this PDF file - Journals
Transcription
this PDF file - Journals
Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 385–404 STONEFLIES (PLECOPTERA) OF MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK, WASHINGTON B.C. Kondratieff1 and Richard A. Lechleitner2 ABSTRACT.—Mount Rainier National Park, with an area of 95,356 ha, is approximately one-third as large as the state of Rhode Island. The lowest point is 490 m in elevation in the southeastern corner near where the Ohanapecosh River crosses the southern boundary. Columbia Crest is the highest point at 4392 m. The entire park is a rugged landscape marked by the major topographical feature, Mount Rainier, comprising over 25,899 ha, almost one-third of the park. The park lies entirely west of the crest line of the Cascade Range. Most streams in the park originate on Mount Rainier; however, several large rivers meander through the park near its boundaries. One of the first attempts to summarize the stoneflies of Washington, including Mount Rainier National Park, was Hoppe’s 1938 work that reported ca 8 species. Jewett (1959) reviewed the stoneflies of the Pacific Northwest and listed 7 species that had type localities in the park: Megaleuctra kincaidi Frison, Doddsia occidentalis (Banks), Soliperla fenderi ( Jewett), Frisonia picticeps (Hanson), Isoperla rainiera Jewett, Megarcys irregularis (Banks), and M. subtruncata (Hanson). Subsequently, Kathroperla takhoma Stark and Surdick (1987) was described from the park. Samples of adult stoneflies from 1994 to 2001 indicate the presence of at least 82 species, with 64% of these typical Pacific Northwest species, and 30 species, or 36%, widespread western North American species. Seventeen new Washington state records are listed, including a substantial range extension for Lednia tumana (Ricker). One undescribed species in the Sweltsa borealis complex was also discovered. We also present illustrations of male terminalia for Despaxia augusta (Banks) and Moselia infuscata (Claassen) to aid in the identification of these species. Key words: stoneflies, Plecoptera, Mount Rainier National Park, Washington. Mount Rainier National Park is in Lewis and Pierce counties on the western slope of the Cascade Range of Washington State. Mount Rainier is located approximately 65–110 km from the Seattle-Tacoma metropolitan area known as Puget Sound (Fig. 1). The park area is 95,356 ha, and elevations range from 490 m above sea level to 4392 m at the summit. Mount Rainier, one of the highest and topographically most impressive of the world’s volcanoes, owes its scenic beauty to many features. The broad cone rises about 2300 m above its 2100-m foundation and stands in solitary splendor as the highest peak in the Cascade Range. Its rocky ice/snow-mantled slopes above timberline contrast with the dense green forests, giving Mount Rainier the appearance of an arctic island in a temperate sea. There are 26 major glaciers on Mount Rainier and numerous unnamed snow or ice patches. Mount Rainier was born during the Pleistocene, and gradually the high main cone was built up. As eruptions diminished, Mount Rainier began to deteriorate by explosion, collapse, and erosion. It has been estimated that the cone was once about 600 m higher than it is now. Even before Mount Rainier reached its greatest height, rivers and glaciers were cutting deep valleys and huge, bowl-shaped cirques into its sides. During the last major glaciation, which ended about 10,000 years ago, the valley glaciers grew to as much as 60 km long, and smaller glaciers nestled in cirques above 1400 m. The peak has essentially remained the same in appearance since the last major glaciations. The last major eruption of the volcano occurred about 2000 years ago, although the last eruption was approximately 150 years ago (Mullineaux 1974). Mount Rainier is situated within a temperate, maritime climate. Several climatic zones exist elevationally and geographically around the park. However, the east-southeast side of the park is generally the driest, and the northwest side is the wettest sector (especially during spring and summer months). Annual precipitation is heavy, ranging from about 1.5 m at lowest elevations to over 2.5 m in the subalpine 1Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523. 2Mount Rainier National Park, Tahoma Woods, Star Route, Ashford, WA 98304. 385 386 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 Fig. 1. Map of western Washington, indicating Mount Rainier National Park, Washington. regions. Because southwesterly winds bear much of the moisture, a rain shadow occurs on the northeast side of the park. Over 90% of the precipitation occurs between November and April. Much of the winter precipitation is snow that accumulates into depths of 6 to 8 m at higher elevations. At Paradise the average annual snowfall is about 17 m, with over 26 m of snow during the winter of 1998–99. Winter temperatures are relatively warm (mean January temperatures of about –4° to –1°C). Summers tend to be cool (mean July temperatures of 10° to 20°C), and extended periods of cloudiness are not uncommon. July and August are usually comparatively dry. Fog and high winds may be expected any day of the year. The topography of the park is rugged and precipitous, consisting mainly of peaks and valleys. Nine major rivers and their tributaries drain the flanks of the mountain, with all but 2 flowing into Puget Sound near Tacoma, Washington. The Muddy Fork and Ohanapecosh rivers are the exception, flowing into the Cowlitz River, outside the park, and then draining into the Columbia River and on to the Pacific Ocean. Each major river occupies a deep canyon, its floor 300–1000 m below the adjacent divides. Valley floor gradients are steep and increase markedly upstream, especially in Tahoma Creek, North and South Puyallup and Mowich rivers. The park includes 470 mapped rivers and streams, some 400 mapped lakes and ponds, and over 1200 ha of other wetland types, including numerous thermal and mineral springs. About 800 species of plants are known from the park (Franklin et al. 1988), reflecting the varied climatic and environmental conditions encountered across the 3800-m elevation gradient. Approximately 58% of the park is covered by forests, mostly old-growth stands ranging from 200 to 1000 years old. The subalpine parkland covers approximately 23% of the park; vegetation in this zone is a mosaic of tree clumps and herbaceous meadows extending 2002] MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK STONEFLIES from 1500 m to about 2200 m elevation. The alpine zone extends from treeline to the mountain’s summit and covers approximately 19% of the park. Permanent snow and ice cover half of the alpine zone, with fragile alpine vegetation growing on rock and soil outcrops. According to historic records, coho (silver) salmon, chinook, and steelhead were once present in many of the park’s major rivers before the construction of dams outside the park. Chinook, steelhead, and coho are now transported around some dams in an effort to restore these anadromous fish runs, thereby allowing access to the headwaters in the park. These fish species are thought to occur in the White and Carbon rivers inside the park. Bull trout are present throughout the park. In addition to native fish species, nonnative and hatchery fish have been introduced to lakes and streams in the park. Nonnative and hatchery fish stocks have probably altered natural lake and stream ecosystems. One of the first attempts to summarize the stoneflies for the state of Washington, including Mount Rainier National Park, was the work of Hoppe (1938). She reported at least 8 species from the park: Yoraperla brevis (Banks) (as Peltoperia [sic] brevis), Megarcys irregularis (Banks) (as Perlodes irregularis), Claassenia sabulosa (Banks) (as Perla languida Needham and Claassen), Isoperla sordida Banks, I. fulva Claassen (as I. cascadensis Hoppe), Ostrocerca dimicki (Claassen) (as Nemoura dimicki), Zapada cinctipes (Banks) (as Nemoura cinctipes), and Doddsia occidentalis (Banks) (as Taeniopteryx occidentalis). Stark and Nelson (1994) did not report Y. brevis from Washington, and Hoppe’s records probably refer to Y. nigrisoma (Banks) or Y. mariana (Ricker). Hoppe’s record may be the one originally cited by Needham and Claassen (1925). Ostrocerca dimicki was not collected from the park during the present study, and the reported specimens were not located. Her record may refer to O. foersteri (Ricker); however, both species are known from Washington. These small nemourids are often difficult to specifically identify (Young et al. 1989). Additionally, we have been unable to confirm the presence of the widespread and common I. fulva from the park. Hoppe (1938) listed it as I. cascadensis from the Nisqually River, a stream draining the park. Szczytko and Stewart (1979) examined the female specimen. 387 Jewett (1959) in his review of the stoneflies of the Pacific Northwest listed 7 species that had type localities in the park: Megaleuctra kincaidi Frison, D. occidentalis, Soliperla fenderi ( Jewett), Frisonia picticeps, (Hanson), I. rainiera Jewett, M. irregularis, and M. subtruncata (Hanson). Szczytko and Stewart (1979) included a paratype female for I. bifurcata from Longmire; and Stark and Surdick (1987) described Kathroperla takhoma from Falls Creek. Table 1 summarizes the primary type localities in the park. Paradise Valley was relatively easy to access in the early history of the park, and a resort was established there. Our study had 2 main objectives: to document the general distribution of stoneflies of Mount Rainier National Park, and to provide information on endemic, rare, or potentially threatened species. Stoneflies are known to be major indicators of water quality (Baumann 1979) and are often dominant food-web components of most temperate lotic ecosystems (Stewart and Stark 1988). Knowledge of the occurrence and distribution of these insects will help serve as a basis for future biomonitoring programs as dramatic land-use changes occur in adjacent areas. METHODS We sampled over 110 sites between 1994 and 2001 (Fig. 2). These sites were primarily TABLE 1. Primary types originally described from Mount Rainier National Park, Washington. LEUCTRIDAE Megaleuctra kincaidi Frison 1942. Type locality: Fryingpan Creek TAENIOPTERYGIDAE Doddsia occidentalis (Banks) 1900. Type locality: Mount Rainier National Park PELTOPERLIDAE Soliperla fenderi ( Jewett) 1955. Type locality: St. Andrews Creek CHLOROPERLIDAE Kathroperla takhoma Stark and Surdick 1987. Type locality: Falls Creek PERLODIDAE Frisonia picticeps (Hanson) 1942. Type locality: Paradise River Isoperla rainiera Jewett 1954. Type locality: Mount Rainier National Park Megarcys irregularis (Banks) 1900. Type locality: Mount Rainier National Park Megarcys subtruncata (Hanson) 1942. Type locality: Paradise Valley 388 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 Fig. 2. Map of Mount Rainier National Park, Washington, indicating major streams and roads. Major collecting sites of stoneflies during this study are indicated by ▲. chosen to cover all relatively accessible major drainages. Large areas of the park (Fig. 2) are roadless or difficult to access due to extreme topography. All adult and larval specimens were preserved in 80% ethanol. We employed standard collection techniques, including beating sheets, aerial nets, and collection by hand. Specimens collected during the study were deposited in the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Colorado State University. We also present illustrations of the male terminalia for 2 common leuctrid species, Despaxia augusta (Banks) (Figs. 3, 4) and Moselia infuscata (Claassen) (Figs. 5, 6) to aid in their identification. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION We collected over 3600 adult specimens representing at least 82 species of stoneflies in the park during the study; they are listed in Table 2. Sixty-four percent of these taxa are typical Pacific Northwest species (Ricker 1943, Jewett 1959, Ricker and Scudder 1975), and 30 species, or 36%, are widespread western North American species (Table 3; Baumann et al. 1977). One undescribed species in the Sweltsa borealis complex was also discovered and will be described later. Seventeen new stonefly state records for Washington were collected during the study (Table 2; see Nelson and Baumann 1989, Stark 1998). Sixteen of these species are known from adjacent states or British Columbia (Ricker and Scudder 1975, Stark 1998) and were expected records. However, Lednia tumana (Ricker) represents a major range extension. The remarkable Nearctic nemourid genus Lednia is currently known only in the literature from Glacier National Park, Montana (Stewart and Stark 1988). R.W. Baumann (personal communication) indicates that specimens of this genus are also known from North Cascades National Park, Washington, and a site in the California 2002] MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK STONEFLIES 389 Figs. 3–4. Despaxia augusta (Banks), male terminalia: 4, lateral; 5, dorsal. Sierra Nevada. There may be additional relict populations of Lednia along the Coast and Cascade mountains of the Pacific Northwest. Jewett (1955) described S. fenderi from a single male collected from St. Andrews Creek in the park. Stark (1983) reported this species only from Mount Rainier, mostly from the St. Andrews Creek area (B.P. Stark, personal communication, has specimens from Mount Adams, Shamama Co.). This species can be collected from spring seeps and rheocrenes throughout the park (Appendix). Isoperla rainiera was originally described by Jewett (1954) from the park from a single male. The female was described later from Mt. Hood, Oregon ( Jewett 1962). Szczytko and Stewart (1979) did not report any additional specimens from the park. Recently, I. rainiera was collected in Montana (S.W. Szczytko personal communication). Another rare species of stonefly known from the park and only a few outside localities is M. yosemite (Needham and Claassen). This species was originally described from Mt. Lyell, Yosemite National Park, California, and was collected during this study from Fryingpan Creek (Van Wieren et al. 2001). Additionally, M. irregularis, known only from Washington and British Columbia, occurs abundantly in the park. Ricker (1943) once described a flight of adults at Fryingpan Creek as “a small canyon filled with flying adults to a depth of possibly 100 feet, resembling the swarms of large termites. . . .” The nymphs of Setvena tibialis (Banks) are the dominant stonefly predators of most rheocrenes and small streams of the park. Stewart and Stanger (1985) previously reported this species from the park. Jewett (1959) considered S. tibialis a rare species of the Pacific Northwest, and collections from the park represent substantial new material for study. 390 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 Figs. 5–6. Moselia infuscata (Claassen), male terminalia: 6, lateral; 7, dorsal. Despaxia augusta was found to be an abundant autumn- and early winter-emerging species in the park, occurring in small streams and rheocrenes. This species ranges from Alaska to Montana, southwest to northern California. Ricker (1954) clarified the taxonomy of this species. Baumann et al. (1977) indicated adults of D. augusta are uncommonly collected, probably because of their late emergence. Figures 3 and 4 present illustrations of the male terminalia. The other abundant leuctrid in the park is Moselia infuscata. However, very little biological information is available for this species (Stewart and Stark 1988). Nymphs are common in most small streams of the park. Adult emergence is generally from April to July. Illustrations of the distinctive male terminalia are presented in Figures 5 and 6. No major distributional patterns for the 82 stonefly species were discernible for the park. Of the species with an adequate number of records, a few species such as Mesocapnia oenone, Malenka californica, Doroneuria baumanni, and Kogotus nonus appear restricted to drainages on the west side of the park (Appendix). Most other species are generally distributed throughout the park. Despite 7 years of relatively intensive collecting, at least 11 species are represented only 2002] MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK STONEFLIES 391 TABLE 2. Stonefly species recorded from Mount Rainier National Park, Washington. An asterisk (*) indicates a new state record for Washington (see Stark [1998] and Nelson and Baumann [1989]). Zapada cinctipes (Banks) is not indicated from Washington in Stark (1998); however, the type locality of this species is Olympia, Washington. EUHOLOGNATHA CAPNIIDAE Bolshecapnia sasquatchi (Ricker)* Capnia confusa Claassen C. elongata Claassen C. excavata Claassen C. gracilaria Claassen C. licina Jewett C. melia Frison C. nana Claassen C. sextuberculata Jewett Eucapnopsis brevicauda Claassen* Isocapnia agassizi Ricker I. grandis (Banks)* I. spenceri Ricker* I. vedderensis (Ricker)* Mesocapnia oenone (Neave) Paracapnia oswegaptera ( Jewett) LEUCTRIDAE Leuctrinae Despaxia augusta (Banks) Moselia infuscata (Claassen) Paraleuctra forcipata (Frison)* P. occidentalis (Banks)* P. projecta (Frison) P. vershina Gaufin & Ricker Perlomyia collaris Banks* P. utahensis Needham & Claassen* Megaleuctrinae Megaleuctra kincaidi Frison NEMOURIDAE Amphinemurinae Malenka californica (Claassen)* M. cornuta (Claassen) Nemourinae Lednia tumana (Ricker)* Ostrocerca foersteri (Ricker) Podmosta decepta (Frison)* P. delicatula (Claassen)* Prostoia besametsa (Ricker)* Soyedina interrupta (Claassen) S. producta (Claassen) Visoka cataractae (Neave) Zapada cinctipes (Banks) Z. columbiana (Claassen) Z. cordillera (Baumann & Gaufin) Z. frigida (Claassen) Z. haysi (Ricker) Z. oregonensis (Claassen)* TAENIOPTERYGIDAE Brachypteryinae Doddsia occidentalis (Banks) Taenionema kincaidi (Hoppe) T. pallidum (Banks) SYSTELLOGNATHA CHLOROPERLIDAE Chloroperlinae Alloperla fraterna Frison A. serrata Needham & Claassen Plumiperla diversa (Frison) Suwallia dubia (Frison) S. forcipata (Neave) S. pallidula (Banks) Sweltsa borealis (Banks) S. exquisita (Frison) S. occidens (Frison) S. revelstoka ( Jewett) S. n. sp. Paraperlinae Kathroperla perdita (Banks) K. takhoma Stark & Surdick Paraperla frontalis (Banks) P. wilsoni Ricker PELTOPERLIDAE Soliperla fenderi ( Jewett) Yoraperla mariana (Ricker) Y. nigrisoma (Banks) Y. siletz Stark & Nelson PERLIDAE Doroneuria baumanni Stark & Gaufin Hesperoperla pacifica (Banks) Claassenia sabulosa (Banks) PERLODIDAE Isoperlinae Isoperla bifurcata Szczytko & Stewart I. fusca Needham & Claassen I. gravitans (Needham & Claassen) I. petersoni Needham & Christenson* I. rainiera Jewett I. sobria (Hagen) I. sordida Banks I. tilasqua Szczytko & Stewart* Perlodinae Arcynopterygini Frisonia picticeps (Hanson) Megarcys irregularis (Banks) M. subtruncata Hanson M. yosemite (Needham & Claassen) Setvena tibialis (Banks) Skwala americana (Klapalek) Diploperlini Kogotus nonus (Needham & Claassen) PTERONARCYIDAE Pteronarcys princeps Banks 392 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST Fig. 7. Seasonal distribution of adult stoneflies occurring at Mount Rainier National Park, Washington. [Volume 62 2002] MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK STONEFLIES 393 TABLE 3. Stonefly species occurring at Mount Rainier National Park that are considered widespread western North American species. Capnia confusa Claassen C. gracilaria Claassen C. nana Claassen Eucapnopsis brevicauda Claassen Isocapnia grandis (Banks) Paraleuctra occidentalis (Banks) P. projecta (Frison) P. vershina Gaufin & Ricker Perlomyia utahensis Needham & Claassen Malenka californica (Claassen) Podmosta decepta (Frison) P. delicatula (Claassen) Prostoia besametsa (Ricker) Taenionema pallidum (Banks) Zapada cinctipes (Banks by single collections (Appendix). Included are Capnia excavata, Paracapnia oswegaptera, Perlomyia utahensis, L. tumana, Hesperoperla pacifica, Claassenia sabulosa, I. bifurcata, I. fusca, I. petersoni, I. sobria, and Frisonia picticeps. Other populations of these species surely occur in the park, yet to be discovered. The emergence phenology of comparable species of stoneflies of Mount Rainier National Park is very similar to what Jewett (1959), Ricker (1943), and Kerst and Anderson (1974) reported from streams of southwestern British Columbia and Oregon (Fig. 7). For many species, adults can be collected for long periods. Generally, there are winter-emerging species, including the capniids and 2 species of Zapada, Z. cinctipes and Z. columbiana (Fig. 7). Adults of numerous species can be collected beginning in March and April, with some of these species, for example Taenionema kincaidi, still present in August. The largest group of species begins to emerge throughout May and June (Fig. 7). There is also a rather distinct late summer- and fall-emerging group of species, typified by M. oenone, D. augusta, Alloperla serrata, and K. nonus. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Drs. Richard W. Baumann, Brigham Young University, Stanley W. Szczytko, University of Wisconsin, and Bill P. Stark, Mississippi College, for verifying species identifications and providing records. Drs. Baumann and Stark also provided prepublication reviews of the manuscript. We also thank Z. columbiana (Claassen) Z. frigida (Claassen) Z. haysi (Ricker) Z. oregonensis (Claassen) Doddsia occidentalis (Banks) Sweltsa borealis (Banks) S. revelstoka ( Jewett) Suwallia pallidula (Banks) Kathroperla perdita Banks Paraperla frontalis (Banks) Isoperla petersoni Needham & Christenson I. sobria (Hagen) Skwala americana (Klapalek) Hesperoperla pacifica (Banks) Claassenia sabulosa (Banks) Dr. Edward A. Lisowski, Yakima, Washington, and Robert Dopiriak, Mount Rainier National Park, for making valuable collections of stoneflies from Mount Rainier available for study. LITERATURE CITED BAUMANN, R.W. 1979. Nearctic stonefly genera as indicators of ecological parameters (Plecoptera: Insecta). Great Basin Naturalist 39:241–244. BAUMANN, R.W., A.R. GAUFIN, AND R.F. SURDICK. 1977. The stoneflies (Plecoptera) of the Rocky Mountains. Memoirs of the American Entomological Society 31. 208 pp. FRANKLIN, J.F., W.H. MOIR, M.A. HEMSTROM, S.E. GREENE, AND B.G. SMITH. 1988. The forest communities of Mount Rainier National Park. Scientific Monograph Series 19. U.S. Department of Interior, Washington, DC. 194 pp. HOPPE, G.N. 1938. Plecoptera of Washington. University of Washington Publication in Biology 4:139–174. JEWETT, S.G. 1954. New stoneflies (Plecoptera) from western North America. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 11:543–549. ______. 1955. Notes and descriptions concerning western North American stoneflies (Plecoptera). Wasmann Journal of Biology 13:145–153. ______. 1959. The stoneflies (Plecoptera) of the Pacific Northwest. Oregon State Monographs, Studies in Entomology 3:1–95. ______. 1962. New stoneflies and records from the Pacific coast of the United States. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 38:15–20. KERST, C.D., AND N.H. ANDERSON. 1974. Emergence patterns of Plecoptera in a stream in Oregon, USA. Freshwater Biology 4:205–212. MULLINEAUX, D.R. 1974. Pumice and other pyroclastic deposits in Mount Rainier National Park, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1326. 83 pp. NEEDHAM, J.G., AND P.W. CLAASSEN. 1925. A monograph of the Plecoptera or stoneflies of America north of Mexico. Thomas Say Foundation, Entomological Society of America 2. 397 pp. 394 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST NELSON, C.R., AND R.W. BAUMANN. 1989. Systematics and distribution of the winter stonefly genus Capnia (Plecoptera: Capniidae) in North America. Great Basin Naturalist 49:289–363. RICKER, W.E. 1943. Stoneflies of southwestern British Columbia. Indiana University Publications in Science, Series 12. 145 pp. ______. 1954. Nomenclatorial notes on Plecoptera. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 51:37–39. RICKER, W.E., AND G.G.E. SCUDDER. 1975. An annotated checklist of the Plecoptera (Insecta) of British Columbia. Syesis 8:333–348. STARK, B.P. 1983. A review of the genus Soliperla (Plecoptera: Peltoperlidae). Great Basin Naturalist 43: 30–44. ______. 1998. North American stonefly list. www.mc.edu/ ~stark/stonefly.html STARK, B.P., AND C.R. NELSON. 1994. Systematics, phylogeny and zoogeography of genus Yoraperla (Plecoptera: Peltoperlidae). Entomologica Scandinavica 25:241–273. STARK, B.P., AND R.F. SURDICK. 1987. A new Kathroperla species from western North America (Plecoptera: Chloroperlidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 89:527–531. STEWART, K.W., AND J.A. STANGER. 1985. The nymphs, and a new species, of North American Setvena Illies (Plecoptera: Perlodidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 61:237–244. STEWART, K.W., AND B.P. STARK. 1988. Nymphs of North American stonefly genera (Plecoptera). Thomas Say Foundation, Entomological Society of America 12:1–460. SZCZYTKO, S.W., AND K.W. STEWART. 1979. The genus Isoperla (Plecoptera) of western North America: holomorphology and systematics, and a new stonefly genus Cascadoperla. Memoirs of the American Entomological Society 32. 120 pp. VANWIEREN, B.J., B.C. KONDRATIEFF, AND B.P. STARK. 2001. A review of the North American species of Megarcys (Plecoptera: Perlodidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 103:409–427. YOUNG, D.C., B.C. KONDRATIEFF, AND R.F. KIRCHNER. 1989. Description of male Ostrocerca Ricker (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) using the scanning electron microscope. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 91:257–268. Received 1 May 2001 Accepted 15 September 2001 [Volume 62 APPENDIX. Localities for collections records of Plecoptera of Mount Rainier National Park, Washington. Order Plecoptera Suborder Arctoperlaria Group Euholognatha Family Capniidae Genus Capnia Bolshecapnia sasquatchi Ohanapecosh River, Hwy 143, 17-March-70, R.A. Hite & D.S. Potter, 2 males (BYU); Ohanapecosh River, Hwy 143, 16-March-73, D.S. Potter & L.M. Preble, 1 male (BYU). Capnia confusa 0.6 mile S of Ipsut Campground, 04-Apr-97, 1 female; White River Highway 410, 29-May-97, 2 males, 1 female; Tahoma Creek, 30-May-97, 1 male; Tahoma Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 30-May-97, 2 males; stream by South Mowich River Camp, 04-May-98, 2 males, 1 female; Carbon River entrance, 15-Aug-99, 1 female; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Aug-99, 3 females; Tahoma Creek at Fish Creek, 08-Jul-00, 1 female; Cataract Creek at Wonderland Trail, 09-Jul-00, 1 male, 9 females; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 1 male, 2 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road, 16Jul-00, 1 female; Tahoma Creek, 13-May-01, 1 female; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14-May-01, 3 males, 4 females; Longmire, 15-May-01, 1 female; Ohanapecosh Campground, 16-May-01, 1 female; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May01, 3 males, 4 females. Capnia elongata 0.7 mile SE of Ipsut Campground, 25-Mar-95, 1 male; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Aug-00, 2 females; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 16-May01, 1 male; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 2 males. Capnia excavata Boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 07-May-01, 1 male, 1 female. Capnia gracilaria Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 21-Apr-96, 1 male; south of Chenuis Falls parking lot, 23-Feb-97, 1 male; Westside Road at Paradise Road, 29-Mar-97, 1 male, 1 female; Kautz Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 04Apr-01, 18 males, 6 females. Capnia licina Nisqually River at creek from Tato Falls, 14-Apr-94, 2 males, 1 female; 2.2 miles SE Ipsut Campground, 25-Mar-95, 2 males; Nahunta Falls, 16-Apr-95, 3 males; Glacier View Bridge, 16-Apr-95, 2 males, 1 female; 0.1 mile NE Glacier View Bridge, 14-Apr-96, 5 males; Snow Lake inflow, 15Jun-97, 7 males, 2 females; Shaw Creek at White River Road, 07-Jul-99, 2 males; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 10-Jul-00, 4 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Jul-01, 4 males, 3 females. MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK STONEFLIES 2002] Capnia melia Ipsut Falls, 23-Feb-95, 54 males, 19 females; 2.2 miles SE of Ipsut Campground, 25-Mar-95, 1 male; 0.7 mile SE of Ipsut Campground, 25-Mar-95, 1 male, 4 females; Nahunta Falls, 16-Apr-95, 3 males; Nisqually River at creek from Tato Falls, 18-Feb-96, 2 males; Pinnacle Peak Trail stream, 14-Apr-96, 5 males, 3 females; Nisqually River at creek from Tato Falls, 14-Apr-96, 2 males; south of Chenuis Falls parking lot, 23-Feb-97, 4 males, 1 female; 0.7 mile SE of Ipsut Campground, 23-Feb-97, 4 males, 1 female; 0.6 mile S of Ipsut Campground, 23-Feb-97, 6 males; Westside Road 1.3 miles N of Paradise Road, 29-Mar-97, 2 males, 6 females; Tahoma Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 29Mar-97, 1 male; 0.6 mile S of Ipsut Campground, 04-Apr97, 2 males, 2 females; 0.7 mile SE of Ipsut Campground, 04-Apr-97, 5 males, 9 females; Ipsut Falls on Ipsut Creek, 04-May-97, 9 males, 10 females; Nickel Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 28-May-97, 1 male; Crystal Creek at Highway 410, 29-May-97, 6 males, 5 females; unnamed stream N of Crystal Creek, Highway 410, 29-May-97, 2 males, 11 females; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 29May-97, 2 males; Glacier View Bridge, 30-May-97, 4 females; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 30-May-97, 3 males, 3 females; Eagle Peak Creek 4360 ft, 14-Jun-97, 3 males; Snow Lake inflow, 15-Jun-97, 1 male; Olallie Creek, 28-Jun-97, 2 males; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 01-Apr-98, 1 male, 1 female; White River Campground, 01-Apr-98, 1 male, 1 female; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 29-Apr-98, 2 males, 6 females; Mountain Meadow Stream at Paul Peak Trail, 07-Jul-98, 1 male; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 05-Jun-99, 4 males, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 11Jun-99, 3 males; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 06-Jul-99, 4 males; South Puyallup River at Westside Road, 24-Sep-00, 1 female; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 13-May-01, 5 males, 9 females; Ipsut Falls at Ipsut Creek, 14-May-01, 1 male; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 07-Jun-01, 1 female; White River at Sunrise Road, 15-Jun-01, 1 male; seeps into Fryingpan Creek 0.5 mile upstream from Sunrise Road, 15-Jun-01, 1 male, 2 females. 395 Canyon Road, 05-Jun-99, 3 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 11-Jun-99, 2 males, 1 female; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Westside Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug-99, 1 male, 1 female; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16Aug-99, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 4 females; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 16-May-01, 2 females; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 4 males, 3 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 07-Jun01, 1 male, 2 females; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 09Jun-01, 1 male, 1 female; Deer Creek at Eastside Trail, 09-Jun-01, 2 males, 1 female; Ohanapecosh River 0.5 mile S of Shriner Peak Trailhead, 09-Jun-01, 1 male, 2 females; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 02-Jul-01, 1 male, 1 female. Genus Isocapnia Isocapnia abbreviata Seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14-May-01, 1 male, 3 females; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 2 males, 6 females. Isocapnia agassizi White River on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 1 male; Tahoma Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 30-May-97, 1 female; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14-May01, 2 males, 1 female; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 1 male, 3 females. Isocapnia grandis White River on Highway 410, 28-May-97, 1 female; Kautz Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 04-Apr-01, 1 male; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14-May-01, 6 males, 2 females; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 2 males, 1 female. Isocapnia spenceri Capnia nana Ohanapecosh Campground, 28-May-97, 1 female; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14-May-01, 1 male, 1 female. Tahoma Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 29-Mar-97, 1 female; Glacier View Bridge, 30-May-97, 3 females; Longmire, 15-May-01, 1 female. Mesocapnia oenone Capnia sextuberculata Deer Creek at Eastside Trail, 09-Jun-01, 1 female; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 02-Jul-01, 1 female. Genus Eucapnopsis Eucapnopsis brevicauda Laughingwater Creek, 27-Jun-95, 1 female; Nisqually River at Longmire, 28-May-97, 2 males; Ohanapecosh Hot Springs, 28-May-97, 1 male; Ohanapecosh Campground, 28-May-97, 6 males, 5 females; Nickel Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 28-May-97, 19 males, 28 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 28-May-97, 11 males, 10 females; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 28-May-97, 15 males, 4 females; Ohanapecosh River at Sheep Creek, 29-May-97, 13 males, 7 females; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 29-May-97, 22 males, 17 females; Olallie Creek, 28-Jun-97, 2 females; Huckleberry Creek Bridge, 28-Apr-98, 1 male; Falls Creek at Stevens Genus Mesocapnia Carbon River Entrance, 20-Sep-97, 8 males, 3 females; Carbon River Entrance, 15-Aug-99, 1 male; west fork of White River, 13-Sep-99, 1 female. Genus Paracapnia Paracapnia oswegaptera Seeps into Eagle Peak Creek, 28-May-97, 1 male. Family Leuctridae Genus Despaxia Despaxia augusta Westside Road, 0.2 mile NE of Paradise Road, 18-Dec-94, 1 male; Pinnacle Peak trail near road (Reflection Lakes), 28-Oct-95, 1 female; Paradise Valley Road 0.7 mile S of Paradise, 28-Oct-95, 3 males, 6 females; 0.1 mile S of Cayuse Pass, 24-Nov-95, 1 female; Fish Creek near Tahoma Creek, 19-Dec-95, 1 female; 0.1 mile N of Fryingpan Creek Bridge, 03-Nov-96, 1 male, 3 females; 0.2 mile 396 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST NE of Fryingpan Creek bridge, 03-Nov-96, 1 female; 0.1 mile E of Ranger Creek Bridge, 17-Nov-96, 1 female; Kautz Creek Trail 0.7 mile N of Nisqually Road, 08-Dec-96, 2 females; Ipsut Creek at Carbon River Road Bridge, 08Sep-97, 2 males; Carbon River Entrance, 20-Sep-97, 8 males, 3 females; small tributary to Shaw Creek, 07-Jul99, 6 males, 6 females; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 female; Carbon River Entrance, 15-Aug-99, 1 female; Carbon River at Alice Falls, 15-Aug99, 1 male; stream by Lake James, 13-Sep-99, 1 male, 1 female; west fork of White River, 13-Sep-99, 1 male; Van Horn Creek at Waterfall, 13-Sep-99, 2 males; Fryingpan Creek at Wonderland Trail Bridge, 29-Jun-00, 1 male, 1 female; seeps 0.9 mile S of St. Andrews Creek, 16-Sep-00, 6 males, 2 females; seeps 0.8 mile S of St. Andrews Creek, 16-Sep-00, 2 males, 2 females; stream 0.4 mile S of St. Andrews Creek, 16-Sep-00, 15 males, 10 females; stream 1.75 miles S of St. Andrews Creek, 16-Sep-00, 9 males; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 16-Sep-00, 18 males, 2 females; stream 1.5 miles S of St. Andrews Creek, 16-Sep00, 2 males, 3 females; stream 1.15 miles S of St. Andrews Creek, 16-Sep-00, 4 males, 1 female; Dick Creek at Wonderland Trail, 23-Sep-00, 1 female; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 17-Oct-00, 2 females; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 07-May-01, 1 male. Genus Moselia Moselia infuscata Carbon River Entrance, Rainforest Loop Trail, 08-May95, 2 females; Reflection Lake, stream near Pinnacle Peak Trail, 14-Apr-96, 1 male; Tahoma Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 29-Mar-97, 1 male; Carbon River Entrance, Rainforest Loop Trail, 27-May-97, 3 males, 2 females; Carbon River Entrance, 27-May-97, 4 males, 5 females; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 28May-97, 1 female; Ohanapecosh Campground, 28-May97, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 28May-97, 8 males, 5 females; seeps into Eagle Creek, 28May-97, 3 males, 6 females; Ohanapecosh River at Sheep Creek, 29-May-97, 1 male, 1 female; unnamed stream N of Crystal Creek, Highway 410, 29-May-97, 14 males, 11 females; unnamed stream 3.4 miles S of park boundary Highway 410, 29-May-97, 9 males, 5 females; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 12 males, 7 females; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 29-May-97, 3 females; Nisqually River at Glacier View Bridge, 07-Jul99, 7 males, 6 females; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 30-May-97, 10 males, 6 females; Ipsut Creek at Carbon River Road Bridge, 06-Jun-97, 2 males; Eagle Peak Creek 4360 ft, 14-Jun-97, 5 males, 1 female; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 19-Jun-97, 6 males, 15 females; Olallie Creek, 28-Jun-97, 1 female; White River Campground, 23-Jul-97, 4 males, 7 females; White River at Sunrise Road Bridge, 02-Jul-98, 1 male, 2 females; Mountain Meadow Stream at Paul Peak Trail, 07-Jul-98, 2 males; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 05-Jun-99, 4 males; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 11-Jun-99, 3 males, 4 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 06Jul-99, 4 males, 8 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 06-Jul-99, 36 males, 38 females; tributary to Ohanapecosh River, 07-Jul-99, 1 male, 4 females; stream into White River at Highway 410 N of White River Entrance, 07-Jul-99, 1 male; Nisqually River at Glacier View Bridge, 30-May-97, 38 males, 11 females; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Westside Road, 08-Jul-99, 7 males, 10 [Volume 62 females; Seep into Fryingpan Creek, 08-Jul-99, 3 males, 10 females; small tributary on Westside Road 2 miles N of Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 female; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 female; high-gradient tributary at Nisqually River at Longmire, 09-Jul-99, 1 male, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug99, 1 female; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 16-Aug99, 1 female; creek behind Mystic Lake Ranger Station, 04-Sep-99, 1 male, 2 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 5 males, 6 females; stream on the Westside Road 1.5 miles from the Paradise Road, 26Jun-00, 1 male, 3 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 10-Jul-00, 2 males, 4 females; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 6 males, 3 females; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 23-Jul-00, 1 male; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Aug-00, 2 males; seeps into Eagle Peak Creek, 07-May-01, 10 males, 2 females; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek 07-May-01, 17 males, 15 females; seeps by Nisqually River Bridge in Longmire, 13-May-01, 2 males, 2 females; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 13-May-01, 13 males, 3 females; Ipsut Falls at Ipsut Creek, 14-May-01, 3 males, 4 females; Huckleberry Creek Bridge, 14-May-01, 7 males; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 15-May-01, 1 male; small stream near Ohanapecosh Visitor Center, 16-May-01, 1 male, 3 females; stream into White River at Highway 410 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 2 males, 2 females; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 09-Jun-01, 2 females; Deer Creek at Eastside Trail, 09-Jun-01, 2 males, 1 female; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 16-Jun-01, 2 males, 1 female; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 17-Jun-01, 7 males, 6 females; small stream near Narada Falls, 23-Jul-01, 1 male. Genus Paraleuctra Paraleuctra forcipata Westside Road 2.7 miles NNE of Nisqually Entrance, 29Mar-97, 1 male; Tahoma Creek, 1.8 miles NE of Nisqually Entrance, 29-Mar-97, 1 male, 2 females; Carbon River at Alice Falls, 06-Jun-97, 5 males; Huckleberry Creek Bridge, 28-Apr-98, 2 males; Mountain Meadow Stream at Paul Peak Trail, 07-May-98, 2 males; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 05-Jun-99, 1 male, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 11-Jun-99, 2 males; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 06-Jul-99, 2 males; stream into White River at Highway 410 N of White River Entrance, 07-Jul-99, 3 males; small tributary to Shaw Creek, 07-Jul-99, 3 males; small tributary on Westside Road 2 miles N of Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 male; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 2 males, 4 females; Tahoma Creek at Fish Creek, 08-Jul-00, 1 male; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 2 males, 1 female; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16Jul-00, 1 male. Paraleuctra occidentalis White River Road 0.5 mile N of ranger station, 21-Apr-96, 1 male; Westside Road 1.3 miles N of Paradise Road, 29Mar-97, 3 males; Tahoma Creek 1.8 miles NE of Paradise Road, 29-Mar-97, 3 males, 4 females; Ohanapecosh Campground, 28-May-97, 1 male; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 30-May-97, 4 females; Huckleberry Creek Bridge, 21-Apr-98, 1 male; Huckleberry Creek Bridge, 28-Apr-98, 2 males; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 29-Apr-98, 1 male, 2 females; stream by South Mowich 2002] MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK STONEFLIES 397 River Camp, 07-May-98, 1 male; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 06-Jul-99, 1 female; tributary to Ohanapecosh River, 07-Jul-99, 4 males; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Westside Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 male, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 male; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug-99, 1 male, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25Jun-00, 2 males, 4 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 10-Jul-00, 3 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 16-Jul-00, 1 female; Fryingpan Creek 0.25 mile upstream of Sunrise Road, 16-Jul-00 1 male; Ipsut Falls at Ipsut Creek, 14-May-01, 1 male, 2 females; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 16-May-01, 1 male, 1 female; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 2 males, 2 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Jul-01, 1 male. Megaleuctra kincaidi Paraleuctra projecta Malenka californica Boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 07-May-01, 3 males; seeps by Nisqually River Bridge in Longmire, 07May-01, 8 males; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 13-May-01, 35 males, 18 females; seeps by Nisqually River Bridge in Longmire, 13-May-01, 1 male; Ipsut Falls at Ipsut Creek, 14-May-01, 1 male; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 15-May-01, 2 males, 7 females; Nisqually River, 2 miles W of Longmire, 15-May-01, 1 male. Carbon River Entrance, 27-May-97, 1 male; Carbon River Entrance, 21-Sep-97, 1 male; Carbon River Entrance, 15Aug-99, 2 females; Carbon River Entrance, 17-Aug-99, 6 males. Paraleuctra vershina Rainforest Loop Trail at Carbon River Entrance, 08-May95, 7 males, 1 female; Carbon River Entrance, 24-May-95, 1 male; Carbon River Entrance, Rainforest Loop Trail, 27May-97, 5 males, 3 females; Nisqually River at Longmire, 28-May-97, 1 male, 2 females; Ohanapecosh Campground, 28-May-97, 1 male; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 28-May-97, 1 male, 1 female; Ohanapecosh River at Sheep Creek, 29-May-97, 1 male; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 4 males, 3 females; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 29-May-97, 2 males; stream into White River at Highway 410 N of White River entrance, 07-Jul-99, 2 males; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 29-Jun-00, 1 female; Fish Creek at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 1 female; Fish Creek at Dry Creek, 07May-01, 1 male, 1 female; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14-May-01, 3 males, 2 females; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 1 male, 2 females; Ohanapecosh Campground, 16-May-01, 2 males, 1 female; White River at Sunrise Road, 15-Jun01, 7 males, 4 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Jul-01, 1 male; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 02-Jul-01, 2 males, 3 females; seeps into Fryingpan Creek 0.5 mile upstream from Sunrise Road, 15-Jun-01, 6 males, 1 female. female; Huckleberry Creek Bridge, 14-May-01, 2 males, 1 female. Perlomyia utahensis Eagle Peak Creek at Bridge, 30-May-97, 1 male. Genus Megaleuctra Ohanapecosh Campground, 09-May-96, 1 female; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 06-Jul-99, 1 male; seep into Fryingpan Creek, 08-Jul-99, 1 male, 2 females; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 07-May-01, 1 male. Family Nemouridae Genus Malenka Malenka cornuta Seeps into Eagle Creek, 28-May-97, 3 females; unnamed stream 3.4 miles S of park boundary on Highway 410, 29May-97, 1 male; White River on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 1 male, 3 females; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 1 female; Ipsut Creek at Campground, 08Sep-97, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 06-Jul-99, 1 male; Nisqually River at Glacier View Bridge, 07-Jul-99, 1 female; small tributary on Westside Road 2 miles N of Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 male; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 10 males, 6 females; Carbon River Entrance, 15-Aug-99, 2 females; small tributary on Westside Road 2 miles N of Paradise Road, 17-Aug-99, 3 females; West fork of White River, 13Sep-99, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 1 male, 1 female; stream on Westside Road 1.5 miles from Paradise Road, 26-Jun-00, 1 male; Fish Creek at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 16-Jul-00, 1 male; seep 0.8 mile S of St. Andrews Creek, 16-Sep-00, 1 female; White River at Sunrise Road, 15-Jun-01, 1 male; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 17-Jun-01, 4 males, 7 females; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 09-Jul-01, 1 male. Genus Ledina Ledina tumana Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Jul-00, 1 male. Genus Ostrocerca Genus Perlomyia Perlomyia collaris Huckleberry Creek Bridge, 28-Apr-98, 1 male; stream by South Mowich River Camp, 04-May-98, 1 male; North Mowich River at Wonderland Trail, 07-May-98, 1 male; Mountain Meadow Stream at Paul Peak Trail, 07-May-98, 1 male; seeps by Nisqually River Bridge in Longmire, 07May-01, 10 males, 1 female; seeps by Nisqually River Bridge in Longmire, 13-May-01, 2 males, 1 female; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 13-May-01, 17 males, 4 females; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14May-01, 1 male; Ipsut Falls at Ipsut Creek, 14-May-01, 1 Ostrocerca foersteri Ipsut Creek at campground, 18-May-95, 3 males; Falls Creek on Carbon River Road, 27-May-97, 1 male; Nisqually River at Longmire, 28-May-97, 3 males; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 06-Jul-99, 1 male; small stream near Longmire, 09-Jul-99, 1 male. Genus Podmosta Podmosta decepta Small stream into Ohanapecosh River near Highway 123, 07-Jul-99, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16- 398 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST Aug-99, 3 males, 5 females; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16-Aug-99, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 07-Sep-99, 2 females. Podmosta delicatula Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16-Aug-99, 1 male; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug-99, 9 males, 7 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Aug-00, 1 male; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 13-May-01, 1 female. Genus Prostoia [Volume 62 Bridge, 06-Jul-99, 8 males, 4 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug-99, 13 males, 3 females; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16-Aug-99, 3 males, 4 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Aug-00, 1 male; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 07-May-01, 3 males, 2 females; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14-May-01, 2 males; stream into White River at Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 5 males, 4 females; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 16-Jun-01, 1 male; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 17-Jun01, 5 males; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 02-Jul-01, 5 males, 4 females. Prostoia besametsa Genus Visoka Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 28May-97, 1 male, 1 female; Ohanapecosh Campground, 28May-97, 4 males, 5 females; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 29-May-97, 2 males, 5 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 06-Jul-99, 1 male; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Jul-00, 1 male, 1 female; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14-May-01, 7 males, 6 females; Longmire, 15-May-01, 1 male, 1 female; Ohanapecosh Campground, 16-May-01, 2 males, 5 females; White River on Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 17 males, 8 females; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 16-May-01, 2 males, 1 female; Deer Creek at Eastside Trail, 09-Jun-01, 1 female. Genus Soyedina Soyedina interrupta Summerland, 23-Jul-95, 1 male; 0.5 mile W of White River Ranger Station, 21-Apr-96, 1 male; seeps into Eagle Creek, 28-May-97, 2 males, 1 female; unnamed stream 3.4 miles S of park boundary on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 1 male; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 29-May97, 4 males, 1 female; Nisqually River at Glacier View Bridge, 30-May-97, 11 males, 3 females; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 19-Jun-97, 1 male, 2 females; White River across from the White River Campground, 02-Jul-98, 1 male; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 05-Jun-99, 1 male, 2 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 11-Jun-99, 1 male, 5 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 06-Jul-99, 4 males; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 06-Jul-99, 4 males, 5 females; Nisqually River at Glacier View Bridge, 07-Jul99, 3 males, 5 females; seep into Fryingpan Creek, 08-Jul99, 3 males, 1 female; stream on Westside Road 1.5 miles from Paradise Road, 26-Jun-00, 1 male, 1 female; Fryingpan Creek at Wonderland Trail, 29-Jun-00, 1 male; South Puyallup River at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 1 male, 1 female; Longmire, 13-May-01, 1 male; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 13-May-01, 1 male; Ipsut Falls at Ipsut Creek, 14-May-01, 1 male, 1 female; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 15-May-01, 1 male; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 1 male. Soyedina producta Unnamed stream 3.4 miles S of park boundary on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 3 males; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 1 male; Nisqually River at Glacier View Bridge, 30-May-97, 24 males, 3 females; Carbon River at Alice Falls, 06-Jun-97, 3 males, 4 females; Ipsut Creek at Carbon River Road Bridge, 06-Jun-97, 1 male, 1 female; North Mowich River at Wonderland Trail, 07-May-98, 2 males; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Visoka cataractae 0.6 mile S of Ipsut Campground, 04-Apr-97, 1 male; Ipsut Falls on Ipsut Creek, 04-May-97, 17 males, 1 female. Genus Zapada Zapada cinctipes 0.7 mile SE of Ipsut Campground, 25-Mar-95, 4 males, 2 females; Tahoma Creek at Westside Road, 02-Mar-96, 1 male, 3 females; Tahoma Creek 0.1 mile N of Dry Creek, 02-Mar-96, 1 male, 3 females; Reflection Lake, stream near Pinnacle Peak Trail, 14-Apr-96, 2 males, 2 females; White River Road 0.5 mile N of ranger station, 21-Apr-96, 1 male, 4 females; Ohanapecosh Campground, 12-May96, 1 female; Ipsut Falls at Ipsut Creek, 23-Feb-97, 1 female; south of Chenuis Falls parking lot, 23-Feb-97, 2 males, 13 females; 0.7 mile SE of Ipsut Campground, 23Mar-97, 1 female; Westside Road 1.3 miles N of Paradise Road, 29-Mar-97, 4 females; Tahoma Creek, 1.8 miles NE of Nisqually Entrance, 29-Mar-97, 4 males, 8 females; Westside Road, 2.6 miles NNE of Nisqually Entrance, 29Mar-97, 5 males, 6 females; 0.6 mile S of Ipsut Campground, 04-Apr-97, 1 male, 1 female; Shaw Creek at White River Road, 21-Apr-97, 1 male; White River Campground, 01-Apr-98, 1 female; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Westside Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug-99, 9 males, 8 females; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 07-Sep-99, 1 male, 2 females; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 16-Jul-00, 2 males, 1 female; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 23-Jul-00, 1 male; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Aug-00, 2 males; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 07-May01, 3 females; Longmire, 15-May-01, 1 male. Zapada columbiana 2.2 miles SE of Ipsut Campground, 25-Mar-95, 2 males, 2 females; Nahunta Falls, 16-Apr-95, 12 males; Nisqually River at Longmire, 16-Apr-95, 1 male; 0.15 mile NE of Glacier View Bridge, 16-Apr-95, 2 males; Squaw Lake, 07May-95, 1 male; Nisqually River at creek from Tato Falls, 14-Apr-96, 5 males, 5 females; Reflection Lake, stream near Pinnacle Peak Trail, 14-Apr-96, 11 males, 5 females; 0.1 mile NE of Glacier View Bridge, 14-Apr-96, 1 male; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 21-Apr-96, 22 males, 9 females; Edith Creek at Fourth Crossing, 05-May-96, 2 males, 1 female; Edith Creek at Fourth Crossing, 16-May96, 15 males, 6 females; Ipsut Falls, 23-Feb-97, 10 males, 3 females; Ipsut Creek, 0.6 mile S of Ipsut Campground, 23-Feb-97, 1 male; Tahoma Creek, 02-Mar-97, 1 male, 1 female; Westside Road, 2.6 miles NNE of Nisqually Entrance, 29-Mar-97, 4 males, 3 females; Westside Road 2002] MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK STONEFLIES 1.3 miles N of Paradise Road, 29-Mar-97, 2 males; 0.6 mile S of Ipsut Campground, 04-Apr-97, 1 male; 0.7 mile SE of Ipsut Campground, 04-Apr-97, 10 males, 9 females; Ipsut Falls on Ipsut Creek, 04-May-97, 1 female; Crystal Creek at Highway 410, 29-May-97, 1 male, 2 females; Eagle Peak Creek at 4360 ft, 14-Jun-97, 2 males, 2 females; White River Campground, 01-Apr-98, 15 males, 12 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 01-Apr-98, 5 males, 4 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 10-Jul00, 3 males, 11 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Jul-00, 2 males, 3 females; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 13-May-01, 1 male, 1 female; Deer Creek at Eastside Trail, 09-Jun-01, 1 male; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Jul-01, 1 male. Zapada cordillera Westside Road 1.3 miles N of Paradise Road, 29-Mar-97, 1 male, 1 female; Tahoma Creek, 1.8 miles NE of Nisqually Entrance, 29-Mar-97, 1 female; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 07-May-01, 1 female; seeps into Eagle Peak Creek, 07-May-01, 1 male. Zapada frigida 0.6 mile WSW of Shaw Creek Bridge, 03-Nov-96, 1 female; Carbon River Entrance, Rainforest Loop Trail, 08-May95, 1 male, 1 female; Carbon River Entrance, Rainforest Loop Trail, 27-May-97, 1 male; Ohanapecosh Campground, 28-May-97, 2 males; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 28-May-97, 1 female; Carbon River at Alice Falls, 06-Jun97, 4 males, 2 females; Ipsut Creek at Carbon River Road Bridge, 06-Jun-97, 1 male; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 19-Jun-97, 5 males; White River across from the White River Campground, 02-Jul-98, 3 males, 1 female; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 06-Jul-99, 11 males, 5 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 06Jul-99, 4 males; seep into Fryingpan Creek, 08-Jul-99, 3 males; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Westside Road, 08Jul-99, 2 males, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 08-Jul-99, 2 males; high-gradient tributary at Nisqually River Longmire, 09-Jul-99, 2 males; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug-99, 5 males, 4 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 1 male, 2 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 10-Jul-00, 2 females; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 1 male; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Aug-00, 1 male, 1 female; seeps into Fryingpan Creek 0.5 mile upstream from Sunrise Road, 15-Jun-01, 4 males, 1 female. Zapada haysi White River across from the White River Campground, 02-Jul-98, 1 male; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 2 males; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 16-May-01, 1 male; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 04-Jul-01, 1 male. Zapada oregonensis Carbon River Entrance, Rainforest Loop Trail, 27-May97, 4 males, 1 female; unnamed stream N of Crystal Creek, Highway 410, 29-May-97, 3 males; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 1 male; White River Highway 410, 29-May-97, 1 male; Mountain Meadow Stream at Paul Peak Trail, 07-May-98, 2 males; White River across from the White River Campground, 02-Jul-98, 2 males, 2 399 females; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Westside Road, 08Jul-99, 3 males, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 07-Sep-99, 1 male; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 16-May-01, 1 male; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 2 males; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 17-Jun-01, 4 males, 1 female. Family Taeniopterygidae Genus Doddsia Doddsia occidentalis Nisqually River at Longmire, 16-Apr-95, 2 males; Paradise Ice Caves, 20-Aug-95, 2 females; Westside Road 2.6 miles NNE of Nisqually Entrance, 29-Mar-97, 6 males, 5 females; Nisqually River at Longmire, 28-May-97, 5 females; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 7 females; Carbon River at Alice Falls, 06-Jun-97, 2 males; Glacier Basin, 20-Jul-97, 3 females; Glacier Basin, 21-Jul-97, 3 females; Glacier Basin, 27-Jul-97, 16 females; Huckleberry Creek Bridge, 17-Apr-98, 2 males, 2 females; Longmire, 20-Apr-98, 1 male; Huckleberry Creek Bridge, 21Apr-98, 1 male, 5 females; South Puyallup River at Westside Road, 21-Apr-98, 1 female; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 29-Apr-98, 3 males, 1 female; North Mowich River at Wonderland Trail, 07-May-98, 1 male, 1 female; Glacier Basin, 06-Jun-98, 24 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 11-Jun-99, 2 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 06-Jul-99, 2 females; small stream into Ohanapecosh River near Highway 123, 07-Jul-99, 1 female; stream into White River at Highway 410 N of White River Entrance, 07-Jul-99, 1 female; Pebble Creek at 7200 feet, 20-Jul-99, 6 females; Muir Snowfield at 8000 ft, 23-Jul-99, 1 female; Fryingpan Creek at Wonderland Trail, 29-Jun-00, 1 male, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 10-Jul-00, 3 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 10-Jul-00, 2 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Jul-00, 19 females; Kautz Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 04-Apr-01, 1 male, 1 female; Paradise Ice Caves, 12-May-01, 2 females; Kautz Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 13-May-01, 1 female; Tahoma Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 13-May-01, 1 male, 1 female; Ipsut Falls at Ipsut Creek, 14-May-01, 3 females; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14-May-01, 3 males, 7 females; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 15May-01, 1 male; Nisqually River, 2 miles W of Longmire, 15-May-01, 8 males, 6 females; Longmire, 15-May-01, 13 males, 4 females; Paradise River at Stevens Canyon Road, 15-May-01, 1 male, 1 female; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 15-May-01, 1 male, 1 female; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 1 male, 2 females; Ohanapecosh Campground, 16-May-01, 4 females. Genus Taenionema Taenionema kincaidi Kautz Creek Trail 0.7 mile N of Nisqually Road, 08-May95, 1 male, 2 females; South Mowich River Camp, 31-May95, 2 males, 1 female; Tahoma Woods, 29-Apr-96, 1 male; Ohanapecosh Campground, 28-May-97, 6 males, 5 females; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 28May-97, 3 males, 3 females; Nisqually River at Longmire, 28-May-97, 4 males, 1 female; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 29-May-97, 5 males, 2 females; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 17 males, 7 females; Deer WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST 400 [Volume 62 Creek on Highway 123, 29-May-97, 5 males, 3 females; Ohanapecosh River at Sheep Creek, 29-May-97, 5 males, 4 females; Tahoma Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 30-May-97, 6 females; Carbon River at Alice Falls, 06Jun-97, 6 males, 6 females; Ipsut Creek at Carbon River Road Bridge, 06-Jun-97, 5 males, 4 females; Mountain Meadow Stream at Paul Peak Trail, 07-May-98, 7 males, 8 females; North Mowich River at Wonderland Trail, 07May-98, 14 males, 4 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 03-Jul-98, 1 female; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 06-Jul-99, 18 males, 7 females; Nisqually River at Glacier View Bridge, 07-Jul-99, 1 male, 2 females; stream into White River at Highway 410 N of White River Entrance, 07-Jul-99, 1 female; Shaw Creek at White River Road, 07-Jul-99, 2 males; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Westside Road, 08-Jul-99, 2 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 male; small stream near Longmire, 09-Jul-99, 1 female; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 16-Aug-99, 1 male; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16-Aug-99, 2 males, 27 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Aug-99, 5 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 1 male; Fryingpan Creek at Wonderland Trail, 29-Jun-00, 2 females; Cataract Creek at Wonderland Trail, 09-Jul-00, 2 males, 3 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 10-Jul-00, 1 male, 2 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road, 10-Jul00, 1 female; Fish Creek at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 5 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road, 16-Jul-00, 4 females; Fryingpan Creek 0.25 mile upstream from Sunrise Road, 16-Jul-00, 1 male, 2 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 16-Jul-00, 1 female; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 16-Jul-00, 4 males, 1 female; Fish Creek at Westside Road, 05-Aug-00, 1 female; seeps by Nisqually River Bridge in Longmire, 07-May-01, 2 males, 1 female; Fish Creek at Dry Creek, 07-May-01, 8 males; Kautz Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 13-May-01, 8 males; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 13-May-01, 1 male; Tahoma Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 13-May-01, 6 males; Ipsut Falls at Ipsut Creek, 14-May-01, 2 females; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14-May-01, 2 males; Huckleberry Creek Bridge, 14-May-01, 1 male; Paradise River at Stevens Canyon Road, 15-May-01, 1 male; Nisqually River, 2 miles W of Longmire, 15-May01, 4 males, 1 female; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 4 males; Ohanapecosh Campground, 16-May-01, 2 males; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 09-Jun-01, 1 female; Ohanapecosh River 0.5 mile S of Shriner Peak Trailhead, 09-Jun-01, 4 males, 3 females; Deer Creek at Eastside Trail, 09-Jun-01, 1 male; White River at Sunrise Road, 15-Jun-01, 1 male, 1 female; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 02-Jul-01, 2 females. Alloperla serrata Taenionema pallidum Suwallia forcipata North Mowich River at Wonderland Trail, 07-May-98, 2 males, 1 female; Tahoma Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 13-May-01, 1 male; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14-May-01, 1 male. Nisqually River at Longmire, 04-Apr-96, 1 male, 8 females; Carbon River Entrance, 20-Sep-97, 10 males, 13 females; Huckleberry Creek Bridge, 27-Sep-97, 8 females. Group Systellognatha Family Chloroperlidae Genus Alloperla South Mowich River Camp, 31-May-95, 4 males, 5 females. Edith Creek at Fourth Crossing, 13-Sep-97, 1 male; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug-99, 3 males; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16-Aug-99, 9 males; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 16-Aug-99, 2 males; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 07-Sep-99, 1 male, 2 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Aug-00, 2 males, 2 females. Genus Plumiperla Plumiperla diversa Carbon River Entrance, 27-May-97, 15 males, 16 females; Nisqually River at Longmire, 28-May-97, 1 male; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 2 males, 1 female; Tahoma Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 30May-97, 3 males, 2 females; Longmire, 27-Jul-98, 1 male; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 06-Jul-99, 5 males, 5 females; small stream near Longmire, 07-Jul-99, 2 males; Nisqually River at Glacier View Bridge, 07-Jul-99, 14 males, 11 females; tributary to Ohanapecosh River, 07Jul-99, 1 male, 6 females; Tahoma Creek, 08-Jul-99, 1 male, 3 females; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Westside Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 female; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16-Aug-99, 2 males; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Aug-99, 2 males, 2 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 2 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 29-Jun-00, 1 male, 2 females; Tahoma Creek at Fish Creek, 08-Jul-00, 5 males, 2 females; Cataract Creek at Wonderland Trail, 09-Jul-00, 1 male, 1 female; South Puyallup River at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 20 males, 7 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Jul-00, 2 males, 5 females; Fryingpan Creek 0.25 mile upstream of Sunrise Road, 16-Jul-00, 3 males, 4 females; Tahoma Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 13-May-01, 1 male; White River at Sunrise Road Bridge, 15-Jun-01, 3 males, 2 females; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 17-Jun-01, 2 males, 1 female; small stream near Narada Falls, 23-Jul-01, 3 males. Genus Suwallia Suwallia dubia Ipsut Creek at Carbon River Road Bridge, 08-Sep-97, 1 female; Carbon River Entrance, 15-Aug-99, 1 male, 1 female; Carbon River Entrance, 16-Aug-99, 1 male; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 16-Aug-99, 1 male; small tributary on Westside Road 2 miles N of Paradise Road, 17-Aug-99, 1 male; Van Horn Creek at Waterfall, 13-Sep99, 3 males, 2 females; West fork of White River, 13-Sep99, 1 female; South Puyallup River at Westside Road, 29Sep-00, 16 males, 6 females. Suwallia pallidula Genus Sweltsa Alloperla fraterna Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 16-Aug-99, 6 males; small stream near Ohanapecosh Visitor Center, 16-May01, 1 male. Sweltsa borealis Carbon River Entrance, Rainforest Loop Trail, 08-May95, 3 males, 3 females; Wonderland Trail 0.5 mile E of Paul 2002] MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK STONEFLIES 401 Peak Trail junction, 01-Jun-95, 1 male, 1 female; Carbon River Entrance, 27-May-97, 1 male, 2 females; Carbon River Entrance, Rainforest Loop Trail, 27-May-97, 2 males, 2 females; Nisqually River at Longmire, 28-May-97, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 28-May-97, 5 males, 3 females; White River Highway 410, 29-May-97, 1 male, 1 female; unnamed stream N of Crystal Creek, Highway 410, 29-May-97, 10 males, 4 females; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 3 females; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 29-May-97, 1 female; Eagle Peak Creek at Nisqually River, 30-May-97, 1 female; Ipsut Creek at Carbon River Road Bridge, 06-Jun-97, 1 male, 1 female; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 14-Jun-97, 1 male; Olallie Creek, 28-Jun-97, 2 males; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 06-Jul-99, 4 males, 2 females; stream into White River at Highway 410 N of White River entrance, 07-Jul-99, 1 female; tributary to Ohanapecosh River, 07-Jul-99, 7 females; Nisqually River at Glacier View Bridge, 07-Jul-99, 3 females; small stream into Ohanapecosh River near Highway 123, 07-Jul-99, 1 male; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Westside Road, 08-Jul-99, 3 males, 4 females; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 3 females; small tributary on Westside Road 2 miles N of Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 female; high-gradient tributary at Nisqually River Longmire, 09Jul-99, 1 male; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16-Aug99, 1 male, 3 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug-99, 5 males, 7 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 07-Sep-99, 1 male, 1 female; Van Horn Creek at Waterfall, 13-Sep-99, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 4 males, 2 females; Cataract Creek at Wonderland Trail, 09-Jul-00, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 10-Jul-00, 3 males; Fish Creek at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 1 male; South Puyallup River at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 23-Jul-00, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Aug-00, 1 male, 4 females; Olallie Creek at Olallie Creek Camp, 03-Aug-00, 1 female; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 07-May-01, 2 males; Ipsut Falls at Ipsut Creek, 14-May-01, 1 male; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 16-May-01, 1 male; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 17-Jun-01, 3 males, 4 females; small stream near Narada Falls, 23-Jul01, 2 males, 2 females. River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug-99, 8 males, 4 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 07-Sep-99, 2 males, 2 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 2 males; stream on Westside Road 1.5 miles from Paradise Road, 26-Jun-00, 2 males, 4 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 29-Jun-00, 1 male; Cataract Creek at Wonderland Trail, 09-Jul-00, 10 males, 3 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 10-Jul-00, 2 males, 2 females; Fish Creek at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 2 males, 11 females; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 10 males, 5 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Jul-00, 1 male, 2 females; Fryingpan Creek 0.25 mile upstream from Sunrise Road, 16-Jul-00, 4 males; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 23-Jul-00, 3 males; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Aug-00, 1 male, 6 females; Fish Creek at Westside Road, 05-Aug-00, 1 male, 2 females; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 01-Jun-01, 8 males, 2 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 07-Jun-01, 1 male, 1 female; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 09-Jun-01, 1 male; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 17-Jun-01, 6 males; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 02-Jul-01, 1 male; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 09-Jul-01, 2 males, 1 female; small stream near Narada Falls, 23-Jul-01, 2 males. Sweltsa exquisita Sweltsa revelstoka Carbon River Entrance, Rainforest Loop Trail, 27-May97, 1 male; Carbon River Entrance, 27-May-97, 1 male, 1 female; Carbon River at Chenuis Falls Trailhead, 06-Jun97, 8 males; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 24-Jul97, 3 males, 1 female; Edith Creek at Fourth Crossing, 13Sep-97, 2 males; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 06Jul-99, 7 males, 13 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 06-Jul-99, 1 male; tributary to Ohanapecosh River, 07-Jul-99, 2 males; Nisqually River at Glacier View Bridge, 07-Jul-99, 2 males; small stream into Ohanapecosh River near Highway 123, 07-Jul-99, 9 males; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Westside Road, 08-Jul-99, 2 males, 3 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 08Jul-99, 4 males; small stream near Longmire, 09-Jul-99, 2 males, 3 females; High gradient tributary at Nisqually River at Longmire, 09-Jul-99, 1 male; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 16-Aug-99, 1 male; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16-Aug-99, 7 males, 4 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 16-Aug-99, 1 female; Paradise White River Campground, 23-Jul-97, 7 males, 6 females; inflow upper Palisade Lake, 08-Aug-97, 17 males, 8 females; White River across from White River Campground, 02Jul-98, 4 males, 1 female; seep into Fryingpan Creek, 08Jul-99, 1 male; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Aug-99, 1 female; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16-Aug-99, 3 males, 5 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug-99, 5 males, 3 females; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 16-Aug-99, 5 males, 7 females; creek behind Mystic Lake Ranger Station, 04-Sep-99, 1 female; Cataract Creek at Wonderland Trail, 09-Jul-00, 1 female; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road, 10-Jul-00, 6 males, 2 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road, 16-Jul-00, 1 female; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 23-Jul-00, 7 males, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Aug00, 4 males, 4 females; Tamanos Creek at Trail, 03-Aug-00, 2 males; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Jul-01, 1 male; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road, 02-Jul-01, 1 female; Dick Creek at Wonderland Trail, 27-Jul-01, 1 female. Sweltsa occidens Laughingwater Creek, 27-Jun-95, 5 males; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 24-Jul-97, 4 males, 32 females; high-gradient tributary at Nisqually River Longmire, 09Jul-99, 3 males; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug99, 4 males, 7 females; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16-Aug-99, 52 males, 15 females; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 16-Aug-99, 1 male; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 1 male; Cataract Creek at Wonderland Trail, 09-Jul-00, 2 males; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 4 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Jul-00, 1 male, 2 females; Fryingpan Creek 0.25 mile upstream Sunrise Road, 29-Jun-00, 1 male; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 23-Jul-00, 2 males, 1 female; Tamanos Creek at trail, 03-Aug-00, 10 males, 5 females; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 09-Jun-01, 1 male; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 17-Jun-01, 1 male; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 02-Jul-01, 1 male; small stream near Narada Falls, 23-Jul-01, 1 male. WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST 402 Sweltsa new species Tributary to Tahoma Creek at Westside Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 male. Genus Kathroperla Kathroperla perdita White River Highway 410, 29-May-97, 2 males; unnamed stream 3.4 miles S of park boundary on Highway 410, 29May-97, 1 female; Crystal Creek at Highway 410, 29May-97, 1 male, 1 female; unnamed stream N of Crystal Creek, Highway 410, 29-May-97, 2 females; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 29-May-97, 1 female; Tahoma Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 30-May-97, 2 males; Mountain Meadow Stream at Paul Peak Trail, 07-May-98, 1 male; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14-May01, 1 female; Ipsut Falls at Ipsut Creek, 14-May-01, 1 male, 1 female; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 1 male, 2 females; Deer Creek at Eastside Trail, 09-Jun-01, 1 male; White River at Sunrise Road, 15-Jun-01, 1 female. Kathroperla takhoma Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 06-Jul-99, 1 female; tributary to Ohanapecosh River, 07-Jul-99, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 1 female; small stream near Ohanapecosh Visitor Center, 16-May01, 1 male. Genus Paraperla Paraperla frontalis Ohanapecosh Ranger Station, 22-Jun-96, 1 female; Carbon River Entrance, 27-May-97, 2 females; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 28-May-97, 1 male; White River Highway 410, 29-May-97, 1 male. Paraperla wilsoni 0.15 mile NE of Glacier View Bridge, 16-Apr-95, 1 female; 0.6 mile S of Ipsut Campground, 04-Apr-97, 1 female; Nisqually River at Longmire, 28-May-97, 3 females, 1 nymph; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 09-Jun-01, 1 male. Family Peltoperlidae Genus Soliperla Soliperla fenderi Tributary to Tahoma Creek, 08-Jul-99, 4 males, 1 female; small tributary on Westside Road 2 miles N of Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 male, 1 female; small tributary on Westside Road 2 miles N of Paradise Road, 17-Aug-99, 4 males, 1 female; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 17-Aug-99, 1 female; stream on Westside Road 1.5 miles from Paradise Road, 26-Jun-00, 1 male; Cataract Creek at Wonderland Trail, 09-Jul-00, 1 male; Dick Creek at Wonderland Trail, 27-Jul-01, 4 males. Genus Yoraperla [Volume 62 White River across from the White River Campground, 02-Jul-98, 1 female; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 07-May-01, 1 male, 2 females; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 1 female; stream into White River at Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 1 male; Ohanapecosh River 0.5 mile S of Shriner Peak Trailhead, 09-Jun-01, 5 females. Yoraperla nigrisoma Mowich Road at Grindstone Trail Crossing, 07-Jul-95, 1 female; Ipsut Creek at Carbon River Road Bridge, 06Jun-97, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 11Jun-99, 2 males; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 06-Jul-99, 1 male, 1 female; small tributary on Westside Road 2 miles N of Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 female; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Westside Road, 08-Jul-99, 25 males, 12 females; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 2 males, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug-99, 1 male, 1 female; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16-Aug-99, 2 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 16-Aug-99, 2 females; small tributary on Westside Road 2 miles N of Paradise Road, 17-Aug-99, 1 male; creek behind Mystic Lake Ranger Station, 04-Sep-99, 2 males, 3 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 9 males, 4 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 10-Jul-00, 6 males; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 14-Jul-00, 3 males, 2 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 16-Jul-00, 1 male, 3 females; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Aug00, 5 females; Olallie Creek at Olallie Creek Camp, 03Aug-00, 1 female; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 07-May-01, 1 male, 2 females; small stream near Ohanapecosh Visitor Center, 16-May-01, 1 male; Ohanapecosh River 0.5 mile S of Shriner Peak Trailhead, 09Jun-01, 1 female; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 17-Jun-01, 8 males, 2 females; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 04-Jul-01, 1 male; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 09-Jul-01, 2 females. Yoraperla siletz Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 06-Jul-99, 9 males, 11 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 08-Jul99, 5 males, 5 females; small tributary on Westside Road 2 miles N of Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 male, 1 female; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 2 males, 2 females. Family Perlidae Genus Doroneuria Doroneuria baumanni Carbon River Entrance at June Creek, 13-Jul-95, 2 nymphs; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 female; Carbon River Entrance, 15-Aug-99, 5 males, 1 female. Genus Hesperoperla Yoraperla mariana Hesperoperla pacifica Ohanapecosh Campground, 28-May-97, 1 male, 4 females; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 29-May-97, 2 males, 1 female; Ohanapecosh River at Sheep Creek, 29-May-97, 1 male, 1 female; unnamed stream N of Crystal Creek, Highway 410, 29-May-97, 9 males, 7 females; Mountain Meadow Stream at Paul Peak Trail, 07-May-98, 1 male; Ohanapecosh Ranger Station, 17-Jul-97, 1 female. Genus Claassenia Claassenia sabulosa Ohanapecosh Ranger Station, 09-Sep-97, 1 female. MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK STONEFLIES 2002] Family Perlodidae Genus Isoperla 403 Seeps into White River on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 1 nymph. Bridge, 06-Jul-99, 1 male, 2 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Aug-99, 1 female; Cataract Creek at Wonderland Trail, 09-Jul-00, 1 female; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 10-Jul-00, 2 females; Nisqually River at Longmire, 13-May-01, 1 male, 1 female; seeps into White River on Highway 410, 14-May-01, 9 males, 2 females; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 02-Jul-01, 1 female; Cataract Creek at Wonderland Trail, 20-Jul-01, 1 female; Puyallup River at Wonderland Trail, 28-Jul-01, 1 male. Isoperla gravitans Megarcys subtruncata Carbon River Entrance, Rainforest Loop Trail, 08-May95, 1 male; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun00, 1 male. Deer Creek on Highway 123, 27-May-97, 2 males; Ohanapecosh River at the Grove of the Patriarchs, 28-May-97, 1 male, 1 female; Goat Creek on Highway 410, 29-May-97, 4 males, 1 female; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 29May-97, 1 male; Carbon River at Chenuis Falls Trailhead, 06-Jun-97, 2 females; Ipsut Creek at Carbon River Road Bridge, 06-Jul-97, 2 females; Glacier Basin, 20-Jul-97, 4 females; Glacier Basin, 21-Jul-97, 4 females; Glacier Basin, 27-Jul-97, 2 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 06-Jul-99,1 male, 1 female; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16-Aug-99, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug-99, 3 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Aug-99, 1 male, 2 females; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 25-Jun-00, 2 males; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 29-Jun-00, 1 female; Huckleberry Creek Bridge, 14-May-01, 2 males; Longmire, 15-May-01, 1 male; Ohanapecosh Campground, 16May-01, 1 male; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 09-Jun01, 1 male, 2 females; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 17-Jun-01, 1 male. Isoperla bifurcata Carbon River Entrance, 15-Aug-99, 1 female. Isoperla fusca Isoperla petersoni Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Jul-00, 3 males, 1 female. Isoperla rainiera White River Campground, 23-Jul-97, 1 female; Nisqually River at Glacier Vista Bridge, 07-Jul-99, 1 female; Paradise River above Narada Falls, 16-Aug-99, 2 males, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 02-Aug-00, 16 males, 2 females; Fryingpan Creek at Wonderland Trail, 31-Oct-00, 1 female. Isoperla sobria Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Jul-00, 1 male, 1 female; White River Highway 410, 0.5 mile S of park boundary, 16-May-01, 1 male. Isoperla sordida Fryingpan Creek at Wonderland Trail, 03-Jul-98, 1 female; Longmire, 08-Sep-98, 1 female; stream into White River at Highway 410 N of White River entrance, 07-Jul-99, 3 males; small tributary on Westside Road 2 miles N of Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 1 male; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 17-Aug-99, 1 female; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 05-Sep-99, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 07-Sep-99, 2 males; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 13-Sep-99, 1 male; North Puyallup River at Wonderland Trail, 24-Sep-00, 2 males, 32 females. Isoperla tilasqua Stream into White River at Highway 410 N of White River Entrance, 07-Jul-99, 3 males; tributary to Tahoma Creek at Paradise Road, 08-Jul-99, 2 males, 3 females; boggy stream tributary to Tahoma Creek, 17-Aug-99, 1 female. Megarcys yosemite Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Aug-99, 1 male; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Jul-00, 4 females. Genus Setvena Setvena tibialis Mowich Road at Grindstone Trail Crossing, 07-Jul-95, 1 female; Paradise Ice Caves, 20-Aug-95, 1 male, 1 female; St. Andrews Creek at Westside Road, 24-Jul-97, 2 females; Paradise Ice Caves, 13-Sep-97, 1 female; Sunrise Visitor Center, 13-Aug-98, 1 male; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 06-Jul-99, 3 males, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 16-Aug-99, 2 males; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 16-Aug-99, 1 male; Falls Creek at Stevens Canyon Road, 16-Aug-99, 1 female; small tributary on Westside Road 2 miles N of Paradise Road, 17-Aug-99, 1 female; Paradise River in Paradise Valley, 10-Jul-00, 1 male; Paradise River at Fourth Crossing, 23-Jul-00, 1 male. Genus Skwala Genus Frisonia Frisonia picticeps Skwala americana Muir Snowfield at 8000 ft, 28-Jul-95, 1 female. Ohanapecosh Ranger Station, 05-May-96, 1 female; Ohanapecosh Campground, 28-May-97, 2 females; Ohanapecosh Hot Springs, 28-May-97, 1 female; Ohanapecosh Ranger Station, 28-May-97, 2 males. Genus Megarcys Megarcys irregularis Carbon River Entrance, 27-May-97, 8 males, 3 females; Nisqually River at Longmire, 28-May-97, 2 males, 1 female; White River Highway 410, 29-May-97, 8 males, 1 female; Tahoma Creek at Nisqually to Paradise Road, 30May-97, 2 females; Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Genus Kogotus Kogotus nonus Ipsut Creek at Carbon River Road Bridge, 08-Sep-97, 1 male; Carbon River Entrance, 15-Aug-99, 1 male, 2 females; WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST 404 Fryingpan Creek at Sunrise Road Bridge, 16-Jul-00, 1 female. Family Pteronarcyidae Genus Pteronarcys Pteronarcys princeps Stevens Canyon Entrance, 15-May-95, 1 female; Panther Creek at Highway 123, 29-May-97, 1 male; small stream near Ohanapecosh Visitor Center, 16-May-01, 3 nymphs. [Volume 62 Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 405–413 A 4000-YEAR RECORD OF WOODLAND VEGETATION FROM WIND RIVER CANYON, CENTRAL WYOMING Stephen T. Jackson1,3, Mark E. Lyford1, and Julio L. Betancourt2 ABSTRACT.—Plant macrofossil analyses of 16 radiocarbon-dated woodrat middens spanning the past 4000 years from the Wind River Canyon region in central Wyoming provide information concerning late Holocene development of juniper woodlands. The study sites are currently dominated by Juniperus osteosperma, with J. scopulorum present locally. Woodlands in the region were dominated by J. scopulorum from ca 4000 yr BP until at least 2800 yr BP. Juniperus osteosperma invaded and expanded before 2000 yr BP. This expansion fits a regional pattern of J. osteosperma colonization and expansion in north central Wyoming during a relatively dry period between 2800 and 1000 yr BP. At the time the Wind River Canyon region was colonized by J. osteosperma, the species had populations 50–100 km to both the north and south. Long-distance seed dispersal was required for establishment in the study area. Genetic studies are necessary to identify source populations and regions. Key words: juniper woodlands, vegetation history, woodrat middens, central Wyoming, natural invasions, late Holocene. Juniper-dominated woodlands are extensive on the flanks of mountain ranges and on coarse-textured bedrock outcrops in basins of the central Rocky Mountain region (Knight 1994, West 1999). In Wyoming, juniper woodlands occupy some 5737 km2 (Driese et al. 1997). These woodlands are dominated primarily by Juniperus scopulorum (Rocky Mountain juniper), which occurs extensively throughout the Rocky Mountain region, from New Mexico to Canada. However, scattered juniper woodlands in central Wyoming and adjacent Montana are dominated by J. osteosperma (Utah juniper; Fig. 1), which occurs primarily in the Great Basin and Colorado Plateau. The Wyoming and Montana populations represent a series of isolated outposts separated from each other by 25–100 km and from the core distribution of the species by 100–500 km. This pattern contrasts with the distribution of J. osteosperma in the Colorado Plateau and Great Basin regions, where the species is abundant and widespread, and where populations are typically separated by no more than 10–30 km (Little 1971, West 1999). Paleoecological records from woodrat middens indicate that J. osteosperma populations have occurred in the southwestern Great Basin and southern Colorado Plateau since the last glacial maximum (Cole 1990, Nowak et al. 1994), and that the species colonized southeastern and northeastern Utah during the early Holocene (Betancourt 1990, Sharpe 1991). These observations suggest that the species migrated from the Utah/Wyoming border north and east during the Holocene to occupy its present range. Paleobotanical analyses of an array of fossil woodrat middens throughout the modern range of J. osteosperma in Wyoming and adjacent Utah and Montana are revealing the timing, rates, and patterns of its Holocene migration (Lyford et al. 2002a, 2002b). One of the critical sites in this sampling array is the Wind River Canyon region of central Wyoming because of its central location and the existence of a major north-flowing river running through the canyon, connecting the Wind River Basin with the Bighorn Basin (Fig. 1). The canyon may have served as an important migration corridor for J. osteosperma and other north-moving species during the Holocene. Wind River Canyon is the only canyon that bisects the Owl Creek Mountains, which comprise a potential geographic barrier to dispersal between the Bighorn Basin and the Wind River Basin and other basins to the south (Fig. 1). The Wind River/Bighorn River system comprises one of the few north-flowing rivers in western North America, and flood flows may have played an important role in long-distance 1Department of Botany, Aven Nelson Building, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071. 2U.S. Geological Survey, Desert Laboratory, 1675 W. Anklam Road, Tucson, AZ 85745. 3Corresponding author. 405 406 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 Fig. 1. Map of Wyoming and adjacent states showing elevations (white 900–1500 m, light gray 1500–2100 m, medium gray 2100–2600 m, dark gray ≥ 2600 m), key physiographic features, locations of study sites and other sites mentioned in text, and distribution of Juniperus osteosperma (black dots) based on records from the Rocky Mountain Herbarium (http://www.rmh.uwyo.edu). seed dispersal and Holocene migration of southern species. We conducted a study of woodrat middens collected from the Wind River Canyon region in central Wyoming to better assess the Holocene migration patterns of Juniperus osteosperma, to provide information on the history of juniper woodlands at the site, and to determine vegetation composition before and after J. osteosperma colonization (Fig. 1). A 13-midden series from lower Wind River Canyon spans the past 4000 years. Three late Holocene middens from Birdseye Creek, 16 km southsoutheast of the Wind River Canyon sites, provide additional information and corroboration. STUDY SITES Wind River Canyon is a deep, north-trending canyon, 21 km in length, incised into the Owl Creek Mountains (Figs. 1, 2). The canyon cuts through bedrock ranging from Precambrian metavolcanic rocks at the head of the canyon to limestones of the Permian Phosphoria Formation at the canyon mouth (Maughan 1972, 1987). In between it cuts through a series of Paleozoic limestones and dolomites, particularly those of the Amsden, Madison, Bighorn, Gallatin, and Gros Ventre formations. The primary lithologies exposed in the lowermost 4 km of the canyon, where we conducted our study, are limestones and dolomites of the Park City, Amsden, and Madison formations. West- and southwest-facing slopes on the east side of lower Wind River Canyon are vegetated by juniper woodlands (Fig. 2). Juniperus osteosperma is dominant on these slopes, although J. scopulorum occurs locally throughout the canyon, especially in mesic sites (draws, gullies, cliff bases). Rhus trilobata occurs locally 2002] CENTRAL WYOMING VEGETATION HISTORY 407 Fig. 2. Photo of lower Wind River Canyon near midden-collecting sites. Woodlands in foreground and background are dominated by Juniperus osteosperma. View is facing upcanyon, WNW. From a color transparency taken May 1998 by S.T. Jackson. at cliff bases and in draws. Scattered individuals of Pinus flexilis occur throughout the canyon but are not abundant on the lower slopes where we concentrated our collecting efforts. Other plant species on the slopes include shrubs (Ribes aureus [at cliff bases], Artemisia frigida, Atriplex canescens, Chrysothamnus spp., Gutierrezia sarothrae), grasses (Oryzopsis hymenoides, Bromus tectorum, Stipa comata, Elymus sp.), forbs (Artemisia ludoviciana, Cryptantha spp., Eriogonum spp., Penstemon spp.), and succulents (Opuntia polyacantha). Birdseye Creek flows south-southwest, draining uplands of the Owl Creek (Bridger) Mountains immediately east of Wind River Canyon. The creek cuts through a highly faulted series of Paleozoic limestones and dolomites, locally capped by Eocene sediments of the Wind River Formation (Thaden 1980). Middens are in crevices of the Madison Formation. Vegetation in Birdseye Creek Canyon consists of a mosaic of steppe, dominated by Artemisia tridentata, and open juniper woodlands, domi- nated by Juniperus osteosperma. Both vegetation types occur within 20 m of our collecting sites. Subdominants include the same species as observed in lower Wind River Canyon. The climate of central Wyoming is semiarid. Mean annual precipitation at Thermopolis (1948–2000; 1342 m elevation; 8 km N of the Wind River Canyon sites) is 290 mm. Mean annual precipitation at Boysen Dam, at the head of Wind River Canyon (1948–2000; 1416 m elevation; 7.5 km E of the Birdseye Creek sites) is 233 mm. Despite its higher elevation, Boysen Dam receives less precipitation than Thermopolis owing to its isolation at the northern edge of the Wind River Basin, where moisture sources are blocked by the Owl Creek Mountains. Mean July precipitation at Thermopolis and Boysen Dam is respectively 21 and 13 mm; mean January precipitation is respectively 10 and 7 mm. Winters are cold (mean January temperature –5.7°C at Thermopolis and –7.8°C at Boysen Dam) and summers are hot (mean July temperature 22.2°C at Thermopolis and 23.8°C at Boysen Dam). 408 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST METHODS Midden-collecting efforts in Wind River Canyon were concentrated on west-facing slopes in the lower portion of the canyon, where J. osteosperma is most abundant. The collecting sites range in elevation from 1365 to 1475 m (Table 1); river elevation in this reach of the canyon is 1340 m and the rim ranges from 1400 to 1650 m. Using standard field techniques (Spaulding et al. 1990), we collected 19 midden samples from crevices and bedrock overhangs. We collected 6 midden samples from Birdseye Creek Canyon, ranging from 1615 to 1700 m in elevation (Table 1). In all cases, weathering rinds were removed in the field, middens were inspected for stratification and contamination, and a sample from the core of the midden was collected. In the laboratory, midden samples were reinspected, dispersed in water, oven-dried, and sieved using 1- and 2-mm mesh screens (Spaulding et al. 1990). We examined the 2-mm sieve fraction thoroughly, separating identifiable plant macrofossils and identifying them using herbariumdocumented reference collections. The 1-mm sieve fraction was scanned to identify plant species and morphotypes not represented in the larger fraction. Each plant taxon in each midden was assigned a relative abundance value (1 = single occurrence, 5 = dominant; Spaulding et al. 1990). Thirteen middens were selected for radiocarbon-dating from Wind River Canyon, and 3 from Birdseye Creek. We obtained conventional 14C dates on samples of Neotoma fecal pellets from 8 Wind River Canyon and 2 Birdseye Creek middens. Using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), we dated Juniperus osteosperma foliage from 6 Wind River Canyon middens and 2 Birdseye Creek middens. We also AMS-dated J. scopulorum foliage from another Birdseye Creek midden. AMS dating provides precise dates from small amounts of organic material and hence yielded direct age-estimates for Juniperus macrofossils from the middens. We used AMS dating to pinpoint temporal occurrences of J. osteosperma at the study sites and in cases where we suspected possible mixing of plant material of different ages. For the conventional dates, we submitted 3–10 g of Neotoma fecal pellets to Geochronology Laboratories (Cambridge, MA) for dating. Targets for AMS dating were prepared at [Volume 62 the USGS Desert Laboratory in Tucson. Samples were pretreated to remove carbonates and acid- and base-soluble organic matter, combusted to CO2 on a vacuum line, converted to graphite, pressed into targets, and then measured for 14C activity at the University of Arizona–NSF Accelerator Facility. All ages reported or discussed in this paper are calendar-year ages (years Before Present, with 1950 as the benchmark). Radiocarbon ages were converted to calendar-year ages using the Intcal 98 calibration curve, using Method A (ranges with intercepts) from CALIB 4.3 (Stuiver and Reimer 1993). RESULTS The Wind River Canyon middens range in age from 3876 yr BP to modern (Table 1, Fig. 3). Macrofossil assemblages from the 6 middens dating before 2500 BP show relatively little variation; all are dominated by Juniperus scopulorum, with Rhus trilobata and Opuntia also abundant (Fig. 3, Table 2). Most have macrofossils of J. osteosperma. The 5 middens post-dating 2000 yr BP contain both J. osteosperma and J. scopulorum. Rhus and Opuntia occur as subdominants. Atriplex sp. is absent from all of these younger middens, and Artemisia nova occurs only in the oldest of these middens (Fig. 3). One Birdseye Creek midden is dominated by J. scopulorum and lacks macrofossils of J. osteosperma (Fig. 3, Table 2). It contains macrofossils of Artemisia nova and Atriplex sp. This midden was dated at 3350 yr BP, and foliage of J. scopulorum was AMS-dated at 2923 yr BP. Juniperus osteosperma foliage from a 2nd midden, which also contains J. scopulorum macrofossils, was AMS-dated at 2137 yr BP. A 3rd midden, dominated by J. osteosperma, yielded modern dates (45 yr BP; 42 yr BP AMS). Both of these younger middens lack Artemisia nova and Atriplex sp. DISCUSSION During the last glacial period, Juniperus osteosperma populations were restricted to the southern Great Basin and southern Colorado Plateau (Betancourt 1990, Thompson 1990, Nowak et al. 1994, Lyford et al. 2002b). During the late-glacial (13,000–10,000 yr BP), J. osteosperma migrated rapidly from northern Arizona to northeastern Utah (Betancourt 1990, Lab no. AA33168 AA38266 AA38265 AA33162 AA38242 AA33156 GX24953 GX24952 GX24951 GX24948 GX24950 GX25842 GX26611 GX24949 GX25480 AA33680 AA38258 AA33673 GX25479 Midden no. WRC207B WRC240 WRC208 WRC241B WRC173 WRC212 WRC242 WRC183 WRC181C WRC171A WRC173 WRC182 WRC181A WRC172 BEC245A BEC245A BEC301 BEC174A BEC174A J. osteosperma foliage J. osteosperma foliage J. osteosperma foliage J. osteosperma foliage J. osteosperma foliage J. osteosperma foliage Neotoma fecal pellets Neotoma fecal pellets Neotoma fecal pellets Neotoma fecal pellets Neotoma fecal pellets Neotoma fecal pellets Neotoma fecal pellets Neotoma fecal pellets Neotoma fecal pellets J. osteosperma foliage J. osteosperma foliage J. osteosperma foliage Neotoma fecal pellets Material dated Age (cal-yr BP) 467 (309–514) 505 (341–527) 679 (654–760) 1562 (1422–1708) 1675 (1530–1713) 1657 (1529–1815) 1909 (1723–2118) 2750 (2351–2992) 2781 (2736–2965) 2848 (2747–3058) 3469 (3274–3687) 3655 (3471–3889) 3876 (3698–4086) 3876 (3644–4144) 45 (0–285) 42 (0–277) 2137 (1996–2325) 2923 (2780–3157) 3350 (2952–3633) Age (14C yr BP) 375 ± 45 430 ± 33 767 ± 43 1680 ± 50 1719 ± 41 1735 ± 50 1970 ± 75 2620 ± 130 2710 ± 80 2750 ± 75 3260 ± 80 3430 ± 80 3590 ± 60 3590 ± 80 80 ± 65 90 ± 45 2155 ± 50 2825 ± 60 3110 ± 130 43°33′28.8″N 43°33′10.1″N 43°33′28.8″N 43°33′10.1″N 43°33′52.8″N 43°33′34.6″N 43°33′10.1″N 43°33′14.9″N 43°33′14.9″N 43°33′44.2″N 43°33′52.8″N 43°33′14.9″N 43°33′14.9″N 43°33′52.8″N 43°23′37.1″N 43°23′37.1″N 43°24′06.7″N 43°23′34.1″N 43°23′34.1″N Latitude 108°12′20.8″W 108°11′42.6″W 108°12′20.8″W 108°11′42.6″W 108°12′30.3″W 108°12′22.1″W 108°11′42.6″W 108°12′37.6″W 108°12′37.6″W 108°12′42.5″W 108°12′30.3″W 108°12′37.6″W 108°12′37.6″W 108°12′30.3″W 108°05′17.1″W 108°05′17.1″W 108°05′16.2″W 108°05′15.1″W 108°05′15.1″W Longitude 1455 1421 1455 1421 1431 1482 1421 1416 1416 1367 1431 1416 1416 1431 1645 1645 1657 1639 1639 Elevation (m) TABLE 1. Radiocarbon age, location, and elevation of middens analyzed from Wind River Canyon (WRC) and Birdseye Creek (BEC). Age estimates in 14C yr BP include 2 standard errors. Age estimates in calendar-yr BP include median intercept from CALIB 4.2 (Stuiver et al. 1998) and (in parentheses) minimum and maximum ages based on 2 standard errors from minimum and maximum intercepts. 2002] CENTRAL WYOMING VEGETATION HISTORY 409 410 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 Fig. 3. Relative abundances of macrofossils of selected taxa in woodrat middens from Wind River Canyon (WRC) and Birdseye Creek (BEC). Sharpe 1991). It was established at Dutch John Mountain, 5 km south of the Utah/Wyoming border, by 9400 yr BP ( Jackson, Betancourt, and Lyford, unpublished data). Northeastern Utah was the most likely portal for invasion of J. osteosperma and other Great Basin species into Wyoming. The modern distribution of J. osteosperma as well as the topographic configuration suggests that migration from the Utah/ Wyoming border northward proceeded from southwestern Wyoming to the southeastern foothills of the Wind River Mountains, and then across the Owl Creek/Bridger Mountains into the Bighorn Basin (Fig. 1). As the only drainage cutting across the Owl Creek Mountains, Wind River Canyon would appear to have been an important migration pathway. Establishment of J. osteosperma populations at several sites in the Bighorn Basin predates the 1st occurrences (1900 yr BP at Wind River Canyon, 2100 at Birdseye Creek) in the Wind River Canyon region. The earliest documented establishments occurred ca 5400 yr BP at Southern Bighorn Canyon, at the northern edge of the Bighorn Basin (Lyford et al. 2002a), and Mahogany Butte, in the southeastern Bighorn Basin (Lyford et al. 2002b; Fig. 1). However, these occurrences predate not only the 1st J. osteosperma occurrences in the Wind River Canyon region, but also the oldest middens we have in that region (3900 yr BP). The migration of J. osteosperma in Wyoming occurred by means of rare, long-distance dispersal events spanning 30–100 km or more. Such dispersal events were required to cross geographic barriers (e.g., the Wind River Basin) and are confirmed by the patchy pattern of establishment documented from woodrat midden analyses throughout the region (Lyford et al. 2002b). The Wind River Canyon region may – – – – – – – – – – 2 3 5 – 2 2 – – – – 2 – – – 2 – – – – – 1.5 Artemisia nova (lf) Artemisia tridentata (lf) Atriplex sp. (fr) Atriplex sp. (lf) Chrysothamnus sp. (inv) Cryptantha sp. (lf) Elymus sp. (fl) Equisetum sp. (st) Gutierrezia sarothrae (inv) Hedeoma sp. (se) Juniperus osteosperma (fr) Juniperus osteosperma (se) Juniperus osteosperma (st) Juniperus scopulorum (fr) Juniperus scopulorum (se) Juniperus scopulorum (st) Lappula redowskii (se) Lesquerella sp. (lf) Lithospermum sp. (se) Opuntia sp. (se) Opuntia sp. (st) Oryzopsis hymenoides (se) Pinus flexilis (n) Pinus flexilis (se) Rhus trilobata (se) Rosa sp. (lf) Rosa sp. (se) Rosa sp. (st) Stipa sp. (fl) Stipa comata (se) Yucca glauca (se) – – – – – – – – – – – 3 4 – 2 4 – – 1 – 2 – – – 5 – – – – – – 505 – – – – – – – – – – 2 2 5 – 2 2 – – – – 2 – – – 1 – – – – – – 679 – – – – – – – – – – 2 3 5 – 2 2 – – – 2 2 1 – – 2 – – – – – – 1562 – – – – – – – – – – 2 2 2 2 2 5 – – – – 2 2 2 – 2 – – – – – – 1657 2 – – – – – – – 2 1 2 2 4 2 3 4 – – 2 – 2 2 – – 2 – – – – – 3 1909 1 – – – – – 2 – – – – – – – 3 5 – – – – 2 – – – 2 – – – – – – 2750 2 – – – – – – 2 – – – – – 2 3 5 – 2 – 2 2 1 – – 2 3 2 2 – – – 2781 2 – 3 2 – – – – 2 1 – – – 2 4 5 – 2 1 – 2 – – – 2 – – – 1 – – 2848 2 – – – – 2 – – – – – – – 2 4 5 1 – 1 2 – 2 4 – 2 – – – – – – 3469a 2 – 2 – – 2 – 1 – – – – – 2 2 5 – – – – – – – – 2 – – – – – – 3566 – – 1 – – – 1 2 – – – – – 2 2 5 – – – – 2 – – – 2 2 – – – – – 3876 – 2 2 2 2 – – – – – – – – 3 4 5 – – – – – – 2 1 2 – – – – – – 3876 – – – – – – – – – – 1 2 5 – – – – – – – 2 – – – – – – – – – – 45 – – – 5 – – – – – – – – 2 – 2 2 – – – – 3 – – – 2 – – – – – – 2137 2 – 2 4 – 2 2 – – – – – – – 2 4 – 2 – 2 3 2 – – 4 – – – – 2 – 3350b Birdseye Creek _____________________ 245A 301 174A _____________________ aFoliage of Juniperus osteosperma from this midden was AMS–dated at 1719 radiocarbon yr BP (1675 calendar yr BP). This is regarded as a contaminant; the rest of the midden contents are assigned the age obtained from the Neotoma fecal pellets. bFoliage of Juniperus scopulorum from this midden yielded a slightly younger age (see Table 1). 467 Sample age (yr BP) Sample number Wind River Canyon _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 207B 240 208 241B 212 242 183 181C 171A 173 182 181A 172 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE 2. Relative abundances of plant macrofossil types in woodrat middens from Wind River Canyon and Birdseye Creek sites. Organ types abbreviated as follows: lf = leaf, n = needle, fl = floret, se = seed, inv = involucre, fr = fruit, st = stem. 2002] CENTRAL WYOMING VEGETATION HISTORY 411 412 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST have been skipped in long-distance dispersal events during the mid-Holocene, leading to the initial establishment well north of the region. Under this scenario, the region was first colonized by J. osteosperma ~2000 yr BP, either by back-colonization from the Bighorn Basin to the north or by additional dispersal events from populations to the south (SE Wind River Mountains, SW Wyoming). Alternatively, Wind River Canyon may have been colonized by J. osteosperma populations before 5400 yr BP, and did in fact serve as an intermediate site in northward invasion into the Bighorn Basin region. Under this scenario, early populations of J. osteosperma underwent local extinction some time before 3900 yr BP, with recolonization ca 2000 yr BP. This hypothesis cannot be excluded given the absence of middens predating 3900 yr BP. Lyford et al. (2002b) identified a punctuated pattern of J. osteosperma migration in northern Wyoming in which establishment occurred during periods of relatively dry climate (ca 5400 yr BP, 2800–1000 yr BP) and colonization of new sites ceased during relatively wet periods (5400–2800 yr BP). Our data are consistent with this pattern; J. osteosperma is absent from all middens representing the wet period (3900–2800 yr BP), and the 1st documented occurrences (2100–1900 yr BP) occurred during the dry period. The populations established 5400 yr BP at southern Bighorn Canyon and Mahogany Butte persisted throughout the subsequent wet period (Lyford et al. 2002a, 2002b). Because the Mahogany Butte site is higher (1800 m) and wetter than Wind River Canyon and Birdseye Creek, Mahogany Butte populations might be expected to be more sensitive to a moisture increase than those in the Wind River Canyon region. Juniperus osteosperma populations established in Wind River Canyon at or before 5400 yr BP may have declined but persisted locally after 5400 yr BP, and then expanded in response to the drying trend after 2800 yr BP. The absence of J. osteosperma from the 3 middens dating from 2750 to 2850 yr BP as well as the 5 middens dating 3350–3900 yr BP suggests, however, that J. osteosperma was absent from the region during the wet period and that the species invaded the canyon by dispersal from distant sources (e.g., in the eastern Bighorn Basin). Woodrats of Neotoma cinerea [Volume 62 show a strong preference for collecting Juniperus foliage, particularly J. osteosperma (Nowak et al. 2000, Lyford 2001), increasing our confidence that absence of J. osteosperma from the middens predating 2100 yr BP indicates its absence from the surrounding vegetation. Our paleological data provide constraints on the history of J. osteosperma in the Wind River Canyon region and suggest strongly that current populations were established ca 2000 yr BP from distant sources to the north or south. Those populations may carry a genetic signature of their establishment sources and history. Genetic analyses of the Wind River Canyon populations and potential source populations in the Wind River foothills and the Bighorn Basin might reveal the precise pathway and sequence of invasion of Wind River Canyon. Juniperus scopulorum populations persisted in Wind River Canyon after the rapid transition to dominance by J. osteosperma, in contrast to sites in the Bighorn Basin (e.g., Pryor Mountain and Big Horn Canyon; Lyford et al. 2002a). Wind River Canyon is more mesic than the northern sites, owing to shading by the west canyon wall and to greater surface drainage and groundwater seepage from upper slopes. The locally moist habitats have allowed persistence of J. scopulorum over much of the canyon. We cannot determine from the midden records whether J. scopulorum was displaced from drier sites when J. osteosperma invaded. Rhus trilobata and Opuntia occurred in Wind River Canyon both before and after the establishment of J. osteosperma. Rhus trilobata is concentrated around locally moist sites (gulches, seeps, cliff bases) and was thus buffered against changes in moisture of the magnitude experienced in the past 4000 years. Similarly, Opuntia occurs widely in dry, exposed microsites in the canyon, which have been available regardless of climate regime. The reason for the disappearance of Artemisia nova from the canyon between 2500 and 2000 yr BP is unclear. The species did not occur near any of our study sites and is uncommon in the canyon. Its disappearance may have resulted from increasing density of woodlands as J. osteosperma populations expanded. The late Holocene appearance of Yucca glauca at Wind River Canyon matches a pattern observed in the northern Bighorn Basin by Lyford et al. (2002a). 2002] CENTRAL WYOMING VEGETATION HISTORY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was supported by grants to the University of Wyoming and the University of Arizona from the National Science Foundation (Ecology and Paleoclimatology Programs). Invaluable assistance in the field and laboratory was provided by Gabe Cisneros, Mark Betancourt, Jodi Norris, Camille Holmgren, Kate Rylander, and Rob Eddy. The manuscript was improved by comments from 2 anonymous reviewers. LITERATURE CITED BETANCOURT, J.L. 1990. Late Quaternary biogeography of the Colorado Plateau. Pages 259–292 in J.L. Betancourt, T.R. Van Devender, and P.S. Martin, editors, Packrat middens: the last 40,000 years of biotic change. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. COLE, K.L. 1990. Late Quaternary vegetation gradients through the Grand Canyon. Pages 240–258 in J.L. Betancourt, T.R. Van Devender, and P.S. Martin, editors, Packrat middens: the last 40,000 years of biotic change. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. DRIESE, K.L., W.A. REINERS, E.H. MERRILL, AND K.G. GEROW. 1997. A digital land cover map of Wyoming, USA: a tool for vegetation analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science 8:133–146. KNIGHT, D.H. 1994. Mountains and plains: the ecology of Wyoming landscapes. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. LITTLE, E.L., JR. 1971. Atlas of United States trees. Volume 1. Conifers and important hardwoods. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Miscellaneous Publication 1146. LYFORD, M.E. 2001. The roles of dispersal, climate, and topography in the Holocene migration of Utah juniper into Wyoming and southern Montana. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wyoming, Laramie. LYFORD, M.E., J.L. BETANCOURT, AND S.T. JACKSON. 2002a. Holocene vegetation and climate history of the northern Bighorn Basin, southern Montana. Quaternary Research: In press. LYFORD, M.E., S.T. JACKSON, J.L. BETANCOURT, AND S.T. GRAY. 2002b. Anatomy of a late Holocene plant migration: influence of environmental heterogeneity and climate variability. Ecology: In review. 413 MAUGHAN, E.K. 1972. Geologic map of the Wedding of the Waters Quadrangle, Hot Springs County, Wyoming. U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-1042. Washington, DC. ______. 1987. Wind River Canyon, Wyoming. Pages 191– 196 in S.S. Beus, editor, Geological Society of America Centennial field guide—Rocky Mountain section. Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO. NOWAK, C.L., R.S. NOWAK, R.J. TAUSCH, AND P.E. WIGAND. 1994. A 30,000 year record of vegetation dymanics at a semi-arid locale in the Great Basin. Journal of Vegetation Science 5:579–590. NOWAK, R.S., C.L. NOWAK., AND R.J. TAUSCH. 2000. Probability that a fossil absent from a sample is also absent from the paleolandscape. Quaternary Research 54:144–154. SHARPE, S.E. 1991. Late-Pleistocene and Holocene vegetation change in Arches National Park, Grand County, Utah, and Dinosaur National Monument, Moffat County, Colorado. Master’s thesis, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff. SPAULDING, W.G., J.L. BETANCOURT, L.K. CROFT, AND K.L. COLE. 1990. Packrat middens: their composition and methods of analysis. Pages 59–84 in J.L. Betancourt, T.R. Van Devender and P.S. Martin, editors, Packrat middens: the last 40,000 years of biotic change. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. STUIVER, M., AND P.J. REIMER. 1993. Extended 14C database and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon 35:215–230. THADEN, R.E. 1980. Geologic map of the Birdseye Pass Quadrangle, showing chromolithofacies [sic] and coal beds in the Wind River Formation, Fremont and Hot Springs counties, Wyoming. U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-1537. Washington, DC. THOMPSON, R.S. 1990. Late Quaternary vegetation and climate in the Great Basin. Pages 200–239 in J.L. Betancourt, T.R. Van Devender, and P.S. Martin, editors, Packrat middens: the last 40,000 years of biotic change. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. WEST, N.E. 1999. Juniper-piñon savannas and woodlands of western North America. Pages 288–308 in R.C. Anderson, J.S. Fralish, and J.M. Baskin, editors, Savannas, barrens, and rock outcrop plant communities of North America. Cambridge University Press. Received 6 June 2001 Accepted 11 March 2002 Western North American Naturalist 62(4), ©2002, pp. 414–422 VEGETATION RESPONSE TO PRESCRIBED FIRE IN DINOSAUR NATIONAL MONUMENT Barry L. Perryman1, Richard A. Olson2, Stephen Petersburg3, and Tamara Naumann3 ABSTRACT.—Much of western North America is dominated by dense, monotypic, late seral stands of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.). These stands often have depauperate understories with limited species richness, diversity, and herbaceous cover. The National Park Service at Dinosaur National Monument, Colorado, is using both strategic and natural prescribed fire in Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis Beetle and Young) communities to foster intra-community (α-scale) and landscape diversity. This study analyzed an accumulated foliar cover data set between paired burn and control areas on 6 different sites during the last 20 years. Across the monitoring period, mean total vegetation cover of all combined sites was 44% control and 42% burn. Total vegetation cover in burn areas was higher than or equal to paired control areas within 2–3 years post-burn. Shrubs were essentially eliminated in burn areas, but perennial grass cover was 10–35% higher. Mean number of species on all sites and years combined was 17 control and 18 burn. Species richness was different on only 1 site-year, Dry Woman 1995 (P = 0.001, 15 control, 9 burn). Species similarity by site and between treatments ranged from 44% to 75%. Differences in Shannon-Weiner diversity index values between paired sites occurred in 6 of 20 years (P < 0.05). Index value differences on these 6 sites were due to a large annual grass component in burn areas. Prescribed burning successfully shifted late successional sagebrushdominated communities to earlier herbaceous-dominated successional stages without lowering total vegetation cover, while maintaining α-scale diversity and species richness. Key words: prescribed fire, vegetation cover, community diversity, species richness. More than 54 million ha in western North America are dominated by big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.; Whitson and Alley 1984). Late seral or climax sagebrush stands are often dense and monotypic with limited species richness, diversity, and herbaceous cover in the understory (Johnson et al. 1996, West 1999), a condition due in large part to fire suppression activities and/or poor grazing management. In either case decadent, late seral sagebrush communities are left in a stable ecological state that requires energy input to shift the stand from a shrub- to a grass-dominated domain (Archer 1989, Laycock 1991). Brush control measures in decadent sagebrush stands foster intra-community (α-scale) species richness and diversity (Olson et al. 1994, Johnson et al. 1996) as well as landscape patch richness and diversity. Anecdotal accounts by early residents of the Dinosaur National Monument, Colorado, area suggest large areas of the monument were dominated at that time by native perennial grasslands. Domestic livestock began grazing the monument area in the late 1800s, increased beginning in the 1920s, reached a peak autho- rized level of 35–40,000 AUMs on 56,000 ha in the 1940s, and, based on rangeland surveys, reduced to 5000 AUMs by 1973. Resource managers believe that intensive grazing pressure during those 2 decades, in coincidence with the drought of the 1930s and the initiation of effective fire suppression activities circa 1940, all contributed to a shift from grassland to big sagebrush–dominated communities. Under a 1916 Congressional mandate to conserve and protect the natural resources of National Park Service lands, resource managers initiated a complex fire management program in the early 1980s. The program includes both strategic prescription burns and prescribed natural fires. Prescribed natural fires are defined as natural ignitions allowed to burn within strict constraints of location, proximity to monument boundaries, and threats to life and property. Both ignition sources reintroduced fire into stable, decadent Wyoming sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis Beetle and Young) stands. The goal is to shift community composition from brush to perennial grassland dominance and foster 1School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture, Biotechnology, and Natural Resources, University of Nevada–Reno, MS 202, 2Department of Renewable Resources, College of Agriculture, University of Wyoming, PO Box 3354, Laramie, WY 82071. 3USDI, National Park Service, Dinosaur National Monument, 4545 East Hwy 40, Dinosaur, CO 81610. 414 Reno, NV 89557. 2002] VEGETATION RESPONSE TO PRESCRIBED FIRE α-scale and landscape diversity in these plant communities. A post-fire monitoring program was implemented in 1984 after the 1st prescribed burn with follow-up sampling in succeeding years. In 1998 the National Park Service decided to analyze the post-fire monitoring data collection. The specific objectives of this project were to (1) assess plant cover trends in paired burn and control areas, (2) assess intra-community (α-scale) plant species richness and diversity between paired burn and control areas, and (3) assess species richness similarity between burned and control species suites. STUDY AREA Study sites are within the boundary of Dinosaur National Monument, Colorado/Utah, on the east end of the Uinta Mountains in the northwest corner of Colorado with a small portion in northeastern Utah. The monument is centered on the confluence of the Green and Yampa rivers and best described as bench and canyon topography. Elevations range from 1700 to 2740 m. Annual precipitation ranges from 20 to 38 cm. Predominant vegetation type varies by elevation. At lower elevations near springs and water courses, riparian tree and shrub communities are represented by willows (Salix sp.), boxelder (Acer negundo L.), narrowleaf cottonwood (Populus angustifolia James), water birch (Betula occidentalis Hook.), and Wood’s rose (Rosa woodsii Lindl.). On drier sites predominant plant species are basin big sagebrush, Wyoming big sagebrush, rubber rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus nauseosus [Pallus ex Pursh] Britt.), serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia Nutt.), black greasewood (Sarcobatus vermiculatus [Hook.] Torrey), plains prickly pear (Opuntia polyacantha Haw.), winterfat (Ceratoides lanata Pursh), sand verbena (Verbena stricta Vent.), and buckwheat (Eriogonum sp.). Rocky canyon slopes are characterized as a pinyon pine (Pinus edulis Engelm.) / juniper ( Juniperus osteosperma [Torrey] Little) woodland with mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus montanus Raf.) and Mormon tea (Ephedra viridis Coville). High-elevation areas are typically dominated by ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws.) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco), with scattered pockets of aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.). 415 Six sites (East Cactus, West Cactus I, West Cactus II, Success, Iron Springs Bench, and Dry Woman) having similar elevation, annual precipitation amounts, soils, and vegetation were selected for study. Elevation at these sites is approximately 1950 m with mean annual precipitation of 20–25 cm. Soils are primarily Mollisols, formed under grasslands, with a dominant Wyoming big sagebrush and mixedgrass community. Forward rates of fire spread on all 6 sites ranged between 60 and 100 chains hour –1, with residence time over perennial grass root crowns less than 20–30 seconds and surface temperatures less than 120°C. All burns were initiated during the late growing season when fine fuel loads were at annual maximum. METHODS Accumulated monitoring data sets from the 6 prescribed/natural burn sites in Dinosaur National Monument were analyzed to determine fire effects on plant foliar cover and diversity. Sites and sample years included in the analysis are listed in Table 1. Percent cover categories include total vegetation, herbaceous (combined grass and forb cover), shrub, grass, forb, litter, and bare ground. For each site paired burn and control sites were compared using a paired t test. Cover data were collected during the peak of the growing season by the National Park Service and generated from both Daubenmire quadrat (Daubenmire 1959) prior to 1992 and optical projection point measurements beginning in 1992 (Winkworth and Goodall 1962; single or 1st hits were recorded with the optical device). Percent values were conditioned for analyses using the arcsine transformation procedure to achieve normal distribution (Zar 1999). Arcsine values were used in all statistical analyses, but cover is reported as percent values. Differences were determined at P ≤ 0.1 on all cover analyses. Species richness (number of species) was analyzed with paired t tests and by determining percent of similarity ([number of shared species/total species] × 100) between paired areas on each site by year and all years combined. Diversity (species richness and evenness) assessments were performed using cover data for each identified species in each set of paired plots by year. A Shannon-Weiner index value (Shannon and Weaver 1949) was calculated for each site pair by year and a modified Year 1988 1989 1991 1992 1994 1987 1988 1990 1993 1989 1990 1995 1988 1993 1996 1997 1984 1987 1990 1995 Site East Cactus West Cactus I West Cactus II Success Iron Springs Bench Dry Woman 1 1 1 5 4 4 2 4 2 2 5 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 3 3 n 48 46 36 58(±1) 45(±2) 71(±2) 24(±9) 29(±2) 31(±5) 41(±1) 60(±2) 79(±4) 51(±3) 53(±5) 47(±2) 47(±6) 34(±1) 34(±0) 47(±3) 49(±3) 31 66 44 66(±4) 33(±3) 83(±7) 34(±18) 43(±2) 27(±2) 36(±1) 61(±3) 56(±4) 35(±3) 51(±1) 47(±1) 14(±3) 26(±1) 16(±0) 60(±3) 42(±2) 0.079 0.021 0.145 0.427 0.01 0.373 0.172 0.908 0.212 0.250 0.748 0.987 0.187 0.129 0.013 0.008 0.262 Total vegetation _______________________________ Control Burn P-value 10 11 5 23(±1) 34(±3) 36(±2) 12(±2) 16(±2) 3(±0) 6(±1) 20(±2) 41(±1) 32(±3) 30(±1) 25(±1) 25(±5) 14(±1) 22(±1) 16(±2) 28(±3) 0 1 2 0(±0) 0(±0) 0(±0) 0(±0) 0(±0) 0(±0) 0(±0) 3(±1) 0(±0) 0(±0) 0(±0) 0(±0) 0(±0) 0(±0) 0(±0) 1(±0) 0(±0) 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.5 0.002 0.058 0.079 0.001 0.001 0.05 0.009 0.001 0.10 0.022 0.016 0.014 0.011 Shrub _______________________________ Control Burn P-value TABLE 1. List of sites, years, sample size (n), mean cover (%), P-values and standard errors of vegetation cover classes by treatment. 37 36 30 33(±2) 10(±1) 34(±1) 13(±2) 13(±1) 28(±5) 36(±1) 37(±2) 37(±4) 18(±1) 23(±4) 21(±3) 22(±2) 20(±1) 12(±1) 30(±2) 19(±2) 31 66 43 62(±4) 33(±3) 82(±6) 34(±18) 42(±3) 27(±2) 36(±1) 57(±3) 56(±4) 35(±3) 51(±1) 47(±1) 14(±3) 26(±1) 16(±1) 57(±3) 42(±3) 0.002 0.005 0.005 0.469 0.005 0.642 0.844 0.002 0.248 0.21 0.124 0.001 0.338 0.189 0.030 0.002 0.033 Herbaceous _______________________________ Control Burn P-value 416 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 19(±3) 23(±2) 40(±2) 31(±18) 37(±2) 25(±3) 60(±4) 15 50 28 38(±3) 18(±2) 22(±2) 24(±1) 10(±1) 8(±1) 9(±1) 23(±1) 23 20 15 20(±1) 0.008 0.018 0.004 0.469 0.001 0.716 0.806 0.005 0.161 0.042 0.026 0.007 15 16 16 13(±2) 2(±1) 11(±1) 2(±1) 5(±1) 10(±3) 14(±2) 13(±1) 12±(4) 7(±2) 12(±4) 9(±1) 41(±4) 27(±2) 41(±1) 37(±4) 16 16 16 24(±2) 7(±2) 23(±2) 4(±1) 5(±1) 8(±1) 13(±1) 18(±3) 15(±1) 8(±1) 10(±0) 11(±3) 0.008 0.067 0.019 0.479 0.883 0.663 0.795 0.141 0.571 0.795 0.781 0.584 0.175 0.033 0.451 0.031 0.774 26(±1) 11(±1) 12(±1) 11(±2) 2(±0) 4(±0) 4(±0) 17(±4) 8(±3) 5(±1) 7(±0) 5(±1) 10(±5) 7(±1) 12(±3) 23(±1) 11(±1) 42(±6) 34(±1) 17(±3) 12(±1) 8(±1) 16(±3) 12(±2) 0.572 0.133 0.129 0.022 0.021 Forb _______________________________ Control Burn P-value Grass _______________________________ Control Burn P-value TABLE 1. Continued. 40 36 28 25(±1) 35(±1) 18(±1) 20(±3) 16(±1) 28(±4) 25(±4) 23(±2) 32(±2) 41(±1) 22(±1) 32(±1) 38(±5) 22(±1) 28(±8) 20(±3) 23(±3) 18 39 19 23(±1) 3(±0) 13(±3) 36(±14) 43(±2) 19(±1) 9(±1) 30(±2) 23(±4) 15(±7) 28(±2) 36(±2) 14(±1) 12(±1) 11(±2) 21(±1) 42(±4) 0.372 0.001 0.131 0.529 0.001 0.283 0.167 0.042 0.078 0.154 0.112 0.182 0.140 0.125 0.301 0.872 0.011 Litter _______________________________ Control Burn P-value 53 30 45 18(±1) 18(±3) 11(±2) 45(±9) 49(±1) 33(±4) 42(±4) 18(±1) 38(±2) 45(±4) 42(±0) 22(±2) 41(±7) 46(±1) 57(±3) 28(±1) 31(±5) 68 29 44 23(±1) 63(±2) 18(±1) 39(±5) 15(±1) 50(±4) 53(±7) 14(±1) 50(±8) 54(±6) 40(±5) 17(±3) 84(±1) 52(±4) 74(±1) 23(±1) 16(±4) 0.64 0.001 0.039 0.777 0.001 0.272 0.503 0.079 0.291 0.523 0.775 0.358 0.09 0.38 0.29 0.124 0.128 Bare ground _______________________________ Control Burn P-value 2002] VEGETATION RESPONSE TO PRESCRIBED FIRE 417 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST 418 t test performed for each paired set of index values (Zar 1999). When differences in paired index values occurred, a Bray-Curtis polar ordination (Gauch 1982) was performed to assess similarity/dissimilarity of the paired species assemblages. Diversity differences were determined at P < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed on all sites (and years) where data existed for more than 1 transect. Where only 1 transect was sampled, exact values were recorded and summarized. RESULTS Vegetation Cover Across the monitoring period, mean total vegetation cover of all combined sites was 44% (control) and 42% (burn). Total vegetation cover in burn areas was higher than or equal to paired control areas on all sites within 2–3 years post-burn. The greatest species composition shifts occurred between shrub and perennial grass components. Shrubs were essentially eliminated in burn areas, but perennial grass cover was 10%–35% higher compared to paired control plots. Overall shrub cover was 21% in control areas and zero in burn areas, while mean grass cover was 32% in burn areas and 15% in control areas. Foliar cover results by site and year are shown in Table 1. EAST CACTUS.—In 1988 (1st post-fire growing season), the only differences in cover by vegetation class between paired sites were bare ground and shrub. In 1989 forb and shrub cover were both greater in control than burn areas; no other class comparisons were significant. Results for 1991 indicate that total vegetation cover was higher in control than burn areas, while shrub cover was again greater in the control area. However, herbaceous cover was higher in burn areas. By 1992 total vegetation cover was higher in the burn area than control. Herbaceous, forb, and grass cover were also higher in burn areas than control. The large increase of herbaceous cover in the burn area from the previous year (16% to 60%) was a response to April 1992 precipitation (9.5 cm), 6.5 cm above normal. Shrubs were still more prevalent in control areas. Results for 1994 show continued trends from 1992. There was no difference in total vegetation cover; however, herbaceous and grass cover were higher in burn areas. Litter was also more [Volume 62 abundant in burn areas due to increased grass production from the previous 2 years. WEST CACTUS I.—The 1987 analysis (1st post-burn growing season) indicated that the burn was effective in reducing shrub cover and that the litter component was reduced on the burn area. There were no differences between the other classes. In 1988 shrub cover was still lower in the burn area; however, burn area grass cover increased over that in the control area. There was no difference in litter cover, unlike the previous year. The same trend was apparent in the 1990 results. Shrub cover was lower in the burn area and grass cover was higher. In 1993 shrub cover was again higher in control areas, and both grass and total herbaceous cover were higher in burn areas. The greater herbaceous cover was largely due to an increase in the grass component. WEST CACTUS II.—In 1989 and 1990 (1st and 2nd years post-burn), the only cover differences were in the shrub class. However, by 1995 herbaceous and litter cover were higher in burn than control areas. Bare ground and shrub cover were greater in the control areas. SUCCESS.—There were no differences between cover classes in 1988 (1st year postburn). However, variability of mean values and only 1 degree of freedom probably reduced the power of the statistical analyses. A visual comparison of paired means shows that total vegetation, herbaceous, grass, and litter cover means are substantially higher in burn areas while shrub cover is higher in the control area (Table 1). In 1993 variability was lower (4 df) and statistical analyses show differences in all classes except forbs. IRON SPRINGS BENCH.—In the 1st post-burn year (1996), analyses indicated differences in all cover classes. Total vegetation, shrub, and litter cover were greater in the control area. All other classes were higher in the burn area. In 1997 herbaceous, grass, forb cover, and bare ground were higher in the burn area. Shrub cover was greater in the control area. DRY WOMAN.—In 1984, 1987, and 1990, only 1 transect was sampled in each paired area, making it impossible to perform a statistical analysis since the lack of replication precluded calculating a measure of variance. Actual transect values of each paired area are listed in Table 1. The burn treatment was successful in reducing shrub cover, and trends for other cover classes were similar to the other 5 sites. 2002] VEGETATION RESPONSE TO PRESCRIBED FIRE In 1995 we sampled 5 transects in each paired site, making analyses possible. Results indicated that total vegetation, herbaceous, grass, and forb cover were higher in the burn area. Shrub cover was higher in the control area. Diversity Mean numbers of species on combined control and burn areas were 17 and 18, respectively. Statistical comparisons (t tests) of species numbers (richness) are displayed in Table 2. Dry Woman 1995 was the only site where a difference in species number occurred (P < 0.001) between the control (15) and burn (9) area. A summary of percent species similarity (percent of species shared) between paired areas by site and year is shown in Table 3. Actual shared species fluctuated over time at each site. East Cactus similarity ranged from a high of 67% in 1988 to a low of 43% in 1992; West Cactus I ranged from 40% in 1990 to 59% in 1987; and West Cactus II ranged from 59% similarity in 1989 to 78% in 1995. Success 1988 and 1993 were 50% and 47% similar, respectively. Iron Springs 1996 was 55% similar, while Iron Springs 1997 was 71% similar. The Dry Woman site ranged from 22% similarity in 1984 to 57% in 1990. Combining all years on each of the 6 sites, East Cactus was 62% similar; West Cactus I, 44%; West Cactus II, 72%; Success, 44%; Iron Springs, 75%; and Dry Woman, 62%. 419 Differences in Shannon-Weiner index values (P < 0.05) occurred in 6 of 20 paired analyses (Table 4: West Cactus I, 1997; Success 1993; Iron Springs 1996 and 1997; Dry Woman 1984 and 1995). A Bray-Curtis ordination of these 6 sites is displayed in Figure 1. Even though these 6 sites have different diversity index values between paired burn and control areas, they do ordinate along shrub (x)- and grass (y)dominated axes. In all but a single instance (Dry Woman 1995), control sites ordinate to the right of each paired burn site, indicating similar community composition. Dry Woman 1995 again was the only pair exhibiting different species richness values (Table 2). Further investigation of the raw data indicated that community differences fell into 2 general categories. In 5 instances there was a major component of annual grass species, cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) and/or six weeks fescue (Vulpia octoflora [Walt.] Rydb.) measured in the burn areas at the time of sampling (Dry Woman 1984, Dry Woman 1995, West Cactus I, 1987, and Iron Springs 1996, 1997). The Dry Woman site has a continuing history of heavy spring/summer grazing by domestic animals; the Iron Springs Bench site also had a spring/ summer grazing history prior to removal in 1985. These grazing histories may have been partially responsible for the initial invasion and could have exacerbated proliferation of the annual brome. The other site, Success 1993, TABLE 2. Species richness (mean number of species) and standard errors of paired sites for all areas and sample years. Site Control Burn df P-value West Cactus I, 1987 West Cactus I, 1988 West Cactus I, 1990 West Cactus I, 1993 East Cactus, 1988 East Cactus, 1989 East Cactus, 1991 East Cactus, 1992 East Cactus, 1994 Iron Springs, 1996 Iron Springs, 1997 Success, 1988 Success, 1993 Dry Woman, 1984 Dry Woman, 1987 Dry Woman, 1990 Dry Woman, 1995 West Cactus II, 1989 West Cactus II, 1990 West Cactus II, 1995 12 (±1) 13 (±0) 18 (±1) 12 (±7) 11 (±0) 9 (±1) 15 (±0) 10 (±1) 9 (±1) 10 (±1) 16 (±1) 8 (±1) 9 (±1) 18 16 24 15 (±1) 13 (±1) 23 (±2) 19 (±1) 15 (±0) 16 (±1) 16 (±1) 8 (±0) 10 (±1) 8 (±1) 16 (±1) 13 (±1) 9 (±0) 11 (±1) 15 (±1) 7 (±1) 7 (±1) 12 15 23 9 (±1) 12 (±0) 23 (±2) 18 (±1) 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 3 n/a n/a n/a 4 1 1 4 0.09 0.126 0.295 0.018 0.5 0.705 0.05 0.015 0.184 0.297 0.613 0.5 0.103 n/a n/a n/a 0.001a 0.5 0.5 0.587 aSignificant at α = 0.05. 420 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 TABLE 3. Summary of percent plant species similarity ([# shared species / # total species] × 100) between burn and control areas by site and sample year. Site West Cactus I, 1987 West Cactus I, 1988 West Cactus I, 1990 West Cactus I, 1993 East Cactus, 1988 East Cactus, 1989 East Cactus, 1991 East Cactus, 1992 East Cactus, 1994 Iron Springs, 1996 Iron Springs, 1997 Success, 1988 Success, 1993 Dry Woman, 1984 Dry Woman, 1987 Dry Woman, 1990 Dry Woman, 1995 West Cactus II, 1989 West Cactus II, 1990 West Cactus II, 1995 Total species Species shared Percent similarity 17 22 25 19 15 14 20 21 19 18 24 16 19 18 20 23 23 17 33 36 10 10 10 11 10 9 12 9 9 10 17 8 9 4 10 13 12 10 20 28 59 45 40 58 67 64 60 43 47 56 71 50 47 22 50 57 52 59 61 78 TABLE 4. Shannon-Weiner diversity index (H′) and t-test summary between all paired sites and sample years. Site West Cactus I, 1987 West Cactus I, 1988 West Cactus I, 1990 West Cactus I, 1993 East Cactus, 1988 East Cactus, 1989 East Cactus, 1991 East Cactus, 1992 East Cactus, 1994 Iron Springs, 1996 Iron Springs, 1997 Success, 1988 Success, 1993 Dry Woman, 1984 Dry Woman, 1987 Dry Woman, 1990 Dry Woman, 1995 West Cactus II, 1989 West Cactus II, 1990 West Cactus II, 1995 Control H′ Burn H′ df P-value 0.72 0.52 0.66 0.63 0.68 0.55 0.05 0.71 0.55 0.41 0.95 0.52 0.63 0.94 0.90 0.88 0.81 0.55 0.90 0.89 0.94 0.72 0.72 0.59 0.60 0.36 0.44 0.77 0.71 0.85 0.76 0.52 0.38 0.71 0.77 0.86 0.58 0.39 0.83 0.90 80 49 54 42 28 27 23 55 48 37 65 33 40 45 70 43 64 30 39 48 0.008a 0.09 0.579 0.669 0.439 0.084 0.667 0.408 0.098 <0.001a 0.024a 0.988 0.033a 0.01a 0.06 0.841 0.012a 0.205 0.384 0.899 aSignificant at α = 0.05. exhibited a very large difference in the amount of cover from needle-and-thread grass (Stipa comata Trin. & Rupr.) in the burn area. DISCUSSION Prescribed burning caused a shift from late successional, sagebrush-dominated communities to earlier successional, grassland communities. This occurred without reducing total vegetation cover, while improving forage quantity for large grass-preference ungulates such as elk (Cervus elaphus) that occur in the monument. Intra-community (α-scale) diversity has been maintained. Overall species richness in burn and control plots was not different, and only a single instance (Dry Woman 1995) had different species richness. However, the proportionality 2002] VEGETATION RESPONSE TO PRESCRIBED FIRE 421 Fig. 1. Bray-Curtis ordination of 6 paired sites with significant Shannon index values (B–burn, C–control; IS–Iron Springs, Suc–Success, DW–Dry Woman, WC1–West Cactus I). of vegetation class has changed from shrub- to perennial grass–dominated communities. Percent similarity of species richness between paired areas is somewhat variable by year, but expected. Similarity should fall within a natural range of variation since most plant communities are dynamically affected by amount and timing of precipitation events that differentially favor selected species (Sharp et al. 1990). Consequently, a species presence can shift to absence within and between burn and control areas across years. Differences in ShannonWeiner index values where species numbers are greater in the burn areas than control are exceptions to the general trend. A few species difference may not indicate a difference at all, but may be an artifact of observer bias, different cover assessment methods, and species area curve influences. The National Park Service is intervening with fire before these sagebrush/grass communities cross a threshold into a very late, decadent, successional stage with characteristic depauperate understories (Laycock 1991, West 1999). Otherwise, the immediate post-burn response of the herbaceous component would not be observed. Landscape diversity has also been improved by creating an alternating, patchy sequence of communities rather than the original, continuous sagebrush matrix. National Park Service goals of maintaining fire as an active ecological process and fostering diversity while protecting soil and vegetation resources have been achieved, and implementation of periodic prescribed burns in these shrub/grassland communities should be continued. Without this intervention in the successional process, these sagebrush/grassland communities will eventually cross a threshold into a stable state dominated by shrubs to the near exclusion of understory vegetation. If wildfire or prescribed fire is introduced into this community stage, additional inputs such as reseeding along with other cultural practices will be necessary. The Park Service should continue this aggressive, proactive management approach. LITERATURE CITED ARCHER, S. 1989. Have southern Texas savannas been converted to woodlands in recent history? American Naturalist 134:545–561. DAUBENMIRE, R. 1959. A canopy-coverage method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Science 33:43–64. GAUCH, H.G., JR. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge Press, New York. 298 pp. JOHNSON, K.H., R.A. OLSON, AND T.D. WHITSON. 1996. Composition and diversity of plant and small mammal communities in Tebuthiuron-treated big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). Weed Technology 10: 404–416. LAYCOCK, W.A. 1991. Stable states and thresholds of range condition on North American rangelands: a viewpoint. Journal of Range Management 44:427–433. OLSON, R.A., J. HANSEN, T. WHITSON, AND K.H. JOHNSON. 1994. Tebuthiuron to enhance rangeland diversity. Rangelands 16:197–201. 422 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST SHANNON, C.E., AND W. WEAVER. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. SHARP, L.A., K. SANDERS, AND N. RIMBEY. 1990. Forty years of change in a shadscale stand in Idaho. Rangelands 12:313–328. WEST, N.E. 1999. Synecology and disturbance regimes of sagebrush steppe ecosystems. Pages 15–26 in P.G. Entwhistle et al., compilers, Proceedings: Sagebrush Steppe Ecosystem Symposium. Bureau of Land Management, Boise, ID. Publication BLM/ID/PT001001-1150. [Volume 62 WHITSON, T.D., AND H.P. ALLEY. 1984. Tebuthiuron effects on Artemisia ssp. and associated grasses. Weed Science 32:180–184. WINKWORTH, R.E., AND D.W. GOODALL. 1962. A crosswire sighting tube for point quadrat analysis. Ecology 48: 150–152. ZAR, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 663 pp. Received 6 June 2001 Accepted 19 September 2001 Western North American Naturalist 62(4), ©2002, pp. 423–436 MORPHOLOGICAL AND GENETIC VARIATION AMONG POPULATIONS OF THE RARE KACHINA DAISY (ERIGERON KACHINENSIS) FROM SOUTHEASTERN UTAH Loreen Allphin1 and Michael D. Windham2 ABSTRACT.—Erigeron kachinensis, the Kachina daisy, is a rare species restricted to canyons in southeastern Utah. The species is known to exhibit low fecundity due to low percent fertilization of ovules and high percent abortion of fertilized ovules. Previous reproductive studies suggest that low fecundity is a consequence of small population size and inbreeding depression. This study examines genetic diversity within and among populations of E. kachinensis in Natural Bridges National Monument using enzyme electrophoresis. Field populations are found to have significantly different morphologies. However, morphological differences were less pronounced among populations grown in the greenhouse. The Kachina daisy exhibits levels of genetic variability in its populations similar to that of other outcrossed species. Genetic diversity statistics demonstrate that only 22.8% of genetic variation is distributed among populations. Genetic distance could not be correlated with geographic distance. Most of the populations showed significant deviation of fixation indices from zero for multiple loci. Observation of genotype frequencies demonstrates that populations are fixing on different genotypes and may be experiencing initial stages of genetic drift. Mean observed heterozygosity was 0.166 and was found to increase with increasing size and/or age in populations. Key words: Erigeron, heterozygosity, genetic variability, gene flow, fleabane. Ecological factors and life history traits may affect the amount and distribution of genetic diversity within and among natural populations (Hamrick et al. 1979, Nevo et al.1984, Hamrick and Godt 1990). The pool of genetic diversity in wild populations is critical for a species’ survival if environmental pressures exceed its limits of developmental plasticity (Frankel 1983). Moreover, genetic variability is associated with increased fitness in populations of many plant and animal species (Hamrick et al. 1979, Wills 1981, Danzmann et al. 1986, Ledig 1986). For example, increased levels of heterozygosity have been shown to increase longevity in long-lived perennial plant species (Schaal and Levin 1976, Hamrick et al. 1979). In addition, greater levels of genetic variation may buffer genotypes against environmental challenges. Conversely, the loss of genetic variability might render a population more vulnerable to extinction in cases of habitat perturbation, reproductive bottlenecks, etc. (Wright 1933, O’Brien et al. 1985, Lacy 1987, Simberloff 1988, Barrett and Kohn 1991). According to Wright’s (1943, 1946) isolationby-distance models, mating is dependent on the distance between individuals and their ability to disperse propagules. Based on these models, inbreeding may occur if isolation increases and prevents gene flow between small patch populations. Rare and/or endangered plant species often occur in small, disjunct populations with reduced genetic diversity due to increased habitat fragmentation and inbreeding (Stebbins 1980, Simberloff 1988, Barrett and Kohn 1991, Godt et al. 1996, Sun 1996). Erigeron kachinensis Welsh and Moore (Asteraceae), the Kachina daisy, is a rare endemic of the Colorado Plateau regions of southeastern Utah and Colorado. The species exists in alcove seeps that arise along walls of deep canyons in the Cedar Mesa Sandstone. As water percolates through sandstone, it will eventually reach an impermeable layer and exude out of the canyon wall forming seeps. Plants adhere to the surface of the rock in such seeps, forming what are known as hanging gardens. The Kachina daisy is limited in distribution to these hanging gardens, which are often rare or sporadic in distribution (May 1995). Because this species is restricted to seeps and alcoves that are small in size, typically along a single seepline within a canyon, there is concern for its preservation. 1Department of Integrative Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602. 2Garrett Herbarium, Utah Museum of Natural History, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. 423 424 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST Several factors contribute to rarity within E. kachinensis and elucidate its need for preservation. The Kachina daisy is an obligately outcrossing species with a homomorphic, sporophytic type self-incompatibility system (Allphin et al. 2002). The primary pollinators of the species are small generalist flies. The species exhibits low reproductive success due to low levels of successful fertilization events and a high percentage abortion of developing fruits (Allphin and Harper 1997). Its low reproductive success has been attributed at least in part to genetic causes, specifically inbreeding and small population size (Allphin et al. 2002). Reproductive success in the species appears to be limited by both the species’ inability to find compatible mates due to its incompatibility system, and recessive lethals exposed during sexual recombination in its small populations (Allphin et al. 2002). Increased tourism in the canyon country of southeastern Utah poses another serious threat to the species. Hanging garden plant communities in the canyons of the Colorado Plateau are fragile (Fowler et al. 1995, May 1995). Shady alcoves that are habitat for the Kachina daisy are also favorite areas for hikers because they provide refuge from the hot summer sun. Many of these alcoves contain ancient Anasazi Indian ruins that also attract tourists. Populations of the Kachina daisy are also potentially threatened by flash floods, alcove roof rock spall, and other natural catastrophes. For example, if drought caused seeplines occupied by this species to dry up, many populations would be eliminated. The Kachina daisy was proposed as “endangered” by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in 1976 (U.S. Department of Interior 1975, 1976). Later proposals downgraded the original recommendation to “threatened” status (U.S. Department of Interior 1988). The Kachina daisy was more recently listed by the USFWS as a category 2 species, a species for which more information is needed before assigning final designation. However, all category 2 species are now officially deleted from federal lists (U.S. Department of Interior 1996). The Bureau of Land Management in Utah currently lists the Kachina daisy as a sensitive species. Although the species was originally known only from hanging garden communities in Natural Bridges National Monument, San Juan County, Utah, 3 potential races or clusters of populations have been recognized for this [Volume 62 species: hanging garden, high elevation, and Colorado (Welsh et al. 1993, Allphin and Harper 1994). New collections of the species at high elevations and Colorado have significantly increased the number of known populations of the Kachina daisy and have raised the question of its necessity for protection. However, a previous genetic evaluation of the group suggests that the high-elevation and Colorado races likely represent different taxa from E. kachinensis and thus will not be discussed further in this manuscript (Allphin et al. 1996). Nevertheless, the typical Kachina daisy, restricted to seeps and alcoves, is extremely rare and known only from a small number of populations and drainages in the Colorado Plateau region of Utah (Allphin 1992). The maintenance of genetic diversity in populations of plant species such as the Kachina daisy is an important aspect of many conservation programs (Marshall and Brown 1975, Frankel and Soulè 1981, Dole and Sun 1992, Rieseberg and Swensen 1996). Since the Kachina daisy occurs in small, isolated populations exhibiting reduced fitness likely due to inbreeding (Allphin et al. 2002), it is important to understand how genetic diversity is distributed within and among its natural populations. Therefore, the research presented in this manuscript will examine the amount and distribution of genetic diversity within and among populations of E. kachinensis and assess the amount of gene flow among its relatively isolated populations. Significant morphological and pathogenic differences have been observed among populations of this species (Allphin and Harper 1997). Therefore, we will also determine if genetic differentiation among populations, rather than phenotypic plasticity across varying environments, might account for observed morphological and pathogenic differences. MATERIALS AND METHODS Study Site Natural populations of E. kachinensis sampled for this study occur in 6 alcove seeps located in Natural Bridges National Monument, San Juan County, Utah (Allphin and Harper 1994, 1997). The alcoves all occur at the same elevation (1768 m), traverse Cedar Mesa Sandstone, and are shaded for much of the day by high canyon walls. However, the study alcoves differ with respect to the amount and timing of GENETIC VARIATION IN THE KACHINA DAISY 2002] 425 TABLE 1. Population names, abbreviations, and sizes; various population characteristics; and number of individuals sampled by population and size-class for E. kachinensis. Population North-facing A North-facing B South-facing A South-facing B West-facing A West-facing B Population number Abbreviation 1 2 3 4 5 6 NFA NFB SFA SFB WFA WFB aData taken from Allphin and Harper (1994, 1997). bRepresents the number of individuals sampled in natural Aspect(°)a Densitya (ind./m2) Estimated population size Number of individuals sampledb Number of individuals sampled/size-classc 302 328 160 197 252 225 15.1 12.7 6.1 15.7 7.9 27.4 200–300 100–200 50–100 50–100 100–150 50–100 25 25 25 25 25 25 5–8 5–8 5–8 5–7 5–7 5–7 populations and used to compute diversity statistics. This number does not include the seedlings that were sampled for life stage comparisons. cRepresents the range in number of individuals sampled per size-class (1–4) in natural populations. direct sunlight received and soil moisture. Two of the alcoves face north, 2 face south, and 2 face west (Table 1). Each alcove, within the pairs that share the same aspect, differs with respect to the amount of soil moisture, ranging from 5.8% to 25.6% (Allphin and Harper 1994, 1997; Table 1, 9). Morphological and Pathogenic Comparisons To determine if observed morphological differences among populations are due to genetic differences or environmental plasticity, we assessed morphological differences across 6 study populations from both field- and greenhouse-grown individuals. For assessment of morphological differences among the 6 field populations, we randomly selected 100 previously tagged individuals from each of 6 study alcoves (Allphin and Harper 1994, 1997). The following morphological measurements were taken from previous field studies for comparison across the alcoves: leaf length (average of 3 longest leaves), clump diameter, and number of flower heads (characteristics which showed significant differences among populations; Allphin and Harper 1994, 1997). Statistical comparisons among populations were performed using a 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple means comparison (Computing Resource Center 1992). The same morphological characteristics, in addition to leaf width and head diameter (these characteristics were not measured in field study but were observed to vary in the greenhouse), were also measured across greenhousegrown progeny from each of the 6 study populations. To facilitate greenhouse comparisons, we randomly collected seed from all 6 natural populations, germinated it in the greenhouse, and allowed it to grow to maturity. Note that all greenhouse individuals received optimal resources during the experimental period. Greenhouse-grown individuals allowed for morphological comparisons under a commongarden situation. Because morphological differences in field populations may be attributed to abiotic variability in habitat, greenhouse comparisons allowed us to determine whether or not observed morphological differences in field populations were environmentally or genetically controlled. Statistical comparisons among populations were performed for these morphological characteristics using 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple means comparison (SAS Institute, Inc. 1994). The incidence of pathogens, fungal infections, and herbivory was recorded for all 100 individuals in each of the 6 study populations in an earlier study of E. kachinensis (Allphin and Harper 1997). The data compared the percent of infected individuals in each population across the 6 study alcoves. For this study we reexamine these data for evidence of differential resistance to these stressors among study populations and determine if differential resistance is related to genetic differentiation among populations. Enzyme Electrophoresis The level of genetic diversity was assessed within and among the 6 study populations from Natural Bridges National Monument using enzyme electrophoresis (Soltis et al. 1983, Odrzykoski and Gottlieb 1984, Allphin et al. 1998). Approximately 4–5 young leaves were 426 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST collected from 25 individuals in each population (Table 1). The approximate proportion of the total population size that this sample represents can be estimated from Table 1. Samples from each population consisted of 6 or 7 individuals in each of 4 size-classes based upon number of rosettes: (1) a single rosette, (2) two rosettes, (3) three rosettes, and (4) ≥ four rosettes per plant (Table 1). Seedling leaf samples were obtained from (8–10) seedlings grown from germinated seed that had been randomly collected from each study population and sown in the greenhouse. Because the number of rosettes in these populations has been shown to increase with age in this species (Allphin and Harper 1997), the separation of samples with respect to size allowed us to indirectly evaluate whether genetic variation, heterozygosity, was correlated with increased age in this species (Schaal and Levin 1976, Hamrick et al. 1979). All leaf tissue samples were ground in a phosphate-PVP grinding buffer (Soltis et al. 1983) using a mortar and pestle. Ground material was absorbed into wicks made of Whatman 3 MM filter paper and stored in an ultra cold freezer (–70°) prior to electrophoresis. Electrophoresis was performed using a variety of gel and electrode conditions (Soltis et al. 1983, Odrzykoski and Gottlieb 1984; Table 2). Samples were analyzed using 12% starch gels that were sliced and stained for allozyme markers following standard protocols (Soltis et al. 1983). Twenty enzymes were surveyed for variability. Allozyme markers from 12 polymorphic enzyme loci that provided consistent, interpretable results were analyzed (Table 2). The presence or absence of each allele detected was recorded for all populations. Genetic data collected from the 12 variable loci were used to compute a variety of genetic diversity statistics for each study population following Hamrick et al. (1979), Hedrick (1985), and Hamrick and Godt (1990) using LYNSPROG, a genetic statistics program written by M.D. Loveless (College of Wooster, Wooster, OH). These genetic diversity statistics include mean observed heterozygosity (Ho, a direct estimate), expected heterozygosity (He, based on Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium model), polymorphic index (P, mean proportion of polymorphic loci), number of alleles per locus (A), mean number of effective alleles per locus (Ae, number of equally frequent alle- [Volume 62 les in an ideal population that would produce the same homozygosity as the actual population; Hartl 1988), and Nei’s genetic distance (D; Nei 1972). Correlation was performed in the form of linear regression to determine whether there was a significant positive relationship between geographic distance and genetic distance (SAS Institute, Inc. 1994). Mean observed heterozygosity (Ho) was also computed by size-class (life stage) for the Kachina daisy. Because of the small sample sizes for each life stage in each population, populations were pooled. Therefore, mean Ho values for this analysis represent a mean across all individuals of a particular life stage across all populations. Significant differences in these values were assessed using a 1-way analysis of variance (Computing Resource Center 1992). A fixation index (F) was computed for each locus and population using methods of Wright (1965). Chi-square analysis of Wright’s fixation indices for study populations was used to test significance of deviations from Hardy-Weinberg (H-W) expectations (0). Fixation indices and deviations from H-W expectations were computed following Hamrick et al. (1979), Hedrick (1985), and Hamrick and Godt (1990) using LYNSPROG. Distribution of genetic variation among populations was estimated using Nei’s (1973) genetic diversity statistics employing LYNSPROG. These statistics include total genetic diversity (HT), intrapopulation genetic diversity (HS), diversity among populations (DST), the proportion of genetic variation distributed among populations (GST), and inter- to intrapopulation gene diversity (RST). The average number of diploid migrants exchanged among local populations per generation, Nm (Wright 1951, Slatkin and Barton 1989), was also estimated (Nm = (1/GST – 1)). Ruzicka’s (1958) index of similarity was computed for all pairwise comparisons of populations based on allele frequency data for all loci. Average linkage clustering was performed on this similarity matrix using the unweighted pair-group method (UPGMA; Krebs 1989). Cluster analysis permitted the construction of a dendrogram, or cluster diagram, illustrating genetic similarities among populations. This was compared to a 2nd dendrogram based upon various abiotic/site characteristics. In order to generate the 2nd dendrogram, a similarity matrix was computed based upon Ruzicka’s index of 2002] GENETIC VARIATION IN THE KACHINA DAISY 427 TABLE 2. Enzymes used in population genetic analyses of E. kachinensis. Enzyme Esterase Isocitrate dehydrogenase Leucine aminopeptidase Malate dehygrogenase NADH-diaphorase Phosphoglucoisomerase Phosphoglucomutase 6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase Shikimate dehydrogenase Triosephosphate dehydrogenase TOTAL NUMBER OF LOCI Acronym Gel/electrode buffersa No. loci scored EST IDH LAP MDH NADH PGI PGM 6-PGD SKDH TPI 8 11 & M 8 M 8 6&8 6 11 & M 11 & M 6&8 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 12 aSystems 6, 8, 11 after Soltis et al. (1983); system M a 7.5 pH version of the morpholine citrate system after Odrzykoski and Gottlieb (1984). similarity (Ruzicka 1958) for various abiotic/ site characteristics for each population of E. kachinensis as reported in an earlier study (Allphin and Harper 1994). Average linkage clustering using UPGMA was also performed on this similarity matrix (Krebs 1989) and presented in the form of a dendrogram to demonstrate habitat similarities among study populations. RESULTS Significant differences for morphological characters among populations from field and greenhouse individuals are given in Table 3. Most morphological differentiation among populations is apparently due to environmental factors. From the field data, alcoves 2 and 5 had the smallest leaves and smallest clump diameters (Table 3; Allphin and Harper 1997). Alcoves 4 and 6 exhibited the largest leaves and clump diameters (Table 3; Allphin and Harper 1997). These data are consistent with environmental data. Alcoves 2 and 5 are the driest sites and alcoves 4 and 6 the wettest (Allphin and Harper 1994; Tables 1, 9). Greater morphological differences were observed for field populations than among cultivated individuals (Table 3). Actual morphological differences due to genetic factors were more rare, yet more pronounced, for greenhouse-grown individuals. Population (alcove) 1 exhibits significantly smaller leaves, leaf widths, clump diameters, and head diameters than other populations grown in common-garden conditions (Table 3). Levels of genetic variability for allozyme loci are summarized in Table 4. Mean observed heterozygosity varies among the 6 populations (alcoves). Populations 4 (south-facing B) and 6 (west-facing B) exhibited the highest mean observed heterozygosity and polymorphic indices (Ho = 0.201, 0.195, P = 0.187, 0.231; Table 3). Conversely, population 5 showed the lowest level of genetic variability and lowest polymorphic index (Ho = 0 .120, P = 0.155). Mean heterozygosity across all populations was moderate (Ho = 0.166; Table 4). Expected heterozygosity was different from observed heterozygosity in most populations (Table 4). Increased number of rosettes for individuals in populations of the Kachina daisy is consistent with increasing age in field populations (Allphin and Harper 1997). Mean observed heterozygosity (computed as a mean value across all loci for individuals in the same age/size class in the population) increases with increasing size-class (based on number of rosettes) in the Kachina daisy (Fig. 1). Seedlings (from year sampled) exhibit relatively high diversity (Ho = 0.266). Diversity is significantly lower for size-class 1 than the seedling class and continues to increase across size-classes. The youngest size-class, SC1, is significantly less heterozygous than size-classes 3 and 4 at P ≤ 0.05. Genetic diversity statistics for all populations are summarized in Table 5. Total gene diversity is fairly high (Ht = 0.311). Most of this diversity is distributed within populations (Hs = 0.249). GST was estimated as 0.228, and thus 22.8% of genetic variation is distributed among populations (Table 5). This results in a relatively high estimate of Nm, the number of migrants exchanged between local populations per generation. Gene flow (Nm) was estimated to be 0.847. This is interpreted as an exchange of between 8 and 9 migrants every 10 generations WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST 428 [Volume 62 TABLE 3. Mean measurements for several morphological characteristics of 6 study populations of the Kachina daisy in Natural Bridges National Monument. Cultivated populations were sown from seed of the 6 field populations and grown under greenhouse conditions at the University of Utah. Means for any population which do not share the same letter are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. Columns with lines indicate that data are unavailable. Morphological data from field populations were taken from Allphin and Harper (1997). Population (alcove) Leaf length (cm) Leaf width (cm) Clump diam. (cm) No. flower heads Head diam. (cm) 2.7 b (0.07) 1.9 a (0.06) 2.5 b (0.06) 3.6 c (0.08) 2.1 a (0.06) 3.4 c (0.08) — 4.8 b (0.13) 3.6 a (0.10) 6.2 c (0.18) 7.3 d (0.18) 4.4 b (0.1 0) 6.6 c (0.18) 1.3 a (0.08) 0.9 b (0.10) 1.9 c (0.19) 2.3 c (0.20) 0.6 b — 1.4 a (0.14) — 6.9 a (2.33) 18.0 b (5.66) 16.9 b (2.79) 13.6 bc (8.42) 9.8 c (6.89) 11.9 bc (6.30) 67.9 a (32.69) 80.0 a (28.28) 39.0 b (15.25) 34.0 b (17.75) 63.62 a (41.81) 47.0 ab (21.49) 1.0 a (0.18) 1.3 b (0.21) 1.3 b (.180) 1.1 a (0.08) 1.3 b (0.19) 1.4 b (0.14) Field 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cultivated 1 — — — — (0.12) — 3.7 a (1.03) 5.8 b (1.77) 5.4 b (1.27) 5.2 b (1.52) 4.9 b (0.82) 5.4 b (1.49) 2 3 4 5 6 0.7 a (0.19) 1.3 b (0.15) 1.2 b (0.25) 1.2 b (0.32) 1.2 b (0.36) 1.4 b (0.43) — — — — TABLE 4. Level of intrapopulation allozyme variation as measured across 25 individuals in each of 6 study populations of the Kachina daisy in Natural Bridges National Monument. Values are given as means across 12 enzyme loci for each population. Population (alcove) Number of unique genotypesa NFA (1) NFB (2) SFA (3) SFB (4) WFA (5) WFB (6) ALL POPULATIONS 1 1 1 2 2 2 Mean observed heterozygosity (Ho) Mean expected heterozygosity (He) Polymorphic index (PI) Mean no. alleles (A) Mean no. effective alleles (Ae) 0.150 0.177 0.154 0.201 0.120 0.195 0.166 0.157 0.179 0.181 0.187 0.155 0.230 0.182 0.157 0.179 0.181 0.187 0.155 0.231 0.182 1.58 1.58 1.67 1.42 1.67 1.83 1.63 1.29 1.30 1.32 1.34 1.26 1.47 1.33 aLines illustrate that the unique genotype(s) is (are) shared by both populations in the species pair but no other populations. (Slatkin and Barton 1989). However, this appears to be an overestimate of gene flow when genetic distances are compared with geographic distance (Table 6). Genetic distance is not significantly correlated with geographic distance (r2 = 0.0592). Distant populations are just as likely to have alleles in common as pop- ulations in close proximity. Gene flow (Nm) values lower than 1 can lead to population differentiation (Wright 1951). Although the genetic diversity statistics demonstrate that most variability is distributed within populations in the Kachina daisy, genotypic frequencies among populations for 2 enzyme 2002] GENETIC VARIATION IN THE KACHINA DAISY 429 Fig. 1. Mean observed heterozygosity across seedlings and 4 other size/age classes (as described in Methods) in E. kachinensis. Seedlings were sown from seed collected in all natural populations of E. kachinensis and grown in the greenhouse. Mean observed heterozygosity for the seedling class is significantly higher than for size-class 1. Size-class 1 exhibits significantly lower mean observed heterozygosity than size-classes 3 and 4 at P = 0.05. loci in particular suggest that populations are fixing on different genotypes. Table 7 summarizes genotype frequencies for 6-PGD-2 and EST-1. At EST-1 higher genotype frequencies are observed for AA and AB genotypes for populations 1, 2, and 6, and yet populations 3 and 4 generally lack allele A. At 6PGD-2 populations 1 and 2 (north-facing populations) exhibit higher frequencies for genotypes AB and BB, while populations 3 and 4 (south-facing) are missing allele B entirely. Moreover, 2 of the populations (3, 4) have unique genotypes not found in other populations. Two of the population pairs (both northfacing or both west-facing) had unique genotypes not found in other sampled populations. Furthermore, at PGI-2 population 3 (SFA) carries an allele that cannot be found in any other population (Fig. 2, Table 4). Fixation index (F) was determined for all loci in each population of E. kachinensis. Chisquare analysis demonstrates significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg expectations for some of the populations and loci (Table 8). West-facing B, one of the smallest and most genetically variable of the study populations, showed significant deviation from H-W expectations at 4 loci. All populations showed significant deviation from H-W expectations for 1 or more loci (Table 8). Since 6 populations and 12 TABLE 5. Genetic diversity statistics from 6 populations of E. kachinensis in Natural Bridges National Monument, San Juan County, Utah. Data given are mean values for 12 enzyme loci. Total gene diversity (HT) Within populations (HS) Among populations (DST) Coefficient of gene differentiation (GST = DST / HT) Inter- to intrapopulation gene diversity (RST) 0.311 0.249 0.066 0.228 0.441 loci were sampled, there are 72 determinations for F deviations from H-W equilibrium. For E. kachinensis, 7 of the 72 determinations (~10%) deviated significantly (P = 0.05). The dendrogram based on allele frequency data demonstrates genetic similarities among populations (Fig. 3A). Populations 1 and 2 are the most similar (86.2%). These populations are only approximately 100 m from each other, and gene flow likely occurs. Populations 3 and 4 are also very similar (83.7%). These 2 populations are approximately 250 m apart; thus, gene flow is also likely between these populations. However, population 6 (WFB) clusters with populations 1 and 2, but it is geographically the most distant of the populations (over 2 miles). West-facing A and B (5 and 6) are located only 500 m from one another but are genetically dissimilar (Fig. 3A). WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST 430 [Volume 62 TABLE 6. Geographic distance and genetic distances between sampled populations of E. kachinensis. Geographic distances (m) are given above the diagonal, and Nei’s (1972) genetic distances (D) are given below the diagonal. Population NF-A 1 NF-B 2 SF-A 3 SF-B 4 WF-A 5 WF-B 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 — 0.0192 0.0989 0.1122 0.1126 0.0376 100 — 0.1448 0.1446 0.1307 0.0355 1610 1519 — 0.284 0.0516 0.0376 1860 1769 250 — 0.0457 0.0553 3980 3880 2360 2110 — 0.0799 3480 3380 1860 1610 500 — TABLE 7. Genotype frequencies at 2 of the enzyme loci (6-PGD-2 and EST) for study populations of E. kachinensis in Natural Bridges National Monument. Population EST N-facing A (1) N-facing B (2) S-facing A (3) S-facing B (4) W-facing A (5) W-facing B (6) 6-PGD-2 N-facing A (1) N-facing B (2) S-facing A (3) S-facing B (4) W-facing A (5) W-facing B (6) AA AB BB 0.167 0.480 0 0 0 0.292 0.667 0.480 0.093 0 0.417 0.583 0.167 0.040 0.917 1.00 0.583 0.125 0.160 0.158 1.00 1.00 0.750 0.375 0.480 0.210 0 0 0.250 0.250 0.360 0.632 0 0 0 0.375 When this dendrogram is compared with another based on abiotic/site characteristics of the 6 study alcoves (Allphin and Harper 1994), a different clustering pattern results (Fig. 3B). Populations are only ~63% similar at best. Abiotic/site characteristics differ the most among populations that are most similar genetically (populations 1, 2). Environmental variability has been shown to select for allozyme markers (Mitton 1994), but these data show that allozyme variability is independent of environment. DISCUSSION The results presented in this manuscript have many evolutionary and conservation implications. Population size is often correlated with an increase in genetic diversity (heterozygosity) in natural populations (Billington 1991, Stangel et al. 1992). However, in the Kachina daisy, 2 of the smallest populations (SFB and WFB) have the highest heterozygosity and polymorphic indices. These data are consistent with findings in other rare species (Sherwin et al. 1991, Allphin et al. 1998, Maki and Morita 1998). In addition, genetic similarities among populations were found to be independent of ecological (abiotic) similarities among populations. In the Kachina daisy, most genetic variability appears to be distributed within rather than among populations. This would not appear to support the idea of historic, long-term population isolation and genetic drift. The distribution of genetic diversity may be affected by spatial and historical factors (Kimura and Maruyama 1971, Slatkin 1987, Sheely and Meagher 1996). Because the historical range and past population sizes of the Kachina daisy are unknown, interpretation of the data presented in this manuscript is difficult. However, most populations have fixation indices that are significantly different from zero (no fixation) for at least 1 or more loci. These data suggest that most populations of the Kachina daisy do not randomly cross. Maki (1999) found similar findings in a threatened insular endemic in the genus Aster. GENETIC VARIATION IN THE KACHINA DAISY 2002] 431 Fig. 2. Photograph of an allozyme showing variability at the PGI-2 locus. Notice only a single population (alcove 3) has allele 2. TABLE 8. Fixation index (F) values for selected enzyme loci of each population generated using LYNSPROG. Population F values exhibiting significant chi-square deviations from zero are followed by a symbol. Chi-square values for fixation index values were generated using LYNSPROG, following the methods of Hedrick (1985). **P = 0.01; * P = 0.05; †P = 0.10. Population 6PGD-1 MDH-2 IDH-2 NADH-1 SKDH-1 NFA (1) NFB (2) SFA (3) SFB (4) WFA (5) WFB (6) 0.0200 0.4714* 0.0000 0.0000 –0.1190 0.5104* –0.1190 –0.3056† –0.2162 0.1048 –0.1463 –0.4242* 0.2833 0.0882 0.4778* 0.2656 0.1188 0.3354† 0.7873** 0.0000 –0.0387 –0.3824† 0.6543** 0.5131** 0.0000 0.0559 0.5000† 0.0143 0.0571 0.2781 High fixation indices could result from inbreeding, selection pressures, random genetic drift, founder events, etc. We suggest that populations of the Kachina daisy do not show signs of historic, long-term isolation and drift because habitat fragmentation and reduction in population size are of fairly recent origin. However, other additional lines of evidence suggest that populations of the Kachina daisy might be in the early stages of genetic differentiation and genetic drift. For example, populations of the Kachina daisy appear to have differential ability to resist pathogens and predators (Allphin and Harper 1997). In addition, populations differentially fix alternate genotypes at some loci (Table 7). Habitat fragmentation might be a recent phenomenon in the Kachina daisy. Natural habitat fragmentation in this species occurs when seeps and hanging gardens become more isolated from one another, as seeplines in a canyon begin to dry. Drying along seeplines in Natural Bridges National Monument appears to be a relatively recent event (Brough et al. 1987). We compared soil moisture data from 1991–92 (Allphin and Harper 1994) with soil moisture data obtained in 1997 at all study populations. These data demonstrate that all seeps with alcove overhangs (NFA and NFB) were drier in 1997 than in 1992 (Table 9). The populations without alcove overhangs (those populations receiving additional moisture from local precipitation) were the only ones that did not show a drier condition in 1997. Although we have only 2 data points and cannot conclusively say that the alcoves are drying, observations made in these alcoves over 10 years of monitoring suggest drying in these seeps. For example, we have observed an increase in rodent burrows at seeplines that were originally too wet to support habitation. Moreover, population size has gradually dwindled in the study populations over the past 10 years of study (Allphin and Harper 1994, 1997). 432 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 TABLE 9. Mean soil moisture (% of dry weight) for 1990–1992 (mid-June) and 1997 (mid-June). Population Percent soil moisture (1990-1992)a Percent soil moisture (1997) 1 2 3 4 5 6 Mean 12.3 5.8 18.4 12.2 12.7 25.6 14.5 15.0 8.3 18.4 6.1 8.7 22.8 13.2 aData taken from Allphin and Harper (1994). Fig. 3. A, Dendrogram illustrating similarities (percent) among sampled populations of E. kachinensis based upon allele frequencies for allozyme loci; B, dendrogram illustrating similarities (percent) among sampled populations of E. kachinensis based upon abiotic/site characteristics (Allphin and Harper 1994). Since some populations still contain over 100 individuals, we may be only beginning to see the effects of isolation and small population size as a result of habitat fragmentation in these populations (Table 1). Although there was a moderately high estimate of gene flow between populations of the Kachina daisy based upon genetic distances, we could find no correlation between geographic and genetic distance in this species. This is not as expected under the isolation-by-distance model (Wright 1943, 1946). One might expect a lack of correlation between geographic and genetic distance if panmixia (or regular random mating) were occurring among populations (Wright 1946). This explanation seems unlikely for these populations of the Kachina daisy because of the long distances separating many of these populations, the bi-directionality of canyon systems, and the species’ limited dispersal capabilities, due to its short-distance seed dispersal (primarily gravity) and small pollinators. A lack of corre- lation between genetic distance and geographic distance has been found for other rare species including the family Asteraceae (Allphin et al. 1998, Matthews and Howard 1999). Therefore, we suggest that Nm may not be reflective of actual gene flow events in the Kachina daisy, but possibly alleles shared in common through common ancestry. For example, if small population sizes were due to a recent habitat fragmentation, many alleles would still be shared among populations and not yet lost through genetic drift (Wright 1933, 1943, 1946). Most morphological variation among natural populations of the Kachina daisy is apparently due to environmental factors. Morphological differences among populations reflecting genetic differences are evidenced by a few, very pronounced morphological differences between some of the populations of greenhouse-grown individuals (primarily alcove 1). Morphological characteristics appear to be very plastic in this species and not always indicative of genetic differences. Additional patterns emerge from the genetic data that have biological and conservation implications. First, there is a positive relationship between heterozygosity and longevity in our data. If we ignore the seedling size-class, heterozygosity increases with increasing size-class in the Kachina daisy. Increased size of individuals in populations of the Kachina daisy has been shown to be consistent with increasing age in field populations (Allphin and Harper 1997). It is, therefore, probable that greater genetic variation increases the potential to achieve larger size (number of rosettes) or age, and is best interpreted as a correlation between heterozygosity and increasing longevity of 2002] GENETIC VARIATION IN THE KACHINA DAISY individuals, as has been demonstrated for trees and other long-lived perennials (Schaal and Levin 1976, Hamrick 1979. Hamrick et al. 1979). The Kachina daisy is a relatively long-lived species. Demographic monitoring (Allphin and Harper 1997 and unpublished data) has demonstrated no mortality in large individuals over 10 years of monitoring. This demographic research suggests that individuals may live as long as 20 years in the absence of environmental catastrophe. We suggest that the relationship between heterozygosity and longevity in the Kachina daisy might help to explain why this nonwoody perennial is so long-lived. Another pattern emerges in the comparison of heterozygosity in seedlings with other sizeclasses of the Kachina daisy. Greenhouse-grown seedlings exhibited unusually high levels of heterozygosity compared to the size/age classes (1–3). This is greater genetic variability than would have been observed in seedlings in the natural populations, suggesting that the high level of heterozygosity in seedlings is an artifact of being grown in a greenhouse setting. For example, environmental constraints could have eliminated some genotypes from natural populations. Additionally, there is evidence of low reproductive success due to high levels of embryo abortion in the Kachina daisy that can be explained by inbreeding and genetic load (Allphin and Harper 1997, Allphin et al. 2002). Genetic load, recessive deleterious or lethal genes present in a population, should be expected to increase in out-crossed species (Wiens 1984, Wiens et al. 1987, Charlesworth 1989a, 1989b). Such deleterious recessive genes appear in homozygous form as chromosomes are independently assorted in meiosis and produce lethal or sublethal combinations that result in the abortion of developing embryos or endosperm, or death of developing seedlings. Because the most reproductively active sizeclasses of the Kachina daisy are the largest size-classes (Allphin and Harper 1997), and this obligately outcrossing species exhibits relatively high levels of genetic variability for these size-classes, there is a greater potential for inbreeding due to genetic load because more recessive lethals can be maintained in the recessive state. As the populations of the Kachina daisy become isolated and individuals are forced to mate with close relatives, lethals 433 may be exposed in the homozygous state, causing the high level of embryo abortions observed in this species (Allphin and Harper 1997). Genetic data presented in this manuscript support the reproductive studies that suggest inbreeding (Allphin et al. 2002). In this study all populations showed significant deviation of fixation indices from zero for 1 or more loci (Table 8). These data suggest that populations of the Kachina daisy are not mating randomly and that inbreeding may be occurring in at least some of the natural populations. To determine how genetic diversity in the Kachina daisy compares with other outcrossing, perennial endemic species, we compared our data with a synthesis paper by Hamrick and Godt (1990) summarizing levels of diversity across a wide sampling of plants. Mean observed heterozygosity in E. kachinensis is similar to that found in other outcrossing plant species and perennial dicots (Table 10; Hamrick and Godt 1990). However, genetic diversity in E. kachinensis is higher than the level of variation found in other narrow endemic species (Table 10; Hamrick and Godt 1990). Other species in Asteraceae show similar patterns (Maki and Morita 1998, Ayres and Ryan 1999). For example, Aster spathulifolius, a narrow endemic from Japan, also showed high genetic diversity for its endemism (Maki and Morita 1998). Allozyme markers, as used to assess genetic diversity in the Kachina daisy, have been considered “neutral” genes reflecting evolutionary processes affecting the entire genome (Avise 1994). Mitton (1994), however, proposed that environmental factors may occasionally select for allozyme markers. He considers that allozymes are, therefore, not always indicative of random genetic change. However, our 2 dendrograms for similarity among populations of the Kachina daisy based upon genetic and environmental characteristics provide different topologies from one another (Fig. 3). This suggests that environmental conditions likely are not responsible for genetic differences across the study alcoves (populations) and that allozymes can be used as neutral markers in this species. The patterns presented in this manuscript suggest some important conservation implications. Because populations show signs of inbreeding depression and are beginning to show signs of population differentiation and loss of WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST 434 [Volume 62 TABLE 10. Level of allozyme variation at species level for species in different categories. The data were extracted from Hamrick and Godt (1990). These data are compared with allozyme variation at the species level for E. kachinensis. Standard error values are given in parentheses below the means. Statistical differences among means for species or groups were determined using multiple means comparison (Snedecor and Cochran 1967). Means followed by the same letter in a column are not significantly different at P = 0.05. Categories or species Number taxa Mean no. of pop. Mean no. of loci Dicots 329 Short-lived perennials Outcrossing annuals Endemic 152 11.9 (1.7) 8.8 (1.2) 10.7 (2.1) 6.5 (0.9) 6 16.8 (0.4) 17.2 (0.7) 17.7 (0.7) 17.8 (0.6) 12 E. kachinensis 172 81 1 diversity, land managers may need to bring pollen or seed from other populations, or genetically more distant sources, to increase reproductive capacity in local populations of the Kachina daisy. However, we caution the movement of genes among populations if populations are beginning to become differentiated from one another. Alcove seeps and hanging gardens that support Kachina daisy populations are fragile habitats. Backcountry recreation is increasing in the Colorado Plateau area of Utah. Trails into canyon bottoms run near populations of the Kachina daisy. One trail in Natural Bridges National Monument comes very close to alcove 6, which despite theoretic expectations was shown to have the highest genetic diversity and the smallest population size. Land managers should take special care to maintain this population. Trails may need to be rerouted to avoid human impact to Kachina daisy populations. With growing human impact to the canyon country, protection of all populations may prove necessary for preservation of genetic diversity within the Kachina daisy. LITERATURE CITED ALLPHIN, L. 1992. Survey of Grand Gulch Primitive Area for Erigeron kachinensis. Sego Lily (newsletter of Utah Native Plant Society) 15(2):3–4. ALLPHIN, L., AND K.T. HARPER. 1994. Habitat requirements for Erigeron kachinensis, a rare endemic of the Colorado Plateau. Great Basin Naturalist 54:193–203. ______. 1997. Demographic and life history characteristics of the rare Kachina daisy (Erigeron kachinensis). American Midland Naturalist 138:109–120. ALLPHIN, L., D. WIENS, AND K.T. HARPER. 2002. The relative effects of resources and genetics on reproduc- A Ae Ho 1.79 a (0.04) 1.70 a (0.06) 1.99 a (0.07) 1.80 a (0.08) 1.63 a (0.06) 1.19 a (0.01) 1.15 a (0.01) 1.24 b (0.02) 1.15 a (0.04) 1.33 b (0.03) 0.136 a (0.007) 0.116 a (0.009) 0.167 a (0.01) 0.096 b (0.01) 0.166 a (0.01) tive success in the rare Kachina daisy, Erigeron kachinensis (Asteraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 163:599–612. ALLPHIN, L., M.D. WINDHAM, AND K.T. HARPER. 1996. A genetic evaluation of three potential races of the rare Kachina daisy. Pages 68–76 in J. Maschinski, H.D. Hammond, and L. Holter, editors, Proceedings of the Second Conference of Southwestern Rare and Endangered Plants. USDA, U.S. Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-GTR-283, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. ______. 1998. Genetic diversity and gene flow in the endangered dwarf bear poppy, Arctomecon humilis (Papaveraceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 1251–1261. AVISE, J.C. 1994. Molecular markers, natural history, and evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York. AYRES, D.R., AND F.J. RYAN. 1999. Genetic diversity and structure of the narrow endemic Wyethia reticulata and its congener W. bolanderi (Asteraceae) using RAPD and allozyme techniques. American Journal of Botany 86:344–353. BARRETT, S.C., AND J.R. KOHN. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. Pages 3–30 in D.A. Falk and K.E. Holsinger, editors, Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York. BILLINGTON, H.L. 1991. The effect of population size on genetic variation in a dioecious conifer. Conservation Biology 5:115–119. BROUGH, C.R., D.L. JONES, AND D.J. STEVENS. 1987. Utah’s comprehensive weather almanac. Publishers Press, Salt Lake City, UT. 401 pp. CHARLESWORTH, D. 1989a. Evolution and low fertility in plants: pollen limitation, resource allocation, and genetic load. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 289–292. ______. 1989b. Why do plants produce so many more ovules than seeds? Nature 338:21–22. COMPUTING RESOURCE CENTER. 1992. STATA reference manual: release 3. 5th edition. Santa Monica, CA. DANZMANN, R.G, M.M. FERGUSON, F.W. ALLENDORF, AND K.L. KNUDSEN. 1986. Heterozygosity and develop- 2002] GENETIC VARIATION IN THE KACHINA DAISY mental rate in a strain of rainbow trout. Evolution 40:86–93. DOLE, J.A., AND M. SUN. 1992. Field and genetic survey of the endangered Butte County meadowfoam, Limnathes floccosa subsp. californica (Limnanthaceae). Conservation Biology 6:549–558. FOWLER, J.F., N.L. STANTON, R.L. HARTMAN, AND C.L. MAY. 1995. Level of endemism in Colorado Plateau hanging gardens. In: C. Van Ripper III, editor, Second Biennial Conference on Research in Colorado Plateau Transactions and Proceedings, series NPS/NRNAU/ NRTP-95/11. FRANKEL, O.H. 1983. The place of management in conservation. Pages 1–14 in C.M. Schonewald-Cox, S.M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, and L. Thomas, editors, Genetics and conservation: a reference for managing wild animal and plant populations. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA. FRANKEL, O.H., AND M.E. SOULÉ. 1981. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. GODT, M.J.W., B.R. JOHNSON, AND J.L. HAMRICK. 1996. Genetic diversity and population size in four rare southern Appalachian plant species. Conservation Biology 10: 796–805. HAMRICK, J.L. 1979. Genetic variation and longevity. Pages 84–113 in O. Solreg, S. Jain, G. Johnson, and P. Raven, editors, Topics in plant reproductive biology. Columbia University Press, New York. HAMRICK, J.L., AND M.J.W. GODT. 1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species. Pages 43–63 in A.D. Brown, M.T. Clegg, A.L. Kahler, and B.S. Weir, editors, Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. HAMRICK, J.L., Y.B. LINHART, AND J.B. MITTON. 1979. Relationships between life history characteristics and electrophoretically detectable genetic variation in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10:173–200. HARTL, D.L. 1988. A primer of population genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. HEDRICK, P.W. 1985. Genetics of populations. Jones and Barlett, Boston, MA. KIMURA, M., AND T. MARUYAMA. 1971. Pattern of neutral polymorphism in a geographically structured population. Genetical Research, Cambridge 18:125–130. KREBS, C.J. 1989. Ecological methodology. Harper Collins Publishers, New York. LACY, R.C. 1987. Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection, and population subdivision. Conservation Biology 1:143–158. LEDIG, D.A. 1986. Heterozygosity, heterosis, and fitness in outbreeding plants. Pages 77–104 in M.E. Soulé, editor, Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. MAKI, M. 1999. Genetic diversity in the threatened insular endemic plant Aster asa-grayi (Asteraceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution. 217:1–9. MAKI, M., AND H. MORITA. 1998. Genetic diversity in island and mainland populations of Aster spathulifolius (Asteraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 159:148–152. MARSHALL, D.R., AND A.H.D. BROWN. 1975. Optimum sampling strategies in genetic conservation. Pages 53–80 in O.H. Frankel and J.G. Hawkes, editors, Crop 435 genetic resources for today and tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. MATTHEWS, C.R., AND J.H. HOWARD. 1999. Genetic variation in the federally endangered Schweinitz’s sunflower, Helianthus schweinitzii T. & G. (Asteraceae). Castanea 64:231–242. MAY, C.L. 1995. Geomorphology of hanging gardens of the Colorado Plateau. In: C. Van Ripper III, editor, Second Biennial Conference on Research in Colorado Plateau National Parks Proceedings, series NPS/NRNAU/NRTP-95/11. MITTON, J.G. 1994. Molecular approach to population biology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25: 45–69. NEI, M. 1972. Genetic distances between populations. American Naturalist 106:283–292. ______. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 70:3321–3323. NEVO, E., A. BEILES, AND R. BEN-SHLOMO. 1984. The evolutionary significance of genetic diversity: ecological, demographic, and life-history correlates. Pages 13–213 in G.S. Mani, editor, Evolutionary dynamics of genetic diversity. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. O’BRIEN, S.J., M.E. ROELKE, M.A. NEWMAN, C.A. WINKLER, D. MELTZER, L. COLLY, J.F. EVEMAN, ET AL. 1985. Genetic basis for vulnerability in the cheetah. Science 227:1428–1434. ODRZYKOSKI, I.J., AND L.D. GOTTLIEB. 1984. Duplication of genes coding 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase in Clarkia (Onagraceae) and their phylogenetic implications. Systematic Botany 9:479–489. RIESEBERG, L.H., AND S.M SWENSEN. 1996. Conservation genetics of endangered island plants. Pages 305–334 in J.C. Avise and J. L. Hamrick, editors, Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. Chapman and Hall, New York. RUZICKA, M. 1958. Awndung matematisch-statishticher methoden in der geobotanik (syshetische bearbutung von autnahme). Biologia, Bratisl 13:647–661. SAS INSTITUTE, INC. 1994. JMP statistics for the Apple MacIntosh, version 3. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. SCHAAL, B.A., AND D.A. LEVIN. 1976. The demographic genetics of Liatris cylindracea Michx. (Compositae). American Naturalist 110:91–205. SHEELY, D.L., AND T.R. MEAGHER. 1996. Genetic diversity in Micronesian populations of the tropical tree Campnosperma brevipetiolata (Anacardiaceae). American Journal of Botany 83:1571–1579. SHERWIN, W.B., N.D. MURRAY, J.A.M. GRAVES, AND P.R. BROWN. 1991. Measurement of genetic variation in endangered populations: bandicoots (Marsupialia: Peramelidae) as an example. Conservation Biology 5:103–108. SIMBERLOFF, D. 1988. The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19:473–511. SLATKIN, M. 1987. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787–792. SLATKIN, M., AND N.H. BARTON. 1989. A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution 43:1349–1368. SOLTIS, D.E., D.H. HAUFLER, D.C. DARROW, AND J. GASTONY. 1983. Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. American Fern Journal 73(1):9–27. 436 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST SNEDECOR, G.W., AND W.G. COCHRAN. 1967. Statistical methods. 6th edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames. 593 pp. STANGEL, P.W., M.R. LENNARTZ, M.H. SMITH. 1992. Genetic variation and population structure of Red-cockaded Woodpeckers. Conservation Biology 6:282–292. STEBBINS, G.L. 1980. Rarity of plant species: a synthetic viewpoint. Rhodora 82:77–86. SUN, M. 1996. Effects of population size, mating system, and evolutionary origin on genetic diversity in Spiranthes sinenesis and S. hingkongensis. Conservation Biology 10:785–795. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1975. Review of Erigeron kachinensis as an endangered species. Federal Register 40:27880. ______. 1976. Proposal that Erigeron kachinensis be listed as endangered. Federal Register 41:24524–24572. ______. 1988. Endangered species act of 1973 as amended through the 100th Congress. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 45 pp. ______. 1996. Removal of category 2 species from federal lists. Federal Register 61. WELSH, S.L., N.D. ATWOOD, S. GOODRICH, AND L.C. HIGGINS. 1993. A Utah flora. Print Services, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT. [Volume 62 WIENS, D. 1984. Ovule survivorship, brood size, life history, breeding systems, and reproductive success in plants. Oecologia 64:47–53. WIENS, D., C.L. CALVIN, C.A. WILSON, C.I. DAVERN, D. FRANK, AND S.R. SEAVEY. 1987. Reproductive success, spontaneous embryo abortion, and genetic load in flowering plants. Oecologia 71:501–509. WILLS, C. 1981. Genetic variability. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England. WRIGHT, S. 1933. Inbreeding and homozygosis. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA 19:411–433. ______. 1943. Isolation-by-distance. Genetics 28:114–138. ______. 1946. Isolation by distance under diverse systems of mating. Genetics 31:39–59. ______. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15:323–354. ______. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19:395–420. Received 27 March 2001 Accepted 6 December 2001 Western North American Naturalist 62(4),© 2002, pp. 437–450 TEMPERATURE RESPONSES AND HABITAT SHARING IN TWO SYMPATRIC SPECIES OF OKANAGANA (HOMOPTERA: CICADOIDEA) Allen F. Sanborn1,2, Jessica H. Breitbarth1,3, James E. Heath1,4, and Maxine S. Heath1,4 ABSTRACT.—Okanagana striatipes and O. utahensis are species synchronous in location of activity and utilization of host plants. They possess similar acoustic behavior. Analysis of calling songs shows that calls overlap in frequency but differ in temporal pattern. Based on characteristics of the cicada auditory system and the species recognition mechanism, the potential for acoustic interference exists. Both species are ectothermic behavioral thermoregulators. Measurements of thermal preference and body temperature during singing show that although thermal preferences are similar, O. utahensis sings at a significantly higher body temperature. Differences in body temperature required to coordinate singing in the 2 species provide a partial temporal separation of acoustic signaling. We suggest the physiological mechanisms that permit synchronous utilization of a habitat by the 2 species are the production of calling songs of different temporal patterns and the presence of different thermal requirements, which may permit and/or facilitate temporal separation of the acoustic environment during the day. Key words: Okanagana striatipes, Okanagana utahensis, temperature, thermal adaptation, communication, song, cicadas. Okanagana striatipes (Haldeman) and Okanagana utahensis Davis share sagebrush fields of the western United States. Okanagana utahensis is described as resembling O. striatipes but is slightly larger and darker in color (Davis 1919). The 2 species are active in adult form during June and July (Davis 1919). Both O. striatipes (Davis 1930) and O. utahensis (Davis 1919) have been associated with sagebrush (Artemisia spp.). Although the cicadas may sing from other plant species, a species of sagebrush is always present in the habitat and appears to be the host plant for both species. Cryptic coloration makes the cicadas very difficult to see when perched on sagebrush (Davis 1932). Acoustic behavior of the 2 species is also similar. Both species, for example, are solitary animals when calling. Frequency ranges of the calling songs appear to overlap. Okanagana striatipes produces a calling song of medium pitch and average duration (Beamer and Beamer 1930, Davis 1930), whereas the song of O. utahensis is a long, shrill cry (Davis 1919) or a continuous song (Davis 1921). Most male cicadas produce acoustic signals to attract females. Acoustic interference between species inhabiting the same environment has been shown in insects (Perdeck 1958, Ulagaraj and Walker 1973, Morris and Fullard 1983, Latimer and Broughton 1984, Bailey and Morris 1986, Greenfield 1988, Römer et al. 1989, Schatral 1990), frogs (Schwartz and Wells 1983, Schwartz 1993), and birds (Cody and Brown 1969, Ficken et al. 1974, Popp et al. 1985). Cicada calls also have been shown to cause acoustic interference in frogs (Paez et al. 1993). It has been suggested that temporal separation (Wolda 1993, Gogala and Riede 1995, Riede 1995, Riede 1997) or frequency separation (Gogala and Riede 1995, Riede 1996) occurs in cicada communities to decrease acoustic interference. The important song parameter in cicada long-distance communication has been shown to be call frequency (Doolan and Young 1989) or call intensity (Daws et al. 1997). Because the songs of O. utahensis and O. striatipes appear to overlap in frequency and the calls are of similar intensity (Sanborn and Phillips 1995), the potential for acoustic interference exists between these cicadas sharing the same habitat. 1University of Illinois, Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, 524 Burrill Hall, 407 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801. 2Present address: Barry University, School of Natural and Health Sciences, 11300 NE Second Avenue, Miami Shores, FL 33161. 3Present address: 23769 Monte Carlo Place NW, Paulsbo, WA 98370. 4Present address: 104 Hummingbird Circle, Buchanan Dam, TX 78609. 437 438 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST Although the songs of O. striatipes and O. utahensis appear to differ in their temporal patterns, the potential for acoustic interference between the species still exists due to characteristics of the cicada auditory system and the species recognition process. The auditory system of cicadas usually shows a peak sensitivity at the frequency of the species calling song but is sensitive to a wide range of frequencies (Katsuki and Suga 1958, 1960, Hagiwara and Ogura 1960, Katsuki 1960, Enger et al. 1969, Popov 1969, 1981, Simmons et al. 1971, Young and Hill 1977, Schildberger et al. 1986, Huber et al. 1990; but see Popov et al. 1985, Popov and Sergeeva 1987, Fonseca 1993 for exceptions). In fact, Huber et al. (1990) showed that the auditory system in Magicicada cassinii (Fisher) is more sensitive to the call of M. septendecim (L.) than the auditory system of M. septendecim. Physical properties of the sound-production system prevent O. striatipes and O. utahensis from altering the frequency of their calling songs to prevent acoustic interference. Since one species is probably capable of hearing the other quite well, temporal patterns of the song must act to separate the species. Popov and Shuvalov (1974) described cicada auditory receptors as a specialized system in the analysis of amplitude-modulation patterns. However, these receptors respond to a wide range of temporal patterns; they are not an integral part of the conspecific signal recognizer (Huber 1983). Pringle (1954, 1956) suggested the frequency of a cicada song acts as an information carrier, while the speciesspecific information is carried in temporal patterns of the song (Hagiwara and Ogura 1960, Moore 1961, Frings and Frings 1977, Huber 1984, Joermann and Schneider 1987). Since auditory receptors respond to a wide variety of signals, auditory neural pathways must be responsible for filtering out species-specific calls. The primary response to a conspecific song is based on the spectral content of the song (Huber et al. 1979). Nerve fibers respond to natural calling and courtship sounds with a specificity dependent on carrier frequency, rhythm, and transient content of the presented sound (Huber et al. 1980). Cicada auditory nerves respond synchronously to the temporal pattern of a conspecific song while the response to allospecific calls is not clearly [Volume 62 related to song activity (Pringle 1954, Katsuki and Suga 1960, Schildberger et al. 1986, Huber et al. 1980, 1990). Cicada auditory receptors are sensitive to intensity changes (Hagiwara and Ogura 1960, Katsuki 1960, Katsuki and Suga 1960) and are especially sensitive to transient stimuli found in calling songs (Huber et al. 1979, 1980). Amplitude modulations within the call elicit groups of spikes in the auditory nerve (Huber et al. 1980). Interneurons are responsible for filtering the auditory input to the brain, and apparently these interneurons react only to conspecific calls (Huber et al. 1980, Huber 1984). Okanagana striatipes and O. utahensis are synchronous in time of activity during the year, location of activity, utilization of host plants, and possession of similar acoustic behavior. These similarities expose the 2 species to interspecific competition for physical and acoustic resources within their environment. We try to determine with this study whether there are differences in acoustic signals produced by the species and the possible role of thermal requirements for singing in the 2 species that may act as physiological mechanisms to permit synchronous sympatry. MATERIALS AND METHODS Animals The species Okanagana striatipes and O. utahensis were studied in Cortez, Montezuma County, Colorado, USA. Animals were randomly sampled for data collection in the field and for specimen collection for laboratory experimentation. Experiments were performed in early July, approximately in the middle of the emergence period for each species, during 1982, 1983, 1984, 1986, 1988, and 1989. The species were active in an almost pure flat of Great Basin sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). We placed the animals captured for laboratory experimentation in a cardboard carton on ice with a plant specimen and a wet paper towel to prevent dehydration. Live weights were measured with a Cent-O-Gram triple beam balance sensitive to ± 5 mg. Song Analysis We recorded calling songs of both species on 1/4 inch audio tape using a Uher 4000 Report Monitor portable tape deck and an Electro-Voice RE 55 dynamic microphone. 2002] HABITAT SHARING IN OKANAGANA SPP. Songs were recorded at a tape speed of 19 cm ⋅ sec–1. Recordings were analyzed with MacSpeech Lab II (GW Instruments, Somerville, MA) and a Macintosh computer. Recordings were digitized at a sampling rate of 40 kHz, and a narrow band FFT was used to determine peak frequency. Figures 1–4 were generated with a Kay Elemetrics Corporation Digital Sona-graph 7800 using an intermediate bandwidth analysis filter and a Sona-graph Printer 7900. Temperature Responses In the laboratory we recorded insect body temperatures at the minimum temperature for controlled flight, maximum voluntary tolerance or shade-seeking temperature, and temperature of heat torpor. Minimum flight and heat torpor temperatures represent body temperature limits of full activity since cicadas with body temperatures beyond this range are torpid. Maximum voluntary tolerance temperature represents a thermoregulatory point (Heath 1970). Procedures we used to determine thermal responses were the same as those used in previous cicada studies (Heath 1967, Heath and Wilkin 1970). Temperatures were measured with a Physitemp Model BAT-12 digital thermocouple thermometer and a type MT 29/1 29 gauge hypodermic microprobe copper/constantan thermocouple that had been calibrated to a National Institute of Standards and Technology mercury thermometer. Body temperatures were measured by inserting the probe midway into the dorsal mesothorax. When an animal was oriented for insertion of the probe, we handled it by grasping the wingtips between the thumb and forefinger. This procedure prevented conductive heat transfer between the insect and the experimenter. All body temperatures were recorded within 5 seconds of the insect performing the activity of interest. To determine the minimum flight temperature, we repeatedly tossed a pre-cooled animal vertically 1–2 m. As the animal warmed, it began attempts at flight. Initially, it produced small wing movements with the wings folded against the body. As body temperature increased, the wings were extended and normal flight movements of the wings began. The animals sometimes glided as they warmed before they could fly efficiently. When an animal made 439 a controlled flight or landing, we recorded body temperature. Maximum voluntary tolerance was determined by placing a pre-cooled animal on a vertical surface and warming the insect with a heat lamp. The heat lamp was placed 45–50 cm from the vertical surface, and the insect was placed in the center of the beam emanating from the lamp. Animals basked in the heat produced by the heat lamp until their body temperature reached the maximum voluntary tolerance temperature. When body temperature corresponding to maximum voluntary tolerance was reached, the animals walked or flew out of the central portion of the heat lamp. When an animal began to move, we measured body temperature. Temperature of heat torpor was determined by placing an animal in a cardboard container and heating the insect with a heat lamp. The container prevented the specimen’s escape during heating. Body temperature of the insect was measured when motor control ceased due to increase in body temperature. Heat torpor temperature is not a lethal temperature, and animals recover after their body temperature has decreased to the temperature range normally experienced. Field Temperatures We recorded body temperatures of singing animals in the field. Animals were captured in an insect net, which contracted around the animal to prevent movement. The temperature probe was inserted through the net into the dorsal mesothorax of the animal to measure body temperature. This procedure prevented conductive heat transfer between the experimenter and the animal that could have altered insect body temperature. All body temperature measurements were made within 5 seconds of capture. Species identification of each specimen was made after measuring body temperature. Thermoregulation in ectothermic cicadas can be modeled as a coupled on-off regulator (Heath et al. 1971a). When body temperature is below a certain set point, the animal remains exposed to solar radiation. Whenever the body temperature exceeds this set point, the cicada retreats to shade. The degree of radiant heating is altered by changing activity location. The insect can obtain a similar result by changing body orientation with respect to the sun. WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST 440 We collected behavioral data on body orientation at the same time that body temperatures were recorded in the field to determine if the cicadas behaviorally thermoregulate. Orientation of the animals with respect to the sun can be interpreted as an indication of “preferred” thermal state. Animals with their bodies positively oriented to the sun are positioned to maximize radiant heat gain and can be thought of as attempting to elevate body temperature. Negatively oriented animals have minimized heat gain from solar radiation and may be viewed as trying to maintain or decrease body temperature. An animal that is oriented with the side of the body toward the sun may be thought of as being near its “preferred” body temperature. Side-orientation permits the animal to increase or decrease body temperature slowly, depending upon the rate of radiant heat input and the rate of heat loss to the environment. Information on calling activity was obtained by determining which species were singing at different times of the day. Species determination was made through animals captured for body temperature measurements and from calls being produced by uncaptured animals. All statistics are reported as mean ± 1 standard error. RESULTS The species involved in the present study are medium-sized cicadas. Live weight determined for O. striatipes (386.76 ± 10.510 mg, n = 17) is significantly smaller (t = –7.905, df = 52, P << 0.0001) than measured weight of O. utahensis (582.70 ± 16.025 mg, n = 37). The calling song of O. striatipes is a continuous train of constant-amplitude sound pulses (Fig. 1C). The song begins as a train of syllables of varying duration and interburst intervals (Fig. 1A). Syllables begin to fuse together (Fig. 1B) until sound pulses become a continuous train, producing the calling song. Frequency spread of the song is approximately 7 kHz to 12 kHz. Peak sound energy in the power spectrum is 9.74 ± 0.345 kHz (n = 7, range 8.56–10.27 kHz). Expansion of the time wave (Fig. 2) shows sound pulses are produced at a rate of approximately 247 ± 42 pulses ⋅ sec–1 (n = 7, range 181.6–321.9). The calling song of O. utahensis is composed of a train of syllables (Fig. 3). Each syllable [Volume 62 (Fig. 4) is composed of about 26 individual sound pulses (26.1 ± 0.34, n = 21, range 23–29). The syllables are 87.0 ± 1.6 msec in duration (n = 21, range 75.6–107.2) and separated by 6.3 ± 0.62 msec (n = 20, range 3.6–12.57). The pulse repetition rate is 300.96 ± 17.81 sec–1 within each syllable (n = 21, range 251.9– 325.8). Sound energy of the call is distributed between 6 kHz and 11 kHz. There is an increase in intensity and a change in the emphasized frequency midway through the syllable. Peak energy is at 8.85 kHz (8.85 ± 0.07 kHz, n = 21, range 8.20–9.36) near the beginning of a syllable and 9.13 kHz (9.13 ± 0.07 kHz, n = 21, range 8.36–9.64) when the intensity increases midway through a syllable. Sound energy is concentrated in a more narrow frequency range or is more sharply tuned during the earlier portion of the call. Table 1 summarizes temperature responses of O. striatipes and O. utahensis. Minimum flight temperatures are approximately equal (t = –0.0888, df = 52, P = 0.4986). Mean maximum voluntary tolerance and heat torpor temperatures are not significantly different (t = –0.7983, df = 54, P = 0.2142 and t = –0.8137, df = 52, P = 0.2098, respectively). Figure 5 compares the number of each species singing in a given body temperature range. Mean body temperatures of singing animals for each species are significantly different (t = –7.0385, df = 56, P << 0.00001), with O. utahensis singing at higher body temperatures than O. striatipes. Body temperatures of singing animals range from 33.5°C to 37.8°C in O. striatipes and from 34.9°C to 40.2°C in O. utahensis. The relationship between maximum voluntary tolerance temperatures and mean singing temperatures is different for each species (Table 2). Okanagana striatipes sings at a body temperature approximately equal to and not significantly different from (t = –0.6773, df = 34, P = 0.2514) the maximum voluntary tolerance temperature of the species. However, O. utahensis sings at a body temperature significantly greater than the maximum voluntary tolerance temperature determined for the species (t = –5.3755, df = 72, P << 0.0001). Both O. striatipes and O. utahensis are ectothermic behavioral thermoregulators. Solar radiation is used to elevate body temperature for activity. Shuttling movements between sunny and shaded perches and changes in 2002] HABITAT SHARING IN OKANAGANA SPP. 441 Fig. 1. Okanagana striatipes calling song. Upper trace in each pair is the time wave and lower trace is the sona-gram. Frequency spread of the song is approximately 7 kHz to 12 kHz. The song begins as a train of syllables varying in duration and interburst interval (A). Syllables become longer and begin to fuse together (B) until the sound pulses produce the continuous calling song (C). body orientation are then used by both species to regulate body temperature during activity. O. striatipes at lower body temperatures (33– 34°C) illustrated in Figure 5 were positively oriented to the sun. Animals with highest body temperatures (36–37°C) were negatively oriented or side-oriented. Animals in the central body temperature range (34–36°C) were positively oriented, side-oriented, or negatively oriented. Most (7 of 9) O. striatipes with body temperatures below the recorded mean singing temperature (35.87°C) for the species were positively oriented. Animals with body temperatures greater than the mean were found in all possible states of orientation. These data suggest the animals were actively regulating body temperature around the mean temperature recorded. Okanagana utahensis showed a similar pattern of orientation with respect to the sun. Animals with lower body temperatures (34– 37°C) were positively oriented while animals 442 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST Fig. 2. Expanded time wave of the Okanagana striatipes calling song. Sound pulses are produced at a rate of about 182 sec–1 during the full song. [Volume 62 Although these generalizations of the calling activity in the 2 species hold true, activity patterns can be altered by ambient conditions. Singing activity in both species is inhibited by extremely high ambient temperatures. Similarly, on a mostly cloudy day, O. striatipes sang to a greater degree than normal, and O. utahensis sang to a lesser degree than normal in the early afternoon. Clouds not only prevented Ta from rising to a level that would passively raise body temperature high enough for singing, but also prevented O. utahensis from using radiant heat to elevate body temperature. On the other hand, O. striatipes was able to elevate body temperature a sufficient amount and continued calling while activity was suppressed in O. utahensis due to the ambient conditions. DISCUSSION at the upper end of the distribution (39–41°C) showed negative or side-orientation. The difference between the species is that O. utahensis remains positively oriented at a temperature range (36–37°C) when O. striatipes has positioned itself to decrease radiant heat gain. Although both species are behavioral thermoregulators, O. utahensis regulates body temperature at a higher temperature than O. striatipes. Acoustic activity of the 2 species differs throughout the day, producing a partial temporal separation of acoustic activity that is dependent on species-specific thermal preferences. Both species show an initial burst of activity in the morning when ambient conditions are sufficient to elevate body temperature to the species-specific level required for singing. Okanagana striatipes begins to sing before O. utahensis. The lower body temperature required for singing gives O. striatipes a period of about 20–30 minutes in the morning when it is the only cicada species calling. When ambient conditions are sufficient to elevate body temperature in O. utahensis, this species begins to sing as well. Singing in O. striatipes begins to decline as O. utahensis proceeds through its initial peak of acoustic signaling, which lasts 2.5 to 3 hours. As ambient temperature (Ta) continues to rise during the afternoon, O. utahensis continues sporadic signaling while activity in O. striatipes decreases. Okanagana striatipes then resumes activity to a greater degree as Ta falls in the late afternoon while activity in O. utahensis is suppressed by falling body temperature. Thermal requirements of O. striatipes and O. utahensis represent a possible mechanism to decrease the potential for acoustic interference. Laboratory temperature responses of the 2 species are approximately equal (Table 1). This would be expected in 2 animals sharing a habitat because they are exposed to the same environmental conditions. However, the mean body temperature of singing O. utahensis is significantly greater than the mean body temperature of singing O. striatipes (Table 2). It appears O. utahensis “prefers” or requires a higher body temperature to coordinate singing activity. Crawford and Dadone (1979) suggested that temperature sets limits on the ability of cicadas to coordinate motor control of singing. The rate of action for potential firing in the timbal nerve is temperature dependent (Wakabayashi and Hagiwara 1953, Wakabayashi and Ikeda 1961). Raising thoracic temperature during activity in Cystosoma saundersii causes the song cycle period to change (Josephson and Young 1979), and the change in body temperature in Tibicen winnemanna (Davis) during endothermic warming is responsible for changes in acoustic activity of that species (Sanborn 1997). These data suggest the ability of the cicada nervous system to coordinate calling songs is temperature dependent. Cicadas perform complex activities, such as singing, over a small temperature range. The temperature range may represent the maximum range over which the cicada can adjust 2002] HABITAT SHARING IN OKANAGANA SPP. 443 Fig. 3. Okanagana utahensis calling song. The song is composed of a train of syllables with sound energy between 6 kHz and 11 kHz. its rate of activity to compensate for the direct effect of temperature on metabolic processes (Heath et al. 1971b). The body temperature range of singing ectothermic cicadas has been reported as 25.0–31.8°C in Magicicada cassinii (Heath 1967), 32.2–41.5°C in Tibicen chloromerus (Walker) (Sanborn 2000), 35.0–40.8°C in Diceroprocta olympusa (Walker) (Sanborn and Maté 2000), 33.5–43.0°C in Cacama valvata (Uhler) (Heath et al. 1972), 38.0–41.9°C in Okanagodes gracilis Davis (Sanborn et al. 1992), and 39.0-41.8°C in Okanagana hesperia (Uhler) (Heath 1972). Body temperatures of singing O. striatipes were measured between 33.5°C and 37.8°C. Body temperatures of calling O. utahensis ranged from 34.9°C to 40.9°C, both within the range of body temperatures reported for other cicadas to coordinate singing activity. The range is also similar to the body temperature range of singing in endothermic cicada species (Sanborn et al. 1995a, 1995b, Sanborn 2000). Comparison of the data in the singing temperature histogram (Fig. 5) suggests the species select different body temperature ranges when singing. Orientation of the species with respect to the sun also suggests different thermal preferences. Okanagana striatipes begins thermoregulatory behaviors to decrease body temperature while at the same body temperatures O. utahensis continues to maximize radiant heat gain. Comparison of maximum voluntary tolerance temperatures and mean singing tem- peratures of each species illustrates a difference in thermal activity of the species. Okanagana striatipes sings at a body temperature approximately equal to the maximum voluntary tolerance temperature of the species, while O. utahensis sings at a body temperature significantly greater than the maximum voluntary tolerance temperature determined for the species. Although maximum voluntary tolerance temperatures are approximately equal between species, O. utahensis selects a higher body temperature range for activity. Singing at body temperatures greater than the maximum voluntary tolerance temperature has also been described in the cicada Diceroprocta apache (Davis) (Heath and Wilkin 1970). Singing at temperatures above an upper thermoregulatory point suggests O. utahensis requires an elevated body temperature for the singing mechanism to function properly. Okanagana utahensis may require a higher body temperature due to the song parameters of the species. Amplitude modulations within syllables, production of syllables themselves, and/or greater pulse repetition rate of the O. utahensis song may require a higher body temperature for coordination than that required by O. striatipes to coordinate a continuous, unmodulated song. Okanagana utahensis produces sound pulses at a rate of approximately 300 sec–1 compared to 250 sec–1 in O. striatipes. Since timbal muscle contraction kinetics are temperature dependent (Josephson and Young 444 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST Fig. 4. Expanded time wave of the Okanagana utahensis calling song. Syllables are composed of approximately 26 individual sound pulses produced at the rate of 300 sec–1. Syllables are about 87 msec in duration and separated by 6.3 msec. Intensity increases and dominant frequency changes midway through the syllable produced by lateral abdominal movements. 1979, 1985, Josephson 1981, Young and Josephson 1983, Sanborn 2001), the greater pulse repetition rate may require a higher timbal muscle temperature for the timbal to contract at the frequency necessary to produce the calling song. Temperature requirements affect daily activity cycles of the 2 species. It is through this temporal separation of species activity that differences in singing body temperature become important. The lower body temperature of singing O. striatipes permits the species to sing in the morning and late afternoon when O. utahensis is potentially unable to raise body temperature to the range necessary for acoustic activity. Similarly, the higher body temperature required by singing O. utahensis permits acoustic activity during the heat of the day when O. striatipes is forced to retreat to shaded sites. Thus, thermal requirements act to separate reproductive activity temporally and to reduce or eliminate acoustic interference between the species. Thermal separation of activity has been described in ants (Cros et al. 1997), beetles (Colombini et al. 1994, Fallaci et al. 1997), and flies (Gaugler and Schutz 1989, Schutz and Gaugler 1992) that share a habitat. Cicadas have developed several behavioral and physiological methods to minimize acoustic [Volume 62 interference, competition for environmental resources, and interspecific interactions. Cicadas using similar songs for communication or similar host plants can avoid interspecific competition through geographic separation (Pringle 1954, Fleming 1971), microhabitat segregation (Schedl 1986, Riede 1997), temporal separation of calling times (Hayashi 1975a, Wolda 1993, Gogala and Riede 1995, Riede 1995, 1997) or time of year the species are active (Young 1981a, 1981b), or maximizing communicatory differences (Fleming 1971, Walker 1974). Okanagana striatipes and O. utahensis, however, are similar morphological species using the same host plant; they are active in the same place at the same time of year; males of both species are solitary animals when calling; they produce mating calls that overlap in frequency; and both are diurnally active. They are species that contradict the general patterns used by cicadas to avoid interspecific competition, and yet they are able to share an environment while using the same resources, both physical and acoustic. The songs of cicadas act as an isolating mechanism between species (Alexander 1957, Alexander and Moore 1958, Moore and Alexander 1958, DuMortier 1963, Haskell 1974, Bennet-Clark 1975, Fleming 1975, 1984). When related sympatric species share an environment, selection should minimize signal differences within a species and maximize differences between species (Alexander 1967, Walker 1974, Young 1981a). In general, sympatric species differ markedly in calling song structure and/or frequency (Pringle 1954, Alexander 1956, 1957, 1967, Moore and Alexander 1958, Alexander and Moore 1962, DuMortier 1963, Fleming 1971, 1984, Walker 1974, Young 1981a). However, O. striatipes and O. utahensis possess similar songs and acoustic behavior. The overlap of calling song frequency in O. striatipes and O. utahensis is probably due to the similar size of the animals. The frequency of a cicada’s song is determined by the natural period of timbal vibration, which is then modified by several body parts (Pringle 1954, Moore and Sawyer 1966, Popov 1975, Popov et al. 1985, Huber et al. 1990, Bennet-Clark and Young 1992, Fonseca 1996, Bennet-Clark 1997, 1999) and scaled to body size (Daniel et al. 1993, Bennet-Clark and Young 1994). Because the 2 cicadas are physically similar in size, 2002] HABITAT SHARING IN OKANAGANA SPP. 445 TABLE 1. Temperature responses (°C) of Okanagana striatipes and Okanagana utahensis from Cortez, Colorado. O. striatipes (mean ± sx–) O. utahensis (mean ± sx–) 20.66 (± 0.348) n = 17 20.71 (± 0.313) n = 37 35.46 (± 0.571) n = 17 36.03 (± 0.404) n = 37 45.52 (± 0.605) n = 17 46.08 (± 0.375) n = 37 Behavior Minimum flight temperature Maximum voluntary tolerance temperature Heat torpor temperature All interactions P > 0.2. timbal size is probably similar in the species and call frequencies also should be similar. The slightly larger size, together with a slightly larger timbal, of O. utahensis is probably responsible for the lower emphasized frequency of the call. Calling song temporal patterns have been suggested as a means of separating many sympatric species of cicadas. Four species of Maoricicada are thought to remain isolated by the pulse-repetition frequency of their calling songs (Fleming 1971). Jiang (1985) suggested that the number of sound pulses, pulse length, and repetition frequency of amplitude-modulated pulse trains separate Acutivalva choui Yao, Aola bindusara (Distant), and Linguvalva sinensis Chou and Yao. All 3 species inhabit the same location, sing only from 0630 to 0645 hours, and produce calls of similar frequency. The sympatric sibling species Platypleura maytenophila Villet and P. hirtipennis (Germar) (Villet 1987) overlap in calling song frequency but differ in temporal pattern (Villet 1988). Nakao and Kanmiya (1988) showed that there are significant differences in the songs produced by the cicada Meimuna kuroiwae Matsumura over its entire range. Meimuna kuroiwae is a synonymized species of what were originally 7 independent species (Hayashi 1975b) and should probably be classified as separate species based on their calling songs. Temporal patterns of the songs of the 2 species we studied are markedly different. Okanagana striatipes produces a continuous train of constant-amplitude sound pulses (Fig. 1). The song of O. utahensis is a train of syllables that exhibit an amplitude-modulation pattern within each syllable (Fig. 3). Temporal patterns of the songs probably facilitate segregation of the 2 species during interspecific interactions. Fig. 5. Distribution of body temperatures of singing Okanagana striatipes (solid bars) and O. utahensis (striped bars). Mean body temperature of singing O. striatipes is 35.87 ± 0.257°C (mean ± sx–, n = 19). Mean body temperature of singing O. utahensis is 38.62 ± 0.242°C (n = 39). Mean singing temperatures are significantly different (t = –7.0385, df = 56, P << 0.0001). Abdominal movements also may produce the amplitude modulation seen in O. utahensis syllables. The cicada abdomen acts as a resonating structure, increasing the volume of the sound produced (Pringle 1954, Moore and Sawyer 1966, Young 1972, Simmons and Young 1978, Bennet-Clark 1999). When the abdomen is tuned to the natural period of timbal vibration, the intensity of the song increases (Pringle 1954). The observed increase in intensity may also be facilitated by changes in abdominal position. By altering the gap between the opercula and the tympana, the tension placed on the timbals, tympana, and folded membrane is changed, causing an increase in sound 446 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 TABLE 2. Comparison of maximum voluntary tolerance temperatures (°C) and field singing temperatures (°C) of Okanagana striatipes and Okanagana utahensis. Maximum voluntary tolerance temperature (mean ± sx–) Singing temperature (mean ± sx–) Okanagana striatipes 35.46 (± 0.571) n = 17 35.87 (± 0.257)b n = 19 Okanagana utahensis 36.03 (± 0.404)a n = 37 38.62 (± 0.242)ab n = 39 Species a,bP << 0.001. intensity (Pringle 1954, Weber et al. 1987, Villet 1988, Young 1990). Another possibility for the increased intensity could be increased activity in the timbal tensor muscle during the syllable (Hennig et al. 1994). Altering the size of the opercula-tympanal distance may also produce change in the emphasized frequency within O. utahensis syllables as described in many species of cicadas (Allard 1946, Young 1972, Joermann and Schneider 1987, Sanborn 1997). Although cicada auditory receptors react to allospecific calls, the response of the auditory neurons to different portions of the calls could help to separate O. striatipes and O. utahensis. Amplitude modulation, intensity changes, and syllables of the O. utahensis calling song represent stimuli to which the cicada auditory system has already been shown to be sensitive (Hagiwara and Ogura 1960, Katsuki 1960, Katsuki and Suga 1960, Huber et al. 1979, 1980). Production of syllables by O. striatipes prior to production of the calling song may negate any benefit O. utahensis has in possessing a song constructed of syllables. Temporal patterns of the full calling songs may be sufficient in isolating O. striatipes and O. utahensis, but the overlap in frequency could cause acoustic interference between the 2 species. Walker (1986) collected 2 species of cicadas attracted to synthetic cricket calls. Doolan and Young (1989) showed that the call frequency of Cystosoma saundersii Westwood is important in eliciting steering behavior in tethered females. The correct temporal pattern of the species song is necessary for the females to exhibit courtship behavior. If O. striatipes and O. utahensis possess a similar 2-step recognition process, simultaneous calling could cause females to waste time and energy in interspecific interactions. In addition, females flying to males of the wrong species could be exposing themselves to predation. Flying C. saundersii females fall victim to bird predation when flying to a calling male (Doolan and MacNally 1981). Different thermal requirements of each species decrease the chance of acoustic interference between these closely related species of Okanagana. We therefore suggest that O. striatipes and O. utahensis are able to share the same environment by (1) producing calling songs of different temporal patterns and (2) utilizing different thermal requirements that permit and/or facilitate temporal separation of the day. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Polly K. Phillips in the field. The study was supported in part by a traineeship from USPHS GMSO7143 to AFS. Aaron Ellinson made helpful comments on the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED ALEXANDER, R.D. 1956. A comparative study of sound production in insects with special reference to the singing Orthoptera and Cicadidae of the eastern United States. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus. ______. 1957. Sound production and associated behavior in insects. Ohio Journal of Science 57:101–113. ______. 1967. Acoustical communication in arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 12:495–526. ALEXANDER, R.D., AND T.E. MOORE. 1958. Studies on the acoustical behavior of seventeen-year cicadas (Homoptera, Cicadidae, Magicicada). Ohio Journal of Science 58:107–127. ______. 1962. The evolutionary relationships of 17-year and 13-year cicadas, and three new species (Homoptera, Cicadidae, Magicicada). Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 121:1–59. ALLARD, H.A. 1946. Synchronous singing of 17-year cicadas. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 48:93–95. BAILEY, W.J., AND G.K. MORRIS. 1986. Confusion of phonotaxis by masking sounds in the bushcricket Cono- 2002] HABITAT SHARING IN OKANAGANA SPP. cephalus brevipennis (Tettigoniidae: Conocephaline). Ethology 73:19–28. BEAMER, L.D., AND R.H. BEAMER. 1930. Biological notes on some western cicadas. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 38:291–305. BENNET-CLARK, H.C. 1975. Sound production in insects. Science Progress (Oxford) 62:263–283. ______. 1997. Tymbal mechanics and the control of song frequency in the cicada Cyclochila australasiae. Journal of Experimental Biology 200:1681–1694. ______. 1999. Resonators in insect sound production: how insects produce loud pure-tone songs. Journal of Experimental Biology 202:3347–3357. BENNET-CLARK, H.C., AND D. YOUNG. 1992. A model of the mechanism of sound production in cicadas. Journal of Experimental Biology 173:123–153. ______. 1994. The scaling of song frequencies in cicadas. Journal of Experimental Biology 191:291–294. CODY, M.L., AND J.H. BROWN. 1969. Song asynchrony in neighboring bird species. Nature (London) 222: 778–780. COLOMBINI, I., L. CHELAZZI, M. FALLACI, AND L. PALESSE. 1994. Zonation and surface activity of some tenebrionid beetles living on a Mediterranean sandy beach. Journal of Arid Environments 28:215–230. CRAWFORD, C.S., AND M.M. DADONE. 1979. Onset of evening chorus in Tibicen marginalis (Homoptera: Cicadidae). Environmental Entomology 8:1157–1160. CROS, S., X. CERDÁ, AND J. RETANA. 1997. Spatial and temporal variations in the activity patterns of Mediterranean ant communities. Ecoscience 4:269–278. DANIEL, H.J., C. KNIGHT, T.M. CHARLES, AND A.L. LARKINS. 1993. Predicting species by call in three species of North Carolina cicadas. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 109:67–76. DAVIS, W.T. 1919. Cicadas of the genera Okanagana, Tibicenoides, and Okanagodes, with descriptions of several new species. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 27:179–223 ______. 1921. An annotated list of the cicadas of Colorado with descriptions of a new species. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 29:43–57. ______. 1930. The distribution of cicadas in the United States with descriptions of new species. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 38:53–73. ______. 1932. Additional records of North American cicadas with descriptions of new species. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 40:241–264. DAWS, A.G., R.M. HENNIG, AND D. YOUNG. 1997. Phonotaxis in the cicadas Cystosoma saundersii and Cyclochila australasiae. Bioacoustics 7:173–188. DOOLAN, J.M., AND R.C. MACNALLY. 1981. Spatial dynamics and breeding ecology in the cicada, Cystosoma saundersii: the interaction between distribution of resources and interspecific behavior. Journal of Animal Ecology 50:925–940. DOOLAN, J.M., AND D. YOUNG. 1989. Relative importance of song parameters during flight phonotaxis and courtship in the bladder cicada Cystosoma saundersii. Journal of Experimental Biology 141:113–131. DUMORTIER, B. 1963. Ethological and physiological study of sound emissions in arthropods. Pages 583–654 in R.G. Busnel, editor, Acoustic behavior of animals. Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam. 447 ENGER, P.S., D.J. AIDLEY, AND T. SZABO. 1969. Sound reception in the Brazilian cicada Fidicina rana. Journal of Experimental Biology 51:339–345. FALLACI, M., I. COLOMBINI, L. PALESSE, AND L. CHELAZZI. 1997. Spatial and temporal strategies in relation to environmental constraints of four tenebrionids inhabiting a Mediterranean coastal dune system. Journal of Arid Environments 37:45–64. FICKEN, R.W., M.S. FICKEN, AND J.P. HAILMAN. 1974. Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds. Science 183:762–763. FLEMING, C.A. 1971. A new species of cicada from rock fans in southern Wellington, with a review of three species with similar songs and habitat. New Zealand Journal of Science 14:443–479. ______. 1975. Adaptive radiation in New Zealand cicadas. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 119:298–306. ______. 1984. The cicada genus Kikihia (Hemiptera, Homoptera): I. The New Zealand green foliage cicadas. National Museum of New Zealand Records 2:191–206. FONSECA, P.J. 1993. Directional hearing of a cicada: biophysical aspects. Journal of Comparative Physiology 172A:767–774. ______. 1996. Sound production in cicadas: timbal muscle activity during calling song and protest song. Bioacoustics 7:13–31. FRINGS, H., AND M. FRINGS. 1977. Animal communication. 2nd edition. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. 207 pp. GAUGLER, R., AND S.J. SCHUTZ. 1989. Environmental influences on hovering behavior of Tabanus nigrovitatus and T. conterminus (Diptera: Tabanidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 2:775–786. GOGALA, M., AND K. RIEDE. 1995. Time sharing of song activity by cicadas in Temengor Forest Reserve, Hulu Perak, and in Sabah, Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal 48:297–305. GREENFIELD, M.D. 1988. Interspecific acoustic interactions among katydids (Neoconocephalus): inhibitioninduced shifts in diel periodicity. Animal Behaviour 36:684–695. HAGIWARA, S., AND K. OGURA. 1960. Analysis of songs of Japanese cicadas. Journal of Insect Physiology 5: 259–263. HASKELL, P.T. 1974. Sound production. Pages 353–410 in M. Rockstein, editor, The physiology of the Insecta. Volume 2. Academic Press, New York. HAYASHI, M. 1975a. On the species of the genus Meimuna Distant (Homoptera, Cicadidae) of the Ryukyus. II. Geographic and individual variations and mode of coexistence. Kontyû 43:412–421. ______. 1975b. On the species of the genus Meimuna Distant (Homoptera, Cicadidae) of the Ryukyus. I. Synonymy and description of the species. Kontyû 43: 281–298. HEATH, J.E. 1967. Temperature responses of the periodical “17-year” cicada, Magicicada cassini (Homoptera, Cicadidae). American Midland Naturalist 77:64–67. ______. 1970. Behavioral regulation of body temperature in poikilotherms. Physiologist 13:399–410. HEATH, J.E., J.L. HANEGAN, P.J. WILKIN, AND M.S. HEATH. 1971a. Thermoregulation by heat production and 448 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST behavior in insects. Journal de Physiologie 63: 267–270. ______. 1971b. Adaptation of the thermal responses of insects. American Zoologist 11:147–158. HEATH, J.E., AND P.J. WILKIN. 1970. Temperature responses of the desert cicada, Diceroprocta apache (Homoptera, Cicadidae). Physiological Zoology 43:145–154. HEATH, J.E., P.J. WILKIN, AND M.S. HEATH. 1972. Temperature responses of the cactus dodger, Cacama valvata (Homoptera, Cicadidae). Physiological Zoology 45:238–246. HEATH, M.S. 1972. Temperature requirements of the cicada, Okanagana striatipes beameri: a study from Flagtaff, Arizona. Plateau 45:31–40. HENNIG, R.M., T. WEBER, T.E. MOORE, F. HUBER, H.-U. KLEINDIENST, AND A.V. POPOV. 1994. Function of the tensor muscle in the cicada Tibicen linnei. Journal of Experimental Biology 187:33–44. HUBER, F. 1983. Neural correlates on orthopteran and cicada phonotaxis. Pages 108–135 in F. Huber and H. Markl, editor, Neuroethology and behavioral physiology: roots and growing pains. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. ______. 1984. The world of insects: periodical cicadas and their behavior. Alexander von Humbolt Stiftung Mitteilungen 43:24–31. HUBER, F., H.-U. KLEINDIENST, T.E. MOORE, K. SCHILDBERGER, AND T. WEBER. 1990. Acoustic communication in periodical cicadas: neuronal responses to songs of sympatric species. Pages 217–228 in F.G. Gribakin, K. Weise, and A.V. Popov, editors, Sensory systems and communication in arthropods: including the first comprehensive collection of contributions by Soviet scientists. Advances in Life Sciences. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel. HUBER, F., D.W. WOHLERS, AND T.E. MOORE. 1980. Auditory nerve and interneuron responses to natural sounds in several species of cicadas. Physiological Entomology 5:25–45. HUBER, F., D.W. WOHLERS, J.D.L. WILLIAMS, AND T.E. MOORE. 1979. Struktur und funktion der Horbahn von singzikaden (Homoptera: Cicadidae). Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoolischen Gesellschaft 72:212. JIANG, J. 1985. A study of the song characteristics in cicadas at Jinghong in Yunnan Province (China). [In Chinese.] Acta Entomologica Sinica 28:257–296. JOERMANN, G., AND H. SCHNEIDER. 1987. The songs of four species of cicada in Yugoslavia (Homoptera: Cicadidae). Zoologischer Anzeiger 219:283–296. JOSEPHSON, R.K. 1981. Temperature and the mechanical performance of insect muscle. Pages 19–44 in B. Heinrich, editor, Insect thermoregulation. John Wiley and Sons, New York. JOSEPHSON, R.K., AND D. YOUNG. 1979. Body temperature and singing in the bladder cicada, Cystosoma saundersii. Journal of Experimental Biology 80:69–81. ______. 1985. A synchronous insect muscle with an operating frequency greater than 500 Hz. Journal of Experimental Biology 118:185–208. KATSUKI, Y. 1960. Neural mechanism of hearing in cats and insects. Pages 53–75 in Y. Katsuki, editor, Electrical activity of single cells. Igakushion, Hongo, Tokyo. [Volume 62 KATSUKI, Y., AND N. SUGA. 1958. Electrophysiological studies on hearing in common insects in Japan. Proceedings of the Japanese Academy 34:633–638. ______. 1960. Neural mechanism of hearing in insects. Journal of Experimental Biology 37:279–290. LATIMER, W., AND W.B. BROUGHTON. 1984. Acoustic interference in bushcrickets: a factor in the evolution of singing insects? Journal of Natural History 18: 599–616. MOORE, T.E. 1961. Audiospectrographic analysis of sounds of Hemiptera and Homoptera. Annals of the Entomological Society of American 54:273–291. MOORE, T.E., AND R.D. ALEXANDER. 1958. The periodical cicada complex (Homoptera: Cicadidae). Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Entomology I: 349–355. MOORE, T.E., AND R.T. SAWYER. 1966. The mechanism of cicada timbal action (Insecta: Homoptera: Cicadidae). American Zoologist 5:509. MORRIS, G.K., AND J.H. FULLARD. 1983. Random noise and cogeneric discrimination in Conocephalus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Pages 73–96 in D.T. Gwynne and G.K. Morris, editors, Orthopteran mating systems. Sexual competition in a diverse group of insects. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. NAKAO, S., AND K. KANMIYA. 1988. Acoustic analysis of the calling songs of a cicada, Meimuna kuroiwae Matsumura in Nansei Islands, Japan: part I. Physical properties of the sound. [In Japanese.] Kurume University Journal 37:25–46. PAEZ, V.P., B.C. BOCK, AND A.S. RAND. 1993. Inhibition of evoked calling of Dendrobates pumilio due to acoustic interference from cicada calling. Biotropica 25: 242–245. PERDECK, A.C. 1958. The isolating value of specific song patterns in two sibling species of grasshoppers (Chorthippus brunneus Thunb. and C. biguttulus L.). Behaviour 12:1–75. POPOV, A.V. 1969. Comparative studies of the communication sound signals and some principles of the organization of the acoustical system in cicadas and Orthoptera. [In Russian.] Trudy Vsenoiuznoe Entomologicheskow Obshchestvo 53:182–221. ______. 1975. The structure of the tymbals and the characteristics of the sound signals in singing cicadas (Homoptera, Cicadidae) in the southern regions of the USSR. Entomological Review, Washington 54: 7–35. ______. 1981. Sound production and hearing in the cicada, Cicadetta sinuatipennis Osh (Homoptera, Cicadidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology 142A: 271–280. POPOV, A.V., I.B. ARONOV, AND M.V. SERGEEVA. 1985. Calling songs and hearing in cicadas from Soviet Central Asia. Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology 21:451–462. POPOV, A.V., AND M.V. SERGEEVA. 1987. Sound signalization and hearing in the Baikal cicada, Cicadetta yezoensis (Homoptera, Cicadidae). Zoologicheski Zhurnal 66:681–691. POPOV, A.V., AND V.F. SHUVALOV. 1974. Time-characteristics of the communicative sounds and their analysis in the auditory system of insects. Acustica 31: 315–319. 2002] HABITAT SHARING IN OKANAGANA SPP. POPP, J.W., R.W. FICKEN, AND J.A. REINHARTZ. 1985. Shortterm temporal avoidance of interspecific acoustic interference among forest birds. Auk 102:744–748. PRINGLE, J.W.S. 1954. A physiological analysis of cicada song. Journal of Experimental Biology 31:525–560. ______. 1956. Insect song. Endeavour 15:68–72. RIEDE, K. 1995. Räumliche und zeitliche Strukturierung tropischer Rufemeinschaften. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoolischen Gesellschaft 88:45. ______. 1996. Diversity of sound-producing insects in a Bornean lowland rain forest. Pages 77–84 in D.S. Edwards, W.E. Booth, and S.L. Choy, editors, Tropical rain forest research—current issues. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. ______. 1997. Bioacoustic diversity and resource partitioning in tropical calling communities. Pages 275– 280 in H. Ulrich, editor, Tropical biodiversity and systematics. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biodiversity and Systematics in Tropical Ecosystems, Bonn, 1994. Zoologisches Forschungs institut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn. RÖMER, H., W. BAILEY, AND I. DADOUR. 1989. Insect hearing in the field. III. Masking by noise. Journal of Comparative Physiology 164A:609–620. SANBORN, A.F. 1997. Body temperature and the acoustic behavior of the cicada Tibicen winnemanna (Homoptera: Cicadidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 10: 257–264. ______. 2000. Comparative thermoregulation of sympatric endothermic and ectothermic cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Tibicen winnemanna and Tibicen chloromerus). Journal of Comparative Physiology 186A: 551–556. ______. 2001. Timbal muscle physiology in the endothermic cicada Tibicen winnemanna (Homoptera: Cicadidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 130A:9–19. SANBORN, A.F., J.E. HEATH, AND M.S. HEATH. 1992. Thermoregulation and evaporative cooling in the cicada Okanagodes gracilis (Homoptera: Cicadidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 102A:751–757. SANBORN, A.F., J.E. HEATH, M.S. HEATH, AND F.G. NORIEGA. 1995a. Diurnal activity, temperature responses, and endothermy in three South American cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Dorisiana bonaerensis, Quesada gigas and Fidicina mannifera). Journal of Thermal Biology 20:451–460. ______. 1995b. Thermoregulation by endogenous heat production in two South American grass dwelling cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Proarna). Florida Entomologist 78:319–328. SANBORN, A.F., AND S. MATÉ. 2000. Thermoregulation and the effect of body temperature on call temporal parameters in the cicada Diceroprocta olympusa (Homoptera: Cicadidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 125A:141–148. SANBORN, A.F., AND P.K. PHILLIPS. 1995. Scaling of sound pressure level and body size in cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae; Tibicinidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 88:479–484. SCHATRAL, A. 1990. Interspecific acoustic interactions in bushcrickets. Pages 152–165 in W.J. Bailey and D.C.F. Rentz, editors, The Tettigoniidae: behaviour, systematics and evolution. Crawford House Press, Bathurst. 449 SCHEDL, V.W. 1986. Zur morphologie, ökologie und verbreitung der singzikade Cicadetta podolica (Eichw.) (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha, Tibicinidae). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 88/89 B: 579–585. SCHILDBERGER, K., H.-U. KLEINDIENST, T.E. MOORE, AND F. HUBER. 1986. Auditory thresholds and acoustic signal processing in the CNS of periodical cicadas. Page 126 in N. Elsner and W. Rathmayer, editors, Sensomotorik: Identifizierte Neurone. Beiträge zur 14. Göttinger Neurobiologentagung, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart. SCHUTZ, S., AND R. GAUGLER. 1992. Thermoregulation and hovering behavior of salt marsh horse flies (Diptera: Tabanidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 85:431–436. SCHWARTZ, J.J. 1993. Male calling behavior, female discrimination and acoustic interference in the neotropical treefrog Hyla microcephala under realistic acoustic conditions. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32:401–414. SCHWARTZ, J.J., AND K.D. WELLS. 1983. An experimental study of acoustic interference between two species of neotropical treefrogs. Animal Behaviour 31: 181–190. SIMMONS, J.A., E.G. WEVER, AND J.M. PYLKA. 1971. Periodical cicada: sound production and hearing. Science 171:212–213. ULAGARAJ, S.M., AND T.J. WALKER. 1973. Phonotaxis of crickets in flight: attraction of male and female crickets to male calling songs. Science 182:1278–1279. VILLET, M. 1987. Three new platypleurine cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae) from Natal, South Africa. Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa 50: 209–215. ______. 1988. Calling songs of some South African cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae). South African Journal of Zoology 23:71–77. WAKABAYASHI, T., AND S. HAGIWARA. 1953. Mechanical and electrical events in the main sound muscle of cicada. Japanese Journal of Physiology 3:249–253. WAKABAYASHI, T., AND K. IKEDA. 1961. Interrelation between action potential and miniature electrical oscillation in the tymbal muscle of the cicada. Japanese Journal of Physiology 11:585–595. WALKER, T.J. 1974. Character displacement and acoustic insects. American Zoologist 14:1137–1150. ______. 1986 Monitoring the flights of field crickets (Gryllus spp.) and a tachanid fly (Euphasiopteryx ochracea) in north Florida. Florida Entomologist 69:678–685. WEBER, T., T.E. MOORE, F. HUBER, AND U. KLEIN. 1987. Sound production in periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada septendecim, M. cassini). Proceedings of the 6th Auchenorrhyncha Meeting, Turin, Italy, 7–11 September 1987:329–336. WOLDA, H. 1993. Diel and seasonal patterns of mating calls in some neotropical cicadas. Acoustic interference? Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Biological, Chemical, Geological, Physical and Medical Sciences 96:369–381. YOUNG, A.M. 1981a. Notes on the population ecology of cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae) in the Cuesta Angel forest ravine of northeastern Costa Rica. Psyche 88: 175–195. 450 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST ______. 1981b. Notes on seasonality and habitat associations of tropical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae) in premontane and montane tropical moist forest in Costa Rica. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 89:123–142. YOUNG, D. 1972. Neuromuscular mechanisms of sound production in Australian cicadas. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologie 79:343–362. ______. 1990. Do cicadas radiate sound through their eardrums? Journal of Experimental Biology 151: 41–56. YOUNG, D., AND K.J. HILL. 1977. Structure and function of the auditory system of the cicada, Cystosoma saun- [Volume 62 dersii. Journal of Comparative Physiology 117A: 23–46. YOUNG, D., AND R.K. JOSEPHSON. 1983. Pure-tone songs in cicadas with special reference to the genus Magicicada. Journal of Comparative Physiology 152A: 197–207. Received 18 January 2001 Accepted 21 September 2001 Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 451–457 OREOHELICES OF UTAH, II. EXTANT STATUS OF THE BRIAN HEAD MOUNTAINSNAIL, OREOHELIX PARAWANENSIS GREGG, 1941 (STYLOMMATOPHORA: OREOHELICIDAE) George V. Oliver1 and William R. Bosworth III1 ABSTRACT.—The Brian Head mountainsnail, Oreohelix parawanensis, is reported for the 1st time as a living species, and for the 1st time its habitat is described. Preliminary determination of the very limited distribution of this species (≤2.3 ha inhabited in ∼11 ha overall area) is presented. Morphometric data previously had been reported only for the holotype and for 1 topotype; measurements from 37 new specimens as well as 20 paratypes are provided here, and these data show that the lost holotype was not typical of the species. Sizes of reproductive snails and of embryos are also reported. Key words: Oreohelix parawanensis, Brian Head mountainsnail, gastropods, mollusks, Parowan Mountains, Utah. Oreohelix parawanensis, the Brian Head mountainsnail, was described by Gregg (1941a) based on 31 specimens, “all dead and many of them immature,” that he collected “from a rock slide on the southwest slope of Brian Head, Parawan [sic] Mountains, Iron County, Utah, altitude about 11,000 [ft].” It is likely that he collected these specimens during the summer of 1935, when he spent “nearly three months at Cedar Breaks National Monument” (Gregg 1941b), which is only about 2 km from Brian Head (Peak) and where he extensively collected mollusks. Bickel (1977) searched for O. parawanensis and reported: “The type locality was collected June 27, 1975 at which time the rock slide holding the population was still covered by several feet of snow, and only a few empty shells were collected from its margin.” Clarke and Hovingh (1994), too, searched for O. parawanensis at the type locality, in 1992 (Clarke 1993), noting that “no live specimens have ever been collected.” They reported that they “searched this rock slide carefully and excavated the surface from one side to the other” and conducted “[c]areful searches elsewhere . . . in the vicinity,” but they were able to find only a single empty shell of O. parawanensis, and their efforts “failed to produce any live specimens.” Despite the fact that the Brian Head mountainsnail, O. parawanensis, had never been demonstrated to be extant and could have been extinct before the arrival of Europeans in North America, state and federal management agencies have shown considerable interest in the conservation of this species (as discussed below). Efforts to determine its current status had been inadequate, field investigations having been poorly timed seasonally and of insufficient duration, one such search (Bickel 1977) having been conducted too early in the season when the locality was under snow and apparently carried out for only part of a day, and the other search (Clarke 1993) having been made too late in the season—October, under conditions of “very strong wind & cold”—evidently involving only a little more than 4 person-hours of effort. Furthermore, none of the previous work (Gregg 1941a, Bickel 1977, Clarke and Hovingh 1994) had revealed any aspects of the biology of this species. As part of our continuing studies of mountainsnails in Utah (Oliver and Bosworth 2000), our goals were to attempt to find living examples of O. parawanensis, to make a preliminary assessment of its distribution and habitat, and to examine available specimens morphometrically. METHODS We scheduled our fieldwork to search for living examples of O. parawanensis to coincide with conditions favorable for finding active 1Utah Natural Heritage Program, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, 1594 West North Temple, Salt Lake City, UT 84114. 451 452 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST terrestrial mollusks, especially mountainsnails (Oreohelix). Oreohelices of other species are known to hibernate by burrowing beneath the surface of the soil ( Jones 1935, 1940), and moderately warm conditions prevail for only a few weeks each year on Brian Head. We searched for O. parawanensis on 11, 12, and 13 August 1998 on Brian Head. During this time daytime temperatures ranged from ∼15°C to ∼20°C, and summer storms produced brief, light rain showers each day. We established 14 collecting stations on the southern and western slopes of Brian Head, all within 0.7 km of the summit. We made an effort to sample a variety of habitat conditions, but, because most members of the genus Oreohelix are strongly calciphilic (Henderson and Daniels 1916, Pilsbry 1916, 1939, Jones 1940), we focused efforts in areas where we could locate exposed limestone. From the summit of Brian Head, we scanned the slopes, using binoculars, looking for surface limestone to aid us in choosing suitable collecting stations. For each collecting station we noted plant association (dominant plant species present), substrate type, and other variables such as slope and aspect, as well as all mollusks that we found. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION We found O. parawanensis at 7 of our 14 collecting stations on Brian Head. At these 7 stations we found empty shells of O. parawanensis, and at 4 of the stations we discovered the 1st living examples of this species. Oreohelix parawanensis was overall the most common gastropod at the stations where it was detected. We found and collected 49 empty shells (as well as 5 embryos) of O. parawanensis, and we found 18 live individuals, of which we took 8. One of the living examples of O. parawanensis was active and extended when found under a rock between 0938 and 0948 hours on 13 August 1998; less than an hour earlier (at 0857 hours), air temperature at the locality was 16°C. Of the new specimens, we have deposited 5 in the collection of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ANSP 401984) and 5 in the collection of the Los Angeles County Museum (LACM 152567), these being the 2 collections that house all of Gregg’s type material of this species that we have located. [Volume 62 Type Locality The type locality of O. parawanensis stated by Gregg (1941a), while adequate and, for its time, rather precise, can now be stated even more precisely. The only problematic part of Gregg’s (1941a) locality is his ambiguous phrase “a rock slide.” While others (e.g., Bickel 1977, Clarke and Hovingh 1994) have referred to “the rock slide” as though there were no doubt about the location, many parts of the southern and western faces of Brian Head consist of talus material of varying dimensions, and various terms could be applied to these geological features, including the term “rock slide.” Although the exact site of Gregg’s collection of O. parawanensis may never be known, we believe the following is the most probable location: Utah, Iron County, Brian Head (Peak), below summit on SW face, T36S, R9W, section 13, NW1/4 of NW1/4 of NW1/4. Distribution The distribution of O. parawanensis, as revealed by our fieldwork, can be summarized as follows: Utah, Iron County, Brian Head (Peak), below summit on SW face; T36S, R9W, section 13 (NW1/4 of NW1/4 of NW1/4), section 14 (E1/2 of NE1/4 of NE1/4), and section 11 (E1/2 of SE1/4 of SE1/4). The 7 collecting stations in which we found this species are contained within an irregular, but somewhat triangular, polygon of about 11 ha. However, only small patches within this overall distributional area appeared to provide suitable habitat, and we found O. parawanensis in only 7 of these patches. The total area that we determined to be inhabited by this species is only about 2.3 ha or less, although this is a rather crude estimate and one that should be considered the minimal area of its occurrence. Because we found only dead shells of O. parawanensis at 3 of the collecting stations, it is possible that these represented extinct colonies, and the currently inhabited area may be even smaller than that stated above. Habitat The habitat of O. parawanensis has not previously been described (e.g., Gregg 1941a, Pilsbry 1948, Bickel 1977, Clarke 1993, Clarke and Hovingh 1994). Of the 7 stations wherein we found O. parawanensis, 4 were on limestone 2002] EXTANT STATUS OF BRIAN HEAD MOUNTAINSNAIL substrates; 2 were in areas of primarily basaltic rock with some limestone and, in 1 case, a little sandstone; and 1—the highest location and probably the type locality—was almost entirely basaltic rock. Slope in the places where we found O. parawanensis varied from almost none to about 40°, and elevations of the inhabited patches ranged from 3255 m to 3340 m. All 18 live individuals of O. parawanensis were under surface rocks, mostly single individuals but rarely more, 4 being the largest number of live O. parawanensis we found under 1 rock. Most dead shells of this species that we found were also under rocks, though a few were lying exposed on the ground. The stations inhabited by O. parawanensis almost without exception contained dense clumps of currants of 2 species, wax currant (Ribes cereum) and gooseberry currant (Ribes montigenum). Meadow rue (Thalictrum cf. fendleri) and Indian paintbrush (Castilleja sp.) were also typical of the places where we found O. parawanensis. Another plant that characterized several of the stations where O. parawanensis was present was ground juniper ( Juniperus communis). Limber pine (Pinus flexilis), western bristlecone pine (Pinus longaeva), and Engelmann’s spruce (Picea engelmannii) were present at some of the stations where we found O. parawanensis, which were at or slightly above tree line. Other species of forbs, a few grasses, and a few other trees also were present at some of the stations that yielded O. parawanensis. Associated Gastropods The diversity of gastropod species that we found on Brian Head was rather low, as could be expected at such a high, cold, and barren location. Most, but not all, other gastropod species we found on Brian Head were at stations shared with O. parawanensis. The gastropods we found at the same collecting stations as O. parawanensis were the Rocky Mountain column (Pupilla blandi), the crestless column (Pupilla hebes), a vallonia (Vallonia cf. cyclophorella), the Rocky mountainsnail (Oreohelix strigosa), and the western glass-snail (Vitrina pellucida). Most of these associated gastropods were found in small numbers. We found O. strigosa to be the most common associate of O. parawanensis, the 2 congeners occurring together in similar numbers. 453 All of these species were reported by Gregg (1941a) as associates of O. parawanensis, along with the multirib vallonia (Vallonia gracilicosta), the spruce snail (Microphysula ingersolli), the quick gloss (Zonitoides arboreus), and the forest disc (Discus cronkhitei [= Discus whitneyi]), although Gregg (1941a) did not indicate how close their association with O. parawanensis was. In the above list we have not included other species we found on Brian Head that were not at the same collecting stations that yielded O. parawanensis. Conservational Considerations O. parawanensis was formerly a Category 2 candidate for listing by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, under provisions of the Endangered Species Act, until 28 February 1996, when Category 2 was eliminated. Furthermore, even though O. parawanensis had never been reported to be living and thus was not known to be extant, it was indicated as “declining” (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1994). Oreohelix parawanensis is listed as a species of special concern by the state of Utah (Utah Division of Wildlife Resources 1998). The area inhabited by O. parawanensis is within the Dixie National Forest. Because the stations supporting this species are at or above tree line, timber harvest is not a threat. Nearby ski resort operations (lifts, runs, buildings, etc.) to the west and northwest do not currently threaten the snail; however, if resort operations were to expand into the area where O. parawanensis occurs, its entire population could be destroyed. The high elevation of the site and the rather barren nature of the terrain afford relatively good protection for the snail from most other anthropogenic threats. An unpaved road, however, loops around the south side of Brian Head and up to the summit, where a small pavilion stands. Hikers and mountain bikers utilize the area, and we encountered rock collectors near some of the inhabited stations. Bones, apparently those of a domestic goat or sheep, were present near an inhabited station, and we observed large numbers of domestic sheep on U.S. Forest Service land less than 10 km away. Type Specimens Although Gregg (1941a) stated that the holotype of O. parawanensis had been deposited in 454 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST the collection of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (no. 176907), this specimen could not be located and is presumed lost (Edward S. Gilmore, ANSP, personal communication, 1998). Gregg (1941a) also indicated that the paratypes (presumably all of the other 30 specimens of O. parawanensis he collected) were retained in his own collection (no. 324). We located 20 paratypes in the collection of the Los Angeles County Museum (LACM 1660) and 1 paratype in the collection of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ANSP 340315). Labels associated with both of these lots of specimens indicate they are paratypes, and the lot in the Los Angeles County Museum also has Gregg’s catalogue number (324) on 1 of the labels. Although the Los Angeles County Museum catalogue indicates 19 paratypes are housed in that collection (Lindsey Groves, LACM, personal communication, 1999) and there are 19 specimens of moderate size in the lot, an additional tiny specimen, an embryonic shell, is contained in the same lot but is separated and protected in a clear gelatin capsule. Thus 20—or 21, if one includes the embryo—of Gregg’s 30 paratypes have been located and examined. Although Gregg (1941a) stated that all specimens of O. parawanensis he collected were dead, examination of the specimens in the Los Angeles County Museum suggests to us that some of the paratypes may actually have been alive when they were collected despite assertions (Gregg 1941a, Bickel 1977, Clarke 1993, Clarke and Hovingh 1994) that no living examples had ever been found. Of the paratypes we examined, 7 showed evidence of an epiphragm, and 1 other shell contained dried soft tissue. Such evidence, however, does not prove they were alive when Gregg collected them; these specimens may in fact be exactly as they were discovered at the time of collection. Morphometric Data Previously published morphometric data are available for only 2 specimens of O. parawanensis, the holotype (Gregg 1941a) and a shell collected by Clarke and Hovingh (1994), for which they reported “diameter 8.5 mm, height 5.0 mm, whorls 41/4.” Gregg (1941a) considered many of his 31 specimens to be immature, presumably based on size. However, we know of no easily applied criterion that will distinguish mature from [Volume 62 immature shells of O. parawanensis (but see discussion below), there being no reflection of the lip and no apertural teeth in this species. Thus, we measured available intact shells large enough that they could be assigned to this species with confidence. We measured shell diameter, height, and umbilicus width and counted whorls of 20 paratypes (19 LACM, 1 ANSP) and 37 intact examples among the new specimens of O. parawanensis that we collected (Table 1). Our sample of 37 new specimens and the sample of 20 paratypes were very similar for the 3 mensural characters (shell diameter, height, and umbilicus width), whorl counts, and the 2 proportions calculated from the mensural data; the similarity of the 2 data sets is apparent if one compares ranges and means of characters in Table 1. However, when morphometric data for the paratypes and the new specimens are compared with Gregg’s (1941a) data for the now-lost holotype (Table 1), it can be seen that the holotype was quite dissimilar from the paratypes and new topotypes in its measurements and proportions. The holotype was larger in diameter and more depressed (low-spired, as shown by the diameter/height proportion) than any specimen examined by us. Also, the umbilicus was larger—both absolutely and relative to its diameter—in the holotype than in any examined shell. The exceptionally large umbilicus of the holotype is of particular interest since Gregg (1941a), in defining this species, claimed that the larger umbilicus of O. parawanensis is of importance in distinguishing it from the 2 species that he considered to be its closest relatives, O. handi and O. eurekensis. It would, of course, be desirable to reexamine the holotype, and especially to remeasure its umbilicus width, but this unfortunately is not possible, the holotype having been lost. However, Gregg (1941a) did publish 4 photographs of O. parawanensis, an umbilical (ventral) view and an apertural (frontal) view, both at approximately life size, and the same 2 photographs at greater than natural size. Pilsbry (1948) reproduced these photographs. The photographs were published again by Clarke and Hovingh (1994), who incorrectly credited them to Pilsbry (1948). Also, Clarke and Hovingh (1994) labeled the photographs as illustrations of the holotype, despite the fact that neither the original (Gregg 1941a) nor the secondary source (Pilsbry 1948) had indicated this 2002] EXTANT STATUS OF BRIAN HEAD MOUNTAINSNAIL 455 TABLE 1. Morphometric data for Oreohelix parawanensis. Character Whorls (no.) Diameter (mm) Height (mm) Umbilicus width (mm) Diameter/umbilicus Diameter/height New specimens (n = 37) ____________________________ Range Mean sx– 3.00–5.00 3.72–9.62 2.34–6.48 0.78–2.25 3.93–5.78 1.44–1.90 4.14 6.81 4.15 1.50 4.66 1.65 0.07 0.20 0.14 0.06 0.09 0.02 Paratypes (n = 20) ____________________________ Range Mean sx– 3.50–4.38 5.28–8.26 3.14–4.72 0.85–1.78 3.79–6.21 1.56–1.83 4.09 6.79 3.95 1.37 5.06 1.72 0.06 0.19 0.11 0.06 0.13 0.02 Holotypea 4.33 10.5 5.4 3.0 3.50 1.94 aMeasurements and whorl count of the holotype reported by Gregg (1941a) and proportions derived from the reported measurements. to be so—or even that the photographs represented only a single specimen. Using Gregg’s (1941a) published photographs, we measured shell diameter and umbilicus width for the shell shown in umbilical view and shell diameter and height for the shell shown in apertural view. Although we do not consider any of the originally published 4 photographs to be exactly natural size, our measurements of the photographed shells did allow us to calculate their proportions accurately. Using the photograph of the umbilical view, we arrived at a diameter/umbilicus proportion of 3.55. While not within the range for this proportion that we observed in 37 topotypes or in 20 paratypes, it is not quite so far out of the range as the proportion (3.50) calculated using the measurements for the holotype published by Gregg (1941a). In the photograph of the apertural view, diameter/height = 1.77, which does fall within the range observed in both the new specimens and the paratypes, unlike the proportion (1.94) calculated from Gregg’s (1941a) reported measurements of the holotype. When we scaled the umbilical photographic view to the diameter reported by Gregg (1941a) for the holotype, 10.5 mm, the umbilicus then measured 3.00 mm, exactly the umbilicus measurement reported by Gregg (1941a), which strongly suggests that the photograph represents the holotype, as Clarke and Hovingh (1994) assumed. However, scaling the apertural-view photograph to a diameter of 10.5 mm, the height became 5.93 mm as opposed to 5.4 mm as reported by Gregg for the holotype. The specimen shown in apertural view, then, either was not the holotype or, if it was the holotype, was slightly mismeasured by Gregg—off by ∼0.5 mm. Not only is height the most difficult of standard shell measurements to make with accuracy, but good tools for measuring small specimens may not have been readily available to Gregg. Thus, we believe that possibly the photograph showing frontal view also may be of the holotype. Embryos and Size at Maturity Four (10.8%) of the 37 intact dead shells of O. parawanensis we collected contained embryonic shells, 3 with 1 embryo each and 1 with 2 embryos. These 5 embryos were 1.8 to 2.4 mm in diameter (mean = 2.2 mm), with 2 to 2.25 whorls (mean = 2.1). The embryo that was with the paratypes in the collection of the Los Angeles County Museum (LACM 1660) measured 2.3 mm in diameter and had 2.25 whorls, in close agreement with the 5 we found. The discovery of embryos inside 4 dead shells provides information on the size of reproductive O. parawanensis. The 4 gravid snails measured 5.68 to 9.32 mm (mean = 6.98 mm) in diameter and had 3.67 to 4.75 whorls (mean = 4.14 whorls). This shows that maturity in O. parawanensis is reached by the time the snails are 5.68 mm in diameter or have 3.67 whorls. Only 3 of 20 paratypes (excluding the single embryo) we examined were smaller than the smallest of the gravid shells we found, and these 3 measured 5.28, 5.30, and 5.42 mm in diameter and had 3.67, 3.625, and 3.50 whorls, respectively—almost the size of the smallest shell we found that contained an embryo. Unless most or all of the 10 paratypes that we could not locate were smaller than the 20 that we have seen, Gregg’s (1941a) statement that many of his 31 specimens were immature was not correct. 456 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST Nomenclature and Systematic Placement Clarke and Hovingh (1994), noting Gregg’s (1941a) misspelling—at least by current spelling convention—of the Parowan Mountains, declared: “Since the proper spelling is Parowan the species name is here emended to Oreohelix parowanensis.” The alternate spelling “Parawan,” however, has been used by various authors and has appeared in other malacological literature (e.g., Herrington and Roscoe 1953). Most importantly, Gregg’s spelling of the specific epithet, parawanensis, is consistent with his spelling of the “Parawan Mountains” in the original publication (Gregg 1941a), and there is no evidence to suggest that it was not Gregg’s intent to spell parawanensis as he did. Clarke and Hovingh’s (1994) alteration of the name, then, is a violation of Article 32(a), concerning correct original spelling, and an unjustified emendation under Article 33(a) of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Ride et al. 1999). Thus, the name correctly remains Oreohelix parawanensis. Bickel (1977) stated that O. parawanensis is taxonomically “probably invalid, a synonym of O. strigosa depressa,” arguing that “O. parawanensis is a stunted population of the widespread, O. strigosa depressa.” As noted in the type description (Gregg 1941a), Oreohelix strigosa depressa occurs with O. parawanensis, and our work has corroborated this. To this we can add that the 2 species maintain their morphological distinctiveness where they coexist. These facts render implausible Bickel’s (1977) suggestion that O. parawanensis could be a synonym of O. strigosa. However, Gregg’s (1941a) assertion that O. parawanensis “seems nearest related to O. eurekensis . . . and O. handi,” both of which it closely resembles in size and shell morphology, is reasonable and almost certainly correct. Pilsbry (1948) placed O. parawanensis near O. handi, making it a member of the O. yavapai species group and not the O. strigosa species group as the genus was organized by Pilsbry (1933, 1939), who described the genus Oreohelix. Bickel’s (1977) suggestion that O. parawanensis represents merely a “dwarfed colony” of O. strigosa, moreover, raises the question of whether his “few empty shells” were in fact O. parawanensis at all and not shells of immature O. strigosa, which possibly could be confused with O. parawanensis upon superficial inspection. [Volume 62 The atypical size and proportions of the holotype (discussed above), however, suggest that the taxonomic distinction of O. parawanensis from such species as O. handi and O. eurekensis should be reexamined. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Adonia R. Henry’s assistance in the field contributed importantly to the findings reported here, and we extend to her our special thanks. This work was supported in part by a 1998 Canon Exploration Grant from Canon USA, Inc., administered by The Nature Conservancy, and we are grateful to Canon USA, Inc., and The Nature Conservancy for this support. Additional financial support for this work came from the Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission, under the Central Utah Project Completion Act. Lindsey Groves of the Los Angeles County Museum, Edward S. Gilmore and Gary Rosenberg of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, and Eric A. Rickart of the Utah Museum of Natural History provided help with curatorial matters—searches, specimen loans, and cataloguing new material. The encouragement of Larry Dalton, Michael Canning, and Bill James, all of the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, throughout the course of this work is much appreciated. We thank Art Metcalf, University of Texas–El Paso, and an anonymous reviewer for suggestions that improved the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED BICKEL, D. 1977. A survey of locally endemic Mollusca of Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota. Unpublished report prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Minot State College, Minot, ND. ii + 60 pp. CLARKE, A.H. 1993. Status survey of fifteen species and subspecies of aquatic and terrestrial mollusks from Utah, Colorado, and Montana. Unpublished report prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by Ecosearch, Inc., Portland, TX. 77 pp. + appendices. CLARKE, A.H., AND P. HOVINGH. 1994. Studies on the status of endangerment of terrestrial mollusks in Utah. Malacology Data Net 3:101–138. GREGG, W.O. 1941a. A new Oreohelix from southern Utah. Nautilus 54:95–96 + plate 8. ______. 1941b. Mollusca of Cedar Breaks National Monument, Utah. Nautilus 54:116–117. HENDERSON, J., AND L.E. DANIELS. 1916. Hunting Mollusca in Utah and Idaho. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 68: 315–339 + plates XV–XVIII. 2002] EXTANT STATUS OF BRIAN HEAD MOUNTAINSNAIL HERRINGTON, H.B., AND E.J. ROSCOE. 1953. Some Sphaeriidae of Utah. Nautilus 66:97–98. JONES, D.T. 1935. Burrowing of snails. Nautilus 48:1–3. ______. 1940. A study of the Great Basin land snail[,] Oreohelix strigosa depressa (Cockerell). Bulletin of the University of Utah 31 (4) [Biological Series 6]:1–43. OLIVER, G.V., AND W.R. BOSWORTH III. 2000. Oreohelices of Utah, I. Rediscovery of the Uinta mountainsnail, Oreohelix eurekensis uinta Brooks, 1939 (Stylommatophora: Oreohelicidae). Western North American Naturalist 60:451–455. PILSBRY, H.A. 1916. Notes on the anatomy of Oreohelix, with a catalogue of the species. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 68: 340–359 + plates XIX–XXII. ______. 1933. Notes on the anatomy of Oreohelix,—III, with descriptions of new species and subspecies. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 85:385–410. ______. 1939. Land Mollusca of North America (north of Mexico). Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Monographs 3(1):I–XVII + 1–573 + i–ix. 457 ______. 1948. Land Mollusca of North America (north of Mexico). Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Monographs 3(2): XLVII + 521–1113. RIDE, W.D.L., H.G. COGGER, C. DUPUIS, O. KRAUS, A. MINELLI, F.C. THOMPSON, AND P.K. TUBBS, EDITORS. 1999. International code of zoological nomenclature. 4th edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. XXIX + 306 pp. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1994. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; animal candidate review for listing as endangered or threatened species; proposed rule. Federal Register 59:58982–59028. UTAH DIVISION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES. 1998. Utah sensitive species list. Salt Lake City, UT. 48 pp. Received 26 January 2001 Accepted 5 October 2001 Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 458–465 GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN PELAGE COLOR OF PIÑON MICE (PEROMYSCUS TRUEI) IN THE NORTHERN GREAT BASIN AND ENVIRONS Leslie N. Carraway1 and B.J. Verts1 ABSTRACT.—Cluster analyses of values for hue, value, and chroma (based on Munsell soil-color charts) obtained at 6 points on pelages of 202 adult piñon mice (Peromyscus truei) from the northern Great Basin and environs produced dendrograms with specimens grouped into 5 clusters. In most instances distribution of specimens forming clusters reflected those published for nominal races. In instances in which previous distributions of nominal races were not supported and for specimens previously unclassified, geographic distribution of groups of color morphs was logical and suggested avenues for additional research on geographic variation in the species. Key words: Peromyscus truei, piñon mice, pelage color, geographic variation, northern Great Basin. Piñon mice (Peromyscus truei) occur from southwestern and central Oregon, southwestern Idaho, southwestern Wyoming (likely extirpated), eastern Colorado, extreme western Oklahoma, and western Texas, south to central Baja California, Mexico, central Arizona, and southern New Mexico (Gafur et al. 1980, Hoffmeister 1981, Modi and Lee 1984, Clark and Stromberg 1987, Caire et al. 1989, Carraway et al. 1993, Davis and Schmidly 1994, RamírezPulido et al. 1996). Also, a disjunct population occurs near the southern tip of Baja California Sur (Hall 1981). In the northern Great Basin, the species usually is associated with rocky habitats vegetated by old-growth piñon pine (Pinus edulis) or junipers (Juniperus; Hall 1946, Hoffmeister 1951, Carraway et al. 1993), but those in southwestern Oregon and northwestern California are associated with oak (Quercus kelloggii and Q. garryana) or redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii; Hoffmeister 1951, Fisher 1976). Dorsal pelage of P. truei usually is some shade of grayish brown, but color varies considerably geographically (Hall 1981). Five nominal subspecies occur in the northern Great Basin and adjacent areas: P. t. gilberti, P. t. nevadensis, P. t. preblei, P. t. sequoiensis, and P. t. truei. Pelage color originally was involved in differentiating among these races (Shufeldt 1885, Allen 1893, Bailey 1936, Hall and Hoffmeister 1940, Hoffmeister 1941) and was used extensively as a diagnostic character in the most recent taxonomic treatment of the species (Hoffmeister 1951). The latter author described dorsal pelage color for the 5 races in the northern Great Basin and environs based on Ridgway’s (1912) classification as “Sepia,” “Buffy Brown,” “Mummy Brown,” “Brussels Brown,” and “Tawny-Olive to Saccardo’s Umber,” respectively. Nevertheless, no quantitative analysis of pelage color as a character for distinguishing these races has been conducted. In 1992 we collected specimens of P. truei in southeastern Oregon about 225 km from the nearest previously published record in the state. Subsequently, we collected other specimens and located other records from regions in Oregon and Idaho north and east of the known range of the species (Carraway et al. 1993). Because of the proximity of several nominal races to these collection sites (Hoffmeister 1951), we chose not to assign the newly acquired specimens to a subspecies at that time. To assign newly acquired specimens to appropriate subspecies and to delineate more precisely ranges of nominal subspecies of P. truei in the northern Great Basin and environs, we analyzed pelage color of 202 museum specimens collected in Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, northern California, and western Utah. 1Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Nash 104, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-3803. 458 PELAGE COLOR IN PIÑON MICE 2002] 459 METHODS For analyses we used 105 complete (skin and skull) museum specimens of Peromyscus truei collected at 43 sites in April–August (summer) and 97 collected at 35 sites in September–March (winter). These groups include specimens selected from within ranges of the 5 recognized subspecies of P. truei in the northern Great Basin and environs and specimens unclassifed to subspecies from Oregon and Idaho. All specimens are adults in full, clean pelage free of visible grease and exhibiting no molting. Adults were identified by molars being fully erupted and exhibiting wear, and all skull sutures being completely fused. Collection locality (Appendix 1), date of collection, and pelage color were recorded for each specimen. Pelage color was measured on specimens by comparing color at each of 7 points (Fig. 1) with those of Munsell soil-color chips; hue, value, and chroma were recorded for each color (Munsell Color 1975). We used this color-comparison technique in preference to more precise electronic methods because necessary equipment was easily transported to various systematics collections, cost less, and had the potential of being used in the field. The 3 hues found in P. truei (5YR, 7.5YR, 10YR) were coded 1, 2, and 3, respectively, but actual numbers for color value and chroma read from color chips were used in analyses (Appendix 2). For example, for a specimen with a measured color of 10YR3/2 at a point, the data for that point appeared as 3 3 2. Because values for midventer color (Fig. 1) were the same for all specimens (10YR8/1), this character was not used in statistical analyses; thus, each specimen was represented by 18 numerals. Separate data matrices were formed for specimens collected in summer and winter. We analyzed each data matrix by use of a dissimilarity association matrix from Euclidean distance with unweighted pair-group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) method within Hierarchical Cluster Analysis in BioΣtat II (Pimentel 1994). Clusters were designated A, B, C, D, and E, and collection localities for specimens within each cluster were superimposed on a map of Hoffmeister’s (1951) distributions of nominal subspecies occurring in the northern Great Basin and adjacent regions. Fig. 1. Sketch of a Peromyscus truei illustrating points of reference for determining pelage color: a, pate; b, anterior dorsum; c, posterior dorsum; d, dorsal tail stripe; e, side above lateral stripe; f, lateral stripe; and g, midventer. RESULTS All characters, other than midventer color, exhibited some variation among both summerand winter-caught specimens (Table 1). Most variation was in value and chroma, as the most common hue recorded was yellowish brown (10YR). Despite this variation, at sites at which multiple specimens were available, all individuals grouped in the same cluster. Analyses of data matrices for P. truei collected in summer resulted in 5 distinct clusters, whereas those collected in winter resulted in only 4 clusters (Figs. 2a, 2b). Cophenetic correlation coefficients (rcs) for these dendrograms were 0.967 and 0.963, respectively, indicating a high level of agreement between similarity values implied by dendrograms and those of original similarity matrices. Specimens forming cluster A were from western Josephine County, Oregon, and coastal California; those in cluster B were from Shasta Valley, Siskiyou County, California; those in cluster C were from eastern Nevada, western Utah, southern Idaho, and Crook, Deschutes, Jefferson, and Harney counties, Oregon; those in cluster D were from Nevada; and those in cluster E were from Jackson, eastern Josephine, Klamath, and Lake counties, Oregon (Fig. 3). Because geographic distributions of clusters A, C, D, and E for winter-caught specimens were in accord with those of summer-caught specimens, seasonal groups were combined for plotting (Fig. 3). No winter-caught specimens from Siskiyou County, California, with requirements for inclusion were available for study, accounting for absence of a cluster B produced by that analysis (Fig. 2b). We also reanalyzed our matrices, eliminating data for 1 point on the pelage at a time to ascertain whether relationships among clusters WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST 460 [Volume 62 TABLE 1. Munsell color determinations of pelage color of Peromyscus truei from the northern Great Basin and adjacent areas at 6 points of reference. Vertical listings of colors indicate variation possible within a cluster (geographic region); thus, horizontal listings do not indicate colors for any particular individual. Anterior dorsum Posterior dorsum Dorsal tail Lateral side Lateral stripe 10YR2/1 10YR2/1 10YR7/4 10YR8/3 10YR8/6 10YR2/1 10YR2/1 10YR7/4 10YR8/3 10YR2/1 10YR2/1 10YR7/4 7.5YR6/6 10YR8/6 7.5YR3/2 7.5YR3/2 10YR3/2 5YR3/4 7.5YR3/4 7.5YR7/6 7.5YR6/6 10YR6/8 10YR7/4 10YR7/6 Winter 10YR8/6 10YR7/3 10YR8/3 10YR7/6 10YR8/6 Summer 7.5YR7/6 10YR8/3 10YR8/4 7.5YR7/6 10YR8/3 10YR8/4 7.5YR7/6 7.5YR8/4 10YR8/4 5YR3/4 7.5YR3/4 10YR2/1 10YR2/1 10YR3/2 7.5YR7/6 7.5YR7/6 10YR6/6 10YR7/4 10YR7/6 10YR8/4 10YR8/4 10YR8/6 7.5YR7/8 7.5YR7/6 10YR7/6 Winter 10YR7/4 10YR8/3 10YR8/4 10YR8/3 10YR8/4 Summer 10YR7/4 10YR7/4 7.5YR7/6 7.5YR8/4 10YR7/4 10YR8/4 7.5YR6/6 Winter 10YR7/4 10YR7/6 10YR8/6 10YR7/4 10YR7/6 7.5YR6/6 10YR7/6 7.5YR7/6 7.5YR8/6 10YR7/6 10YR8/4 10YR8/6 7.5YR7/6 10YR7/3 10YR7/6 10YR8/6 10YR6/8 10YR7/8 7.5YR7/6 7.5YR7/8 10YR6/8 Cluster Season Pate A Summer Winter Summer Summer B C D E were affected. Results were not altered greatly by sequentially eliminating data points (Fig. 2). Such suggests that the set of variables was correlated over the body. DISCUSSION Distribution of specimens in cluster A conforms most closely with that depicted for P. t. sequoiensis at the northern extent of its range (Fig. 3). The greater Euclidean distance separating cluster A from other clusters, combined with the larger body size, shorter tail, and shorter ears reported for specimens from the region (Hoffmeister 1951), suggests that morphometric and genetic analyses might indicate that sequoiensis is specifically different from the remaining P. truei. Whether sequoiensis and gilberti are sympatric or remain parapatric in that region is unknown. Based on analyses of matrices containing all 6 characters, distribution of all specimens forming cluster D (Fig. 3) conforms with that depicted for P. t. truei (Hoffmeister 1951, Hall 1981). However, southwestern Utah contains localities from which specimens group into cluster C (Fig. 3). Such suggests that the zone of intergradation between clusters C and D is 10YR2/1 10YR3/1 10YR3/1 7.5YR2/0 10YR3/2 10YR2/1 10YR3/1 10YR3/2 10YR7/6 10YR8/6 7.5YR6/6 10YR7/6 10YR6/8 7.5YR7/6 7.5YR7/8 10YR6/8 slightly farther west and south than depicted for truei and nevadensis by Hoffmeister (1951). Specimens forming cluster E were all collected at localities in Oregon: 3 in Josephine County, 3 in Jackson County, 1 in Klamath County, and 3 in Lake County. Those from Josephine County suggest that the range of P. t. gilberti extends farther west than previously believed and those from Klamath and Lake counties extend the range farther north and eastward (Fig. 3). Hoffmeister (1951) and Hall (1981) indicated that the range of P. t. truei extended from Nevada into south central Oregon, encompassing localities at which the Lake County specimens were collected. However, as specimens from that region were not available to them, the depicted ranges for these 2 races must have been based on conjecture. Winter-caught specimens forming cluster E separated into 2 clusters when matrices were analysed after removal of color of pate, anterior dorsum, or posterior dorsum (Figs. 2f, 2j, 2n). We consider the separation spurious because both clusters so formed included individuals from more than 1 of the geographic groups of specimens forming cluster E (Fig. 3). Several other species of small mammals and races thereof associated primarily with 2002] PELAGE COLOR IN PIÑON MICE 461 Fig. 2. Dendrograms with accompanying cophenetic correlation coefficients (rcs) produced from data matrices formed for specimens of Peromyscus truei collected in summer and winter with: a–b, all characters included; c–d, with dorsal tail color removed; e–f, with anterior dorsum color removed; g–h, with lateral stripe color removed; i–j, with posterior dorsum color removed; k–l, with lateral side color removed; and m–n, with pate color removed. habitats in either eastern or western Oregon have ranges that extend through a gap in the Cascade Range near the southern border of that state (Verts and Carraway 1998). Thus, classification of specimens of P. truei from Klamath and Lake counties as gilberti is not surprising. Summer-caught specimens forming cluster B grouped with those in cluster E in analyses in which 1 of 3 color characters (dorsal tail, posterior dorsum, or lateral side) was excluded (Figs. 2c, 2i, 2k). However, when 1 of the other 3 characters (pate, anterior dorsum, or lateral stripe) was excluded and when all 6 characters were included, dendrograms indicated that cluster E was distinct from cluster B and, that other than cluster A, was the most divergent group from the remaining clusters (Figs. 2e, 2g, 2m). Also, specimens in cluster B grouped with those in cluster C when colors of either the anterior dorsum or the lateral stripe were excluded (Figs. 2e, 2g). One locality in Siskiyou County, California, from which specimens forming cluster B were taken, was within the range of P. t. gilberti depicted by Hoffmeister (1951); 3 other localities were only slightly to the east of the depicted range (Fig. 3). From geographic proximity involved (Fig. 3) and from combining of specimens in 3 dendrograms (Figs. 2c, 2i, 2k), specimens in cluster B seem to be consubspecific with those in cluster E. However, the Euclidean-distance 462 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 Fig. 3. Distribution of localities of specimens of Peromyscus truei forming the 5 clusters overlain on a distribution map of subspecies (stippled areas) following Hoffmeister (1951): 1, P. t. gilberti; 2, P. t. nevadensis; 3, P. t. preblei; 4, P. t. sequoiensis; and 5, P. t. truei. Superscript numerals following cluster-letters indicate number of specimens from that locality; absence of numeral indicates only 1 specimen. Dashed-line trapezoid in central Oregon contains 23 localities. Solid square in Harney Co., Oregon, is locality at which KU 157813 was collected. Names of counties referred to in text are abbreviated. relationship between clusters B and E in 4 dendrograms (Figs. 2a, 2e, 2g, 2m) and the fact that all individuals forming cluster B were from a restricted area (Shasta Valley) suggest that these groups are taxonomically distinct. Color analysis combined with morphometric and genetic analyses of additional specimens, including some caught in winter, from central Siskiyou County, California, might aid significantly in clarifying the relationship of this somewhat tenuous colormorph. Except for 2 groups of localities in southwestern Utah and extreme eastern Nevada near the periphery of the depicted range of P. t. 2002] PELAGE COLOR IN PIÑON MICE truei, the distribution of specimens forming cluster C includes regions depicted by Hoffmeister (1951) and Hall (1981) as occupied by P. t. preblei and P. t. nevadensis (Fig. 3). In addition, cluster C also includes specimens from eastern Oregon (other than those from Lake County) and southwestern Idaho collected north and east of the previously described geographic range of the species (Fig. 3). Distributions of P. t. preblei and P. t. nevadensis (Hoffmeister 1951, Hall 1981), combined with localities of more recently collected specimens in cluster C, form a band in a more-or-less continuous arc from central Oregon, through southwestern Idaho, and along the Nevada–Utah state boundary (Fig. 3). Despite this logical grouping of 2 nominal subspecies, we are reluctant to synonymize these races in the absence of morphometric and genetic analyses. Absence of available specimens from much of southeastern Oregon and the northern portion of Nevada (Fig. 3; Hoffmeister 1951, Hall 1981) may not represent the true distribution of the species. In August 1998 we collected a specimen (KU 157813) near the center of this broad region at Juniper Spring (T40S, R31E, SE1/4 SE1/4 Sec. 12), Harney County, Oregon (Fig. 3). Unfortunately, it was a juvenile and so could not be included in the present analyses. However, its occurrence in a region heretofore considered not occupied by the species, combined with the extremely restricted habitat occupied by the species (Carraway et al. 1993), suggests that additional effort to acquire specimens from the region might be productive. Scattered stands of either Pinus edulis or Juniperus, the appropriate vegetative habitats, occur over much of the region (Johnson 1995). Specimens from this region might provide additional insight into the relationship between those presently classified as P. t. preblei and P. t. nevadensis. Overall, distributions of nominal races of P. truei in the northern Great Basin and environs based on our analyses of pelage color tend to support conclusions of previous researchers. In instances in which previous conclusions were not supported and for specimens from areas outside the previously known range of the species, distributions based on our color analyses are logical and suggest avenues for additional research on geographic variation in the species. 463 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank curators and collection managers at Museum of Natural History, Albertson College, Caldwell, Idaho (CIMNH); Eastern Oregon University, La Grande (EOSC); National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. (USNM); Portland State University, Portland, Oregon (PSU); Department of Biology, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho (BSU); Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis (OSUFW); Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley (MVZ); Natural History Museum, University of Kansas, Lawrence (KU); and Burke Museum, University of Washington, Seattle (UW) for loans or access to collections they curate. N.A. Slade provided statistical advice. L.J. Rielly aided in finding a particularly obscure locality. Earlier drafts of the manuscript were reviewed by J.L. Patton, T.L. Best, and S.T. Alvarez-Castañeda. This is Technical Paper 11,618, Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station. LITERATURE CITED ALLEN, J.A. 1893. On a collection of mammals from the San Pedro Martir region of Lower California, with notes on other species, particularly of the genus Sitomys. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 5:181–202. BAILEY, V. 1936. The mammals and life zones of Oregon. North American Fauna 55:1–416. CAIRE, W., J.D. TYLER, B.P. GLASS, AND M.A. MARES. 1989. Mammals of Oklahoma. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. CARRAWAY, L.N., E. YENSEN, B.J. VERTS, AND L.F. ALEXANDER. 1993. Range extension and habitat of Peromyscus truei in eastern Oregon. Northwestern Naturalist 74:81–84. CLARK, T.W., AND M.R. STROMBERG. 1987. Mammals in Wyoming. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Public Education Series 10:1–314. DAVIS, W.B., AND D.J. SCHMIDLY. 1994. The mammals of Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Press, Austin. FISHER, J.L. 1976. An autecological study of the pinyon mouse, Peromyscus truei, in southwestern Oregon. Unpublished master’s thesis, General Studies–Science/Mathematics, Southern Oregon State College, Ashland. GAFUR, Z., D. HOYLE, K. KEECH, B. ROBERTS, L.R. POWERS, AND E. YENSEN. 1980. Records of the pinyon mouse, Peromyscus truei, from southwestern Idaho. Journal of the Idaho Academy of Science 16:1–2. HAFNER, M.S., W.L. GANNON, J. SALAZAR-BRAVO, AND S.T. ALVAREZ-CASTAÑEDA. 1997. Mammal collections in the Western Hemisphere: a survey and directory of existing collections. American Society of Mammalogists, Lawrence, KS. 464 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST HALL, E.R. 1946. Mammals of Nevada. University of California Press, Berkeley. ______. 1981. The mammals of North America. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Volume 2:601–1181 + 90. HALL, E.R., AND D.F. HOFFMEISTER. 1940. The pinyon mouse (Peromyscus truei) in Nevada, with description of a new subspecies. University of California Publications in Zoology 42:401–406. HOFFMEISTER, D.F. 1941. Two new subspecies of the piñon mouse, Peromyscus truei, from California. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 54: 129–132. ______. 1951. A taxonomic and evolutionary study of the piñon mouse, Peromyscus truei. Illinois Biological Monograph 21(4):1–104. ______. 1981. Peromyscus truei. Mammalian Species 161: 1–5. JOHNSON, F.D. 1995. Wild trees of Idaho. University of Idaho Press, Moscow. MODI, W.S., AND M.R. LEE. 1984. Systematic implications of chromosomal banding analyses of populations of Peromyscus truei (Rodentia: Muridae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 97:716–723. MUNSELL COLOR. 1975. Munsell soil color charts. Kollmorgen Corporation, Baltimore, MD. PIMENTEL, R.A. 1994. BioΣtat II: a multivariate statistical toolbox. Version 3.5. Sigma Soft, San Luis Obispo, CA. RAMÍREZ-PULIDO, J., A. CASTRO -CAMPILLO, J. ARROYO CABRALES, AND F.A. CERVANTES. 1996. Lista taxonómica de los mamiferos terrestres de México. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University 158:1–62. RIDGWAY, R. 1912. Color standards and color nomenclature. Privately published, Washington, DC. 53 plates. SHUFELDT, R.W. 1885. Description of Hesperomys truei, a new species belonging to the subfamily Murinae. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 8:403–408. VERTS, B.J., AND L.N. CARRAWAY. 1998. Land mammals of Oregon. University of California Press, Berkeley. Received 26 March 2001 Accepted 26 September 2001 APPENDIX 1. Specimens of Peromyscus truei examined. Type specimens indicated by an asterisk [*]. Localities followed by a plus [+] were not plotted on Figure 3. Museum acronyms follow Hafner et al. (1997). U.S.A.—CALIFORNIA, Del Norte Co.: Gasquet (USNM 91540). Siskiyou Co.: 1.5 mi SW Edgewood (MVZ 69422, 69424–69426); 10 mi E Montague (MVZ 69413); 11 mi NE Weed (MVZ 69414–69416); Mayten (MVZ 13333). IDAHO, Owyhee Co.: T10S, R5W, Sec. 22/27 (BSU 1352–1359); T4S, R3W, Sec. 26, 1500 m (BSU 1285–1286, 1288–1290, 1292, 1315–1317, 1319–1320, [Volume 62 1323–1324, 1326; CIMNH 639, 790–798, 801); T9S, R5W, Sec. 17 (BSU 1293–1294). NEVADA, Churchill Co.: 16 mi E Stillwater (USNM 93403–93404). Clark Co.: Charleston Mts. (KU 75703; USNM 26888/34304, 205558); Charleston Peak (USNM 26253/33659, 26268/33674, 26891/ 34307, 26894/34310, 26895/34311, 26899/34315, 26922/ 34338, 208980). Elko Co.: 0.5 mi W Debbs Cr., Pilot Peak (MVZ 68468–68473, 68475–68479*, 68480–68482). Lander Co.: Reese River, lat. 39 (USNM 93408). Lincoln Co.: 0.25 mi W UT–NV boundary+ (MVZ 59565); 3.5 mi N Eagle Valley (MVZ 48770); SW base Groom Baldy, T5S, R55/56E (MVZ 48753); E slope Irish Mts. (MVZ 48755, 48760, 48763); Meadow Valley (MVZ 48765); Panaca (USNM 28409/40513); 11 mi E Panaca (MVZ 48767, 48769); 2 mi S Pioche (MVZ 59562–59563); 2 mi SE Pioche (MVZ 59561, 59564). Lyon Co.: 2 mi SW Pine Grove (MVZ 64408, 64412, 64428); 3.5 mi SW Pine Grove (MVZ 64410). Nye Co.: Grapevine Mts. (USNM 28696/40800). Pershing Co.: S slope Granite Peak (MVZ 74174). Washoe Co.: 3 mi E Reno (MVZ 71072). White Pine Co.: Cheery Creek (MVZ 46226); Cleve Creek, T16N, R65E, NE1/4 (MVZ 46224); 8 mi N Lund (MVZ 53152–53159); Overland Pass, E slope Ruby Mts. (KU 47146); W side Ruby Lake (KU 47143–47145). OREGON, Crook Co.: at mouth Bear Creek (MVZ 87730–87732); mouth Bear Creek on Crooked River (MVZ 87727–87728); 13.5 mi S, 2.5 mi W Prineville (OSUFW 1635); 12 mi S, 2.5 mi E Prineville (UW 20029–20031). Deschutes Co.: 14 mi S, 10 mi E Bend (OSUFW 2753); Crooked River, 20 mi SE Prineville (USNM 78660*); 2 mi N, 4 mi E Redmond (OSUFW 2778); 3 mi N, 1 mi W Redmond (OSUFW 2232); 2 mi S, 1 mi E Redmond (OSUFW 2652); 3 mi N, 3 mi E Sisters (OSUFW 1508); 3 mi N, 4 mi E Sisters (OSUFW 2207); 9 mi N, 6.5 mi E Sisters (OSUFW 2651); 10 mi N, 4 mi W Sisters (OSUFW 2231); 2 mi S, 5 mi E Sisters (OSUFW 2887); 0.25 mi N, 4 mi W Terrebonne (OSUFW 5508); 1 mi N, 1 mi W Terrebonne (OSUFW 3084); 1 mi N, 3 mi W Terrebonne (OSUFW 3035); 1 mi S, 3 mi W Terrebonne (OSUFW 2989); 2 mi S, 8 mi W Terrebonne (OSUFW 2187); 3 mi W Terrebonne (OSUFW 2888, 2911, 3016, 3072, 3248, 3477, 3523, 4185–4192, 5154, 7070, 7896, 7971, 7982, 8095); 4 mi W Terrebonne (OSUFW 3432, 3862–3864, 5451). Harney Co.: 9 mi NE Riley (BSU 1304–1306); T24S, R25E, N1/2 Sec. 3 (KU 145222); T30/ 31S, R35E, Sec. 35/2 (KU 145215–145217, 145218). Jackson Co.: Brownsboro (USNM 262546); 7 mi S, 15 mi W Medford (OSUFW 3479); T38S, R2E, Sec. 22 (PSU 2717). Jefferson Co.: 10 mi S Madras (PSU 1256); 10 mi W Metolius (OSUFW 5144–5145, 5197). Josephine Co.: 13 mi SW Galice (USNM 203581–203584, 203587); Grants Pass (USNM 17276/24205, 32135/43947, 32137/43949, 203653); 2 mi N, 1 mi W Grants Pass (OSUFW 2478, 2487, PSU 2468); T39S, R7W, Sec. 34 (PSU 2716, 2718–2719). Klamath Co.: 0.7 mi N, 0.7 mi E Keno (PSU 2721). Lake Co.: Oatman Flat, 8 mi NW Silver Lake (PSU 1888); Oatman Flat, 7 mi N Silver Lake (PSU 882); Oatman Flat, 7 mi N, 1 mi W Silver Lake (PSU 680). UTAH, Millard Co.: Wah Wah Mts. (USNM 356962–356963). Washington Co.: 11 mi N St. George (USNM 327174, 327181); Mt. Meadows (USNM 167535–167537, 167542); Pine Valley (USNM 166769, 166776). PELAGE COLOR IN PIÑON MICE 2002] 465 APPENDIX 2. Hue, value, and chroma with Munsell Color (1975) names for colors found in Peromyscus truei in the northern Great Basin and environs. 10YR2/1 10YR6/6 10YR6/8 10YR7/3 10YR7/4 10YR7/6 10YR7/8 10YR8/1 10YR8/3 10YR8/4 10YR8/6 Black Brownish yellow Brownish yellow Very pale brown Very pale brown Yellow Yellow White Very pale brown Very pale brown Yellow 7.5YR3/2 7.5YR3/4 7.5YR6/6 7.5YR7/6 7.5YR7/8 7.5YR8/4 7.5YR8/6 7.5YR2/0 Dark brown Dark brown Reddish yellow Reddish yellow Reddish yellow Pink Reddish yellow Black 5YR3/4 Dark reddish brown Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 466–473 A HETEROTROPHIC DESERT STREAM? THE ROLE OF SEDIMENT STABILITY Urs Uehlinger1, Markus Naegeli2,3, and Stuart G. Fisher2 ABSTRACT.—In autumn 1998 stream metabolism was measured in the Hassayampa River, Arizona, a Sonoran Desert stream, using single-station diel oxygen curves and an oxygen mass balance model. Oxygen consumption rates of parafluvial and channel sediments were determined with respiration chambers. Bedload of channel sediments (sand) prevented significant primary production by benthic autotrophs, despite favorable nutrient, light, and temperature conditions. Ecosystem respiration was relatively low (1.50 g O2 m–2d–1) and presumably fueled by production in the riparian zone and riverine marshes. Respiration rates in the parafluvial zone and in channel sediments ranged from 0.6 to 1.4 g O2 m–3 sediment h–1. Sediment organic matter (ash-free dry mass) was 4.0 ± 1.8 kg m–3 sediment and did not significantly differ between the channel and the parafluvial zone. Results indicate that heterotrophic processes may dominate the metabolism of desert stream segments over extended periods of time if unstable sandy bed sediments prevail. Key words: desert stream, stream metabolism, diel oxygen curve, sediment respiration, disturbance, sediment stability. Environmental conditions in streams of warm arid or semiarid climates favor high primary production rates that may exceed ecosystem respiration (Minshall 1978, Cushing and Wolf 1984, Grimm 1987, Lamberti and Steinman 1997, Sinsabaugh 1997). Respiration in streams mainly occurs in hyporheic and parafluvial sediments (Grimm and Fisher 1984, Mulholland et al. 1997, Naegeli and Uehlinger 1997). Jones et al. (1995) found that in Sycamore Creek, a warm desert stream, benthic production fueled more than 80% of the hyporheic respiration through leaching dissolved material. Input of allochthonous organic matter is of minor importance if a riparian zone is narrow and upland vegetation is sparse as in arid environments (Cushing 1997, Schade and Fisher 1997). However, river corridors may include floodplain marshes, shrubs, and trees (e.g., Prach et al. 1996, Stromberg et al. 1997) that provide organic matter through aerial deposition of plant litter, fine root production or release of organic matter by roots, or processing of particulate organic matter buried during floods (Robertson et al. 1999). The stability of bed sediments is an important determinant of the biologically mediated energy flow through lotic ecosystems. Bed- moving spates damage benthic primary producers but have only a minor influence on the heterotrophic community of the hyporheic zone (Grimm and Fisher 1984, Naegeli and Uehlinger 1997). These disturbances shift stream metabolism toward heterotrophy (Fisher et al. 1982, Uehlinger and Naegeli 1998, Uehlinger 2000). Flash floods in desert streams decimate primary producers, but recovery can be rapid due to favorable light and temperature conditions and stable substrata after flood recession (Fisher et al. 1982, Grimm and Fisher 1989). This study focuses on the metabolism of a warm desert stream, where light availability, temperature, and nutrient concentrations are ample to support high primary production rates. However, bed sediments consisted of sand, the superficial layer of which was in continuous motion even at low flow. We hypothesized that the metabolism of this desert stream would be dominated by respiration because of this persistent bedload. Further, we expected that metabolism rates in the wetted channel would be smaller than in the parafluvial zone because low in-stream primary production was thought to result in low organic matter supply compared to inputs from the riparian vegetation and riverine marshes to the parafluvial zone. 1Department of Limnology, Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG), CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland. 2Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1501, USA. 3Present address: XPERTEAM Management Consultants AG, Glattalstrasse 501, CH-8153 Ruemlang, Switzerland. 466 HETEROTROPHY OF A DESERT STREAM 2002] METHODS Study Reach The Hassayampa River drains a catchment of about 2000 km2 into the Gila River (central Arizona). Perennial, intermittent, and ephemeral reaches characterize the river. The study was conducted downstream of Wickenburg (Maricopa County, AZ, USA), where a shallow bedrock layer causes perennial surface flow for about 8 km. Sand dominates channel sediments in the bedrock-confined reach (Stromberg et al. 1993), which is an upwelling zone of alluvialand basin-filled groundwater ( Jenkins 1989). The study reach is 1 km downstream of The Nature Conservancy’s Hassayampa River Preserve, close to the end of the perennial river section. Elevation is about 610 masl, and channel slope averages 0.006 (m/m). The reach is relatively homogenous with respect to channel structure (pool-riffle-run frequency), depth, slope, and riparian vegetation. At the Hassayampa River Preserve, mean annual discharge averages 0.1 m3s–1 ( Jenkins 1989). Effluent from a municipal wastewater treatment plant upstream of the study area makes up 0.01 to 0.02 m3s–1 of the flow. Large floods (Qmax > 500 m3s–1), which change channel area and instream riparian habitat structure, occur predominantly in winter (Stromberg et al. 1997). Emergent macrophytes, such as Typha domingensis Pers., is occasionally dominant within the river channel and abundant in adjacent marshlands (Wolden et al. 1994). Baccharis salicifolia [Ruíz et Pavón] Pers. occurs along stream margins; more distal riparian vegetation is dominated by cottonwood (Populus fremonti Wats.) and willow (Salix goodnigii Ball). Floodplain width ranges from 100 to 200 m. Adjacent uplands consist of Sonoran Desert scrub vegetation (Stromberg et al. 1993). The study reach is unreplicated; therefore, only tentative conclusions about ecosystem metabolism and sediment respiration of desert streams may be drawn. Physics and Chemistry Channel width and depth were measured along a 260-m reach. In the wetted channel and the parafluvial zone of a 75-m sub-reach, we installed 15 permanent piezometers with sampling depths of 10 cm (6), 30 cm (6), and 80 cm (3) for sampling interstitial water. A small side channel longitudinally divided the parafluvial zone. 467 Interstitial water temperatures were measured using 2 temperature loggers (StowAway, Onset Corporation, North Falmouth, MA, USA) that were installed 20 cm below the sedimentwater interface in the wetted channel and 20 cm below the water table in the parafluvial zone. Surface water temperatures were continuously recorded with a combination temperature-oxygen probe (see below). We measured discharge with the slug injection method (Gordon et al. 1992), using NaCl as tracer and a conductivity meter (WTW LF 340, Wissenschaftlich-Technische Werkstätten GmbH, Weilheim, Germany) as detector. Discharge records of the Hassayampa River at the Morristown gage (about 6 km downstream of the study site) were recorded by the USGS (http://waterdata. usgs.gov/nwis-w/AZ/). Surface and interstitial water samples for chemical analyses were collected in triplicate on 28 October and 1 November 1998 (surface water was also sampled on 27 October 1998). Samples were stored on ice, filtered in the laboratory (Whatman GF/F glass fiber filters), and analyzed for nitrate (NO3) and ammonium (NH4) nitrogen, soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Analyses were performed as described by Holmes et al. (1998). Dissolved oxygen (O2) and temperature of subsurface water were measured in the field with an oxygen meter (ATI Orion model 830). Metabolism We measured sediment respiration as changes in O2 concentration over time in sealed Plexiglas cores (4.5-cm diameter, 32 cm long), filled with sediments from 10 or 30 cm depth and water from the respective depths, and sealed with rubber stoppers (after Jones et al. 1995). Cores were incubated in situ for 2 to 3 hours. Oxygen concentrations and temperatures were measured with an oxygen meter (ATI Orion model 830). After incubation, sediments were analyzed for particulate organic matter as ash-free dry mass (loss on ignition) and grain-size distribution. Sampling sites were located in the main channel and in the parafluvial zone. To assess gross primary production and ecosystem respiration in the channel, oxygen concentrations and temperatures were continuously measured at the end of the study reach WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST 468 from 27 October to 1 November 1998 with Orbisphere equipment (probe 2115 with O2meter 2607 of Orbisphere, Geneva, Switzerland). Temperature and O2 signals were averaged for 5 minutes and stored (datalogger LI1000, LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). We used an oxygen mass-balance model to calculate gross primary production GPP (g O2m–2d–1) and ecosystem respiration ER (g O2m–2d–1). A detailed description of the model is given by Uehlinger et al. (2000). Model simulations and parameter estimations were performed with the computer program AQUASIM (version 2.0; Reichert, 1994, 1995). Respiration per volume r (g O2m–3d–1) was parameterized as: ER r = – ____ z (1) where ER is the respiration rate per area (g O2m–2d–1) and z the mean water depth (m). Gross primary production was described as a linear function of incident light (I): GPP = pIz (2) where p is the slope of the linear P–I curve (g O2m–1d–1W–1) and I is incident light intensity (Wm–2). Linear or almost linear relationships between ecosystem primary production and light intensitiy are usually obtained with open system methods (e.g., Duffer and Dorris 1966, Hornberger et al. 1976, Uehlinger 1993, Uehlinger et al. 2000). We described temperature dependence of ER and GPP with the following Arrhenius equation: X(T)=X(20ºC)βx(T–20) (3) where the subscript X is p or r and βX is a constant ( βX > 1; Bowie et al. 1985). Saturation concentrations of O2 at the study site were calculated using water temperature and the barometric pressure recorded at Wickenburg Airport (about 6 km from the study site). We determined the reaeration coefficient Ks with propane as tracer gas (Genereux and Hemond 1992). Temperature dependence of Ks was described according to Elmore and West (1961). Estimates of the parameters r, p, and βX were based on the minimization of the sum of squares (SS): [Volume 62 n SS = Σ (O2(ti )–O2meas,i )2 i=1 (4) where O2meas,i is the O2 concentration measured at the end of the reach at the time ti, O2(ti ) is the O2 concentration at the end of the reach at the time ti is calculated with the model, and n is the number of observations. To judge the identifiability for model parameters, we calculated the collinearity index (γ ), which is a measure for the degree of approximate linear dependence of sensibility functions (Brun et al. 2001). Critical values of γ are in the range of 5 to 20. To evaluate the relative importance of ER, GPP, and the influence of temperature on both processes, we performed model runs by activating and deactivating primary production, respiration, and temperature dependence of both processes (i.e., by setting β = 1 or p or r = 0). To assess differences in sediment respiration rates and sediment organic matter, we used 2-way ANOVA. Prior to the analysis, respiration data were transformed (log(x + 1)). Temperature dependence of sediment respiration was evaluated using linear regression analysis. Differences or regressions were considered significant when P < 0.05. RESULTS Discharge measured on 3 occasions averaged 0.094 ± 0.007 m3s–1. At this flow rate, width and depth of the wetted channel averaged 6.6 m and 0.034 m, respectively, and mean current velocity was 0.41 ms–1. Between 0900 and 1200 hours, the main channel stage decreased by about 1 cm (presumably due to diel transpiration cycles of the riparian vegetation). As a consequence, the upper part of the small side channel fell dry each day during the investigation. A transient flow increase due to a rainstorm during the night of 31 October/ 1 November 1998 (flood marks indicated a stage increase by 3–5 cm) scoured some of the algal patches located along the margins of the wetted channel. Main channel surface water temperature varied between 12.4°C and 26.7°C (Table 1, Fig. 1). The high diel temperature variation of the interstitial water in the sediments of the wetted channel (∆T = 9.5°C) indicated a substantial water exchange between sediment and surface water. Temperature in the parafluvial HETEROTROPHY OF A DESERT STREAM 2002] 469 TABLE 1. Temperature of surface water and interstitial water (°C) in the Hassayamapa River. Temperatures were recorded in 10-minute intervals. Period Minimum Maximum Average Surface water Sediment below the main channela Saturated sediments of the parafluvial zoneb 27–31 Oct 12.4 26.7 17.4 27–30 Oct 14.1 23.6 17.6 30 Oct–2 Nov 13.0 15.3 14.3 a25 cm below the sediment water interface b25 cm below the water table zone averaged only 14.3°C, and diel variations were small (∆T = 2.3°C). This pattern suggests minor water exchange between surface water and parafluvial sediments. Relatively high concentrations of nitrate and SRP characterize the surface and interstitial water of the main channel (Table 2). Vertical concentration gradients of the interstitial water were small or absent, and even at 80 cm depth O2 was surprisingly high. In the parafluvial zone, O2 and nitrate concentrations were lower than in the channel sediments, and SRP increased with depth. We found higher DOC concentrations in parafluvial sediments than in channel sediments. Ammonium concentrations were relatively high and uniform at all sites. Differences in grain-size distribution between the channel and the parafluvial zone were small (Fig. 2). Apart from a narrow zone along the channel margins, surface bed sediments (D90 about 2 mm) were in continuous motion (based on average channel characteristics such as width, depth, slope, and D90, the discharge threshold for initiation of sediment transport, was estimated to be 0.078 m3s–1; Günther 1971). Sediment movement occurred between the beginning of October 1998 (1st visit to the site) and the end of the study in mid-November 1998, and also when we returned to the reach in February 1999. This bedload restricted habitats suitable for algae to small patches along the channel margins; we observed that more than 95% of the wetted channel area was free of algal patches visible by eye. Site (main channel, parafluvial zone) and depth had no significant effect on sediment organic matter, which averaged 4.0 ± 1.8 kg m–3 sediment (Table 3). Site and depth significantly influenced sediment respiration. Average respiration rates decreased by about 40% from the parafluvial zone to the main channel and by 30% from 10 Fig. 1. Top: Surface water temperature (bold line) in the main channel of the Hassayampa River and global radiation (fine line) at Wickenburg airport. Bottom: Dissolved oxygen concentration in the surface water of the main channel. to 30 cm depths (Table 3). During incubation, average temperatures in the sediment tubes ranged from 15.8°C to 24.5°C in the channel and from 12.5°C to 22.7°C in the parafluvial zone. However, the regression between the respiration rates and temperature was significant only for parafluvial sediments (R2 = 0.198). Oxygen concentrations in the surface water were always below saturation concentration and showed distinct diel variation (∆O2 = 2.3 ± 3 mg O2 L–1) with daily minimum in the early afternoon (between 1300 and 1500 hours; Fig. 1). The small spate of 30 October resulted in a distinct but transient increase in O2. The reaeration coefficient Ks (20°C) for O2 determined with the gas tracer method was 89 ± 18 d–1. Table 4 summarizes the results of a series of calculations with models of different complexity (number of active processes). The value of the collinearity index (γ < 5) points out that the 4 470 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 TABLE 2. Concentrations of oxygen, major nutrients, and DOC on 28 October and 1 November 1998 between 1100 and 1400 hours (channel surface water was also sampled on 27 October 1998). Main channel Surface water Sediments (depth 10 cma) Sediments (depth 30 cma) Sediments (depth 80 cma) Parafluvial zone Sediments (depth 10 cmb) Sediments (depth 30 cmb) Sediments (depth 80 cmb) O2 (mg L–1) NH4-N (µg L–1) NO3-N (µg L–1) SRP (µg L–1) DOC (mg L–1) 7.7 ± 0.4 6.8 ± 1.1 7.1 ± 0.7 7.3 ± 0.4 28 ± 15 20 ± 11 26 ± 23 26 ± 19 230 ± 15 278 ± 32 296 ± 20 302 ± 9 53 ± 1 48 ± 7 42 ± 14 51 ± <1 1.67 ± 0.12 1.61 ± 0.12 1.53 ± 0.07 1.52 ± 0.05 3.3 ± 3.6 2.8 ± 2.1 1.0 ± 0.3 23 ± 9 31 ± 14 30 ± 16 165 ± 139 288 ± 343 171 ± 164 58 ± 20 63 ± 15 73 ± 16 2.71 ± 1.58 2.30 ± 0.88 1.83 ± 0.39 aBelow the sediment-water interface bBelow the water table was the most parsimonious fit and led to good agreement between calculated and measured oxygen data. Estimates of daily gross primary production and ecosystem respiration based on fits 5, 6, and 7 are given in Table 5. We assume that the values provided by fits 5 and 6 most probably delimited the range of gross primary production and ecosystem respiration during the investigation. DISCUSSION Fig. 2. Grain-size distribution of main channel sediments (10 and 30 cm below the bed surface) and parafluvial sediments (10 and 30 cm below the water table) in the Hassayampa River. model parameters (ER, p, βr, βp) can be identified. The sum of squares (SS) of the basic model, which considered only gas exchange, was 145.9. Respiration had the largest influence on SS through all levels of model complexity and indicates the importance of this process for oxygen balance. In contrast, primary production had no (fits 1, 3, 4) or only a small effect (fits 6, 7). Temperature dependence of gross primary production and ecosystem respiration reduced SS to 17.0. However, we did not consider this model in the estimation of metabolism rates because βp became unrealistically high (a value βp = 1.2311 means an 8fold increase in gross primary production if temperature rises from 10°C to 20°C). Fit 5 As expected, heterotrophic processes dominated the metabolism of this desert stream. The permanent motion of the uppermost bed sediments in most parts of the wetted channel prevented substantial periphyton accrual and thus any substantial primary production. Apart from sediment stability, environmental conditions were favorable for the growth of benthic algae; the river was open canopied, the water was clear, and concentrations of major nutrient were high. Algal patches were restricted to areas with stable substrata such as channel margins, backwater areas, and parafluvial sediments inundated for only a few hours a day. However, the contribution of these stable areas to the wetted channel area was small (< 5%). The metabolism of the Hassayampa River was heterotrophic during this study; estimates of P/R ranged from 0 to 0.10 depending on the model applied (fits 5 and 6) to calculate metabolism rates. Ecosystem respiration rates were relatively small (1.33–1.50 g O2 m–2d–1) compared to rates reported from other desert streams (3.6–6.5 O2 m–2d–1; Grimm 1987, Cushing and Wolf 1984). Algae can provide significant quantities of dissolved and particulate HETEROTROPHY OF A DESERT STREAM 2002] 471 TABLE 3. Sediment respiration rates and sediment organic matter (mean and standard deviation) in the Hassayampa River measured on 29 and 31 October, and 10 November 1998. N = number of samples. Location Depth (cm) Respiration rate (g O2 m–3 sediment h–1) Organic matter (kg m–3 sediment) N 10a 30a 10b 30b 0.96 ± 0.11 0.55 ± 0.31 1.39 ± 0.82 0.78 ± 0.31 3.8 ± 1.8 4.4 ± 1.9 4.2 ± 1.9 4.4 ± 1.2 22 9 21 6 Main channel Parafluvial zone aBelow the sediment-water interface bBelow the water table TABLE 4. Evaluation of the processes influencing the oxygen balance in the Hassayampa River. Reaeration, Ks(20°C), was measured (see text). The other parameters were fitted to the models defined by equations 1, 2, and 3. Standard error estimates are in parentheses; empty cells mark the parameters not included in a fit. Number of parameters fitted Ks(20°C) (d–1) — 1 2 0 1 1 89 89 89 3 4 5 2 2 2 89 89 89 6 3 89 7 4 89 Fit no. ER (g O2 m–2d–1) P (g O2 W–1d–1) βr βp 2.90 10–7 a 1.290 (0.021) 1.295a 1.476 (0.022) 1.707 (0.038) 1.958 (0.049) 2.77.10–7 a 0.00a 9.04 10–4 (1.27 10–4) 9.72 10–4 (1.30 10–4) 1.00001a 1.0502 (0.0034) 1.0698 (0.0046) 1.1087 (0.0060) 1.2311 (0.0216) SS γ 145.9 145.9 25.8 — 1.00 1.00 145.9 25.8 20.3 4.04 1.82 1.53 19.0 3.19 17.0 4.47 aStandard error could not be estimated. organic matter supporting respiration in the hyporheic zone (Jones et al. 1995). We suggest that the lack of a substantial algal community may account for the low ecosystem respiration rates, and we hypothesize that organic matter released by macrophytes of the riverine marshes and the riparian vegetation, in addition to organic matter buried during floods, may have fueled sediment respiration. Organic matter from riverine marshlands and the riparian vegetation bordering the investigated parafluvial zone may have accounted for the differences in respiration rates between parafluvial and channel sediments; the differences in DOC concentrations between the parafluvial zone and channel sediments may reflect different organic matter sources. Sediment organic matter in the Hassayampa River averaged 4.0 kg m–3 sediment in the uppermost 30 cm, which is in the range of values reported from Sycamore Creek (2.8–5.7 kg m–3 sediment in the top 15 cm; Valett et al. 1990). This material is presumably of suboptimal quality, but it is an energy reservoir that may increase the resistance of stream metabolism to short-term environmental fluctuations. Sediment organic matter was homogeneously distributed in the uppermost 30 cm of the sediments (channel and saturated parafluvial zone), but respiration rates significantly decreased from 10 to 30 cm depth. This may reflect the increasing refractory nature of the sediment organic matter with depth. One prediction of the river continuum concept is that changes in the relative importance of primary production and respiration for energy flow through lotic ecosystems can be attributed to changes in stream size and riparian vegetation (Vannote et al. 1980); for example, environmental settings in arid or semiarid regions were found to favor high rates of primary production exceeding ecosystem respiration (Minshall 1978, Lamberti and Steinman 1997, Sinsabaugh 1997). However, this study and recent investigations indicate that the stability of bed sediments has to be considered in WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST 472 TABLE 5. Gross primary production, ecosystem respiration, and P/R (average and standard deviation) in the Hassayampa River, 28–31 October 1998. Daily rates (g O2 m–2d–1) were calculated with 3 models of different complexity (fits 5, 6, and 7; Table 4). Model (fit) 5 6 7 Gross primary production Ecosystem respiration P/R 0.00 0.15 ± 0.03 0.29 ± 0.10 1.33 ± 0.05 1.50 ± 0.07 1.65 ± 0.13 0.00 0.10 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.05 predictions on the relative importance of stream metabolism (Uehlinger and Naegeli 1998, Uehlinger 2000). During high flow, bed sediments may become unstable, which mainly affects benthic algae and primary production (Fisher et al. 1982, Uehlinger and Naegeli 1998). But the effects of such events are usually transient because spates are limited in time and primary production recovers more or less rapidly depending on environmental conditions (Fisher et al. 1982, Uehlinger and Naegeli 1998, Uehlinger 2000). At the Morristown gage (about 6 km downstream of our study site), spates were recorded on 29 March 1998 (Qmax = 21 m3s–1) and on 12 August 1998 (Qmax ≈ 2 m3s–1). During the spate-free period between August 1998 and the beginning of our measurements, permanently moving bed sediments apparently prevented periphyton accrual in most parts of the channel; i.e., sediment instability seems to account for a persistent dominance of heterotrophic processes in the metabolism of this warm desert stream. Streams with sandy, unstable sediments can be found throughout the semiarid Southwest of North America, though we do not know the extent to which they comprise a significant proportion of southwestern river habitat. Conditions of high bedload may be restricted to certain segments or transient (e.g., during the wet season). In the Hassayampa River, for example, the study reach represented a particular successional stage of a desert river corridor. Large floods dramatically change prevailing substrata and the spatial extent of the wetted channel, parafluvial zones, riverine marshes, floodplain forests, and shrublands within the river corridor (Stromberg et al. 1997). Such flood-induced alterations in the configuration of the river corridor may affect stream metabolism. Studies of stream metabolism in the arid West of North America indicate that desert [Volume 62 streams are autotrophic ecosystems (Minshall 1978, Cushing and Wolf 1984, Grimm 1987). The results of this investigation suggest that heterotrophic processes may dominate the metabolism of desert stream segments over extended periods of time if unstable sandy bed sediments prevail. However, a test of this hypothesis needs reliable estimates of annual metabolism rates. Such estimates require measurements at least during one annual cycle and with a temporal resolution that accounts for the hydrological disturbance regime of these systems. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Cathy Kochert for analyzing chemical parameters, Jennifer Zachary for POM and grain-size distribution analysis, and the stream group at ASU for their valuable support. We appreciate the critical comments of Nancy Grimm, James Ward, and 2 anonymous reviewers. LITERATURE CITED BOWIE, G.L., W.B. MILLS, D.B. PORCELLA, C.L. CAMPBELL, J.R. PAGENKOPF, G.L. RUPP, K.M. JOHNSON, ET AL. 1985. Rates, constants, and kinetics formulations in surface water quality modeling. United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA. 455 pp. BRUN R., P. REICHERT, AND H.R. KÜNSCH. 2001. Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models. Water Resources Research 37: 1015–1030. CUSHING, C.E., 1997. Organic matter dynamics in Rattlesnake Springs, Washington, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16:39–43. CUSHING, C.E., AND E.G. WOLF. 1984. Primary production in Rattlesnake Springs, a cold desert spring stream. Hydrobiologia 114:229–236. DUFFER, W.R., AND T.C. DORRIS. 1966. Primary productivity in a Southern Great Plains stream. Limnology and Oceanography 11:143–151. ELMORE, H.L., AND W.F. WEST. 1961. Effect of water temperature on stream reaeration. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers 87:59–17. FISHER, S.G., L.J. GRAY, N.B. GRIMM, AND D.E. BUSCH. 1982. Temporal succession in a desert stream ecosystem following flash flooding. Ecological Monographs 52:93–110. GENEREUX, D.P., AND H.F. HEMOND. 1992. Determination of gas exchange rate constants for a small stream on Walker Branch Watershed, Tennessee. Water Resources Research 28:2365–2374. GORDON, N.D., T.A. MCMAHON, AND B.L. FINLAYSON. 1992. Stream hydrology. An introduction for ecologists. Wiley, Chichester. 526 pp. GRIMM, N.B. 1987. Nitrogen dynamics during succession in a desert stream. Ecology 68:1157–1170. 2002] HETEROTROPHY OF A DESERT STREAM GRIMM, N.B., AND S.G. FISHER. 1984. Exchange between interstitial and surface water: implications for stream metabolism and nutrient cycling. Hydrobiologia 111:219–228. ______. 1989. Stability of periphyton and macroinvertebrates to disturbances by flash floods in a desert stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8:293–238. GÜNTER, A. 1971. Die kritische mittlere Sohlenschubspannung bei Geschiebemischungen unter Berücksichtigung der Deckschichtbildung und der turbulenzbedingten Sohlenschubspannungsschwankungen. Mitteilung VAW 3, Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich. 70 pp. HOLMES, R.M., S.G. FISHER, N.B. GRIMM, AND B.J. HARPER. 1998. The impact of flash floods on microbial distribution and biogeochemistry in the parafluvial zone of a desert stream. Freshwater Biology 40:641–654. HORNBERGER, G.M., M.G. KELLY, AND R.M. ELLER. 1976. The relationship between light and photosynthetic rate in a river community and implications for water quality modeling. Water Resources Research 12: 723–730 JENKINS, M.E. 1989. Surface and groundwater assessments, supporting in-stream flow protection at the Hassayampa River Preserve, Wickenburg, Arizona. Pages 307–316 in W.W. Woessner and D.F. Potts, editors, Symposium proceedings on headwaters hydrology. American Water Resources Association, Bethesda, MD. JONES, J.B., S.G. FISHER, AND N.B. GRIMM. 1995. Vertical hydrological exchange and ecosystem metabolism in a Sonoran Desert stream. Ecology 76:942–952. LAMBERTI, G.A., AND A.D. STEINMAN. 1997. A comparison of primary production in stream ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthoglogical Society 16: 95–104. MINSHALL, G.W. 1978. Autotrophy in stream ecosystems. BioScience 28:767–771. MULHOLLAND, P.J., E.R. MARZOLF, J.R. WEBSTER, D.R. HART, AND S.P. HENDRICKS. 1997. Evidence that hyporheic zones increase heterotrophic metabolism and phosphorus uptake in forest streams. Limnology and Oceanography 42:443–451. NAEGELI, M.W., AND U. UEHLINGER. 1997. Contribution of the hyporheic zone to ecosystem metabolism in a prealpine gravel-bed river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16:794–804. PRACH, K., J. JENÍK, AND A.R.G. LARGE. 1996. Floodplain ecology and management. The Luznice River in the Trebon Biospere Reserve, Central Europe. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 285 pp. 473 REICHERT, P. 1994. AQUASIM—a tool for simulation and data analysis of aquatic systems. Water Science and Technology 30:21–30. ______. Design techniques of a computer program for the identification of processes and the simulation of water quality in aquatic systems. Environmental Software 10:199–210. ROBERTSON, A.I., S.E. BUNN, P.I. BOON, AND K.F. WALKER. 1999. Sources, sinks and transformation in Australian floodplain rivers 50:813–829. SCHADE, J.D., AND S.G. FISHER. 1997. Leaf litter in a Sonoran Desert stream ecosystem. Journal of the North American Benthoglogical Society 16:612–626. SINSABAUGH, R.L. 1997. Large-scale trends for stream benthic respiration. Journal of the North American Benthoglogical Society 16:119–122. STROMBERG, J.C., J. FRY, AND D.T. PATTEN. 1997. Marsh development after large floods in an alluvial aridland river. Wetlands 17:292–300. STROMBERG, J.C., B.D. RICHTER, D.T. PATTEN, AND L.G. WOLDEN. 1993. Response of a Sonoran riparian forest to a 10-year return flood. Great Basin Naturalist 53:118–130. UEHLINGER, U. 1993. Primary production and respiration in the outlet of an eutrophic lake (River Glatt, Switzerland). Archiv für Hydrobiologie 128:39–55. ______. 2000 Resistance and resilience of ecosystem metabolism in a flood-prone river system. Freshwater Biology 45:319–332. UEHLINGER, U., AND M.W. NAEGELI. 1998. Ecosystem metabolism, disturbance, and stability in a prealpine gravel bed river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 17:165–178. UEHLINGER, U., C. KÖNIG, AND P. REICHERT. 2000. Variability of photosynthesis-irradiance curves and ecosystem respiration in a small river. Freshwater Biology 44:493–507. VALLET, H.M., S.G. FISHER, AND E.H. STANLEY. 1990. Physical and chemical characteristics of the hyporheic zone of a Sonoran Desert stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 9:201–215. VANNOTE, R.L., G.W. MINSHALL, K.W. CUMMINS, J.R. SEDELL, AND C.E. CUSHING. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:130–137. WOLDEN, L.G., J.C. STROMBERG, AND D.T. PATTEN. 1994. Flora and vegetation of the Hassayampa River Preserve Maricopa County, Arizona. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 1:76–111. Received 7 June 2001 Accepted 6 November 2001 Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 474–478 A SEED CHALCID (EURYTOMA SQUAMOSA BUGBEE) PARASITIZES BUCKBRUSH (CEANOTHUS FENDLERI GRAY) SEEDS IN A PONDEROSA PINE FOREST OF ARIZONA David W. Huffman1 ABSTRACT.—Predispersal seed parasitism rates were quantified for buckbrush (Ceanothus fendleri Gray) in 3 Arizona ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Laws.) forest units that had been thinned for ecological restoration objectives. The chalcidoid wasp Eurytoma squamosa Bugbee (Eurytomidae) was responsible for 35% of total seed loss in a single year. These findings represent an expansion of the known range and host list for E. squamosa and increase our understanding of factors that may constrain regeneration of C. fendleri in Southwest ponderosa pine forests. Key words: predispersal seed predation, range expansion, Hymenoptera, Eurytoma squamosa, Ceanothus fendleri, ecological restoration, plant-insect interactions, parasitism. In ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Laws.) forests of the Southwest, ecological restoration treatments have been initiated that include thinning dense stands of young trees and applying low-intensity fire (Covington and Moore 1994, Covington et al. 1997, Moore et al. 1999). Although reestablishment of ecological function is theorized to flow from overstory structural manipulation and the reintroduction of surface fire, ecological interactions, particularly between arthropods and understory plant hosts, have been minimally researched. In 1999 I began a study to examine various factors affecting regeneration of Ceanothus fendleri Gray in areas undergoing ecological restoration treatments. Ceanothus fendleri is a shrub common in the understory of ponderosa pine forests in the Southwest. It is a preferred browse of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus Rafinesque; Urness et al. 1975), a nitrogen fixer (Story 1974), and a provider of structural heterogeneity in predominantly grassy and herbaceous understory communities. Resprouting of C. fendleri after disturbances such as fire is common (Pearson et al. 1972, Ffolliott et al. 1977, Vose and White 1991). Its seeds are forcibly ejected from dehiscing capsules and likely remain in forest floor seed banks for years until stimulated by heat from fire to germinate (Kearney and Peebles 1951, Reed 1974, Krishnan 1989). Large ungulate use of understory forage can increase after forest thinning (Patton 1974), and herbivory on C. fendleri can be intense and constrain flower and fruit production (Huffman and Moore in preparation). Other factors that likely affect C. fendleri regeneration and vary with forest condition include seed predation and parasitism. Prior to this study, rates of seed parasitism and predation had not been reported for C. fendleri, although nearly complete predispersal consumption of seed crops by invertebrates has been reported for overstory ponderosa pine (Blake et al. 1985). The objectives of my research were to (1) collect preliminary data on predispersal seed parasitism for Ceanothus fendleri in areas thinned for ecological restoration objectives and (2) identify common insect species infesting C. fendleri seeds. Information concerning processes that affect ovule and seed fate can help resource managers predict rates of ecological recovery in communities undergoing restoration treatments. METHODS The study was conducted from 1999 to 2000 on the Fort Valley Experimental Forest (latitude 35°16′N, longitude 111°41′W) in Coconino County approximately 10 km northwest of Flagstaff, Arizona. The site is approximately 2300 m above mean sea level and has flat to gently rolling topography with slopes 1Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5017. 474 2002] SEED CHALCID PARASITIZES BUCKBRUSH generally less than 20%. Annual precipitation averages 52 cm, of which approximately half falls as snow in late winter. Soils are moderately well drained and classified as Brolliar stony clay loam (Meurisse 1971) developed from tertiary basalt parent material. Overstory vegetation is nearly pure ponderosa pine with scattered occurrence of Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii Nutt.). Common understory species include bunchgrasses Festuca arizonica Vasey, Muhlenbergia montana (Nutt.) A.S. Hitchc., Elymus elymoides (Raf.) Swezey, and Blepharoneuron tricholepis (Torr.) Nash; forbs Lupinus spp., Erigergon spp., Erigonium spp., Achillea millifolium L., and Antennaria spp.; and woody shrubs Ceanothus fendleri and Rosa woodsii Lindl. Large mammalian herbivores present on the site are mule deer and elk (Cervus elaphus Linnaeus). Livestock were excluded from the study site. Overstory trees were thinned in February 1999, which reduced tree density in three 15-ha experimental forest restoration units to approximately 111–120 trees per hectare. In May 1999, I established 60 plots (4 m2 in size) centered on Ceanothus fendleri shrubs in each of the 3 restoration units (180 shrub plots total). Ceanothus fendleri plants on these plots produced no fruit in 1999. Therefore, I collected seeds from C. fendleri shrubs growing on microsites adjacent to the restoration units and monitored parasite emergence from these seeds until June 2001. Adult parasites emerging were captured and immediately preserved in 70% isopropyl alcohol. Specimens were sent to Dr. Robert Zuparko at the California Academy of Science (CAS), San Francisco, California, USA, and to the USDA Systematic Entomology Laboratory (SEL; specimens identified by E. Eric Grissell, Research Entomologist), Bethesda, Maryland, USA, for identification. Fruit developed on 11 total C. fendleri plots in July 2000. To capture seeds as fruits dehisced, I installed seed traps constructed from bridal veil material (mesh size <2 mm) tied around fruiting stems. Twenty-three traps were installed on 1 to 5 stems per plot and each enclosed 1 to 14 fruits. Seeds collected from traps were separated from plant debris and counted in the laboratory. Seeds were classified as “developed” or “undeveloped.” Developed seeds were approximately 2 mm in diameter, had smooth, full 475 seed coats, and were glossy brown in appearance (Fig. 1a). In contrast, undeveloped seeds were typically smaller than 2 mm and flattened; additionally, they had wrinkled, yellowish seed coats (Fig. 1b). Seeds were examined under a dissecting scope (10–20X) for parasite emergence holes or other signs of infestation and then dissected to determine embryo condition and presence of parasite larvae/pupae. RESULTS Parasite specimens collected as they emerged from 1999 seeds were all from a single chalcidoid wasp species, Eurytoma squamosa Bugbee (Eurytomidae; Figs. 1c–d). Although emergence was not specifically studied, I observed adult wasps emerging up to 20 months after the 1999 seed collection. A total of 144 seeds were recovered in 2000 from traps installed on C. fendleri fruiting stems. Each trap yielded 1 to 24 seeds. Fifty percent of the seeds captured were undeveloped (Table 1), and in these seeds no parasite larvae or signs of infestation were found. Parasitism was responsible for 35% of the total seed loss and 71% of the loss of developed seeds (Table 1). No clear trends were observed for rate of parasitism and number of seeds per trap or seeds per plot. Parasite emergence holes in developed seeds were approximately 0.5 mm in diameter (Fig. 1e). Embryonic tissue of seeds with emergence holes was completely consumed, leaving the seeds hollow. Seeds housing parasite larvae showed no external signs of infestation. Emergence hole appearance (i.e., size and shape) was consistent between seeds trapped in 2000 and those collected in 1999. Likewise, characteristics of larvae within dissected seeds of both collections were consistent. We found no evidence of other parasitic species associated with C. fendleri seeds. The majority of developed seeds that had not been parasitized were filled with apparently healthy embryos (Fig. 1f, Table 1). However, approximately 3% of these showed no signs of parasitism but were hollow nonetheless. DISCUSSION These results represent an expansion of the known range and host list for Eurytoma squamosa. Prior to this study, this wasp species was not known to occur in Arizona or on Ceanothus 476 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 Fig. 1. Images (10–20X) showing (a) normally developed seeds of Ceanothus fendleri, (b) undeveloped seeds, (c) adult parasite Eurytoma squamosa, (d) emerging seed parasite, (e) characteristic emergence holes made by seed parasite, and (f) cross-section of developed seed with healthy embryo. fendleri. Occurrence of the species has been reported in Idaho, Washington, and California, USA (Bugbee 1967). In these states its hosts are other species of Ceanothus including C. divaricatus, C. thyraiflorus, C. cordulatus, C. velutinus, and C. sanguineus. For C. sanguineus in Idaho, E. squamosa and 2 other phytophagous insects were responsible for an average loss of 9–27% of total seeds in fruits over a 3-year period (Furniss et al. 1978). Another Eurytoma species (E. greggii Bugbee) has been reported to infest >80% of the seeds of Ceanothus greggii Gray in chaparral ecosystems of Arizona (Bugbee 1971). Seed chalcids are well-known parasites of seeds of commercial tree species such as ponderosa pine in SEED CHALCID PARASITIZES BUCKBRUSH 2002] 477 TABLE 1. Fate of seeds collected from Ceanothus fendleri plants in ponderosa pine forests of northern Arizona. Developed _____________________________________________ a Parasitized ____________________ Seeds Undeveloped Total Number Percentage of developed seeds Emerged 37 Larval 14 Filled 19 Hollow 2 72 144 51.4 19.4 26.4 2.7 — 100 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL 25.7 9.7 13.2 1.3 50 100 aParasites (Eurytoma squamosa) either had emerged prior to seed collection or were found within seeds as larvae or pupae. northern Arizona (e.g., Blake et al. 1985), but little research has quantified parasitism on understory plants. With the data presented here, long-term effects of seed parasitism on Ceanothus fendleri regeneration are difficult to determine. Traits such as innate dormancy suggest that C. fendleri utilizes a seed bank strategy similar to congeneric species (Quick 1935, Reed 1974, Conard et al. 1985, Krishnan 1989). However, resprouting after disturbance is also common (Ffolliott et al. 1977, Vose and White 1991). Thus, although my data suggest that E. squamosa constrained replenishment of seeds in soil seed banks, temporal patterns of seed parasitism and the relative importance of sprouting versus seedling recruitment for C. fendleri persistence are not yet clear. Presettlement characteristics of C. fendleri– E. squamosa interactions are not known. Plausibly, frequent surface fires common in ponderosa pine forests prior to Anglo and Hispanic settlement of northern Arizona (ca 1876; Fulé et al. 1997) could have functioned to control larval populations of E. squamosa in dispersed seeds. Fires heating C. fendleri seeds in soil seed banks may have caused wasp mortality while stimulating seed germination. Thus, future research could address questions related to fire or heat effects on parasite and seed survival and seed germination. Studies illuminating presettlement conditions with respect to plant–insect interactions could help ecologists and land managers expand their understanding of ecosystem dynamics and, in turn, make informed decisions concerning forest restoration and management. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Dr. Margaret M. Moore and Amy Waltz for insightful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript and W. Walker Chancellor for field assistance. This project was funded by USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station–Northern Arizona University School of Forestry, Research Joint Venture Agreement RMRS-99167-RJVA. LITERATURE CITED BLAKE, E.A., M.R. WAGNER, AND T.W. KOERBER. 1985. Insects destructive to ponderosa pine cone crops in northern Arizona. Conifer Tree Seed in the Inland Mountain West Symposium, 5–6 August 1985, Missoula, MT. BUGBEE, R.E. 1967. Revision of chalcid wasps of genus Eurytoma in America north of Mexico. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 118:433–552. ______. 1971. A new species of Arizona Eurytoma phytophagous in Ceanothus greggii seeds. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 44:111–112. CONARD, S.G., A.E. JARAMILLO, K. CROMACK, JR., AND S. ROSE. 1985. The role of the genus Ceanothus in western forest ecosystems. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-182. COVINGTON, W.W., AND M.M. MOORE. 1994. Southwestern ponderosa forest structure: changes since Euro-American settlement. Journal of Forestry 92(1):39–47. COVINGTON, W.W., P.Z. FULÉ, M.M. MOORE, S.C. HART, T.E. KOLB, J.N. MAST, S.S. SACKETT, AND M.R. WAGNER. 1997. Restoring ecosystem health in ponderosa pine forests of the Southwest. Journal of Forestry 95(4):23–29. FFOLLIOTT, P.F., W.P. CLARY, AND F.R LARSON. 1977. Effects of a prescribed fire in an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. USDA Forest Service Research Note RM-336. FULÉ, P.Z., W.W. COVINGTON, AND M.M. MOORE. 1997. Determining reference conditions for ecosystem management of southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Ecological Applications 7:895–908. FURNISS, M.M., T.A. LEEGE, AND R.J. NASKALI. 1978. Insects that reduce redstem Ceanothus seed production in Idaho. In: Proceedings of the First International Rangeland Congress. KEARNEY, T.H., AND R.H. PEEBLES. 1951. Arizona flora. University of California Press, Los Angeles. KRISHNAN, S. 1989. Propagation of four native drought tolerant shrubs—Ceanothus spp. and Sherpherdia spp. Master’s thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. 478 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST MEURISSE, R.T. 1971. Soil report on the San Francisco Peaks area, Elden and Flagstaff Ranger Districts, Coconino National Forests. USDA Forest Service (unpublished). MOORE, M.M., W.W. COVINGTON, AND P.Z. FULÉ. 1999. Reference conditions and ecological restoration: a southwestern ponderosa pine perspective. Ecological Applications 9:1266–1277. PATTON, D.R. 1974. Patch cutting increases deer and elk use of a pine forest in Arizona. Journal of Forestry 72:764–766. PEARSON, H.A., J.R. DAVIS, AND G.H. SCHUBERT. 1972. Effects of wildfire on timber and forage production in Arizona. Journal of Range Management 25:250–253. QUICK, C.R. 1935. Notes on the germination of Ceanothus seeds. Madroño 3:345–346. REED, M.J. 1974. Ceanothus L. ceanothus. In: C.S. Schopmeyer, technical coordinator, Seeds of woody plants in the United States. USDA Handbook 450. [Volume 62 STORY, M.T. 1974. Nitrogen fixation by Ceanothus fendleri and Lupinus argenteus as a function of parent material and vegetal cover. Master’s thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson. URNESS, P.J., D.J. NEFF, AND R.K. WATKINS. 1975. Nutritive value of mule deer forages on ponderosa pine summer range in Arizona. USDA Forest Service Research Note RM-304, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. VOSE, J.M., AND A.S. WHITE. 1991. Biomass response mechanisms of understory species the first year after prescribed burning in an Arizona ponderosa-pine community. Forest Ecology and Management 40: 175–187. Received 7 February 2001 Accepted 25 September 2001 Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 479–483 NEST SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF THE WESTERN TANAGER (PIRANGA LUDOVICIANA) ON THE COLORADO FRONT RANGE Karen N. Fischer1, John W. Prather1,2, and Alexander Cruz1 ABSTRACT.—From 1999 through 2001 we located and monitored Western Tanager (Piranga ludoviciana) nests in public open-space properties in Boulder County, Colorado. Fifty-four of 58 nests were located in ponderosa pine and the remainder in Douglas-fir. Nests were generally placed near the midpoint of branches in areas of high canopy cover (>50%) in the middle section of nest trees. Nest height varied as a function of nest tree height, and nests were oriented randomly in relation to trunks of nest trees. Tanager nesting success varied annually, with estimates using the Mayfield method ranging from 11.3% in 2000 to 75.3% in 2001. At least 8 nests were predated, and predation was the primary cause of nest failure. Parasitism by Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater) occurred in 7 of 17 (41%) nests found during egg-laying or incubation. Clutch size averaged 3.8 in 10 unparasitized nests, but only 2.4 in 8 parasitized nests. Brood parasitism dramatically reduced the number of tanager fledglings produced per nest. Key words: Western Tanager, Piranga ludoviciana, breeding biology, nest site selection, Colorado. The Western Tanager (Piranga ludoviciana), a neotropical migrant, is widespread throughout western portions of the United States and Canada. Breeding occurs in open, mixed coniferous-deciduous forests from the southeastern tip of Alaska to the Trans-Pecos region of Texas (Hudon 1999) and east as far as western South Dakota (Peterson 1995). In Colorado the Western Tanager occurs primarily from mid-May until mid-September in montane portions of the state (Andrews and Righter 1992, Versaw 1998). Western Tanager nests are difficult to locate and monitor since they are often high and well hidden in conifers. Few studies have examined ecological factors that influence reproductive success in the Western Tanager, and most of these are anecdotal or unpublished. To the best of our knowledge, a study by Hudon (1999) in Alberta (n = 7) and Goguen and Mathews (1998) in New Mexico (n = 39) are the only ones that have examined in detail the breeding biology and nest site characteristics of this species. In addition, Project Tanager, conducted by the Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, examined the effects of habitat fragmentation on tanager species breeding in North America (Rosenberg et al. 1999), but it has limited information on breeding biology or microhabitat characteristics of nest sites ( Jim Lowe personal communication). From 1998 through 2001 we collected data on the breeding biology of neotropical migratory birds on open-space properties in Boulder County, Colorado. We present here information on the nest site selection and reproductive success of the Western Tanager. STUDY AREAS Nests were located on open-space properties maintained by the city and county of Boulder at elevations of 1600–1900 m in the foothills west of Boulder, Colorado (40°0′N, 105°16′W). On these properties we searched for nests every 2–3 days on 10 plots ranging from 6 to 24 ha in size. These plots are dominated by ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) woodland and savannah with a mixture of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) at higher elevations. Riparian corridors border some plots, although we located no nests in riparian vegetation. Neither did we locate nests in residential areas, though once again such areas bordered on some plots. All of our plots were within a few kilometers of the city of Boulder and were subject to varying degrees of human disturbance. 1Environmental, Population, and Organismic Biology Department, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0334. 2Corresponding author. Present address: Center for Environmental Science and Education, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5694. 479 480 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST METHODS We monitored nests at intervals of 2–4 days (normally every 3 days) following standard nest-monitoring protocols (Ralph et al. 1993), until they were no longer active. Attempts were made to limit nest failure due to factors associated with nest monitoring (Martin and Geupel 1993). We determined nest contents by direct observation or by using a 6-m mirror pole whenever possible, but some nests were too high for contents to be monitored safely. For nests that we were unable to directly determine the contents, we relied on adult behavior and nest condition to ascertain whether the nest was active, predated, or abandoned. A search for fledglings was conducted in the vicinity of every nest in which chicks were presumed to have fledged. All nests that were confirmed as being active, either by monitoring the contents or by observing adults sitting on and/or visiting the nest with food, were included in this study. After nests were no longer active, we measured habitat characteristics at each site using standardized protocols ( James and Shugart 1970, Martin and Roper 1988). For each nest we measured nest tree height, nest tree diameter (dbh), canopy cover over the nest, distance of nest to trunk and to tip of supporting branch, and height of the lowest living branch on the nest tree. All distances were measured with a measuring tape whenever possible. However, it was usually necessary to measure heights of tall trees and higher nests using a Suunto PM-5/360 PC clinometer. Canopy cover was measured by averaging 4 measurements taken with a Lemmon model-A convex spherical densiometer at a distance of 1 m from the nest in the 4 cardinal directions (Lemmon 1957). Additionally, we measured slope and aspect of the terrain around the nest site using a compass and the clinometer. Finally, we documented the location of each nest using a Garmin GPS-12 global positioning system. We calculated nest success following the method proposed by Mayfield (1975), incorporating modifications suggested by Manolis et al. (2000). For nests of unknown fate, we used the last day the nest was observed to be active as the last active date; for nests of known fate, we used the midpoint between the last active day and the day the nest was observed to be empty or destroyed. We used estimates of the [Volume 62 egg-laying/incubation period (13 days) and nestling period (12 days) from a subsample of our own nests from which we could obtain this data (see below). Shapiro-Wilks W-tests were used to determine whether Western Tanager nests were normally distributed in their placement in relation to measured habitat variables. Linear regression and/or Student’s t tests also were used to search for patterns in nest placement in relation to measured habitat variables. All aforementioned tests were carried out using JMP statistical software (SAS Institute 1995). In addition, we used a Rayleigh test (Zar 1999) to determine if there was a significant directional component to nest orientation in relation to the trunk of the nest tree. Means and standard deviations are provided for numerical data whenever applicable. RESULTS We located 17 nests in both 1999 and 2000 and 24 nests in 2001, for a total of 58 nests. Half of these nests came from 2 plots on which we located 75% or more of the active tanager nests in each season; the remainder were located in less rigorously searched areas. Using nests with known dates of laying and fledging, and those for which dates could be extrapolated from available data, we determined that the breeding season extended from 28 May through 29 July. Active nests were observed from 2 June through 29 July. The peak of the breeding season (at least 50% of nests active) occurred between 6 June and 1 July. We have no evidence of 2nd broods. We found 54 of 58 nests in ponderosa pine and the remaining 4 in Douglas-fir. In general, tanager nests were well hidden along midpoints of branches in the middle portion of nest trees. Canopy cover was high at all nest sites, averaging 71%, and never being less than 31%. This distribution was slightly skewed from normal, with more nests at lower canopy coverage (W = 0.95, P = 0.055). Nests were placed an average of 63% of the distance out toward the tip of the branch in a distribution that was skewed toward the end of the branch (W = 0.95, P = 0.054). Nests were distributed normally in relation to the height of the nest tree (W = 0.97, P = 0.378), with the mean of the distribution at 54% of the height of the tree. Tree height was a good predictor of nest height 2002] WESTERN TANAGER REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS (F = 27.96, R2 = 0.34, P < 0.001). We found no significant patterns of nest placement in relation to the other habitat variables that we measured. Nest orientation in relation to trunk of the nest tree was not significantly different from uniform (Rayleigh’s R = 10.84, z = 1.99, P = 0.16), although there was a slight bias in number of nests oriented toward the south and east. Twenty-nine nests (50%) were oriented between 80° and 200°. The egg-laying and incubation period lasted 13.0 ± 2 days (range 11–15, n = 3). Nestlings remained in the nest for 12.2 ± 1.5 days after the initial egg hatched (range 11–14, n = 4). One additional nest that fledged young in only 8 days may have fledged only a cowbird. A few late nests may have been 2nd nesting attempts due to a previous failure. Mean clutch size for nests not parasitized by Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater) was 3.8 ± 0.4 (n = 10). Eight of 18 (44%) nests found during egg-laying or incubation were known to be parasitized by cowbirds. These nests contained an average of 2.4 ± 0.9 tanager eggs and 1.1 ± 0.4 cowbird eggs (n = 8). Of 38 nests with known outcome, 28 (74%) successfully fledged at least 1 young (Table 1). Mean number of fledglings produced by all nests with known outcome and for which actual numbers of fledglings could be determined was 1.0 ± 1.3 (n = 28). This number is less than the number of nests with known outcome since we could not accurately determine how many young fledged from 10 successful nests. Mean number of fledglings produced by successful nests that were not parasitized was 2.7 ± 0.7 (n = 15), while parasitized nests fledged only 0.7 ± 1.2 tanager young (n = 3). Mayfield nest success was calculated to be 51.8% for all years combined, but it varied dramatically between years (Table 1). Mayfield nest success was lower than apparent nest success due to the large number of nests located after hatching of the eggs. DISCUSSION In Colorado the breeding season for Western Tanagers appears to begin in late May and end in early August. We found tanager nests with eggs as early as 2 June, with an estimated 1st date of laying of 28 May. Active nests were present on our study sites through at least 29 481 July. Records of active nests from the Colorado Breeding Bird Atlas range from 1 June through 7 August (Versaw 1998). Initiation of the breeding season occurs between mid-May and mid-June in most areas (Hudon 1999). We found only a few patterns in the placement of nests in relation to habitat characteristics. Tanagers did not appear to preferentially orient their nests in relation to the trunk of the nest tree. There was a slight directional component to nest placement (mean orientation 132°), but this was not significantly different from uniform. In general, tanager nests were located on large branches near the middle of nest trees. All but 1 nest were placed 30–90% of the distance from the trunk of the tree to the tip of the branch, in locations with high overhead canopy. Unlike other studies, which have generally reported tanagers as nesting very near tips of branches (Hudon 1999), we rarely found nests in such sites. We believe this may be because high canopy cover is important to Western Tanagers. In ponderosa pines, which often have a distinctly conical shape, nests placed at the tips of branches would normally be very exposed. Therefore, nests may be placed somewhat closer to the trunk of ponderosa pines than they would be in other trees. High canopy cover (77 ± 12%) was also reported over tanager nests in New Mexico (Hudon 1999). In Colorado, as in other areas (Hudon 1999), Western Tanagers appear to lay 4 eggs normally. We have data on incubation and nestling periods for very few nests since the majority of nests were located after young had hatched. However, these data also support conclusions from other studies. Our nests followed through incubation had eggs hatch in 11–13 days, as compared to other studies that report 13–14 days (Versaw 1998, Hudon 1999). Additionally, the mean nestling period for nests in our study was 12.2 days, which is close to the mean of 11.3 days reported by Hudon (1999). Nesting success was high in 1999 and 2001 but low in 2000 due to a high rate of predation (Table 1). Nests normally fledged fewer young than eggs laid. Because so few nests have been located during egg-laying and incubation, few studies have reported rates or effects of cowbird parasitism on breeding Western Tanagers. Prior to this study there were only a few records of cowbird parasitism on tanager nests in Colorado (Chace and Cruz 1996, Versaw 1998). 482 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 TABLE 1. Clutch size and reproductive success of Western Tanagers breeding around Boulder, Colorado, 1999–2001. Year 1999 2000 2001 Total No. nests No. successful No. predated No. abandoned No. unknown No. parasitizeda 17 7 (41%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 8 (47%) 1 (17%) 17 7 (41%) 5 (29%) 0 5 (29%) 2 (40%) 24 14 (58%) 1 (4%) 1 (4%) 8 (33%) 5 (71%) 58 28 (48%) 7 (12%) 2 (05%) 21 (36%) 8 (44%) 3.8 (n = 5) 4.0 (n = 3) 3.5 (n = 2) 3.8 (n = 10) 97 69.9 ± 15.1% 89 11.3 ± 24.5% 189 76.5 ± 10.3% 375 51.8 ± 15.8% Clutch size Exposure days Mayfield success aOf 18 nests located before the eggs hatched (6 in 1999, 5 in 2000, 7 in 2001). However, in New Mexico cowbirds parasitized 33 of 39 nests (85%) over the course of a 4-year study (Goguen and Mathews 1998). In contrast, Chace et al. (2000) reported 1 of 9 nests parasitized (11%) in Arizona, and parasitism was recorded in only 2 of 39 nests (5%) in British Colombia (Hudon 1999). In our study we found parasitism in 8 of 18 nests (44%) located before the eggs hatched (Table 1). Parasitism varied considerably between years; 5 of 7 nests found with eggs were parasitized in 2001, while only 3 of 11 nests found with eggs were parasitized in 1999–2000 (Table 1). Three additional parasitized nests were found after egg-hatching in 2001, while only 1 parasitized nest was found after egg-hatching in 1999–2000. Additional nests may have been parasitized, but we were unable to differentiate between cowbird and tanager young in many cases because of the difficulty of directly observing these nests. Cowbirds had a strong negative effect on tanager breeding success. Parasitized nests held an average of 1.2 fewer tanager eggs than unparasitized nests, suggesting cowbirds removed tanager eggs from the nests. In addition, we could confirm that tanager young fledged from parasitized nests in only 2 cases. In one of these cases, the cowbird egg failed to hatch, and the nest fledged 3 tanager young. In the other, 2 tanager nestlings survived to fledge along with 1 cowbird nestling. In at least 3 cases, parasitized nests fledged only cowbird young, with the tanager young either dying or disappearing from the nest. As in our study, parasitized nests in New Mexico contained fewer eggs (2.4) than unparasitized nests (4.0) and fledged lower numbers of young (0.9 fledglings per nest) than unparasitized nests (2.5 fledglings per nest) (Goguen and Mathews 1998). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this study was obtained from the City of Boulder Parks and Recreation Department, the Boulder County Parks and Open Space Department, and the Undergraduate Research Opportunities program at the University of Colorado. We thank Jameson Chace, John Walsh, Heather Swanson, and all of our field assistants who took data on nests and nest sites. LITERATURE CITED ANDREWS, R., AND R. RIGHTER. 1992. Colorado birds: a reference to their distribution and habitat. Denver Museum of Natural History, Denver, CO. CHACE, J.F., AND A. CRUZ. 1996. Knowledge of the Colorado host relations of the parasitic Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater). Journal of the Colorado Field Ornithologists 30:67–81. CHACE, J.F., S.T. MCKINNEY, AND A. CRUZ. 2000. Nest-site characteristics and nesting success of the Greater Pewee in Arizona. Southwestern Naturalist 45: 169–175. GOGUEN, C.B., AND N.E. MATHEWS. 1998. Songbird species composition and nesting success in grazed and ungrazed pinyon-juniper woodlands. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:474–484. HUDON, J. 1999. Western Tanager (Piranga ludoviciana). In: A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The birds of North America. Volume 432. American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, DC, and The National Academy of Science, Philadelphia, PA. JAMES, F.C., AND H.H. SHUGART, JR. 1970. A quantitative method of habitat description. Audubon Field Notes 24:727–736. LEMMON, P.E. 1957. A new instrument for measuring forest overstory density. Journal of Forestry 55:667–668. MANOLIS, J.C., D.E. ANDERSEN, AND F.J. CUTHBERT. 2000. Uncertain nest fates in songbird studies and variation in Mayfield estimation. Auk 117:615–626. MARTIN, T.E., AND G.R. GEUPEL. 1993. Nest-monitoring plots: methods for locating nests and monitoring success. Journal of Field Ornithology 64:507–519. 2002] WESTERN TANAGER REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS MARTIN, T.E., AND J.J. ROPER. 1988. Nest predation and nest site selection of a western population of the Hermit Thrush. Condor 90:51–57. MAYFIELD, H.F. 1975. Suggestions for calculating nest success. Wilson Bulletin 87:456–461. PETERSON, R.A. 1995. The South Dakota breeding bird atlas. South Dakota Ornithological Union, Aberdeen. RALPH, C.J., G.R. GEUPEL, P. PYLE, T.E. MARTIN, AND D.F. DESANTE. 1993. Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. General Technical Report PSWGTR-144, Pacific Southwest Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Albany, CA. ROSENBERG, K., J. LOWE, AND A. DHONDT. 1999. Effects of forest fragmentation on breeding tanagers: a 483 continental perspective. Conservation Biology 13: 568–583. SAS INSTITUTE. 1995. JMP users guide. Version 3.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. VERSAW, A. 1998. Western Tanager. Pages 442–443 in H. Kingery, editor, The Colorado breeding bird atlas. Colorado Bird Atlas Partnership, Denver, CO. ZAR, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th edition. PrenticeHall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Received 7 February 2001 Accepted 4 December 2001 Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 484–486 CAPNIA CARYI, AN INTERESTING NEW SPECIES OF WINTER STONEFLY FROM THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST (PLECOPTERA: CAPNIIDAE) R.W. Baumann1 and G.Z. Jacobi2 ABSTRACT.—Capnia caryi, a new species of Nearctic Capniidae, is described from adults collected from high-elevation locations in the Southern Rocky Mountains of southern New Mexico and Arizona. Males are distinguished by their rounded club-shaped epiproct and sclerotized knobs on abdominal terga 8 and 9. Females possess a darkly sclerotized subgenital plate that covers most of tergum 8 and is produced posteriorly as a pair of broadly rounded lobes. Key words: Plecoptera, stonefly, Capniidae, Capnia caryi, American Southwest. Very dry years have characterized the American Southwest in the late 1900s and early part of the 21st century. The reduced amount of snowfall during these years has enabled collectors to gain access to streams at high elevations that were otherwise usually inaccessible. In 1999 the mountains in the Mogollon Rim Complex of the Gila Wilderness Area received only 5% of the normal winter snowpack (P. Stewart, U.S. Forest Service, personal communication). Winter stoneflies have been the object of increased collecting efforts since the formation of the western chapter of the Winter Stonefly Club in the 1980s as part of a revision of the genus Capnia (Nelson and Baumann 1989). Previous studies of winter stoneflies in New Mexico include Jacobi and Baumann (1983), Jacobi and Cary (1986, 1996). Because this interest has continued in many areas of the West, with the collection of new material one can easily compare specimens with the named species. When these different specimens from the Southwest were found in the winters of 1999 and 2001 at high-elevation locations in Arizona and New Mexico, it was determined that they represented a previously undescribed Capnia species. Capnia caryi, new species MALE.—Wings brachypterous. Length of forewings 3.5–4.0 mm; length of body 5.0–6.0 mm. Body and appendages dark brown; wings slightly fumose. Eighth abdominal tergum with small, rounded medial knob, located just before posterior margin (Figs. 1, 2). Ninth tergum bearing large, darkly sclerotized, wedge-shaped hump on posterior margin; apex wide, thin, and broadly rounded (Figs. 1, 2). Tenth tergum darkly sclerotized except for round, median, light area where epiproct rests (Fig. 2). Area under base of epiproct also light and membranous (Figs. 1, 2). Epiproct recurved, extending forward to middle of tergum 9, very narrow at base, tapering abruptly to widest expanse near apex, producing overall rounded club shape, especially in lateral view, apex pointed and bearing tiny, blunt hook (Fig. 1). FEMALE.—Wings macropterous. Length of forewings 5.0–6.0 mm; length of body 6.0–7.0 mm. Coloration similar to male, with broad, membranous dorsal stripe extending to posterior margin of tergum 8. Subgenital plate restricted to sternum 8; entire segment darkly sclerotized; anterior margin with V-shaped indentation medially; posterior margin very darkly sclerotized, expanded into broadly rounded, bilobed margin, with median indented area (Fig. 3). DIAGNOSIS.—Capnia caryi does not fit easily into any of the species groups proposed by Nelson and Baumann (1989). It is most similar to species in the Mariposa group because the large dorsal hump of the male is on tergum 9. However, even though it looks similar to Capnia giulianii Nelson and Baumann in lateral view, the hump is not divided in C. caryi as in 1Department of Integrative Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602. 22314 Calle Colibri, Sante Fe, NM 87505, and New Mexico Highlands University (retired), Las Vegas, NM 87710. 484 NEW SPECIES OF WINTER STONEFLY 2002] 485 1 2 3 Capnia caryi: Fig. 1. Adult male terminalia lateral, epiproct. Fig. 2. Adult male terminalia dorsal, epiproct. Fig. 3. Adult female terminalia ventral, subgenital plate. 486 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST all 3 species of the Mariposa group. Thus, the presence of a large, undivided hump on tergum 9 of the male, along with a small medial knob on tergum 8, serves to separate this species from all other known Capnia males. In addition, the female subgenital plate is distinctive in that it has a broadly rounded posterior lobe on each side of the midline. Otherwise, the presence of a large, darkly sclerotized subgenital plate could place it in any of several species groups. TYPES.—Holotype male, allotype female, and 7 male and 3 female paratypes, NEW MEXICO, Catron Co., Upper Iron Creek, Forest Trail 151, 2650 m, 32°22.67′N, 108°34.09′W, 22 February 1999, G.Z. Jacobi and S.J. Cary. PARATYPES: ARIZONA, Apache Co., Mamie Creek, Forest Road 275, 2400 m, Escudilla Mountain, southeast of Springerville, 19 March 2001, G.Z. Jacobi and S.J. Cary, 2 males. Holotype and allotype deposited at the United States National Museum, Washington, D.C.; paratypes at Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, and personal collection of G.Z. Jacobi. ETYMOLOGY.—We are pleased to name this species after our friend and colleague Steve Cary. He was present when all type specimens were collected and has been a major participant in surveys of the stonefly fauna of New Mexico. NOTES.—The 2 creeks in which this new species was collected are located near the border between southern Arizona and New Mexico. Iron Creek is in New Mexico and is a small tributary of the Middle Fork of the Gila River, southeast of Reserve in the Gila National Forest (Julyan 1998). Mamie Creek lies in Arizona at the base of Escudilla Peak, southeast of Springerville, and is part of the Little Colorado River drainage in the Apache National Forest. In Iron Creek, Capnia confusa Claassen [Volume 62 was emerging, and nymphs of Skwala americana (Klapalek), Nemouridae, and Chloroperlidae were collected. In addition to C. caryi, a male of Capnia decepta (Banks) was collected at the same time in Mamie Creek. Stream flow measurements by the New Mexico Environmental Department in 1996 showed Iron Creek to be low in flow in mid-July (0.1 m3), with a similarly estimated flow in February 1999. Surface stream flow ceased 100 m upstream of the collection location in February 1999. The substrate consisted of scattered boulders and a mixture of cobble with gravels; gradient was 3%. The water was clear (<2 NTU) and cool (<10°C), with low amounts of dissolved materials (total phosphorus <0.01 mg ⋅ L–1 and total CaCo3 alkalinity of <20 mg ⋅ L–1) and low non-filterable residues (<3.0 mg ⋅ L–1). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Nicole Cox and Randy Baker prepared the illustrations. LITERATURE CITED JACOBI, G.Z., AND R.W. BAUMANN. 1983. Winter stoneflies (Plecoptera) of New Mexico. Great Basin Naturalist 43:585–591. JACOBI, G.Z., AND S.J. CARY. 1986. New records of winter stoneflies (Plecoptera) from southwestern New Mexico, with notes on habitat preferences and zoogeographical origins. Southwestern Naturalist 31:503–510. ______. 1996. Winter stoneflies in seasonal habitats in New Mexico, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15:690–699. JULYAN, R. 1998. The place names of New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. 385 pp. NELSON, C.R., AND R.W. BAUMANN. 1989. Systematics and distribution of the winter stonefly genus Capnia (Plecoptera: Capniidae) in North America. Great Basin Naturalist 49:289–363. Received 12 April 2002 Accepted 16 September 2002 Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 487–490 DISTRIBUTION OF NEUROTRICHUS GIBBSII IN CALIFORNIA WITH A RANGE EXTENSION IN THE SIERRA NEVADA Leslie N. Carraway1, B.J. Verts1, and J.W. Goertz2 Key words: shrew-mole, Neurotrichus gibbsii, distribution, range extension, California. Published distribution maps for the shrewmole (Neurotrichus gibbsii) in California depict widely variable occupied ranges (Figs. 1A–C). In our review of published information on the species (Carraway and Verts 1991), we chose to use a modification of Hall’s (1981:67, Map 39) distribution map because it was based on published locality records. It showed no records for the Sierra Nevada. Regrettably, we overlooked the statement by Jameson and Peeters (1988:107) that the species “is found in the northern Sierra Nevada south at least to Plumas County.” On 15 June 1999, one of us (JWG) found a dead specimen about 6 miles S, 4 miles E of Nevada City, Nevada County, California. The specimen, preserved in alcohol, is deposited in the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley (MVZ 196311). The locality extends the range approximately 203 km (127 miles) SSE from previous published records at Carberry Ranch (about 9 miles E of the town of Montgomery Creek), Shasta County; about 189 km (118 miles) ESE of South Yolla Bolly Mountain, Tehama County; and about 155 km (97 miles) E of Mill Creek, Lake County (Williams 1975, Hall 1981). The locality is approximately 114 km (71 miles) south of the northern border of Plumas County in the Sierra Nevada. The extensive distances between published locality records and the site of the new Nevada County record, combined with the widely variable ranges depicted in published maps (Figs. 1A–C), caused us to produce a specimen-based distribution map for the species in California (Fig. 1D). We plotted localities (n = 185) for specimens (n = 466) obtained from curators of 15 museum collections (Appendix). Three additional localities from which 4 specimens were collected were not plotted because of inadequate or contradictory information. Because all unplotted localities occurred in counties (Humboldt and Marin) containing other collection sites, we do not believe their deletion was significant. Symbols for 39 localities were obscured by those nearby (Fig. 1D). The distribution of N. gibbsii in California is considerably more widespread than depicted in previous publications (Fig. 1). Although our specimen remains the southernmost record for the species in the Sierra Nevada, other localities in Plumas and Nevada counties confirm the occurrence of the species in that mountain range (Fig. 1D). We postulate that specimens from these localities and others outside previously depicted ranges are not the result of recent invasion of new territory by the species, but represent collections in previously unsampled areas or are samples obtained from disjunct and scattered residual populations. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank curators of mammal collections at the National Museum of Natural History (USNM); American Museum of Natural History (AMNH); Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley (MVZ); Field Museum (FMNH); Museum of Wildlife and Fisheries Biology, University of California, Davis (MWFB); Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM); Carnegie Museum of Natural History (CM); Occidental College, Moore Laboratory of Zoology (MLZ); Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History (SBMNH); San Diego Natural History Museum (SDNHM); Humboldt State University (HSU); University 1Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Nash 104, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-3803. 21402 Caddo St., Ruston, LA 71270-5220. 487 488 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 Fig. 1. Distribution of the shrew-mole, Neurotrichus gibbsii, in California as indicated by A, Ingles (1965); B, Hall (1981); and C, Jameson and Peeters (1988); D, 185 localities at which 466 museum specimens of shrew-moles were collected (see Appendix). Three localities were not mapped; symbols for 39 localities are obscured by those nearby. Open symbol indicates new southernmost record in the Sierra Nevada (MVZ 196311). 2002] NOTES of California, Los Angeles, Dickey Collection (UCLA); California Academy of Sciences (CAS); University of Kansas, Natural History Museum (KU); and California State University, Stanislaus (CSCS) for providing locality data for specimens in their care. We also thank the following curators of collections for responding to our query: California State University, Long Beach (CSULB); California State University, Chico (CSUC); California State University, Northridge (CSUN); and California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (CSPUP). J.L. Patton commented on an earlier draft of the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED CARRAWAY, L.N., AND B.J. VERTS. 1991. Neurotrichus gibbsii. Mammalian Species 387:1–7. HALL, E.R. 1981. The mammals of North America. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1:1–600 + 90. INGLES, L.G. 1965. Mammals of the Pacific states: California, Oregon, and Washington. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. JAMESON, E.W., JR., AND H.J. PEETERS. 1988. California mammals. University of California Press, Berkeley. WILLIAMS, D.F. 1975. Distribution records for shrew-moles, Neurotrichus gibbsii. Murrelet 56:2–3. Received 26 March 2001 Accepted 16 August 2001 APPENDIX. Specimen localities for Neurothrichus gibbsii in California. Localities followed by an asterisk (*) were not plotted on Figure 1D. U.S.A.—California, Butte Co.: 1 mi W Forbestown (1 MVZ). Del Norte Co.: Crescent City (2 USNM); Requa (1 SBMNH, 1 CAS); Smith River, 0.25 mi W Douglas Park (1 MVZ). Glenn Co.: Brittan Ranch, Mendocino National Forest, 39°23′45.9″N, 122°39′29.2″W (1 CAS); Masterson Camp (1 MVZ); Telephone Campground, 1.5 mi NNW Blackbutte (1 MVZ). Humboldt Co.: 7.2 km N, 1.6 km E Salyer (1 MVZ); Ammon Creek, 6.9 km S Salyer (2 HSU); Arboritos, 15.3 km S, 1.9 km W Salyer (1 MVZ); Arcata (1 MVZ, 5 HSU); 1 mi E Arcata (1 LACM); Big Lagoon (3 MVZ); Big Rock, 5.5 km S, 3.9 km W Salyer (1 MVZ); 2 mi N, 4 mi E Bridgeville (1 HSU); Brush Mountain, 3 mi W Salyer (1 MWFB); Brush Mountain, 0.5 km S, 7.1 km W Salyer (1 MVZ); Carlotta (2 MVZ, 1 SDNHM, 1 HSU, 12 UCLA, 1 KU, 3 CAS); 1 mi E Carlotta (4 UCLA); Cedar Creek, 1.6 km N, 8 km E Willow Creek (2 MVZ); Clam Beach (3 HSU); Clam Beach County Park (1 HSU); Cuddeback (9 MVZ); Despenadero, 1.6 km S, 6.4 km W Salyer (1 MVZ); Eureka (6 FMNH, 1 MVZ, 1 HSU); 4 mi N Eureka (1 HSU); 4 mi E Fortuna, T3N, R1W, sec. 34 [sic]* (1 HSU); Halcon, 5.6 km S, 2.9 km E Salyer (1 MVZ); Hatchery Inlet Creek (1 HSU); Hoopa Valley (1 USNM); Humboldt State University (2 HSU); 1 mi NE 489 Humboldt State University (1 HSU); Kneeland (1 HSU); Maple Creek, 1 mi N jct Mad River (2 MVZ); Orick (3 SDNHM); 3 mi N Orick (1 USNM); 6 mi S, 6 mi E Orick (1 LACM); Six Rivers National Forest* (1 MWFB); Trinidad (1 USNM, 4 MVZ, 2 SDNHM, 1 HSU, 2 UCLA, 2 CAS); 3 mi N Trinidad (2 MWFB); 4 mi N Trinidad (3 MWFB); 1.5 mi N, 2 mi W Willow Creek (1 HSU); 3 mi N Willow Creek (5 MVZ, 1 HSU); 4.5 mi N, 1.5 mi E Willow Creek (3 MVZ); 1 mi N, 14 mi W Willow Creek (1 HSU); 2 mi S, 12 mi E Willow Creek, T6N, R3E, sec. 8 and 17 [sic]* (2 HSU). Lake Co.: Mill Creek, 4000 ft (1 CSCS). Marin Co.: Audubon Canyon Ranch (1 CAS); Abalone Point, 3 mi NW Bolinas (1 MVZ); 3 mi N Bolinas (1 MVZ); 1 mi W Bolinas (1 MVZ); Bolinas Bay (1 MWFB); W end Elk Valley [37.84187N, 122.550963W] (32 MVZ); Fort Baker (2 CAS); Camp Taylor, 2 mi WNW Lagunitas (1 MVZ); Fairfax (1 CAS); Canyon near Fairfax (1 MVZ); W Portal of Tunnel, Fort Baker (1 MVZ); West Portal area, Fort Barry Military Reservation (17 MVZ); Fort Cronkhite (1 MVZ); Inverness (1 USNM, 1 MVZ, 1 CAS); 1 mi S Inverness (1 MVZ); 1 mi SE Inverness (2 MVZ); 2 mi WNW Inverness (19 MVZ); 3 mi W Inverness (5 MVZ); 4 mi NW Inverness (2 SDNHM); 5 mi W Inverness (1 MVZ); Lagunitas (2 MVZ); Lagunitas Canyon (1 MVZ); Marin Headlands, Golden Gate National Recreational Area (1 CAS); Mill Valley (7 CAS); Muir Beach (3 CAS); Muir Woods (1 MVZ); Murphy’s Ranch, 3.5 mi W Point Reyes Hill (1 MVZ); Nicasio (2 USNM, 1 AMNH, 5 CAS); 3 mi W Novato (1 CAS); 5 mi NNE Point Reyes Lighthouse (8 MVZ); Point Reyes National Seashore (1 CAS); Point Reyes, Umentore [= Limentour] Beach (1 SBMNH); 6 mi SSE Tomales Bluff (2 CAS); San Geronoms [= San Geronimo] (1 FMNH, 1 MVZ); San Rafael, 82 Southern Heights Blvd (1 MVZ); Sausalito (1 CAS); 1 mi N Stinson Beach (1 CAS); Mount Tamalpais (1 CAS). Mendocino Co.: 0.5 mi E Albion (4 AMNH); 0.5 mi NE Albion (1 CSCS); Point Arena (4 CM, 4 MVZ); 6 mi SE Point Arena (1 CM); 8 mi SE Boonville (1 HSU); Brandon Gulch, Jackson State Park (1 MVZ); 5 mi N, 3.5 mi W Branscomb (1 HSU); 6 mi N, 0.5 mi W Branscomb (1 HSU); 7 mi N, 1.5 mi E Branscomb (1 HSU); 8 mi N, 3 mi W Branscomb (1 HSU); Gualala (1 CM, 1 MVZ); Gualala River, near Gualala (1 CM); 2 mi N. Gualala (1 MVZ); Laytonville (1 MVZ); Mendocino City (1 MVZ); 4.3 mi E Navarro (2 MVZ); Russian Gulch (1 MVZ); Russian Gulch State Park (16 MVZ); Van Damme Beach State Park (1 CAS); 5 mi NW Yorkville (1 MVZ, 6 CAS). Napa Co.: Angwin [T8N, R5W] (1 MVZ); Bothe State Park, Napa Valley (1 MVZ); Napa Valley, 1 mi W Napa, Portrich Rd (1 MVZ). Nevada Co.: 8 mi NE Nevada City (1 MWFB); 6 miles S, 4 miles E, Nevada City (1 MVZ). Plumas Co.: Buck Ranch, 39°55′N, 121°20′W (1 UCLA); Butt Creek, 8 mi S Chester (1 MVZ); Quincy (3 MWFB); 2 mi E Quincy (2 MWFB, 1 MVZ); Rich Gulch, 8 mi N, 11 mi W Quincy (5 MVZ); Sierra Valley (1 CAS). San Benito Co.: Fremont Peak (1 USNM); Gabilan Mountains, 3.5 mi W San Juan Bautista (1 MVZ). San Francisco Co.: San Francisco, near SW corner Olympic Club, Lakeside (1 MVZ); San Francisco, S end Lake Merced (3 CAS). San Mateo Co.: Colma (1 CAS); 0.9 mi NE Colma (1 CAS); Crystal Springs (1 CAS); Palo Alto (1 FMNH); Portola (1 UCLA); 2 mi WNW Portola (3 MVZ); Portola Valley (2 CAS); Tunitas (8 SDNHM); Woodside (1 CAS); 2 mi N Woodside [Filoli] (1 MVZ). Santa Cruz Co.: 5 mi S Aptos (10 USNM); 2 mi N Ben Lomond (1 CAS); Bear Creek, 2 mi N Boulder Creek [T9S, R2W] (2 MVZ); Big Basin, E Waddell Creek (1 MVZ); Greenly Farm, 4 mi from Boulder 490 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST Creek (1 CAS); Santa Cruz (5 USNM, 2 MVZ, 1 SBMNH); 7 mi N Santa Cruz (1 CAS); Santa Cruz Mountains between Santa Cruz and Los Gatos (1 CAS); 7 mi W Stanford University (2 CAS); Valencia Park Ranch [T11 S, R1E] (1 MVZ); Waddell Creek, 1 mi N, 3 mi E Ano Neuvo Point (1 MVZ); Waddell Creek, 0.5 mi N, 4 mi E Ano Neuvo Point (1 MVZ); Waddell Creek [T9S, R4W] (1 MVZ). Shasta Co.: Carberry Ranch, between Mt. Shasta and Mt. Lassen [about 9 miles E town of Montgomery Creek] (3 USNM); 12 mi S McCloud River (1 MWFB); Tower House (2 MVZ). Siskiyou Co.: Beswick (1 USNM); Clear Creek, 3 mi W Klamath River (1 MVZ); Davis Creek, 2 km N, 0.5 km E Somes Bar (1 MVZ); 8 mi SE Somes Bar (1 MVZ); Mt. Shasta, Upper Mud Creek (3 USNM); Mt. Shasta, Wagon Camp (1 USNM); Mt. Shasta City (2 UCLA); 0.5 mi SW Mt. Shasta City (1 MVZ); Salmon Mountains, near Etna Mills (1 USNM); Ukonom Station, 1 km N, 1.6 km E Somes Bar (2 MVZ). Sonoma Co.: 7 mi W Cazadero (1 MVZ); Duncan’s Mills (1 MVZ); Freestone (1 MVZ); Gualala, S side Gualala River (8 MVZ); 1 mi W Guerneville (5 MVZ); Salmon Creek, 2 mi [Volume 62 N Bogeda Bay (3 LACM); Salmon Creek, 2 mi NW Bogeda Bay (6 LACM); Salmon Creek, 3 mi N Bogeda Bay (1 LACM); Sonoma (1 CAS). Tehama Co.: 2 mi W Black Butte (2 MVZ); Lyman, 4 mi NW Lyonsville (1 MVZ); 2 mi E Mineral (1 MVZ); 2 mi S South Yolla Bolly Mountain (1 MVZ). Trinity Co.: Beartooth Mountain, 4.8 km N, 10 km E Burnt Ranch (6 MVZ); 1.6 km N, 6.9 km E Burnt Ranch (1 HSU); Cedar Basin, 1 mi SW North Yolla Bolly Mountain (1 AMNH); Dyer Creek, 0.8 km S, 9 km E Salyer (1 MVZ); Eastman Gulch [40°45′22″N, 122°46′35″W] (1 SDNHM); Hennessy Peak, 3.2 km W Burnt Ranch (3 MVZ); Dulce, 3.5 km S, 5.5 km E Big Bar (1 MVZ); 4.5 km W, 7.2 km N Big Bar (1 HSU); Hennessy Ridge, 1.5 km E Salyer (1 MVZ); 4.8 km E Salyer (2 HSU); 1.5 mi N Mad River Bridge, South Fork Mountain (3 MVZ); 3 mi N Mad River Bridge, South Fork Mountain (1 MVZ); Nogaar’s Ranch, South Fork Trinity River [40.415129N, 123.408238W] (1 MVZ); South Fork, 6 km S, 1.6 km E Salyer (1 MVZ); Swede Creek, 7.4 km N, 8 km W Big Bar (4 MVZ). Yolo Co.: Copay Valley (1 MWFB). Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 491–495 HELMINTHS OF THE PLAINS SPADEFOOT, SPEA BOMBIFRONS, THE WESTERN SPADEFOOT, SPEA HAMMONDII, AND THE GREAT BASIN SPADEFOOT, SPEA INTERMONTANA (PELOBATIDAE) Stephen R. Goldberg1 and Charles R. Bursey2 Key words: Spea bombifrons, Spea hammondii, Spea intermontana, helminths, Trematoda, Cestoda, Nematoda. The plains spadefoot, Spea bombifrons (Cope, 1863), occurs from southern Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba to eastern Arizona and northeastern Texas south to Chihuahua, Mexico; the western spadefoot, Spea hammondii (Baird, 1859), occurs from the Great Valley of California and Coast Ranges south of San Francisco Bay, California, into northwestern Baja California, mainly below 910 m; the Great Basin spadefoot, Spea intermontana (Cope, 1883), ranges from southern British Columbia through the Great Basin to northwestern Arizona (Stebbins 1985). The 3 species are allopatric throughout their ranges. Taxonomy is according to Crother (2000): Spea = Scaphiopus in part. There are 2 reports of helminths (Rodgers 1941, Brooks 1976) for S. bombifrons; but, to our knowledge, there are no reports of helminths for S. hammondii or S. intermontana, although the biology of S. intermontana has been summarized (Hall 1998). The purpose of this paper is to add to the helminth list of S. bombifrons and to provide the initial account of helminths for S. hammondii and S. intermontana. Thirty-five adult specimens (19 female, 16 male) of Spea bombifrons collected 1953– 1962, 31 adult specimens (9 female, 22 male) of S. hammondii collected 1938–1975, and 34 adult specimens (11 female, 23 male) of S. intermontana collected 1937–1964 were borrowed from museum collections. All S. bombifrons were from Arizona (snout-vent length, SVL = 46 mm ± 3 s, range = 38–53 mm). All S. hammondii were from California (SVL = 46 mm ± 7 s, range = 31–58 mm). Twelve S. intermontana were from Arizona (SVL = 57 mm ± 2 s, range = 54–61 mm), 8 from Nevada (SVL = 50 mm ± 3 s, range = 47–55 mm), and 14 from Utah (SVL = 57 mm ± 6 s, range = 44–67 mm). Museum accession numbers and counties of collection are given in the Appendix. For each toad the body cavity was opened and the lungs, esophagus, stomach, small intestine, large intestine, bladder, and body cavity were searched for helminths. Each nematode was placed in a drop of glycerol on a glass slide, allowed to clear, and then identified. Cestodes and trematodes were stained in hematoxylin, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, cleared in xylene, and mounted in balsam for identification. Representative samples were deposited in the United States National Parasite Collection, Beltsville, Maryland (Appendix). Five (14%) of 35 Spea bombifrons were found to harbor helminths: 1 male with immature individuals of the trematode Polystoma nearcticum (Paul, 1935); 1 male with gravid individuals of the nematode Aplectana incerta Caballero, 1949; 1 female and 1 male with gravid individuals of the nematode Aplectana itzocanensis Bravo Hollis, 1943; and 1 female with 1 larva of Physaloptera sp. (Nematoda). Infection rates are too low for comparative (female, male) statistical analyses; helminth numbers, site of infection, prevalence (percentage of infected toads), mean intensity (mean number of helminths per infected toad) ± 1 s, and range (low to high number of helminths per infected toads) are presented in Table 1. Spea bombifrons represents a new host record for Polystoma nearcticum, Aplectana incerta, and A. itzocanensis. 1Department of Biology, Whittier College, Whittier, CA 90608. 2Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, Shenango Campus, Sharon, PA 16146. 491 492 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 TABLE 1. Number of helminths, prevalence, mean intensity ± 1 s, range, and infection site for 35 Spea bombifrons from Arizona. Helminth Site of infection TREMATODA Polystoma nearcticum lung NEMATODA Aplectana incerta Large intestine Aplectana itzocanensis Large intestine Physaloptera sp. Stomach Number helminths Prevalence (%) Mean intensity Range 3 3 3.0 0 29 6 14.5 ± 19.0 1–28 1 3 1.0 0 1 3 1.0 0 Five of 31 S. hammondii were found to harbor gravid females of Aplectana incerta (large intestine of 3 male and 2 female toads, prevalence = 16%, mean intensity = 3.6 ± 1.7 s, range 1–5). Spea hammondii is a new host record for Aplectana incerta. Sixteen (47%) of 34 S. intermontana were found to harbor helminths: 3 females and 11 males with gravid individuals of the trematode Polystoma nearcticum; 2 males with gravid individuals of the cestode Distoichometra bufonis Dickey, 1921; 6 males with gravid individuals of Aplectana incerta; 1 male with 5 larvae of an unidentified species of an acuariid nematode; and 1 male with 2 larvae of Physaloptera sp. There was no statistical difference for infection by Polystoma nearcticum in female and male toads (χ2 = 0.57, 1 df, P > 0.05); infection rates by the other species of helminths are too low for comparative statistical analyses. We report the presence of Aplectana incerta only in male hosts because only male toads comprised the Nevada subsample. Helminth numbers, site of infection, prevalence, mean ± 1 s, and range by location are presented in Table 2. Spea intermontana represents a new host record for Polystoma nearcticum, Distoichometra bufonis, and Aplectana incerta. The monogenean Polystoma nearcticum was originally described from Hyla versicolor collected in New England and H. cinerea from Florida (Paul 1935). Examination of the life cycle has revealed the presence of a rapidly maturing brachial form (22 days) and a more slowly maturing (3 years) bladder form (Paul 1938). Only brachial forms were found in S. bombifrons; both brachial and bladder forms were found in S. intermontana. It should be noted that Rodgers (1941) described the mono- genean Neodiplorchis scaphiopodis (= Diplorchis scaphiopodis) from S. bombifrons collected in Oklahoma and that Brooks (1976) reported it from the same host collected in Nebraska. In the original descriptions, immature forms of these 2 species were reported to have different numbers of hooks between the anterior suckers of the opisthohaptor: N. scaphiopodis with 6, P. nearcticum with 8. Because immature trematodes collected from S. bombifrons in this study possessed 8 hooks between the anterior suckers, we have assigned them to P. nearcticum. Distoichometra bufonis was originally described from Bufo terrestris collected in Georgia (Dickey 1921). Distoichometra kozloffi was placed in synonymy with D. bufonis by Jones (1987); thus, only a single species of Distoichometra is recognized for North America. This species is a common cestode of North American anurans and, in addition to B. terrestris, has been reported from Bufo americanus, B. boreas, B. cognatus, B. debilis, B. microscaphus, B. punctatus, B. retiformis, B. woodhousii, Pseudacris regilla, Pternohyla fodiens, Scaphiopus couchii, S. holbrookii, and Spea multiplicata (Brandt 1936, Odlaug 1954, Douglas 1958, Koller and Gaudin 1977, Goldberg and Bursey 1991a, 1991b, Goldberg et al. 1996a, 1996b, 1999). Although D. bufonis was found only in Nevada in this study, it has been reported from Arizona and Utah (Parry and Grundmann 1965, Goldberg and Bursey 1991a). Aplectana incerta was originally described from Bufo marinus collected in Mexico (Caballero 1949) and has been reported from toads of Arizona and New Mexico, namely, Bufo debilis, B. microscaphus, B. retiformis, B. woodhousii, Gastrophryne olivacea, Scaphiopus Helminth Site of infection 0 5.0 7 5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 8 1 1.0 1–3 2.0 ± 1.4 14 2–44 — — — — 90 50 22.5 ± 23.7 4 — — — — 0 4.0 13 4 — — — — 2–18 10.5 ± 7.3 29 33 3.3 ± 2.1 1–5 13 75 2.2 ± 1.5 1–5 42 (n = 14) (n = 8) (n = 12) 13 Trematoda Polystoma nearcticum Lung and bladder Cestoda Distoichometra bufonis Small intestine Nematoda Aplectana incerta Small and large intestines Physaloptera sp. (larvae) Stomach Acuariidea gen. sp. (larvae) In cysts on stomach wall Nevada ____________________________________ Number Prevalence Mean helminths (%) intensity Range Utah ____________________________________ Number Prevalence Mean helminths (%) intensity Range NOTES Arizona ____________________________________ Number Prevalence Mean helminths (%) intensity Range TABLE 2. Number of helminths, prevalence, mean intensity ± 1 s, range, and infection site for 34 Spea intermontana from Arizona, Nevada and Utah. 2002] 493 couchii, and Spea multiplicata (Goldberg et al. 1998). This study extends the range of A. incerta, previously considered a middle-American species (see Goldberg et al. 1998), into the Great Basin of western North America as well as California. Aplectana itzocanenesis was originally described from Spea multiplicata (= Scaphiopus multiplicatus) from Puebla, Mexico, by Bravo Hollis (1943) and was also found in S. multiplicata from New Mexico by Goldberg et al. (1995). It has been reported from the following toads of Arizona and New Mexico: Bufo alvarius, B. cognatus, B. debilis, B. microscaphus, B. punctatus, B. retiformis, B. woodhousii, Gastrophryne olivacea, Scaphiopus couchii, and Spea multiplicata (Goldberg et al. 1998). Additional examinations of Great Basin anurans will be required to determine if, like A. incerta, the range of A. itzocanensis extends north of Arizona and New Mexico. Third stage larvae of Physaloptera sp. (but not adults) are known from a variety of amphibians and reptiles (see Goldberg et al. 1993). Members of the Physalopteridae require insect intermediate hosts (Anderson 2000). They enter amphibians or reptiles in insect prey, no further development occurs, and they subsequently pass from the body with feces. Species of the Acuariidae are bird parasites requiring arthropod intermediate hosts (Anderson 2000). They also enter with prey and then migrate to tissue where they are found in cysts; no further development occurs. Four species of Spea occur in North America: S. bombifrons, S. hammondii, S. intermontana, and S. multiplicata (Crother 2000). Prior to this study, Rodgers (1941) and Brooks (1976) reported the trematode Neodiplorchis scaphiopodis (= Diplorchis scaphiopodis) from S. bombifrons collected in Oklahoma and Nebraska, respectively; Lamothe-Argumedo (1973) found N. scaphiopodis in S. multiplicata from Mexico; and Goldberg et al. (1995) reported Distoichometra bufonis, Aplectana incerta, and A. itzocanensis from S. multiplicata collected in New Mexico. Although these helminths are generalist parasites (occurring in 2 or more host species) of anurans, they have been encountered infrequently in species of Spea. However, these helminths are now known to occur in at least 2 species of Spea: Neodiplorchis scaphiopodis in S. bombifrons and S. multiplicata; Polystoma nearcticum in S. bombifrons 494 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST and S. intermontana; Distoichometra bufonis in S. intermontana and S. multiplicata; Aplectana incerta in S. bombifrons, S. hammondii, S. intermontana, and S. multiplicata; Aplectana itzocanensis in S. bombifrons and S. multiplicata. Further examination of species of Spea as well as Scaphiopus will be required before the number of shared helminth species within the genus and the family Pelobatidae can be known. Spea bombifrons were loaned to us by Charles H. Lowe (University of Arizona). David B. Wake (Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley), Bradford D. Hollingsworth (San Diego Natural History Museum), and David A. Kizirian (Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County) loaned the S. hammondii. Michael E. Douglas (formerly of Arizona State University), Jack W. Sites, Jr. (Brigham Young University), David A. Kizirian, and Charles H. Lowe allowed us to examine S. intermontana. LITERATURE CITED ANDERSON, R.C. 2000. Nematode parasites of vertebrates: their development and transmission. 2nd edition. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, U.K. 650 pp. BRANDT, B.B. 1936. Parasites of certain North Carolina Salientia. Ecological Monographs 6:491–532. BRAVO HOLLIS, M. 1943. Dos neuvos nemátodos parásitos de anuros del sur de Puebla. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 14:69–78. BROOKS, D.R. 1976. Parasites of amphibians of the Great Plains. Part 2. Platyhelminths of amphibians in Nebraska. Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum 10:65–92. CABALLERO, C.E. 1949. Estudios helmintológicos de la región oncocercosa de México y de la República de Guatemala. Nematoda. 5a parte. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 20:279–292. CROTHER, B.I. 2000. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Herpetological Circular 29. 82 pp. DICKEY, L.B. 1921. A new amphibian cestode. Journal of Parasitology 7:129–137. DOUGLAS, L.T. 1958. The taxonomy of nematotaeniid cestodes. Journal of Parasitology 44:261–273. GOLDBERG, S.R., AND C.R. BURSEY. 1991a. Helminths of three toads, Bufo alvarius, Bufo cognatus (Bufonidae), and Scaphiopus couchii (Pelobatidae), from southern Arizona. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 58:142–146. ______. 1991b. Helminths of the red-spotted toad, Bufo punctatus (Anura: Bufonidae), from southern Arizona. [Volume 62 Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 58:267–269. GOLDBERG, S.R., C.R. BURSEY, AND H. CHEAM. 1998. Nematodes of the great plains narrow-mouthed toad, Gastrophryne olivacea (Microhylidae), from southern Arizona. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 65:102–104. GOLDBERG, S.R., C.R. BURSEY, AND G. GALINDO. 1999. Helminths of the lowland burrowing treefrog, Ptyernohyla fodiens (Hylidae), from southern Arizona. Great Basin Naturalist 59:195–197. GOLDBERG, S.R., C.R. BURSEY, K.B. MALMOS, B.K. SULLIVAN, AND H. CHEAM. 1996a. Helminths of the southwestern toad, Bufo microscaphus, Woodhouse’s toad, Bufo woodhousii (Bufonidae), and their hybrids from central Arizona. Great Basin Naturalist 56:369–374. GOLDBERG, S.R., C.R. BURSEY, B.K. SULLIVAN, AND Q.A. TRUONG. 1996b. Helminths of the Sonoran green toad, Bufo retiformis (Bufonidae), from southern Arizona. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 63:120–122. GOLDBERG, S.R., C.R. BURSEY, AND I. RAMOS. 1995. The component parasite community of three sympatric toad species, Bufo cognatus, Bufo debilis (Bufonidae), and Spea multiplicata (Pelobatidae) from New Mexico. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 62:57–61. GOLDBERG, S.R., C.R. BURSEY, AND R. TAWIL. 1993. Gastrointestinal helminths of the western brush lizard, Urosaurus graciosus graciosus (Phrynosomatidae). Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 92:43–51. HALL, J.A. 1998. Scaphiopus intermontanus Cope. Great Basin spadefoot. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 650.1–650.17. JONES, M.K. 1987. A taxonomic revision of the Nematotaeniidae Lühe, 1910 (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). Systematic Parasitology 10:165–245. KOLLER, R.L., AND A.J. GAUDIN. 1977. An analysis of helminth infections in Bufo boreas (Amphibia: Bufonidae) and Hyla regilla (Amphibia: Hylidae) in southern California. Southwestern Naturalist 21: 503–509. LAMOTHE-ARGUMEDO, R. 1973. Monogéneos de los anfibios de México V. Descripción de la larva de Neodiplorchis scaphiopi (Rodgers, 1941) Yamaguti, 1963 (Monogénea: Polystomatidae). Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 44:9–14. ODLAUG, T.O. 1954. Parasites of some Ohio Amphibia. Ohio Journal of Science 54:126–128. PARRY, J.E., AND A.W. GRUNDMANN. 1965. Species composition and distribution of the parasites of some common amphibians of Iron and Washington counties, Utah. Proceedings of the Utah Academy of Arts and Sciences 42:271–279. PAUL, A.A. 1935. Polystoma integerrimum nearcticum n. subsp. from the urinary bladder, genital ducts, kidneys and gills of Hyla versicolor Le Conte. Journal of Parasitology 21:442. ______. 1938. Life history studies of North American freshwater polystomes. Journal of Parasitology 24:489–510. RODGERS, L.O. 1941. Diplorchis scaphiopi, a new polystomatid monogenean fluke from the spadefoot toad. Journal of Parasitology 27:153–157. 2002] NOTES STEBBINS, R.C. 1985. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA. 336 pp. Received 3 December 2000 Accepted 16 August 2001 APPENDIX LOCALITIES AND MUSEUM NUMBERS FOR SPECIMENS EXAMINED Spea bombifrons: University of Arizona (UAZ) ARIZONA (Cochise County) 7378, 7379, 7381, 7386, 7388, 7389, 7391, 7392, 7364–7366, 7368, 7395, 7399–7408, 7410–7412, 7414–7418, 7420, 7421, 7423, 7425. Spea hammondii: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM) CALIFORNIA (Madera County) 147873; Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (MVZ) (Madera County) 25963, 31874, 54046–54049, 54202, 54203, 55519, 56734, 60284–60291, 60983, 76003; San Diego 495 Natural History Museum (SDSNH) (San Diego County) 55335–55337, 55518–55524. Spea intermontana: Arizona State University (ASU) NEVADA (Lincoln County) 21290, 21291, 21293, 21297– 21299, 21301, 21302; Brigham Young University (BYU) UTAH (Garfield County) 1970, 1973, 1977, 2772, (Carbon County) 2058, 2800, (Daggett County) 14180, (Tooele County) 14789, 14791; Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM) UTAH (Carbon County) 90959– 90963; University of Arizona (UAZ) ARIZONA (Mohave County) 14668, 14670, 14672, 14674, 14676, 14679, 14680, 14683–14685, 14688, 14690. ***** Accession numbers for helminths in the U.S. National Parasite Collection (USNPC): Spea bombifrons: Polystoma nearcticum (91240); Aplectana incerta (91241); Aplectana itzocanensis (91242); Physaloptera sp. (91243). Spea hammondii: Aplectana incerta (92015). Spea intermontana: Polystoma nearcticum (90903, 90906); Distoichometra bufonis (90904); Aplectana incerta (90905, 90907); Physaloptera sp. (90902); acuariid larvae (90908). Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 496–497 EXTIRPATION OF BAILEY’S POCKET MOUSE, CHAETODIPUS BAILEYI FORNICATUS (HETEROMYIDAE: MAMMALIA), FROM ISLA MONTSERRAT, BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR, MEXICO Sergio Ticul Alvarez-Castañeda1 and Patricia Cortés-Calva1 Key words: Rodentia, Chaetodipus baileyi, islands, extinction, Mexico. Seven taxa of rodents endemic to northwestern Mexico recently have been reported as extirpated: Peromyscus maniculatus cineritius, P. pembertoni, Dipodomys gravipes, Oryzomys couesi peninsularis, Neotoma anthonyi, N. bunkeri, and N. martinensis (Lawlor 1983, Mellink 1992, Smith et al. 1993, Alvarez-Castañeda 1994, Alvarez-Castañeda and CortésCalva 1996). Extirpation of these rodents may be a consequence of human activity and the introduction of nonnative species, primarily cats (Felis silvestris) that prey on the endemic rodents and Mus musculus and Rattus rattus that may compete with native species for resources (Alvarez-Castañeda 1997). We report the possible extirpation of an endemic rodent, Bailey’s pocket mouse (Chaetodipus baileyi fornicatus), from Isla Montserrat. Isla Montserrat, located 13 km east of the Baja California peninsula, has an area of 19.4 km2 (Nieto-Garibay 1999). The island has many small mountains and canyons; the soil is poor and in some areas very stony. Dominant plants on Isla Montserrat include golondrina (Euphorbia magdalenae), pitaya agría (Stenocereus gummosus), matacora ( Jatropha cuneata), cholla (Opuntia cholla), dipúa o medesá (Cercidium microphyllum), and palo fierro (Olneya tesota; León De La Luz and Pérez Navarro 1997). Chaetodipus baileyi has 7 subspecies, 2 of which inhabit islands in the Sea of Cortez: C. b. fornicatus on Isla Montserrat and C. b. insularis on Isla Tiburon. Three other subspecies occur on the Baja peninsula and 2 in the state of Sonora (Patton and Alvarez-Castañeda 1999). The Bailey’s pocket mouse of Montserrat island (C. b. fornicatus) was described by Burt (1932) on the basis of 12 specimens. Ecological data were not provided in the original description. This taxon is considered rare by Mexico (NOM059-Ecol 1994) but is not listed by CITES (1989). The last 2 specimens of C. b. fornicatus from Montserrat island (10, collected 21 May 1975) are housed in the mammal collection of the Instituto de Biología of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Subsequent surveys of the islands did not yield additional specimens, but specimens of Burt’s deer mouse, Peromyscus caniceps, were collected on 20 May 1975 (31), 10 August 1986 (2), 16 January 1987 (5), 11 May 1987 (3), 24 October 1995 (3), 18 May 1997 (3), and 27 April 1998 (1). Four surveys of rodents in various areas of Montserrat island were conducted over a period of 5 years by the Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S. C. and the Universidad Autónoma of México. The surveys attempted to avoid seasonal and annual variations in capture success by trapping in different years and months: August 1993 (600 trapnights on the southwestern part of the island); November 1995 (950 trap-nights, western; 700 trap-nights, northwestern); May 1997 (479 trapnights, northeastern; 300 trap-nights, eastern); and April 1998 (120 trap-nights, northern end of the island), for a total of 3149 trap-nights. Sherman and Museum Special traps were used in all surveys. Transects of 40 traps, with 10-m spacing between traps, were set in a variety of habitats, avoiding cliffs and favoring scrub areas likely preferred by the mice. The proportion of P. caniceps collected in every survey was about 0.2% (Alvarez-Castañeda et al. 1998), but no C. baileyi fornicatus were trapped. No Mus or Rattus were collected. 1Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, Mar Bermejo, 195 Playa Palo Santa Rita, La Paz, Baja California Sur, 23090 México. 496 2002] NOTES 497 cial support to STA-C was provided by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT J28319N). LITERATURE CITED ––– Fig. 1. Location of Montserrat island, off the eastern coast of Baja California peninsula. Heavy black borders around the island represent cliffs. Feces of feral cats were found on the island in all years, but these did not contain Chaetodipus hairs or bones. Cat feces were observed in all parts of the island visited during a botanical survey of the island in 1998 (Leon De la Luz personal communication). It is not known when cats were introduced to the island. Isla Montserrat currently has a fishermen’s camp, but human activity otherwise is very low. It is now more than 25 years since the last C. b. fornicatus were trapped, and there is no subsequent evidence of this rodent occurring on the island. The most plausible explanation for the apparent extirpation of Chaetodipus baileyi fornicatus is predation by domestic cats. We thank the Mexican Navy for transport to Montserrat island; D. Hafner, M. Hafner, B. Riddle, and Cheryl Patten for reviewing the manuscript draft; and F.A. Cervantes for use of the Colección Nacional de Mamíferos. Finan- ALVAREZ-CASTAÑEDA, S.T. 1994. Current status of the rice rat Oryzomys couesi peninsularis. Southwestern Naturalist 39:99–100. ______. 1997. Diversidad y conservación de mamíferos terrestres en el estado de Baja California Sur, México. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 221 pp. ALVAREZ-CASTAÑEDA, S.T., AND P. CORTÉS -CALVA. 1996. Anthropogenic extinction of the endemic deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus cineritius, on San Roque island, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist 41:99–100. ALVAREZ-CASTAÑEDA, S.T., P. CORTÉS-CALVA, AND C. GÓMEZMACHORRO. 1998. Peromyscus caniceps. Mammalian Species 602:1–3. BURT, W.H. 1932. Description of heretofore unknown mammals from islands in the Gulf of California, México. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History 7:161–182. CITES. 1989. Appendices I, II, and III to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. LAWLOR, T.E. 1983. The mammals. Pages 265–287 in T.J. Case and M.L. Cody, editors, Island biogeography of the Sea of Cortez. University California Press, Berkeley. 508 pp. LEÓN DE LA LUZ, J.L., AND J.J. PÉREZ NAVARRO. 1997. Advances in the botany of the Gulf of California islands, Baja California, México. Baja California Botanical Symposium, San Diego Natural History Museum. MELLINK, B.E. 1992. Status de los Heterómidos y Cricétidos endémicos del Estado de Baja California. Contribuciones Académica, Serie Ecológica, Centro Investigaciones Científicas y Educativas Superiores de Ensenada, 1–10. NIETO -GARIBAY, A. 1999. Características generales del Noroeste de México. Pages 10–25 in S.T. AlvarezCastañeda and J.L. Patton, editors, Mamíferos del Noroeste de México. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S. C., La Paz, México. NOM-059-ECOL. 1994. Norma Oficial Mexicana, que determina las especies y subespecies de flora y fauna silvestre terrestre y acuática en peligro de extinción, amenazadas, raras y sujetas a protección especial, y establece especificaciones para su protección. 16 mayo. PATTON, J.L., AND S.T. ALVAREZ-CASTAÑEDA. 1999. Family Heteromyidae. Pages 351–444 in S.T. Alvarez-Castañeda and J.L. Patton, editors, Mamíferos del Noroeste de México. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S. C., La Paz, México. SMITH, F.A., B.T. BESTELMEYER, J. BIARDI, AND M. STRONG. 1993. Anthropogenic extinction of the endemic woodrat, Neotoma bunkeri Burt. Biodiversity Letters 1: 149–155. Received 7 August 2000 Accepted 26 September 2001 Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 498–499 REMOVAL OF RHODODENDRON MACROPHYLLUM PETALS BY CAMPONOTUS MODOC Michael D. Weiser1 Key words: Formicidae, nectivory, pollination, pollinator. Most research on the relationship between ants and plants has focused on mutualistic interactions in which plants benefit from the presence of ants (Hölldobler and Wilson 1990). While there are examples of ants removing petals as a food source (Cerdá et al. 1992, Hölldobler and Wilson 1990), I know of no report of ants removing petals specifically to access floral nectaries. There are few reports in the literature of ants collecting floral nectar (Tobin 1994), but ants will readily accept floral nectar when it is accessible (Schubart and Anderson 1978, Guerrant and Fiedler 1981, Haber et al. 1981). Herein I report observations of Camponotus modoc removing petals from Rhododendron macrophyllum flowers, a behavior that may have impacts on R. macrophyllum pollination biology. Camponotus modoc (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Formicinae), a common carpenter ant of the Pacific Northwest, nests at the base of live trees, as well as in dead logs in old-growth forests. In clear-cuts they often nest in and under stumps. Rhododendron macrophyllum (Ericaceae) is a common shrub of moist to dry, coniferous or mixed forests ranging from British Columbia south to California. In the Western Cascade Range of Oregon, R. macrophyllum flowers in May and June. Flowers have large pink blossoms that are collected in racemes of 20 or more flowers. Individual flowers last a few days, and then the entire corolla (individual petals are fused to each other) wilts, turns brown, and falls off the flower. Rhododendron macrophyllum is bee pollinated (Halverson 1986), but many other insects and hummingbirds visit Rhododendron flowers for nectar (Pojar 1975). I made all observations reported here in H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Willamette National Forest, in the Western Cascade Range of Oregon. My initial observation, in full sun at 1400 hours on 2 June 1997, was of R. macrophyllum in flower in a clear-cut experimental plot at ~650 m. Several C. modoc workers were clipping petals off apparently normal R. macrophyllum flowers. The workers, typically a single individual to a flower, were cutting around the base of the petals with their mandibles, clipping off the entire corolla intact, which then fell to the ground. The remaining flower had very little or no petal remaining (i.e., all pinkcolored portions of the flower were removed.) The ants remained on the flower head after removing the corolla and appeared to collect nectar from the base of the flower. They placed their mouthparts on the base of the flower and their gasters appeared distended, indicating that they had taken up liquid from the plant. None of the flowers I observed being clipped had any serious damage to their petals (e.g., browning or wilting) before cutting by the ant. I observed this behavior on 6 other R. macrophyllum in the immediate area. Two R. macrophyllum in the area had C. modoc on them, but I did not observe petal removal. I saw this behavior over several days at this single site, but not on R. macrophyllum at other localities within H.J. Andrews. I also observed at least 10 species of flying insects, including Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera, landing on intact flowers. The only flying insects observed landing on flowers lacking petals were asilid flies that used them as perches. While speculative, I suggest that C. modoc workers removed the petals to access the floral nectar of R. macrophyllum and that removing 1University of Oklahoma, Department of Zoology, 730 Van Vleet Oval, Room 314, Norman, OK 73019-0235. Present address: University of Arizona, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 1041 E. Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ 85721. 498 2002] NOTES petals allowed the ants to monopolize the nectar source. It is possible that the petals limited C. modoc access to the inside of the corolla. Two smaller species of ants (Tapinoma sessile and Formica sp.) were observed within intact flowers. Several small C. modoc were observed within corollas of unclipped flowers, but many more were observed on the outer surface of the flowers, which may indicate that petals limit C. modoc access to the floral nectaries. Given that removal of the corolla was almost complete, pollinators, which use the showy pink petals as a cue to find floral nectar, would be less likely to visit flowers lacking these cues. As only C. modoc and asilid flies were seen visiting clipped flowers, the nectaries were, in effect, monopolized by the ants. To differentiate between the hypotheses that flower clipping behavior was for access or monopolization (or both), one could manipulate petals of R. macrophyllum in the presence of ants and observe their behavior. For example, if a portion of the corolla large enough for the ants to pass through were removed, then the access hypothesis predicts that they would not continue clipping petals. The monopolization hypothesis predicts complete petal removal. I observed more than 10 flowers being cut from a single plant in 2 hours. Estimating 150– 200 flowers on the plant, one can easily extrapolate the potential impact of this behavior on the pollination biology of R. macrophyllum. Ants are not effective pollinators (Hölldobler and Wilson 1990), and removal of petals should reduce the number of potential pollination events by reducing blooming time for individual flowers. Petal removal also may affect the 499 energy budget of R. macrophyllum, as non-pollinating nectar-feeders such as hummingbirds would not access flowers lacking petals. As the flowers clipped by ants look superficially similar to flowers that have naturally dehisced their corolla, this behavior has implications for field studies of R. macrophyllum, specifically in the examination of seed set and pollination success. LITERATURE CITED CERDÁ, X., J. RETANA, S. CARPINTERO, AND S. CROS. 1992. Petals as the main resource collected by the ant, Cataglyphis floricola (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 20:315–319. GUERRANT, E.O., JR., AND P.G. FIEDLER. 1981. Flower defenses against nectar-pilferage by ants. Biotropica 13(suppl. 2): 25–33. HABER, W.A., G.W. FRANKIE, H.G. BAKER, I. BAKER, AND S. KOPTUR. 1981. Ants like flower nectar. Biotropica 13:211–214. HALVERSON, N.M. 1986. Major indicator shrubs and herbs on national forests of western Oregon and southwestern Washington. R6-TM-229. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. HÖLLDOBLER, B., AND E.O. WILSON. 1990. The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. POJAR, J. 1975. Hummingbird flowers of British Columbia. Syesis 8:25–28. SCHUBART, H.O.R., AND A.B. ANDERSON. 1978. Why don’t ants visit flowers? A reply to D.H. Janzen. Biotropica 10:310–311. TOBIN, J.E. 1994. Ants as primary consumers: diet and abundance in the Formicidae. Pages 278–309 in J.H. Hunt and C. Napela, editors, Nourishment and evolution in insect societies. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. Received 20 November 2000 Accepted 17 October 2001 Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, p. 500 BOOK REVIEW Birds of the Lahontan Valley: a Guide to Nevada’s Wetland Oasis. Graham Chisholm and Larry A. Neel. University of Nevada Press, Reno and Las Vegas. 2002. $21.95, paperback; 256 pages + 60 illustrations, 5 maps, 2 appendixes. ISBN 0-87417-479-1. Beyond J. Linsdale’s early publication of Nevada’s avifauna, The Birds of Nevada (1936), and then the much latter Birds of the Great Basin by F. Ryser (1985) that included Nevada, and finally Birds of Nevada by R.J. Alcorn (1988), most other works dealing with Nevada’s birds tend to be somewhat regional in nature. So it is with this book. But, indeed, it is an excellent review and summary of bird records that have occurred in this wonderful wetlands in far western Nevada’s Lahontan Valley. The geography encompassed by the book covers that region surrounding Reno and Carson City, thence eastward a bit beyond Fallon and Stillwater. It is primarily a book on wetlands, including such locations as Walker, Pyramid, Winnemucca, Humboldt, and Carson lakes plus the Stillwater Marshes, Carson Sinks, and Lahontan Reservoir. These are the remnants, totaling about 10,000 acres, of the 5.5-millionacre Pleistocene Lake Lahontan that covered the region and that by 10,000 years ago had all but disappeared. The authors detail a historical record of the region together with a discussion of contemporary impacts by post-European settlement—all interesting reading. They introduce us to topics such as early Paiute peoples there, irrigation projects that impact(ed) wetlands, problems from mining and agriculture contamination, naturalists and ornithologists that have plied the region, and a brief discussion of a much larger geographic region called the Great Basin and her wetlands. Not each bird is illustrated, but pen-andink drawings by Mimi Hoppe Wolf are liberally scattered throughout the book—and they are delightful. Most are generally accurate and add a pleasant touch to the reading. Overall, the bulk of the text, pages 33–186, is an annotated account of each species from the region. The authors have used specimen records, literature, and contemporary sight records to round out each account. The final section consists of birding sites within the Lahontan Valley, including 4 maps. This is followed by an appendix giving a yearby-year individual count, between 1986 and 1999, of colony-nesting wading birds; 1 ibis, 2 heron species, 3 egret species, and a cormorant species. Next come 2 extensive tables giving shorebird and larid counts, by year, during essentially the same time period. Total counts for 26 species varied from 112,103 individuals in 1990 to as few as 10,026 in 1993. Presumably the same methods and same degree of search effort occurred both years. To me, these tables are somewhat confusing, however. Both tables give the same species, by the same year, and from the same source (U.S. Fish and Wildlife and Nevada Division of Wildlife) based on spring and fall counts, but Table 2 produces different numbers from Table 3. Perhaps Table 2 is spring and Table 3 autumn counts; but, if so, the differentiation is certainly not clear to me. Perhaps it is a problem of table legends. Regardless, there is a wealth of information for birders. Anyone interested in wetlands and wetland birds could benefit by having this book. I recommend it, not so much for the birds, but for all the other added information and discussion it provides at a time when all wetlands are threatened by human encroachment. 500 Clayton M. White Department of Zoology Brigham Young University Provo, UT 84602 Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 501–502 BOOK REVIEW Trilobite Eyewitness to Evolution. Richard Fortey. Vintage Books of Random House, Inc., New York. 2001. $14.00, paperback; 284 pages. ISBN 0-375-70621-6. Why do we like what we like? How do we choose our life’s work? What is interesting? Richard Fortey, a museum scientist and world authority on trilobites, explains some answers to these questions as he looks at diverse issues of the biological world through the eyes of these magnificent animals. He teaches us much about these extinct arthropods that were once highly diverse. Fortey discusses as well the lives and personalities of scientists with their passions, quirks, and foibles. He considers how he began studying these creatures and became thoroughly involved with understanding their lives, without having access to any living members of the group. Fortey’s humorous and engaging style brings these long-dead animals to virtual life. This book is full of comparisons to classical and popular literature, culture, and everyday human experience: When my children were young they used to play a game with sea shells. Holding a large whelk to one ear they contrived to “hear” the sea: the distant crashing of waves on the shore, or the insistent whistling of a gentle sea breeze. Later they understood that the conch merely amplified the murmuring of the air around them, but they never forgot the leap of imagination that joined shell to sea. Palaeontology is all about listening to what fossil shells have to say. We have to pay attention to shells . . . (p. 27). He also introduces us to the anatomy and purported physiology of these animals using a few, but not too many, technical terms. He clearly speaks as a scientist and yet doesn’t wallow in the mystique of too many latinized words. One clearly understands that when he refers to Paradoxides, Agnostus, Phacops, and Ogygiocarella, he is not trying to impress us with his Latin training, which is proper indeed, but rather is speaking fondly of old friends from bygone years. We learn together of the effort of many scientists to understand trilobite shells, legs, crystal eyes, and pygidia. We learn of Ken Towe working on trilobite vision at the Smithsonian Institution: . . . his office had a view across the grand avenue to the FBI building. . . . Using the trilobite lens as a substitute camera lens Ken photographed the FBI building—not perfectly, but recognizable. What more curious tribute to J. Edgar Hoover than to have his workplace photographed through the eyes of an ancient fossil (p. 106)! The magnificent soft-bodied fossils of the Burgess Shale are visited in a discussion of the purported “Cambrian explosion” of animal diversification that might have occurred there. He properly credits Charles Doolittle Walcott, Harry Whittington, Derek Briggs, Simon Conway Morris, and others for the detailed work they did in these strata, as well as the popularization made by Stephen J. Gould. He makes no bones, however, that, based on his collaborations with Briggs, this “explosion” was an orderly one in which no special interpretations of phylogeny were required to produce a tree summarizing relationships. Still, more explanation is needed: So now we are left with a paradox. There is a tree of descent which helps us understand the history of our characters before their spectacular appearance on stage—but of this earlier history there is no evidence. Even the traces left by animals, their scratches and burrows, are rare before the latest Precambrian. Where can these animals be? . . . My favoured theory is that the earlier branches in the tree were tiny animals, which were not easily preserved as fossils (pp. 138–139). The book has scattered diagrams, figures, and many photographs of trilobites, their parts, and lore, but the book’s small size and rough ivory paper detract ever so slightly from the beautiful content they attempt to convey. 501 502 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST Readers interested more in artistic photographs of these creatures would be better off obtaining Riccardo Levi-Setti’s 1975 or 1993 book Trilobites. Still, the photos in Fortey’s book are usable and impressive. He continues with a concise, yet informative, treatment of the need for taxonomists, systematists, and museums. The next chapter deals with the life history stages of individual species of trilobites and the scientists that revealed them to us. Additional chapters follow a discussion of their decline and disappearance from the fossil record near the end of the Permian. They left with a whimper rather than a bang, just prior to the largest extinction event the world has ever seen. In discussing “Possible Worlds,” Dr. Fortey traces his (and others’) efforts to reconstruct the history of continents and seas for the 300 or so million years that were witnessed by trilobites during their tenure on earth. He then attempts a prediction at what else these creatures might teach us of themselves and life in general. Could we better approach key [Volume 62 issues of contemporary biology and environmentalism from a novel viewpoint? Could the trilobites reveal what they “learned” during their long history? Near the end of the book he waxes justifiably poetic: Will we be able to see the mysteries of this time of innovation explained, as once Walcott surveyed the mysteries of the trilobite limb? These are not Gradgrind facts, “dull realities”: they are wings for flights of the imagination. I wish I could live long enough to know, and even if I did, I should never cry “enough” (p. 263). Oh, that all could be so excited about some aspect of their life! I am a better person for having heard the passion and viewpoints of Richard Fortey in this book. C. Riley Nelson Department of Integrative Biology Brigham Young University Provo, UT 84602 Western North American Naturalist INDEX Volume 62—2002 Brigham Young University Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 504–512 INDEX Volume 62—2002 AUTHOR INDEX Agenbroad, Larry D., 129 Allphin, Loreen, 423 Alvarez-Castañeda, Sergio Ticul, 127, 496 Ames, Abbe D., 240 Applegate, Roger D., 227 Giordano, Mark R., 341 Goad Henry, Susanna, 124 Goertz, J.W., 487 Goldberg, Stephen R., 160, 243, 491 Gul, Bilquees, 101 Bartolome, James W., 73 Bateman, Terry A., 316 Baumann, R.W., 484 Beaty, Barry J., 120 Belthoff, James R., 112 Betancourt, Julio L., 348, 405 Bock, Carl E., 370 Bolling, John D., 88 Bosworth III, William R, 451 Boudell, Jere A., 14 Bourassa, Jean B., 240 Breitbarth, Jessica H., 437 Bryan, Scott D., 197 Bursey, Charles R., 160, 243, 491 Busse, M.D., 141 Butcher, Laurence R., 365 Hall, Linnea S., 370 Harris, Charles E., 151 Heath, James E., 437 Heath, Maxine S., 437 Holechek, Jerry, 300 Huffman, David W., 474 Calisher, Charles H., 120 Carraway, Leslie N., 458, 487 Cartron, Jean-Luc E., 249 Christoferson, Laurel L., 370 Clark, William H., 230 Cortés-Calva, Patricia, 496 Crane, Kenneth A., 240 Cruz, Alexander, 479 Douglass, John F., 253 Dunbar, Mike R., 341 Ingersoll, Thomas E., 124 Inouye, Richard S., 360 Jackson, Stephen T., 405 Jacobi, G.Z., 484 Jass, Christopher N., 129 Jehl, Jr., Joseph R., 335 Jensen, Mark E., 257 Johansen, Jeffrey R., 14 Johansson, Carl, 335 Jones, Cheri A., 120 Karp, Catherine A., 106 Kato, Thomas T., 151 Kaushal, Sujay S., 246 Kelly, Brian T., 151 Khan, M. Ajmal, 101 King, R. Andrew, 112 Kippenhan, Michael G., 381 Kolb, Thomas E., 266 Kondratieff, Boris C., 59, 385 Koopman, Marni E., 151 Evans, Howard E., 206 Fehmi, Jeffrey S., 73 Felix, Todd A., 240 Fischer, Karen N., 479 Fisher, Stuart G., 466 Fleury, Scott A., 365 Frey, Jennifer K., 120 Gaddis, Stanley E., 240 Galt, Dee, 300 Galuszka, Donna M., 266 Leatherman, David A., 206 Leavitt, Steven W., 348 Leberg, Paul L., 32 Lechleitner, Richard A., 385 Lester, Gary T., 230 Lindstrom, Robert F., 44 Link, Steven O., 14 Linz, George M., 39 López González, Carlos A., 218 Lutz, R. Scott, 227 Lyford, Mark E., 405 504 2002] INDEX Martin, John, 370 McCann, Geraldine R., 240 Mead, Jim I., 129 Meadows, Dwayne W., 377 Medlyn, David A., 210 Meik, Jesse M., 234 Meretsky, Vicky J., 307 Miller, Brian J., 218 Molinar, Francisco, 300 Molles, Jr., Manuel C., 249 Morrison, Amy D., 129 Morrison, Michael L., 370 Mueller, Gordon, 106 Mulcahy, Daniel G., 234 Myers, Marilyn J., 1 Naegeli, Markus, 466 Naumann, Tamara, 414 Navo, Kirk W., 124 Nelson, C. Riley, 383, 501 Nonacs, Peter, 188 North, Eric G., 307 Nowak, Robert S., 327 O’Farrell, Thomas P., 151 Oliver, George V., 451 Olson, Richard A., 414 Pedicino, Lisa C., 348 Perryman, Barry L., 414 Petersburg, Stephen, 414 Petersen, Brett E., 240 Pierce, John R., 257 Prather, John W., 479 Ramaley, Robert F., 44 Reed, J. Michael, 365 Resh, Vincent H., 1 Rhodes, Howard A., 59 Rich, Terrell D., 288 Riegel, G.M., 141 Rissler, Peter H., 82 Robinson, Anthony T., 197 Root, J. Jeffrey, 120 505 Rosenberg, Daniel K., 280 Rychert, Robert C., 223 Sanborn, Allen F., 437 Scoppettone, G. Gary, 82 Setser, Kirk, 234 Shumake, Stephen A., 240 Smith, James F., 316 Smith, Stanley D., 327 Sterner, Ray T., 240 Stevens, Lawrence E., 307 Stockwell, Craig A., 32 Stromberg, Juliet C., 170 Strong, Thomas R., 370 Sturm, Ken K., 280 Svejcar, T.J., 141 Sweetser, Michael G., 197 Thomas, Milton, 300 Tidwell, William D., 210 Titus, Jonathan H., 327 Titus, Priscilla J., 327 Twedt, Daniel J., 39 Uehlinger, Urs, 466 Valenzuela, Michael, 25 Van de Water, Peter K., 348 Verts, B.J., 458, 487 Walker, Lawrence R., 88 Walsh, John J., 246 Weber, Darrell J., 101 Weiser, Michael D., 498 Weiss Bizzoco, Richard L., 44 White, Clayton M., 254, 255, 500 Wilkinson, Jack A., 253 Williams, Christopher K., 227 Wilson, Paul, 25 Windham, Michael D., 423 York, Melissa M., 280 Zoellick, Bruce W., 151 Zuellig, Robert E., 59 KEY WORD INDEX Taxa described as new to science appear in boldface type. Acanthocephala, 160 Acer negundo, 266 acid, 44 adaptation local, 32 thermal, 437 adaptive management, 32 age structure, 170 allelopathy, 141 Alnus oblongifolia, 266 ambersnail, 307 American Southwest, 484 Amphipoda, 230 amphipods, 1 ants, 188 Anura, 160 aquatic macrophyte vegetation, 257 aquatic plant communities, 257 Araucarioxylon, 210 arbuscular mycorrhizae, 327 Arizona, 243, 266, 370 northern, 348 Artemisia tridentata, 14 506 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST artificial burrows, 112 Athene cunicularia, 112, 280 atmospheric carbon dioxide, 348 coyote, 341 Crenichthys, 82 cryptobiotic crusts, 223 cryptogamic crusts, 14 Baja California Sur, [Mexico], 127 banding, 124 behavior, 365 mobbing, 253 benthic, 59 birds, 246 Black Hills, [South Dakota], 129 body weight, 188 breeding biology, 479 birds, 370 Brewer’s Sparrow, 288 Brian Head mountainsnail, 451 Bromus tectorum, 14 brush control, 300 Bufo kelloggi, 160 mazatlanensis, 160 bullsnake, 240 Burrowing Owl, 112, 280 burrows, 327 dendrochronology, 266 desert springs, 1 stream, 466 diel oxygen curve, 466 diet, 249, 280 Dipogon, 206 discrimination, isotopic, 348 distribution(s), 120, 197, 206, 234, 487 disturbance, 88, 466 diversity, community, 414 caddisflies, 1 California, 73, 280, 487 Imperial Valley, 280 Mono Lake, 335 San Joaquin Valley, 151 Canis latrans, 253, 341 Capnia caryi, 484 Capniidae, 484 carbon isotopes, 348 cattle, 300 caves, 124 Ceanothus fendleri, 474 central Wyoming, 405 Cestoda, 160, 491 Chaetodipus baileyi, 496 character-count method, 25 chlorophyll, 223 cicadas, 437 Cicindela, 381 climate, 266 Coleoptera, 381 Colinus virginianus, 227 Colorado, 59, 120, 479 North Fork Cache la Poudre River, 59 Plateau, 307 River, 82 Colubridae, 243 communication, 437 community diversity, 414 contamination, 44 Corophium, 230 [Volume 62 habitat associations, 234 fragmentation, 377 use, 365 halophytes, 101 health, 341 helminths, 160, 243, 491 hematology, 341 herbarium specimens, 348 herbicides, 300 herpetofauna, 234 heterozygosity, 423 home range, 151 hot spring, 44 howling survey, 341 hybridization, 25 Hymenoptera, 206, 474 Eared Grebe, 335 ecological classification, 257 restoration, 474 ecophysiology, 348 Empetrichthyidae, 82 endemic species, 1 Erigeron, 423 Eriogonum shockleyi, 316 ethephon, 101 Eurytoma squamosa, 474 extinction, 496 Idaho, 288 southwestern, 112 Imperial Valley, [California], 280 inbreeding, 32 individual variation, 288 introduced species, 230 islands, 496 isotopes, 246 isotopic discrimination, 348 ISSR, 316 fire recovery, 223 fleabane, 423 flooding, 227 floods, 170 foliar nutrients, 141 food habits, 218 food-niche breadth, 280 foraging, 188 forest regeneration, 141 Formica, 188 Formicidae, 498 fossil wood, 210 Fraxinus velutina, 266 fusicoccin, 101 jaguar, 218 Juglans major, 266 juniper woodlands, 405 gastropods, 451 gene flow, 423 genetic bottleneck, 32 genetic variability, 423 geographic variation, 288, 458 gibberellic acid, 101 Goodeidae, 82 granivores, 246 grassland management, 73 grazing, 300 Great Basin, 234 northern, 458 Great Salt Lake, [Utah], 335 Gulf of California, [Mexico], 249 kinetin, 101 kit fox, 127 Larrea tridentata, 88 late Holocene, 405 Late Pleistocene, 129 leaves, 348 Lepidomeda vittata, 197 Leptodactylus melanonotus, 160 Little Colorado spinedace, 197 local adaptation, 32 longevity, 124 macroinvertebrate, 59 Mammoth Site, [South Dakota], 129 mass, 39 Mesembrioxylon, 210 Mexican vole, 120 Mexico, 160, 496 Baja California Sur, 127 Gulf of California, 249 microbe, 44 microhabitat use, 365 microorganism, 44 2002] Microtus californicus, 73 mexicanus, 120 mogollonensis, 120 migration, 335 mobbing behavior, 253 Mogollon vole, 120 Mojave Desert, 327 mollusks, 129, 451 molt, 39 monitoring, 335 Mono Lake, [California], 335 morphology, 39 Morrison Formation, [Wyoming], 210 mortality, 227 Mount Rainier National Park, [Washington], 385 movement(s), 151, 197, 377 Mugil cephalus, 249 mycorrhizal inoculum potential, 327 Myotis, 124 native grasses, 73 natural invasions, 405 nectivory, 498 Nelson-Wittenberg Site, [South Dakota], 129 Nematoda, 160, 491 nest-site selection, 112, 479 Neurotrichus gibbsii, 487 Nevada, 381 River Mountains, 327 White River, 82 Snake Range, 234 Nevada Test Site, 327 North Dakota, 39 North Fork Cache la Poudre River, [Colorado], 59 northern Arizona, 348 northern Great Basin, 458 Northern Bobwhite, 227 Odocoileus hemionus, 253 oil-field development, 151 Okanagana striatipes, 437 utahensis, 437 open-hole index, 240 Oregon, 341 Oreohelix parawanensis, 451 peripherica wasatchensis, 377 Osprey, 249 outbreeding, 32 Oxyloma, 307 INDEX Pachymedusa dacnicolor, 160 paleoenvironments, 129 Pandion haliaetus, 249 Panthera onca, 218 parasitism, 474 Parowan Mountains, [Utah], 451 pelage color, 458 Penstemon, 25 Peromyscus truei, 458 physiology, 341 Pinus jeffreyi, 141 piñon mice, 458 Piranga ludovicana, 479 plant community comparison, 73 plant-insect interactions, 474 Platanus wrightii, 170, 266 Plecoptera, 1, 375, 484 pocket gopher, 240 Podiceps nigricollis, 335 Pogonomyrmex, 188 point frame, 360 pollination, 498 pollinator, 498 Polygonaceae, 316 Pompilidae, 206 population(s), 316, 335 estimate, 82 trends, 370 Populus fremontii, 266 predispersal seed predation, 474 predation, 197, 240 predator attacked by prey, 253 prescribed fire, 414 prey, 206, 218 radio-tracking, 240 ramet, 170 Rana forreri, 160 magnaocularis, 160 range expansion, 474 range extension, 487 rangeland, 300 rapid evolution, 32 rare plants, 316 razorback sucker, 106 recovery, 59 regeneration, 266 reintroduction, 32 revegetation, 88 riparian, 266, 370 habitat, 170 River Mountains, [Nevada], 327 road avoidance, 377 Rodentia, 496 507 sagebrush, 288 steppe, 360 Salicornia rubra, 101 Salix, 266 salmonids, 197 sampling effort, 360 San Juan River inflow, 106 San Joaquin kit fox, 151 San Joaquin Valley, [California], 151 seasonality, 327 sediment, 59 respiration, 466 stability, 466 seed banks, 14 dormancy, 101 seedling establishment, 170 growth, 141 shrew-mole, 487 shrub-steppe, 14 Smilisca baudini, 160 snail, 377 Snake Range, [Nevada], 234 Snake River, 230 Snake River Birds of Prey Conservation Area, 112 Snake River Plain, 223, 288 soil chemical, 141 microbial biomass, 141 recovery, 88 song, 437 dialects, 288 South Dakota Black Hills, 129 Mammoth Site, 129 Nelson-Wittenberg Site, 129 southwestern Idaho, 112 southwestern USA, 348 spatial organization, 151 Spea bombifrons, 491 intermontana, 491 species endemic, 1 richness, 414 spiders, 206 Spizella breweri, 288 springfish, 82 stonefly(ies), 385, 484 stream flow, 266 metabolism, 466 Strongylura, 249 succession, 88, 141 Succineidae, 307 sulphur, 44 508 swarming, 124 synecological study, 257 taxonomy, 307 temperature, 437 Thamnophis cyrtopsis, 243 thermal adaptation, 437 thiourea, 101 tiger beetles, 381 tree ring, 266 Trematoda, 160, 491 trend analysis, 39 trophic level, 246 Tylosurus, 249 Upper Jurassic, 210 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST Utah, 377, 451 Great Salt Lake, 335 Parowan Mountains, 451 variety, 316 vegetation classification, 257 cover, 414 history, 405 vegetative cover, 360 Vulpes macrotis mutica, 151 velox, 127 warm springs, 82 Washington, 385 Mount Rainier National Park, 385 [Volume 62 Western Tanager, 479 White River, [Nevada], 82 woodpecker, 365 woodrat middens, 405 Wyethia mollis, 141 Wyoming, 210 central, 405 Morrison Formation, 210 Yellowstone National Park, 44 Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus, 39 Xyrauchen texanus, 106 Yellow-headed Blackbird, 39 Yellowstone National Park, [Wyoming], 44 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 62 No. 1—January 2002 Articles Trichoptera and other macroinvertebrates in springs of the Great Basin: species composition, richness, and distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marilyn J. Myers and Vincent H. Resh 1 Effect of soil microtopography on seed bank distribution in the shrub-steppe . . . . Jere A. Boudell, Steven O. Link, and Jeffrey R. Johansen 14 Three naturally occurring Penstemon hybrids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paul Wilson and Michael Valenzuela 25 Ecological genetics and the translocation of native fishes: emerging experimental approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Craig A. Stockwell and Paul L. Leberg 32 Morphometric changes in Yellow-headed Blackbirds during summer in central North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Daniel J. Twedt and George M. Linz 39 Invisible invasion: potential contamination of Yellowstone hot springs by human activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Robert F. Lindstrom, Robert F. Ramaley, and Richard L. Weiss Bizzoco 44 Benthos recovery after an episodic sediment release into a Colorado Rocky Mountain river . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Robert E. Zuellig, Boris C. Kondratieff, and Howard A. Rhodes 59 Species richness and California voles in an annual and a perennial grassland . . . . . Jeffrey S. Fehmi and James W. Bartolome 73 Status of the Preston White River springfish (Crenichthys baileyi albivallis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G. Gary Scoppettone and Peter H. Rissler 82 Fertile island development around perennial shrubs across a Mojave Desert chronosequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . John D. Bolling and Lawrence R. Walker 88 Improving seed germination of Salicornia rubra (Chenopodiaceae) under saline conditions using germination-regulating chemicals . . . . . . M. Ajmal Khan, Bilquees Gul, and Darrell J. Weber 101 2002] INDEX Razorback sucker movements and habitat use in the San Juan River inflow, Lake Powell, Utah, 1995–1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Catherine A. Karp and Gordon Mueller Nest-site characteristics of Burrowing Owls (Athene cunicularia) in the Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area, Idaho, and applications to artificial burrow installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . James R. Belthoff and R. Andrew King 509 106 112 Notes New records of the Mogollon vole, Microtus mogollonensis (Mearns 1890), in southwestern Colorado . . . . . Jennifer K. Frey, J. Jeffrey Root, Cheri A. Jones, Charles H. Calisher, and Barry J. Beaty 120 Observations of swarming by bats and band recoveries in Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kirk W. Navo, Susanna Goad Henry, and Thomas E. Ingersoll 124 Noteworthy record of the kit fox (Mammalia: Canidae: Vulpes velox macrotis) in Vizcaino Desert, Baja California Sur, México . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sergio Ticul Alvarez-Castañeda 127 No. 2—April 2002 Articles Late Pleistocene mollusks from the southern Black Hills, South Dakota . . . . . Christopher N. Jass, Jim I. Mead, Amy D. Morrison, and Larry D. Agenbroad 129 Does the presence of Wyethia mollis affect growth of Pinus jeffreyi seedlings? . . . . . . G.M. Riegel, T.J. Svejcar, and M.D. Busse 141 Movements and home ranges of San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica) relative to oil-field development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruce W. Zoellick, Charles E. Harris, Brian T. Kelly, Thomas P. O’Farrell, Thomas T. Kato, and Marni E. Koopman 151 Helminth parasites of seven anuran species from northwestern Mexico . . . . . Stephen R. Goldberg and Charles R. Bursey 160 Flood flows and population dynamics of Arizona sycamore (Platanus wrightii) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Juliet C. Stromberg 170 Patterns of energy allocation within foragers of Formica planipilis and Pogonomyrmex salinus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Peter Nonacs 188 Movement, distribution, and predation: Lepidomeda vittata and nonnative salmonids in eastern Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Michael G. Sweetser, Scott D. Bryan, and Anthony T. Robinson 197 New records and range extensions of species of Dipogon (Hymenoptera, Pompilidae) in Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Howard E. Evans and David A. Leatherman 206 Mesembrioxylon obscurum, a new combination for Araucarioxylon? obscurum Knowlton, from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Wyoming . . . . David A. Medlyn and William D. Tidwell 210 Do jaguars (Panthera onca) depend on large prey? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Carlos A. López González and Brian J. Miller 218 Assessment of cryptobiotic crust recovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Robert C. Rychert 223 Notes The effect of flooding on Northern Bobwhites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Roger D. Applegate, Christopher K. Williams, and R. Scott Lutz 227 Occurrence of Corophium spinicorne Stimpson, 1857 (Amphipoda: Corophiidae) in Idaho, USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gary T. Lester and William H. Clark 230 510 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST [Volume 62 Herpetofauna of the southern Snake Range of Nevada and surrounding valleys . . . . . . Kirk Setser, Jesse M. Meik, and Daniel G. Mulcahy 234 Movements of a bullsnake (Pituophis catenifer) following predation of a radio-collared northern pocket gopher (Thomomys talpoides) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ray T. Sterner, Brett E. Petersen, Stephen A. Shumake, Stanley E. Gaddis, Jean B. Bourassa, Todd A. Felix, Geraldine R. McCann, Kenneth A. Crane, and Abbe D. Ames 240 Gastrointestinal helminths of the blackneck garter snake, Thamnophis cyrtopsis (Colubridae) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stephen R. Goldberg and Charles R. Bursey 243 Comparison of nitrogen isotope ratios in feathers from seven species of Colorado breeding birds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sujay S. Kaushal and John J. Walsh 246 Osprey diet along the eastern side of the Gulf of California, Mexico . . . . . . . . Jean-Luc E. Cartron and Manuel C. Molles, Jr. 249 Mule deer group kills coyote . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jack A. Wilkinson and John F. Douglass 253 Book Reviews Bird Hand Book Victor Schrager and A.S. Byatt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clayton M. White The World of the Hummingbird Robert Burton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clayton M. White 254 255 No. 3—July 2002 Articles A classification of aquatic plant communities within the Northern Rocky Mountains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . John R. Pierce and Mark E. Jensen 257 Tree growth and regeneration response to climate and stream flow in a species-rich southwestern riparian forest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Donna M. Galuszka and Thomas E. Kolb 266 Diet and food-niche breadth of Burrowing Owls (Athene cunicularia) in the Imperial Valley, California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Melissa M. York, Daniel K. Rosenberg, and Ken K. Sturm 280 The short song of Brewer’s Sparrow: individual and geographic variation in southern Idaho . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terrell D. Rich 288 Soil depth effects on Chihuahuan Desert vegetation . . . . . . . . . Francisco Molinar, Jerry Holechek, Dee Galt, and Milton Thomas 300 Kanab ambersnail and other terrestrial snails in south central Utah . . . . . . . . . . Vicky J. Meretsky, Eric G. North, and Lawrence E. Stevens 307 Genetic differentiation of rare and common varieties of Eriogonum shockleyi (Polygonaceae) in Idaho using ISSR variability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . James F. Smith and Terry A. Bateman 316 Arbuscular mycorrhizae of Mojave Desert plants . . . . . . . . . . . Jonathan H. Titus, Priscilla J. Titus, Robert S. Nowak, and Stanley D. Smith 327 Autumnal migration of Eared Grebes (Podiceps nigricollis) through southwestern Wyoming: a key to assessing the size of the North American population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Joseph R. Jehl, Jr., and Carl Johansson 335 Abundance and condition indices of coyotes on Hart Mountain National Antelope Refuge, Oregon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mike R. Dunbar and Mark R. Giordano Historical variations in δ13Cleaf of herbarium specimens in the southwestern U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lisa C. Pedicino, Steven W. Leavitt, Julio L. Betancourt, and Peter K. Van de Water 348 Sampling effort and vegetative cover estimates in sagebrush steppe . . . . . . . . . . Richard S. Inouye 360 341 2002] INDEX Orientation and vertical distribution of Red-naped Sapsucker (Sphyrapicus nuchalis) nest cavities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Laurence R. Butcher, Scott A. Fleury, and J. Michael Reed 511 365 Notes Bird populations in riparian areas of southeastern Arizona in 1985–86 and 1994–95 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Linnea S. Hall, Michael L. Morrison, Laurel L. Christoferson, John Martin, Carl E. Bock, and Thomas R. Strong 370 The effect of roads and trails on movement of the Ogden Rocky Mountain snail (Oreohelix peripherica wasatchensis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dwayne W. Meadows 377 A new state record of Cicindela nigrocoerulea nigrocoerulea LeConte (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Michael G. Kippenhan 381 Book Review The Geology of the Parks, Monuments, and Wildlands of Southern Utah Robert Fillmore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C. Riley Nelson 383 No. 4—October 2002 Articles Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Mount Rainier National Park, Washington . . . . . . . . . . . B.C. Kondratieff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and Richard A. Lechleitner 385 A 4000-year record of woodland vegetation from Wind River Canyon, central Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stephen T. Jackson, Mark E. Lyford, and Julio L. Betancourt 405 Vegetation response to prescribed fire in Dinosaur National Monument . . . . . . Barry L. Perryman, Richard A. Olson, Stephen Petersburg, and Tamara Naumann 414 Morphological and genetic variation among populations of the rare Kachina daisy (Erigeron kachinensis) from southeastern Utah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loreen Allphin and Michael D. Windham 423 Temperature responses and habitat sharing in two sympatric species of Okanagana (Homoptera: Cicadoidea) . . . Allen F. Sanborn, Jessica H. Breitbarth, James E. Heath, and Maxine S. Heath 437 Oreohelices of Utah, II. Extant status of the Brian Head mountainsnail, Oreohelix parawanensis Gregg, 1941 (Stylommatophora: Oreohelicidae) . . . . George V. Oliver and William R. Bosworth III 451 Geographic variation in pelage color of piñon mice (Peromyscus truei) in the northern Great Basin and environs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leslie N. Carraway and B.J. Verts 458 A heterotrophic desert stream? The role of sediment stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Urs Uehlinger, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Markus Naegeli, and Stuart G. Fisher 466 A seed chalcid (Eurytoma squamosa Bugbee) parasitizes buckbrush (Ceanothus fendleri Gray) seeds in a ponderosa pine forest of Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . David W. Huffman 474 Nest site characteristics and reproductive success of the Western Tanager (Piranga ludoviciana) on the Colorado Front Range . . . . . . . . . . Karen H. Fischer, John W. Prather, and Alexander Cruz 479 Capnia caryi, an interesting new species of winter stonefly from the American Southwest (Plecoptera: Capniidae) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R.W. Baumann and G.Z. Jacobi 484 Notes Distribution of Neurotrichus gibbsii in California with a range extension in the Sierra Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leslie N. Carraway, B.J. Verts, and J.W. Goertz 487 Helminths of the plains spadefoot, Spea bombifrons, the western spadefoot, Spea hammondii, and the Great Basin spadefoot, Spea intermontana (Pelobatidae) . . . . . . . . . . Stephen R. Goldberg and Charles R. Bursey 491 WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST 512 [Volume 62 Extirpation of Bailey’s pocket mouse, Chaetopidus baileyi fornicatus (Heteromyidae: Mammalia), from Isla Montserrat, Baja California Sur, Mexico . . . . . . . . . . Sergio Ticul Alvarez-Castañeda and Patricia Cortés-Calva 496 Removal of Rhododendron macrophyllum petals by Camponotus modoc . . . . . . . Michael D. Weiser 498 Book Reviews Birds of the Lahontan Valley: a Guide to Nevada’s Wetland Oasis Graham Chisholm and Larry A. Neel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clayton M. White 500 Trilobite Eyewitness to Evolution Richard Fortey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C. Riley Nelson 501 Index to Volume 62 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 503 Introducing . . . Monographs of the WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST VOLUME 1 _____________ The monograph comprises the following 3 articles: Mammals of the Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument A literature & museum survey Jerran T. Flinders, Duke S. Rogers, Jackee L. Webber, Harry A. Barber ________________________________ Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of southern Utah with an updated checklist of Utah species Ronald G. Call, Richard W. Baumann ________________________________ Annotated checklist of the millipeds of California (Arthropoda: Diplopoda) Rowland M. Shelley ________________________________ Standard price $20 $16 per copy with this offer This monograph is in the final stages of publication. A complimentary copy will be sent to each subscriber upon completion of printing. Additional copies can be purchased at the $16 pre-publication price. Please make checks payable to Western North American Naturalist and send to M.L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo UT 84602.