Agenda - Wakulla County
Transcription
Agenda - Wakulla County
REVISED 1/14/15 Board of County Commissioners Wakulla County, Florida Agenda Regular Public Meeting Tuesday, January 20, 2015 @ 5:00 P.M. Invocation Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda: (The Chairman and members of the Board will approve and/or modify the official agenda at this time). Citizens to be Heard (There is a Three (3) minute time limit; non-discussion by Commission; there shall be no debate and no action by the Commission. Citizens will have the opportunity to speak once under the Citizens to be Heard portion of the agenda which will be at the start or end of each meeting). (To ensure fairness and encourage participation, citizens who would like to speak on any item will need to fill out a speaker’s card and turn in to Ms. Osborne prior to the beginning of discussion on that particular item. Citizens are allowed a maximum of 3 minutes to speak.) Awards and Presentations (Members of the Board will have the opportunity to acknowledge members of the community or commendable efforts at this time. Presentations will be made from individuals concerning issue of importance). Announcement Regarding Wakulla County Chamber Strategic Planning Initiative and Process – John Shuff, Wakulla County Chamber of Commerce and EDC Member Veteran Services Update – Harold Ross, Veteran Services Director Unrecognized Respiratory Health Hazard? – Howard Kessler, Commissioner Consent (All items contained herein may be voted on with one motion. Consent items are considered to be routine in nature, are typically non-controversial and do not deviate from past Board direction or policy. However, any Commissioner, the County Administrator, or the County Attorney may withdraw an item from the consent agenda, either in writing prior to the meeting, or at the beginning of the meeting and it shall then be voted on individually. Every effort shall be made to provide such a request to the Chairman at least 24 hours before the meeting). 1. Approval of Minutes from the January 5, 2015 Regular Board Meeting (Brent Thurmond, Clerk of Court) 2. Approval of Bills and Vouchers Submitted for January 1, 2015 through January 14, 2015 (Brent Thurmond, Clerk of Court) 3. Request Board Approval of Participation and License Agreement between Leon County and Wakulla County for the Big Bend Scenic Byway (Gail Gilman, TDC Chairman) 4. Request Board Ratification of an Emergency Purchase for Repairs to the Sopchoppy Master Lift Station (Cleve Fleming, Public Works Director) 5. Request Board Approval to Schedule and Advertise a Workshop to Discuss the Fire MSBU and other Public Safety Issues (Chief Mike Morgan, Fire Rescue Dept.) 6. Request Board Approval of Resolution and Budget Amendment for an E911 Grant Award (Brandy King, Budget Coordinator/Fixed Asset Officer) 7. Request Board Re-Approval of a Line of Credit Reserved for Emergency / Disaster Relief and ReAuthorize the Chairman and Clerk to Execute the Renewal Agreement (Greg James, Finance Director) 13. Request Board Approval of a Resolution and Budget Amendment for Azalea Park Improvements (Brandy King, Budget Coordinator/Fixed Asset Officer) 14. Request Board Approval to Award ITB#2014-19 to the Lowest Responsive Bidder for Azalea Park Trail Renovations (Katie Taff, Contracts and Procurement Coordinator) Consent Items Pulled for Discussion (Members requesting further information on items placed under “Consent Agenda,” may withdraw those items and place them here, for further discussion). General Business (General Business items are items of a general nature that require Board directions or pertain to Board policy 8. Request Board Approval of an Amended and Restated Fund Balance Policy (Greg James, Finance Director) 9. Request Board Approval of the Debt Service Policy (Greg James, Finance Director) 10. Request Board Approval of Change Order No. 3 to Godfrey Builders for Fire Station 8 Improvements: This Item has been Tabled to a Future Meeting (Katie Taff, Contracts and Procurement Coordinator) Public Hearing (Public Hearings are held as required to receive public comments on matters of special importance or as prescribed by law. For regular Board meetings, public hearings shall be scheduled as the first substantive item on the agenda and heard at the time scheduled for the start of the meeting or as soon thereafter as is possible. Individual speakers are encouraged to adhere to a three (3) minute time limit. The Chairman has the discretion to either extend or reduce time limits, based on the number of speakers) Planning and Zoning (Members will be provided with planning and zoning amendment requests five (5) business days prior to the scheduled meeting. To the maximum extent possible, all support information and documentation for P&Z items shall be made available through a variety of means including the County website that will provide the public with the greatest opportunity to review documentation at the date of advertisement pursuant to Resolution No. 04-43. “In accordance with Sec. 24.01 of County Code, for all quasijudicial proceedings each Commission member must disclose all contact received from interested parties and/or their representatives, lobbyists, or any other third parties concerning any application and any personal investigation or knowledge being relied upon during the consideration of any quasi-judicial planning and zoning matters”.) Commissioner Agenda Items (Items with supporting documentation shall be provided by a Commissioner to the County Administrator three (3) business days prior to the scheduled meeting. Items that are agendaed by Commissioners and fail to gain approval may not be replaced on the agenda by a Commissioner on the non-prevailing side for a period of six (6) months without approval of the Chairman unless there is substantive new information to present). 11. Commissioner Merritt – a. Request Board Approval to Request that the Florida Department of Transportation Include Landscaping in the Plan for the Improvement of the US319 Corridor 12. Commissioner Moore – a. Request Board Approval of a Resolution in Support of Oysters and the Oyster Industry in Wakulla County County Attorney (County Attorney items are items of a legal nature that require Board direction or represent general information to Board Members, staff or the public). County Administrator (County Administrator items are items that require Board direction or represent general information to Board Members, staff or the public). Citizens to be Heard (There is a Three (3) minute time limit; non-discussion by Commission; there shall be no debate and no action by the Commission. Citizens will have the opportunity to speak once under the Citizens to be Heard portion of the agenda which will be at the start or end of each meeting). Discussion Issues by Commissioners (The purpose of this section is for Commissioners to request staff action on various issues, including scheduling of a future agenda item for later Board action, based on the approval of a majority of the Board. No assignments or request for agenda items shall be given to the County Administrator or County Attorney without the express approval of the majority of the Board. The Board shall take no policy action without an agenda item unless such is accomplished through a unanimous vote of the Board. The remarks of each Commissioner during his or her “discussion items” shall adhere to Robert Rules of Order, for proper decorum and civility as enforced by the Chairman. Commissioner Merritt – a. Buck Miller Rd. Right of Way Clearing b. Hutto Property in Panacea Adjourn (Any departure from the order of business set forth in the official agenda shall be made only upon majority vote of the members of the Commission present at the meeting) The next Board of County Commissioners Meeting is scheduled for Monday, February 2, 2015 at 5:00p.m. Regular Board Meeting and Holiday Schedule January 2015 – December 2015 S January 2015 M T W Th F 1 Sa S February 2015 M T W Th F 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sa S March 2015 M T W Th F 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sa 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 31 M April 2015 T W Th F Sa M June 2015 T W Th F Sa 1 3 4 1 2 5 6 S 2 S M May 2015 T W Th F Sa 1 2 S 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 S September 2015 M T W Th F 31 S M July 2015 T W Th F Sa 1 2 3 4 S August 2015 M T W Th F Sa 1 Sa 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 30 31 Sa S December 2015 M T W Th F October 2015 T W Th F Sa S November 2015 M T W Th F 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 31 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 S M 1 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 Regular Board Meeting & Workshops Special Meeting Holiday Sa PUBLIC NOTICE 2014/2015 Tentative Schedule All Workshops, Meetings, and Public Hearings are subject to change All sessions are held in the Commission Chambers, 29 Arran Road, Suite 101, Crawfordville, FL. Workshops are scheduled as needed. Month Day Time Meeting Type January 2015 Monday, 12 7:00 P.M. Planning Commission Meeting Wednesday, 14 5:30 P.M. Code Enforcement Meeting Tuesday, 20 5:00 P.M. Regular Board Meeting Monday, 2 5:00 P.M. Regular Board Meeting Monday, 9 7:00 P.M. Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, 17 5:00 P.M. Regular Board Meeting Monday, 9 5:00 P.M. Regular Board Meeting Tuesday, 10 7:00 P.M. Planning Commission Meeting Monday, 23 5:00 P.M. Regular Board Meeting Monday, 6 5:00 P.M. Regular Board Meeting Monday, 13 7:00 P.M. Planning Commission Meeting Monday, 20 5:00 P.M. Regular Board Meeting February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request Date of Meeting: January 20, 2015 Date Submitted: January 12, 2015 To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board From: Brent X. Thurmond, Clerk of Court Subject: Approval of Minutes from the January 5, 2015 Regular Board Meeting Statement of Issue: This agenda item requests Board approval of the minutes of the January 5, 2015 Regular Board Meeting (Attachment #1). Options: 1. Approve the minutes of the January 5, 2015 Regular Board Meeting. 2. Do not approve minutes of the January 5, 2015 Regular Board Meeting. 3. Board direction. Recommendation: Option #1 Attachment(s) 1. Draft of Minutes – January 5, 2015 Regular Board Meeting Board of County Commissioners Regular Public Meeting Monday, January 5, 2015 The Board of County Commissioners in and for Wakulla County, Florida met for a Regular Public Meeting on Monday, January 5, 2015 at 5:00 p.m. with Chairman Ralph Thomas presiding. Present were Commissioners Randy Merritt, Richard Harden, Jerry Moore and Howard Kessler. Also present were County Administrator David Edwards, County Attorney Heather Encinosa and Deputy Clerk Brandy Raye King. The Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance were provided by Commissioner Harden. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (CD5:01) Commissioner Kessler requested to pull item (8) from the consent agenda for discussion and added one announcement to Awards and Presentations. Commissioner Thomas requested to add two items to Awards and Presentations: a proclamation pertaining to First Responders and Chuck Robinson from Palaver Tree Theatre. Commissioner Merritt moved to approve the agenda with the changes; second by Commissioner Kessler and the motion passed unanimously, 5/0. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD (CD 5:02) W.D. Lansford—Panacea Incorporation Report CONSENT AGENDA (CD 5:04) Commissioner Merritt moved to approve the consent agenda; second by Commissioner Harden and the motion passed unanimously 5/0. 1. Approval of Minutes from the December 8, 2014 Regular Board Meeting Approve - Minutes from the December 8, 2014 Regular Board Meeting 2. Approval of Bills and Vouchers Submitted for December 4, 2014 through December 31, 2014 Approve - Bills and Vouchers Submitted for December 4, 2014 through December 31, 2014 3. Request Board Approval of a Proclamation Recognizing and Commending Evelyn Evans for 26 Years of Dedicated Service to the Citizens of Wakulla County Approve - a Proclamation Recognizing and Commending Evelyn Evans for 26 Years of Dedicated Service to the Citizens of Wakulla County 4. Request Board Approval of the FY2015/2016 Budget Calendar Approve - FY2015/2016 Budget Calendar 5. Request Board Approval of the Disposal of County Property Approve - Disposal of County Property 6. Request Board Approval of a Resolution Replacing/Appointing Members to the Wakulla County Parks Advisory Committee Approve - Resolution Replacing/Appointing Members to the Wakulla County Parks Advisory Committee 7. Request Board Approval of a Resolution Accepting the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, Off System Project Maintenance Agreement Regarding OBBT Phase 2 Approve - Resolution Accepting the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, Off System Project Maintenance Agreement Regarding OBBT Phase 2 CONSENT ITEMS PULLED FOR DISCUSSION (CD 5:05) 8. Request Board Approval of a Resolution to Appoint a Member to the Code Enforcement Board to Fill a Vacant Seat Commissioner Merritt moved to approve a Resolution to Appoint a Member to the Code Enforcement Board to Fill a Vacant Seat; second by Commissioner Moore and the motion passed 4/1with Commissioners Merritt, Moore, Thomas and Harden voting for and Commissioner Kessler opposing the motion. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS (CD 5:06) Announcement Honoring Mrs. Evelyn Evans – Brent Thurmond, Clerk of Court (CD 5:11) First Responder Proclamation – Commissioner Thomas Commissioner Merritt moved to approve First Responder Proclamation; second by Commissioner Kessler and the motion passed unanimously 5/0. (CD5:13) Town Hall Meeting January 27, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in Commissioner Chambers – Commissioner Kessler (CD 5:14) Martin Luther King Day Celebration and Remembrance Events – Chuck Robinson GENERAL BUSINESS (CD 5:16) 9. Request Board Approval of Eagle Scout Project for a Veteran’s Monument to be place at Woolley Park Commissioner Merritt moved to approve Eagle Scout Project for a Veteran’s Monument to be place at Woolley Park; second by Commissioner Kessler and the motion passed unanimously 5/0. (CD 5:16) 10. Request Board Approval to Waive the County’s Subordination Policy to allow the Refinancing of a 1st Mortgage Loan and the Subordination of the County’s $15,000 State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Loan to the Refinanced 1st Mortgage Loan for Mr. Duane Hatmaker Commisioner Merritt moved to approve to waive the County’s Subordination Policy to allow the Refinancing of a 1st Mortgage Loan and the Subordination of the County’s $15,000 State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Loan to the Refinanced 1st Mortgage Loan for Mr. Duane Hatmaker; second by Commissioner Kessler. The motion passed 4/0 with Commissioners Merritt, Moore, Harden and Kessler voting for the motion and Commissioner Thomas abstaining from the vote and filing form 8B. (CD 5:17) 11. Request Board Appointment to the DCF Circuit 2 Community Alliance and Alternate Appointment to the Canvassing Board Commissioner Merritt moved to approve Jessica Welch as the Alternate Appointment to the Canvassing Board and have staff designate an Appointment to the DCF Circuit 2 Community Alliance; second by Commissioner Kessler and the motion passed unanimously, 5/0. (CD5:23) 12. Request Board Approval of Updated 2015 State and Federal Legislative Priorities Commissioner Kessler moved to approve Updated 2015 State and Federal Legislative Priorities with the following changes: prioritize bridges in the order of Sopchoppy River Bridge, Upper River Bridge and Mashes Sands Bridge; acquire land if possible at Upper River Bridge; include Small County Coalition priorities; and add rehabilitation of lift stations in Panacea. Second by Commissioner Merritt and the motion passed unanimously, 5/0. (CD 5:29) 13. Request Board Direction Regarding Adopting a Proclamation Declaring a Zero Tolerance to Racism and Racial Discrimination in Wakulla County Commissioner Merritt moved to approve Adopting the Proclamation Declaring a Zero Tolerance to Racism and Racial Discrimination in Wakulla County striking the words “WHEREAS, there’s a need to reaffirm our commitments to the purposes and principles contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; and”; second by Commissioner Kessler and the motion passed unanimously, 5/0. (CD5:48) Commissioner Harden moved to approve Adopting a Proclamation Declaring a Zero Tolerance to Discrimination in Wakulla County; second by Commissioner Merritt and the motion passed 4/1 with Commissioners Merritt, Moore, Thomas and Harden voting for the motion and Commissioner Kessler opposing the motion. PUBLIC HEARING (CD 5:52)14. Request Board Approval to Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider a Purchase and Sale Agreement for the Acquisition of Land on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Rd. (MLK) for a New Fire Rescue Facility and Indigent Burial Site Commissioner Moore moved to approve to Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider a Purchase and Sale Agreement for the Acquisition of Land on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Rd. (MLK) for a New Fire Rescue Facility and Indigent Burial Site conditional upon being able to get a LOMA (Letter of Map Amendment) for the property and not to approve the purchase price unless that happens; second by Commissioner Merritt and the motion passed unanimously, 5/0. PLANNING AND ZONING (CD 6:00) 15. Application for Short Form Subdivision SF14-02- Tiger’s Den - Mortham Governmental Consultants, LLC, Marcelo Llorente, Ijjasz Oscar Tirado, Owners/Edwin Brown & Associates, Agent Commissioner Merritt moved to approve to Conduct a Public Hearing and the proposed Application for Short Form Subdivision SF14-02, based upon the recommendation of the Planning Department and the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the Board and any evidence submitted at the Hearing hereon; second by Commissioner Harden and the motion passed unanimously, 5/0. COMMISSIONER AGENDA ITEMS (CD 6:03) 16. Commissioner Kessler – Request Board Approval of an Anti-Fracking Resolution and a Letter to the State Requesting a Statewide Ban on Fracking Commissioner Kessler moved to approve an Anti-Fracking Resolution and a Letter to the State Requesting a Statewide Ban on Fracking. The motion dies for lack of second. (CD 6:05) 17. Commissioner Thomas – Request Board Approval of a Resolution Supporting the Display of the National Motto “In God We Trust” in the Wakulla Commission Chambers Commissioner Harden moved to approve a Resolution Supporting the Display of the National Motto “In God We Trust” in the Wakulla Commission Chambers under the seal and half the size of the words “Wakulla County”; second by Commissioner Merritt and the motion passed 4/1 with Commissioners Merritt, Moore, Thomas and Harden voting for the motion and Commissioner Kessler opposing the motion. (CD 6:25) 18. Commissioner Moore – Request Board Approval of a Resolution on the Incorporation of the Panacea Community Commissioner Moore moved to approve a Resolution on the Incorporation of the Panacea Community; second by Commissioner Harden and the motion passed 4/1 with Commissioners Merritt, Moore, Thomas and Harden voting for the motion and Commissioner Kessler opposing the motion. COUNTY ATTORNEY None. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR (CD 6:50) Azalea Park Construction Update CITIZENS TO BE HEARD (CD 6:51) Anginita Rosier – Racism in Wakulla County (CD 6:54) Simon Nelson – Racism Proclamation (CD 6:57) Chris Russell - Racism Proclamation DISCUSSION ISSUES BY COMMISSIONERS (CD 6:59) COMMISSIONER MERRITT - FDOT Landscaping at US Hwy 319/98 Intersection, Guy Strickland Road stabilization (CD 7:03) COMMISSIONER KESSLER - Zero Tolerance Proclamation, Town Hall Meeting on January 27, 2015 at 7p.m., noise complaints from vehicles on Trice Lane, resident complaint about storage shed planning fee (CD 7:15) COMMISSIONER THOMAS – Racism in Wakulla County (CD 7:16) COMMISSIONER MOORE - Mashes Sands Park Project, Shell Point Beach Project, boat ramp at Shell Point, sidewalks at Senior Center, Otter Lake Road, Levy Bay warning traffic sign (CD 7:21) COMMISSIONER HARDEN - Racism and Discrimination There being no further business to come before the Board, Commissioner Merritt made a motion to adjourn; second by Commissioner Moore and the motion passed unanimously, 5/0. The meeting adjourned at 7:22pm. Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request Date of Meeting: January 20, 2015 Date Submitted: January 12, 2015 To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board From: Brent X. Thurmond, Clerk of Court Subject: Approval for Payment of Bills and Vouchers Submitted for January 1, 2015 through January 14, 2015 Statement of Issue: This agenda item requests Board approval for payment of bills and vouchers submitted for January 1, 2015 through January 14, 2015. Background: It is the policy of the Board to pre-approve payment of bills and vouchers prior to the release of funds. Options: 1. Approve payment of bills and vouchers submitted for January 1, 2015 through January 14, 2015. 2. Do not approve payment of bills and vouchers submitted for January 1, 2015 through January 14, 2015. 3. Board direction. Recommendation: Option #1 Attachment(s) 1. Statement of bills and vouchers submitted for January 1, 2015 through January 14, 2015. Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request Date of Meeting: January 20, 2015 Date Submitted: January 5, 2015 To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board From: David Edwards, County Administrator Gail Gilman, TDC Chairman Subject: Request Board Approval of a Participation and License Agreement Between Leon County and Wakulla County for the Big Bend Scenic Byway Statement of Issue: This agenda item requests Board approval of a Participation and License Agreement between Leon County and Wakulla County for the Big Bend Scenic Byway for use of three County owned properties to construct three BBSB Kiosks. Background: On December 6, 2010, the Board approved an Agenda Request (Attachments 1 and 2) for submission of the 2011-12 National Scenic Byway Program Grant Application by Wakulla County Tourist Development Council and gave approval for a portion of the cash match ($25.000.00) required by the grant. The submission of the 2011-12 National Scenic Byway Grant Program application proposed funding in excess of $650,000 to implement the entire Big Bend Scenic Byway Interpretive and Wayshowing Plan over the course of two to three fiscal years. The scope of work included research and writing of the 15 themes and 64 storylines outlined in the plan as well as design and construction of 13 Kiosks/Portals, 23 Exhibits, 63 Tertiary Signs, and 46 Site Approach markers. Wakulla County is the owner of three real properties located in Wakulla County and identified as; Parcel ID’s 253S-01E-000-05423-000 (Newport County Park); 24-5S-02W-000-02973-003 (County Welcome Center); and 24-5S02W-000-02973-005 (County Maritime Center). The subject property is adjacent to the 220-mile Florida Scenic Highway known as the Big Bend Scenic Byway. Approximately 90 miles of the 220-mile corridor are within Wakulla County. In order to implement the construction, fabrication, and installation of the Byway Improvements, Leon County must have Wakulla County’s permission in the form of a signed Participation and License Agreement (Attachment 3) executed and payment of the $25,000.00 cash match. Analysis: Leon County is the agency responsible for implementing and managing the grant funding for the Byway, and for directing and managing the final design and construction of the Byway Improvements. The grant requires Leon County to provide match funding in an amount equal to 20% of the grant amount and Wakulla County, as a member of the Corridor Management Entity, to participate in accomplishing the goals and objectives of the Corridor Management Plan to enhance and improve the Byway by permitting a certain number of the Byway Improvements to be constructed on the subject property and by providing a portion of the match funding for the grant in the form of cash, materials and/or labor. Request Board Approval of a Participation and License Agreement Between Leon County and Wakulla County for the Big Bend Scenic Byway January 20, 2015 Page 2 Pledges for match exceed $110,000 and have been approved by Leon County Commission ($25,000), Franklin County Commission ($25,000), Cities of Apalachicola, Carrabelle, Sopchoppy, and St Marks (over $25,000 collectively), Summer Camp and St. Joe Foundation ($15,500), Florida Fish & Wildlife Council ($2,380), St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge and Florida National Trail ($13,900 in-kind), and Panacea Blue Crab Festival ($5,500 The grant will provide 5 portals, 11 exhibits, 37 interpretive panels, and 22 site approach markers in Wakulla County, for a total estimated cost of $290,700. Leon and Wakulla Counties wish to establish, with this Agreement, the manner in which Leon County will be permitted to utilize a portion of the subject property for the construction of the Byway Improvements, and Wakulla County will contribute match funding for the construction. Budgetary Impact: The project was implemented over three fiscal years (2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13). The $25,000 Wakulla County cash match was set aside over three budget cycles at just over $8,300 per fiscal year. These funds are ready to be disbursed by the Clerk’s Office upon approval of the Participation and License Agreement. Options 1. Approve the Participation and License Agreement Between Leon County and Wakulla County for the Big Bend Scenic Byway. 2. Do Not Approve the Participation and License Agreement Between Leon County and Wakulla County for the Big Bend Scenic Byway. 3. Board direction. Recommendation: Option #1. Attachment(s): 1. December 6, 2010 BOCC Agenda Item 2. December 6, 2010 BOCC Meeting Minutes 3. Participation and License Agreement Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request Date of Meeting: December 6, 2010 Date Submitted: November 19, 2010 To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board From: Jerry Evans, Tourist Development Council Chairman Pam Portwood, Tourist Development Council Director Subject: Update on Big Bend Scenic Byway Project; Discussion of 2011-12 National Scenic Byway Program Grant Application; Request Board Approval for Grant Submission by the Tourist Development Council; and Request Board Approval for Pledge of Match Statement of Issue: This agenda item provides an update to the Board on the Big Bend Scenic Byway (BBSB) and discussion of the proposed 2011-12 National Scenic Byway Program Grant Application. Additionally, this item requests Board approval for submission of the grant by Wakulla County Tourist Development Council and requests Board approval for a portion of the cash match required by the grant. Background: The Big Bend Scenic Byway is a 220-mile corridor through Wakulla, Leon, and Franklin counties. It connects National Forest, National Estuarine Research Reserve, National Wildlife Refuges, the Florida National Scenic Trail, State Parks, Sate Forests, and numerous County and City Parks. The byway also features four designated Waterfronts Florida Communities and three historic lighthouses. The BBSB was designated as a Florida Scenic Highway in 2007 and was honored with designation as a National Scenic Byway in 2009 by being added to the America’s Byways® collection. During this 8year grassroots project, over $437,000 has been raised in local matching support. The BBSB Project is led by a 31-member Corridor Management Entity (CME). The CME is responsible for the administration of BBSB activities and implementation of the Corridor Management Plan. The BBSB Corridor Management Plan outlines the goals, objectives, and strategies for establishing the nationally-designated byway as a nature- and heritage-based tourist destination. Recent Agenda Request: Update on Big Bend Scenic Byway Project; Discussion of 2011-12 National Scenic Byway Program Grant Application; Request Board Approval for Grant Submission by the Tourist Development Council; and Request Board Approval for Pledge of Match December 6, 2010 Page 2 accomplishments toward the implementation of the Plan include: development of key marketing materials such as the BBSB rack card, tear-off maps, and website. Current grant funds from VISIT FLORIDA will provide for the revision of the Guide to the Big Bend Scenic Byway, establishment of a byway-wide Ambassador Program, and creation of video podcasts interpreting the incredible intrinsic resources of the byway. A major accomplishment in implementation of the BBSB Corridor Management Plan is the development of the Big Bend Scenic Byway Interpretive and Wayshowing Plan, funded through a previous National Scenic Byway Grant. This plan identifies the unique characteristics of the byway; establishes certain branding elements for the byway; provides design and preliminary cost estimates for the kiosks and interpretive panels planned along the byway; and suggests other interpretive media to consider for marketing and interpreting the byway. The completed plan was recently highlighted by the National Scenic Byways Program on their nationalbyways.org website as a model for other byways throughout the nation. Recently, a presentation was made to the Wakulla TDC highlighting the Interpretive and Wayshowing Plan and asking for support to move forward with implementing the plan. The TDC unanimously approved moving forward with the request to the County Commission for approval to be the applicant for the grant application, as well as, requesting a pledge for match should the application be funded. Additionally, on September 8, 2010, Commissioner Artz (appointed representative for Wakulla County Commission on the CME), arranged a meeting with byway representatives and County staff to discuss the project. It was determined that a presentation and formal request would be provided to the Board at the 12-6-10 County Commission meeting. Analysis: The submission of the 2011-12 National Scenic Byway Grant Program application will propose funding in excess of $650,000 to implement the entire Big Bend Scenic Byway Interpretive and Wayshowing Plan over the course of two to three fiscal years. The scope of work includes research and writing of the 15 themes and 64 storylines outlined in the plan as well as design and construction of 13 kiosks/Portals, 23 Exhibits, 63 Tertiary Signs, and 46 Site Approach markers. Over the last several months, Pam Portwood, previous Byway Coordinator, and Diane Delaney, ASE Enterprises (consultant to the byway) have been making presentations to the organizations, local governments, and business community throughout the entire byway in order to gather pledges of cash match for this ambitious project. The National Scenic Byway Grant Program provides a generous 80% of the total funding for approved projects leaving a 20% minimum match requirement. To date, pledges for match exceed $110,000 and have been approved by Leon County Commission ($25,000), Franklin County Commission ($25,000), Cities of Apalachicola, Carrabelle, Sopchoppy, and St Marks (over $25,000 collectively), Summer Camp and St. Joe Foundation ($15,500), Florida Fish & Wildlife Council ($2,380), St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge and Florida National Trail Agenda Request: Update on Big Bend Scenic Byway Project; Discussion of 2011-12 National Scenic Byway Program Grant Application; Request Board Approval for Grant Submission by the Tourist Development Council; and Request Board Approval for Pledge of Match December 6, 2010 Page 3 ($13,900 in-kind), and Panacea Blue Crab Festival ($5,500). Approximately 90 miles of the 220mile corridor are within Wakulla County. If funded, the grant will provide 5 Portals, 11 exhibits, 37 interpretive panels, and 22 site approach markers in Wakulla County, for a total estimated cost of $290,700. Based on the pledges received by Franklin and Leon Counties and recognizing the incredible benefit of this project to Wakulla County Tourism, the Wakulla County TDC respectfully requests the Board to approve a pledge of $25,000 cash match for this grant application. PLEASE NOTE: If funded, the project will be implemented over the next three fiscal years (2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13). Therefore, the $25,000 match can be spread over three budget cycles at just over $8,300 per fiscal year. Additionally, the Wakulla County TDC is requesting board approval to be the grantee for this application. This will allow the TDC to remain closely involved with the project, receive administrative funding to manage the grant, and provide the Local Agency Participation agreement with Florida Department of Transportation that is required for any construction project. The application cycle for the 2011-12 National Scenic Byway Program is expected to open sometime in the next month or two. The draft application will be provided to the Board for final approval prior to submission. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please don’t hesitate to contact Pam Portwood, Director, Wakulla County TDC at (850) 544-6133. Options: 1. Approve the Wakulla TDC as grantee and administrator of the 2011-12 National Scenic Byway Program Grant Application and approve pledge of cash match for Wakulla County. 2. Do not approve the Wakulla TDC as grantee and administrator of the 2011-12 National Scenic Byway Program Grant Application and do not approve pledge of cash match for Wakulla County. 3. Board Direction. Recommendation: Option #1 Attachment: 1. Benefits of Scenic Highway Designation Prepared by: Herbert W. A. Thiele, Esq. Leon County Attorney’s Office Leon County Courthouse 301 S. Monroe St., Suite 202 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Wakulla County Parcel ID: 25-3S-01E-000-05423-000 24-5S-02W-000-02973-003 24-5S-02W-000-02973-005 PARTICIPATION AND LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR BIG BEND SCENIC BYWAY IMPROVEMENTS THIS PARTICIPATION AND LICENSE AGREEMENT (the or this “Agreement”) is made and entered into the date upon which the last of the parties signs the Agreement (“Effective Date”), by and between WAKULLA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is P.O. Box 1263, Crawfordville, FL 32326, hereinafter referred to as “Participant,” and LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, a charter county and political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose post office address is Leon County Office of Financial Stewardship, Attention: Grants Coordinator, 301 South Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32301, hereinafter referred to as “Facilitator.” W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Participant is the owner of those certain parcels of real property located in Wakulla County, Florida, and identified by the Wakulla County Property Appraiser as Parcel ID’s 25-3S-01E-00005423-000; 24-5S-02W-000-02973-003; and 24-5S-02W-000-02973-005 (collectively the “Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is adjacent to the 220-mile Florida Scenic Highway known as the Big Bend Scenic Byway (hereinafter referred to as the “Byway”); and WHEREAS, in May 2006, the Corridor Management Entity (the “CME”) was established to serve as the caretaker of the Byway and to take the lead in monitoring and implementing the 2007 Corridor Management Plan (the “CMP”) adopted for the Byway; and WHEREAS, the CME worked in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service to prepare a plan designed to implement the goals and objectives of the CMP and contain the design guidelines and prototypes to be used by contractors and fabricators to construct the improvements along the Byway (the “Byway Improvements”), with such plan finalized and approved by the CME on March 4, 2010 as the Big Bend Scenic Byway Interpretive and Wayshowing Plan which, by this reference, is hereby incorporated as part of this Agreement (the “Interpretive and Wayshowing Plan”); and WHEREAS, in order to implement the construction, fabrication, and installation of the Byway Improvements, a study was completed in June 2011 by Diane Delaney and Pamela Portwood, on behalf of the CME, entitled Implementation Study of the Big Bend Scenic Byway Roadside Interpretation Plan which, by this reference, is also hereby incorporated as part of this Agreement (the “Implementation Study”); and WHEREAS, the CME was awarded a federal grant (the “Grant”) managed through the Florida Department of Transportation to fund the final design and construction of Byway Improvements as shown and implemented in the Interpretive and Wayshowing Plan and Implementation Study, respectively; and WHEREAS, Facilitator is the Agency responsible for implementing and managing the Grant funding for the Byway, and for directing and managing the final design and construction of the Byway Improvements; and WHEREAS, the Grant requires Facilitator to provide match funding in an amount equal to 20% of the Grant amount; and WHEREAS, Participant, as a member of the CME, wishes to participate in accomplishing the goals and objectives of the CMP to enhance and improve to the Byway by permitting a certain number of the Byway Improvements to be constructed on the Subject Property and by providing a portion of the match funding for the Grant in the form of cash, materials, and/or labor (the “Match Funding”); and WHEREAS, Participant and Facilitator wish to establish with this Agreement the manner in which Facilitator will be permitted to utilize a portion of the Subject Property for the construction of the Byway Improvements, and which Participant will contribute Match Funding for such construction. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Participant and Facilitator agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into the terms of this Agreement. 2. Grant of License; Licensed Area Defined. Participant hereby licenses to Facilitator, its employees, contractors, agents, successors, and assigns, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, that certain area of the Subject Property adjacent to the Byway as depicted in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Licensed Area”). With regard to the Licensed Area, Participant and Facilitator acknowledge and agree to the following: a. Not Real Property. This Agreement constitutes a license for the use of the Licensed Area and does not grant any permanent possessory interest in real property, nor shall this Agreement be construed as conveying any real property interest in the Licensed Area. b. Term of License. The term of this license shall commence on the Effective Date of this Agreement and shall continue thereafter until the latest date of expiration of the warranty periods for any of the Participant Improvements constructed and lying within the Licensed Area. The expiration date of this license may be extended upon written agreement of the parties. c. Approximate Boundaries. The boundaries of the Licensed Area as depicted herein are intended to be an approximation and are not to scale. As such, to the extent the Licensed Area encroaches on to abutting property not owned by Participant, the boundaries of the Licensed Area shall be deemed to be the nearest actual boundary of the Subject Property. d. No License Fee. The mutual covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement represent sufficient consideration for this Agreement and, as such, Facilitator shall not be required to pay a fee for the license of the Licensed Area. e. License Revocable. The license granted herein shall be revocable by Participant in accordance with the terms set forth in paragraph 10 below; provided, however, that such revocation of the license shall have no force and effect on the remaining rights and obligations of Participant and Facilitator that do not necessarily rely upon the existence of the license, and such remaining rights and obligations shall survive a revocation of the license granted herein. 3. Permitted Use. The use of the Licensed Area by Facilitator, its employees, contractors, agents, successors, and assigns shall be limited to only the following activities: a. Construction of the Participant Improvements (as that term is defined in paragraph 4 below); -2- b. Ingress and egress of vehicles and equipment as needed to construct the Participant Improvements; and c. Temporary storage and staging of equipment and materials as needed to construct the Participant Improvements. 4. Participant Improvements; Ownership. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “Participant Improvements” shall refer to those Byway Improvements to be constructed on the Subject Property as depicted in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. With regard to the Participant Improvements, Participant and Facilitator acknowledge and agree to the following: a. The Participant Improvements as depicted herein are artist renderings as contained in the Interpretive and Wayshowing Plan and Implementation Study, and are only intended to represent the design guidelines and prototypes of the Byway Improvements. As such, the final design of the Participant Improvements may vary from those depicted in Exhibit “B.” b. The installation of all tertiary signs, as identified and shown in the Interpretive and Wayshowing Plan and Implementation Study, has been completed as of the Effective Date of this Agreement and, as such, will not be considered as part of the Participant Improvements. c. The installation of any and all site approach markers, as identified and shown in the Interpretive and Wayshowing Plan and Implementation Study, will require further coordination between Facilitator and the Florida Department of Transportation (“FDOT”) to allow for such installation to occur within the FDOT right-of-way. Therefore, such installation will be addressed as part of a separate agreement and will not be considered as part of the Participant Improvements. d. Facilitator’s role is merely to facilitate the design and construction of the Participant Improvements by acting as the Agency responsible for implementing and managing the Grant funding for the Byway. Facilitator shall at no time assume any ownership rights or responsibilities of the Participant Improvements. As such, any and all ownership rights and responsibilities associated with the Participant Improvements shall, at all times, be that of Participant. This subparagraph shall survive the termination or expiration of the term of the license for the Licensed Area. 5. Match Funding. Participant shall contribute Match Funding consisting of cash in the amount of Thirty Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($30,500.00). Participant and Facilitator acknowledge and agree that the Match Funding amount shall be apportioned between Participant, whose contribution shall be $25,000.00, and the Panacea Blue Crab Festival Committee, whose post office address is P.O. Box 456, Panacea, FL 32346 (“Blue Crab Festival Committee”), whose contribution shall be $5,500.00. As of the Effective Date of this Agreement, Facilitator acknowledges its receipt of the $5,500.00 Blue Crab Festival Committee contribution, leaving an unpaid balance of the Match Funding in the amount of $25,000.00. To the extent such Match Funding has not already been paid as of the Effective Date of this Agreement, it shall be paid to Facilitator by check and delivered to Facilitator, no later than forty-five (45) days after the Effective Date of this Agreement, care of Leon County Office of Financial Stewardship, Attn: Grants Program Coordinator, 301 South Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32301, or to such other address as Facilitator directs in writing. 6. Permitting of Participant Improvements; Further Assurance and Cooperation. To the extent Participant is a jurisdictional permitting authority involved in the permitting for the construction of the Participant Improvements, Participant shall make reasonable efforts to seek a waiver of any of its permitting fees required for such construction. Furthermore, Participant acknowledges and agrees that, in order to assure the timely construction of the Participant Improvements with no interruption or delay, Participant shall cooperate with Facilitator in the permitting process by executing, upon request, any and all documents as required by the various permitting authorities involved in such construction. -3- 7. Repair, Replacement, and Maintenance of Participant Improvements; Contractor Warranties. The maintenance, repair, and replacement of the Participant Improvements, whether required during or after construction thereof, shall be the responsibility of Participant at Participant’s expense. Any such repairs and replacements that are covered under any warranty or guaranty provided by Facilitator’s contractors shall be coordinated through Facilitator. Upon receipt of a written request from Participant for such warranty repairs, Facilitator shall, no later than five business days after such receipt, notify its contractor of Participant’s warranty repair request. 8. Compliance with Laws, Regulations, and Other Legal Requirements. With regard to the use of the Licensed Area, Facilitator shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and standards including, but not limited to, any applicable laws related to environmental protection or public health and safety, as well as those relating to the operation and maintenance of any equipment or personal property on, or in, the Licensed Area. 9. Termination by Facilitator. Facilitator may terminate this Agreement for any reason, subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions: a. Facilitator shall deliver written notice to Participant of Facilitator’s intent to terminate; provided, however, such termination shall not be effective until three (3) business days after Participant’s receipt of written notice of Facilitator’s intent to terminate. b. Upon Participant’s request, Facilitator shall, at Facilitator’s expense, remove any partially constructed Participant’s Improvements. 10. Termination by Participant. The license granted herein may be revoked by Participant for any reason. However, with regard to the remaining provisions of this Agreement that survive such revocation in accordance with paragraph 2 above, Participant may terminate such remaining provisions for any reason, subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions: a. Participant shall deliver written notice to Facilitator of Participant’s intent to terminate; provided, however, such termination shall not be effective until two (2) business days after Facilitator’s receipt of written notice of Participant’s intent to terminate, unless Participant has given Facilitator the opportunity to take corrective action pursuant to paragraph 11 below. b. With regard to any of the Participant Improvements that have been partially constructed within the Licensed Area, Facilitator’s obligation to complete such Participant Improvements shall be deemed released and waived as of the date of Participant’s termination and, with regard to Participant’s Match Funding to have been delivered in accordance with paragraph 5 above, Participant shall not be entitled to reimbursement of any such Match Funding delivered as of the date of Participant’s termination. c. Participant shall defend and hold Facilitator harmless from any and all loss or damages claimed against Facilitator by its contractors for any breach of contract resulting from Participant’s termination. 11. Facilitator’s Opportunity to Take Corrective Action. Prior to the Participant’s termination of this Agreement, Participant shall provide to Facilitator written notice setting forth the reason for such termination and a reasonable period of time, not to exceed five (5) business days, within which Facilitator may complete any corrective action deemed necessary by Participant to prevent such termination. 12. Delivery of Notices. Any written notice required or permitted to be delivered by the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be delivered by hand delivery or guaranteed overnight delivery service. -4- a. Notices to Participant shall be delivered to the address specified in the introductory paragraph of this Agreement or as specified in any change of address provided by Participant in accordance with the terms herein. b. Notices to Facilitator shall be delivered to: Leon County Public Works Department Attention: Director of Engineering Services 2280 Miccosukee Road Tallahassee, FL 32308 With a copy delivered to: Herbert W. A. Thiele, Esq. Leon County Attorney’s Office 301 S. Monroe Street, Suite 202 Leon County Courthouse Tallahassee, FL 32301 c. All notices shall be effective upon delivery or attempted delivery during regular business hours. Either party may change its notice address upon written notice to the other party, given in accordance herewith by an authorized officer, partner, or principal. 13. Authority of Facilitator. Facilitator represents and warrants to Participant that the party executing on behalf of Facilitator is fully and properly authorized to execute and enter into this Agreement on behalf of Facilitator, and that the execution of this Agreement and the performance by Facilitator of its obligations hereunder have been duly authorized and approved by all necessary corporate action. 14. Authority of Participant. Participant represents and warrants to Facilitator that the party executing on behalf of Participant is fully and properly authorized to execute and enter into this Agreement on behalf of Participant, and that the execution of this Agreement and the performance by Participant of its obligations hereunder have been duly authorized and approved by all necessary corporate action. 15. Florida Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any legal proceeding arising from this Agreement shall be the 2nd Judicial Circuit in and for Leon County, Florida unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties. 16. Time Is Of The Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and all provisions contained herein. [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] -5- 17. Incorporation of Prior Agreements; Modifications. This Agreement is the only effective agreement between the parties pertaining to the participation in the construction of the Byway Improvements, the provision of Match Funding, and the use of the Licensed Area, and no other agreements either oral or otherwise are effective unless embodied herein. All amendments to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by all parties. Any other attempted amendment shall be void. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Facilitator and Participant have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first above written. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED IN THE PRESENCE OF: WAKULLA COUNTY ___________________________ ________________________________ Name: _____________________ By: _____________________________ (Print Name) ___________________________ Name: Its: _____________________________ (Print Title) Date: _________________________ LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA ___________________________ Name: ______________________ ________________________________ By: Vincent S. Long Its County Administrator ____________________________ Date: _________________________ Name: ______________________ ATTEST: Bob Inzer, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller, Leon County, Florida Approved as to Form: Leon County Attorney’s Office BY: _________________________ BY: ___________________________ Herbert W. A. Thiele, Esq. F12-00156 -6- Composite Exhibit “A” Licensed Area Wakulla County Newport County Park/St. Marks River Wakulla County Welcome Center Big Bend Maritime Center Owner: Wakulla County County: Wakulla Parcel No.: 25-3S-01E-000-05423-000 Site: Newport Co. Park/St. Marks River Address: US-98 x X - Approximate Location of Participant Improvements - Boundary of Licensed Area A1 Owner: Wakulla County County: Wakulla Parcel No.: 24-5S-02W-000-02973-003 Site: Wakulla County Welcome Ctr. Address: US-98 x X - Approximate Location of Participant Improvements - Boundary of Licensed Area A2 Owner: Wakulla County County: Wakulla Parcel No.: 24-5S-02W-000-02973-005 Site: Big Bend Maritime Center Address: Mound St. / Crum Dr. x X - Approximate Location of Participant Improvements - Boundary of Licensed Area A3 Composite Exhibit “B” Participant Improvements Wakulla County Newport County Park/St. Marks River Wakulla County Welcome Center Big Bend Maritime Center Owner: Wakulla County County: Wakulla Parcel No.: 25-3S-01E-000-05423-000 Site: Newport Co. Park/St. Marks River Address: US-98 Primary Portal Kiosk and Sign B1 Owner: Wakulla County County: Wakulla Parcel No.: 24-5S-02W-000-02973-003 Site: Wakulla County Welcome Ctr. Address: US-98 Secondary Portal Kiosk and Sign B2 Owner: Wakulla County County: Wakulla Parcel No.: 24-5S-02W-000-02973-005 Site: Big Bend Maritime Center Address: Mound St. / Crum Dr. Wayside Exhibit B3 Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request Date of Meeting: January 20, 2015 Date Submitted: January 5, 2015 To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board From: David Edwards, County Administrator Cleve Fleming, Public Works Project Director Subject: Request Board Ratification of an Emergency Purchase for Repairs to the Sopchoppy Master Lift Station Statement of Issue: This agenda item is requesting ratification of an emergency purchase for repairs to the Sopchoppy Master Lift Station. Background: The Sopchoppy Master Lift Station (# 68) is a pump station and the master sanitary sewer lift station that pumps all of the sewage from the Sopchoppy area to the Wakulla County Waste Water Treatment Plant. This lift station receives waste water from three other lift stations and approximately 170 individual grinder stations, all located within the Sopchoppy area. On August 1, 2014, a fire occurred in the control panel at this lift station. The control panel operates the pumps and the alarms. Based on a consultant’s observation, the fire was caused by an apparent power surge. In order to get the lift station operational, a bypass pump was placed at this location the following day and currently remains there while the control panel is being replaced. Staff has filed a claim with the County’s insurance provider, however the claim is pending at this time. If the claim is approved, the County will be reimbursed a percentage of the total cost of repairs. Analysis: Due to the cost of operating off of a bypass pump, it was imperative that staff move quickly to get the control panel replaced. Because of that, staff promptly issued a request for quote to three (3) vendors who provide replacement control panels, with all three vendors responding (Attachment #1). The lowest quote was selected (Attachment #2). Staff quickly ordered the control panel replacement to expedite the repair process. Per Section 4.7.1 of the County purchasing policy; In the case of emergencies that require the immediate purchase of goods or services, the County Administrator or his designee shall be empowered to secure such good or service without competitive bidding. In this event, all measures shall be taken to assure the maximum cost benefit to the County is reached. Therefore, staff is seeking ratification of the purchase of the control panel for emergency repairs to the Sopchoppy Master Lift Station. Request Board Ratification of an Emergency Purchase for Repairs to the Sopchoppy Master Lift Station January 20, 2015 Page 2 Budgetary Impact: The total cost of the replacement control panel was $33,893.00. It has been budgeted for in FY14/15 and will be paid for from the Sewer Maintenance fund. Options: 1. Ratify the emergency purchase of the control panel for emergency repairs to the Sopchoppy Master Lift Station in the amount of $33,893.00. 2. Do not ratify the emergency purchase of the control panel for emergency repairs to the Sopchoppy Master Lift Station in the amount of $33,893.00. 3. Board Direction. Recommendation: Option#1 Attachments: 1. Control Panel Quotes 2. Pump and Process Invoice Quote Number: 3820 Hopkins Street Pensacola, FL 32505 (850) 432-0334, fax: (850) 432-1336 Quotation Date: 8/15/2014 Project: L.S. 68 Sopchoppy Location: Wakulla County, FL To: Brent Pell Wakulla County Public Works 340 Trice Ln. Crawfordville Engineer: N/A FL 32327 Equipment: Duplex Control Panel 1405 B Terms: NET 30 Days Delivery: 4 Weeks We are pleased to quote on the following equipment: One (1) Replacement Duplex Control Panel - 60 HP, 480 Volt, 3-Phase which includes Danfoss VFDs with 6 year on-site warranty to be used as soft starters with heat sinks through the back to eliminate need for A/C units, 2 HP Mixer starter and controls. Includes Omnisite Cystall Ball with 3 year elite monitoring to monitor the pulse output of the flow meter to the Omnsite unit in order to get flow totals. -Four float switches Net price, F.O.B. shipping point: $33,893.00 NOTES: 1. If ordered, please sign this quotation form and FAX or Email back to Pump & Process Equipment, Inc. 2. Only items mentioned above are included. If it is not listed it is to be provided by others. 3. Delivery promise date begins upon return of approved Submittal or approved drawings. Additional Note 1. Includes startup of panel and omnisite unit. 2. Danfoss VFDs have 6 year on-site warranty which covers drives, moisture, and corrosion. Fuses will be replaced to customer at no charge when needed. This Quotation Prepared By Kathleen For Pump & Process Equipment, Inc. The undersigned agrees to and has the authority to bind the purchaser to the terms and conditions below and equipment as described above. Date Quotation good for 30 days. Prices do not include any applicable taxes. Payment terms are NET 30 days from date of shipment. Past due accounts will be charged interest at 1.5% per month. Should the services of an attorney, collection agency or other legal service become necessary for collection, purchaser will assume responsibilty for all expenses accrued in the collection process including fees, court cost, serving charges, lien filing, etc. Manufacturer's warranty applies. Pump & Process Equipment, Inc. assumes no liability whatsoever for delays or damages caused by defects or any other equipment failure. Quality Controls Inc. Industrial Control Panels EQUIPMENT PROPOSAL DATE: August 13, 2014 PROJECT: Wakulla County TO: Pump & Process Attn.: Kathleen McDole QUOTATION: Q14882-R1 We are pleased to propose the following quotation based on our interpretation of the furnished specifications. Any additional equipment not listed will be subject to pricing review. Enclosure Type: Enclosure Mounting: Power Requirements: Horsepower: Station Type: NEMA 4X Stainless Steel (60x36x12) w/ 3-point latching handle 12” leg kit 480 Volt 3 Phase 60 HP Duplex Equipment ____ Main power distribution block ____ Individual circuit breakers ____ VFD’s for pumps w/ heat sinks out enclosure back VFD’s by PPE ____ Starter for mixer with 3 leg overload protection, IEC rated ____ Phase/Power monitor ____ Surge protector ____ GFI convenient receptacle ____ 120 Volt fused control transformer ____ Level control system, four float system by PPE ____ Seal fail relays with seal fail indicating light, door mounted ____ Motor overtemp indicator lights, door mounted ____ Running indicating lights, door mounted ____ Hand-Off-Auto selector switches, door mounted ____ Elapsed time meters, door mounted ____ Alternator, with lead/lag selector switch ____ Cycle timer for mixer ____ Enclosure mounted alarm light for high-level alarm ____ Audible alarm horn, with alarm silence control ____ Alarm/Telemetry dry contact and relays ____ Auto-Dialer, furnished by PPE ____ Terminals for field connections ____ UL 508A Listed Plus any Federal, State, Local, or Applicable Taxes to be the responsibility of the buyer. One (1) copy of submittal information is included in the above price. Additional copies can be supplied at $5.00 a copy. Estimated delivery is 3 to 4 weeks after receipt of Complete Engineering Approved Drawings and/or acceptable order in our office located in Cincinnati, Ohio. Price valid for 60 days from the date of this proposal/agreement. Projects extended past this time period are subject to adjustments based on prevailing material costs. Established customers payment terms are NET 30 Days from date of shipment. Submitted by: Tom Pulskamp________________________________________ 3411 Church Street - Cincinnati, Ohio 45244 - Phone (513) 272-3900 - Fax (513) 272-3939 Email – Qualitycontrols@fuse.net Website – www.qualitycontrolsinc.com 8/13/14 L.S. 68 Sopchoppy 1 each Duplex Control Panel One (1) Duplex Control Panel - 60 HP, 480 Volt, 3-Phase with VFDs and 6 year on-site warranty. VFD to function as soft starters w/ heat sinks through the back to eliminate need for A/C. Includes 2 HP Mixer starter and controls. Includes telemetry with 3 years monitoring. GULF COAST ELECTRIC MOTOR SERVICE, INC. 3810 HOPKINS STREET PENSACOLA, FL 32505 PH (850)433-5134 * FAX (850)433-0308 24 HR RESPONSE (888)959-0415 August 13, 2014 Brent Pell Wakulla County Public Works 340 Trice Ln Crawfordville, FL Proposed to: Kelly Griffis Via: Email kgriffis@esginc.net CC: Gulf Coast Electric Motor Service is pleased to propose the following: L.S. # 68 Sopchoppy - Duplex Control Panel Provide: Item Qty #1 1 Description Price Replacement Duplex Control Panel - 60 HP, 480 V, 3 phase; includes Danfoss VFDs with six (6) year warranty to be used as soft starteres with heat sinks through the back to eliminate need for A/C unites, 2 HP Mixer starter and controls. Includes Omnisite Cystall Ball with three (3) year elite monitoring to monitor the pulse output of the flow meter to the Omnisite unit in order to get flow totals. -- Four (4) float switches. Total Price: Proposed by: Accepted By: $39,994.00 $39,994.00 Heneo Rodriguez Date: _________________ Pump & Process Equipment, Inc. Invoice 300 Shadow Wood Park Birmingham, AL 35244 Phone # Fax # 1-800-500-0029 205-987-3622 DATE INVOICE # 12/15/2014 11351 SHIP TO Wakulla County Pubic Works 340 Trice Lane Crawfordville, FL 32327 ITEM Misc. DESCRIPTION One (1) Replacement Duplex Control Panel60HP/480V/3PH which includes Danfoss VFDs with 6 year on-site warranty to be used as soft starters with heat sinks through the back to eliminate need for A/C units, 2HP Mixer starter and controls. Includes Omnisite Crystal Ball with 3 year elite monitoring to monitor the pulse out put of the flow meter to the Omnisite unit in order to get flow totals. - Four float switches P.O. NO. TERMS PROJECT 061442 NET 30 DAYS Wakulla Ct, LS 38 S... QTY RATE 1 33,893.00 AMOUNT 33,893.00 RE: Wakulla Sopchoppy LS. #68 Total $33,893.00 Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request Date of Meeting: January 20, 2015 Date Submitted: January 6, 2015 To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board From: David Edwards, County Administrator Michael Morgan, Fire Chief Subject: Request Board Approval to Schedule and Advertise a Workshop to Discuss Fire MSBU and other Public Safety Issues Statement of Issue: This agenda item requests Board approval to schedule and advertise a workshop to discuss the status of the Fire MSBU and other public safety issues. Background: Wakulla County provides Fire protection that is funded through a Municipal Services Benefit Unit. While the current MSBU has been in effect for several decades, the current funding level was established approximately five years ago. The response level as well as call load has changed over this time. In addition, changes have been made with EMS to bring that division into Wakulla County Fire Rescue along with the fire organization. Analysis: A workshop is being requested to allow staff to provide the BOCC with an update of the status of several Fire Rescue Department issues including apparatus, equipment, and facilities. Also included will be the current status of levels of protection for the citizens of Wakulla for both Fire and EMS. The Five Year Plan illustrates a list of capital items that have exceeded life expectancy and are in critical need of replacement. The BOCC will also be presented with an updated overview of the issues facing Fire Rescue including changes in responses from VFDs, re-organization of several VFDs, response times, upcoming ISO rating evaluations, changes in recruitment and retention of VFD members, ALS response, call load for EMS units, etc. The proposed Workshop is intended to facilitate discussion and review of the current status as well as the future needs in the Fire Rescue Department and the Five Year Plan. Staff anticipates obtaining the Board’s consensus and/or direction on the several issues including upcoming capital improvement expenditures. Lastly, staff anticipates this workshop lasting more than one hour; therefore, staff recommends the workshop begin at 3p.m. on February 17, 2015. Request Board Approval to Schedule and Advertise a Workshop to Discuss Fire MSBU and other Public Safety Issues January 20, 2015 Page 2 Budgetary Impact: None. Options: 1. Approve to schedule and advertise a Workshop on February 17, 2015 at 3p.m. to discuss Fire MSBU and other public safety issues. 2. Do not approve to schedule and advertise a Workshop on February 17, 2015 at 3p.m. to discuss Fire MSBU and other public safety issues. 3. Board direction. Recommendation: Option #1 Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request Date of Meeting: January 20, 2015 Date Submitted: January 9, 2015 To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board From: David Edwards, County Administrator Brandy King, Budget Coordinator Subject: Request Board Approval of a Resolution and Budget Amendment for an E911 Grant Award Statement of Issue: This agenda item requests Board approval of a Resolution and Budget Amendment for an E911 grant award. Background: Pursuant to Florida Statute 129 which governs the budget process, the Board has the ability to approve budget amendments to the current budget based on a receipt of a nature from a source not anticipated in the budget and received for a particular purpose, including but not limited to grants, donations, gifts, or reimbursement for damages, may, by resolution of the board spread on its minutes, be appropriated and expended for that purpose, in addition to the appropriations and expenditures provided for in the budget. Such receipts and appropriations must be added to the budget of the proper fund. The resolution may amend the budget to transfer revenue between funds to properly account for unanticipated revenue. Analysis: The State of Florida E911 Board annually awards grant funds to improve E911 systems serving rural counties on a cost reimbursement basis. Wakulla County is the recipient of this award for Fiscal Year 2014/2015 for the purpose of enhancing the E911 system used by the Wakulla County Sheriff Office and Wakulla County Fire & Rescue. These funds are restricted for use and cannot be used for any other purposes. The grant funds will be administered by Wakulla County Sheriff Office. Budgetary Impact: In preparing the FY2014/2015 Final Budget, these funds were not anticipated. According to the Florida E911 Board grant award letter (Attachment #1), the actual amount of the award is $18,145.14. Approval of this Resolution and Budget Amendment increases the Final FY2014/2015 revenue line item budget of 190-DMS-01.0600-02.000.334200 by $18,145.14 and will increase the expense line item of 190-DMS-01.0600-02.581.5911 by $18,145.14. Request Board Approval of Resolution and Budget Amendment for an E911 Grant Award January 20, 2015 Page 2 Options: 1. Approve the Resolution and Budget Amendment for an E911 grant award in the amount of $18,145.14. 2. Do not approve the Resolution and Budget Amendment for an E911 grant award in the amount of $18,145.14. 3. Board direction. Recommendation: Option #1. Attachment(s): 1. Florida E911 Board Grant Award Letter 2. Resolution 3. Budget Amendment WAKULLA COUNTY RESOLUTION #___________ WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Wakulla County, Florida has received funds from sources not anticipated in its budget for 2014-15 and WHEREAS, those funds hereinafter described were received for a particular purpose; and WHEREAS, Chapter 129.06, Florida Statutes, provides that the Budget Officer at any time within a fiscal year may amend a budget for that year when there is a receipt of funds from a source not anticipated in the budget and for a particular purpose, and expend it for a particular purpose; and WHEREAS, there is provision for such receipts and appropriations to be added to the budget of the proper fund: NOW, THEREFORE, The Board of County Commissioners does RESOLVE that the following described funds be appropriated and expended for the purpose indicated: 190-DMS-01.0600-02.000.334200 190-DMS-01.0600-02.581.5911 State Grant – Public Safety Transfer to Constitutional Officer $18,145.14 $18,145.14 Authorized and directed to add said receipts and appropriations to the budget of the proper fund. PASSED AND ADOPTED, on this the ______ day of __________________, 2015 _________________________________ Ralph Thomas, Chairman Wakulla County, Florida For 2014-2015 budget year ATTEST: ______________________________ Brent X. Thurmond, Clerk of Court APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY: _______________________________ Heather Encinosa, Esquire County Attorney BUDGET AMENDMENT Date: 1/20/2015 Department: Budget Amendment Finance Account # Description Beginning / Current Budget Increase 190-DMS-01.0600-02.000.334200 State Grant - Public Safety 0 18,145.14 190-DMS-01.0600-02.581.5911 Transfer to Constitutional Officer 0 18,145.14 Total: 0 36,290 Justification: Date of BOCC Action: Ending Budget Decrease 0 0 18,145 0 18,145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,290 Receipt of notification from Florida E911 Board of grant award 1/20/2015 Department Authorization: Date: OMB Authorization: Date: Budget Amendment Form OMB-11-15-07 Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request Date of Meeting: January 20, 2015 Date Submitted: January 6, 2015 To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board From: David Edwards, County Administrator Greg James, Finance Director Subject: Request Board Approval of a Line of Credit Renewal Reserved for Emergency / Disaster Relief and Authorize the Chairman and Clerk to Execute the Renewal Agreement Statement of Issue: This agenda item requests the Board to approval of a line of credit renewal reserved for emergency disaster relief and authorize the Chairman and Clerk to execute the $2,000,000 line of credit Renewal Agreement (Attachment #1) with Ameris Bank. Background: On October 7, 2013, the Board approved opening a line of credit at Ameris Bank for the sole purpose of funding future emergency or disaster relief efforts that cannot be internally funded through cash reserves. The approval was subject to legal review and the final agreement was approved by the Board on November 4, 2013. The line of credit is valid for 12 months and must be renewed every year. Analysis: When a disaster event occurs, the County is required to provide the needed funding for recovering from the event. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) and the State of Florida reimburse the County for 87.5% of approved expenditures at a later date. Typically this “later date” is several months and, in some instances, it may take more than a year for the County to be reimbursed. More recently, it has become more difficult to obtain reimbursement from FEMA. For example, the County has only just recently been fully reimbursed for the costs associated with the 2012 Tropical Storm Debby flooding. It took hundreds of man-hours between County and ESG, Inc. staff to obtain the reimbursements and it took approximately two years to receive full reimbursement. The County is in the process of rebuilding its reserves to appropriate levels. If a significant disaster struck the County, cash reserves will be wiped out. Given the difficulties of reimbursement, the County may be many months or even years without appropriate amounts of cash on hand. Request Board Approval of a Line of Credit Renewal Reserved for Emergency / Disaster Relief and Authorize the Chairman and Clerk to Execute the Renewal Agreement January 20, 2015 Page 2 In light of this possibility, staff is recommending the County re-authorize a line of credit with Ameris Bank. The arrangements set forth in the original promissory note have not changed. The line of credit is tied to the Prime lending rate which will vary over time. The rate is currently set at 3.25%. Repayment arrangements of the debt would be as follows: Interest only payments required on a monthly basis for a maximum of 12 months Principal payments made at any time at the discretion of the County Principal balance paid in full within one year of use of funds Renewal of the line of credit required on an annual basis At no time would staff have the authority to use the line of credit without prior authorization from the Board. If an emergency arises, staff would assess whether or not the event is of such magnitude that the line of credit may be needed. If such an assessment is made, staff would bring an agenda item before the Board to approve the use of the line of credit. Budgetary Impact: The cost associated with opening the original line of credit was $6,000 in bond counsel / attorney’s fees paid to Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson. Ameris Bank waived their fees. The current budgetary impact is zero due to Ameris Bank waiving the $500 renewal fee. Options: 1. Approve the renewal of the line of credit with Ameris Bank and authorize the Chairman and Clerk to sign the renewal agreement. 2. Do not approve the renewal of the line of credit with Ameris Bank and do not authorize the Chairman and Clerk to sign the renewal agreement. 3. Board Direction. Recommendation: Option #1 Attachments: 1. Ameris Bank Renewal Agreement to Promissory Note 2. Minutes from November 4, 2013 Meeting authorizing original line of credit BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR BOARD MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2013 The Board of County Commissioners in and for Wakulla County, Florida met for a regular scheduled Board Meeting on Monday, November 4, 2013 at 6:00 p.m., Chairman Randy Merritt presiding. Present were Commissioners Richard Harden, Howard Kessler, Jerry Moore, and Ralph Thomas. Also, present were County Administrator David Edwards, County Attorney Heather Encinosa and Deputy Clerk Evelyn Evans Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance provided by Commissioner Ralph Thomas APPROVAL OF AGENDA (CD6:01) Commissioner Thomas moved to approve the Agenda with the following changes: Commissioner Moore – requests to make a change to his item 18A in the analysis section County Administrator – requests to pull Consent item 9 Commissioner Kessler – requests to pull Consent items 6 & 8 Second by Commissioner Harden and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD (CD6:02) 1. Bob Danzey – Wetlands (CD6:04) 2. Chris Russell – Wetlands (CD6:06) 3. Chris Langston – Experience at the Stone Crab Festival regarding a Booth “Save Our Wetlands” (CD6:09) 4. James Hennessey – Wetlands and clarified that there was a registered booth at the Stone Crab Festival for the petition drive (CD6:13) 5. Charles Hickman – County budget and raises for Commissioners (CD6:15) 6. Bill Anderson – Taxes and wetlands PUBLIC HEARING (CD6:18) 1. Request the Board Hold a Public Hearing and Consider Transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Amending Policy 2.3 and Repealing Policy 4.1 of the Conservation Element Pertaining to Wetlands, CP13-02 Commissioner Harden moved to approve to conduct the public hearing and vote to transmit the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the amending of Policy 2.3 and repealing of Policy 4.1 of the Conservation Element Pertaining to Wetlands. Second by Commissioner Thomas with Commissioners Merritt, Harden, Moore, and Thomas in favor, Commissioner Kessler opposed, motion carried, 4/1. (CD7:29) 2. Request Board Approval to Conduct the Public Hearing and Consider Transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Establishing the Crawfordville Town Center 1 and Crawfordville Town Center 2 Future Land Use Designations, CP13-03 Commissioner Thomas moved to approve to conduct the public hearing and vote to transmit the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the establishment of the Crawfordville Town Center 1 and Crawfordville Town Center 2 Future Land Use Designations, CP13-03. Second by Commissioner Kessler and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. November 4, 2013 (CD7:39) 3. Request Board Approval to Conduct the Public Hearing and Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 15 of the County Code Adding a Section Relating to Vacancy Adjustments for Solid Waste Services Commissioner Kessler moved to approve to conduct the Public Hearing and Adopt the Ordinance Amending Chapter 15 of the County Code adding a New Section Relating to Vacancy Adjustments for Solid Waste Services. Second by Commissioner Thomas and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. CONSENT AGENDA (CD7:33) Commissioner Thomas moved to approve the Consent Agenda minus item 6, 8, & 9 that are pulled for discussion. Second by Commissioner Harden and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. 4. Approval of Minutes from the October 21, 2013 Regular Board Meeting Approve – Minutes from the October 21, 2013 Regular Board Meeting 5. Approval for Payment of Bills and Vouchers Submitted for October 17, 2013 – October 30, 2013 Approve – Payment of Bills and Vouchers submitted for October 17, 2013 – October 30, 2013 7. Request Board Approval of the Annual Core Contract and Amendment to the Fee Schedule for the Wakulla County Health Department Approve – the Annual Core Contract and Amendment to the Fee Schedule for Wakulla County Health Department 20. Request Board Approval of Temporary Road Closure for the 7th Annual Veteran’s Day Parade on November 9, 2013 Approve – the temporary road closure on November 9, 2013 from Myrtle Avenue to Arran Road at 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. for the 7th Annual Veteran’s Day Parade CONSENT ITEMS PULLED FOR DISCUSSION (CD7:33) 6. Request Board Approval of a Resolution Appointing Members to the One Cent Sales Tax Committee Commissioner Thomas moved to approve the Proposed Resolution appointing Members to the One Cent Sales Tax Committee, with an amendment to add a Board appointee for a 4 year term. Second by Commissioner Harden and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. (CD7:44) 8. Request Board Approval of the Contracts for the Gulf Tourism and Seafood Promotional Grant RFP# 2013-06 Creative Marketing and Graphic Design Services to Media Design and RFP# 2013-07 Digital Media Advertising Services to Simpleview, Inc. Commissioner Thomas moved to approve the Gulf Tourism and Seafood Promotional Grant contracts for RFP #2013-06 Creative Marketing and Graphic Design Services to media Design and RFP #2013-07 Digital Media Advertising Services for to Simpleview, Inc. Second by Commissioner Moore and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. (CD7:48) 9. Request Board Approval of a Resolution Appointing and Re-Appointing Members and Alternate Members to the Animal Control Appeals Board Commissioner Kessler moved to approve the proposed Resolution appointing and re-appointing members and alternate members to the Animal Control Appeals Board, with an amendment to add Steve Pigott as the Public Health Expertise instead of Scott McDermid and Debra Johnson as the alternate. The Lay Member is Sherry Calloway and Dale Twist is the alternate. Second by Commissioner Harden and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. 2 November 4, 2013 PLANNING AND ZONING (CD7:49) 10. Application for Change of Zoning R13-08, RMH-1 to R-1, for the Magnolia Gardens Subdivision Commissioner Moore moved to conduct the second of three public hearings and consider the adoption of the proposed Ordinance amending the Official Zoning from RMH-1 (Mobile Home Residential) zoning district to the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) zoning district, based upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the Board and any evidence submitted at the Hearing hereon. Second by Commissioner Thomas and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. (CD7:53) 11. Application for Variance V13-06, (Claude & Lauren Walker, Owners) Commissioner Moore moved to conduct a Public Hearing and recommend approval of the reduction of the wetland and other surface water buffer zone as requested in the Application for Variance V13-06 with conditions, based upon the recommendation of staff and the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the Planning Commission and any evidence submitted at the Hearing hereon. Second by Commissioner Harden and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. (CD7:59) 12. Request Board Approval to Conduct the Public Hearing and Adopt the Revised Public School Facilities Element and Revised Capital Improvements Element Text Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan CP12-04 Commissioner Kessler moved to approve to conduct the Public Hearing and vote to adopt the text amendment to the Public School Facilities Element and Capital Improvements Element of the comprehensive Plan, based upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission and based upon the findings of facts and conclusions of law made by the board and any evidence submitted at the Hearing hereon. Second by Commissioner Thomas and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. GENERAL BUSINESS (CD8:00) 13. Request Board Approval of a Resolution Amending the Building Fees Schedule Commissioner Harden moved to approve the proposed Resolution setting forth the new Building Department fees and approval to adjust the fees on an annual basis in accordance with the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Second by Commissioner Thomas and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. (CD8:03) 14. Request Board Approval of Eligible Code Enforcement Lien Foreclosures (go to CD8:28) Commissioner Kessler moved to direct County Attorney’s Office to proceed with conducting background research on each code lien listed above and proceed with foreclosures. Direct the County Attorney’s Office to proceed with sending demand letters to each non-homestead property with a code lien of $350 or less. Motion dies for lack of second Item 14 was reconsidered at CD8:28 Commissioner Kessler moved to direct County Attorney’s Office to proceed with conducting background research on each code lien listed above and proceed with foreclosures. Direct the County Attorney’s Office to proceed with sending demand letters to each non-homestead property with a code lien of $350 or less. Second by Commissioner Moore with Commissioners Merritt, Moore and Kessler in favor, Commissioners Harden and Thomas opposed, motion carried, 3/2. (CD8:04) 15. Request Board Approval to Purchase a Godwin Bypass Pump from Xylem Dewatering Solutions, Inc. Commissioner Moore moved to approve the purchase of the bypass pump for the Sewer Collection and Road & Bridge Department from Xylem Dewatering Solutions, Inc. Second by Commissioner Thomas and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. 3 November 4, 2013 (CD8:05) 16. Request Board Ratification of Fuel Purchase Payable to Mansfield Oil Company Commissioner Moore moved to ratify the Fuel purchase payable to Mansfield Oil, Company in the amount of $25,744.34. Second by Commissioner Kessler and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. (CD8:05) 17. Request Board Approval of CW Roberts Change Order #2 for Paving at Azalea, Hudson, and Hickory Park Commissioner Moore moved to approve Change Order No. 2 to C. W. Roberts for $14,200 for paving of parking areas at Hudson, Azalea and Hickory Parks. Second by Commissioner Harden and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. (CD8:05) 21. Approval to Open a Line of Credit Reserved for Emergency/Disaster Relief Commissioner Harden moved to approve the opening of a line or credit with Ameris Bank, authorize the Chairman and Clerk to sign the attached documents, and approve the budget amendment for the attorney fees. Second by Commissioner Kessler with Commissioners Merritt, Harden, Kessler, and Moore in favor, Commissioner Thomas opposed, motion carried, 4/1. COMMISSIONER AGENDA ITEMS 18. COMMISSIONER KESSLER (CD8:09) a. Request Board approval to Direct Staff to Review and Draft an Amendment to the Wakulla County Wetlands Protection Ordinance 10-16, Applying to Properties Platted Prior to 1995 Pertaining to Seawalls Commissioner Kessler moved to approve to direct staff to review Wakulla County Wetlands Protection Ordinance 10-16 and draft an amendment that would apply to land purchased prior to 1995 as directed in the modifications listed in the analysis section of this agenda item. Motion dies for lack of second. (CD8:16) b. Request Board Approval to Direct Staff to Review and Draft an Amendment to the Wakulla County Wetlands Protection Ordinance 10-16, Applying to Properties Platted Prior to 1995 Commissioner Kessler moved to approve to direct staff to review Wakulla County Wetlands Protection Ordinance 10-16 and draft an amendment that would apply to land purchased prior to 1995 as directed in the modifications listed in the analysis section of this agenda item. Motion dies for lack of second. 19. COMMISSIONER MOORE (CD8:15) a. Request the County Attorney to Render an Opinion that the Referendum will not Trigger County Liability under the Bert Harris Act – No Motion on this item (CD8:16) b. Lawsuit Litigation Cost Commissioner Moore moved to direct staff to ask FACT to provide all costs incurred in the Crum/Tucker Lawsuit and Log Creek Lawsuit whether they be incurred by the County, FACT or their Insurance Company or incurred on Commissioner Kessler’s behalf. Second by Commissioner Thomas and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. COUNTY ATTORNEY - 0 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR (CD8:27) 1. Seeking 2 members for the Industrial Development Authority (2) Seeking 15 Citizens for the Charter Review Committee (3) Two Workshops on Thursday evening starting at 4:00 p.m. (4) Agenda item 14 regarding Code Enforcement was re-visited at this point with a motion (see item 14 above) 4 November 4, 2013 (CD8:45) Commissioner Kessler – Ms. Lottie Roddenberry Recognition – She is 102 years old and is the oldest registered voter in Wakulla County. She will be present at next meeting to receive a plaque. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD (CD8:47) 1. David Damon – Commissioner Thomas’ presentation regarding wetlands was a personal attack on citizens, and further commented on Commissioner Thomas speaking in defense of a landowner at a Planning Commission meeting; suggested that Commissioner Moore look into science as to why beaches are closed and glad that he is now in support of our kids. (CD8:50) 2. Steve Cushman – Oyster Industry is dying and the need to have the State declare Wakulla County as a disaster area in order to receive funding (CD8:53) 3. Vic Lambou – Questioned why speaker time is being cut from 3 minutes as people come prepared to speak to an item and can’t get out what they came prepared for. Thinks that there should have been public hearings where people could have talked and had their say regarding the Wetlands. (CD8:54) 4. Chuck Hess – Wetlands and Science DISCUSSION ISSUES BY COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Kessler – Ms. Lottie Roddenberry Recognition (see CD8:45) (CD8:56) Commissioner Thomas – When you are taking on flack, you must be directly over the target. (CD8:57) Commissioner Moore – Oysters and the Board is in the process of appointing a Marine Advisory Committee; Zaxby’s is opened; Congratulations to the School Superintendent and School Board for the Automotive Repair Program located behind Super Lube (CD9:01) Commissioner Merritt – Wanted to see if there was support in moving the Board meetings back to 5:00 p.m. There are two portions of Citizens to be Heard now and staff has an hour to wait for the meetings to begin. Commissioners Harden, Kessler and Thomas were not in support of changing the time back. (CD9:03) Commissioner Harden – Wetlands Petitions and proposed changes to ordinances (CD9:08) Commissioner Kessler – Trash collection fee on tax bill for Senior Citizens. County Attorney advised that they can make partial payments to the Tax Collector; Code Enforcement lien fines building up and now with the expeditious handling of these liens this should be handled in much less time; Wetlands argument “Everyone should have what you have” would be destroying more Wetlands; The issue of false statements and an obligation to set the record straight; People taking time to come to the meetings and providing more time for them to speak at Public Hearings There being no further business to come before the Board, Commissioner Thomas moved to adjourn; second by Commissioner Kessler and the motion carried unanimously, 5/0. These minutes approved by the Board on November 18, 2013 as presented by Brent X. Thurmond, Clerk. 5 Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request Date of Meeting: January 20, 2015 Date Submitted: January 12, 2015 To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board From: David Edwards, County Administrator Brandy King, Budget Coordinator Subject: Request Board Approval of a Resolution and Budget Amendment for Azalea Park Improvements Statement of Issue: This agenda item requests Board approval of a Resolution (Attachment #1) and Budget Amendment (Attachment #2) for Azalea Park Improvements. Background: On June 2, 2014, the Board approved the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Recreational Trails Program Grant Agreement for walking trail improvements and trail amenities at Azalea Park. At the time of Board approval, a resolution and budget amendment were not brought forward with the agreement for approval. Analysis: Pursuant to Florida Statute 129 which governs the budget process, the Board has the ability to approve budget amendments to the current budget based on a receipt of a nature from a source not anticipated in the budget and received for a particular purpose, including but not limited to grants, donations, gifts, or reimbursement for damages, may, by resolution of the board spread on its minutes, be appropriated and expended for that purpose, in addition to the appropriations and expenditures provided for in the budget. Such receipts and appropriations must be added to the budget of the proper fund. The resolution may amend the budget to transfer revenue between funds to properly account for unanticipated revenue. Budgetary Impact: The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Recreational Trails Program Grant Agreement calls for matching funding from the County of $199,766. The match funding is available and was budgeted for in One Cent Sales Tax Parks in the current fiscal year. The DEP shall pay the county on a cost reimbursement basis, not to exceed $199,766 for a total project cost of $399,532. Request Board Approval of a Resolution and Budget Amendment for Azalea Park Improvements January 20, 2015 Page 2 Options: 1. Approve the Resolution and Budget Amendment for Azalea Park Improvements. 2. Do not approve Resolution and Budget Amendment for Azalea Park Improvements. 3. Board direction. Recommendation: Option #1. Attachment(s): 1. Resolution 2. Budget Amendment WAKULLA COUNTY RESOLUTION #___________ WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Wakulla County, Florida has received funds from sources not anticipated in its budget for 2014-15 and WHEREAS, those funds hereinafter described were received for a particular purpose; and WHEREAS, Chapter 129.06, Florida Statutes, provides that the Budget Officer at any time within a fiscal year may amend a budget for that year when there is a receipt of funds from a source not anticipated in the budget and for a particular purpose, and expend it for a particular purpose; and WHEREAS, there is provision for such receipts and appropriations to be added to the budget of the proper fund: NOW, THEREFORE, The Board of County Commissioners does RESOLVE that the following described funds be appropriated and expended for the purpose indicated: 300-DEP-05.6900-02.000.334706 300-DEP-05.6900-02.000.381000 300-DEP-05.6900-02.572.5620 State Grant – Parks Interfund Transfers Capital Outlay - Building $199,766. $199,766. $399,532. Authorized and directed to add said receipts and appropriations to the budget of the proper fund. PASSED AND ADOPTED, on this the ______ day of __________________, 2015 _________________________________ Ralph Thomas, Chairman Wakulla County, Florida For 2014-2015 budget year ATTEST: ______________________________ Brent X. Thurmond, Clerk of Court APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY: _______________________________ Heather Encinosa, Esquire County Attorney BUDGET AMENDMENT Date: 1/20/2015 Department: Finance Account # 300-DEP-05.6900-02.000.334706 300-DEP-05.6900-02.000.381000 Description State Grant - Parks Interfund Transfers 300-DEP-05.6900-02.572.5620 Capital Outlay - Building 317-PARK.6900.572.5630 317-PARK.6900.581.5910 Justification: Date of BOCC Action: Budget Amendment Beginning / Current Budget Increase 0 199,766 0 199,766 0 399,532 Capital Outlay - Infrastructure Interfund Transfer 275,000 0 199,766 Total: 275,000 799,064 Decrease 199,766 199,766 Ending Budget 199,766 199,766 0 399,532 0 75,234 199,766 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,074,064 Grant funding and match funding for Azalea Park Improvements 1/20/2015 Department Authorization: Date: OMB Authorization: Date: Budget Amendment Form OMB-11-15-07 Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request Date of Meeting: January 20, 2015 Date Submitted: January 6, 2015 To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board From: David Edwards, County Administrator Greg James, Finance Director Subject: Request Board Approval of an Amended and Restated Fund Balance Policy Statement of Issue: This agenda item is requesting Board approval of an Amended and Restated Fund Balance Policy. Background: In June 2011, the Audit Committee made 14 recommendations to the Board in light of the financial emergency the County was facing. The Board approved those recommendations at the July 18, 2011 meeting. In June 2012, the Board approved its first Fund Balance Policy and in September 2012 the Fund Balance Policy was amended to adjust how the fund balance of the Fine & Forfeiture Fund was calculated. Also Resolutions #97-33, #00-52 and #11-14 which established and outlined the parameters of the “Rainy Day Fund” were rescinded. To date, all 14 recommendations of the audit committee have been met. Many of these recommendations are on-going and the County continues to build its reserves to appropriate levels. Additionally, the County Charter was amended in November 2014 to require the Board to adopt and adhere to a Fund Balance Policy. Analysis: Staff has determined, after operating several years under the current Fund Balance Policy that several additional changes need to be made and that the current Fund Balance Policy wording needs to be amended to reflect one of the recommendations made by the Audit Committee and to reflect changes made in “accounting terminology”. The proposed Amended and Restated Fund Balance Policy (Attachment #1) contains four changes are as follows: Request Board Approval of an Amended and Restated Fund Balance Policy January 20, 2015 Page 2 General Fund – Amended and Restated Recommendation #7 of the Audit Committee was to provide a reserve or designated fund balance for each constitutional officer once the County’s fund balance improved to such a level that would permit such reserves to be set aside. A separate section has been added to the fund balance policy to address how these constitutional officer reserves are established and used. Essentially all monies returned from a constitutional officer which used to go the General Fund will now go to a separate fund set aside for each officer. These returns will continue to build up until 25% of the officers operating budget is met. Once the 25% threshold is met, any future returns will go the General Fund again. The Board must approve the use of these reserves either through the annual budgetary process or through the budget amendment process. If portions of the officer’s fund balance are used, they will be replenished by future returns. Special Revenue Funds – Amended and Restated The Fine & Forfeiture Fund balance was calculated in two portions. The first portion was similar to other operating funds and should be no less than three (3) months (25%) of regular operating revenues or expenses. The second portion, designed to insulate the Sheriff’s Office budget for Corrections, was two (2) years of “Net Jail Bed Revenues” as outlined in the “Fine & Forfeiture Fund Parameters”. The first change lowers the fund balance goal of the Fine & Forfeiture fund to be the same as the General Fund – between 25% and 33% of the operating budget. One additional change is made to the amount being set aside in the County’s Fine & Forfeiture Rainy Day Fund. The original percentage of 10% was temporarily increased to 20% until the inter-fund loan was paid back by the General Fund. That inter-fund loan has been paid back and 10% is currently being set aside. The policy needs to be amended to reflect this. Enterprise Fund – Amended and Restated Accounting terminology changes from time to time. The term “retained earnings” is no longer an acceptable term in governmental accounting. The term “net position” is now used for enterprise funds and entity-wide financial statements. For simplicity, the policy will continue to use the term “fund balance”. The definition section of the policy has also been amended to reflect this change. Budgetary Impact None. Options: 1. Approve the Amended and Restated Fund Balance Policy. 2. Do not approve the Amended and Restated Fund Balance Policy. 3. Board Direction. Request Board Approval of an Amended and Restated Fund Balance Policy January 20, 2015 Page 3 Recommendation: Option #1 Attachments(s): 1. Amended and Restated Fund Balance Policy Policy # ______ Amended and Restated WAKULLA COUNTY FUND BALANCE POLICY (January 20, 2015) I. PURPOSE The County hereby establishes and will maintain reservations of Fund Balance, as defined herein, in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions. Fund Balance shall be composed of non-spendable, restricted, committed, assigned and unassigned amounts. II. DEFINITIONS Fund Balance – The difference between assets and liabilities in a governmental fund. For purposes of this policy, the term “fund balance” is used inter-changeably with the term “net position” for entity-wide financial statements and enterprise fund financial statements. Non-Spendable Fund Balance – Amounts that are not in spendable form (inventory or long-term receivables) or amounts that are required to be maintained intact (corpus of a permanent fund). Restricted Fund Balance – Amounts that can be spent only for specific purposes stipulated by external resource providers such as creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments, or imposed by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. Committed Fund Balance – Amounts that can only be used for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by formal action (resolution or ordinance) of the County Commission, the County’s highest level of decision-making authority. Committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the County Commission removes or changes the specified use by taking the same type of formal action (resolution or ordinance) it employed to commit those amounts. Assigned Fund Balance – Amounts established by County management intended to be used for specific purposes. Assigned amounts can be used for any other purpose as determined by County management. Unassigned Fund Balance – The residual classification representing fund balance that has not been restricted, committed or assigned and is available for general purposes. III. SPENDING ORDER OF FUND BALANCES The County uses restricted amounts to be spent first when both restricted (NonSpendable Fund Balance and Restricted Fund Balance) and unrestricted fund balances 1 (Committed Fund Balance, Assigned Fund Balance and Unassigned Fund Balance) are available unless there are legal documents/contracts that prohibit doing this, such as grant agreements requiring dollar for dollar spending. Additionally, the County would first use committed fund balance, followed by assigned fund balance and then unassigned fund balance when expenditures are incurred for purposes for which amounts in any of the unrestricted fund balance classifications could be used. IV. ESTABLISH RESERVE BALANCE TARGET General Fund It is essential that governments maintain adequate levels of fund balance to mitigate risks and provide a back-up for revenue shortfalls. The Government Finance Officers Association recommends, at a minimum, that general-purpose governments, regardless of size, incorporate a financial policy maintaining unrestricted fund balance in the general fund of no less than three (3) months (25%) of regular general fund operating revenues or regular general fund operating expenditures with a maximum of four (4) months or 33%. The County Commission hereby establishes the targeted minimum fund balance in the County’s General Fund equal to 25% of the General Fund’s current fiscal year operating expenditures and transfers out budgeted for the fund. The minimum fund balance shall be calculated by adding the total of Assigned and Unassigned Fund Balance. For the purposes of this calculation, the current fiscal year budget shall be the budget as originally adopted by ordinance in September for the subsequent fiscal year. This reserve shall be in addition to all other required reserves or designations of fund balance. Constitutional Officers In accordance with the recommendations of the Audit Committee adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on July 18, 2011, a reserve shall be established for each Constitutional Officer within the fund which funds their operating budget once the General Fund fund balance is sufficient. This reserve shall be comprised of 100% of the annual monies returned to the Board from each Constitutional Officer. This reserve shall continue to be built up until it represents 25% of the Constitutional Officer’s operating budget. Once the 25% threshold is met, all future returns to the Board shall be credited to the General Fund. The reserve or any portion thereof may be requested by the Constitutional Officer to be placed in the budget of the County as part of the annual budget process. Use of any amounts in a reserve line must be approved by the Board through the budget amendment process. Special Revenue Funds Special Revenue Funds are created to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific purposes. The amount of any Fund Balance reservation should be governed by the legal authority underlying the creation of the individual funds. Typically, no specific reservation of Fund Balance is required in Special Revenue Funds. 2 Wakulla County uses several special revenue funds for operations and essential services such as the Road Department and Fire Department. Such funds should maintain no less than three (3) months (25%) of regular operating revenues or expenses. Additionally, any special revenue fund whose revenues have been dedicated to the repayment of outstanding debt should maintain fund balance reserves equal to one (1) year of debt service payments. Fine & Forfeiture Funds The Sheriff’s Fine & Forfeiture fund balance shall be calculated in two portions. The first portion of fund balance should equal 2 years of “Net Jail Bed revenues” as defined by the Fine & Forfeiture Fund Parameters. This portion of fund balance shall be set aside to be used in the event the Housing Prisoner Jail Bed revenues decline or are lost as a source of revenue. The second portion of fund balance shall equal, at a minimum, 25% of the remaining Sheriff’s operating budget and no more than 33% of the Sheriff’s operating budget. The Sheriff’s Office shall deposit 100% of the Housing Prisoner Jail Bed revenue with the Clerk of Court on a monthly basis. The Clerk, on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, shall set aside each month ten percent (10%) of all jail bed revenue collected. These funds shall be deposited in a separate interest bearing account which shall be retained as income to the Fine and Forfeiture Fund. The 10% funds may not be spent without Board approval. The balance of the jail bed revenues (90%) shall be deposited into the pooled cash account of the Board and credited as income to the Fine & Forfeiture Fund and shall be used for the operations of the Corrections Department of the Sheriff’s Office as determined by the approved annual budget. Capital Project Funds Capital Projects Funds are created to account for resources designated to construct or acquire general fixed assets and major improvements. These projects may extend beyond a single fiscal year. No specific reserve requirement is established for the Capital Project Funds. However, at a minimum, the fiscal year end Fund Balance, and estimated revenues for the ensuing fiscal year must be sufficient to meet all outstanding fund encumbrances. Additionally, any capital project fund whose revenues have been dedicated to the repayment of outstanding debt should maintain fund balance reserves equal to one (1) year of debt service payments. Enterprise Funds For each enterprise fund, there shall be created a reservation of Retained Earnings fund balance (net position) no less than three (3) months (25%) of the operating costs for that fund. Additionally, any Enterprise fund whose revenues have been dedicated to the repayment of outstanding debt should maintain additional fund balance reserves equal to one (1) year of debt service payments. For the purposes of this calculation, the current fiscal year budget shall be the budget as originally adopted by ordinance in September for the subsequent fiscal year. This reserve shall be in addition to all other required reservations of retained earnings fund balance including, but not limited to, amounts reserved for renewal and replacement of long lived assets. V. REPLENISHMENT OF RESERVE DEFICITS If, at the end of any fiscal year, the actual amount of Assigned and Unassigned Fund Balance falls below the targeted levels set forth herein, a plan shall be established to 3 achieve the target by adding a designated amount to the budget to cover the deficiency over a period not to exceed five (5) fiscal years. VI. UTILIZATION OF RESERVES In the event that the Unassigned Fund Balance exceeds the amounts set forth herein, the excess may be utilized for any lawful purpose. Appropriation of the minimum reserve balances, once met, shall require the approval of the County Commission by inclusion in the approved annual budget (and revisions thereto). VII. ANNUAL REVIEW AND DETERMINATION OF FUND BALANCE RESERVE AMOUNTS Compliance with the provisions of this policy shall be reviewed as a part of the annual budget adoption process, and the amounts of non-spendable, restricted, committed, assigned and unassigned fund balance shall be determined during this process. Adopted on: ____________________________________ 4 Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request Date of Meeting: January 20, 2015 Date Submitted: January 6, 2015 To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board From: David Edwards, County Administrator Greg James, Finance Director Subject: Request Board Approval of the Debt Service Policy Statement of Issue: This agenda item is requesting Board approval of the Debt Service Policy. Background: The Board has adopted several financial policies over time, some stand-alone policies and some are “bundled” together in one policy statement. On May 19, 2008, the Board approved a broad set of financial policies (Attachment #1). One section of these policies was dedicated to establishing policies for the County’s management of its debt. From time to time, staff reviews these policies to determine if changes or updates need to be made. In 2014, the Charter Review Committee (CRC) recommended the Board adopt a debt policy. Clerk staff made the CRC aware of the existing policy. It was noted there were several financial policies adopted by the Board, but the County Charter did not require any of these policies to be in place. It was noted that while both policies were already in place, the Board could remove those policies at any time. Thus, the CRC recommended that the Charter be amended to require two policies – a fund balance policy and a debt policy. Subsequently, a referendum election was held on November 4, 2014 and the citizens voted to approve the County Charter be amended to require the Board to adopt and adhere to a Debt Service Policy. Analysis: The Board had already adopted a stand-alone fund balance policy and Clerk staff recommends the existing debt policy adopted in 2008 be reviewed, updated and separated into its own separate, stand-alone policy. Clerk staff reviewed the debt policies and manuals of several other Counties (Citrus, Lee, Palm Beach, Sarasota and St. Lucie) in addition to the “best practices” recommended by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). The recommended policy is attached (Attachment #2). The proposed Debt Policy requires, among other things, an annual debt report be prepared. Clerk staff has prepared the Preliminary First Annual Debt Service Report. Request Board Approval of the Debt Service Policy January 20, 2015 Page 2 This report is preliminary as it is based on un-audited figures from FY 2013-2014 just ended. This report will be updated and re-issued after the audit of FY 13-14 has been completed which is anticipated for March 2015. This report is being provided in conjunction with the proposed Debt Policy to provide some “concrete” numbers to show how the County’s debt is measured and the status of the County’s current debt amounts. Budgetary Impact None. Options: 1. Approve the Debt Service Policy. 2. Do not approve the Debt Service Policy. 3. Board Direction. Recommendation: Option #1 Attachments(s): 1. BOCC Financial Policies (approved May 2008) 2. Proposed Debt Service Policy 3. Preliminary 1st Annual Debt Service Report Wakulla County Board of County Commissioners FINANCIAL POLICIES In an effort to increase the level of financial and budgetary accountability in Wakulla County, it is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the following policies: Objective of Financial Policies The objectives of the Wakulla County’s financial policies are listed below: Provide clear direction to County staff in managing the County’s finances, developing and adopting a budget, and ensuring the efficient and effective delivery of services. Provide careful fiscal planning and health long term financial management of all County resources and activities. Comply with all statutory requirements of the State of Florida, County ordinances, and the standards set by the State of Florida, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (G.A.A.P.) and the Government Finance Officers Association for budget development and financial management. General Policy: 1. The Operating Budget authorizing expenditure of County funds will be adopted annually by the Board at the Fund level. The Budget will be presented in a multi-year format to aid in long term planning. 2. The budgeted expenditures and reserves of each fund (including the reserve for contingencies, Reserve for fund balance, and all other purposes) will equal the sum of balances brought forward for the fiscal year and all revenues which reasonably can be expected to be received during the fiscal year. In plain language: the revenues and expenditures must be equal on a fund by fund basis in order to present a “balanced budget”. 3. Fiscal Planning shall estimate 95% of all ad-valorem receipts reasonably anticipated from all sources. This will be the basis for budgeted revenues. F.S.129.01(2)(b)} Budgeting Process-Summary of Statutory Requirements Wakulla County has an important responsibility to its citizens to correctly account for public funds, to manage County finances wisely, and to plan for adequate funding of services desired by the public. Chapters 129 and 200 of the Florida Statutes establish legal procedures for Counties to follow when determining their individual budgets, as well as annual tax, or millage that ultimately results from those budgets. The County incorporates these statutory provisions (as OMB -1- 1/14/2015 well as those General Accepted Accounting Principles specific to state and local governments) into all financial policies set forth by the County. Chapter 129 of the Florida Statutes, titled “County Annual Budget” requires all Counties establish “an annual budget for such funds as may be required by law or by sound financial practice and generally accepted accounting principles. The budget shall control the levy of taxes and the expenditure of money for all county purposes during the ensuing fiscal year.” Wakulla County naturally observes this requirement, and, as a matter of policy and of law, also follows and incorporates other subsections of this chapter, including such key principles as: 1. Chapter 129.01(2)(b): “The budget shall be balanced…the total of the estimated receipts including the balance brought forward, shall equal the total of the appropriation and reserves.” 2. Chapter 129.01(2)(b): The budget…”shall conform to the uniform classification of accounts prescribed by the appropriate state agency.” 3. Chapter 129.01(2)(c)(1): “A reserve for contingencies may be provided in a sum not to exceed 10 percent of the total budget.” The reserve creates a pool for unallocated funds that may be needed for expenses not foreseen or contemplated when the original budget was created, such as storm emergencies. 4. Chapter 129.01(2)(b)(2): “A reserve for cash balance to be carried over may be provided for the purpose of paying expenses from October 1st of the ensuing fiscal year until the time when the revenues for that year are expected to be available.” A cash balance reserve essentially pays expenses for a County until revenues from ad valorem (property) taxes are levied and collected. 5. Using specific procedural guidelines, as established by Chapter 129.06(2), the County Commissioners may amend the current year budget: a. b. c. d. For unanticipated revenue related to a particular fund For appropriations of expenditures within a particular fund For appropriations from the reserves of a particular fund For transfers between funds Chapter 200, titled, “Determination of Millage” defines how Florida counties must proceed with respect to raising operating monies though taxation of real, personal and tangible property both before and after the final budget is established. The responsibilities of the Property Appraiser, the Tax Collector, and the Board of County Commissioners with respect to this duty are detailed here. In addition, this chapter places special emphasis upon the legal requirement that the proposed millage rates be advertised to the general public well in advance of their finalization, in order to allow the public ample opportunity to respond to them through public hearings. It is the policy of Wakulla County to follow these procedures in order to comply with Florida Law. Budget Modification Budget modifications shall follow the rules set forth in Florida Statute 129.06. Wakulla County has two (2) methods of budget modification. The annual budget can either be modified by resolution or budget amendment. OMB -2- 1/14/2015 The purpose of this process is to adjust fund amounts to reflect the level of revenues reasonably anticipated to be received and to balance expenditures to these revenues according to state law and sound financial practices. A supplemental budget hearing and a budget resolution shall be required for the Board to recognize an unanticipated excess amount of anticipated revenue. A budget resolution approved by the Board shall be required for revenue from an unanticipated source. A resolution is also required when transferring revenues between funds. In general, a budget resolution with Board approval is required anytime the overall budget fund increases. Wakulla County has two (2) levels of budget amendments. 1. Any transfer across department/division lines, from reserves, or increase of staffing levels must have Board approval. This also includes any transfer of positions from one department to another. 2. The Budget Officer or his / her designee must approve any transfers affecting personnel costs, capital projects / equipment, and / or all other forms of budget changes (changes to line items) within the same department / division. All amendments/transfers of funds will first be reviewed and approved by the division or department director of the requesting department, followed by a review for subsequent denial/approval by the Board of County Commissioners and /or the County Administrator, as set forth in the following: a. Provide that the County Administrator may authorize intrafund transfers up to $10,000. b. Provide that intrafund transfers greater than $10,000 and all interfund transfers may be approved by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners. All requests for use of reserves for contingency must be approved by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners. An annual mid-year budget adjustment process will be established to insure that all fund budgets are in-line with Board direction. All requests for budget modifications must be submitted on a form entitled “Budget Amendment” and signed by the Department Head. They are then sent to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. If required, they are sent onto the next level for further approval. Budget Procedure Policy Budget formulation, adoption, and execution involve year-round interaction of many people at various levels within the County. The purpose of this process is to identify service needs, develop strategies for meeting these needs and development of detailed revenue and expenditure plans to carry out the strategic plans. The budget process incorporates the following procedures and activities. OMB -3- 1/14/2015 The development of the budget preparation manual and the design and printing of budget forms. An annual meeting with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) staff, County Administrator, department heads, and the Board of County Commissioners to set goals and priorities for the coming fiscal year. Distribution of budget packages to all operating units at a kickoff meeting with the County Administrator. This meeting will serve as a forum to answer questions on budget procedures and to inform department heads of budget policies and priorities for the coming budget year. OMB reviews and tabulates all operating budgets, capital improvement projects, and revenue projections. Each submission is analyzed for accuracy, content, and compliance with the previously determined priorities and policies. OMB meets with each department to review their budgets in detail and make adjustments if needed. These meetings give each department head the opportunity to discuss and defend the amounts requested in their individual department budget submission. The County Administrator and OMB meet with each department to review and evaluate individual budgets. These hearings provide a forum for the explanation of revisions determined by OMB, and for any additional revisions by the County Administrator. Constitutional Officers submit their budgets to OMB by June 1 or as otherwise required by the Board and allowed by law. A tentative balanced budget is generated and distributed to the Board by July 15 of each year. The Board reviews the requests in a series of budget workshops throughout the year. Public hearings are held to adopt the proposed budget, millage rates, and Capital Improvement Program. October 1, implementation of the adopted budget and Capital Improvement Program. A finalized budget is printed, bound, and distributed. Operating Policies 1. The County will operate in a financially responsible manner and spend within its resources at all times. 2. The operating and capital budgets should be determined concurrently. Proper balance between current and long term requirements shall be maintained. OMB -4- 1/14/2015 3. The County will maintain a budgetary control system to ensure adherence to the budget, which will be used to evaluate any department requests for increase funding within a particular year. 4. The County will continue to work with the Legislature to ensure that programs impacting County government are designed to provide appropriate resources to fund service requirements. 5. The use of technologies and practices that increase productivity and lower costs is strongly encouraged. 6. The County will adhere to its “Non-Profit Policy and Procedures” with respect to community agencies such as non-profit and Quasi-nonprofit organizations. This policy details the application process, supporting documentation (i.e tax returns, proof of nonprofit status, auditor’s reports if necessary, etc…) and deadline criteria each must meet in order to be considered for funding in a particular year. Upon successful and timely completion of all paperwork, the policy also outlines how funding levels will be determined for each class, as well as the agency’s fiscal responsibilities upon any award it is granted. Revenue Policy: 1. The use of ad valorem tax revenues will be limited to the General Fund, Debt Service Funds and municipal service taxing units. 2. The use of Gas taxes will be limited to the Road Department Fund (generally known as the Transportation Trust Fund) and transportation capital projects. 3. Tourist Development Tax proceeds will be appropriated in accordance with the level contained in the Tourist Development Tax Ordinance. 4. The use of revenues that have been pledged to bondholders will conform in every respect to the bond covenants that commit those revenues. 5. Fee revenues will be anticipated for purpose of budget preparation using fee schedules that have been adopted by the Board and historic collection rates. 6. Revenues that are reasonably to be unexpended and unencumbered at the end of the fiscal year are available to be budgeted as beginning fund balances in the budget of the following year. The amount budgeted should represent a conservative view of funds available to limit the impact of economic downturns. 7. Cash balances remaining in any fund at year-end will stay in that fund for subsequent years. 8. Fund balances utilized as a revenue source must be reviewed against the actual fund balance for the fund as estimated by the Clerk of Court’s Finance office after year-end closing. Any shortfall in actual fund balance must be adjusted for by intradepartmental transfer or Board budget amendment. OMB -5- 1/14/2015 Financial Reserves Policy: 1. Provide that all requests for use of reserves for contingency must be approved by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners. 2. It shall be the objective of the Board of County Commissioners to maintain a Contingency Reserve of thirty to sixty days of operating expenditures and Emergency/Disaster Relief Reserve of thirty days of operating expenditures in the General Fund. 3. Debt Service Fund reserves will be maintained as required by bond covenants or other debt obligations. 4. Capital Funds should maintain reserves if allowed by type of fund. Many Capital Funds have time limitations and those funds will be expended as available and allowable. 5. Enterprise Funds shall maintain reserves of thirty to ninety days of operating expenditures, plus fifty percent of one year’s senior lien debt service interest. Compensated Absences shall be fully funded in all appropriate programs, where practical and available. Transfer Policy: 1. Transfers among expenditure and revenue accounts may be made during the fiscal year within a fund and within a department. The County Administrator or designee must approve transfer requests moving funds to or from personal services expense accounts. No transfers may be made if the result of such transfer will be to change the adopted total budget of a fund. 2. Changes in the adopted total budget of a fund shall be made only with Board approval of a budget amendment and resolution. Capital Improvement Policy: 1. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget showing estimated annualized costs of a capital projects will be updated on an annual basis. All amendments during the year must be approved by the Board. 2. On and annual basis, the County shall prepare and adopt a five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) consistent with the requirement of the Comprehensive Plan. The annual budget will include sufficient appropriations to fund capital projects identified in the first year of the CIP. 3. Capital Projects identified in the five-year CIP will be given priority for funding. The five-year plan for waste and wastewater CIP projects will be based on projects included in the adopted master plans. 4. A capital project may not be added or deleted without approval of the Board. OMB -6- 1/14/2015 5. An adopted capital project may not be amended or changed more than necessary to fulfill the original intent of the project. No funds may be added or deleted which change the outcome of the project without Board approval. 6. Capital Projects shall not be used to determine or establish land use or permissible development. Capital projects are the implementer of the Comprehensive Plan, not the reverse. 7. All Comprehensive Plan capital projects shall be added, deleted or amended in compliance with Plan amendment procedures. 8. All capital projects shall compute and display the impact upon the operating budget at the time the project is being proposed for Board approval. 9. The use of impact fees shall always be related to “growth” and not be used to correct existing deficiencies. 10. The respective departments, during the budget process, will identify annual operating expenses associated with capital projects. 11. The following guidelines must be met in order to qualify as a Capital Project: New Construction / Renovations a. Over $25,000 and 5 year life expectancy b. Newly acquired or constructed assets must exceed minimum capitalization threshold requirements as determined by fixed asset guidelines. c. Improvements to or expansions of existing assets must increase its appraised value or add to its life expectancy. d. Routine maintenance and repair services of a repetitive nature, provided for the purpose of sustaining capital assets in serviceable condition, such as painting or lawn mowing, are not capital projects. e. Studies and evaluations entered into for the purpose of providing a tangible asset that is later determined to be unfeasible as a result of the study, may be capitalized. The length of time between a study or evaluation and actual commencement of construction or acquisition of the asset is not determinative criterion. Debt Policy: The objective of Wakulla County’s Debt Policy is to maintain the County’s ability to incur present and future debt at the most advantageous circumstances to the County and its citizens, for purposes of financing or refinancing approved elements of its capital improvements program. OMB -7- 1/14/2015 f. The County may issue bonds only for capital improvement and general obligations. Long-term debt will not be used to fund operating activities. g. Every effort may be made to limit the amount general obligation debt. All general obligation debt will be used for public purposes. h. General obligation debt may not be used for enterprise activities. All such bonds will be supported by revenue from operations. i. Where possible the County may use special assessment, revenue or other self supporting bonds and avoid the use of general obligation debt. j. The County may maintain a bond retirement reserve, which is the equivalent to the amount of debt service due on tax supported general obligation bonds in the next fiscal year. k. The County may issue notes for bond anticipation purposes only Several guiding principles which are incorporated into the County’s Debt Policy are as follows: 1. Asset Life: The County will consider long-term financing for the acquisition, replacement, or expansion of physical assets (including land) only if they have a useful life of at least five years. Debt will be used only to finance capital projects and equipment, except in case of emergency. County debt will generally not be issued for periods exceeding the useful life or average useful lives of the project or projects to be financed. 2. Capital Financing: The County normally will rely on specifically generated funds and/or grants and contributions from other governments to finance its capital needs on a pay-as-you-go basis. To achieve this it may become necessary to secure short term (not exceeding 5 years amortization) construction funding. Such financing is anticipated and allows maximum flexibility in CIP implementation. Debt of longer amortization periods (long-term debt) will be issued for capital projects when it is an appropriate means to achieve a fair allocation of costs between current and future beneficiaries. Debt shall not, in general, be used for projects solely because insufficient funds are budgeted at the time of acquisition or construction. 3. Debt Guarantees: The County may consider, on case-by-case basis, the use of its debt capacity for legally allowed capital projects by public development authorities or other special purpose units of government. 4. Credit Ratings: Wakulla County seeks to maintain the highest possible credit ratings for all categories of short and long-term debt that can be achieved without compromising delivery of basic County services and achievement of adopted county policy objectives. 5. Financial Disclosure: The County is committed to full and complete financial disclosure, and to cooperating fully with rating agencies, institutional and individual investors, agencies, other levels of government, and the general public to share clear, comprehensible, and accurate financial and other relevant information. The County is committed to meeting secondary disclosure requirements on a timely and comprehensive basis. 6. Capital Planning: To enhance creditworthiness and prudent financial management, Wakulla County is committed to systematic capital planning, intergovernmental cooperation and long-term OMB -8- 1/14/2015 financial planning. Evidence of this commitment to systematic capital planning is demonstrated through adoption and periodic adjustment of a Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the Florida Growth Management Act and Rule 9 J 5, and the adoption of the five year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). 7. Debt Limits: The County will keep outstanding debt within the limits prescribed by State statue and/or County Charter, if applicable, and at levels consistent with its creditworthiness, best practices, needs and affordability objectives. 8. Debt Structure: Debt will be structured to achieve the lowest possible net cost to the County given market conditions, the urgency of the capital project, and the nature and type of security provided. Moreover, to the extent possible, the County will design the repayment of its overall debt so as to recapture rapidly its credit capacity for future use. The County shall strive to repay at least 20 percent of the principal amount of its general obligation debt within five years and at least 40 percent within ten years. 9. Length of Debt: Debt will be structured for the shortest amortization period consistent with a fair allocation of costs to current and future beneficiaries or users. 10. Back loading: The County will normally seek to structure debt with level principal and interest costs over the life of the debt. “Backloading” of costs will be considered when natural disasters or extraordinary or unanticipated external factors make the short-term cost of the debt prohibitive, when the benefits derived from the debt issuance can clearly be demonstrated to be greater in the future than in the present when such structuring is beneficial to the County’s overall amortization schedule, or when such structuring will allow debt service to more closely match project revenues during the early years of the project’s operation. 11. Refunding: The County’s staff and advisors will undertake periodic reviews of all outstanding debt to determine refunding opportunities. Refunding will be considered (within federal tax law constraints) if and when there is a net economic benefit of the refunding or the refunding is essential in order to modernize covenants essential to operations and management. In general, advance refundings for economic saving will be undertaken when a net present value savings of at least five percent of the refunded debt can be achieved. Current refunding that produce a net present value saving of less than five percent will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Refunding with negative savings will not be considered unless there is a compelling public policy or legal objective. 12. Credit Enhancements: Credit enhancement, such as letters of credit and bond insurance, may be used, but only when net debt service on the bond is reduced by more than the costs of the enhancement. 13. Variable Rate Debt: The County may choose to issue securities that pay a rate of interest that varies according to pre-determined formula or results from a periodic remarketing of the securities, consistent with state law and covenants of pre-existing bonds, and depending on market conditions. The County will limit its outstanding bonds in variable rate form to reasonable levels in relation to total debt. 14. Subordinate Debt: The County may issue subordinate debt only if it is financially beneficial to the County or consistent with creditworthiness objectives. OMB -9- 1/14/2015 15. Short Term Notes: Use of short-term borrowing, such as bond anticipation notes and taxexempt commercial paper, will be undertaken only if the transaction costs plus interest on the debt are less than the cost of internal financing, or available cash is insufficient to meet working capital requirements. 16. State Revolving Fund Program: This program provides funds for projects involving water supply and distribution facilities, storm water control and treatment projects, air and water pollution control, and solid waste disposal facilities. Whenever possible, this program will be utilized since the costs associated with issuing the notes are low and local agencies benefit from the strength of the state’s credit. Carry Forward Policy The Carry Forward Program provides budget incentives to managers to improve financial management effectiveness and accountability. The program allows managers to carry forward into the ensuing fiscal year a portion of, or all, of the unexpended end-of-year funds for identifiable projects which will result in increased productivity, cost savings and/or increased efficiency. Those projects which receive the County Administrator’s approval will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners prior to November 30 of each year. A. Eligibility Requirements 1. The department manager must submit the program proposal to the Office of Management & Budget (OMB) no later than the deadline established by OMB. The proposal must include financial savings estimated based on the most recent financial data available. The department manager must clearly indicate in the Carry Forward Program how the County will realize an increase in productivity, save money or increase efficiency by approving the proposal. Any request that was denied during the budget review process will be forwarded directly to the County Administrator for special review. The County Administrator will provide further direction to OMB. 2. 3. Note: B. Those projects which were funded by the Board in the current fiscal year, and which were not completed, are not affected by this program. In such case, the manager must submit a “Carry Forward Request Form” to the Office of Management & Budget requesting that these funds be added to the budget of the ensuing fiscal year for the sole purpose of completing the projects for which the funds were appropriated in the previous fiscal year. The program must state on the “Carry Forward Request Form” why the project was not completed within the current fiscal year and the anticipated completion date. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Responsibilities The Office of Management & Budget shall review all proposals from department managers. The Office of Management & Budget will be responsible for the program activities listed below: 1. 2. OMB Verify the total amount of funds eligible to be carried forward into the ensuing fiscal year with the Finance Department. Review an analysis of the proposed project to determine if it will increase productivity, save tax dollars and/or increase efficiency. - 10 - 1/14/2015 3. 4. OMB Make a recommendation of approval or denial to the County Administrator. Notify the program manager in writing of whether the project was accepted or denied within two (2) working days of the County Administrator’s final decision. - 11 - 1/14/2015 Policy # ________ WAKULLA COUNTY DEBT ADMINISTRATION POLICY Adopted: ________________ I. OVERVIEW STATEMENT The Board of County Commissioners is responsible for establishing fiscally sound financial policies that will guide the County to and maintain a strong financial position. The Board of County Commissioners is ultimately responsible for and in charge of the approval of form, terms and dollar amounts of all County borrowings. The objective of this debt policy is 1) to provide guidance to County Staff in managing and reporting the County’s debt, 2) to enhance the quality of the decision making process by imposing order and consistency into the debt issuance process, and 3) to maintain the County’s ability to incur present and future debt at the most advantageous circumstances to the County and its citizens, for purposes of financing or refinancing approved elements of its capital improvements program. The County may issue general obligation (GO) bonds and other debt instruments by means of referendum, County ordinance, resolution and/or other applicable provisions of law as required, and in full compliance with, the Constitution and Statutes of the State of Florida. II. PURPOSE OF DEBT The County borrows money from time to time to meet ongoing obligations of providing capital and infrastructure improvements necessary to offer the services needed and requested by the citizens of Wakulla. Incurring debt allows the County to spread the repayment of this equipment and infrastructure over a long period of time. In addition, incurring debt allocates the cost of these facilities to all of the users or beneficiaries over the life of the asset and it allows the County to maintain consistent healthy reserves. Debt shall not be used to fund operating activities except during a declared state of financial or physical emergency and such use must be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 1 III. LEGAL DEBT LIMITS While neither the Florida Constitution, nor the Florida Statutes, nor the County Charter place a limit on the amount of debt the County can incur, the Board of County Commissioners, by adoption of this policy, has established appropriate guidelines for 1) monitoring the total indebtedness of the County, 2) ensuring the ability to meet current and long-term obligations, and 3) maintaining sound financial health and creditworthiness. General obligation (GO) debt may not be used for enterprise activities. Debt, in general, shall not be used for projects solely because insufficient funds are budgeted at the time of acquisition or construction. Debt limitations are not expressed in hard dollars or capped at a particular dollar threshold. Debt limitations are analyzed, reviewed and expressed as ratios or trends. These ratios and trends are compared to industry standards or benchmarks. The change in these ratios and trends indicate the County’s ability to pay long-term debt, the County’s level of flexibility in how resources are allocated and/or the County’s ability to respond to economic changes. Some of these ratios are analyzed from a government-wide perspective, some on a fund by fund basis and others distinguish governmental operations from enterprise operations. Long-term Debt per Capita One of the ways the County’s total long-term debt is expressed is as an amount owed per citizen. When this amount increases over time it may indicate that the County has a decreasing level of flexibility in how resources are allocated or a decreasing ability to pay long-term debt. The County should strive to maintain a target of less than or equal to $500 per citizen as adjusted for inflation. Debt Service Expenditures to Total Expenditures Another way the County’s debt is measured is to divide the total annual debt service payment by the County’s total expenditures. When this percentage increases over time it may indicate a declining flexibility of the County to respond to economic changes. The County should strive to maintain a ratio of less than or equal to 15% of operating expenditures as adjusted for inflation. Another way of looking at this ratio is no more than 15 cents of every dollar spent should go to debt service payments. Debt Service Coverage Ratio Another way the County monitors debt is to compare the annual debt payments to the net income of the fund making those debt payments. This is called the debt service coverage ratio (DSCR). This ratio measures the cash available (net income) for debt service payments on an annual basis. Certain non-operating amounts are excluded from the net 2 income calculation such as transfers in or out, depreciation expense and principal and interest payments. It is a benchmark used to measure the ability to produce enough cash to pay all operating costs and the anticipated debt service payments. The higher the ratio the better it is. A ratio of 1.0 or more means you have sufficient revenues to pay the debt service payments and a ratio of less than 1.0 means you have insufficient revenues. The County should strive to maintain a DSCR equal to or greater than 1.10. County staff will monitor these measurements annually and provide them in the annual debt report discussed under the Debt Administration section. IV. TYPES OF DEBT There are two debt categories: capital and non-capital. Capital debt is incurred for the acquisition or construction of physical assets with a cost of $5,000 or more or a useful life of one (1) year or more. Non-capital debt is incurred for the purchase or construction of physical assets with a cost of less than $5,000 or with a useful life of less than one (1) year (i.e. copier or postage lease) or debt incurred by the County as part of ongoing operational activities (employment and contract liabilities). This policy is intended to only cover capital debt. Debt can also be categorized by the type of collateral, security or pledge made to secure the debt. For example, General Obligation (GO) debt is secured by the County’s ability to levy ad valorem taxes on real and personal property. Assessment debt is secured by special assessments upon property owners benefiting from specific activities (fire protection or solid waste collection). Revenue debt is secured by pledging specific dedicated revenues (sales taxes, sewer fees). Additionally, the County may covenant to budget and appropriate legally available non-ad valorem revenues as collateral. Some types of debt instruments are quite complex and may have tax implications to the County. In some circumstances the use of independent bond counsel and/or financial advisors may be necessary. Capital Debt Instruments The list of debt instruments below are intended to provide a basic guide of the various types of capital debt the County may use to finance capital projects. It does not contain every possible type of debt instrument and is not intended to limit the County to the use of only those listed. It must also be noted that some debt instruments tend to cost more than others due to their complexity. 3 Bonds or Tax-Exempt Bonds 1. General Obligation (GO) Bonds are securities issued to raise funds for countywide projects that lack substantial ability to generate the income necessary to cover the project costs. General obligation bonds are unique because they require voter approval and they are backed by the full faith and credit of the County. The County commits the full resources to paying investors, including the power to collect ad valorem taxes as security for this type debt. 2. Non-Ad Valorem Revenue Bonds or Pledged Revenue Bonds are issued for the construction of County infrastructure. Non-ad valorem revenue bonds are repaid from a particular revenue source such as sales tax, gas tax or user fees. If the income generated by the financed project is insufficient to make the debt payments on the bonds, additional support from non-ad valorem taxes or fees is needed. 3. Business-type Revenue Bonds are used to finance self-supporting projects with specific and defined revenue streams. The County has two Enterprise (business-type) funds: the Sewer Fund and the Solid Waste Fund. Business-type revenue bonds are repaid with user fees from these funds. Notes / Loans / Lines of Credit Bank loans or notes payable proceeds can be used for a variety of countywide projects, construction of facilities and infrastructure or for the purchase of equipment or software. Bank loans are typically secured by the County’s covenant to budget and appropriate from legally available revenues in an amount sufficient to pay the required annual principal and interest payments on the note but may also be secured by non-ad valorem revenue. A line of credit is simply a pre-approval of possible future debt with a credit limit very similar to a personal credit card. Interim Financing / Bridge Loans Interim financing is typically short term debt of 1 to 5 years that is incurred to bridge the need to purchase or construct an asset now until grant funds from other governments are received in the future. Bridge loans are intended to be paid off with the future grant funds or permanent financing, either in whole or in part, depending on the grant agreement. Refunding / Refinancing Refunding is the payment of existing debt by the issuance of new debt (refinancing) and are often done to take advantage of favorable market changes in interest rates or to escape unfavorable debt covenants. 4 Capital leases Capital leases are leases of equipment, software or space with values greater than $5,000 and/or a life span of more than one (1) year. Most capital leases are heavy equipment or vehicles. All capital leases undergo a thorough process of comparison to actual acquisition costs. Lease options are chosen if the annual cost of owning and maintaining the asset is higher over the life of the asset. Capital leases are also a cost-saving mechanism designed to keep up with the fast changing technologies and high service and repair costs associated with some equipment and/or software. V. DEBT PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) recommends that a formal debt policy include debt planning, management and issuance guidelines. There are many factors involved in debt planning including but not limited to the setting of capital priorities, debt affordability, weighing of opportunity costs and lowering of borrowing costs. Prior to proposing the issuance of debt to the Board of County Commissioners, either through the annual budget process or during the budget year, the County Administrator and Finance Department shall coordinate the proposed issuance and method of debt, the sizing of the debt, the structure of the debt and the source of repayment (security) for the debt. This is accomplished by preparing and reviewing a cost-benefit analysis taking into account the current amount of outstanding debt, the various debt instruments available, the fiscal strength of the fund incurring the debt, the funds’ ability to repay the debt and the associated fund balance requirements of the new debt. Debt Planning Wakulla County is committed to systematic capital planning. Evidence of this commitment is demonstrated through the adoption and periodic adjustment of a Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the Florida Growth Management Act and the adoption of the five (5) year Capital Improvement Plan. The County Administrator, as Budget Officer, and the Finance Department of the Clerk of Court shall evaluate each debt proposal as part of the annual budget process and/or five (5) year Capital Plan. Funding Sources Where ever possible, the County will first attempt to fund capital projects with grant funds. When such funds are not available or insufficient, the County shall use dedicated or restricted revenues, or the leveraging thereof, to fund the project or remainder of the project. If these are not available or insufficient, the County may use general revenue, or the leveraging thereof, to fund the project with one exception: general obligation bonds should not be used to fund enterprise activity debt. 5 Debt Structure Considerations 1. Net Cost - All debt should be structured to provide the lowest possible net cost to the County given current market conditions, prudent estimations of future market conditions, the urgency of the capital project and the nature and type of security provided. 2. Length of Debt - The County should design the repayment of debt so as to recapture, as rapidly as possible, credit capacity for future debt. Debt should be structured for the shortest amortization period possible giving proper consideration to the life of the asset and the fair allocation of costs to current and future beneficiaries or users of the asset. 3. Back-loading - The County will normally seek to structure debt with level or close to level annual principal and interest payments over the life of the debt. Back-loading (balloon payments etc.) of costs should only be considered when natural disasters or extraordinary circumstances make the short term cost of the debt prohibitive, when the benefits derived from the debt issuance can be clearly demonstrated to be greater in the future than in the present, when such structuring is clearly beneficial to the County’s overall amortization schedule, or when such structuring will allow debt service to more closely match project revenues that will be used to repay such debt. 4. Refunding - An annual review should be conducted of the County’s outstanding debt to determine if refunding opportunities exist and whether the refunding saves the County money either through interest savings or through unfavorable debt covenants such as compensating balances or pre-payment penalties. Federal tax law constraints should also be considered. Typically refunding should be considered when the net present value of the savings exceeds five (5) percent of the refunded debt. Refunding that produces less than five (5) percent net present value savings should be considered on a case by case basis. Refunding with negative savings should not be considered unless there is a compelling public purpose or legal objective. Debt should be structured so it can be paid off at any time. 5. Credit Enhancements - Credit enhancements such as letters of credit or bond insurance may be used but only to the extent that the net debt service cost on the bond is reduced by more than the cost of the credit enhancement. 6. Variable Rate Debt - The County may consider the issuance of variable rate debt only after careful consideration of current market conditions and when prudent estimations of future market conditions dictate that variable rate debt is the best choice given the County’s total debt portfolio. Preference should be given to the certainty of fixed rate financing. 7. Subordinate Debt - The County may issue subordinate debt only if it is financially beneficial to the County or consistent with creditworthiness objectives. 8. Short-term Notes - The use of short-term borrowings, such as bond anticipation notes and tax-exempt commercial paper, may be undertaken only if the transaction costs plus 6 interest on the debt are less than the cost of internal financing, or if the available cash for internal financing is insufficient to meet funding requirements. 9. Inter-fund Loans – If sufficient cash is available and the use of such cash is legally allowed for the anticipated project, one fund may loan another fund the necessary cash to internally finance the project. If such financing is utilized, it will be evidenced by an Inter-fund Loan Note, and if such internal financing is provided by the General Fund, said note will be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Said note shall outline the terms of repayment including the length of the loan and the interest rate charged. The opportunity cost (i.e. lost interest earnings from the lending fund) should be considered in setting the interest rate. 10. Government Loan Programs - The County should review the availability and cost of various Federal, State, or Regional Agency loan programs such as “State Revolving Fund Loans” since the costs associated with such borrowings is typically lower than borrowing from private sector banks and the open market. Debt Issuance Process The County Administrator and Clerk of Court, Finance Department, shall, as part of the debt planning process, determine whether proposed borrowings should be accomplished through competitive sale or negotiated sale. All proposed borrowings require the County Commission’s final approval which includes the adoption of the appropriate Resolutions as drafted by legal or bond counsel. Competitive Sale Under normal market conditions, County debt is issued through a competitive bidding process, formal or otherwise. Bids are awarded on a “True Interest Cost” (TIC) basis provided other bidding requirements are satisfied. “True Interest Cost” is simply the real cost of borrowing. It includes not only the interest cost but also all ancillary fees and costs such as finances charges, possible late fees, discount points, prepaid interest, costs associated with issuing a bond, legal fees, and other factors related to the time value of money. Negotiated Sale Negotiated sale of debt is considered when the complexity of the debt issuance requires specialized expertise, when the negotiated sale would result in substantial savings in time or money, when the market conditions are unusual or volatile and/or liquidity conditions are unfavorable, if the County’s credit is problematic or when a negotiated sale is otherwise in the best interest of the County. 7 Debt Administration Reporting & Disclosure The County is committed to full and complete financial disclosure and to cooperate fully with rating agencies, institutional and individual investors, agencies, other levels of government and the general public to share clear, comprehensive and accurate financial and other pertinent or relevant information. The County is committed to meeting secondary disclosure requirements on a timely and comprehensive basis. The Clerk of Court, Finance Department is responsible for ongoing disclosure and maintaining compliance with disclosure standards promulgated by state and national regulatory bodies. 1. Annual Debt Report The County Administrator and Clerk of Court shall prepare an annual report to the Board of County Commissioners which shall include, at a minimum: Calculations of appropriate ratios and measurements o Debt Service per Capita o Debt Service Expenditures to Total Expenditures o Debt Service Coverage Ratios by Fund Detailed schedule of current outstanding debt Historical schedule of outstanding debt List of anticipated future debt This report shall be provided to the Board of County Commissioners in a time frame consistent with the release of the Annual Financial Report. 2. Report to Bondholders The County, through the Clerk of Court, Finance Department shall prepare and release to all interested parties the Annual Financial Report which will act as the ongoing disclosure document required under the Continuing Disclosure Rules promulgated by the Securities Exchange Commission [SEC Rule 15c2-12(b)(5)]. The information presented in this report shall comply with the disclosure obligations set forth in the Continuing Disclosure Certificates issued in connection with its debt obligations. 3. Arbitrage Analysis & Compliance Arbitrage is the process by which profit is earned from interest on borrowed money that is invested at a higher yield. When government borrows money by the issuance of notaxable debt, it is allowed to invest the proceeds of the debt and keep the interest if it earns less than or equal to the borrowing rate on the debt. If the interest earned on the 8 investment of non-taxable debt exceeds the interest rate paid on the debt that excess interest must be remitted or “rebated” to the federal government. The process of tracking and reporting the interest on these type investments is known as arbitrage analysis and must be done in accordance with IRS tax code regulations. The County and Clerk of Court may carry out such responsibilities through the engagement of outside agents or legal counsel. 4. Tax-Exempt Debt Post-Issuance Compliance The County’s legal counsel or bond counsel shall prepare or co-ordinate the preparation of IRS Form 8038-G, Information Return for Tax-Exempt Governmental Obligations or Form 8038-GC, Information Return for Small Tax-Exempt Governmental Bond Issues, Leases and Installment Sales in connection with each tax-exempt debt issuance by the County. VI. CREDITWORTHINESS Bond ratings are like credit scores for governmental entities and rate their overall creditworthiness. Wakulla County is not rated by Moody’s Investor Service, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch Ratings. Should the County become rated, it shall strive to maintain a minimum underlying bond rating equivalent to “Upper Medium Grade” (an A rating) without compromising the delivery of basic County services. No credit rating or poor credit ratings typically result in higher borrowing costs for a government entity. At the same time, for smaller government entities who do not issue bonds on a regular basis, the cost associated with maintaining an appropriate credit rating may outweigh the borrowing cost of not having a credit rating. There are a variety of factors involved in the credit rating of a government entity including, but not limited to, the overall management and governance, expansion strategies and economic policies, financial operating performance, resources and flexibility, total debt burden and liquidity, current economic conditions, revenue and expenditure composition and diversity, risk management and contingency planning and investment performance. End of Policy 9 Wakulla County Annual Debt Report For FY 2013-2014 (unaudited) Prepared by the Wakulla County Clerk of Court, Finance Department Board of County Commissioners and Citizens of Wakulla County, As your Clerk of Court, it is my constitutional duty to keep you informed of the County’s debt and to provide an independent check and balance on County finances to ensure your tax dollars are safe. For many years, the County’s debt was managed in accordance with policies established as part of a broader financial policy package approved by the BOCC in May of 2008 and as amended from time to time. I am glad my office was instrumental in developing the County’s first standalone debt policy as approved by the BOCC on January 20, 2015. The County debt policy calls for an annual debt report to be provided to the BOCC and the citizens of Wakulla County. This is the first annual debt report. This report is written in such a manner that non-financial readers may have a better understanding of the County’s debt and how it impacts the overall health of the County’s finances. As the accountant to the BOCC, I am glad to report that the County’s overall debt status is favorable. As of September 30, 2014, the County’s debt continues to decline. As with most governmental entities, and like most households, debt is a necessary component to the budget. Like households who borrow money to finance larger purchases such as vehicles and homes, Wakulla County borrows money from time to time to finance capital equipment and large infrastructure projects so that the County may continue to provide the necessary services its citizens expect. Our office is charged with a variety of tasks related to the debt of the County. We assist the County Administrator, David Edwards, with analyzing funding options and with debt structuring both during the budget process and after. We ensure timely payment of debt service obligations, pre-audit and maintain supporting documentation of all debt service payments, accurately account for all debt transactions in the general ledger for financial reporting purposes and ensure compliance with debt covenants and related third party reporting requirements. The amount of debt owed by the County is not the only factor in determining the health of County finances. As your Clerk, our office prepared, and the BOCC approved, its first standalone fund balance policy in 2012. The BOCC continues to work toward appropriate levels of fund balance and cash reserves. As always, I am honored to serve as your Clerk of Court. I remain dedicated to promoting transparency and accountability in reporting the financial activities of our County in spending your taxpayer dollars. If you have any questions concerning the contents of this or any other report of our office, please contact me or my staff. In your service, Brent X. Thurmond, C.P.A. Wakulla County Clerk of Courts TABLE OF CONTENTS Debt Overview Total Outstanding Debt & Debt Service Payments Total Outstanding Debt by Debt Instrument Type Total Outstanding Debt by Lender Total Outstanding Debt by Activity Debt History Historical Total Outstanding Debt Historical Total Debt Service Payments Debt Planning Current Debt Retirement Schedule Schedule of Future Anticipated Debt Combining Chart of 10 Year Debt History and 10 Year Debt Projection Combining Chart of 10 Year Debt Service History and 10 Year Debt Service Projection Debt Management & Analysis Total Outstanding Debt per Capita Debt Service Expenditures to Total Operating Expenditures Debt Service Coverage Ratios by Fund Appendix Debt Policy DEBT OVERVIEW As of September 30, 2014 (unaudited) This unaudited report and the numbers contained herein represent only the capital infrastructure related debt of Wakulla County. It does not include any debt incurred by the Constitutional Officers and does not include other types of long-term debt such as compensated absences and other post-employment benefits. As such, this report is not intended to and will not match the audited Annual Financial Report. Total Outstanding Debt & Debt Service Payments Wakulla County’s (the County) outstanding debt totaled $4,771,538 as of September 30, 2014. During fiscal year 2013-14, the County paid $1,381,268 in principal and interest on outstanding debt. The total debt of the County decreased by $1,189,072 and the County paid $192,196 in interest expense. The principal reduction of $1,189,072 represents 19.9% of the balance due at the beginning of the year. The interest expense of $192,196 represents 3.2% of the balance due at the beginning of the year. The County’s total debt balance of $4,771,538 is comprised entirely of notes and loans. At fiscal year end, the County had no outstanding bonds or capital leases. The County’s total debt of $4,771,538 can be further divided into Governmental Activities and Business-type Activities. Governmental activities include the General Fund, all Special Revenue Funds, and all Capital Project Funds and the total outstanding Governmental debt was $2,480,573 (52%). Business-type activities include the County’s two enterprise funds (Sewer and Solid Waste) and the total outstanding Business-type debt is $2,290,965 (48%). Total Outstanding Debt by Instrument Type The following graph shows the types of debt the County has incurred. As fiscal year end, the County’s entire debt balance is comprised of notes and loans. Bonds tend to cost more and are typically only used for very large projects. In recent history, the County has only issued bonds three times. The County does not currently have any outstanding bonds. While the County does not currently have any outstanding capital leases either, the County has used this financing mechanism in the past for equipment that is expensive to maintain such a road graders. As outlined in the County’s debt policy (Appendix A), the County selects the lender to borrow from based on several criteria but the primary factor is the cost of the borrowing. The following chart summarizes the lenders the County currently owes and the balances owed. Governmental accounting makes distinctions between activities that the County is responsible for that are not intended to function like a business, that is, make a profit or break even. These activities are called “governmental activities” and accounted for in the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, and Capital Project Funds. Activities that are more narrowly defined and are intended to function like a business, make a profit or break even and called “business-type activities”. The County has two such activities, sewer and solid waste, and, as such, they are accounted for in the Sewer Fund and Solid Waste Fund. The following chart summarizes the County’s outstanding debt by activity. DEBT HISTORY Historical Total Outstanding Debt The County’s total outstanding debt has decreased for 10 consecutive years (2005-2014), dropping from $11,750,387 to $4,771,538, a 60% decline. The number of individual debt obligations has dropped from 10 in 2005 to 6 in 2014 and the average maturity of the County’s outstanding debt has also dropped from 8.08 years in 2005 to 6.34 years in 2014. Below is a chart and graph of the last 10 years of debt history. In $Millions 1E+06 Year 04/05 Governemental Funds 7.62 Enterprise Funds 4.13 Total Debt Service $ 11.75 05/06 06/07 7.60 6.80 4.13 4.49 $ 11.73 $ 11.29 07/08 5.36 4.35 $ 9.71 08/09 4.59 4.00 $ 8.59 09/10 4.61 3.62 $ 8.22 10/11 5.67 2.83 $ 8.50 11/12 4.51 3.02 $ 7.53 12/13 3.25 2.71 $ 5.96 13/14 2.48 2.29 $ 4.77 Historical Total Debt Service Payments During the same period, 2005 – 2014, the County’s annual debt service payments have only slightly decreased dropping from $1,411,637 in 2005 to $1,381,267 in 2014 as shown in the graph below. The “spikes” found in the chart include the early retirement of debt. Year Principal Interest Total Debt Service 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 921,075 1,231,840 1,076,327 1,275,208 1,198,279 2,072,466 2,009,052 1,555,268 1,647,760 1,189,072 490,562 469,379 429,328 382,314 341,450 357,285 340,284 298,066 260,945 192,196 1,411,637 1,701,219 1,505,655 1,657,522 1,539,729 2,429,751 2,349,336 1,853,334 1,908,705 1,381,268 DEBT PLANNING Debt must be carefully planned in order to maintain the County’s financial health. Expenditures in today’s County budget arising from debt service payments (principal and interest) are obligations on present taxpayers that were decided years in the past and debt incurred today will affect the taxpayers of the future. While the resources used to repay the County’s debt comes primarily from restricted or dedicated revenues, the County often offers creditors assurances that the debt will be backed by the “full faith and credit” of the County, that is, the County promises to budget and appropriate sufficient revenues to pay the debt whether or not the restricted or pledged revenues are sufficient from time to time. The County’s Debt Policy (Appendix A) outlines specific guidelines for administering and managing the County’s existing debt and the issuance of new debt. This policy is consistent with the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) debt management policy best practices (2012) and with the State of Florida, Auditor General “Local Governmental Entity Example Financial Condition Assessment Indicators and Related Procedures” (2013). Current Debt Retirement Schedule If no changes are made to the current debt schedule, the County’s debt will be retired as follows: Project 1 Cent Sales Tax Road Paving Sewer Expansion #1 Courthouse Renovation A Northwoods Road Paving Courthouse Renovation B Sewer Expansion #3 Total Lender Bank of America Bank of America Hancock Bank Centennial Hancock Bank State Rev. Loan Maturity 12/1/2016 11/1/2017 12/31/2017 2/14/2020 3/1/2021 12/15/2031 Balance Due $ 760,564 1,320,302 894,871 88,285 736,853 970,663 $ 4,771,538 The County prepares a Five Year Plan in conjunction with the annual budget process. This plan is an estimate of the future operating and capital needs of the County and is amended from time to time as the County’s needs change. As with any plan, it does not take into account the unforeseen or unknown. Circumstances will arise due to disrepair or emergency that may require the County to consider financing a capital expense that was not budgeted for. This uncertainty highlights the importance of having sufficient reserves budgeted and the resource flexibility to incur new unexpected debt. Retirement/Refinancing The County’s Five Year Plan anticipates refinancing the Bank of America sewer loan and the State of Florida Revolving Fund sewer loan in fiscal year 2014-15 as part of the Wastewater Treatment Plant upgrade being funded through the U.S.D.A. grant/loan. It is estimated that $2,000,000 will be refinanced. Refinancing these two loans will provide more flexibility with increased cash flow and a lower interest rate. It is expected that approximately $124,000, on average, will become available each year in increased cash flow and $151,000 will saved in net interest expense due to this refinancing. Schedule of Future Anticipated Debt The County’s Five Year Plan anticipates most of the capital improvements being funded by grants and restricted cash. The following capital improvements are expected to be financed through the issuance of debt: Fund Road Fund Pledged Revenue / Funding Source Project Amount 2 Cent Gas Tax 3 Motor Graders $ 525,000 Road Fund 2 Cent Gas Tax 3 Dump Trucks Sewer Fund Sewer Fees WWTP Solid Waste Assessment Class III Landfill Solid Waste Total 636,000 Life 5 years Instrument Lease w/ option to buy 6 years Lease w/ option to buy 6,495,000 40 years 930,000 15 years $ 8,586,000 Local Interim Financing / USDA Revenue Bonds Local Bank Loan 3 Motor Graders & 3 Dump Trucks The County leases its heavy equipment due to the high maintenance and repair expense associated with this type of equipment. The County currently operates 3 motor graders and anticipates selling them, using the proceeds as a down payment on 3 new graders and making lease payments on them over the next 5 years. The County has also budgeted to lease purchase 3 new dump trucks. Typically this cycle is repeated at the end of each lease so that the County always has new equipment on the roads and eliminates the typically high maintenance and repair expense associated with such equipment. WWTP Expansion The Board has approved a project to expand the existing Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The WWTP is almost at capacity and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) is requiring action by the Board. Staff has negotiated a loan/grant agreement with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) in which the County will borrow $6,495,000 from a local/regional bank during construction and USDA will repay (take out) the bank loan and, in turn, issue tax-exempt bonds in the amount of $6,495,000. The USDA is providing a grant in the amount of $3,066,900 to complete the project. The low-interest loan will be repaid with sewer revenues over the next 40 years. Additionally, as mentioned in the previous section, the 2 current sewer loans will be refunded in FY 14/15 through this USDA loan. Class III Landfill Closure The Board has approved a project to close (cap) the Lower Bridge Class III landfill. The landfill is at capacity and the FDEP again is requiring Board action. Staff has negotiated a long-term fixed interest rate loan from Ameris Bank. The County will borrow approximately $930,000 and use $300,000 in existing cash to complete the project. The loan will be repaid using with the Solid Waste franchise fee over the next 15 years. Please note there are several other capital project needs that the County has identified that may require the issuance of new debt but they are not included in these schedules since staff has not identified how they can be funded or the debt repaid. Combining Chart of 10 Year Debt History and 10 Year Debt Projection The chart and graph below illustrates the County’s 10 year debt history, current outstanding debt, and the County’s anticipated refunding and borrowing schedule for the next 10 years. As seen in the graph, the bulk of the outstanding debt is expected to be related to the County’s two enterprise funds. In $Millions Year Governemental Funds Enterprise Funds Total Debt Service 1000000 04/05 05/06 7.62 7.60 4.13 4.13 $ 11.75 $ 11.73 06/07 6.80 4.49 $ 11.29 07/08 5.36 4.35 $ 9.71 08/09 4.59 4.00 $ 8.59 09/10 4.61 3.62 $ 8.22 10/11 5.67 2.83 $ 8.50 11/12 4.51 3.02 $ 7.53 12/13 3.25 2.71 $ 5.96 13/14 2.48 2.29 $ 4.77 In $Millions Year 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Governemental Funds 2.97 2.07 1.42 0.87 0.55 0.22 0.53 1.06 0.85 0.63 0.42 Enterprise Funds 3.93 7.38 7.33 7.11 6.89 6.68 6.46 6.23 6.01 5.78 5.56 Total Debt Service $ 6.90 $ 9.45 $ 8.74 $ 7.98 $ 7.44 $ 6.90 $ 6.98 $ 7.29 $ 6.86 $ 6.42 $ 5.98 Combining Chart of 10 Year Debt Service History and 10 Year Debt Service Projection The chart and graph below illustrates the County’s 10 year annual debt service history, current debt service, and the County’s anticipated annual debt service schedule for the next 10 years. The spike in FY 14/15 is a result of refinancing the two sewer loans and the spike in FY 16/17 is a result of paying off the WWTP interim financing with the issuance of the USDA bonds. As shown in the graph, the County’s annual debt service payments have exceeded $1,000,000 every year for the past 10 years. It is anticipated the annual debt service payments for the next 10 years will be about $500,000 which will provide $500,000 in available cash for on-going operations. Year Principal Interest Total Debt Service Year Principal Interest Total Debt Service 04/05 $ 921,075 $ 490,562 $ 1,411,637 14/15 $ 2,964,852 $ 308,689 $ 3,273,541 05/06 $ 1,231,840 $ 469,379 $ 1,701,219 15/16 $ 946,312 $ 338,322 $ 1,284,635 06/07 $ 1,076,327 $ 429,328 $ 1,505,655 16/17 $ 7,198,075 $ 398,720 $ 7,596,795 07/08 $ 1,275,208 $ 382,314 $ 1,657,522 17/18 $ 765,594 $ 186,460 $ 952,055 08/09 $ 1,198,279 $ 341,450 $ 1,539,729 18/19 $ 536,168 $ 172,892 $ 709,061 09/10 $ 2,072,466 $ 357,285 $ 2,429,751 19/20 $ 541,969 $ 167,092 $ 709,061 10/11 $ 2,009,052 $ 340,284 $ 2,349,336 20/21 $ 442,977 $ 157,934 $ 600,911 11/12 $ 1,555,268 $ 298,066 $ 1,853,334 21/22 $ 326,926 $ 151,695 $ 478,621 12/13 $ 1,647,760 $ 260,945 $ 1,908,705 22/23 $ 434,920 $ 152,867 $ 587,787 23/24 $ 436,982 $ 150,805 $ 587,787 13/14 $ 1,189,072 $ 192,196 $ 1,381,268 24/25 $ 439,112 $ 148,674 $ 587,787 DEBT MANAGEMENT & ANALYSIS The County uses ratios, trends and benchmarks to assess the County’s level of outstanding debt. As a stand-alone number, these ratios are relatively useless, but the change in the ratios from year to year or the trend helps the County assess whether or not the total outstanding debt is at an appropriate level or if it is causing a financial burden. Industry norms and third parties have also established benchmarks to help assess whether or not the County’s total debt is at an appropriate level. These benchmarks must be refined or massaged to fit each local government since not all governments are the same size, have the same revenue resources, or provide the same services and so on. We also review these trends for mitigating factors that might cause the trend to seem favorable or unfavorable on the surface but not so when all of the variables are taken into account. Many of the variables used in the following analysis must be adjusted for inflation. The price index used by the Auditor General of Florida is the September Municipal Cost Index published by American City and County Magazine. This index is a weighted average of the consumer price index, the producer price index for industrial commodities and the construction cost index. These indices can be found on the American City and County or U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics web sites. Total Outstanding Debt per Capita One of the ways the County analyzes its total debt is by looking at the amount of outstanding debt (in constant $) per citizen over time. If the results of this analysis are increasing over time it may indicate that the County has a decreasing level of flexibility in how its resources (revenues) are allocated to its costs or it even may indicate a decreasing ability to pay its long-term debt. Simply put, as this number increases over time, the County is allocating more and more of its revenues to pay for annual debt services payments and is allocating less to operating costs or unable to adjust its budget due to unforeseen changes or events. And, as this number decreases, it indicates the County has the ability to easily adjust to unforeseen economic conditions. The County’s debt policy requires the outstanding debt amount not to exceed $500 per citizen. The highest per capita debt was in FY 04/05 and was $437.35. The lowest per capita debt is expected to be in the current year just ended, FY 13/14, and is expected to be $151.59. The per capita debt is expected to climb in the next two years due to the issuance of debt for the WWTP project and the Lower Bridge Class III Landfill project but will decline over the following eight (8) years. The population growth is estimated to be approximately 1.7% over the next ten (10) year period which is slightly lower than the actual growth rate of 2.2% over the past ten (10) year period. Source: Office of Economic & Demographic Research; http://edr.state.fl.us Debt Service Expenditures to Total Operating Expenditures Another important factor in the overall health of the County’s debt is looking at the trend of annual debt service payments (principal and interest) divided by the total operating expenditures. It is important to distinguish governmental activities from business-type activities when looking at this trend. As the percentage of debt service payments compared to total operating expenditures increases over time, it may indicate a declining flexibility of the County to respond to uncertainties and changes in economic conditions. And, as the percentage decreases, it illustrates the county’s ability to easily respond to these changing conditions. The County’s debt policy recommends this ratio not exceed 15%. The Governmental debt service ratio has historically hovered around 5% and is expected to drop to less than 2%, on average, of the Governmental operating expenses. That is, less than 2 cents on every dollar spent is expected to be spent on principal and interest payments. The Business-type debt service ratio has historically exceeded the 15% benchmark and has caused the cash position of the County’s sewer and landfill funds to suffer. Staff has re-balanced the business-type debt with the planned issuance of the USDA bonds and this ratio is expected to drop below 10% for the foreseeable future. For purposes of calculating this ratio, the early retirement of debt in a given year is removed so that only annual debt service payments are analyzed. Debt Service Coverage Ratios by Fund Debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) is the ratio of cash available (net income) for debt service payments on an annual basis. Certain non-operating amounts are excluded from the net income calculation such as transfers in or out, depreciation expense and principal and interest payments. It is a benchmark used to measure the ability to produce enough cash to pay all operating costs and the anticipated debt service payments. The higher the ratio the better it is. A ratio of 1.0 or more means you have sufficient revenues to pay the debt service payments and a ratio of less than 1.0 means you have insufficient revenues. The industry standard is typically between 1.10 and 1.20 depending on the particular circumstances of the borrowing. Several factors make analyzing this ratio difficult across all funds. For example, in a capital project fund such as 1 Cent Sales Tax, the net income before making debt service payments may be very high for several years while it is building up for a large purchase or construction project. When the funds are spent, there is a net loss in the year the funds are spent and the DSCR may actually be negative. Another example may be when a fund pays off debt early, the debt service payment for the year will far exceed the typical debt service payment and the DSCR is of little use and not needed any longer since the debt is gone. Due to these factors, the DSCR is really only a useful tool for operating funds. A deficient DSCR may require the County to pledge additional revenues and/or may cause the County to pay more in interest expense. Wakulla County Debt Service Coverage Ratios by Fund Fund / Year $30 State Court Fee - Courthouse Annual Debt Service Pmt Annual Net Income DSCR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 6,044 66,975 11.08 121,274 59,071 0.49 121,274 82,908 0.68 2 Cent Gas Tax - Capital Equipment Annual Debt Service Pmt Annual Net Income DSCR 125,947 203,752 1.62 125,947 206,533 1.64 101,921 128,732 1.26 Northwoods Subdivision Road Paving Annual Debt Service Pmt Annual Net Income DSCR 34,694 13,346 0.38 34,694 51,734 1.49 34,694 21,469 0.62 MSBU Fire Dept - Station 8 Annual Debt Service Pmt Annual Net Income DSCR 23,443 90,811 3.87 71,369 274,564 3.85 189,463 118,009 0.62 776,403 532,735 0.69 754,779 720,951 0.96 729,328 789,340 1.08 482,552 531,878 1.10 22,835 86,467 3.79 242,994 348,462 1.43 242,994 333,192 1.37 242,994 (167,483) -0.69 1,359,970 (191,448) -0.14 502,277 679,301 1.35 489,031 1,165,821 2.38 499,771 662,917 1.33 1 Cent Sales Tax Road Paving Annual Debt Service Pmt Annual Net Income DSCR 1 Cent Sales Tax Public Facility - Courthouse Annual Debt Service Pmt Annual Net Income DSCR Sewer Fund Annual Debt Service Pmt Annual Net Income DSCR 121,274 95,390 0.79 Debt Paid Off 34,676 28,228 0.81 Debt Paid Off Notes on deficient DSCR: 1. The debt for the Courthouse in the $30 State Court Fee Fund is supplemented by the 1 Cent Sales Tax Public Facility. Currently revenues are down and staff is reviewing options for refinancing or refunding. 2. The Northwoods Subdivision Road Paving debt is recovered by assessing the property owners on the annual tax bill. Currently, not enough is collected each year to pay the annual note. Staff is reviewing options for refinancing the debt to lower the annual payment. 3. The MSBU Fire Dept. fund and both 1 Cent Sales Tax funds have had deficient DSCR from time to time due to the capital outlay expenditures in these funds. OTHER POTENTIAL OBLIGATIONS In 2002 the County guaranteed a loan on behalf of the Senior Citizens Center. The original amount of the loan was $350,000 and will be paid off in 2022. The current balance due is $196,933.50 with annual principal and interest payments of approximately $44,000. In 2013 the County opened a $2,000,000 line of credit for disaster response / emergency preparation. No monies have been borrowed and only the BOCC may authorize a borrowing after declaring a state of emergency. This line of credit expires annually and the Board will determine whether or not it should be renewed annually. APPENDIX A The following pages contain the Wakulla County Debt Policy as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on _______________. Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request Date of Meeting: January 20, 2015 Date Submitted: January 6, 2015 To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board From: Randy Merritt, District 2 Subject: Request Board Approval Request that the Florida Department of Transportation Include Landscaping in the Plan for the Improvement of the US319 Corridor Statement of Issues: After conversations with officials with the FDOT, they indicated that they would entertain installing and maintain landscaping as part of the US319 corridor improvements if Wakulla County requested it. Background: The Florida Department of Transportation is planning to add capacity improvements to the US319 corridor. Part of the design of the intersections include concrete medians to separate different lanes of traffic. Instead of concrete in the medians, I suggest we request that the DOT landscape these medians to make the intersections more attractive. I would also ask that we request that DOT maintain the landscaping. Analysis: Landscaping is much easier to have installed as part of a construction design, rather than go back later and try to retrofit it. Therefore, I recommend staff send DOT a letter (Attachment #1) requesting landscaping be added to the plans for capacity improvements to the US319 corridor. Options: 1. Approve to direct staff to draft a letter requesting that the FDOT place and maintain landscaping to the capacity improvements planned for the US319 corridor. 2. Do not approve to direct staff to draft a letter requesting that the FDOT place and maintain landscaping to the capacity improvements planned for the US319 corridor. 3. Board Direction. Recommendation: Option #1 Attachment: 1. Letter to FDOT January 20, 2015 Mr. Tommy Barfield Secretary, District 3 Department of Transportation Highway 90 East Chipley, Florida 32428 RE: FDOT Proposed Improvements to US Hwy 319 Corridor Dear Mr. Barfield: Wakulla County appreciates the FDOT’s commitment to improving traffic mobility and traffic circulation along the US Hwy 319 Corridor and its intersections. It is understood that part of the proposed design of the intersections include concrete medians to separate different lanes of traffic. We would like to request that FDOT add landscaping to the medians to make them more attractive. On behalf of the Wakulla County Board of County Commissioners, I am respectfully requesting that FDOT consider this request and advise the Board upon FDOT’s decision. Sincerely, _____________________ Ralph Thomas, Chairman Administration Office Post Office Box 1263 Crawfordville, FL 32326 (850) 926-0919 (850) 926-0940 FAX Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request Date of Meeting: January 20, 2015 Date Submitted: January 9, 2015 To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board From: Jerry Moore, Commissioner Subject: Request Board Approval of a Resolution in Support of Oysters and the Oyster Industry in Wakulla County Statement of Issue: This agenda item requests Board approval of a Resolution in support of oysters and the oyster industry in Wakulla County. Background: Oysters are a rich part of Wakulla’s history and a valuable, natural resource providing food and jobs for our citizens. Commercial oystering is an important industry and vital to our local economy and business. The oyster population and oyster industry have been adversely affected by many factors such as poor water quality, natural predators, heavy rains, recreational harvesting, and commercial harvesting to meet consumer demands. Oysters are sometimes referred to as “filter feeders” because of the important role they perform in filtering the water in which they live. According to an article in the September 12, 2013, Florida Today, biologists consider the oyster to be a miracle worker providing natural ecosystem services. Through its natural process of feeding, the oyster takes in water and filters out bacteria, virus, nitrogen, algae, etc. that are later expelled and eventually decompose into the atmosphere. Healthy oyster beds can improve water quality and clarity. The oysters’ shell itself provides a habitat for many other small and micro marine species. The Panacea area is the community known in Wakulla County for commercial oyster harvesting and the sale of this succulent food at local restaurants and seafood houses. Analysis: It is important to protect the oyster population and the oyster industry as it provides both economic and environmental benefits to Wakulla County and its coastal waters. Board approval of the proposed Resolution (Attachment #1) is being requested to recognize the importance of oysters and the oyster industry in Wakulla County, and to encourage state, private, and non-profit organizations to pursue grant opportunities that enable, enhance, protect, and improve the long term sustainability of the oyster population and oyster industry in Wakulla County. The proposed Resolution does not support state, private, or non-profit organizations applying for Request Board Approval of a Resolution in Support of Oysters and the Oyster Industry in Wakulla County January 20, 2015 Page 2 or receiving RESTORE Act funds allocated to Wakulla County- Pot 1, because this will be a separate process where all non-County entities will compete and eventually all projects will come before the BoCC for approval in accordance with County policy, RESTORE Act Ordinance Number 12-30, as amended by Ordinance Number 13-06, the RESTORE Act and U.S. Treasury Rules. This Resolution does not commit or promise County funds or resources. Furthermore, it does not commit or promise the County to participate as a partner or coapplicant in any grant funds that any state, private or non-profit may seek on its behalf. Budgetary Impact: None. Options: 1. Approve the Resolution in support of oysters and the oyster industry in Wakulla County. 2. Do not approve the Resolution in support of oysters and the oyster industry in Wakulla County. 3. Board direction. Recommendation: Option 1. Attachment(s): 1. Proposed Resolution RESOLUTION NUMBER ________ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WAKULLA COUNTY, FLORIDA IN SUPPORT OF OYSTERS AND THE OYSTER INDUSTRY IN WAKULLA COUNTY; PROVIDING CERTAIN FINDINGS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, oysters and the oyster industry are an important part of Wakulla’s history and economy; and WHEREAS, oysters are important to tourism and many restaurant establishments of Wakulla County; and WHEREAS, oysters serve an important and necessary function in the health of Wakulla County’s coastal waters and eco-systems; and WHEREAS, the oyster population and oyster industry have been adversely affected by many factors; and WHEREAS, Wakulla County families that rely on oystering as their primary income are adversely affected by decreased or un-harvestable oyster populations; and WHEREAS, oysters are recognized as an important and valuable natural resource to Wakulla County. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the Wakulla County Board of County Commissioners recognizes the importance of oysters and the oyster industry in Wakulla County and encourages public, private and non-profit organizations to pursue grant opportunities that enable, enhance, protect and improve the long-term sustainability of the oyster population and oyster industry in Wakulla County. This Resolution shall be effective on the date approved by the Board, as provided below. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, WAKULLA COUNTY, FLORIDA, ON _________________________. WAKULLA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS _________________________________ RALPH THOMAS, Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY: __________________________________ BRENT X. THURMOND, Clerk of Court ________________________________ HEATHER ENCINOSA, Esq. County Attorney