRLV. In all but one case, antibodies were detected on a routine periodic blood test. If the prevalence of infection within a flock was low (<5 per cent of animals seropositive by AGID test), testing and culling allowed flocks to regain MV-accredited status within 18 months. Of the 20 breakdown flocks that attempted to regain MV-accredited status using the test and cull procedure, 18 flocks were successful. In addition, 10 sheep flocks and two goat herds managed to eradicate infection, having joined the scheme with infected animals. Eradication is more difficult in dairy herds due to the continual close contact between animals and the potential for virus to spread via contaminated milking machines. One dairy flock with an initial seroprevalence rate of 65% went out of business after 3 years, largely because of the costs of the eradication program and the disease. A very large dairy goat herd with 3500 goats and an initial herd seroprevalence of 3% in the AGID test managed to achieve CAE-accredited status, but could do so only after 10 years of testing. Frequent whole herd tests could not be afforded. Clinical signs (wasting and pneumonia) were only seen in 2 herds, both dairy flocks with high initial seroprevalence rates of 65 and 75%. Two flocks that successfully eradicated the disease had subsequent breakdowns, and in both instances the source was probably a non-accredited flock on the same premises. B.A. Synge and C.M. Ritchie Vet Record 167:739-743, 2010 TOOLS FOR MANAGING INTERNAL PARASITES IN SMALL RUMINANTS: SERICEA LESPEDEZA Condensed tannins in this palatable legume decrease worm burdens and pasture contamination. This ATTRA publication begins with a review of the ruminant strongyle life cycle, emphasizing that the larvae survive under warm, wet conditions and are usually on blades of grass within 1 to 3 inches of the ground. Because of the development of dewormer resistance, small ruminant producers need to apply multiple management procedures to control internal parasites. These include: maintaining forage height greater than 3 inches; providing browse; maintaining a low stocking rate; grazing with cattle or in rotation with cattle or horses; providing tannin-rich forages; harvesting hay; and avoiding wet patches in the pasture, such as around the water trough. The FAMACHA program should be used to select anemic animals for deworming (applies to Haemonchus infections only). If possible, a resistant breed should be selected and resistant individuals within the breed should be kept for reproduction. Some animals are resilient rather than resistant, meaning that they don’t show clinical signs or decreased production but do shed enough eggs to endanger other herd members. Animals that contribute most to pasture contamination should be culled. Available and tested alternative treatments for worms include copper oxide wire particles orally and feeding supplements containing condensed tannins. There are two main types of tannins; hydrolyzable tannins (HT), some of which may have toxic effects on animals, and condensed tannins (CT),which are found in forage legumes and other plants. When CT are present at more than 5.5% of forage dry matter they may cause reduced intake and reduced digestibility. However, they also can increase by-pass protein, reduce bloating, increase production and reduce the number of internal parasites and the output of eggs. The condensed tannin content varies with the forages species: birdsfoot trefoil (4.8%), big trefoil (7.7%), sanfoin (2.9%), sulla (5.1 to 8.4%), and Sericea lespedeza (4.6-15.2%) are all high in tannins. Alfalfa (0.05%), perennial ryegrass (0.18%) and crabgrass/tall fescue mix (0.32%) are all relatively low in CT. Sericea lespedeza is a legume that grows in low fertility, acid soils. It is listed as a noxious weed in Colorado and Kansas, and there goats can be used to control infestations. In other states the forage can be successfully grazed after a period of adaptation for animals not yet accustomed to it, but hay made from this plant is readily consumed by all classes of livestock. The tannins in Sericea may directly damage worms or they may indirectly improve the protein nutrition or immune system function of the goat. Goats eating the forage shed fewer eggs and the eggs that are shed have reduced hatchability, but shedding resumes when the goats are moved off 14 the Sericea. The results of 7 controlled studies are reported. For instance, SL fed as hay reduced naturally infected worm burdens by 67% and reduced establishment of incoming larvae by 26% in one study. The forage is thus beneficial but cannot be relied upon as the sole means of controlling internal parasites. L. Coffey et al. ATTRA, available online at <http://www.scsrpc.org/SCSRPC/Files/sericea_ lespedeza.pdf> EFFICACY OF COPPER OXIDE WIRE PARTICLES AGAINST GASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODES IN SHEEP AND GOATS Two grams of COWP controlled Haemonchus infestations in weaned lambs and kids. This study involved a side by side comparison of copper oxide wire particles (COWP, 2g from a subdivided Copasure bolus for cattle delivered in a gel capsule) in 12 weaned Katahdin or Dorper x Blackface lambs and 12 weaned Kiko x Spanish kids. The animals were allowed to acquire natural infections by grazing contaminated pasture in Georgia for 4 months until the fecal egg count (FEC) was approximately 3000 eggs/g in the lambs and approximately 1500 eggs/g in the kids. The animals were then randomized to a treatment (2 g COWP) or no treatment group and continued to graze on the same pasture. The FEC and PCV were followed weekly and half of the animals were slaughtered after 28 days for determination of worm burdens in the abomasum and small intestine. Haemonchus contortus comprised more than 90% of the original worm burden. After 12 days, FEC of COWP-treated sheep and goats were 94.3 and 74.9% lower, respectively, than untreated animals, while these differences were 82.5 and 90.5% for sheep and goats 26 days after treatment. The animals treated with COWP had higher (P < 0.05) PCV values than controls from days 21 to 42 of the experiment. The reduction in number of adult H. contortus due to COWP treatment was 67 and 86% for sheep and goats, respectively. Despite having lower FECs, the goats were consistently more anemic than the lambs. The PCV in the treated group of kids increased from 16% at 12 days to 22% at 42 days. Other studies have shown lower or no efficacy in mature goats, especially when a larger proportion of the worm burden consists of intestinal rather than abomasal worms. F. Soli et al. Vet Parasitology 168: 93-96, 2010 CLINICAL, ULTRASONOGRAPHIC, AND LABORATORY FINDINGS IN 12 LLAMAS AND 12 ALPACAS WITH MALIGNANT ROUND CELL TUMORS This is a companion article to one published in Veterinary Pathology 46:288-298, 2009 and abstracted in Wool & Wattles 38 no.1, 2010. Clinical signs, duration of illness, clinicopathologic findings, and ultrasonographic findings were evaluated in 12 llamas and 12 alpacas with malignant round cell tumors. Common clinical findings were anorexia, recumbency or weakness, and weight loss or poor growth. Peripheral lymphadenopathy was detected in only 4 of the 24 animals. The duration of clinical signs was variable but usually short: sudden death (2 animals), 1 d (3 animals), 2 wk (10 animals), and longer than 2 wk (9 animals). Only 2 of 11 animals less than 2 years old had a clinical course that lasted longer than 2 wk, whereas 7 of 13 animals that were over 2 y old had a clinical course longer than 2 wk. The 5 animals with gastric MRCT were often older animals (mean 7.2 y) and all died or were euthanized within 1 wk of onset of signs. The most common clinical chemistry findings were hypoalbuminemia, acidosis, anemia, azotemia, increased serum gammaglutamyl transferase (GGT) activity, and hyperglycemia. Lymphocytosis was detected in only 1 animal. Azotemia occurred in half of the animals Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 but only one had a renal neoplasm. Abdominal or thoracic ultrasound on 6 animals resulted in diagnostic findings in 4 animals, including 2 where the cause of hepatomegaly was confirmed by ultrasound guided biopsy. Abdominal or thoracic effusions should be evaluated cytologically if noted. Various treatments (antibiotics, parasiticides, fluids, etc were attempted, but the only survivor was an animal with a cervical mass, diagnosed as a primitive round cell tumor. Chemotherapy was not attempted on any animal but might be of value if tumors could be identified at an earlier stage. Mandibular and inguinal lymph nodes in particular should be examined at routine physical examinations. J.M. Martin et al. Can Vet J. 51(12): 1379-1382, 2010 NUTRITIONAL DISEASES OF LLAMAS AND ALPACAS This article did not make it into the volume 25 no 2 Veterinary Clinics issue devoted to camelids. Camelids are susceptible to both malnutrition and obesity. Prolonged energy and/or protein deficiency leads to a decrease in body weight and body condition score. Growing animals will cease to gain and pregnant or lactating animals are susceptible to hepatic lipidosis. Extreme cold also increases energy demands, and camelids raised in the northern United States will be exposed to much colder conditions than faced in their native environment in South America. Energy maintenance requirements for animals in full fleece probably increase 1% for every degree C below the camelid lower critical temperature of 0 to 10 C. If animals are wet and muddy or exposed to wind chill, the requirements may increase as much as 75%. Hands-on body condition scoring is necessary to detect problems early. Serum nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA; >0.6 mEq/L) and b-hydroxybutyrate (BHB; >5 mg/dL) concentrations may be elevated if the problem is severe or secondary hepatic lipidosis is present. Underlying infectious, parasitic, and dental diseases should be addressed in addition to improving the nutrition. The prognosis is grave for recumbent animals, even with aggressive therapy. Chemical forage quality analysis is important to be able to match feed quality with the requirements of individuals. Body condition score should be assessed during early to mid pregnancy, early to mid lactation, and periodically (4–6 times per year) for other animals of the herd. By contrast, feeding too rich a forage or excess grain leads to obesity, which in turn causes greater susceptibility to Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 heat stress, metabolic derangements, infertility, and associated locomotive problems. Packing or hiking will help to avoid obesity but in general be sure to house obese animals where they can not steal from others and only allow them to graze on mature pastures. Copper deficiency in camelids has been associated with anemia, altered hair coloration, impaired immune response, and poor growth. Hind limb ataxia and posterior paresis, similar to the disease ‘‘swayback’’ observed in neonatal sheep, have also been reported in camelids but causation by copper deficiency is not well documented. Although not as susceptible as sheep, copper toxicity also occurs in camelids and is typified by hepatic necrosis without hemolysis. Toxicity has been reported with dietary copper above 30 mg/kg and dietary ratio of Cu-to-Mo greater than 16:1. Iron deficiency anemia might be expected in neonates consuming only milk or in animals with chronic blood loss (such as from haemonchosis). White muscle disease is believed to occur in camelids in selenium deficient regions but is not well documented. Llamas and alpacas have a greater amount of Se-dependent glutathione peroxidase activity in serum rather than being concentrated primarily in red blood cells. Deficient whole blood Se concentrations are defined as less than 120 ng/mL with adequate between 150 and 220 ng/mL for either llamas or alpacas. Selenium toxicity is usually caused by an injectable product, and toxicity is expected if the dose given is 20 times or more the labeled dose. Signs of distressed breathing, salivation, and cardiovascular collapse appear within hours after injection, and there is no antidote. A number of veterinary diagnostic laboratories are finding very high concentrations of Se (>12 ug/g dry weight) in llama and alpaca liver samples, suggesting an excessive level of supplementation. The newer organic selenomethionine sources are more apt to cause this than is dietary sodium selenite. A zinc responsive crusting dermatitis, most pronounced on the relatively hairless areas of dark fleeced animals, is frequently seen in camelids. Treatment recommendations include daily supplementation with either 1 g zinc sulfate or 2 to 4 g zinc methionine. Zinc methionine is believed to be more available in the face of interfering dietary agents such as high calcium intake. Growing llamas and alpacas between 3 and 6 months of age are susceptible to a seasonal vitamin D deficiency resulting in a hypophosphatemic rickets syndrome. Affected crias are often fall born, dark colored and full fleeced. They show a slower rate of growth, reluctance to move, humped-back stance, and shifting leg lameness. Vitamin D can be effectively supplemented by injection, oral dosing, or increasing dietary levels. Injections of vitamin D3 between 1000 and 1500 IU/kg body weight have been shown to maintain adequate serum vitamin D concentrations for up to 3 months. Oral gels delivering vitamin D3 at 33,000 IU every 2 weeks or 100,000 IU once monthly have also been used successfully. Avoid excessive doses, which can be toxic. A rapid change from high forage to high concentrate, low-fiber diet leading to reduced ruminal pH and altered microbial flora is often associated with polioencephalomalacia in young or adult camelids. Clinical signs include depression, seizures, opisthotonos, blindness, hyperesthesia, and sudden death. Diagnosis is made by presenting signs and rapid response to thiamin therapy (10 to 20 mg/kg body weight) or definitively by presence of histologic lesions at necropsy. Lactic acidosis occurs in camelids, as it does in ruminants, and has been caused by consumption of 500 g of concentrate, often compounded by unsecure storage or social hierarchy issues. Concentrates high in corn, oats, barley, or wheat and with low crude fiber content (<12%) have the highest potential risk of inducing lactic acidosis. Male camelids are susceptible to urolithiasis, although the etiology is unclear. Bladder rupture may occur. Incomplete blockage results in stranguria, exaggerated and prolonged urination posture, urine dribbling, and blood-tinged urine. Recommendations for prevention often include adding salt to the diet to increase water consumption and keeping the calcium-to-phosphorus ratio between 2.0-to-4:1. The article also lists plant poisonings that have been reported in camelids, including rhododendrons and other grayanotoxin-containing members of the Ericaceae family, death camas, oleander (a frequent cause of acute death) and red maple. An endophyte on perennial ryegrass induces tremors, incoordination, head shaking, and staggers in afflicted animals. Signs resolve with withdrawal from the affected pasture/forage. Accidental inclusion in alpaca feed of the poultry ionophore selenomycin caused toxicity in many animals in Ohio in 2003. Clinical signs were diarrhea, muscle tremors, weakness, and acute death as a result of severe acute rhabdomyolysis. Losses continued for up to 3 months after exposure. R.J. Van Saun Vet Clin N Amer Food Anim Pract 25(3):797-810, 2009 15 EXPERIMENTAL RAYLESS GOLDENROD (ISOCOMA PLURIFLORA) TOXICOSIS IN GOATS A dose related skeletal myopathy developed in all exercised goats within one week of commencing feeding this plant from the southwestern USA. The rayless goldenrod or southern jimmyweed has been known to be toxic to livestock in southwestern states for over 100 years. Poisoned animals develop violent tremors, especially when forced to move, and the clinical signs are similar to those caused by white snakeroot (Ageratina altissima, previously Eupatorium rugosum) which causes ‘trembles’ in livestock and ‘milk sickness’ in humans. Both plants contain tremetol, a mixture of benzofuran ketones, which can cause secondary poisoning in nursing animals. Clinically, poisoning with rayless goldenrod is seen as depression, anorexia, and inactivity followed by muscle tremors especially following exercise or activity. Some poisoned animals may develop tachypnea and tachycardia, with ascites and hydrothorax. In the current study, 15 yearling Spanish goats were trained to lead and run on a treadmill. They were subsequently given dried ground rayless goldenrod by stomach tube to obtain 10, 20, 40, and 60 mg benzofuran ketones/kg body weight/day. The control group was given similar volumes of ground alfalfa. Blood was collected and the goats were exercised daily, then euthanized and necropsied after 7 days of treatment. The amount of plant fed was equivalent to 0.5 to 3% of their body weight per day. After 4 or 5 days, 5 of the 6 goats receiving the most rayless goldenrod became reluctant to move. Large appendicular muscles were swollen and firm. When standing, the goats would tremble and would quickly tire and lie down. Affected goats developed increased resting heart rate. Serum enzyme concentrations suggestive of muscle damage (creatine kinase, AST, ALT, LDH) were increased and in some goats cardiac troponin-1 was also elevated. (Normal cardiac troponin-I concentrations are undetectable, less than 0.02 ng/ml). At necropsy, goats dosed with 40 and 60 mg/kg had swelling and pallor of nearly all skeletal muscles. The myocardium of 2 of the 60-mg/kg–dosed goats and all 3 of the 40-mg/kg– dosed goats also had multifocal myocyte swelling, degeneration, and, rarely, necrosis. At the lowest doses, muscle lesions were subtle but most evident in the quadriceps femoris and diaphragm. The goats fed the highest doses did not develop the extensive hepatocellular necrosis or renal nephrosis reported previously in goats fed white snakeroot, suggesting differences in the ketones contained in the two plants. B.L. Stegelmeier et al. J Vet Diagn Invest 22:570–577, 2010 EFFECTS OF FEEDING MANAGEMENT AND TIME OF DAY ON THE OCCURRENCE OF SELFSUCKLING IN DAIRY GOATS It is interesting to speculate if milking twice a day and feeding more long stem fiber would avoid the development of the behavior in the first place. Self-suckling and intersuckling both occur in dairy cows, with intersuckling being more common and associated with damage to the teats of the other cow. Self-suckling is observed in dairy goats as well but has not been studied much before. It has been hypothesized that initially the animal is trying to relieve discomfort from a turgid udder, but subsequently it continues to self-suckle because the milk is highly palatable. The habit is hard to break and less milk is available for sale. Udder bags, distasteful solutions painted on the teats and Elizabethan collars have been used to prevent the behavior, but culling may be required. In the present report, 21 dairy goats of the Majorera breed in Spain were housed in a group away from herd members that did not display the behavior, but how these animals were selected is not indicated. They were fed a diet of corn, soy, dehydrated alfalfa, dehydrated beetroots, alfalfa hay, and vitamins and minerals, balanced to meet their nutritional requirements. The diet was 10.6% crude protein and 10.2% crude fiber. The goats were milked once a day and fed concentrates in the morning and then fed hay in the afternoon. For the study, the animals were observed for self-suckling during three, 20 minute periods each day: 16 immediately after milking, after the hay feeding, and later in the afternoon. Initial observations were made for 9 days, then wheat straw was offered adlib in addition to the regular diet and the observations were repeated for 9 days, and finally the goats were returned to the original feeding program for a final 9 day observation period. More goats self-suckled immediately after milking than after the second feeding. The behavior was seen in 16 of the 21 goats, 14 of which suckled on both their right and left teats. Goats showed a preference for the right teat, which might be explained by interference from the rumen in reaching the left teat. Some goats had teat injuries in the middle of the teat that could have been caused by the behavior. The frequency of suckling was statistically reduced when the straw was fed, but the behavior was not eliminated by this management change. Goats that suckled more frequently had a lower milk yield but cause and effect could not be determined. The straw would provide more oral activity and more rumination time, and this might be beneficial immediately after milking when the goats tended to suckle more. J. Martínez-de la Puente et al. Vet Record168:378, 2011 (on line) INVESTIGATION OF MYCOPLASMA HAEMOLAMAE INFECTION IN CRIAS BORN TO INFECTED DAMS Some but not all crias born to infected alpacas are already infected at time of delivery. The haemotropic organism Mycoplasma haemolamae adheres to the surface of red blood cells of llamas and alpacas. It is sometimes associated with anemia and other clinical signs such as depression, fever and weight loss. However, many infected camelids do not develop clinical or laboratory abnormalities. Camelids with immunosuppression, stress, or other concurrent diseases are most apt to develop anemia. Many animals, once infected, remain chronic carriers despite antibiotic treatment. Biting insects might be involved in spreading the infection. This study involved 5 clinically healthy pregnant alpacas previously shown to be infected on herd screening with the highly sensitive and specific PCR test for the organism in blood. It is not yet possible to grow the organism in the laboratory. Blood collected from the jugular vein of the dam within 1 hour before or after parturition was positive in all 5 animals. Blood from the crias was tested within 30 minutes and before the crias nursed or had contact with another alpaca. Three of the crias were negative before and again within a week after birth. One colostrum sample was tested, and that was also negative by PCR. Two of these negative crias were tested every 1 to 2 weeks until they were 15 weeks old and they remained negative. The other two crias were positive immediately after birth and again after suckling. One of them was followed until 6.5 months of age, remaining positive at each sampling. It seems unlikely that these two crias were infected during the birth process, as experimental transfusion of large amounts of blood into negative animals does not yield a positive PCR test until 4 days later. Thus transplacental infection is the most likely explanation for infection in the neonate. S.J. Tornquist et al. Vet Record 168:380, 2011 (on line) ASSESSMENT OF THE USE OF TEMPERATURE-SENSITIVE MICROCHIPS TO DETERMINE CORE BODY TEMPERATURE IN GOATS Subcutaneous microchips do not give an accurate assessment of core body temperature under environmental extremes or in the presence of an induced fever. The core body temperature is the temperature at the hypothalamus or at a deep internal site such as the carotid artery or esophagus. For practicality, the rectal temperature is usually substituted. Temperature-sensitive microchips are now available for animals; one manufacturer suggests implanting them between the shoulder blades and then adding 2 ºC to the reading to get a Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 proxy for the core body temperature. In this study, a temperature datalogger with a resolution of 0.04ºC was placed within the abdomen and tethered to the linea alba of each of 5 female Boer goats with a mean body weight of 27 kg. This measured the core body temperature. Then each goat was implanted with an additional 5 temperature microchips: subcutaneously between the shoulder blades, subcutaneously in the groin area at the junction of abdomen and thigh, subcutaneously in the middle of the right flank midway between dorsum and ventrum, into the upper right seimembranosus muscle, and retroperitoneally between the internal abdominal oblique muscle and the peritoneum just off the linea alba. The goats were then subjected to six different environmental situations for 7 hours, with data collection beginning after one hour of acclimitisation. The treatments were thermoneutral (24ºC), cold (13ºC), cold plus radiant heat from halogen bulbs, hot (40ºC), hot plus radiant heat, and fever induced by an intravenous injection of lipopolysaccharide. The rectal temperature was a mean of 0.4ºC higher than the core body temperature, while the retroperitoneal microchip gave the closest agreement with core temperature (0.2ºC lower) under all environmental conditions. Muscle, flank, and shoulder blade readings were lower than core temperature by 0.5º C, 1.0º C, and 0.5º C, whereas the groin reading averaged 0.2º C higher but was quite variable. A cold environment increased the difference between core temperature and subcutaneous or muscle microchips, whereas a hot environment reduced the difference from the core temperature. At times, the temperature measured in the flank was 4º C lower than the core temperature, When the goat was subjected to radiant heat, the temperature of the chip between the shoulder blades was as much as 2º C higher than core. During the LPS induced fevers, the subcutaneous temperatures were as much as 3º C lower than core temperature because of peripheral vasoconstriction. To obtain an accurate temperature reading over many situations, the retroperitoneal location is recommended. N.A. Torrao et al. Vet Record 168:328, 2011 (on line) PESTE DES PETITS RUMINANTS: A SUITABLE CANDIDATE FOR ERADICATION? The plague is dead: long live the plague. An announcement was recently made that rinderpest (cattle plague) has been eradicated from the wild. This is a morbillivirus, a genus that also contains measles, distemper, and peste des petits ruminants (PPR). PPR may be the fastest growing and most economically important disease of small ruminants in developing countries. The virus is endemic in Turkey and there have been recent outbreaks in Morocco and Tunisia, thus presenting a threat to sheep and goats in European Union countries. In developing countries in Africa and Asia, where sheep and goats are integral to sustainable agriculture, the disease causes tremendous losses. For instance, between 2006 and 2008 it was estimated that more than five million animals were affected in Kenya, with more than half of the infected animals dying of the disease. Because rinderpest in cattle and PPR in small ruminants cause very similar diseases and mortality, and because diagnostic tests that discriminated between the two viruses only became available in the past 20 years, it is likely that, in the past, many cases of PPR were ascribed to the rinderpest virus. PPR was first described in the early 1940s as a disease of sheep and goats that did not spread to cattle. As PPR spreads rapidly across Africa and Asia, Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 it is not clear if the virus is spreading or if the disease is only now being recognized because rinderpest has been eliminated. The lineage pattern of PPRV suggests that this virus was circulating and becoming homogeneous in Asia for centuries, and has only recently been introduced into Africa, where several African lineages have developed. lt is also possible that eradication of rinderpest has facilitated the spread of PPR, since sheep and goats exposed to RPV are immune to PPRV, hence circulating rinderpest in cattle may have partially immunized in-contact sheep and goat flocks. However, this is not the whole story, as China and Morocco have been free of rinderpest for many years but now have PPR. Flock mortality from PPR varies from 10 to 90%. Typically there is nearly 100% mortality in young lambs and kids and 10% mortality in adults. Interestingly, European breeds of sheep and goats commonly show a mild subacute form of disease, with low fever and congestion of the eyes and nose, but little discharge or diarrhea. In susceptible African and Asian breeds, a fever develops 3 to 9 days after infection and lasts for up to a week. Mucous membranes are congested and there is copious discharge from the nose and mouth, accompanied by marked leukopenia. Diarrhea often develops. Then necrotic lesions appear in the mouth and vagina. Pregnant animals abort. Fatal cases succumb 5 to 12 days after the onset of signs, with prominent pneumonia. Convalescence is slow, and the animals are susceptible to other infections and parasites because of immunosuppression. Reference labs usually base diagnosis on PCR. Recovered animals are tested for antibody using a cELISA as the virus is only shed for a short time. The disease is spread through contact with infected animals and secretions, but the virus is easily killed by heat, UV light, dehydration, or pH extremes. Movement of animals from endemic areas should be restricted. A homologous modified live virus vaccine is used to control the disease in endemic areas. The antibody response to vaccination is similar to that in a recovered animal, interfering with disease surveillance. The factors that favored eradication of rinderpest were: a safe and reliable vaccine covering all strains of the disease; the availability of simple and effective diagnostic tests; a short infectious period with no persistence or carrier state; transmission only by close contact; an economic incentive for local and national participation and for compliance with the program. Many of these factors also apply to PPR. It is disadvantageous that sheep and goats are of less individual value than cattle and have a quicker turnover, meaning that more doses of vaccine and personnel to administer it will be required. A coordinated action will be needed to eradicate this virus. M. D. Baron et al. Vet Record 169:16-21, 2011 (on line) MYCOPLASMA OVIPNEUMONIAE ASSOCIATED WITH SEVERE RESPIRATORY DISEASE IN GOATS The organism may be a primary invader of the lungs; it can predispose to bacterial and viral pneumonia. Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae is believed to play an important role in chronic nonprogressive pneumonia of lambs but there are few reports of its involvement in respiratory disease of goats. In sheep the organism predisposes to bacterial and viral infections by such mechanisms as alteration in macrophage activity, adherence of the organism to ciliated epithelium by its polysaccharide capsule, induction of the production of autoantibodies to the ciliary antigen and suppressive activity on lymphocytes. An outbreak of pneumonia occurred in a herd of approximately 200 goats of various breeds and ages, from multiple sources but mostly through the black market, on a farm in Kosovo. Over the winter, approximately 50% of the goats died, mostly kids under 1 month of age. Unilateral pneumonia, pleuritis, and pericarditis were found in the 5 animals that were necropsied, and M. ovipneumoniae was isolated from all 5 while Mannheimia haemolytica was isolated from 3 lungs and Streptococcus from one. The mycoplasma produced typical fried egg colonies and identification of species was confirmed by PCR. Ten of 30 nasal swabs from surviving kids were also positive for the organism. The generally poor condition of the farm and infection with multiple strains originating from several areas may have contributed to the extremely high mortality in this outbreak. M. Rifatbegovic et al. Vet Record 168:565, 2011 (on line) 17 AASRP Board of Directors President Dr. Joan Bowen 5036 E County Rd. 60 Wellington, CO 80549 Phone: 970.568.3613 Cell: 970.217.0447 Joan.S.Bowen@gmail.com Term: 7/11 – 7/13 President Elect Dr. Joan Dean Rowe 24580 Cache Street Capay, CA 95607 Phone: 530.752.0292 Fax: 530.752.4278 jdrowe@ucdavis.edu Term: 7/11 – 7/13 Immediate Past President Dr. Jim Fallen Large Animal Clinic 9300 Guadalupe Trail NW Albuquerque, NM 87114 Phone: 505.897.3787 Fax: 505.898.8402 fallendvm@aol.com Term: 7/11 – 7/13 Director, Region 1 Dr. William P. Shulaw Veterinary Extension 4030 Alton Darby Creek Rd. Hilliard, OH 43026 Phone: 614-292-9453 Fax: 614-292-4142 shulaw.1@osu.edu Term: 7/11 – 7/13 Director, Region 2 Dr. Patty B. Scharko PO Box 102406 Columbia, SC 29224-2406 Phone: 803-788-2269 x290 pschark@clemson.edu Term: 7/11 – 7/13 Director, Region 3 Dr. Clifford Shipley University of Illinois, CVM 1008 West Hazelwood Dr. Urbana, IL 61802 cshipley@illinois.edu Term: 7/10 – 7/12 Director, Region 4 Dr. Annika M. Rogers 5520 S W Cherry Ave Corvallis, OR 97333 Phone: 541-602-2062 rogersvetservice@gmail.com Term: 7/11 – 7/13 Management Headquarters Franz Management P. O. Box 3514 Montgomery, AL 36109 Phone: 334/517-1233 Fax: 331/270-3399 Email: aasrp@aasrp.org AVMA Delegate Dr. Paul Jones Woodburn Vet Clinic 225 South Pacific Highway Woodburn, OR 80634 Home: 503.982.2421 Cell: 503.982.2425 pljvet@gmail.com 2009-2017 Executive Director Dr. Tom Johnson Cell: 515-306-1129 AVMA Alternate Delegate Dr. Joan Bowen 2009-2017 AASRP Representation for AVMA Offices & Committees Executive Board-District IX (Arizona, Colorado, Kansas, NewMexico, Oklahoma & Utah) Dr. Theodore Cohn (2010-2011) AVMA Delegate Dr. Paul Jones (2009-2017) Alternate Dr. Joan S. Bowen (2009 – 2017) Legislative Advisory Committee Dr. Seyedmehdi Mobini (2011 – 2014) Alternate Dr. Kelly Still Brooks (2011 – 2014) 18 Committee on Environmental Issues Dr. Peregrine Wolff (2006 - 2012) Clinical Practitioners Advisory Committee Andrea Mongini (2010-2013) Alternate Dr. Jonathan Bergmann (2011 – 2014) Animal Agriculture Liaison Committee Dr. Jeanne M. Rankin (2005 – 2011) Alternate Dr. Amy Robinson (2008-2011) Animal Welfare Committee Dr. Joe Snyder (2007-2013) Alternate Dr. Peregrine Wolff (2007-2013) Committee on Disaster & Emergency Issues Dr. Peregrine Wolff (2008-2011) Food Safety Advisory Committee Dr. Christine Navarre (2006-2012) Alternate Dr. Joan Bowen (2007-2013) Antimicrobial Use Task Force Dr. Christine Navarre 2009-2010 Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 AASRP VETERINARY COLLEGE LIAISONS Auburn University Misty Edmonson, DVM 1500 Wire Road Auburn, AL 36849 Ph: 334-844-4490 Fax: 334-844-4368 abramms@auburn.edu Cornell University Mary C. Smith, DVM Ambulatory/Prod Med Box 29 NYS College of Vet Med Ithaca, NY 14853 Ph: 607-253-3140 mcs8@cornell.edu Colorado State University David Van Metre, DVM, DACVIM Associate Professor Animal Population Health Inst. CVM and Biomedical Sciences Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1678 Ph: 970-297-1299 Fax: 970-297-1275 David.Van_Metre@ColoState.EDU Iowa State University Paul J. Plummer, DVM PhD DACVIM College of Veterinary Medicine 2426 Lloyd Veterinary Medical Center Ames, IA 50011 Ph: 515-294-8522 Pplummer@iastate.edu Kansas State University Patricia A. Payne, DVM, PhD Department of Diagnostic Medicine/ Pathobiology College of Vet Medicine 1600 Denison Ave. Manhattan KS 66506 - 5600 Ph: 785-532-4604 Payne@vet.k-state.edu Louisiana State University Marjorie S. Gill, DVM Vet Teaching Hospital & Clinics Skip Bertman Drive Baton Rouge, LA 70803 Ph: 225-578-9574 mgill@vetmed.lsu.edu Michigan State University Michelle Kopcha, DVM, MS Coordinator-Practice-based Ambulatory Large Animal Clinical Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine East Lansing, MI 48824-1314 Ph: 517-355-8491 Fax: 517-432-1092 kopcha@cvm.msu.edu Mississippi State University Dr. Sherrill Fleming, Associate Professor Food Animal Medicine College of Veterinary Medicine Box 6100 Mississippi State, MS 39762 Ph: 662-325-2198 sfleming@cvm.msstate.edu North Carolina State University Kevin L. Anderson, DVM, PhD Dept of Food Animal Health and Resource Management CVM 4700 Hillsborough St. Raleigh, NC 27606 Ph: 919-513-6245 Fax: 919-513-6464 Kevin_Anderson@ncsu.edu Ohio State University Michael Rings, DVM 601 Vernon Tharp Drive Columbus, OH 43210 Ph: 614-292-6661 Rings.1@osu.edu Oklahoma State University Lionel Dawson, DVM Oklahoma State University Boren Vet Med Teaching Hosp Farm Road Stillwater, OK 74078 Ph: 405-744-8584 dlionel@okstate.edu Oregon State University VACANT Purdue University A.N. (Nickie) Baird, DVM, MS Diplomate ACVS Associate Professor Large Animal Surgery Dept. of Vet. Clinical Science 625 Harrison St. West Lafayette, IN 47907-2026 Ph: 765-494-8548 Fax: 765-496-2641 abaird@purdue.edu Texas A & M University Virginia Fajt, DVM, PhD, DACVCP Clinical Assistant Professor 326-C VMA Dept. of Vet. Physiology & Pharmacology Hwy. 60, VMA Bldg., MS 4466 College Station, TX 77843 Ph: 979-845-7299 Fax: 979-845-6544 vfajt@cvm.tamu.edu Tufts University Sandra L. Ayres, DVM 200 West Borough Rd. North Grafton, MA 01536 Ph: 508-839-7956 x 84605 sandra.ayres@tufts.edu Tuskegee University David McKenzie, DVM Dept. of Clinical Sciences School of Veterinary Medicine Tuskegee, AL 36088 Ph: 334-727-8461 dmckenzie@tuskegee.edu University of California Joan Dean Rowe, DVM Vet Medical Teaching Hospital 24580 Cache St. Capay, CA 95607 Ph: 530-752-0292 jdrowe@ucdavis.edu Wool&Wattles April-June 2011 University of Florida VACANT University of Georgia Lisa Williamson, DVM UGA College of Vet Medicine Large Animal Department 1810 Clotfelter Rd. Athens, GA 30622 Ph: 706-542-9323 lisa1@uga.edu University of Illinois Clifford F. Shipley, DVM, DACT Assistant Director, AACUP College of Veterinary Medicine 1008 W. Hazelwood Dr. Urbana, IL 61802 Ph: 217-333-2479 Fax: 217-333-7126 Cell: 217-493-2958 cshipley@illinois.edu University of Minnesota Cindy Wolf, DVM 225 VMC, 1365 Gortner Avenue St. Paul, MN 55108 Cell: 507-450-5453 Ph: 612-625-1780 Fax: 612-625-6241 Wolfx006@umn.edu University of Missouri Tessa Marshall, BVSc, MS Diplomate ABVP-Dairy Practice Assistant Teaching Professor Production Medicine 900 E Campus Dr. Columbia, MO 65211 Ph: 573-882-6857 marshallts@missouri.edu University of Pennsylvania Marie-Eve Fecteau, DVM Diplomate ACVIM-LA Asst. Professor for Food Animal Medicine and Surgery New Bolton Center 382 W. Street Rd. Kennett Square, PA 19348 Ph: 610-925-6208 Fax: 610-925-8100 mfecteau@vet.upenn.edu University of Tennessee Jerry R. Roberson, DVM, PhD Associate Professor Food Animal Medicine/Surgery College of Vet Med, LACS 2407 River Drive Knoxville, TN 37996-45545 Ph: 865-755-8256 Fax: 865-974-5773 jrobers8@utk.edu University of Wisconsin-Madison Susan D. Semrad, DVM School of Veterinary Medicine 2015 Linden Drive West Madison, WI 53706 Ph: 608-263-6695 semrads@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu Virginia/Maryland Regional CVM D. Phillip Sponenberg, DVM, Phd Professor, Pathology & Genetics Dept. of Biomedical Sciences 100 Duckpond Drive Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA 24061 Ph: 540-231-4805 Fax: 540-231-6033 dpsponen@vt.edu Washington State University Steven M. Parish, DVM Professor Large Animal Med/Surgery Diplomat ACVIM New Vet Teaching Hospital College of Veterinary Medicine Pullman, WA 99164 Ph: 509-335-0711 smp@vetmed.wsu.edu Western University of Health Sciences Ronald L. Terra, DVM, MS, MBA Professor, Food Animal Medicine College of Vet Medicine 309 E. 2nd Street Pomona, CA 91766-1854 Ph: 909-469-5693 Fax: 909-469-5635 rterra@westernu.edu FOREIGN COLLEGE LIAISONS University of Guelph Paula Menzies, MPVM Associate Professor Ruminant Health Management Group Ontario Veterinary College Guelph, Ontario CANADA N1G 2W1 pmenzies@ovc.uoguelph.ca University of Montreal Pascal, Dubreuil Faculte de medicine veterinaire 3200 Sicotte St-Hyacinthe PQ J2S 7C6 Ph: 450-773-8521 x8266 Fax: 450-778-8101 Email: pascal.dubreuil@uomontreal.ca University of Prince Edward Island Jeffrey Wichtel, BVSC PhD DipACT Associate Professor Chairman, Dept of Health Mgt Atlantic Veterinary College 550 University Avenue Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island CANADA C1A 4P3 jwichtel@Upei.CA University of Saskatchewan Lyall Petrie, BVMS, MRCVS Dept of Lg Animal Clinical Sciences Western College of Vet Medicine 52 Campus Drive Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5B4 Ph: 306-966-7087 Fax: 306-966-7174 petrie@skyway.usask.ca NOTE TO STUDENT: If you cannot reach your liaison contact please contact aasrp@aasrp.org 19 $ TOTALTOTAL ENCLOSED ENCLOSED Date: Date: Signature: Signature: **A tax**A deductible contribution to the Samuel B. Guss Fund helps small grants to student tax deductible contribution to the Samuel B.Memorial Guss Memorial Fundprovide helps provide small grants to student members of AASRP to undertake extern extern opportunities in veterinary practices, working with one or one more members of AASRP to undertake opportunities in veterinary practices, working with orofmore of the small species. theruminant small ruminant species. PLEASE MAKEMAKE YOURYOUR CHECK PAYABLE TO AASRP PLEASE CHECK PAYABLE TO AASRP AND MAIL WITHWITH THIS THIS FORMFORM TO: TO: AND MAIL AASRP, P.O. BOX AL 36109 AASRP, P.O.3614, BOX MONTGOMERY, 3614, MONTGOMERY, AL 36109 DUES DUES PAYMENTS MADE MADE BY CREDIT CARD CARD MAY BE FAXED TO 334-270-3399 PAYMENTS BY CREDIT MAY BE FAXED TO 334-270-3399 YOU CAN JOIN OR RENEW MEMBERSHIP AT WWW.AASRP.ORG YOUALSO CAN ALSO JOIN OR RENEW MEMBERSHIP AT WWW.AASRP.ORG Exp. Date: Exp. Date: $ $ $ Credit Credit Card Number: Card Number: Payment Method: □ Check □ Mastercard □ Visa □ Visa Payment Method: □ Check □ Mastercard $ $ US Funds US Funds $ $ $ $ $ $ U.S./Canada ForeignForeign U.S./Canada Veterinarians $105 $105 $130 $130 Veterinarians Non-Veterinary Associates $130 $130 Non-Veterinary Associates $105 $105 Veterinary Students $15 $15 $20 $20 Veterinary Students **Contribution to Samuel B. Guss **Contribution to Samuel B. Guss Memorial Fund Fund Memorial RetiredRetired Veterinary Members 50% discount off of regular fee Veterinary Members 50% discount off of regular fee MEMBERSHIP DUESDUES MEMBERSHIP All dues paidbeinpaid U.S.infunds. Allmust duesbe must U.S. funds. ___Ultrasonography for pregnancy diagnosis ___Ultrasonography for pregnancy diagnosis ___Embryo transfertransfer ___Semen collection & evaluation ___Laparoscopic AI ___Transcervical AI ___Embryo ___Semen collection & evaluation ___Laparoscopic AI ___Transcervical AI If you marked yes, doyes, youdo provide: (you may many apply) If you marked you provide: (youselect may as select as as many as apply) Do youDo provide reproductive services for sheep and goats? ___Y ___Y ___N ___N you provide reproductive services for sheep and goats? Would Would you accept externships? ___Yes___Yes ____No you accept externships? ____No Non-Veterinarian: __Associate __Student Non-Veterinarian: __Associate __Student PleasePlease check the category that best you: you: check the category thatdescribes best describes Veterinarian: __Owner/Partner __Associate __Academician/Researcher __Industry __Government Veterinarian: __Owner/Partner __Associate __Academician/Researcher __Industry __Government Other__________________________________ Other__________________________________ VETERINARY COLLEGE______________________________________YEAR GRADUATED___________ VETERINARY COLLEGE______________________________________YEAR GRADUATED___________ E-MAIL________________________________________________________________________________ E-MAIL________________________________________________________________________________ PHONE_______________________________FAX_____________________________________________ PHONE_______________________________FAX_____________________________________________ CITY/STATE/ZIP________________________________________________________________________ CITY/STATE/ZIP________________________________________________________________________ ADDRESS___________________________________________________________ ___ □ Home ___ □ Home □ Office □ Office ADDRESS___________________________________________________________ CLINIC/BUSINESS______________________________________________________________________ CLINIC/BUSINESS______________________________________________________________________ NAME________________________________________________________________________________ NAME________________________________________________________________________________ Membership Membership Application Application AMERICAN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION OF SMALL OF SMALL RUMINANT RUMINANT PRACTITIONERS PRACTITIONERS Wool & Wattles the AASRP Newsletter P.O. Box 3614 Montgomery, AL 36109 NONPROFIT ORG. U.S. POSTAGE Montgomery, AL PERMIT NO. 77 PAID ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED
Similar documents
WW Jan - Mar 2014 - American Association of Small Ruminant
they are interested in hosting primarily 4th year students for 2-4 weeks. Information that the students desire includes: - Small ruminant species seen in your practice, - Busiest months of the year...
More information