Mix December 2008 - The Limits of Compression
Transcription
Mix December 2008 - The Limits of Compression
BY GAVIN LURSSEN I recently traveled to San Francisco to attend the AES Convention and A MASTERING ENG~ N EER'S TAKE ON MAKING THE MOST OF DYNAMIC RANGE 2008 on Bob Lu at AES. I n you were tJlere. you know that T Bone Burnett is why we find ourselves again and again talk· delivered an inspired speech aGG€pting his ing about compression and the "loud" CD. people-all Hall of Fame award. Among other things. he download or MP3-the pushing of limits that trends in m challenged all of us in this industry to produce seems to define production and consumption to make SUI albums that re-think the ways we use the of music in the Digital Age. is "not the' But I think an important lesson lies in my brother's approach as a parent. As he steers the oppositt sumers who. over recent years. have become his daughter through her world, he sets limits to over·mok used to a vast array of options when it comes to because he knows he mLlSt. But what he really ing is that t experiencing audio at home and on the move. does is this: He responds to the entire range of that theywa While in the Bay Area I also ducked out for her experience. He focuses on his daughter as laughed; no a few hours to see my brother and his young a whole person. And in this way. he brings out family. Witnessing his two small children it breathe al obvious occurred to me. I realized that. from with dynamic range. TIle limits are meaning· by previous the earliest stages of life. we are taught limits less by themselves. What matters is the range ago and eal by our parents-also by relatives, teachers, and depth between the limits. True of parent meaning far friends. Over a lifetime, the lessons of our lim ing, true of mastering music, true of most the recordin its (and how to push them) are always with us. things, probably. If)'ou're with me, this is how audiooutof This is not especially profound, just some I think we should approach mastering for in taday's WI these new times. an explanati, Mastering is not just about pushing the ers and artis limits. although that is what it has become. rather the d The funny thing about limits: We also Even at its most conservative. mastering today lished artist spend a lot of time testing them. Whenever requires a certain amount of pushing the limits take this risl my brother tells his 5-year-old daughter not to to provide sound that fits the mainstream, vis fan base, bu do something. she immediately does it. She ceral expectations of most average consumers sound. pushes to see if it really is the edge-and what of music. The "whole" of the sound requires To barre a push to complete the picture-and, frankly, ogy, I think happens whell she crosses it. But here's the interesting thing. I asked my all too often this means the loss of any real dy· trendisakil brother how he deals with this. He said that he namic range. In 111Y mastering projects, I find sugar. Migh doesn't sweat the small stuff and. at times that myself using more equipment in my chain ally what Y01 really matter, he holds the limit. He sees his and just applying a little of each, working very If my br job as providing IUs daughter what she needs hard to sound like I was never there. The more of cereal wi to sllcceed. and that includes setting limits. I push a device, the more it presents a veil be would eath, tween the fan and the artist on a recording. would also, What in the world does this have to do with WWW.MIXONLINE.COM the best ill her. Whatth audio fit int' Call it the parenting equivalent of working make their way through the world. something in our work-was on my mind. I on to say th tools available to us. And he challenged us to embrace new ways of presenting music to con portant to all of us--compression and its place MIX DECEMBER 2008 Last yea Recorded music has boundaries, too. This thing that occurred to me when a subject im 40 compression? A lot, I think. TEC Awards. If Last year, I had the honor of being included pense of so many other flavors (to say nothing music and reduce the peak volume while avoid too. This on Bob Ludwig's Platinum Mastering panel of her nutrition). That would be her baseline, ing sample overs. 5ain talk at AES. I mentioned in front of hundreds of the norm. All other tastes would have to be as 'ud" CD, people-all there to learn about the current "loud" as sugar just to compete. Compression and limiting became popular ways to push the limits-no longer simply mits that trends in mastering-that I often get a request Sugar has its place the same way pushing part of a set of tools to be used to enhance the umption to make sure that the album I am working on the limits on sound has its important place, but musical vision of an artist, producer or mixer. is "not the loudest thing in the world." I went I think we are at a time when we fear that if we The trend gained popularity as more and more fs in my on to say that I always interpret that request as remove the sugar, no one will eat the cereal. le steers the opposite of what it seems: By asking me not noise infiltrated our lives and our listening I am not a gear head. I've always focused envirohments. When the Digital Age went por !1s limits to over-cook the andio, what they are really say on "vibe" rather than the purely technical side table, to compete with ambient noise meant to he really ing is that they do want me to over-cook it, but of things; the music, the sound, is the primary push and push the limits ofoUl recordings. r3ngeof that they want it to also sound good. Eyerybody focus. I only use whatever tools are necessary 19hter as laughed; nobody questioned the remark. to get the job done, and that changes with each rings out What the clients are asking for is to have the audio fit into today's standards but to also have assignment. Less is more. Less electronics, less processing, less push on what is in the chain. In other words, we sugarcoated everything to make sure it still got eaten. "Compression" is an often misunderstood and misused term. It is nothing more than worlcing it breathe and feel good. This was easier to do But I do have strong feelings about tools dynamic range control. It does not reduce tleaning by previous standards: Records from 10 years like compression-especially from a concep highs or add lows, as some people think. (I am be range ago and earlier have far lower average levels, tual point of view. I like to think of myself as referring to compression of the stereo master. parent meaning far more dynamic range and room for growing with the new school and participating Compression of individual tracks within a re of most the recording to breathe. However, if you print in it on every level. Any experience I share, or cording before it is mixed would be the subject isis how audio out of the realm of the visceral expectation mentoring, is offered in the service of creating of a different article.) in today's world, it often has to come along ,vith an environment of responsible audio transfers, The responsibility of all engineering is to an explanation. Sometimes I work with produc no matter what mediulll. My close work with T learn from and maintain standards set by the . ing for the ers and artists who don't buy into the levels but Bone Burnett and his CODE sound quality--<:on greats, to embrace and enhance them. It is become. rather the depth of field of a recording. Estab trol initiative is an additional testament to this. about working with the whole of a sound, oper ng today lished artists and producers find it easier to This idea of humans always pushing be limits take this risk because they have an established against limits brings to mind the early history When we limit the range of audio, we are in vis fan base, but I get others who want to copy the of CDs, starting back in the 1980s when digital fact simply limiting ourselves. We are limiting ~ing ~m, 18umers requires storage arrived for consumers. CD manufactur the size of the canvas upon which we are asked from the parenting anal ers would not accept any masters with samples to work, and we are, in the end, limiting what sound. To borrow ~lgain ating within the entire dynamic range. ogy, I think at its worst the current loudness over digital zero. The engineer would have to we can contribute to the prodl.lction of music in dy trend is akin to infusing a diet with too much record or capture the music way below the this Digital Age. III Is, I find sugar. Might taste good up front, but is thane threshold to maintain a legal master. fl' chain ally what you have in mind? Is that best? frankly, r real In the late '80S and early '90S, equipment Mastering engineer Gavin LUrssen is a two-time ing very If my brother fed his daughter a steady diet manufacturers started building tools to clip Gramm}' winner for the 0 Brother, Where Art l1emore of cereal with copious amOunts of sugar, she audio right before the digital zero point. That, Thou? soundtrack and PBS' Martin Scorsese I veil would eat her breakfast. Job well done. But she in turn, allowed the use of compression to Presents the Blues. He won two 2008 TEe awards would also develop a taste for sugar at the ex essentially tl.lrn up the average volume of the for Robert Plant and Alison Krauss' Raising Sand. jingo be WWW.MtXONlINE.COM I DECEMBER 2008 MIX 41