1_Mr. Bessonov - GRFC 2014, 23

Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance
Indicators
Gennady Bessonov,
CCTT Secretary General
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
Integrated multimodal network
Integrated multimodal services connect
sea ports and terminals of Europe,
Russia and the Asia-Pacific Region and
can deliver a container from North
Atlantic shores to the Pacific.
(2)
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
Changes in through container traffic on the TSR
1999-2013
800 000
700 000
600 000
500 000
400 000
300 000
200 000
100 000
0
(3)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
В межд. cообщ.
Internat.traffic
71 505
127 961
150 370
205 893
306 894
398 216
392 750
351 695
620 831
604 710
267 062
442 862
553 215
643 308
705 745
В.т.ч. транзит
Incl. transit
34 623
55 351
67 297
70 568
117 136
155 381
124 960
39 880
38 043
29 028
18 058
32 407
45 608
102 094
117 383
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
International highhigh-capacity container traffic on the TSR ((empty
empty and loaded,
loaded, TEU)
1Q 2014
1Q 2013
Import
78 083
Export
64 650
Transit
25 004
In 1Q 2013 TSM international container
traffic totalled 167 737 TEU
(4)
+19,07%
Export
76 979
-11,92%
Import
68 774
Transit
+22,53%
30 638
In 1Q 2014 TSM international container traffic
totalled 176 391 TEU, up 5.2% from 2013.
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
High-capacity container traffic between Russia and APR countries.
High1Q 2013 – 1Q 2014, TEU
(+
(+8
8%)
120 000
103 159
95 934
100 000
80 000
(+
(+11
11%)
%)
49 304
44 431
60 000
40 000
18 154
13 898
20 000
0
1Q 2013
Russia - China
(5)
1Q 2014
Russia - Japan
Russia - Republic of Korea
(+
(+31
31%)
%)
Transport products on the TSR: China – Russia – Europe
(6)
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
Current significant trade flows between NorthNorth-Western Europe,
Eastern Europe (Baltic States) and mainland Asia
(7)
Source : Panteia
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
Mercury service
BALTIC TRANSIT
Riga Express, Eurasia 1|2
Operator : SRR AS
(8)
Source : LIETUVOS GELEŽINKELIAI
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
Comparison of the logistics efficiency in Russia and foreign countries
Relative expenses for logistics in Russia
are higher than in other countries
Logistics expenses, % from GDP
General logistics efficiency is also losing
Efficiency rate of logistics in 2014
Germany
China
Russia
France
Brasil
Belgium
India
France
Great
Britain
UN
Italy
Japan
USA
Germany
Kazakhstan
Russia
Nominal GDP in 2011, billion dollars
(9)
Source : BCG
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
Market structure of the transport and logistics services
Effective business-model
drivers
Integrated
logistics
Integrated logistics (4PL)
supply management
Contract logistics (complex 3PL)
Complex service made
upon client’s demand
Optimal routes choosing
Warehouse services
Overland forwarding
Mainline
R/w transp.
Aero and sea forwarding
Sea transp.
Aero transp.
“last mile”
Rolling
stock
Hauling
Trucks
Terminals
Warehouse
Freight forwarding (base 3PL)
Freight transportation
(2PL)
Tankers
Bulkers
Airplanes
Ports
Airports
(10)
Source : BCG
Infrastructure
provision
Efficiency of cost and
service quality
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
Outsourcing share in word practice by elements of logistics
10-20% of companies have functions on outsourcing
20-50% of companies have functions on outsourcing
More than 50% of companies have functions on
outsourcing
International transp. 78%
National transp. 71%
Forwarding 57%
Customs support 48%
Incoming
logistics
Warehou
sing
Internal
logistics
man-t
Planning and management 23%
Delivery invoice payment 17%
Consulting 11%
Fleet control 10%
4PL-services 9%
Production
& internal
resources
Warehou
sing
Outgoing
logistics
Requests
handling
Packaging, marking, assembling 24%
Resource management 21%
IT-services 15%
(11)
Source : BCG
Client
support
Reverse
logistics
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
1. Transit time guarantee
(12)
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
2. Efficiency of customs procedures
Burden of customs procedure, WEF (1=extremely
inefficient to 7=extremely efficient)
(13)
Source: GTE
Documents to export (number)
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
Main reasons for cargo detention on borders
Incorrect execution of
carriage and commercial
documents
56%
Untimely provision of cargo
consignment by empty rolling 12%
stock
Technical errors
7%
Commercial errors
8%
Problems of customs
processing
Malfunctions of
infrastructure
Problems with regulatory
documents
9%
7%
1%
(14)
Source: InterRail TSES
1%
9% 7%
8%
7%
12%
56%
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
3. Transparency of the final transportation cost
I.
By railway transport via TSM through Zabaikalsk and Naushki border crossings.
1
2
3
4
5
1. Railway infrastructure tariffs: Railways of China, KTZ, RZD, BCh, PKP, DB.
2. Container flatcar rent
3. Security
4. Additional charge (handling, customs control, station charge etc.)
5. Operator’s commission
II. Intermodal transport on the TSR the through Far East ports (sea + railway).
1
2
3
1. Sea freight
2. Stevedore's charges
3. Terminal services
4. Railway infrastructure tariffs: Railways of
China, KTZ, RZD, BCh, PKP, DB.
(15)
4
5
6
7
8
5. Container flatcar rent
6. Security
7. Additional charge (handling, customs
control, station charge etc.)
8. Operator’s commission
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
Tariff policy for freight transport by container trains between China to Europe (40’ own)
7 069 km
Osinovka/Krasnoe
Brest
2 058 km
609 km
Zabaikalsk/
Manzhouli
Kanisai/Iletsk
3 025 km
Dostyk/Alashankou
Zabaikalsk – Krasnoe (1 044 CHF)
Krasnoe – Zabaikalsk (464 CHF)
Osinovka – Brest or return (230 CHF)
Dostyk – Iletsk or return (859 CHF)
Kanisai – Krasnoe or return (576 CHF)
(16)
China
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
4. Unified legal framework
SMGS
Unified Rail Transport Law
COTIF/CIM
(17)
Source: CIT
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
5. Cargo security control
Cargo transferring scheme
(18)
Problems of cargo security between
cargo transfer points in the border area
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
Conceptual scheme of a system for security control
and transit traffic monitoring
IRIDIUM, INMARSAT
GLOBALSTAR
Railways
Customs
CCAST
UIC/CCTT
CCAST
CC
Internet
Emergency mode
MESC
ЦЭТО
ЦЭТО
Regular mode
Internet
Central subsystem (MESC)
GSM-operators
Regional subsystem
MESC – maintenance & engineering support centre
CCAST UIC/CCTT – centre for coordinating and
analytical solutions on transit traffic
(19)
CCAST CC - centre for coordinating and analytical
solutions on transit traffic in terms of customs control
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
S2
WP5
Multimodality
WP24
CIM/SMGS
Commissions I, II, III
GTE
CCTT IC WG
(20)
Security BIRC
CCTT IT WG
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
CCTT cooperation with international organizations
OSJD, UIC, EurAsEC, ITC UNECE,
CIT
Information support
Legislative and judical support
Fare conditions
Technological support
Carriers,
Rolling stock
operators
International
+ multimodal operators,
Regulatory bodies
Infrastructure
Rolling stock
Proposals for the improvement of transport and logistics products
(21)
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
&
cooperation
- Global Team of Experts (GTE)
SECURITY
- Security BIRC
BIRC
- Standardization
(22)
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
Freight corridors integration
(23)
Transsib Transport Corridor: Key Performance Indicators
Service
regularity
Improvement of the
regulatory framework
Stable and
competitive tariff
TARGET PRIORITIES
OF A MODERN TRANSPORT PRODUCT
New infrastructure
opportunities
(24)
Introduction of
new technologies
Thank you for your attention!
CCTT Secretary General
Gennady Bessonov
info@icctt.com