CORPORATE PRESENTATION JUNE 2016
Transcription
CORPORATE PRESENTATION JUNE 2016
CORPORATE PRESENTATION JUNE 2016 All amounts in Canadian dollars unless indicated otherwise Advisory Regarding Forward-Looking Information and Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words “will”, “expects”, “believe”, “plans”, “potential” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or information. More particularly and without limitation, this presentation contains forward-looking statements and information concerning: NuVista's future strategy, focus and opportunities; plans to maintain NuVista's balance sheet strength; profitably grow production and funds from operations and develop NuVista's resource base, plans to focus on and improve processing and infrastructure; the benefits of NuVista's risk management program; the anticipated benefits of NuVista's asset base; expected supply cost reductions; NuVista's exploration and development program; drilling, testing and completion plans, the timing thereof and the results therefrom; anticipated inventory of drilling locations and type of wells; estimated liquid yields; anticipated well economics including drilling, completion and equipping and tie-in costs; anticipated well performance and type curves; and other estimated operating, transportation, G&A and other costs; estimated liquid yields; netbacks, payouts, finding and development costs, capital efficiencies, recycle ratio and estimated rates of return; NuVista's ability to fulfill all TOP obligations; guidance with respect to NuVista's capital expenditure program, production mix, netback, funds from operations, targeted net debt levels and net debt to funds from operations ratios; commodity pricing and exchange rates and industry conditions. Statements relating to "reserves" and "resources" are also deemed to be forward-looking statements, as they involve the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the reserves or resources described exist in the quantities predicted or estimated and that the reserves or resources can be profitably produced in the future. The forward-looking statements and information in this presentation are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by NuVista, including prevailing commodity prices and exchange rates; applicable royalty rates and tax laws; future well production rates; reserve and resource volumes; the performance of existing wells; the success obtained in drilling new wells; the sufficiency of budgeted capital expenditures in carrying out planned activities; the availability and cost of labour and services; debt service requirements and operating costs and the receipt, in a timely manner, of regulatory and other required approvals. Although NuVista believes that the expectations and assumptions on which such forward-looking statements and information are based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements and information because NuVista can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. There is no certainty that NuVista will achieve commercially viable production from its undeveloped lands and prospects. Since forward-looking statements and information address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to the risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general such as: operational risks in development, exploration and production; delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of reserve estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to reserves, production, costs and expenses; health, safety and environmental risks; commodity price and exchange rate fluctuations; marketing and transportation of petroleum and natural gas and loss of markets; environmental risks; competition; incorrect assessment of the value of acquisitions; failure to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions; ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources; stock market volatility; and changes in legislation, including but not limited to tax laws, royalty rates and environmental regulations. Management has included the above summary of assumptions and risks related to forward-looking statements in order to provide a more complete perspective on NuVista's future operations. Readers are cautioned that this information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. Additional information on these and other factors that could affect the operations or financial results of NuVista are included in reports on file with applicable securities regulatory authorities and may be accessed through the SEDAR website (www.sedar.com). This presentation also contains future-oriented financial information and financial outlook information (collectively, "FOFI") about our prospective results of operations and funds from operations, all of which are subject to the same assumptions, risk factors, limitations, and qualifications as set forth in above. Readers are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on FOFI and forward-looking statements. NuVista’s actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these FOFI and forward-looking statements, or if any of them do so, what benefits NuVista will derive therefrom. NuVista has included the FOFI and forward-looking statements in this presentation in order to provide readers with a more complete perspective on NuVista’s future operations and such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The FOFI and forward-looking statements and information contained in this presentation are made as of the date hereof and NuVista undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws. June 2016 1 NuVista Snapshot NuVista Corporate Info (June 30, 2016E) TSX trading symbol: Market capitalization: Basic shares outstanding: Bank revolver capacity: Percent Drawn: Net Debt:Cashflow1: GRANDE PRAIRIE NVA ~$1.0 billion 156.6 million $200 million 45% 1.5x 2016 Guidance Production: Capital investment: WAPITI 23,500 – 24,500 Boe/d $165 – $175 million Funds from operations2: $110 – $120 million Production (MBoe/d) EDMONTON 30 25 20 17% 15 CALGARY 10 5 0 Operating areas 28% 27% 2013* 1 June 2016 25% June 2016 est. debt to Q116 Annualized Funds from Operations 2 Pricing 75% ~90% 95+% 50% 2014 Wapiti Montney Assumptions: $2.10/GJ AECO and US$50/Bbl WTI 2015 2016E 2017E Wapiti Sweet Other * Pro-forma 2013 Divestitures 2 NVA Principles and 2016 Guidance Focused on the Long Term… Flexibly managing the short term Maintain Balance Sheet Strength Profitable Growth Tuned to Market Environment • Net debt/funds flow from operations target under 2x and falling as strip pricing rises • • Flexibility to dial spending quickly down or upwards as commodity prices change • • Disciplined approach to capital spending Short term pace of spend minimized while preserving long term take-away plans Reducing Costs & Improving Performance • Well costs down an additional 30% since 2014 • Result is 10% to 20% production per share growth with ~flat debt Continued improvement versus type curve • • 2017 cash flow per share growth 15 to 50%(1) Infrastructure spend complete for growth through 2018+ • • Optimized 2016 development well economics 30% to 60% IRR and 1.5 to 3.0 year payout(1) Capex focused on well development in 2016-17, not on facilities • G&A reduced by 1/2 over last 3 years, to $1.75/Boe for 2016 Efficiency and Flexibility June 2016 (1)Range refers to Strip and Upside pricing cases, refer to Slide 7 for detailed assumptions 3 The Alberta Condensate-Rich Montney … A sweet spot in a "world class" play 1. Scalable/Repeatable • Deposition on the shelf edge – not isolated pockets • Gas charged top to bottom • Over-pressured – low water saturation High Quality Reservoir 2. Porous and Permeable • Hydrocarbon filled porosity up to 9% (typically 4-5%) • Sand/silt reservoir exhibits much better permeability Overpressured 150-200 m thick 3. Condensate-rich • High liquids and condensate demonstrated in all our wells to date 4. Thick Formation Condensate Rich • 150 – 200 metres • Multiple developable layers of resource June 2016 4 The Alberta Condensate-Rich Montney Industry Drilling and Production growth continues… Elmworth to Kakwa Montney HZ Activity Update* • High level of industry activity continues T70 • > 850 Montney HZ wells licensed and/or drilled to date T69 T68 • Montney gas production exceeding 0.8 Bcf/d T67 Elmworth to Kakwa Production Growth* 900 Avg. Gas Rate Producing Well Count 500 800 400 700 350 600 300 500 250 400 200 300 150 200 100 100 50 0 June 2016 T65 450 0 Producing Hz Well Count Avg. Calendar Day Gas (MMcf/d) 1000 T66 T64 NuVista Encana Paramount Sinopec-Daylight CNRL Seven Generations Shell Apache Montney Licenses and Hz Wells R10R9 W6W6 T63 T62 T61 R8W6 R6W6 R4W6 *Excludes southern areas of Alberta Condensate-rich Montney (Resthaven and Simonette). Map is an estimate of Industry land positions compiled from public data R2W6 5 2016 Capital Guidance Ability to Adapt to Commodity Price Environment 2015A FY Capex ($MM) 2016FY Capex – March Forecast ($MM) DCET & Well Optimization Facilities & Water Mgmt Maintenance Other $6 $8 $6 $8 $11 $10 $14 $10 $67 $185 Development Focused $100 Incremental Wells with Robust Economics $273 MM $115-$135 MM 2015 Highlights: • 18 Montney Wells drilled • Built Elmworth Compressor Station March 2016 Highlights: • Flexible capex program; reduced from orig. Budget of $140M-$160M • 10-11 Wells in Bilbo & Elmworth • Minimal infrastructure spend June 2016 2016FY Capex – June Forecast ($MM) $140 $165-$175 MM June 2016 Highlights: • Increased capex as a result of proceeds from strategic initiatives • Incremental development wells added: total of ~18 Wells now planned 6 Funded Growth Plan at Strip and Upside Pricing… Production (MBoe/d) Capital Expenditures ($MM) $300 $273 Upside Case Strip Case 35 Upside Case Strip Case 29.0 30 25 $200 $273 $175(2) $10 $165 $100 2015A 2016E $180 $40 $140 Upside Case 22.4 23.5 2015A 2016E 2017E 2016E 2017E 26.0 10 2017E Debt ($MM)(1)(3) Cashflow(1) ($MM) $200 22.4 20 15 3.0 24.5 1.0 Strip Case Term Debt $175 Bank Debt $250 $150 $100 $125 $125 $50 $120 $10 $110 $150 $125 $50 $50 2015A (1)Assumptions: June 2016 2016E 2017E 2016 STRIP & UPSIDE: US$46/bbl WTI; C$2.00/GJ AECO; 1.31:1.0 C$:USD 2017 STRIP: US$51/bbl WTI; C$2.60/GJ AECO; 1.31:1.0 C$:USD 2017 UPSIDE: US$60/bbl WTI; C$3.00/GJ AECO; 1.27:1.0 C$:USD 2015A (2) 2016 Capex approximately $100MM net of June 2016 W6 Asset Divestiture proceeds (3) Working Capital Deficit not illustrated, which estimated to be approximately $20MM 7 Relentless Improvement Efficiency and Well Costs Average Annual Montney Drilling Curves Montney Well Cost (DCET) By Year 0 $12 2013 $8 2,000 Recent Wells 3,000 $6 4,000 $4 RecentRecord wells: Recent 4,700mWells: in 17 days; 5,500m in 17 21 days; days 4,750m 5,500m in 21 days 5,000 $2 6,000 $0 2013 2014 2015E 0 2016E Montney Drilling & Completion Cost per Stage $600 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 2013 June 2016 2014 2015E 2016E 5 10 15 20 Days 25 30 35 40 Operational Highlights Last 5 wells outperforming these 2016 budget expectations $500 ($000) 2015 Depth (m) 1,000 ($M) $10 2014 • Drilling and completion costs coming down steadily from efficiency improvements • Record drilling cost of $2.8 MM with 4,750 metres of total measured depth • Record completion costs of <$2.0 MM; average completion cost per stage placed has now dropped below $130,000 • In-field gathering largely in place – majority of 2016 wells will be on-lease tie-ins; limited expiry/step-out drilling 8 Relentless Improvement Bilbo Well Performance Bilbo Type Curve Progression 700 2013 Type Curve (4.4 Bcf; 35 Bbls/MMcf) 2014 Type Curve (4.4 Bcf; 45 Bbls/MMcf) 2015 Type Curve (4.4 Bcf; 75 Bbls/MMcf) 2016 Optimized Locations (5.0 Bcf; 66 Bbls/MMcf) 300 2015 Type Curve (4.4 Bcf, 75 bbl/MMcf) 2011-2013 (11 Wells) 2014 (12 Wells) 2015+ (10 Wells) 600 200 Two-year CTD production up 13% vs. 2015 and 38% vs. 2013 100 500 0 0 6 12 Time (Months) 18 24 2016 Optimized Bilbo Well Production Profile 1,800 2016 Optimized Bilbo Total Production (Boe/d) 2016 Optimized Bilbo C5+ Production (Bbls/d) 1,500 Cumulative Production (Mboe) Cumulative Production (MBoe) 400 Bilbo Well Production-to-Date 400 300 Sales Prod (Boe/d) 200 1,200 900 100 600 300 0 June 2016 6 12 Time (Months) 18 24 NuVista's type curve based on Management's best estimates; Type Curve: Bcf = EUR; Bbls/MMcf = C5+ yield 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 0 0 Time (Months) *Production groupings based off spud dates 9 Relentless Improvement Elmworth Well Performance Elmworth Type Curve Progression 700 2013 Type Curve (4.4 Bcf; 35 Bbls/MMcf) 2014 Type Curve (4.4 Bcf; 45 Bbls/MMcf) 2015 Type Curve (6.0 Bcf; 45 Bbls/MMcf) 2016 Optimized Loc's (6.5 Bcf; 42 Bbls/MMcf) 300 2015 Type Curve (6 Bcf, 45 bbl/MMcf) Small Frac (3 Wells) Big Frac (12 Wells) 600 200 Two-year CTD production up 7% vs. 2015 and 45% vs. 2013 100 500 0 0 6 12 Time (Months) 18 24 2016 Optimized Elmworth Well Production Profile 1,800 2016 Optimized Elmworth Total Production (Boe/d) 2016 Optimized Elmworth C5+ Production (Bbls/d) 1,500 Cumulative Production (Mboe) Cumulative Production (MBoe) 400 Elmworth Well Production-to-Date 400 300 200 900 100 600 300 0 June 2016 6 12 Time (Months) 18 24 NuVista's type curve based on Management's best estimates; Type Curve: Bcf = EUR; Bbls/MMcf = C5+ yield 36 30 24 18 0 12 6 0 0 Sales Prod (Boe/d) 1,200 Time (months) 10 Montney Operations Activity Update R8W6 Activity Highlights • 4 New IP30's in Q1 – 4 Additional IP30's in Q2 R7W6 T70 R6W6 Elmworth 16 Wells Producing in the Development Block (IP30) 4 Elmworth Extension wells Producing (IP30) 1 New IP 30 – 1 Additional on-stream 1 Rig Drilling • Increasing to 2 Rigs in Q3 • >60 wells on production T69 2016 Focus on Capital Efficiency • Increasing Montney Activity post-W6 Divestiture • ~18 Montney wells planned in 2016 • Minimal Infrastructure Capex required – filling existing facilities • 2016 well performance expectations up 10-15% over 2015 Attractive Land Tenure • NuVista has over 135,000 gross acres of land (210 sections @ 86% WI) Gold Creek 6 Producers (IP30) One new IP 30 T68 New Gold Creek IP30: T67 Bilbo 33 Producers (IP30) 2 New IP30's – 2 Additional on-stream T66 1 New Extended-reach well completed (onstream in July) 4.4 MMcf/d (flat) 710 Bbl/d 1,355 Boed 160 Bbl/MMcf NVA New IP30 NVA Producing Montney (IP30) • Minimal 3rd party encumbrances NVA In-Progress Wells • Manageable expiries Montney HZ’s June 2016 Raw Gas: Condensate: Total Sales: CGR: 11 Elmworth Development Block Volume Ramp in-progress R9W6 T69 North Montney Sales Production 1 New IP30 R8W6 2 Additional Wells Recently On-Stream 1 Rig Drilling 9 Cumulative-to-Date Production (Mboed) 7 6 Sales Gas Bbls/MMcf 8 NGL's C5+ 11 Condensate 9 Butane 39 Propane 5 4 3 2 1 T68 0 Elmworth Well Performance T67 NVA Montney IP30's NVA In-Progress Wells Montney Horizontal Wells NVA Compressor Site Connected to SemCAMS June 2016 IP30 IP60 IP90 IP180 IP360 Raw Gas (Mcf/d) C5+ (Bbl/d) Total Sales (Boe/d) C5+ Yield (Bbl/ MMcf) Well Count 6,305 312 1,298 49 16 5,662 268 1,154 47 15 5,375 236 1,078 44 13 4,169 172 837 41 9 3,186 126 635 39 8 12 Bilbo Development Block Focus on Efficient Production Additions in 2016 South Montney Sales Production 2 New IP30's 2 Wells Recently On-Stream 1 Well Completed 16 T66 Cumulative-to-Date Bbls/MMcf Two New Step-Out IP30's Avg/Well: Raw Gas: Condensate: Total Sales: CGR: 6.3 MMcf/d 842 Bbl/d 1,732 Boed 134 Bbl/MMcf T65 Production (Mboed) 12 10 Sales Gas Condensate 14 5 5 NGL's C5+ Butane Propane 76 8 6 4 2 0 Bilbo Well Performance NVA Montney IP30 Wells NVA Montney In-Progress Wells R6W6 June 2016 IP30 Raw Gas (Mcf/d) C5+ (Bbl/d) Total Sales (Boe/d) C5+ Yield (Bbl/ MMcf) Well Count 6,341 642 1,618 101 33 Montney Horizontal Wells IP60 5,604 515 1,383 92 31 NVA 3-36 Compressor and connect to Keyera IP90 5,123 450 1,245 88 31 IP180 4,331 343 1,021 79 26 IP360 3,235 226 737 70 22 13 A Closer Look at the NuVista 'Boe' Condensate Underpins Economics and Provides Torque to Oil Price Recovery NuVista 2016 Revenue Composition(2) NuVista Production Mix(1) 100% 25,000 90% 80% 20,000 Boe/d 8% Nat Gas 22% 15,000 10,000 2% 70% 60% Condensate 50% 70% NGL's & Oil 17% 40% 30% 12% 5,000 49% 20% 71% 49% 10% 0 2013 2014 2015 2016E 0% 2016E Hedged or Unhedged: Condensate is ~50% of revenue from 22% of total production June 2016 (1) Pro-forma Divestitures (2) Based on WTI (USD/Bbl): $40.00; AECO (C$/GJ): $2.50; Fx (CAD:USD): 1.4:1 14 Wapiti Montney … Firm Egress Counts Built-in growth with generous capital flexibility in the short term … … and multiple options for the long term Grande Prairie Proposed 2018 Wapiti Area Gas Plants NuVista (50%) North Compressor Station Raw Gas Capacity – 20 MMcf/d CNRL Gold Creek Plant NuVista (100%) Elmworth Compressor Station Raw Gas Capacity – 80 MMcf/d Condensate Cap'y – 4,000 Bbl/d NuVista (100%) Bilbo Compressor Station Raw Gas Capacity – 80 MMcf/d Condensate Cap'y – 8,000 Bbl/d Keyera Simonette Plant SemCAMS Raw Gas Pipeline SemCAMS K3 Plant Keyera Raw Gas and c5+ Pipeline Alliance Sales Line TCPL Sales Line June 2016 15 Wapiti Montney Processing Capacity Firm Capacity with TOP flexibility built in All products have virtually 100% FIRM downstream take-away 200 45,000 180 New Sour Gas 40,000 Plant 160 35,000 30 MMcf/d 140 30,000 120 30 MMcf/d 25,000 15 MMcf/d 20,000 30 MMcf/d 15,000 100 80 60 Montney Capacity – Boe/d Montney Raw Gas Capacity - MMcf/d 2016 Montney Production 20,000+ Boe/d 15,000+ Boe/d of Future Growth Capacity in Place 10,000 40 35 MMcf/d 5,000 20 0 2013 2014 SemCAMS June 2016 2015 Keyera 2016 17 MMcf/d 2017 0 Min TOP Commitment 16 Commodity Price Risk Management We are well hedged with under 10% AECO exposure for 2016 Crude Oil Hedge Position 3,500 100.00 2,000 60.00 1,500 40.00 1,000 Floor C$ WTI price of $77.17/Bbl on ~52% of 2016 Q2-Q4 net production 20.00 500 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 Bbl/d Capped 2016 Q4 Bbl/d Uncapped 2017 Q1 2017 Q2 Avg. Floor Avg. Ceiling Natural Gas Hedge Position 120,000 Hedged Volume, GJ/d Price, C$/Bbl 80.00 2,500 4.50 100,000 3.75 80,000 3.00 60,000 2.25 40,000 1.50 20,000 0.75 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 GJ/d Capped June 2016 2016 Q4 2017 Q1 2017 Q2 GJ/d Uncapped 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2018 Q1 2018 Q2 GJ/d AECO-NYMEX Basis 2018 Q3 2018 Q4 Avg. Floor Basis includes some Chicago pricing. Includes NYMEX hedges converted to an AECO equivalent price. Price, C$/GJ Hedged Volume, Bbl/d 3,000 Floor AECO price of $3.30/Mcf on ~71% of 2016 Q2-Q4 net production Only 5% of gas volumes exposed to AECO this summer 2019 Q1 Avg. Ceiling Hedging position shown is post-W6 asset sale circa July 1, 2016 17 NuVista Operating Results 2016 Guidance Corporate Production (Boe/d) 30,000 Wapiti Montney 25,000 20,000 15,000 Q114 21,448 21,622 25,484 Q1 25,484 24,500 - 25,000 2016 FY - 23,500 - 24,500 14,493 66% 45% 23,215 23,355 18,030 10,000 5,000 Guidance (Boe/d) Other Properties 23,165 17,823 2016 Actual Production (Boe/d) 72% 76% 72% 79% 81% 2016 Actual Funds from Operations ($MM) 2016 Funds from Operations Guidance Range ($MM) (1) $30 - 52% 31% Q214 Q1 Q314 Q414 Q115 Q215 Q315 Q415 Q116 2016 FY $110 - $120 Funds from Operations $45 $40 Funds from Operations ($MM) $19.26 $16.47 $17.22 $35 ($MM) $25 Funds from Operations ($/BOE) $30 $14.52 $15.53 $16.00 $15.15 $13.06 $11.42 $25 2016 Actual Capex ($MM) 2016 Capex Guidance Range ($MM) $61 - $20 Q1 $15 $10 $20 ($/BOE) $50 2016 FY $165 - $175 $15 $5 $10 $5 $0 $0 Q114 June 2016 Q214 Q314 Q414 Q115 Q215 Q315 Q415 Funds from Operations and netbacks hanging in there despite low commodity prices Q116 (1) Based on commodity pricing of US$50/Bbl WTI and $2.10/GJ AECO 18 NuVista Looking Forward Flexibility and Strength in a Volatile Environment Balance sheet comes first Top plays win at any price, wells keep improving Focused capital discipline & reducing unit costs No material unutilized TOP cost concerns Increasing our growth in stages as strip prices move up Hedging – strong downside protection through 2016+ but with full torque to oil prices 2017+ We have the Assets We have the Will We have the Team We have the Strategy… To Deliver June 2016 19 Advisory Regarding Oil and Gas Information & Other Advisories ADVISORY REGARDING OIL AND GAS INFORMATION Throughout this presentation the terms Boe (barrels of oil equivalent), MBoe (thousands of barrels of oil equivalent), MMBOE (millions of barrels of oil equivalent),Bcfe (billions of cubic feet of gas equivalent) and Tcfe (trillion of cubic feet of gas equivalent). Such terms may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. The conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet per barrel (6 Mcf: 1 Bbl) of natural gas to barrels of oil equivalent and the conversion ratio of 1 barrel per six thousand cubic feet (1 Bbl: 6 Mcf) of barrels of oil to natural gas equivalent is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be misleading as an indication of value. Any references in this presentation to initial production rates are useful in confirming the presence of hydrocarbons, however, such rates are not determinative of the rates at which such wells will continue production and decline thereafter. While encouraging, readers are cautioned not to place reliance on such rates in calculating the aggregate production for NuVista. NuVista has presented certain typecurves and well economics which are based on NuVista’s historical production in the Bilbo and Elmworth development areas, in addition to production history from analogous Montney developments located in close proximity to the Wapiti area. Such type curves and well economics are useful in understanding management's assumptions of well performance in making investment decisions in relation to development drilling in the Montney area and for determining the success of the performance of development wells; however, such type curves and well economics are not necessarily determinative of the production rates and performance of existing and future wells. In this presentation, estimated ultimate recovery represents the estimated ultimate recovery associated with the type curves presented; however, there is no certainty that NuVista will ultimately recover such volumes from the wells it drills. In presenting such type curves, inputs and economics information, NuVista has used a number of oil and gas metrics which do not have standardized meanings and therefore may be calculated differently from the metrics presented by other oil and gas companies. Such metrics include "Development Well Capital", "raw EUR", "NPV10", "PIR", "payout", "ROR", "netback", "F&D" and "capital efficiency". Development well capital includes all capital spent to drill, complete, equip and tie-in a well. Raw EUR represents the estimated ultimate recovery of resources associated with the type curves presented. NPV 10 represents the anticipated net present value of the future net revenue discounted at a rate of 10% associated with the type curves presented. PIR (Profit to Investment Ratio) is the ratio of the NPV 10 relative to the development well capital. Payout means the anticipated years of production from a well required to fully pay for the development well capital of such well. ROR means the rate of return of a well or the discount rate required to arrive at a NPV equal to zero. Netback equals total revenues on a BOE basis (excluding realized commodity derivative gains/losses) less royalties, transportation and operating costs. F&D is the anticipated full exploration and development costs associated with each barrel of oil equivalent expected to be recovered from a well based on the type curves and economics presented. Capital efficiency is a measure of expected development well capital divided by average first year production results (IP365) from such well based on the type curve presented. It should not be assumed that the future net revenues (NPV10) included in this presentation represent the fair market value of the reserves. The estimates of reserves and future net revenue for individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as estimates of reserves and future net revenue for all properties due to the effects of aggregation. NON-GAAP MEASUREMENTS Within this presentation, references are made to terms commonly used in the oil and natural gas industry. Management uses funds flow, debt to annualized funds from operations and netback to analyze operating performance and leverage. Funds from operations as presented, does not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore it may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures for other entities. All references to funds from operations throughout this presentation are based on cash flow from operating activities before changes in non-cash working capital, environmental remediation expenses, note receivable allowance (recovery) and asset retirement expenditures. Netbacks equals total revenues excluding realized commodity derivative gains/losses less royalties, transportation and operating costs. Debt (net debt) is calculated as long-term debt plus current assets less current liabilities and excludes the current portions of the commodity derivative asset or liability. June 2016 20 Advisory Regarding Reserves Disclosure RESERVES DISCLOSURE The reserves estimates prepared herein have been evaluated by an independent qualified reserves evaluator in accordance with NI 51-101 and the COGE Handbook and is effective December 31, 2015 and is based on an independent evaluation by GLJ using January 1, 2016 forecast pricing. The reserves have been categorized accordance with the reserves and resource definitions as set out in the COGE Handbook, which are set out below: Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of petroleum anticipated to be recoverable from known accumulations, as of a given date, based on the analysis of drilling, geological, geophysical, and engineering data; the use of established technology; and specified economic conditions, which are generally accepted as being reasonable. Reserves are further classified according to the level of certainty associated with the estimates and may be sub-classified based on development and production status. Proved Reserves are those quantities of petroleum, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations. Probable Reserves are those additional quantities of petroleum that are less certain to be recovered than Proved Reserves, but which, together with Proved Reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered. June 2016 21 APPENDIX June 2016 22 Gold Creek Delineation Continued Encouragement… 13-25 Shut-in pending tie-in IP30 Well Raw Gas (MMcf/d) C5+ (Bbls/d) 16-19 13-25 1-28 16-01 16-27 8-12 6.8 1.8 2.9 7.3 4.6 4.4 377 263 462 489 256 710 Total Sales C5+ Yield (Boe/d) (Bbl/MMcf) 1,307 543 876 1,635 1,044 1,355 56 146 161 67 55 160 8-12 New IP30 16-1 On-production 16-19 On-production Cumulative Production to Date (June 15, 2016) Well Cumulative Total Days on C5+ Yield Condensate Sales Gas Prod (Bbl/MMcf) (Mbbls) (MMcf) (MBoe) 16-19 339 56 52 775 197 13-25 232 123 36 257 81 1-28 451 121 120 860 270 16-01 245 49 40 694 170 16-27 322 40 39 832 193 June 2016 16-27 On-production 1-28 On-production 23 2015 Year-end Reserves Report 2015 Year-end Reserves Report – GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. • PDP reserves volume increased 40% before production and dispositions, or 13% after • Corporate TP+PA reserves volume increased by 15% • Corporate TP+PA F&D of $3.69/Boe & TP F&D of $8.11/Boe – 2015 Corporate Netback $15.28/Boe – TP+PA Recycle Ratio 4.1x & TP Recycle Ratio 1.9x • Corporate TP+PA B-Tax NPV10% decreased 25% to $1.1 billion primarily due to a ~30% reduction in GLJ's price forecast* • Reserve Life Index now at ~27 years and ~13 years on a TP+PA and TP basis, respectively • Montney TP+PA average reserves per well increased 4% vs. 2014; Montney TP+PA well locations now 253, an increase of 23% compared to year end 2014 Corporate TP+PA Reserves (MMBoe) 253 250 28 36 200 2% 1,400 MTY 9% 251 1,200 W6 SWT 1,058 476 1,000 Non-W6 120 800 150 225 53 100 0 Corporate TP+PA Reserves by Area 1,600 300 50 Corporate TP+PA NPV10% ($MM) 184 98 65 12 2011 29 Other June 2016 1,155 612 938 847 200 0 2013 1,197 400 86 2012 600 2014 2015 Wapiti Montney * Based on first 3 yr avg prices 87 167 2011 2012 Other 89% 2013 2014 2015 Wapiti Montney See Appendix for important disclosures regarding Reserves 24 Condensate Pricing Strong demand and premium price for the long term Western Canadian Condensate Pricing • Condensate is used in Alberta as a diluent to ship heavy oil on pipelines • Condensate in Alberta is typically priced at a premium to crude oil • US condensate supply is increasing • But condensate export restrictions are easing Western Canada Condensate Supply and Demand • Condensate must be transported to Alberta – "we're on the right end of the pipe" • Premium for condensate will always reflect the cost of transportation to deliver to Alberta while demand outstrips local Alberta production … and it still does June 2016 25 Lower Montney Activity NuVista Data Collection In Progress R5W6 R7W6 R9W6 T70 R3W6 Pipestone NVA 15-13-68-7W6 Vertical Over-pressured – 133 Bbls/MMcf condy Elmworth • NuVista has good distribution of vertical wells and cores T68 Wapiti Gold Creek • NuVista vertical completion: over pressured, condensate-rich SCL 1-33-67-5W6 Producing ACL 1-7-67-7W6 Producing Confidential: 07-Oct-2015 T66 Karr SCL 9-27-66-7W6 Confidential: 14-Feb-2016 7Gen 13-24-65-5W6 Producing (dual lateral) South Wapiti NVA Lands • Multiple pilot wells in progress by industry – Early Production Data Emerging Bilbo • NuVista pilot deferred until commodity price recovery 7Gen 12-32-64-5W6 Producing Montney Wells LWR Montney A Wells LWR Montney Cores June 2016 Kakwa 7Gen 15-22-63-3W6 Producing Confidential 30-Jan-2016 26