Wellington High School - NZIFST - The New Zealand Institute of
Transcription
Wellington High School - NZIFST - The New Zealand Institute of
Aim and Opportunity We chose to develop a dairy based sports recovery drink that meets the needs of active adolescents. The purpose is to refuel and rehydrate the body. body We want a unique drink that is acceptable for teenagers. teenagers Research Throughout the entire process we conducted surveys and spoke to various consultants to h help We l us make k the h right i h decisions. d i i W also l ffound d case studies di and d researched h d market k information. O iinitial Our iti l research h showed h d us th that: t • Acidified fruit milk (AMD) drinks are a gap in the current market. Ch l t milk ilk is i an ideal id l sports t recovery drink d i k due d to t it’s it’ concentration t ti off • Chocolate carbohydrates, protein and other key nutrients. • Functional F ti l foods f d such h as pro-biotic bi ti yoghurt h t give i products d t competitive titi advantage. d t • Teenagers require 1.2 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body weight per hour after sport and protein is recommended. recommended Concepts p With advice from our mentor Eileen we developed p four initial concepts. We produced three acidified fruit milk drinks and a chocolate milk drink. We then ran sensory testing on them using 30 g g School students. After analysing y g Wellington High the results we decided to continue the production of an acidified raspberry, peach and passion fruit milk drink. We experimented with different techniques and ingredients to improve the formula, trying pear and apricot instead of peach and frozen raspberries rather than cordial. A key part of our experimentation was working out the best pectin and milk base to use. We found it very difficult to have an outcome with consistent results. Morgan Christy Christy-Jones, Eames, Jones Emma Eames Oska Rego, Rego Lillian Savage Stage g Gate In a meeting following hedonic and stapel testing on our drink we came to a stage gate and decided not to continue with the acidified raspberry and passion fruit milk drink. drink This was due to the complexity of the variables involved. The tests had been unsuccessful due to the drink not producing the desired colour, colour texture or taste. taste We went back to our initial research and decided to develop the chocolate milk concept. We revisited some case studies on chocolate milk’ss effective sports recovery properties and decided this would be a better option. milk option The nutritional qualities are more useful for sports recovery and the drink is not as reliant on specific resources for production as an acidified milk. milk 12 849 (Papaya Juice) 12 6 134 (Our Acidifed Fruit Milk Drink) 3 14 3 4 4 5 0% 50% 100% Banana Choc milk ilk d drink i k 0 3 Tropical AMD 3 Peach, Raspberr d Passion P i y and AMD 6 Honey Lemon AMD 6 10 5 3 21 4 0% Very Bad Flavour Bad Flavour Good Flavour Very Good Flavour 21 6 0 3 9 20% 13 40% 60% 80% 100% Refreshing-ness of First Four Concepts Banana Choc milk drink 1 Tropical AMD 1 Peach, Raspberry and Passion AMD 1 8 17 12 0% Refreshing 12 9 20% Slightly Refreshing 6 13 5 Not Refreshing 4 12 4 2 Honey Lemon AMD 13 40% 60% Very R f hi Refreshing 80% 100% Overall Appeal of First Four Concepts Sensory testing revised AMD formula vs. Current Market Products. 709 (Calapis Water) p Flavour of First Four Concepts Banana Choc milk drink Like E t Extremely l Like Moderately Neither Like or Dislike Dislike Moderately Dislike Extremely 1 1 1 Tropical AMD 3 2 0% Unappealing 14 11 19 5 9 20% Very y Unappealing 16 10 11 Peach, Raspberry and Passion AMD Honey Lemon AMD 12 Appealing 14 40% 60% 80% 100% Very Appealing Chocolate Milk Development Collecting g feedback and sensoryy tests from WHS students After changing g g to chocolate milk we began g thinking g of ways y to g gain a competitive p advantage g with our “Me-Too” p product. To start with,, none of the chocolate drinks on the current market are advertised as a sports recovery drink. For the drink itself we decided that the use of functional foods will g give us a p point of difference. For the flavour of our drink we are using Dutch cocoa. Dutch cocoa is a processed product with a sweeter flavour than ordinary cocoa powder. For both a sweetener and a flavour we thought p g that active Manuka honeyy would work well,, p particularlyy with it’s added health advantages. To add more calcium to the drink we are using calcium enhanced trim milk. Lastly we decided that we could fortify the drink with vitamin D to p promote the absorption p of the calcium. We were happy with this product and the results it produced in sensory testing. It needed improvements to it’s consistency and flavour so we experimented with different ingredients g to optimise our formula. We contacted Allan Hardacre, a research officer at the Masseyy University Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health for help with using stabilisers for the viscosity and other additives for nutritional benefit. He gave us useful advice on what and how to use it. We decided on xantham gum as the stabiliser and for adding texture to the beverage. Sensory Testing of revised Chocolate Milk formula vs. Current Market Products Like Extremely 3 134 (Calci ( yyum Chocolate Milk) C-Monster C Monster is a product that meets our brief. brief Unlike common chocolate milks it is sweetened with active anti-bacterial UMF 12+ manuka honey benefits It contains no added sugar and is for its great taste and health benefits. enhanced with extra vitamins and carbohydrates for ideal sports recovery As we fine tuned the design we received a lot of feedback recovery. from various consultants including Eileen Basher, Allan Hardacre and Ben Sigmund who gave us feedback on the product which we used to optimize the formula. We also used sensory evaluations from active teenagers to help with the final developments. developments How do you rank this chocolate drink? How do you rank this chocolate drink? Like extremley/ chocolatety/ Too Sweet A Appeal l Just Right g Flavour Sweetne ss Dislike/ Not Chocolatey/ Bitter Chocolatey/ Bitter 0% 50% 100% NUTRITIONAL INFORMATION Serving Size: 350ml ‐ Servings per Pack: 1 Avg. Quantity per Serving per 100mL Energy 1842kJ 307kJ Protein 30.3g 5.1g 6.5% 2.4g 0.4g 1.1% 1.3g 0.2g Fat, Total ‐Saturated Carbohydrate ‐Sugar 77g 12.8g *%DI (per serving) 24% 17.3% 75g 12.5g Sodium 553mg 92mg 6% Calcium 603.2mg 170.9mg 60%RDI^ *DI Percentage Daily Intakes are based on an average adolescent diet of 7600kJ. Your daily intake may be higher or lower depending on your energy levels. ^Recommended Daily Intake LEMON DEVELOPMENTS would like to thank Karen Saunders, Marietjie Van Schalkwyk and the rest of the Wellington High School Food Technology Department along with our mentor Eileen Basher Basher, DIANZ DIANZ, Allan Hardacre of the Massey University Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health and Ben Sigmund of the Wellington Phoenix FC 4 15 Like Moderately 849 (Primo Chocolate Milk) 7 22 709 (Honey Chocolate Milk) 15 0% Final Product 8 20% 1 14 40% 60% Marketing After pursuing a “Me-Too” chocolate milk product and adding functional food and sports recovery benefits b fi we decided d id d to focus on these points in marketing. We i ll wanted t d to t h i th especially emphasize the benefits of active manuka honey and added dd d calcium l i and d vitamins it i A and d D. D Promoting our chocolate milk’s effective sport’s is to t’ recovery properties ti i key k t meeting our brief, and endorsing our prod ct’s sporting benefits is Wellington product’s Phoenix and All Whites fan favourite Ben Sigmund who we met for promotional Sigmund, photos and feedback on the drink. It was a great boost hearing him say he would drink our product after a professional football training or game. We game brainstormed around 25 potential drink names including suggestions from Wellington High School students. This was then whittled down to a ten name short list which we put to a survey. The chosen name was C-Monster, C-Monster a clever play on both Chocolate Monster and our endorser’ss nickname Sigmund the endorser Seamonster. 1 80% 100% Dislike Moderately Dislike Extremely