3D Printing: Separating Hype from Reality for Distributors and their
Transcription
3D Printing: Separating Hype from Reality for Distributors and their
3D Printing: Separating Hype from Reality for Distributors and their Associations Tim Shinbara VP – Manufacturing Technology 1 Trends 2 3 Background: Terminology “Direct Digital”… “Laser Additive”… “Direct Part Mfg”… …there are standards? 4 5 More than 3D Printing 6 7 sheet lamination power bed fusion 8 material/binder jetting vat photopolymerization directed energy deposition 9 material extrusion carbon fiber impregnated with resin additive/ subtractive machining 10 1st Affordability 2nd Smart(er) Manufacturing 3rd Optimize Product Design With Additive You Can Design for Functionality 11 12 13 14 15 ~10” (25.4cm) Courtesy of Northrop Grumman Corp. and CalRam Inc. As-Fabricated ~8” (20.3cm) Post Machining and NDI Additive’s Impact…Today 16 ~10” (25.4cm) Composite Interface Fitting (JWST) Traditional Manufacturing Additive Manufacturing ~500 CNC machining hours 32 build hours ~16 – 26 week lead time ~4 day lead time Nominal 60% - 70% cost savings Applications: Aerospace Industrial Use Hot Air Mixer (UCAS-D) As-Fabricated ~8” (20.3cm) Traditional Manufacturing Additive Manufacturing Buy-to-Fly ratio 10 – 20:1 Buy-to-Fly ratio ~2:1 Min. 4-pieces w/ 2 welds 1 piece w/ no welding Nominal 35% - 45% cost savings Post Machining and NDI Courtesy of Northrop Grumman Corp. and CalRam Inc. 17 Courtesy: DM3D Courtesy: Solid Concepts Courtesy: Solid Concepts Applications: Oil & Gas/Automotive Trending from Prototyping-Only to now Include Production 18 Courtesy: ExOne Courtesy: Rennteam Uni Stuttgart SWOT Analysis: A Distributor’s View AM Strengths: Market Opportunities: 1. Shorter lead-times 2. Both discrete parts, assemblies & re-work 3. Enables digital enterprise 4. Reduced tooling, ancillary costs 1. Establish “niche” capability to augment traditional support 2. Engage with AM OEMs for distribution rights 3. Partner for increased AM portfolio offerings AM Weaknesses: Market Threats: 1. Few industrially-qualified materials and processes 2. Limited material systems 3. Post-processing required 4. Perceived reliability, repeatability 1. Current customers acquiring access to technology 2. Newly established localized MRO / depot business models 3. Early adopters establish and solidify preferred AM suppliers 19 The Technology The Industry No longer just “emerging” Increase education to non-AM communities Varying readiness levels Prototyping to functional models to end-use production AM discriminator: Knowing how to use AM Summary &Conclusion AM is an enabler, complement Additive is a Complement & Requires Consideration 20 Tim Shinbara tshinbara@AMTonline.org 21