Explosion Science - morechemistry.com
Transcription
Explosion Science - morechemistry.com
SAFe and Efficient hydrocarbon oxidation processes by KINetics and Explosion eXpertise and development of computational process engineering tools Project No. EVG1-CT-2002-00072 Workshop Saint Dénis La Plaine, November 2006 Explosion Science Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM) Kai Holtappels Working Group "Safety Related Properties of Gases" Division II.1 "Gases, Gas Plants" 1 Outline History, Trends and Challenges Beginning of explosion science Prevention of explosive atmospheres Ignition of explosive atmospheres Flame propagation in explosive atmospheres Protection against the consequences of flame propagation Final statement SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 2 Beginning of explosion science • The development of human culture is closely linked to the use and exploitation of fire by mankind. • Even today more than 90 % of the energy used comes from combustion processes (apparently decreased in recent decades). • A remarkably high degree of operational safety has been achieved over thousands of generations in using combustion processes. • Of course there is never 100 % safety. • We occasionally hear of accidental fires and explosions, of combustion processes running out of control, and of undesired processes that happen completely unexpectedly. • Even though their share of the total volume of combustion is generally very small, their local effects can be disastrous. • It is therefore truly worthwhile to ensure that such events are avoided. SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 3 Beginning of explosion science Mining disasters • The Oaks explosion, Barnsley, Yorkshire, (March 1847): 73 killed • Courrières mine disaster, Courrière, France, (March 1906): 1099 killed (Worst mine disaster in Europe) • Consol No. 9 Mine Mining Disaster, Farmington, West Virginia, USA (1968): 78 killed, 21 survivors (very gassy mine, 200.000 to 250.000 m3 CH4 per day:… a concrete cap was placed on both shafts….to reduce the amount of intake air…sustaining the mine fire…November 22 at 2:45 a.m. an explosion occurred….and blew the cap off the shaft opening. After the concrete cap blew off, both shafts were filled with limestone….) • Liaoning mine disaster, Fuxin, People's Republic of China (February 14, 2005): 210 killed • Sago Coal Mine Disaster, Tallmansville, West Virginia, USA (January 2, 2006): 12 killed, one survivor SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 4 Consol No. 9 Mine Mining Disaster (http://www.msha.gov/DISASTER/FARM/FARM1.asp) Explosion 5.30 am Flames after explosion (9.30 am) Concrete cap was blown away in a second explosion two days later (installed one day after explosion) SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 5 Beginning of explosion science SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 6 Beginning of explosion science Gas explosion disasters • New London School explosion, New London, Texas, USA (March 18, 1937): 300 killed (natural gas leak) • Cleveland East Ohio Gas explosion, Cleveland, Ohio (October 20, 1944): 130 killed, one square mile area destroyed (LPG vapour) Refinery in Feyzin, Isère, France (January 4, 1966): 18 killed (BLEVE) • Flixborough disaster, North Lincolnshire, England (June 1, 1974): 28 killed (cyclohexane oxidation) • San Juan Ixhuatepec explosion, México State, Mexico (November 19, 1984): 500 killed (LPG BLEVE), Petroleum storage facility • Piper Alpha explosion, North Sea, Scotland, (July 6, 1988): 167 killed (leakage of natural gas condensate) • Phillips Petroleum Co., Pasadena, Texas, USA (October 23, 1989): 23 killed (isobutane UVCE) • Guadalajara sewer explosion, Jalisco, Mexico (April 22, 1992): 296 killed (gasoline explosions in a sewer system) SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 7 Beginning of explosion science SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 8 Beginning of explosion science SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 9 Beginning of explosion science New water pipes, made of zinc-coated copper, were built too close to an existing steel gasoline pipeline. The underground humidity caused these metals to create an elctrolytic reaction, which eventually caused the metal to corrode, creating a hole in the pipelines that caused gasoline to leak into the ground and into the main sewer pipe. SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 10 Outline History, Trends and Challenges Beginning of explosion science Prevention of explosive atmospheres Ignition of explosive atmospheres Flame propagation in explosive atmospheres Protection against the consequences of flame propagation Final statement SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 11 Prevention of explosive atmospheres An explosion can take place only if a reaction can propagate in the mixture. For the evaluation of the flammability (explosibility) the following characteristics are used: • Explosion limits, • Other characteristics of explosion regions, • Temperature and pressure limits for instability, • Explosion point, • Flash point. SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 12 Explosion limits SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 13 Explosion limits First reported explosion limits of methane by Davy (1816, 100 cm3 narrow necked bottle, top ignition via candle flame): LEL = 6.2 (burning without explosion) LEL = 6.7 (diminished violence) UEL = 14.3 History of methane explosion limits SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 14 Explosion limits Flame propagation criterion according to EN 1839, method „T“ Flame detachment (ignition, height min. 100 mm) Presentation of Volkmar Schröder! Aureole (no ignition, except height of aureole is 240 mm) SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Explosionskriterium Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 15 Explosion limits fuel rich NH3/air mixture 14,7 mol-% NH3 in air SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 16 Explosion limits Newer aspects : Explosion limits of various fuels in N2O atmosphere (instead air) Æ follow-on project Fuel ammonia n-butane ethane ethylene carbon monoxide methane propane propylene hydrogen LEL (mol.-%) UEL (mol.-%) 4,4 (15,4) 0,7 (1,4) 1,3 (2,1) 1,4 (2,3) 9,5 (11,0) 1,5 (4,4) 0,7 (1,7) 0,8 (2,0) 2,9 (4,1) 65,0 (33,6) 27,0 (9,3) 33,0 (15,4) 40,5 (32,4) 86,0 (77,0) 45,9 (16,5) 27,0 (10,9) 29,5 (11,0) 82,5 (77,0) BAM-Annual report 1986 SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 17 Explosion limits Pressure-time histories of propane/N2O explosions Æ follow-on project 160 160 5,0 mol-% propane 2,0 mol-% propane 140 140 1,5 mol-% propane 1,0 mol-% propane 120 0,5 mol-% propane 100 pressure [bara] pressure [bara] 120 80 60 100 80 60 40 40 0,0 mol-% propane 20 20 0 0 0 0.5 1 time [s] 1.5 2 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 time [s] SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 18 Other characteristics of explosion regions Reducing the explosion range by inerting the gas system 0 100 10 90 MOC: maximum oxidizer content 20 80 MXC: maximum permissable 30 amount of combustible 70 40 IAR MAI: minimum required amount 60 of inert gas 50 fuel inert gas 50 IAR: minimum inert gas / air 60 [mol-%] [mol-%] (oxidizer) ratio 40 70 ICR: minimum inert gas / 30 combustible ratio 80 20 10 0 C explosion region 90 MAI 100 MOC 100 90 80 60 50 70 40 oxydizer [mol-%] MXC ICR 30 20 10 0 SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 19 Temperature and pressure limits for instability C2H2 decomposition reaction (1.5 bar, 20 °C, 500 f/s): pex = 11.7 bara 22 measured pstabat 293.15 K measured pstab at 373.15 K simulation: T0 = 293.15 K; TFG = 1454.39 K simulation: T0 = 373.15 K; TFG = 1458.96 K 19 pstab [bara] 16 Pressure limits of stability for C2H2/NH3 mixtures at 20 °C and 100 °C (measured and calculated) 13 10 7 4 1 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 C2H2 [mol-%] SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 20 Explosion point, Flash point Scheme of a flash point apparatus Correlation between explosion limits, explosion points and flash points: vapour pressure versus temperature 5 6 C 3 8 UEL molar amount vapor pressure D 2 1 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Sample (liquid phase) Sample (vapour phase) Ignition source Stirrer Thermometer reading the flashpoint Thermometer regulating the heater Thermostating device Lid e urv c e sur s e r pr o p B va A A lower explosion point LEL temperature flash point A = not explosive (to lean) C = not explosive (to rich) A upper explosion point B = explosive D = hybrid mixtures possible SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 21 Explosion point, Flash point The knowledge of the flash point may lead to a wrong safety impression due to possible reactions on liquid surface and in foams of bubbles (Hattwig, Stehen: "Handbook of Explosion Prevention and Protection") Æ Possible topic for follow-on Methanol at -20 °C (flash point at 1 bara: 9 °C, increases with initial pressure) and 5 bara O2 SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 22 Outline History, Trends and Challenges Beginning of explosion science Prevention of explosive atmospheres Ignition of explosive atmospheres Flame propagation in explosive atmospheres Protection against the consequences of flame propagation Final statement SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 23 Ignition of explosive atmospheres If an explosive mixture is present, the question arises whether it is ignitable by a certain ignition source or not. For the evaluation of the ignitability the following characteristics are used: • Minimum ignition energy, • Minimum ignition current, • Autoignition temperature. SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 24 Ignition of explosive atmospheres Examples of possible ignition sources SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 25 Ignition of explosive atmospheres Definition of the minimum ignition energy Presentation of Max Weiss! SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 26 Ignition of explosive atmospheres Typical blue flames at ethers: Ignition of an ether vapor air mixture on a hot surface (PTB) SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 27 Ignition of explosive atmospheres Determination of Autoignition Temperature according IEC 79-4 3 4 1 Ignition chamber (Erlenmeyer flask 200 ml) 2 Oven 3 Metering device 4 Mirror T1 1 T1 Thermocouple reading the auto ignition temperature T2 Thermocouple regulating the oven 2 T2 SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 28 Ignition of explosive atmospheres Ignition Temperature / °C Variation of autoignition temperature with C-chain length 700 700 Hydrocarbons 600 600 500 500 Alkoholes 400 400 300 300 200 200 100 100 Aldehydes 0 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 Length of C-chain Ignition process is strongly dependent on the reaction mechanism! Æ Presentations of John Griffith and Christian Liebner SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 29 Outline History, Trends and Challenges Beginning of explosion science Prevention of explosive atmospheres Ignition of explosive atmospheres Flame propagation in explosive atmospheres Protection against the consequences of flame propagation Final statement SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 30 Flame propagation in explosive atmospheres If a combustible mixture can be ignited, the question arises how the explosion can propagate under given conditions. The following characteristics describe the reaction propagation: •Detonation limits, •Propagation speed of deflagrations, •Maximum experimental safe gap. SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 31 Flame propagation in explosive atmospheres Explosion Deflagration Detonation Sf/SS 10-4 < Sf/SS < 3 * 10-2 5 < Sf/SS < 10 Sbehind/Sahead 4 < Sbehind/Sahead < 6 (acceleration) 0.4 < Sbehind/Sahead < 0.7 (delay) pbehind/pahead 0.98 (slight expansion) 13 < pbehind/pahead < 55 (compression) ρbehind/ρahead 0.06 < ρbehind/ρahead < 0.25 1.7 < ρbehind/ρahead < 2.6 Tbehind/Tahead 4 < Tbehind/Tahead < 16 (heating) 8 < Tbehind/Tahead < 21 (heating) SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 32 Flame propagation in explosive atmospheres 50-dm3 spherical autoclave designed for pressures up to 1.100 bar (investigation of detonations) SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 33 Flame propagation in explosive atmospheres 0 10 90 2 N 80 50 l. - m hio c i sto ere -%) d h ol. me 69 v for is up to ot so l.-% vo %] 70 ve ati n 60 eto f d ion o H2 ge plos 3 ran ex + CO 3 -> O2 5 1. range of + 6 H deflagrative explosion, 3 C ric 5 bar abs, 25 °C t e [Vo [Vo 40 70 O2 l. - % ] 30 50 60 80 (43 st oi ch io m et st ric oi ch C io 3H m 6 + et 4. ric 5 O C 2 3H > 6 + 3 CO 3 O 2 + 2 > 3 H 3 CO 2O + 3 H 2O 20 yellow range: possibly heat explosion Different explosion regimes (deflagration, heat explosion, detonation) 100 40 30 20 90 prope ne/air- mixtur 10 es 100 0 Presentation of Peter Schildberg! 0 10 20 30 SAFEKINEX - Project Partner 40 50 60 70 Propene C3H6 [Vol.-%] 80 Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany 90 100 Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 34 Flame propagation in explosive atmospheres Determination of MESG (maximum experimantel safe gap) according to IEC 79-1A 6 1 Inner explosion chamber (20 ccm) 2 Outer explosion chamber (2,5 l) 3 Gap 1 4 Window 3 4 2 5 Ignition source 6 Screw 5 SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 35 Flame propagation in explosive atmospheres Maximum Experimental Safe Gap maximum experimental safe gap (mm) 3,5 Alkane Alkene Alkyne Hydrogen Ammonia Carbondisulfid 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0 0 1 2 number of C atoms 3 4 SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 36 Outline History, Trends and Challenges Beginning of explosion science Prevention of explosive atmospheres Ignition of explosive atmospheres Flame propagation in explosive atmospheres Protection against the consequences of flame propagation Final statement SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 37 Protection against the consequences of flame propagation If an explosion propagates the question arises how its effects can be estimated. For the evaluation of the effects of an explosion, the following characteristics are used: •Explosion pressure and maximum explosion pressure, •Pressure rise and maximum rate of pressure rise, "KG-value", •Pressure effects during detonations. SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 38 Protection against the consequences of flame propagation Explosion pressure ratios for hydrogen/oxygen and hydrogen/air mixtures (measured and calculated) 11,0 10,0 9,0 8,0 pex/pi [-] 7,0 6,0 5,0 4,0 BAM 6.0-dm^3 H2/air 3,0 BAM 6.0-dm^3 H2/O2 2,0 calculation H2/air 1,0 calculation H2/O2 0,0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 H2 [mol-%] SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 39 Protection against the consequences of flame propagation KG-values for hydrogen/oxygen and hydrogen/air mixtures (measured and calculated) 4500 BAM 6.0-dm^3 H2/air 4000 BAM 6.0-dm^3 H2/O2 3500 KG [bar m/s] 3000 Presentation of P. Schildberg and K. Holtappels! 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 H2 [mol-%] SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 40 Protection against the consequences of flame propagation Examples of constructional measures SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 41 Protection against the consequences of flame propagation Pressure venting: C3H8/N2/air at 1 bara (rupture foil opened at 20 mbar overpressure) SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 42 Outline History, Trends and Challenges Beginning of explosion science Prevention of explosive atmospheres Ignition of explosive atmospheres Flame propagation in explosive atmospheres Protection against the consequences of flame propagation Final statement SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 43 Final statement SAFETY KINETICS (gas phase) E x p C1-C3 CVB: C4-C10 LEL aromats UEL (benzene, Pmax toluene, (dP/dt)max o-xylene) MIE Explosion modelling eriments (gas phase) CVB,RCM, ST: Detailed kinetic IDT AIT CFT ISC modelling C1-C3; C4-C10 aromats Validation / Reduction Many aspects (trends, challenges…) have been combined in Data base the SAFEKINEX-project. Reactive flow +Prediction Comp.Fluid Dynamics Flow Explosion Tests of explosion indices Industrial Application Process safety, Engineering, Process control SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 44 Final statement Important trends and challenges not presented: • vapour cloud explosions and their consequences • quantitative risk assessment of explosion hazards • Security (terrorism) • modeling (reactive flows in closed/confined/open spaces, safety characteristics, kinetics) SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 45 Final statement … The way we blind ourselves to honest assessment of risk goes back a long way. … … As individuals, we may learn from close shaves and warnings; as a society, we only learn from blood. … Risk Management and Technology by Roy Brander, Calgary, Alberta Presentation to the National Defense Industrial Association Conference, Vancouver, 29 February 2000 SAFEKINEX - Project Partner Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Berlin, Germany Kai Holtappels Workshop, Explosion Science 46 Thank you very much for your attention. If there are any questions left don`t hesitate to ask me.