Motion to Vacate And/Or to Reconsider Order and for a Rehearing

Transcription

Boston College Law School
Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School
Snail Darter Documents
The Snail Darter and the Dam
7-16-1979
Motion to Vacate And/Or to Reconsider Order
and for a Rehearing & Affidavit of Counsel & Brief
in Support of Motion to Vacate and/or Reconsider
Order for a Rehearing, Including Exhibits, TVA v.
Hill et al, Civil Action No. 3-76-48
W.P. Boone Dougherty
Peter Alliman
Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/darter_materials
Part of the Environmental Law Commons, Land Use Planning Commons, and the Water Law
Commons
Digital Commons Citation
Dougherty, W.P. Boone and Alliman, Peter, "Motion to Vacate And/Or to Reconsider Order and for a Rehearing & Affidavit of
Counsel & Brief in Support of Motion to Vacate and/or Reconsider Order for a Rehearing, Including Exhibits, TVA v. Hill et al, Civil
Action No. 3-76-48" (1979). Snail Darter Documents. Paper 99.
http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/darter_materials/99
This Archival Material is brought to you for free and open access by the The Snail Darter and the Dam at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law
School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Snail Darter Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law
School. For more information, please contact nick.szydlowski@bc.edu.
..
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE,
NORTHERN DIVISION
tl
HIRAM G. HILL, JR., ZYGMUNT J. B. PLATER
and DONALD S. COHEN,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3-76-48
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY,
Defendant.
'
!'
MOTION TO VACATE AND/OR TO RECONSIDER ORDER AND FOR A REHEARING
Come now the plaintiffs through their attorneys and respectfully
request that this Honorable Court vacate and/or reconsider the judgment filed
and entered on July 5, 1979, denying plaintiff's request for expert witness,
attorney fees, and costs against the defendant, Tennessee Valley Authority,
and in support thereof, state:
:i
1.
That the award of costs and fees in this matter is appropriate.
2.
That the request for costs and fees in this matter was timely
3.
The award of fees at the rate of $75.00 per hour is not
filed.
excessive under the circumstances of this case.
4.
~
Plaintiffs request their reasonable attorney fees and costs
(
!i
1:
for the collection of fees and costs in the above captioned matter.
REQUEST FOR RELIEF
In view of the foregoing, the plaintiffs ·urge the Court to entertain
::
:1 Lhis Motiontovacate and/or reconsider the Order filed and entered on July 5,
:I
1979, and rehear the issues presented in the case at bar.
Further, plaintiffs request their reasonqble attorney fees and costs
for the collection of fees and costs in the above captioned matter.
Further, in support of this Motion, plaintiff attaches as Exhibits
to this Motion, Exhibits 1 - 31.
Plaintiffs request oral hearing in this matter.
W. P. BOONE DOUGHERTY
:·
··J
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS
Suite 604
P. 0. Box 29
Park National Bank Building
Knoxville, Tennessee 37902
(615) 522-4194
Ji
,,'I
~ '
PETER ALLIMAN
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS
Suite 602
P. 0. Box 29
Park National Bank Building
(615) 637-6258
"•
i,
il
l
",,
I'
'I
,.
!
~l
II,,
·•,
-2-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NORTHERN DIVISION
HIRAM G. HILL, JR., ZYGMUNT J. B. PLATER
and DONALD S. COHEN,
Plaintiffs,
!' vs.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3-76~48
,,
,·"
Defendant.
AFFIDAVIT OF COUNSEL
I,
Because some question has arisen as to the accuracy of some items
I!
'I
li
claimed by plaintiffs in their Verified Bill of Costs, the following is
\l•'
:;., submitted:
i
Exhibts 2 - 31 attached to plaintiffs Hotion to Vacate the Order
I!
entered on July 5, 1979, contain all of the check stubs, canceled checks,
bills, receipts, or other documents in plaintiffs possession which relate
to fees, costs and other expenses incurred in the legal portion of the Tellico
Dam controversy.
All other claims made in relation to the above captioned matter
not specifically documented are represented by counsel under oath to be
truley and necessarily incurred in the above captioned matter.
The Court's attention is invited to the below affidavit of counsel.
AFFIDAVIT OF COUNSEL
STATE OF TENNESSEE )
COUNTY OF KNOX
)
Personally appeared before me, the undersigned, PETER ALLIHAN, who
after being duly sworn, makes oath that the statements contained in the above
are true to the best of his knowledge, information and belief; that the
expenses and time and labor were necessarily incurred in the above styled
case; and that the services for which charges have been made were actually
and necessarily performed.
PETER ALLIHAN
I.
H
q
Sworn to and subscribed before me
H
!Iil
this
J.fit.h
day
of July, 1979.
NOTARY PUBLIC
('•
My commission expires:
------------------
•I
-2-
:
il
:
~
I;
II
I'
J!
ii
~j
I•
li.
•:
IN THE UNITED STATES DIST1UCT COURT FOR THE EASTER.c"'\J DISTRICT
OF TENNESSEE, NORTHERN DIVISION
HIRAM G. HILL I
and
DO~;JALD
JR.
I
ZYG.r~iUNT J.
B. PLATER
COHE~J,
S.
'i
I
Plaintiff s,
vs.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3-76-48
I;
J:
,,
!,
,.:;
Defendant .
;:
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF .1'110TIOI:·J TO VACATE
AND/OR TO RECONSIDER ORDER AND FOR A REHEARHTG
i!
I
The Endangere d Species Act, 16 USC §1540
provides~
The Court, in issuing any Final Order
in any suit brought pursuant to paragraph
(1) of this sub section may award costs
of litigation (including reasonabl e
attorney and expert witness fees) to
any party whenever the Court determine s
such award is appropria te.
II
li
li
..
(g) (4)
(g)
I.
THE AWARD OF COSTS A:ND FEES PURSUANT TO 16 USC §1540
IS APPROPRIA TE.
(4)
I·
:
Where Congress provides the authority for the award of
I
I
f,
1:
:: the costs of litigation , such costs should be awarded unless such
award would be unjust.
Th.e
standard for the determina tion of the
:!
' appropria teness of an award of costs has been ex0ressse d by the
f<
~
i
it
!1
Supreme Court as follows:
,,1:
It follows that one who succeeds in
obtaining an injunction under that title
should ordinarily recover an attorney' s
fee unless special circumsta nces vmuld
render such an award unjust.
Ne:;man v.
Piagie Park Enterpris es, Inc., 390 US 400
at 402 (9068) (emp:i:1asis added).
See Also · Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wildernes s Society,
421 US 240
(1975); Albermarl e Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 US 405
(1975);: Northcros s v. :r.1emphis Board of Education , 412 US 427
(1973); Christians burg Garment Co. v. EEOC, 98 Supreme Court 694
I
jl (1978).
ri
II
li
ji
,.,.,.,-,.,,,,,,,,,,,_,,_.,·.·.····· .,
.... .. ,.,,,,.,.,.,,,,_,,,_, .. .. •.•,·,·,·,,,.,,, .. ......... .
-
,
_
ii
i:
Congressional policy is furthered by the award of such
I,1:
;I
costs where a statute specifically allows.
Arthur v. Nyquist,
,• 426 F Supp 194 (D. N. Y.- 1977).
Further, plaintiffs would like to point out to the Court
that, far from having an adverse impact upon the public weal,
plaintiffs' lawsuit under the Endangered Species Act has actually
saved the taxpayer's money.
Because of the legal rulings in this
suit, the General Accounting Office as well as the University of
Tennessee,.were asked to reevaluate the Project.
:,1
l
Three hearings
:·I! were held in the Senate and two were held in the House.
,,11"
(
Another
~
il
hearing of the Project is presently scheduled in the House.
All
i of these hearings have indicated that Valley development is the
most beneficial alternative.
Further, plaintiffs'lawsuit has also resulted in renewed
;:
!: consultation between the United States Department of Interior and
1
the Tennessee Valley Authority which produced an
Alternatives
'·
!i
i•
:·
Study which again pointed out the greater benefits of Valley
;, development.
,,
Plaintiffs' lawsuit has also resulted in a cabinet level
·I
I.
'I
I
review of the project by the Endangered Species
Co~~ittee
which
unanimously found that the Project was not justifiable as a
1i
I
reservoir.
Charles Schultz , a member of the Endangered Species
!;
I'
1: Committee as well as Chairman of the President's Council of
I
:
1
;;1
Economic Advisors, said during the hearings on the Project:
1:
,l
Here is a project that is 95% complete
and if one takes just the costs of
finishing it against the total project
benefits, it doesn't pay, which says
something about the original design.
;'
!I
'
i:I
I;I
!:.,
Tennessee Valley Authority
li! additional
1
.,,,
itself.estimates that an
$30-$40 million remains to be spent to complete the
Project .
Thus, plaintiffs insist that their efforts have been a
paradigm of citizen participation which has saved the taxpayers
millions of dollars and therefore, the award of costs and fees
in this cause is appropriate.
-2-
,.
!!
i:
p
,!
II.
PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR FEES AND COSTS WAS TH1ELY
J! FILED
!~
As was repeated-ly mentioned in defendant's brief,
li plaintiffs did not file a request for fees and costs with the
il
:; Appellate Court.
ii
However, defendant fails to mention that at the
time of such appeals, defendant and plaintiffs were working under
.!
,,
iL
il
an agreement signed by plaintiffs' attorney and defendant's
general counsel that "
. the plaintiffs will defer any claim
'i for costs, expenses, and attorneys fees until the appeal process
l:.!
is concluded before the Supreme Court of the United States,
I!,.
unless matters at issue are otherwise prior thereto concluded."
"
'
;1 (See Exhibit 1)
Apparently, defendant mistakenly overlooked this
\i
, agreement while formulating
:i
its
brief to this Court.
,,,,
Further, plaintiffs were not obligated to claim their
!ili
' fees and costs in the Appellate Courts.
The defendant's
' reliance upon Briggs v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 334 US 304 (1948)
ii is misplaced.
The test which this Court must use in determining whether
attorney fees and costs are appropriate is that found in Newman
v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., 390 US 400
,.';
;:
,,'·
11
(1968)
(".
. that
one V'7ho succeeds in obtaining an injunction under that title
should ordinarily recover an attorneys fee unless special
circumstance s would render such an award unjust."
390 US at 402).
I.
(t
'1
,,;,
III.
THE AWARD OF FEES AT 'THE RATE OF $75.00 PER HOUR
::,, IS NOT EXCESSIVE UNDER THE CIRCJMS'l'ANCES OF THIS CASE
1.:
II
:j
ll
)i
The most often used guidelines for determining reasonable.
1:
attorney fees in this type of case are set down in Johnson v.
Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F 2d 714 (Fifth Circuit 1974) .
.1
II
The factors to be considered are:
1)
'I'ime and labor requiredi
2)
Novelty and difficulty of the legal questions
3)
Skill requiredi
.
1 ve d ;
l:!'i 1nvo
-3-
4)
L
!i
Proclesions of other employment due to acceptance
of the case;
5)
Usual fee for similar work in the community;
6)
Whether fee was fixed or contingent;
7)
Time limitations involved;
8)
Amount involved and results obtained;
9)
Experience, reputation and ability of counsel;
10)
Undesirability of the case;
ll)
Nature and length of professional relationship with
I ~.
12)
Fee awards in similar cases;
Iii
488 F 2d at 717-19.
, client;
li
1,(
,I
See also Carter v. 1·1ontgomery Ward and Co. ,
it!
! 76
1
Federal Rules Decisions 565 (E.D. Tenn 1977); Brandenburger v.
' Thompson, 494 F 2d 885 (Ninth Circuit 1974); Fairley v. Patterson,
, 493 F 2d 598 (Fifth Circuit 1974)
~
Smith v. Chapman, 436 F Supp
!)
'!
:158
(~·J.D.
Texas 1977).
Defendants apparently accept the above guidelines.
(Defendant's brief page 8)
I; that only
Defendants are correct when they say
. reasonable attorney fees may be allmved."
n
Defendant is also correct when i t insists that here the fee,
is
not a contractual one, "but one imposed upon an involuntary
1: client."
l:
But it must be remembered that this "involuntary
:; client" had
i!
>i
,,·i
imposed'itself upon an unwilling public (as
represented by Congress) when it ignored Federal Law.
In fact,
a strong motivating factor for the Supreme Court's presumption
of awarding attorneys fees in Nevnnan v. Piggie Park Enterprises,
Inc.,
390 US 400
(1968) was that costs would be taxed not
against normal civil litigants, but against'those who violate
Federal Statutes.
The request for attorney fees in this case by Professor
:• Plater and Hr. Dougherty is extremely reasonable under the
circumstances.
l\-1r. Dougherty is a highly experienced trial and
appellate attorney in Knoxville, Tennessee, has practiced before
this Court upon many and varied occasions and is one of the
-4-·
distinguis hed attorneys in this state.
approxima tely 18 years.
He has practiced law for
Professor Zygmunt J. B. Plater is a
former professor of law _at the University of Tennessee College
of Law and is currently a professor at Wayne State Universit y.
He has published numerous scholarly works concerning Federal
Environme ntal Law, is a recognized expert in the field of
Environme ntal Law, and has received many awards for distinguis hed
achieveme nt in these areas.
As noted in plaintiff s' Verified Bill of Costs, the
vast majority of Professor Plater's time to this case has been
donated pro bono.
Further, the only periods for which
1: compensat ion is claimed is his own personal time during vacations
~!
;: or otherwise .
II
Few cases have presented more novel or difficult legal
questions than the present case from inception to completio n.
The case was without precedent .
1
political significan ce.
The case had national legal and
The case presented questions that
ultimately had to be resolved by the Supreme Court of the
ii. United States.
H
The successfu l pursuit of plaintiff s' claim also required,
considera ble skill.
1
j:
In addition to the highly complex issues
presented , plaintiffs were pitted against the formidable resources
of the Tennessee Valley Authority and the United States Departmen t
Justice.
It is impossibl e to determine with certainty the extent
11,,
::
i!
to which plaintiff s' counsel was precluded from accepting other
employmen t.
In light of the time and labor involved, however,
a substanti al preclusiv e effect is undeniabl e.
Similary, no "usual fee" for suits under the Endangere d
Species Act has been establishe d in this or any other communi t::l·
11ost certainly , however, the request of Plaintiff s' counsel for
reiriliursem ent at the rate of $75.00 per hour is well within
normal rate range for this community .
the
In applying fee authori-
zation provision s almost identical to those of the Endangere d
Species Act, the Court in Save Our Sound Fisheries Associatio n v.
-5-
jl Calloway, 429 F Supp 1136
d
( D. R. I. 1977 ) , noted that fee
awards were to be competitive with prevailing rates in the
:. community.
'I
See also Vaughman v. VJilson Freight Forwarding Co.,
l\
>!
,,,,
\<
79 FRD 520
(W. D. Penn 1978)
($50.00 per hour proper rate for
'I
i' period 72-76 in Alleghany County, Pennsylvania) ; Oliver v.
;i
!i
: Kalamazoo Board of Education, 73 FRD 30
l'
(W. D. Mich 1976)
($40.00 - $100.00 per hour billing rates resulted in base figures
of 283, 925 and ultimate award of $507,067.00)
l\
!t
i1
IJ
Aid Act).
(Emergency School
The $75.00 per hour rate is competitive •;-Jith pre-
vailing rates in this community.
ll
Plaintiffs' request remains reasonable in light of the
li
ji
'''·!eighth factor set forth in Johnson.
,t
The efforts of counsel
:r
ultimately yielded the exact relief prescribed by Congress and
desired by plaintiffs.
u of
The permanent injunction against closure
the Tellico Dam has preserved the Snail Darter for legislative
resolution of the issue.
Further, plaintiffs
efforts thoughout this lawsuit
have ultimately saved the tax payers millions of dollars.
Finally, determining reasonable attorney fees requires
consideration of the undesirability of the caae.
Dam controversy polarized public opinion.
,,i'l
The Tellico
Emotions ran high on
both sides of the issue throughout the surrounding area.
Despite
the vJOrthiness of plaintiffs 1 cause, public pressure, fueled
by extensive media coverage, was intense.
Serving as counsel
in such a case inevitably risks the alienation of a large segment
of the community.
CONCLUSION
For the above reasons stated, the Court should vacate
i
the Order entered on July 5, 1979, and avJ'D.rd the plaintiffs their
if
il
I'
'l
-·6-
reasonable attorney fees and costs in the above captioned
matter.
Respectfu lly submitted this 16th day of July, 1979.
~·l.
P. BOONE DOUGHERTY
i)
li
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF S
PETER ALLD1AN
ATTORl;rEY FOR PLAINTIFF S
I
I
!·
I'
!I
,,i'I
TENNESSEE
KNOXVILLE~
VALLEY
AUTHORITY
TENNESSEE 37902
"
FEB 1 J 1977
W. P. Boone Dougherty, Esq.
Suite 1200
United American Bank Building
Re:
Hiram G. Hill, et al. v.
Docket No. 76-2116
Dear l1r. Dougherty:
The fol'lowing reflects our understanding and agreement as
counsel of record for the respective parties in the
captioned litigation.
The parties agree that upon the issuance of the mandate
by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, the attached
agreed order will be presented to the district court for
entry.
It is specifically agreed that the attached agreed order
incorporates and sets forth the work and activity in
which the Tennessee Valley Authority will be permitted
to engage relative to construction of the Tellico project
and that from which they will be enjoined.
It is further agreed that the work which is to be discontinued and enjoined will cease as of the end of the
workday on Thursday, February 10, 1977.
It is further agreed between the parties that the plaintiffs will defer any claim for costs, expenses, and
An E.qual Opportunity Etnploy,:t·
,.
2 W. P. Boone Dougherty,
Fl 8 11 1977
Es~.
attorneys' fees until the appeal process is concluded before
the Supreme Court of the United States, unless the matters
at issue are otherwise prior thereto concluded.
Sincerely yours,
iL-'Lt~)t.L
s, s Cl
YLtSh))
Herbert S. Sanger,
General Counsel
The foregoing constitutes the
agreement between all of the
parties in the captioned
litigation.
w.f~w~ ]>4~1
H. P. Boone Dougherty
Attorney of Record for all of
the Plaintiffs, Hiram G. Hill, Jr.,
Zygmunt J. B. Plater, DonaldS.
Cohen, The Audubon Council of
Tennessee, Inc., and The Association
of Southeastern Biologists
\:vu -
J~
/tlD f1~/'i-'f
$
_,.c""""_}"'""O'--L___c__ _
No. _
111
FoR
(.;.
19
,? -·~
CENTS
·=-
BALANCE BROUGHT fORWARD
AMOUNT DEPOSITED
ToTAL
'1
;;
AMOUNTOFTHIS CHECK
ji
BALANCE CARRIED FoRWARD
,,I
I
"
i,
11.-
$
oocl
No.
Z-/u·,
19'1
-
To
FoR
4-
'
j:
DOLLARS
CENTS
BALANCE BROUGHT FORWARD
AMOUNT DEPOSITED
TOTAL
AMOUNTOFTHIS CHECK
,,'
BALANCE CARRIED fORWARD
d
!
,,
,,
CENTS
70
AMOUNT DEPOSITED
ToTAL
,;
11-'----+-c-t-C--1,1
AMoUNTOFTHIS CHECK
((c.,
•;)
,J
A
..
7.20
----
0
No.
~
To
FoR
'L-7
'
i
1/
19/b
L.:o.........---.>..t N -e_~Q_Q
C,._,;!J~ aJ2 ..... ~y
'
DOLLARS
CENTS
-~~~(:,
~0
A
AMOUNT 0EPOSI"TED
TOTAL
5o
AMOUNT OF THIS CHECK
,,
'
"1..¥' -,_(.,
BALANCE CARRIED FORWARD
·- ~
'0'Sv
-..~v
ii
$ ~~7 bt,/-:0.
0 ~
v
_ _ _ _ _____j'14(----!::1..:.....&i?L/_·_19 7.(,
To
C_
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~------~
'·
BALANCE BROUGHT FoRWARD
::
AMOUNT DEPOSI"TED
B
ToThL
AMoUNT oF THIS CHECK
/7/_
~I
-----------------4''~~-------'9 ~
I'
DOLLARS
AMOUN"T DEPOSITED
TOTAL
AMOUNTOFTHIS CHECK
CENTS
T
C.'(
$ ::>)~ b
0.2Yi
No.
S (Lo
,I
To
.lV ~
19
fb
~---L:~)
.::'~ (l_; ',_..;J.Ko/
foR
DOLLARS
BALANCE BRoUGHT FoRwARD
2'22-~ DC]
AMOUNT DEPOSITED
TOTAL
I
5:h !0
AMoUNTOFT HIS CHECK
::
A
CENTS
~I
10
CJ3
J
t
·I
!,
,.·i
,I'
:j
l
B
,i
CENTS
DOLLARS
t '70 9J.
1>.'}3
AMOUNT DEPOSITED
OD
TOTAL
I
,!
+
:I
,i
l·i
CENTS
'i'I
I ~~
AMOUNT DEPOSITED
;,
TOTAL
"
1--'----- -+---11
I
!i
!•
AMoUNTOFT Hrs CHECK
j
j_
£X S
..
II'
$ ~f)D
-
No.
_J..()"-¥.4--·~L.c_/_ _
__ __ ____.:::JsL-/-t/~2"'-·Jc::c::,_._i9 7G
A
AMOUN T DEPOS ITED
TOTAL
AMoU NT oF THIS CHECK
BALAN CE CARRIE D foRWA RD
'
I
DOLLAR S
,,
CENTS
BALAN CE BROUG HT FORWA RD
AMOUN T DEPOS ITED
TOTAL
AMOU NT OF THIS CHECK
BALANC E CARRIE D FoRWA RD
----·---
--ri~.vo No. ~b
$
To
q
5e.(2f
19
7£
Bo.::>..-,e_ \) O!Act\...v-l-o~
foR
"
......
1 1"9. .,...., c.,,.-·, r.:A· - '-1'/~poJodt.ls/~~j..
DOLLAR S ,
BALAN CE BROUG HT FoRwAR D
2-s-s-
CENTS
77
AMOUN T DEPOS ITED
t.
I
:•
TOTAL
A MOUN TOFTH IS
CHECK
BALAN CE CARRIE D fORWA RD
7
9'/5
~-7
77
..
$ 5"'0
~7
No.
~
¥
19,,
&Jj! 6~ Do~~~
I
To
11
jJ J2PLkri:_
Q~O
foR
I
....!...!'.
l'i
DOLLARS
AMOUNT DEPOSITED
I ( \ __ ,,,
'
.SI 11
(, (_) ---- ") ,-)
r;
ToTAL
CENTS
..
/
::)
1.
5-0
BALANCE CARRIED FORWARD ;•
·~
'
A
(l0
~
~-
..,
(:;; / 3
~
l . . f.
."--' •r
N
...-~c:..
$ ~_
0.~
~--
I "/ 0
To
..,
' . l2t,
,/-?( ..H\
,c /,)·-
E~--!-r_,
cr
19
c·
/1
:~
foR
,.
2 '--:2""va7·v 1
...:--e "·· .,-;_. ._..; 1/J!
""'
b_
·:;.~
'
...
:; }f:,-:.
v
.b1/_~.,_/'
DOLLARS
AMOUNT
16
"''-~ ~~~
CENTS
.
.., 77
DEPOSITED
ToTAL
A MOUNTOFTH IS
...,
CHECK
.
8
ALANCE CARRIED FORWARD
)
;
_,"
I
-, '7
!
('
'
$_tf_S"_'J:_)O_
No.---..2'.::..0___ _ -oc:t-
:tO
---~~-
19
'
CENTS
BALANCE BRouGHT FoRWARD
AMOUNT DEPOSITED
ToTAL
AMOUNTOF THIS CHECK
B
£X7
..
f
..
Lj!)']_!.L No. t,~
;!
3 JO.r.
To 75<1. <"t\~4 ~I:...
foRC'J...~-1-c.-
;I
19J..f__
..
D"'"'",.t,,_,..,L., +- Jt--riJ-v...!J
A
-;:>C, ... c;"'M·l'
CENTS
DOLLARS
I I 2]
70
.:_,'_-·]
f I
AMOUNT DEPOSITED
TOTAL
/::-
s:·q
':;·
ORIG!I\!AL
AO Frorm No. 82-Revised
Form a.pproved by
Comp. Gen., U, S.
December 2, 1952
RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR
THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
RECEIVED
FROM
£~~_L'JA';//:,
l.
7/..£4/t, .77~.-:A
Place
DOC.
NO.
~~~ 3-71:,--~g
/*-'
CASE
OR
PROCEEDING
·
-"r.-C:i-·J-1-i..)
ACCOUNT
Clerk's Fil)ng• Fee
~
-1
'-Juf,_c:..e -Jz t tJjt<cif
Division
/i:t-CL-JC..-u'Jt
I ;{ /7(,
i(A~
. Uv IDATE fo
)7·
B
J.4tlfly:;;. TtA.
AMOUNT
.,!; 12£)_
ACCOUNT
Registry
Cosh Boil
Bonkruptcy
•
7
Filing Fee
Referee's Sol.
ond Exp. Fund
AMOUNT
Tender
Restitution
Miscel. Earnings
Admission of Attorney
Other Moneys
Civil Judgment
Copy-Compore
rCosts
Certificote
!'
Fine
Noturolizotion
i
i'
,[
lr
-I
,,
I
',,
rl
7ha~Jdn
~~
r
Decl'n
Pet'n
"
No.
Total+
DEPUTY CLERK
i)
0
\J.
I
Cosh
0
-if S:OCJ
Check
1::f
€i
U.s. ;po : li74·560-SSS
L
£X8 .
..
c.
·J
;
...
... ,'
·-·······
· 1·:...~ ~ . ::: r-. - y
,-.--~
,_
-:: :; -! ;_:
,~,.·~-
'
o-:~
:-:.'}S.~\~JO.
0.
G.
J~
.,_r•, . ...._: ......... _ -- .)
COHS~-~
120:>
t11\rv:IL1-::N
t'~f'.!O:...~VfLLE.
8;.:-.:;<
TEh.
D·J::.cl:;c;
~C:SSCC
~ 790.~2
H~_ram G. Hill, et al.
vs. TVA (Snail darter)
MATTER:
L
Endangered Species Committee
P.O. Box 8590
UT Station
DATE:
_j
December 29, 1976
A
STATEMENT
FOR PERIOD:
$
$
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED:
Air charter to
Cincinn~ti,
Ohio - October 14, 1976
459.11
(further statement will follow)
0
THANK YOU!
TOTAL
1$ 459.11
i,J
I
ORIGIN -
ENDORSEMENTS{RESTRICTIONS {CARBOH)
I
-'- :,_$ /--
.r
(,:·
~ l
.)
. '. ,. 'I
/\ .·' /:: ,r,/.-
DESTINATION
.tlt:
,.?(JL;/" :./1 !'/~~-
FROM TO
4"" )~
CARRIER
FARE
CALCUlATION
CONJUNCTION TICKET($)
.. ),-'
DATE OF ISSUE
ISSUED IN EXCHANGE fOR
CARRIER
fORM & SERIAL NUMP.fR
TICKET DESIGI'IATOR
PlACE
TOUR CODE
B
r
I
,,
!)
:
I'
8251499967 4
D
.,
:~
i
l;
,.I
,,
i
A
10
1 1
cO
--1
0\
12
C)
0
-l
8
:s:
"'0
:i:
s:
I
f\5
0
0
;
I~
,I
·'
I'
RATES DO r-001 I
APPLICABLE SALE:;
or:- C·THER i
TrJ-EN;:TH ER LA,_N_D_H_I_L_T_O_r·-i-
ii
I
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202
,GUEST SIGNATURE
FIRM
ADDRESS
CITY
231426
I
-""'!.......----·.....,-·~----____.,.,......,-'
1 ENOORSEMENfS/RESTII:ICTIONS (C.4.RBON)
j,:..c /ti.I'JIU
Jr, ( t
.
1-.' 'It ft
I'
V If
't (.
<'
u
WESTC::1 N i;VORLD
TVL CEN rEF: INC
KNOXViLLE TN
/I:';U.//.
NAME OF PASSENGER
DATE OF ISSUE
ISSUED IN EXCHANGE FOil:
• 8 FEB 7
CARRIER
FORM & SERI,I,l NUMBER
TOVR CODE
TICKET DESIGNATOR
CARRIER
~~:;;:3375 2
PLACE
FLIGHT/CLASS
,,
I
({II UniTED AIRL~nes
016 2
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT ON PASSENGERS COUPON
SERIAl NUMBER
CPN
016
8265954324 5
0
..
u
Jl\
PI! f\',f
Steve ns 'iJeechcraft,lnc.
GREENVILL E-SPARTAN BURG AIRPORT
P. 0. BOX 589
P.O. BOX 1010
CHARLOTTE. N.C. 28231
1 10t3cO
91 1063l0
ACCOUNT NUMBER
DCRNSTEIN UCLGHERTY E
SLSAf\C
12 ~. 0 U r:r T t 0 AI' E F<l C t l\ tAl'-1< ElCG
l~
·,·;c, ..
·'t~·~.··l"
Accounts Receivable Oepartme
11/2S/ /6
~NOX~ILLE
·~.
:.t. ..'\=~. 'or:'
J. P Stevens & Co., in<
GREER, SOUTH CAROLIN A 29651
803/877-81 00
STATEM ENT OF ACCOUN T
IJI 1 fH H
ANO MAIL WITH
YOUR CHECK TO:
ll/29/7 (;
?7SC2
YOUR ATTENTION
IS DIRECTED TO:
~--------~----~----~----~----~
------------+----------TRANS.
DATE
DUE
DATE
INVOICE
1\NS.
CUSTOMER
JPS
TOTAL
PAST DUE
NUMBER
'JDE
REFERENCE
DEPT.
AMOUNT
MO. ,DAY YR.
MO. i DAY j YR.
AMOUNT
~-
I
!
11
573'.:
72t
1030.76 ll\2 9\7 t
I
DATE
I NV. NO. OR REMARKS
GROSS
DISCOUNT
45111
I
45r
NET
·~··
,.
..... ...: -'"".·· . ~.
TOTAL
.1- .
~·
BERNSTEIN , DOUGHERT Y & SUSANO
1200 Hamilton Nat'! Bank Bldg.
KNOXVILLE , TENN. 37902
\
3E TO COME
NC?
10160
TTOCOME
,1.,:.·
·:.··
..,.,
<.:..·
.. "'"" l :,;':
,,•!
\
~
,!
'tr' ..,·
EX II
.
JPS-22540-7
Stevens CUeechcraft,lnc.
INVOICE
0
INVOICE NO.
norr"'"
')~
J { d·J
GREENVILLE-SPARTA NBURG AIRPORT, P. 0. BOX 589, GREER, S.C. 29651
IX] KNOXVILLE DOWNTOWN ISLAND AIRPORT, P. 0. BOX ~664, KNOXVILLE, TENN.37901
28J
SOLD
TO
Oct. 30, 1976
Bernstein, Dougherty, Susano
1200 United American Bank Bldg.
Knoxville, Tnen. 37902
ANY REFERENCE TO THIS INVOICE
SHOULD CARRY OUR INVOICE NUMBER
REMIT TO:
J.P. STEVENS & CO., 11\JC.
Accounts Receivable
P. 0. BOX 1010
CHARLOTTE, 1\J. C. 28231
'REFER ADJUSTMENTS AND
CORRESPONDENCE TO:
SHIPPED
TO
STEVENS BEECHCRAFT, INC.
P. 0. BOX 589
GREER, S.C. 29651
VIA
I
CUSTOMER ORDER NO. (For ldent. Only)
I
AIRCRAFT
I
MODEL
I
Y~U~ ~;~U;T NO.
REGISTRATION NO.
DESCRIPTION
I
RATE
145.00
10.00
PERTINENT DETAILS OF THE REPAIR ARE ON FILE AT THIS
AGENCY UNDER WORK ORDER NO.
DATE ________________ ______________
Sl GNED ----------------- ----------------- --FOR
D
P. 0. BOX 589
GREER, S.C. 29651
REPAIR STATION 4348
PARTS
FUEL, ETC.
I
459.08
TRANSPORTATION
SALES TAX
0
P. 0. BOX 2664
KNOXVILLE, TENN. 37901
REPAIR STATION 4350
ORIGINAL
d
367.29
33.33
53.36
5.10
TOTAL LABOR
OTHER
.;
AMOUNT
63.58
337.04
53.36
5.10
THE AIRCRAFT AND/OR COMPONENT ABOVE WAS REPAIRED AND
INSPECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AVIATION
REGULATIONS AND WAS FOUND AIRWORTHY FOR RETURN TO
SERVICE.
2605735
TACH. OR H. M.
MFG. NO.
2.533
3.333
PARTS ITEMIZED ON ATTACHED SHEET
CONTROL
I
WORK ORDER NO.
HOURS
Charter 10/13 & 1014/76
Kn~o±lle to Cincinnati & return
Pax: Mr. Boone Dougherty plus 3
Pilot Waiting Time
Pilot Expenses
Tiedown
319-012-029
319-012-026
421-111-029
408-209-029
PLEASE FURNISH THE NUMBER
OF THIS INVOICE WITH YOUR
PAYMENT.
TOTAL
459.08
..
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
JOHN P. HEHMAN
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
CLERK
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202
August 31, 1976
W. P. Boone Dougherty
Bernstein, Dougherty & Susana
1200 Hamilton National Bank Bldg.
Re:
Hiram G. Hill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs.
Tennessee Valley Authority, Defendant-Appellee.
Our Number 76-2116 transferred from 76-8129
District Court Number C-3-76-48
Dear Mr. Dougherty:
We have today filed the certified record and docketed the
above-captioned case as Number 76-2116 in this Court. Your
receipt for the payment of the $50.00 filing fee is enclosed.
Very truly yours,
John P. Hehman, Clerk
cc:
Zygmunt J. B. Plater
1224 Ferdon Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104
Herbert S. Sanger, Jr.
General Counsel
Division of Law
400 Commerce Ave.
£113
..
ORIGINA l
AO Form No. 182
F·~· ap»<c'Y."d by
Ct ·C'\. Gen., U.S.
Janu.~r;y 8, 1953
RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
9-1 -J(c
Clerk's Fee for docketing
A
(DATE)
ACCOUNT
AMOUNT
case}){J-c.j'Z..}-I::.J
....~
;!!_ OJ
2..J- 7 '
Miscellaneo us Fees
Certified copy of
,,
;j
Copy of Opinion
Certificate of admission
.I
Copy of Court Rules
'I
'i
D
;
~
v Clerk
0
;st.
I
I
_$Z) t:IJ
TOTAL
------~~~~~~----~~~~~~~--~~---
------------!
*u.s.
!
-DATE
--
GROSS
GPO: IS74-550-9l58
-·
DIS<;OUNT
NET
//
~
/
TOTAL
//
PAYABLE TO:
REMARI$5
b;d.; ~l!t.tJ./cl'~.
DA
T~
,12
¢/? &:>
(,/
i
,at'MT.
d~~":7J~il
'; .,..,.. 'd'L?
~CHECK
6"'t::J.
{/_
.4 .A -
~
7
t)O
'
8 ERNST EIN, DOUGHER TY & SUSANO
1200 Hamilton Not'l Bonk Bldg.
KNOXVILL E, TENN. 37902
THIS IS A STATEMENT OF PAYMENT OR
A STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND DEDUCTION-S
PLEASE DETACH BEFORE CASHING
9706
:i
L
.
·-·
DATE
I NV. NO. ORJEMARK~.,
--t/,J, o(L
r'JJ" ..1?
TOTAL
---
--
...
G!;jOSS
~
DACOUNT
f'~
-
('.~
.,.£/_
-NET
.£_.,
-
PAYABLE TO:
REMARKS
~:~~ k/_A.'JAr.Y./.A .0-~
. ...,. 'II
DA~AL'20
I
-
AMT. OF dfiECK
-
~ () iJ
A
BERNSTE IN, DOUGHER TY & SUSANO
\.
8253
A STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND DEDUCTION'S
DATE
GROSS
DISCOUNT
NET
r·
TOTAL
PAYABLE TO:
I
I
ti
,,'
7hrJ'. ~~A_A
·- ,'lPl~ ~
~~
DAJ; _,:
REMARKS
;I
,;-
~?(~A_/£'~
;j
I
.,
--1
AMTiF CHECK
,0(]
BERNSTEI N, DOUGHER TY & SUSANO
. li
N?
9081
N~
9777
DATE
i
TOTAL
·THIS IS A STATEMENT OF PAYMENT OR
B
..
il I
l \ u ..... I 'u f 4 ~}_ :..:., fJ u
I i J ~ I f u \. . . I I u i'J 0 t u J l -J L 1 I ./ j ·~ . . L u F
PROCE SS BY THE U.S. MARS HAL" on the
reverse of the last
(No. 5) copy of this form. Please type or print
legibly
readab ility of all copies . Do not detach any copies , insurin g
.
J
PROCESS RECEIPT and RETU RN
PLAINTIFF
J
L
COURT NUMBE R
DEFENDANT
TYPE OF WRIT(S)
NAME OF INDIVI DUAL, COMP ANY, CORPO
RATIO N, ETC., TO SERVE OR DESCR IPTION
OF PROPE RTY TO SEIZE OR COND EMN
SERVE
('>·
ADDRE SS (Street or RFD, Apartm ent No., City,
State and ZIP Code).
I·
AT
S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2~~~M~~~~A~~~~~~~~~---------
~
.
.
. '· ·; '
i. ~
.. '·'
Numbe r of writs to be
served with this form-2 85
------------+--------
L,_l
·'·'
..
,
I
1
Numb erpart iestob e
served in this case
I Check for service
~ onU~A
--------------------SPECI AL INSTR UCTIO NS OR OTHER INFOR- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MATIO N THATW ILLA.S SIST IN EXPED ITING~--------------------~-----------SERVI CE:
I
)
···,
;
t'
I
1,
I
.\····
i·
Signat ure of Attorne y or other Origina tor reques
ting service on behalf of:
SPACE BELO W FOR USE OF U.S.
..
Ia cknow iedge receipt for the
tot al numbe r of writs indicat ed
(S ign only first USM 285 if
mo re than one 285 is submit ted]
Total Writs
I hereby certify and return that I 0have person
J
1\~AilSHAL
Distric t
of Origin
District
to Serve
0
PLAIN TIFF
0
DEFEN DANT
TELEP HONE NUMB ER
DATE
ONL Y- DO NOT WRITE BELO W THIS LINE
Signat ure of Author ized USMS Deputy or Clerk
0
Date
0
ally served ,
have legal eviden ce of service ,
have execut ed as shown in "Rema rks", the
w1 it describ ed on the individ ual, compa ny,
corpor ation, etc., at the addres s shown above
or on the individ ual, compa ny, corpor ation, etc.,
the addres s inserte d below,
at
0
I hereby certify and return that I am unable to
locate the individ ual, compa ny, corpor ation, etc.,
named above. (See remark s below)
·Name and title of individ ual served (if not shown
above)
A person of suitabl e age and
discret ion then residin g in the
defend ant's usual place of abode.
Addres s (compl ete only if differe nt than shown
above)
Date of Servic e
Time
0
am
pm
Siannt ure of U.S. Marsha l or Deputy
. ~c•·-, ~r-v..C
·\),
REMA RKS:
:~~c j( ?J,n v
I/
Forwar ding Fee !Servic e Fee
!
I {() t
JJ- · o::-
!Milea ge (includ ing endeav ors)
ITo~al
. _1
Serv ice - 2-24 -76 -On e Subp oena - $3.00
THIS IS YOUR STATEf.1ENT ---- ---- ---- -PLEASE use the Cler k's No. on your chec k
Please ma':e check payable to
U.S. Marshal
P. 0. Box 551
KnoxviJie, Tennessee 37901
r 1
1
II
. ";;
Mr. W. P. Boone Dougherty
Attorny at Law
Hamilton Bank Building
Knoxville, TN
37902
Dear Mr. Dougherty,
Please find enclosed a check for $798.00 to pay for the transcripts of
Proceedings in Civil Action No. 3-76-48 - Hiram G. Hill, Jr. et al,
Plaintiffs, v. TVA, Defendant; and a check for $50.00 to perfect the
appeal for the same case.
t)/1~
r
A-or-?____ _
Doris Gov~ • Tennessee Endangered Species Committee
P.O. Box 8590
U.T. Station
Knoxville TN 37916
11
9-September 1976
GENERAL REPORTING
STANLEY 1<.
FORO
STATE
AT
LARGE
NOTARY
OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
APPEAL RECORD
REPRODUCTIONS
U. S. DISTRICT COURT
OFFICE PHONES 525·42[]2
524·[]751
POST Of"F"ICE BOX 277
KNOXVILLE 2, TENNESSEE
August 23, 1976
P. Boone Dougherty,
Attorney at Law,
Hamilton Bank Bldg.,
Knoxville, TN 37902.
Mr. W.
8/23
Original and one carbon copy of Transcript cf Proceedings
in Civil Action No. 3-76-48 - Hiram G. Hill, Jr., et al,
Plaintiffs, v. Tennessee Valley Authority, Defendant
u.s. District Court, Knoxville, TN, 4/29-30/76
456 pages, $1.75 pp
iJ
$
798.00
..
GENERAL REPORTINI 3
STATE
F"C RO
K.
STAN LEY
OF'F'ICIAL COURT REPORTE R
APPEAL RECORD
REPRODUC TIONS
U,
e._ DISTRICT
AT
LARGE
NOTARY
OF"F"ICE PHONES 525·4202
524-0751
COURT
POST OF"F"ICE BOX 277
KNOXVIL LE 2, TENNESS EE
April 6 1 1976
Mr. H. P. Boone Doughe rty 1
Attorne y at Law,
Hamilt on Bank Buildin g,
Knoxv ille, TN 37902.
A
4/6
-DATE
!NV. NO. OR REMARKS
---
----
NET
DISCOUNT
GROSS
Procee dings on Plaint iffs'
Civil Action No. 3-76-48
iffs, v. T.V.A. , Defend ant,
N, 2/25/76
I
J
-J
TOTAL
REMARKS
PAYABLE TO:
I
i
&-.. ~;!.$~-~~:~A1~
AMT. OF CHECK
DS;t~/;~
l
i
33.-.s o·
12.00 Hamilton Nat' I Bank Bldg.
KNOXVILLE , TENN. 37902.
8120
THIS IS A STATEMENT OF PAYMENT OR _
A STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND DEDUCTIONS
--
-·
-
-
---
DISCOUNT
GROSS
!NV. NO. OR REMARKS
DATE
NET
-
I
.i
li
TOTAL
REMARKS
PAYABLE TO:
'--t5P B.&
DATE
DJ);{/ -n
I
kl~~
fl~t·.~~
AAI h ' tJ .«:r '" ',)
'f_q 'L
AMT. OF CHEC~
-II j 5 () :E.
I
12.00 Hamilton Nat'l Bank Bldg.
KNOXVILLE , TENN. 37902.
NC?
?555
13
6X11
..
--
"'
,,
NET
DISCOU NT
GROSS
DATE
.
TOTA L
REMAR KS
PAYA BLE TO:
.i
,,
:l
.!
'
u
a. t;[(;_,d 7ICW£
')
DATE
q/,J-tilrt
A'.-.~/'< tf·
fitt¢ .-&
'.:
/)_J /P
AMT. OF CHEC ft
Lf,q;-7
-=
&{/.),
'
8801
N«?
THIS IS A STATEM ENT OF PAYME NT OR
ION'S
A STATEM ENT OF EARNINGS AND DEDUCT
,,I
DATE
GROSS
NET
DISCOU NT
;:
d
.
TOTA L
REMAR KS
PAYA BLE TO:
~k-L ~~A§~/1)
DATE< /-
. -
7
-5-1 7'7
j/
1
£ ·j!g;:~~ z·
'Jru . 'h n _, .1 •d.L ~ t! A;;;z:;
I AMT;/i_~~K_cj
O
BERN STEIN , DOUG HERTY & SUSAN
1200 Hamilt on Nat'l Bank Bldg.
KNOX VILLE , TENN . 37902
t1· 37
N9
.
THIS IS A STATEM ENT OF PAYMEN T OR
IONS
A STATEM ENT OF EARNIN GS AND DEDUCT
10685
B
;ij~:J\l ~::~~:V,""l12ni' ~D:
~-::.;;j os-~;A :;::~·~ore:-:~:-~ (;or
D-U-N-S
-'-I
Bank No.
05-807-0459
Freight Payment Plan
-------.
srx
--~~~i
18695
MEMPHIS TN 38118
' 'Sill lo;
>
m
~-t
l.
rn
.
......
>:I:
::u
A~~
~~(;;
mm1
:t:~~
rn:J c
mZfTI
•
mz ~
OOUr;HERTY & SUSM-!0
0 HA~1IL TON BA~IK
'VILLE TI-J 37902
11r111111 111i
'IT DUE IN 7 DAYS
e. :r:
~~i ;i~ ~~~~~'' 1u-~11~
~rn(/)
Zgz
l~JSTE!IJ
ZG)
-I
~~~
• .:;:·,;c''J'~"3 79-..0201 "'r
r----
Custome-
Invoice No.
3r~-
,l
i
-iO
(C
(/)
•
)>
r~ ~
I
F~lll &~I!
1200 HAMILTON
8ELn~ lNCLUbES A 5% FfDFRAL EXCISE TAX ON THE
AIP
TPANSPORTATION PORTION AND RELATED ACCfSSORIAL SERVlCES.
J nvoice
7 .. 03·2-(J6015
Date
Date Shipped
03/15/77
jrn
(X)
-<?.~/;;;--'><"1·-·•• , ..-~;;.,··~·-'-''""'
I
~ It'"'~
r
tt
oc,sio1
01
Svc.
-
0 i)
.
J 75
Rate
Scale
No.
Pkgs.
B Ll20
Weight
1
2
Net Weight
Charge
12 :50
Insurance
i
I
z
I
I
I~
m
;
'
()3/03/77
PRE·PaJD
I
.
Shipping
Cost
Other _Charges
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
Shipper Reference
1 c.-, I t;;- ()
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
tN
{_,,,)
Consignment
Scale
--Federal Expn :s
Control ID.
I
I
II
Pre-paid/
Collect
·:;:)r~:lr;·!·
!
w
RLOG
37902
THF CHARGE
....
(X)
RA~K
KNOXVILLE TN
NO:C
G)()-{
8 E R 1\J S T f HJ 0 0 Ur~ H E R T Y &. S! IS AN 0
BLDG
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
Serv1ce Codes 4.
1. Prtority 1, 2. Std. Atr.
4 Hazardous Mat., 6. SSS
--
-~~
~--
S • :3 H tr., f1 EN T
5-PSS
A•PO::>T PATD C/P
I
1. Address Corrections, 2 Returned Shipment.
Advance. 4. Handling, 5. Saturday Delivery,
6. International Service. 7. International Expedited,
8. Out of Delivery Area
13.
~
fT\
i
A Other Charge Code A
Total Charge
I
I
1 ? i r::; (1
~
oi~flll(
G!ll(liJn[
' /llt:iln I ·-~J-,:i.
b
I
!i'
5/12/76
Expenses in Snail Darter case:
i
'i
Trip to Washington
air fare
(Jim Williams' deposition)
$220.00 /
Jim O'Brien - 4/5/76
Jim O'Brien - 4/12/76
Jim O'Brien
4/16/76
Lawrence O'Brien - 3/30/76,
3/31/76 adn 4/l/76
79.50
271.00
53.25
Stanley K. Ford - 4/6/76
DATE
A
922.25
33.50
$1,579.50
DISCOUNT
GROSS
NET
TOTAL
~~. ~A;L/-_-;6 ~~A)
·
LJi.A.jU.A"'
AMT. OF CHECK
DATE&/d//)
•
0
1,,
a.,oo
BERNSTEIN, DOUGHERTY & SUSANO
1200 Hamilton Nat'l Bank Bldg.
1
B
REMARKS
PAYABLE TO:
N?
8891
DATE
GROSS
DISCOUNT
NET
./
'
TOTAL
PAYABLE TO:
'
I
REMARKS
·lz/J.'7J~..1J,- ,.&_; lLLL:t.~dvzJ
AMT. OF CHECK
DA~EJ it)!? 6
~.oo
I
1200 Hamilton Nat'l Bank Bldg.
N?
8924
_J
..
_ _ __
No. _~·;-
ENDANGERED SPECIES COMMITTEE
87-777
642
A
April lL~,
TO:
RE:
Attorney At Law
United American Bank Bldg.
I\:noxville, Tennessee
HALL, E'I' AL
ltj)j. NO. OR REMARKS
a.~
1
v
GROSS./?
DISCOUNT
NET
Jt l..nY-- <)t Qj
l...
.
TOTAL
REMARKS
PAYABLE TO:
'~··
~L .u- a.L- A</,
/;;.g-/?"
DA7{
.
r:JU
'
1
AMT. OF CHECK
~9._So
'
l
1200 Hamilton Not'! Bonk Bldg.
N?
9087.
VS.
409-38-1136
409.82-9484
B
TENNESSEE VALLEY
AUTHIDRITY
Deposition Of Dr. Williams On
DATE
(X )
LAWRENCE P. O'BRIEN
KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE 37918
•
To:
JAMES J. O'BRIEN
COURT REPORTING SERVICES
P. 0. BOX 5181
1976
MAKE CHECK PAYAaLE
O'BRIEN ". O'BRIEN
4-5-76.
(cc)
$
79 50
Ext?J
..
0 BRIEN
~
April
-O'BRIEN
COURT REPORTING SERVICES
•
P. 0. BOX 5181
TO:
JAMESJ. O'BRIEN
KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE 37918
LAWRENCE P. O'BRIEN
RE:
Attorney At Law
United American Bank Bldg.
Knoxville, Tennessee
Depositions Taken On
DATE
GROSS
26, 1976
MAKE CHECK PAYAaLE: To:
HILL, ET AL
VS.
4-12-76. (Your Portion)
(X)
409-38-1136
)
409-82-9484
(
TENNESSEE VALLEY
AUTHORITY
$ 271
00
NET
DISCOUNT
TOTAL
REMARKS
PAYABLE TO:
hA~&~- IAL-~~
-;;r- .,
~A4/3jt) /7 h
AMT.;;
l't.J-,
17//J-
11:~ 0
I
.._j
I
l
N?
9096
•
'I
'
'I
"
li
,,
,I
\!
i.
i
O'BR IEN
~
April 26, 1976
O'BR IEN
MAKE CHECK PAYAaLE
COURT REPOR TING SERVIC ES
P. 0. BOX 5181
TO:
To:
JAMES J. O'BRIEN
LAWREN CE P. O'BRIEN
e KNOXVIL LE. TENNES SEE 37918
Mr. W. P. Boone Dough erty
Attorn ey At Law
United Ameri can Bank Bldg.
Knoxv ille, Tenne ssee
RE:
HILL, ET AL
VS.
{ X)
409-38-1 136
)
409-82-9 484
{
TENNESSEE VAL.LEY
AUTHORITY
=======r======r=-=---
====~======~=================================
Depos ition Of Dr. Suttku s On 4-16-7 6. (cc)
DATE
GROSS
DISCOUNT
NET
i----~--------+----+--+---r-~---T--JI
TOTAL
PAYABLE TO:
REMARKS
-
AMT. OF CHECK
t..£3.,~5-
r
1200 Hamilton Nat'\ Bank Bldg.
]
N?
THIS IS A STATEMENT OF PAYMENT.OR
9097·
$
53 25
;;
MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO:
O'aRI EN oc O'BRI EN
JAMES J. O'BRIEN
COURT REPORT ING SERVICE S
P. 0. BOX5181 e KNOXVILL E, TENNESS EE37918
LAWRENC E P. O'BRIEN
(
)
409-38-11 36
<X
>
409-82-94 84
April 26, 1976
TO:
Ivlr. v.J. P. Boone Doughe rty
Attorn ey at Law
United J\.meric an Bank Bldg.
Knoxvi lle;, TN.
RE:
HILL, ET PL
VS
TVA
Servic es rendere d on 3/30/76~ 3/31/7 6,
::mn
DATE
INV. NO. OR REMARKS
4/1/76 .
GROSS
I
I
DISCOUNT
)t
/J.
t7)~..J- ~ './{
/)···~
v
NET
~.I'
·ipt (your share)
~.
:;o Lawren ce P. O'Brj_e n
TOTAL
I.
PAYABLE TO:
REMARKS
I
:JL:iv-.4- a,V $/, ]t/;U
I
!:J.-tJ /76
DA;;
]
·
-
AMT. OF CHECK
9 ;J,;:?.. ;;, .s-
KNOXVILLE , TENN. 37902
N?
I
11
:I
li
il
II
i!
i'
ii
!i
II
'I
I
i
il
9095
~~:
922 25
INSTRUCTIONS: See "INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE OF
PROCESS BY THE U.S. MARSHAL" on the reverse of the last
(No. 5) copy of this form. Please type or print legibly, insuring
readability of all copies. Do not detach any copies.
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
PROCESS RECEIPT and RETURN
PLAINTIFF
!
.;
COURT NUMBER
-
;•
)
DEFENDANT
SERVE
•
1YPE OF WRIT(S)
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL, COMPANY. CORPORATION, ETC., TO SERVE OR DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO SEIZE OR CONDEMN
ADDRESS (Street or RFD, Apartment No., City, State and ZIP Code)
AT
s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---------~
}-'
',~\:l
".cJ;}r~~.:
}>i'":':~·· -1:::~.:;:t~·-.-:-
:U. . <>:"f cn.t.
?~~_-f.!_:~..::. ;;j~j~J.l (':
"l
;'
/\···:~.:c·_i;"r~·~;y
Number of writs to be
served with this form-285
1--------------t-------~-
i.>;r - .cd.·\~~.
~e::de~:t~~ecsa:~be
;. -~_-_t_lrJ.C:~ :~r~~-~
I Check for service
---'~-o_n_u_._s_.A_.
_ - - - - - __ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - __________
_ _ _ _ _ _ __.__ _ _ _ _ _ __
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR OTHER INFORMATION THAT WILL ASSIST IN EXPEDITING SERVICE:
S'gnature of Attorney or other Originator requesting service on behalf of:
D
TELEPHONE NUMBER
PLAINTIFF
D DEFENDANT
SPACE BELOW FOR USE OF U.S. MARSHAL ONLY- DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
I acknowledge receipt for the
total number of writs indicated
(Sign only first USM 285 if
more than one 285 is submitted)
Total Writs
District
of Origin
District
to Serve
-..
Signature of Authorized USMS Deputy or Clerk
Date
,.
0
0
I hereby certify and return that I Dhave personally served,
haye legal evidence of service,
have executed as shown in "Remarks", the
writ described on the individual, company, corporation, etc., at the address shown above or on the individual, company, corporation, etc., at
the address inserted below.
\
0
I hereby certify and return that I am unable to locate the individual, company, corporation, etc., named above. (See remarks below)
A person of suitable age and
discretion then residing in the
defendant's usual place of abode.
Name and title of individual served (if not shown above)
0
Address (complete only if different than shown above)
Date of Service
Time
am
pm
I
Signature of U.S. Marshal or Deputy
For;arding Fee
ISer~ice
Fee
I
Mileage (including endeavors)
ITo~al
REMARKS:
.. '...
,,
.
L,' ·• '.' .', ~
fh
e.;ec
s
~I
'U. . . •
M-r-::~1 :d
So. 5::; 1
~·
pajableto
\P o
\<.~ox.vl\\e, Tennessee 37901
USM-285(Ed. 11-1-74)
3. NOTICE OF SERVICE
SNAIL DARTER APPENDIX
Item
Tota l co12ies
BD&S
TVA
Plea ding s
1601
1406
195
Tran scrip t
5629
3250
2379
Exhi bits
2782
429
2353
TOTAL
1001 2
5085
4927
CHARGES:
Hill et al
5085
X.03 (actu al pape r cost)
152.5 5
+7. 50 (post age)
13.50 (tran scrip t to Zyg)
+5.0 0 (post age)
$178 .05 (plus labo r)
TVA
4927
X.25
-$123 1.75
SNAIL DARTER APPENDIX
Tota l coEi es
BD&S
TVA
Plea ding s
1601
1406
195
Tran scrip t
5629
3250
2379
Exhi bits
2782
429
2353
TOTAL
1001 2
5085
4927
CHARGES:
Hill et al
Item
'
TVA
5085
X.03 (actu al pape r cost)
152.5 5
4927
X.25
=
$123 1.75
+7. 50 (post age)
13.50 (tran scrip t to Zyg)
+5.0 0 (post age)
$178 :05 (plus labo r)
W. P. BOON E DOUGHERTY
ATIORNE Y AT lAW
1200 HAMIL TON NATIO NAL BANK BUILD ING
KNOXV ILLE. TENNE SSEE 37902 - 546-80 30
Marc h 30, 1976
Rese rvati ons have been made for Mr. Doug herty ,
Mr. Pede rsen, Mr. Dell a Volp e and Mr. O'Br ien
as follo ws:
Apri l 5, 1976
Unit ed Flig ht 550:
10:5 4 A.M.
11:54 A.M.
Leav es Knox ville
Arriv es Wash ingto n, D.C.
Nons top
Mr. Jim Will iams ' depo sitio n is sche duled
for 1:00 P.M. Mond ay, Apri l 5, 1976 , in his
offic e.
Unit ed Flig ht 593:
7:00 P.M.
8:24 P.M.
Leav es Wash ingto n, D. C.
Arriv es Knox ville
Nons top
Mr. Ron Lamb ertso n, soli cito r is out of his
offic e for the rest of the week , and Mr.
Willi ams sugg ests a cont act with the perso n
who is sitti ng in for Mr. Lamb ertso n.
That
telep hone numb er is AC 202, 343-2 172.
A

Motion to Vacate And/Or to Reconsider Order and for a Rehearing

Transcription

Similar documents

Winter 2014 - Knoxville TVA Employees Credit Union

Bristol Motor Speedway Bristol Motor Speedway

csNewsletter 3-12-15

2016 Summer East Tennessee Newsletter

CAX Barbarian Bruiser

Untitled

Knoxville, Tennessee. Much cooler than you might imagine.

partners_JULY_04.qxd (Page 1)

USFCU Newsletter_2ND QUARTER.indd

A-1 FREEMAN RELOCATION INC vs. Z BILLIARDS

dismissed a putative class action

Case 3:08-cv-00516 Document 1 Filed 12/29/2008 Page 1 of 19

No Good Deed Goes Unpunished - UC Hastings Scholarship

See the EXCLUSIVE Court Docs.

Joint Compendium of Exhibits