the culture of neglect in a shadow of japanese appocalypse
Transcription
the culture of neglect in a shadow of japanese appocalypse
Styblińska M. (2012). The culture of neglect in a shadow of Japanese appocalypse – some concerns on Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission one year since the disaster. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). GIS for Geoscientists. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 170-180. THE CULTURE OF NEGLECT IN A SHADOW OF JAPANESE APPOCALYPSE - SOME CONCERNS ON FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION COMMISSION ONE YEAR SINCE THE DISASTER Maria Styblińska Institute of Computer Science, University of Silesia, Poland ul. Będzińska 39, 41-200 Sosnowiec e-mail: maria.styblinska@us.edu.pl 0048 32 36 89 716 Abstract The Great East Japan Earthquake off the Pacific March11, 2011 coast of Tohoku Earthquake changed our thinking about the safe nuclear energy and nuclear power plants and opened the doubts and threatens. After the year since that tragic disaster The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission publised it’s report. They said the nuclear crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant in Japan was a "man-made disaster" or “Japan made” that unfolded as a result of collusion between the facility's operator, regulators and the government, an independent panel said in an unusually frank report. Also the report mentioned about the culture of neglictans which seems to be characteristic for Japan. The paper considers the report and some other problems increased cause of earthquake and tsunami damaged of nuclear reactors in Fukushima Daiichi. The Fukushima radiation leak is a soft-kill operation against the people and ecosystem. The results have the apocalyptic dimensions and unforeseen consequences for the global life. Key words: natural disasters, technological disasters, cultre of neglect, radioactive hazards, ethical dilemmas, Japan’s Commission Report, Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission Introduction – One Year Since the Japanise Appocalypse Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission The 2011 earthquake off the Pacific coast of Tōhoku (Tōhoku-chihō Taiheiyō Oki Jishin was a magnitude 9.0 (Mw) undersea mega thrust earthquake off the coast of Japan that occurred on 11 of March 2011, with the epicenter approximately 70 kilometers (43 mi) east of the Oshika Peninsula of Tōhoku and the hypocenter at an underwater depth of approximately 32 km (20 mi), was the most powerful known earthquake ever to have hit Japan, and one of the five most powerful earthquakes in the world since modern record-keeping began in 1900. The earthquake triggered powerful tsunami waves that reached heights of up to 40.5 meters (133 ft) and which travelled up to 10 km (6 mi) inland (1). The tsunami caused a number of nuclear accidents, primarily the ongoing level 7 meltdowns at three reactors in the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant complex, (at least four) and the associated evacuation zones affecting hundreds of thousands of residents. Many electrical generators were taken down, and at least three nuclear reactors suffered explosions due to hydrogen gas that had built up within their outer containment buildings after cooling system failure. Residents within a 20 km (12 mi) radius of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant and a 10 km (6.2 mi) radius of the Fukushima Daini Nuclear Power Plant were evacuated. The Great East Japan Earthquake off the Pacific coast was the most powerful known earthquake to have hit Japan, and one of the five most powerful earthquakes in the world overall since modern record-keeping began in 1900 (2). 170 Styblińska M. (2012). The culture of neglect in a shadow of Japanese appocalypse – some concerns on Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission one year since the disaster. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). GIS for Geoscientists. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 170-180. The world`s worst nuclear disaster in a quarter center could have been avoided: that is according to a new Japanese investigation. The tsunami that hit Japan in 2011 killed more than 15,000 people; the cooling system at one of the Fukushima Daiichi reactors failed, the ensuing fallout was categorized as bad as Chernobyl. And it saw 200,000 people being forced to evacuate. The estimated clean-up costs anything up to 250 billion US dollars (8). After the year since the beginning of the Japan’s Appocalypse was published the report by the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission, which outlines errors and willful negligence at the plant before the earthquake and tsunami that devastated swaths of northeastern Japan on March 11, 2011 and a flawed response in the hours, days and weeks that followed. Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Was “Man-Made” or “Made in Japan” The nuclear crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant in Japan was a "man-made disaster" that unfolded as a result of collusion between the facility's operator, regulators and the government, an independent panel said in an unusually frank report of FNAIIC. Photo 1. Japanese parliament report: Fukushima nuclear crisis was ‘man-made'. Source: CNN News, http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/1207 05015538-plant-journalist-story-top.jpg The 641-page report, based on more 900 hours of interviews with 1,167 people, found that the nuclear power plant was already in vulnerable conditions before the earthquake and tsunami hit. The commission suggested that the reactors may have been damaged by the 9.0-magnitude quake, contrary to previous claims that the disaster was the result of the tsunami. The crippled Fukushima Daiichi plant spewed radiation and displaced tens of thousands of residents from the surrounding area in the worst nuclear accident since the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine (7). Commissioned by the national parliament, the panel's report tellingly blames Japanese culture for the fundamental causes of the disaster. As well as detailing the specific failings related to the accident, the report describes a Japan in which nuclear power became "an unstoppable force, immune to scrutiny by civil society … Its regulation was entrusted to the same government bureaucracy responsible for its promotion", the commission reported (32). Contradicting claims by Tokyo Electric Power Corporation TEPCO, the operator of the plant, the report said that "the direct causes of the accident were all foreseeable prior to March 11, 2011" The operator, regulators and the government "failed to correctly develop the most basic safety requirements - such as assessing the probability of damage, preparing for containing collateral damage from such a disaster, and developing evacuation plans," the commission said. Fukushima plant operator: We weren't prepared for nuclear accident. Tokyo Electric Power Company is the fourth largest electric power company in the world and the largest from Asia. TEPCO has one-third of the Japanese electric market and is the largest of the 10 electric utilities in Japan. Therefore, TEPCO is really a state-endorsed monopoly that has a great deal of control over the Japanese government and political puppets the world-over. Considering profits and public harm it is clear that the leadership of TEPCO, the owner and operator of the Fukushima nuclear facility, cares more about preserving its income-generating assets than killing its workers and others from radioactive fallout. 171 Styblińska M. (2012). The culture of neglect in a shadow of Japanese appocalypse – some concerns on Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission one year since the disaster. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). GIS for Geoscientists. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 170-180. Following the quake and tsunami, the lack of training and knowledge of the TEPCO workers at the facility reduced the effectiveness of the response to the situation at a critical time, according to the report. As the crisis escalated, TEPCO, the regulators, government agencies and the prime minister's office were ineffective in "preventing or limiting the consequential damage" at Fukushima Daiichi, the commission said. The report's authors, leding by Kiyoshi Kurokawa, a former president of the Science Council of Japan, a medical doctor and professor emeritus at Tokyo University, said the crisis was the result of "a multitude of errors and willful negligence", by the government, safety officials and the plant's operator, Tokyo Electric Power and attributed the failings at the plant before and after March 11, specifically to Japanese culture. Photo2. A satellite image of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant suffered a meltdown after the Japanese tsunami. Source: http://static.guim.co.uk/sysimages/guardian/Pix/pictures/2011/3/16/130028115834 5/A-satellite-image-of-Fuku-007.jpg Photo 3. Fucushima Daiichi after disaster, Utility Week. Source: http://www.utilityweek.co.uk/news/ images/197121.jpg Cultural traits of Japan at heart of Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Report preface states that conventions such as insularity and a reluctance to question authority were partly to blame for the disaster. Misplaced deference and other "ingrained conventions" of Japanese culture were at the heart of meltdown at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, according to the chairman of an independent panel, described the accident as a "profoundly man-made disaster" (20). According to Kurokawa, behind the safety missteps and lack of readiness for a tsunami in a region known for powerful earthquakes are cultural traits that ensured the disaster was "made in Japan" (17). "Its fundamental causes are to be found in the ingrained conventions of Japanese culture: our reflexive obedience; our reluctance to question authority; our devotion to 'sticking with the program'; our groupism; and our insularity…"What must be admitted – very painfully – is that this was a disaster 'Made in Japan'…Its fundamental causes are to be found in the ingrained conventions of Japanese culture: our reflexive obedience; our reluctance to question authority; our devotion to 'sticking with the program.'”. The commission believes that the root causes were the organizational and regulatory systems that supported faulty rationales for decisions and actions, rather than issues relating to the competency of any specific individual. Across the board, the commission found ignorance and arrogance unforgivable for anyone or any organization that deals with nuclear power. “We found a disregard for global trends and a disregard for public safety" claimed Kurokawa. The report was published on the same day a nuclear reactor in western Japan became the first to produce electricity since the accident. All of the country's 50 functioning reactors had been switched off after the crisis to undergo safety checks. Japan, which once depended on nuclear power for about a third of its energy supply, was briefly without atomic power for the first time in more than 40 years. Contrary the report contrasts with a similar investigation by TEPCO in which the utility insisted it had acted appropriately in the wake of a natural disaster it claimed it could never have predicted. The organization has always maintained that the damage to four of Fukushima Daiichi's reactors was caused by the tsunami, which knocked out cooling apparatus and prompted a core meltdown in three of the units. TEPCO was 172 Styblińska M. (2012). The culture of neglect in a shadow of Japanese appocalypse – some concerns on Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission one year since the disaster. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). GIS for Geoscientists. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 170-180. ignoring warnings going as far back as 2006 that a tsunami could cause a blackout at the plant. Since 2006, the regulators and Corporation were aware of the risk that a total outage of electricity at the Fukushima Daiichi plant might occur if a tsunami were to reach the level of the site. However the greatest criticism is directed at “a culture in Japan that suppresses dissent and outside opinion” (24). The chairman of the commission, Kiyoshi Kurokawa, lay fault with Japanese cultural traditions, criticizing, “our reflexive obedience” and “our reluctance to question authority.” Japan's atomic accident was due to human error, negligence, and a culture of "reflexive obedience" (13). Picture 1. Japanese Flag Meltdown Radiation. Source: http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/dir/radiation/JapaneseFlag-Meltdown-Radiation.jpg Listing a "multitude of failures and willful negligence" from equipment shortcomings, to confusion in the chain of command and a catalogue of failings in managing the public evacuation, the report authors declined to lay blame on any individual. Instead, they said the "catastrophic" negligence was also a consequence of the Japanese mindset. The report said that "replacing people or changing the names of institutions will not solve the problems". Without a fundamental restructuring of the industry and a change of mindset "preventive measures against future similar accidents will never be complete" (11). Report preface states that conventions such as insularity and a reluctance to question authority were partly to blame for incident (17). Misplaced deference and other "ingrained conventions" of Japanese culture were at the heart of last year's meltdown at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Japanese Parliamentary Report Blames Japanese Culture for Disaster As it was written the report takes aim at the heart of Japanese culture saying that "a cultural aversion to questioning authority" caused the nuclear disaster (14). The commission that wrote the report says there were errors and negligence before the disaster, which were compounded by all the mistakes in handling the aftermath. The report is shocking because it flat out blames Japanese cultural norms, such as obedience to authority and groupism, for the failure to challenge superiors' bad decisions, secrecy and negligence that were the hallmark of the handling of the disaster. The report has shocked Japanese citizens, some of whom feel they are being blamed for what happened (17). Today, a damning independent report did not blame individuals for the Fukushima meltdown; it had blamed an entire culture. The Fukushima nuclear disaster was caused not just by the 9.0 earthquake or the massive tsunami that followed, but also by a cultural aversion to questioning authority. According to the findings of an independent commission set up by the Japanese parliament it was man-made. That view is shared by others. Sounds like they`re saying the people in charge of the crisis were not wrong, but that all Japanese are to blame. We might not be able to deny that Japanese culture, which is usually positive, worked negatively in the crisis. This is not for understanding that the culture was singled out as the cause of the accident, because it`s not the only cause. The main thrust of the report is still a blistering criticism of the collusion between the government and the utilities. However, in all fairness it also 173 Styblińska M. (2012). The culture of neglect in a shadow of Japanese appocalypse – some concerns on Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission one year since the disaster. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). GIS for Geoscientists. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 170-180. singles out the defect in the Japanese cultural character. This is a leftover from Confucianism, this idea that Japan citizens deference to their authorities (23). The casus of Japan it is that things getting be changed and a paradigm shifted. Before Fukushima people would simply say the government knows best, the government will always protect us. Now it`s coming out, the government officials were secretly evacuating their own relatives. Told the people: “Don`t worry. Everything is OK”. It means a bunch of hypocrites. It why now the Japanese people are beginning to thinking that perhaps there is room for change, if only they dare to reach out and grab it. From the other site it is worthy to point out that Japan sits on top of four tectonic plates (Moret L.), at the edge of the subduction zone, and is one of the most tectonically active regions in the world. Many of Japan's nuclear reactors were negligently sited on active faults, where major earthquakes of magnitude 7-8 or more on the Richter scale frequently occur. On average, a major earthquake occurs in Japan at least once in a ten-year period. It is not a question of whether or not a nuclear disaster will occur in Japan; it is a question of when it will occur (25). Picture 2. A map of Japan annotated by Leuren Moret, showing the tectonic plates, areas of high ("observed region") and very high ("specially observed") quake risk, and the sites of nuclear reactors, Japan 2004. Source: (Moret, 25), http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/fl20040523x2.ht ml#.T_xmyZE8CSo Like the former Soviet Union after Chernobyl, Japan will become a country suffering from radiation sickness destroying future generations, and widespread contamination of agricultural areas will ensure a public-health disaster. Its economy may never recover. Some authors predicted problems of cooling Japan’s nuclear reactors in the event of an earthquake (19): "...there is an extreme danger of an earthquake causing a loss of water coolant in the pools where spent fuel rods are kept. As reported last year in the journal Science and Global Security, based on a 2001 study by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, if the heat-removing function of those pools is seriously compromised -- by, for example, the water in them draining out -- and the fuel rods heat up enough to combust, the radiation inside them will then be released into the atmosphere." The article mention above (Moret, 25) is noted that during a nuclear disaster, power plant workers (such as the Fukushima 50 people), as well as emergency-response personnel would be exposed to lethal radiation. Japan also lacked plans to evacuate millions of people in such event. Prior the March 11th Fukushima meltdown, numerous whistle-blowers who publicly spoke-out about the danger of Japan’s nuclear power plants were ignored and/or fired. Thirty five years ago, Dale G. Bridenbaugh and two of his colleagues at General Electric, who designed the Fukushima reactors, resigned from their jobs after becoming convinced that the nuclear reactor design for the Mark 1 was flawed and could lead to a devastating accident. Bridenbaugh said that "the problems we identified in 1975 were that, in doing the design of the containment, they did not take into account the dynamic loads that could be experienced with a loss of 174 Styblińska M. (2012). The culture of neglect in a shadow of Japanese appocalypse – some concerns on Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission one year since the disaster. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). GIS for Geoscientists. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 170-180. coolant . . . The impact loads the containment would receive by this very rapid release of energy could tear the containment apart and create an uncontrolled release." (22). Shortcoming of information and transparent program of decontamination and relocation The report called for measures tackling public health and welfare issues, including the establishment of a system "to deal with long-term public health effects," monitoring "hot spots" and "the spread of radioactive contamination." It called for starting "a detailed and transparent program of decontamination and relocation." The earthquake and tsunami killed more than 15,000 people in northeastern Japan. The Fukushima nuclear accident of March 2011 was a “Made in Japan” disaster caused by human error and negligence, a Japanese parliamentary commission concluded in a report released by the commision (31). The Fukushima radiation was polluting air, drinking water, and food supply. Millions of gallons of radioactive water have been released from the facility into the ocean, which could devastate marine life. Can the radiation permanently alter our DNA, or that of plants and animals? Scores of experts and analysts have feared for months that it would happen, and now it has: Radiation from the heavily damaged nuclear power plants at Japan's Fukushima complex has made it into the seafood chain off the coast of America (13). Recent headlines focusing on results of the Fukushima Disaster with increasing problems almost every day include as examples below: • Radioactive buckyballs from Fukushima invade California beaches – 17.6.2012- from Japan's tsunami-damaged nuclear reactors at its Fukushima complex continues to worsen, scientists are concerned about another related phenomenon – buckyballs that appears the U.S. West Coast; • The next catastrophic nuclear reactor core meltdown is much more likely than you suspect – 1.6.2012 - new research shows that the probability for more such disasters is much higher than previously believed, much higher as in Charnobyl; • Fukushima radiation now detected in the U.S. food supply – 30.5.2012 - Scores of experts and analysts have feared for months that it would happen, and now it has: Radiation from the heavily damaged nuclear power plants at Japan's Fukushima complex has made it into the seafood chain off the coast of America - amounts of radioactive cesium-137 and cesium-134. • Tokyo soil so contaminated with radiation it would be considered nuclear waste in US – 24.5.2012 - Radioactive fallout from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster continues to show up at dangerously high levels in the city of Tokyo, which is located roughly 200 miles from the actual disaster site. • Plume-gate: Secret documents prove global cover-up of continued Fukushima radiation pollution – 12.5.2012 - A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by Friends of the Earth (FoE), Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR), and the Nuclear Information and Resource Center (NIRS) has unearthed a shocking series of new evidence proving a deliberate, global cover-up of the true severity of the Fukushima (18). • Fukushima haunts the world – 11.5.2012 - It does seem that Japan is in the process of contaminating the entire Pacific Ocean via continued uncontrolled. • Fukushima radiation detected 400 miles away in Pacific Ocean at levels 1,000 times higher than previous readings – 25.5.2012 - The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster is far from over, as new reports explains that water samples taken nearly 400 miles off the coast of Japan in the Pacific Ocean are showing radiation levels of up to 1,000 times higher than previous readings. Presenting their findings at the recent Ocean Sciences. • Fukushima radiation may be killing off Alaskan ringed seals and other arctic mammals 13.2.2012 - For many months now, Alaskan ringed seals, Pacific walruses, and various other arctic mammals have reportedly been turning up with a mystery disease that manifests itself in the form of oozing skin sores, patchy hair loss, and damaged organs, according to the Alaska Dispatch. 175 Styblińska M. (2012). The culture of neglect in a shadow of Japanese appocalypse – some concerns on Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission one year since the disaster. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). GIS for Geoscientists. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 170-180. • Death Estimates (5): the numbers, from reputable scientists, are that Fukushima is going to kill 200,000 from increased cancers over the next 50 years. Likewise, states that 400,000 people will develop cancer within a 200 kilometer radius of Fukushima (8). It is most required that TEPCO and the Japanese government were criminally negligent for failing to inform the public of the true danger. Public Nuisance According to the “a public nuisance occurs when somebody unreasonably interferes with a right common to the general public, or does something that endangers or causes great injury to life, health or property.”(6). The Attorney General’s website focuses on the fake Club of Rome created nuisance of man-made global warming rather than prosecuting TEPCO for the nuisance of radiating world’s citizens. Fukushima radiation has arrived, for ex. in California and across the United States, with San Francisco tap water radiation 18,100% above the drinking water limit. Any involvement of HAARP Program in the Disaster Background? The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) (15) is an ionospheric research program jointly funded by the US Air Force, the US Navy, the University of Alaska and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) (9). Its purpose is to analyze the ionosphere and investigate the potential for developing ionospheric enhancement technology for radio communications and surveillance purposes. Therefore, given the nature of the New World Order globalists, there is definitely a possibility that the Japan earthquake and nuclear crisis resulted from tectonic warfare. Photo 4. & 5. The main side of HAARP and unusual aurora http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/images/hpimage.jpg The Japan earthquake, regarding to some independent scientists (Moret, 25) might be triggered by a HAARP aerosol/chemtrails plasma weapon (27). These hypotheses are supported by the research of one of the world’s foremost experts on the global covert spraying of aerosols (chemtrails) (Cornicom, 32). Carnicom and Moret know that covert aerosol-spraying operations have transformed the Earth’s atmosphere into plasma for carrying out weaponized applications such as tectonic (earthquake) warfare. Additionally, there is substantial evidence that HAARP was active before and during the March 11th earthquake. HAARP on April 7th, a 7.4 earthquake aftershock struck 25 miles of the Japanese coast. During the quake, there was a strange blue light show, which has been referred 176 Styblińska M. (2012). The culture of neglect in a shadow of Japanese appocalypse – some concerns on Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission one year since the disaster. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). GIS for Geoscientists. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 170-180. to as an “earthquake light.” These lights might caused by HAARP or a similar program tampering with the ionosphere. Based on NASA, a possible explanation for earthquake lights is local disruption of the Earth's magnetic field and/or ionosphere in the region of tectonic stress, resulting in the observed glow effects either from ionospheric radiative recombination at lower altitudes and greater atmospheric pressure or as aurora, what was achieved by HAARP evidently. Could be the Fukushima Disaster a “nuclear war without a war”? Picture 3. Japan, Fukushima Nuclear Radiation Disaster. Source: NaturalNews, http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/dir/Radiation/Fukus hima-Japan-Nuclear-Radiation-Disaster.jpg More the one year ago (March, 11, 2012) the massive 9.0-plus magnitude earthquake and corresponding tsunami devastated the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant on the eastern coast of Japan, sending untold amounts of nuclear radiation into the environment. The threat of nuclear fallout is ever-present all around the world in what some have described as a "nuclear war without a war." Though the devastation was not delivered in one fellswoop via an atomic or nuclear bomb (NUCK). Radioactive elements from Fukushima continue to be quietly delivered through air and ocean currents to soils, oceans, flora & fauna in any shape, drinking water supplies, farms, lawns, children's playgrounds, airplanes and countless many other sources. Products made with elements and materials that have been contaminated with radiation, particularly in Japan, are exposing untold thousands or millions, of people to dangerous levels of nuclear radiation (17). Picture 4. Contaminated Ocean. Source: NaruralNews, http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/dir/Nature/BPAContaminated-Ocean.jpg Picture 5. The Fukushima radiation is detected in the U.S. food supply. Source: NaturalNews, http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/dir/Radiatio n/Radiation-in-food.jpg "Hazardous radioactive elements being released in the sea and air around Fukushima accumulate at each step of various food chains (for example: into algae, crustaceans, small fish, bigger fish, then humans; or soil, grass, cow's meat and milk, then humans)," writes Helen Caldicott in her piece, Fukushima: Nuclear Apologists Play Shoot the Messenger on Radiation, in The Age. 177 Styblińska M. (2012). The culture of neglect in a shadow of Japanese appocalypse – some concerns on Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission one year since the disaster. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). GIS for Geoscientists. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 170-180. "Entering the body, these elements - called internal emitters - migrate to specific organs such as the thyroid, liver, bone, and brain, continuously irradiating small volumes of cells with high doses of alpha, beta and/or gamma radiation, and over many years often induce cancer." Seems that the nuclear war, whether intentional or unintentional, has already been waged, Regardless of whether or not the Fukushima disaster was a natural event or a man-made terrorist conspiracy, the trigger has been pulled, and the quiet nuclear war has been set in motion. Fukushima's thousands of exposed fuel rods continue to remain in a precarious plight. Reactor 4 is on the verge of collapse, and radiation from existing leaks and damage continues to spread. Politically, the entire nation of Japan is the biggest casualty of this nuclear war so far, as the country's economy is in dire straits, and on the verge of collapse. Tokyo is reportedly now suffering its first trade deficit since the 1980s, and the rest of the country's manufacturing base is quickly dwindling as the world grows increasingly leery of importing goods from Japan that may be contaminated with Fukushima radiation. Because no efforts are being made to contain Fukushima, as was done with Chernobyl, the facility itself is essentially a grounded nuclear weapon that every second of every day is waging war against Planet Earth. And as far as the human race is concerned, thousands have already died as a result, with millions more to follow in the years and decades to come as the unrelenting spew of radiation settles in every crevice of the global ecology, spurring rapid increases in cancer and other deadly conditions. Conclusion The Japanese Parliament and Commission said that even the direct causes of the accident were all foreseeable, that "failed to correctly develop the most basic safety requirements - such as assessing the probability of damage, preparing for containing collateral damage from such a disaster, and developing evacuation plans" and the lack of training and knowledge of the workers at a critical times the facility reduced the effectiveness of the response to the situation. The operator, regulators and the government "failed to correctly develop the most basic safety requirements - such as assessing the probability of damage, preparing for containing collateral damage from such a disaster, and developing evacuation plans" and according to Fukushima plant operator (TEPCO), they have not had been prepared for nuclear accident. Additionally the commission believes that the root causes were the organizational and regulatory systems that supported faulty rationales for decisions and actions, rather than issues relating to the competency of any specific individual. From the other hand across the board, the commission found ignorance and arrogance unforgivable for anyone or any organization that deals with nuclear power. They found a disregard for global trends and a disregard for public safety, not preventing or limiting the consequential damage. The firm, regulators and the government had failed to correctly develop the most basic safety requirements, such as assessing the probability of damage, preparing for containing collateral damage from such a disaster, and developing evacuation plans for the public in the case of a serious radiation release. Looks like TEPCO and the corporate-controlled Japanese and U.S. governments would rather allow toxic radiation to spread than to save hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives (10). However the report urged citizens to reflect on own responsibility as individuals in a democratic society, adding that the fault lay with Japanese cultural traditions, criticizing Japan’s reflexive obedience and their reluctance to question authority. Hard to agree and believe that it was an accident or the foul is connected with Japanese culture of neglect. That way the Japanese citizens, and everyone else, would think Japan has a monopoly on lethal ineptitude. Collusion between government and industry is a real threat in many nations around the world, and it is dangerous to assume that what happened at Fukushima could not happen anywhere else. The results have the Apocalyptic dimensions and unforeseen consequences for the global life. The Fukushima radiation leak is a soft-kill operation against the people and ecosystem. 178 Styblińska M. (2012). The culture of neglect in a shadow of Japanese appocalypse – some concerns on Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission one year since the disaster. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). GIS for Geoscientists. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 170-180. Photo 6. No the nuclear bombs – No Nukes, one of the demonstration in Japan. Source: A. Lambremont Webre, Japan earthquake, nuke “accident” are tectonic nuclear warfare (23), http://cdn7.wn.com/ph/img/f8/35/22dee85ad4ad770dbb6154696552-grande.jpg References: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_T%C5%8Dhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami [access: 8.07.2012] 3 nuclear reactors melted down after quake, Japan confirms, CNN. 7 June 2011, [access: 8.07.2012] Acton James M., Hibbs Mark, Why Fukushima was preventable? The Carnegie Papers. Nuclear Policy, March 2012. Carnegie Endowment. http://carnegieendowment.org/files/fukushima.pdf, [access: 11.07.2012] Allemang John: Why Japan embraced nuclear power after suffering the atomic bomb. The Globe and Mail; http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/asia-pacific/why-japan-embraced-nuclear-powerafter-suffering-the-atomic-bomb/article1945020/, [access: 8.07.2012] Begich Nick, Manning Jeane The Military's Pandora's Box http://haarp.net, [access: 10.07.2012] Chernobyl disaster, from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster, [access: 10.07.2012] Chossudovsky Michel, Fukushima: A Nuclear War without a War- The Unspoken Crisis of Worldwide Nuclear Radiation, Global Research online Interactive reader series, Book No. 3, January 25, 2012, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28870, [access: 10.07.2012] Clancy Jim, CNN's report, http://www.shoppingblog.com/blog/70520129, [access: 8.07.2012] Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), from Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA, [access: 10.07.2012] Ethan Jacobs - a licensed attorney with a B.A. in Political Science. His passion is researching and writing about a wide range of issues to increase public awareness, http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=147&contentid=8260&page=2[access: 8.07.2012] Fukushima report damns industry, regulators and safety culture for 'manmade disaster', Utility Week; http://www.utilityweek.co.uk/news/news_story.asp?id=197121&channel=0&title=Fukushima+report+da mns+industry%2C+regulators+and+safety+culture+for+'manmade+disaster', [access: 8.07.2012] Gunderson Arnold, a 39-year veteran of the nuclear industry Hewitt Elizabeth, Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Was 'Man-Made; The Slates Magazine, July 5, 2012; http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2012/07/05/fukushima_japan_s_nuclear_accident_was_a_man_made_disast er_new_report_concludes_.html, [access: 8.07.2012] Heyes J. D, May 30, 2012, Fukushima Japan’s Nuclear Accident Was a Man-Made Disaster Natural News, http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2012/07/05/fukushima_japan_s_nuclear_accident_was_a_man_made_disast er_new_report_concludes_.html, [access: 9.07.2012] 179 Styblińska M. (2012). The culture of neglect in a shadow of Japanese appocalypse – some concerns on Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission one year since the disaster. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). GIS for Geoscientists. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 170-180. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Wikipedia; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program, [access: 8.07.2012] http;//www.naturalnews.com/035847_plume-gate_Fukushima_radiation.htm, [access: 8.07.2012] Huff Ethan A., Fukushima disaster is 'nuclear war without a war', May 23, 2012, http://www.naturalnews.com/035950_Fukushima_nuclear_war_disaster.html, [access: 10.07.2012] Jacobs Ethan - a licensed attorney with a B.A. in Political Science. His passion is researching and writing about a wide range of issues to increase public awareness, http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=147&contentid=8260&page=2, [access: 8.07.2012] Jacobs Ethan, Fukushima Radiation: A Soft-Kill, http://www.activistpost.com/2011/04/fukushimaradiation-soft-kill-operation.htmlHED , [access: 8.07.2012] Japanese Cultural Traits Fukushima Disaster, Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jul/05/japanese-cultural-traits-fukushima-disaster, [access: 9.07.2012] Japanese PM: 'Toughest' crisis since World War II,. CNN. 13 March 2011. Archived from the original on 12 April 2011. Retrieved 13 March 2011, [access: 8.07.2012] Kaku Michio, a theoretical physicist at City University of New York Lambremont Webre Alfred, Japan earthquake, nuke “accident” are tectonic nuclear warfare Scientist,: http://www.examiner.com/article/scientist-japan-earthquake-nuke-accident-are-tectonic-nuclear-warfare, [access: 10.07.2012] McCurry Justin, Japanese cultural triats at ‘heart of Fukushima disaster, in Tokyo, Guardian, guardian.co.uk, 5 July '2012, ; http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jul/05/japanese-cultural-traitsfukushima-disaster, [access: 8.07.2012], Moret Leuren Japan's deadly game of nuclear roulette, Special to The Japan Times, May24, 2004; http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/fl20040523x2.html#.T_xmyZE8CSo, [access: 10.07.2012] Mosk Mathew, Fukushima: Mark 1 Nuclear Reactor Design Caused GE Scientist To Quit In Protest, ABC World News, March 15, 2011, http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/fukushima-mark-nuclear-reactordesign-caused-ge-scientist/story?id=13141287#.T_xvp5E8CSo; [access: 8.07.2012] Scientist Leuren Moret Japan earthquake, nuke “accident” are tectonic nuclear warfare; Video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=5WxmeOqYtB0, [access: 8.07.2012] Sircus Mark, Fukushima haunts the world, Friday, May 11, 2012 AC, OMD, http://www.naturalnews.com/035829_Fukushima_radiation_catastrophe.html, [access: 8.07.2012] Styblińska Maria, Some Concerns About Nuclear Power Plants after Japanese Apocalypse Disaster, The Future with GIS, Zagreb 2011, pp. 104-112 The Financial Times and Reuters, May 2012, [access: 8.07.2012] The New York Times, May 2012, [access: 8.07.2012] VLF Pulses and HAARP Aerosol Operation, Carnicom Clifford E Mar 23, 2003, http://www.carnicominstitute.org/articles/elf23.htm [access: 10.07.2012] Wakatsuki Yoko, Mullen Jethro, CNN; http://edition.cnn.com/2012/07/05/world/asia/japan-fukushimareport/index.html [access: 8.07.2012] 180