Record of Site Condition # 209366 Record of Site

Transcription

Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # 209366
Record of Site Condition
Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act
Summary
Record of Site Condition Number
Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry
Certification Date
Current Property Use
Intended Property Use
Certificate of Property Use Number
Applicable Site Condition Standards**
Property Municipal Address
209366
21/08/2013
10/05/2013
Commercial
Community
No CPU
Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,
with Non-potable Ground Water, Coarse
Textured Soil, for Community property use
16 Brookers Lane M8V 0A5
Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence
This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has
access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings
with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental
condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.
Contents of this Record of Site Condition
This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from
the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been
submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment.
RSC Information
Each field marked by an asterisk ( * ) must be completed.
Is the property used, or has it ever been used, in whole or in part for an industrial use or as a garage;
a bulk liquid dispensing facility, including a gasoline outlet; or for the operation of dry cleaning equipment? *
Yes
No
During a phase one environmental site assessment of the property, was a potentially contaminating activity identified on, in or under the property? *
Yes
No
Select Type of RSC *
Phase 1 RSC
Phase 1 and 2 RSC
Phase 1 and 2 RSC with RA
Owner Information
Owners' General Information
Submitting Owner's Information
RSC Property Information
Environmental Condition
Owner's Information
Is the submitting owner(s) a Receiver for the Property? *
Yes
No
Is the submitting owner(s) represented by an Agent? *
Contaminant Concentrations
ESA Information
QP Profile Information
Certification Statement
Supporting Documents
Yes
No
Owner Information
Owner's Information
Type of Owner *
Owner Name *
Firm, Corporation or Partnership
Monarch Waterview Development Limited
Street Number *
Street Name *
Apt No. /RR No.
2550
Victoria Park Avenue
200
City, Town or Village *
Province *
Postal Code *
Country
ESA Information
Toronto
Ontario
M2J 5A9
Canada
Submitting Owner's Contact Information
Contact First Name *
Contact Last Name *
David A.
George
Phone Number * (including area code)
Fax Number (including area code)
(416) 491-7440
(416) 491-0435
Email Address
Owner Information
Property Address
Does the Property have a Municipal Address?
Property Address
Yes
Municipality Information
No
Property Reference Number
Geographical Reference/Area of
RSC Property
Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s)
ESA Information
*
Is the property administered by MNR under the Public Lands Act?
*
Yes
No
Street Number * Street Name *
16
Apt No. /RR No.
Brookers Lane
Province *
Postal Code *
Toronto
Ontario
M8V 0A5
Owner Information
Municipality & Property Address Information
Property Address
Lower or Single Tier Municipality *
Toronto
Tier of Municipality
Single Tier
RSC Property
The District Office of MOE *
Toronto District Office
Address of District Office of MOE
ESA Information
5775 Yonge St., 8th floor, North York ON M2M 4J1
Owner Information
Property Address
Municipality & Property Address Information
Assessment Roll Number
1919 054 020 03711
RSC Property
ESA Information
Property Identifier Number (PIN #)
Part of 07624-0359 (LT)
Owner Information
Geo Reference & Other Properties Details
Geographical References
Property Address
UTM Coordinates
Datum
NAD 83
Zone *
RSC Property
17
Easting *
622,770.00
Northing *
4,831,475.00
ESA Information
Area of RSC Property
Total Area of RSC Property in Hectares *
0.24
Owner Information
Previous Submission Information
Previously Filed Record of Site Condition Number:
Property Address
Previously Filed Transition Notice Number:
RSC Property
ESA Information
Owner Information
Site Condition Information
Other Site Condition Information
Site Conditions for 2011 Generic
Standards
Risk Assessment Information
Property Use and Certification
Date
Additional Ground Water
Information
Remedial Action and Mitigation
Details
Area(s) of Potential Environmental
Concern
Table of Current/Past Property Uses
of Phase One Property
ESA Information
Is the RSC being submitted using the transition provision under Section 21.1 of the Regulation?
Yes
No
*
Owner Information
Standards
Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards
Is Property:
(i) Within an area of natural significance? or
Does Property:
(ii) Include or is adjacent to an area of natural significance or part of such an area? or
(ii) Include land that is within 30 m of an area of natural significance or part of such an area.
Yes
Date
No
Information
Details
Soil at the property has:
(i) a pH value for Surface Soil less than 5 or greater than 9 or
(ii) a pH value for Subsurface Soil less than 5 or greater than 11.
*
*
Yes
No
Concern
ESA Information
Is qualified person of the opinion that, given the characteristics of the property and the certifications the
qualified person would be required to make in a record of site condition in relation to the property as specified
in Schedule A, it is appropriate to apply this section to the property? *
Yes
No
What is the intended use of the property? *
Community
Is the property a shallow soil property?
*
Yes
No
Does the property include or is the property adjacent to a water body or does it include land that is within
30 metres of a water body? *
Yes
No
What is the Assessment/Restoration approach?
*
Background
Full Depth Generic
Stratified
What is the ground water condition for the property?
*
Potable
Non-potable
What is the texture of the soil?
*
Coarse
Medium and Fine
Applicable 2011 Generic Standard Table Number : TABLE 3
Owner Information
Has a Certificate of Property Use (CPU) been issued under section 168.6 of the Act for the RSC property?
Yes
Standards
Date
Information
Details
Concern
ESA Information
No
Owner Information
Property Use and Certification Date
Current Property Use and Certification Date
What is the current use of the property? *
Commercial
Standards
Date
Information
Details
Concern
ESA Information
Certification Date *
2013/05/10
Owner Information
Standards
Data
Information
Details
Concern
ESA Information
Additional Ground Water Information
Has municipality been notified of non-potable ground water on site?
Yes
No
Municipality notified of non-potable water by?
*
Owner
QP
Local/Lower tier municipality non-potable water notification date *
2013/01/31
*
Owner Information
Remedial Action & Mitigation
Soil Control or Treatment Measures
Standards
Identify the estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have
been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the
soil as measured in, or equivalent to, in-ground volume in cubic metres, and indicate the remediation process or
processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.
Zero
Data
Information
Identify the estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC
property as measured in, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres.
Zero
Details
Concern
Identify the estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the
RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property not
including any soil that may have been remediated off the property and brought back to the property as measured
in, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres.
Zero
ESA Information
Indicate if any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the
RSC property boundary has been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation.
No soil, sediment or groundwater remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation.
Owner Information
Remedial Action & Mitigation
Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures
Standards
Identify and describe any ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property
prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing; or are or will be required for the
RSC property after the certification date.
None required
Data
Information
Identify the estimated volume in litres of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Zero
Details
Concern
ESA Information
Other Treatment Measures
Other than the activities identified in the in the Soil or Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures above,
identify any constructed works that, prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing,
were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the
RSC property; or after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement
of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
No works required to control or mitigate known existing contaminants
Indicate whether there are any monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or
replacement of any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC
property, after the certification date, and whether any monitoring requirements or requirements for care,
maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works are ground water management measures
or soil management measures.
No monitoring or control works required.
Owner Information
Potential Environmental Concern
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern
Are there areas of potential environmental concern? *
Yes
Standards
Data
Information
Details
Area(s) of Potential
Environmental Concern
Table of Current/Past Property
Use of Phase One Property
ESA Information
No
Click here for Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Form
Current and Past Property Use
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property
Click here for Table of Current and Past Property Use Form
Owner Information
Contaminants Measured in SOIL
Contaminants Measured in
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
General Information Related to Soil Media
Is there no soil on, in or under the property? *
(Note there is “no soil” if either there is no soil on, in or under the property OR the soil present is not sufficient
to investigate, sample and analyze in a manner which will meet the requirements and objectives
of a phase two environmental site assessment)
Yes
No
Owner Information
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Contaminant 1-30 *
Type of Measurement *
Antimony
Minimum Detectable
GROUND WATER
Arsenic
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
0.8
40
µg/g
Measured
4
18
µg/g
Barium
Measured
94
670
µg/g
Beryllium
Measured
0.6
8
µg/g
Boron (total)
Measured
13
120
µg/g
Boron (Hot Water Soluble)*
Measured
0.34
2
µg/g
Cadmium
Minimum Detectable
0.5
1.9
µg/g
Chromium Total
Measured
22
160
µg/g
Cobalt
Measured
9.6
80
µg/g
Copper
Measured
22
230
µg/g
Lead
Measured
18
120
µg/g
Mercury
Measured
0.02
3.9
µg/g
Molybdenum
Measured
0.8
40
µg/g
Nickel
Measured
20
270
µg/g
Selenium
Measured
0.4
5.5
µg/g
Silver
Minimum Detectable
0.2
40
µg/g
Thallium
Minimum Detectable
0.4
3.3
µg/g
Uranium
Measured
0.8
33
µg/g
Vanadium
Measured
31
86
µg/g
Chromium VI
Minimum Detectable
0.2
8
µg/g
Zinc
Measured
86
340
µg/g
Cyanide (CN-)
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.051
µg/g
Electrical Conductivity
Measured
0.675
1.4
mS/cm
Sodium Adsorption Ratio
Measured
2.6
12
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2-
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.087
µg/g
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
6.1
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.05
µg/g
Dichloroethane, 1,1-
Minimum Detectable
0.02
17
µg/g
Dichloroethylene, 1,1-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.064
µg/g
Total # of Contaminants 65
Owner Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 31-60 *
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.064
µg/g
GROUND WATER
Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
6.8
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.05
µg/g
SEDIMENTS
Dichloropropane, 1,2-
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.16
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
9.6
µg/g
Dichloropropene,1,3-
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.18
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.2
µg/g
Acetone
Minimum Detectable
0.50
16
µg/g
Benzene
Minimum Detectable
0.02
0.32
µg/g
Bromodichloromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
18
µg/g
Bromoform
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.61
µg/g
Carbon Tetrachloride
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.21
µg/g
Chlorobenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
2.4
µg/g
Chloroform
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.47
µg/g
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis-
Minimum Detectable
0.04
55
µg/g
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.02
16
µg/g
Ethylbenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
9.5
µg/g
Ethylene dibromide
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Hexane (n)
Minimum Detectable
0.05
46
µg/g
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Minimum Detectable
0.04
70
µg/g
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Minimum Detectable
0.05
31
µg/g
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
Minimum Detectable
0.5
11
µg/g
Methylene Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.50
1.6
µg/g
Styrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
34
µg/g
Tetrachloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
4.5
µg/g
Toluene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
68
µg/g
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
1.3
µg/g
Trichloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.91
µg/g
Trichlorofluoromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
4
µg/g
Vinyl Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.032
µg/g
ESA Information
Owner Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 61-90*
Xylene Mixture
Minimum Detectable
0.05
26
µg/g
GROUND WATER
Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1****
Minimum Detectable
5
55
µg/g
Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2
Measured
13
230
µg/g
SEDIMENTS
Measured
200
1700
µg/g
Measured
76
3300
µg/g
ESA Information
Owner Information
Contaminants Measured in Ground Water
Has ground water sampling been conducted at the property?
*
Yes
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
No
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground Water
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 1-30 *
Minimum Detectable
0.10
3.3
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.30
640
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.10
3.2
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.20
4.7
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.30
320
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.30
1.6
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.10
4600
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.20
1.6
µg/L
Dichloropropane, 1,2-
Minimum Detectable
0.20
16
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.10
9600
µg/L
Dichloropropene,1,3-
Minimum Detectable
0.30
5.2
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.10
8
µg/L
Acetone
Minimum Detectable
1.0
130000
µg/L
Benzene
Minimum Detectable
0.20
44
µg/L
Bromodichloromethane
Measured
0.82
85000
µg/L
Bromoform
Minimum Detectable
0.10
380
µg/L
Bromomethane
Minimum Detectable
0.20
5.6
µg/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
Minimum Detectable
0.20
0.79
µg/L
Chlorobenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.10
630
µg/L
Chloroform
Measured
1.8
2.4
µg/L
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis-
Minimum Detectable
0.20
1.6
µg/L
Dibromochloromethane
Measured
0.43
82000
µg/L
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.20
4400
µg/L
Ethylbenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.10
2300
µg/L
Ethylene dibromide
Minimum Detectable
0.10
0.25
µg/L
Hexane (n)
Minimum Detectable
0.20
51
µg/L
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Minimum Detectable
1.0
470000
µg/L
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Minimum Detectable
1.0
140000
µg/L
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
Minimum Detectable
0.20
190
µg/L
Methylene Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.30
610
µg/L
Owner Information
Contaminants Measured in Ground Water
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground Water
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 31-60 *
Styrene
Minimum Detectable
0.10
1300
µg/L
GROUND WATER
Tetrachloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.20
1.6
µg/L
Toluene
Minimum Detectable
0.20
18000
µg/L
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans-
Minimum Detectable
0.20
1.6
µg/L
Trichloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.20
1.6
µg/L
Trichlorofluoromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.40
2500
µg/L
Vinyl Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.17
0.5
µg/L
Xylene Mixture
Minimum Detectable
0.20
4200
µg/L
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Owner Information
Contaminants Measured in Sediments
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Has sediment sampling been conducted at the property?
Yes
No
*
Owner Information
Laboratory Information
Laboratory Name *
AGAT Laboratories
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Owner Information
ESA Information
ESA Reports
Phase One ESA Reports
The date the last work on the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance
components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done.
ESA Information
Phase Two ESA Reports
Phase One Reports and Other
Documents
Phase Two Reports and Other
Documents
2012/04/18
Type of Report *
Phase One ESA
*
Report Title *
Date of Report * Author of Report *
Name of Consulting
Organization
Phase One Environmental
2013/01/02
Site Assessment,
Douglas M.
Street
Fisher
'C'and
and
Coffey
Christopher
PartGeotechnics
of Street
Nielsen
'A',Inc.
16 Brookers
Owner Information
ESA Information
ESA Reports
The date the last work on the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site
investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done.
ESA Information
Documents
Documents
2013/05/10
Type of Report *
Phase Two ESA
*
Report Title *
Name of Consulting
Organization
Phase Two Environmental
2013/05/16
Site Assessment,
Douglas M.
Conveyance
Fisher and
Coffey
Lands,
Christopher
Geotechnics
StreetNielsen
'C' and
Inc. Part of Str
Owner Information
ESA Information
Reports and Other Documents
Phase 1 Reports and Other Documents
ESA Information
List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 1 ESA relied on in certifying
the information set out in Section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 1 ESA
Report Title *
Name of Consulting
Organization for Report
Geotechnical Investigation, Waterview Condominium
2005/01/26- PhaseFanyu
4 Building,
Zhu and
Lakeshore
Shabbir
Shaheen
Boulevard,
Bandukwala
& Peaker
Toronto,
Limited
Ontario
Environmental Soil and Groundwater Investigation,
2005/01/27
Waterview
Sergiy
Condominium
Tchernikov(Phase
and
Shaheen
W.4),David
Lakeshore
& Peaker
Lewis Boulevard
Limited West, Toronto,
Documents
2005/02/18- PhaseFanyu
5 Buildings,
Zhu andLakeshore
Shabbir
Shaheen
Bandukwala
Boulevard,
& Peaker
Toronto,
Limited
Ontario
Documents
2005/05/18
Waterview
Sergiy
Condominium
Tchernikov(Phase
and
Shaheen
W.5),David
Lakeshore
& Peaker
Lewis Boulevard
Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, Phase
2008/11/19
4 (FormerlyCharlene
2125, 2127,
Humphrey
2135, 2137
Shaheen
and Cynthia
and &
2139
Peaker
L. Robins
LakeLimited
Shore Boulevard West
Hydrogeologic Assessment, 2143 - 2147 Lake
2008/12/16
Shore Boulevard
Vic Nersesian
West, Toronto Construction Control Inc.
Remedial Action Plan Summary Report, Conveyance
2012/05/30Lands,Teresa
2123-2147
Weatherhead
Lakeshore
Coffey
and
Boulevard
Christopher
Geotechnics
West,
Nielsen
Toronto,
Inc.
Ontario
Owner Information
ESA Information
Reports and Other Documents
Phase 2 Reports and Other Documents
List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 2 ESA relied on in making
any certifications in the RSC in relation to the Phase 2 ESA or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 2 ESA
ESA Information
Report Title *
Name of Consulting
Organization for Report
2005/01/26- Phae Fanyu
4 Building,
Zhu and
Lakeshore
Shabbir
Shaheen
Boulevard,
Bandukwala
& Peaker
Toronto,
Limited
Ontario
2005/01/27
Waterview
Sergiy
Condominiium
Tchernikov(Phase
and
Shaheen
W.4),
David
Lakeshore
& Peaker
Lewis Boulevard
Limited West, Toronto
Documents
Geotechnical Investigation, Waterview Condominiuim
2005/02/18- Phase
Fanyu
5 Buildings,
Zhu andLakeshore
Shabbir
Shaheen
Bandukwala
Boulevard,
& Peaker
Toronto,
Limited
Ontario
Documents
2005/05/18
Waterview
Sergiy
Condominium
Tchernikov(Phase
and
Shaheen
W.5),David
Lakeshore
& Peaker
Lewis Boulevard
Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, Phase
2008/11/19
4 (FormerlyCharlene
2125, 2127,
Humphrey
2135, and
Shaheen
and 2139
Cynthia
&
Lake
Peaker
L. Shore
Robins
Limited
Boulevard West) & Ph
Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment,
2007/07/11 Proposed
Vic Nersesian
Development atConstruction
2143 & 2147Control
Lake Shore
Inc. Boulevard West,
Geotechnical Investigation for the Proposed2007/07/12
Residential Development
Michael Lam
at 2143-2147
and VicConstruction
Nersesian
Lake Shore
Control
Boulevard
Inc. West, Toronto, On
Hydrogeologic Assessment, 2143-2147 Lake
2008/12/16
Shore Boulevard
Vic West,
Nersesian
Toronto
Construction Control Inc.
Remedial Action Plan Summary Report, Conveyance
2012/05/30Lands Teresa
- 2123-2147
Weatherhead
Laskeshore
Coffey
and Boulevard
Christopher
Geotechnics
West,
Nielsen
Inc.
Toronto, Ontario
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment,
2013/01/02
Street 'C' and Part
Douglas
of Street
M. Fisher
'A', 16and
Coffey
Brookers
Christopher
Geotechnics
Lane,Nielsen
Toronto,
Inc. Ontario
Owner Information
QP Information
First Name *
Middle Name
Last Name *
Douglas
ESA Information
QP Information
Fisher
Which one of the following licences under
the Professional Engineers Act do you hold? *
None
Which one of the following memberships under
the Professional Geoscientists Act do you hold? *
Practising Member
0402
Is the QP Employed? *
Yes
No
Membership Number *
Employer Name *
Coffey Geotechnics Inc.
QP Contact Information
Phone Number *
Fax Number *
Email
(416) 213-1255
(416) 213-1260
doug.fisher@coffey.com
*
QP Mailing Address Information
Street Number *
20
Street Name *
Apt No. / RR No.
Meteor Drive
Province *
Postal Code *
Toronto
Ontario
M9W 1A4
Owner Information
QP Certification Statement D
As the qualified person, I certify that: *
ESA Information
A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information
gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has
been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as
required by the regulation.
A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the
information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required,
has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as
required by the regulation.
The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only
and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.
As of 2013/05/10, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental
site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling,
there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under
the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property
will be put, as specified in the RSC.
QP Certification Statement
Owner Certification Statement
Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the
supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition,
given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the
clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier
municipality in which the property is located.
As of 2013/05/10, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase
two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the
applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation
for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which
this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum
Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.
As of 2013/05/10, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant
in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been
performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to
Applicable Site Condition Standards.
I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.
I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.
I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site
condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains
a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own
due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information
in the Registry.
The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally
accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science
profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.
I do not hold and have not held
a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property
which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment
or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based
To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC
are true as of 2013/05/10.
By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.
I, the qualified person named below, on the date stated below, make all of the stated certifications applicable to
the qualified person in this Part of the record of site condition.
Douglas Fisher
2013/07/22
Owner Information
ESA Information
QP Certification Statement
Click here to download Firm, Corp, Other Form
Owner Information
Please note, only PDF attachments will be accepted with the exception of the
Property Specific Standard, which must be an Excel document.
Certificate of Status or equivalent *
CertofStatus.pdf
Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property *
ESA Information
LawyersLetter.pdf
Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) *
TransferDeed.pdf
A Current plan of Survey *
PlanofSurvey.pdf
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern *
APECTable.pdf
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property *
TableofCandPUses.pdf
Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model *
PhaseTwoCSM.pdf
Owner Certification Statement *
OwnerCerts.pdf
Request ID:
015538018
Demande n° :
Transaction ID: 51510913
Transaction n° :
Category ID:
CT
Catégorie :
Province of Ontario
Province de l'Ontario
Ministry of Government Services
Ministère des Services gouvernementaux
Date Report Produced: 2013/07/16
Document produit le :
Time Report Produced: 15:05:40
Imprimé à :
CERTIFICATE OF STATUS
ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE
This is to certify that according to the
records of the Ministry of Government
Services
D'après les dossiers du Ministère des
Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons
que la société
MONARCH WATERVIEW DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
Ontario Corporation Number
Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario)
001640414
is a corporation incorporated,
amalgamated or continued under
the laws of the Province of Ontario.
est une société constituée, prorogée ou née
d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la
Province de l'Ontario.
The corporation came into existence on
La société a été fondée le
NOVEMBER 25 NOVEMBRE, 2004
and has not been dissolved.
et n'est pas dissoute.
Dated
Fait le
JULY 16 JUILLET, 2013
Director
Directrice
The issuance of this certificate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services.
La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.
Phase One Property
Phase Two Property
RSC Property
“TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN"
(Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)
Area of Potential
Environmental Concern1
Location of Area of
Potential Environmental
Concern on Phase One
Property
APEC 1
Entire Phase One Property
Potentially
Contaminating
Activity2
Location of PCA
(on-site or off-site)
PCA 51: Storage
and use of solvents
Contaminants
of Potential
Concern3
Off-site
VOCs
Media Potentially
Impacted (Ground
water, soil and/or
sediment)
Groundwater
Notes:
1 - Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present, as determined through
the phase one environmental site assessment, including through,
(a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and
(b) identification of potentially contaminating activity.
2 - Potentially Contaminating Activity means a use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a phase one study area
3 - when completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the "Protocol for in the Assessment of Properties under Part
XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below:
PCBs
Metals
PAHs
THMs
As, Sb, Se
Na
Dioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs
VOCs
B-HWS
OCs
BTEX
Cl
high pH
PHCs
Ca, Mg
CN-
low pH
ABNs
CPs
1,4-Dioxane
Electrical Conductivity
SAR
Cr (VI)
Hg
Methyl Mercury
4 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached
**Cette publication hautement spécialisée n’est disponible qu’en anglais en vertu du règlement 671/92, qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur les
services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en francais, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère de l’Environnement au 1-800-461-6290
“TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY” (Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04) Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use Property Use1 Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans etc. Dec. 1873 – Jan. 1874 Jan. 1874 – July 1877 July 1877 – May 1880 May 1880 – July 1881 July 1881 – Jan. 1894 Jan. 1894 – June 1896 June 1896 – Nov. 1901 Oct. 1900 – Aug. 1919 Nov. 1901 – May 1947 Nov. 1901 – May 1947 July 1906 – April 1910 April 1910 – March 1925 Aug. 1919 – Jan. 1921 Jan. 1921 – April 1934 March 1925 – April 1943 April 1934 – Nov. 1947 April 1943 – Aug. 1985 May 1947 – Oct. 1952 Nov. 1947 – Oct. 1952 Oct. 1952 – Dec. 1953 Patrick G. Close Agriculture – Chain A Agriculture – Chain A Agriculture – Chain A Agriculture – Chain A Agriculture – Chain A Agriculture – Chain A1, A2 Agriculture – Chain A1, A2 Agriculture – Chain B Residential – Chain A1 Residential – Chain A2 Residential – Chain A3 Residential – Chain A3 Residential – Chain B Residential – Chain B Residential – Chain A3 Residential – Chain B Residential – Chain A3 Residential – Chain A1, A2 Residential – Chain B Residential – Chain B Agriculture or other use Agriculture or other use Agriculture or other use Agriculture or other use Agriculture or other use Agriculture or other use Agriculture or other use Agriculture or other use Residential
use Residential
use Residential
use Residential
use Residential
use Residential
use Residential
use Residential
use Residential
use Residential
use Residential
use Residential
use None
Motel – Chain A1, A2, B Commercial
use Dec. 1953 – March 1984 Robert Grant Patrick G. Close James E. Smith Patrick G. Close Benjamin H. Dixon Toronto General Trusts Co. George H. Boulton August Ramsperger August Ramsperger Sarah A. Simpson Caroline Johnstone Naomi Pattullo Thomas J. Pattullo Caroline M. Gray Naomi Pattullo Ruth E. White Murray G. Pattullo, Morden J. Pattullo Murray G. Pattullo, Morden J. Pattullo Leon Szelazek, A. Potapenko, Frank Szelazek Leon Szelazek 1899 Goad’s Atlas indicates large lots None
None
None
None
None
1903 Goad’s Atlas indicates large lots 1924 Goad’s Atlas shows narrow rectangular lots 1924 Goad’s Atlas shows narrow rectangular lots None
1924 Goad’s Atlas shows narrow rectangular lots None
1924 Goad’s Atlas shows narrow rectangular lots 1937 aerial photo indicates residential sized structure 1937 aerial photo indicates residential sized structure None
None
None
None
1954 aerial photo indicates motel like structure; 1962 FIP indicates motel March 1984 –Oct. 1986 Aug 1985 – May 1986 May 1986 – April 1987 Oct. 1986 – Jan. 2001 April 1987 – Nov. 1987 Nov. 1987 – Jan. 2001 Jan. 2001 – Present 547280 Ontario Ltd. Motel – Chain A1, A2, B E. Antonarakis, P. Residential ‐ Chain Antonarakis A3 Andrew R. Chorny Residential – Chain A3 Grenadier Gardens Motel – Chain A1, Ltd. A2, B Grenadier Gardens Motel – Chain A3
Ltd. (In Trust) 727577 Ontario Inc. Motel – Chain A3
Monarch Waterview Development Limited (formerly Water View Corporation) Commercial
use Residential
use Residential
use Commercial
use Commercial
use Commercial
use Vacant, then under Commercial
redevelopment as a use condominium None
None
None
None
None
None
2002 and 2005 photos shows site is vacant; 2009 photo indicates 16 Brookers Lane under construction Notes: 1 – for each owner, specify one of the following types of property uses (as defined in O.Reg. 153/04) that applies: Agriculture or other use Commercial use Community use Industrial use Institutional use Parkland use Residential use 2 – when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached Phase Two Conceptual Site Model – Street ‘C’ and Part of Street ‘A’, 16 Brookers Lane
The Phase Two Conceptual Site Model (CSM) has been prepared based on information and
data collected as of the certification date as part of Coffey’s Phase One ESA and Phase Two
ESA conducted at the Phase Two Property. The legal survey deposited as Plan 66R-26311
shows the outline of the Phase One Property and the legal survey deposited as Plan 66R26715 shows the location of Part 1 of Plan 66R-26715 which is excluded from the Phase Two
2
Property. This excluded portion covers an area of approximately 20 m .
Areas of Potential Environmental Concern
The Phase One ESA identified the following areas of Potential Environmental Concern:

The Ecolog ERIS report identified the presence of a generator of wastes, including
aliphatic solvents on the property located on the north side of Lake Shore Boulevard
West, opposite the subject site. These on wastes were generated by the current
occupant (Kraft Canada) or a former occupant (Christie Brown & Company) of the
facility located at 2150 Lake Shore Blvd. West.
The CSM is based on the results of 27 soil chemical results as well as the results of the
groundwater samples from three boreholes which were analyzed for VOCs. The analyses
included those which were identified as potential contaminants of concern in Coffey’s Phase
One ESA for the Phase Two property.
The CSM is also based on the following:

The Phase Two Property is assessed in comparison to the Full Depth Generic Site
Condition Standards for in a Non-Potable Ground Water Condition for residential,
parkland, institutional (RPI) property uses for coarse textured soil contained in Table 3
of the MOE publication “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under
Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act”, dated April 15, 2011.
The Phase Two Conceptual Site Model consists of this text and associated text and Drawings
as outlined below.
Phase Two/RSC Property
CSM Requirement
i.
Provide a description and assessment of,
A. areas where potentially
contaminating activity has occurred,
No potentially contaminating activity was identified to
have occurred on the Phase Two Property. Native soil
was encountered below the surficial fills for the pavement
structure and as such no indication of the presence of a
former landfill site within the Phase Two Property
boundary was identified. All areas of the subject site are
located to the west of the limits of Lake Ontario as shown
on Registered Plans 403 and 1176.
B. areas of potential environmental
concern, and
The Phase One ESA identified potential impacts to the
groundwater as a result of the current and/or former
presence of a generator of liquid wastes, including
aliphatic solvents located to the north of Lake Shore Blvd.
West, opposite the subject site.
Groundwater with
measureable concentrations of chloroform was previously
recorded in a former monitoring well at the location of a
high-rise building at 16 Brookers Lane and groundwater
with elevated concentrations of trichloroethylene was
reported in groundwater samples on the south adjacent
property.
C. any subsurface structures and
utilities on, in or under the phase two
property that may affect contaminant
distribution and transport,
ii.
Utility trenches for services located within Streets ‘A’ and
‘C’ may affect groundwater flow. The weeping system
(permanent de-watering) installed adjacent to the
foundations for the two adjacent high-rise buildings will
also affect groundwater flow.
a description of and, as appropriate, figures illustrating, the physical setting of the phase two
property and any areas under it including,
See Cross Sections – Drawings 5A and 5B
A. stratigraphy from ground surface to
the deepest aquifer or aquitard
investigated,
The site is covered asphalt pavement and granular fills
that extend to a depth of less than 1 m at the borehole
locations. These fills are underlain by native silts and
clayey silts that extend to a depth of approximately 5.3 m.
Below this, weathered shale was encountered.
B. hydrogeological characteristics,
including aquifers, aquitards and, in
each hydrostratigraphic unit where
one or more contaminants is present
at concentrations above the
applicable site condition standards,
lateral and vertical gradients,
Shallow groundwater flow towards the east (see Drawing
2). The lateral hydraulic gradient based on February 15,
2013 observations between BH701 and BH702 located
near the western and eastern ends of the site
respectively is 0.0237.
C. approximate depth to bedrock,
Bedrock encountered at a depth of between
approximately 3.5 (elev. 76.9 m) and 5.3 m (elev. 74.0 m)
below the surface.
D. approximate depth to water table,
Approximately 5.7 mbgs (elev. 78.1 m) to more than 12.3
mbgs (elev. 68.7 m) based on May 10, 2013 observations
E. any respect in which section 41 or
43.1 of the regulation applies to the
property,
iii.
The site is not within or adjacent to an area of natural
significance and is located more than 30 m from Lake
Ontario. The pH of the soil as measured in the samples
analyzed is between 5 and 9. Based on this Section 41
does not apply.
As the site is not considered to be a shallow soil property
and is more than 30 m from a water body, Section 43.1 of
the regulation does not apply to the Phase Two/RSC
Property.
F. areas where soil has been brought
from another property and placed
on, in or under the phase two
property, and
Granular fills are expected beneath asphalt covered
areas and within utility trenches.
G. approximate locations, if known, of
any proposed buildings and other
structures
No buildings are proposed for the Phase Two Property.
Buried utilities such as water and sewers are located on
the site.
where a contaminant is present on, in or under the phase two property at a concentration greater
than the applicable site condition standard, identification of,
A. each area where a contaminant is
All soil and groundwater samples analyzed from the
present on, in or under the phase
Phase Two Property met the 2011 MOE Table 3 RPI
two property at a concentration
Standards.
greater than the applicable site
2
condition standard,
B. the contaminants associated with
each of the areas referred to in
subparagraph A.
Standards.
C. each medium in which a
contaminant associated with an area
referred to in subparagraph is
present,
Standards.
D. a description and assessment of
what is known about each of the
areas referred to in subparagraph A,
E. the distribution, in each of the areas
referred to in subparagraph A, of
each contaminant present in the
area at a concentration greater than
the applicable site condition
standard, for each medium in which
the contaminant is present, together
with figures showing the distribution,
F. anything known about the reason for
the discharge of the contaminants
present on, in or under the phase
two property at a concentration
greater than the applicable site
condition standard into the natural
environment,
G. anything known about migration of
the contaminants present on, in or
under the phase two property at a
concentration greater than the
applicable site condition standard
away from any area of potential
environmental concern, including the
identification of any preferential
pathways,
H. Climatic or meteorological conditions
that may have influenced distribution
and migration of the contaminants,
such as temporal fluctuations in
ground water levels,
I.
If applicable, information concerning
soil vapour intrusion of the
contaminants into building,
No impacts identified.
No buildings on site at time of this report. Also, all soil
and groundwater samples analyzed met the 2011 MOE
Table 3 RPI Standards.
1. Relevant construction features of a
building, such as a basement or crawl
space
Not applicable, no buildings currently on site
2. Building heating, ventilating and air
conditioning design and operation, and
Not applicable, no buildings currently on site
3. Subsurface utilities,
iv. Where contaminants on, in or under
the phase two property are present
at concentrations greater than the
applicable site condition standard,
one or more cross-sections
showing:
3
A.
The lateral and vertical
distribution of a contaminant in
each area where the
contamination is present at
concentrations greater than the
applicable site condition
standard
B.
Approximate depth to the water
table
C.
Stratigraphy from the ground
surface
D.
Any subsurface structures and
utilities that may affect
contaminant distribution.
3.Subsurface utilities,
v. For each area where a contaminant
is present on, in or under the
property at a concentration greater
than the applicable site condition
standard for the contaminant, a
diagram identifying:
A. the release mechanisms
B. contaminant transport pathway
C. the human and ecological receptors
located on, in or under the phase
two property
D. receptor exposure points, and
E. routes of exposure.
Summary of Drawings
Drawing 1: Site Location
Drawing 1 shows the site and properties within the vicinity
Drawing 2: Borehole and
Monitoring Well Locations
Drawing 2 shows the locations of boreholes and monitoring
wells advanced on the Phase Two Property during this
Phase Two ESA as well as the locations of three boreholes
previously advanced on the Phase Two Property.
Drawing 3: Groundwater
Elevations – May 10, 2013
Drawing 3 shows the groundwater flow direction and
groundwater elevation contours.
Drawing 4: Subsurface Cross
Section Locations
Drawing 4 shows the locations of cross sections A-A and
1
B-B .
Drawing 5A and 5B: Cross
Sections
Drawing 5A and 5B shows the stratigraphy and depth of
groundwater.
Drawing 6: Human and
Ecological Receptors
Drawing 6 is a schematic diagram of a cross section of the
site.
1
Physical Setting
Fill material of unknown origin was historically used to infill Lake Ontario but at locations to the
east of the Phase Two Property. De-icing salts have likely been applied to the paved portion
of the Phase Two Property but as the site has not historically been used as a road and the
results of previous testing have indicated that electrical conductivity (EC) and sodium
adsorption ratio (SAR) values have met the applicable site condition Standards, significant EC
and/or SAR impacts are unlikely.
4
The natural groundwater levels and direction of groundwater flow appear to have been
influenced by construction dewatering taking place in the vicinity of the Phase Two Property.
Field Investigations
Two (2) boreholes (BH701 and BH703) for environmental purposes were advanced within the
Phase Two Property in January 2013 and groundwater monitoring wells were installed in both
boreholes. Subsequently, in April 2013 two additional boreholes (BH801 and BH802) with
monitoring wells were completed within the Phase Two Property.
The Phase Two Property is covered by asphalt and concrete pavements and underlain by
granular fills that at the borehole locations are less than 1 m deep (elev. 83.5 – 80.2 m). The
surficial fills are underlain by native soils consisting of silts and clays which extend to a depth
of between approximately 4.6 to 6.1 m (elev. 76.2 – 74.9 m) where they are underlain by
weathered shale. The shale was cored to a depth of 13.7 m (elev. 67.0 m).
Groundwater levels were recorded on several occasions between January and May 2013
using. Based on the measurements recorded on May 10, 2013, the groundwater encountered
in the onsite monitoring wells ranged from a depth of approximately 5.74 m below the ground
surface in BH701 to a depth of 12.3 m at BH802. This corresponds to an elevation of 78.13 m
and 68.67 m, respectively.
Coffey understands that weeping systems were installed at elevations of approximately 67.7
m at 16 Brookers Lane and at about 68.3 m at 2123 Lake Shore and that these weeping
systems are removing groundwater from the vicinity of the two buildings adjacent to the site.
The presence of a weeping system at the foundations of the adjacent buildings appears to be
impacting the groundwater elevation and flow direction within the Phase Two Property.
Based on the May 10, 2013 observations, the inferred direction of flow for the shallow
groundwater is along Street ‘A’ is towards the north (the dewatering system installed at 16
Brookers Lane) whereas groundwater flow along Street ‘C’ would be either in an easterly or
westerly direction towards the dewatering systems installed at 16 Brookers Lane and the east
contiguous construction site. In a previous investigation conducted in 2005, which was
completed prior to the construction activities at adjacent buildings, the groundwater flow
direction was interpreted to be towards the east in the direction of Lake Ontario.
Sanitary sewers and other utilities are located within the boundaries of the Phase Two
Property. Confirmatory samples collected by Coffey during the time of utility installation and
backfilling indicated that the material within the utility trenches met the applicable Standards.
Groundwater flow within the Phase Two Property would also be influenced by the presence of
the utility trenches.
Soil Results
The results of soil samples analyzed by Coffey from the Phase Two Property indicate that the
soil samples analyzed met the 2011 MOE Table 3 Standards for RPI property uses. This is
based on:
5

Two soil samples from the locations of borehole BH701 and BH702 which were
analyzed for metals and inorganic parameters.

Two soil samples from the locations of borehole BH701 and BH702 which were
analyzed for metals and hydride parameters.

One soil sample from borehole BH701 which was analyzed for volatile organic
parameters and petroleum hydrocarbons.

The results of 13 soil samples for metals and inorganic parameters analyzed at the
time of the utility installations in 2011 that indicated that each of the 13 samples
analyzed meet the 2011 MOE Table 3 RPI Standards.
Groundwater Results
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were identified in the Phase One ESA as potential
contaminants of concern on the Phase Two Property and the results of the groundwater
samples analyzed for VOCs at the three monitoring wells on the Phase Two Property where
groundwater was sampled indicated that the concentrations of VOCs in the groundwater
samples analyzed met the 2011 MOE Table 3 Standards for VOCs.
Contaminants of Concern
No contaminants of concern were identified on the Phase Two Property.
Release Mechanisms and Exposure Routes
As the concentrations of each of the soil and groundwater samples analyzed met the MOE
Table 3 Standards, a discussion of the release mechanisms, contaminant transport pathway,
human and ecological receptors, and routes of exposure is not required in accordance with
O.Reg. 153/04, as amended.
6
W
PR
EX
NE
SW
ES
T
ES
AY
R
DI
AR
G
Water's Edge, December 15, 1992
Limit of Lake Ontario as shown
on Registered Plan 1176
Phase Two Property
LAKE ONTARIO
(Conveyance Lands)
Limit of Lake Ontario as shown
on Registered Plan 403
0
20
40
60
80
100
METRES
LEGEND
Phase Two Property Boundary
Limit of Area 250m from Phase Two Property Boundary
Notes:
1. Drawing to be reviewed in conjunction with associated report.
2. Phase Two property boundary adapted from Reference Plan prepared by
R. AVIS SURVEYING INC., Registered Plan 66R-26311, deposited July 31, 2012 and
from Reference Plan prepared by R. AVIS SURVEYING INC., Registered Plan 66R-26715,
deposited April 2, 2013; limit of Lake Ontario as shown on Registered Plan 1176 and
Registered Plan 403, dates unknown.
3. Satellite image: c 2011 Google and c 2012 Digital Globe.
4. Bar scale applies only to Phase Two property boundary. All other features are not
necessarily to scale.
drawn
approved
DF/MV
CN
date
MAY 2013
scale
AS SHOWN
original
size
Tabloid
\\missfs01\data$\GEOT\ENVIRO\0 Projects\ENVSETOB 10000AA to ENVSETOB ---\0 - OLD Numbers with ENVS ETOB\05695AE - Ph One ESA, Remed Sum, Monarch Waterview\Street C and part Street A\2013 Phase Two\Drawing\05695AE_Ph Two ESA_D1-D5B_May_2013.dwg
client:
MONARCH CORPORATION
project:
title:
project no:
PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
CONVEYANCE LANDS, STREET 'C' AND PART OF STREET 'A'
16 BROOKERS LANE
TORONTO, ONTARIO
PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
SITE LOCATION
drawing no:
ENVSETOB05695AE
1
BRO
OKE
RS
58 Marine Parade Drive
LANE
C
O
N
D
O
M
I
N
I
U
M
16 Brookers Lane
(Existing Hi-Rise Condominiums)
er
Limit of Lake Ontario as shown on
Registered Plan 403
BH407
P H A S E
BH406
D
CB
MAR
INE
CB
STM
SAN
A
K
STM
L
BH801
R
CB
N
E
A
A
ter
DRIV
Wa
2123 Lake Shore Boulevard West
(Hi-Rise Condominium Under Construction)
DE
CB
S t
r e
e t
5
PARA
LAK
CB
BH802
STM
BH701
E
SHO
CB
BH703
RE
BOU
LEV
ARD
CB
Wat
4
Registered Plan 1176
P
WE
ST
S t
r e
e t
P H A S E
(Kraft Canada Inc.)
C
CB
CB
CB
(Former Hillcrest Motel
Demolished / Vacant)
Notes:
Registered Plan 403, dates unknown; proposed service connections adapted from drawings
prepared by MMM Group, dated March, 2008.
3. Bar scale applies only to Phase Two property boundary. All other features are
not necessarily to scale.
CB
0
10
15
20
25
METRES
LEGEND
BH801 Monitoring Well by Coffey, April 2013
BH701
Monitoring Well Location by Coffey, January 2013
BH406
Borehole by Coffey, 2005
BH407
Borehole with Former Monitoring Well by Coffey, 2005
Catch Basin
Man Hole
5
Fire Hydrant
Sanitary Sewer Line
Storm Sewer Line
Water Line
Adjoining and Neighbouring Property Boundary
drawn
approved
DF/MV
CN
date
MAY 2013
scale
AS SHOWN
original
size
Tabloid
client:
MONARCH CORPORATION
project:
title:
project no:
16 BROOKERS LANE
TORONTO, ONTARIO
BOREHOLE AND MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS
drawing no:
ENVSETOB05695AE
2
BRO
OKE
RS
LANE
O
N
D
O
M
I
N
I
U
M
m
tion
68.3
+_
C
Elev
a
S t
r e
e t
xima
te W
eepe
r
te W
eepe
r
16 Brookers Lane
< 73.65 m
LEV
ARD
Appr
oxim
a
Registered Plan 403
BOU
BH703
68.67 m
68.91 m
N
A
L
BH801
App
roxim
ate
Wee
per
Elev
ation
_
68.3
K
R
A
70
75 .0 m
.0
m
P
A
E
m
DRIV
S t
r e
e t
DE
eep
er E
leva
tion
67.7
+_
D
ate
W
PARA
78.13 m
BH802
App
roxim
5
INE
BH701
LAK
E
SHO
RE
P H A S E
MAR
WE
ST
4
Appr
o
P H A S E
(Kraft Canada Inc.)
Elev
ation
67
.7 +_
m
C
+_ m
Notes:
Registered Plan 403, dates unknown.
3. Bar scale applies only to Phase Two property boundary. All other features are
not necessarily to scale.
0
10
15
20
25
METRES
LEGEND
BH701
68.91 m Groundwater Elevation - May 10, 2013
Approximate Groundwater Elevation Isoline 75.00 m
May, 2013 (geodetic - m)
Inferred Pre-Construction Groundwater
Flow Direction (2005)
5
Inferred Groundwater Flow Direction with Dewatering
in Place at 2123 Lake Shore Boulevard West and
16 Brookers Lane (May 2013)
drawn
approved
DF/MV
CN
date
MAY 2013
scale
AS SHOWN
original
size
Tabloid
client:
MONARCH CORPORATION
project:
title:
project no:
16 BROOKERS LANE
TORONTO, ONTARIO
GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS - May 10, 2013
drawing no:
ENVSETOB05695AE
3
BRO
OKE
RS
LANE
C
O
N
D
O
M
I
N
I
U
M
CB
CB
Registered Plan 403
BH703
A
BH407
P H A S E
BH406
D
CB
B
BH705
STM
SAN
K
R
A
A'
CB
P
STM
A
DE
BH801
L
A
CB
N
E
DRIV
ate
r
PARA
CB
S t
r e
e t
W
INE
CB
5
MAR
LAK
BH802
STM
BH701
E
SHO
S t
r e
e t
er
WE
ST
LEV
ARD
4
RE
BOU
Wat
P H A S E
(Kraft Canada Inc.)
C
B'
CB
CB
CB
Notes:
Registered Plan 403, dates unknown; proposed service connections adapted from drawings
prepared by MMM Group, dated March, 2008.
3. See Drawing 5A - 5B for Cross Sections.
4. Bar scale applies only to Phase two property boundary. All other features are not
necessarily to scale.
CB
0
10
15
20
25
METRES
LEGEND
BH705
Borehole Location by Coffey, January 2013
BH701
BH406
BH407
Borehole with Former Monitoring Well by Coffey, 2005
Catch Basin
5
Man Hole
Fire Hydrant
A
Sanitary Sewer Line
Storm Sewer Line
Water Line
A'
Subsurface Cross Section (For Cross
Sections See Drawings 5A-5B)
drawn
approved
DF/MV
CN
date
MAY 2013
scale
AS SHOWN
original
size
Tabloid
client:
MONARCH CORPORATION
project:
title:
project no:
16 BROOKERS LANE
TORONTO, ONTARIO
SUBSURFACE CROSS SECTION LOCATIONS
drawing no:
ENVSETOB05695AE
4
LEGEND
BH705
BH701 Monitoring Well Location by Coffey, January 2013
BH406
BH407 Borehole with Former Monitoring Well by Coffey, 2005
Groundwater Elevation - Date
B-B'
Approximate Location of Cross Section
No Exceedance for Parameters Analyzed
Sand and Gravel / Asphalt
Native Soil
Shale / Bedrock
BH705
A
BH701
West
Notes:
2. Phase Two property boundary adapted from Reference Plan
prepared by R. AVIS SURVEYING INC., Registered Plan
66R-26311, deposited July 31, 2012.
3. Bar scale applies only to Phase Two property boundary. All other
features are not necessarily to scale.
drawn
approved
DF/MV
CN
date
MAY 2013
scale
AS SHOWN
original
size
Tabloid
client:
MONARCH CORPORATION
project:
title:
project no:
16 BROOKERS LANE
TORONTO, ONTARIO
CROSS SECTION A-A`
drawing no:
ENVSETOB05695AE
5A
BH703
LEGEND
BH705
BH701 Monitoring Well Location by Coffey, January 2013
BH406
Groundwater Elevation - Date
A-A'
Approximate Location of Cross Section
No Exceedance for Parameters Analyzed
Sand and Gravel / Asphalt
Native Soil
Shale / Bedrock
Notes:
2. Phase Two property boundary adapted from Reference Plan
prepared by R. AVIS SURVEYING INC., Registered Plan
66R-26311, deposited July 31, 2012.
3. Bar scale applies only to Phase Two property boundary. All other
features are not necessarily to scale.
drawn
approved
DF/MV
CN
date
MAY 2013
scale
AS SHOWN
original
size
Tabloid
client:
MONARCH CORPORATION
project:
title:
project no:
16 BROOKERS LANE
TORONTO, ONTARIO
CROSS SECTION B-B`
drawing no:
ENVSETOB05695AE
5B
Water Main
Sanitary Sewer
Sidewalk
Sidewalk
Granular / Fill
Granular / Fill
Approximate Utilities Trench
16 Brookers Lane
(Existing Hi-Rise Condominium)
Silts and Clay
Silts and Clay
Groundwater at
Top of Shale
Shale
Shale
Approximate Weeper Elevation 67.7 + m
LEGEND
drawn
Notes:
approved
DF/MV
CN
date
MAY 2013
scale
NTS
original
size
Tabloid
\\missfs01\data$\GEOT\ENVIRO\0 Projects\ENVSETOB 10000AA to ENVSETOB ---\0 - OLD Numbers with ENVS ETOB\05695AE - Ph One ESA, Remed Sum, Monarch Waterview\Street C and part Street A\2013 Phase Two\Drawing\05695AE_Ph Two ESA_D6_CSM_May_2013.dwg
client:
MONARCH CORPORATION
project:
title:
project no:
16 BROOKERS LANE
TORONTO, ONTARIO
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RECEPTORS
drawing no:
ENVSETOB05695AE
6

Record of Site Condition # 209366 Record of Site

Transcription

Similar documents

88TH RSC HOW TO GUIDE FOR DTS INVITATIONAL

GS GSPro GSElite - Arizona Wholesale Supply

and Print - RSC Custom Graphics

RSC Project Prospect

Record of Site Condition # 212289 Record of Site

Record of Site Condition # 213151 Record of Site

St Benedict`s Newsletter - St. Benedict`s Catholic High School

Technical Sheet - Microbes Biosciences

211988 - Ontario.ca

212610 - Ontario