1401.12.033050-final_programmatic_report
Transcription
1401.12.033050-final_programmatic_report
Easygrants ID: 33050 NFWF/Legacy Grant Project ID: 1401.12.033050 LI Sound Futures Fund 2012 - Clean Water, Habitat Restoration, and Species Conservation - Submit Final Programmatic Report (Activities) Grantee Organization: University of Connecticut Project Title: Nutrient Bioextraction in Long Island Sound (CT, NY) National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Project Period Award Amount Matching Contributions Project Location Description (from Proposal) 10/15/2012 - 07/14/2014 $157,447.67 $286,143.00 NY at mouth of Bronx River, 40°.830 N / 073°.870 W, & CT off the coast of Fairfield, 41º06.882? N / 73º15.277? W, & Thimble Islands, Branford, 41º12.772? N / 73º 57.070? W Project Summary (from Proposal) Demonstrate the use of kelp, a native seaweed, to bioextract 53 lbs. of nitrogen and 343 lbs. of carbon pollution at a small-scale and then model the potential large-scale nutrient removal capacity. Summary of Accomplishments A winter crop, the sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) was farmed at two sites in LIS and another one at the mouth of the Bronx River Estuary during the winter 2012 to spring 2013 growing season to evaluate the nutrient bioextraction capacity of this seaweed species. After outplanting juvenile kelp (1mm), the sugar kelp grew over 2 m in length at harvest in May and June, 2013 at all sites. However, a strong Nor’Easter storm (70 miles per hour wind gusts) on Jan. 31st caused significant damage to all farm systems, causing a reduction in kelp productivity and, therefore, nitrogen removal. The productivities at harvest were approximately 9.3 (BRE), 9.1 (Western LIS) and 5.5 kg FW/m (Central LIS). These values were significantly lower than that we found in our previous trial in 2011-2012 growing season (18 kg/m). This is a result of the storm damage. We have designed a hypothetical nutrient bioextraction kelp farm system that assumes 1.5 m spacing between longlines. Nitrogen removal by sugar kelp in our hypothetical one hectare farm system was approximately 183 (BRE), 74 (Western LIS) and 35 kg/ha (Central LIS), respectively. We have developed cultivation video and accompanying manual for sugar kelp. Two workshops were conducted in CT and NY. We have presented some of the project results in relevant and appropriate events. Our work has received a great deal of media attention. Lessons Learned 1. Sugar kelp aquaculture is a useful tool to use for nutrient bioextraction in urbanized estuaries, including LIS and New York estuaries. 2. The optimal conditions for sugar kelp cultivation are site-specific. 3. Turbidity reduced light penetration at the BRE site. Shallow depth (0.5 m; with higher light intensity) provided a better condition for sugar kelp to increase growth and therefore to extract more nutrients from the water body even until June. 4. More secure mooring systems in sugar kelp farms should be developed to accommodate the severe storm events common in LIS and NY estuaries. Conservation Activities Progress Measures Value at Grant Completion Conservation Activities Remove nitrogen from Long Island Sound waters (total for 3 sites) Other Activity Metric (lb nitrogen removed) 3.1 Remove carbon from Long Island Sound waters (total for 3 sites) Progress Measures Other Activity Metric (lb carbon removed) Value at Grant Completion 48 Conservation Activities Involve high school and college in research activities Progress Measures # schools involved in activity Value at Grant Completion 3 Conservation Activities Involve high school and college students in research activities Progress Measures Other Activity Metric (# students involved in research) Value at Grant Completion 25 Conservation Activities Generate kelp biomass (total for 3 sites) Progress Measures Other Activity Metric (lb kelp harvested (dry weight)) Value at Grant Completion 160 Conservation Activities Request assistance to establish seaweed aquaculture system (post-grant) Progress Measures Other Activity Metric (# Resource Managers requesting assistance from PIs) Value at Grant Completion 5 Conservation Activities Present workshop to fisheries industry, NGOs, Shellfish Commissions about how to set up bioextraction facility Progress Measures # of workshops, webcasts, webinars, special events, meetings associated with activity Value at Grant Completion 2 Conservation Activities Produce how to manual and distribute to NGOs, fishing industry and other entities who may apply technology Progress Measures Other Activity Metric (Manual produced) Value at Grant Completion 1 Conservation Activities Present at regional conferences about project (NE Aquaculture Conf and Exposition, Annual Milford Labor Aquaculture SEminar, before LISS CAC and STAC Progress Measures # of workshops, webcasts, webinars, special events, meetings associated with activity Value at Grant Completion 37 Conservation Activities Produce articles for scientific publications Progress Measures Other Activity Metric Value at Grant Completion 2 Conservation Activities Work with regional and local media to do articles about project Progress Measures Other Activity Metric Value at Grant Completion 18 Conservation Activities Produce sugar kelp seedstring Progress Measures Other Activity Metric (Length of seedstring, meter) Value at Grant Completion 1000 Conservation Activities Remove phosphorus from Long Island Sound waters (total for 3 sites) Progress Measures Other Activity Metric ((lb phosphorus removed)) Value at Grant Completion 0.3 Conservation Activities Produce miscellaneous articles Progress Measures Other Activity Metric Value at Grant Completion 3 Final Programmatic Report Narrative Instructions: Save this document on your computer and complete the narrative in the format provided. The final narrative should not exceed ten (10) pages; do not delete the text provided below. Once complete, upload this document into the on-line final programmatic report task as instructed. 1. Summary of Accomplishments In four to five sentences, provide a brief summary of the project’s key accomplishments and outcomes that were observed or measured. The sugar kelp, Saccharina latissima, grew well under different environmental conditions and extracted nutrients from LIS and the Bronx River estuary (BRE), demonstrating that nutrient bioextraction by seaweed aquaculture can be an effective coastal nutrient management tool in urbanized estuaries. We estimated that Saccharina latissima could remove up to 180 kg N ha-1 at BRE, 67 kg N ha-1 at western LIS and 38 kg N ha-1 at central LIS in a hypothetical kelp farm system with 1.5 m spacing between longlines. We estimated that the sugar kelp can sequester 1,350 (BRE), 1,800 (western LIS) and 1,200 (Central LIS) kg C ha -1, respectively. The potential monetary value of N sequestration by the sugar kelp at each site is up to $1,600 ha-1 (BRE), $760 ha-1 (western LIS) and $430 ha-1 (central LIS) if incorporated in the State of Connecticut Nitrogen Credit Trading Program and a carbon trading program. The potential economic values of C sequestration are up to $30-$300 ha-1, $40-$400 ha-1, and $24-$240 ha-1, respectively. These results suggest that seaweed aquaculture is a useful technique for nutrient bioextraction in urbanized coastal waters, such as LIS and BRE. An alternation of the warm and cold water species would maximize the nutrient bioextraction and provide invaluable ecosystem services that would have economic benefits to the region and to the USA. 2. Project Activities & Outcomes Activities Describe and quantify (using the approved metrics referenced in your grant agreement) the primary activities conducted during this grant. Activities are the actions that you completed with the grant funding. These activities helped you achieve the overall goals of your project. For example, acres restored, # installed rainwater harvesting sites, # of communities or volunteers engaged, data collected and analyzed etc.). Briefly explain the differences between the activities conducted during the grant and the activities agreed upon in your grant agreement and proposal. Outcomes Describe and quantify progress towards achieving the conservation activities described in your original proposal. (Quantify using the approved metrics referenced in your grant agreement or by using more relevant metrics not included in the application.) Outcomes are defined as the longer-term or “big picture” environmental result(s) that you expect will ultimately occur as a result of a particular activity or activities. For projects with continuing long-term benefits (such as riparian buffer plantings) you may want to estimate the environmental benefits after a set period of time (say, five years). For studies you should describe the usefulness of the data to applied resource management or it role in developing new tools or techniques for applied resource management. Briefly explain differences between what actually occurred compared to what was projected to occur. Provide any further information (such as unexpected outcomes) important for understanding project activities and outcome results. Task 1 – Development of laboratory cultures from spores of Saccharina latissima harvested from the wild Native Saccharina latissima seedstring was produced using the nursery rearing technology developed at UCONN (Fig. 1; Redmond et al. 2014). To develop seedstring of native Saccharina latissima, spores of wild-harvested specimens were collected in November, 2012 from LIS to obtain a wide variety of genotypes. Reproductive sorus tissue was scraped gently and cleansed of epibionts, immersed in a dilute solution of Betadine®, rinsed, and then wrapped in damp paper towels. The sorus tissue was stored overnight at 10°C in darkness. The following day, sorus tissue was re-immersed in autoclaved natural seawater to stimulate release of the flagellated meiospores (zoospores). After removing the spent sori, the spore-filled seawater was filtered through cheese-cloth to remove potential contaminants (Brinkhuis et al. 1987). Spore concentration was determined with a hemocytometer under a compound microscope, and adjusted via dilution with autoclaved Fig. 1. The sugar kelp nursery system at natural seawater to ca. 4000 cells mL-1. These zoospores were seeded UCONN Stamford. directly on seedstring (Korean type string: Guraron 24, 2mm) wrapped around 38 cm × 6 cm PVC nursery spools and placed in seeding tanks containing 10°C sterilized Provasoli’s enriched seawater (PES) and 2mL L-1 of germanium dioxide (GeO2). After 24 hours in the seeding tanks (dark, 10°C), the spools were then transferred to grow-out tanks at UCONN and BRASTEC containing sterilized PES (half strength) treated with GeO2 and maintained at 10°C. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) was adjusted to 20 μmol m-2 s-1 with a 12:12, L:D photoperiod, and then gradually increased to 100 μmol m-2 s-1 as sporophytes grew. Outcomes: The length of sugar kelp seedstring: unspecified (proposed) 1000 m (to date) Fig. 2. Temperatures at three farm sites during the study. Temperatures at the 0.5 and 1.0 m depths were averaged since for the majority of samples (90-94%) the two depths differed by ≤ 0.3° C. Task 2 – Cultivation of Saccharina at the demonstration sites. When the sporophytes of S. latissima reached approximately 1 mm in length, the kelp seedstring was outplanted at 0.5 m and 1.0 m depth at each farm site. The outplanting of kelp at Bronx River Estuary (BRE) site was delayed until December 20, 2012, because of delays in receiving from NY DEC the renewals of our farm permits. However, with the assistance of HDR (Kevin Keane and Eileen Wands), an extension of our permit for that site was finally granted in late Dec., which enable us to make our deployment. Our team also had to deal with damage caused by Hurricane Sandy. Moorings were reset with the assistance of Dr. Carter Newell. Following this, a broken mooring line from another winter storm was repaired just prior to deployment on December 20th. At the BRASTEC farm site in Western LIS (Fairfield, CT), kelp was outplanted on December 4th, 2012 and Jan. 11th, 2013. The outplanted kelp grew very well but a strong Nor’Easter storm (over 70 miles per hour wind gusts) on Jan. 31st moved the anchors of all our Coast Guard marker buoys. The January Nor’Easter caused severe damage at the kelp farm system. The majority of kelp longlines were tangled, causing a significant loss of kelp longlines and biomass. The surviving kelp longlines grew well, and most plants grew over 2 m in length. At Thimble Island Oyster Co. farm site in the Central LIS, the kelp seedstring was outplanted on Nov. 10th, 2013 at 0.5 and 1.0m depths. However, the shallow kelp longlines were severely braided by surface support longlines due to the aforementioned storms. Although the longlines at 1 m depth were also impacted by the storms, causing a loss of biomass, the surviving plants at this depth grew well. Most plants are over 2m in length at harvest. Outcomes: N/A Task 3 – Determination of growth rate and productivity of Saccharina latissima. Fig. 3. Salinities at three Long Island Sound sites over the duration of the study. The small inset graph shows average salinities from data pooled across Oct 2012 – Apr 2013. To evaluate the productivity of cultured Saccharina, the fresh weight biomass of kelp per longline (e.g. kg FW m-1) at final harvest was measured at each site. Each month, water samples (n = 3) adjacent to the longlines at 1.0 m depth were also collected for inorganic nutrient analysis via a SmartChem Discrete Analyzer (Westco Scientific Instruments, Inc., Brookfield, CT). At each site, a temperature sensor (HOBO data logger 64K - UA-002-64; http://www.onsetcomp.com/products/data-loggers/ua-002-64) was deployed at 1.0 m depth to monitor water temperature throughout the growing season. Salinity was also measured at the same depth using a refractometer (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA). 3.1. Temperature Temperatures at the three sites varied in similar fashion (Fig. 2), decreasing until mid-February, then increasing until the end of the study (June). Over the period during which all three sites had temperature records (7-Feb-2013 to 15-May-2013), temperatures varied significantly among the sites (Kruskal-Wallis Hdf=2 = 230, p < 0.001). The Bronx site was warmest, on average, over the experimental period (6.0° C), followed by the Central LIS site (5.9° C) and the Western LIS site (5.5° C), all significantly different from each other. Maximum water temperature was greatest at the Bronx site (15.2° C), followed by the Western and Central LIS sites (14.9° C and 14.0° C, respectively). Fig. 4. Dissolved inorganic nutrient concentrations over the course of the study (Nov 2012-June 2013). Top panel: total dissolved inorganic nitrogen. Bottom panel: dissolved orthophosphate. For some samples, the error bars are smaller than the symbols. 3.2. Salinity The salinities at the three sites showed similar patterns; roughly constant from Oct 2012 – Mar 2013, then declining through May and June (Fig. 3). For analysis, data were pooled across time from Oct 2012 – Apr 2013 for each site (sample date did not significantly influence salinity over this range). The salinities at the three sites differed significantly (Kruskal-Wallis Hdf=2 = 11.0, p = 0.004), with Central LIS (31.7 psu) > Bronx (28.0 psu), with Western LIS salinity (30.8 psu) similar to both other sites. 3.3. Inorganic Nutrients Total dissolved inorganic nitrogen differed by month (F5,36 = 33.6, p <0.001), site (F5,36 = 356, p <0.001), and the interaction term was also significant (F5,36 = 16.1, p <0.001). The latter term indicated the difference in temporal pattern of the Bronx River site and the Western and Central LIS sites. Total inorganic phosphorus differed by site only (F5,33 = 22.5 p <0.001) and month (F2,36 = 113, p <0.001; the interaction term was non-significant (F8,33 = 1.99, p = 0.079, however, power of the interaction test was relatively low; (0.376). 3.4. Yield (Productivity) Productivity (kg FW m-1 longline) was first examined using a site depth ANOVA for the Bronx and Western LIS sites. This analysis revealed no influence of depth (0.5 vs. 1.0 m) on total plant production. Hence, data from the two depths were combined. The ANOVA on depth-pooled data revealed no difference among sites (Fig. 5; F2,20 = 3.00, p = 0.072, however, variation due to site represented only 23% of total variation). Productivity at the Central LIS site was only 62% and 69% of productivity at the Western LIS and Bronx River sites, respectively. Task 4 – Evaluation of the nutrient bioextraction. 4.1. Tissue carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus contents The most comprehensive tissue N data sets came from the Bronx River and Western LIS sites (Central LIS lacked the 0.5 Fig. 6. Tissue nutrient content (% DW). Top panel: nitrogen across the study. Middle panel: carbon across the study. Bottom panel: phosphorus (end of study harvest sample only). For some samples, the error bars (standard deviation) are smaller than the symbols. Fig. 5. Yield (kg FW m-1) at 1.0 m depth over the duration of the study (depth (0.5 vs. 1.0 m) did not have significant effect on yield). ANOVA suggested mean values were not statistically different (p = 0.072), though site explained only 23% of the total variation). Fig. 7. Nutrient bioextraction by Saccharina latissima over the course of the study (i.e., biomass produced x nutrient content at harvest).symbols. m depth) for Feb-May (Fig. 6). These were first examined for site, sample date, and depth effects on tissue nitrogen content. Site (F1,42 = 119, p < 0.001) and date (F2,42 = 31, p < 0.001) were both highly significant terms, while depth (F1,42 = 0.05, p = 0.81) had no influence on tissue nitrogen content. Site and data also interacted significantly (F2,42 = 26, p < 0.001), revealing the decline in tissue nitrogen at the Western LIS site, and stasis in tissue N at the Bronx River site. Since depth did not influence tissue nitrogen content in the above analysis, depth was pooled for each site from Feb-May. Site and month had significant main effects (F2, 69 = 58, p < 0.001, F3, 69 = 176, p < 0.001, respectively), as well as significant interaction effects (F6, 69 = 44, p < 0.001). The latter term identified the differences in pattern at the Bronx River site (constancy of tissue nitrogen) and the Western and Central LIS sites (decline from ca. 4% to 1% nitrogen). The nitrogen content of samples collected in May were highest in Bronx River samples (2.6% DW), compared with the Western and Central LIS sites (1.0% and 1.2% DW, respectively). In general, tissue carbon content increased across the course of the study (Fig. 6); on average, carbon increased from 20.6% FW in Feb to 28.5% DW in May. Site, month, and the site x month interaction all significantly influenced the tissue carbon content (F6,847 = 6.9, p = 0.002, F3,69, = 30, p = <0.001, F6,69, = 10.9, p = <0.001). The interaction term was driven by the low carbon content in Apr 2013. The tissue carbon contents in May (last overlapping sample) at the Bronx River, Western LIS, and Central LIS sites were 26.8%, 29.1%, and 29.9% DW, respectively. Tissue phosphorus (P) was quantified only on harvested tissue (i.e., end point measurements only). Site significantly influenced the tissue phosphorus content (F2,9 = 539, p < 0.001). While the tissue phosphorus concentrations at each site all differed statistically, the Bronx River site produced tissue with by far the highest P concentration (i.e., possessed 70% more phosphorus (0.99% DW) than tissue from the Central LIS site (0.59% DW), and 102% more phosphorus than tissue from the Western LIS site (0.49% DW)). Table 1. Nutrient bioextraction at the three sites and two depths for hypothetical Saccharina latissima farms with longline separation distances of 1.5 and 6.0 m for 1.0 meter depth (Central LIS site did not grow S. latissima at 0.5 m). 1.5 m longline spacing Site Bronx River Western Long Island Sound Central Long Island Sound 6.0 m longline spacing N removal (kg ha-1) P removal (kg ha-1) C removal (kg ha-1) N removal (kg ha-1) P removal (kg ha-1) C removal (kg ha-1) 139 43 1,357 35 11 344 67 30 1,813 17 08 460 38 22 1,102 10 05 280 Fig. 8. . δ15N value for tissue samples collected across the study. For most samples, the error bars (standard deviation) are smaller than the symbols. 4.2. Nutrient bioextraction Integrating average total production (harvested biomass) and average tissue nutrient content at harvest provided overall estimates of nutrient bioextraction per meter of longline (Fig. 7). Depth appeared to influence the removal of nitrogen, carbon, and phosphorus at the BRE site. There, nitrogen and carbon removal at the 1.0 m depth were 104% and 163%, respectively, greater than the removal at 0.5 m (P removal was only estimated at the 1.0 m depth at all sites). At the Western LIS site, N and C removal were 13% and 11%, respectively, greater at the 1.0 m depth than removal at 0.5 m. The influence of site on nutrient bioextraction was examined using the full data set at 1.0 m depth. With the exception of carbon removal by Western LIS kelp, the BRE site always removed more nutrients than the other sites, especially the Central LIS site. This higher performance by kelp at BRE site ranged from 23% more carbon removed than the Central LIS site to 99% and 262% more phosphorus and nitrogen, removed, respectively, than from the Central LIS site. 4.3. δ15N The δ15N values for S. latissima tissue samples also differed (Fig. 8). Statistical analysis of the Feb-June samples (obtained for all sites) revealed significant effects of site (F2,24 = 577, p < 0.001), date (F2,24 = 30, p < 0.001), with a significant interaction between site and date (F6,24 = 8.1, p < 0.001). The interaction term was significant in part because the March δ15N values were elevated compared to the other dates. The May samples (last date with values for all sites) were all significantly different from one another; Bronx River tissue averaged -0.094 ± 0.51‰, Western Long Island Sound tissue averaged 13.56 ± 0.02‰, and Central Long Island Sound averaged 10.80 ± 1.28‰. 4.4. Thallus thickness Thallus thickness was evaluated at two points along the thallus; 10 cm distal to the meristem and at the widest section of the blade. The ANOVA (site x thallus position) did not reject the null hypothesis of equal thicknesses (F2,86 = 3.03, p = 0.054), but the low power of the test (0.396) suggests caution in interpretation. Fig. 9. Thickness of Saccharina latissima thalli at the widest In fact, the ANOVA for the thicknesses measured only at the point. Different letters denote statistically different values. widest point along the blade revealed significant differences (n = 30 for each site). between sites (F2,87 = 15.4, p < 0.001; Fig. 9). Average thicknesses at the three sites were all different from one another; Bronx River (645 µm) > Central LIS (555 µm) > Western LIS (476 µm). 4.5. Phytoremediation Heavy metal and phosphorus (P) contents were also evaluated with sugar kelp samples at harvest from all three farm sites (Table 1). Cadmium, lead and phosphorus contents were significantly higher at the BRE sites than LIS sites. However, the mercury concentration in kelp grown at the Central LIS site was higher than that at other two sites (Table 2). We also estimated heavy metal removal rates in our hypothetical nutrient bioextraction 1 hectare sugar kelp farm systems (Table 3). Table 2. Heavy metal and phosphorus contents (μg g-1) in sugar kelp tissue from three different farm sites at harvest (mean ± SD). Cr As Cd Pb Hg BRE 1.22 (±0.22) 26.92 (±1.30) 0.37 (±0.03) 1.95 (±0.27) 0.047 (±0.003) Western LIS 0.84 (±0.22) 27.88 (±2.05) 0.19 (±0.01) 0.40 (±0.08) 0.086 (±0.002) Central LIS 0.96 (±0.09) 29.78 (±3.52) 0.21 (±0.06) 0.85 (±0.42) 0.107 (±0.008) Table 3. Potential heavy metal removal (g ha-1 mon-1) in our hypothetical nutrient bioextraction 1 hectare sugar kelp farm system (1.5 m or 6.0 spacing). 1.5 m longline spacing 6 m longline spacing -1 Removal (kg ha ) Removal (kg ha-1) Site Cr As Cd Pb Hg Cr As Cd Pb Hg BRE 53.1 1172.2 16.1 84.9 2.0 13.3 293.1 4.0 21.2 0.51 Western LIS 36.6 1214.0 8.3 17.4 3.7 9.1 303.5 2.1 4.4 0.94 Central LIS 41.8 1296.8 9.1 37.0 4.7 10.5 324.2 2.3 9.3 1.16 Outcomes: - Generate kelp biomass (total for 3 sites): 1320 lb DW (proposed) 160 lb DW (to date) - Remove nitrogen from Long Island Sound waters (total for 3 sites): 53 lb (proposed) 3.1 lb (to date) - Remove carbon from Long Island Sound waters (total for 3 sites): 343 lb (proposed) 48 lb (to date) - Remove phosphorus from Long Island Sound waters (total for 3 sites): unspecified (proposed) 0.3 lb (to date) Task 5 – Outreach and results dissemination. 5.1. Workshop Two workshops were held to disseminate project results conducted in New York and Connecticut. Workshops were advertised through various email listserves as well as direct contact to interested individuals. Target audience included municipalities, regulatory agencies, NGOs and others who have expressed an interest in water quality enhancement. The rationale to hold workshops in Connecticut and New York was to provide regulatory agencies, who have restricted travel allowances, the opportunity to learn project results. Project information was summarized in the form of handouts and provided to workshop participants. The first workshop was held at one of the project partners’ facilities, the Bridgeport Regional Aquaculture Science and Technology Center in Bridgeport, CT on April 3rd, 2013. In addition to project researchers, speakers included representatives from federal and state agencies presenting on similar projects on bioextraction and on current programs developed to improve water quality. A review of the aquaculture permitting process in Connecticut was also presented. Twenty-six participants attended the workshop as well as a tour of the off-shore seaweed farm site. Space at the Mamaroneck Town Center, located in Mamaroneck, NY, was donated to hold the second workshop on October 10th, 2013. Twenty-two participants attended. In addition to previous methods in advertising the workshop, a media advisory was developed and distributed with the assistance of Margret Van Patten, the Communications Director for Connecticut Sea Grant. In addition to project researchers, additional speakers were invited to present similar projects on bioextraction and on current programs developed to improve water quality. A review of the aquaculture permitting process in New York coastal waters was also presented. 5.2. Cultivation manual We have developed cultivation manual for sugar kelp. This cultivation manual is now available online (http://s.uconn.edu/seaweedplaylist). Additional support for this manual and DVD was provided by CT Sea Grant College Program (R/A-38 and R/A-39) and NOAA SBIR I and II (WC133R10CN0221). 5.3. Presentations We have presented some of the project results in relevant and appropriate events (Northeast Algal Symposium (April, 2013 and 2014); Annual meetings of Phycological Society of America (Aug., 2013); Aquaculture America (Feb., 2013); Northeast Aquaculture Conference and Exposition (Dec., 2012); ASLO (Feb., 2013); Long Island Sound Research Conference (April, 2013); Ocean Sciences Meetings (Feb., 2014) and Joint Aquatic Sciences Meeting (May, 2014). Dr. Yarish made an invited keynote presentation at a Maine Sea Grant seaweed aquaculture workshop, entitled “The Seaweed Scene 2013” Aug. 29, 2013. Drs. Yarish and Kim, and BRASTEC’s director John Curtis, were invited to present at the 1st International Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) symposium in Busan, Korea, Mar. 28-29, 2013. The PIs have also presented at other public events as a key note speaker or an invited speaker, including The Society of In Vitro Biology Annual Meeting (June, 2013), CT Cosmetic Society annual meeting (Sept., 2013), CT NOFA's 32nd Annual Winter Conference (Mar. 2014). BRASTEC’s first ‘Chef Event’ for seaweed (May, 2013), Long Island Sound Educators Conference (Southeastern New England Marine Educators; April, 2014), Ocean Science Public Lecture Series at Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, Florida Atlantic University (May, 2014), Three Revisers Community College (May 2014), CT nitrogen Trading Board (July, 2014), Nature Center at Sherwood Island State Park (June 2014), Maine Seaweed Festival (Aug. 2014), Mystic Aquarium’s Ridgeway Seminar Series (Sept., 2014), etc. 5.4. Publications: Kim J.K., G.P. Kraemer and C. Yarish. submitted. Sugar kelp aquaculture in Long Island Sound and the Bronx River Estuary for nutrient bioextraction and ecosystem services. Estuaries and Coasts. Kraemer, G.P., J.K. Kim and C. Yarish. 2014. Seaweed aquaculture: bioextraction of nutrients to reduce eutrophication. Association of Massachusetts Wetland Scientists Newsletter. April 2014 No. 89, 16-17. Kim J.K., G.P. Kraemer and C. Yarish. 2014. Integrated multi-tropic aquaculture in the U.S.A. In Greening the Blue Revolution: the Turquoise Revolution of Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) (Eds. Chopin T., A. Buschmann, and A. Neori). Springer. In press. Redmond, S., L. Green, C. Yarish, J.K. Kim, and C. Neefus. 2014. New England Seaweed Culture Handbook-Nursery Systems. Connecticut Sea Grant CTSG-14-01. 92 pp. PDF file. URL: http://seagrant.uconn.edu/publications/aquaculture/handbook.pdf. 92 pp) Redmond, S., L. Green, C. Yarish, J. Kim, and C. Neefus. 2014. New England Seaweed Culture Handbook-Nursery Systems. (DVD) http://s.uconn.edu/seaweedplaylist 5.5. Other Outreach Activities: The PIs also have trained BRASTEC students, faculty and staff on sugar kelp nursery techniques. A demonstration nursery system is in place at BRASTEC. Drs. Yarish and Kim received Connecticut Quality Improvement Award (CQIA) Innovation Prize (June 2013). This award was for Performance Excellence criteria in an effort to advance innovative programs that improve quality performance and marketplace competitiveness. Dr. Yarish also received UCONN’s 2013 Provost Award for his contributions in outreach, service and research, Best Presentation Award from CT Cosmetic Society (Mar., 2014). Our effort to promote ecosystem services provided by kelp, along with Dr. Wikfors’ team at NOAA Milford lab, recently received national acknowledge by US EPA in their annual report (attached). Dr. Yarish also participated in a National Webinar for the US EPA on Nutrient Bioextraction (Nov. 21, 2013). UCONN’s School of Business team (lead by T. Dowding) along with the School of Law developed a regulatory frame work for seaweed aquacultre which was passed by the CT State legislature (PA 13-238, SB 803) and signed by the Governor D. Malloy on July 2nd, 2013. This regulatory frame work provides the Bureau of Aquaculture of CT’s Department of Agriculture as the primary regulatory authority for seaweed aquaculture in CT. UCONN’s School of Business team (lead by T. Dowding) along with the UCONN PIs (C. Yarish and J.K. Kim) developed a business plan for non-profit seedstock nursery for the sugar kelp. We determined $2.00 per meter as the breakeven price for seedstring based on costs of the kelp nursery system at UCONN, assuming that up to 4,000m of seedstring can be produced per year. The School of Business and the PIs also worked with UCONN’s School of Engineering determining the sugar content in the kelp grown in LIS. The LIS grown sugar kelp contained a high concentration of sugar, 45.3%. This will be important for biofuel applications of the sugar kelp biomass, if there are no other applications of the biomass. Outcomes: - Involve high school and college in research activities: 5 (proposed) 3 (to date; UCONN, Purchase College and BRASTEC) - Involve high school and college students in research activities: 18 (proposed) 25 (to date) - Requests of assistance to establish seaweed aquaculture system (post-grant): 10 (proposed) 5 (to date) - Adoptions of seaweed aquaculture as part of water quality enhancement program (post-grant): 3 (proposed) 0 (to date) - Present workshop to fisheries industry, NGOs, Shellfish Commissions about how to set up bioextraction facility:1 (proposed) 2 (to date) - Produce how to manual and distribute to NGOs, fishing industry and other entities who may apply technology:1 (proposed) 1 (to date) - Present at regional conferences about project: 6 (proposed) 37 (to date) - Produce articles for scientific publications: 2 (proposed) 1 in press and 1 in review (to date) - Produce miscellaneous articles: unspecified (proposed) 3 (to date) - Work with regional and local media to do articles about project: 3 (proposed) 18 (to date) 3. Lessons Learned Describe the key lessons learned from this project, such as the least and most effective conservation practices or notable aspects of the project’s methods, monitoring, or results. How could other conservation organizations adapt their projects to build upon some of these key lessons about what worked best and what did not? 1. The sugar kelp, Saccharina latissima, grew well under different environmental conditions and extracted nutrients from LIS and the Bronx River estuary (BRE), demonstrating that nutrient bioextraction by seaweed aquaculture can be an effective coastal nutrient management tool in urbanized estuaries. 2. The δ15N values indicated that wastewater treatment plants were the primary nitrogen sources for the growth of the sugar kelp at the western of the central LIS farm sites. Surprisingly, we found no influence of the wastewater treatment plant discharge at the BRE site, even though it is closest to a wastewater treatment plant. It may be because the super storm Sandy in October - November, 2012 and winter storms (e.g. January, 2013, Nor’Easter) during the growing season at the Bronx site, might have resuspended surface sediments, resulting in the washing 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. away of the heavier nitrogen isotope (15N) and subsequent release of 14N enriched nitrogen from the sediment, as well as the flushing of lighter nitrogen from terrestrial systems. The potential monetary value of N sequestration by the sugar kelp at each site is up to $1,600 ha-1 (BRE), $760 ha1 (western LIS) and $430 ha-1 (central LIS). The potential economic values of C sequestration are up to $30-$300 ha-1, $40-$400 ha-1, and $24-$240 ha-1, respectively. These values reflect incorporation into nitrogen and carbon trading programs. When sufficient nutrients were available for the growth of the sugar kelp (i.e. BRE), the growing season for the sugar kelp may be extended to very late spring, which has never been reported in the scientific literature. Salinity fluctuation at the BRE site did not affect the productivity of the sugar kelp, maybe due to the sufficient nutrients but might affect the morphology (thickness) of the sugar kelp. Advantages of sugar kelp aquaculture in highly urbanized estuaries such as Long Island Sound and New York estuaries are 1) the growing season of the sugar kelp rarely overlaps with the period of heavy recreational boat activities; 2) the sugar kelp growing season occurs during the off-season for shellfish farming, and; 3) cultivation requires minimum maintenance effort and, hence, cost until harvest. Challenges include natural disasters (e.g. Nor’easters, storms, etc.) during the winter season as we had experienced during our study period. It is, therefore, important to have an appropriate farm design and to determine appropriate locations considering environmental factors including waves, currents, nutrient conditions, salinity, sediment types, etc. 4. Dissemination Briefly identify any dissemination of lessons learned or other project results to external audiences, such as the public, governmental agencies, educational entities, scientific, community-based and conservation organizations. Our Nutrient Bioextraction project was selected as one of the best practices of EPA in 2012/2013 FY (Going Really Green: Sea Farming for Environmental and Economic Benefits; http://water.epa.gov/resource_performance/performance/upload/7-Going-Really-Green-Sea-Farming-for-Environmentaland-Economic-Benefits.pdf). Our work has received a great deal of media attention (both TV and print), including The Wall Street Journal, CNN, Hartford Current, NPR, Scientific American, New Haven Register, CBS news, The Day, CT Post, CT.com, Westchester Magazine, River Head News Review, Wildfoodgirl.com, 27east.com, lohud.com, etc. (attached). 5. Maintenance and Management Describe specific provisions for long-term maintenance, management and protection, as appropriate, associated with project (i.e., maintenance of debris-catching devices, LWD jams, or removing blockages etc.)? N/A 6. Partners: Describe the contribution of any partnering organization to the project or new partnerships that were developed as a result of the project? Purchase College (G.P. Kraemer) worked with UCONN PIs (C. Yarish and J.K. Kim) for the design of experiments, writing manuscripts and reports, presentations. Purchase College also provided student labor to support the field and laboratory work. Rocking the Boat (RTB) provided all the necessary logistic field and boat support for the project. RTB was also in support of the development and supervision of the kelp long-lines at their farm site at the Bronx River estuary, NY. BRASTEC was in support of lab-based activities including maintenance and supervision of the sugar kelp nursery system at BRASTEC. BRASTEC also provided logistic field and boat support for the project and also services for the development and supervision of their Fairfield kelp farm site. Thimble Island Oyster Co.: provided all the necessary logistic field and boat support for the project at their sugar kelp farm site at the Thimble Islands, Branford, CT. Thimble Island Oyster Co. also provided services for the maintenance and supervision of the kelp long-lines at their farm site. 7. Project Documents Include in your final programmatic report, via the Uploads section of this task, the following: 2-5 representative photos from the project. Photos need to have a minimum resolution of 300 dpi; report publications, GIS data, brochures, videos, outreach tools, press releases, media coverage; any other project deliverables per the terms of your grant agreement and in your original proposal. POSTING OF FINAL REPORT: This report and attached project documents may be shared by the Foundation and any Funding Source for the Project via their respective websites. In the event that the Recipient intends to claim that its final report or project documents contains material that does not have to be posted on such websites because it is protected from disclosure by statutory or regulatory provisions, the Recipient shall clearly mark all such potentially protected materials as “PROTECTED” and provide an explanation and complete citation to the statutory or regulatory source for such protection. http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2012/10/12/162728509/kelp-for-farmers-seaweed-becomes-a-newcrop-in-america Kelp For Farmers: Seaweed Becomes A New Crop In America OCT. 12, 2012 By CRAIG LEMOULT A new kind of crop is being planted in the United States, and it doesn't require any land or fertilizer. Farming it improves the environment, and it can be used in a number of ways. So what is this miracle cash crop of the future? It's seaweed. Charlie Yarish, professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Connecticut, loves seaweed. In nature, he says, when seaweed turns a rich chocolate color, that means the plant is picking up nitrogen, a process called nutrient bioextraction. And for Yarish, this nitrogen extraction is the most exciting aspect of seaweed farming. Many plants and animals cannot survive when there is too much nitrogen in the water, but seaweed is able to "capture" the nitrogen, as well as contaminants in the water. A United Nations report says that nearly 16 million tons of seaweed were farmed in 2008 — most of it in Asia. Yarish helped a company called Ocean Approved start the United States' first open-water kelp farm in the Gulf of Maine in 2006, and the business is growing. Now, he's helping to create a seaweed farm off the coast of Connecticut. Bren Smith owns and runs the Thimble Island Oyster Company, off the coast of Branford, Conn. After his business was hit hard by Tropical Storm Irene last year, ruining about 80 percent of the shellfish crop, Smith started looking around for something more resilient to farm. That's when he found Yarish, who agreed to help set him up in the seaweed farming business. This fall, in the water above his shellfishing lines, he'll stretch a 150-foot line about a meter below the surface of the water. They'll be seeded with kelp spores grown in Yarish's lab. "There's no barns, there's no tractors. This is what's so special about ocean farming. It's that it's got a small footprint and it's under the water. I mean, we're so lucky; I feel like I stumbled on this just great secret that we then can model and spread out to other places," Smith says. Kelp grows in the winter time, and by spring, Smith should have 9 to 12 feet of growth. He and Yarish are hoping to try another species in the summer. Because shellfishing is so heavily regulated, the waters near the Thimble Islands are clean, and the seaweed is safe to eat. And it will also help remove nitrogen from the water. "The plan is to actually split it into a couple different experimental markets — one for food, one for fertilizer, one for fish food. I'm [also] working with a skin care company in Connecticut, and then one for biofuel," Smith says. He's even hoping he can someday fuel his own boat with biofuel from the seaweed. Smith is most hopeful that seaweed will take off as a food, but here's the big question: Will Americans eat seaweed? "If I can't figure out how [to] make this taste good, I'm going to lose a lot of money out here," he says. That's where chefs like David Santos come in. Santos has worked at some top restaurants in New Jersey and New York. He now runs a private supper club in the New York area, and is planning to open his own restaurant soon. Santos says the food world works in kind of a trickle-down way, starting with the fancy restaurants. "If the big chefs don't use it, it will never catch. Like, it just won't," he says. But seaweed is a great ingredient, Santos says, and if chefs start having access to a fresh locally farmed product, they'll start using it. "So if you're the cool guy using the fresh seaweed first, like, that's a big deal," he says. Santos says he's hoping to go to Bren Smith's Connecticut farm this spring with some of his chef friends to check it out for themselves. But he's also looking forward to creating some new seaweed dishes. Tags: seaweed farming http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323415304578368530350386620.html#articleTabs %3Darticle Life Down on the Kelp Farm March 19, 2013, By JOSEPH DE AVILA BRANFORD, Conn.—From the bobbing deck of his 24-foot boat in Long Island Sound, a quarter mile from shore, Bren Smith pulled out of the water a rope draped with ribbon-shaped blades of fresh sugar kelp. He grabbed a few handfuls of the green, nearly translucent variety of seaweed for samples he planned to serve at lunch with a chef and organic farmer. Mr. Smith, who has cultivated shellfish such as oysters and clams for years, is now also a seaweed farmer. He said his fellow fishermen have been skeptical. "They think I'm crazy," he said. They ask, "'Why would anyone eat seaweed? It's stuff you find on the beach.'" The Branford man hopes to become the first to market farmed seaweed from Long Island Sound. Asia dominates production in the $7.1 billion seaweed industry, and only a few companies in the U.S. harvest it. Seaweed is sold for sushi, for salads, as a dried snack and as a fertilizer ingredient, among many uses. Most of those U.S. companies sell wild seaweed. Mr. Smith, the owner of the Thimble Island Oyster Co., hopes his locally farmed seaweed will appeal to foodies and chefs in the region. Benjamin Lowy for The Wall Street Journal Prof. Charles Yarish grows a variety of kelp in the University of Connecticut's marine biology labs in Stamford. "We have great resources in Long Island Sound, and we think there is significant potential in this area," said Steven Reviczky, commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Agriculture. Mr. Smith decided to diversify his commercial-fishing business by growing kelp in the winter—when he isn't as busy harvesting shellfish—and to reduce his crops' exposure to violent weather. The tidal surges associated with superstorm Sandy and Tropical Storm Irene stirred up mud that killed his shellfish. While Mr. Smith awaits a state permit to sell the kelp, he is giving away samples to chefs and others. "It's wicked clean," said Chef Brad Stabinsky of Chamard Vineyards and Bistro in Clinton, Conn. "I found it to be tender....It has a nice mineral component to it that I liked. It wasn't that powerful of seaweed at that stage of growth." Mr. Stabinsky recently made a béarnaise sauce but swapped out tarragon for Mr. Smith's kelp and served that on top of raw oysters. "I loved it and my staff loved it," he said. Mayur Subbarao of Bittermens Spirits, a liquor company in New Orleans, also has been experimenting with Mr. Smith's kelp by infusing various boozy concoctions with it. "I haven't had anybody say these things are weird," Mr. Subbarao said. "If anything, I think people are intrigued." Mr. Smith's kelp got its start in a University of Connecticut lab in Stamford. Charles Yarish, a professor at the university who has studied seaweed cultivation for more than two decades, grows sugar-kelp seeds there for a project he runs with Purchase College in New York. He also grows a red, bushy seaweed called gracilaria. Nature groups like the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and government-funded research organizations such as Connecticut Sea Grant and the Long Island Sound Study sponsored Mr. Yarish's seaweed project to show how seaweed can keep nutrient pollution in check. For decades, discharges by wastewater treatment plants and land runoff have led to excessive levels of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus in Long Island Sound. Nutrient overloads lead to low levels of dissolved oxygen in the water, which can kill fish. Seaweed can help. "They suck up a lot of dissolved nutrients," said George Kraemer, professor of Biology and Environmental Studies at Purchase College. Regulations in Connecticut pose one hurdle to the industry, said Tim Dowding, professor-in-residence at the University of Connecticut's School of Business. The seaweed needs to be tested for toxins such as mercury and pathogens such as salmonella. That can be a time-consuming process, he said. Some of his students who are studying how to start businesses processing seaweed for products such as fertilizers have experienced long waits for state approvals. "The challenge is cutting through the bureaucratic quagmire," Mr. Dowding said. "Anything like this that is breaking new ground is a challenge and takes time," said Mr. Reviczky of the Department of Agriculture. In water 20 to 25 feet deep just off the Thimble Islands, Mr. Smith has set up two, 150-foot lines of rope that are submerged about three feet below the water's surface and held into place by chains and 400pound anchors. The kelp seeds, grown on a string back at the university lab, are wrapped around the 150-foot lines. Sugar kelp is best harvested after one month to three months, when it has reached one to three feet in length, Mr. Smith said. Much longer than that, and it becomes rubbery. He plans to harvest about two tons of sugar kelp by the end of the winter season. Next year, he's shooting for 21 tons. He admits it is far from certain whether he will find enough chefs and regular consumers who want a fresh, local option for kelp. "That is the 'what if?'" Mr. Smith said. "Luckily, it tastes good." http://www.ct.com/news/advocates/latest-news/nm-ht15ncseaweed-20130409,0,961288.story Seaweed Farming in the Connecticut Sound Could Help Grow the Economy By Gregory B. Hladky April 10, 2013 A 21st century riddle for you: What's slimy, green and brown, sometimes smelly and disgusting, but also a potentially wonderful anti-pollution tool that's good to eat and could turn into an economic pot of gold for Connecticut? The answer, of course, is seaweed. That's right, the same sort of icky stuff that can pile up at the beach or wrap around your legs when you're walking through the waves at Hammonasset or Silver Sands. Seaweed has got a lot of Connecticut folks all hot and bothered these days. They include scientists at the University of Connecticut, state aquaculture honchos, federal and state marine experts, environmentalists, students at a Bridgeport science and technical school, and a shellfishing outfit in Branford that wants to become this state's first seaweed-farming operation. Connecticut's legislature is right now considering a bill to create a new and much simpler licensing system to make it easier for potential seaweed farmers to start growing the stuff in Long Island Sound. One major reason for all the excitement is that seaweed turns out to be a great way to suck up some of the nitrogen pollution that's been screwing up Long Island Sound. "I made that suggestion 20 years ago to the EPA and no one was interested," Charles Yarish says with a chuckle. Yarish is a top researcher with UConn's Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Marine Sciences and the acknowledged guru of seaweed farming. He's been studying seaweed — as a source of food for humans and livestock as well as an anti-pollution engine — for decades. "We are the leading [seaweed] operation in the U.S. right now," Yarish says with pride. Yarish has been growing seaweed in his Stamford lab and in Long Island Sound plots off Fairfield and the mouth of the Bronx River for years. Those seaweed farms have produced some astonishing numbers for cutting nitrogen pollution in seawater. Nitrogen gets into the Sound from sewage treatment plants (there are 79 in Connecticut alone), industrial waste, agricultural farmland and from all the fertilizer spread on suburban lawns that gets washed into rivers and streams. All those tons and tons of nitrogen trigger huge blooms in aquatic plants. They die and get eaten by bacteria and algae, which use up most of the oxygen in the water. In some parts of the Sound, this pollution cycle can suffocate or drive away other marine organisms like fish and lobsters. It's the nitrogen pollution that causes those red and brown "tides" of algae that force officials to occasionally shut down beaches. Yarish gets all whipped up when talking about how much nitrogen his seaweed can remove from the Sound's waters. (The seaweed simply takes up and processes the stuff, just the way plants on land take up fertilizer, and the nitrogen that's a pollutant in seawater is turned into edible vegetable matter in the plants.) In a one hectare (that's about 2.47 acres) plot, Yarish has achieved from six-to-eight kilos of nitrogen removed in an October test, to 33-60 kilos (as much as 145 pounds) of nitrogen removed from the water in a July experiment. "It's a huge nitrogen remover," says Kristin DeRosia-Banick, a state environmental analyst with the Bureau of Aquaculture. Yarish and his colleagues are cultivating seaweed seeds (one type for a summer crop called "sea asparagus" and another for a winter crop known as "sugar kelp") in tanks at their UConn lab. He's helped get one seaweed farm going in Maine and is working on another that's ready to harvest its first crop next month from the waters off Branford's Thimble Islands. The seaweed is grown attached to long lines anchored in waters 20-25 feet deep, and when it's long enough, the farmer cuts off the vegetation and brings it to shore for processing or sale. The kicker to all this is that the seaweed these people are growing can be eaten. (It's always been used as a fertilizer — Native Americans were doing that when the settlers arrived from Europe.) It's good for animal food, and more and more restaurants across the country are finding ways to use seaweed beyond sushi. Seaweed is being touted as a fantastic health food that can help with everything from weight loss to lowering blood pressure. In fact, Yarish told lawmakers, there are 50 pounds of "high-quality, vacuum-packed kelp pasta noodles" stored in a freezer at the Bridgeport Regional Aquaculture Science and Technology Education Center. All that's needed is state approval and those noodles could be sold to restaurants and consumers. http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Kids-prepare-chef-prepared-seaweed-recipes-4488773.php Kids prepare chef-prepared seaweed recipes Linda Conner Lambeck May 4, 2013 BRIDGEPORT -- Kelly DeMeo, a junior at Bridgeport's Regional Aquaculture Science and Technology Education Center, is more apt to name her seafood than eat it. Even so, DeMeo, of Fairfield, was game to try the seaweed that was incorporated into a number of recipes at the school's first-ever celebrity chef event. "I'll tell you why you should eat seaweed. Most of the popular food we eat today is incredibly unhealthy for us -- beef, corn, soy. We need to start thinking about foods that are not necessarily popular, but are incredibly good for our bodies and restorative and regenerative, like seaweed," Chef Bun Lai, of Miya's Sushi in New Haven, told the 60 invited guests at the event. Lai called seaweed a "super food." Along with Mark Shadle, owner of G-Zen, a Branford restaurant that specializes in vegan and raw foods, the pair whipped up a menu that included a seaweed miso soup, watercress and sea asparagus salad, a tilapia dish with seaweed garnish and seaweed-wrapped sushi that the audience helped assemble. The event took place at Angie's At Aqua, the school's open-to-the-public seafood market. The demonstration is something school director John Curtis has envisioned hosting ever since an addition was built onto the school two years ago to include the market and seafood-spawning laboratories. "This will be the first of many," Curtis said. Home to boat-building, tilapia-breeding and lobster-restoration projects, Aqua is now growing its own seaweed in Long Island Sound with the help of the University of Connecticut and hopes legislation being considered by the state Legislature this spring will allow it to package and sell it to the public. Charles Yarish, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at UConn's Stamford campus, said seaweed -- what he calls sea vegetables -- has a potential to be a much bigger business than it is in the United States. Worldwide it is a $5 to $7 billion industry, but most seaweed today comes from China, Korea and Japan. The United States accounts for only $35 million of seaweed sales. "Growing seaweed locally can ensure a cleaner, higher-quality product," said Yarish. "It's like eating green vegetables. You get all the nutrients it soaks up." And it can help clean up the sound, as well. Yarish grows local kelp, a brownish type of seaweed, from microscopic stages on string in his laboratory. When the kelp is about the size of a pinhead, it is moved to Long Island Sound and the seeded string is unwound on long lines that are suspended 3-6 feet below the surface. Yarish oversees three farm sites in the sound, which have 250 feet of line at each site. Low in cholesterol and high in fiber, seaweed is packed with Vitamins C and K, calcium, iron and magnesium. It is not only good for human consumption, but can be used in pet foods, shampoos, cosmetics and fertilizers. Treasen Hooper, an Aqua senior from of Bridgeport who helped prepare the feast, made a face at the dry, salty seaweed. "It is an acquired taste," she said. It's "different, but not disgusting or anything," said Ophelia Barnett, also a senior from Bridgeport. The seaweed used for the demonstration came from the Baby Kelp Leaf Company in the Thimble Islands. It will be first in line to market seaweed if the state Legislature agrees to license the practice. Abby Pierger, a senior at Aqua from Trumbull, said her experience with seaweed was at a "seaweed party" held at the school in her sophomore year. She said the seaweed-infused chocolate milk wasn't bad. Curtis said he started eating seaweed -- of the nori variety -- on his first trip to Asia in 1998. Now, he is hooked. http://www.theday.com/article/20130527/NWS01/305279955/1070 Long Island Sound delicacy on NYC menus, and it isn't fish, it's seaweed By Judy Benson May 27, 2013 Kelp shipment marks first sale of new effort Branford - In a first for Long Island Sound, 120 pounds of kelp farmed in waters near the Thimble Islands has made its way to the plates and soupbowls of New York City restaurants. "We're the only one in the country selling a fresh kelp product," said Bren Smith, owner of the Thimble Island Oyster Co., which grew the long, wide kelp ribbons on a 20-acre plot where he also raises oysters, mussels and clams. "It has a short shelf life, but because I'm close to New York City, I can sell it directly there." Margaret Van Patten, communications director of Connecticut Sea Grant, said the sale is significant because it marks the first time seaweed farmed in the Sound has been sold as a food product. Sea Grant, based at the University of Connecticut's Avery Point campus in Groton, worked with Smith, as did Charles Yarish, a UConn professor of ecology and evolutionary biology who has been involved in seaweed research for decades. Before the sale took place about three weeks ago, Smith had to obtain permits from the state Department of Public Health and the state Department of Consumer Protection. The kelp was also subjected to product safety tests, which required the purchase of new equipment that was funded by Sea Grant. "Now that this has proved successful, Sea Grant is going to be looking to work with more people who want to grow this crop," Van Patten said. David Carey, director of the Aquaculture division of the state Department of Agriculture, said the permits created for this new crop specify that it can be grown only in areas also approved for shellfish farming, so it must meet the same water quality standards. "We're excited about this," Carey said, adding that he sees potential for former lobstermen who lost their livelihood when the lobster population declined to repurpose their boats for seaweed farming. "Their boats would be the perfect size," he said. To develop this market, he said, more research and investment is needed in economical ways of processing seaweed and increasing the market. In addition to the permits and testing for the fresh product, Smith has also obtained the approvals to blanch, freeze, package and sell processed kelp. He is using facilities at the Bridgeport Regional Aquaculture Science & Technology Education Center for the processing. Chefs in New York are using the kelp in soups, salads, butter and some Nordic cuisine dishes, he said. Some are also working to develop dishes such as kelp ice cream, cocktails and pickles. The kelp he is growing, raised from native seed stock originally from a site off Pine Island in Groton collected by Yarish, is not the type of seaweed used in sushi dishes. While the markets and uses for local kelp are still emerging, he said, it was more commonly eaten in past decades. "We're trying to reclaim a very old tradition," he said. "It's a really good local food." He is also selling his harvest to Yale for use as a fertilizer on its farm. Over the next few months, he plans to triple his kelp production and try to grow other types of seaweed. Smith said he turned to seaweed farming after 80 percent of his shellfish crop was wiped out by Hurricane Irene and Superstorm Sandy. He started doing research on the Internet about other crops he could grow in his shellfish beds, and came across references to Yarish and his seaweed research. Yarish said Smith's success "will open people's eyes" about the potential for seaweed farming in Long Island Sound. Several areas in the eastern Sound would be suitable, he added. Areas with good water quality and water depths of 20 feet to 100 feet are required. To help foster interest in others starting seaweed farms, Yarish is working with Sea Grant to develop a kelp cultivation manual. The kelp Smith is growing, known as sugar kelp, "is the same stuff you find walking at Ocean Beach Park. "This is local, high yield and sustainable," Yarish said. Yarish is growing different types of seaweed at sites off Fairfield and in the East River near New York City, among others. In addition to promoting it as a highly nutritious food, Yarish said he and UConn are also partnering with a Shelton-based startup, Sea Green Organics, on an organic seaweed-based fertilizer. This article distributed to other via AP, including http://www.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/2013/06/02/kelp-from-sound-farmed-forrestaurants/MmoK8jCr34CcJ4XPr67UwL/story.html http://washingtonexaminer.com/kelp-from-li-sound-farmed-for-restaurants/article/feed/2103219 http://www.yourpublicmedia.org/content/wnpr/seaweed-and-sound Seaweed And The Sound ONE FISHERMAN EMBARKING ON NEW ENTERPRISE By WNPR Staff, Jan Ellen Spiegel May 21, 2013 For the last decade or so, Connecticut’s fishermen and shellfishermen have weathered a nearly non-stop storm of difficulties; some related to climate change; some from pollution. One fisherman who has had enough is embarking on a new enterprise that many hope will help to save or create jobs on Long Island Sound, and clean it up. Brendan Smith: Isn’t it beautiful? Look at that. What Brendan Smith is calling beautiful is a long rope covered with slimy, green, wet seaweed. He’s hoisted it high against a deep blue sky above Long Island Sound in the Thimble Islands. Seaweed or kelp – whatever you choose to call it, may be a perpetual bane to outboard motors – but to Smith – it’s the future. Smith: This line right here this is 2 months of growth. For 10 years Smith has farmed the Sound as the Thimble Island Oyster Company. Smith: I’ve been wiped out 3 times from different storms, from mud, from everything form starfish to drills to other kinds of critters that kill my oysters. So I actually got online and started searching on Google looking for other ways to grow things. It just so happened that the world’s expert on growing seaweed was in Stamford at UConn. That would be Charlie Yarish. For decades he’s researched seaweed’s natural ability to soak up substances that can harm the Sound like nitrogen and phosphorus that runoff from the fertilizers people put on their lawns. Yarish: It is something that the Asians been doing for a long time and we can start doing that using our own farming technologies. Smith decided to try it – but he was thinking food. Working with Yarish he planted sugar kelp to sell fresh – kelp sold in this country is usually dried or processed. And he wanted to supply it for fertilizer and even for biofuel. But first he had to get through a laundry list of state and federal permits for everything from the gear he needed to authorization for the kelp as an approved food source. It took a year and thousands of dollars for the gear – that happened last August. And only recently has he gotten the final OK to sell it as food. In the interim legislation to streamline permitting was proposed. Despite widespread support it remains stalled in the legislature. The plan is to use the Department of Agriculture’s aquaculture bureau as one-stop-permit-shopping says director Dave Carey. Carey: It’s never gonna be a simple process like it is when you purchase a piece of land and want to grow lettuce. The processes for that are a lot easier because the public doesn’t have access to that land. Smith has already delivered a load of kelp to Yale University’s farm to make into fertilizer. Farm manager Jeremy Oldfield says the kelp closes an environmental loop because it provides the nitrogen and potassium the fields need, but that also end up in the Sound through runoff. Kelp absorbs that and returns it to the farm. Oldfield: We wind up being much more responsible stewards of the land than we were formerly able to be. I do think the idea of helping Bren in an effort to sort of diversify his income stream off of kelp.That’s just exciting for us. Among the restaurants Smith hopes to sell to is the Bistro at Chamard Vineyard. Executive chef, Brad Stabinsky has experimented with Smith’s kelp. He wrapped it around oysters, breaded and fried them; made a béarnaise sauce with kelp instead of tarragon; and added raw kelp to salad. He says he’ll put kelp on his menu occasionally. Stabinsky: Why not? If it’s safe, if it’s delicious (laughs) or if we can find ways to make it delicious and have something else that I can show the people here once in awhile about being local, what’s wrong with that? 7I think it’s great. Bren Smith calls his seaweed a fisherman’s dream crop, though he does miss the thrill of the high seas. Smith: We chase fish, we’re out on the high seas so this idea that we’re gonna start farming arugula and cabbage it’s a real challenge to the identity in many ways. On the other hand, he hopes it's a way he and others can stay in business. http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/06/20/long-island-sound-cash-crop-makes-its-way-tomanhattan-tables/ Long Island Sound Cash Crop Makes Its Way To Manhattan Tables It's Rich In Vitamins And Antioxidants, But It's Not What You Think It Is June 20, 2013 11:38 PM NEW YORK (CBS 2) — The latest cash crop in the farm-to-table food craze doesn’t come from the land; it comes from the Long Island Sound. In spite of what you might think, this new cash crop isn’t shell-fish; it’s kelp. The superfood is loaded with vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants, and is being served up at local restaurants . “We’re just in the tail end of harvesting season,” Bren Smith told CBS 2′s Maurice Dubois. Smith claims to be the first one in the country to sell fresh kelp — an easy to grow, highly nutritious, sea vegetable. “It’s already been pre-ordered, restaurants want it, I can’t grow enough of it,” he said. Kelp farming is the 20-year-old brain child of Dr. Charlie Yarish, who recently started his first research crop in the East River. “My colleagues in science said it’s impossible to do that in the greater metropolitan area, and I said, it’s not impossible,” he told CBS 2′s Dubois. In addition to being a viable food source, Dr. Yarish said kelp can be used as an inexpensive bio-fuel and as a natural fertilizer. It also plays a role in cleaning local water. “I’m a happy scientist right now. How many people think you can have a kelp farm in the East River and do some environmental good?” he asked. Some of the kelp grown on Smith’s farm has been incorporated into the curriculum at a local high school, where students cleaned and processed it before it was distributed to restaurants like Louro in Greenwich Village. “It’s been a lot of fun exploring what you can do with this product,” Chef Dave Santos said. “When you taste it, it has an al dente quality.” Santos couldn’t stop singing the praises of kelp. “It’s the epitome of what we talk about as chefs, love and care in the growth, and production, and ti’s local,” he said. The idea of eating kelp may be familiar to fans of sushi and other Asian cuisines, but this is the first time that it has been grown locally and incorporated into mainstream menus. http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2013/07/21/news/doc51eb4aea41f7b501508220.txt Seaweed may offer lucrative future for Connecticut aquaculture July 21, 2013 By Mark Zaretsky BRANFORD >> Just a few months ago, there was no Long Island Sound seaweed industry at all. Now, sugar kelp produced through decades of research at the University of Connecticut in Stamford, under the direction of one of the world’s authorities on seaweed, and grown in the Thimble Islands by former shellfisherman Bren Smith of Guilford is being served in cutting-edge restaurants in New York City. Kelp butter, kelp ice cream, kelp “pasta” all have turned up in recent months on menus at Manhattan restaurants and supper clubs aimed at “really high-end foodies,” according to Smith and some of the people experimenting with it as an ingredient. Smith’s kelp, grown in the late fall, winter and spring in an offshore area leased from the town of Branford, also is being experimented with as a flavoring in a savory “shrub” that a Manhattan spirits company uses to make trendy, kelp martinis and other premium cocktails. Some of Smith’s kelp also is being used as fertilizer for the Yale Sustainable Food Project’s organic farm in New Haven — even as a Shelton-based spin-off of research at UConn-Stamford works to bring an organic Long Island Sound seaweed-based fertilizer to market. Meanwhile, a different, seaweed, gracilaria, that UConn-Stamford professor Charles Yarish and his colleagues are test-growing, is being eyed as a summer crop. They’re growing it in the Sound and in tanks in Bridgeport’s Black Rock section with the help of students and staff at the Bridgeport Regional Aquaculture Science and Technology Education Center, part of the city public school system. The new industry, fueled by the internationally recognized research of Yarish and his colleagues at UConn-Stamford, including professors Jang Kim, Tim Dowding and others, may well be the future for Connecticut aquaculture http://www.yourpublicmedia.org/content/wnpr/lobsters-are-out-eels-are-seaweed-will-save-us-all Lobsters Are Out, Eels Are In, & Seaweed Will Save Us All A DISCUSSION ON OCEANS AND RIVERS IN CONNECTICUT. By Colin McEnroe Aug 26, 2013 Today it's lobsters, eels and seaweed. We like to eat things that come out of the water, but we're not always smart about taking care of the happy aquatic hunting grounds. Lobster harvests have seen some bumper crops recently, but that could lead to a false sense of security. There's a sweet spot, temp-wise, for lobsters, and if things get too warm in the water, we could go from feast to famine. Meanwhile, there's a bull market for juvenile eels, driven by Asian consumers, who have screwed up eels stocks in ways that are both within and outside of their control. On this continent, eels have their own problems which may well be exacerbated by the way they're suddenly worth a lot of money. And lastly, what we hope is a hopeful story about seaweed, a promising crop if we don't screw it up. Host: Colin McEnroe Guest: David Simpson, James Prosek, Charles Yarish, Bun Lai Contributor: Patrick Skahill, Chion Wolf http://www.courant.com/business/hc-oyster-farming-20130901,0,868088.story Seaweed Sends Oyster Farmer In Search Of New Markets By WILLIAM WEIR September 1, 2013 Bren Smith, owner of the Thimble Island Oyster Co., has a few hopes for the near future: that Connecticut doesn't get hit with another hurricane this fall, and that his equipment holds up through the season. Also, he hopes that people really like seaweed, because he expects to have two dozen tons of it by spring. His shellfish and seaweed farm, kept on 20 acres in Long Island Sound among the Thimble Islands off Branford, is the only commercial one of its kind in Connecticut. It's part of his diversification strategy to adapt to the "new normal" of his industry: extreme weather, acidification, overfishing. "People thought it was crazy that I'd be trying to grow vegetables [in the ocean]," he said. "It sounded nuts. It still does." But he also knows that he can't rely on any one product. "Shellfish is a slow-growing species, relatively, and it takes a while to recover — that's why I have this multi-species approach," he said. "If one species is having trouble, I can still go to market and have something for my restaurants. The restaurants love that because they get variation instead of hundreds of thousands of oysters." Smith, 40, tried conventional shellfishing when he began leasing acres from the state in 2003 as part of a program to encourage young fishermen. He started experimenting with seaweed three years ago. When Sandy hit, the second major storm in as many years, he stepped up that part of his business. Sandy and tropical storm Irene the year before wiped out his oyster crops. In a good year, he can harvest about 150,000 shellfish. When a storm like Irene or Sandy hits, he said, 80 to 90 percent of his crop is wiped out. "It's the storm surges that bring 3 feet of mud," said Smith, who lives in Guilford. "That just buries everything, and the oysters drown." He raised more than $37,000 with a Kickstarter campaign, which funds creative projects, in July to pay for new equipment, including 10 lines used to grow seaweed. The seeds are fertilized at the laboratory of Charles Yarish, a seaweed researcher at UConn, and then placed on a thin line wrapped around a larger, 150-foot rope. The seaweed grows about 6 feet below the surface. And it really grows. He'll seed it in November and expects 24 tons of it by May. Sugar kelp is his main seaweed crop for now. He's been working for the past few years, trying to create a market for it. Until now, he's had two lines of seaweed growing on his farm, figuring the best system by trial and error. "The good thing is that I'm OK with failure," Smith said, laughing. He gave out much of what he grew, often to chefs at trendy restaurants. One of those chefs, David Santos, said his most popular kelp dish at his Manhattan restaurant, Louro, is a fra diavalo, a kind of spicy sauce. "That's been one of the highest-rated things that we've done," he said. Santos conceded that it takes some convincing to get diners to try seaweed. Once they try it, though, they find it has a nice pasta-like texture and tastes like the ocean. "It's like an oyster, but without the salinity." Smith said his goal is to make kelp the new kale. "Kale went from rabbit food to the [menus of the] best restaurants in New York city. If in five years I could do that, that'll be a huge success — that's a heavy lift." If seaweed ends up a short-lived fad of the capricious foodie culture, it would hardly be the first setback that Smith has weathered. "It might be a one-hit wonder, but that's another reason to diversify," he said. "Kelp is just a piece of the 20 acres, so really what can you grow, and how many things can you grow, I think that's where the real possibilities are." Mussels and scallops are kept in lantern nets that hang from the same ropes where the seaweed grows. Below that are cages that hold oysters and some clams. He calls it "3-D farming." To develop it, Smith has been working with Yarish. "You're using the entire water column, you're not just using the surface and you're not just using the bottom," said Yarish, nicknamed "Capt. Seaweed." "You're treating it as an entire ecosystem — nutrients extend from bottom to the top," he said. Yarish's program supplied Smith with seaweed seed, taken from the ocean as part of his research. As Yarish said, "There's no Burpee Seed catalog of seaweed seed." http://www.westchestermagazine.com/Westchester-Magazine/January-2013/The-Sound-ScrubberGeorge-Kraemer-PhD/ The Sound Scrubber: George Kraemer, PhD DECEMBER 21, 2012 The Sound Scrubber George Kraemer, PhD Professor of Environmental Studies and Biology, Purchase College It would be hard for a single number to describe the Long Island Sound. It’s home to more than 120 species of finfish, bordered by 600 miles of shorefront, the source of a 10-million-inhabitant-supporting watershed, responsible for up to $8.9 billion in value to nearby economies (like our own) every year, and filled with 18 trillion gallons of water. The issue is that much of that treasured resource is at risk for becoming an aqua dead zone because of pollution. Yet George Kraemer, PhD, a professor of Environmental Studies and Biology at Purchase College, is working on a program that has shown promising results in saving us from that bleak scenario—and making a dent in our fuel concerns at the same time. “All these environmental problems are not easy fixes, because they’re so complex,” says Kraemer, 54, of Greenburgh. “Nature has devised, through eons, systems that function well in a certain way with a certain balance. Anytime this is thrown off-kilter, the outcomes are at the same time unexpected and often negative.” To reinvigorate the Sound, Kraemer tries to restore the balance that’s lost when “over-fertilization” by nitrogen—mostly from sewage treatment and cars’ internal-combustion engines—causes imbalances in species that eventually rob the ecosystem of oxygen. By selectively placing seaweed and mussels that will soak up the excess nitrogen (as well as other pollutants) and then removing the whole setup, Kraemer and his partners have developed a system that appears at once sustainable and fast. The seaweed, for instance, doubles in biomass in as few as five days and has the potential to remove thousands of tons of the nitrogen every month, depending on the type and amount of seaweed present. The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and the Environmental Protection Agency have been impressed enough to help fund the work. Kraemer points out that removing that level of pollution isn’t just about the species balance in the water. “This natural system provides services for us for free—fish, shellfish, tourism. It’s a regional economic driver,” he says. “So there’s more than one reason to protect the quality of local systems in any way we can.” And still another reason to clean it up—and clean it up with help from Kraemer: The project is finding ways to convert the used seaweed into biofuel and feed for farms. Charles Yarish, PhD, a professor in the Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology at the University of Connecticut who oversees the research in the Sound and has been working with Kraemer since 1999, is glad Kraemer signed on. Yarish says Kraemer is “a very energetic person and a darned good scientist. He’s a great marine ecologist, a very good biostatistician, very good in writing, aquaculture, et cetera.” For his part, Kraemer is hoping he can change how we think about our roles as humans in the environment. “For a long time, we humans have viewed ourselves as sort of separate from other plants and animals, like we’re not bound by the same rules. But we need to remember that we are.” http://www.lohud.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2013310160069&nclick_check=1 Foliage benefits Long Island Sound, adds to trendy menus Written by KEN VALENTI If you’re munching on a trendy salad that has a certain marine quality to it, or if your cocktail has a twist of kelp, your dining excursion may help to save Long Island Sound. Seaweed has become the latest tool in the long battle to breathe new life into the estuary, just as it is becoming more popular on dinner plates at upscale restaurants. At three spots in the central and western Sound, scientists from the University of Connecticut and an aquatic farmer, working with other schools, have been testing the idea by growing sweet kelp in the winter and gracilaria, another type of seaweed, in the summer. As the marine foliage sprouts rapidly along lines 50 or 100 meters long, it uses up nitrogen, a nutrient so overabundant in the Sound that it topples the balance of life, creating oxygen-depleted dead zones in warm weather where fish and other creatures struggle to survive. “Every line you pull out that grows, you’re removing nutrients,” said Charles Yarish, professor of ecology, evolutionary biology and marine sciences at the University of Connecticut. Two years ago, he and others from the University of Connecticut, Purchase College and other entities started the program, stringing lines at the mouth of the Bronx River and off Fairfield, Conn. They started with funding from groups including Connecticut Sea Grant and the Long Island Sound Study, a partnership of federal, state and local governments as well as private entities. A year ago, aquafarmer Bren Smith of Branford, Conn., got in on the project, after his shellfish beds among the Thimble Islands had been battered by major storms. “I got wiped out by Irene and Sandy,” he said. “I lost 80 percent of my crop two years in a row. ... I came to the conclusion that I had to adapt.” Last year, he strung two 50-meter lines studded with sea kelp over the beds in December. Five months later, he had two tons of seaweed. Unlike the other sites, Smith’s had approvals for the seaweed grown there to be sold as food. So he sold half and gave half away to cultivate a market. It was gone in six weeks to chefs and others who would toss it into salads or slice into “noodles.” One entrepreneur was experimenting with kelp in mixed drinks, Smith said. The foliage that is not eaten by humans can be used as fertilizer or biofuel. Extracts are used as emulsifiers in other foods or in cosmetics. Yarish offered a workshop on the growing process and its benefits last week in Mamaroneck. While the seaweed improves the health of the water, it can do the same for diners. It is loaded with nutrients such as iron, calcium and iodine, said Paul Dobbins, president of Ocean Approved, a Mainebased producer of kelp as food products. And it’s finding its way onto more menus. “The popularity of Japanese food has really propelled seafood into the forefront of dining,” said Louise Kramer, spokeswoman for the Specialty Food Association. “People are getting more experimental with it.” “There’s a lot of interest in sustainability and the environment,” Kramer said. “People want to be good. There’s this great interest in where your food comes from and locally sourced products.” Nisa Lee, a Westchester-based caterer, uses Ocean Approved kelp many ways, sometimes simply tossed in a salad with olive oil and lemon. “It has great texture,” she said. “It is incredibly refreshing.” No one has the illusion that seaweed farmers alone soon will restore the balance of nitrogen just by growing their crops. The researchers estimate that a 2.5-acre farm of marine foliage could remove 600 pounds of nitrogen over the five-month winter growing period. During the summer, the amounts vary. The same 2.5 acres, strung with gracilaria, could remove 73 pounds of nitrogen in July and about 20 pounds in October, they estimate. Excess nitrogen that enters the Sound in sewage, animal waste and from other sources is measured not in hundreds of pounds, but in thousands of tons. Sources in Connecticut alone added 57,000 tons of nitrogen to the Sound in 2005, the latest year cited in a 2012 annual report from the Long Island Sound Study. But the foliage is one of many tools in the effort to boost the Sound’s health. And it’s a cinch to grow, with seedlings cultivated by Yarish and assistant research professor Jang Kim in a UConn lab in Stamford. It’s as easy as stringing the lines in the Sound’s waters and letting them dangle. “It takes zero inputs,” Smith said. “There’s no fresh water, no fertilizer, no land use.” Also, it goes in after hurricane season, in December, and its rapid growth reduces the risk of trouble with harsh weather, he said. “(In five months) they go from practically invisible or a fuzz to about 10 feet,” said George Kraemer, professor of environmental studies at Purchase College, SUNY, who was involved in the project. “And these lines get so heavy, it takes a couple to three people to pull the line out of the water.” Mark Tedesco, director of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Long Island Sound office, said the seaweed brings other benefits, such as providing shelter for marine creatures. “There’s no negative environmental impact from having these plants growing,” said Tedesco, whose office heads the Long Island Sound Study. The partnership gave about $250,000 in grants to start the program. The gracilaria grows quickly, too, Yarish said. “I put out a fistful, about 20 grams, and then we come back in two weeks, it’s the size of a soccer ball and we give it a haircut,” he said. The effort is expanding. Smith will string seven lines in December. Mamaroneck Supervisor Nancy Seligson, an advocate of Long Island Sound improvement, sees promise in its growth. “They’re on a small scale right now,” she said. “But the hope is that experiments like this could be expanded to a very large scale that can make a real difference.” http://www.27east.com/news/article.cfm/Sag-Harbor/42759/Seaweed-Could-Be-The-NextSouth-Fork-Crop Seaweed Could Be The Next South Fork Crop Publication: The Southampton Press By Virginia Garrison Dec 19, 2013 They call kelp “the virtuous vegetable” up in Maine. Seaweed is good for you, what with its potassium and calcium and iodine and Omega-3. Off the Connecticut shore of Long Island Sound, the Thimble Island Oyster Company now farms seaweed, and kelp accompanies oysters, clams and mussels in community-supported fishery shares just like the vegetables rewarding shareholders in CSAs. “Eating like a fish”—that is, eating seaweed—can ease pressure on fish stocks, according to Thimble Island’s website, which also notes that Manhattan restaurants are serving kelp linguine, kelp ice cream, even kelp cocktails, all using its harvest. Not only is seaweed a sustainable food source, without the need for irrigation, land or pesticides, but it can remove nutrients such as nitrogen that promote excessive algae growth, improving the health of water bodies while removing carbon from the atmosphere. Imagine South Fork farm stands and restaurants selling homegrown kelp harvested by local baymen, or by oyster growers who want to make use of the water above their shellfish beds. Is the farming of sea vegetables the next logical step beyond the cultivation of shellfish? The answer depends on who’s giving it, considering a number of hurdles ranging from official certification to protecting the environment to finding a spot where seaweed farming could turn a profit without interfering with other activities. “You’ve got some good opportunities there as long as the growers are able to get the proper permits from the Department of Environmental Conservation and also the Army Corps of Engineers. ... You’ve got some excellent areas,” said Charles Yarish at the University of Connecticut in Stamford, who mentioned Montauk, the Peconic bays, Shelter Island and Long Island Sound as possibilities. A professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and an expert in aquaculture-cultivated seaweed, Dr. Yarish helped get kelp farms off the ground at both the Thimble Island Oyster Company and Ocean Approved in Portland, Maine, a former mussel farm that last year harvested more than 100,000 pounds of three native seaweeds germinated onshore and then set out on lines descending into the water. “Once the kelp gets to about 1/2 to 2 millimeters long, then we move it into the open ocean,” explained Paul Dobbins, an owner of Ocean Approved. In 90 to 110 days the seaweed will grow to be anywhere from 9 to 12 feet long, with a harvest of about 33,000 pounds per acre. Ocean Approved sells most of its fresh-frozen product, which comes in cuts like “slaw,” “noodle” and “salad,” to restaurants and food service organizations. The Maine company—whose nutritionist, Stefanie Sacks, lives in Montauk—says its product is much more vibrant-looking and tasty than dried seaweed imported from Asia. “Business is booming,” Mr. Dobbins said, adding that the company’s tillers of the ocean were “right in the middle of our seeding season” for next spring’s harvest. “The rest of the world has done it, and now the U.S. is starting to catch up ... globally, we are really behind the curve,” Mr. Dobbins said. “I believe aquaculture is how we’re going to feed the world’s population.” Mr. Dobbins and Dr. Yarish led three workshops in New England on kelp farming this fall. Together, they drew 154 participants, including Joe Tremblay, who’s been involved in raising oysters in Sag Harbor and nearby through an “oyster club” of private individuals, the Cornell Cooperative Extension’s Southold Project on Aquaculture Training (SPAT) program and the Southampton Town Trustees. “There was a lot of interest from people on Long Island,” said Mr. Tremblay, who attended a workshop at Roger Williams College in Rhode Island. “There’s a lot of potential.” “I’m interested in growing seaweed because of so many of the problems we’re facing in our local estuaries,” he said, adding that he would like to find varieties that can be grown in smaller water bodies like Sag Harbor Cove where “you can make a difference” by using them to pull nitrogen out. Kelp requires colder water like that off Montauk, he said, also noting that a current impediment to farming sea vegetables locally is the lack of a mechanism for securing approvals from the DEC. “The product is clean and it’s loaded with nutrients,” Mr. Tremblay said. “So the health food market for it is strong ... a combination of Asian and health food markets.” One might combine farming shellfish or even harvesting sea salt with farming seaweed, he said. “I can definitely see someone selling this at farmers markets and everyone eating it right up.” An owner of Bay Burger in Sag Harbor, Mr. Tremblay said he wasn’t sure that raising seaweed is “what I want to do with my life,” but pointed out that he already has an ice cream business—Joe and Liza’s Ice Cream—“so I’m already in the frozen food market.” If he doesn’t get involved, he said, he hopes that someone else will. “Somebody’s going to do it, no doubt about it,” said Gregg Rivara, an aquaculture specialist with Cornell Cooperative Extension’s marine program. Mr. Rivara ticked off several hurdles to growing seaweed locally, however. Kelp grows relatively high in the water column because it needs sunlight, which means boats could run afoul of the lines on which the plants are cultivated, There would also need to be a way to guarantee that the water is pure enough to make the seaweed safe to eat, perhaps by making sure it comes from places already certified for shellfish. Also, seaweed growers would need permission to use bodies of water, which generally are owned by the public: shellfish farmers who have leases for bottomland couldn’t just tack seaweed-growing onto their approval, Mr. Rivara said: “It’s like saying I’m leasing the house from this guy and I want to start a tire store.” On the other hand, he said the idea held small-scale promise for perhaps “10 percent of the existing 40 or 50 people involved in shellfish aquaculture” on the East End, potentially providing an opportunity to diversify for fishermen who already have boats and gear and others simply thinking about a startup business. “I’m all for what you call water-dependent uses of the shoreline,” said Mr. Rivara, who used to gather seaweed in Montauk and hang it on his clothesline before mixing it into soups and other dishes. He pointed out, too, that seaweed has also been seen as a potential source of fuel and for pharmaceutical use for years. There’s a long history to eating sea vegetables, but Americans really only started giving them a sniff in recent years, Mr. Rivara said. “You can get seaweed salad at most restaurants now. ... I think it’s more of a niche market—there’s a cachet to it—just like local wine and beer,” he said. “I could see farmers carrying it at farm stands.” Larry Liddle, a professor emeritus of marine science at Stony Brook Southampton, who has long studied seaweed, said the use of sea plants as “scrubbers” is already in place both in the Harlem River—in that case with the DEC’s permission to proceed experimentally—and in China, where Dr. Liddle has been working over the last three years with people who grow a red alga called gracilaria to remove nutrients and for use as food and as a gelling agent. He stressed that seaweed must be harvested if it is to remove nitrates; otherwise they will simply return to the water when the plants break down. The kelp seen at Montauk Point is what the Japanese call kombu, an edible plant, although it’s at the southernmost point of its range and thus not as plentiful as it is to the north. “I think the issue, the overall issue, is the problem of introducing any nonnative species to any area,” Dr. Liddle said of farming seaweed locally. “It might take over or something like that.” Diane McNally, clerk of the East Hampton Town Trustees, expressed a similar concern, adding that the prospect of using Trustee-owned waters had not so far been raised. At one point they discussed “seeding” a community shellfish garden, she said, adding that growing seaweed might somehow be worked into that program if it comes to pass. The private use of a public resource like Trustee waters has traditionally been tricky, she said, adding that the county has been leasing bottomland in Gardiners Bay and wondering whether growing seaweed might “fit in more easily ... in a scenario like that.” Southampton Town Trustee Bill Pell, who works out of Shinnecock Bay, said he had explored the idea of farming seaweed years ago after seeing it done on the West Coast. “You need deeper water, colder water,” he said. “Our bays are warmer.” Another Southampton Trustee, Ed Warner, said he sees very little kelp where he fishes, including in western Peconic Bay, essentially from Gardiners Island west to Flanders. “I do see codium, basically the spaghetti grass,” he said, adding that the native plants are likely to involve shellfish beds that had best not be disturbed. But Dr. Yarish described the concept as “3D farming” where both the water column—with, say, oysters on the bottom and seaweed above—and the seasons can be exploited with greater efficiency. “Here’s another crop for the shellfish farmer,” he said. “And you’re doing valuable ecosystem services.” He said a winter crop of sugar kelp would work particularly well in this area, growing from December through late April or early May, when recreational boats are out of the water and biological activity has slowed down. Fishermen or shellfish growers who own boats could grow kelp during their slow period, Dr. Yarish said, with the added advantage that the nutrients the seaweed removes are at their highest levels in January and February. “So we’re doing very important ecosystem services, and just by growing a commodity that has potential as a sea vegetable we’re providing livelihoods,” Dr. Yarish said. “It’s good for the environment and it’s good for business, you’re giving people a good healthy commodity—and if you have a gluten allergy you can make a pasta that’s gluten-free.” http://wildfoodgirl.com/2014/wild-edible-notebook-march-2014-release/ Wild Edible Notebook—March 2014 Release! March 2nd, 2014 Wild sea vegetables are hard to come by here in the Colorado high country, so for the March 2014 issue of the Wild Edible Notebook I decided to travel through space and time to coastal Connecticut via several jars of seaweed—Irish moss (Chondrus crispus), sea lettuce (Ulva sp.) and sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima)—that I collected last summer and dried in my parents’ house. While researching the story I was fortunate to tap into the expertise of Dr. Charles Yarish, professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Connecticut, who promotes the cultivation of sea vegetables as a means to clean coastal waters while also providing good food for the dinner plate. This edition also includes a lighthearted jaunt into wild jellies and things to make with them besides toast. The issue concludes with a handful of recipes using wild foraged seaweeds, including one by West Coast seaweed purveyor Louise Gaudet, as well as a recipe for serviceberry jelly pork glaze by the awesome cook that is my dad. The Wild Edible Notebook is an ongoing project, started in 2011. It is now available for iPad and iPhone in the Apple Newsstand, or in various PDF formats including screen-reading and 8.5×14” print-and-fold versions at www.wildfoodgirl.com/wild-edible-notebook for $1.99/month. Your support makes the continued development of this publication possible, both on the content and technical sides. Big, supersqueezy, wild hugs to those who have already purchased a subscription in support of this effort. To download a free issue of the Wild Edible Notebook and stay abreast of future developments, join the email list by filling out your info at the very bottom of the page. http://riverheadnewsreview.timesreview.com/2014/07/56134/kelp-a-slippery-seaweed-could-bemajor-moneymaker/ http://suffolktimes.timesreview.com/2014/07/50108/kelp-a-slippery-seaweed-could-be-majormoneymaker/ Kelp, a slippery seaweed, could be major moneymaker by Carrie Miller 07/11/2014 It’s a delicacy Asian cultures have enjoyed for centuries but is more commonly thought of as the slippery — and sometimes slimy — brown stuff that grows naturally in area waters and then washes up on beaches. And one day, it could be a major moneymaker for the North Fork. Though regional cash crops are typically cultivated on land, aquaculturists are pushing state and county lawmakers to permit the growing and selling of sugar kelp, or seaweed. They say the salty yet sweet leafy sea vegetable could benefit the economy, the environment, and even put baymen back to work at a time when making a living on the water is becoming increasingly difficult. Researchers have suggested that farming kelp in Long Island Sound waters has the potential to produce annual sales of $47 million, according to County Executive Steve Bellone’s office. But in order for sugar kelp to be farmed in Peconic Bay and Sound waters — where many of the state’s aquaculture farms are located — state and county lawmakers need to make regulatory changes to allow it. Currently, state law allows only for shellfish cultivation in these areas. Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County is exploring the idea of growing the kelp industry locally and hopes to partner with researchers from the University of Connecticut on a study in Orient Harbor — if it can find the funds to do so. Uncharted waters “It’s exciting,” Southold aquaculturist Karen Rivara said of the industry’s potential while giving Mr. Bellone a tour of the Peconic Land Trust’s Shellfisher Preserve on Southold Bay last month. Ms. Rivara, who owns Aeros Cultured Oyster Company, is also president of the Long Island Farm Bureau. She is the organization’s first aquaculturist to hold that title. “I think it’s hard to find a reason not to do it.” Area waters already ideal for growing shellfish are also perfect for kelp cultivation, she said, and would allow aquatic farmers another crop to harvest when the shellfish industry slows down, since kelp grows in the winter. The two can be grown in the same underwater space. Ms. Rivara said the ultimate benefit of kelp is that it thrives on nitrogen, sucking up the very culprit wreaking havoc on the same waters, feeding harmful algal blooms and depriving waters of oxygen. Growing shellfish and kelp side by side, she explained, would help protect her shellfish from being polluted by harmful algal blooms — one particular variety can cause paralytic shellfish poisoning in humans — and allow her to make a few bucks in the process. Environmental benefits to be had “The darker the color, the more nitrogen [the kelp] is soaking up,” said Bren Smith, a Connecticut kelp farmer who grows his product in Long Island Sound waters and is banking on the sugar kelp industry to take off. A vocal advocate of kelp’s growth potential, Mr. Smith owns Thimble Island Oysters and — as Ms. Rivara hopes to do — grows his shellfish and kelp within a single ecosystem. And it just so happens that the darker the kelp’s color, the richer and sweeter its flavor, said University of Connecticut professor Charlie Yarish, who has been studying seaweed cultivation for several decades. “It is really a way of restoring the environment while making a product we can eat,” he said. Sugar kelp is produced when reproductive cells, known as spores, are collected from kelp already occurring naturally in local waters, Mr. Yarish explained. The cells are retrieved from the leafy greens in a lab and settled on a string where they continue to reproduce, essentially growing off the string. The string is then wrapped around a rope and submerged horizontally across bay waters, where the kelp continues to grow by feeding on nitrogen already abundant in Peconic Bay and Sound waters. “The kelp starts to grow vertically, and it grows very quickly, as soon as the water drops below 50 degrees,” said Mr. Smith, who uses this exact process. In December, January and February, kelp grows rapidly, sucking up nitrogen before phytoplankton — which multiply in warmer waters, eventually causing algal blooms — can begin feeding on it, Mr. Yarish said. He said he developed the cultivation process with financial support from the Connecticut Sea Grant College Program and has passed his knowledge on to growers like Mr. Smith. He hopes to one day mentor New York cultivators as well. A growing market According to a 2010 United Nations State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture report, “countries in East and Southeast Asia dominate seaweed culture production (99.8 percent by quantity and 99.5 percent by value, according to 2008 data).” China, Indonesia and the Philippines lead the way, accounting for over 85 percent of kelp production. The U.S., however, has lagged behind, as only a handful of growers currently cultivate it nationwide and are located mostly in New England. As a result, it’s had to import nearly all of its kelp meant for human consumption. “I know that seaweed farming in Asian countries has been prolific,” said Assemblyman Anthony Palumbo (R-New Suffolk), whose district spans the North Fork. “To kind of expand on that here, I think, is a great idea.” Demand for a domestically grown product safe from contaminants is growing, Mr. Smith said. He added that his company’s 18-ton-a-year kelp yield — for which he earns about 35 cents per pound, when wet — is nowhere near filling increasing domestic demand. Companies including Whole Foods Market are working to incorporate kelp into other products, as a way of expanding the market, Mr. Yarish said. Because kelp has a very short shelf life when gathered fresh from the sea, freezing or incorporating it into other products is a way of preserving it. The question is, “How do we take this weird thing and get it on the kitchen table?” Mr. Smith said. “How can we make kelp the new kale, which is now on every restaurant menu?” Sugar kelp is rich in calcium, folic acid and vitamins A, B, D, E and K, according to multiple research studies. As a result, it’s been touted by many health food outlets as the next “superfood.” Because of this, it has potential not only for the dinner table but also in pharmaceutical and cosmetic markets. It’s also high in iodine, which is commonly used in supplements given to people with thyroid problems, according to New York University hospital researchers. Kelp extract is also added to skin care products, helping to give the appearance of firmer skin. And because it sucks up all that nitrogen, it can also be used as a natural fertilizer, Mr. Yarish said. Mr. Smith said he hopes land farmers will consider using the seaweed as fertilizer and stop using synthetic forms of nitrogen on land, which inevitably makes its way into area waters. “We’re taking land- and sea-based farming and trying to close the nitrogen loop,” he said. What’s being done now Cultivating kelp in town or privately owned waters and creeks wouldn’t require a change in law, said Chris Pickerell, director of Cornell’s marine program. However, state-owned lands — where many local aquaculture farms exist — would need to amend current legislation to allow for seaweed cultivation. Ms. Rivara is one of more than 40 growers taking advantage of state-owned land through Suffolk County’s Shellfish Aquaculture Lease Program, which gives area growers access to underwater lands for farming in the Peconic Bay. Many other shellfish farmers operate on state-owned lands leased in the Long Island Sound, she said. Currently, she said, there’s no way to apply for a permit for seaweed cultivation on state-controlled lands. “We don’t have the legal mechanism to do it,” she said. Mr. Pickerell said that “In the simplest sense, it is a matter of adding the words ‘seaweed cultivation’ into the current law.” He said he’s been working with County Legislator Al Krupski (D-Cutchogue) and state Assemblymen Fred Thiele (I-Sag Harbor) to create legislation to change the law. Ms. Rivara has spoken with Mr. Bellone in hopes of initiating the change. Senator Ken LaValle (R-Port Jefferson) said a kelp industry would “both lead to job creation and stimulate our economy, while cleaning our waters.” In a letter supporting Cornell’s pilot cultivation study, Mr. Bellone called the industry’s potential “an extremely interesting, and potentially lucrative, economic development opportunity.” He added that the program will help “develop policies that can help grow and support the industry.” Cornell has applied for grant funding from both the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority’s Cleaner, Greener Communities grant program. It hopes to raise enough money to plan, design, construct and acquire the equipment necessary for a start-up kelp farm. Mr. Palumbo said, “I would like to see the results of the program so we can see how to manage it [the industry] properly, to find that happy medium so that we can both reduce nitrogen and produce an additional product that can be sold,” adding that the right environmental groups are involved in the project. From a community standpoint, Mr. LaValle said, the project “will help ensure the maritime industry of aquaculture remains viable, and create new opportunities for the next generation to work on the water.” He said he has written a letter to the state, which runs NYSERDA, in hopes of receiving project funding from them. “This is a win-win for everything,” Mr. Pickerell said. “We need to get all of our ducks in a row in terms of the regulatory approvals.” http://nationswell.com/sea-weed-save-mankind/ You helped Thimble Island Oysters take one step closer to its goal. Take Action Appears in Preserving the Environment by Charlotte Parker on December 23, 2013 Kelp: The Sea Weed That Could Save Mankind Bren Smith is no ordinary waterman. He’s out to revolutionize fishing, fight climate change, create jobs—and get you to eat seaweed. Bren Smith blends into the New England seascape, a waterman decked out in waders tooling around on his boat in the Long Island Sound. On this hazy July morning, he’s motored out aboard the Mookie III from a Stony Creek, Conn., dock to check on his oyster beds scattered between the Thimble Islands. Another boat putters by, and Smith raises his arm to point, his hands cloaked in rubber gloves to protect against the barnacles. “That guy,” Smith says, “is only catching about five pounds of lobsters a day. He doesn’t even pay for half his fuel with that.” And with this observation, Smith shatters the illusion that he’s just another fisherman chasing his catch. Smith, in fact, is a genuine revolutionary, a man who sees powerful currents of change in the choppy waters off the Atlantic seaboard. And his neighbor, chugging past with his nearly empty hold, is proof that the end of a way of life is looming—and the beginning of a new one is at hand. Climate change has affected the fishing beds. Ocean acidification, a product of rising atmospheric CO2 levels, kills off coral reefs, causes toxic algae blooms and dissolves the shells of oysters and other mollusks, researchers say. And then there’s what Smith calls the “rape and pillage” of the world’s oceans—the overfishing that has dried up once-fertile sources of food, and sent unemployment in once-thriving seaside communities through the roof. Smith assigns himself a share of the blame. He fished for McDonald’s in the Bering Sea some years back, and pushed the cod stocks to the brink. But grousing about it, and hoping government regulation will solve the problem, won’t do the trick. What fishermen catch needs to be rethought. What fishermen should be doing, in Smith’s view, is harvesting kelp. Yes, you read that right: the slimy brown sea vegetation that has grossed out generations of New England beachgoers. You might think of it as an annoyance of no particular significance to mankind. Smith sees it as a jobs program, an amazing source of nutrition, a strategic adaptation to the havoc being wrought by global warming—and, quite possibly, the next big thing in trendy New York City restaurants. He calls it his “path of ecological redemption,” and he’s calling on fishermen, businessmen and consumers to follow it with him. A short, bald man blessed with the ability to sound businesslike and salty at the same time, Smith dropped out of high school at age 14 to become a fisherman, intending to spend his life at sea (even though, as a product of Newfoundland’s icy waters, he never learned to swim). He stuck with it, while finding time to graduate from the University of Vermont and take a law degree from Cornell. In 2002, he leased a plot of shellfish ground, and began growing oysters, mussels, scallops and clams. He started a communitysupported fishery program, the first of its kind in the Northeast, supplying subscribers with a package of sustainably grown shellfish once a month during the summer months. Business was rolling along—until back-to-back hurricanes in 2011 and 2012 stuck him with cages full of oysters suffocated by mud. He began looking into species that could both renew their ecosystem and better resist storm surges. His search was fueled by changes in the waters beneath his boat. The combination of overharvesting and ocean acidification had begun taking a dramatic toll. “There are thousands of boats beached, houses foreclosed, up and down the East Coast, in the gulf, everywhere,” Smith says. “The idea that climate change is an environmental issue has sort of been misbranded. It’s an economic issue.” Today, he runs what he calls a 3-D sea farm, covering some 20 acres. He harvests seaweed, mussels and scallops near the ocean surface, with oysters and clams in cages further below. He speaks of renewing, rather than depleting, the ecosystem on his watch. But his eyes really light up when he starts talking about kelp. It’s a food source with “more iron than red meat, more calcium than milk and more protein than soybeans,” he intones, on a video accompanying a Kickstarter campaign to raise money in support of his efforts. It’s fuel, for machines—with the potential to one day relieve America’s dependence on oil. And it’s a source of jobs, for a region that desperately needs them. “It’s an industry that doesn’t exist, an industry we can scale up,” Smith tells me. He’s making headway with his sales pitch. This year alone, he’s been featured in The New Yorker, NPR, The Wall Street Journal, McSweeney’s Lucky Peach, and National Geographic. He’s visited with venture capital investors. He’s teamed up with the Yale Farm, which has helped him spread the word— extending his reach into media and food circles. And lately, he’s been making the 90-mile drive from his patch of ocean to New York City, the bed of his orange pickup packed with kelp in solar-powered coolers, delivering it to a handful of forward-thinking chefs to play around with in their kitchens. David Santos is a believer. A veteran of the foodie landmark Per Se on Manhattan’s Upper West Side, Santos took to Kickstarter himself to launch his own place, Louro, in the West Village. He’s lined the walls with glass jars of creative combinations of ingredients he steeps for days on end, giving the place the aura of a genial mad scientist’s lab. Sure, seaweed has long been part of a Japanese diet. But Americans need to be led a little. So Santos is sneaking dishes onto VIP and tasting menus—pureeing ribbons of kelp into house-made butter, frying them into tempura, sprinkling them into lemon soup and sautéeing them into a tomato sauce and crab mixture to make an “al diavolo” dish. Not your standard menu, but it’s delicious, at least in Santos’s hands. “Kelp is a better product than kale,” he says. “It’s cheaper, it tastes better, there are more nutrients, and more stuff you can do with it.” The trick, Santos says, is getting people to try it—maybe even before you fully acquaint them with what it is they’re putting in their mouths. “It’s seaweed. It’s its own worst enemy in a way. We have to get people to understand this is not just stuff that was laying around—this is stuff that was grown with care, treated properly and produced appropriately,” he says. The toughest sell may be among Smith’s fellow watermen. Persuading them to switch from cod to “sea vegetables” could be tricky, Smith knows. “The kelp is more like farming arugula than chasing things,” he says. “And people think that’s crazy: growing sea vegetables? Fishermen don’t grow veggies! It seems kind of wimpy.” “Mother Nature created these technologies hundreds of millions of years ago, and they actually mitigate the harm we do to the sea. Our job now is to grow them.” Bren Smith The fishermen may take some persuading. But Smith has scientists on his side. Dr. Charles Yarish, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Connecticut at Stamford, has been researching the ecosystem benefits of kelp for 35 years. In bubbling, white fluorescent-lit tanks in his Stamford lab, two varieties of North Atlantic seaweed—sugar kelp or Saccharina latissima—grow from seed to thread on giant plastic beads. His team uses a system of anchored longlines strung with these beads and planted at three open-water farms—at the mouth of the Bronx River, off the coast of Fairfield, Conn., and on Smith’s Thimble Island farm—to grow plants to maturity and test their potential to clean coastal waters. Sugar kelp, like oysters, soak up nitrogen, carbon and other excess nutrients through a process called nutrient bioextraction. Using Yarish’s technology and funded by a series of federal grants, Smith and Yarish have been testing a 3-D sea farm model, using the entire water column to produce food for human consumption, rebuild marine ecosystems and clean, nutrient-heavy waters. A 20-acre oyster farm could compensate for the aquatic nitrogen pollution caused by 350 shoreline residents, and a 20-acre farm of kelp could remove 134 tons of the carbon that causes ocean acidification. Those same 20 acres could also grow 24 tons of kelp in five months. “Mother Nature created these technologies hundreds of millions of years ago, and they actually mitigate the harm we do to the sea,” Smith says. “Our job now is to grow them.” Jeremy Oldfield, field academic coordinator at the Yale Farm, a sustainable food project affiliated with the New Haven, Conn., university, worked with Smith this summer on developing a kelp-based fertilizer for his tomato crop. Oldfield calls kelp “a preloaded multivitamin for farm soil.” Students at the University of Connecticut School of Business are developing a first-round fuel product, based on a U.S. Department of Energy study that found kelp a rich source of sugar for biofuel. Smith and Yarish have been working with lawmakers and regulators to suss out how to make the farming process easier. Yarish, his U Conn team, and Maine-based Oceans Approved, LLC, have recently started a training program for new kelp farmers in Maine, Rhode Island, and Connecticut. In exploring seaweed’s potential, Smith shows an almost missionary zeal. “I’m just thinking about how Bren communicates,” says Oldfield. “He has a great sense of ‘food justice.’…It’s sort of like a manifesto.” And it’s catching on—in this country and beyond. The Kickstarter campaign Smith launched this summer exceeded expectations. He had hoped to raise enough money to cover the cost of hurricane-resistant anchors, marker buoys, lines, installation and marine licensing fees for seven new longlines wrapped in kelp and mussel seeds. By the time the campaign closed in late July, he’d received donations from 734 people, and raised more than $37,000. By the end of August, all the new longlines had been installed on Smith’s Thimble Island farm. Cash arrived from all over the world: Myanmar, Ghana, Vietnam and Brazil. Donors wondered if kelp could be used as animal feed, whether his 3-D farm model could work for other species of sea vegetables. “I don’t want to think too big and I’m not the one to do this, but I really think it could be replicated globally if you did an ecosystem analysis based on what could be restorative in each place,” Smith says. In Micronesia, for example, it could be conch, or sponges. “The question is,” he asks, “are we going to be able to model this where we scale it up sustainably, locally, where people own their own farms?” Closer to home, there are now four new sea farmers awaiting permits in the Long Island Sound. The Bridgeport Regional Vocational Aquaculture School, a high school in Bridgeport, Conn., focusing on marine science, has made progress in procuring a kelp noodle-processing machine. Smith’s fisherman’s co-op has voted to install a kelp seed hatchery, which he hopes will become the first in a series of incubators for investigating value-added products such as fertilizer, cosmetics and biofuel. In September, on the heels of being named to a list of Social Capital Markets’ global entrepreneurs for 2013, Smith traveled to San Francisco to give a talk on restorative species to a roomful of venture capitalists. At the end of October, he brought down the house at the annual TEDx Bermuda conference, where he discussed how his methods could be exported to Caribbean waters. And there may be even bigger breakthroughs ahead. Impressed by a sampling of kelp lemon soup, kelp butter and kelp fettuccine with shrimp cooked up by chef Santos, Whole Foods is now exploring ways to get Thimble Island’s products on their shelves by next spring. And sometime next year, if all goes according to plan, attendees at the closing dinner for the International Oceans Conference will dine on kelp—served on White House platters. Smith clearly enjoys the success, but remains anxious about what comes next—like a parent wary of letting his kid wander too far out of reach. “My job is to advocate now, and then hopefully there will be hundreds of me, out trying it, perfecting it, innovating, and then I can go back to farming by myself. If I’m the only one talking about this in 10 years I’m going to have failed,” Smith says. Let’s fix this country together. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/food-matters/2014/07/11/move-over-kale-the-new-supervegetable-comes-from-the-sea-video/ Move Over, Kale, The New Super Vegetable Comes From The Sea. By Patrick Mustain July 11, 2014 Eat Kelp. It’s chock-full of nutrients, it mitigates climate change by sequestering carbon, improves oceans by soaking up excess nitrogen and phosphorus, and has potential as a valuable fertilizer and biofuel. It’s also delicious. Bren Smith, owner of Connecticut-based Thimble Island Oyster Company, and director of the organization Greenwave started growing kelp and shellfish as a reaction to several crises he faced in his own life: overfishing, climate change, and rampant unemployment in the fishing industry. He was working on the Bering Sea when the cod stocks crashed, and he lost oyster crops to both ocean acidification and two hurricanes. Based in part on the research of Dr. Charles Yarish at the University of Connecticut, Smith’s 3-D ocean farming model uses the entire ocean column to grow as many different foods as possible in as small an area as possible. “I’m growing more food in 20 acres of ocean now than I was in 100 acres a few years ago,” he said. Oyster cages mark the sea floor, and curtains of kelp sprout along lines suspended by surface buoys. Mesh containers housing scallops, clams and mussels hang among the long kelp leaves. All of these species extract nutrients that leech into the water from land-based agricultural runoff (a significant contributor to ocean dead zones), and that’s central to Smith’s approach. His work with Greenwave is aimed at jump-starting a “blue-green” economy: identifying restorative species in any given ecosystem that make the oceans healthier, that are nutritious, delicious, and economically viable. This is an “elegant solution,” to some of the problems inherent in our current food system, Smith said. Indeed, solutions are needed. Menus of Change (MOC), a meeting hosted by the Culinary Institute of America and the Harvard School of Public Health, highlighted the need for reforming the way we produce food. The MOC annual report pointed to a “perfect storm” of problems associated with industrial food production, including challenges like depletion of arable land and fresh water, antibiotic resistance, drought and other extreme weather associated with climate change, food insecurity, and obesity. A 2011 report from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations identified the global food production sector as one of the most significant drivers of climate change, consuming about 30 percent of the world’s total energy consumption, and producing over one-fifth of its greenhouse gas emissions. One session at MOC explored the potential of underutilized sea foods, and the promise of ocean-based food production: it requires no fresh water, no land, and if done properly can actually mitigate climate change, rather than contribute to it. But there are challenges: Panelist William Bradley described unsuccessful attempts at serving sea vegetables to visitors to the New England Aquarium, where he acts as Executive Chef. Another panelist, Chef Bun Lai has had some success in his restaurant Miya’s Sushi, but he pointed out that many Americans are still simply unfamiliar or uncomfortable with the idea of eating plants from the sea. Bren Smith hopes this will change, and has been working with Chef David Santos at Louro Restaurant in New York to develop innovative ways to prepare sea vegetables. The possibilities are endless. Kelp leaves cut into strips make a perfect al dente noodle; pickled kelp stems are crisp, flavorful and refreshing; kelp butter makes a unique but mild and rich spread; and a simple plate of kelp with a bit of sweet sesame dressing gives any fancy kale salad a run for its money. “It just make sense that this would be the next super-food,” said Santos, pointing to kelp’s healthfulness, environmental impact, and diversity of uses and flavors. There are many reasons that sea farming like Smith’s model may be a key component in the way we think about the future of food production, as described in a recent report by Business Insider. Menus of Change focused on solutions that support health, sustainability, and economics. But at the end of the day, these solutions also have to be delicious. Smith’s 3-D farming fulfills all of those criteria, and shows that similar approaches can be viable. “I think what’s kind of exciting now, is because we’ve screwed things up so badly, because our backs are against the wall, we have to innovate. I mean all over the world we need to come up with answers in order to really change our relationships to the oceans, and reformat the economy, and that’s where a lot of my hope comes from, and where a lot of the excitement comes from, because we have to do something, and I think that’s going to cause a lot of creativity, resilience, and solutions,” he said. But those solutions will only work when we as consumers are ready to step up and embrace new foods and new ways of eating. So go get yourself some kelp, and bon appétite. 'I'm on the front lines of this crisis' By John D. Sutter, CNN September 22, 2014 On Long Island Sound (CNN) -- On Friday morning, I boarded a leaky oyster boat in Connecticut with a captain who can't swim. Our destination: Manhattan, 84 miles down the coast. Mission: don't drown get world leaders to act on climate change. If anyone can accomplish that herculean task it should be Bren Smith, a 42-year-old oysterman off the coast of Branford, Connecticut, who has become a sort of reluctant poster boy for doing something about the crisis instead of just talking about it. Bren's oyster beds were wiped out twice by hurricanes, once by Irene and then, a year later, by Sandy. Warming waters and ocean acidification aren't helping his business model, either. But instead of giving up, he's currently helping to pioneer new techniques for "ocean farming," growing, among other things, kelp seaweed for use in pasta, martinis and biofuel. That he can't swim hasn't stopped him from spending his life on the ocean, which he loves. ("The world disappears; it doesn't exist when you're out here," he said, bouncing over 3- and 4-foot waves). And that he, single-handedly, can't stop climate change didn't stop him from driving his boat down the coast to attend the People's Climate March in New York on Sunday, which is being billed as the largest public demonstration for climate action to date. "This isn't a shtick. I actually believe in this," he said of the reason he's boating from Connecticut to New York for the rally. "I love the ocean. I want to protect it." Bren -- who described himself as being "on the front lines of the this crisis" -- will be one of the most important people to attend Sunday's People's Climate March, which is expected to draw more than 100,000 protestors ahead of United Nations climate summit on Tuesday. He's essential to the international climate conversation for two reasons. One, he's a witness to the reality of climate change today -- here and now and in America. Too often we think of this as an Arctic-only problem, or a 100-years-in-the- future problem. It's actually both urgent and local, as Bren and so many others can attest. And two: Instead of just griping about the changes, he's actually doing something to help. "This isn't a story of giving up," he said. "This is a story of hope." Preach, brother. We all have a lot to learn from Bren. Opinion: Why climate change is an 'everybody issue' now I was lucky enough to get to join him and his co-conspirator, Ron Gautreau, 52, on the 7½-hour journey from the Thimble Island Oyster Co., near Branford, Connecticut, to Pier 59 in the Chelsea neighborhood of Manhattan. We took Bren's 1983 workboat, which he calls "Mookie II," named for the Mets' legendary Mookie Wilson. It chugged along, past the mansions of Greenwich, Connecticut, and the industrial decay of Bridgeport, at a steady and slightly sea-sickening pace of about 17 mph. He told me he took the boat instead of a car because traffic on Interstate 95 headed into New York is "f--ing hell" and because it's a fun bit of "political theater," inspired in part by 1970s protests in which farmers drove their tractors across the country to Washington to demand better farm policy. Between bouts of losing our footing and hollering over the wind, I got to learn some of Bren's inspirational story. He grew up in in Petty Harbour, Newfoundland, a fishing village with 14 houses, as he tells it, at "the edge of the world." His parents were from New York and Connecticut, but moved there during the Vietnam War to dodge the draft. Their son took to the tiny village well, and started fishing at a young age. Because it was so remote, he said, it was a place where people were "fascinated with everything new." It was a place of doers and makers, not complainers. Bren's parents later moved him to the Boston area. People sat around too much, and he missed being out on the ocean -- subject to its moods, humbled by its strength. So, at 14, he dropped out and went to work as a commercial fishermen -- first in Massachusetts, then on the Bering Sea, where he saw 60-foot waves. He dreamed about the work even when he wasn't doing it -- fell in love with a life lived out on the water. It was so cold, he said, he never bothered to learn to swim. That's not uncommon among fishermen, he told me. The prevailing view: Swimming prolongs drowning. He's no stranger to ecological catastrophe. He witnessed the collapse of cod populations in the Atlantic, which he said put many of his friends out of work. And then, when he'd established himself as an oysterman on Long Island Sound, the hurricanes came. While scientists say it's impossible to attribute any single storm to human-induced climate change, the warming atmosphere is expected to make hurricanes larger and more dangerous. And just as Bren rebuilt from one storm, the second hit. He lost 80% of his oysters and about half of his equipment, he told me. "That just blanketed the farm and killed everything," he said. Three days after Sandy hit, he told me, he got online and started researching alternative methods of oyster cultivation -- and new crops to "farm" in the ocean. He came upon the work of Charles Yarish, a professor at the University of Connecticut who studies seaweed cultivation. Yarish helped Bren devise a system, Bren told me, to grow kelp underwater in vertical columns, attached to buoys on the surface. He calls the result a "3-D ocean farm" -- almost invisible from the surface, but capable of producing 10 tons of seaweed per acre per year, along with oysters, clams and mussels, some of which attach themselves to the towers of kelp. This vertical farming method might help prevent his entire operation from being wiped out if another storm swept through, pushing mud across the floor of Long Island Sound. As part of a nonprofit called GreenWave, he's trying to help spread this idea to other "ocean farmers" by open-sourcing the model and teaching what he knows. It's a success story, at least for now. Bren now says the hurricanes were among the best things to happen to him -- because they forced him to innovate, to come up with a new, better way of doing things. The kelp helps sink carbon from the atmosphere, and it processes nitrogen pollution from land-based farms. It doesn't require fresh water, which gives it an environmental leg up on traditional crops. Plus, he expects it to be more resilient in storms and warmer waters. But the future is still uncertain. "Unless the fossil fuels industry reduces their emissions, my farm won't last," he said. He sees oysters and other ocean creatures as the canaries in the coal mine for climate change. Most of us are so distant from the oceans we don't see the change. When we were pulling into New York, I asked Bren what he would do if the United Nations and world leaders continued to fail to act on curbing global carbon emissions. The meetings next week are largely seen as gathering political will ahead of more-formal talks in 2015. But what if no one cares? "I don't know," he said, calmly. "I'll just keep doing my part." It's just the kind of guy he is. It would help if elected officials operated with similar resolve. Conference Presentations Kim J.K., G.P. Kraemer and C. Yarish. 2014. Kelp farming in Long Island Sound and the New York Estuaries for Nutrient Bioextraction. Joint Aquatic Sciences Meeting 2014 (May 18, 2014 - May 24, 2014). Kim J.K., G.P. Kraemer and C. Yarish. 2014. Sugar Kelp Aquaculture: a Coastal Management Tool and New Business Opportunities in Long Island Sound and New York Coastal Waters. Northeast Algal Society Annual Meeting (April 25, 2014 - April 27, 2014) . Koval D.J., J.K. Kim, G.P. Kraemer and Charles Yarish. 2014. GIS Modeling of Potential Aquaculture Sites in Long Island Sound for Nutrient Bio-extraction. Northeast Algal Society Annual Meeting (April 25, 2014 - April 27, 2014). Yarish, C., J.K. Kim and G.P. Kraemer. 2014. Seaweed aquaculture for nutrient bioextraction and other ecosystem services in Long Island Sound and other urbanized estuaries in northeast America. 2014 Ocean Sciences Meeting (February 23, 2014 - February 28, 2014). Yarish, C, J.K. Kim and G.P. Kraemer. 2013. Seaweed Aquaculture for nutrient bioextraction in Long Island Sound and the urbanized Bronx River estuaries. 10th International Phycological Congress. In symposium, “Trends in Applied Phycology: Moving into the 21st Century.” Aug. 4-10, 2013 Kim, J., Kraemer, G. P., Yarish, C., "Sugar Kelp Aquaculture: a Coastal Management Tool and New Business Opportunities in Long Island Sound and New York Coastal Waters", Northeast Algal Society Annual Meeting (April 25, 2014 - April 27, 2014). Kim, J., Yarish, C., Kraemer, G. P., Curtis, J. J., Green, A. Seaweed aquaculture: an opportunity for nutrient bioextraction in Long Island Sound and adjacent urbanized estuaries. 39. 11th Long Island Sound Research Conference Proceedings, 2013, Published. Kim J.K. and C. Yarish. 2012. Nutrient bioextraction by Saccharina latissima and Gracilaria tikvahiae in Long Island Sound and the Bronx River Estuary. Annual Meeting of the Phycological Society of America. Charleston, SC, June 20-23, 2013. Kim J.K., G.P. Kraemer and C. Yarish. 2013. Nutrient Bioextraction: an Application of Extractive Aquaculture in Urbanized Estuaries. 1st International Integrated Multi-trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) Symposium, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Pusan, Republic of Korea, Mar 28-29, 2013. Yarish, C. and J.K. Kim. Exploring Multi-Trophic Linkages Through Aquaculture Systems: Using Ecological Methods to Integrate the Cultivation of Seaweeds and Fish. 1st International Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) Symposium, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Pusan, Republic of Korea, March 28-29, 2013. Yarish, C., Kim, J., Kraemer, G. P., Newell, C., "Seaweed aquaculture for nutrient bioextraction in Long Island Sound and other USA urbanized estuaries", Aquaculture 2013 (Gran Canaria, Spain). (November 3, 2013 - November 7, 2013). Yarish, C. and J.K. Kim. 2013. Seaweed aquaculture: an opportunity for nutrient bioextraction in Long Island Sound and adjacent urbanized estuaries. ASLO 2013 Aquatic Sciences Meeting. New Orleans, LA, Feb. 17-21, 2013. Kim J.K., S. Redmond, G.P. Kraemer, J. Curtis and C. Yarish. 2012. Open water cultivation of Gracilaria tikvahiae and Saccharina latissima in Long Island Sound and the Bronx River Estuary. Northeast Aquaculture Conference and Exposition. Mystic, CT. Dec. 12-15, 2012. Yarish, C., J.K. Kim, C. Neefus and J. Curtis. 2012. An introduction to the cultivation of seaweeds: New opportunities for integrating seaweeds in Northeast America. Northeast Aquaculture Conference and Exposition, Mystic, CT. Dec. 12-15, 2012. Yarish, C., Kim, J., "Exploring Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) Linkages Through Nutrient Bioextraction: The Use of Ecological Methods to Integrate the Cultivation of Seaweeds to Remediate Nutrified Coastal Waters." 2013 In Vitro Biology Meeting. (June 15, 2013 - June 19, 2013). Vaudrey, J., Yarish, C., Chlus, A., "Using nitrogen budgets as a tool to more effectively manage Long Island Sound embayments.", Bioextraction Workshop. (October 10, 2013). Yarish, C. J. K. Kim and G.P. Kraemer. Using Cultivated Seaweed for Nutrient Bioextraction in LIS and the Bronx River Estuary. Workshop on Using Kelp for Nutrient Bioextraction in LIS and the Bronx River Estuary, Bridgeport Regional Aquaculture School and Technology Education Center, Bridgeport, CT. April 3, 2013. Invited Presentations Yarish, C., Kim, J., Kraemer, G. P. “Cultivation of Seaweeds in Northeast America for Food, Feeds and Fertilizer,” Mystic Aquarium’s The Ridgeway Research Seminar series, Sept. 10, 2014. Yarish, C. and J.K. Kim. “2013-2014 Seaweed farm year in a cold Long Island Sound-An update from Connecticut.” 1st Annual Maine Seaweed Festival, Maine Sea Grant College Program, South Portland, ME, August. 30, 2014 Kim, J., Kraemer, G. P., Yarish, C. “An Introduction to Seaweed Aquaculture in Long Island Sound and other Urbanized Estuaries in North America” Nature Center, Sherwood Island State Park. June 28, 2014 Yarish, C., Kim, J., Kraemer, G. P. “Opportunities for the Cultivation of Seaweeds & Shellfish in Long Island Sound for Nutrient Bioextraction.” CT Nitrogen Program Trading Board, July 16, 2014. Kim, J., Kraemer, G. P., Yarish, C., "An Introduction to Seaweed Aquaculture in Long Island Sound and other Urbanized Estuaries in North America", Department Seminar, Three Rivers Community College. (May 7, 2014). Yarish, C., Kim, J., Kraemer, G. P., "Cultivation of Seaweeds In Northeast America For Food, Feeds And Fertilizer,” Ocean Science Public Lecture Series at Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution , Florida Atlantic University. (May 7, 2014; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9EFC0eWNf0&list=UU6YvxeMtmn-a5NbhMKvkJg&feature=share&index=1 ). Yarish, C., Kim, J., Kraemer, G. P., "An Introduction to Seaweed Aquaculture in Long Island Sound and Other Urbanized Estuaries in North America", Plenary Address to The Long Island Sound Educators Conference (Southeastern New England Marine Educators, April 25, 2014). Kraemer, G. P., Kim, J., Yarish, C., Hidu, T., "Cultivation Of Seaweeds In Long Island Sound For Food, Feeds And Fertilizer", CT NOFA's 32nd Annual Winter Conference. (March 1, 2014). Kim, J. K. and C. Yarish. Seaweed aquaculture for nutrient bioextraction and biofuel. Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Pusan, Republic of Korea, March 29, 2013. Kim, J. K. and C. Yarish. Seaweed Aquaculture: New opportunities for integrating seaweeds in Northeast America. Gangwon Sea Grant International Symposium, Gangwon, Republic of Korea, March 26, 2013. Kim, J. K. and C. Yarish. Seaweed farming: a new industry in North America. West Sea Fisheries Research Institute Seminar, Incheon, Republic of Korea, March 19, 2013. Kim, J. K. and C. Yarish. Nutrient bioextraction (IMTA) for urban estuaries. Chungnam National University Seminar, March 18, 2013. Kim J.K. and C. Yarish. 2013. Nutrient Bioextraction, a potential opportunity in West Sea of Korea. Incheon National University. Incheon, Republic of Korea, Mar. 15, 2013. Kim, J., Lindell, S., Yarish, C., "Nutrient Bioextraction Practice in Embayments", Department seminar, Jeju National University (September 24, 2013). Yarish, C., Kim, J., Kraemer, G. P. Nutrient Bioextraction: Opportunities for nutrient management and economic development in Long Island Sound and Coastal New England, CT Society of Cosmetic Chemists Annual Meeting, Sept. 17, 2013 (Published Abstract, Newsletter Vol. 30 (5):1; Best paper award recipient, March 18, 2014). Yarish, C. J. K. Kim and S. Redmond. From Ecosystem Service to Final Product – Capturing the Full Pot ential of Seaweed Aquaculture. Angie’s Bistro Culinary Event, Bridgeport Regional Aquaculture S chool and Technology Education Center, Bridgeport, CT. April 3, 2013. Yarish, C. J. Kim and J. Curtis. Seaweed Aquaculture from Bioextraction of Nutrients from Long Island Sound (R/A-39). Connecticut Sea Grant 25th Anniversary Researcher Forum, Groton, CT. April 10, 2013. Yarish, C., J. Kim, G.P. Kraemer and S. Redmond. Nutrient Bioextraction: Opportunities for nutrient management in urbanized estuaries through extractive aquaculture of seaweeds. University of New England’s Marine Programs, April 22, 2013. Yarish, C., J. Kim, G.P. Kraemer and S. Redmond.Nutrient Bioextraction: Opportunities for nutrient management in urbanized estuaries through extractive aquaculture of seaweeds. The Center for Coastal and Marine Studies, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT, April 9, 2013. National Webinar for the US EPA Yarish, C., Kim, J., Kraemer, G. P., "Seaweed aquaculture for nutrient bioextraction in Long Island Sound and other USA urbanized estuaries", Sea Farming for Environmental and Economic Benefits. (November 21, 2013). • Nutrient Bioextraction An opportunity for nutrient management in Long Island Sound • Charles Yarish and Jang K. Kim (University of Connecticut) George P. Kraemer (Purchase College) NUTRIENT BIOEXTRACTION is an environmental management strategy by which nutrients are removed from an aquatic ecosystem through the harvest of enhanced biological production, including the aquaculture of marine macro algae (seaweeds) and/or suspension-feeding shellfish. How does nutrient bioextraction work? Seaweeds remove inorganic nutrients from water and shellfish (oysters, clams, mussels) filter organically bound particles rich in nutrients. The combination of these two groups of organisms will extract both inorganic and organically bound nutrients, and therefore, could be a powerful tool in cleaning up nutrient-enriched areas in urban estuaries. Why is nutrient bioextraction being considered in Long Island Sound? Dissolved oxygen in Long Island Sound bottom waters, August 14-16, 2012 (CT DEEP and EPA Long Island Sound Study) Long Island Sound has a long history of acting as a giant receptacle for human pollution. Its waters are consistently high in nutrients from waste water treatment plants (point source) and land runoff (nonpoint source). The Bronx River, is a natural freshwater river that empties into the East River of New York City. The East River receives enormous quantities of waste water (point source) and nonpoint source run-off . (*Photo credit: Ron Gautreau, Jang K. Kim, Sarah Redmond and Charles Yarish) Seaweed Aquaculture for Nutrient Bioextraction in Long Island Sound OUR ULTIMATIVE GOAL was to design, Open water seaweed farms: Bronx River estuary, NY (left), Fairfield, CT (western LIS, center), and Branford, CT (central LIS) demonstrate, and promote the bioextraction of inorganic nutrients from coastal waters using native seaweeds (the red seaweed, Gracilaria tikvahiae & the brown sugar kelp, Saccharina latissima). • Gracilaria at the Bronx site grew up to 16.5 %/day in July, suggesting that nutrients were rapidly assimilated and used to fuel the growth of new Gracilaria tissue at that site. • The sugar kelp (Saccharina) at our farm sites grew from 1mm up to 3 m in length with a yield of 18 kg/m within 5 months of growing season (Dec. - May). Nitrogen Removal in a hypothetical (1 ha) nutrient bioextraction farm (unit: (kg / ha) Gracilaria * 4 m spacing between longlines Sugar kelp * 1.5m spacing between longlines • • • Potential applications and uses of biomass • In collaboration with T. Dowding & colleagues (UCONN School of Business’ SLA), an optimization model was developed to determine the value of both nutrient bioextraction and the commodities (including animals feeds, fertilizer, biofuels, etc.) derived from the harvested seaweed as a method to maximize potential multiple revenue streams, while reducing any residual biomass waste to zero. Ecosystem services -Habitat Improvement -Nitrogen credit Sea vegetables Hydrocolloids and Cosmeceuticals Biofuel Project Partners: University of Connecticut, Purchase College, Bridgeport Regional Aquaculture Science and Technology Education Center (BRASTEC) & Rocking The Boat Project Sponsors: Long Island Sound Study's Long Island Sound Futures Fund, New York State Attorney General's Bronx River Watershed Initiative Grant Program, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation & Connecticut Sea Grant College Program For more information email charles.yarish@uconn.edu, and/or visit http://seagrant.uconn.edu/publications/magazines/wracklines/sprsummer13/newcrop.pdf; http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2013/07/21/news/doc51eb4aea41f7b501508220.txt; http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/06/20/long-island-sound-cash-crop-makes-its-way-to-manhattan-tables/; http://www.yourpublicmedia.org/content/wnpr/seaweed-and-sound; http://www.theday.com/article/20130527/NWS01/305279955/1070 SEAWEED AQUACULTURE: BIOEXTRACTION OF NUTRIENTS TO REDUCE EUTROPHICATION GEORGE P. KRAEMER, JANG K. KIM, AND CHARLES YARISH Like many other estuaries and coastal regions, Long Island Sound suffers from anthropogenic eutrophication. This phenomenon, the addition of nutrients to the system as a result of human activities, is a consequence of the human alteration of the nitrogen cycle on a global scale. In coastal waters and estuaries primary production by phytoplankton, seaweeds, and seagrasses is generally limited by the availability of dissolved inorganic nitrogen, present as nitrate, nitrite, and ammonium. The sources of the inorganic nitrogen added into coastal waters and estuaries are several: fertilizer run-off from residences, agriculture, septic seep into groundwater, fossil fuel combustion, and wastewater treatment plant discharges. in revenue each year to the local economies2. Coastal resource managers have become increasingly drawn into watershed management in efforts to reduce eutrophication and its concomitant impacts, and protect coastal economies. In many areas of the northeast, a high degree of development and high population densities preclude large scale land use the Sound. In 2013 hypoxia covered roughly 81 mi2 for a period of more than two months, the second smallest hypoxic area during the past 27 years4. It is likely that sediments at the bottom of Long Island Sound contain a reservoir of nitrogen that maintains the elevated nutrient status and occurrence of hypoxia 5. What are needed are additional tools in the suite of approaches to nutrient and consequently eutrophication reduction. An additional strategy to mitigate nutrient levels in estuaries and shallow coastal waters is seaweed aquaculture. Seaweeds have been a part of the human diet for ca. 14,000 years6, and have a long and important history in Asian countries, The ecological consequences including Japan, China, and are also varied. Eutrophication Korea. These aquatic primary can lead to blooms of harmful producers remove nutrients (toxin-producing) microalgae, from water to fuel growth and and the onshore accumulation reproduction in a process of excess seaweed – one need termed bioextraction. The same Left: Gracilaria harvest after 2 weeks of growth at the Bronx River only think back to the sailing Estuary site (in foreground Purchase college Student, John Delgado function occurs on land when events of the 2008 Olympics and background Rocking the Boat student, Gianmarco Bocchini). wetlands and riparian plants7 act in Qingdao, China for a an Photo credit: J.K. Kim and C. Yarish. as “sponges” absorbing nutrient example of this impact 1. In from ground and surface water. addition, the sinking of algae to the bottom changes that could reduce nutrient inputs. Through growth of seaweeds, dissolved in shallow waters delivers biomass to Within 50 miles of its shores, Long Island nutrients are removed and concentrated microbes, with decomposition consuming Sound is home to more than 20 million in algal biomass which is then harvested, effectively removing nutrients from the oxygen, leading to hypoxia and anoxia. people3. aquatic system. This has become a regular late summer feature of estuaries in the U.S., including These high population densities translate Long Island Sound, Chesapeake Bay, into large eutrophication pressures. Bioextraction is not envisioned as a Neuse River, and along coastal areas Strategies for reducing nutrient input replacement for any of the current throughout the U.S. The “Dead Zone” include programs to educate homeowners nutrient or eutrophication mitigation off the mouth of the Mississippi River is to the action-at-a-distance effects of strategies. Rather, it gives another point the most famous example of this. In all over-fertilization of suburban lawns, of attack, and is an approach with cases, ecological impacts also translate conversion of septic systems to sewerage, subsidiary benefits. Once harvested from into economic impacts, from reductions and upgrading of wastewater treatment aquaculture systems, algal biomass has in fisheries yield to man-hours consumed plants to augment microbial denitrification the potential for many uses. Depending cleaning beaches of accumulated seaweed. prior to water discharge. These efforts all on the species cultured and siting of cost money, and though demonstrably farm systems, biomass may be sold Estuaries and coastal zones are some of effective in reducing inorganic nitrogen the most important regional economic inputs over the past 25 years, have not 4 http://www.ct.gov/deep/lib/deep/water/lis_water_quality/hypoxia/2013_season_review.pdf drivers. Long Island Sound, for example, eliminated hypoxia in the western arm of 5 e.g., Lai & Lam (2008) Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol. 57, contributes eight to nine billion dollars Issues 6–12, pp. 349–356 2 http://longislandsoundstudy.net/about-the-sound/by- 1 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/01/world/ asia/01algae.html the-numbers/ 3 Latimer et al. (2014). Long Island Sound: Prospects for the Urban Sea. Springer. New York. 558p. 6 Dillehay et al. (2008) Science, Vol. 320 no. 5877 pp. 784786. 7 e.g., Likens (2010) River Ecosystem Ecology: A Global Perspective, Elsevier Pub., 424 p. Continued on Page 17 Page 16 * AMWS Newsletter No. 89 Seaweed (Continued from Page 16) for direct consumption as human food1. In addition, biomass may also become part of a feed for fish, shrimp, chicken, cattle, etc. Biomass unsold for consumption has potential use as a source of cosmeceutical and nutraceuticals compounds, and cell wall phycocolloids (agars, carrageenans or alginates). Anything remaining has potential value as feedstock for organic fertilizers and/or biofuels. These ancillary revenue sources help make seaweed bioextraction a more attractive, economically viable option. Seaweed aquaculture is not a “one size fits all” strategy. Native seaweed species differ in phycocolloid chemistry and quantity, ability to sequester nitrogen, growth rate, and life history malleability2. In fact, seasonality of growth varies among species, necessitating a sort of crop rotation. Gracilaria tikvahiae, for example, is Right: Bren Smith, owner of the Thimble Island Oyster Co. harvests sugar kelp grown at a site off the Thimble Islands, Branford, CT. Smith is the first commercial seaweed grower in Long Island a red, agar-producing seaweed that Sound. Photo credit: R. Gautreau. grows well during warmer months (water temperature greater than 15°C) up to 145 kilograms of nitrogen during a sediment reservoir. Seaweed aquaculture in temperate ecosystems. Under optimal conditions, this species may 120 days growing season (July – October). could be a cost effective, affordable and grow at more than 16% per day, and Since these estimates only encompass equitable solution to remove inorganic accumulate nitrogen at up to 6% per gram part of the full May-October growing nutrients in urbanized coastal systems. of dry tissue. The sugar kelp, Saccharina season, total realized bioextraction would Seaweed aquaculture, therefore, could be latissima, is a brown, alginate-producing be much greater. The greatest extraction, included as part of a suite of management seaweed growing when temperatures are a function of ambient temperature, light, tools to minimize nutrient impacts in less than about 15°C. After out-planting and N concentration, will likely occur urbanized coastal waters, while providing juvenile kelp (<1mm), the sugar kelp can during May-July. The sugar kelp can a new business opportunities for seaweed 4 grow up to 3.0 m in length with a yield of remove up to 183 kilograms nitrogen per aquaculturalists in the United States . over 18 kilograms fresh weight per meter hectare, during the winter spring growing of line after 5 months (December-May). season. The economic value of N removal, George P. Kraemer, Professor 3 The sugar kelp accumulates nitrogen up if incorporated into a N trading program , Department of Environmental Studies Purchase College would be as high as $1,600 per hectare to 3% on a dry weight basis, depending for Gracilaria tikvahiae and $2,020 per 735 Anderson Hill Road on location. hectare for the sugar kelp. These values Purchase, NY, 10577, USA Recent studies in the Long Island Sound would represent additional income for and the Bronx River estuaries, supported seaweed aquaculturalists beyond the value Jang K. Kim, Assistant Research Professor Department of Marine Sciences by the Connecticut Sea Grant College of seaweed products. University of Connecticut Program, the U.S. EPA Long Island Sound Study’s Long Island Sound Futures Fund, The bottom line is that seaweed 1 University Place New York State Attorney General’s Bronx aquaculture removes inorganic nutrients Stamford, CT, 06901, USA River Watershed Initiative Grant Program from seawater in a fashion similar to landand National Fish and Wildlife Foundation based wetlands; nutrients that could Charles Yarish, Professor estimated that the biomass yields of otherwise fuel the growth of potentially Department of Ecology and Evolutionary microalgal and nuisance Biology Gracilaria tikvahiae and the sugar kelp harmful were up to 21 and 62 metric tons fresh macroalgal blooms. And, since a fraction University of Connecticut of biomass eventually reaches the base 1 University Place weight per hectare, respectively. of the water column, bloom prevention Stamford, CT, 06901, USA The aquacultured Gracilaria tikvahiae in a through bioextraction will help reduce (203) 251-8432 hypothetical one hectare farm can remove bottom water hypoxia, and eventually charles.yarish@uconn.edu draw down nutrients stored in the 1 http://today.uconn.edu/blog/2013/08/from-the-lab-to- the-dinner-table-kelp/ 2 http://seagrant.uconn.edu/publications/aquaculture/ handbook.pdf 3 http://www.ct.gov/deep/lib/deep/water/municipal_ wastewater/nitrogen_report_2012.pdf 4 http://water.epa.gov/resource_performance/perfor- mance/upload/OW_End_of_Year_BPFY2012_Report.pdf April 2014 * Page 17 2nd Workshop on Using Cultivated Seaweed and Shellfish for Nutrient Bioextraction in LIS and the Bronx River Estuary Thursday, October 10th, 1pm to 4pm Mamaroneck Town Center Courtroom 740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY10543 This workshop will be hosted by the University of Connecticut, EPA’s Long Island Sound Futures Fund (NFWF), Purchase College and Connecticut Sea Grant. The Long Island Sound and adjacent coastal waters (ie. Bronx River Estuary) receive high quantities of point source (waste water) and nonpoint source runoff (storm water, atmospheric deposition, etc.) leading to coastal eutrophication. Current mitigation strategies have had limited success managing the nutrient influx. This workshop will demonstrate utilizing seaweed and shellfish as nutrient bioextraction tools in water treatment. Regulatory managers, municipalities, and other stakeholders who have an interest in improving water quality are encouraged to attend. There is no fee to attend this workshop, however registration is required. Please RSVP to Anoushka Concepcion (anoushka.concepcion@uconn.edu) or (860) 405-9105 by September 27th. (tentative): Gary Wikfors (NOAA): “What We Learned About Ribbed Mussels and Hunts Point” Charles Yarish (UConn): “Seaweed Aquaculture for Nutrient Bioextraction in Long Island Sound and the Urbanized Bronx River Estuaries” Jang K. Kim (UConn): “Multi-cropping Seaweed Gracilaria tikvahiae with Oysters for Nutrient Bioextraction and Sea Vegetables in Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts” Jamie Vaudrey (UConn): “Using Nitrogen Budgets as a Tool to More Effectively Manage Long Island Sound Embayments” Wade Carden (NYSDEC): “An Overview of the Permitting Process for Seaweed Farming NY Coastal Waters” Kelly Streich (CT DEEP): “An Overview of the CT Nitrogen Credit Exchange Program” Panel Discussion: “Opportunities for Nutrient Bioextraction for coastal waters of CT and NY”