Vodou and the Global Diaspora
Transcription
Vodou and the Global Diaspora
I wrote this essay as a final project for “Pirates, Pilgrims, and Pagans,” a freshman introductory writing course taught by Professor Michael Ennis. The class focused on the “making of Modernity,” as well as the progression of culture in the African Diaspora. For our final project, Professor Ennis wanted us to pick a topic that we felt passionate about. I remember not having a clue as to what I would write about. He mentioned how a Vodou Priestess was coming to give a lecture for the department of African-American Studies. The lecture sounded interesting so I decided to go with a few of my classmates. What I attended was not a lecture, but an intimate question-and-answer session with Marie Maude Evans, a Haitian Vodou Priestess who had recently relocated to Boston to serve as a Mambo for a small Haitian population there. The presentation sparked my interest in the topic. The Haitian religion she spoke of was far different from the one I had known. It was out of my comfort zone. Vodou was complex; media prejudice blurred the truth, and that’s what excited me most. I never have considered myself a writer or someone who particularly enjoys the writing process. I tend to be impatient and overly meticulous, two attributes that make any form of essay-writing painstaking. Yet given the openness of the assignment and the free reign Professor Ennis granted, I really enjoyed writing this paper. I hope you enjoy the essay! Vodou and the Global Diaspora: Authenticity, Consumerism, and Culture Connor Gordon Academic Writing (Fall 2011) Pirates, Pilgrims, and Pagans Professor Michael Ennis “… drawing previously isolated, autarkic, or otherwise independent communities into the global economy [tends] to lead to an increased diversity within cultures at the expense of diversity between cultures.” - Andrew Potter in The Authenticity Hoax “Vodou is the soul, the memory of Haiti…” - Marie Maude Evans O n January 12, 2011, a disastrous 7.0-magnitude earthquake struck near Portau-Prince, the capital and largest city of Haiti. More than 3.5 million citizens experienced the quake and 220,000 people lost their lives (“Haiti”). At the time, Haiti was ranked 145th of 169 countries in the U.N. Human Development Index, the lowest in the Western Hemisphere, and the country dropped even further to 158th after the disaster (“Indices”). The quake’s effects were astronomical. Haiti’s dismal public health services and sterile market economy were no match for the catastrophe that ensued, and Haiti spiraled into an even deeper pit of debt and poverty. Yet, despite the utter devastation of the natural disaster, American TV evangelist Pat Robertson declared the quake a “blessing in disguise,” citing the cataclysm as the direct consequence of the entire Haitian population “[swearing] a pact to the devil” (Pat). He continued that the Haitians brazenly used the devil’s malevolent prowess to ensure victory during the Haitian Revolution of 1791, illuminating his implicit belief that the nation has since descended into a state of political illegitimacy and disturbed religious fundamentalism. This antagonistic attitude targeted at the unofficial native religion of Haiti, Vodou, is not a new or uncommon development. The origins of this outlook spawned primarily from the eyewitness accounts that meticulously detailed the events succeeding the declaration of war on August 21, 1791. Vodou played a key role in mobilizing the plebeians against their French counterparts1 and, thus, is frequently cited as a catalyst to such a violent, unprecedented response. 1 Scholars argue that the syncretic faith “[sustained] people who [had] endured oppressive governments, grinding poverty and natural calamities” (Bilefsky). 4 Ultimately, Vodou “helped Haiti win independence in 1804 as the first Black Republic,” eliminating slavery within its borders (Anderson 90). This rise of Haiti’s enslaved people to power threatened American security and slavery. In criticizing and distorting the sacred Haitian faith, Western accounts rebuked the rebellion as baseless and wicked and denied the nation political recognition on the world stage (Maude Evans). To this day, Haitian Vodou in the United States has a poor reputation. If Vodou is not familiar to most Americans, the more phoneticallysounding, Americanized “voodoo” is. Its bizarre spelling alone is alienating and mysterious. It effectively transcribes the eeriness and enigma that surrounds the Haitian faith. Many scholars avoid the “orthographic” form altogether, arguing that the “spelling has come to signify centuries of racist falsities and perversions, not the least from Hollywood” (Davis 9). Zombies, witchcraft, voodoo dolls, and even human sacrifice are commonly thought of as quintessential components of Vodou, viewed as primitive and anachronistic (Bilefsky). These contemporary conventions are either gross misconceptions or fabricated fantasies of the mysterious faith. However, in recent years there has been a revival of Haitian Vodou in America. Societal disdain for the religion has been coupled in the last few decades by the increasing presence of Vodou communities in American cities such as Miami, New Orleans, and New York. More than 300,000 Haitians currently live in New York City, the largest concentration in the United States (Bilefsky). Furthermore, more than 60 million people practice Vodou in the world, not including the numerous daughter religions that have formed in South America, specifically Brazil. To put it into perspective, there are more than four times as many adherents of Vodou as there are of Judaism, and for every 35 Christians, there is approximately one Vodouisant (Robinson). The gap between the formerly distant nationalities is narrowing; coexistence is inevitable. Once vilified as satanic and excessively superstitious, Vodou now experiences a political resurgence in American culture due to an increase in consumer interest. Spellcasting and herbal healing attract progressively larger amounts of individuals who long for an authentic Vodou experience that can be found nowhere else. The term “authenticity” has taken on various sociopolitical designations throughout history; the acceptance or denial of the consequently blurred delineation continually create new topics of debate that impassion ethnic groups to search for new value in their origins. Most commonly, authenticity means “genuineness” or “realness.” These words, however, do not provide enough insight into what is an ambiguous term. Vodou authentica line store shelves in businesses adjacent to large tourist attractions. Spells, dolls, and potions of all flavors, promising to “turn the tide” of your life in a most auspicious way, bring in a considerable amount of revenue for “souvenir” businesses. These love spells, Good Health Broom Dolls, and beyond, however, are not without their price. For $29 a pop, you can purchase a Voodoo Breakup Spell online for use against a couple you resent, and for an additional nine dollars, the hex will be cast again two hours later to ensure complete effectiveness. Throw in a voodoo doll for another $17.95 and you have yourself a deal! While to many this sum may seem ridiculous for a service that “will not be successful every time,” it is not at all surprising that some people dish 5 American TV evangelist Pat Robertson declared the quake a “blessing in disguise,” citing the cataclysm as the direct consequence of the entire Haitian population “[swearing] a pact to the devil.” AP Photo/United Nations, Logan Abassi out cash with sheer alacrity simply because the product is marked authentic (“Authentic”). Authenticity is like an economic supply-demand curve. Buyers generate certain expectations of authenticity that must be matched adequately by sellers—or in other words, the observed culture. Likewise, sellers possess certain cultural obligations that require them to present their cultural practices effectively. Where these two expectations meet, consumerism flourishes. Yet the underlying complexities of interpreting public opinion and centralizing a multifaceted culture under a common image often lead to discrepancies between the curves. While this argument seems convincing, it can be countered by the belief that authenticity remains stagnant and builds upon cultural preservation. This essay evaluates this interpretation through an exploration of Haitian Vodou practices and their manifestations in the United States. Is authentic Vodou truly authentic by society’s view of the notion? Vodou is the perfect case study for such a topic due to its syncretic nature, and the commercialization and critical public opinion that increasingly strains it. In exploring how societies retain or change authenticity, we gain better insight into how cultures adapt and react in the countries to which they migrate, as well as understand why the quest for authenticity is so prevalent in our culture today. Before beginning an evaluation of authenticity in Vodou, it is necessary to reflect upon the current critical consensus on authenticity, which is in a state of disarray. Scholar Paul Gilroy explores cultural authenticity and race in his highly influential study The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. Gilroy surveys race, which is ultimately defined by history as static and colorcoded, using a new reference point of analysis that accentuates race’s transcontinental fluidity and overt complexities. This redefined perspective has revolutionized how historians and literary critics alike view trans-Atlantic migration in regard to the African diaspora. Gilroy classifies society’s definition of cultural authenticity as a derivative of geographic locality. Global manifestations of similar cultural forms “have been dismissed as inauthentic and therefore lacking in cultural or aesthetic value precisely because of their distance (supposed or actual) from a readily identifiable point of origin” (Gilroy 96). By placing authenticity in a spatial context, he seeks to demonstrate its ambiguity: where is the line demarcating each territory (authentic vs. inauthentic)? Adam McGee, a scholar of African studies at Harvard University, tweaks this methodology slightly in his article, “Constructing Africa: Authenticity and Gine in Haitian Vodou,” to address Vodou in particular. When American Marines invaded Haiti in 1915, the peasant class was alienated from their hereditary homesteads, losing the spirits the family inherited (tied to their aged estates). Vodou priesthood was instantiated to mollify the Vodouisants and arbitrate severed familyspirit relations. Vodou transformed into an urban, mobile religion. “Authenticity shifted from being a matter primarily of place to a matter of actions,” McGee concludes (34-35). In reconstructing their past in the new Haitian temples, Vodou retained its legitimacy. Therefore, society contextualizes authenticity not only by space but also by expression and aestheticism. Andrew Potter, author of The Authenticity Hoax, opts for a different approach that abandons the idea of authenticity as a universal concept and, instead, views it as a modern cultural trend. In a world where “outrageous advertising, lying politicians, and fraudulent memoirists” reign and the “fake, prepackaged, and the artificial” are unavoidable, a new movement has developed, in the words of John Zogby, “to reconnect with the truth of our lives and to disconnect from the illusions that everyone…tries to make us believe are real” (Potter 4). To deride our ensuing identity crisis (harvested from “cheap building blocks of consumer goods”), Potter argues that we seek authenticity as a means to self-actualization (Potter 12). Furthering his argument daringly, he goes on to say that the quest for authenticity is a form of “status seeking.” In the past, religion “served as the objective and eternal standard of all that is good and true and valuable” (Potter 12). Where religion has waned, technology, secularism, and capitalism have risen and crafted a society that undervalues nationalism and community and has lost touch with the meaningful aspects of the human existence. 6 Mass consumerism made available through highly developed market economies heralding entrepreneurship and democracy has obliterated transnational barriers of communication like never before. Following Potter’s argument, the commodification of Vodou authentica in America reflects our need to experience something that others have not; we have become, in a sense, dilettantes of our own identity. Potter’s provocative take on authenticity has sparked considerable critique. Alex Good, a writer for the Canadian Quill and Quire book review magazine, described Potter’s work as a “strident defense of free market consumer capitalism…a take-down of various left wing writers he doesn’t like” (Good). Jonathan Russo, blogger and co-founder of the Organic Wine Journal, was equally infuriated, labeling the book as “the latest diatribe from the conservative right” (Russo). Potter, Russo argues, “[attacks] anyone who doesn’t want to shop in the sterilized world of malls, vacation at Disneyland, or …eat industrialized junk food” (Russo). Others, such as Paul Beston of the Wall Street Journal, have called The Authenticity Hoax “ahistorical” and “utopian” (Beston). Ultimately, Potter concludes that “the quest for authenticity [as] a socially destructive form of status-seeking… takes the misguided critique of mass society that has motivated the quest for ‘cool’ for the past forty years and blows it up into a sweeping and even more wrong-headed critique of the entire modern world” (Potter 267-8). Needless to say, his project has been praised and degraded for its provocative message. If one strips the book of its political bias, there is an inventive and necessary perspective on authenticity that needs to be heard. Potter places a timestamp on authenticity. Whereas Gilroy and McGee argue that authenticity is an ideology that long has existed, Potter sees authenticity as contemporary and fluid, an outcome of a recent cultural trend. For this idea of authenticity as a supply and demand curve to endure, there must be a discrepancy in terms of industrialization between the buyer and seller. The consumers must live in a nation that has a potent market economy and sovereign political authority. This position of economic and administrative power will subsequently drive market incentives; the pursuit of a good that is more traditional, hand-made, personalized, and “real” illustrates a desire that inflicts only industrialized buyers, who are most exposed to the plethora of cultural practices exercised around the globe. The closure of the theoretical spatial gap between the two distant players (traditionalist vs. contemporary, two classifications only established recently) is solely a development dependent upon transatlantic trade and consumerism. Economics play as big a role in authenticity as Potter’s suggested social trends. Thus, we can contextualize authenticity as a purely modern phenomenon. Vodou’s transcendence into the heart of American consumerism generates an apt example of a culture becoming commodified, through which the implications of authenticity sufficiently can be contested. Vodou is uniquely Haitian, yet ethnically eclectic and diverse. It is a manifestation of numerous African diasporic religions—most notably the West African Fon and Ewe—strained by passage within the Atlantic world. When faced with the laborious task of policing the religious integrity of Vodou through the establishment of a standardized, national orthodoxy, Max Beauvoir, founder of the Fédération Nationale des Vodouisants Haïtiens, “largely excised Catholic elements from his Temple’s liturgy because he deemed them to be inauthentic to Vodou” (McGee 39). Yet, what tacit statutes of the syncretic faith disallowed Catholicism’s inclusion? Vodou always has been “heterogeneous and decidedly uncentralized, relying on neither the teachings of a founder, nor scripture, nor formal doctrine” (International). Whereas Christian orthodoxy assures salvation, Vodou delineates Africa as its primary form of “religious capital” and consequently designs itself “to enfold the worshippers in an envelope of African space” through herbal healing, conversation with the spirit world, and animal sacrifice (McGee 32). To Vodouisants, Africa is “heaven” on 7 “Possibly the most surprising aspect of Vodou is that many of its practitioners consider themselves Roman Catholic—a reflection of the Haitian faith’s syncretic nature.” Photo courtesy of The Kobal Collection at Art Resource, NY Ian Fleming’s Live and Let Die “… paints Vodou as a cover for a vicious cartel of thugs interested only in drug sales.” Earth and Vodou is a means of remembering. Possibly the most surprising aspect of Vodou is that many of its practitioners consider themselves Roman Catholic—a reflection of the Haitian faith’s syncretic nature.2 Catholicism, dating back to French occupation in Haiti during the early nineteenth century, has interwoven itself into the core mantras of Vodou. Following the liberation of 1804, the “Vatican broke with Haiti and did not establish relations with her again until 1860” (Corbett). However, the French influence never fully left. When Jean-Jacques Dessalines ascended the throne as emperor of Haiti following the revolution, he advanced a harsh, regimented attack against all the “French and their sympathizers” with the aim to “[eliminate] the caste system” that had besmirched his people through bondage and embittered the nation (Simmonds). French Catholic priests were among those to go—as they were killed off or exiled immediately—leaving only the black, native Haitians to fill their shoes as the religious supreme. Subsequently, cultural mixing between the native religion and its Catholic regime resulted in a new form of double consciousness still perceptible today. An example of this dual nature is that virtually all Iwa— spirits of the Vodou faith—are “associated with Catholic saints”3 (Corbett). Neither component religion, Catholic and Vodou, is more important than the other. They coexist. Nonetheless, political recognition of Vodou’s double consciousness is nearly non-existent. The saturation of devil worship and witchcraft condemnations in the media has blinded the American public from realizing Vodou’s twofold nature. In America, Vodou inhabits an unfriendly cultural contact zone. Political figures, citizens, and the media frequently victimize the faith. The media in particular has monopolized public opinion and directed harsh criticism toward Vodou, which appears most often in the form of news “stories that tend to shock readers with bizarre and striking accounts” (Kulii 64). Elon Ali Kulii, a religious scholar, collected a series of these articles in his dissertation, A Look at Hoodoo in Three Urban Areas of Indiana. Hoodoo, a form of predominantly African-American folk magic, is not Vodou. But the few articles Kulii included regarding Vodou tend to treat all Vodou happenings— repeatedly used as criminal evidence in these stories—as hearsay. The report on each case is ambiguous and ambivalent. In one story, a woman kills her husband and two aunts at a wedding reception after being possessed by a voodoo lizard. The author of the article states that the woman “thinks she was possessed.” The verb “thinks” belittles the credibility of the defendant’s argument, revealing the author’s disbelief that the specified spiritual event actually occurred. The news puts Vodou, and not the responsible individual, continuously on trial for any number of unlawful disturbances. U.S. culture seemingly mutates the religion into an image of insanity and derangement; it is a source of blame for all ill happenings, even matters as random and possibly coincidental as a recent five-alarm fire in Brooklyn (Bilefsky).4 Papa Shango, a famous WWE wrestler, donned the persona of a skullfaced voodoo practitioner to terrorize his opponents and audience. Draped in a ragged shadowy vest complimented by a necklace fashioned from human bone, Shango would enter arenas to complete silence, menacingly rocking a smoking skull from his gloved hands, as if searching for his next victim.5 He looked murderous and insane; the inaudible, violent slurs that passed his contorted lips were enough to evoke fear in even the bravest of men (WWE). Mainstream film is no exception. Ian Fleming’s Live and Let Die featuring Roger Moore as British agent 007 paints 2 This religious identity contrasts with the political agenda Beauvoir is trying to establish for the Vodou faith. 3 “Dumballah the snake Iwa is St. Patrick; Ezrulie, the earth mother is the Virgin Mary” (Corbett). In one account, “authorities say [Vodou] played a central role” in an apartment fire, which “was ignited by candles surrounding a bed during a ceremony in the apartment of a voodoo priest who…was hired by a woman to chase away evil spirits” (Bilefsky). 4 5 One of his common pre-show routines involved placing a curse on his opponent. The opponent, upon being stricken with the spell, would notice a mysterious black fluid trickling from part of his body (e.g. head/hand). One rare incident involved his opponent’s feet catching fire and a perfect K.O. While these performances were intended to be theatrical, they still make a statement as to popular culture’s view of the syncretic religion. 8 Vodou as a cover for a vicious cartel of thugs interested only in drug sales. The media resorts to stereotypes. Criticism tears at the faith’s seams, harshly painting Vodou as violent, primitive, and fake. Vodou adherents have responded to this criticism by either playing up the religion’s peculiarity or disproving the critique altogether. Authenticity is a means of responding to its world view, according to Gilroy, as it “[projects] a coherent and stable racial culture as a means to establish…political legitimacy…and the notions of ethnic particularity on which it has come to rely” (97). In other words, cultural authenticity is pursued for political recognition on the world stage. Yet, perhaps it is not so simple. Politics certainly does factor in, but for nations that hold minimal power on the global scale, such as Haiti, it is difficult to cite that as the primary reason. Increasing demand for Vodou performance culture largely has linked authenticity with performance revenue; this relationship has granted tourists and scholars alike a certain amount of influence over Vodou principle. Not surprisingly, “what [is] ‘authentic’…[is] given funding to be performed” as “publications of scholars [have] the effect of helping certain styles of Vodou to triumph over others as more authentic” (McGee 36). Not to mention, audiences place enormous pressure on certain Vodouisants to provide an original, realistic cultural experience. To appease public consciousness, Vodou culture has made certain internal changes to adapt. Adam McGee presents a recent documented case of scholarship influencing Vodou “mythos and pedigree”: Landmark works by Milo Rigaud and Louis Maximilien sought to “uncover” the African sources of Haitian Vodou. For Rigaud, this meant linking Vodou cosmology to ancient Egypt—an imaginative and false history which nonetheless has had influence upon the learned Vodou priesthood, who read his work and took to heart his arguments. For example, Rigaud “found” elements of European magic, cabala, and freemasonry in Vodou—an association which acknowledged and also encouraged the growing coincidence, especially in Port-au-Prince, between the Vodou priesthood and Masonic membership. It also meant the increased use in Vodou of symbols from Masonry and the western magical tradition—influences that can be seen on the walls of Vodou temples in Port-au-Prince to this day. (McGee 36-37) Scholarly writings have aided the transposition of Vodou principles with their own. These changes, however, are mostly effective on Vodou expression (what Vodou looks like). Evaluating the malleability of the core values of the Vodou faith surpasses the scope of this argument. Tourism has provided Vodou with an outlet for responding to its stereotypes. Some companies choose to praise it, and play up the mysterious, dark nature of their practice. Others attempt to make the religion more personable and friendly. Crafting authenticity is a matter of aesthetics. It is a means to unity. An iconic ethnic identity is fashioned to celebrate culture or, more specifically for Vodou and Haiti, nationality (Maude Evans). Michelle Anderson, a journalist from The Drama Review, studied the effects of tourism on Haitian Vodou. In it, she visits three towns where an authentic Vodou performance takes place, specifically an act of spiritual possession which she believes is “the central and inalienable ‘marker’ of any voodoo event” (Anderson 91). Each location is distinguished by a different degree of tourism. For the sake of length, we will look at Mariani and Nansoucri only. Mariani features theatrical voodoo and is “advertised in brochures as [the] ‘most authentic and enjoyable’” Vodou. Located on the outskirts of Port-au-Prince, Mariani draws mainly tourists and elite Haitians to its performances (Anderson 91). It is the more readily accessible and tourist-friendly of the two, includes an admission fee, and remains in close contact with Max Beauvoir. Nansoucri is 9 “Vodou’s transcendence into the heart of American consumerism generates an apt example of a culture becoming commodified, through which the implications of authenticity sufficiently can be contested.” just the opposite. Nansoucri features ritual voodoo in a remote village “two hours away by car” from the nearest hotel (Anderson 96). Typically, it is not accessible to outsiders, but Anderson was granted a unique look into the town’s celebration of Assumption Day. Whereas Mariani’s performance went from 10 p.m. to 1 a.m., Nansoucri’s ritual lasted far longer, from 3 p.m. to 2 a.m. Anderson described the rhythm of the Nansoucri ritual as “cyclical…based on agriculture concerns: weather & harvest” (Anderson 101), while Mariani’s performance built to a climax in the linear way a stage performance would, ending in a bang. Anderson also described Nansoucri’s ceremony as more of a communal effort than the individualistic, internalized performance at Mariani. During the presentation at Mariani, Anderson witnessed the invocation of loa Ague.6 The performance was a “perpetration of voodoo ‘myth’” (Anderson 102). “The action is tightly choreographed, allowing for the unexpected to occur (predictably) within a selective dramatic presentation of those aspects of voodoo which are palatable to the foreign audience,” writes Anderson. “Simultaneously, it confirms the popular expectation of ‘scary voodoo’ with bloody spectacle7 and fire-handling, while enforcing a distance from the audience that disallows real transformation (inadvertent possession), thus affirming the other side of the outsiders’ voodoo myth: that voodoo is ‘fake.’ The tricks can be seen simultaneously as evidence of authenticity and as sleight-of-hand charlatanism and entertainment” (Anderson 93). Mariani more visibly presented the darker aspects of Vodou than Nansoucri. The blood offering, described above, still took place during the ceremony of Nansoucri, but it was not visible. Furthermore, Anderson characterizes the dancer’s involvement at Mariani as “inward-oriented as opposed to the community-oriented action discernible in… voodoo performances…not advertised as ‘touristique’” (Anderson 93). Despite these differences, the two performances’ interpretations of various elements of Vodou retained some similarities. Performers wore the traditional black, red, and white costumes and used the same ritual props—swords, drums, and fire. The “authentic” merchandise sold by Vodou boutiques further represents the manifestations of Vodou as a new form of consumerism. Candles, oils, sprays, incense, books, and other paraphernalia appear in multitudes. Candles “come in an array of sizes and colors and are covered with intricate designs and words designed to make even the unintelligent feel sophisticated when they find those that seem marked for their desired purpose” (Kulii 70). Each candle attends to a specific individualistic need. To activate the candle, a psalm must be read. This biblical undertone undermines any question that Vodou incorporates black magic and instead illuminates the faith’s piety and good-naturedness. It is common to see Vodou practitioners in the United States hide behind biblical identifications. American Root Doctors, in particular, known as conjurers and future-tellers, advertise with a profuse amount of Christian archetypes and symbols. They aim to make their practice more acceptable by society’s standards and work to bridge the gap between the resident and distant cultures. The perpetual variety and high-level customization of Vodou merchandise is an American phenomenon. Spells as well as potions capitalize on the uncertainty of consumers to increase profitability. This mentality—if you buy, you will succeed— is a huge selling point for Vodou souvenirs. The incorporation of hate and breakup spells also are new creations. It is atypical for a faith, Marie Maude Evans states, that is built off of “family, community, healing, and blessing” (Maude Evans). These spells do not belong to the same religion that, as Maude Evans recounts, removed a cancerous lump from her breast through non-stop prayer to the spirits. In traveling 6 The loa Ague is considered the divine sovereign of the sea who “inhabit[s] an intermediate realm between man and a higher supreme life force” (Anderson 90). 7 A girl is possessed violently, during which a female dancer appears on stage with a white dove. This dove is handed to the possessed one who “plucks feathers from it and then severs its head. 10 from Haiti to America, Vodou spells and potions have changed to incorporate the fiery diadems of revenge, hatred, and despair. Even weight loss spells, reflecting a substantial American cultural trend, find their way into the mix. This argument also can be extended to the proliferation of the voodoo doll. Voodoo dolls have become a hit for New Orleans tourists. The relics are captivating and mysterious. In procuring one of these figurines, sightseers are given the chance to investigate for themselves the myths of violence and haphazardness that revolve around the doll. Yet in actuality, the “dolls” in Haitian Vodou, which resemble today’s Americanized dolls, are not weapons of revenge or playful trickery. Rather, they stand as a representation of the loas8 and typically can be found on a temple altar (Maude Evans). Many historians believe that the modern Americanized voodoo doll originates from the “‘poppet,’ used in European witchcraft” (Cunningham 12-13). While this theory does not satisfy all historians, most agree that the doll’s origins are not Haitian. What all this shows is that Vodou in America and even parts of Haiti is inauthentic. Certain sections of its practice have subsequently been manipulated to increase profitability, and, furthermore, Vodou has responded to the criticisms it has received by inventing a new image of itself. In other words, its claimed authenticity has been constructed to satisfy the most recent cultural trends. The constant change and update have isolated American “voodoo” from its Haitian origins. Currently, they lie in their own separate spheres of influence. Haitian Vodou has adapted to the strains of commercialization to trigger a new cultural equilibrium. It is inauthentic. Historians and literary figures alike can now condemn the religion for lacking the proper commitment to cultural preservation. Only one question has yet to be addressed: So what? Many consider inauthenticity as a sign of cultural depravity and suppression. Cultural purity falls prey to ethnic breeding and, thus, diminishes the culture’s value and identity. Yet this perspective is inadvisable and improbable. For a culture to be genuine, it must exist singularly and have no knowledge of other cultures. Only a utopian world could house such an instance. As most scholars agree, the migration of culture is unavoidable (Gilroy). Culture is like a living organism. It must grow and adapt in the company of others in order to survive. Total independence and introversion would render it obsolete. What is authentic now was not authentic ten years ago. Take the theatricality of the Mariani performance. While some scholars criticize the cultural experience as counterfeit and ostentatious, the performance should be celebrated for its inventiveness in bringing out the character of Vodou audience members want to see. Certain aspects of its culture are exaggerated but the culture as a whole is not lost. There are still grass-roots efforts to maintain traditionalism, such as Nansoucri. Since when is theatre not a form of cultural preservation? Culture is not preserved by keeping it static and secluded. It is maintained through change and reinvention. The memory of the significant/ insignificant culture will forever exist. By society’s definition, authenticity is meant to be static and anachronistic. However, as demonstrated by this paper, authenticity is dynamic and fluid. If it were not, culture would become a relic. Thus, authenticity as a supply and demand curve still exists. Authenticity is abstract and convoluted. What criteria do you use to measure it? For a country with as low a gross domestic product as Haiti, when is it acceptable for a citizen to stage his or her culture for profit, particularly if it means an income, even survival? When is it shameful? It is a blurred boundary. Rarely is credit granted to the “home” social situation. We view authenticity as something that is fact and quantifiable. Yet we lack the necessary intimacy with foreign cultures to believe that Loas and lwa are two different names for the spirits in Vodou. 8 11 “The term ‘authenticity’ should rightly be abandoned.” way. The absence of a universal authenticity “rubric” shows that authenticity is, in fact, subjective. Subjectivity hardly can account for the stability and power of a culture. To revise Andrew Potter’s premise, authenticity is not a counterculture to consumerism. It is consumerism, an energetic free market centered on the traditional commodity. Essentially “authenticity” and modernity, often cited alongside capitalism, mobility, and rationalism, walk handin-hand. The most “authentic” cultural practices undergo waves of reworking as time transforms them into melting pots of influence. Vodou marketed as “authentic” is Vodou in its most modern form. Anthropologists tend to scorn consumerism. However, when culture is commodified, as all culture is to varying degrees, it should not be dismissed. Authenticity and modernity demand a new perspective, one that recognizes and applauds the dynamic nature of the world in which we live. The lively, ever-changing state of the universe crafted the world that we live in today. Thus, the term “authenticity” should rightly be abandoned. Due to the “overlapping diasporas” associated with transnational migration, a single culture progresses, from its origins to the present, at too dizzying a pace to allow the appropriate level of assessment required of evaluating authenticity (Zeleza 36). Authenticity is manufactured; it is crafted to appease the public eye so that no truth is present for evaluation. Yet this should be praised, not criticized. A new reference point is required. Look not to authenticity, but instead evaluate cultural adaptability. History allows us to study the unique responses of various cultures strained by the perpetual complexities of time and space. It describes our humanity and our will to survive. The propagation of Vodou authentica in the United States has allowed the faith to endure, if not grow. Perhaps the “blessing in disguise” Pat Robertson described was not the disastrous earthquake that struck Haiti, but his own words. His statement, though punitive and discriminating, has given Vodou a superior purpose to persist. Acknowledgments A special thanks goes out to my writing group— Teresa Rosenberger and Will Giles—for offering some great ideas for my paper. Their revisions were extremely helpful in producing this final draft. Additionally, I would like to wholeheartedly thank Professor Michael Ennis for the revisions/thoughts he provided me throughout the course of this paper. He helped me solidify my argument and additionally was a great person to bounce ideas off of. Works Cited Anderson, Michelle. “Authentic Vodou Is Synthetic.” The Drama Review 26.2 (1982): 89-110. JSTOR. Web. Microfilms International, 1982. Print. Lindholm, Charles. Culture and Authenticity. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2008. Print. “Authentic Voodoo Spells for Love, Revenge, Money: Voodoo Curses, Dolls and Spells.” Love Spells, Money Spells, Love Horoscopes, & Witchcraft. California Astrology Association, 2011. Web. Live and Let Die. Albert R. Broccoli and Harry Saltzman. United Artists, 1973. DVD. Beston, Paul. “Why It’s So Hard to Get Real.” Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 13 Apr. 2010. Web. Maude Evans, Marie. “Vodou, Culture and Healing.” Duke University, Durham. 19 Oct. 2011. Lecture. Bilefsky, Dan. “Voodoo, Spiritual Anchor, Rises Again in New York City.” NY Times. The New York Times Company, 08 Apr. 2011. Web. Corbett, Bob. “Haiti: Introduction to Voodoo.” Webster University. Mar. 1988. Web. McGee, Adam. “Constructing Africa: Authenticity and Gine in Haitian Vodou.” Journal of Haitian Studies 14.2 (2008): 30-51. ProQuest PRISMAS. Web. Cunningham, Scott. Cunningham’s Encyclopedia of Magical Herbs. St. Paul, MN: Llewellyn Publications, 1985. Print. Parker, Adam. “After Quake, Questions about Religious Practice Raised.” The Post and Courier. Evening Post Publishing Co., 24 Jan. 2010. Web. Davis, Rod. American Voudou: Journey into a Hidden World. Denton: University of North Texas, 1998. Print. Potter, Andrew. The Authenticity Hoax: How We Got Lost Finding Ourselves. New York: Harper/HarperCollins, 2010. Print. Gilroy, Paul. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1993. Print. Robertson, Pat, and Bill Horan. Pat Robertson Calls Quake ‘Blessing in Disguise’. Associated Press, 13 Jan. 2010. Web. 6 Nov. 2011. <http://www. youtube.com/watch?v=f5TE99sAbwM>. Good, Alex. “Review of The Authenticity Hoax: How We Get Lost Finding Ourselves.” Quill and Quire - Canada’s Magazine of Book News and Review. St. Joseph Media, Mar. 2010. Web. Robinson, B. A. “Religions of the World: Numbers of Adherents; Growth Rates.” Religious Tolerance. Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, 28 Sept. 2011. Web. “Haiti Earthquake Facts and Figures | Disasters Emergency Committee.” Disasters Emergency Committee | Working Together. DEC. Web. Russo, Jonathan. “Book Review - The Authenticity Hoax: How We Get Lost Finding Ourselves.” The Organic Wine Journal. 2010. Web. “Indices & Data | Human Development Reports (HDR) | United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).” Human Development Reports (HDR) - United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). HDR, 02 Nov. 2011. Web. Simmonds, Yussuf J. “Jean Jacques Dessalines - The Los Angeles Sentinel.” News - The Los Angeles Sentinel. 11 Feb. 2010. Web. International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences. 2nd ed. 2008. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. “WWE ‘Papa Shango’ | Bio, Videos, Photos, and More.” WWE: The Official Site of the WWE Universe. WWE, Inc. Web. Kulii, Elon Ali. A Look at Hoodoo in Three Urban Areas of Indiana: Folklore and Change. Thesis. Indiana University, 1982. Ann Arbor: University Zeleza, P. T. “Rewriting the African Diaspora: Beyond the Black Atlantic.” African Affairs 104.414 (2005): 35-68. Print. 12