BroadBand (SK)(3)07
Transcription
BroadBand (SK)(3)07
FILM PROUCTION IN IRELAND Audiovisual Federation Review 2005 An affiliate association within IBEC | the Irish Business and Employers Confederation www.tif.ie broadband fixed mobile wireless cable satellite Table of contents Executive Summary 1.0 Tif 2.0 Broadband Taskforce 3.0 Report Objective 4.0 Analysis Of Broadband Supply 5.0 Analysis Of Broadband Demand 6.0 Conclusions 6.1 Broadband penetration is an issue of both supply and demand 6.2 Industry cannot supply areas where expenditure exceeds revenue 6.3 Solutions to date have not given 100% coverage 6.4 New technologies will provide new solutions 7.0 Recommendations 7.1 Public investment only where needed 7.2 Use of public tender process for outlying areas 7.3 The role of regulation 7.4 Multiple initiatives are required to stimulate demand 7.5 Close cooperation of all stakeholders 8.0 Closing Statement Appendices A1 Broadband and Next Generation Networks Industry Group A2 Secretariat A3 TIF Members A4 TIF Industry Groups 1 3 4 5 5 6 8 9 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 14 14 16 2 Executive Summary In January 2006, the TIF Broadband Taskforce was set up to provide a unified industry voice on the broadband market and infrastructure in Ireland. This enabled the telecoms industry to establish a common position on many major factors affecting Broadband in Ireland. A survey of network coverage, population and technical issues was undertaken, and the group performed an analysis of that data. The outcome of this supply analysis is that approximately 75-80% of the population have access to a wired broadband service and 60% have access to a form of wireless broadband service. TIF estimates that the combined availability of wired and wireless broadband covers approximately 80-85% of the population. This is an aggregated nationwide figure, so availability will vary greatly from individual location to location. Based on this analysis a list of detailed recommendations was developed. The main areas of recommendation are: ● Public investment only where needed – the most appropriate use of Government funding is to restrict it to areas where private industry is least likely to invest. ● Use of public tender process for outlying areas – Government funding is required to make certain areas economically viable for industry to supply with broadband services. This should be tendered on a region by region basis. ● The role of regulation – the regulatory environment must be flexible enough to keep pace with the dynamic nature of the industry. Spectrum allocation to enable wireless and mobile broadband solutions; standardization of local authority charges and procedures; and regulatory policies that balance the development of competition with the need for long-term sustained investment are vital to the rollout of broadband. ● Multiple initiatives are required to stimulate demand – there is no single solution to driving demand, a blended approach is required. Stronger ICT presence in schools; incentives for businesses to promote teleworking and online sales; initiatives to promote the uptake of PCs and other internet enabled devices; awareness campaigns to educate consumers on the benefits of broadband are examples of the multitude of means available. ● Close cooperation of all stakeholders – both the private and public sectors have a role to play in maximizing the reach and uptake of broadband. A joint effort and full consultation between Government and Industry is crucial in the deployment of all of these recommendations. As a nation and an economy, knowledge based industries have been identified as the key to future economic success. Industry is committed to this ideal and a mutual effort with Government to specify and agree the key deliverables and outcomes that Irish society is trying to achieve is a vital step. This will ensure that there is agreement on and understanding of the challenges and will enable Industry and Government to jointly plot the correct course to achieve them. These issues need to be developed and agreement reached on what is affordable and achievable. The recently published National Development Plan has shown the Government’s commitment to investing in telecommunications, but it is vital to have two-way consultation with industry to ensure that best use is made of that investment. Direct Government funding may be a key factor, but it is not the only factor. Comprehensive cooperation of Government and Industry in other ways may very well be required to help stimulate demand in creative and imaginative ways. 3 1.0 TIF The Telecommunications and Internet Federation (TIF) is the representative body for the electronic communications industry in Ireland. The Federation informs policymakers; namely the Government, the EU and the Commission for Communications Regulation (ComReg), of the industry's needs in respect of telecommunications and Internet policies including fixed, mobile, wireless and satellite, cable, applications, Internet service provision and technology research developments. IBEC's Telecommunications and Internet Federation oversees: ● The advocacy of the long-term interests of participants in the electronic communications industry in Ireland. ● The publication and promotion of policy recommendations reflecting the views of operators and users in relation to telecommunications and internet matters. ● The provision of a forum for discussion on relevant issues amongst network operators, telecommunications users, internet service providers, application service providers and other communities of interest. The primary remit of TIF is the development of telecoms policy; in particular, we look to formulate joint industry positions on Government policy in the area of telecommunications as well as in the broader field of ICT. This document, aimed at Government and the State agencies, seeks to articulate industry’s viewpoint on the development and implementation of broadband strategy, with a particular focus on the residential and SME markets. Development of effective broadband strategy, we believe, will require the ongoing and active engagement of operators and relevant stakeholders. The TIF membership represents the vast majority of broadband suppliers in Ireland, and these members have provided substantial levels of investment in Ireland’s broadband infrastructure. This funding is currently at a rate of investment which is almost 20% of overall industry revenues. This rate of investment is well above the standard industry benchmark of 10%, which represents a measure of the scale of commitment of the industry to Ireland and the future of the Irish telecommunications market and the economy as a whole. This is an industry which is striving to ensure that Ireland has the most modern telecoms infrastructure it can economically support. 4 2.0 Broadband Taskforce In January 2006, the TIF Broadband Taskforce was set up to provide a joint industry perspective on the broadband market and infrastructure in Ireland. Membership of the group was at board level and was drawn from TIF member companies involved in providing broadband services. The group was set up with the following remit: ● To develop recommendations for both industry and government that will optimise the take up of broadband in Ireland across all multi access technologies i.e. wired, wireless, mobile, cable and satellite. ● To examine the inhibitors to the take up of broadband given the wide range of prices and technologies currently available in Ireland. ● To consider and propose measures on both the supply and demand side that will drive the take up of broadband. ● To promote the Irish telecoms industry utilising international broadband benchmarking that is relevant, accurate and appropriate to Irish circumstances. ● To publish the recommendations with an action plan for both industry and government. 3.0 Report Objective The TIF Broadband Taskforce was established to determine the facts of the Irish broadband market. The taskforce examined both supply and demand issues, in both the residential and SME commercial markets. A broadband survey was carried out among all the main broadband providers to obtain the ‘raw data’ required to establish the facts of the market. The data has been analysed, and this report contains the analysis and findings of the taskforce. The report is intended to inform all stakeholders of the facts of the market, to present the conclusions drawn from those facts, and to advise all stakeholders of TIF’s recommendations to maximise the availability of broadband in Ireland. In the broadest sense, TIF wants to promote the advancement of telecommunications in Ireland, and to expedite a future where information technology is seamlessly woven into the fabric of Irish society. 5 4.0 Analysis of Broadband Supply The OECD analysis of broadband penetration is the standard measure used to gauge broadband development in a nation. In this report, the definition of basic broadband services is the OECD definition, which includes all technologies capable of delivering download bit rates in excess of 256kb/s. It should be noted that even the entry level packages of broadband suppliers in Ireland typically start at a data rate several times faster than this minimum standard. Furthermore, Ireland currently boasts some of the cheapest entry level broadband products in Europe. Basic residential packages are now available for less than ¤20 per month. This report focuses on broadband from a largely consumer/SME perspective, and so the only technologies included were based on the particular mass market affordability threshold of less than ¤50 per month, although the basic residential packages are markedly cheaper than this. Consequently, the report encompasses a wide variety of technologies which are currently capable of meeting these criteria, including DSL, Cable Modem, wireless and also 3G services. The broadband platforms compared in this survey do not have identical features. Customers must make complex choices based on a trade-off between download speed, upload speed, availability, ubiquity, mobility, convenience, contention, price and support. It is important to understand how each platform differs in order to correctly interpret the survey data. To allow for a comparison in service levels, typical features are provided below for each platform at a monthly price range of G40-G50. ● DSL: 4 Mbps download speed, 512 Kbps upload; requires a phone line, fixed location. ● Cable: 6 Mbps download speed, 512 Kbps upload; requires cable television, fixed location. ● Wireless: 3 Mbps download speed, 3 Mbps upload, does not require a phone line. ● Mobile: 384 Kbps to 1.2 Mbps download, 64 to 384 Kbps upload, mobile within all 3G enabled cells, requires mobile phone. TIF recognises that the DSL enablement of a telephone exchange does not automatically convert to 100% DSL availability in the exchange area, nor does the availability of wireless broadband guarantee 100% availability within the wireless coverage footprint. Similarly, the availability of cable television services does not guarantee the availability of cable broadband. The survey data collected was adjusted to incorporate this, based on a variety of measures. This adjustment process showed approximately 8% of lines are unable to support DSL for a variety of technical reasons related to copper quality but principally due to absolute copper distance from the exchange. A secondary difficulty is that even among lines that may be suitable for DSL, there are shared lines. These lines utilise carrier systems, which allow for line multiplication but are now a barrier to DSL provision; it should be noted that carriers are more prevalent in rural than urban areas. Taking these two DSL limiting factors into account TIF estimates that on average up to 15% of lines connected to DSL exchanges should be realistically excluded from those which can access DSL. This proportion will vary from exchange area to exchange area. Technical developments in DSL, for ‘long-lines’ in particular, are ensuring that the percentage limited by copper quality will reduce significantly but the carrier issue will give rise to a residual 7% to 8% which will not be addressed. . Investment in infrastructure is a key element to DSL enabling the maximum number of lines. The unbundling of the local loop enables new companies to enter the wired broadband market. The increased number of companies involved could act as a catalyst for wider Industry investment in Ireland’s broadband infrastructure. The ComReg forum on LLU should be completed as rapidly as possible to remove all uncertainties regarding how unbundling will proceed. 6 The fast pace of change in telecommunications technology can diminish the value of existing investments in broadband infrastructure. The regulatory environment should include provisions to ensure that infrastructure assets are not stranded as a result of technology development. Cable television networks are in the process of being broadband enabled, with an estimated 45% of the network currently capable of delivering broadband. It is expected that 90% of the network will be broadband enabled within the next 2 years. Similarly, wireless services available either from wireless broadband or 3G will have a certain degree of impairment. There is a proportion of customers who live in properties of heavy construction or have other attenuating obstacles such that wireless penetration is inhibited. It is estimated that the proportion of customers classed as having access should be reduced by up to 15% on this basis. Spectrum allocation plays a key role in maximising the impact of wireless solutions. Improved liberalisation on a technology neutral basis will provide industry with greater opportunity to innovate and deliver wider broadband services. It should be recognised that those unable to avail of DSL for the above cited reasons, may very well be in a position to access a competitive wireless broadband service or a cable service, and vice versa. This fact gives a complementary effect to the total coverage, see the table below. Maximum Typical Impairment Realistic 90% 15% 75% 50% 27% 23% 75% 15% 60% DSL Population within DSL enabled exchange areas CABLE Population in Cable areas WIRELESS Population within wireless coverage areas 80-85% Total complementary coverage The outcome of this supply analysis is that approximately 75-80% of the population have access to a wired broadband service and 60% have access to a form of wireless broadband service. Taking account of a certain level of complementary coverage between DSL and wireless then in the country as a whole, 80-85% of the population has access to some form of broadband service. Given the current rate of investment in fixed and mobile services these figures will continue to improve. A further analysis of the data shows the level of consumer choice in the market. From a choice of service provider perspective, we can say that up to 85% of customers have access to at least one broadband service provider, over 60% of customers can access at least 2 alternative technologies, and over 40% of customers have access to all the available technology platforms. It must also be noted that there are multiple suppliers for every technology, so the ability access to one or two technologies could let the customer access many more service providers. 7 5.0 Analysis of Broadband Demand The conundrum of stimulating demand is not unique to Ireland; simply increasing the supply will not necessarily lead to an increase in demand. With supply at 80% and rising, other limiting factors need to be addressed to substantially raise demand levels. No consumer will purchase a broadband product without a device for accessing it, and so a significant factor is the availability of PCs or other internet enabled devices. The Central Statistics Office has measured PC penetration in Ireland at 59%, which is substantially lower than countries at the top of the broadband penetration rankings. There is undoubtedly a correlation between PC penetration and broadband penetration. Furthermore, TIF contends that the societal factors that inhibit the uptake of home PCs are also inhibiting factors for broadband uptake. A recent workshop organised by ICT Ireland, Intel and the Department of An Taoiseach, identified that many of those currently un-connected to available broadband or dial-up did not see themselves as having any demand for the service. Only 10% cited price as the barrier, more often the issue was lack of perceived utility. In particular, among senior citizens, under-pressure parents and semi-skilled and un-skilled workers the demand was severely lacking. Several explanations for this were offered including, skill deficit, fear of technology, lack of hire purchase finance, lack of local distribution and limited access to training. A recent international study by the Economist Intelligence Unit1 analysed markets where government programmes were run which provided incentivised packages of PC, broadband and training/support. It is clear that the effectiveness of such measures was quite dependant on the specific detail of the scheme. One of the key success factors was identified as close collaboration between industry and Government in their design and implementation. There are clear success stories for these mechanisms, such as Sweden where PC penetration at over 90% is the highest in Europe. There are ample examples from other countries which could guide the development of similar programmes here, in particular the establishment of the proposed Home Computing Initiative, a joint Industry and Government scheme to promote the uptake of PCs in the home. Many of the demand issues cited go beyond price and availability; fear of technology, inadequate training, and the lack of perceived usefulness are less tangible factors which must be addressed through education. TIF has taken a leadership role in this area by providing a significant amount of funding to promote school access to broadband. TIF members have committed to providing G15 million over 3 years to fund the Broadband for schools programme. By providing a broadband connection to every school, it exposes young people to the broadband experience, who will then hopefully act as a catalyst for demand to educate and encourage their families to subscribe for the service. Education can also come through the media; TIF members have also provided funding for the cross-border broadband awareness campaign, which is helping to raise the awareness and promote demand for broadband services. 1. At Home with IT, how Governments make the information society happen, Economist Intelligence Unit, April 2006 8 6.0 Conclusions This section details the main conclusions that TIF has drawn from the results of the preceding section. 6.1 Broadband penetration is an issue of both supply and demand With an overall availability of approximately 80%, Ireland’s current position in the lower half of broadband penetration league tables seems counterintuitive. As of September 2006, ComReg estimated that broadband penetration stands at approximately 10% by population, whereas the OECD average is 12%. This is partially explained by the fact that Irish supply levels are below those in the upper half of the rankings, with some markets having achieved 100% supply availability. However, it is clear that the disparity cannot only be attributed to supply issues. Even with 100% supply, Ireland’s position in broadband penetration will not improve without an increased take-up of the service. Both Industry and Government have invested heavily in the supply of broadband, and continue to do so. However, investment and initiatives in stimulating demand are a key factor in addressing the overall penetration statistics. 6.2 Industry cannot supply areas where expenditure exceeds revenue Industry has risen to the challenge of providing Broadband infrastructure to the vast majority of the population. Private investment has worked, and will continue to work, in areas where the economics allow for a reasonable return on investment. The unprecedented diversity in broadband platforms used in Ireland is a testament to the ingenuity of the telecommunications providers in the Irish market. This is a clear indication that absence of coverage for the remainder of the population is not due to a lack of innovation and effort on the part of Irish operators, but rather is due to the realities of running a successful business. Given the relatively small size of the population outside the current reach of broadband, coupled with the dispersed nature of that population, it is not feasible for industry to provide broadband connectivity to all in a cost effective manner without external support. 9 6.3 Solutions to date have not given 100% coverage The solutions attempted thus far, both public and private, have not delivered on the promise of 100% broadband availability. As shown above, 20% of the population still has no means of accessing residential broadband services. While recognising the individual successes of some Group Broadband schemes, the districts still outside the reach of broadband show that the schemes have not resolved the supply issue. At the current rate of rollout it would take many years to enable the remaining population. The supply problem must be resolved far sooner than this. The MANS project has contributed to increased competition in areas that are already served by broadband; however, it does not effectively extend the reach of broadband infrastructure. As with group broadband schemes, this fact is borne out by the areas still unable to receive broadband services. 6.4 New technologies will provide new solutions The results above show that many technologies have been used to supply broadband within Ireland. Telecommunications is a fast moving industry; existing platforms are constantly evolving and entirely new platforms are emerging. There is no doubt that improvements to existing technologies, and the introduction of entirely new platforms (e.g. WiMAX, HSDPA, HSUPA) will further contribute to the availability of broadband. These developments may reduce the cost of broadband supply, which would enable industry to provide broadband to areas that could not previously be entered on the basis of economic feasibility. They may also allow broadband to be provided in areas that were previously inaccessible due to purely technical reasons. New technology will certainly be a contributing factor to extending access to broadband. Unfortunately, it is unlikely that technologies developed in the short to medium term will resolve all the difficulties of broadband supply. 10 7.0 Recommendations Following on from the conclusions of the preceding section, TIF has the following recommendations to resolve the issue of total broadband availability. 7.1 Public investment only where needed Any plan to deliver broadband to those currently unable to receive it will inevitably involve both private industry and public bodies. Investment will be needed from both sides, and all investment should be planned to deliver the maximum possible efficiency. The core of this efficiency comes from what areas both parties choose to invest in. Public investment should be made in areas where there is market failure. Investing in areas where industry could make a reasonable return without government assistance represents bad value for the taxpayer, since industry would have invested in that area anyway. Conversely, industry cannot invest in areas with very low (or in some cases negative) returns as it would lead to the inevitable closure of that business due to losses. The recently published National Development Plan has shown the Government’s commitment to investing in telecommunications, but it is vital to have two-way consultation with industry to ensure that best use is made of that investment. TIF recommends that public funds be used to supply broadband to areas that cannot be serviced by industry. 7.2 Use of public tender process for outlying areas In light of the above recommendation, it is vital that, in order to achieve 100% broadband availability, public funding is provided for areas that industry cannot feasibly enter alone. Total coverage is not possible without this investment. As noted in the conclusions, a variety of platforms have already been deployed to supply broadband in Ireland. TIF recommends that a public tender process be used for the provision of broadband to areas that are not economically viable to supply with purely private investment. The tender should be open to all companies and should consider all platforms. Cost should not be the only factor under consideration. Many issues including: rollout time; capacity; connection speed; competition; resilience; maintenance should also be analysed. It is unlikely that any one company will be able to provide the best solution in all areas, thus a region by region tender would be optimal. 11 7.3 The role of regulation TIF recommends that changes to regulation, and not merely communications regulation, be used to open up new possible avenues of addressing the issue of supplying total broadband coverage. ● Altering current regulations regarding spectrum allocation will enable mobile and wireless providers to extend the availability of broadband services on their networks. Spectrum should be made available for the rollout of wireless broadband in a technology neutral manner. ● As stated in conclusion 6.4, new technology will contribute to increased broadband availability. It must be ensured that the regulatory environment is constantly updated to keep pace with technological developments to avoid needless delays to their deployment. ● Regulatory decisions must find the correct balance between the rapid development of short-term competition and the development of long-term sustainable investment in the telecommunications sector. The regulatory environment should also include provisions to ensure that infrastructure assets are not stranded as a result of technology development. ● The unbundling of the local loop enables new companies to enter the wired broadband market. The increased number of companies involved could act as a catalyst for wider Industry investment in Ireland’s broadband infrastructure. The ComReg forum on LLU should be completed as rapidly as possible to remove all uncertainties regarding how unbundling will proceed. ● There is a pressing need for regulation and standardisation of the charges and procedures of local authorities. This will counteract the problems of arbitrary fees, inconsistent bond procedures and excessive deposits, all of which act as an economic barrier and general disincentive to infrastructure development. All the charges and procedures should be proportionate, reasonable, transparent, non-discriminatory and consistent. 7.4 Multiple initiatives are required to stimulate demand The existing demand initiatives will provide a foundation to develop the low demand levels in Ireland. The long term evolution and success of these schemes will require a substantial level of collaboration and consultation between Government and Industry. Support and incentives could be developed to better enable businesses to make use of broadband services. For example use of ‘teleworking’ facilities that improve efficiency, reduce transport congestion and provide better ‘work life balance’. Government should also promote the use of online services for Irish businesses. This will maximise their potential customer base and benefit the economy through increased exports. Such initiatives would greatly assist the SME sector by lowering the barriers to entry to the online marketplace. Better ICT integration in the national curriculum, coupled with further investment in ICT assets in schools will derive full benefit from the broadband to schools programme. This will be crucial to the long term adoption and usage of broadband in Ireland. Programmes to simplify and incentivise the uptake of PCs and broadband, such as the Home Computing Initiative, are an important factor in lowering the barriers to entry for broadband for the home user. PC and broadband penetration are inextricably linked, and success in this area will simultaneously drive both PC and broadband adoption. Information campaigns such as the broadband awareness campaign, should be delivered through the media to educate on the benefits and opportunities afforded by broadband in the home. 12 7.5 Close cooperation of all stakeholders None of the recommendations above can be implemented without establishing a close working relationship between all stakeholders. Government and Industry must jointly formulate and implement development plans to provide broadband access to the entire population of Ireland. The very nature of this report shows the existing cooperation and collective will within Industry to tackle this crucial issue. TIF hopes that it will act as a strong signal to all stakeholders that it is time for all parties to work together towards a solution. Recommendation 7.1 highlighted the need to properly allocate public funds to areas of market failure. The process of identifying these areas and determining the level of investment needed must be a joint effort between Government and Industry. Alterations to communications regulation and the provision of regulation and standards to local authority charges and procedures must also be discussed and agreed by Government, Local Authorities, Industry and the appropriate regulatory bodies. Neither the Government nor Industry can single-handedly deliver a complete broadband network to the entire nation. Only by working together can we create the broadband infrastructure that Ireland needs to maintain its position as a leading knowledge-based economy. 8.0 Closing Statement The drivers on industry are to achieve an economic return on its investment and as such the growth rate and target levels for broadband adoption are likely to differ between commercial operators and policy makers. As a nation and an economy, knowledge based industries have been identified as the key to future economic success. Industry is committed to this ideal and a mutual effort with Government to specify and agree the key deliverables and outcomes that Irish society is trying to achieve is a vital step. This will ensure that there is agreement on and understanding of the challenges and will enable Industry and Government to jointly plot the correct course to achieve them. These issues need to be developed and agreement reached on what is affordable and achievable. Direct Government funding may be a key factor, but it is not the only factor. Comprehensive cooperation of Government and Industry in other ways may very well be required to help stimulate demand in creative and imaginative ways. 13 Appendices A1 Broadband and Next Generation Networks Industry Group Chairman: Andy MacLeod, COO, Eircom Vice-Chairman: Michael Maloney, COO, BT Ireland Aurora Telecom BT Ireland Cable & Wireless Services Clearwire Broadband Colt Telecom Ireland Ltd Commergy Ltd Data Electronics Group Ltd Digiweb Ltd eircom E-Net ESB Telecoms EU Networks Irish Broadband Liberty Global Magnet Networks O2 Communications Ireland UPC Ireland Vodafone Ireland 3 Ireland A2 Sean O'Donnell Michael Maloney Noreen O'Hare, Kevin Relihan Dan Churchill, Brent Smith Gary Keogh George Young Maurice Mortell Colm Piercy Andy MacLeod, Pat Galvin Conal Henry, Tom Savage Niall Hogan Barry Nolan Neil Parkinson Shane O'Neill, Ray Collins Vern Kennedy Gerry McQuaid, Juan Latasa Robert Dunn Gerry Fahy Robert Finnegan Secretariat TIF - Tommy McCabe (Director) TIF - Peter Scott (Executive) TIF - Carolyn Doumeni (Support) A3 TIF Members Afilias Ltd Alcatel Ireland Ltd Aurora Telecom Limited BT Ireland Cable & Wireless Clearwire Broadband Liberty Global (Chorus/NTL) Coillte Teo Colt Telecom Ireland Ltd Commergy Ltd Conduit Plc DCC Management Services Ltd. Data Electronics Group Ltd Digiweb Ltd Dublin City University Henry Lubben Kevin O'Callaghan, Neil Harte Sean O'Donnell Michael Maloney, Gary Cobain, John O’Dwyer, Justin Verrecchia,Tom Carson Noreen O'Hare, Kevin Relihan Dan Churchill, Brent Smith Shane O’Neill, Robert Dunne, Ray Collins, Kate O’Sullivan Dermot O'Brien Gary Keogh George Young Denis Creighton Donal Murphy Maurice Mortell Colm Piercy, John Quinn Paschal Preston 14 A3 TIF Members Afilias Ltd Alcatel Ireland Ltd Aurora Telecom Limited BT Ireland Cable & Wireless Clearwire Broadband Liberty Global (Chorus/NTL) Coillte Teo Colt Telecom Ireland Ltd Commergy Ltd Conduit Plc DCC Management Services Ltd. Data Electronics Group Ltd Digiweb Ltd Dublin City University E D S Ireland Limited e net eircom Electricity Supply Board Fujitsu Services Limited Global Voice Green Isle Foods Ltd HEAnet Ltd 3 Ireland Icarus Interfusion Networks Irish Broadband Internet Services Irish Life Assurance plc L M Ericsson Ltd Lucent Technology Magnet Networks Mason Communications Ireland Meteor Mobile Communications NITM Nortel Networks Ireland Ltd O2 Ireland Limited Oracle Corporation Radio Telefis Eireann S A P SSC Ireland Ltd Siemens Ltd Sky Television Supplierforce Ltd Tesco Ireland Ltd TG4 The Carphone Warehouse Ltd The Digital Hub TV3 Television Network Ltd Tyndall National Institute Udaras na Gaeltachta Ulster Television Plc University College Dublin Valista Ltd Verizon Business Vodafone Ireland Plc Henry Lubben Kevin O'Callaghan, Neil Harte Sean O'Donnell Michael Maloney, Gary Cobain, John O’Dwyer, Justin Verrecchia,Tom Carson Noreen O'Hare, Kevin Relihan Dan Churchill, Brent Smith Shane O’Neill, Robert Dunne, Ray Collins, Kate O’Sullivan Dermot O'Brien Gary Keogh George Young Denis Creighton Donal Murphy Maurice Mortell Colm Piercy, John Quinn Paschal Preston Paschal Naylor, Paul Sills, Michael Wosser Eoin O’Driscoll, Conal Henry, Tom Savage Rex Comb, Andy McLeod, Pat Galvin Niall Hogan, Deborah Meghen George Nagle Noel Meaney, Barry Nolan, Dianne Hodnett Richard O'Connell John Boland, Mike Norris Robert Finnegan, John Naughton, Catriona Costello tephen Tracey Derek Daly Paul Doody, Niall Parkinson, Ruairí Jennings Martin Farrely John Hennessy, Michael Gallagher Michael Devane Vern Kennedy, Liam O'Halloran, Donal Halloran, Charlie Ardagh Pat Kidney Robert Haulbrook, Andrew Kelly, Jackie VanDenBergh, Gareth Davies Ian Cahill, Breffni Tomlin Mike Conroy Danuta Gray, Paul Whelan, Robert Mourik, Majella Fitzpatrick, Gerard Woods Paul O’Riordan Cathal Goan, Dermot Horan, Anne O’Connor Liam Ryan Ger O'Byrne Delia Bushell, Mark Deering Declan Kearney Damian Harte Pol O Gallchoir, Padhraic O Ciardha, Neil Keaveney Stephen Mackarel Philip Flynn David McRedmond, David McMunn, Peter Ennis Roger Whatmore, Cormac Harrington, Michael Grufferty John Glynn John McCann, Michael Wilson, Scott Taunton Tom Brazil Raomal Perera Eamonn Walsh, Ronan Lupton, Marc VanDenBergh Teresa Elder, Gerry Fahy, Eileen Maher, Michael Maher, David Humphreys, Cara Twohig 15 A4 TIF Industry Groups TIF Council Oversees the activities of the Industry Groups Chairman: Gerry Fahy, Strategy Director, Vodafone Vice-Chair: Michael Maloney, COO, BT Ireland Broadband and Next Generation Networks Industry Group Engaging with Government to stimulate Broadband demand and to develop the national broadband infrastructure. Chairman: Andy MacLeod, COO, eircom Vice-Chair: Vice-Chair: Michael Maloney, COO, BT Ireland Telecoms Technology Industry Group Organising seminars and publishing reports to stimulate the takeup of new technology in both business and consumer sectors; examining the latest developments in this field e.g. VOIP, NGN, WAN, UMA, UMTS. Chairman: Gary Keogh, CEO, Colt Telecom Vice-Chair: Ruairi Jennings, Commercial Manager, Irish Broadband Cable and Broadcasting Industry Group Engages with Government and EU to advise on policy in the Television sector. Monitors developments in DVBH, DTT and HDTV. Chairman: Dermot Horan, Director of Broadcasting and Acquisition, RTE Vice-Chair: Mark Deering, Assistant Managing Director, SKY Ireland Mobile Industry Group Advises on policy in the Mobile Telecoms market. • ICIA – Represents mobile Industry in areas of public concern. Chair: Rachel Channing, Head of Communications, 3 Ireland • MMF – Forum to develop the premium services market in Ireland. Chair: Eamon Hession, CEO, Púca Chairman: Andrew Kelly, Director of Corporate Affairs, Meteor Vice-Chair: Robert Mourik, Head of Regulatory Affairs, O2 Regulatory Affairs Industry Group Monitors and advises on regulatory policy across all telecoms sectors at both a national and EU level. Chairman: Pat Galvin, Head of Public Policy, eircom Vice-Chair: Kate O’Sullivan, Head of Regulatory Affairs, UPC Outsourcing Services Industry Group Regular analysis of trends in outsourcing and managed services both nationally and internationally. Engages with target markets to stimulate demand for managed services. Runs seminars to promote the industry. Chairman: Maurice Mortell, CEO, Data Electronics Vice-Chair: Tom Carson, Managing Director, BT Networked IT Services 16 17 FILM PROUCTION IN IRELAND Audiovisual Federation Review 2005 TELECOMMUNICATIONS & INTERNET FEDERATION An affiliate association within IBEC | the Irish Business and Employers Confederation TIF is affiliated to ICT Ireland, the sector representing the voice of technology in IBEC Confederation House, 84/86 Lower Baggot Street, Dublin 2 Tel: + 353 - 1 - 605 1528, Fax: + 353 - 1 - 6381528 Email: carolyn.doumeni@ibec.ie Website: www.tif.ie
Similar documents
Ensuring Broadband Ireland - TIF
The Government’s broadband action plan as detailed in March 2002 in New Connections: A strategy to realise the potential of the Information Society lists the following two key objectives for broadb...
More information