The Childhood Obesity Epidemic and Hypermobile Flatfoot

Transcription

The Childhood Obesity Epidemic and Hypermobile Flatfoot
The Childhood Obesity Epidemic
and Hypermobile Flatfoot
Paul R. Scherer, DPM
Clinical Professor
College of Podiatry Medicine
Western University of Health Sciences
The Western Podiatric Medical Congress 2010
Short Code: 313131
Item Code: VTB4793
Financial Disclosure: ProLab Orthotics
Stride Rite®
Hypothesis
Hypermobile pediatric flatfoot is a comorbidity of
childhood obesity.
Lecture Objective
To reach a clinically significant
conclusion through a review of
recent literature and provide
practice guidelines.
Presentation and references at www.prolaborthotics.com
Why Are We Here?
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
How prevalent is childhood
obesity?
What is the evidence that
childhood obesity has an effect
on the lower extremity?
Does childhood obesity cause
flatfoot?
What does the literature tell us
about treating hypermobile
flatfoot?
What role should orthoses and
shoes play in treating
hypermobile flatfoot?
Prevalence of Childhood Obesity
ƒ
30% of U.S. children (aged 6-11 years) are
overweight (BMI>85th percentile)
ƒ
15.3% are obese (BMI > 95th percentile)
BMI = weight (kg)
height 2 (m)
Krebs NF, Pediatrics 2003
Troiano R, Pediatrics 1998
Prevalence of Childhood Obesity
ƒ
16.4% of children are obese in the U.S.
•
•
•
14% White
20% Black
25% Hispanic
Pomerantz WJ, Pediatrics 2010
Prevalence of Childhood Obesity
in the US
Global Prevalence
of Childhood Obesity
Lecture Guide
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
How prevalent is childhood
obesity?
What is the evidence that
childhood obesity has an effect
on the lower extremity?
Does childhood obesity cause
flatfoot?
What does the literature tell us
about treating hypermobile
flatfoot?
What role should orthoses and
shoes play in treating
hypermobile flatfoot?
Pediatric Obesity Comorbidity
Obesity in childhood is the leading cause
of :
•
•
•
•
•
Pediatric hypertension
Type 2 diabetes
Coronary heart disease
Increased lower extremity injury
Hypermobile flatfoot
www.kidsource.com
Pediatric Obesity Comorbidity
Lower Extremity Injury
ƒ
Obese children have a 1.7x greater risk of LE injury including
•
•
•
•
dislocations
fractures
lacerations
sprains
n=24,588
Pomerantz W.J. Pediatrics 2010
Pediatric Obesity Comorbidity
Lower Extremity Injury
ƒ
Six months after Salter-Harris I injury, overweight children were
more likely to sustain persistent symptoms than non-overweight
(n=171)
Timm NL, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 2005
Lecture Guide
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
How prevalent is childhood
obesity?
What is the evidence that
childhood obesity has an effect
on the lower extremity?
Does childhood obesity cause
flatfoot?
What does the literature tell us
about treating hypermobile
flatfoot?
What role should orthoses and
shoes play in treating
hypermobile flatfoot?
Flatfoot and Obesity
ƒ
Garcia-Rodriguez 1999 (n= 1000)
• overweight children have an increased prevalence of flatfoot
ƒ
Bordin 2001 (n=243)
• flatfoot affects16% of non-obese children and 24.3% of obese children
ƒ
Dowling 2001 (13 obese,13 control)
• obese children have higher forefoot peak pressures than non-obese
ƒ
Pfeiffer 2006 (n= 835)
• pediatric flatfoot is influenced by age, gender, and especially weight
ƒ
Mickle 2006 (17 obese,17 control)
• obese children have higher pressure-time integrals than non-obese
ƒ
Mickle 2006 (19 obese,19 control)
• lower arch height in obese children is caused by structural changes
ƒ
Mauch 2008 (n= 2887)
• flatfeet 2x more likely in overweight children than normal weight children
ƒ
Chen 2009 (n= 1024)
• flatfoot in Taiwanese children: normal wt-27%, overweight-31%, obese-56%
Lecture Guide
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
How prevalent is childhood
obesity?
What is the evidence that
childhood obesity has an effect
on the lower extremity?
Does childhood obesity cause
flatfoot?
What does the literature tell us
about treating hypermobile
flatfoot?
What role should orthoses and
shoes play in treating
hypermobile flatfoot?
Flexible Flatfoot
Classifications
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Rigid Congenital
•
•
Vertical Talus
Calcaneal Valgus
Developmental
•
•
ƒ
Metatarsus Adductus
Skewfoot
ƒ
Cerebral Palsy
Congenital Hypotonia
Muscular Dystrophy
•
•
ƒ
Down Syndrome
Marfan Syndrome
Connective tissue disorders
•
•
Neurologic/Muscular
•
•
•
Genetic
Collagen/Elastin
Ehlers-Danlos
Idiopathic Hypermobile
Flatfoot
•
•
Symptomatic
Asymptomatic (progressive)
Flexible Flatfoot
Clinical Findings
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Low longitudinal arch height
Everted calcaneus
Abduction of forefoot in stance
Gait changes
•
•
•
ƒ
Decreased stride length
Decreased cadence
Decreased velocity
Equinus involvement
How Should We Treat Hypermobile
Pediatric Flatfoot?
ƒ Are orthoses an effective treatment?
UCBL
Mereday 1972
ƒ
ƒ
n= 10 children
Method
•
ƒ
X-ray evaluation, UCBL for 2 years
Results
•
•
•
Pain relief
Gait improvement
No lasting structural changes
Mereday C, et al: Evaluation of the University of California Biomechanics
Laboratory shoe insert in “flexible” pes planus: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1972
UCBL
Bleck 1977
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
n= 71 children
Method
•
•
•
X-ray evaluation
UCBL
>1 year
Results
•
•
79% improvement in clinical appearance and x-ray findings
1° improvement (lateral tarsometatarsal angle) every 2 months of
use
Bleck EE, et al: Conservative management of pes valgus with
plantar flexed talus flexible: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1977
Custom Foot Orthotic
Bordelon 1980
ƒ
ƒ
n= 50 (3-9 y/o children)
ƒ
Results
• 5° improvement of lateral tarsometatarsal angle
annually
• No loss of motion in ankle or STJ
Method
• Custom molded orthotic (1/8” poly)
• X-ray evaluation by lateral tarsometatarsal angle
Bordelon RL: Correction of hypermobile flatfoot in
children by molded insert. Foot Ankle, 1980
Maintenance of Arch
Bordelon 1983
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
n= 6 (5 y/o children)
Method
• Followed children from first study after orthotics
discontinued
Results
• 5 out of 6 children maintained correction after
discontinuation of corrective devices for 25 months
Bordelon: Hypermobile flatfoot in children; comprehensive,
evaluation and treatment. Clin Ortho Rel Research, 1983
Down Syndrome Gait Patterns
Selby-Silverstein 2001
ƒ
n=26 (3-6 y/o children)
•
ƒ
ƒ
16 Down patients, 10 control patients
Method
• Motion analysis gait evaluation
• Custom molded orthotics
Results
• Heel eversion decreased
• Transverse plane angle reduced in gait
• Improvement of ankle movement and stride length
Selby-Silverstein, et al: The effect of foot orthoses on standing foot posture and
gait of young children with Down syndrome. Neurorehab, 2001
Clinical Questions
ƒ
Could it be that the arch develops only in a
stabilized midtarsal joint?
ƒ
Could stabilizing the midtarsal joint in flatfoot
assist in more normal development of the arch?
ƒ Can early intervention alter midlife
outcomes?
Lecture Guide
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
How prevalent is childhood
obesity?
What is the evidence that
childhood obesity has an effect
on the lower extremity?
Does childhood obesity cause
flatfoot?
What does the literature tell us
about treating hypermobile
flatfoot?
What role should orthoses and
shoes play in treating
hypermobile flatfoot?
Pediatric Flatfoot
To Treat or Not to Treat
ƒ
Evans 2008
Method
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies, separated by design
™
Wenger 1989 - no difference
™ Powell 2005 - significant improvement
™ Whitford 2007 - mixed results
ƒ
Recommendations
•
Introduced patient-generated index
™
•
Established observations and assessment
™
•
Poor running, leg aches, shoe wear/comfort, angle of gait
Obesity, heel eversion, tenderness, heel inversion with tiptoe
Treatment pathway
™
Red light -symptomaticÎ treat
™ Yellow light -poor structure but developingÎ monitor for symptoms
™ Green light –transient / improvingÎ leave alone
Evans. AM: The flatfooted child—To treat or not to treat. JAPMA, 2008
Pediatric Flatfoot
Orthotic Therapy Goals
GOAL #1
Increase ground reactive forces medially
GOAL #2
Provide stable surface in shoe
GOAL #3
Improve calcaneal position on ground
Orthotic Goal 1
Increase Ground Reactive Forces Medially
ƒ
Medial skive
•
ƒ
Wide plate or medial flange
•
ƒ
Increases supinatory moment
Expand surface area under foot
Rigid or semirigid plate
•
3mm polypropylene for <50 lbs.
Orthotic Goal 2
Provide Stable Surface in Shoe
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Semirigid or rigid device
Rearfoot post
Wide plate
Orthotic Goal 3
Improve Calcaneal Position on Ground
ƒ
Deep heel cup
•
ƒ
Rearfoot post
•
•
ƒ
Improves ground reactive forces in
frontal plane on a higher level
Increases contact area and rearfoot
control
Increases medial ground reactive
force
Medial Skive
•
2-8 mm
Pediatric Flatfoot
Custom Orthotic Recommendations
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Material:
Width:
Heel Cup Height:
Cast Fill:
Positive Cast :
Posting:
Additions:
3mm polypropylene
Wide and medial flange
Deep (20+mm)
Minimal
2-8 mm medial skive
0/0 (flat)
Optional topcover for athletic shoes
Pediatric Flatfoot
Prefabricated Orthoses
ƒ Advantages
•
•
Cost
Frequent foot size changes
are easier to accommodate
ƒ Disadvantages
•
•
•
Sizes limited
Heel cup may not be deep
enough for adequate control
Medial skive not frequently
incorporated
Pediatric Flatfoot
Prefabricated Orthotic Recommendations
ƒ
Specifications
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Close sizing
Rigid poly
20+ mm heel cup
Wide width
Medial flange
Medial skive
Rearfoot post
Sizing set
Importance of Shoes
ƒ Effects of torsional shoe
flexibility on gait
ƒ How do children learn to
walk?
ƒ Does shoe structure
affect children’s gait
patterns?
Shoe Study
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
15 subjects
• 5 cruisers: dependent walkers
• 5 early walkers: walking for 0 – 5 months
• 5 mature walkers: walking for 6 – 12 months
9 - 24 months of age
8 females, 7 males
Obstacle Course
Stumbles and Falls
Plantar Distribution
Results: Barefoot Interpretation
H2: Footwear will affect the number of stumbles and falls
when a child executes functional activities
Number of Stumbles & Falls ( n=15 )
14
12
10
Barefoot
Softee
8
Jamie II
6
Adv Jamie A
Adv Jamie B
4
2
0
Stumbles (n=15)
Falls (n=15)
Results: Plantar Distribution
H5: Footwear will change plantar pressure distributions
(peak pressures under each metatarsophalangeal joint
and the medial and lateral aspects of the foot)
Peak Pressure (N/cm2) (N=10)
12
10
1st MTPJ (right)
8
2nd MTPJ (right)
6
3rd MTPJ (right)
4th MTPJ (right)
4
5th MTPJ (right)
2
0
Jamie II
Advanced Jamie Advanced Jamie
B
A
Softee
Summary
ƒ
ƒ
Childhood obesity is a new link to flatfoot
ƒ
Evidence supports treating symptomatic and
non-improving flatfoot with orthoses
ƒ
There are specific criteria for selecting
prefabricated kiddy orthotics
ƒ
The flexibility of the shoe influences walking
stability in children
Numerous studies link obesity, LE trauma,
pediatric flatfoot, and orthotic treatment
“The verified change in foot morphology from childhood obesity
may produce foot discomfort and... in-turn might keep children
from being active and…therefore reinforce the risk of obesity”
Mauch M, 2008
Inactivity
Foot
Discomfort
Obesity
Thank You