Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan
Transcription
Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan
Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan March 2006 Analysis Presentation Agenda • • • Schedule & Public Process Recent Efforts/Current Projects Site Analysis: – – • • • Context Infrastructure Area Details Market Analysis Summary Concepts Next Steps Schedule + Public Process Schedule November week of Phase 1: Assessment 1.1: Project Framework/Stakeholder Interviews 1.2: Site Analysis 1.3 Transportation & Infrastructure Analysis 1.4: Market Analysis & Program Development Phase 2: Master Plan 2.1: Alternatives 2.2: Public Process/Work Sessions 2.3: Preferred Master Plan Concept Phase 3: Implementation Plan 3.1: Draft Master Plan 3.2: Draft Implementation Plan 3.3: Public Process/Public Hearings 3.4: Final Documentation 3.5 Final Presentations 3.6 Knowledge Transfer Summary of Work Sessions Public Meetings/Workshops Stakeholder Planning Department/City Staff City Commission/City Council Walking Tour December 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 January February March April 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 May June July August September 8 15 22 29 5 12 19 26 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 2 October November 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 City's Vision • • • • • • • • A Coastal Recreational Park Human scale Public open spaces Connectivity for the pedestrian realm Waterfront promenades Diverse open spaces An active park Sensitive environmental spoil island connections (real or visual) - Coconut Grove Waterfront & Spoil Islands Request for Qualifications City's Requirements • • • A Plan that reflects the growth and desires of the community An overhaul of the mooring fields to comply with FDEP Spoil islands rehabilitation: cleaned of exotic plants, replanted with native species and redesigned for public access - Coconut Grove Waterfront & Spoil Islands Request for Qualifications Community and Stakeholder Meetings • • • • • • • Residents Coconut Grove Boards Community Organizations Waterfront Activities Hoteliers Merchants Business Improvement Committee Stakeholder Recurrent Issues • • • • • • • • • • • • • Parks isolated and not well connected Existing uses need more upland space Dangerous street crossings Conflicting uses Safety and security Obstacles to continuous boardwalk Not capturing thru traffic Limited access to water – physical & visual No connection between Grove and waterfront Grove needs a facelift and better mix of tenants Expo Center not contributing to waterfront/Grove Unreliable circulator No support services Stakeholder Recurrent Goals • • • • • • • • • • • Visual/physical connection to the waterfront Demolish Expo Center or redevelop into other use Need for parking strategy Minimize dominance of vehicles on Bayshore/McFarlane Environmentally sensitive passive recreation on Spoil Islands No commercial uses on waterfront that compete with Center Grove Limited commercial uses on the waterfront Waterfront restaurants, cafes, kiosks Improved safety and security Natural amphitheater Water-related equipment rentals Recent Efforts/Current Projects Recent Efforts • • • • • • • Peacock Park Charrette Coconut Grove Market Analysis and Strategy Report Seminole Boat Ramp and Kenneth Meyers Park Coconut Grove Sailing Club Program Document Dinner Key Convention Center FEMA Feasibility Study Neighborhood Conservation District Studies 1996 Coconut Grove Planning Study Recent Efforts – Peacock Park Charrette • • • Open Forum lead by Friends of Peacock Park, November 2004 to develop a vision for the future of the Park "Park should reflect the unique character of Coconut Grove" Charrette concepts: – – – – – – – – – Enhance landscaped open spaces Minimal service parking only Trim and "window" mangroves Connection to spoil islands Tie into local history Redesign street frontage and articulate entrances Redesign and seek alternative uses for Glass House Outdoor cultural facility (amphitheater, waterfront plaza) Hardcourts ok, no expansion Current Projects/Initiatives • • • • Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan Commodore Bike Trail Miami 21 CIP Projects - locations – – – – – – – – City Hall Pan Am Drive Miami Watersports Center Dinner Key Dinner Key Marina Kennedy Park Grand Avenue Expo Center Parks + Public Spaces Master Plan City of Miami Parks & Public Spaces Master Plan Vision • A weekend pedestrian and bicycle zone at the waterfront • Enhanced connections along the waterfront • Safe streets for cyclists and pedestrians • Enhance miniparks for use as small neighborhood spaces Commodore Bicycle Project • • • • • City of Miami Bicycle Route 1 since 1970s 5-mile alignment from Cocoaplum Circle to Southern Miami Avenue Already exists along Main Highway and Bayshore Drive – wide curb lanes and adjacent bike paths Safety concerns: car-bicycle conflict, bicyclepedestrian/jogger conflict, mature tree roots damaging the path Determined to be most feasible and beneficial of all the projects in Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities Plan CIP Current Projects - Coconut Grove Kennedy Park Restroom Building Improvements Construction Bid Design Future Kennedy Park Boardwalk Renovation & Recreation Building Expansion Miami Watersports Center Building & Hangar Improvements Miami Watersports Center Boat Ramp & Island Improvements Expo Center Improvements Expo Center Fire Alarm Upgrades Pan Am Dr. Milling & Resurfacing Expo Center Redevelopment City Hall Communications Room Relocation Grand Ave. Improvements Dinner Key Marina Dock Master's Building Dinner Key Fuel Dock Dinner Key Dredging City Hall Historic Preservation Dinner Key Marina Grating, Gates & Locks Dinner Key Anchorage Project Site Analysis Zoning Zoning CS: Conservation • An essentially natural state; only activities which reinforce this character; minimum development; no negative effect to the environment PR: Parks, Recreation, & Open Space • Public and private parks; recreational, educational, cultural, marina, entertainment, and social/health related facilities; public safety; and City of Miami administrative facilities • By Special Permit: performing arts center, museum, art gallery, and exhibition space which change the character of an existing park; conference facility; supporting social and entertainment services (restaurants, cafes, retailing) Community Assets Transit Street Network Scenic Transportation Corridor • • • • • Intent: to preserve and protect trees and other significant environmental features within the city Requires all development be consistent with the preservation of trees Vacant and undeveloped property, property to be redeveloped, public or private rights-of-way Boundaries: right-of-way, established fronting yards, significant natural features not in right-if-way, areas from which there is a unique scenic view of water bodies or historical structures Once designated, all development activity or removal of trees must be reviewed by the preservation officer the missing link Parking Locations Open Space Network Walking Distances Pedestrian Experience Path Disconnect Waterfront Character Ecological Connections - Distributions Mangrove Distribution Seagrass Distribution National Parks Adjacent "It is important to recognize the bay system for its richness. Seeing the larger ecological trends of mangroves and seagrass distribution helps to do this. It would also help build justification for proposing mangrove restoration work on the spoil islands. Being so close to the National Park also would help the spoil islands function as wildlife stopover and corridor movement vs. being small disconnected islands" (Mark Reaves, Biologist) Spoil Islands • Spoil Islands – – – – – Currently supporting a high density of non-native invasive plant species such as Australian Pine and Brazilian Pepper Providing suitable habitat for mangroves and tropical hardwood hammock species Seaward shorelines have been stabilized with riprap There is a high potential for recreational uses The island shorelines capture a high volume of human debris Invasive Plants Established (Aussie Pine, etc) Mangroves Small and Large Debris Spoil Islands - Restoration Restoration Process Overview • Initial Permitting • Restoration Design Development – – • • • • • Historical documents Extensive field investigations (biological, topographical, hydrological, geo-technical, etc.) Final Restoration Design Cost Estimates Final Permitting Funding Construction Contracts Flora/Fauna Community Development Managing Invasive Species Regulations/Permits Minimum permits required for construction activities in the Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve: • Federal – – • State – – – – • Federal Dredge and Fill Permit Program, (USACE, DEP) NPDES Permit, (Section 403 CWA) Environmental Resource Permit, (DEP, Watershed Management District) Proprietary-Sovereign Submerged Lands, (DEP, Watershed Management District) Authorization to Use State Owned Submerged Lands (DEP) Mangrove Trimming and Alteration Permit (DEP) Local – – – Class I Permit (DERM) Class III Permit (DERM) Tree Removal Permit (DERM) Area Details Area Details Upper Waterfront South Bayshore Drive McFarlane Road Lower Waterfront Peacock Park Peacock Park History Peacock Park Inn 1884 Peacock Park 1977 -The first non indigenous settlers to arrive in Miami settled in Coconut Grove, the oldest section of what would become Miami, where fisherman from the Bahamas soon were joined by industrialists from the north in 1870. -1884 the Peacock Inn was built in Peacock Park which became the 1st hotel on the South Florida mainland. -Grapefruit plantations, Hayden Mango and the Trapp Avocado were developed in Coconut Grove. Peacock Park - Activities Picnic tables + NET office Shuffleboard Issues: -Existing building has limited active community services -Active recreational usage of skate park interferes with adjacent parcels of church, school Inline skating -Boardwalk, shuffleboard are in need of repair Play area at adjacent parcel of Church Asphalt area, basketball Baseball field+ open lawn Performance area i.e. "Shakespeare in the Park" Peacock Park - Circulation Uncontrolled pedestrian +bike access on sand surfaces Uncontrolled car access and car circulation on top of existing tree root system Issues: -No clear entrances into Park -Disconnection to Kenneth Meyer Park, Library or Women's Club -No water access! Boardwalk in disrepair, which provided only water access on site -No continuous path connection, parts of park (only shaded area) are not accessible for wheelchair users, strollers skaters etc. -Uncontrolled car access for festival activities on top of existing tree root system creates long term destruction on 200 year old trees -No physical connection to The Barnacle or spoil islands Existing wall separates playgrounds and disconnects the park Boardwalk in disrepair only water access Peacock Park - Lighting/Seating Issues: Seating -Not enough seating provided! only one bench at the bus stop along McFarlane Rd -Up to five picnic tables in peacock park which are not all accessible for wheelchair users, strollers, skaters etc. -No seating is provided around skate park, baseball field, or along the waterfront Lighting -The park does not have enough light fixtures to give a secure and comfortable feeling at night. No light fixtures in upper shaded part of park. A series of newly installed blue light fixtures along existing path, which sometimes face the wrong direction -No consistent design of light fixtures. Three different kinds along McFarlane Rd. + blue lights along path in Peacock Park + spotlights of baseball field Peacock Park - Green Analysis Peacock Park has 4 green habitats: - Hardwood Hammocks (live oak, red maple, mahogany, gumbo limbo, and cocoplum) -Coconut Palm Trees -Mangroves -Lawn Issues: -Root system of Hardwood Hammocks disturbed through uncontrolled car traffic -Mangroves block water views, capture debris and smell but have an important role in the ecological marine system and are protected Hardwood Hammock -Palm trees do not provide shade but offer aesthetic values Lawn Palm Trees Mangroves Pan Am Terminal History Pan American Seaplane Base and Terminal Building, built 1931 1938, Architects Delano & Aldrich - Known as the "Air Gateway between the Americas" the Pan Am Seaplane Base and Terminal Building at Dinner Key linked the United States with Latin America. At the time of its construction the Art Deco style building was the largest and most modern marine air terminal in the world. - The famous Pan Am "Clipper" Flying Boats opened major trade and passenger routes and made Miami a center of international air transportation. Lower Waterfront - Circulation Car access at Seminole Ramp interferes with pedestrian flow No continuous pedestrian connections and wide street lanes create insecure waterfront access Temporary fence blocks pedestrian connection No continuous sidewalk along the waterfront Pedestrian circulation over parking lot – no sidewalk No continuous sidewalk along the waterfront Outdoor seating of restaurant blocks pedestrian connection Lower Waterfront - Activities Issues: 1 2 8 6 3 7 4 5 1. Coconut Grove Sail Club feels secluded and is fenced in, not an inviting environment 9 2. Physical public access to water only possible at Seminole Boat Ramp 3. Few seating elements along waterfront, often with parking lots behind 4. Majority of site is occupied by parking usage, very little green space 5. City Hall feels secluded and fenced in 6. Expo Center in need of repair, takes up large amount of space without offering any amenities 7. Grove Key Marina does not offer public walkway along waterfront 8. Fresh Market does not address the waterfront or offer outdoor seating space with views of the water 9. Shake A-Leg walkway is disconnected to public water promenade by temporary construction fence Lower Waterfront - Lighting/Seating Issues: -No continuous seating amenities offered along the waterfront, seating most of the time in places with parking lots behind -Dining tables block public water access -Seating elements and lighting features do no have continuous design language, change from blue to red at Grove Harbor Marina, some blue light fixtures point in wrong directions Lower Waterfront - Green Analysis 3 4 2 1 4 3 4 2 2 Canopy Trees Live Oak, Red Maple, 1 3 3 Palm Trees 4 Lawn 2 Issues: 1 Mangroves 2 3 4 -Mangroves block water views, capture debris and smell, but have an important role in the ecological marine system and are protected -Palm trees do not provide shade but offer aesthetic values -Canopy trees in parking lot do not have ideal condition and show signs of drought and poor maintenance Upper Waterfront - Activities Issues: 2 1. Access along waterfront stops at Monty's 3 2. Private Yacht Clubs fenced in, secluded, provide no public water access 6 1 3. Parking lot feels private 4 4. Poor location of benches and picnic tables 5 5. Existing boardwalk in disrepair, only water access and water view in park 6. Mangroves block view and water access Upper Waterfront - Circulation Surface of waterfront access changes from concrete to wooden boardwalk Biscayne Bay Yacht Club Montys No sidewalk connection along South Bayshore Drive Coral Reef Yacht Club Kennedy Park US Sailing Center Existing waterfront connection stops Boardwalk in disrepair only water access in Kennedy Park Upper Waterfront - Issues: Lighting/Seating -No seating opportunities along South Bayshore Drive -Seating elements in Kennedy Park need to be updated, replaced and placed better along pathway -No light fixtures along walkway on South Bayshore Drive -No light fixtures in Kennedy Park -Some the existing blue light fixtures are poorly placed Upper Waterfront - Green Analysis 1 Mangroves 1 4 3 2 Canopy Trees 3 Live Oak, Red Maple, 3 Palm Trees 1 2 4 Lawn 1 Issues: -Mangroves block water views, capture debris and smell, but have an important role in the ecological marine system and are protected -Palm trees do not provide shade but offer aesthetic values -No continuous and recognizable planting scheme along waterfront McFarlane Road- Existing Condition Existing Condition Issues: - Currently McFarlane Road is a 7 lane road (4 driving lanes, 2 parking lanes, 1 turning lane) No pedestrian-friendly crossing areas No visible connection from Cocowalk to McFarlane Road No pedestrian amenities along McFarlane (seating areas, restaurants) No water views Cars dominate the road Existing sidewalk does not connect towards Kenneth Mayer Park McFarlane Road - Possible Design Solution Proposed Condition Possible Design Solutions: - Reduce driving lanes to two lanes - Turn McFarlane into pedestrian-oriented zone, like the "Ramblas", Barcelona or Lincoln Road, South Beach - Provide amenities like restaurants, outdoor cafes, water + light features, shade + seating areas along McFarlane Road - Physically connect "Cocowalk" with McFarlane Road - Create strong view corridor towards waterfront - Pier extension of McFarlane creates physical access towards the water, allowing fishing, water taxi stop etc. Lincoln Road, South Beach The Ramblas, Barcelona Lincoln Road, South Beach South Bayshore Drive - Existing Condition Gateways into Park/Conflict Points Existing Condition Issues: - Currently South Bayshore Drive is a 4 lane road with a pedestrian sidewalk on either side - Green median feels disconnected to park and does not offer any amenities, seating etc. - No pedestrian-friendly crossing areas are provided - No traffic signal to coordinate pedestrian crossing - No seating areas along South Bayshore Drive - Bus stops are difficult to find and do not provide shelter - Entrances to parking lots create a conflict with sidewalks along South Bayshore Drive South Bayshore Drive - Possible Design Solution Proposed Condition Possible Design Solutions: - Reduce traffic lane to two lanes - Turn other two lanes into pedestrian-oriented promenade and provide space for biking, skating, walking, jogging - Integrate existing median into new park design - Provide amenities like kiosks, light features, shade and seating areas along South Bayshore Drive - Create secure pedestrian crossing areas at intersections - Create strong view corridors towards waterfront - Reduce existing car entrances to parking lots Copacabana, Rio de Janeiro Walking Inline Skating, Biking Horse Carriage Market Analysis Economic Objectives • Conduct market/economic/financial analyses of various potential waterfront uses that will: – – – – – Identify appropriate park uses Explore potential park enhancements that a provide a range of activities Serve community needs, existing and potential markets Strengthen connectivity between commercial center and waterfront Provide recommendations for potential revenues to support needed capital investment and operating costs over time Demographic Overview, 2005 2005 Bird Avenue BirdGrove East Bird Avenue BirdGrove West East Grove Grove Center North Grove South Bayside South Grove West Grove Population 4,011 1,438 1,398 1,315 1,462 827 3,079 3,428 Households Demographic Characteristics 2,205 673 562 813 752 308 1,338 1,263 Average Household Size 1.8 2.1 2.4 1.6 1.9 2.7 2.3 2.7 Median Age 35 40 45 39 40 44 44 35 White 3,343 571 1,328 1,176 1,348 777 2,796 240 Black 306 785 12 46 35 21 182 3,067 American Indian, Eskimo 8 2 5 2 1 - 4 4 Asian or Pacific Islander 79 11 8 27 19 6 21 4 Race Tw o Races 127 30 26 33 37 15 42 103 Ot her 148 38 19 31 22 7 34 10 Median Household Income $60,388 $30,748 $108,695 $74,902 $75,468 $207,807 $123,801 $31,477 Average Household Income $81,112 $45,039 $157,513 $131,183 $102,336 $275,878 $186,203 $45,524 934 197 457 463 494 275 1,125 457 42.3% 29.4% 81.2% 57.0% 65.8% 89.3% 84.1% 36.2% 1,271 475 106 350 257 33 213 805 57.7% 70.6% 18.8% 43.0% 34.2% 10.7% 15.9% 63.8% 2,205 673 562 813 752 308 1,338 1,263 Income Characteristics Housing Characteristics Ow ner-occupied Unit s As % of Total Rent er-occupied Units As % of Total Total Housing Unit s: Source: ESRI Business Information Solutions; Economics Research Associates, December 2006. Demographic Overview, 2010 2010 Bird Avenue BirdGrove East BirdGrove West Bird Avenue East Grove Grove Center North Grove South Bayside South Grove West Grove Population 4,376 1,531 1,508 1,452 1,556 879 3,314 3,683 Households 2,393 712 604 892 796 325 1,432 1,352 Average Household Size 1.8 2.2 2.4 1.6 1.9 2.7 2.3 2.7 Median Age 35 42 47 40 43 45 46 37 White 3,625 653 1,427 1,289 1,424 824 2,996 278 Black 321 782 12 48 36 23 196 3,263 Demographic Characteristics Race American Indian, Eskimo 8 2 5 3 1 - 4 5 Asian or Pacific Islander 92 12 9 34 22 7 25 5 Tw o Races 145 36 31 38 44 18 49 120 Ot her 185 46 24 41 29 7 43 12 Median Household Income $79,782 $36,745 $128,829 $98,138 $94,054 $261,741 $155,990 $37,070 Average Household Income $108,944 $52,408 $194,587 $178,716 $133,658 $370,920 $244,673 $55,660 941 196 492 509 518 292 1,214 507 39.3% 27.5% 81.4% 57.1% 65.0% 89.9% 84.8% 37.5% 1,452 516 112 383 278 33 218 844 60.7% 72.5% 18.6% 42.9% 35.0% 10.1% 15.2% 62.5% 2,393 712 604 892 796 325 1,432 1,352 Income Characteristics Housing Characteristics Ow ner-occupied Unit s As % of Total Rent er-occupied Units As % of Total Total Housing Unit s: Source: ESRI Business Information Solutions; Economics Research Associates, December 2006. Summary of Current Revenue Generating Uses • Leasehold use rents have increased 17 percent, from $1.3 million in 2001 to $2.9 million in 2005. – • Grove Harbor Marina/Fresh Market lease generated the highest revenue in 2005 with $1.5 million. Facilities net revenues (Dinner Key Marina and Coconut Grove Expo Center) have increased from $1.5 million to $2.3 million. – – Dinner Key Marina generated almost $2.5 million in revenues in 2005. Coconut Grove Expo Center continues to operate at a loss, losing more than $100,000 in 2005. Current Revenue Generating Uses 2001 Leasehold Rents U.S. Sailing Center Grove Key Marina Grove Harbor Marina/Fresh Market Monty's Restaurant Shake-a-Leg, Miami, Inc. Biscayne Bay Yacht Club Chart House Restaurant Coconut Grove Chamber of Commerce Coral Reef Yacht Club Coconut Grove Sailing Club Subtotal - Leaseholds: 2002 2003 8,534 316,344 64,721 728,241 500 5,069 104,384 3,600 24,433 84,857 $ 1,340,684 2004 $ 8,812 388,180 564,717 718,921 500 5,069 113,463 3,600 25,655 80,480 $ 1,909,397 2005 $ 7,077 321,776 851,235 100 5,069 108,067 3,600 22,162 45,148 $ 1,364,236 $ 7,720 327,891 601,689 500 5,069 117,961 2,700 23,270 52,199 $ 1,138,999 $ Facilities-Net Revenues Dinner Key Marina Coconut Grove Expo Center Subtotal - Facilities: $ 1,540,742 $ $ 1,540,742 $ 1,636,812 $ $ 1,636,812 $ 1,927,629 $ 2,209,931 $ 2,486,522 $ (94,326) $ (173,075) $ (129,184) $ 1,833,303 $ 2,036,856 $ 2,357,338 10.0% 11.1% 8.9% TOTAL - WATERFRONT REVENUES: $ 2,904,977 $ 2,775,811 $ 3,173,987 12.8% $ 3,946,253 $ 9,016 382,383 1,537,304 778,285 500 5,069 121,644 3,600 26,938 88,485 $ 2,953,224 % CAGR 2001-2005 $ 5,310,562 Source: City of Miami Department of Public Facilities, Asset Management Division; City of Miami Department of Planning; Economics Research Associates, March 2006. 5.0% 3.5% 187.5% -1.8% 38.0% 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% 4.0% 14.4% 16.7% Lease Expiration Status of ERA Analysis by Component • Coconut Grove Expo Center: – – – • Mooring Fields: – – – • Lease abstracts under review ERA analyzing other mooring facilities to determine relevant pricing rates, operating costs/characteristics and management approaches. Analyze proposed mooring fields, governance, current uses, costs, revenues etc. Dinner Key Marina – • Projected to close for public use on June 1, 2006 Not competitive with Miami Beach facility, operates at a deficit. Potential for interim uses, but long term purpose and viability are yet to be determined ERA to provide recommended improvements (such as proposed Dock Masters building and it’s relationship to moorings field). Coconut Grove Sailing Club: – ERA will analyze costs, revenues and operating characteristics including required building maintenance costs, area upgrades and improvements, and competitive position. Status of ERA Analysis by Component • Parking and Transportation – – • Transportation sub-consultant will review study and recommended uses to determine adequacy of existing and potential supply and demand Recommendations for projected parking revenues and appropriate management approaches Park Programming – – Goals and objectives include recommended uses that provide improved connectivity, activation of public spaces and streets and enhanced level of park amenities Program will explore opportunities to create compatible venues for events for enhanced public programs in the parks and serve as potential source of revenue Case Study: Pinellas County Parks ERA has conducted thorough research on revenue generators for parks across the United States. The following slides summarize that research and focus on work conducted for Pinellas County, FL. ERA analyzed revenue generation potential and the current management structure associated with the following uses at a series of County-owned and operated parks: •Food and Beverage Concessions (temporary/seasonal to permanent) • Gift Shop Concessions • Special Events/Rentals in County-owned facilities Park Concessions - Trends Summary An analysis of national contract concession agreements for food service in public venues reveals the following: • Operating terms: – • Capital investment requirements: – – – • Vary greatly by jurisdiction and required level of control. Tenant fit-out solely the responsibility of the operator (less control/less public investment). Local jurisdiction provided facilities and equipment with concessioner working under an operating contract (maximum control/highest public investment). Revenue splits: – • Generally five years with two- to five-year renewal options; terms based on performance, operating standards and capital investment made by the operator. Usually based on annual license or rental fee, plus a percentage of annual gross revenues. Concession offerings: – Range from snack food to full-service dining, gift and equipment rental shops, and venues available for public events (picnics to parties). Park Concessions – Trends Summary • In all cases, operators required to provide surety bonds, full liability insurance, and meet minimum revenue and performance standards. • Seasonal adjustments to operating hours allowed based on use patterns, requests by the operators and jurisdiction approval • Among “lessons learned” from national examples, options to extend operating agreements were based on performance and revenues, and operator investment in improvements to public property. • Concession operations in public venues are often independently owned and operated, with few exceptions in unique locations • Market density can attract branded products (like Chart House and Fresh Market) or national operators (usually for multiple venues and facilities) Park Retail Shop An analysis of park gift shop operations in the southern U.S. reveals the following: • The park gift shop retail season: – • Sales volumes: – • Most active from October until the end of May, with March and April having the highest sales. For retail-oriented shops, sales increase over holiday periods where gift shopping is traditionally strong. April tends to be particularly strong due to partial-year residents preparing to return home for the summer months. Store concepts: – Vary depending on park characteristics – activity-oriented parks may sell more equipment and rentals/services; arts and cultural park shops are more gift and book oriented Park Special Events/Rentals • • • • • • • • Themed Festivals – permanent and temporary facilities required Weddings – Venue(s), permitting standards, costs and fees Private “Life Cycle” Parties, including receptions, graduation, family reunions, picnics, etc. Cultural/Art Performances – Compatibility and facilities required Educational events Catering facilities -- On grounds or off-site Connections to Coconut Grove downtown Suggested new activities and supporting facilities in park Summary Concepts Constraints Opportunities Next Steps Next Steps • • • • • • Determine priorities for current and future uses Recommend use mix, management approach and other factors affecting implementation Project sales/public revenues, operating costs and net revenues by recommended use Address parking needs, requirements and management Prepare design alternatives Solicit public input on design alternatives Tell Us Your Priorities…