211988 - Ontario.ca

Transcription

211988 - Ontario.ca

Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # 211988
Record of Site Condition
Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act
Summary
Record of Site Condition Number
Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry
Certification Date
Current Property Use
Intended Property Use
Certificate of Property Use Number
Applicable Site Condition Standards**
Property Municipal Address
211988
20/02/2014
07/01/2014
Industrial
Residential
No CPU
Stratified Site Conditions Standard, with Nonpotable Ground Water, Medium and Fine
Textured Soil, for Residential property use
980 Lansdowne Avenue M6H 3Z4
Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence
This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has
access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings
with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental
condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.
Contents of this Record of Site Condition
This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from
the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been
submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment.
RSC Information
Each field marked by an asterisk ( * ) must be completed.
Is the property used, or has it ever been used, in whole or in part for an industrial use or as a garage;
a bulk liquid dispensing facility, including a gasoline outlet; or for the operation of dry cleaning equipment? *
Yes
No
Is the property being used or has the property ever been used, in whole or in part
(a) for quarrying to excavate consolidated or unconsolidated aggregate; or
(b) for that aspect of the production of oil and gas consisting of the presence of an oil well or gas well on, in or under the property? *
Yes
No
Is the property currently used for an agricultural or other use, or a community use, an institutional use, a parkland use or a residential use? *
Yes
No
Select Type of RSC *
Phase 1 and 2 RSC
Phase 1 and 2 RSC with RA
Owner Information
Owners' General Information
Submitting Owner's Information
RSC Property Information
Environmental Condition
Owner's Information
Is the submitting owner(s) a Receiver for the Property? *
Yes
No
Is the submitting owner(s) represented by an Agent? *
Contaminant Concentrations
ESA Information
QP Profile Information
Certification Statement
Supporting Documents
Yes
No
Owner Information
Owner's Information
Type of Owner *
Owner Name *
Firm, Corporation or Partnership
Edgewood Holdings Ltd.
Street Number *
Street Name *
Apt No. /RR No.
940
Lansdowne Avenue
City, Town or Village *
Province *
Postal Code *
Country
ESA Information
Toronto
Ontario
M6H 3Z4
Canada
Submitting Owner's Contact Information
Contact First Name *
Contact Last Name *
Tom
Falus
Phone Number * (including area code)
Fax Number (including area code)
(416) 483-1066
Email Address
tom@neudorfercorp.com
Owner's Information
Type of Owner *
Owner Name *
Firm, Corporation or Partnership
Emsatec Canada Inc.
Street Number *
Street Name *
940
Lansdowne Avenue
Apt No. /RR No.
Province *
Postal Code *
Country
Toronto
Ontario
M6H 3Z4
Canada
Owner's Contact Information
Contact First Name *
Contact Last Name *
Tom
Falus
Phone Number * (including area code)
(416) 483-1066
Fax Number (including area code)
Email Address
tom@neudorfercorp.com
Owner Information
Property Address
Does the Property have a Municipal Address?
Property Address
Yes
Municipality Information
No
Property Reference Number
Geographical Reference/Area of
RSC Property
Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s)
ESA Information
*
Is the property administered by MNR under the Public Lands Act?
*
Yes
No
Street Number * Street Name *
980
Apt No. /RR No.
Lansdowne Avenue
Province *
Postal Code *
Toronto
Ontario
M6H 3Z4
Owner Information
Municipality & Property Address Information
Property Address
Lower or Single Tier Municipality *
Toronto
Tier of Municipality
Single Tier
RSC Property
The District Office of MOE *
Toronto District Office
Address of District Office of MOE
ESA Information
5775 Yonge St., 8th floor, North York ON M2M 4J1
Owner Information
Property Address
Municipality & Property Address Information
Assessment Roll Number
19 040 032 010 00701
RSC Property
ESA Information
Property Identifier Number (PIN #)
21325 0363 LT
Owner Information
Geo Reference & Other Properties Details
Geographical References
Property Address
UTM Coordinates
Datum
NAD 83
Zone *
RSC Property
17
Easting *
625,091.00
Northing *
4,836,156.00
ESA Information
Area of RSC Property
Total Area of RSC Property in Hectares *
1.17
Owner Information
Previous Submission Information
Previously Filed Record of Site Condition Number:
Property Address
Previously Filed Transition Notice Number:
RSC Property
ESA Information
Owner Information
Site Condition Information
Other Site Condition Information
Site Conditions for 2011 Generic
Standards
Risk Assessment Information
Property Use and Certification
Date
Additional Ground Water
Information
Remedial Action and Mitigation
Details
Area(s) of Potential Environmental
Concern
Table of Current/Past Property Uses
of Phase One Property
ESA Information
Is the RSC being submitted using the transition provision under Section 21.1 of the Regulation?
Yes
No
*
Owner Information
Standards
Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards
Is Property:
(i) Within an area of natural significance? or
Does Property:
(ii) Include or is adjacent to an area of natural significance or part of such an area? or
(ii) Include land that is within 30 m of an area of natural significance or part of such an area.
Yes
Date
No
Information
Details
Soil at the property has:
(i) a pH value for Surface Soil less than 5 or greater than 9 or
(ii) a pH value for Subsurface Soil less than 5 or greater than 11.
*
*
Yes
No
Concern
ESA Information
Is qualified person of the opinion that, given the characteristics of the property and the certifications the
qualified person would be required to make in a record of site condition in relation to the property as specified
in Schedule A, it is appropriate to apply this section to the property? *
Yes
No
What is the intended use of the property? *
Residential
Is the property a shallow soil property?
*
Yes
No
Does the property include or is the property adjacent to a water body or does it include land that is within
30 metres of a water body? *
Yes
No
What is the Assessment/Restoration approach?
*
Background
Full Depth Generic
Stratified
What is the ground water condition for the property?
*
Potable
Non-potable
What is the texture of the soil?
*
Coarse
Medium and Fine
Applicable 2011 Generic Standard Table Number : TABLE 5
Owner Information
Has a Certificate of Property Use (CPU) been issued under section 168.6 of the Act for the RSC property?
Yes
Standards
Date
Information
Details
Concern
ESA Information
No
Owner Information
Property Use and Certification Date
Current Property Use and Certification Date
What is the current use of the property? *
Industrial
Standards
Date
Information
Details
Concern
ESA Information
Certification Date *
2014/01/07
Owner Information
Standards
Data
Information
Details
Concern
ESA Information
Additional Ground Water Information
Has municipality been notified of non-potable ground water on site?
Yes
No
Municipality notified of non-potable water by?
*
Owner
QP
Local/Lower tier municipality non-potable water notification date *
2013/10/18
*
Owner Information
Remedial Action & Mitigation
Soil Control or Treatment Measures
Standards
Identify the estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have
been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the
soil as measured in, or equivalent to, in-ground volume in cubic metres, and indicate the remediation process or
processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.
Not applicable.
Data
Information
Identify the estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC
property as measured in, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres.
24,650 cubic metres.
Details
Concern
Identify the estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the
RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property not
including any soil that may have been remediated off the property and brought back to the property as measured
in, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres.
Not applicable.
ESA Information
Indicate if any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the
RSC property boundary has been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation.
Yes. As part of the remediation of the RSC property, all fill materials were removed from the then-existing
ground surface to a depth of up to 5 metres across the entire RSC property. The excavation extended past
the RCS property boundary and on the neighboring lands at the same municipal address. Verification
samples collected for the outer perimeter walls and floor of the excavated area all satisfies the currently
applicable SCS.
Owner Information
Remedial Action & Mitigation
Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures
Standards
Identify and describe any ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property
prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing; or are or will be required for the
RSC property after the certification date.
Not applicable.
Data
Information
Identify the estimated volume in litres of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Not applicable.
Details
Concern
ESA Information
Other Treatment Measures
Other than the activities identified in the in the Soil or Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures above,
identify any constructed works that, prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing,
were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the
RSC property; or after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement
of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
Not applicable.
Indicate whether there are any monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or
replacement of any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC
property, after the certification date, and whether any monitoring requirements or requirements for care,
maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works are ground water management measures
or soil management measures.
Not applicable.
Owner Information
Potential Environmental Concern
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern
Are there areas of potential environmental concern? *
Yes
Standards
Data
Information
Details
Area(s) of Potential
Environmental Concern
Table of Current/Past Property
Use of Phase One Property
ESA Information
No
Click here for Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Form
Current and Past Property Use
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property
Click here for Table of Current and Past Property Use Form
Owner Information
Contaminants Measured in SOIL
Contaminants Measured in
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
General Information Related to Soil Media
Is there no soil on, in or under the property? *
(Note there is “no soil” if either there is no soil on, in or under the property OR the soil present is not sufficient
to investigate, sample and analyze in a manner which will meet the requirements and objectives
of a phase two environmental site assessment)
Yes
No
Owner Information
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Surface Soil
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 1-30 *
Type of Measurement *
Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1****
Minimum Detectable
5
65
µg/g
GROUND WATER
Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2
Minimum Detectable
10
150
µg/g
Measured
390
1300
µg/g
SEDIMENTS
Measured
68
5600
µg/g
Antimony
Measured
2.6
7.5
µg/g
Arsenic
Measured
10
18
µg/g
Barium
Measured
144
390
µg/g
Beryllium
Measured
1.2
5
µg/g
Boron (Hot Water Soluble)*
Measured
1.26
1.5
µg/g
Cadmium
Minimum Detectable
0.5
1.2
µg/g
Chromium Total
Measured
96
160
µg/g
Cobalt
Measured
20
22
µg/g
Copper
Measured
47
180
µg/g
Lead
Measured
34
120
µg/g
Molybdenum
Measured
1
6.9
µg/g
Nickel
Measured
47
130
µg/g
Selenium
Measured
0.7
2.4
µg/g
Silver
Minimum Detectable
0.2
25
µg/g
Thallium
Minimum Detectable
0.4
1
µg/g
Uranium
Measured
0.9
23
µg/g
Vanadium
Measured
65
86
µg/g
Zinc
Measured
91
340
µg/g
Chromium VI
Minimum Detectable
0.2
10
µg/g
Cyanide (CN-)
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.051
µg/g
Mercury
Measured
0.1
1.8
µg/g
Electrical Conductivity
Measured
0.376
0.7
mS/cm
Sodium Adsorption Ratio
Measured
4.59
5
Naphthalene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.75
µg/g
Acenaphthylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.17
µg/g
Acenaphthene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
58
µg/g
ESA Information
Total # of Contaminants 101
Owner Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 31-60 *
Fluorene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
69
µg/g
GROUND WATER
Phenanthrene
Measured
0.17
7.8
µg/g
Anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.74
µg/g
SEDIMENTS
Fluoranthene
Measured
0.3
0.69
µg/g
Pyrene
Measured
0.27
78
µg/g
Benz[a]anthracene
Measured
0.1
0.63
µg/g
Chrysene
Measured
0.15
7.8
µg/g
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Measured
0.09
0.78
µg/g
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.78
µg/g
Benzo[a]pyrene
Measured
0.05
0.3
µg/g
Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.48
µg/g
Dibenz[a h]anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.1
µg/g
Benzo[ghi]perylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
7.8
µg/g
Phenol
Minimum Detectable
0.5
9.4
µg/g
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.5
µg/g
Chlorophenol, 2-
Minimum Detectable
0.1
2
µg/g
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Minimum Detectable
0.1
1.8
µg/g
Dimethylphenol, 2,4-
Minimum Detectable
0.2
420
µg/g
Dichlorophenol, 2,4-
Minimum Detectable
0.1
2.1
µg/g
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
1.4
µg/g
Chloroaniline p-
Minimum Detectable
0.5
0.53
µg/g
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-
Minimum Detectable
0.1
4.2
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.1
5.5
µg/g
Biphenyl 1,1'-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
1.1
µg/g
Dimethylphthalate
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.5
µg/g
Dinitrotoluene, 2,4 & 2,6-
Minimum Detectable
0.5
0.92
µg/g
Diethyl Phthalate
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.5
µg/g
Pentachlorophenol
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.1
µg/g
Dichlorobenzidine, 3,3'-
Minimum Detectable
0.5
1
µg/g
Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) ***
Minimum Detectable
0.05
3.4
µg/g
ESA Information
Owner Information
Contaminant 61-90*
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Measured
GROUND WATER
Dinitrophenol, 2,4-
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
2.4
5
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
2
38
µg/g
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.35
µg/g
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
25
µg/g
Vinyl Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.02
0.022
µg/g
Bromomethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Acetone
Minimum Detectable
0.5
28
µg/g
Dichloroethylene, 1,1-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Methylene Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.96
µg/g
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.75
µg/g
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
Minimum Detectable
0.05
1.4
µg/g
Dichloroethane, 1,1-
Minimum Detectable
0.02
11
µg/g
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Minimum Detectable
0.5
44
µg/g
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis-
Minimum Detectable
0.02
30
µg/g
Chloroform
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.18
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.05
µg/g
Trichlorofluoromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
5.8
µg/g
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
3.4
µg/g
Carbon Tetrachloride
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.12
µg/g
Benzene
Minimum Detectable
0.02
0.17
µg/g
Dichloropropane, 1,2-
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.085
µg/g
Trichloroethylene
Measured
0.29
0.52
µg/g
Bromodichloromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
13
µg/g
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Minimum Detectable
0.5
4.3
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.05
µg/g
Toluene
Measured
1.6
6
µg/g
Dibromochloromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
9.4
µg/g
Ethylene dibromide
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.05
µg/g
Tetrachloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
2.3
µg/g
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2-
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.05
µg/g
Owner Information
Contaminant 91-120*
Chlorobenzene
Minimum Detectable
GROUND WATER
Ethylbenzene
Measured
Bromoform
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
0.05
2.7
µg/g
0.1
15
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.26
µg/g
Styrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
2.2
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Dichlorobenzene, 1,3-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
6
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.097
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
4.3
µg/g
Xylene Mixture
Measured
0.05
25
µg/g
Dichloropropene,1,3-
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.083
µg/g
Hexane (n)
Minimum Detectable
0.05
34
µg/g
Owner Information
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Subsurface Soil
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 1-30 *
Measured
11
65
µg/g
Measured
17
150
µg/g
Measured
180
7200
µg/g
Measured
190
8000
µg/g
Antimony
Measured
5.2
63
µg/g
Arsenic
Measured
7
18
µg/g
Barium
Measured
110
8600
µg/g
Beryllium
Measured
0.8
60
µg/g
Boron (total)
Measured
11
7900
µg/g
Cadmium
Minimum Detectable
0.5
7.9
µg/g
Chromium Total
Measured
99
18000
µg/g
Cobalt
Measured
13.3
250
µg/g
Copper
Measured
254
5600
µg/g
Lead
Measured
26
1000
µg/g
Molybdenum
Measured
2
1200
µg/g
Nickel
Measured
31
510
µg/g
Selenium
Measured
0.6
1200
µg/g
Silver
Minimum Detectable
0.2
490
µg/g
Thallium
Minimum Detectable
0.4
3.3
µg/g
Uranium
Measured
0.8
300
µg/g
Vanadium
Measured
42
160
µg/g
Zinc
Measured
77
24000
µg/g
Chromium VI
Minimum Detectable
0.2
40
µg/g
Cyanide (CN-)
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.051
µg/g
Mercury
Measured
0.15
1.8
µg/g
Naphthalene
Measured
0.21
4.6
µg/g
Acenaphthylene
Measured
0.08
0.17
µg/g
Acenaphthene
Measured
0.07
58
µg/g
Fluorene
Measured
0.14
69
µg/g
Phenanthrene
Measured
1.3
300
µg/g
Owner Information
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 31-60 *
Anthracene
Measured
0.29
0.74
µg/g
Fluoranthene
Measured
1.9
9.6
µg/g
Pyrene
Measured
1.7
96
µg/g
Benz[a]anthracene
Measured
0.56
0.96
µg/g
Chrysene
Measured
0.59
9.6
µg/g
Measured
0.18
0.96
µg/g
Measured
0.08
0.96
µg/g
Benzo[a]pyrene
Measured
0.17
0.3
µg/g
Measured
0.11
0.96
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.1
µg/g
Benzo[ghi]perylene
Measured
0.09
9.6
µg/g
Phenol
Minimum Detectable
0.5
53
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.5
µg/g
Chlorophenol, 2-
Minimum Detectable
0.1
23
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.1
14
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.2
440
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.1
52
µg/g
Measured
0.1
1.4
µg/g
Chloroaniline p-
Minimum Detectable
0.5
0.53
µg/g
Measured
0.08
85
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.1
4.2
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.1
30
µg/g
Biphenyl 1,1'-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
83
µg/g
Dimethylphthalate
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.5
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.5
1.2
µg/g
Diethyl Phthalate
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.5
µg/g
Pentachlorophenol
Minimum Detectable
0.1
3.3
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.5
1
µg/g
Measured
1.9
8300
µg/g
Dinitrophenol, 2,4-
Minimum Detectable
2
66
µg/g
Owner Information
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Contaminant 61-90*
Measured
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
1.3
2.7
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
25
µg/g
Vinyl Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.02
0.022
µg/g
Bromomethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
5.8
µg/g
Acetone
Minimum Detectable
0.5
28
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Methylene Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.96
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.75
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
1.4
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.02
31
µg/g
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Minimum Detectable
0.5
180
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.02
30
µg/g
Chloroform
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.18
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.05
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
3.4
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.12
µg/g
Benzene
Minimum Detectable
0.02
0.17
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.085
µg/g
Trichloroethylene
Measured
0.44
0.52
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
18
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.5
66
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.05
µg/g
Toluene
Measured
0.6
50
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
13
µg/g
Ethylene dibromide
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.05
µg/g
Tetrachloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
2.3
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.05
µg/g
Chlorobenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
2.7
µg/g
Ethylbenzene
Measured
0.34
16
µg/g
Owner Information
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 91-120*
Bromoform
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.26
µg/g
Styrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
19
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Measured
0.34
67
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.097
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
52
µg/g
Xylene Mixture
Measured
0.17
25
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.083
µg/g
Hexane (n)
Minimum Detectable
0.05
34
µg/g
Owner Information
Contaminants Measured in Ground Water
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground Water
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 1-30 *
Minimum Detectable
25
750
µg/L
GROUND WATER
Minimum Detectable
100
150
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
100
500
µg/L
SEDIMENTS
Minimum Detectable
100
500
µg/L
Antimony
Measured
0.6
20000
µg/L
Arsenic
Measured
4.4
1900
µg/L
Barium
Measured
717
29000
µg/L
Beryllium
Minimum Detectable
0.5
67
µg/L
Boron (total)
Measured
161
45000
µg/L
Cadmium
Measured
0.3
2.7
µg/L
Chromium Total
Measured
16.3
810
µg/L
Cobalt
Measured
1.1
66
µg/L
Copper
Measured
4.3
87
µg/L
Lead
Measured
1.9
25
µg/L
Molybdenum
Measured
19.4
9200
µg/L
Nickel
Measured
5.1
490
µg/L
Selenium
Measured
2
63
µg/L
Silver
Measured
1.1
1.5
µg/L
Thallium
Minimum Detectable
0.3
510
µg/L
Uranium
Measured
7.2
420
µg/L
Vanadium
Measured
2.9
250
µg/L
Zinc
Measured
364
1100
µg/L
Mercury
Minimum Detectable
0.02
2.8
µg/L
Chromium VI
Minimum Detectable
5
140
µg/L
Cyanide (CN-)
Minimum Detectable
2
66
µg/L
Sodium
Measured
701000
2300000
µg/L
Chloride
Measured
860000
2300000
µg/L
Naphthalene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
6400
µg/L
Acenaphthylene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
1.8
µg/L
Acenaphthene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
1700
µg/L
ESA Information
Owner Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 31-60 *
Fluorene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
400
µg/L
GROUND WATER
Phenanthrene
Minimum Detectable
0.1
580
µg/L
Anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.1
2.4
µg/L
SEDIMENTS
Fluoranthene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
130
µg/L
Pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
68
µg/L
Benz[a]anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
4.7
µg/L
Chrysene
Minimum Detectable
0.1
1
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.75
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.4
µg/L
Benzo[a]pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.01
0.81
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
0.2
µg/L
Measured
0.2
0.52
µg/L
Benzo[ghi]perylene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
0.2
µg/L
Phenol
Minimum Detectable
1
12000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
300000
µg/L
Chlorophenol, 2-
Minimum Detectable
0.5
3300
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
20000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
39000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.3
4600
µg/L
Measured
0.56
850
µg/L
Chloroaniline p-
Minimum Detectable
1
400
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
1800
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
230
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
1600
µg/L
Biphenyl 1,1'-
Minimum Detectable
0.5
2200
µg/L
Dimethylphthalate
Minimum Detectable
0.5
38
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
2900
µg/L
Diethyl Phthalate
Minimum Detectable
0.5
38
µg/L
Pentachlorophenol
Minimum Detectable
0.5
62
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
640
µg/L
ESA Information
Owner Information
Contaminant 61-90*
Measured
GROUND WATER
Dinitrophenol, 2,4-
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
1.8
140
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
10
11000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.3
15
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
4400
µg/L
Vinyl Chloride
Measured
1
1.7
µg/L
Bromomethane
Minimum Detectable
0.2
56
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.4
2500
µg/L
Acetone
Measured
200
130000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.3
17
µg/L
Methylene Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.3
5500
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
17
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
1400
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.3
3100
µg/L
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Measured
2.6
1500000
µg/L
Measured
1.2
17
µg/L
Chloroform
Minimum Detectable
0.2
22
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
12
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.3
6700
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
8.4
µg/L
Benzene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
430
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
140
µg/L
Trichloroethylene
Measured
11
17
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
85000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
1
580000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
30
µg/L
Toluene
Measured
3.7
18000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.1
82000
µg/L
Ethylene dibromide
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.83
µg/L
Tetrachloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
17
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.1
28
µg/L
Owner Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 91-120*
Chlorobenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.1
630
µg/L
GROUND WATER
Ethylbenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.1
2300
µg/L
Bromoform
Minimum Detectable
0.1
770
µg/L
Styrene
Minimum Detectable
0.1
9100
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.1
15
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.1
9600
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.1
67
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.1
9600
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.3
45
µg/L
Xylene Mixture
Minimum Detectable
0.2
4200
µg/L
Hexane (n)
Minimum Detectable
0.2
520
µg/L
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Owner Information
Contaminants Measured in Sediments
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Has sediment sampling been conducted at the property?
Yes
No
*
Owner Information
Laboratory Information
Laboratory Name *
AGAT Laboratories
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Owner Information
ESA Information
ESA Reports
Phase One ESA Reports
The date the last work on the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance
components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done.
ESA Information
Phase Two ESA Reports
Phase One Reports and Other
Documents
Phase Two Reports and Other
Documents
2013/12/23
Type of Report *
Phase One ESA
*
Report Title *
Date of Report * Author of Report *
Name of Consulting
Organization
Phase I Environmental
2013/12/23
Site Assessment,
T.A. McIelwain,
Block 6, Part
P.Eng.,
of
Golder
Block
QP Associates
and
O, Plan
Dulce
M-208
Reyes,
Ltd. at 980
M.Sc.
Lan
Owner Information
ESA Information
ESA Reports
The date the last work on the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site
investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done.
ESA Information
Documents
Documents
2014/01/07
Type of Report *
Phase Two ESA
*
Report Title *
Name of Consulting
Organization
Phase II Environmental
2014/01/09
Site Assessment,
T.A. McIelwain,
Block 6, Part
P.Eng.,
of
Golder
Block
QP Associates
and
O, Plan
KellyM-208
Oullahan,
Ltd. at 980
B.Sc.
Lan
Owner Information
ESA Information
Reports and Other Documents
Phase 1 Reports and Other Documents
ESA Information
List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 1 ESA relied on in certifying
the information set out in Section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 1 ESA
Report Title *
Name of Consulting
Organization for Report
2011 Annual Monitoring Report - 940 Lansdowne
2012/06/15
Avenue
2007 Monitoring Data Summary Package - 2008/01/01
940 Lansdowne Avenue
Trevor Janzen
Documents
2009 and 2013 Investigation - Block 6 at 980
2013/04/01
Lansdowne Avenue,
T.A. McIelwain,
Toronot, Ontario
P.Eng.,
Golder
QP,Associates
and Kelly Oullahan,
Ltd.
B.Sc.
Documents
Terry LaChapelle, P.Geo
AECOM
Gartner Lee Ltd.
Owner Information
ESA Information
Reports and Other Documents
Phase 2 Reports and Other Documents
List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 2 ESA relied on in making
any certifications in the RSC in relation to the Phase 2 ESA or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 2 ESA
ESA Information
Report Title *
Name of Consulting
Organization for Report
2007 Monitoring Data Summary Package - 2008/01/01
940 Lansdowne Avenue,
Trevor Janzen
Toronto, Ontario
Gartner Lee Ltd.
2011 Annual Monitoring Report - 940 Lansdowne
2012/06/15
Avenue
Documents
2009 and 2013 Investigation - Block 6 at 980
2013/04/01
Lansdowne Avenue,
T.A. McIelwain,
Toronto, Ontario
P.Eng.,
Golder
QP Associates
and Kelly Oullahan,
Ltd.
B.Sc.
Documents
Terry LaChapelle, P.Geo
AECOM
Owner Information
ESA Information
QP Information
QP Information
First Name *
Middle Name
Last Name *
Thomas
A
McIelwain
Which one of the following licences under
the Professional Engineers Act do you hold? *
Licence Number *
Licence
30502504
Which one of the following memberships under
the Professional Geoscientists Act do you hold? *
None
Is the QP Employed? *
Yes
No
Employer Name *
Golder Associates Ltd.
QP Contact Information
Phone Number *
Fax Number *
Email
(905) 723-2727
(905) 723-2182
tmcielwain@golder.com
*
QP Mailing Address Information
Street Number *
100
Street Name *
Apt No. / RR No.
Scotia Court
Province *
Postal Code *
Whitby
Ontario
L1N 8Y6
Owner Information
QP Certification Statement F
As the qualified person, I certify that: *
ESA Information
A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information
gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has
been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as
required by the regulation.
A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the
information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required,
has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as
required by the regulation.
The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only
and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.
As of 2014/01/07, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental
site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling,
there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under
the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property
will be put, as specified in the RSC.
QP Certification Statement
Owner Certification Statement
Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the
supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given
written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of
the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in
which the property is located.
As of 2014/01/07, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase
two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the
applicable stratified site condition standards prescribed by section 39 of the regulation for all
contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC
is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant
Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.
As of 2014/01/07, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant
in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been
performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to
Applicable Site Condition Standards.
I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.
I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.
I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site
condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains
a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own
due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information
in the Registry.
The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally
accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science
profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.
I do not hold and have not held
a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property
which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment
or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based
To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are
true as of 2014/01/07.
By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.
I, the qualified person named below, on the date stated below, make all of the stated certifications applicable to
the qualified person in this Part of the record of site condition.
Thomas A McIelwain
2014/01/16
Owner Information
ESA Information
QP Certification Statement
Click here to download Firm, Corp, Other Form
Owner Information
Please note, only PDF attachments will be accepted with the exception of the
Property Specific Standard, which must be an Excel document.
Certificate of Status or equivalent *
CertofStatus.pdf
Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property *
ESA Information
Legal Letter.pdf
Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) *
Deed.pdf
A Current plan of Survey *
Survey.pdf
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern *
APECTable.pdf
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property *
CandPUses.pdf
Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model *
Phase II CSM.pdf
Owner Certification Statement *
OwnerAuth.pdf
Request ID:
016046996
Demande n° :
Transaction ID: 53061092
Transaction n° :
Category ID:
CT
Catégorie :
Province of Ontario
Province de l'Ontario
Ministry of Government Services
Ministère des Services gouvernementaux
Date Report Produced: 2014/01/09
Document produit le :
Time Report Produced: 10:30:44
Imprimé à :
CERTIFICATE OF STATUS
ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE
This is to certify that according to the
records of the Ministry of Government
Services
D'après les dossiers du Ministère des
Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons
que la société
EDGEWOOD HOLDINGS LIMITED
Ontario Corporation Number
Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario)
001021108
is a corporation incorporated,
amalgamated or continued under
the laws of the Province of Ontario.
est une société constituée, prorogée ou née
d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la
Province de l'Ontario.
The corporation came into existence on
La société a été fondée le
MARCH 09 MARS, 1993
and has not been dissolved.
et n'est pas dissoute.
Dated
Fait le
JANUARY 09 JANVIER, 2014
Director
Directeur
The issuance of this certifcate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services.
La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.
Certificate of Compliance
Certificat de conformité
Canada Business Corporations Act
s. 263.1
Loi canadienne sur les sociétés par actions
art. 263.1
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
Corporate name / Dénomination sociale
307662-8
Corporation number / Numéro de société
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the corporation
named above:
JE CERTIFIE, par la présente, que la société cidessus mentionnée :
• exists under the Canada Business
Corporations Act;
• existe en vertu de la Loi canadienne sur les
sociétés par actions;
• has filed the required annual returns; and
• a déposé les rapports annuels exigés; et
• has paid all prescribed fees required.
• a acquitté les droits prescrits.
Marcie Girouard
Director / Directeur
2014-01-09
Issuance date (YYYY-MM-DD)
Date d'émission (AAAA-MM-JJ)
20 Holly Street, Suite 300
Toronto, ON M4S 3B1
Tel: 416 486 9800
Fax: 416 486 3309
www.owenswright.com
OWENS, WRIGHT LLP
BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS
Arthur L. Shapero
Direct: 416 848 4743
ashapero@owenswright.com
Law Clerk: Alexis Belluomini
Direct: 416 848 4724
abelluomini@owenswright.com
November 6, 2013
Program Support – Approvals and BrownFields
Environmental Assessments and Approvals Branch
Ministry of the Environment
2 St. Clair Avenue West
Toronto, Ontario
M4V 1L5
Attention: Records of Site Condition Officer
Dear Sirs:
Re:
Emsatec Canada Inc. and Edgewood Holdings Limited (collectively the “Owner”) –
Block 6 on Plan 66M-2496, City of Toronto (PIN 21325-0363 (LT))
Municipal Address – 980 Lansdowne Avenue, Toronto M6H 3Z4
Roll Number: 19 040 032 010 00701
Our File No. 6465-016
Please be advised that we act on behalf of Emsatec Canada Inc. and Edgewood Holdings
Limited, the owners of the above noted lands. The Owner’s interest in the RSC Lands is fee
simple absolute.
We are enclosing a copy of the following:
1.
two (2) copies of M-Plan 66M-2496;
2.
PIN 21325-0363 (LT).
This Record of Site Condition applies to Block 6 on Plan 66M-2496 as shown on the attached
survey (the “RSC Lands”).
I can confirm and verify that the RSC Lands are owned by Emsatec Canada Inc. and Edgewood
Holdings Limited and are contained within the legal description referenced above. That is, the
RSC Lands are part of the overall lands owned by Emsatec Canada Inc. and Edgewood Holdings
OWENS, WRIGHT LLP
Page 2
Limited. We enclose herein a copy of the Transfer to Emsatec Canada Inc. as Instrument No.
E548950 and a copy of the Transfer to Edgewood Holdings Limited as Instrument No. E548952,
both registered on June 7, 2002.
I trust the foregoing is satisfactory and if you require any further information, please do not
hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Yours very truly,
OWENS, WRIGHT LLP
Arthur L. Shapero*
ALS/ab
Encl.
*on behalf of ARTHUR L. SHAPERO PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
PARCEL REGISTER (ABBREVIATED) FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER
LAND
PAGE 1 OF 3
REGISTRY
OFFICE #66
PREPARED FOR Belluomini
ON 2013/11/06 AT 11:51:03
21325−0363 (LT)
SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS IN CROWN GRANT
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
BLOCK 6, PLAN 66M2496 ; S/T EASEMENT IN FAVOUR OF ROGERS CABLE COMMUNICATIONS INC. AS IN AT2348081 PARTIALLY RELEASED BY AT2454984, AT2982989 AND
AT2982975; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT OVER PART 4 ON PLAN 66R19002 AS IN E548950; SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT OVER BLK 6, PLAN 66M2496 IN FAVOUR OF BLK 3 ON
PLAN 66M2496 AS IN AT3051153; SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT OVER BLOCK 6, PLAN 66M2496 IN FAVOUR OF BLOCK 3, PLAN 66M2496 AS IN AT3051154; TOGETHER WITH AN
EASEMENT OVER BLOCK 3, PLAN 66M2496 AS IN AT3051155; CITY OF TORONTO
PROPERTY REMARKS:
CORRECTION: DOCUMENT 66R26087 ADDED TO 21325−0363 ON 2012/04/11 AT 16:23 BY SHIU, KEVIN.
ESTATE/QUALIFIER:
FEE SIMPLE
ABSOLUTE
RECENTLY:
SUBDIVISION FROM 21325−0357
OWNERS’ NAMES
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
CAPACITY
REG. NUM.
DATE
INSTRUMENT TYPE
PIN CREATION DATE:
2012/04/11
SHARE
AMOUNT
PARTIES FROM
CERT/
CHKD
PARTIES TO
** PRINTOUT INCLUDES ALL DOCUMENT TYPES AND DELETED INSTRUMENTS SINCE: 2012/04/11 **
C305412Z
1986/07/31
APL ANNEX REST COV
C305413
1986/07/31
CHARGE
C
*** DELETED AGAINST THIS PROPERTY ***
CANADIAN GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY LIMITED
E548953
2002/06/07
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
OLYMPIA ELEVATOR SERVICE LIMITED
REMARKS: DELETED PURSUANT TO AT3051156 ON 2012/12/12 BY L.WANG
AT441024
2004/03/26
TRANSFER EASEMENT
APL CH NAME INST
GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA INC.
CANADIAN GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY LIMITED
GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA PROPERTY INC.
REMARKS: C305413
AT452297
2004/04/07
TRANSFER OF CHARGE
REMARKS: RE:C305413
AT1511978
2007/07/19
NOTICE
AT1511979
2007/07/19
POSTPONEMENT
$2 CITY OF TORONTO
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
C
CITY OF TORONTO
REMARKS: C305413 TO AT1511978
AT2215114
2009/10/29
TRANSFER EASEMENT
$2 EMSATEC CANADA INC.
ROGERS CABLE COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTE: ADJOINING PROPERTIES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED TO ASCERTAIN DESCRIPTIVE INCONSISTENCIES, IF ANY, WITH DESCRIPTION REPRESENTED FOR THIS PROPERTY.
NOTE: ENSURE THAT YOUR PRINTOUT STATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES AND THAT YOU HAVE PICKED THEM ALL UP.
C
LAND
PAGE 2 OF 3
REGISTRY
OFFICE #66
ON 2013/11/06 AT 11:51:03
21325−0363 (LT)
REG. NUM.
DATE
INSTRUMENT TYPE
AT2348081
2010/04/09
TRANSFER EASEMENT
AT2859313
2011/11/02
CHARGE
66M2496
2012/03/22
PLAN SUBDIVISION
AT2972520
2012/03/22
APL INH ORDER−LAND
66R26087
2012/03/26
PLAN REFERENCE
AT2982967
2012/04/03
NO SUB AGREEMENT
AMOUNT
PARTIES FROM
$2 EMSATEC CANADA INC.
$9,000,000 EMSATEC CANADA INC.
CERT/
CHKD
PARTIES TO
ROGERS CABLE COMMUNICATIONS INC.
C
AVIVA INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
C
C
CITY OF TORONTO
C
CITY OF TORONTO
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
C
AT2982968
2012/04/03 POSTPONEMENT
REMARKS: AT2859313 TO AT2982967
CITY OF TORONTO
C
AT2982969
REMARKS: C305413 & AT452297 TO AT2982967
CITY OF TORONTO
C
AT2982970
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.
CITY OF TORONTO
C
AT2982971
CITY OF TORONTO
C
AT2982972
REMARKS: E548953 TO AT2982967
CITY OF TORONTO
C
AT2982982
2012/04/03 NOTICE
REMARKS: THIS NOTICE IS FOR AN INDETERMINATE PERIOD
CITY OF TORONTO
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
C
AT2982983
CITY OF TORONTO
C
AT2982984
CITY OF TORONTO
C
AT2982985
CITY OF TORONTO
C
LAND
PAGE 3 OF 3
REGISTRY
OFFICE #66
ON 2013/11/06 AT 11:51:03
21325−0363 (LT)
REG. NUM.
DATE
INSTRUMENT TYPE
AT2982986
REMARKS: E548953 TO AT2982982
AT2982987
2012/04/03
APL ANNEX REST COV
AT2982990
2012/04/03
APL DEL INH ORDER
AMOUNT
PARTIES FROM
CERT/
CHKD
PARTIES TO
CITY OF TORONTO
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
REMARKS: EFFECT ALL OF BLOCKS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7, PLAN 66M−2496
C
C
CITY OF TORONTO
REMARKS: AT2972520.
AT3051153
2012/06/20
TRANSFER EASEMENT
$10 EDGEWOOD HOLDINGS LIMITED
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
C
$2 EDGEWOOD HOLDINGS LIMITED
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
C
REMARKS: PLANNING ACT STATEMENTS
AT3051154
2012/06/20
TRANSFER EASEMENT
REMARKS: PLANNING ACT STATEMENTS
AT3051156
2012/06/20
TRANSFER REL&ABAND
*** COMPLETELY DELETED ***
GENERAL ELECTRIC PROPERTY INC.
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
NEUDORFER−KATES CORPORATION
REMARKS: E548953.
AT3051157
2012/06/20
DISCH OF CHARGE
*** COMPLETELY DELETED ***
REMARKS: C305413.
66R26579
2013/01/14
PLAN REFERENCE
C
APEC Table
980 Lansdowne Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
04-1182-063 (1006)
Area of Potential
Environmental Concern
Location of Area of
Potential
Environmental
Concern on Phase
One Property
Potentially
Contaminating
Activity
Location of PCA
(on-Site or offSite)
Contaminants of
Potential Concern
Media Potentially Impacted
(Groundwater, soil and/or
Sediment)
A. Historical On-Site Spur
Lines
On-Site (throughout
Site)
Rail Yards,
Tracks and
Spurs
On-Site
Creosote (PAHs)
Soil, Groundwater
B. Reported On-Site Fill
Materials
On-Site (throughout
the Site)
Importation of
Fill of Unknown
Quality
On-Site
Metals and
inorganics
Soil, Groundwater
C. Reported On-Site
Impacts from On-Site and
Off-Site Historical
Industrial Operations
On-Site (throughout
the Site)
Chemical
Manufacturing,
Processing and
Bulk Storage
On-Site/Off-Site
PAHs, BTEX, PHCs
F1-F4, VOCs, BNAs,
PCBs
Soil, Groundwater
D. Bulk Storage South of
Historical Building 26
Northeastern portion
of the Site
Chemical
Manufacturing,
Processing and
Bulk Storage
On-Site
PHCs F1-F4, PAHs,
VOCs including
BTEX
Soil, Groundwater
Northeastern portion
of the Site
Gasoline and
Associated
Products
Storage in
Fixed Tanks
On-Site
PHCs F1-F4, VOCs
including BTEX
Soil, Groundwater
E. Current Presence of
On-Site Diesel and
Gasoline ASTs
1
1. Reported historical industrial operations occurred within the Phase One Property as well as off-Site up-gradient lands to the north.
Current and Past Uses of the Site
Year(s)
June 7, 1887 to
March 13, 1888
13 March 1888 to
March 20, 1901
March 20, 1901 to
July 31, 1986
Description of Property Use
Property Use
Other Observations from Aerial
Photographs, Fire Insurance
Plans, Etc.
Vacant
Agricultural or
other use
Chain of title indicates name of the
owner.
No
aerial photograph
coverage available for prior to 1947.
No other information was available
prior to 1902.
Vacant
Agricultural or
other use
No aerial photograph coverage
available for prior to 1947. The chain
of title indicates that the Phase One
Property was purchased by the
Canadian General Electric Company
Limited in 1901.
Industrial operations of the Canadian
General Electric Company.
Industrial use
No aerial photograph coverage
available for prior to 1947. The Site
appears to be occupied with spur
lines in the 1947 aerial photograph.
Name of Owner
Simeon Herman
The Land
Security
Company
Canadian
General Electric
Company Limited
04-1182-063 (1006)
According to previous reports, the
groundwater collection trench
located within the southern portion
of the Site was reportedly installed
in 1984.
Based on the chain of title, GE sold
the Site to the Canada Square
Company in July of 1986. The
Canadian General Electric Shops
appear listed at the former Site
address (940 Lansdowne Avenue)
in the 1950 city directories, and as
Current and Past Uses of the Site
Description of Property Use
Year(s)
Property Use
Name of Owner
04-1182-063 (1006)
Other Observations from Aerial
Photographs, Fire Insurance
Plans, Etc.
the Canadian General Electric Co.
Ltd. in the reviewed city directories
of 1960-1980.
July 31, 1986 to
June 7, 2002
June 7, 2002 to
Present
Vacant and offices
Industrial use
According to the chain of title, the
Site was sold to the Canada Square
Company in July of 1986. No
significant changes to the Site area
appear
in
the
1992
aerial
photograph with respect to the 1973
aerial photograph.
Vacant and offices
Industrial use
According to the chain of title, the
Phase One Property was sold on
June 2002 to Emsatec Canada Inc.
and Edgewood Holdings Limited,
which are reportedly the current
owners. Google Earth Aerial Images
of 2002, and 2007 show the Site as
paved and occupied with parked
vehicles and temporary storage
trailers and mobile units in the
southwestern portion of the Site.
Canada Square
Development
Corporation Ltd
Emsatec Canada
Inc., Edgewood
Holdings Limited
PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
The Phase II ESA Conceptual Site Model is described below:
1.0
1.1
SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS
Physical Setting
The Site consists of an approximately 2.9 acre (1.17 ha) irregular-shaped parcel of land which has been
excavated and partially backfilled. The Site is located approximately 80 m west of Lansdowne Avenue and
approximately 130 m south of Powerhouse Street, in Toronto, Ontario. The Site is located immediately north
and east of two rail lines. The Site location is indicated on Figure 1.
At the time of the Site reconnaissance, approximately three 1,200 L aboveground storage tanks (“ASTs”) (two for
storage of gasoline, and one for storage of diesel) as well as two 205 L drums (one of which included a pump)
were noted to be located within the northeastern portion of the Site, in a fenced area, over the gravel-covered
surface. No staining or leaks were noted on the gravel-covered surface in the vicinity of the ASTs or drums.
Three steel containers and an exterior propane storage area were noted to be located immediately north of the
ASTs. Approximately two 1,100 L plastic totes were noted to be stored on metal skids on the roof of one of the
three steel containers noted at the Site, used to store tools and equipment. Two mobile units were noted in the
vicinity of the steel containers and are used for offices and storage areas for the remedial activities reportedly
completed to date at the Site.
A groundwater collection trench was installed by former Site owner, Canadian General Electric Company Limited
(“GE”). The collection trench traverses the south part of the Site (i.e. Block 6) in a west to east direction towards
a treatment system located off-Site to the east and its location is shown on Figure 3. The groundwater elevation
is lower at the southern portion of the Site in the area of the collection trench due to its hydraulic influence. The
collection trench was reportedly installed by GE as a precautionary measure to ensure that no potentially
contaminated groundwater was able to migrate from the lands that were formerly operated by GE. GE plans to
decommission the trench in the near future as it has been demonstrated to be unnecessary. This groundwater
collector trench is referred to as the “south trench” and was installed by GE concurrently with the installation of a
second groundwater collector trench referred to as the “east trench”. The east trench is situated on lands east of
the RSC Property (the Site) beneath lands still under the control of GE. The east trench is separated from the
RSC Property by a steel sheet pile barrier wall, also located on lands controlled by GE. The east trench
continues to be operated by GE as a means to hydraulically control residual free phase oil potentially containing
PCB that has been identified beneath lands controlled by GE that lie to the east of the Site, and west of
Lansdowne Avenue. GE operates a groundwater treatment facility that operates under MOE approval on these
GE-occupied lands.
However, based on groundwater monitoring activities completed by AECOM (formerly Gartner Lee Limited) as of
2011 there was no evidence of groundwater concentrations in any groundwater monitoring well on or beneath
the Site above the applicable SCS. As part of the Phase II ESA scope of work completed by Golder preparatory
to the submission of this RSC application, groundwater monitoring wells were installed across the Site and
groundwater samples collected from each such well were chemically analysed and shown to satisfy the
applicable SCS. Further, a focused investigation undertaken by Golder, in the area proximal to and beneath the
south trench, as well as the water quality of the groundwater actually collected by the south trench, confirmed
that all soil and groundwater, on, under and within the area of the south groundwater collector trench satisfies
the applicable SCS.
Project No: 04-1182-063
January 2014
1/12
Based on information collected as part of this Phase I ESA, prior to 1901, the Site was reportedly owned by a
private individual. The first developed use of the Phase One Property was during the year 1901, at which time,
according to a chain of title completed for the Site, the Site was purchased by GE; and, reportedly, the Site was
used as exterior yard areas that were occupied with temporary storage of supplies and developed with spur lines
entering the off-Site Building 24. The groundwater collection trench located within the southern portion of the Site
was reportedly installed by GE as a precautionary measure in 1984. GE sold the Site to the Canada Square
Company in July of 1986, which subsequently sold the Site in June 2002 to Edgewood Holdings Limited and
Emsatec Canada Inc., the current owners.
The surrounding properties mainly consist of residential and industrial land uses. Surrounding properties were
observed to consist of the following. A residential apartment building and Foundry Avenue as well as a vacant,
undeveloped parcel of land are located north of the northeast, north and northwest portions of the Site. Further
to the north, a vacant building (Building 10, i.e. the historical powerhouse building) was followed by Powerhouse
Street, and a residential condominium sales office building; and, a residential apartment building known as the
“Foundry Lofts” at 1100 Lansdowne Avenue (to the northeast). To the east, a fenced property, including a
building identified as historical Building 36 and currently occupied by GE, was followed by Lansdowne Avenue.
Further to the east are an industrial building occupied by General Electric and residential buildings as well as the
Metro Central Garage. To the south, C.P. Railways is followed by condo lofts (formerly the GE Royce sales
plant) followed by Dupont Street. To the west, C.N. Railways are followed by commercial, multi-tenant offices.
Figure 2 shows the surrounding land use.
Although the Site is currently not serviced, the majority of the surrounding areas are serviced with municipal
water, sanitary sewers and storm sewers. Services are available for the Site and accessible from the adjacent
streets which could be connected (if needed) during re-development of the Site with a proposed vehicle
roadway. There is no potable water wells observed or reported on-Site or within the study area (i.e. with a 250
m radius of the Site).
The Site is proposed for future servicing and development with three residential condominium structures. The
proposed approximate locations of the future development structures are shown on Figure 2A.
1.2
Topography and Drainage
The Site topography appeared to be irregular, with areas that appeared to have been excavated and backfilled
(associated with construction activities). Surrounding properties appeared to slope slightly to the south.
No surface water bodies are present within the boundaries of the Site. The nearest surface water body is a
tributary of Genadier Pond, located approximately 2 km southwest of the Site.
1.3
Environmentally Sensitive Areas
The Site is not considered to be environmentally sensitive, nor is it within 30 metres of an area of natural
significance.
1.4
Shallow Soil Property or Water Body
The Site is not a shallow soil property. All soil borings constructed at the Site encountered a minimum of 7.0
metres of soil. This Site does not include all or part of a water body, nor is it within 30 metres of a water body.
Project No: 04-1182-063
January 2014
2/12
1.5
Geological Conditions
Geological mapping indicates that the surface geology in the vicinity of the Site is expected to consist of glacial
lake deposits underlain by glacial deposits of till (Sharpe, D. R. et al, 1997, Surficial Geology of the Greater
Toronto and Oak Ridges Moraine Area, Southern Ontario; Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 3062, Scale
1:200,000). The Site is situated approximately 300 m south of the glacial Lake Iroquois shoreline bluff (which
approximates Davenport Road in this area), and lies within the glacial lake basin. The glacial lake deposits are
mapped as sand to silty sand ranging from 1 m to 50 m thick. The underlying till is known as the Newmarket Till,
a regional aquitard, which has a matrix of silty sand to sand. Bedrock in the vicinity of the Subject Property is
expected to consist of Upper Ordovician shale, limestone, dolostone and siltstone (Ontario Geological Survey,
1991, Bedrock Geology of Ontario, Southern Sheet; Ontario Geological Survey, Map 2544, Scale 1:1,000,000).
Of the MOE Water Well Records within 500 m of the Site, one water well record indicates that bedrock consists
of shale at a depth of about 24 m below grade.
Based on conditions encountered in the test pits and boreholes completed as part of a previous investigation
(2009 and 2013 Investigation report) and the subsequent drilling activities in 2013, the subsurface conditions
included fill material which extended to depths of ground surface to 4.6 metres below ground surface (“mbgs”)
and was generally comprised of silty sand to sandy silt. Below the fill material, native sandy silt to silty clay were
encountered which extended beyond the depths investigated (7.0 mbgs). Based on calculated hydraulic
conductivity measurements from on-Site grain size analyses, the hydraulic conductivity for the soil encountered
-6
on Site was estimated to be 6.0 x10 centimetres per second (“cm/s”). Sand and gravel was encountered at a
few locations at the water table, and it was anticipated that the hydraulic conductivity of the sand and gravel may
have been greater than that estimated for the sandy silt to silty sand layer. The underlying sandy silt to silty clay
till is expected to function as an aquitard.
The soil was remediated throughout the Site (the “Main Excavation”) to limits of native soil established to satisfy
the applicable Site Condition Standards (“SCS”). An additional excavation (the “Supplementary Excavation”)
was completed in January 2014 to remove additional soil that exhibited concentrations of some COCs in excess
of the applicable SCS. The overall soil remediation (both Main and Supplementary Excavations) involved
removal of impacted material to a maximum depth of 5.0 metres below ground surface, and backfilling of the
excavation, in some areas, with fill material demonstrated to satisfy the applicable SCS. Following the Main
Excavation at the Site, this Phase II ESA Site investigation program was designed to confirm the soil
concentrations and to assess whether groundwater contamination was present on Site related to the areas of
potential environmental concern, identified in Section 3.1 herein.
The Supplementary Excavation was conducted during January 2014 within the area of the Site shown on Figure
10C. It had been determined through the current Phase II ESA that in the affected areas (see Figure 10B) soil
exposed at ground surface failed to satisfy the applicable SCS, and further excavation was completed.
Subsequent verification samples collected from representative excavation floor and wall locations confirm that all
soil at the Site satisfies the applicable SCS. The Supplementary Excavation activities and results are
documented in the letter report prepared by Golder, dated January 9, 2014, entitled “Supplementary Excavation
and Remediation Program, Block 6, 980 Lansdowne Avenue, Toronto, Ontario”.
The geological cross-section locations are indicated on Figure 3. Figures 4 and 5 provide the geological crosssections of the Site.
Project No: 04-1182-063
January 2014
3/12
1.6
Groundwater Levels, Flow Direction, Hydraulic Gradient
Groundwater elevations and depths as measured in the On-Site monitoring wells are presented on Figure 6,
along with the resulting contours and interpreted groundwater flow direction. The following observations were
made:

On October 15, 2013, groundwater levels at the eleven on-Site monitoring wells ranged from 0.14 mbgs to
2.80 mbgs, with elevations ranging from 116.94 metres above sea level (“masl”) to 120.52 masl;

Since the Block 6 excavation was completed to depths of 2.5 m to 5.0 mbgs and only partially backfilled
prior to installation of the Phase II ESA boreholes, the aquifer system measured at the Site is inferred to
represent the deep aquifer unit, which has a relatively high piezometric surface. Three monitoring wells
(MW09-10, MW09-11 and MW09-12) were installed following backfilling activities while the remaining wells
were installed at the base of the excavation (in an area not backfilled);

The groundwater flow direction at the Site was inferred to be to the southwest. It is noted that based on
previous studies completed at the Site, the groundwater flow direction has historically been southeasterly
and it is inferred that the excavation and backfilling activities may have temporarily altered the flow
direction; and,

Based on the groundwater elevation contours of the groundwater monitoring event on October 15, 2013,
the horizontal hydraulic gradient within the aquifer at the Site was estimated to be 0.05 m/m.
1.7
Influence of Subsurface Structure or Utilities
Buildings were not present at the Site at the time of the Phase II ESA field investigation; and no structures, other
than rail spurs and mobile storage units were historically present at the Site. Utility drawings, dated December
2001, were reviewed as part of the 2013 Phase I ESA which noted the following (in relation to the Site):

At the time of the 2001 utility drawings, an underground steam line was noted to cross the northeastern
portion of the Site, running north-south.

At the time of the 2001 utility drawings, water lines were noted to cross the northern portion of the Site,
running west-east; and the central portion of the Site, running north-south. Fire hydrants were noted within
the western and central portions of the Site; and valve chamber number 5 was noted within the central
portion of the Site.


An electrical line was located along the north and western portions of the Site.

At the time of the 2001 utility drawings, a hydrogen line was noted to be located along the northern
boundary of the Site.
One catch basin was noted within the southeastern portion of the Site. Four catch basins and one manhole
appeared to be located within the central portion of the Site.
Additionally, the groundwater collection trench (south trench) acts as a utility on the Site. The collection trench
traverses the south part of the Site (i.e. Block 6) in a west to east direction. Groundwater collected in the south
trench is directed via sewer piping towards a treatment system operated by GW that is located off-Site to the
Project No: 04-1182-063
January 2014
4/12
east on lands controlled by GE. The hydraulic influence of the south trench is to locally and modestly reduce the
groundwater elevation within its radius of influence; However, as the radius of influence is inferred to extend only
about 3 metres to the north and south of the south trench, its hydraulic influence is inferred to be minimal. It is
understood that the south trench will be removed from the Site in the near future, eliminating even this modest
hydraulic influence.
Prior to and during the Site remediation, subsurface utilities located within the shallow fill subsurface and
generally with inverst above the water table at the Site were removed. Historic subsurface utilities may have
modestly affected contaminant distribution however, given that shallow soil impacts within the shallow fill were
removed, the likelihood of contaminant transport via subsurface utilities affecting other areas is considered to be
minimal.
2.0
2.1
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS
Summary of 2009 and 2013 Previous Investigations
In 2009 and 2013, investigations were completed at the Site. The Qualified Person reviewed the technical
procedures employed during the implementation of the prior work and found them to be in substantial
compliance with the protocols and procedures set out in Ontario Regulation 153/04, as amended.
Based on Golder’s review of the 2009 and 2013 Investigations, the following was noted:

Investigations carried out at Block 6 consisted of the excavation of 17 test pits (TP09-11, TP09-12 TP09-13
and TP09-17 to TP09-30) in February 2009, the drilling and sampling of four boreholes (MW09-10, MW0911, MW09-12 and MW09-13) in March 2009 and the drilling and sampling of nine boreholes (BH13-1 to
BH13-9) in March 2013. Chemical analysis was completed on selected soil samples for petroleum
hydrocarbons (“PHCs”), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (“PAHs”), base, neutral acid extractibles (“BNAs”),
volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”), polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) and/or metals and inorganics. The
2009 test pits were excavated to depths ranging from 2.6 m to 3.8 mbgs; the 2009 boreholes were drilled to
depths ranging from 5.8 m to 7.0 mbgs; while the 2013 boreholes were drilled to depths ranging from 4.6 m
to 6.1 mbgs.

The results of the investigation indicated the extent of soil impact at the Site when compared to the SCS
was identified throughout the Site for parameters including: PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs and/or metals and
inorganics. Surface and sub-surface soil exceedances from the 2009 and 2013 Previous Investigations are
shown on Figures 7A and 7B, respectively.

Petroleum-hydrocarbon-like odours were noted in soil samples at nine of the 17 test pit locations, as well as
at three of the four borehole locations completed in 2009 and two of the nine borehole locations in 2013.
Further, sheen was observed on soil samples collected from three test pit locations and at one borehole
location.
Based on a review of the Golder 2009 and 2013 Investigations, concentrations of PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs
and/or metals and inorganics above the applicable SCS were identified in the soil at the Site.
Project No: 04-1182-063
January 2014
5/12
3.0
3.1
SUMMARY OF ONTARIO REGULATION 153/04 PHASE I AND II
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS
Summary of the O. Reg 153/04 Phase I ESA
Table 2 of O. Reg. 153/04 (as amended), identifies potentially contaminating activities, which if currently or
historically carried out at a site, trigger the need for a Phase II ESA in order to support the filing of a Record of
Site Condition. Based on the information obtained as part of Golder’s Phase I ESA completed in December,
2013, the following potentially contaminating activities were previously carried out at the Site:

Electrical Equipment or Transformer Manufacturing, Processing or Use – Based on the review of the
Ecolog ERIS report the historical storage of PCBs by the Canadian General Electric Company, at Building
18, which is located to the east of the Site is considered an off-Site potentially contaminating activity.

Metal Treatment, Coating, Plating and Finishing - Based on the 1971 PUR, impregnating of transformers
with a resinous varnish compound was carried out in the west side of Building 18. This historical activity is
considered an off-Site potentially contaminating activity.

Railyards, Tracks and Spurs - Based on a 1964 FIP including the Site area, spur lines were located from
north to south throughout the Site. Railtracks were also noted immediately west and south of the Site.
Given the reported historical use of creosote to treat railway ties, the historical presence of rail spur lines at
the Site is a potentially contaminating activity that represents an area of potential environmental concern at
the Site.

Heating Oil Manufacturing, Processing, Use, Storage, Handling or Disposal - Based on Golder’s review of
Insurance Maps and Reports, five, 32,730 L (7,200 gallon) fuel oil USTs were noted approximately 125 m
to the north of the Site in the 1964 FIP. The off-Site historical fuel oil storage at these USTs is considered
an off-Site potentially contaminating activity.

Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality - Based on a review of the AECOM 2011 Annual Monitoring
Report, fill materials were present within the on-Site monitoring wells. The presence of fill materials at the
Site is considered a potentially contaminating activity that generates an area of potential environmental
concern at the Site.

Photographic Processing – Based on a review of the EcoLog ERIS Report, Building 26 was listed at 940
Lansdowne Avenue under company name Claremont Graphic with one record for photoprocessing wastes
during the years 1995-2001, within the Site. The historical presence of Claremont Graphic at Site Building
26 is considered an off-Site potentially contaminating activity.

Chemical Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage – Based on Golder’s review of available historical
information for the Site and the Phase One Study Area, the historical chemical manufacturing, processing
and bulk storage activities at Building 24 (reportedly including a continuous conveyor type enclosed dip
tank-oven combination utilized for painting and baking metal ballast containers; and, paint spraying and
drying operations) and the historical chemical manufacturing, processing and bulk storage activities at
Building 28 (including three lacquer USTs and six varnish tanks immediately south/southwest of Building
28) – approximately 25 m and 140 m north of the Site, respectively, are considered an off-Site potentially
Project No: 04-1182-063
January 2014
6/12
contaminating activity. The chemical bulk storage reportedly located to the south of the Site Building 26,
within the northeastern portion of the Site, reportedly consisting of buried tanks with thinner, mineral spirits,
ethyl alcohol, solvent T1103, acetone and gasoline, is considered a potentially contaminating activity that
represents an area of potential environmental concern at the Site.

Iron and Steel Manufacturing and Processing – Based on a review of available historical FIPs and PURs,
for the Site and surrounding areas, the off-Site historical ‘foundry’ activities associated with Building 13,
located approximately 200 m to the north of the Site and Building 29, located approximately 180 m to the
north of the Site (including spray paint booths, and chemical storage within Building 13) are considered an
off-Site potentially contaminating activity.

Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks – Based on Golder’s Site reconnaissance, three
1,200 L ASTs (two for storage of gasoline, and one for storage of diesel) as well as two 205 L drums (one
of which included a pump) were noted to be located within the northeastern portion of the Site, in a fenced
area, over the gravel-covered surface. No staining or leaks were noted on the gravel-covered surface in the
vicinity of the ASTs or drums. Three steel containers and an exterior propane storage area were noted to
be located immediately north of the ASTs. Approximately two 1,100 L plastic totes were noted to be stored
on metal skids on the roof of one of the three steel containers noted at the Site, used to store tools and
equipment. No staining or odours were noted in the vicinity of the ASTs. The current presence of these
ASTs is considered an on-Site potentially contaminating activity that represents an area of potential
environmental concern to the Site.
Other Potentially Contaminating Activities were assessed and not considered to be sources of APECs to the
Phase One Property given their distance to the Site, the inferred groundwater direction, and the subsurface
conditions. Golder completed a Phase I ESA at the Site in December 2013 which identified the following areas
of potential environmental concern (“APECs”):
(A) Historical On-Site Spur Lines (throughout the Site) - Based on a 1964 FIP including the Site area, spur
lines were located throughout the Site from north to south. Given the reported historical use of creosote to treat
railway ties, the historical presence of rail spurs at the Site is considered an on-Site potentially contaminating
activity that generates an area of potential environmental concern. Contaminants of concern consist of creosote
(PAHs).
(B) Fill materials (throughout the Site) – Based on a review of previous reports, fill materials were present
within the on-Site monitoring wells. The importation of fill materials of unknown quality to the Site represents an
on-Site potentially contaminating activity that generates an area of potential environmental concern.
Contaminants of concern consist of metals and inorganic parameters.
(C) Reported on-Site impacts from historical industrial operations (throughout the Site from surrounding
properties) - Based on a review of previous reports, groundwater concentrations of PCBs, Vinyl Chloride, Cis1,2 dychloroethylene were detected at the Site (Block 6) at concentrations above the MOE Table 3 Standards;
and, an extraction trench was installed within the southern portion of the Site since 1984 to remove any light
non-aqueous phase liquid (“LNAPL”) and PCBs within the Site area. Detections of phthalate compounds were
also noted within the Site, although below the MOE Table 3 Standards. A number of areas of overburden and
groundwater impacts were reportedly noted off-Site. In general, the areas of reported impact within the former
Project No: 04-1182-063
January 2014
7/12
GE property (off-Site and on-Site) were interpreted to be associated with various source areas (i.e., the north,
central and south portions of Building 18, Building 36, the south yard and, to a lesser degree, the south parking
lot, including a likely storage area between Building 24 (off-Site) and Building 26 (off-Site). The historical
industrial operations resulting in the presence of LNAPL, PCBs, and VOCs at the Site and within the properties
surrounding the Site, as well as the detections of phtalate compounds are considered a potentially contaminating
activity that resulted in an area of potential environmental concern. Contaminants of concern consist of PCBs,
PHCs F1-F4, PAHs, BNAs, VOCs including BTEX.
(D) Chemical Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage – Based on Site operating records for the former
GE operations including a portion of the Site, the chemical bulk storage reportedly located to the south of the
Building 26, within the northeastern portion of the Site, reportedly consisting of buried tanks with thinner, mineral
spirits, ethyl alcohol, solvent T1103, acetone and gasoline, is considered a potentially contaminating activity that
generated an area of potential environmental concern at the Site. Contaminants of concern consist of PHCs F1F4, PAHs, VOCs including BTEX.
(E) Current Presence of On-Site Diesel and Gasoline ASTs – Based on observations made at the time of the
Site reconnaissance, three 1,200 L ASTs (two for storage of gasoline, and one for storage of diesel) as well as
two 205 L drums (one of which included a pump) were noted to be located within the northeastern portion of the
Site, in a fenced area, over the gravel-covered surface. No staining or leaks were noted on the gravel-covered
surface in the vicinity of the ASTs or drums. Three steel containers and an exterior propane storage area were
noted to be located immediately north of the ASTs. Approximately two 1,100 L plastic totes were noted to be
stored on metal skids on the roof of one of the three steel containers noted at the Site, used to store tools and
equipment. No staining or odours were noted in the vicinity of the ASTs. The current presence of diesel and
gasoline ASTs at the Site is considered an on-Site potentially contaminating activity that generates an area of
potential environmental concern. Contaminants of concern consit of PHCs F1-F4, VOCs and BTEX.
The soil remediation addressed the APECs described above in relation to potential soil impacts. As such, the O.
Reg 153/04 Phase II ESA was developed to address the APECs identified in the O. Reg 153/04 Phase I ESA in
groundwater.
The lists of PCAs and APECs with descriptions are included in the “APEC Table” as part of the RSC filing. The
location of PCAs and APECs is shown in Figure 8.
3.2
Results of the O. Reg 153/04 Phase II ESA
As part of the Phase II ESA investigation, previous reports were reviewed and the protocols utilized in the
development of sampling plans and field activities were reviewed to assess consistency with the applicable
protocols required by Ontario Regulation 153/04, as revised. The policies, procedures and protocols utilized by
Golder during the completion of this prior remediation were assessed by the Qualified Person and found to be in
substantial compliance with the Regulation.
The Phase II ESA was completed following the soil remediation at the Site. Following the soil remediation, only
the eastern portion of the Site was backfilled with on-Site stockpile material which met the SCS (as described in
Section 2.3) and as such, the some of the Phase II ESA drilling activities (the central and western portions of the
Site) were completed at the base of the excavation. The Phase II ESA activities were completed in September
and October 2013 with the exception of three boreholes completed within the cul-de-sac area of the Site in
Project No: 04-1182-063
January 2014
8/12
March 2013, as well as sampling of an on-Site manhole in August 2013. Based on the results of the Phase II
ESA, the following was noted:

The results of the previous environmental investigation work completed at the Site delineated the extent of
soil impact at the Site for all identified constituents of concern including: PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs and/or
metals and inorganics;

No significant pathways for migration were identified during the delineation of the contaminants. The
contaminants were not present in groundwater. No evidence suggesting any effect of the climatic or
meteorological conditions on the migration of the contaminants were found. No utilities or subsurface
structures were discovered to be present in the contaminated areas. Some of the contaminants found were
volatile. Models for the potential release and transport mechanisms, exposure pathways and human and
ecological receptors located on-Site in relation to the contaminants are displayed on Figure 9;

The soil materials found to exceed the SCS during previous investigations were excavated and removed
from the Site between May and September 2013. The soil remediation program included the excavation of
soil throughout the Site extending to the Site boundaries. The soil remediation activities undertaken prior to
the commencement of the Phase II ESA activities reported herein were successful in that all soil verification
samples were confirmed to satisfy the applicable SCS. The excavation activities and post-excavation
confirmatory sampling results are summarized in Section 3.3 and described in detail in Appendix K of the
Phase II ESA. The results indicate that the concentrations of the parameters of concern in the final
confirmatory soil samples from the excavation limits met the applicable SCS;

The soil samples collected from the interior cul-de-sac boreholes (BH13-7, BH13-8 and BH13-9) located
near the northern portion of the Site had concentrations of PHCs, VOCs, PCBs and metals and inorganics
below the SCS;

The directional monitoring well (BH13-10), was completed at the southern portion of the Site to allow for the
collection of soil and groundwater sampling beneath the on-Site groundwater collection trench. The soil
analysis indicated the concentrations of the contaminants of concern (PHCs, PAHs, BNAs, VOCs, PCBs
and metals and inorganics) were below the SCS. The groundwater analysis indicated concentration of
PCBs and VOCs were below the SCS with the remainder of the contaminants of concern not sampled due
to low volume of water within the well;

The standing water within the manhole (MH13-1) located at the southeastern portion of the Site, connected
to the groundwater collection trench, had concentrations of the contaminants of concern (PHCs, PAHs,
BNAs, VOCs, PCBs and metals and inorganics), below the SCS. It is noted that the collection trench
traverses the south part of the Site in a west to east direction towards a treatment system located off-Site to
the east and as such this manhole represents the lowest point of the collection trench on the Site property
(Block 6); and,

Groundwater samples from all monitoring wells located in the aquifer beneath the Site that were installed as
part of this Phase II ESA had concentrations of the constituents of concern (PHCs, PAHs, BNAs, VOCs,
PCBs and metals and inorganics) below the SCS.
Project No: 04-1182-063
January 2014
9/12
3.3
Summary of Soil Remediation
A primary soil remediation (the Main Excavation) was carried out between May and September 2013 prior to the
completion of the current Phase II ESA. A Supplementary Excavation program was completed after the
completion of the current Phase II ESA between January 3 and January 7, 2014.
It is noted that no soil has been imported to the RSC property throughout the duration of the Phase II ESA and
Soil Remediation activities.
3.3.1
Main Excavation
The Main Excavation program included the excavation of fill and some native soil throughout the Site extending
to the Site boundaries. Following the Main Excavation, only the eastern portion of the excavation at the Site was
backfilled with on-Site stockpile material which met the SCS, while the remainder of the Site was left as
excavated and unbackfilled. The area backfilled is shown on Figure 3.
The horizontal and vertical limits of the Main Excavation and locations of confirmatory samples are shown on
Figures 4, 5, 10A and 10B. Note that the pre-remediation depth of fill was obtained from the 2009 and 2013
Investigation. The findings of the Main Excavation are as follows:

Remediation efforts included excavation of soil impacted with PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs and/or metals and
inorganics from the Site. An excavation extending to the property boundaries of the Site (approximately 2.9
acres) to a maximum depth of 4.0 mbgs was conducted at the Site to remove the impacted fill material;

Confirmatory soil samples were collected by Golder in accordance with O. Reg. 153/04 (as amended) at
representative locations from the exposed soil in the walls and floors of Block 6 excavation. It is noted that
most of the east wall of Block 6 was a sheet pile wall and a portion of the northern wall of Block 6 was
concrete and as such could not be sampled. As part of the confirmatory testing program, soil samples
indicating the greatest evidence of potential for impact, based on visual and/or olfactory evidence of
chemical impact, headspace vapour concentrations, sample location and/or sample depth, were submitted
to the analytical laboratory for analysis of PHC F1 to F4, VOCs, PAHs, BNAs, PCBs and/or metals and
inorganics. Results from the analysis of soil samples from the final limits of the excavation indicated all
analytical results were below the applicable MOE Table 5 standards, with the exception of three areas
identified within the central and south-central areas of the Site. These areas are identified on Figure 10C
and were addressed by means of the Supplementary Excavation and soil verification program conducted in
early January, 2014;

The lateral distribution of the former contamination extended to the Site boundaries and is shown on
Figures 10A and 10B. The vertical extent of the former contamination is shown on the geological crosssections presented on Figures 4 and 5;

Approximately 23,590 cubic meters of soil encountered during the excavation of the fill and native materials
were removed for off-Site disposal with an additional approximately 7,200 cubic meters of on-Site stockpile
material which met the SCS used as backfill at the Site;
Project No: 04-1182-063
January 2014
10/12

Soil samples of the impacted material were submitted for ignitability and leachate analysis of metals and
inorganics, VOCs, and PCBs, prior to the removal from the Site, the results of which indicated that the soil
was classified as non-hazardous for disposal purposes; and,

Segregated soils encountered during the excavation activities that were considered to exceed the
remediation standards and/or to be geotechnically unsuitable for reuse at the Site, were removed off-Site.
The total mass of soil removed from the Site in conjunction with the remediation was approximately 51,970
tonnes. The non-hazardous soil from the Site was removed and transported by MOE-licensed hauler Green
Soils Inc., who transported the material to the Megacity Environmental Solutions facility in Toronto, Ontario
(Certificate of Approvals A210742 and A680294) or to Green Soils Waterfront Inc. in Toronto, Ontario
(Certificate of Approval 4410-85LJ85).
3.3.2
Supplementary Excavation
Arising from the discovery of specific areas of soil exposed at ground surface that exceeded the applicable SCS,
a supplementary excavation program was conducted at the Site between January 3 and January 7, 2014. The
areas of the Site requiring supplementary excavation and verification were delineated based on review of
previous floor verification sample results derived from the primary excavation. The areas requiring delineation
included all areas that were not previously verified to satisfy the applicable SCS. As shown on Figure 10C, three
such areas were identified.

Supplementary Excavation 1 (“EX 1”) is a rectangular area located in the south central area of the Site and
is approximately 23 metres wide in the west-east direction and approximately 43 metres long in the northsouth direction. The excavation was carried to an average depth of 4.5 metres below the existing grade
(i.e. 1.0 m below the previous excavation depth);

Supplementary Excavation 2 (“EX2”) is a rectangular area located in the north-central area of the Site and
is a smaller excavation with dimensions of 5 metres by 5 metres. The average depth of the excavation
area of EX2 was 5.0 metres below existing grade (i.e. 1.5 m below the previous excavation depth);

Supplementary Excavation 3 (“EX3”) is also a rectangular area with approximate dimensions of 5 metres by
5 metres and is located in the central area of the Site. The average depth of the excavation area of EX2
was 5.0 metres below original grade (i.e. 1.5 m below the previous excavation depth);

In total, approximately 1,060 cubic metres of soil were excavated during the Supplementary Excavation. As
previous chemical analyses obtained during the current Phase II ESA indicated that all of these excavated
soils satisfy the SCS applicable to subsurface soils, and as the Site is proposed to undergo redevelopment
during which such soils may be suitable for appropriate reuse, the excavated soils were temporarily
stockpiled on other lands owned by the Site owners, beyond the boundaries of the RSC Property (the Site);

During redevelopment, if the stockpiled soils can be reused appropriately at the Site, they may be reused,
and if such reuse cannot be accommodated, the soils will be lawfully managed off-Site;

Upon completion of the Supplementary Excavation in each of areas EX1, EX2 and EX3, soil samples were
collected from the excavation floors and walls in accordance with the requirements of the Regulation. All
floor and wall verification samples were submitted to the analytical laboratory for analysis of PHC F1 to F4,
Project No: 04-1182-063
January 2014
11/12
VOCs, PAHs, BNAs, PCBs and/or metals and inorganics. Results from the analysis of soil samples from
the final limits of the excavation indicated all analytical results were below the applicable MOE Table 5
standards. The locations of the verification samples collected during the Supplementary Excavation are
shown on Figures 10C, 11A, 11B and 11C; and,

The findings of the Supplementary Excavation have been published in a letter report prepared by Golder
dated January 9, 2014 entitled “Supplementary Excavation and Verification, Block 6, 980 Lansdowne
Avenue, Toronto, Ontario”, which is included in Appendix K of the Phase II ESA report.
\\golder.gds\gal\whitby\active\_2004\1182 environmental\0-100\04-1182-063 neudorfer emp landsowne\rsc supporting documents\block 6\7. phase ii csm block 6\04-1182-063 block 6 ph ii
csm revised.docx
Project No: 04-1182-063
January 2014
12/12
!
!
625000
³
626000
!
SI
LV
!
N
R OA
!
NIA
!
RO A
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
4837000
4837000
4836000
!
!
!
!
O UR
4835000
EET
ERC
UE
AD
VEN
AN A
YLV
T RO
R
W
STR
DO V
UE
ST
DRIV
D
RO A
ET
UE
VEN
CK A
UE
AS
IAN
IND
DE
NUE
AV E
KSI
NAN
PAR
NDE
E
N
AVE
BRO
O
D
DU N
C LE
UE
BLO
N
AVE
N
AVE
EST
TW
RE E
R ST
T
UE
NE
DO W
GLE
EE
STR
S
LAN
UE
UE
ARK
HP
N
AVE
N
AVE
HIG
KE
NL A
E
LAM
HAL
T
TON
ING
B
E
TRE
SYM
UE
!
IN S
FER
DUF
!
EN
E AV
ENU
TON
ING
OSS
AD
T
ID
ERS
N
AVE
AC E
L
L
WA
E
ENU
Y AV
R
EET
A
GE
STR
T
N
O
DUP
4835000
RO
!
ET
AV
PIN
LAP
W
SHA
RK
!
!
4836000
PA
E
T RE
RS
ET
E
TRE
T RE
HUM
S
T
ES
LEG
CO L
ES
T
E
TRE
E
G:\Projects\2004\04-1182-063_Neudorfer\GIS\MXDs\Reporting\1006\Phase_II_CSM\041182063_1006_Phase_II_CSM_01.mxd
A
!
ENU
SITE LOCATION
LE S
KEE
AN
TE S
N ET
OA D
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
NI
N AV
DA
RT R
!
!
!
DO
!
H TO
!
PO
VE N
LE
OS
OAD
I VE
LE
CA
!
AD
N RO
NR
NUE
AVE
!
G
LAU
ESTO
AD
JU
IO
NCT
T
WES
A DR
!
RO
W
OLD
!
ON
WIN
OD
WO
OAK
D
!
N
TO
ES
W
CITY OF TORONTO
UE
!
!
ST C
N
AVE
LAIR
!
UE
NUE
AVE
E DO
CAL
!
V EN
E
RO G
!
4838000
OD
WO
OAK
!
OR
TH
ER
D
RS
A
4838000
624000
624000
625000
626000
500
0
500
SCALE 1:20,000
PROJECT
TITLE
METRES
PHASE II CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
BLOCK 6, PART OF BLOCK O, PLAN M-208,
AT 980 LANSDOWNE AVENUE
TORONTO, ONTARIO
KEY PLAN
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1006)
REFERENCE
Base Data - MNR LIO, obtained 2009
Produced by Golder Associates Ltd under licence from
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, © Queens Printer 2008
Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: NAD 83 Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17N
1,000
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
NOV. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 1
³
LEGEND
Block 6 Site Boundary
Phase I Study Area
4836400
,
%
4836200
625400
4836400
625200
4836200
625000
Surrounding Property
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
1. Residential Apartment Buildings
2. Residential, Foundry Lofts -1100 Lansdowne Avenue
(Historical Foundry Building)
3. Building 15 - Historical Offices Building
4. Residential Houses
5. Undeveloped Vacant Former Building 28 (Historical
Chemical Building)
6. Vacant Building 10 - Historical Powerhouse Building
7. Residential, Brownstones Rental Residences 1111 - 1201 Lansdowne Avenue
8. Toronto Hydro-Electric Station
9. Vacant Former Building 18 (Historical Transformer
Manufacturing)
10. Lounsbury Foods Limited - 11 Wiltshire Avenue
11. Residential Apartments Building - Former Building 24
(Historical Transformer Manufacturing)
12. Former General Electric Building 36 - Historical Storage
Building
13. General Electric - Hitachi
14. Metro Central Garage
15. Commercial Offices - 1 Wiltshire Avenue
16. Undeveloped Excavated
17. Residential Apartment Building
18. Condo/Loft, Former GE Royce Sales Plant
19. Caldas Auto Garage Ltd. - 20 Primrose Avenue
20. Collosus Auto Collision - 4 Primsose Avenue
21. Coffee Time
22. Jomar Electric Co. Ltd. - 777 St. Clarens Avenue
23. Massive Auto Collision Inc. - 1361 Dupont Street
24. Commercial and Residential Building
25. Commercial, Multi-tenant
26. Felim Court, Commercial Multi-tenant - 1444 Dupont
Street
27. Vacant, Studio Lofts
NOTES:
4836000
1. All locations are approximate.
4836000
624800
REFERENCE
Imagery: Bing Maps © 2012 Microsoft Corporation and its data suppliers
50
PROJECT
TITLE
25
0
50
100
METRES
SCALE 1:2,750
BLOCK 6, PART OF BLOCK O, PLAN M-208
TORONTO, ONTARIO
PHASE I STUDY AREA
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1006)
624800
625000
625200
150
625400
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
NOV. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 2
625100
625150
LEGEND
4836200
4836200
4836150
4836150
Approximate Location of Proposed Building
NOTES:
REFERENCE
4836100
4836100
G:\Projects\2004\04-1182-063_Neudorfer\GIS\MXDs\Reporting\1006\Phase_II_CSM\041182063_1006_Phase_II_CSM_02A.mxd
³
625200
4836250
625050
4836250
625000
15
PROJECT
TITLE
7.5
0
15
30
SCALE 1:750
TORONTO, ONTARIO
PROPOSED BUILDINGS
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1006)
625000
625050
625100
625150
45
METRES
625200
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
NOV. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE2A
625100
625150
³
625200
LEGEND
4836250
625050
Area of Excavation to be Backfilled
@
A
Borehole Location
@
?
Monitoring Well Location
@
?
Directional Monitoring Well Location
1
&
Manhole Location
Ú
4836250
625000
Collection Trench
Concrete Foundation Wall
4836200
4836200
4836150
4836150
#
*
Geological Cross Section Location
A
NOTES:
REFERENCE
4836100
Base Survey by: Holding Jones Vanderveen Inc. Entitled "Plan of Subdivision of Part
of Block O Registered Plan M-208 City of Toronto". Dated May 4, 2011.
4836100
Sheet Pile Wall
15
7.5
PROJECT
TITLE
0
15
30
45
METRES
SCALE 1:750
TORONTO, ONTARIO
GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION LOCATIONS
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1006)
625000
625050
625100
625150
625200
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
NOV. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 3
LEGEND
BOREHOLE
IDENTIFICATION
MW 09-13
O/S 12.4 m W
NORTH
A
SOUTH
A'
128
128
DENOTES ACTUAL
BOREHOLE LOCATION
WHERE BOREHOLES
HAVE BEEN
SHIFTED FOR VISUAL
PRESENTATION
BOREHOLE OFFSET
DISTANCE AND LOCATION
RELATIVE TO CROSS
SECTION LINE
SIMPLIFIED
STRATIGRAPHY
MONITORING WELL
126
126
PL
PROPERTY LINE
EXCAVATION FLOOR SAMPLE MET APPLICABLE
MOE 2011 SITE CONDITION STANDARDS
Pre-Remediation
Ground Surface
124
124
ORIGINAL SOIL SAMPLES WITH EXCEEDANCES
(GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD.'S PREVIOUS INVESTIGATION)
SIMPLIFIED STRATIGRAPHY
Approximate Ground Surface
(Post -Remediation) and
Extent of Remedial Excavation
122
SILTY SAND
SANDY SILT TILL
CLAYEY SILT
CONCRETE
SANDY SILT
ASPHALT
COLLECTION
TRENCH
122
Southern Property
Boundary of Block 6
TP 09-13 SA1
BH13-2
BH13-1
(O/S 7.7 m W)
(O/S 13.1 m E)
MW09-13
O/S 4.6 m
TP 09-24 SA3
120
Northern Property
Boundary of Block 6
ELEVATION (m)
FILL
FL42
FL30
FL49
FL78
120
FL79 TP 09-13 SA6
FL83
118
FL82
FL81
118
ter
dwa
un
Gro
Aquitard
116
116
114
114
NOTES
1. All location are approximate.
2. For detailed soil stratigraphy and groundwater conditions,
refer to Record of Borehole sheets.
3. Figure 3 indicates the location of the cross section.
4. Groundwater level measured at Block 6 on Oct. 15, 2013.
5. Bedrock was not encountered during this and previous
investigations. According to the EcoLog ERIS report,
boreholes were drilled to a maximum depth of 7.0 m and
bedrock was not encountered.
6. All measured soil chemical parameters were compared to the
MOE 2011 Table 5 Standards for medium to fine textured
soils and Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property Use.
7. *Soil exceedances are shown on Figure 8A and 8B.
SCALE
VERTICAL
112
112
HORIZONTAL
110
110
TORONTO, ONTARIO
108
0
50
100
108
150
GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION A-A'
DISTANCE (m)
FIGURE 4
LEGEND
BOREHOLE
IDENTIFICATION
WEST
B
EAST
B'
128
128
MW 09-13
O/S 12.4 m W
DENOTES ACTUAL
BOREHOLE LOCATION
WHERE BOREHOLES
HAVE BEEN
SHIFTED FOR VISUAL
PRESENTATION
BOREHOLE OFFSET
DISTANCE AND LOCATION
RELATIVE TO CROSS
SECTION LINE
SIMPLIFIED
STRATIGRAPHY
MONITORING WELL
126
126
PL
124
Pre-Remediation
Ground Surface
MW 09-12D
124
O/S 1.6 m N
ORIGINAL SOIL SAMPLES WITH EXCEEDANCES
(GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD.'S PREVIOUS INVESTIGATION)
SIMPLIFIED STRATIGRAPHY
122
122
Western Property
Boundary of Block 6
TP 09-22 SA1
MW 09-13D
BH13-5D
O/S 2.2 m S
120
TP 09-19 SA2
FL61 FL63
FL84 FL87
FL103
118
FL101
FL99
FILL
SANDY SILT
NOTES
118
Groundwater
BLK6 FL14-3
BLK6 FL14-1
CLAYEY SILT
TP 09-30 SA4
TP 09-28 SA5
FL81
ASPHALT
SILTY SAND
120
FL76 FL73
FL66
Perched
Aquifer
TP 09-28 SA1
O/S 11.9 m N
Post-Remediation
Ground Surface
TP 09-22 SA4
ELEVATION (m)
EXCAVATION FLOOR SAMPLE MET APPLICABLE
MOE 2011 SITE CONDITION STANDARDS
Eastern Property
Boundary of Block 6
Post-Remediation
Ground Surface
PROPERTY LINE
Aquitard
116
116
Extent of Remedial
Excavation
114
114
1. All location are approximate.
2. For detailed soil stratigraphy and groundwater conditions,
refer to Record of Borehole sheets.
3. Figure 3 indicates the location of the cross section.
4. Groundwater level measured on Oct. 15, 2013.
5. Bedrock was not encountered during this and previous
investigations. According to the EcoLog ERIS report,
boreholes were drilled to a maximum depth of 7.0 m and
bedrock was not encountered.
6. All measured soil chemical parameters were compared to the
MOE 2011 Table 5 Standards for medium to fine textured
soils and Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property Use.
7. *Soil exceedances are shown on Figure 8A and 8B.
SCALE
VERTICAL
112
112
HORIZONTAL
110
110
TORONTO, ONTARIO
108
0
50
100
DISTANCE (m)
108
150
GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION B-B'
FIGURE 5
625050
625100
625150
³
LEGEND
@
?
@
?
Directional Monitoring Well Location
1
&
Manhole Location
Ú
625000
Collection Trench
Groundwater Contours (m asl)
4836200
4836200
4836150
4836150
Inferred Groundwater Flow Direction
(117.92)
Groundwater Elevation (m asl),
Measured October 15, 2013
NOTES:
2. masl = meters above sea level
REFERENCE
10
4836100
PROJECT
4836100
119
TITLE
5
0
10
20
METRES
SCALE 1:600
TORONTO, ONTARIO
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1006)
625000
625050
625100
30
625150
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
NOV. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 6
625150
625200
TP09-11 SA1 (0.30-0.61) 20-Feb-09
Fluoranthene
0.89
Benzo(a)pyrene
0.41
TP09-11 SA3 (1.23-1.50) 20-Feb-09
Measured
Parameter
Concentration ug/g
PHC F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX
130
PHC F2 (C10 to C16)
5400
PHC F3 (C16 to C34)
11000
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
180
120
340
0.17
7.8
0.74
0.69
0.63
7.8
0.78
0.78
0.3
0.48
0.1
0.35
TP09-12 SA1 (0.45-0.61) 20-Feb-09
Measured
Concentration ug/g
Lead
125
Parameter
0.69
0.3
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
65
150
1300
TP09-26 SA1 (0.31-0.63) 24-Feb-09
Measured
Concentration ug/g
Acenaphthylene
0.23
Anthracene
0.85
Fluoranthene
7.5
Benzo(a)anthracene
2.1
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
3
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
1.2
Benzo(a)pyrene
2.7
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1.4
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
0.29
Parameter
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
120
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
0.17
0.74
0.69
0.63
0.78
0.78
0.3
0.48
0.1
TP09-25 SA1 (0.36-0.61) 23-Feb-09
Measured
Concentration ug/g
Antimony
17.9
Arsenic
19.1
Cadmium
2.6
Copper
4840
Lead
754
Zinc
5260
5.14
Benzo(a)pyrene
0.38
Parameter
4836150
BH13-2 SA1 (0-0.79) 21-Mar-13
Measured
Concentration ug/g
Boron (Hot Water Soluble)
1.51
Lead
153
5.8
Parameter
@
?
D
E
Test Pit Location
1
&
Manhole Location
Sheet Pile Wall
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
18
180
120
0.17
0.69
0.63
0.78
0.78
0.3
0.48
0.1
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
120
NOTES:
2. All measured soil chemical parameters were compared to the MOE 2011 Table 5
Standards for medium to fine textured soils and Residential/Parkland/Institutional
Property Use.
TP09-28 SA1 (0.60-1.20) 24-Feb-09
Measured
Concentration ug/g
Lead
131
Parameter
TP09-24 SA3 (1.35-1.85) 24-Feb-09
Measured
Concentration ug/g
PHC F2 (C10 to C16)
4400
PHC F3 (C16 to C34)
5900
Parameter
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
180
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
120
REFERENCE
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
150
1300
15
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
0.7
TP09-19 SA1 (0.25-0.61) 23-Feb-09
Measured
Concentration ug/g
0.11
Parameter
Borehole Location
TP09-27 SA1 (0.36-0.61) 23-Feb-09
Measured
Concentration ug/g
Lead
526
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
0.35
2.7
BH13-4 SA1 (0-1.50) 21-Mar-13
Measured
Parameter
Concentration ug/g
Copper
385
BH13-4 SA1 (0-1.50) 21-Mar-13
Measured
Parameter
Concentration ug/g
Electrical Conductivity
2.13
@
A
Collection Trench
Parameter
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
18
120
0.69
2.8
0.78
0.78
0.3
0.48
0.1
0.35
TP09-18 SA2 (0.75-1.52) 23-Feb-09
Measured
Concentration ug/g
1.2
Chlorobenzene
4.8
Parameter
TP09-29 SA1 (0.25-0.61) 24-Feb-09
Measured
Concentration ug/g
Arsenic
21.8
Copper
184
Lead
875
Acenaphthylene
0.32
Fluoranthene
4.9
Benzo(a)anthracene
3.1
4.8
1.9
Benzo(a)pyrene
5.1
2.7
0.74
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
1.5
120
5
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
7.5
18
1.2
180
120
340
5
0.3
Parameter
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
180
120
340
TP09-20 SA1 (0.38-0.61) 23-Feb-09
Measured
Concentration ug/g
Arsenic
18.8
Lead
379
Fluoranthene
3.5
Benzo(a)anthracene
1.8
2.5
0.95
Benzo(a)pyrene
2
1.1
0.32
4.1
Parameter
4836100
TP09-13 SA1 (0.38-0.61) 23-Feb-09
Measured
Parameter
Concentration ug/g
Copper
640
Lead
585
Zinc
701
³
LEGEND
4836200
625100
4836150
TP09-17 SA1 (0.38-0.61) 23-Feb-09
Measured
Parameter
Concentration ug/g
Copper
403
Lead
829
Zinc
672
Acenapthylene
0.26
Phenanthrene
18
Anthracene
4.6
Fluoranthene
20
Benzo(a)anthracene
8
Chrysene
7.9
9.1
4.4
Benzo(a)pyrene
7.5
5.1
1.6
200
625050
4836100
4836200
625000
TP09-22 SA1 (0.31-0.61) 23-Feb-09
Measured
Parameter
Concentration ug/g
Lead
128
Fluoranthene
4.1
Benzo(a)anthracene
2.8
5.6
1.8
Benzo(a)pyrene
3.4
2.6
0.9
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
0.1
MOE Table 5
Standard ug/g
120
0.69
0.63
0.78
0.78
0.3
0.48
0.1
PROJECT
TITLE
7.5
0
15
30
METRES
SCALE 1:750
TORONTO, ONTARIO
SURFACE SOIL EXCEEDANNCES
(2009 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATION)
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1006)
625000
625050
625100
625150
45
625200
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
NOV. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 7A
625000
625050
625100
625150
625200
³
LEGEND
@
A
Borehole Location
@
?
D
E
Test Pit Location
1
&
Manhole Location
Collection Trench
Sheet Pile Wall
4836200
4836200
BH13-1 SA2 (1.52-2.21) 21-Mar-13
Measured
MOE Table 5
Concentration ug/g Standard ug/g
PHC F2 (C10 to C16)
990
150
BH13-1 SA4 (3.05-3.83) 21-Mar-13
Measured
MOE Table 5
Parameter
PHC F2 (C10 to C16)
920
150
Parameter
TP09-24 SA6 (2.90-3.35) 23-Feb-09
Measured
MOE Table 5
PHC F2 (C10 to C16)
330
150
4836150
4836150
TP09-30 SA4 (1.95-2.45) 24-Feb-09
Measured
MOE Table 5
Lead
1170
1000
Anthracene
2.5
0.74
Parameter
NOTES:
2. All measured soil chemical parameters were compared to the MOE 2011 Table 5
Standards for medium to fine textured soils and Residential/Parkland/Institutional
Property Use.
TP09-28 SA5 (2.75-3.20) 24-Feb-09
Measured
MOE Table 5
PHC F2 (C10 to C16)
7700
150
REFERENCE
Parameter
TP09-21 SA3 (1.52-1.85) 23-Feb-09
Measured
MOE Table 5
Parameter
PHC F2 (C10 to C16)
1700
150
4836100
4836100
G:\Projects\2004\04-1182-063_Neudorfer\GIS\MXDs\Reporting\1006\Phase_II_CSM\041182063_1006_Phase_II_CSM_07B.mxd
Parameter
15
TP09-22 SA4 (1.98-2.30) 23-Feb-09
Measured
MOE Table 5
PHC F2 (C10 to C16)
680
150
TP09-19 SA3 (1.50-1.85) 23-Feb-09
Measured
MOE Table 5
PHC F2 (C10 to C16)
1300
150
7.5
0
15
30
PROJECT
TITLE
METRES
SCALE 1:750
TORONTO, ONTARIO
SUB-SURFACE SOIL EXCEEDANNCES
(2009 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATION)
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1006)
625000
45
Parameter
Parameter
625050
625100
625150
625200
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
NOV. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 7B
625100
625150
³
625200
LEGEND
4836250
625050
4836250
625000
!
(
"
)
Potentially Contaminating Activity (PCA)
Area of Actual or Potential Environmental Concern (APEC)
A
B
D
4836200
4836200
4836150
E
4836150
APEC Description
Potentially Contaminating Activity (PCA) MOE PCA #
Description
Historical On‐Site spur line
Reported presence of fill materials
Reported On‐Site impacts from historical industrial operations
C
Railyards, tracks and spurs
Importation of fill of unknown quality
Chemical manufacturing processing and bulk storage
Chemical manufacturing processing and bulk Bulk storage ‐ South of historical building 26
storage
Current presence of On‐Site diesel and gasoline Gasoline and associated products storage in ASTs
fixed tanks
Location of APEC/PCA
46
30
Throughout the Site
Throughout the Site
8
Throughout the Site
8
Northeast portion of the Site
28
Northeast portion of the Site
NOTES:
REFERENCE
4836100
4836100
Area of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC)
15
7.5
PROJECT
TITLE
0
15
30
45
METRES
SCALE 1:750
TORONTO, ONTARIO
AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
AND POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATING ACTIVITIES
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1006)
625000
625050
625100
625150
625200
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
NOV. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 8
625100
625150
³
625200
LEGEND
4836250
625050
4836250
625000
Supplemental Excavation
Verification Surface Floor Sample
Submitted for Analysis
#
Collection Trench
4836200
4836200
4836150
4836150
NOTES:
REFERENCE
4836100
4836100
Sheet Pile Wall
15
7.5
PROJECT
TITLE
0
15
30
METRES
SCALE 1:750
TORONTO, ONTARIO
REMEDIATION PLAN - FLOOR SAMPLES
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1006)
625000
625050
625100
625150
45
625200
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
NOV. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 10A
625100
625150
³
625200
LEGEND
4836250
625050
4836250
625000
Supplemental Excavation
#
Verification Surface Wall Sample
#
Verification Subsurface Wall Sample
Collection Trench
4836200
4836200
4836150
4836150
NOTES:
REFERENCE
4836100
4836100
G:\Projects\2004\04-1182-063_Neudorfer\GIS\MXDs\Reporting\1006\Phase_II_CSM\041182063_1006_Phase_II_CSM_10B.mxd
Sheet Pile Wall
15
PROJECT
TITLE
7.5
0
15
30
METRES
SCALE 1:750
TORONTO, ONTARIO
REMEDIATION PLAN - WALL SAMPLES
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1006)
625000
625050
625100
625150
45
625200
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
NOV. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 10B
625100
625125
³
LEGEND
4836175
625075
4836175
625050
#
6, Supplementary Verification
Surface Wall Sample Submitted for
Analysis
#
6, Supplementary Verification
Surface Floor Sample Submitted for
Analysis
Supplemental Excavation (EX1, EX2
and EX3)
Collection Trench
4836150
4836150
4836125
4836125
NOTES:
REFERENCE
5
PROJECT
4836100
TITLE
4836100
G:\Projects\2004\04-1182-063_Neudorfer\GIS\MXDs\Reporting\1006\Phase_II_CSM\041182063_1006_Phase_II_CSM_10C.mxd
Sheet Pile Wall
625050
625075
625100
2.5
0
5
10
SCALE 1:350
15
METRES
TORONTO, ONTARIO
REMEDIATION PLAN SUPPLEMENTARY EXCAVATIONS
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1006)
625125
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
NOV. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 10C

211988 - Ontario.ca

Transcription

Similar documents

88TH RSC HOW TO GUIDE FOR DTS INVITATIONAL

GS GSPro GSElite - Arizona Wholesale Supply

Angiosperm Latin Name: Cyperus involucratus Common Name

Technical Sheet - Microbes Biosciences

Bodemverontreiniging op het spoor

and Print - RSC Custom Graphics

Record of Site Condition # 209366 Record of Site

Angiosperm Latin Name: Euphorbia ingens Common Name

Record of Site Condition # 212289 Record of Site

212610 - Ontario