Exploration - Department of State Development
Transcription
Exploration - Department of State Development
WESTERN AUSTRALIA’S INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT MAGAZINE December 2002–February 2003 $3 (inc GST) Gas-to-liquids New game-breaker Strand lumber Print post approved PP 665002/00062 Focus on Albany Exploration Need for action WESTERN AUSTRALIAN OFFICES Department of Mineral & Petroleum Resources Mineral House • 100 Plain Street • EAST PERTH WA 6004 Tel: +618 9222 3333 • Fax: +618 9222 3430 www.mpr.wa.gov.au Office of Major Projects 168–170 St Georges Terrace • PERTH Western Australia 6000 Postal address: Box 7606 • Cloisters Square PERTH Western Australia 6850 Tel: +618 9327 5555 • Fax: +618 9327 5500 www.mpr.wa.gov.au INTERNATIONAL OFFICES Europe Government of Western Australia European Office • 5th floor, Australia Centre Corner of Strand and Melbourne Place LONDON WC2B 4LG • UNITED KINGDOM Tel: +44 20 7240 2881 • Fax: +44 20 7240 6637 Email: agent_general@wago.co.uk India — Mumbai Western Australian Trade Office 93 Jolly Maker Chambers No 2 9th floor, Nariman Point • MUMBAI 400 021 INDIA Tel: +91 22 230 3973/74/75 • Fax: +91 22 230 3977 Email: sgrinceri@indtech.wa.gov.au India — Chennai Western Australian Trade Office - Advisory Office 1 Doshi Regency • 876 Poonamallee High Road Kilpauk • Chennai 600 084 • INDIA Tel: +91 44 640 0407 • Fax: +91 44 643 0064 E-mail: kvrdctwa@md2.vsnl.net.in Indonesia — Jakarta Western Australia Trade Office c/- Australian Trade Commission • Australian Embassy JI H R Rasuna Said Kav C15 - 16, Kuningan Jakarta 12940 • INDONESIA Tel: +62 21 2550 5331 • Fax: +62 21 522 7103 E-mail: ross.taylor@austrade.gov.au Indonesia — Surabaya Western Australian Trade Office 6th floor, World Trade Centre • Jalan Pemuda 27-31 Surabaya 60275 INDONESIA Tel: +62 31 531 9123 • Fax: +62 31 531 9118 Email: lagam@indtech.wa.gov.au Japan — Tokyo Western Australian Government Office Australian Business Centre 28th floor, New Otani Garden Court 4-1 Kioicho, Chiyoda-Ku • TOKYO 102-0094 JAPAN Tel: +81 3 5214 0791 • Fax: +81 3 5214 0796 Email: marketingwagt@gol.com Japan — Kobe Government of Western Australia 6th floor, Golden Sun Building • 3-6 Nakayamate-dori 4-Chome Chuo-Ku • KOBE 650-0004 JAPAN Tel: +81 78 242 7705 • Fax: +81 78 242 7707 Email: wagovkb@mtj.biglobe.ne.jp Malaysia Western Australian Trade Office 4th floor, UBN Tower • 10 Jalan P Ramlee KUALA LUMPUR 50250 MALAYSIA Tel: +60 3 2031 8175/6 • Fax: +60 3 2031 8177 Email: eyong@indtech.wa.gov.au Middle East Western Australian Government Office • Emarat Atrium PO Box 58007 • Dubai • UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Tel: +971 4 343 3226 • Fax: +971 4 343 3238 E-mail: wato@emirates.net.ae People’s Republic of China — Shanghai Western Australian Trade & Investment Promotion Shanghai Representative Office • Room 2208, CITIC Square 1168 Nanjing Road West • Shanghai 200041 THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA Tel: +86 21 5292 5899 • Fax: +86 21 5292 5889 Email: bjzhuang@indtech.wa.gov.au People’s Republic of China — Hangzhou Western Australian Trade & Investment Promotion Hangzhou Representative Office Room 910 • World Trade Office Plaza Zhejiang World Trade Centre 15 Shuguang Road • Hangzhou 310007 PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA Tel: +86 571 8795 0296 • Fax: +86 571 8795 0295 E-mail: sbu@indtech.wa.gov.au Taiwan WA Business Development Manager Australian Commerce & Industry Office Australian Business Centre Suite 2605, International Trade Building #333 Keelung Road Section 1 • TAIPEI 110 TAIWAN Tel: +886 2 8725 4280 • Fax: +886 2 2757 6707 Thailand WA Business Development Manager Australian Trade Commission • Australian Embassy 37 South Sathorn Road • BANGKOK 10120 • THAILAND Tel: +662 287 2680 Ext 3307 • Fax: +662 287 2589 E-mail: siraphop@austrade.gov.au FROM THE MINISTER Anniversary edition R eaching 25 years in print is quite an achievement, and I’d like to congratulate all those involved in making Prospect one of the world’s leading publications on major resources investment opportunities. Clive Brown, MLA Prospect continues to be an important source of information for Minister for State Development its national and international audience. It is also a great avenue through which we can promote the many successes the industry and the Western Australian Government have achieved over the past 25 years. And what an impressive period of development it has been over the last quarter of a century. During that time, the value of mineral and petroleum output in Western Australia has risen from A$1.6 billion to more than A$26 billion now. In 1978, iron ore was the State’s number one commodity, followed by alumina and nickel. Today, petroleum heads the list, followed by iron ore, alumina and gold. What hasn’t changed is the critical role the resources sector plays in the Western Australian economy. Today more than ever, a healthy diversified minerals and petroleum sector is the cornerstone of our prosperity — and the nation’s prosperity as well. In the past 25 years, Western Australia has grown to become the nation’s leading producer of mineral and petroleum products. Now, we also lead the nation in minerals and petroleum technology and expertise exports. And the future looks positive with several important projects reaching significant milestones and others waiting in the wings. Some of those are featured in this 25th anniversary edition. I would also like to take this opportunity to wish all Prospect readers a happy and safe Christmas and new year. FROM THE DIRECTOR GENERAL I n 1978, Prospect started as a 12-page newsletter. Since then, it has grown in stature as well as size. Prospect has always sought to provide information about key aspects of the Western Australian resources industry. And not just minerals and petroleum products. Prospect also covers agriculture, wood processing, engineering, new technologies, community relations and environment as part of its brief. In this milestone edition, you’ll also read a comprehensive Jim Limerick feature on exploration in Western Australia and the steps being Director General taken to reinvigorate the industry. Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources The core aim of Prospect has always been to encourage investment in Western Australia — to create jobs and a better standard of living for Western Australians, in line with the State’s sustainable development policies. Prospect now reaches about 10 000 subscribers each quarterly edition, and with almost 8000 hits each quarter on the online edition, it continues to strengthen and expand. As we move into our 26th year, you can be assured that Prospect will continue to provide you with up-to-date information on opportunities and projects in the Western Australian resources industry. May I also wish you a safe and enjoyable Christmas, and a prosperous new year. in this issue EXPLORATION In this edition, Prospect looks at exploration, the all-important first link in the resources development chain. While things have been relatively quiet lately on the exploration front in Western Australia, a turn-around in the fortunes of the industry may not be too far away. Turn to pages 7-21 for more details. 2 GAS-TO-LIQUIDS 23 New technology from Texas could allow small and large gas producers in Western Australia to turn uncommitted gas reserves into worthwhile gas-to-liquids projects. 3 24 NICKEL JUNIORS 24 22 STRAND LUMBER Front cover: Photo courtesy Consolidated Minerals Ltd. 26 FINANCIAL MODELLING An insight into how the experts evaluate the worth of resource projects. Perth-based company, Lignor Pty Ltd, has its sights set on Albany as a location for a A$150 million engineered strand lumber plant. Exploration drilling at Consolidated Minerals Ltd’s Woodie Woodie manganese project in the East Pilbara. WATER STUDY Results of an exhaustive study to find a long-term solution for water needs for the Eastern Goldfields–Esperance region. PLATINUM The Panton Sill project in far north Western Australia is shaping up to become Australia’s first commercial platinum–palladium operation. ALUMINA Western Australia has plenty to boast about when it comes to efficiency with alumina production. Four of its refineries are among the top ten lowest-cost producers in the world. Despite mergers by several resource majors in recent times, junior nickel companies in Western Australia are proving that many opportunities still exist at the lower end of the food chain. 4 ANNIVERSARY Prospect has come a long way since being launched 25 years ago. Prospect RESOURCES MAP— INSIDE BACK COVER A subscription form appears on page 36 ISSN 1037-4590 Western Australian Prospect magazine is published quarterly by the Western Australian Government’s Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (MPR) and Aspermont Ltd. Editorial management: John Terrell, MPR Investment Attraction Division. Tel: (08) 9327 5555 • Fax: (08) 9327 5500. Advertising management: Aspermont Ltd, PO Box 78, Leederville, Western Australia, 6902. Tel: (08) 9489 9100 • Fax: (08) 9381 1848. Prospect has been compiled in good faith by the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources from information and data gathered in the course of the magazine’s production. Opinions expressed in Prospect are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources. No person or organisation should act on the basis of any matter contained in this publication without considering, and if necessary Department of taking, appropriate professional advice from other sources. The Department of Mineral and Mineral and Petroleum Resources Petroleum Resources, its employees and contracted personnel undertake no responsibility to any person or organisation in respect of this publication. www.mpr.wa.gov.au ABN: 69 410 335 356 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 1 Gas-to-liquids New technology a potential game-breaker Beyond the test phase: Both small and large gasfields and downstream processing industries in Western Australia could benefit from a new gasto-liquids technology that has been successfully tested in this plant in Texas. W estern Australia’s vast gas reserves could be used to significantly increase Australia’s supply of synthetic transport fuels, as well as other petrochemical products, employing a new gas-to-liquids technology. Described by its promoters as a “gamebreaker”, it has the potential to spearhead a marked swing from oil to gas-based fuels, delivering significant environmental benefits to the global transport industry as well. Vast reserves of natural gas exist off Western Australia’s northwest coast, some of which is unlikely to be developed in the foreseeable future using conventional technology. Texas-based Synfuels International will soon present a business plan to interested companies which it claims will make even small gasfields attractive for the production of petroleum. Perth-based Clough Ltd, one of Australia’s most experienced companies in the oil and gas industry, has formed an alliance with the Houston engineering firm S&B Engineering and Constructors Ltd that could lead to the technology being employed on Australian fields. Synfuels is successfully operating a pilot plant in Texas and a number of companies have indicated that they are interested in building commercial operations. Initially the company envisages building plants that will process 10, 20 and 50 million cubic feet of gas a day, scaling eventually up to 500 million cubic feet a day (similar to the volume piped from the North West Shelf to Western Australian markets) to produce around 100 000 barrels of hydrocarbon liquids a day, equivalent to a significant proportion of current Australian production. Synfuels’ business development representative for Australia, John Read, says a soon-to-be released business plan is expected to confirm that a 10 million cubic feet per day processing plant, capable of producing 1200 barrels of light gasoline product per day, will cost in the order of US$30-35 million. The overall production cost will be significantly less than US$20 per barrel. Mr Read points out that Australian oil production is expected to decline rapidly in the next decade, and the use of Australia’s much more plentiful gas reserves could help fill the gap. For small fields, a flow rate of a few million cubic feet a day would be sufficient to justify its use. The technology, developed by university researchers in Texas (after stumbling on it while working on an unrelated project), involves passing gas very quickly through extremely high temperatures, the separation of hydrogen in the gas, a catalytic reactor and product separation. The only waste product is steam, which if condensed and put through filters could be used as potable water — a valuable commodity if the plant was established in arid areas. A major advantage is that the transport fuel that is produced has the same benign characteristic as natural gas; it has much lower levels of emissions than petroleum refined directly from crude oil. The plant is entirely self sufficient — the raw material, natural gas, is burnt in its turbines to produce electricity and steam. John Read says that Australian companies have shown a keen interest in the technology and he hopes Western Australia will be one of the first places in the world where it is employed on a large scale. For more details, contact John Read Management Services, Perth, on +618 9227 3221or jmr@johnread.com.au 2 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 Nickel juniors flourish G et big or get out. That’s been the catchcry of some of the world’s leading resource companies in recent years. While it may suit the likes of BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto and WMC Resources to deal only in world-scale mining projects, it has presented many exciting opportunities for smaller resource companies at the bottom end of the food chain. Emerging opportunities: Junior nickel producers in the Kambalda area, like Mincor at Miitel, are proving there are good rewards in re-working ground previously owned by major mining companies. China LNG contract officially signed Important signing: In Canberra recently, representatives from China and Australia put their signatures on paper, cementing a A$25 billion LNG sale and purchase agreement between the two countries. From left to right (foreground) are Jiang Longsheng, the Vice President of China National Offshore Oil Corporation; Rod Duke, Vice President Australia LNG; and John Akehurst, Woodside Managing Director. he contract binding China and Australia LNG to a A$25 billion liquefied natural gas deal announced in August 2002 has now been formally signed. Partners in the North West Shelf project and representatives from the Chinese buyers executed a series of sale and purchase agreements in Canberra on 18 October 2002. The nine buyers are participants in a Chinese joint venture company that will import LNG into China’s first LNG receival facility to be constructed at Cheng Tou Jiao, near Shenzhen, in Guangdong Province. The buyers include China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC), BP Global Investment Corporation and seven other companies that will use the gas in power stations and for distribution through city gas networks to industrial and residential consumers. Commencing in 2005–06, Western Australia’s North West Shelf project will supply more than three million tonnes of LNG per year to China for 25 years. In an associated development, an agreement was signed in Perth on 21 October 2002 that will see CNOOC acquire an interest in the North West Shelf petroleum titles. CNOOC will also secure rights to use North West Shelf Venture infrastructure to process gas owned by CNOOC for sale to the Guangdong LNG project. To give effect to these arrangements, a new “China LNG” unincorporated joint venture will be established and CNOOC Limited will participate at a level of 25%, with each of the existing North West Shelf Venture participants holding a 12.5% stake. The deal represents the first Chinese-equity investment in Western Australia’s A$9 billion per year petroleum industry. T The China LNG contract is expected to result in the construction of a fifth LNG processing train on the Burrup Peninsula. This has been good for the resources sector in Western Australia where a new breed of junior nickel sulphide producer has emerged. They are enjoying success by revitalising mature mining operations with lower cost structures, by applying selective mining methods and through an innovative approach to exploration. Juniors such as Mincor Resources NL and Independence Gold NL, which each acquired near worked-out nickel mines from WMC Resources, are two excellent examples of small-scale miners currently doing well. A senior resources analyst for stockbroker Hartleys, Kevin Tomlinson, told the 2002 Australian Nickel Conference that six junior Western Australian companies were now among the top 20 nickel sulphide producers in the world. They are Black Swan operator MPI, which is positioned 7th in world rankings; Mincor (12th with its Miitel and Wannaway operations; Jubilee Mines (13th with its Cosmos operation); LionOre Nickel (14th with its Emily Ann operation); Independence Gold (17th with its Long/Victor project) and Fox Resources (19th with its Radio Hill operation). Mr Tomlinson said various commodity commentators had forecast a 7–10% growth in world nickel consumption in 2003 and an average 3–4% rise per annum for the decade. He said a supply deficit was likely in 2003–04, mainly because no new nickel operations were planned to come on stream anywhere in the world before 2005. Mr Tomlinson said most of the success of junior nickel sulphide operators had come as a result of lower cost structures compared with majors. They also proved themselves to be more flexible and able to adopt selective mining techniques to narrower ore zones. Also, many ready-made exploration drilling targets were lurking in existing geological files. This meant extensions to existing orebodies were a distinct possibility. Some junior explorers are using downhole and hand-held sensing equipment at the mine face to detect new high-grade sulphide deposits. Importantly, they were proving themselves to be internationally competitive. Majors like WMC were more than willing to further process the ore from junior miners and market the upgraded (nickel, cobalt and PGM) products overseas. Prospect December 2002–February 2003 3 Panton Sill Development of Australia’s first platinum mine looms I t is now almost certain that Panton Sill, about 60 km north of Halls Creek in the Kimberley region of Western Australia, will host Australia’s first platinum– palladium mine. Just over a year ago, Platinum Australia Limited with its Panton project and Helix Resources NL with its Munni Munni prospect, were vying to become the nation’s inaugural platinum group metal (PGM) producer. At the time, Lonmin, the world’s third biggest platinum producer, was funding 4 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 feasibility studies for both the Panton Sill and Munni Munni projects. However, follow-up exploration at Munni Munni proved disappointing, to an extent that drilling at the site was suspended in August 2002. Helix then ordered a complete review of exploration data gathered in the vicinity of the once highly promising Ferguson Reef. The review is due to be completed by the end of 2002. At 30 September 2002 Helix Resources reported that a high-grade thicker portion of the Ferguson Reef contained 2.6 Mt at 3.5g/t of palladium, platinum and gold. Unlike most PGM operations around the world, the Munni Munni resource is dominant in palladium, having a 6:1 ratio of palladium to platinum, which is unfortunate given recent soft prices for palladium. On the other hand, since acquiring ownership of the Panton Sill leases in 2000, Platinum Australia has increased the project’s identified resource from 387 000 ounces to 4.5 million ounces of PGM plus gold credits. Hills afar: The hilly countryside at Panton Sill in the far north of Western Australia that hosts what appears to be a significant platinum–palladium deposit. continued overleaf ▼ The new resource includes the high-grade Top Reef, which contains 10.6 Mt at an average grade of 5.8 g/t PGM + gold, and the Middle Reef resource of 5.7 Mt which averages 3.4 g/t PGM + gold. The high-grade chromitite PGM system within the Top Reef has an average overall width of more than one metre along a mainly continuous strike length of about 4 km, including an average of 1.9 metres in the pre-eminent A Block. This adds up to a significant resource, given that PGMs are among the least abundant of the Earth’s elements, with fewer than 10 significant PGM mining companies in the world. Russia and South Africa, two politically unstable countries, dominate PGM production with Canada’s Sudbury Basin producing much of the balance of world supply in the form of by-product material from nickel processing. The emergence of a new platinum–palladium mine in Australia will be strategically important for the nation, and further enhance Western Australia’s reputation as one of the world’s premier mineral provinces. As part of its bankable feasibility study into the development of a mine at Panton Sill, Platinum Australia sunk a 300-metre long, 73metre deep decline so that a 650 tonne bulk ore sample could be taken from the high-grade Top Reef. Other bulk ore samples have been gathered from surface reefs around the Panton mining leases and sent to South Africa for pilot plant testing. The metallurgical testwork and other aspects of the bankable feasibility study are due to be completed in the first quarter of 2003. Geologist’s delight: Platinum Australia’s senior project geologist, Tony Greenaway, alongside an outcrop of platinum–palladium ore at Panton Sill. Prospect December 2002–February 2003 5 from page 5 This, according to Platinum Australia executive director, John Lewins, should pave the way for a construction start-up later in the year, with production following about 12 months later. Metallurgical testwork being undertaken on the Panton Sill project has identified a new process capable of producing a highgrade PGM + gold concentrate suitable for direct feed into a refinery. This would bypass the need for a smelter, and effectively save Platinum Australia about A$10 million each year in transportation costs. Being able to produce highly concentrated base metal and PGM products on site will effectively eliminate the need for smelting, and reduce export volumes from about 50 000 tonnes per year to 5000 tonnes per year. The base metals are likely to be trucked to Wyndham and shipped to markets overseas while the low-volume, precious PGMs will be flown under tight security to Perth and then to specialist refineries overseas. The process uses standard flotation to produce high-recovery, low-grade concentrate, which is then subjected to lowtemperature calcination, followed by leaching to achieve more than 80% recovery of PGM + gold. A precipitation recovery route is currently being tested that would produce a high-grade PGM + gold concentrate and a base metal concentrate. The process also uses off-the-shelf equipment currently used in the Australian gold industry. In fact, it is similar to that set up at the Kanowna Belle gold mine, but employs a subtle variation in temperature during the calcination process to separate the PGMs and gold from the base metals. The Panton Sill operation is expected to produce between 100 000 and 130 000 ounces of PGM and gold per year worth A$80–100 million, plus 1000–1500 tonnes of nickel, 500–800 tonnes of copper and 50–100 tonnes of cobalt worth another A$20–30 million. The mine is expected to operate for at least 10 years and provide full-time employment for about 200 people, most of whom will be recruited from within the Kimberley region. Capital costs in establishing the Panton operation will be in the order of A$80–100 million. One of the interesting aspects of the project will be the provision of power. Options include extending the hydroelectricity power grid south of Argyle, using power from a proposed tidal power station at Derby (some 400 km away), using liquefied natural gas from the North West Shelf or establishing stand-alone diesel generation on site. 6 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 Peaks and troughs are synonymous with the minerals industry. Disappointingly for Western Australia, the State’s highly valued mineral exploration industry is currently in a trough. A combination of factors, including native title and low commodity prices, has caused mineral exploration spending in Western Australia to shrink 46% from A$704 million in 1996–97 to just A$376 million in 2001–02. There are concerns that, at this level of exploration, the minerals industry may not be sustainable in the longer term. Exploration: urgent rebound needed Prospect December 2002–February 2003 7 The bare facts Minerals Mineral and petroleum output in Western Australia account for 23% of gross State products and employment (directly and indirectly) for 20% of the State’s workforce. ■ Mineral exploration in Western Australia has fallen every year since 1997. Mineral exploration activity in 2001–02 was 14% lower than in the previous year and 46% lower than the peak of around A$700 million in 1996–97. Exploration in greenfields areas (defined as more than 5 km from existing mines) has fallen 63% over the last five years. Prices for most major commodities have fallen in recent years. Currently, A$460 million of potential exploration activity is associated with stalled tenement applications. Even if only 25% of this is converted to actual exploration expenditure, it would generate about 1000 new jobs, 400 of them in regional areas. ■ ■ ■ ■ Mineral exploration expenditure (excluding petroleum) in Western Australia Trend series versus seasonally adjusted data 175 150 125 Seasonally adjusted 2002 Jun 2001 Jun 2001 Dec 2000 Jun 2000 Dec 1999 Jun 1999 Dec 1998 Jun 1998 Dec 1997 Jun 1997 Dec 1996 Jun 1996 Dec 1995 Jun 1995 Dec 75 Trend Source: ABS Petroleum During 2001–02 spending for petroleum exploration in Western Australia fell by 30% (A$207 million) from A$687 million in 2000–01 to A$480 million. The proportion of Australian petroleum exploration expenditure in Western Australia declined from 66% in 2000–01 to 54% in 2001–02. 800 70% 700 60% 600 50% 500 40% 400 30% 300 20% 200 10% 00–01 0% 01–02 99–00 98–99 97–98 96–97 95–96 94–95 93–94 92–93 91–92 100 WA % OF TOTAL AUSTRALIAN EXPENDITURE WA EXPENDITURE ($ M) Petroleum exploration expenditure, WA versus Australia (Adjusted to June 2002 dollars) 0 Background In April 2002, State Development Minister Clive Brown established the Bowler inquiry to investigate reduced levels of private investment in greenfields exploration in Western Australia. During the following six months, the Member for Eyre, John Bowler MLA (pictured), spoke to a lot of people and examined a number of potential strategies to achieve a sustainable future for the State’s allimportant minerals industry. It was clear that the downturn in greenfields exploration in Western Australia was not peculiar to the State. It was a worldwide trend. While Western Australia had a welldeveloped tenement management system, a glaring weakness lurked close by. It was in the form of a legislative mismatch between the Mining Act and the Native Title Act in terms of the ability of mineral explorers to access land. Mr Bowler said the State Government needed to move urgently to allow the land access process to be like its much-vaunted tenement management system — in the realm of world’s best practice. The way ahead 100 1994 Dec Expenditure per quar ter ($ million) 200 The Bowler Inquiry Source: ABS 8 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 Mr Bowler’s vision for mineral and petroleum exploration in Western Australia is to: ■ Restore exploration so that the minerals industry is sustainable in the long term; ■ Establish a viable and significant petroleum industry in onshore basins; and ■ Improve Western Australia’s position in the world market for exploration investment. There are currently around 12 000 unprocessed exploration, prospecting and mining tenement applications in Western Australia, and the No. 1 priority of the State Government should be to remove the backlog as quickly as possible. Only then will explorers and drilling rigs return to the field in numbers reminiscent of buoyant times of the past, according to Mr Bowler. He said clearing the logjam of unprocessed tenements, along with a minor upturn in the minerals industry internationally, could inject more than A$50 million per year into the search for minerals in Western Australia. “Every effort, both of an administrative and legislative kind, should be made to expedite the granting of pending tenements that, collectively, contain exploration expenditure commitments totalling around A$460 million,” he said. Another priority, among 33 key recommendations made by Mr Bowler, is to introduce processes that guarantee that heritage issues are dealt with in a timely manner. He also recommended the availability of pre-competitive geoscientific data and analysis in order to improve Western Australia’s competitiveness and sustain interest in the prospectivity of the State. To achieve this, funding to the Geological Survey of Western Australia (GSWA) should be maintained at least A$17 million per year. In addition, the capture of geophysical data, especially in greenfields areas, should be expanded with a special allocation of A$24 million over six years, as recommended by the 2001 Fardon Review of Funding for GSWA. Such funding would be counter cyclical to the level of activity within the exploration industry and, in effect, counter the boom-and-bust nature of the exploration industry and retain geological skills within the State. A significant fiscal incentive should also be given, in consultation with the Commonwealth and exploration industry, for investment in the search for minerals in greenfields areas. Mr Bowler believes that special conditions should apply to recognise the greater risk and difficulty of exploring in less understood, remote parts of Western Australia. Mr Bowler endorsed the concept of a flow-through share scheme, similar to that operating in Canada, which provides tax deductions above 100% for expenditure on mineral exploration in greenfields areas. Other recommendations made by Mr Bowler include: ■ Providing information and guidance to prospectors and small companies, assisting them through the Native Title and Aboriginal Heritage processes to gain access to mineral-prospective land, similar to the business support provided by the Small Business exploration ■ Ensuring that the Departments of Mineral and Petroleum Resources and Conservation and Land Management are more pro-active in reviewing the conservation estate in terms of productivity for minerals and petroleum. ■ Lobbying for joint venture agreements to be free of the Goods and Services Tax. ■ Exempting the transfer of exploration tenements from WA stamp duty. Mr Bowler’s recommendations were delivered to State Development Minister Clive Brown in November 2002. The State Government will soon decide on appropriate forms of action. Quiet times: Diamond drilling at Western Area’s New Morning prospect at the Forrestania nickel project — one of the few busy areas for exploration in the Goldfields area. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Development Corporation and Business Enterprise Centres. Pressing the Commonwealth Government to ensure adequate funding in the 2003–04 Federal Budget for Native Title Review Boards and the future role and operation of “prescribed bodies corporate”. Monitoring the effectiveness of additional resources with Native Title Review Boards to deal with the mismatch between the Mining Act and the Native Title Act. Introducing legislation to extend the term of an Exploration Licence beyond five years, if substantial spending on exploration in the fifth year warrants an extension. Avoiding multiple heritage surveys over the same ground. An audited expenditure statement for annual Form-5 returns. Introducing a bond system to avoid frivolous plaints in the Wardens Court. Expanding online tenement lodgement procedures for mineral tenement applications. Increasing levels of State and Federal funding for cooperative geoscientific research in Western Australia. Removing the right of veto to exploration on private land. Ensuring that land should not be converted to a “conservation zone” without the Minister for State Development approving land-use changes under Section 16 of the Mining Act. Minerals — why are they so important? Minerals. Where would we be without them? Every day we rely on them to make our lives easier, from toothpaste that we use in the morning, from the motor car we drive to work, through to the light globe that glows in our bedroom at night. The sustainable development of Australia’s mineral resources is in the national interest, because: ■ ■ ■ Mineral and petroleum production make up 35% of Australia’s goods and services exports; Capital investment in the resources sector accounts for 12% of annual private capital investment in Australia; Australia’s balance of White knights: These are among a few day-to-day payments is critically items that are derived from minerals and dependent on a petroleum. successful resources sector. Western Australia’s resources sector is very significant in terms of the national economy. It currently accounts for: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ More than 48% of the nation’s mining and petroleum production. More than 60% of the nation’s mineral exploration investment. More than half of the nation’s petroleum exploration investment. Nearly 80% of the nation’s oil and condensate production. 100% of the nation’s LNG production. Prospect December 2002–February 2003 9 New officers to speed up native title processing T he State Government is to invest more than A$2.8 million to speed up the processing of mineral tenement applications on land under native title claim. Deputy Premier Eric Ripper, who is the Minister responsible for native title, said the funding would be used to recruit 11 specialist Help on the way: Senior Case Manager Phil Mirabella and officers who would dedicate colleague Karen Pye will soon be welcoming another four officers their time to resolving land into the Mineral Titles Division of MPR to assist in the onerous access issues. task of clearing a backlog of some 12 000 unresolved mineral Mr Ripper said the tenement applications in Western Australia. successful negotiation of native title issues was vital to stimulate mining, exploration and prospecting, and it was in the State's best economic interests to assist native title representative ndorsement of a flow-through share scheme by the Australia Government, bodies. similar to that adopted in Canada, “Respect for native title rights and the could be the trigger that Australia needs to encouragement of economic development reverse a worrying slump in mineral are not conflicting aims,” he said. exploration. “Everyone recognises that these issues Mining company chairman and former can often be resolved through negotiation. stockbroker, David Reed, told the 2002 “But, the success of negotiation Australian Nickel Conference that a circuitdepends on how well the parties are breaking initiative like this was needed to resourced.” produce a sustainable upsurge in exploration expenditure, particularly in Four of the officers will be employed by Western Australia, the target of most the Department of Mineral and Petroleum mineral exploration in Australia. Resources (MPR), while the balance will be He said flow-through share incentives were recruited by indigenous land councils: instrumental in the discovery of diamonds Goldfields Land and Sea Council (two), in the Northwest Territories, the Yamatji Land and Sea Council (two), South Loouvicourt base metal mine in Quebec, West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council and two high-grade precious and base (one), Kimberley Land Council (one), and metal mines elsewhere in Canada — at the Ngaanyatjarra Land Council (one). Eskay Creek in British Columbia and Lindsley in Ontario. “Land councils have heavy statutory Those discoveries have caused a major responsibilities under the Native Title Act upgrade of the perceived prospectivity of and it is the Commonwealth GovernCanada. ment's job to properly fund them,” Mr The basic concept of flow-through is that a Ripper said. person subscribes for shares in a What worried Mr Ripper most was that corporation, and the corporation uses the Federal funding to land councils had subscription proceeds to incur certain remained static since 1995–96. This meant resource expenditures. These expenses land councils were increasingly unable to are then renounced back to the subscriber keep up with the workload. who claims the expense for taxation purposes. This initiative by the State Government In October 2000, the Canadian Federal was in line with recommendations of a Government introduced a 15% nontechnical taskforce on mineral tenements, refundable tax credit. This credit is in chaired by National Native Title Tribunal addition to the existing 100% deduction for member Bardy McFarlane and including eligible exploration expenditures from the mining industry, indigenous and federal portion of one’s taxes. To Government representatives. distinguish it from the fully deductible The chief executive officer of the regular flow-through, investors are calling Western Australian Chamber of Minerals and Energy, Tim Shanahan, and the CEO of the Association of Mining and Exploration Companies, George Savell, both welcomed the latest government initiative to address the native title issue. Mr Shanahan said the extra money would go some of the way towards addressing the issue, while Mr Savell described it as a positive first step. “I still have reservations about the level of resources that will eventually be needed to cope with the day-to-day inflow of mineral title applications on top of the 12 000 unresolved titles currently in the backlog.” Mr Savell suggested that many more people would be needed to help process these claims within a reasonable time. Plea for flow-though tax incentives E 10 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 this new creditenhanced version “super flow-through”. In addition to the super flowthrough benefit, the Ontario Provincial Government has given a 30% bonus tax deduction for David Reed mineral exploration investment, while the Quebec Provincial Government has extended its maximum deduction to 175% for exploration in certain locations. In the Yukon, the refundable tax credit to companies has been increased from 22% to 25% for eligible mineral exploration expenditures. Mr Reed said Australia relied on mining more than most countries, especially as a means of generating export earnings. “It is clear that exploration levels are at a crisis point and, if neglected, the position could become crippling both to the industry and the nation,” he said. “There is a need to reverse the current trend with commercially driven, tax effective incentives that are proven internationally in Canada. “Flow-though shares could be the answer in Australia.” Mr Reed understands that the Federal Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources, Ian MacFarlane will be sending a government officer to Canada to gather background on its flow-through share scheme. exploration Brownfields vs Greenfields R Percentage of total estimated exploration ecent Federal and State Greenfields versus brownfields trends (1996–2001) (Based on +/- 5 km from mine sites) inquiries into shrinking mineral 80% exploration in Australia raised a <5 km (brownfield) >5 km (greenfield) 70% few interesting questions, not least of 60% all the difference between brownfields 50% and greenfields exploration. Does greenfields exploration mean 40% the search for minerals in a frontier 30% area, as opposed to that in a mature 20% mining area? Does it mean 10% exploration within an Exploration 0% 1996 1997 1998 1999 2001 2000 Licence as opposed to a Mining Lease? And at what distance (from an established mining location) should the transition from brownfields to greenfields occur? These issues were closely scrutinised after staff at the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (MPR) noticed glaring differences in figures published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) with industry trends and anecdotal evidence. What exploration companies, drillers, government departments, politicians and people in regional communities all know for certain is that there has been a major slump in Other points from the MPR analysis include: exploration spending in Western Australia ■ The number of granted tenements greater over the last five years. than 40 km from mine sites The following graph shows that (unquestionably greenfields tenements) exploration spending more than 5 km from has dropped from 1407 in 1997 to 802 in mine sites (nominally greenfields) has 2001, a decline of 43% over four years. Such declined from 40% of the total in 1997 to just greenfields tenements represent only 7% of 28% of the total in 2001. the granted tenements. This supports the concept of the shrinking area of greenfields exploration (see illustration in centre column). ■ The exploration expenditure on greenfields tenements has dropped from A$76 million (1997) to $A45 million (2001), a decline of 41% over four years. ■ That exploration expenditure in undisputed greenfields areas ( more than 40 km from mine sites) has dropped from 2.0% (1997) to 1.2% (2001) of reported expenditure on granted tenements (including mining and all other costs). This highlights how little of industry’s total costs are directed to high-risk greenfields exploration. In the final analysis, MPR resource experts found that the real future lies in greenfields exploration, if world-scale mining projects in Western Australia are to be sustained in the long term. While brownfields developments (those that generally involve exploiting small, low-cost pockets of ore close to existing mines and infrastructure) tend to maximise shareholder returns in the short term, the people of Western Australia are less likely to reap benefits in the longer term. Consequently, every effort should be made to encourage exploration expenditure in areas away from established mining operations. Prospect December 2002–February 2003 11 Prosser Inquiry More recognition — and money — needed for mineral exploration T he Western Australian Government has put forward a strong case to its Federal counterpart for a more coherent and realistic fiscal regime to help stimulate greater investment in mineral exploration across Australia. The State’s submission to the House of Representatives’ Prosser Inquiry into impediments to exploration asserts that Western Australia’s mineral and petroleum resources endowment is of strategic importance to the growth of the nation’s economy. The Western Australian Government believes greater recognition should be given to exploration as the essential first phase in the development of these resources. Being the nation’s most prospective mineral State — more than 60% of all mineral exploration in Australia is carried out in Western Australia — there is plenty at stake for WA. Disappointingly, the amount outlaid on mineral exploration in Australia has fallen by almost half, from A$1166 million in 1997 to A$664 million in 2001. In real terms, mineral exploration in Western Australia is now at lower levels than during the recession years of the early 1990s and the lowest since at least the mid-1980s. This has had a detrimental impact on employment in the exploration and drilling sectors of the resources industry, not to mention the adverse economic impact on key mining towns in Western Australia such as Kalgoorlie–Boulder, Leonora, Laverton and Norseman. The State Government’s submission recommends the development of a national mineral and energy policy. Remarkably, no such policy exists. That is despite the fact that tens of billions of dollars worth of coal, oil, gas, gold, nickel, diamonds and other minerals in the ground are strategic assets for Australia. It believes the provision of state-of-theart geoscientific data is a key mechanism for raising investor perceptions about the mineral prospectivity of Australia. The Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources in Western Australia is already marketing the State’s mineral prospectivity to the broader investment world. However, for Australia to remain globally competitive, a national approach is required to first acknowledge the importance of exploration for economic growth. 14 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 ■ ■ ■ ■ Stating our case: Federal politician Geoff Prosser with Western Australia’s submission that seeks greater recognition of the importance of mineral exploration. In total, the State Government submission contains 24 different recommendations — all aimed at removing perceived impediments that are slowing down exploration spending. In particular, the Western Australian Government believes that special attention should be given to increasing greenfields exploration. It asserts that the Commonwealth should acknowledge that declines in greenfields exploration are more than just cyclical and related to commodity price cycles. A worrying trend is that many big companies are opting to acquire known resources rather than pursue the challenge of finding the “grand prize” via the higher risk greenfields exploration route. It is time to recognise that company growth through acquisitions, rather than discoveries, may be good for company share values in the short term, but is not a sustainable policy for Australia in the medium to long term. The State Government submission also calls for: ■ 150% tax write-offs on exploration to companies with a taxable income, or dollar-for-dollar subsidies for companies that do not have a taxable income. ■ The introduction of a “flow-through share scheme” for greenfields exploration in designated regions of ■ ■ ■ ■ Australia. Basically, that means tax benefits should be transferred back to shareholders in situations where companies do not make a profit from exploration. An increase in Commonwealth funding to the National Native Title Tribunal to speed up the back log of mineral and petroleum titles required by Western Australia to ensure sustainability of its resources industry. A cooperative effort between the State and Commonwealth to streamline environmental approvals for both exploration and development projects. Increased Commonwealth funding for geoscientific research in universities and cooperative research centres. Increased Commonwealth funding for modern airborne and ground-based geophysical surveys and hightechnology laboratory-based studies in greenfields and frontier areas in order to kick-start new exploration investment. The building of seamless geoscience and mineral deposit databases — to be available free of charge to investors via the internet. Higher levels of State assistance through revenue or expenditure measures to sustain Western Australia’s already substantial contribution to the Federation. A review of the zone allowance rebate system so that it more effectively compensates for the disadvantages of living in areas remote from major cities. An increase in funding under the Regional Mineral Study Program. Next steps A series of hearings will take place around Australia before the end of March 2003 to gain wider input from industry and the community. Then, the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Resources Exploration Impediments will report to parliament with a series of recommendations in a bid to reshape the Federal Government’s resources policy — and hopefully come up with strategic measures that will stimulate greater investment in exploration, especially greenfields exploration. exploration Western Australia is home base for another big mineral explorer Technology Park, Bentley, “provided an excellent environment of entrepreneurial, active multi-disciplinary businesses that fit perfectly with our exploration style and focus.” The decision to set up an exploration hub in Perth also recognised Western Australia was still highly prospective for minerals. P erth will be the base for exploration in regions with half the world’s population as Anglo American plc intensifies its global search for minerals. Anglo’s Perth hub will control the search for a wide variety of resources in places as diverse as the Philippines and India, with a special emphasis on China. The Perth office, covering what the company defines as Asia/Australasia, will report to Anglo’s world headquarters in London. It will be separate from three other companies in Australia in the corporate family — Anglo Gold, Anglo Coal and De Beers, which manages the diamond business. The group as a whole is one of the world’s biggest mining houses. Ian Willis, vice president exploration Asia/Australia, says the decision to run a sprawling exploration program from Perth indicates Anglo American’s recognition of the great potential for exploration in Western Australia, but more importantly, its attributes as a service centre. As a city that serves one of the biggest resource industries in the world, Perth has an almost unique combination of expertise, infrastructure and stability. The other three hubs are in Vancouver (for North America), Santiago (South America), and Johannesburg (Africa). Mr Willis points out that the region covered from Perth has half the world’s population, significant industrial capacity, and a striking range of cultures. The local office is responsible for copper exploration in India, the proving of a major copper discovery in Mindanao in the Philippines and a number of projects in Australia. These include base metals exploration near Halls Creek (in a joint venture) another in Queensland, and a third on the Gawler Craton in South Australia. The Perth office will be responsible for new exploration the company hopes to carry out in China, which is seen as having immense significance both as a source and consumer of metals. The then chief executive officer of Anglo American’s exploration division, Dr Bobby Dachin, in Perth for the launching of the hub, said the regional hub’s headquarters at Major new player: The head of Anglo American's new exploration base in Perth, Ian Willis. Federal initiative Action agenda to boost exploration expenditure A Federal action agenda aimed at Total Australian Exports for 2001-02 stimulating mineral exploration across Australia will have strong $A150.5 billion Other representation from Western 1.5% Australia. Service The President of the Chamber of Resources Minerals and Energy in Western 36.7% Australia, Peter Lalor, will chair the all-important Strategic Leaders Group. He will be supported by the Director General of the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources, Dr Jim Limerick, and up to 10 government and industry leaders from throughout Australia. 20.0% Manufacturing 23.6% Rural 18.2% They and specific working groups will address many of the tough issues facing the mineral exploration industry, among them incentives for investment, native title, land access and environmental legislation. The aim will be to come up with clearly defined strategies to lead a revival of interest and investment in exploration in Australia. Creation of the Mineral Exploration Action Agenda was an initiative of the Federal Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources, Ian Macfarlane, who says he is extremely concerned that mineral exploration spending in Australia has slumped over the past five years. Exploration is seen to be the cornerstone of the broader resources sector, which accounts for more than a third of Australia’s total exports. The challenge is to ensure that mineral exploration is encouraged and given every chance to flourish. The various working groups are due to report their findings to Mr Macfarlane by mid-2003. Meanwhile, people interested in this topic are urged to access the website of the Mineral Exploration Action Agenda at www.industry.gov.au/minexpagenda or e-mail their comments to the action agenda secretariat at exploration@industry.gov.au. Prospect December 2002–February 2003 15 ...from your printer On the web... Design your own map online — free T he Government of Western Australia takes seriously its commitment to enhance the mineral prospectivity of the State by disseminating geoscientific information at minimal cost to the consumer. That’s why the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (MPR) launched GeoVIEW.WA, a web application that provides customers with timely access to geoscientific data online, and an ability to produce a downloadable customised map. It’s online, it’s free and it’s of the highest quality. GeoVIEW.WA allows you to: ■ choose your own area of interest within Western Australia, ■ decide which themes you wish to display (geology, structure, mines and mineral deposits, mineral and petroleum tenements, geophysical data etc.), ■ choose a scale, and ■ print a published-quality map at your chosen size (A4 to A0). 16 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 GeoVIEW.WA generates the map to your specifications, and sends you an email message with a link to your map in Adobe PDF format. This allows the map to be downloaded at an appropriate time to the customer. The service is available from MPR’s home page at www.mpr.wa.gov.au, under the “Interactive Computer Systems” tab. A quick visit will convince you of its quality, useability and usefulness. GeoVIEW.WA is the latest offering from the Geological Survey of WA (GSWA), MPR’s geoscientific arm, which for more than one hundred years, has provided high-quality mapping and resource information services at zero, or nominal cost. “We believe that GSWA is today recognised as a technological innovator in the field of geoscience information delivery,” said Stephen Bandy, GSWA’s Manager of Geoscience Information Products. “With GeoVIEW.WA we have taken advantage of new technologies and contemporary information-management practices to provide management of, and access to, geoscientific data. The system has an easy-to-use web interface that provides interactive querying and analysis in a responsive manner. The service is generating a lot of interest and is available to anyone who has an Internet connection.” Customised maps from GeoVIEW.WA exhibit full-colour, high-resolution images and carry supplementary and reference information provided on traditional, massproduced geological maps. Traditionally, map users have been frustrated by a lack of flexibility with published maps. Areas that span map boundaries require multiple maps. This problem is often compounded when users need to access multiple themes. On the other hand, maps that address generalpurpose requirements can become very exploration cluttered with data and legends that are not relevant to particular users. GeoVIEW.WA overcomes these difficulties by including customisation that allows users to define geographic areas and choose themes such as topography, mineral occurrence, geology etc. The intelligent software builds a customised legend so the map is not cluttered with irrelevant detail. Mr Bandy said that GeoVIEW.WA had been designed with the non-specialist user in mind. “While large exploration companies have sophisticated geographic information systems and expert personnel to operate them, smaller companies, geological consultants, prospectors and the general community generally lack such facilities,” he said. “Users now have access to a growing number of geoscience datasets, including various scales, mineral resources, titles, seismic data and geochronology, as well as topographical and administrative data. “GeoVIEW.WA utilises freely available software such as PDF reader, ArcIMS map reader, e-mail and ZIP etc. All you have to pay for is the paper and ink.” Low-risk Australia A n international risk survey has placed Australia ahead of the rest of the world in terms of investment in exploration and mining projects. Conducted by the Australian resources publication Resourcestocks and the American Investment Group (AIG), the 2002 survey rated Australia ahead of Canada and the United States as the least risky places to invest in the search and development of mineral projects. Then followed Chile, South Africa, Ghana, Tanzania, Brazil, Mexico and Malaysia which was listed as tenth as a low-risk investment destination. At the bottom of the list in places 18th, 19th and 20th positions were Indonesia, Papua/New Guinea and Zimbabwe. Survey respondents gave Australia its best low-risk marks in areas of sovereign risk, social risk, natural disasters and infrastructure. Eight good reasons... Here are eight good reasons why explorers and resource developers should choose Western Australia as an investment destination. The State has: • World-class mineral and petroleum resources. • A wealth of information for explorers. • Unrivalled potential for new discoveries. • A proven track record in successful resource development projects. • Proximity to expanding markets in Asia. • Low sovereign risk and pro-development government policies. • Government assistance for developers. • World-competitive environment for developers. Prospect December 2002–February 2003 17 Rigs, rigs, rigs Building on a 30% success rate for exploration drilling T he number of drilling rigs operating offshore in Western Australia increased to the highest level for many years with the movement of three new mobile offshore drilling units (MODUs) into the region in late 2002. The MODUs include Glomar’s deepwater drillship Jack Ryan, (picture) which is capable of drilling in water depths up to 2500 metres (8000 ft). It will operate in the deeper waters of the State’s northwest. Other MODUs heading for Western Australia are the Atwood Falcon which will be drilling for Woodside, and the Ensco 53 which will be drilling for ROC Oil near the recent Cliff Head discovery site in the Perth Basin. These will join the Ensco 56, on longterm contract with prolific local explorer Apache Energy, and the Sedco 703 rig, which has been drilling for Santos. This sudden increase in drilling activity follows a downturn in exploration drilling during the 2001–2002 financial year. Most of the current drilling activity is being focused on appraisal drilling of numerous recent discoveries. This is an inevitable flow-on effect from the high (30%) success rate of exploration drilling in Western Australia in recent years Of the 67 wells drilled in Western Australia during 2001–02, 37 were new field wildcats, with an overall potential commercial discovery rate of 27%. Two significant gas and eight oil discoveries were made. Apache’s very active drilling program includes approximately 25 exploration, appraisal and development wells in this financial year. From late 2000, Apache has been developing its “String of Pearls” discoveries with the Simpson miniplatforms in 2001, the Gibson/South Plato development in 2002, and the Victoria Platform currently under construction. BHP Billiton is actively exploring for significant oil resources in the frontier deep waters of the Browse Basin. Kerr-McGee, with Agip Australia in a JV partnership for WA-295-P, undertook an extensive 2-D program in the deepwater outer Canning Basin in preparation for two wells to be drilled by August 2003. 20 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 ExxonMobil recently commenced appraisal drilling on the recently discovered Jansz gasfield using the Jack Ryan deepwater drill ship. The appraisal of the potentially huge reserves in the Jansz–Io and other fields west of the Gorgon field is of great interest. Following the success of its Norfolk and Exeter oil discoveries in the Mutineer area, Santos has commenced development studies for the project and intends to drill a further four exploration and appraisal wells in the Carnarvon Basin in 2002, plus four exploration wells in 2003. Woodside participated in the drilling of 11 offshore exploration wells in Western Australian waters last financial year. The company is planning a similar activity level for 2002–03, and is expected to drill additional appraisal wells in the Vincent–Enfield area. While most of the offshore Hello Jack: Glomar’s deep-water drillship Jack Ryan (foreground) drilling activity has been in is one of several exploration vessels to arrive in Western the Carnarvon and Browse Australian waters recently to probe a number of exciting targets Basins, the Perth Basin has below the seabed off the State’s northwest coast. also become a centre of these as operator. Further appraisal of attention, with a significant oil discovery discoveries at Hovea 1 is expected as well as with the Cliff Head wells drilled by ROC Oil, exploration for gas in the Hovea-2, Beharra only 8 km offshore. Of particular note has Springs and/or Hibbertia 3D areas. been the success of onshore exploration Untapped potential wells in the Perth Basin, especially Beharra Despite some onshore success in the Springs North 1 and Hovea 1. The Hovea Perth Basin, there continues to be little new field is currently undergoing extended exploration activity in other onshore basins. production testing, prior to development by This is thought to be largely due to the size Origin Energy and its partners. The recent and remoteness of these basins. discovery of a 30-metre oil column by Origin Unfortunately, this is a Catch-22 situation Energy at the Jindamia-1 exploration well where unless there is initial exploration has further fanned the interest in the activity and success (as recently observed in onshore Perth Basin. the Perth Basin) there will not be great In 2002–03, Origin plans to participate in interest. Although these basins are frontier up to eight exploration, appraisal and exploration areas, there is the real potential development wells in the Perth Basin, half of exploration Drill core mapping made easy Quick scan: This new device developed by CSIRO can automatically scan and map drill cores at a rate of 500–600 metres per day, improving geologists’ understanding of ore forming processes. ustralian scientists have developed what is believed to be the world's first automatic system for mapping minerals in drill cores, with potential to save the mining industry millions of dollars. A The new rapid core logging system developed by CSIRO in collaboration with the mining industry through AMIRA International, applies satellite-based mineral-mapping knowhow to significantly increase the geological knowledge gained from drill cores, chips and powders. Dr Jon Huntington's team at CSIRO has demonstrated automatic and continuous mapping of the minerals in drill cores at a rate of 500–600 metres per day and a resolution of 1 cm or less, with further scope for improvement. The technology can also extract new knowledge from the millions of kilometres of core stored in core yards around the world. for major rewards. The onshore Canning Basin is substantially underexplored with few wells. The potential oil and gas structures of the Officer Basin have been compared to those of Oman, Russia, and the Amadeus Basin. The few exploration wells to date have encountered minor hydrocarbons. A major player with the courage, commitment and resources to adequately appraise the true potential of these areas is, however, urgently needed. Western Australia continues to be one of the most successful places to conduct oil and gas exploration, and has the advantage of significantly reduced political risk compared with other greenfields areas in the world. It is therefore expected that the current increase in drilling activity will continue into the future. “The most exciting thing is the geological information revealed,” says Dr Huntington. “Detailed knowledge of the mineralogy can contribute to grade control, assessment of mine stability, optimisation of ore processing and improved understanding of ore forming processes.” The new system has been successfully tested at the Sunrise Gold Mine in Western Australia and will be trialled at Mount Isa and sites in South Australia in the near future “We've brought our airborne and satellite-based mineral mapping expertise into the core shed,” says Dr Huntington. He envisions complete 3-D models of ore system mineralogy being easily assembled from all drill holes, mine faces and benches, and incorporated into existing 3-D mine visualisation and modelling systems. While current work is focusing on mine-scale applications, it is easy to see the value of the technology for improving returns from exploration drilling. Operationally this information could be available within just a few hours of completing a drill hole. At the heart of the system is a sophisticated infrared reflectance spectrometer that rapidly measures molecular level absorption characteristics of a suite of important alteration and rock-forming minerals. For more information: Dr Jon Huntington, CSIRO Exploration and Mining, 0408-221-934 Joe Cucuzza, AMIRA, joe.cucuzza@amira.com.au Prospect December 2002–February 2003 21 Eyes on Albany for high-tech lumber plant T Discussions have also been he Albany region has firmed as a held with potential overseas likely site for a A$150 million end-users with the idea of “engineered strand lumber” using ELS as a high-quality, plant, using bluegum plantation timber price-effective building as a feedstock. material and possibly as a Perth-based Lignor Pty Ltd originally flooring alternative in sea had its eye on four potential sites in the containers and semi-trailers. South West–Great Southern region of Target markets for all of the Western Australia. However, most products are Australia, and recent evaluations suggest that Albany overseas (especially New is the best location for the proposed Zealand, Japan, and other new plant. parts of Asia, and the United Using bluegum plantation timber as States). a feedstock, the operation will be The proposed engineered unique to Australia and the Southern strand lumber plant for Hemisphere. Currently there are two Western Australia will require such plants operating in North America approximately 1500 hectares (with a third under construction) and of wood per annum, which is one due to commence construction in well within the capability of Europe. the South West–Great Critical factors identified for the Southern region, given that proposed Great Southern strand more than 200 000 hectares of lumber plant include a suitably sized bluegums are currently under wood resource, the availability of water cultivation in these areas, and power at a reasonable cost, suitable much of which is uncomhaulage road linkages, a railway line, Strand-by-strand: Lignor’s project coordinator, James Anderson, is mitted at this stage. and access to a port that can preferably confident that his company’s A$150 million strand lumber project can Project coordinator, James handle containers. be up and running by early 2005. Anderson, said the proposed Lignor has obtained a licence from a engineered strand lumber plant would be an German manufacturer to use its unique environmentally friendly project that would construction strand lumber (CSL) The world’s first construction strand provide about 130 direct jobs and potentially technology in Australia and New Zealand to lumber plant commenced production in the another 300 indirectly. produce a product that will be known as United States about a decade ago, utilising While the key to the project is the ability engineered strand lumber (ESL™). Lignor aspen and poplar wood resources. It to sell the end-product, Lignor is working will be the first company in the world to use produces a product called “Timberstrand”, with Austrade, Invest Australia and Jaakko CSL technology on eucalyptus hardwood which is marketed as a replacement for solid Poyry, leading advisors to the global forest resources. lumber, as well as competing with other based industry, to identify strategic partners Bluegum plantation trees, currently used structural engineered wood products such and further develop markets for the for pulp and paper production, are generally as laminated veneer lumber (LVL). engineered strand lumber product. considered unsuitable for use as structural The latter uses pine saw logs, which have Lignor has also completed initial tests, in timber. However, advanced German a 20–25 year planting–harvest rotation, conjunction with the State Government and technology has opened up significant compared with just 8–10 years for bluegums. the Forest Products Commission, on nonmarket opportunities for hardwood Features of ELS include a consistent plantation marri and karri re-growth plantation resources. quality, high-structural reliability (including thinnings from South West forests. The A major component in the ELS higher strength ratings than comparable results indicate the commercial potential of manufacturing process is the use of existing products), the use of a non-toxic marri and karri resources, now used by the isocyanate binder resin. Another critical petroleum-based binding resin, inherently State Government as low-value woodchips. aspect of the manufacturing process is the high water resistance and an ability to drill, Following 18 months of product testing, steam press used to compress the waferscrew and nail in all areas of the wood. examining marketing options and feasibility thin, 200 mm-long strands of bluegum into Water, rot, fire and termite resistant work regarding eucalypt resource materials, blocks of structural timber (or billets). products can also be added to the Lignor is currently looking for a strategic The proposed plant will produce billets manufacturing process. partner to advance the project. up to 200 mm thick x 1860 mm wide and 12 This makes it very suitable for weightMr Anderson said if all goes according to metres in length. These will be suitable for bearing beams, columns, headers, lintels, plan the engineered strand lumber plant cutting into a various lumber sizes, joists and rafters in residential construction, could be up and running by early 2005. depending on clients’ needs. including outdoor applications. 22 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 Prospect — 25 years on T his edition of Prospect represents a significant milestone in the magazine’s history. It was 25 years ago ( January 1978) that the first issue of the magazine rolled off the printing presses. Prepared originally by the Department of Industrial Development, the publication aimed to keep senior people in industry and government postings overseas up-to-date with business opportunities in Western Australia. The Minister for Industrial Development, Mines, Fuel and Energy, Andrew Mensaros, commented in the magazine’s initial frontpage foreword that: “We have some of the world’s biggest deposits of key minerals, a Making history: The first issue of Prospect appeared in January 1978. Local content Big gear underlines our skill capability estern Australia’s reputation as a supplier of world-class services for the resources sector was reinforced recently when Bassendean-based Hofmann Engineering successfully completed building Australia’s largest mechanical gear. W Measuring 12.5 metres in diameter and weighing 74 tonnes, the specially hardened metal girth gear will be used in a semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill in a Papua New Guinea gold mine. The supply contract which also included two mating pinions, a girth gear guard, two lubrication systems and two condition monitoring systems was valued at more than A$1 million. Built to United States company Metso Minerals standards, Hofmann Engineering beat stiff international competition to win the supply contract. Hofmanns employ about 220 Western Australians and has been supplying sophisticated engineering components to the resources sector for some 30 years, but nothing as big as the monster girth gear it manufactured recently. Metal in the girth gear and pinion are forged, rather than cast, making the components extremely durable. The unit will be driven by two 3500 kilowatt electric motors. The girth gear was dismantled and packed into five sections prior to being road hauled to Cairns on its way to PNG. major natural gas field and a burgeoning oil search. We are entering a new period of economic expansion and we need and welcome your investment capital and development and marketing skills.” In fact, the North West Shelf was undeveloped 25 years ago, with output from the State’s petroleum industry being worth just A$95 million in 1978, compared with A$9.5 billion in 2001–02. The table below indicates the massive growth in mineral and petroleum production in Western Australia over the last quarter of a century. Commodity Iron ore products Alumina Gold Nickel Petroleum Mineral sands Coal Salt Tin Total 1978 2001–02 Value A$ millions Value A$ millions 959 277 74 186 95 57 28 27 5 1647 5099 3584 3280 2007 9532 859 258 251 6 26 271 The inaugural 12-page edition of Prospect covered a range of topics including: ■ A revival of petroleum exploration and the granting of an exploration permit to Esso–Western Mining Corporation covering a highly promising area taking in the Abrolhos Islands, 100 km west of Geraldton; ■ Possible difficulties associated with the overlapping of construction of the North West Shelf project and two new alumina refineries in the South West of the State; ■ A Western Australian Government investment mission to the United Kingdom, Europe and South East Asia; ■ A breakthrough with the Federal Loan Council to allow larger semi-government authorities to access independent borrowings (overseas if necessary) to support projects of major economic significance; and ■ A visit to Perth by the Industries Assistance Commission in December 1977 to investigate potential support for additional land and services for shipbuilding facilities at Cockburn Sound. The first issue of Prospect featured a State resources map, a spread on economic indicators and a page of newspaper clippings. Prospect December 2002–February 2003 23 Desert water may be cheap but not necessarily best option he Nullarbor Plain, best known as one of the driest and most remote parts of Australia, has been flagged as a strategic oasis capable of meeting the long-term water needs of Kalgoorlie–Boulder and the surrounding mining region. T A detailed investigation by the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (MPR) indicated that the supply of brackish groundwater from the Eucla Basin could be the cheapest option for delivering future bulk water supplies to Kalgoorlie–Boulder and its environs. Highly competitive: Alcoa’s Wagerup alumina refinery in southwest Western Australia (pictured) is ranked with the Worsley refinery, near Collie, as equal second lowest-cost alumina plant in the world. Alumina costs Western Australia still a trend-setter Western Australia continues to host some of the world’s lowest-cost alumina plants. London-based James F. King, a renowned economic adviser to the industrial and raw materials industries, says Western Australia’s four alumina refineries — Wagerup, Worsley, Pinjarra and Kwinana — are ranked two, three, four and six respectively in terms of operating costs per tonne of alumina produced. Only the Damanjoli plant in India has a lower base operating cost. However, when total costs (operating and capital costs) are taken into consideration, Alcoa’s Pinjarra alumina refinery is the cheapest operating plant in the world. The following table shows the world’s 10 lowest cost alumina producers. METALURGICAL ALUMINA PRODUCTION COSTS SECOND QUARTER — 2002 Country Company India National Australia Alcoa Australia Worsley Australia Alcoa Venezuela Interalumina Australia Alcoa Australia QAL Brazil Alumar China Pingguo Suriname Suraloco World total/weighted average cost Location Damanjoli Wagerup Worsley Pinjarra Matanzas Kwinana Gladstone Sao Luis Pingguo Pananam Capacity 1.65 Mt/a 2.32 Mt/a 3.25 Mt/a 3.215 Mt/a 1.85 Mt/a 1.485 Mt/a 3.72 Mt/a 1.3 Mt/a 0.525 Mt/a 1.85 Mt/a Production costs +Operating US$/t 103 112 112 114 131 144 148 152 155 157 175 *Total US$/t 149 153 153 124 185 155 163 198 209 168 201 +Operating costs mean cash costs for raw materials, energy, labour and overheads *Total costs are operating costs plus capital charges (interest and depreciation) Source: James F. King Aluminium Using a 10-year time horizon, Mr King forecasts world consumption of primary aluminium will increase from 24.2 Mt in 2001 to 34.1 Mt in 2012. By that date 2.6 Mt of primary smelting capacity will be needed beyond that currently planned. Total Australian production was 1.8 Mt in 2001. For alumina, Mr King’s current forecasts show that world consumption will increase from 52.5 Mt in 2001 to 72.7 Mt in 2012 and that by that date 6.6 Mt of alumina capacity will be needed beyond that currently planned. Total Australian production was 16.3 Mt in 2001. In both cases “currently planned” includes all committed expansion and greenfields projects and capacity creep at existing plants. 24 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 However, because of a question mark over the sustainability of this resource and public feedback, it seems that sourcing seawater from Esperance is the simplest option and probably in the best interest of people in the Goldfields–Esperance region. In the lead-up to a public consultation process in October 2002, consultants looked at five options aimed at meeting the long-term water needs of the Goldfields–Esperance region. Options included: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Upgrading the Mundaring pipeline to meet potable water needs for the Eastern Goldfields, with mining interests using palaeochannel groundwater to meet mining and processing requirements; Desalinating seawater at Esperance and pumping it to Kalgoorlie–Boulder; Pumping seawater from Esperance to Kalgoorlie–Boulder and desalinating it as required. Sourcing water from the Officer Basin and delivering it to Kalgoorlie–Boulder; and Developing a scheme based on the piping of brackish groundwater from the Eucla Basin, 450 km east of Kalgoorlie–Boulder and desalinating it at the nation’s gold mining capital. During the study, the possibility of delivering water from the Wheatbelt, Kimberley and mine voids had been considered, but each of these ideas was eliminated for various reasons. The Minister for Goldfields–Esperance, Nick Griffiths, said a single supply option was preferred. So why is an alternative water supply for the Goldfields necessary? Basically, it gets down to the current cost of supplying water via the Mundaring pipeline, fears about the long-term sustainability of this supply given that the demand for water in the Goldfields has been on the rise for many years and is likely to continue, and the cheaper unit cost of sourcing water from Esperance or via the Eucla or Officer Basins. The study found there is sufficient regional groundwater available in the Goldfields to sustain current mining demands, plus an additional 100 gigalitres per year, for at least 40 years. Mundaring-Kalgoorlie pipeline Optional new water pipelines Officer Basin Laverton Leonora Kalgoorlie-Boulder Eucla Basin Esperance Quest for cheaper electricity The State’s resources industry is set to benefit from proposed energy reforms announced recently by the Western Australia Government. An independent study commissioned by the State Government shows that an average cut of 8.5% in the retail price of electricity would help create new jobs and boost the Gross State Product by A$300 million a year by 2010. Deputy Premier and Energy Minister, Eric Ripper, described high electricity prices as a handbrake on the State economy that disadvantaged consumers. President of the Western Australian Chamber of Minerals and Energy, Peter Lalor, said the mineral and energy industries, the largest single user of electricity in the State, have been urging energy reform for several years. “Lower electricity prices means more investment in major projects and more jobs for West Australians,” Mr Lalor said. “The lower the energy input costs, the more competitive our minerals and energy exports are to the rest of the world.” In late November, State Cabinet endorsed the breaking up of Western Power into four separate entities — generation, transmission and distribution networks, retail and regional power — in a bid to further reduce electricity prices in Western Australia. Environmental excellence Silica miner rewarded for saving rare wildflower The Environmental Protection Authority responded by agreeing to use the “Change to Environmental Conditions” process to fast-track approval for Simcoa to mine an area known as the Western Ridge near Moora. The company also demonstrated environmental sensitivity at its Kemerton smelter operations by successfully managing potentially harmful waste streams. Waste products are now marketed as silicon fume and silicon dross and used Controlled quarrying: One of Simcoa’s quartz mining sites near for the manufacture of Moora. Inset photo shows the rare plant species Regalia concrete. megacephala. Simcoa is also decreasing its use of CALM-supplied jarrah Western Australian resource company in favour of mill ends, waste and fallen that opted to forego development of a timber. By standing in the market for mill high-grade silica deposit near Moora, ends and other waste timber, the company just to protect a rare plant species, has been provides security and economic benefit to a rewarded for its sensitivity. number of small timber mills in the South Simcoa Operations Pty Ltd, together with West of Western Australia. its environmental consultant, Sally In summary, Simcoa is to be Robinson, were joint winners of a Certificate congratulated for its environmental of Merit at the 2002 Golden Gecko Awards responsibility and its flexibility to achieve a for their package of environmental win-win outcome for itself and the State. measures in and around the company’s Moora mining leases. Parts of the Moora mining tenements, Other Golden Gecko award recipients which provide vital feedstock for Simcoa’s for 2002 were: silicon smelter at Kemerton, were of high Golden Gecko statuettes ecological significance in the eyes of the Alcoa World Alumina Australia — for Environmental Protection Authority, with restoring the botanical diversity of the the Cairn Hill area in particular being jarrah forest after bauxite mining in the South West. regarded as “the jewel in the crown”. A rare plant species, Regalia LionOre Nickel — for its “get it right from the start” approach to the megacephala, that thrives on unbroken development of its Emily Ann mining quartz along the so-called Noondine Chert project. horizon, lay in the path of a planned quarry A development. However, Simcoa chose to leave the Cairn Hill area untouched and source its quartz from less sensitive areas within its overall tenement holdings in the Moora region. Not only did Simcoa choose not to mine the fragile area in question, it succeeded in re-generating the rare plant on broken sections of rock in rehabilitated quarries in others parts of the region. The Esperance Port Authority — for its innovative environmental controls at the port. Certificate of Merit Woodside’s Cossack Pioneer team — for reducing flare gas emissions on its FPSO. Encouragement Certificate Newmont Golden Grove Operations — for its ongoing commitment to achieving environmental excellence. Prospect December 2002–February 2003 25 Economic and financial modelling Sizing up the value of resource projects W hat is the value of a mine? How much is an oil and gas project worth? The answer depends on who is making the assessment. A mine accountant may access the company’s assets register to find an answer. The banker who financed the mining operation may dig into a risk file and come up with another figure, while the jumbo operator at the mine face and the local shopkeeper who sells provisions to the miner may view the mine’s value completely differently. Likewise, costs can be viewed from many different perspectives, far beyond simple accounting procedures. For example, who pays for the wear and tear on the roads to the mine? What about the extra school teachers needed in the town for the miners’ children? More profoundly, what value is put on a construction workforce for a potential resource project, if workers are committed to a project somewhere else. To tackle this seemingly mind-boggling array of valuation issues, economic and financial models are necessary. Akin to running a pilot-scale plant to assess the viability of a new mineral processing technique, economic models are a key step in the process of evaluating benefits, threats and opportunities associated with a potential new investment. Proponents of large-scale resource projects often request Government support in building or extending infrastructure such as ports and roads. Many of these projects are in remote locations. In response, the Government needs to be able to measure broader community benefits that will flow from an individual project and compare these with the costs incurred in facilitating the project. One model that the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (MPR) uses when assessing projects is the Project Analysis System (PAS). This model was developed to undertake cost-benefit assessments of single, relatively large-scale projects with significant exports. MPR has used different versions of PAS since the mid 1990s to analyse more than 40 individual projects covering a broad range of resource industries including, nickel, iron and steel, natural gas, methanol, ammonia, urea, wood fibre and gas-to-liquids. The PAS model has two facets, comprising a financial analysis system (FAS) that derives a discounted cash flow financial 26 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 By Richard Borozdin Manager, Resource Economics Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Key concepts: Senior Economist Qiang Ye and Manager Resource Economics Richard Borozdin working together on a resource-related modelling project. analysis of projects and a project-analysis system that uses the data and analysis of FAS to provide a broad economic impact assessment of projects. Impacts assessed include royalties and payroll taxes paid to the State Government from a project plus associated employment. PAS also assesses a project’s impact on Commonwealth revenue flows by way of corporate taxes, incomes taxes and fringe benefits tax. The PAS model can also broadly show the impact of a project on the State economy in general terms of output and employment. However, for a more sophisticated analysis of how projects impact on the State economy, MPR has acquired Monash University’s Computable General Equilibrium, Multi-Regional Forecasting model (MMRF-Green). General equilibrium modelling is a wellestablished field of applied economics, with widespread application and strong influence in the Australian policy community. To capture the entire economywide effects of various mineral investment activities, a computable general equilibrium model is the ideal tool. It can be applied to a wide range of economic issues such as major project analysis, industry assistance, environmental regulation, competition policy, structural change and trade policy. The genesis of the MMRF-Green model can be traced back to Monash University’s IMPACT Project initiated in 1975. The most important and well-known product of this project was a model of the Australian economy named “ORANI”. For MPR, a general equilibrium model is essential in analysing the economy-wide implications of a variety of shocks pertaining to the State’s mineral and petroleum sector such as mineral investment booms, changes to oil prices, productivity growth and greenhouse gas emission control. The fruits of MPR’s first General Equilibrium efforts using MMRF-Green were borne recently by modelling the broad effects of changes in exploration on the Western Australian economy. It showed, for example, that a A$100 million annual increase in exploration expenditure for five years, would see 0.8% higher State employment (or about 11 700 jobs) in 2020–21. It was also projected to add an additional A$10.4 billion in investment, A$45.8 billion in export revenue, A$32 billion in GSP and $1.7 billion in the State Government revenue over the entire simulation period to 2020–21. Results such as these serve as a reminder that as we may take for granted the enormous economic benefits of resource projects, it is often necessary to back up the sector’s proud assertions with hard numbers that economic and financial modelling can produce. the big picture The Global Scene mild recovery, though consumption and investment are likely to be softer than previously expected. Mild recovery should continue but risks remain One of the key risks to this benign outlook is that the equities market continues to sag, causing further erosion in consumption and investment plans to be further delayed. High levels of consumer and business debt have the potential to exacerbate this factor in two ways. If investors and consumers decide that declines in wealth and ongoing uncertainty about employment and economic growth require balance-sheet rebuilding, households will lift savings and reduce consumption and firms will cutback on investment. Second, if further falls in equities add to the uncertainties in the economy, financial institutions, in a climate of rising bad debts, may decide to restrict access to finance, thus reducing the ability of households and investors to borrow. The world economy has been recovering gradually during 2002, driven by growth in the United States. However, early expectations for a robust recovery, founded on rapid US growth in the first quarter of 2002, have been revised down in the wake of sharp declines on global sharemarkets, uncertainties related to the Middle East and concerns over oil prices. A modest recovery should continue given generally supportive macroeconomic policies and low inflation. However, significant downside risks remain, reflecting the potential for further financial market weakness and higher oil prices due to instability in the Middle East. The outlook for the global economy as outlined in the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) September 2002 World Economic Outlook is for slower than expected, but still improving, growth into 2003 (Table 1). Another risk is that further instability in the Middle East causes oil prices to rise sharply. Sharp rises in fuel prices would reduce real consumer spending and raise business costs, thus reducing profitability and the incentive to invest. TABLE 1 — INTERNATIONAL GROWTH OVER THE NEAR-TERM (%) The Federal Reserve has signalled its recognition of these risks and its willingness to further reduce interest rates should the US economy weaken further. Actual Forecasts 2003 2000 2001 2002 World 4.7 2.2 2.8 3.7 United States Japan European Union Germany Non-Japan Asia Newly Industrialised Asia Developing Asia China 3.8 2.4 3.5 2.9 0.3 -0.3 1.6 0.6 2.2 -0.5 1.1 0.5 2.6 1.1 2.3 2.0 8.5 6.7 8.0 0.8 5.6 7.3 4.7 6.1 7.5 4.9 6.3 7.2 Annual percentage changes Source: International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook 2002. United States growth has slowed Inventory building and strong consumer spending drove a robust recovery in the US in early 2002. Since then, however, growth in the US economy has slowed significantly, driven by sharply higher imports (and thus lower net exports) and softer consumption amid rising uncertainty (Chart 1). This uncertainty has been partly driven by continued sharp declines on US sharemarkets reflecting, among other things, lower earnings expectations (Chart 2). The sharemarkets’ falls and concerns about the pace of the recovery have led to a sharp weakening of consumer and investor confidence from early 2002 highs. Adding to rising uncertainty have been growing international political tensions relating to Iraq and the Middle East. US business investment, the key driver of economic growth, has remained weak, in part because the strong investment of recent years, particularly in manufacturing and IT, led to over-capacity. While some economists have pointed out that long-term interest rates have fallen to very low levels, and thus should support US investment, to a significant degree the decline in rates has reflected market concerns about the weakness in recovery and associated flows of capital out of equities into safer longterm bonds. The outlook for investment therefore depends partly on the extent to which low interest rates counterbalance the gloom about the economy and the reductions in equity-based wealth that has caused them. As Japan’s case indicates, low interest rates do not necessarily offset a poor economic outlook. The outlook for the US economy depends on the extent to which lower equity prices and rising global tensions lead to lower consumption growth and/or a further delay in recovery in investment spending. On a positive note, there have also been signs that investment is beginning to improve, notably in terms of software and capital equipment spending. On balance, therefore, the US economy should continue its 28 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 Japan’s outlook remains weak Following the third, and most severe, contraction in the Japanese economy in the past ten years, economic activity seems to have troughed. The current outlook is for a modest recovery in 2003. Activity accelerated mildly in the first half of 2002 driven by net exports. Industrial production has picked up in response. Domestic demand, however, particularly household consumption, has remained very weak raising questions about the sustainability of any recovery. Prices have continued to fall, exacerbating consumers’ tendency to “wait and see” before spending. Lack of domestic demand has provided a disincentive for businesses to invest and consequently unemployment has resumed its drift upwards to 5.4% in July 2002. Signs of an incipient stabilisation are there, however. Shipments of capital goods, which had fallen since early 2001, have stopped declining and software investment has started a reasonable recovery. More recently, business surveys including the Bank of Japan’s tankan (Short-Term Economic Survey of Enterprises) suggest that business investment is on the verge of picking up, though given weak retail sales and rising unemployment, any lift is likely to be very modest. Significant excess capacity remains and price deflation continues to increase the real debt burden on firms and the financial sector. The balance sheets of the latter are further weakened by falling equity and land prices, restricting the ability of the sector to lend to willing investors. The outlook is for a modest improvement in domestic demand with household consumption rising and, as noted, business investment slowly recovering. Stronger import demand as consumption and investment rise, combined with the rise of the yen against the $US, will weaken net exports’ contribution to growth. Tax cuts will offset some of the negative impact of fiscal consolidation on spending. The key risks to the economy are on the downside and to a large degree external. A deterioration in global, particularly US, growth or a further appreciation of the yen, would reduce net exports. Internally, further falls in equity prices would erode fragile confidence and the precarious state of the banks. Europe Recovery in European economic growth has lagged behind that of the US, Canada and much of the Asian region. Growth in Europe has been driven by net exports rather than domestic growth with exports rising and imports actually falling. Household consumption is weak and investment has yet to recover from its 2001 slump. Recent indicators of retail sales, GDP and business confidence, particularly in Germany and Italy, have been softer than expected. Economic trends C o m p i l e d b y M P R ’s R e s o u r c e S t r a t e g i e s B r a n c h Chart 1: Recent Major Economy Output Growth per cent 2.0 per cent 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -0.5 -1.0 -1.0 -1.5 -1.5 -2.0 -2.0 -2.5 Jun-99 Dec-99 Jun-00 Dec-00 US Euro area Quarterly Economic Growth. Source RBA Bulletin Jun-01 Dec-01 -2.5 Jun-02 Japan Positive factors supporting the European growth outlook are the likely end of the stock cycle, so that production rises to lift inventories, underpinned by stronger consumption spending. The latter reflects higher wages and employment growth, and modest inflation. Investment should be boosted by improved corporate earnings and falling levels of capacity utilisation. There are a number of risks to the outlook. Weaker world growth and/or further appreciation of the Euro would reduce the stimulus from net exports. While Europeans are not as exposed to equities as in the US case, European markets have fallen further in recent quarters than their US counterparts. Further falls have the potential to dampen consumer demand and put pressure on financial sector balance sheets, reducing the latter’s capacity to lend. The German economy is of some concern, given its relatively dominant role in the Euro economy, with an uncertain outlook for industrial production and domestic demand. Weak growth in Germany would be a significant drag on Europe as a whole. Non-Japan Asian growth expected to be sustained In contrast with other regions the Asian region (excluding Japan) has seen a stronger than expected recovery in growth from the recession of 2001. Stronger growth in global trade, and in particular the electronics trade, has provided the key boost to growth prospects. However, domestic demand growth in some instances, notably China, India and Korea, has played an important role. Macroeconomic policy, notably fiscal policy in Korea, has contributed to kick-starting sustained growth. Chart 2: Global Sharemarkets to end September 2002 Index Jun-99 = 100 150 The IMF’s current forecast for the region is for a mild acceleration in growth: in the newly industrialised Asian economies from 4.7% in 2002 to 4.9% in 2003 and the developing Asian economies from 6.1% in 2002 to 6.3% in 2003. China is expected to slow mildly from growth of 7.5% in 2002 to 7.2% in 2003. 140 130 The key risk to the outlook is that global growth disappoints, removing one of the underpinnings present in the strong performance to date. 120 110 100 Western Australia’s economy continues its growth 90 The Western Australian economy showed growth patterns similar to the national economy through the past year. Western Australian domestic demand grew by 7.2% over the year to the June quarter 2002 period, underpinned by ongoing dwelling investment, higher business investment and strong household consumption. 80 70 60 This strength is notwithstanding the negative impact of the slowdown in the US, Europe and Japan, and consequent continued decline in exports. 50 Jun-99 Dec-99 Jun-00 US Dec-00 Japan Jun-01 Germany Dec-01 Jun-02 Aust The outlook remains positive, though, should the international economy take a turn for the worse, this would place downward pressure on the State’s growth, particularly if investment in the globally exposed resources sector were to be delayed. Source: Reserve Bank Bulletin The A$ remains subject to volatile international forces Chart 3: Australian dollar exchange rate against major currencies $US,Euro 0.7 Yen,TWI 75 70 0.7 65 0.6 60 0.6 55 0.5 The Australian dollar (A$) has fallen against the major currencies since May 2002 following a period of appreciation beginning in the second half of 2001 (Chart 3). This early appreciation was driven by a number of basic factors. These included: rising global growth and expectations of strengthening growth; rising commodity prices, falling risk aversion to peripheral and growth-driven currencies like the A$ and the expectation that Australian interest rates would likely rise more quickly than those in other economies owing to Australia’s relatively strong growth rate. Since then these factors have turned around and the A$ has fallen by 2.9% against the Yen, 3.5% against the US$, 7.8% against the Euro and 3.4% against the trade weighted index (TWI). 50 0.5 45 40 0.4 Oct-99 Apr-00 Oct-00 Apr-01 Oct-01 Yen (lhs) TWI (lhs) $US (rhs) Source: Reserve Bank Bulletin Apr-02 Euro (rhs) mid Oct-02 Driving these falls have been: the deterioration in actual and expected global growth reflecting the slowdown in the US economy; the ongoing falls in equity markets; rising risk aversion to peripheral currencies owing to developments relating to Iraq and the war on terror; and reduced expectations of further RBA monetary policy tightening. Providing some support to the currency has been the strong domestic growth that Australia continues to experience. Prospect December 2002–February 2003 29 the big picture Tale of two markets Expectations and concern about a sustained and robust global economic recovery continue to influence most commodity prices. While US equity markets recovered in October, they provided no crutch for the commodities sector. Major industrial commodities have turned their backs on Wall Street to focus on real actual economic performance. Commodity prices have therefore mainly floundered on the back of a lacklustre US manufacturing sector and weak business investment. However, oil and gold markets paint a different picture. Oil has been on a high, dancing to its own rhythm beaten out by geopolitical tensions surrounding the Middle East. Gold is also in another world, in limbo between its diminishing ‘safe haven’ status, equity market gyrations and hard-nosed supply and demand price exploitation. Oil price US$/barrel* 31.00 29.00 27.00 25.00 23.00 21.00 19.00 17.00 With oil prices recently running at high levels and possibilities of US attacks on Iraq, many market observers hoped OPEC might lean towards increasing its export quotas. However, at the 121st meeting of the OPEC conference in Osaka on 19 September 2002, it was decided that agreed production levels would be maintained. This decision was based on an expectation of very moderate global economic growth rates for the remainder of 2002 and normal seasonal growth in demand being expected for the fourth quarter. It is also likely that an increase in OPEC quotas would tend to have legitimised current cheating. In response to high prices, OPEC members are estimated to be producing 1.5 million to 2 million barrels per day above the current quota level of 21.7 million barrels per day. If OPEC were to raise quotas now, further cheating may be encouraged. The danger from OPEC’s viewpoint, is that if the disruption of an Iraqi war is avoided and world economic growth and demand for oil are slack, prices can fall sharply. Oct-02 Sep-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Jun-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jan-02 Feb-02 Dec-01 Oct-01 Sep-01 Mar-02 Since June 2002 the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil price has crept higher to be consistently above US$30/bbl by late September and early October. By late October the crude oil market fell sharply to around US$28/bbl on the news of a diluted, softened stance on war with Iraq. Aug-01 Jul-01 Oil — marching to its own beat Nov-01 15.00 Source Bloomberg via WA Treasury Corporation *average of Tapis, West Texas and Brent prices World Crude Oil Reserves and Production at the end of 2001 Reserves billion barrels 300 250 200 150 100 50 Iraq Saudi Arabia Production 8.8 per day IAE 2.4 2.4 Kuwait Iran 2.1 3.7 3.4 10-Jul-02 0 13-Jun-02 The conference closed with OPEC reiterating its commitment to continued monitoring of the market and to taking any further measures, including the convening of extraordinary meetings if necessary, to maintain prices within the range US$2228/bbl. With this in mind, the conference agreed to meet again in Vienna on 12 December 2002 to review the situation. Venezuela Russia 7.1 United States Libya Mexico 7.7 1.4 3.6 Source: BP Statistics Review of World Energy … beating to the tune of Iraq Energy analysts have estimated Iraq’s average daily exports for the year thus far, to be around 1.19 million barrels per day. Strategically though, and most significantly, Iraqi oil reserves stand at 112.5 billion barrels — the second largest in the world, surpassed only by Saudi Arabia. 30 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 1,700 1,600 1,500 Source: LME Cash Official 21-Oct-02 29-Sep-02 2-Sep-02 6-Aug-02 17-May-02 20-Apr-02 24-Mar-02 1,400 29-Jan-02 Iraq’s OPEC quota is in suspension but its total current output capacity is judged by the EIA to be about 3 million barrels per day, a level that could be surpassed only by two other OPEC members, Iran, at 3.85 million barrels per day and Saudi Arabia, which is capable of producing 10 million barrels per day, but whose quota is 7.05 million barrels per day. US$/t 1,800 25-Feb-02 Under UN sanctions, Iraq is only allowed to export oil under an oil-for-food program, aiming to ensure that Iraq’s oil export earnings can only be used for food and medicines — not to purchase weapons. But, Iraq has had some success in circumventing these restrictions by selling its oil under the UN program to energy traders and levying a separate surcharge (around 25 cents per barrel). The UN’s announcement that it will crack down on this practice means that Iraqi oil flowing onto the world market could increase as Iraq’s desperation for revenue grows. This would be in addition to the estimated 400 000 barrels of oil per day that Iraq manages to transport via pipelines and road tankers to Jordan, Syria and Turkey. Copper Price 2-Jan-02 The softening of the US stance towards Iraq and Saddam Hussein’s apparent willingness to admit weapons inspectors helped to ease oil prices in October. Another potential downward move in oil prices could be influenced by a less noticed, but important announcement by Iraq that it would cease to levy a surcharge on its oil. Commodity trends C o m p i l e d b y M P R ’s R e s o u r c e E c o n o m i c s B r a n c h Base metals — rough southern ride World base metal market fundamentals continue to remain less than encouraging. Following annual lows in August 2002, the base metals market appeared to stabilise and then rise again by early September. However, this was a false dawn. Hammered by fitful equity news and distrustful global economic outlooks, prices came crashing down again in early October. New annual lows were touched before staging another feeble upward assault. Lead and Zinc US$/t (zinc) 860 US$/t (lead) 550 840 820 500 Zinc, for example, is facing tentative indications of improved demand. However, as pointed out by ABARE’s September issue of Australian Commodities, so far, production in 2002 has exceeded consumption. Official stocks at the end of 2002 were forecast to be at historically high levels. Price rises, therefore, critically depend on producers’ response to expectations of strengthening demand and prices. If decisions to permanently close high-cost operations and delay potential restarts materialise, a foundation for higher prices will have been laid. Increased consumption depends of course on augured economic pick up taking place in major consumer countries. ABARE points out that rebuilding activity following severe flooding in China and central Europe is hoped to be a major fillip in rising global zinc consumption. 800 780 450 760 740 400 7-Oct-02 21-Oct-02 13-Sep-02 30-Jul-02 Lead Source: LME Cash Official 21-Aug-02 8-Jul-02 14-Jun-02 26-Apr-02 21-May-02 4-Apr-02 11-Mar-02 15-Feb-02 2-Jan-02 24-Jan-02 720 Zinc Likewise, copper depends on the timing and magnitude of global economic recovery. China is particularly crucial, where it is expected that copper demand will continue to grow on the back of major infrastructure development. The prognosis is similar for lead, though weak demand by the battery industry and high production levels are still major factors hindering a solid recovery in lead prices in the short term. Nickel prices US$/t 8,000 Nickel — weaker but still hopeful 7,500 Nickel prices have held up relatively well compared with other base metals through most of 2002. Prices have been driven largely by uncertainty surrounding production and relatively robust stainless steel demand. Nevertheless, the metal has suffered from the generally weaker tone set by the same maladies as those of the base metal markets. 7,000 6,500 6,000 5,500 5,000 2-Jan-02 1-Feb-02 3-Mar-02 2-Apr-02 2-May-02 1-Jun-02 1-Jul-02 31-Jul-02 30-Aug-02 29-Sep-02 22-Oct-02 Evidence is now materialising that global stainless steel production has slowed comparef to the first half of 2002. While global growth in the 5–6% range is still predicted by ABARE, the main driver behind this is expected to be only China, with the Japanese sector down, US flat and Europe showing only fickle growth. Source: LME Cash Official Gold — price el Dorado postponed? The opening six months of 2002 started optimistically enough for gold with prices rising from lows of less than US$280/oz to well above US$320/oz in June 2002. However, following this buoyant first six months of 2002, prices took a decidedly southern turn, flirting with the US$300/oz mark in July before getting on a generally upward roller coaster ride to beyond US$325/oz. This ride was short lived. Gold Price Stock market manoeuvrings appear to be the primary driving influences on gold’s mixed fortunes. Resurgence of large-scale terrorism in early October unsettled investors and prompted a flight to gold as a safe-haven asset, reaching highs of US$319.50/oz. However, firmer US stock markets on the back of some stronger corporate results illustrated the strong negative correlation between gold and the Dow Jones Index. Gold prices subsequently plummeted to US$310/oz in the latter half of October. US$/oz 340 330 320 310 300 290 280 270 260 Source: NY Comex 21-Oct-02 29-Sep-02 02-Sep-02 06-Aug-02 10-Jul-02 13-Jun-02 17-May-02 20-Apr-02 24-Mar-02 25-Feb-02 29-Jan-02 02-Jan-02 250 Gold is rallying on each dip in the stock market and falling on each rally. In this respect, the gold market is truly caught in a vicious trap, as on each rally, physical demand plummets. Demand for gold in India (the largest buyer globally) is extremely price sensitive and demand dissolves when prices move higher. North American and European commercial interests have now been trained, in the Indian fashion, to be buyers on dips, instead of chasing rallies, especially those rallies that are due to safehaven buying. Prospect December 2002–February 2003 31 Commissioned Projects Committed Projects for the financial year 2002–2003 as at 3 December 2002 H E AV Y M I N E R A L S A N D S IRON ORE NICKEL Dardanup — Mineral Sands Mine Mining Area C — Iron Ore Mine Cosmos — Nickel Mine (sulphide ore) DORAL MINERAL SANDS PTY LTD Doral has spent more than A$30 million on asset acquisition and construction costs to bring a new 130 000 t/a open pit mine into operation during Q3 2002. The company plans to mine 120 000 t/a of titanium-based minerals and 10 000 t/a of zircon over a nine-year period. The ore is being processed at a refurbished plant at Picton (purchased by Doral from the Japanese company ISK Minerals Ltd). The project was officially opened on 8 October 2002. Expenditure: A$30 million Employment: Construction: 60; Operation: 60 BHP BILLITON IRON ORE PTY LTD BHPBilliton and the State approved the development of Mining Area C on 3 April 2002. Mining operations at deposit C are planned to commence in Q3 2003. The product and capacity expansion (PACE) project at Finucane Island was approved on 19 July 2002. Expenditure: A$1 billion Employment: Construction: 500; Operation: 200 JUBILEE MINES NL A feasibility study based on the Cosmos Deeps ore reserve of 520 000 t at 7.2% nickel grade was completed in April 2001. Development of the decline to the underground orebody commenced in Q4 2001, with access to the ore anticipated to occur in Q2 2003. This timing will ensure a smooth transition from the opencut development, and with current ore reserves, will see operations extended into mid-2007. Exploration drilling is continuing in and around the Cosmos Deeps orebody. Expenditure: A$33 million Employment: Construction: 15; Operation: 55 IRON ORE West Angelas — Iron Ore Mine ROBE RIVER MINING CO PTY LTD A new iron ore mine at West Angelas in the Central Pilbara region of Western Australia was officially opened on 24 August 2002. Based on a resource of around one billion tonnes of Marra Mamba ore, the mine commenced production earlier this year and is building up to a production rate of 20 Mt/a. A new joint rail arrangement with Hamersley Iron has been finalised to allow ore from West Angelas to be delivered to Cape Lambert for export to Japan. West Angelas iron ore will be transported, in part, via Hamersley’s railway. These arrangements have involved the establishment of a new entity, the Pilbara Rail Company (PRC), which is equally owned by Robe and Rio Tinto. PRC operates the rail network on behalf of Robe and Rio Tinto. Expenditure: A$1 billion Employment: Construction: 1200; Operation: 330 IRON ORE PROCESSING Kwinana — HIsmelt Commercial Iron Making Plant HISMELT CORPORATION LIMITED HIsmelt Corporation, in a joint venture with Nucor (25%), Mitsubishi (10%) and Shougang (5%), announced on 24 April 2002 that it will build a commercial scale HIsmelt process plant at Kwinana, near Perth. The first stage plant will initially produce around 800 000 t/a of pig iron from iron ore fines, coal and fluxes. Construction is proposed to commence on receipt of statutory approvals in Q4 2002 with the plant being commissioned in 2004. Expenditure: A$1.2 billion Employment: Construction: 320; Operation: 80 Significant resource projects underway or planned in Western Australia IRON AND STEEL PROJECT VALUE (ESTIMATED) Hope Downs iron ore mine and railway $1050m Fortescue (Cape Preston) mine and HBI plant $3000m Kwinana HIsmelt pig iron and steel plant $1200m Mt Gibson iron ore mine, pig iron and pellet plant $500m Koolyanobbing iron ore mine expansion $100m Sub total $5850m NICKEL/COBALT Ravensthorpe mine $950m Cosmos Deeps $33m Sally Malay $50m Sub total $1033m PETROCHEMICALS Dampier Nitrogen ammonia–urea plant $900m Burrup Fertilisers ammonia plant $630m Japan DME — di methyl ether plant $1000m GTL Resources methanol plant $770m Methanex methanol plant $2000m Sasol Chevron gas-to-liquids plant (Phase 1) $2040m Sub total $7340m GAS Gorgon project $4000m LNG Train-4 and trunkline $2400m Train-5 LNG project $1600m Sub total $8000m OTHER Alcoa Wagerup Train-3 expansion $995m Boddington Wandoo gold mine expansion $500m Kemerton titanium dioxide pigment plant expansion $470m Telfer gold mine expansion $1000m Port Hedland manganese dioxide project $136m Sundry projects — at least another $5000m Sub total TOTAL $8101m A$30 324 million OIL & GAS DEVELOPMENTS North West Shelf — Project Expansion — 4th LNG Train, Second Trunkline WOODSIDE ENERGY LTD Proposals by the NWS partners for additional LNG trains 4 & 5, and a second trunkline and expansion of the Domgas plant, received environmental approval in 1998 and 1999. The LNG expansion is based on growing Asian energy markets. In April 2001 the partners committed to development of the A$1.6 billion LNG Train 4. Construction of Train 4 commenced in Q3 2001. In December 2001 the joint venturers approved expenditure for the A$800 million second subsea trunkline linking the offshore production facilities to the onshore gas plant on the Burrup Peninsula. Construction of the trunkline is scheduled to finish in April 2004 to coincide with the completion of Train 4. Expenditure: A$2.4 billion Minerals and petroleum Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Prospect December 2002–February 2003 33 Projects under consideration as at 3 December 2002 A G R I C U LT U R E Mantinea Flats — Ord River Irrigation Scheme (Stage 2 Development) — Mantinea Flats HENRY WALKER ELTIN LTD. The project consists of developing and servicing approximately 80 farms (about 4200 ha total) at Mantinea Flats for irrigated intensive horticulture which will then be offered for sale. Following an Expression of Interest process in late 1998, a consortium headed by Henry Walker Eltin Limited was mandated to carry out the development, subject to a successful feasibility study and associated approvals. The studies have been deferred pending resolution of land access issues. Expenditure: A$108 million Employment: Operation: 240 Ord River — Ord River Irrigation Scheme ORD STAGE 2 M2 AREA The potential exists for a 30 500 ha irrigated agricultural development immediately to the north east of the existing Ord Stage 1 development. The WA and NT Governments are committed to investigating the project feasibility. Both WA and NT Governments propose to consult with the local community before progressing re-tendering Ord Stage 2 M2 area. Environmental approval has been given for an irrigated agricultural project in the M2 area, but it is possible that a future proponent or proponents may wish to develop this area for other purposes such as cotton, leucaena or horticultural crops. West Kimberley — Water & Land Resources Development Project WESTERN AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES PTY LTD Western Agricultural Industries Pty Limited (WAI) was appointed in August 1997 to carry out feasibility studies into establishing an irrigated agricultural industry based on the ground and surface water resources of the Canning Basin and Fitzroy River system. Results to date indicate that there is sufficient potential to establish a 20 000 ha groundwater-based irrigated cotton industry in an area situated about 200 km south of Broome. Feasibility studies have been deferred pending resolution of land access issues. Expenditure: A$600 million Employment: Construction: 250; Operation: 3000 BAUXITE/ALUMINA Wagerup/Willowdale — Alumina Refinery/Bauxite Mine Expansion Train 3 ALCOA WORLD ALUMINA AUSTRALIA Environmental approval was granted in August 1995 to increase the mining rate and expand the Wagerup refinery to 3.3 Mt/a by construction of a third production train and round-out of total facilities. A round-out to increase capacity by 25% was completed in 1999. Commitment to build the third train is dependent on market and community factors. Expenditure: A$995 million Employment: Construction: 1500; Operation: 250 COPPER Maroochydore — Copper Mine STRAITS RESOURCES LIMITED Straits Resources is continuing efforts to define the scope of work and synergies associated with the proposed integration of Maroochydore with the sulphide development at the Nifty mine. The feasibility scope and project schedule is expected to be completed in Q1 2003. Expenditure: A$200 million 34 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 GALLIUM Pinjarra — Gallium Extraction Plant GEO SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC. In March 2001, GEO Speciality Chemicals Inc of the USA announced plans to construct a major new gallium metal extraction facility at Pinjarra, south of Perth, on the site of the former Rhodia gallium chloride plant. The facility is planned to have a capacity of 100 t/a of ‘4N’ gallium metal. The gallium will be extracted from the Bayer liquor stream generated in Alcoa’s adjacent alumina refinery. Timing is dependent on favourable market conditions and statutory approvals. Expenditure: A$75 million Employment: Construction: 150; Operation: 50 GOLD Boddington — Gold Mine (Wandoo Expansion) BGM MANAGEMENT COMPANY PTY LTD Boddington Gold Mine (BGM) is now managed by BGM Management Company Pty Ltd on behalf of Newmont, AngloGold and Newcrest. BGM has environmental approval to expand the Wandoo project, based on mining the extensive bedrock that underlies the mined-out oxide resource. The project includes a dedicated 100 MW gas-fired power station. Project go-ahead will be subject to commercial factors. Expenditure: A$500 million Employment: Construction: 450; Operation: 600 Telfer — Gold Mine (Expansion) NEWCREST MINING LIMITED Conceptual studies for the Telfer expansion have identified a large low-grade resource (up to 200 Mt of sulphide and 50 Mt of oxide ore) adjacent to Newcrest’s suspended (October 2000) mine pit. Newcrest intends to commence construction of the mine extension in late 2002. The expected life of the expansion should go beyond 2017. Newcrest is investigating the potential for exporting copper as a metal instead of concentrate. A final decision will be made by the end of 2002. Expenditure: A$1 billion Employment: Construction: 1200; Operation: 620 H E AV Y M I N E R A L S A N D S Jangardup South — Mineral Sands Mine CABLE SANDS (WA) PTY LTD Cable Sands has outlined a titanium minerals orebody adjacent to D’Entrecasteaux National Park. Feasibility and environmental studies are underway. A formal proposal to mine has been put to Government. The proposal is subject to an environmental impact assessment which has been set at the ERMP level. The environmental impact statement is expected to be released in the first half of 2003. Expenditure: A$40 million Employment: Construction: 100; Operation: 50 Kemerton — Titanium Dioxide Pigment Plant Expansion MILLENNIUM INORGANIC CHEMICALS LTD Millennium proposes a major expansion of its Kemerton titanium dioxide pigment plant to 190 000 t/a. The EPA approved the proposal in April 1999. A decision to proceed is dependent on market factors. Expenditure: A$470 million Employment: Construction: 500; Operation: 200 Kwinana — Titanium Dioxide Pigment Plant Expansion TIWEST JOINT VENTURE Environmental approval for the staged expansion of the pigment plant capacity to 180 000 t/a has been given. A decision to proceed with further stages within this expansion is dependent on improved market conditions. Employment: Construction: 108; Operation: 98 INFRASTRUCTURE Oakajee — Oakajee Deepwater Port & Industrial Estate STATE GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE The WA Government has established the economic, environmental and technical feasibility of developing an industrial estate and associated deepwater port at Oakajee, about 20 km north of Geraldton. Land has been acquired for the core area and acquisition of land for the buffer zone is continuing. The initial users of the industrial estate and port will be major Mid West resource projects. A commitment to proceed with the port development will be dependent on an agreement, with a major customer, on the terms and conditions of use. Expenditure: A$221 million Employment: Construction: 150; Operation: 10 IRON ORE Hope Downs — Iron Ore Mine HOPE DOWNS LIMITED Hancock and Kumba have completed a feasibility study of the Hope Downs project. The alliance is now progressing project finance, joint venture and market agreements. Expenditure: A$1.05 billion Employment: Construction: 500; Operation: 300 Koolyanobbing — Expansion — Iron Ore Mine PORTMAN LIMITED Portman is proposing to increase iron ore production at its Koolyanobbing operations to 6 Mt/a in the next few years through the development of deposits located at Mt Jackson and Windarling, 50 to 100 km north of Koolyanobbing. Mining of these areas may commence in early 2003. A new railway connecting the northern deposits to Koolyanobbing is being considered. The company is seeking environmental approval to proceed with the expansion. Expenditure: A$100 million Employment: Construction: 120; Operation: 35 Nammuldi — Iron Ore Mine HAMERSLEY IRON PTY LIMITED Hamersley Iron intends developing iron ore deposits near its current Brockman No 2 iron ore mine, 55 km northwest of Tom Price. Environmental approval was granted in November 2000. The Nammuldi deposits will produce Marra Mamba lump and fine ores either as stand-alone products, or for incorporation into the Hamersley blend, depending upon market conditions. The existing Brockman No 2 loadout facilities and rail spur will be used to transport the ore from the mine. Production is likely to commence at 2 to 3 Mt/a with potential expansion of up to around 20 Mt/a as demand dictates. Development timing is dependent on customer acceptance of Nammuldi trial shipments and prevailing market conditions. Prefeasibility studies were completed in late 2002. IRON ORE PROCESSING Fortescue (Cape Preston) — Mine and HBI Plant AUSTEEL PTY LTD The Austeel consortium is promoting a 3.85 Mt/a EAF steelmaking project, utilising the Fortescue magnetite deposits. The Austeel plan is to produce slab, hot-rolled and cold-rolled coil and galvanised steel at a new plant in Newcastle, NSW, that will receive its feed from a new iron ore mine and HBI production facility at Fortescue. Processing in WA includes magnetic concentration, pelletising and DRI processes. HBI will be shipped to Newcastle through new port facilities at Cape Preston. Environmental impact assessment for the mine to HBI stage commenced in late 2000. Other projects based on the Fortescue deposits (being promoted by parent company Mineralogy) involve an export DRI/slab project and an export pellet project. Expenditure: A$3 billion Employment: Construction: 5000; Operation: 1050 Mt Gibson — Iron Pellet Plant MT GIBSON IRON LTD Mount Gibson Iron Ltd is proposing a small export iron ore development of 1.5 to 2 Mt/a. The initial operation will be based on the company’s Tallering Peak deposits, although its Mt Gibson deposits could also be mined later. Mount Gibson also plans to conduct feasibility studies into value-adding products such as pig iron. The total investment with value-adding products being developed could be as much as A$500 million. Expenditure: A$500 million KAOLIN Thangoo (100km SSE of Broome) — Kaolin Mine MANSFIELD MINING NL A major kaolin deposit, to be mined by Mansfield Mining NL as the Eaglehawk Kaolin Project, is situated on Thangoo pastoral station about 100 km south-southeast of Broome in the West Kimberley. It is one of Western Australia’s few high-grade deposits, with proven reserves of around 410 Mt. The quality of the resource has been verified by independent bodies (CSIRO, universities in Qld and SA). Once operating, the A$90 million project could produce and export 700 000 t/a of kaolin and byproduct minerals such as silica sand, ilmenite and leucoxene. Expenditure: A$90 million Employment: Construction: 50; Operation: 130 LEAD Wiluna (Magellan) — Lead Mine MAGELLAN METALS PTY LTD The project is based on a lead carbonate (cerussite) deposit 30 km west of Wiluna. The company expects to mine 950 000 t/a of ore to yield 100 000 t/a of concentrate. Magellan is developing this project in association with Ivernia West Plc, an Irish resource company. Construction is projected to commence in Q3 2003. The plan is to export more than 50% of production as a concentrate. Expenditure: A$23 million Employment: Construction: 150; Operation: 80 MANGANESE Port Hedland (Boodarie) — Manganese Dioxide Project — Stage 1 HITEC ENERGY LIMITED HiTec Energy Limited proposes to produce manganese sulphate and electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD) at Boodarie, near Port Hedland. It will be a staged development, with first production levels being 25 000 t/a, with an expected rise to 50 000 t/a. It will use ore from Consolidated Minerals’ Woodie Woodie manganese mine in the East Pilbara, about 400 km east-southeast of Port Hedland. Expenditure: A$136 million Employment: Operation: 115 METHANOL Burrup Peninsula — Methanex Methanol Plant METHANEX Methanex is considering the establishment of a 5 Mt/a methanol plant on the Burrup Peninsula. Feasibility and approvals work have commenced for a decision on the project by Q1 2003. Expenditure: A$2 billion Employment: Construction: 1000; Operation: 150 Burrup Peninsula — Methanol Plant GTL RESOURCES PLC GTL Resources proposes to build a plant to produce 1 Mt/a of methanol from mid-2005. The plant will be situated at Withnell East on the Burrup Peninsula. On 17 October 2001, GTL Resources signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Apache Corporation, Globex Energy Inc and Santos Ltd for the purchase of 108 TJ/d of natural gas to supply the plant. Products will be sold to Swiss company Vitol for trading on international markets. Expenditure: A$770 million Employment: Construction: 500; Operation: 60 NICKEL Mt Keith — Nickel Mine WMC RESOURCES LTD WMC Resources is reviewing options to expand its Mt Keith operations from 11 Mt/a to 14.3 Mt/a by the second half of 2004, and then possibly to a mill throughput of 16 Mt/a later in the project development. A feasibility study into the preferred expansion options is expected to be completed by the end of 2002. Options for expanding its output at its Kwinana refinery are also being evaluated. Expenditure: A$200 million Ravensthorpe — Nickel Mine BHP BILLITON — RAVENSTHORPE NICKEL OPERATIONS PTY LTD BHP Billiton is currently evaluating the production of approximately 180 000 t/a of mixed nickel/cobalt hydroxide that contains at least 45 000 t/a of nickel and 1800 t/a of cobalt to be processed at QNI’s Yabulu refinery in Queensland. The definition phase has been extended to December 2002 to undertake further pilot scale testing and plant optimisation modelling. The project is then expected to move, subject to the results of the definition phase, into the engineering stage which is due to be completed by mid 2003. Expenditure: A$950 million Employment: Construction: 1000; Operation: 300 Sally Malay — Nickel Project SALLY MALAY MINING LIMITED Sally Malay Mining recently secured US$5 million project financing and signed a life-of-mine concentrate offtake agreement with the Chinese resource giants Jinchuan Group and Sino Mining International. In Q3 2002 the company awarded the stage 1 (optimisation) EPCM contract to Roche Mining/JR Pty Ltd. The company is aiming to commission the mine and process plant in Q4 2003. The project proponents plan to employ both opencut and underground mining methods to extract the ore, which will be processed via a 535 000 t/a mill. A bulk nickel/copper/cobalt concentrate will be shipped by road and exported through the upgraded Port of Wyndham. The project is expected to have a mine life of 5.5 years on current resource estimates. Expenditure: A$50 million Employment: Construction: 150; Operation: 120 OIL & GAS DEVELOPMENTS Gorgon (Carnarvon Offshore Basin) — Gas and Condensate Field CHEVRON AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. A range of alternative development scenarios is currently being examined. The restricted use of Barrow Island will be considered after a public review of environmental, social, economic and strategic aspects as part of an evaluation by Government. Potential markets include domestic gas consumers in Western Australia and value-adding gas processing consumers such as LNG or GTL. Gas reserves have been enhanced by positive results from an exploration program in the West Gorgon area. Development decisions by the Gorgon joint venturers will be subject to market commitments. Expenditure: A$4 billion Employment: Construction: 2000; Operation: 120 Macedon/Pyrenees (Carnarvon Offshore Basin) — Oil/Gas Fields BHP BILLITON PETROLEUM PTY LTD These are two adjacent, but separate offshore hydrocarbon fields within the West Muiron structure, about 50 km north of Exmouth. The Macedon gas field was discovered in 1992 by the West Muiron-3 well with a follow-up appraisal campaign in 1994. The Pyrenees oil and gas field was discovered in 1993. There are no immediate plans to develop the Pyrenees oilfield. Pyrenees and Macedon are under consideration for domestic market opportunities. Employment: Construction: 35; Operation: 5 North West Shelf — Project Expansion — 5th LNG Train WOODSIDE ENERGY LTD Proposals by the NWS partners, for LNG train 5 and a second trunkline, and expansion of the Domgas plant, received environmental approval in 1998 and 1999. The LNG expansion is based on growing Asian energy markets. In April 2001 the partners committed to development of the A$1.6 billion LNG Train 4. Train 5 development is contingent on future market conditions. Expenditure: A$1.6 billion Scarborough (Carnarvon Offshore Basin) — Gas Field ESSO AUSTRALIA LTD The field is located in 900 metres of water, 300 km offshore in the Carnarvon Basin. Development will depend on reserves proving up to 7 to 11 Tcf of gas. Further evaluation work is being undertaken, but currently there are no near to mid-term development plans. Scott Reef/Brecknock (Browse Basin) — Gas Fields WOODSIDE ENERGY LTD The latest exploration is focussed on Brecknock South-1 in WA-33-P where a 167 metre hydrocarbon column over a single interval in the primary reservoir objective has been found, a result that was at the high end of expectations. The water depth is 420 metres. In February 2001, the recoverable reserves for the Scott Reef/Brecknock project were upgraded to 20.49 Tcf of gas and 311 million barrels of condensate after multi-disciplinary studies incorporating the results of drilling at Brecknock South. The fields are considered commercially viable in the future, but await firm development plans dependent on significant growth in domestic gas and LNG markets. Tern/Petrel (Bonaparte Offshore Basin) — Gas Field SANTOS LIMITED The offshore Petrel gas field, discovered in 1969, is located about 250 km west of Darwin on the WA/NT seabed border in the Bonaparte Basin. The offshore Tern gas field, discovered in 1971, is located about 300 km west of Darwin in WA waters in the Bonaparte Basin. Field development options include installation of unmanned offshore production platforms with a pipeline to a gas treatment plant south of Darwin. The development possibilities for these fields have been enhanced by recent significant discoveries by other parties nearby which may provide tie-in potential for Petrel and Tern to service domestic gas customers. Whicher Range (Perth Onshore Basin) — Gas Field AMITY OIL NL The Whicher Range gas field, located 21 km south of Busselton, was discovered in 1968. The four wells drilled to date have confirmed a significant-sized gas field, but gas flow rates have been subcommercial. Recent work by Amity Oil to increase gas flow rates from the extremely tight sands, including high pressure injection of carbon dioxide, Prospect December 2002–February 2003 35 Projects under consideration as at 3 December 2002 has increased the possibility of commercial development. Amity is presently holding discussions with interested parties to take a farm-in position to assist in funding expenditure of up to A$9 million on a new well (Whicher Range-5). If a commercial gas flow is obtained, the well would be completed for production. Woollybutt (Carnarvon Offshore Basin) — Oil Field Development AGIP AUSTRALIA LIMITED The Woollybutt development plan comprises the reentry and sidetracking of two of the existing three wells to drill two horizontal production sections, each 500 metres in length. Produced oil will be exported via a shuttle tanker arrangement. The joint venture partners have signed an agreement for the provision of a leased FPSO vessel. First oil is planned for Q1 2003 at an estimated (gross) production rate of 35 000 barrels per day. Expenditure: A$100 million PETROCHEMICALS/CHEMICALS Barrow Island — Gas to Liquids Fuels SASOL CHEVRON GLOBAL JOINT VENTURE Sasol Chevron is considering Australia as a location for a plant to produce environmentally clean diesel fuel from natural gas. This gas-to-liquids (GTL) fuels plant would initially produce about 30 000 barrels a day, of which 22 700 barrels would be diesel and the rest naphtha and LPG. Future expansions would provide up to 200 000 barrels a day to supply both Australian and South East Asian markets with total investments of $10 billion and utilising around 20 Tcf of gas over the 25-year design life. Likely locations for the plant are the North West of Western Australia or the Northern Territory. Expenditure: A$2.04 billion Employment: Construction: 2500; Operation: 200 Burrup Peninsula — Ammonia Plant BURRUP FERTILISERS PTY LTD Burrup Fertilisers plans to develop an ammonia plant at King Bay/Hearson Cove industrial area on the Burrup Peninsula, near Karratha. Around 760 000 t/a of liquid ammonia will be produced and exported to India for the manufacture of ammonium phosphate fertilisers. The company has concluded a bankable feasibility study and is well advanced in negotiations with government agencies on land tenure, water and port infrastructure. Environmental and Aboriginal Heritage approvals and Native Title agreements have been obtained. SNC-Lavalin Australia Pty Ltd, was appointed the EPC management contractor for the project. The Harriet Joint Venture has entered into an agreement to supply 82 TJ/d of natural gas to the project. Construction is scheduled to start up in Q1 2003. Expenditure: A$630 million Employment: Construction: 500; Operation: 60 Burrup Peninsula near Karratha. DME is used as an aerosol propellant and is a likely future environmentally clean fuel for the power generation and transportation industries. The proposed plant will produce methanol for conversion into 1.7 Mt/a of DME from around 220 TJ/d natural gas. Detailed feasibility studies are underway. Environmental consultant, PPK Environmental and Infrastructure Pty Ltd, has commenced work on obtaining environmental approval for the project. A commitment to proceed is expected in the latter half of 2003. When a project go-ahead is given, the plant could be operating in late 2006. Expenditure: A$1 billion Employment: Construction: 1000; Operation: 150 P L AT I N U M G R O U P M E TA L S Halls Creek — Panton Sill-Platinum Project PLATINUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED The Panton platinum-palladium project is located 60 km north of Halls Creek in the Kimberley. It will be an open cut and underground mine operation, and it is expected to have a mine life of 11 years. The proposed high-grade plant will consist of crushing, milling and flotation to produce a final flotation concentrate. It is proposed that 650 000 tonnes per annum will be processed through the plant. Platinum Australia anticipates construction to commence in 2003. Expenditure: A$80 million Munni Munni — Platinum Deposit HELIX RESOURCES NL Helix Resources NL and UK-based Lonmin PLC, the third largest PGM producer in the world, announced a joint venture covering the Munni Munni PGM deposit with Lonmin to provide A$8 million in funding to October 2002 in return for 50% equity in the project. At the end of September 2001 the indicated resource was 9.2 Mt at 2.9 g/t combined platinum, palladium, rhodium, and gold, 0.2% nickel, and 0.3% copper. Preliminary mining studies suggested a mining rate of combined open cut and underground production of 1.5 Mt/a. Extensive drilling was undertaken to add to the resource with work in early 2002 revealing the deposit was not a typical layered PGM intrusion, with the western and eastern margins bounded by steeply dipping faults. In the September quarter of 2002 a A$2 million diamond drilling program was begun to test for feeder zones and downplunge extensions of the Ferguson Reef. The company will then decide whether to proceed with a feasibility study. RARE EARTHS Mt Weld — Rare Earths Operations LYNAS CORPORATION LTD Environmental approval has been granted to mine 100 to 150 000 t/a of ore at Mt Weld leading to up to 40 000 t/a of 40% concentrates to produce up to 13 000 t/a REO. Lynas intends to sell 30-40% of product as mixed REO carbonate, produced in Australia, with the balance of the material shipped to China for separation and on-sale. Lynas will own and market the output through its Rare Earths Direct brand. Expenditure: A$55 million Employment: Construction: 100; Operation: 30 TIMBER Flynn Drive — Laminated Veneer Lumber Plant WESBEAM PTY LTD WESBEAM Pty Ltd has reached an agreement with the State, which has been ratified by Parliament, for the development of an A$80 million laminated veneer lumber (LVL) plant at Flynn Drive, Neerabup. LVL is prepared by peeling pine logs into sheets, then re-aligning and gluing them to produce very strong engineered wood products. Timber feedstocks will be pine trees harvested from State Government- owned plantations in Gnangara and other areas. The project will sell LVL and veneers to Australian and overseas markets. Expenditure: A$80 million Employment: Construction: 200; Operation: 160 Name Position Organisation Address Burrup Peninsula — Ammonia Urea Plant DAMPIER NITROGEN Agrium Inc of Canada, Plenty River Corporation Ltd, Thiess Pty Ltd and Krupp Uhde GmbH of Germany have signed a Project Development Agreement to complete a bankable feasibility study for the construction of a A$900 million ammonia and urea plant on the Burrup Peninsula near Karratha. The world-scale plant will produce around 1.2 Mt/a of granular urea and 100 000 t/a of ammonia. Urea is widely used as a fertiliser, while ammonia is used in fertilisers, explosives and as a chemical feedstock. Expenditure: A$900 million Employment: Construction: 1000; Operation: 130 Burrup Peninsula — Dimethyl Ether Project JAPAN DME LTD. Japan DME Ltd, a joint venture of Japanese companies comprising Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Itochu Corporation, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and JGC Corporation, plans to develop a world-scale dimethyl-ether (DME) plant on the 36 Prospect December 2002–February 2003 Type of business Phone number Email Please tick the appropriate box Please add me to your mailing list to receive Western Australian Prospect. I would like to take out my subcription for one year at c $12 (incl. GST) c two years at $22 (incl. GST) c three years at $32 (incl. GST) My cheque made out to the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources, is enclosed or please debit the amount to my credit card using the following details: Type of card: c Visa c Bankcard c Mastercard Credit card number This form will become a tax invoice for GST purposes when payment is made Expiry date Change of address (please mark the changes you require on one of your old labels). Please photocopy or cut coupon and mail to: Prospect subscriptions • Information Centre, Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Mineral House, 100 Plain Street, East Perth, Western Australia 6004 Major Resource Development Projects: Western Australia As at December 2002 Loxton Shoals N Troubador N Bard N N Sunrise N Kelp Deep Jahal Chudditch O Kuda Tasi O Laminaria East ! N Buffalo OO Krill O Elang-Kakatua ExeterO Norfolk Mutineer OO Hermes Montague Egret ! OPitcairn Eaglehawk ! Lambert O O Capella u uAngel u ! Cossack Perseus u u North !Wanaea Gaea ! Legendre North Dockrell u u Rankin u Goodwyn ! Echo/Yodel u u Legendre South Burrup Keast ; Tidepole N Io Urania @ Ammonia N ;Dixon/West Dixon N Jansz N Saffron @ Ammonia-urea N Iago/N Tryal Rocks N Geryon Reindeer N @ Dimethyl Ether u Wilcox u Caribou @ Synthetic Fuels Corvus N Maenad Orthrus and Lubricants Wandoo ! NN Chrysaor/Dionysus Tusk u O @LNG u West Tryal Rocks Oryx O O Stag @Methanol N Chamois Campbell u John Brookes N Sinbad Cape Lambert Wonnich ; Linda u Ulidia N Gorgon u N NN Lee Baker/Josephine/ q Maitland N Bambra q Harriet Dampier O u Monty/Rose ! Spar N Agincourt ! !uO! O s Dampier salt O Gipsy/North Gipsy Simpson Rosette/Tanami Karratha East Spar N N Narvik Barrow Island O Woollybutt O n Radio Hill ! Pasco I Fortescue K Munni Munni I ! Flinders Shoal Austeel DRI/HBI Chinook/Scindian Chervil Griffin O ! South Chervil O ! Nasutus Coniston O ! Nimrod N Australind O Novara ! u Cadell Yammaderry !! Crest Enfield O Vincent O Pyrenees OOuttrimCowle! Saladin Laverda! N ! ! Skate N ; Blencathra ! Roller ScafellMacedon CoasterO I Robe River O s Onslow Leatherback N Tubridgi INSET B N Hingkip ! Bayu-Undan OliverN Tenacious N Audacious ! O Jabiru Maple N Challis O Puffin O N Swan OTalbot Padthaway Tahbilk NO Montara N N Crux Petrel N u Prometheus/Rubicon N Tern Dinichthys Gorgonichthys N N Scott Reef O Cornea N Titanichthys NN Brewster N Brecknock N Brecknock South Blacktip N ! Gwydion Turtle O b Mitchell Plateau Ord Stage 2-M2 Wyndham q e lin sP ipe am pie rN atu ral Ga I Cockatoo Island Pe rt h-D KIMBERLEY Argyle d N Point Torment Derbyq Lloyd Nammuldi/Silvergrass I Brockman No. 2 I O Rough Range 0 100 O Boundary West Terrace OO Sundown O d Ellendale Blina Broome q Sally Malay n Panton Sill K Z Pillara Zn Pb 200 km 6 West Kimberley Kapok Zn Pb Z RESOURCE SYMBOLS SEE INSET B Port Hedland qs Port Hedland Salt Scarborough N Boodarie HBI Y y Hitec EMD I Yarrie Z Whim Creek Cu Wodgina t Z Panorama Zn Cu Nifty Cu Woodie Woodier Z j Telfer Au Cu PILBARA rAnt Hill Z Maroochydore Cu Co Marillana Creek Yandi/BHPB Marandoo I I Yandicoogina/HI Tom Price I I Mining Area C II Hope Downs Ridge West IRhodes Orebody 23 & 25 Paraburdoo I Angelas I Eastern Range I Giles Mini I I III Orebody 18 ChannarI Jimblebar Mt Whaleback j c Coobina Mt Olympus Lake MacLeod qx Lake MacLeod s Carnarvon Plutonic j Shark Bay qs Jundee/Nimary Magellan Pb Z Wiluna j Honeymoon Well n Bluebird Weld Range I j j n Mt Keith Gidgee j Yakabindie n j Bronzewing/Mt McClure Cosmos n Leinster Hill 50 Bulchina Agnew n j Darlot j Port Gregory j j Lawlers j j Thunderbox I Tallering Peak G V Windimurra Murrin Oakajee Tarmoola j Murrin Granny Smith q Z Golden Grove Zn Cu n j P Mt Weld GeraldtonqJ Narngulu Synthetic Rutile Sons of Gwalia j R Mount Horner j Sunrise Dam Yardarino Nu Koolanooka I Hovea OODongara Three Springs Cliff Head O m T Dongara Davyhurst I Beharra SpringsN Mt Gibson Windarling Range j Eneabba Woodada u m I Goongarrie n Carosue Dam Cawse Paddington j Mt Jackson I Lady Ida j n n Black Swan Kanowna Belle j Mt Pleasant j j Koolyanobbing I n Bulong Kundana jjj Super Cooljarloo m Pit Frogs Leg j Binduli v Kalgoorlie Ni Smelter SEE INSET A New Celebrationj j Jubilee Marvel Loch/ n Kambalda St Ives Southern Cross j j Yilgarn Star j Miitel n t Bald Hill Big Bell j j Dalgaranga Kwinana/Rockingham q AIS Jetty a Alumina Refinery @ BP Oil Refinery C Cement and Lime @ Chlor Alkali @ Chemicals @ Chemicals/ @ @ Y @ v 8 @ J @ Fertilizers Fused Alumina Fused Zirconia HIsmelt LPG Nickel Refinery Power Station Sodium Cyanide Titanium Pigment Zirconia INSET A Chandala J Synthetic Rutile 1 Neerabup • PERTH qFremantle 0 50km a Pinjarra ab Huntly j PERTH• Kemerton @ Chlor Alkali X Silicon Smelter J Titanium Pigment Emily Ann n Boddington Au Cu m Waroona aWagerup b Saddleback Kemerton NON-MINERAL PROJECTS 6 Irrigation schemes q Major port handling facilities 8 Major power stations 1 Downstream timber processsing plant GAS PIPELINE OPERATING PROJECTS ARE SHOWN IN BLUE POTENTIAL PROJECTS ARE SHOWN IN RED j Central Norseman ? O'Sullivans w Western Australia ? Scaddan aWorsley h 8 Collie qBunbury m Ewington h Premier Dardanup 1 Dardanup h Muja Capel m Collie Pig Iron Y 8 Capel Synthetic J m Gwindinup 1 Donnybrook Rutilem Yoganup Whicher Range t Greenbushes N Bauxite−Alumina a Alumina refineries b Mines and deposits Chemicals / Petrochemicals / Petroleum @ Processing plants / refineries N Natural gas field O Oil field ! Natural gas / oil field u Natural gas / condensate field ; Natural gas / oil / condensate field Chromite c Mines and deposits Coal h Coal mines and deposits ? Lignite mines and deposits Copper−Lead−Zinc Z Mines and deposits Diamonds d Mines and deposits Gold j Mines and deposits Gypsum x Mines and deposits Heavy mineral sands m Mines and deposits — titanium-bearing sands G Mines and deposits — garnet-bearing sands J Ti02 pigment and synthetic rutile plants Iron ore I Mines and deposits Y Downstream processing plants Limestone−Limesand 4 Mines and Deposits C Cement plants Manganese ore r Mines and deposits y Downstream processing plants Nickel n Mines and deposits v Smelters and refineries Phosphate P Mines and deposits Platinoids K Mines and deposits Rare earth elements R Mines and deposits Salt s Production facilities / pans Silica − Silica Sand w Mines and deposits X Silicon smelters Talc T Mines and deposits Tantalum t Mines and deposits Vanadium−Titanium V Mines and deposits Bounty j Pinjarra Gallium Rav 8 n Ravensthorpe/BHPBn q Esperance Jangardup m 1 Manjiump m Jangardup South Mirambeena 1 I Southdown Albany 0 100 200 300 400 km 6 Ord Stage 2-Mantinea Flats 6 6 Ord Stage 1 Lake Argyle Hydro 6