agfocert asc trout audit report - Aquaculture Stewardship Council

Transcription

AGFOCERT ASC TROUT AUDIT REPORT
AGFO Teknik Kontrol ve
Belgelendirme Hiz. Ltd.Sti.
Rapor durumu / Report status
Final Report
Üretici Adı/Producer name:
ÖZPEKLER İNŞ.TAAH.DAY.TÜK.MALL.SU ÜRÜNLERİ SAN. VE TİC.LTD.ŞTİ.
Üretici Adresi/Producer address:
Mesebuku Mevkii Karaçam Köyü Köyceğiz/Muğla
AGFOCERT Dosya No/File no.
AGFO-ASC-0001
Kapsam / Scope
Rainbow Trout (Onchorynchus mykiss)(Gökkuşağı Alabalığı)
Denetim Tarihi/Audit date
09-10.02.2016
Denetçi adı / Auditor name
Kar Nazende Şatır (ASC Trout Lead Auditor)
Sosyal denetçi ve sertifiker adı / Social auditor and
technical reviewer name
Büşra Evgin Güngör (Quality Manager)
Audit Summary
This audit covers hatchery,aquaculture facilities in ponds, harvesting, transportation into the produce handling unit with own trucks in Denizli owned by the same company.
Bu denetim kuluçkahane,havuzlardaki çiftlik aktiviteleri,hasat,çiftliğin kendisine ait olan kendi kamyonlarıyla Denizli'deki işleme ünitesine hasatlık balığın transferini kapsamaktadır.
CoC Summary:
ÖZPEKLER İNŞ.TAAH.DAY.TÜK.MALL.SU ÜRÜNLERİ SAN. VE
TİC.LTD.ŞTİ. Own Karaçam Fish Farm and handling unit on a seperate area located at the realated address in Denizli (Address: BOZBURUN MH. A.N.ZORLU SAN.SİT.7152 SK.NO:4
DENİZLİ/TURKEY).There is not any subcontracted operations and the company has own trucks for distrubition between farm and the handling unit.
TİC.LTD.ŞTİ.'nin Karaçam Alabalık Çiftliği vardır,ve ayrı bir adreste olan işleme tesisine sahiptir. (Adres:BOZBURUN MH. A.N.ZORLU SAN.SİT.7152 SK.NO:4 DENİZLİ/TURKEY) Taşeron
kullanmamaktadır ve kendi kamyonlarıyla çiftlikten balığın işleme tesisine transferini gerçekleştirmektedir.Activities at Karaçam Freshwater Farm is farming trout from broodstock until delivery to
Sahilceylan farm or for slaughering at about 300 grams.Karaçam Farm has own hatchery for egg,juvenil.
Karaçam Tatlı Su Alabalık Çiftliği'ndeki faaliyetler anaçtan döl alımının ardından alabalığın yaklaşık 300 gramlık porsiyonluk boyuta gelene kadar yetiştirilmesi ve ardından hasat edilmesi şeklinde
sürdürülmektedir.Karaçam Alabalık Çiftliği'nin kendi kuluçkahanesi mevcuttur. (anaç-yumurta-yavru üretimi gerçekleştirilmektedir).
Water abstraction from river for the concrete basins. Treatment of water in settling basins and drum filter. The fish are transported to growing farm, during change there was not a possibility for
escape of fish. Control of the fish as well as feeding, is managed at the farm. The farm has a building containing feed storage,west storage for all types of wastes (chemical,packing materials like
feed packagings ext.
Beton havuzlara su kaynaktan alınmaktadır.Su tambur filtre ile filtrelenmektedir.Balık çiftlikteki beton havuzlar içerisinde taşınmaktadır ve bu esnada balık kaçışı olasılığı bulunmamaktadır.Balık
kontrolleri,yemleme kontrolleri çiftlikte yapılmaktadır.Çiftlik yem deposu,atık deposu (kimyasal atıklar,yem çuvalları gibi paketleme malzemeleri vb..) gibi depolama alanlarını barındırmaktadır.
Summary of the Major Findings
2 major nonconformities has been detected during the audit.
3.2.1a Total phosphorus of feed amount as percentage (85%) and this is identified on the label of the related feed.
Total amount of phosphorus released in to the environment per metric ton is 4,5 and the result must be less then 4 after 7th february.
6.9.2b There is no Social Impact Assessment or equivalent methodology to ensure social impacts from the farm.
Denetimde 2 adet major uygunsuzluk tespit edilmiştir.
3.2.1a Abalıoğlu yem üreticisinden tedarik edilen yemlerde fosfor oranı %85 olarak yem etiketlerinde görülmüştr.Doğaya bırakılan fosfor oranı toplamda 4,5 ton/m2 olarak tespit edilmiştir.7
Şubat'tan itibaren olması gereken değer 4 m2 altında olmalıdır.Dolayısıyla standartın gereklilikleriyle uyuşmamaktadır.
6.9.2b Sosyal etki değerlendirmesi veya çiftlik üzerindeki sosyal etkilerin değerlendirilmesine ilişkin bir metadoloji Karaçam Çiftliği için görülememiştir.
Table of summary of all findings
Total number of requirements
425
Number of non-applicable requirements
Number of applicable requirements
Number of requirements score as "Major"
157
Number of requirements scored as " Minor"
15
Number of requirements scored as "Compliant"
Total number of requirements already scored
Total number of NCs
% Score based on number of NCs
Checksum control (if zero ok)
252
AGFO-ASC Audit Report-Cover Page
268
2
426
17
93,66%
Please check the un-scored requirements
Lead Auditor : Kar Nazende Satir
ASC Audit Report - Opening
General Requirements
C1 Audit reports shall be written in English and in the most common language spoken in the areas where the operation is located.
C2 Audit reports may contain confidential annexes for commercially sensitive information.
C2.1 The CAB shall agree the content of any commercially sensitive information with the applicant, which can still be accessible by
the ASC and the appointed accreditation body upon request as stipulated in the certification contract.
C2.2 The public report shall contain a clear overview of the items which are in the confidential annexes.
C2.3 Except for the annexes that contain commercially sensitive information all audit reports will
C3 The CAB is solely responsible for the content of all reports, including the content of any confidential annexes.
C4 Reporting Deadlines* for certification and re-certification audit reports
C4.1 Within thirty (30) days of the completing of the audit the CAB shall submit a draft report in English and the national or most
common language spoken in the area where the operation is located.
C4.2 Within five (5) days the ASC should post the draft report to the ASC website.
C4.3 The CAB shall allow stakeholders and interested parties to comment on the report for fifteen (15) days.
C4.4 Within twenty (20) days of the close of comments, the CAB shall submit the final report to the ASC in English and the national
or most common language spoken in the area where the operation is located.
C4.5 Within five (5) days the ASC should post the final report to the ASC website.
C4.6 Audit reports shall contain accurate and reproducable results.
C5 Reporting Deadlines* for surveillance audit reports
C5.1 Within ninety (90) days of the completing of the audit the CAB shall submit a final report in English and the national or most
common language spoken in the area where the operation is located.
C5.2 Within five (5) days the ASC should post the final report to the ASC website.
C5.3 Audit reports shall contain accurate and reproducable results.
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Opening
* working days
2/121
1 Title Page
1.1 Name of Applicant
TİC.LTD.ŞTİ.
1.2 Report Title [e.g. Public Final Certification Report
Certification Report]
1.3 CAB name
AGFO Teknik Kontrol ve Belgelendirme Hizmetleri Ltd. Sti.
1.4 Name of Lead Auditor
Kar Nazende Şatır (ASC Trout Lead Auditor)
1.5 Names and positions of Tülin Pervan Dikener (SA 8000 Auditor)
Cemal Gürkan Kara (Technical Reviewer)
report authors and
reviewers
1.6 Client's Contact person: Büşra Evgin Güngör (Quality Manager)
Name and Title
1.7 Date
09-10.02.2016
* working days
3/121
2 Table of Contents
3 Glossary
Terms and abbreviations that are specific to this audit
report and that are not otherwise defined in the ASC
glossary
4 Summary
A concise summary of the report and findings. The summary shall be written to be readable to the stakeholders and other interested parties.
4.1
A brief description of
the scope of the audit
Activities at Karaçam Freshwater Farm is farming trout from
broodstock until delivery to Sahilceylan farm or for slaughering at
about 300 grams.Karaçam Farm has own hatchery for egg,juvenil.
Karaçam Tatlı Su Alabalık Çiftliği'ndeki faaliyetler anaçtan döl alımının
ardından alabalığın yaklaşık 300 gramlık porsiyonluk boyuta gelene
kadar yetiştirilmesi ve ardından hasat edilmesi şeklinde
sürdürülmektedir.Karaçam Alabalık Çiftliği'nin kendi kuluçkahanesi
mevcuttur. (anaç-yumurta-yavru üretimi gerçekleştirilmektedir).
4.2
A brief description of
the operations of the
unit of certification
Water abstraction from river for the concrete basins. Treatment of
water in settling basins and drum filter. The fish are transported to
growing farm, during change there was not a possibility for escape of
fish. Control of the fish as well as feeding, is managed at the farm. The
farm has a building containing feed storage,west storage for all types
of wastes (chemical,packing materials like feed packagings ext.
Beton havuzlara su kaynaktan alınmaktadır.Su tambur filtre ile
filtrelenmektedir.Balık çiftlikteki beton havuzlar içerisinde
taşınmaktadır ve bu esnada balık kaçışı olasılığı bulunmamaktadır.Balık
kontrolleri,yemleme kontrolleri çiftlikte yapılmaktadır.Çiftlik yem
deposu,atık deposu (kimyasal atıklar,yem çuvalları gibi paketleme
malzemeleri vb..) gibi depolama alanlarını barındırmaktadır.
4.3
Type of unit of
certification (select only
Single farm/Tek çiftlik
one type of unit of
certification in the list)
4.4
Type of audit (select all
Initial audit/İlk denetim
the types of audit that apply
in the list)
4.5
A summary of the
major findings
2 major nonconformities has been detected during the audit.
3.2.1a Total phosphorus of feed amount as percentage (85%) and
this is identified on the label of the related feed.
Total amount of phosphorus released in to the environment per
metric ton is 4,5 and the result must be less then 4 after 7th february.
6.9.2b There is no Social Impact Assessment or equivalent
methodology to ensure social impacts from the farm.
Denetimde 2 adet major uygunsuzluk tespit edilmiştir.
3.2.1a Abalıoğlu yem üreticisinden tedarik edilen yemlerde fosfor
oranı %85 olarak yem etiketlerinde görülmüştr.Doğaya bırakılan fosfor
oranı toplamda 4,5 ton/m2 olarak tespit edilmiştir.7 Şubat'tan itibaren
olması gereken değer 4 m2 altında olmalıdır.Dolayısıyla standartın
gereklilikleriyle uyuşmamaktadır.
6.9.2b Sosyal etki değerlendirmesi veya çiftlik üzerindeki sosyal
etkilerin değerlendirilmesine ilişkin bir metadoloji Karaçam Çiftliği için
görülememiştir.
* working days
4/121
4.6
5 CAB Contact Information
5.1
The Audit
determination
CAB Name
AGFO Teknik Kontrol ve Belgelendirme Hizmetleri Ltd. Sti.
5.2
CAB Mailing Address
Baglarbasi Mah. Bagdat Cad. Gedik Is Merkezi No: 414 Kat: 5 D:43 Maltepe/Istanbul
5.3
Email Address
nazende@agfocert.com
5.4
Other Contact Information
ckara@agfocert.com
6 Background on the Applicant
Information on the Public Disclosure Form (Form 3)
6.1
except 1.2-1.3 All information updated as necessary
to reflect the audit as conducted.
There is no distraction from the Form-3.
Form-3'ten sapma bulunmamaktadır.
6.2
A description of the unit of certification (for intial
audit) / changes, if any (for surveillance and recertification
audits )
This is the Karacam trout farm of the company. This farm is located in
near Karacam village in Koycegiz Mugla.
Denetlenen çiftlik firmanın Karaçam Köyceğiz Muğla'daki çiftliğidir.
6.3
Other certifications currently held by the unit of
certification
MSC CoC
* working days
5/121
6.4
Other certification(s) obtained before this audit
BRC,IFS,GLOBALG.A.P. Aquaculture
6.5
Estimated annual production volumes of the unit of
certification of the current year
750 tonnes
6.6
Actual annual production volumes of the unit of
certification of the previous year ( mandatory for
surveillance and recertification audits )
635 tonnes
6.7
Production system(s) employed within the unit of
certification (select one or more in the list)
pond system
6.8
Number of employees working at the unit of
certification
16
* working days
6/121
7 Scope
7.1
The Standard(s) against which the audit was
conducted, including version number
ASC Trout Standard V1.0
7.2
The species produced at the applicant farm
Trout
7.3
A description of the scope of the audit including a
description of whether the unit of certification covers
all production or harvest areas (i.e. ponds) managed
by the operation or located at the included sites, or
whether only a sub-set of these are included in the
unit of certification. If only a sub-set of production or
harvest areas are included in the unit of certification
these shall be clearly named.
This audit covers hatchery,aquaculture facilities in ponds, harvesting,
transportation into the produce handling unit with own trucks in
Denizli owned by the same company.
The names and addresses of any storage, processing,
or distribution sites included in the operation
(including subcontracted operations) that will
potentially be handling certified products, up until the
point where product enters further chain of custody.
TİC.LTD.ŞTİ. Own Karaçam Fish Farm and handling unit on a seperate
area located at the realated address in Denizli (Address: BOZBURUN
MH. A.N.ZORLU SAN.SİT.7152 SK.NO:4 DENİZLİ/TURKEY).There is not
any subcontracted operations and the company has own trucks for
distrubition between farm and the handling unit.
7.4
Bu denetim kuluçkahane,havuzlardaki çiftlik aktiviteleri,hasat,çiftliğin
kendisine ait olan kendi kamyonlarıyla Denizli'deki işleme ünitesine
hasatlık balığın transferini kapsamaktadır.
TİC.LTD.ŞTİ.'nin Karaçam Alabalık Çiftliği vardır,ve ayrı bir adreste olan
işleme tesisine sahiptir. (Adres:BOZBURUN MH. A.N.ZORLU
SAN.SİT.7152 SK.NO:4 DENİZLİ/TURKEY) Taşeron kullanmamaktadır ve
kendi kamyonlarıyla çiftlikten balığın işleme tesisine transferini
gerçekleştirmektedir.
7.5
Description of the receiving water body(ies).
Gökçay in Köycegiz/Mugla is the receiving water body.
Su Köyceğiz/Muğla'ya bağlı olan Gökçay kaynağından alınmaktadır.
* working days
7/121
8 Audit Plan
8.1
8.2
The names of the auditors and the dates when each Kar Nazende Şatır (ASC Trout Lead Auditor)
of the following were undertaken or completed:
Tülin Pervan Dikener (SA 8000 Auditor)
conducting the audit, writing of the report, reviewing
the report, and taking the certification decision.
Previous Audits (if applicable):
NC
referenc Standard
e
clause
number reference
8.2.1
Closing
deadline status closing date of
each NC
Initial audit - mm/yyyy
Surveillance audit 1 - mm/ yyyy
Surveillance audit 2 mm/ yyyy
Recertification audit mm/ yyyy
Unannounced audit mm/ yyyy
NC close-out audit mm/ yyyyy
Scope extention audit
mm/ yyyy
* working days
8/121
8.4
Audit plan as implemented including:
Dates
Desk Reviews
8.4.2
Onsite audits
8.4.3
Stakeholder interviews and
Community meetings
8.4.4
Draft report sent to client
05.03.2016
AGFOCERT Office
8.4.5
Draft report sent to ASC
11.03.2016
AGFOCERT Office
8.5.5
Final report sent to Client and
ASC
16.05.2016
01.02.2016
8.7
Locations
8.4.1
Names and affiliations of individuals consulted or
otherwise involved in the audit including:
representatives of the client, employees, contractors,
stakeholders and any observers that participated in
the audit.
09-10.02.2016
10.02.2016
AGFOCERT Office
Karaçam Trout Farm
Karaçam Village
AGFOCERT Office
ASC Trout Lead Auditor Kar Nazende Şatır interviewed with Mrs Büşra
Evgin Güngör (Quality Manager) and Mr Soner Ekin (Consultant of the
company) and staff (totally 17) at the Karaçam Farm about all
requirements of ASC Trout Standard.(Examples of some employees:
Yılmaz Eşmeli,Rasim Tatlı,Muzaffer Kut,Şükrü Uysal,Durali Kanat,Sami
Kaplan..)
SA 8000 Auditor Mrs Tülin Pervan Dikener interviewed with the staff
about social responsibility aspects of the ASC standard.She
interviewed with totally 17 personnel one by one and seperated some
of them into groups and talked with them face to face and asked
questions about social requirements of the ASC standard.(Examples of
some employees: Durali Kanat,Fikri Kaplan,Nazmi Şahin,Fahri
Kanat,Nermin Kaplan..)
ASC Alabalık Baş Denetçisi Kalite Yöneticisi Büşra Evgin Güngör ile ve
firmanın daanışmanı Soner Ekin ile çiftlikte çlışn 17 personel ile ASC
Alabalık standardının gereklilikleriyle ilgili görüşmeler yapmıştır.
(Görüşme yapılan çalışanlardan örnekler: Yılmaz Eşmeli,Rasim
Tatlı,Muzaffer Kut,Şükrü Uysal,Durali Kanat,Sami Kaplan..).
SA 8000 Denetçisi Tülin Pervan Dikener sosyal sorumluluk faktörleriyle
ilgili çiftlikte çalışan 17 personelle gruplar şeklinde ve birebir
görüşmeler gerçekleştirmiştir.İşçilerle ypmış olduğu özel görüşmelerde
standardın gerekliliklerinin karşılanıp karşılanmadığını tespit etmek
üzere personel denetçi tarafından birtakım sorular sorulmuştur ve
kayıtlar alınmıştır.(Görüşme yapılan çalışanlardan örnekler: Durali
Kanat,Fikri Kaplan,Nazmi Şahin,Fahri Kanat,Nermin Kaplan..).
* working days
9/121
8.8
Stakeholder submissions, including written or other documented information and CAB written
responses to each submission.
Name of stakeholder (if permission given to make name
public)
Ali Kanat
Relevance to be
contacted
Date of
contact
CAB
responded
Yes/No
Head of village Karacam 10.02.2016
Yes
* working days
Brief
summary of
points Raised
Use of
comment by
CAB
There is not
N/A
any complaint
from the
stakeholder.
Paydaşlardan
alınan
herhangi bir
şikayet
bulunmamakt
adır.
Response
sent to
stakeholder
N/A
10/121
Audit report _Audit evidence_ ASC Trout Standard v.1.0
AUDIT MANUAL - ASC Freshwater Trout StandardCreated by the Freshwater Trout Aquaculture Dialogue
Scope: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss ) or any other salmonids grown in fresh water This audit manual was developed to accompany the version of the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard developed through the Freshwater Trout Aquaculture Dialogue and published at 7 February 2013.
Footnote references in this Audit Manual can be found within this document and differ in numbering of the same references in the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard. The manual is complemented by a separate pre-audit checklist that outlines the minimum information that a client must have prior to the first audit.
Prior to audit, the client and their conformity assessment body (CAB) shall reach agreement on whether the audit requires visits to both the client headquarters and the farm site, which information is held at each location, and the acceptable format of records (e.g. electronic or hard copy files).
No
Indicator
Compliance Criteria
(Use as guidance for audit only)
Audit evidence
1. Write down all audit evidence for each compliance criterion (CC). Audit
evidence (including evidence of conformity and nonconformity) should be
recorded so that the audit can be repeated by a different audit team.
2. Replace explanitory text in the 'Audit Evidence' column as appropriate.
3. If you see any Compliance Criteria which is not listed below, please describe
in the blue cells below.
Minor
Justification of classification of NC
Provide an explanation of the reason(s) for the classification of any
NCs or non-applicability
PRINCIPLE 1: COMPLY WITH ALL NATIONAL AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Criterion 1.1 Operate within the legal framework of national and local laws and regulations that are applicable and current
1.1.1
Indicator: Presence of
documents issued by
pertinent authorities
indicating compliance with
local and national
authorities on land and
water use
a. Maintain copies of key land and water use
A. Confirm that the producer has copies of key land and water use
laws (both local and national) that apply to
laws of direct relevance to aquaculture impacts.
regulating the environmental and social impacts
of aquaculture.
Requirement: Yes
Minor
Compliant
Karaçam trout farm was established 2005 by the owner
occupier
Mustafa Özpek,Osman Özpek and Yasin Özpek.(Özpekler
İnşaat Taahhut Dayanıklı Tüketim Malları Su Ürünleri San.
ve Tic. Ltd. Şti.)
Authority requirement are
described in Environmental approval from T.C. Gıda Tarım
ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı (Food agricultural ministry) based
on Biosafety law 18.3.2010 and aquaculture regulation
18/06/2007.
Applicability: All
Food,Agriculture and Livestock Ministry of Fisheries and
Aquaculture General Directorate B.48.01.0161 750 tons /
year (635 tons / year of the current production) capacity
trout 9816 m2 lease basis surface area of water quantity
1500 l/sn dated 21.12.2011. Mainly farming document of
approved projects is available. General Manager (Mr. Dr.
Dural Koçak) approved on 28.12.2011.
The water permission has been given by Muğla
Food,Agriculture and Livestock Ministry dated between
21.09.2015 and 21.09.2016 according to the 12th rule of
6111. law.
And the legal authority DSI has given a letter to the compan
about the renewal of water use hiring dated
Audit Manual - ASC Trout Standard - version 1.0
Copyright (c) 2013 Aquaculture Stewardship Council. All rights reserved by Aquaculture Stewardship Council
11
b. Maintain original lease agreements, land
B. Confirm that the client holds original lease agreements or land
titles, concession permits, or related official land titles. Other documents may be accepted as evidence if they are issued
use documents on file as applicable.
by a pertinent legal authority and clearly establish that the farm has
legitimate land tenure.
Compliant
c. Keep records of inspections for compliance
with national and local laws and regulations (if
such inspections are legally required in the
country of operation).
Compliant
C .Verify presence of a copy of records of inspections (where such
inspections are legally required and paperwork can be provided to
producers).
The company has a permit letter according to the 18th rule
of 6831. law for fish production between the dates
01.12.2010-24.08.2015. And the permit letter dated
13.12.2005 by 5 year 9 months by related authority. The
legal permission for this has expired at 24.08.2015 and the
company is waiting for the renewal permit letter from legal
authority.Farm management provides the communication
later between the related parts Özpekler and General
Directorate of Forestry dated 25.01.2016 signed by Branch
Manager of General Directorate of Forestry Mr Naci
Polat/Work Order Number: 55690203-255.03.80112.
Muğla Regional Directorate of Forestry has sent extension
request for fish production permits for the 9,816 m2 area
as required by the Ministry to the General Directorate of
Forestry dated 25.01.2016.There is a letter of company to
Forestry and Water Affairs IV. Regional Office Nature
Conservation and National Parks Supervisor dated
(10.11.2015-Number:28640755-045-01-2267709 about
conflict with national preservation areas and the company
is waiting a letter from the legal authority about the issue.
The area stays out of the areas which are assessed under
the 2873 National Parks Act of IV. Muğla Regional
Directorate of Forestry Region and declared in the scope of
the Land Hunting Law of Wild Life Protection Area, Wild Life
Development and Wetlands. (11/10/2015-Number:
28640755-045-01-2267709.
There is supervision for control of operations , at least per
year
from Muğla Directorate of Provincial Food Agriculture and
Livestock. Last visit has been dated 06.11.2015 by
Aquacultural Engineer İsa Özden and Veterinerian Sercan
Gümüş. They checks general conditions,use of chemicals
and feed.However,the inspectors takes fish samples for
MRL analysis. Last analysis report number 81418677 dated
04.11.2015/11.11.2015 and approved by director Mr
Necdet Akkoca.
Site inspection has been carried out by the Köyceğiz Food
Agriculture and Livestock Directorate dated 06.11.2015
(Report No: 005032). MRL reports have been checked and
the results are appropriate. (Report No:8141
8677,Registration No: 9613).Analysis has been done by
İzmir Bornova Veterinery Control Institute/Acredidation
no: AB-00272-T).
12
d. Obtain permits and maps showing that the
farm does not conflict with national
preservation areas (see Indicator 2.1.1)
D. Confirm that the producer has evidence showing that the facility
does not conflict with designated preservation areas and has required
operational permits if sited in such an area (see 2.1.1).
e. Others, please describe
1.1.2
documents indicating
compliance with tax laws
a. Maintain copies of tax laws for jurisdiction(s)
where company operates.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
A. Verify presence of a copy of tax laws.
Compliant
The company has a permit letter according to the 18th rule
of 6831. law for fish production between the dates
01.12.2010-24.08.2015. And the permit letter dated
13.12.2005 by 5 year 9 months by related authority. The
legal permission has expired by 24.08.2015 and the
company is waiting for the renewal permit letter from legal
authority,bakanlığa ilgili yazı ulaştırılmıştır.The related
letter has been sent to the Ministry dated
25.01.2016.(Check details on 1.1.1a)
There is a letter of company to Forestry and Water Affairs
IV. Regional Office Nature Conservation and National Parks
Supervisor dated 19.08.2015 about conflict with national
preservation areas and the company is waiting a letter
from the legal authority about the issue.
Compliant
On the other hand,the company applied for the renewal of
trout farm project for addition of new area to the site. The
site also has private property included to the total area.The
land is 9816 m2+private property is 10027 m2+new
addition land is 7544 m2.The new project Özpekler Trout
Aquaculture Revision Project dated 04.10.2015 by
Food,Agriculture and Livestock Ministry By Mr Özerdem
Altuntaş.Related Aquaculture Certificate will be revised
futhermore.
Compliant
Tax Procedural Law No: 213, 1.4.1961 are included in
clients documentation. Tax Certificate Date: 01.01.1986
.There is agenda for 2016 February for tax payments but
there is not documented procedure but the company has
the copies of the tax laws.
The company has a file which contains the tax laws (Tax
Procedure Law 213 numbered), Income Tax Act (193 No.),
Value Added Tax Law (3065) in their air system and they
are aware of the related laws.
Tax Law Law No. 213,1.4.1961 Activity Code and Name: 031
101Fishing on Marine and Coastal Waters Tax No:
7290038354 / Gökpınar Tax Office / Work commencement
date: 01.01.1986.
13
1.1.3
compliance with all labor
laws and regulations
b. Maintain records of tax payments to
B. Verify that the client has records of tax payments to the appropriate
appropriate authorities (e.g. land use tax, water authorities. Do not disclose client tax information which is
use tax, revenue tax). Note that CABs will not
confidential.
disclose confidential tax information unless
client is required to or chooses to make it public.
Compliant
Yearly invoice and payment of water
use tax, from goverment are paid
amount xxxx given in TL yearly.
Annual account report from Muğla Municipality Water and
Sewage Administration Strategy Development Bank decont
from HalkBank has been seen dated 21.09.2015 Between
21.09.2011 and 21.09.2016 there are 4 installment (file
number: T-185) First payment has been paid dated
21.12.2015 xxx amount./The last received water tax
through Halkbank xxx amount was paid to Mugla
Municipality. (Koycegiz water rental fee) -File No: TR-185.
Yearly invoice and payment of land tax,from government
are paid amount xxx in TL yearly. Annual account from
Muğla Forrest Regional Office decont from Halkbank has
been dated 30.11.2015./Tax payments related to land area
was paid through 30.11.2015't Halkbank xxxx./Receipt No.
0800699.
Yearly invoice and payment of revenue tax,from
government and paid amount xxxx in TL yearly. Annually by
4 installment for 3 month three at each (293th rule),last
payment has been declared dated 16.11.2015 and paid
dated (according to the 3065th rule).
c. Register with national or local authorities as
an “aquaculture activity" where such
registration is consistent with regulations.
Maintain copies of registration documents and
the contact details for relevant authorities.
Compliant
Karaçam trout farm is registered with local and national
authorities .
Özpekler İnşaat Taah. Day. Tük. Mal. Su Ürün. San Tic. Ltd.
Şti is registred with legal registration number
B.48.01.0161.
d. Others, please describe
Compliant
Temporary tax return is be paid in installments as advance
tax return for the year (3 on a quarterly basis) and tax
return declaration institution is clear and unchanging end
of the first fourth months of the tax year following the tax.
a. Maintain copies of key labor laws and
A. Confirm that the producer has copies of key labor laws and
regulations that are applicable to regulating the regulations of direct relevance to social impacts of aquaculture.
social impacts of aquaculture.
Compliant
LABOUR ACT OF TURKEY Law No. 4857 from Ministry of
Labour and Social Security, are included in clients
documentation.
C. Verify that the client is registered with local or national authorities.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
14
b. Keep records of farm inspections for
compliance with national labor laws and codes
(only if such inspections are legally required in
the country of operation).
B. Confirm that the client has the specified documentation from the
appropriate authorities (where such inspections are legally required
and paperwork is provided to producers).
c. Others, please describe
1.1.4
compliance with regulations
or permits concerning
water quality impacts,
effluent and water
abstraction
a. Maintain copies of key regulations and
permitting requirements that apply to water
quality impacts, effluent discharge and water
abstraction by the farm.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
Compliant
These inspections are performed by SGK(Social Security
Administration) in Turkey. There is not any inspections
performed yet by SGK.This inspections has been done at
the starting period but there is not any regular
inspections.Other controls which has been done by
Food,Agriculture and Livestock as site inspection has been
checked during the audit.
SSI (Social Security Administration), except for the initial
period has not been made by a regular check.
Field and other checks made by legal by authorities related
to food safety has been observed in the relevant article.
Compliant
A. Confirm that the client maintains copies of key regulations and
permitting requirements as specified.
Compliant
Provincial Environment and Forestry Directorate Decision
dated 27.05.2005 according to the 16.12.2003 dated and
25318 numbered Official Gazette enacted the
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance under article
17 for Aquacultural production of trout farm project and
the ''EIA is desicion is not necessary'' is taken.Water
entrance and discharge analysis are done by the legal
authorities and the private external accredidated
laboratories by the company and the water analysis results
are appropriate and the analysis have been checked on the
other related parts of the ASC standard as well.Check
details 1.1.4b.
15
b. Obtain permits for water quality impacts
where applicable.
B. Confirm that the client obtains water quality permits as applicable.
c. Maintain records of monitoring and
C. Verify that records show compliance with discharge laws and
compliance with discharge laws and regulations regulations.
as required.
Compliant
Compliant
The client obtains water quality.Analysis report number: as03122015-09 Çevtest Çevre Laboratory Analysis Company
accredidated by TÜRKAK Ab-0091-T ;
Karaçam 2 entrance water analysis dated 03-09.02.2015
Suspended solids: less than 10 mg/lt
Biochemical oxygen demand:less than 0 mg/lt
dissolved oxygen:8,8 mg/lt
Chemical oxygen demand:22,4 mg/lt
Total nitrogen: 2,274 mg/lt
Total phosphorus:less than 0,1mg/lt
Total ciyanide: 0,01 mg/lt
Karaçam 2 discharge 03-09.02.2015 Report number: G-20154954-05
Biochemical oxygen demand: less than 10 mg/lt
Chemical oxygen demand:less than 10 mg/lt
Total nitrogen:1,277mg/lt
Total phosphorus: 0,123mg/lt
Total ciyanide: less than 0,01 mg/lt
Karaçam 1 entrance water analysis dated 03-09.02.2015
Report number: G-2015-4954-02
Biochemical oxygen demand: less than 10 mg/lt
Chemical oxygen demand: 34,56 mg/lt
Total nitrogen: 1,516 mg/lt
Total phosphorus: less than 0,1 mg/lt
Total ciyanide: less than 0,01 mg/lt
Karaçam 1 discharge water analysis dated 03-09.02.2015
Report number: G-2015-4954-03
There are analyse report results from outlet and from inlet
of water, in compliance with reqiurements in the analysis
report results See 1.1.4 c for Suspended solids,Biochemical
oxygen demand,dissolved oxygen,Chemical oxygen
demand,Total nitrogen,Total phosphorus,Total
coliforms.The client obtains water quality.Analysis report
number: as-03122015-09 Çevtest Çevre Laboratory Analysis
Company accredidated by TÜRKAK Ab-0091-T.
16
d. Obtain a statement from local authorities
D. Review the water abstraction limits set for the farm by local
indicating the water abstraction limits (units
authorities. If local authorities do not set water abstraction limits,
given) for the farm. If local authorities do not set confirm that the farm has an attestation.
water abstraction limits for farms operating in
the region, obtain of a statement from local
authorities attesting to this fact.
Compliant
e. Maintain records of water abstraction.
E. Verify that the farm keeps complete records of water abstraction.
see 1.1.4.c
Compliant
-
F. Check the farm's water intake against the water abstraction limits to
verify compliance with regulations or permits. Cross-check against
reported values for total water abstracted (see 3.1.1b).
Compliant
1/3 of the water is that has been taken from the river and is %95
confidence level and leave again to the river.The recirculated water is
4,320 m3/sn'dir.
Compliant
g. Others, please describe
The water permission has been given by Muğla
Food,Agriculture and Livestock Ministry dated between
21.09.2015 and 21.09.2016 according to the 12th rule of
6111. law.
Food,Agriculture and Livestock Ministry of Fisheries and
Aquaculture General Directorate B.48.01.0161 750 tons /
year (635 tons / year of the current production) capacity
trout 9816 m2 lease basis surface area of water quantity
1500 l/sn dated 21.12.2011.
There is an inspection dated 06.11.2015 (sample has
taken),result date is 07.12.2015 report from Süleyman
Demirel University. They have taken samples from 5
stations.
KÖS-1: The start point of Gökçay (A part of Dalaman) .
KÖS-2: The input area of water to the farm-Q: 3,322 m3/sn
There are 2 entrance points of water KÖS-2A -Q: 0,066
m3/sn and KÖS-2B-Q: 0,869 m3/sn .
KÖS-3A: The point where the rest of the water from the
plant
KÖS-3: The point where the water is being carried by the
cannels.4,257 m3/sn.
Besides Gökçay one of the Dalaman River upper arm at the
facility, one flow is low (60-70 l / s) of the other flow is
moderate (400 l / s).There are two separate sources and
the water discharge is 1500 l / sec.
PRINCIPLE 2: CONSERVE HABITAT AND BIODIVERSITY
17
Criterion 2.1 Siting and location of farms [2]
2.1.1
Indicator: Allowance for
a. Provide a map showing the location of the
siting in National Protected farm relative to nearby protected areas as
Areas [3]
defined by national laws (also see 1.1.1d).
A. Review map of national protected areas and cross-check against
farm location.
Compliant
Requirement: None [4,5]
Karaçam fish farm shows that they are not in protected
area, the related letter from Forestry and Water Affairs
Minister dated 10.11.2015 IV. Regional Office Report
Number: 28640755-045-01-22670 by Mr Rahmi Bayrak.1
/1000 general layout (farm map) and 1/25000 scale maps
are are checked during the audit.(General basin).
Applicability: All except as
noted in [4] and [5]
b. If the farm is not sited in a protected area as B. If the farm is not sited in a protected area, make note of this fact in
defined above, inform the CAB. In this case, the the audit report. Otherwise proceed to 2.1.1c.
requirements of 2.1.1c-d do not apply.
2.1.2
Indicator: Conversion of
wetlands [6] after 1999
Requirement: None [7]
Compliant
After the research results the area stays out of the related
areas as national parks,natural parks,natural monuments
according to the 2873. National Parks Law and wildlife
conservation area,wildlife development course and
wetlands according to the 4915. Land Hunting Law.
c. If the farm is sited in a protected area, review C. Review the applicability of the exception requested by the farm
the Instructions for Indicator 2.1.1 (above) to
together with the supporting evidence to determine if the farm is
determine if the farm is allowed an exception to eligible. If yes, Indicator 2.1.1 is not applicable.
the requirements. If yes, inform the CAB which
exception (#1 or #2) is allowed and provide
supporting evidence.
N/A
d. If the farm is sited in a protected area and the D. Review evidence to determine whether the farm is allowed to be
exceptions provided for Indicator 2.1.1 do not
sited in a protected area and hence eligible for ASC certification.
apply, then the farm does not comply with the
requirement and is ineligible for ASC
certification.
N/A
None
N/A
a. Provide documentary evidence showing all
construction activities and the habitat types
impacted by those activities on the farm since
1999.
A. Review evidence for date of all construction activities or and the
types of habitats (e.g. wetland, forest, grassland) impacted by those
activities on the farm since 1999.
N/A
The farm is not in a protected area.
The farm is not in a protected area.
There is not wetland area.
noted in [7]
18
b. Provide a map delineating all wetlands (as
defined in [6]) currently within a 5-km radius of
the farm.
B. Evaluate whether there is evidence for any wetland conversion
occuring within a 5-km radius of the farm since 1999.
N/A
c. Prepare a map showing wetland coverage in
1999 at the farm site.
C. If evidence shows that current farm siting or construction activities
have resulted in loss of wetland habitat since 1999, then the farm is
not certifiable.
N/A
2.1.3
Indicator: An assessment
of the presence on the farm
of species listed on the
International Union for
Conservation of Nature
(IUCN) “Red List of
Threatened Species” as
vulnerable, near
threatened, endangered or
critically endangered; an
evaluation of the farm’s
impact on any such species
present; and clearly defined
mitigation measures to
reduce any negative
impacts and allow existence
of such species
a. Perform above analysis and record all IUCN
red listed species and farm-related threats.
Alternatively, farms may have a qualified thirdparty entity conduct the assessment for the
presence on the farm of IUCN red listed species.
A. Review the results of the farm's analysis. If the assessment was
done by a third party, review credentials of the experts who
conducted the assessment. Verify through interviews with relevant
stakeholders (e.g. local community, eNGOs, government agency
responsible for wildlife protection), in order to cross-check whether
endangered species exist in the immediate vicinity of the farm.
Compliant
According to the rules dated 04.17.2014 and numbered
83461 an affirmative covenant for wetland has been taken
from farm for control and monitoring.
If the farm keeps up with the mandatory matters on the
affirmative covenant there is not drawback for Ministry of
Water Affairs and Ministry.
Compliant
There is a description of consequence for the habitat, as a
environmental impact assessement, this has not shown to
negatively affect the habitat.
Farm shows from IUCN list there was no endangered
species in area, there is not any analyse or survey from
expert assessment, showing no consequence or negatively
affect to the habitat.
There is a Wildlife Protection Plan Doc. No: USP-011 dated
30.05.2015.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
19
b. Provide a map showing location of the farm B. Review the map and verify that client is aware of IUCN red-listed
(see 1.1.1d) relative to the known distribution of species (categories as defined in the indicator) or critical habitats
IUCN red-listed species (categories as defined in located near the farm.
the indicator) or critical habitats in the area.
Compliant
c. If results from 2.1.3a (above) identify that
C. Verify that client has performed an evaluation of farm impacts to
IUCN Red List species occur within a 5 km radius IUCN Red Listed species (as applicable).
of the farm (including upstream and receiving
waters), provide a documented evaluation of
the farm's impacts on such species.
Compliant
d. Where the results from 2.1.3c indicate a
D. Confirm that the farm has documented all mitigation measures and
potential for negative impacts, prepare a set of verify implementation during the on-site inspection (as applicable).
written and clearly-defined mitigation measures
to reduce any negative impacts and allow
existence of such species.
Compliant
None
There is not IUCN red-lis ted species in habitat.
First report:
T.C. Süleyman Demirel University Eğirdir Aquacultural
Faculty has been done sampling in Gökçay for all species on
the are at Kös-1 entrance point the population is zero
because it is the starting point of the fund and at Kös-5
point discharge point the population value %10 for
Onchorynchus mykiss and %90 for Squalius fellowesii and
18 squalis fellowesii has been seen on the area and 2
Onchorynchus mykiss has been seen as well dated
06.11.2015/report date: 07.12.2015.
Second report:
T.C. Süleyman Demirel University Eğirdir Aquacultural
Faculty has been done sampling in Gökçay for all species on
the are at Kös-1 entrance point the population is zero
because it is the starting point of the fund and at Kös-5
point discharge point the population value %20 (4 pieces)
for Onchorynchus mykiss and %40 for Squalius fellowesii
and 8 squalis fellowesii has been seen on the area and 4
Onchorynchus mykiss and 8 capeota capoeta bergamae and
the population value of new species is %40 dated
06.11.2015.
These samplings will be done during all the year at each
period of seasons and at the end of the year the university
will offer a statical seasonal population assesment to the
farm.
There is not IUCN red-lis ted species in habitat.
There is not potential for negative impact.The company has
been checked these species from IUCN list on database and
we can see they are not on that list.
N/A
20
Criterion 2.2 Riparian buffer zones [8]
2.2.1
Indicator: For new farms a. Inform the CAB of the date when farm
installed on land after
installation was originally completed and any
publication of the ASC
farm expansions thereafter (also see 2.1.2a).
Freshwater Trout Standard
(or for significant
expansions), minimum
buffer zone between the
farm and an adjacent water
body in which there is no
farm infrastructure that
might impede wildlife’s
access to the water, except
for inflow and outflow
systems
A. Review evidence for date of farm installation and expansions.
N/A
Karaçam fish farm exists dated 2005.
Requirement: ≥ 15 meters
from the water's edge [9]
Applicability: All landbased farms constructed
after publication of the ASC
except as noted in [9]
b. If farm installation was completed before
publication of the ASC Freshwater Trout
Standard, then indicator 2.2.1 does not apply.
Otherwise proceed to 2.2.1c.
B. Determine whether Indicator 2.2.1 is applicable to the farm.
Compliant
There is a map of the farm for all habitats and there is not
another siting or another farm around.
21
c. Prepare a diagram of the farm showing the
siting and dimensions of buffer zones between
the farm and adjacent water body.
C. Review diagram to verify that siting of buffer zones is appropriate
and that the farm does not impede wildlife's access to the water.
Compliant
d. Ensure that buffer zones are free of farm
D. During the on-site visit, inspect buffer zones to verify appropriate
infrastructure (rescue and safety equipment is
siting and dimensions.
allowed as appropriate to ensure worker health
and welfare).
None
Compliant
There is a risk assesment for wildlife's access to the water
and there is a diagram as well.Wild Life Protection Plan
Doc. No: RH-P-011 / 30.05.2015.Pl water, birds, phyto and
zooplankton, flora and fauna, air pollution, noise,
gardening, flowering, setting the host and live on the red
list are evaluated under this plan.
Environmental Impact Assessment and Impact Dimensions
Plan doc.no: RH-P-012 / 05.30.2015 aquaculture activities
(cages with lake water interaction, transport streams, drug
and vaccine use, the vaccine medication containers, fish
production in cages and concrete swimming pool ( escaped
fish from the cage and pool, dead fish); hatchery activities
(use of spring water, dead fish and eggs, food packaging
and unwanted substances); use the (exhaust gases, waste,
feeding (food packaging), generator use (fuel consumption,
exhaust gas, noise), harvesting and freezing (bloody ice),
social facilities (municipal waste, draining the waste),
storage of chemical materials (chemicals in the ground
water or air mixing), heating (stove servant resistance); fuel
storage (soil and water mixture).
See 2.2.1 b
N/A
Criterion 2.3 Introduction of exotic species [10]
2.3.1
Indicator: New
introductions of exotic trout
after the date of publication
of the ASC Freshwater
Trout Standard, unless in a
closed production system
[11]
a. Inform the CAB if the farm uses a closed
production system according to the above
definition (indicator 2.3.1 does not apply).
Otherwise, proceed to 2.3.1b.
Requirement: None
A. Determine which type of culture system is used by the farm. If
closed, then 2.3.1 does not apply (response "n/a"). Otherwise,
proceed to 2.3.1B.
N/A
The water is taken from the source directly and transported
to the ponds,the water is not recirculate in the system,the
output water from the ponds is send to the sedimentation
pond then to the drumfilter finally. The particles in the
output water is filtered and then send to the nature.The
water is send to the nature with the %95 confidence limitg
as we can see in the report of TC Süleyman Demirel
University Aquacultural Faculty as well.Karaçam Fish Farm
use the 1/3 level of water from Gökçay.The farm is at the
beginning of the source.So there is not a recirculated water.
Applicability: All except
closed production systems
22
b. Inform the CAB which trout species is being
cultured at the farm and maintain purchase
records (e.g. receipts) that identify the species
by Latin name.
Compliant
The trout produced is Oncorhynchus mykiss.There is a
declaration of the designated veterrinerian of the company.
c. Compile available primary literature (e.g.
C. Review the literature to determine if the cultured species is
scientific studies, government publications) to
generally considered native to the area. If yes, then 2.3.1 does not
determine whether or not the cultured species is apply (response "n/a"). Otherwise, proceed to 2.3.1D.
generally considered to be native to the region
in which the farm operates.
Compliant
The trout produced is Oncorhynchus mykiss, the species
has been introduced to Turkey freshwater farms for more
than 50 years ago, according to
http:/ / www.fao.org/ fishery/ countrysector/
naso_turkey/ e n
d. If the species is considered non-native but was
previously established in the area (i.e. if it is an
introduced species), search the literature for a
reliable estimate of the year of introduction.
D. If the species is not considered native to the area, review available
information to determine if it was introduced and had self-sustaining
population established in the wild before publication of the ASC
Freshwater Trout Standard (7 February 2013). If yes, then 2.3.1 does
not apply (response "n/a"). Otherwise, proceed to 2.3.1E.
Compliant
There is not a self-sustaining population establish of the
species Oncorhynchus mykiss in Turkey.
-
E. Inform the client that the proposed culture stock is considered an
'exotic trout' under the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard and therefore
the farm is ineligible for certification.
N/A
None
N/A
f. Others, please describe
B. Confirm which species of trout is cultured at the farm.
There is no exotic trout which is considered in culture
stock.
Criterion 2.4 Transgenic [12] Trout
2.4.1
the culture of transgenic
trout, including the
offspring of genetically
engineered trout
a. Maintain records for the origin of all cultured A. Review records to confirm compliance with the requirement.
stocks including the supplier name, address and
contact person(s) for stock purchases.
Requirement: None
N/A
Transgenic trout is not allowed to produce in turkish farms,
confirmed by authorized Mrs. Özge Otgucuoğlu letter
dated 24.07.2015 dip. No: 6879.There is analysis report
from Food,Agriculture and Livestock Ministry accredidated
by Türkak (accredidaion number: AB-0559-T)/Report
number: 2015-14753-Lot number: 01152280103
(09.08.2015).
Applicability: All
23
b. Ensure purchase documents confirm that the
culture stock is not transgenic.
B. If the auditor suspects that transgenic fish are in culture, add
condition that the farm must have stock identity tested by collecting
randomly 3 fish from each stocked tank/cage for genetic analysis at an
ISO 17025 certified laboratory. An exception is made for countries in
which (local) governments provides official statements for nonallowance of transgenic fish.
N/A
None
N/A
See 2.4.1 a
Criterion 2.5 Escapes from culture facilities
2.5.1
Indicator: Evidence of a
well-designed, maintained
and managed culture
system, infrastructure and
farm management to
prevent escapes during
grow-out and at harvest, as
demonstrated through the
requirements in Appendix
IV
a. Ensure that farm procedures (see 2.5.2a)
address all the farm measures for escape
prevention given in Appendix IV. Align farm
procedures against requirements in Appendix
IV.
Requirement: Yes
A. Review the list showing how farm's SOP's meet all requirements
given in Appendix IV.
Compliant
As far as the fish escapes and risk assmessment from the
farm Doc. No: KG-TA-013 dated 10.05.2015 can show, there
is not a possibility for the fish to escape from the farm. In
the farm ASC management folder, corresponding to
requirements in Appendix IV, a detailed map shows water
flow through farm, trough sludge basin, plant lagune, and
barriers/screens as well as the regulated barrier at the
outlet to river.
There is a Preventing of Fish Escape Instruction Doc. No: ÇFT-018 dated 20.01.2015 according to this instruction
for following the amounts of escapes daily Screen Cleaning
Control Form Doc. No: ÇF-F-019 dated 01.01.2015.
Fish Escape Diagram Form Doc. No: ÇF-F-016 dated
01.01.2015 and according to this form the farm can detect
the fish amounts,escapes ext.
Maximum risk according to the risk assesment is about
cages and nets.All the areas are also control points for
escapes.
The staff has taken training about escapes of fish dated
15.12.2015 by the designated veterinerian Mrs. Özge
Otgucuoğlu by 1 hour and 15 personnel has attended to the
related training (Doc. No: Training Attendance Form: Pİ-F001.
24
b. Ensure proper maintenance of the culture
system and infrastructure to prevent escapes
during grow-out and harvest.
B. During the initial on-site visit, inspect the culture system to verify
proper maintenance of nets, screens and barriers.
Compliant
c. For initial audits, arrange for the auditor to
witness the farm's method of harvesting during
the on-site visit.
C. During the initial on-site visit, observe how the farm harvests fish to
verify effectiveness of escape prevention measures.
Compliant
The barriers,screens and maintenance of nets are seen on
the farm and described at the risk assesment.
Harvesting pond and equipment has been inspected and
found effective to prevent escape or they are not effective
for escape preventation measures.There was harvest
during audit period.
The harvesting was observed; the fish was collected with a
net and manually landed with a net into a container with
ice and water. The fish was stored in ice until no activity
and packed in boxes with ice immidiately before
transported in truck to smoking house. During harvest
there was not a possibility for escape of fish.
2.5.2
trout farming standard
operating procedures (SOP)
that incorporate an escape
risk assessment [14]
Compliant
a. Prepare a written SOP that incorporates an
escape risk assessment (see 2.5.1a). For farms
that operate closed production systems, SOPs do
not need to incorporate an escape risk
assessment.
A. Review the farm's SOP to confirm it includes an escape risk
assessment. Include a synopsis in auditing report (e.g. contents table
of SOP) for future standadization of "risk assessment" requirements by
ASC or standards setting group.
Compliant
b. Ensure that the SOP is implemented on the
farm.
B. During the on-site visit, confirm that the SOP is implemented by
direct inspection and through interviews with key staff.
Compliant
None
For breakout situations the company inform the related
Food,Agriculture and Livestock Ministry but there is no
situation like this yet.
There is a risk assesment for stocking of trout in net
located in settling pond. There is ASC SOP handbook Doc.
No: ÜS-GGEK-003 dated 30.01.2015.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
There is a risk assesment for stocking of trout in net located
in settling pond.During our interviews with key staff
Mr.Mustafa the related requirements in risk assesment are
implemented by the farm for fish escapes,stocks ext.
N/A
25
2.5.3
Indicator: Evidence of farm
staff capacities and
capabilities, including
training of staff prior to
starting work and regular
training during employment
to understand and address
risks from escapes and
follow the defined SOP
a. In the SOP for reducing escapes (see 2.5.2a),
provide a description of how the farm ensures
adequate staff capacity to address risks from
escapes.
A. Review SOP to verify that farm addresses staffing capacity needs in
order to reduce escapes.
Compliant
The staff are trained for the operation follow requirements
in Appendix IV, daily reporting of sorting, weighing,
feeding, counting of dead fish, including inspection of
barriers daily.
Requirement: Yes
b. Maintain documentary records (e.g. minutes, B. Review records to verify that the farm regularly provides its
attendance sheets) from regular staff trainings employees with introductory or continuing training on escape
on escape prevention procedures.
prevention procedures.
Compliant
-
Compliant
C. During the on-site visit, conduct interviews with responsible staff to
confirm that training sessions are held regularly (i.e. ≥ annually) and
workers are aware of risks.
There is a specific record of farm training for escape
prevention document name and informations about 15
staff has been attended and dated 15.12.2015 given by Mrs
Özge Otgucuoğlu (designated veterinerian of the company).
Staff are fully aware of the inspection and rutines in
connection to possible escapes.
26
2.5.4
Indicator: Estimated
unexplained loss [15] of
farmed trout in net pens is
made publicly available
Requirement: Yes
None
a. For each production cycle, maintain detailed
records of the following:
- stocking count;
- harvest count;
- mortalities; and
- recorded escapes.
A. Review records for completeness.
Compliant
b. Calculate the estimated unexplained loss as
described in the instructions (above) for the
most recent full production cycle. For first audit,
farm must demonstrate understanding of
calculation and the requirement to disclose EUL
after harvest of the current cycle.
B. Verify that the farm calculates estimated unexplained losses
correctly according using the formula for EUL presented above.
Compliant
N/A
Applicability: All
18 Calculated as: Unexplained loss = Stocking count harvest count - mortalities - other known escapes.
Calculation:
According to the Stock Density,Mortality Rates and Fish
Feeding Instruction Doc. No: ÇF-T-022 ratios of the
mortality gramages are indentified with he critical limits.If
death occurs above of the related defined criterias
emergency action plan will be implemented.
Example: October: 3.279.561 (274.630 kg) -708.300 (juvenil
output-47.998 kg),harvested fish 57.426 kg17.568,mortality od broodstock 99-58 kg;mortality of fish is
12.438 adet-1.096 kg,stock amount at the end of the
october:2.501.298.562 kg ,the expected fish is
2.503.650,unexplained loss is: -2.356 fish.
Calculation of estimated unexplained losses correctly according using
the formula for EUL.
c. Make the results from 2.5.4b publicly
C. Verify that the farm makes the information available to the public
available (e.g. by publishing information on the and describe the means of access in the audit report.
farm's website). Keep records of when and
where the results were made public for all
production cycles.
None
Farm records shows stocking count,harvest
count,mortalities and recorded escapes.Farm facility report
has seen for each day and seen all the amounts of
stocking,harvest count,mortalities,recorded escapes and
unexplained loss for each cage and pound. (Doc. No: ÇF-F001 dated 30.03.2015).Example : A-8 02.01.2016 Lot no:
ÖZ2014/15 the amount of the fish: 3618 average gramage:
2,7 gr and there is 8 fish (mortality).
Minor
Farm did not make the information of unexplained results
available on the farms web site.
N/A
27
2.5.5
Indicator: All fish in net
pens are counted during
each grading
a. Prepare a written procedure for grading which A. Review the farm's procedure for grading.
describes the frequency and methodology for
obtaining counts.
Compliant
b. Keep records of counts obtained at each
grading.
B. Review records and ask producer to trace back a logical unit from
harvest to stocking, showing when grading occurred.
Compliant
None
There is a procedure for grading.Grading Instruction Doc.
No: ÇF-T-010 dated 24.05.2011; grading for
juvenils,harvesting fish is done by grading machine.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
There is records of track back a logical unit from harvest to
stocking,showing when grading occured at the related farm
facility documents,we have seen traceability from
broodstock to the harvest.
N/A
28
Criterion 2.6 Predator control [16]
2.6.1
Indicator: Intentional use
of lethal predator control
a. Prepare a list of all predator control devices
used on the farm and their locations.
A. Review list and confirm device locations and working condition
during the on-site inspection.
Compliant
There is an intentional use of lethal predator control
equipment. There is a instruction for predator control and
prevetation Doc. No: ÇF-T-021 dated 20.01.2015. According
to this instruction the farm uses sound bomb for the birds
(predators) and uses bird nets over the cages as well.By the
way for other predators which are alive around the water
rand,there is a grid system for these predators.On the
other hand, all staff has taken trainings about these
instructions by the designated veterinerian.
Compliant
The bird nets,sound bombs are described in 2.6.1.a is
established.The predators controls are preventative and
they are not lethal and seen on site and at the related
documents.
Requirement: None [17]
noted in [17]
b. Provide a description of farm procedures for B. Verify that the farm's predator control procedures are implemented
managing predators (e.g. in the SOP identified in and that there is no evidence the control measures are lethal.
2.5.2) which explains how the farm ensures that
all actions are non-lethal.
29
Compliant
Training Document Doc. No: Pİ-F-001 dated 15.12.2015 17
staff has been attended to the predator training by 1 hour
by Mrs Özge Otgucuoğlu.
30
PRINCIPLE 3: MINIMIZE NEGATIVE EFFECT ON WATER RESOURCES
Criterion 3.1 Water Use/Abstraction Levels
3.1.1
Indicator: Maximum
amount of water that a
farm can abstract from a
natural flowing water body
(such as a river or stream)
a. Inform the CAB if the farm seeks an
A. If the farm seeks an exemption, review evidence for compliance
exemption to 3.1.1. and provide supporting
with regulatory or scientifically-derived water flow minima and
evidence (see Instructions). Otherwise, proceed provide a synopsis in the audit report. Otherwise, proceed to 3.1.1B.
to 3.1.1b.
Compliant
Requirement: 50% of the
natural water body’s flow
immediately above the
farm [18]
The permit for water abstraction is given from DSİ.Total
capacity is 1500 lt/sn.Usage of water is from 2 funds.
400 l / s water is drawn from the first source. 70 l / s and
enters the plant from the second source. Total water
volume of 470 l / sec. One third of the plant up to the
mains water supply is realized.95% of the water usedis
returned to nature by filtered with drumfilter.
Applicability: All farms
utilizing surface water (such
as water from a river)
except as noted in [18]
b. Maintain records of all water abstracted by
the farm and use these values to calculate the
total volume of water abstracted on an annual
basis.
B. Confirm that the farm maintains records of water abstraction and
that calculations are accurate for annual volume of water abstracted.
N/A
c. Provide the CAB with reliable estimates of
C. Confirm that the farm has access to reliable estimates for water
water flow immediately above the farm (e.g.
flow immediately above the farm and that caclulations are accurate
scientific studies, government publications). Use for annual volume of water flow immediately above the farm.
these values to calulate the total volume of
water flow on an annual basis.
N/A
d. Use the results of 3.1.1b divided by 3.1.1c
multiplied by 100 to determine the percent
abstraction of the natural water body's flow.
N/A
D. Review data to verify that the volume of water abstracted does not
exceed 50% of the natural water body's flow immediately above the
farm during any month of the year. One annual measurement at point
of lowest flow rate period to demonstrate less than 50% water
abstraction. The farmer is required to demonstrate historical statistics
of what period is defined as "low flow rate".
NA for recirculated water.
31
3.1.2
None
Indicator: Demonstration a. Retain records to show how the farm ensures A. Review farm records for completeness.
that >90% abstracted water that > 90% of abstracted water is returned to
is returned to the natural
the natural water body.
water body
N/A
Compliant
There is use of water, or and there is not significant
evaporation or leakage to the underground, the water is
returned to the river and there is no recirculation.95% of
the water usedis returned to nature by filtered.There will
be a drum filter at the farm.
Requirement: Yes
utilizing surface water (such
as water from a river)
3.1.3
-
B. During the on-site visit, inspect the water intake and discharge areas
to confirm that the farm has means of estimating returned water
volume.
None
N/A
A. Verify whether the farm uses underground pumped water or not
and record this in the audit report.
N/A
Karaçam fish farm does not use underground water.
b. Obtain permits from regulatory authorities.
B. Confirm that the farm has permits for all pumped water (as
applicable).
N/A
-
C. During the on-site visit, inspect groundwater sources (as applicable).
N/A
None
N/A
Indicator: All use of
a. Identify any use of underground pumped
underground pumped water water by the farm and include in the farm map
has been permitted by
or diagram (see 1.1.1d and 2.1.1a).
regulatory authorities
Compliant
Checking of intake and discharge areas are appropriate
with visual inspections.
Requirement: Yes
utilizing groundwater (such
as water from a well)
32
3.1.4
Indicator: Well depths are a. Ensure that well tests are conducted at a
A. Review evidence to verify that the farm has wells tested at a similar
tested at least annually, and similar time each year [19] using an appropriate time each year using an appropriate methodology.
results made publicly
methodology.
available [19]
N/A
Requirement: Yes
utilizing groundwater (such
as water from a well)
b. Maintain records of results from all tests of
well depth.
B. Confirm that the farm maintains results from tests of well depth.
N/A
c. Make the results from 3.1.4b available
publicly (e.g. by posting on the farm's website).
Keep records of when and where results were
made public.
C. Verify that the farm makes the information from 3.1.4b available to
the public and record the testing results in the audit report (public
section).
N/A
None
N/A
Criterion 3.2 Land-based systems—Water Quality/Effluent
33
3.2.1
Indicator: Maximum total a. Maintain records showing the amount and
amount of phosphorus
type of feeds used during the past 12 months.
released into the
environment per metric ton
(mt) of fish produced over a
12-month period (see
methodology in Appendix IIA)
A. Verify that farm has records for feeds used over the relevant time
period.
Compliant
B. Verify that farm has records showing the phosphorus content in
feeds.
Compliant
Feed supplier is Abalıoğlu Yem Soya ve Tekstil A.Ş. Karaçam
fish farm has records used for the relevant time period.The
document is Feed Following From Doc. No: ÇF-F-010.
From January 2015 until January 2016
The feed usage is 578,362 tonnes
Requirement: 5 kg/mt of
fish produced over a 12month period; within three
years of publication of the
ASC Freshwater Trout
Standard (from 7 February
2013 to 7 February 2016), 4
kg/mt of fish produced
over a 12-month period
(after 7 February 2016)
Applicability: All landbased systems
b. For all feeds used (result from 3.2.1a), keep
records showing phosphorus content as
determined by chemical analysis or based on
feed supplier declaration (Appendix II-A).
Farm has records which shows phosphorus content in feed
by each metric of feed and by monthly.There is a follow up
system record.
34
c. Using equation #1 from Appendix II-A and
C. Confirm that calculations are done according to Appendix II-A.
results from 3.2.1a and b, calculate the total
amount of phosphorus added as feed during the
last 12 months of production.
Compliant
Calculation of maximum total amount of phosphorus:
P released to the water body per unit of trout produced =
(P in – P out)/biomass produced
where:
The feed usage is 578,362 ise 578,362*0,0085= 4,91 for
12.But the calculation is for 12 months as below:
For 12 months calculation is:
Harvest=533.799*0,0043=2,29
Mortality=14.042*0,0043=0,06
Mortality of broodstock=4.924*0,0040=0,019
Outgoing juvenile=51.436*0,0043=0,22
Sludge=0,5 tonnes*0,0037=0,00185
Totally=2,59
Pin -Pout/biomass (533 tonnes)*1000=4,912,59/533.799*1000=4,34.The value is more than the
related value 4 kg/mt and it is not appropriate for ASC
standard.
Calculations are done according to Appendix II-A and
verified during audit on the table attached to the report.
d. Maintain records for stocking, harvest and
mortality which are sufficient to calculate the
amount of biomass produced (equation #2 in
Appendix II-A) during the past 12 months.
D. Verify that the farm maintained all records needed to calculate the
amount of biomass produced during the past 12 months.
Compliant
e. Calculate the amount of phosphorus in fish
biomass produced (result from 3.2.1d) using
equation #3 in Appendix II-A.
E. Confirm that P-content calculations are done according to Appendix
II-A.
Compliant
f. If applicable, maintain records showing the
total amount of P removed as sludge (equation
#4 in Appendix II-A) during the past 12 months.
F. As applicable, verify records showing how the farm determined the
amount of phosphorus removed from the system as sludge.
Compliant
Biomass of fish produced over the specific time period is
calculated is: 533.799 kg
Total P content in biomass produced = (Biomass
produced)*(% of P in fish)
The result is 2,29.
There has been analyses report of P in sludge.
500 kg slugde has been sent,I wrote 500 tonnes but it is 0,5
tonnes as well and 0,5*0,0037=0,00185 kg/mt.
35
g. Using the formula in Appendix II-A and results G. Review calculations to confirm that the farm does not exceed
from 3.2.1a-f (above), calculate total
requirements for total amount of phosphorus released.
phosphorus released per ton of fish produced.
Major
The feed usage is 578,362 ise 578,362*0,0085= 4,91 for 12
months and for 13 months input phosphorus is
625.362*0,0085=5,33 as well.But the calculation is for 12
months as below:
For 12 months calculation is:
Harvest=533.799*0,0043=2,29
Mortality=14.042*0,0043=0,06
Mortality of broodstock=4.924*0,0040=0,019
Outgoing juvenile=51.436*0,0043=0,22
Sludge=0,5 tonnes*0,0037=0,00185
Totally=2,59
Pin -Pout/biomass (533 tonnes)*1000=4,912,59/533.799*1000=4,34.The value is more than the
related value 4 kg/mt and it is not appropriate for ASC
standard.
3.2.2
Indicator: Minimum
oxygen saturation in the
outflow, measured monthly
(see methodology in
Appendix II-B)
h. Others, please describe
None
a. Provide monthly monitoring records of DO
percent saturation in outlfow water for the
previous 12 months. For first audits, farm
records must cover ≥ 6 months.
A. Review DO dataset to confirm that monitoring covers the required
timeframe and that DO was ≥ 60% for each monthly water sample.
Requirement: 60% [20]
N/A
Compliant
Oxygen level is measured morning and afternoon every day
during the last (09:00 and 15:00).We can see the record for
every day. Everyday the farm responsibles measures DO at
30 stages (2 times).In november the average of DO from
entrance is 100 %L and discharge is 93 %L. However,the
analysis from Süleyman Demirel University Aquacultural
Faculty verifies the results on the farm.For all stages
oxygen saturation is upper thn 60 %L and appropriates with
the ASC standard.
The DO measurements have been done by trained farm
operators using an calibrated Oxyguard or accredidated
laboratory.The calibration certificate dated 15-20.09.2015
by Fine Offset Electronics Co.Ltd.The company send
oxguard to accredidated laboratory annually./The
calibration was made according to the Europen
Accredidation Union and The Internal Laboratory
Accredidation Union.Model No: DS-102-Serial number:
DS2015090740.By the way if there is any big differences
about the measurements the farm makes cross check with
the pure water.During audit we checked the calibration of
the oxyguard with pure water.
36
3.2.3
Indicator:
Macroinvertebrate surveys
downstream from the
farm’s effluent discharge
demonstrate benthic health
that is similar to or better
than surveys upstream from
the discharge (see
methodology in Appendix IIC)
b. If any single value from 3.2.2a is < 60%,
B. If applicable (see results from 3.2.2a), review the farm's results
initiate daily continuous DO monitoring with an from daily continuous monitoring to verify that DO saturation in the
electronic probe and recorder for > 1 week.
outflow was ≥ 60% at all times for at least one week.
Maintain a record of the results.
Compliant
There is not any measurement of DO lower than 60
%.However at the analysis reports Oxygen saturation KÖS1=72,1 and KÖS-5=103,7.
c. During the on site visit, make arrangements
for the auditor to observe calibration of
equipment and measurements.
C. During the on-site visit, observe how the farm calibrates equipment
and takes DO measurements (or takes samples for chemical analysis)
to confirm compliance.
Compliant
The DO measurements have been done by trained farm
operators using an calibrated Oxyguard or accredidated
laboratory.The calibration certificate dated 15-20.09.2015
by Fine Offset Electronics Co.Ltd.The company send
oxguard to accredidated laboratory annually./The
calibration was made according to the Europen
Accredidation Union and The Internal Laboratory
Accredidation Union.Model No: DS-102-Serial number:
DS2015090740.By the way if there is any big differences
about the measurements the farm makes cross check with
the pure water.
None
a. Have a scientific assessment done in the area A. Confirm that the farm used the results from a scientific assessment
downstream of the outlet to identify the zone
to determine the location of downstream sampling.
most likely to be impacted by farm discharge.
This assessment must consider water mixing and
distance from farm outlet.
N/A
Compliant
The macro invertebrate analyse have been performed by TC
Süleyman Demirel University Aquacultural Faculty
06.11.2015/Report date 07.12.2015 according to Biotic
Index Card (Appendix II C).
Requirement: Yes
37
b. Prepare a map showing the upstream and
downstream transects and sampling stations
used for macroinvertebrate surveys (see
Appendix II-C).
B. Review map to verify appropriate siting of sampling stations relative
to the scientific assessment (see 3.2.3a) and in compliance with
Appendix II-C.
Compliant
c. Collect benthic samples along transects in
accordance with Appendix II-C and maintain
records of all sample collections.
C. Confirm that the sample collection followed Appendix II-C.
Compliant
d. Have an accredited laboratory analyze the
D. Confirm that the laboratory used by the farm is accredited for
samples for benthic invertebrate fauna including analyses of benthic samples. Review the laboratory results to confirm
characterization of species composition,
that the samples of benthic fauna were characterized as required.
abundance, diversity, and presence of key
sensitive indicator species.
e. Using survey results from 3.2.3d, compare the
benthic health of areas downstream from the
discharge to those areas upstream of the
discharge to assure no change.
E. Review the farm's comparison of upstream and downstream
benthic health to confirm that the farm's conclusions are directly
supported by objective evidence from benthic surveys. Verify that
surveys show compliance with the requirement.
Minor
Compliant
The stations are described at the report.
The macro invertebrate has been requested by farm to be
done in accordance with appendix II-C, there is a
confirmation of compiance from TC Süleyman Demirel
University Aquacultural Faculty.
The macro vertebrate anaysis has been done by Süleyman
Demirel University Aquacultural Faculty and the laboratory
of related univesity is not accredidated.There is not any
accredidated laboratory for macro vertebrate analysis in
Turkey yet.Variance form for this requirement will be sent
to ASC after the audit.
The results from the sampling from TC Süleyman Demirel
University Aquacultural Faculty result number upstream
and number downstream the farm.The BIC for upstream is
higher than 10 (the result is 19) and the BIC for
downstream is higher than 10 (the result is 23) as well.
The macro invertebrate analyse have been performed by TC
Süleyman Demirel University Aquacultural Faculty
06.11.2015/Report date 07.12.2015 according to Biotic
Index Card (Appendix II C). The results from the sampling
from TC Süleyman Demirel University Aquacultural Faculty
result number upstream and number downstream the
farm.The BIC for upstream is higher than 10 (the result is
19) and the BIC for downstream is higher than 10 (the
result is 23) as well.
At the report of the university the BIC value at the entry
and the exit points are identified as if the results is
between:
0-2 the water is dirty
3-9 the water is medium dirty
if the BIC value is more than 10 the water is clean.
So,the values are more than 10 and they are appropriate
with the ASC standard.
38
-
3.2.4
F. Compare upstream and downstream benthic health over time to
determine future surveillance ferquency (see instructions).
None
Indicator: Evidence of
a. Prepare a biosolids (sludge) management plan A. Review the farm's biosolids (sludge) management plan for
implementation of biosolids that addresses all requirements in Appendix II-D. compliance with Appendix II-D.
(sludge); Best Management
Practices (BMPs) (see
Appendix II-D)
Compliant
The results from upstream and downstream are not
different.Total species at the upstream is higher than the
downstream. The evaluation for intensity for upstream is
low and is is higher on the upstream as well.
N/A
Compliant
There is a farm bio solid (sludge) management plan
compliance with Appendix II-D, with a map for flow of
water sludge and water treatment, there is not an
identification and solution of risks as flood.Environmental
Assessment and Impact Dimensions Plan Doc. No: ÜSB-012.
Requirement: Yes
b. Prepare a process flow diagram of the key
steps taken to responsibly manage sludge
identifying treatment, transfer, storage,
utilization and disposal.
B. Evaluate the flow diagram to confirm it covers all steps (e.g.
cleaning routines of pipes, sumps, channels and units).
c. Maintain records of biosolid (sludge) cleaning, C. Review the farm's records to verify there is evidence of
maintenance, and disposal as described in
implementation of biosolids management as required in Appendix II-D.
Appendix II-D.
Compliant
There is a flow diagram that confirm it covers all steps and
show flow of sludge as seen at farm.
Sludge collection and disposal flow diagram Doc. No.: ÜRAŞ-009 dated 06.01.2015 and according to the diagram Mud
scraped the bottom of the pool is removed with water
transported by wheelbarrow or by the staff. Then the drum
through the mud settling pond filter. Sludge is delivered to
authorized companies. Sludge has been weighed and
sampled for analysis.
Compliant
There is a registration of sludge disposal by Çöp Adam
Entegre Atık Yönetimi San.ve Tic. Ltd. Şti., last slugde has
taken by the company dated 14.11.2015 and amount of the
sludge is 500 kg. (code 190813).And there is also an analysis
report for he phosporus in the sludge is 3.700
mg/kg,analysis method is TS 8338 and the analysis has
done by Çevtest Laboratory accredidated by
TÜRKAK(accredidation number is AB-00091-T).
39
-
D. During the on site visit, inspect the farm and conduct community
interviews to verify there is no evidence for discharge of biosolids into
natural water bodies.
3.2.5
Indicator: Water-quality
monitoring matrix
completed and submitted
to ASC (see Appendix II-B)
Compliant
Inspection on site confirms management of biosolids has
seen.The sludge is taken See 3.2.4 c,there is concrete pit for
dead fish.Chemical wastes are taken by Beysu Atık
Yönetimi San. ve Tic. Ltd Şti.,last visit has been done dated
12.11.205 165 kg plastic.(code 150110)
There has been no evidence for discharge of bio solids into
natural water bodies, no notes from authorities.
Compliant
However, there is a seperated area for classifying all the
type of wastes.
Water monitoring dataset for all the months has been
established.There is table for monitoring and analysis are
performed monyhly as well.Analysis Data Form includes all
the results of the analysis and there is a follow up system
for monitoring.
a. Conduct ≥ 6 months of water quality
monitoring before first audit. Thereafter,
monitoring should be part of production
practices for certified farms.
A. Do not schedule the on-site audit until client has monitoring
dataset.
Compliant
b.Complete the Water Quality Monitoring
Matrix (Appendix II-B) and submit to CAB.
B. Review Matrix to verify that client monitored all four required
parameters at the required frequency.
Compliant
c. Calibrate all equipment at the frequency and
by the method recommended by the
manufacturer. Calibrate daily if there is no
manufacturer's recommendation.
C. Verify that client calibrates equipment as required.Water analysis
are performed by accredidated laboratory.
Compliant
The name of the laboratory is Çevre Laboratory Analysis
A.Ş. Accredidated by Turkish Accredidation Center and
accredidation number is AB-0183-T.
d. During the audit of the farm, arrange to
conduct water quality monitoring. The auditor
will witness water sampling.
D. Witness the client conducting water quality monitoring.Water
analysis are performed by accredidated laboratory.
Compliant
e. Collect water samples and prepare them for
shipment to a laboratory (if applicable).
E. Witness the farm collecting water samples or (if applicable)
preparing samples to send to an independent laboratory.
Compliant
Water analysis are performed by accredidated laboratory.
Requirement: Yes
The matrix is fulfilled for TP, TN, BOD and TSS.There are
water analysis results for the related values from
accredidated laboratory.
40
f. Perform routine analysis of water samples (i.e. F. Witness the farm's analyses of water samples or (if applicable)
done in the same manner as for previous
review evidence that the independent laboratory is suitably qualified
months of water quality monitoring).
to perform analyses. Water analysis are performed by accredidated
laboratory.
Compliant
g. Record values for each parameter and submit G.Review the recorded values and examine consistency with the
results to CAB.
farm's previous results for water quality monitoring.
Compliant
Parameters are consistent.
h. Submit data on water quality monitoring to
ASC in a suitable format (required parameters
are shown in Appendix II-B) at least once per
year.
i. Others, please describe
H. Confirm that client has submitted data on water quality to ASC
(Appendix II-B).
None
Minor
The company has a analysis table Doc.No: ÜSB-P-01.But
data on water quality is not submitted to ASC.
N/A
Criterion 3.3 Cage-Based Systems—Water Quality/Benthic Community
3.3.1
Indicator: For cages
a. Determine the surface area of the water body A. Review data to confirm that it comes from an accurate and reliable
located on water bodies
where the farm operates (see Instructions
source.
with a surface area less
above).
than 1,000 km2, evidence
that farm production levels
reflect the results of an
assimilative capacity study
(see Appendix II-E)
N/A
The system is not a cage-based system.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: Cage-based
systems operating on water
bodies with a surface area <
1000 km2
b. Inform the CAB if results from 3.3.1a indicate
that the water body is less than 1,000 km2
surface area and proceed to 3.3.1c. Otherwise,
go to 3.3.2.
B. Review the information used by the farm (see Instructions above) to
verify that the farm has correctly assigned the water body to a size
class. If the water body is ≥ 1,000 km2 then Indicator 3.3.1 does not
apply.
N/A
c. Obtain a documentated assimilative capacity
study for the water body where the farm
operates. The assimilative capacity study must
address all requirements described in Appendix
II-E.
C. Review the assimilative capacity study to verify it meets the
requirments of Appendix II-E (e.g. appropriateness of model used,
scope of investigation, and analyses performed).
N/A
41
d. Provide evidence that the farm production
levels reflect the results of the assimilative
capacity study in 3.3.1c.
D. Review the conclusions presented in 3.3.1c to verify that loading
from farm production levels does not exceed water body capacity to
assimilate.
N/A
N/A
42
3.3.2
Indicator: For cages
located on water bodies
with a surface area of 1,000
km2 or greater, evidence
that cages are located at
sites that are classified as
“Type 3” sites, as defined in
Appendix II-F
a. Determine the surface area of the water body
where the farm operates (see 3.3.1a). If the
surface area is 1,000 km2 or greater, proceed to
3.3.2b. Otherwise, go to 3.3.1
A. Review the information used by the farm (see 3.3.1A and 3.3.1B) to
verify that the farm has correctly assigned the water body to a size
class. If the water body is < 1,000 km2 then Indicator 3.3.2 does not
apply.
N/A
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: Cage-based
systems operating on water
bodies with a surface area ≥
1000 km2
43
3.3.3
b. Provide evidence that the water body
B. Review the evidence from the regulatory agency to confirm that the
classification was performed by a regulatory
site is classified as "Type 3" according to the required methodology (if
agency as required under Appendix II-F. If no
applicable).
regulatory agency has classified the water body,
proceed to 3.3.2c.
N/A
c. If applicable, hire a qualified independent
C. As applicable, verify that the consultant was suitably qualified and
consultant to analyze and classify the site where provided a detailed analysis to support the determination.
the farm operates in accordance with the
definitions in Appendix II-F.
N/A
-
D. Confirm that actual cage locations are at sites classified as Type 3.
N/A
None
N/A
N/A
Indicator: Water quality
a. Conduct ≥ 6 months of water quality
A. Do not schedule the on-site audit until client has monitoring
monitoring matrix
monitoring before first audit and submit to CAB. dataset.
completed (see Appendix IIG)
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All cagebased systems
b. Calibrate all equipment at the frequency and
by the method recommended by the
manufacturer. Calibrate daily if there is no
manufacturer's recommendation.
B. Verify that client calibrates equipment as required.
N/A
c. During the audit of the farm, arrange to
conduct water quality monitoring at location of
auditor's choice.
C. Witness the client conducting water quality monitoring.
N/A
e. Collect water samples at the same location as E. Examine independent analyses performed by an independent
3.3.3a and obtain analysis from a water quality laboratory (i.e. not by farm staff) for consistency with farm results for
laboratory at least once annually.
months where duplicate samples taken.
N/A
f.Assure that values from laboratory are
consistent with values obtained from laboratory
results. If values differ by >5%, demonstrate
how equipment has been recalibrated, replaced,
or how procedures have been modified.
N/A
F. Examine percent error between farm measurements and auditor
measurements.Determine whether ammendments made are
sufficient. Auditor is at liberty to request a second set of tests to
confirm accurate recalibration.
44
g. Submit data on water quality monitoring to
ASC as per Appendix II-B.
G. Confirm that client has submitted data on water quality to ASC
(Appendix II-B).
N/A
None
N/A
45
3.3.4
Indicator: Maximum
a. Provide CAB with a description of the farm's
baseline total phosphorus TP monitoring program (e.g. sampling station,
concentration of the water sampling protocol, name of laboratory used).
body (see Appendix II-H)
A. Review farm's description of the TP monitoring program to verify it
complies with requirements. Where situations arise with complex
modified water bodies (eg: large lakes and/or hydroelectric facilities)
resulting in high or variable water depth fluctuations, sites should
record with frequent monitoring flow, depth and water quality.
N/A
B. During on site visit, observe sample collection, processing, and
transport or mailing to the laboratory.
N/A
c. Identify the baseline TP concentration of the C. Review the farm's evidence for establishment of a baseline TP
water body (see Instructions above) and provide concentration and record the value and rationale in the audit report.
the CAB with evidence to show how this value
was established.
N/A
d. Provide monthly TP monitoring data to the
CAB as indicated in Appendix II-B
D. Review TP data set for completeness and cross-check against
previous monitoring results for consistency.
N/A
-
E. Review TP monitoring records and verify that no quarterly TP
concentration is ≥ 20 µg/l.
N/A
None
N/A
A. Review farm's description of the oxygen saturation montioring
program to verify it complies with requirements.
N/A
B. Witness how the farm makes calibrations and takes DO
measurements to ensure that testing done as required.
N/A
Requirement: ≤ 20 µg/l
[21]
b. Implement monitoring of TP as described in
the instructions for Indicator 3.3.3.
3.3.5
Indicator: Minimum
a. Provide CAB with a description of the farm's
percent oxygen saturation oxygen saturation monitoring program (see
of water 50 centimeters
Indicator 3.3.3).
above bottom sediment (at
all oxygen monitoring
locations described in
Appendix II-G)
Requirement: ≥ 50%
b. Implement monitoring of oxygen saturation
according to the methods described above.
46
3.3.6
Indicator: Trophic status
classification of water body
remains unchanged from
baseline (see Appendix II-H)
c. Provide oxygen monitoring data to the CAB.
C. Review the farm's DO data set for completeness and to verify that
verify that no monthly value was <50% saturation.
N/A
-
D. If a value of < 50% saturation is detected while on-site, raise a Nonconformance.
N/A
None
N/A
a. Obtain documentary evidence stating the
A. Verify that farm obtains evidence that the trophic status of the
trophic status of water body if previously set by water body has been previously set by a competent authority (as
a competent authority (if applicable). If not, got applicable).
to 3.3.6.b
N/A
b. If the trophic status of the water body has not B. Verify that the farm has correctly assigned trophic status to the
previously been classified, use the baseline TP
water body using baseline TP concentration.
concentration (result from 3.3.4c) to assign a
trophic status to the water body according to
the table in Appendix II-H.
N/A
c. Compare the current trophic status of the
C. Review the farm's conclusion to verify compliance with the
water body (results from either 3.3.6a or 3.3.6b) requirement.
to the trophic status reported in all previous
audits. For first audits, this requirement is not
applicable.
N/A
N/A
Requirement: Yes
None
47
3.3.7
Indicator: Maximum
allowed increase in total
phosphorus concentration
in lake from baseline
a. Use the result from Indicator 3.3.4 (above) to A. Verify that the farm has justification for selecting the TP value to
identify the baseline TP concentration that will serve as the baseline TP concentration for the water body (as was
be used to calculate percent change from
done for 3.3.4).
baseline.
N/A
b. Use the result from Indicator 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 B. Verify that farm has accurately catergorized the size of the water
(above) to identify the size of the water body in body.
which the farm operates.
N/A
c. Use TP monitoring data from the reference
station taken over the past 12 months to
calculate the current annual average
concentration of TP.
d. Calculate the difference between 'baseline TP'
and the annual average TP concentration over
the most recent 12 months according to the
instructions given above.
C. Verify that farm has accurately calculated the current annual
average TP concentration using data from the reference station.
N/A
D. Verify that the farm has made accurate calculation of the
percentage difference in TP concentration.
N/A
-
E. Confirm that any observed increase in phosphorus concentration
falls within the maximum allowed range for the size of water body
where the farm operates.
N/A
None
N/A
Requirement: 25% for
water bodies with a surface
area of less than 1,000 km2
15% for water bodies with a
surface area of 1,000 km2
or greater
Applicability: All cagebased systems as specifed
according to size of water
body in which the farm
operates
48
3.3.8
Indicator: Maximum total a. Maintain records showing the amount and
amount of phosphorus
type of feeds used during the past 12 months.
released into the
environment per metric ton
(mt) of fish produced over a
12-month period (see
Appendix II-A)
A. Verify that farm has records for feeds used over the relevant time
period.
N/A
B. Verify that farm has records showing the phosphorus content in
feeds.
N/A
c. Using equation #1 from Appendix II-A and
C. Confirm that calculations are done according to Appendix II-A.
results from 3.3.8a and b, calculate the total
amount of phosphorus added as feed during the
last 12 months of production.
N/A
d. Maintain records for stocking, harvest and
D. Verify that the farm maintained all records needed to calculate the
mortality which are sufficient to calculate the
amount of biomass produced during the past 12 months.
amount of biomass produced (equation #2 in
Appendix II-A) during the past 12 months. Value
taken from 3.2.1.d
N/A
e. Calculate the amount of phosphorus in fish
biomass produced (result from 3.3.8d) using
equation #3 in Appendix II-A.
N/A
Requirement: 5 kg/mt of
fish produced over a 12month period; within three
years of publication of the
ASC Freshwater Trout
Standard (from 7 February
2013 to 7 February 2016), 4
kg/mt of fish produced over
a 12-month period (after 7
February 2016).
b. For all feeds used (result from 3.3.8a), keep
records showing phosphorus content as
determined by chemical analysis or based on
feed supplier declaration (Appendix II-A).
E. Confirm that P-content/biomass produced calculations are done
according to Appendix II-A.
49
f. If applicable, maintain records showing the
total amount of P removed as sludge (equation
#4 in Appendix II-A) during the past 12 months.
This compliance criteria valid for flow-through
systems but does not apply for cage systems.
F. As applicable, verify records showing how the farm determined the
amount of phosphorus removed from the system as sludge. This
compliance criteria valid for flow-through systems but does not apply
for cage systems.
N/A
g. Using the formula in Appendix II-A and results G. Review calculations to confirm that the farm does not exceed
from 3.3.8a-f (above), calculate total
requirements for total amount of phosphorus released.
phosphorus released per ton of fish produced.
N/A
N/A
None
PRINCIPLE 4: PROACTIVELY MAINTAIN THE HEALTH OF CULTURED FISH AND MINIMIZE THE RISK OF DISEASE TRANSMISSION
Criterion 4.1 Farm health management
4.1.1
Indicator: Presence of a
site-specific farm health
plan that is reviewed at
least annually and
addresses biosecurity,
veterinary health, crisis
management and risk
assessment
a. Prepare a Farm Health Plan (FHP) that is site- A. Review the farm health plan to confirm that it adequately addresses
specific and addresses biosecurity, veterinary
each of the relevant requirements.
health, crisis management, and risk assessment
Compliant
There is a farm veterinerian health plan which is
established covering the relevant
requirements,02.01.2016,signed by veterinarian Mrs Özge
Otgucuoğlu(Diploma number:6879). The veterenieran
health plan covers adeaquately address of the Karaçam Fish
Farm and the contents of the plan are the identifications of
the diseases including preventative measures and disease
mitigation,potential risks,vaccination protocol,parasite
controls,screening program in place for relevant
pathogens,prohibited drugs,medicines and treatments that
may be used at the farm,including drug name,active
subtance,indication,supplier,administration route,dosage
and pre-harvest withdrawal period.
b. Ensure that the FHP is reviewed and updated
at least annually with signatures by farm
management indicating approval.
Compliant
For previous years,farm health plans are updated regularly.
Compliant
Farm veterinerian health plan has been signed by the
designated veterinarian of the farm for 2016.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
B. Verify that farm management approves review and update of the
FHP at least annually.The farm health plan will be updated yearly.
c. Ensure that the farm's designated veterinarian C. Confirm that the farm has paperwork showing signature and date of
reviews and approves the FHP annually and after review by designated veterinarian.
each update of the FHP, by signature.
50
4.1.2
Indicator: All fish, at all
stages in the life cycle, are
sourced from a supply that
is of equal or better health
status than its own stock
Requirement: Yes
None
a. Design a set of health status metrics that can
be evaluated at all relevant phases of the life
history. Note: metrics for serious health
conditions (e.g. symptoms of infectious disease)
should outweigh metrics for transitory
conditions (e.g. fin abrasions). Have the metrics
reviewed and approved by the farm's designated
health care professional.
A. Verify that the farm has designed health status metrics which are
reasonable and can be evaluated across the life history. Confirm that
the metrics were approved by the farm's designated veterinary health
care professional.
N/A
Compliant
The health status metrics are approved by the farm's
designated veterinerian health care professional for all the
life history of the farm.
Applicability: All
51
b. Ensure that the farm's designated health care B. Examine the farm's record of conditions from annual inspection by
professional samples fish on-site during an
the farm's designated health care professional.
annual inspection and maintains records of
conditions using metrics defined by 4.1.2a.
c. Ensure that the samples of health condition
(from 4.1.2b) are taken from all of the main
cohorts in production during each health status
inspection .
C. Ensure records of evaluations are taken from all main cohorts in
production at the time of the veterinary health care professional's
inspection.
Evaluations are updated from all stages of the farm.
Compliant
Compliant
Health status is checked by veterinarian every time
scala,visit records are verified every 2 weeks. All the
reports of the inspections have seen. Last farm inspection
has been done by degisnated veterinerian of Karaçam Farm
dated 10.12.2015, sample control is dated 07.12.2015 for C
Block. The actions are; all the blocks are has been checked
and Vibriospp. has been detected for the
juvenils.However,coccus infection has been seen at the C
Block and the veterinerian has been taken sample from
that pond.
Parasitological control: Necrosis and anemia was observed
in the gill lamellae.
Icthyophthiriusmultifillis ++
Microbiological control:
Lactococcusgarviae (Streptococ) has been detected in 3
samples. There is not any patogens in other fishes.
Suggested treatment:
For 7 days50 mg/kg CA dozage Florfenil
(Report No: 07)
Karaçam farm dated 04.02.2016,sample control is dated
07.02.2016.Report No: ÖZPEKLER-11.The actions are;all the
blocks are has been checked and stock amounts has been
verified.There is any symptoms on juvenils.Abdominal
adiposity are normal.
Lungs brownish pink in color.
There is no lubrication and degeneration.
Kidney and spleen structure is normal.
Less stomach is full.
There are generally digested in the intestines feed.
Parasitological control, did not reveal any interference
made.
Microbiological control; in October has not made any
See 4.1.2 b
52
d. Prior to accepting a transfer of fish (whether
the transfer is internal or external), ensure that
the supplier has evaluated fish using the farm's
health status metrics in 4.1.2a. Farm's may also
use evidence from statutory evaluations (e.g.
health certificates) as a basis for accepting
transfers provided that the evaluations are
appropriately documented.
D. Verify that the farm has evidence of suppliers evaluating fish using
the farm's health status metrics prior to accepting transfer or, if
applicable, verify that the farm reviews evidence from statutory
evaluations before accepting transfers.
Compliant
Health status is checked by veterinarian every date scala,
records verified. Transfer of fish is internal regulary
between cages and then lastly harvested fish is transferred
to the handling unit.Before transfer transfer declaration
has been signed by the veterinerian of Food,Agriculture
and Livestock Ministry according to the laws and
regulations.
Declaration of transportation 29.10.2015 Köyceğiz
Food,Agriculture and Livestock Ministry 11,500 kg
harvested fish,Veterinerian Doc. from Legal Authority
Sercan Gümüş has inspected the harvest and declared and
health status of the fish.Diploma no: 2011-6468.
e. Ensure that responsible farm staff are trained E.Verify that responsible farm staff have received training on how to
to evaluate fish condition using health status
evaluate fish condition using health status metrics.
metrics. Training should include instruction on
how to identify fish health symptoms. Farms
may decide for themselves on the most effective
training tools (e.g. lectures, courses, tests) and
frequency of training and re-training (e.g.
annually, every two years, etc).
Compliant
Fish are not moved from lower to higher status of health,
health status has been checked during deliveries. Health
status is checked by veterinarian every date scala, records
verified.
Staff are fully aware of health status metrics and all staff
are tained by the designated veterinerian of the farm about
health status metrics.
Training Attendance Form: Harvest Training 15 staff has
been attended dated 12.12.2015 and given by Mrs
Otgucuoğlu.
f. Arrange for the farm's veterinary health
professional to review the accuracy of fish
health condition scores that were assigned by
trained farm staff. This validation exercise may
be done annually on a small sample of fish.
F. Verify that the farm's veterinary health professional has reviewed
the accuracy of scoring by farm staff.
Compliant
Visits are done every 2 week by the veterinerian regularly
and however if there is any request and any situation for
risks,diseases the veterinerain visits the form for controls.
All staff has been trained by the designated veterinerian.
g.Ensure that a sub-sample of fish are screened
from each batch prior to transfer. Any batch
which does not conform is returned to the
supplier with health status metrics recorded.
G. Verify that the farm has evidence of health screening on a subsample of individuals prior to a decision to transfer each batch of fish.
Compliant
The company has own hatchery and there is no another fish
supplier.
53
4.1.3
Indicator: All fish that are
moved off site, at all stages
in the life cycle, are moved
to a location of equal or
lesser health status
The related trainings are as below:
Compliant
a. Ensure that receivers evaluate fish health
A. Verify the receiving farm has evidence that health check scoring was
condition using metrics defined by the farm's
carried out before accepting transfer.
designated veterinary health specialist (4.1.2a)
at the receiving location prior to transfer, and to
convey this information prior to transfer.
Compliant
b. Ensure that trained farm staff (4.1.2e)
B. Verify that appropriately trained staff (as per 4.1.2e) have
evaluate the health condition of a subsample of evaluated health condition and have recorded results prior to outindividuals prior to moving fish off site.
shipments.
Compliant
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
Antimicrobial Training has been done dated 17.09.2015 by
Mrs Özge Otgucuoğlu by 1 hour.
Stock Density Training has been done dated 17.09.2015 by
Predators Training has been done dated 17.09.2015 by Mrs
Özge Otgucuoğlu by 1 hour.
Forbidden Materials Training has been done dated
17.09.2015 by Mrs Özge Otgucuoğlu by 1 hour.
Chemical,Vaccination,Medications and Accidents Training
has been done dated 17.09.2015 by Mrs Özge Otgucuoğlu
by 1 hour.
Chemicals and Usage Training has been done dated
Feed with Medication Training has been done dated
Preventation of Fish Escapes Training has been done dated
Vaccination Training has been done dated 17.09.2015 by
Biosecurity Training has been done dated 17.09.2015 by
Condition scores are known by staff and is verified by
veterinarian and registered.Transfer declaration by the
legal authority has been given at each delivery after
harvest.The transfer is only between the ponds and cages
during the life cycle.Before harvest related authority
implements a harvest finding report example: 28.08.2015
11 tonnes of fish harvested and deliveried.Before delivery
veterinerian health plan has been implemented doc. no.:
13439 Köyceğiz/Muğla Food,Agriculture and Fisheries
Ministry and transfer declaration has been signed by
company.
Trained staff are evaluated health condition of fish, farm
manager sign delivery note at dispatch.The fish is moved
off site as harvested to the handling unit and all the
conditions is been checked.
54
c. Ensure that fish are only moved off site if
C. Verify that the farm has a protocol that assures that evaluations
there are records demonstrating that fish health show health status in receiving location is equal to or less than that in
in the receiving location is equal to or less than the shipping location.
that in the shipping location.
4.1.4
Indicator: Site access,
disinfection and hygiene
protocols are written and
observed
None
Compliant
Condition scores are known by staff and is verified by
veterinarian and registered and also described in the
related instuructions.
N/A
a. Prepare written protocols for site access,
A. Verify that the required protocols exist.
disinfection and hygiene (these protocols may be
incorporated into the Farm Health Plan in
4.1.1a).
Compliant
There are produces for disinfection and hygiene
protocols.Antimicrobial Disinfection Implementation
Instruction (ÇF-T-025) ;Personnel Hygiene Instruction (ÜRT047).Operators change to work wear before entrance to
farm through foot bath. Visitors are given coats, hair nets
and boots or shoe covers before entering the farm area.
b. In the above protocols (4.1.4a) make direct
B. Verify that relevant national legislation has been appropriately
reference to national regulations related to site accounted for in protocols.
access, disinfection and hygiene.
Compliant
Legislation are clarified at a list.(KG-L-008 dated
15.12.2015.
c. Ensure that farm protocols for site access,
disinfection and hygiene are implemented.
C. Verify that the farm has on-site access to all materials needed for
implementation of distinfection and hygiene protocols.
Compliant
There are sign labels at the farm to prevent access to
hatchery, feed storage and site.All hygiene instructions are
impelemented by all the staff and the hatchery.There are
foot pools before access to the ponds and hatchery
(production sites). Personnel has protective
clothings,boots.All visitors fill and sign visitor control form
before access to the farm as well.
-
D. Confirm that relevant staff are aware of nature and intent of
protocols through interview.
Compliant
Staff follow the practice at farm, and are aware of
intention.
None
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
N/A
55
4.1.5
Indicator: Biosecure
disposal of mortalities and
fish trimmings
a. Maintain records for disposal of all mortalities A. Verify that the farm maintains records for disposal of all mortalities
and fish trimmings.
and fish trimmings.
Compliant
Dead fish are deposited in whole in underground, treated
with chalk and covered with earth when filled up, the
procedure is in accordance with authority permission.
b. Create a protocol for biosecure disposal of
B. Verify that the farm's protocol provides an adequate rationale to
biological tissue and fish trimmings with a
ensure biosecure disposal of mortalities and fish trimmings.
rationale explaining how biosecurity is achieved.
Compliant
In Fish Health Plan has a description of treatment and
disposal of dead fish.Doc.No: ÇF-T-004 dated 02.12.2010.
c. In the above protocol (4.1.5b), make explicit C. Verify that relevant national legislation has been appropriately
reference to any national regulations related to accounted for in the protocol.
disposal of biological waste.
Compliant
There is a insturction anout disposal of biological waste but
related legislation is clarified in the related instruction
Dead Fish Extermination Instruction Doc. No: ÇF-T004.(Aquaculture Regulations 20/7)
-
D. Confirm that relevant staff are aware of nature and intent of
protocols through interviews.
Compliant
Staff are fully aware of and intent of the protocol.
None
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
4.1.6
Indicator: Immediate
investigation of all mortality
events on site and, in
instances where mortality
remains unexplained or
unattributed, further
investigation with fish
health professionals off site
[22]
a. Maintain records of all mortality events and A. Verify that the farm maintains records of all mortality events and
identify the actions taken. Collected data should actions taken. Verify baseline mortality and identify major mortality
indicate a baseline mortality as well as major
events.
mortality events.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
N/A
Compliant
Dead fish are collected every day, there are registration of
number of each cage and pond or amount of dead fish from
every pond and cage.However, mortality percentages are
described by farm management and veterinerian in the
related instruction ÇF-T-022.According to this insturction
the percentages are as below:
egg: %10
marsupial: %25
10 gr: %10
10-30 gr: %6
30-100 gr: %3
100-200 gr: %2
200-300 gr: %1
56
4.1.7
b. For each major mortality event identified in
4.1.6a, maintain records to show that the farm
undertook immediate investigation (i.e. within
24 hours of detection).
B. Review records and supporting evidence to confirm that the farm
undertook an investigation of each mortality event within 24 hours of
detection.
Compliant
For mortality of fish, veterinarian are contacted to visit
farm. There has not been an exceeded mortality of fish the
last year.All mortalities are recorded daily Pond,Cage and
Tank Following Form Doc. No.: ÇF-F-001 and if there is
major mortality the farm lets know the Food,Agriculture
and Livestock Ministry and degisnated veterinerian visits
for investigating the reasons of mortality.
c. For investigation of major mortality events
that are coducted on site, maintain a record of
the tests used and the results obtained.
C. Verify evidence of records and methods used on site to investigate
major mortality events.
Compliant
Farm Emergency Plan Doc. No.: ÜSP-009 describes the
related instructions.
d. For any major mortality events in 4.1.6c
where the results were unexplained or
unattributed, have a relevant fish health
professional perform an off site investigation
and keep a record of their opinion as to cause.
D. Verify that farm has a record of opinion from fish health expert for
off site investigations of major mortality events.
Compliant
See. 4.1.6.b
None
Indicator: Minimum
a. Maintain log showing the date of visit, title
frequency of inspection of and affiliation of designated veterinarian.
the farm by a designated
veterinarian [22] who
specializes in aquatic animal
health. The inspection must
review the farm health
plan.
A. Verify that an inspection log is maintained.
N/A
Compliant
Veterinerian visits are done by weekly by the designated
veterinerian Mrs Özge Otgucuoğlu.Last visit records has
been seen.
Compliant
Veterinerian visits are done by weekly by the designated
veterinerian Mrs Özge Otgucuoğlu.Last visit records has
been seen.
Requirement: ≥ 1
inspection per year, at a
time when the site is in
production
Applicability: All
b. Obtain signature from designated veterinarian B. Verify that inspections frequency is compliant with
confirming inspection and date.
requirements.There is an inspection report from every veterinarian
visit.
57
c. Maintain on site, a current (within 3 years) CV C. Verify that the credentials of the designated veterinarian conform
of the farm's designated veterinarian.
to the definition in Footnote 22.
Compliant
-
Compliant
4.1.8
Indicator: Evidence that
a. Include rationale for maximum stock density
maximum stock density was in the farm health plan (see 4.1.1) that refers to
determined jointly by the
peer reviewed reference material.
designated veterinarian [22]
and site management
D. Use feed records to ensure that inspections occurred during
production.
None
Inspections occured during production, according to feed
records.
N/A
A. Verify that a section is included in the farm health plan that
rationalizes stocking density and contains relevant references. Crosscheck a sample of the peer-reviewed citations to confirm legitimacy
and quality.
Compliant
Stocking density are planned together with designed
veterinarian at yearly inspection and described in the
related instruction Stock Density,Mortality and Feeding
Ratios Instruction Doc. No: ÇF-T-022 and this instruction is
signed by designated veterinerian.According to the
instruction the max stock densities for gramage parameter
are as below:
1 gram-1,5 kg/m3
2-5 gram 4 kg/m3
5-10 gram 9 kg/m3
10-30 gram 14 kg/m3
30-50 gram 17 kg/m3
50-150 gram 22 kg/m3
150-300 gram 25 kg/m3
B. Verify that the farm has a signed statement from the designated
veterinarian and site manager who have jointly determined the
maximum stock density.
Compliant
Approved maximum stocking density changes number
kg/m3 in basins and in ponds according to size of fish, at
inspection last inspection dated 15.12.2015, signed by Mrs
Özge.All stock densities has been calculated and
verified.See 4.1.8 b
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
b. Obtain a statement signed by the designated
veterinarian and site manager confirming their
joint determination of maximum stock density.
Mrs Özge Otgucuoğlu has 13 years experience,diploma
number is 6879 and room record number:254 of the
designed veterinarian.
58
-
C. Verify through interviews with site manager that he/she was
consulted in the decision to determine maximum stock density.
Compliant
There is a letter from senior manager stating that
maximum stock density was determined by the designated
veterinarian and site management.Maximum stock density
is planned in coordination with farm management and
veterinarian.
Compliant
Fish Management Instruction Doc. No: ÇF-T-015 dated
17.05.2014. According to these instruction the stock
density before harvest is described and broodstock density
as 10-15 kg/m3 as well.
Criterion 4.2 Chemicals and treatments
59
4.2.1
treatment plan, treatment
record book and farm
health history that includes
a detailed recording of all
treatments and all health
events on the farm, as well
as written veterinary
prescriptions and receipts
a. Create requisite protocols which include at a A. Verify that farm has a treatment plan and records of all treatments,
mimimum: name of the veterinary health
health events and veterinary prescriptions.
professional prescribing treatment; product
name and chemical name (for all therapeutants
and antimicrobials); treatment plan and reason
for use (specific disease); date(s) of treatment;
amount (g) of product used; dosage; quantity of
fish treated (mt); WHO classifcation of any
antibiotics used; and supplier of chemicals or
therapeutants.
Compliant
There is a treatment plan, visit report from veterinarian
and records of all treatments in farm handbook, this
include antibiotic and vaccinations.
Last prescription dated 17.09.2015.The Erovil (Eritromisin)
Serial Number: 10 /Last use date: 07.2017 ;treatment has
been done as 5m mg/kg dosoge by 7 days total usage is
2940 gr.The disease is Coccus infection.The theapueutants
is purchased from Yılmaz Su Ürünleri and prescribed by the
veterinerian Yüksel Yılmaz (dip no: 231) Method is bath and
residual drug washout period is 500 day/C,dosage 19
pieces.Treatment records are documented doc. No.: ÇF-F005 .
b. Maintain all required records and receipts
listed in 4.2.1a.
B. Verify that the farm has records and receipts that match treatments
over a subsample of time and cross-check prescriptions and treatment
records against the FHP.
Compliant
Every treatment are prescripted by veterinarian and also
recorded. All the treatments has been listed in the
Medicine and Vaccine Following Form Doc. No: ÇF-F-006.
None
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
4.2.2
Indicator: Use of
therapeutic treatments,
including antibiotics or
other treatments, that are
banned under European
Union (EU) law
N/A
a. Maintain a list of therapeutants (including
A. Cross-check receipts for treatments/therapeutants and confirm that
antibiotics) banned by the EU and update the list none are items banned under EU law.
no less than annually.
Compliant
There is not any treatment or therapeutants banned under
EU law.
b. Ensure that staff responsible for purchasing
and administering therapeutants (including
antibiotics) are aware of banned therapeutants
listed in 4.2.2a.
Compliant
There is a clear understanding of banned therapeutants,
only approved therapeutants are used.
Requirement: Not
permitted
Applicability: All
B. Verify through interviews with staff that they are aware that the use
of therapeutants banned under EU law is not permitted.
60
c. Maintain records of voluntary and/or
C. As applicable, review results from any voluntary or mandatory
mandatory chemical residue testing conducted chemical residue testing to verify that no EU banned substances were
or commissioned by the farm from the prior and detected.
current production cycles.
4.2.3
Indicator: Prophylactic use
of chemical antimicrobial
treatments (excluding
prebiotics and probiotics
that have been approved by
a regulatory process that
included a risk assessment)
[23]
None
Compliant
Residue testing is perfomed by legal
authorities.04.11.2015/9613 done by İzmir Bornova
Veteriner Kontrol Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü (TÜRKAK-AB-0272T).
N/A
a. Inform the CAB if the farm used any prebiotic A. Determine if the farm's use of prebiotics or probiotics qualifies for
or probiotic treatments for the last full
an exclusion (see Instructions), verify that the chemical compounds are
production cycle and, if applicable, provide
not banned in the EU, and provide a rationale in the audit report.
chemical names.
Compliant
There has been no use of prophylactic and probiotic
treatments.Only Probiotics are given with probiotic mixed
feed and there is not any additional use of probiotics.
b. Maintain records of all chemical antimicrobial B. Verify records of treatments and cross-check against purchases and
treatments for the last full production cycle as
inventories of chemical antimicrobial compounds.
per 4.2.1a and 4.2.1b.
Compliant
The antimicrobial components are used, are prescribed by
veterinarian.
c. Provide records to show that all chemical
C. Review records of antimicrobial treatments and cross-check against
anitmicrobial treatments identified in 4.2.3b
health screenings and prescriptions to verify there is no evidence of
were prescribed by the farm's veterinary health prophylactic treatments.
care professional before application.
Compliant
The antimicrobial components are used, are prescribed by
veterinarian.
Requirement: Not
permitted
Applicability: All
4.2.4
Indicator: Public disclosure a. Maintain records of all antimicrobial
of all antimicrobial
treatments for the last full production cycle as
treatments used on the
per 4.2.1b.
farm
None
A. Review farm records (4.2.1b) to identify all antimicrobial
treatments used for the last full production cycle.
N/A
Compliant
There are farm records of all antimicrobial treatment for
the last production cycle.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
61
b. Make a public disclosure of all the
antimicrobial treatments listed in 4.2.4a. by
publishing the information on the farm's website
or via another more effective medium (see
Instructions).
c. As an alternative to 4.2.4b, farms may choose
to make a public disclosure using the ASC
website. If applicable, use the form in Appendix
VI of the ASC Salmon Standard to list all
antimicrobial treatments used on the farm. Then
submitt the completed form to ASC for
publication on the ASC website.
B. Verify that the farm has disclosed information about antimicrobial
treatments and that the information is readily accessible by the public.
Minor
Information about antimicrobial treatments are not
published at farm's web site yet.
C. If applicable, verify that the farm has completed Appendix VI from
the Sal mon Standard and submitted the information to ASC for
publication.
Minor
The company has been (antimicrobial
treatments)completed Appendix VI from the Salmon
Standard but not submitted the information to ASC
publication.
62
4.2.5
Indicator: Proactive
vaccination against diseases
that present a risk in the
region and for which an
effective, legally authorized
and commercially viable
vaccine exists, as
determined by the farm’s
designated veterinarian
None
a. Request that the veterinary health
professional creates a record listing diseases
that present a risk in the region and the
relevant, available vaccine (or absence of a
suitable vaccine).
A. Verify that the farm holds a list of the regional diseases that also
gives the relevant, available vaccine or states the absence of a suitable
vaccine.
Compliant
b. Maintain a record of all vaccinations
administered.
B. Verify that the farm maintains a vaccination record.All vaccinations
is registered in farm log book, signed by veteriarian.
Compliant
c. Where the veterinary health professional has
listed a disease that does not have a
commercially viable vaccine, or a when an
existing vaccination has not been administered
(for whatever reason), request that the
veterinary health professional supplies a written
rationale for avoiding vaccination in the
vaccination record.
C. If a vaccine exists for a regional disease but was not administered,
ensure that the farm's health professional provided a rationale.
Consult outside expert for a second opinion if the rationale is unusual
or weak.
Compliant
None
N/A
Requirement: Yes
The veterinary health plan holds a list of regional
diseases,usage of chemicalsi,vaccines. The plan includes a
vaccination protocol.The name of the vaccine is Icthıovac
LG,active ingredient is Inactive Lactococcus garvieae,the
compny name is Akya Veterinerian Clinic-Hipra,injection
dosage is 0,1 ml. (for coccus) and implemented by
enjection.
The name of the vaccine is Icthıovac VR,inactive ingredient
is Listonella anguillarum,serotype 01 andd 02,injection
dosage is 0,1 ml; implemented by immersion and
enjection( for vibrio).
Applicability: All
Vaccination records are documented doc. No.: ÇF-F005.Example: 08.09.2015 E-7 Bloc Akuakim (Coccus-VibrioYersiniosis),1 day period by enjection,last usage date of
the vaccine 14.06.2016,12 lt vaccination has been used,the
mortality is 3,the temperature of the water 17 C,the
amount of fish: 35.992.
All vaccines are registered and also the ratio has been
described by the designated veterinerian and
implementation duration,dosage as well.
N/A
63
PRINCIPLE 5: USE RESOURCES IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY EFFICIENT AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER
Criterion 5.1 Traceability and transparency of raw materials in feed
5.1.1
traceability, demonstrated
by the feed producer, of
feed ingredients that make
up more than 1% of the
feed [24]
a. From each feed producer obtain a list of all
A. Confirm that the farm obtains relevant ingredient lists for all feeds
ingredients representing more than 1% by
used (also see 5.1.2a).
weight of the feed as specified in Indicator 5.1.2
(below).
Compliant
There is a list of feed ingredients, for (example production
date is 09.11.2015) for all feed ingredients from feed
Abalıoğlu Soya ve Tekstil San. A.Ş.Details of igredients are
as below:
Lot number: 2150325 3mm trout extruder feed and it can
seen on the related excel attached to the report.
b. For all feed ingredients identified in 5.1.1.a,
B. Verify that farm has a copies of certificates from the feed
provide copies of third-party documentation
manufacturer demonstrating chain of custody capable of tracing back
showing certified traceability of the production to fishing area, landing site, species and harvest method.
site and (for fish products), fishing area, landing
site, species and harvest method.
Compliant
Fish meal and fish oil has IFFO RS Certificate from FF
Skagen and FF Skagen is accredidated under EN
45011;certificate number is FF015 and it is valid until 7th
April 2017.Annex of the fishes and scopes is dated 26 th
March 2014.
c. For three ingredients of marine origin (fewer if C. Review examples of tracebacks for completeness and confirm
fewer are used), collate three examples of
compliance.See 5.1.1 b .
traceback procedures conducted by a third-party
auditor for the selected feed ingredients to the
point of landing and vessel, in the source fishery.
Compliant
%100 of fishmeal and fish oil are certified under IFFO RS.
d. For producers wishing to source from a feed D. Verify that audit reports contain evidence of appropriate massmanufacturer using a mass balance approach,
balance records and procedures at the feed manufacturer (if
provide a report from an onsite third-party audit applicable).
of the feed manufacturer to assure traceability
as in 5.1.1.b.
Compliant
See 5.1.1 b . %100 of fishmeal and fish oil are certified
under IFFO RS.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
None
N/A
64
5.1.2
Indicator: Presence of a list
of all ingredients that make
up more than 1% of the
feed
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
a. Obtain a statement from each feed supplier
A. Confirm that the farm has a complete lists of ingredients for all
(on company letterhead) identifying all feed
feeds being used.
ingredients that make up more than 1% of the
feed by weight. Market names must be
accompanied by scientific latin names for
natural ingredients and formal chemical
nomenclature for synthetic products.
Compliant
-
B. During the on-site inspection, verify that the farm is using only the
types of feeds listed in 5.1.2a.
Compliant
None
There is a list of feed ingredients, date for all feed
ingredients from feed producer feed Abalıoğlu Yem ve Soya
Tekstil San. Tic. A.Ş.See 5.1.1 b
The list of feed ingredients from feed bag of products lot
number is included in feed ingredient list.
N/A
Criterion 5.2 Responsible origin of marine raw materials
5.2.1
Indicator: Percentage of
fishmeal and fish oil used in
feed that comes from
fisheries [25] certified under
a scheme that is ISEALaccredited and has
guidelines that specifically
promote responsible
environmental
management of small
pelagic fisheries
a. Prepare a policy stating the company's
A. Verify that the client's policy supports responsible feed sourcing
support of efforts to shift feed manufacturers
(e.g. programs at http://www.isealalliance.org/aboutpurchases of fishmeal and fish oil to fisheries
standards/sectors-covered/fishing).
certified under a scheme that is an ISEAL
member and has guidelines that specifically
promote responsible environmental
management of small pelagic fisheries. Include
supporting text from the relevant portion of the
certification scheme showing management
unique to small pelagics.
Compliant
b. Prepare a letter stating the farm's intent to
preferentially source feed containing fishmeal
and fish oil originating from fisheries certified
under the type of certification scheme in 5.2.1a
and inform all feed suppliers.
Compliant
There is a letter for supporting responsible feed
sourcing,signed by Research and development manager
Derya Sayın dated 05.02.2016 from Abalıoğlu Yem Soya ve
Tekstil Sa. Ve Tic. A.Ş.
Requirement: 10% within
three years of publication
of the ASC Freshwater
Trout Standard [by 7
February 2016) and 100%
within five years [by 7
February 2018)
Applicability: All
B. Verify that the client has prepared a letter of intent and has notified
feed all its suppliers accordingly.
See 5.1.1 b or c.
65
c. Use feed inventory and feed supplier
declarations in 5.1.2a to develop a list of the
origin of all fish products used as feed
ingredients.
Compliant
The farm has suffient evidence for the origin of all fish
products in feed to demonstrate compliance with indicator
5.2.1.
d. Use the list from 5.2.1c to identify which
D. Confirm that the farm identifies which ingredients are certified as
fishmeal and fish oil feed ingredients come from described in 5.2.1d.
fisheries certified under a scheme that is ISEALaccredited and has guidelines that specifically
promote responsible environmental
management of small pelagic fisheries.
Compliant
Fish meal and fish oil has IFFO RS Certificate from FF
Skagen and FF Skagen is accredidated under EN 45011
;certificate number is FF015 and it is valid until 7th April
2017.Annex of the fishes and scopes is dated 26 th March
2014.
e. Starting 7 February 2016, provide evidence E. As of 7 February 2016, review evidence and confirm compliance.
that the volume of certified ingredients (result Prior to 7 February 2016, 5.2.1e does not apply.
from 5.2.1d) is ≥ 10% of the total volume of
fishmeal and fish oil ingredients (result from
5.2.1c).
f. Starting 7 February 2018, provide evidence
F. As of 7 February 2018, review evidence and confirm compliance.
that 100% of fishmeal and fish oil used in feed
come from certified fisheries as per 5.2.1d.
Compliant
Related annex to the IFFO RS certificate shows the
ingredients come from fisheries certified IFFO RS and %100
of the ingredients are certificed.
Compliant
Prior to 7 February 2018, 5.2.1E applies.See 5.2.1 e
5.2.2.
Indicator: Prior to 100%
achievement of 5.2.1, the
Fishsource [26] score
required for the fisheries
from which marine raw
material in feed is derived
(excluding trimming and byproducts)
C. Confirm that the farm has sufficient evidence for the origin of all
fish products in feed to demonstrate compliance with indicator 5.2.1.
None
a. Provide a FS score for each fish species
A. Verify that the farm obtains FS scores for all fish species listed as
identified as a feed ingredient (see 5.1.2a) for all feed ingredients.
feeds used by the farm during the last 12
months. For first audits, farm records must
cover ≥ 6 months.
N/A
N/A
The farm do not obtains FS scores for fish species.Because
the annex of IFFO RS inclued all of the
ingredients.However,the company has declarations.Salmon
oil declared dated 01.07.2015 by Biomega A.Ş.,Gluten
dated 15.05.2015 by CBM Co.,Bonkalite decalared declared
dated 15.05.2015 by Toprak Tarım Co.
Requirement: All individual
scores ≥ 6, and biomass
score ≥ 8
Applicability: All
-
B. For a subsample of fish species listed in 5.2.2a, use the FishSource
online database to check the validity of the farm's FS scores for the
time period within two months of the onsite audit.
None
Compliant
See 5.2.2 a
N/A
66
5.2.3
Indicator: Prior to 100%
achievement of 5.2.1,
demonstration of chain of
custody and traceability for
fisheries products in feed
through an ISEAL-accredited
or ISO 65-compliant
certification scheme that
incorporates the United
Nations Food and
Agriculture Organization’s
“Code of Conduct for
Responsible Fisheries”
a. Obtain from the feed supplier documentary
A. Review evidence and confirm that a third party verified chain of
evidence that the origin of all fishmeal and fish custody or traceability program was used for the fishmeal and fish oil.
oil used in the feed is traceable via a third-party
verified chain of custody or traceability program.
Compliant
Feed supplier documentary evidence shows that the origin
of all fishmeal and fish oil used in the feed is traceable via a
third-party verified chain of custody or traceability
program, ISO 65-compliant certification scheme. (IFFO RS)
b. Ensure that all species within the scope of the B. Verify that the scope of the chain of custody audit matches
chain of custody or traceability program align
ingredient lists for feeds.
with fish meal and fish oil ingredients used in the
farm's feeds (consistent with 5.2.2.a and
5.3.1.a).
Compliant
See 5.2.3a
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
5.2.4
Indicator: Evidence that byproduct feed ingredients do
not come from fish species
that are categorized as
vulnerable [27], endangered
or critically endangered
according to the IUCN Red
List of Threatened Species
[28]
None
a. Compile and maintain a list (as per 5.3.1a
below) of the fishery of origin for all fishmeal
and fish oil originating from by-products and
trimmings.
A. Review list and for consistency with 5.3.1a.
N/A
Compliant
By-product feed ingredients are not originated from fish
species that are categorized as vulnerable , endangered or
critically endangered according to the IUCN Red List of
Threatened Species
Requirement: Yes
noted in [27]
67
b. For each by-product species (5.2.4a) that is an B. Confirm that the farm has identified all byproducts and cross-check
ingredient of any feed used during the last 12
a subsample of species to verify their IUCN Red List categorization.
months, search the IUCN database to determine
if it is categorized as vulnerable, endangered, or
criticatlly endangered. For first audits, farm
records must cover ≥ 6 months.
None
Compliant
See 5.2.4.a and there is not any buy products or trimmings.
N/A
Criterion 5.3 Dependency on wild-caught marine ingredients in feed [29]
5.3.1
Indicator: Fishmeal Forage a. Maintain a detailed inventory of the feed used A. Verify completeness of records and that values are stated in a
Fish Dependency Ratio
including:
declaration from the feed manufacturer.
(FFDRm) for grow-out
- Quantities used of each formulation (kg);
(calculated using formulas
- Percentage of fish oil in each formulation
in Appendix III, subsection used;
1)
- Source (fishery) of fish oil/EPA/DHA in each
formulation used;
Requirement: ≤1.5
- Percentage of oil in each formulation
derived from trimmings; and
Applicability: All
- Supporting documentation and signed
declaration from feed supplier.
b. Calculate FFDRm using formulas in Appendix B. Verify that relevant calculations were done correctly, byproducts
III. Exclude fish meal derived from rendering of were excluded in calculations and confirm the value complies with the
seafood by-products (e.g. the "trimmings" from standard.
a human consumption fishery).
None
Compliant
Records of kilo feed used and percentage of fish meal used
for calculation of FFDRm verified from declaration from
feed manufacturer.
According to the calculation of FFDRo and FFDRm for
November and October has been done in the related annex
attached to the report and all results are appropriate.
Compliant
Include in public audit report.See 5.3.1a
N/A
68
5.3.2Option A Option A
a. Inform the CAB whether the farm choses
Option A or Option B to show compliance. If
Indicator: Compliance with Option A is selected, proceed directly to 5.3.2b
the following requirement: below. Otherwise, skip to Option B in the next
section.
Fish Oil Forage Fish
Dependency Ratio (FFDRo)
for grow-out (calculated
using formulas in Appendix
III, subsection 1) c
A. Record which option the client chose and proceed to evaluate
compliance with the applicable set of compliance criteria.
Compliant
Related calculations implemented for both fish meal and
fish oil.Related documents of the company are:
FFDRm Calculation Form Doc. No: ÇF-F-025
FFDRo Calculation Form Doc. No: ÇF-F-026
EPA/DHA Calculation Form Doc. No: ÇF-F-017
b. Maintain a detailed inventory of the feed used B. Verify completeness of records as done for 5.3.1A.
as specified under 5.3.1a.
Compliant
See 5.3.2a
c. Calculate FFDRo using formulas for eFCR value C. Verify that relevant calculations were done correctly, by-products
as given in Appendix III .
were excluded in calculations and confirm the value complies with the
requirement. Include in public audit report.
Compliant
See 5.3.2a
Requirement: ≤2.95
Applicability: All, but note
that farms may choose to
demonstrate compliance
with either Option A or
Option B under Indicator
5.3.2.
None
N/A
69
5.3.2Option B Option B
a. Inform the CAB whether the farm choses
Option A or Option B to show compliance. If
Indicator: Compliance with Option B is selected, proceed directly to 5.3.2b
the following requirement: below. Otherwise, return to Option A in the
previous section.
Maximum level of EPA/DHA
content from marine
sources as a percentage of
fatty acids in the feed
(excluding EPA/DHA from
trimmings and by-products)
A. Record which option the client chose and proceed to evaluate
compliance with the applicable set of compliance criteria.
N/A
Karaçam fish farm selected Option A.
b. Maintain a detailed inventory of the feed used B. Verify completeness of records as done for 5.3.1A.
as specified under 5.3.1a.
N/A
c. Calculate EPA/DHA percentage using formula
in Section 2 of Appendix III.
C. Verify that relevant calculations were done correctly, by-products
were excluded in calculations and confirm the value complies with the
requirement. Include in public audit report.
N/A
None
N/A
Requirement: ≤ 9%
Applicability: All, but note
that farms may choose to
demonstrate compliance
with either Option A or
Option B under Indicator
5.3.2.
Criterion 5.4 Responsible origin of non-marine raw materials in feed
70
5.4.1
Indicator: Presence and
a. Compile and maintain a list of all feed
evidence of a responsible
suppliers with contact information (see also
sourcing policy for the feed 5.1.1a).
manufacturer for feed
ingredients that comply
with internationally
recognized moratoriums
and local laws [30]
A. Review feed supplier list and cross-check against feed purchases
(see also 5.1.1a).
Compliant
The feed producer used, name of the Abalıoğlu Yem ve
Soya Tekstil San. Tic. A.Ş. The feed manufacturer has Fish
meal and fish oil has IFFO RS Certificate from FF Skagen
and FF Skagen is accredidated under EN 45011 ;certificate
number is FF015 and it is valid until 7th April 2017.Annex of
the fishes and scopes is dated 26 th March 2014.
b. Obtain from each feed manufacturer a copy
of the manufacturer's responsible sourcing
policy for feed ingredients showing how the
company complies with recognized crop
moratoriums and local laws [34].
B. Review policies from each feed supplier to confirm required
sourcing policy is in place.
Compliant
Searching policy is described in quality statement.Abalıoğlu
has been declared responbsible sourcing policy for feed
ingredients dated 14.05.2015 and all of the raw material
suppliers of Abalıoğlu has declared responsible sourcing
policy to the manufacturer and Abalıoğlu declared the raw
materials are not in the IUCN list as well.
c. Obtain copies of third-party audits of feed
suppliers (5.1.1) and confirm that these show
evidence that supplier's responsible sourcing
policies are implemented.
C. Verify that the scope of third-party audits of feed suppliers includes
review of policies and evidence of implementation.
Compliant
The feed manufacturer has GLOBALG.A.P. CFM (GGN:
4050373871567 or ISO 22000 (01 100 901235)
certification.All certificates are accredidated GLOBALG.A.P.
From ENAC and ISO 9001 from TÜRKAK.
None
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
N/A
71
5.4.2
soy ingredients that are
certified by the Roundtable
on Responsible Soy, or
equivalent [31]
a. Prepare a letter to each feed supplier stating
the farm's intention to source only feeds with
soy ingredients that are certified by the
Roundtable for Responsible Soy (RTRS) or
equivalent.
A. Verify that the farm has prepared a letter of intent.
Compliant
There is a letter stating the farm's intent to source 100% of
its feed containing soya is not certified under the
Roundtable for Responsible Soy (RTRS).There is only one
feed supplier now.Abalıoğlu purchases soybeans from
Archer Daniels Midland Company and there is analysis
report for protein (35,3 %),oil (19,3),moisture (11,7).
b.Keep records to show that the farm sent the
letter of intent (5.4.2a) to each feed supplier.
B. Verify that the farm sent a letter of intent (5.4.2) to each feed
supplier. Acceptable forms of evidence may include direct responses
from suppliers (emails, letters confirming receipt) or certified mail
slips.
Compliant
There is a intent letter which the farm has sent to the feed
manufacturer dated 05.02.2016.
Requirement: 100% within
five years of publication of
the ASC Freshwater Trout
Standard (by 7 February
2018)
Applicability: All
c. Obtain and maintain declarations from all feed C. Confirm that the farm has sufficient evidence for the origin of soya
suppliers detailing the origin of soya in the feeds. products in feeds to demonstrate compliance with indicator 5.4.2 after
7 February 2018.
N/A
Will be completed within 5 years after publication of
standard.
d. Starting 7 February 2018, provide evidence
D. As of 7 February 2018 review evidence and confirm compliance.
that all soya used in feed is certified by the RTRS Prior to 7 February 2018, 5.4.2d does not apply.
or equivalent [31].
N/A
Will be completed within 5 years after publication of
standard.
N/A
None
72
5.4.3
Indicator: Disclosure by the
feed supplier of any
ingredients that contain
more than 0.9% transgenic
[32] plant material
a. Obtain from feed suppliers a disclosure
detailing all plant material used as feed
ingredients (i.e. soya and others plants) and
specify which of these ingredients contains
>0.9% transgenic plant material by weight.
A. Review feed supplier declarations to confirm that all suppliers have
made a disclosure identifying any ingredient containing >0.9%
transgenic plant material.
b. Others, please describe
None
a. For feeds with ingredients containing > 0.9%
transgenic plant material (i.e. those feeds
specified in 5.4.3a), ensure that the farm can
identify any harvested fish that were fed such
products. If no such feeds were identified in
5.4.3a, then Indicator 5.4.4 is not applicable.
A. If applicable based on results of 5.4.3a, verify that the farm has a
robust method for identifying harvested fish that were reared using
said feeds.
Compliant
No use of GM material in feed or harvested fish.The fish
farm has analysis reports for both of them.The analysis has
been performed for the lot number 0115500303 dated
14.12.2015 and there is not any trangenical material
detected.
b.If disclosures about transgenic matrial are
needed (based on 5.4.4a), the farm must
compile a list of all buyers who may have
obtained fish from the harvest in question. The
list must include contact details of buyers.
B. Review the farm's list of buyers and cross-check with sales records
and invoices (as applicable).
Compliant
See 5.4.3a
c. As applicable (based on 5.4.4a), the farm must
make disclosures to all buyers listed in 5.4.4b.
Maintain documentary evidence of disclosures.
For first audits, farm records of disclosures must
cover > 6 months.
C. As applicable, verify evidence that the farm has made disclosures to
all buyers about transgenic feed ingredients. Cross-check the plant
material list from feed supplier (5.4.3.a) to see that all transgenic plant
ingredients were disclosed.
Compliant
See 5.4.3a
None
Compliant
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
5.4.4
Indicator: Disclosure by the
farm to the direct
purchasers of its harvested
fish of any feed ingredients
that have contained more
than 0.9% transgenic
material
There is use of transgenic plant material, this is verified by
analyses of incoming soy and finished feed.The feed
manufacturer declared that the max amount of transgenic
material (soya bean) is %9.They also declares that they will
obtain the soya beans from RTRS certified suppliers until
2018 dated 17.12.2015.There is a an also analysis report for
GMO dated 12.10.2015 for Gavillon Grain,LLC.And Eurofins
Laboratory has done analysis for GMO,they declares that
the shipment may contain grains deriving from GMO events
whih are approved by the Europen Community under
Desicion 96/281/ec dated 22.10.2015.
N/A
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
N/A
Criterion 5.5 Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (on farm)
73
5.5.1
a. Maintain records for all energy consumption
records and evidence of all on the farm by source (fuel, electricity)
energy consumption on the throughout the year.
farm (including electric
power and fuels) and
evidence of an energy use
assessment of on-farm
energy consumption
A. Verify that the farm maintains records for energy
consumption.There is maintained records for energy consumption.
Compliant
Records are dated Energy Calculation Form Doc. No: ÇF-F020 for each month. The calculation contains usage of
electric (kw) and payment of the amount and calculation of
kilojoule (1 kw:3600 kjoule).Totally electric use is xxxxx kg
joule. (January-November) Total harvest: xxxxxxkg total
used electric/harvested fish= xxxxx kjoule/kg for 1 kg. This
means the farm used xxxxx kjoule/kg energy for harvesting
1 kg trout.the 12-month period, total 107 668 800 kJ /
503.79914.042 = 207,918kg / joule (1 kg of fish up to the
amount of energy exhausted)
b. Use results from 5.5.1a and relevant
B. Review the farm's calculations for total energy use and cross-check
conversion factors to calculate the farm's total against farm records for energy consumption.
energy consumption in kilojoules (kj) during the
last 12 months.
Compliant
There is a calculation of Energy GHG scheme, for total
energy using calculation from electricity and diesel fuel,
resulting in KJ per produced tons of fish.See 5.5.1 b
c. Calculate the total weight of fish produced (in C. Cross-check the farm's reported annual production against other
metric tons, mt) during the last 12 months.
farm data sets (e.g. harvet records, sales).
When calculating total annual production, it is
acceptable for farms to estimate the total
weight using records for processed weight or
tonnage sold.
Compliant
Total weight of fish is verified./see 5.1.1b
d. Use the results of 5.5.1b divided by the results D. Review the farm's energy use calculations to confirm accuracy and
of 5.5.1c to calculate energy consumption on the completeness.
farm in kilojuoule/mt fish/year.
Compliant
Calculation of energy is number kilojuoule/mt
fish/year./see 5.1.1b
e. Provide the CAB with evidence that the farm
has had an energy use assessment (see
Instructions above) within the last 12 months.
E. Verify that the farm has had an energy use assessment.
Compliant
Farm has an energy use assessment continously and
follows up the energy,personel expenses ext.
None
Requirement: Yes,
measured in kilojoule/mt
fish/year
Applicability: All
N/A
Criterion 5.6 Non-therapeutic chemical inputs
74
5.6.1
combustibles contained in
waterproof bunds
a. Maintain a written list of all types of
combustibles used on the farm.
A. Verify that the farm has a complete list of combustibles on the
premises.
Compliant
Storage of combustibles diesel oil, in tank.
Storage of combustibles as diesel oil, list of chemicals in
original containers in a locked room.
Requirement: 100%
Applicability: All
5.6.2
b. Ensure that all combustibles are stored in
waterproof bunds.
B. Verify the storage locations of combustibles with responsible staff
and confirm that combustibles are stored in waterproof bunds during
the on-site inspection.
None
a. Maintain a detailed list of all chemicals or
chemicals stored in
therapeutants on the farm.
impermeable containers or
buildings
A. Verify that the farm has a complete list of chemicals and
therapeutants on the premises.
Compliant
Storage of combustibles as diesel oil, list of chemicals are in
original containers in a locked room.
N/A
Compliant
There is a list of complete list of chemicals and
therapeutants on the premises.
Compliant
Chemicals and therapeutants are stored in impermeable
containers or buildings.
Requirement: 100%
Applicability: All
b. Ensure that all chemicals or therapeutants are B. Verify the storage locations of chemicals with responsible staff and
stored in impermeable containers or buildings. confirm during the on-site inspection that all chemicals or
therapeutants are stored in impermeable containers or buildings.
5.6.3
used lubricants recycled or
turned over to a waste
management company
Requirement: 100%
None
N/A
a. Prepare a written policy or procedure
A. Verify policy with responsible staff and observe waste containers in
explaining how used lubricants are recycled or
use during the on-site inspection. Or, examine letter of confirmation if
turned over to a waste management company. If relevant.
no waste management company exists, obtain a
signed letter from the government agency in
charge of waste disposal at the provincial/state
level as confirmation.
Compliant
There is a "Waste Magement Plan''. The Karaçam Farm
works with a Environmntal Consultant Ms Şermin Eyler/
Kavram Kimya Arıtma Mühendislik Co.
b. Where waste is collected by a waste
management company, maintain receipts of
payment for services.
Compliant
There are payment to municipality for waste/renovation,
delivery one time per week.
Applicability: All
B. Verify that the farm has records of payment to waste management
company.
75
5.6.4
chemical containers reused
or turned over to a waste
management company
Requirement: 100%
Applicability: All
5.6.5
non‐hazardous,
non‐recyclable wastes
turned over to a waste
management company or
landfill [33]
Requirement: 100%
None
N/A
a. Prepare a written policy explaining how the
A. Verify policy with responsible staff and observe waste containers in
chemical containers are reused or turned over to use during the on-site inspection. Or, examine letter of confirmation if
a waste management company. If no waste
relevant.
management company exists, obtain a signed
letter from the government agency in charge of
waste disposal at the local level as confirmation
that neither public nor private waste disposal
services are available.
Compliant
Waste policy is implemented.
b. Where containers are re-used, maintain
B. Verify container tally based on record of chemical purchases versus
records of chemical purchases and demonstrate containers in use/re-cycled.
tallied alignment against the number of
containers in re-use/re-cycled.
Compliant
Chemical containers are reused, there is a program for total
use and storage of chemicals.
-
C. Verify that the farm has records of disposal or payment to waste
disposal company.
Compliant
Waste payments are verified.
None
N/A
a. Prepare a written farm policy explaining how A. Verify farm policy with responsible staff and examine handling of
and which non-hazardous, non-recyclable
non-hazardous, non-recyclable wastes during the on-site inspection.
wastes are turned over to a waste management Or, examine letter of confirmation if relevant.
company or buried on-site. If no waste
management company exists, obtain a signed
letter from the government agency in charge of
waste disposal at the local level as confirmation
that neither public nor private waste disposal
services are available.
Compliant
There is a Waste Management Plan/Doc. No: ÜSP-010.
b. For on-site burial of waste, show that an
B. Verify that farm has letter affirming lack of impacts to freshwater
outside expert (hired groundwater or geology
due to buried waste protocols by an expert with the stated credentials.
consultant with minimum of five years
experience and university degree, or academic
groundwater geologist) has signed a letter
affirming that waste burial poses no risk of
contamination to surface and underground
waters. Maintain CV of outside expert on file for
possible inspection.
Compliant
The waste from dead fish are buried at site, approved by
authority, this approval is documented by outside expert.
Applicability: All
76
5.6.6
Indicator: Demonstration
that a farmer is aware of
recycling facilities that are
accessible to the farm and
demonstration of a
commitment to use those
facilities
Requirement: Yes
c. Include a statement in the farm waste disposal C. Verify that burning is covered in the farm policy. During the audit,
policy (5.6.5a) which prohibits the burning of
inspect the farm to verify there is no evidence of burning waste
non-hazardous, non-recyclable wastes.
materials (not allowed).
Compliant
There is a Waste Management Plan/Doc. No: ÜSP-010.
d. Where waste is collected by a waste
management company, maintain receipts of
payment for services.
e. Where waste collection is a public service,
show schedule of collections.
D. Verify that the farm has records of payment to waste disposal
company.
Compliant
Waste payment verified from last delivery.
E. Verify waste collection schedule.
Compliant
Waste payment verified from last delivery.
None
N/A
a. Provide a list of the three closest recycling
A. Contact the local waste management agency to determine
facilities for relevant farm products (regardless accessibility of the three closest recycling facilities that were identified
of how far away these may be). Provide the
by the farm as applicable.
auditor with contact informationl for the local
waste management agency. If the farm is
obligated to utilize a designated recycling facility
(e.g. as specified in local regulations or
environmental use permit), the farm shall
provide this information to the auditor.
Compliant
Waste recycling at local authority facilities are known.
b. Prepare a written statement articulating the
farm's commitment to recycle waste from
production.
c. Provide a description of the types of
production waste materials and how these are
either disposed of, or recycled.
B. Review the farm's statement of commitment to use those recycling
facilities that are accessible to the farm.
Compliant
See 5.6.6a
C. During the on-site visit, interview relevant staff and make direct
observations to confirm that farm recycling procedures are
implemented.
Compliant
Staff are fully aware of recycling procedures.
d. Inform CAB of any infractions or fines for
improper waste disposal received during the
previous 12 months and corrective actions
taken.
D. Review infractions and corrective actions, if any.
Compliant
There are corrective actions.
Applicability: All
None
N/A
PRINCIPLE 6: BE SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE
Criterion 6.1 Child labor
77
6.1.1
Indicator: Number of
incidences of child [34]
labor [35]
a. Minimum age of permanent workers is 15 or
older (except in countries as noted above).
Compliant
All farm workers are older than 15 years old. Personnel
files were reviewed for 16 farm personnel, ID copy was
seen in each file. Youngest workers birth date is 20th
August 1996.
b. Employer maintains age records for
employees that are sufficient to demonstrate
compliance.
Compliant
ID copy is available in each personnel file.
Compliant
Also Population registration paper taken form
governmental authority was available for each worker.
a. Contracts are clearly stated and understood
by employees. Contracts do not lead to workers
being indebted (i.e. no ‘pay to work’ schemes
through labor contractors or training credit
programs).
Compliant
There is no forced, bonded or compulsory labor. All
workers are free to leave the job whenever they wish. The
work contract was seen and also interviews prove this.
b. Employees are free to leave workplace and
manage their own time.
Compliant
Interviews prove that employees are free to leave
workplace and manage their own time.
c. Employer does not withhold employee’s
original identity documents.
Compliant
Neither ID card or any other valuable paper are kept by
company. Interviews and personnel file records prove this.
d. Employer does not withhold any part of
workers’ salaries, benefits, property or
documents in order to oblige them to continue
working for employer.
e. Employees are not to be obligated to stay in
job to repay debt.
Compliant
Salaries are paid within the first 5 days of next month. Any
part of salaries, benefits, property or documents are not
hold by employer.
Compliant
Employees are not requested to stay in job to repay debt.
f. Maintain payroll records and be advised that
workers will be interviewed to confirm the
above.
Compliant
Payroll records were seen for each worker. All issues under
this item were proved with records and interviews.
Compliant
One of the worker who move to another village leave the
job and obtain wages and other benefits he deserved.
Requirement: None
Applicability: All
Criterion 6.2 Forced, bonded or compulsory labor
6.2.1
incidences of forced [38],
bonded [39] or compulsory
labor
Requirement: None
Applicability: All
Criterion 6.3 Discrimination [40] in the work environment
78
6.3.1
a. Employer has written anti-discrimination
proactive antidiscrimination policy in place, stating [41] the company does
practice [41]
not engage in or support discrimination in hiring,
remuneration, access to training, promotion,
Requirement: Yes
termination or retirement based on race, caste,
national origin, religion, disability, gender,
Applicability: All
sexual orientation, union membership, political
affiliation, age or any other condition that may
give rise to discrimination.
Compliant
It is written in Farm Personnel Working Procedure (Pİ-PR002) that discrimination shall not be implemented. No
claims received during interviews against discrimination.
b. Employer has clear and transparent company
procedures that outline how to raise, file, and
respond to discrimination complaints.
Compliant
There is written farm complain and request procedure (PİPR-003) which mention how to raise internal and external
complains and request. Since there is no complain and
request, no implementation of the procedure was seen
during the audit.
c. Employer respects the principle of equal pay
for equal work and equal access to job
opportunities, promotions and raises.
Compliant
d. All managers and supervisors receive training
on diversity and non-discrimination. All
personnel receive non-discrimination training.
Internal or external training is acceptable if
proven effective.
Minor
6.3.2
a. Employer maintains a record of all
incidences of discrimination discrimination complaints. These records do not
show evidence for discrimination.
Requirement: None
There is slightly difference between salaries. It was
mentioned that the salaries are determined by employer
based on workers performance. However, there is no clear
evidence about performance record.
None
There is no evidence record to ensure that all managers
and supervisors received training on diversity and nondiscrimination.
N/A
Compliant
There is no discrimination complains raised by workers. It is
one of the issue considered during interviews.
Compliant
There is no complain received during interviews about
observing tenets and practices related with religion, race
and political issues. It was mentioned that in the last
election, all personnel were given 2 hours permission from
work for voting.
There is no disable personnel and no workers union.
Applicability: All
b. Be advised that worker testimonies will be
used to confirm that the company does not
interfere with the rights of personnel to observe
tenets or practices, or to meet needs related to
race, caste, national origin, religion, disability,
gender, sexual orientation, union membership,
political affiliation or any other condition that
may give rise to discrimination.
79
None
N/A
Criterion 6.4 Work environment health and safety
6.4.1
workers trained in health
and safety practices,
procedures and policies
Requirement: 100%
a. Employer has documented practices,
procedures (including emergency response
procedures) and policies to protect employees
from workplace hazards and to minimize risk of
accident or injury. The information shall be
available to employees.
Minor
b. Practices, policies and procedures are
regularly revised to address workplace hazards
that were identified in risk assessments (see
Indicator 6.4.5, risk assessents revised at least
annually).
Compliant
c. Employees know and understand emergency
response procedures.
Minor
d. Employer conducts health and safety training
for all employees on a regular basis (once a year
and immediately for all new employees),
including training on potential hazards and risk
minimization, Occupational Safety and Health
(OSH) and effective use of PPE.
Minor
There is written Health and Safety Procedure posted on
resting room of personnel. (eating place at the same time)
The emergency response procedure was established but
emergency teams were not assigned and trained yet.
Applicability: All
6.4.2
a. Employer records all health- and safetyhealth- and safety-related related accidents.
accidents are recorded and
corrective actions are taken
None
Risk assessment period was defined as 4 years in risk
assessment procedure, as in compliance with risk
assessment regulation.
There is Emergency Response Plan, employees are given
training about emergency response. However, emergency
teams are not established yet although the teams are
addressed in the emergency response plan.
The Health and Safety training records given in 2016 is
available, but not available for 2015 to prove yearly
trainings were given.
N/A
Minor
There was an accident occured in farm area and result in
broken heel which is not recorded as accident and then
investigated to take corrective action.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
b. Employer maintains complete documentation
for all occupational health and safety violations.
Compliant
No health and safety violation was recorded.
80
c. Employer implements corrective action plans
in response to any accidents that occur. Plans
are documented and they include an analysis of
root cause, actions to address root cause,
actions to remediate, and actions to prevent
future accidents of similar nature.
Compliant
Since there is no recorded accident exist, no corrective
action plan was seen during the audit.
d. Employees working in departments where
accidents have occurred can explain what
analysis has been done and what steps were
taken or improvements made.
Compliant
Worker who broken his heel was interviewed. He told that
he jumped from 30-50 cm height and he didn’t notice he
had broken his heel. Supervisor asked him to go to hospital.
6.4.3
Indicator: Proof of
company accident insurance
covering employee costs
stemming from a jobrelated accident or injury
when not covered under
national law
Requirement: Yes
None
a. Employer maintains documentation to
confirm that all personnel are provided sufficient
insurance to cover costs related to occupational
accidents or injuries (if not covered under
national law). Equal insurance coverage must
include temporary, migrant or foreign workers.
Written contract of employer responsibility to
cover accident costs is acceptable evidence in
place of insurance.
N/A
Compliant
Legal social security registration covers job related accident
and injury.
Also there is private social security insurance done by
management, however only head office address was
written in the insurance contract.
Applicability: All
6.4.4
Indicator: Workers use and a. Employer maintains a list of all health and
have access to appropriate safety hazards (e.g. chemicals).
personal protective
equipment (PPE)
None
N/A
Compliant
Health and safety hazards were listed in risk assessment.
b. Employer provides workers with PPE that is
appropriate to known health and safety hazards.
Compliant
Appropriate PPEs were available.
c. Employees receive annual training in the
proper use of PPE (see 6.4.1d).
Compliant
Last training given in January 2016 covers PPE use also.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
81
d. Be advised that workers will be interviewed
to confirm the above.
6.4.5
Indicator: Evidence of a
health and safety
assessment of site facilities
and processes
Compliant
None
15 personnel were interviewed.
N/A
a. Employer makes regular assessments of
hazards and risks in the workplace. Risk
assessments are reviewed and updated at least
annually (see also Indicator 6.4.1).
Minor
There was risk assessment procedure, it is mentioned that
risk assessment is being updated every 4 years as
regulation require. Hazards were identified and risk
assessment was done in January 2016 by contracted safety
specialist.
Minor 1:
The risk assessment which was done in June 2016 does not
cover all hazard such as annimal attack, falling from height.
Minor 2:
The risk assessment metodology is defined in risk
assessment procedure. The risk assessment frequency was
set out 4 yearly as defined in Risk Assessment Requlation
for hazardous industry. However, ASC trout certification
standart requires annual risk assessment.
b. Employees are trained in how to identify and
prevent known hazards and risks (see also
6.4.1d).
c. Health and safety procedures are adapted
based on results from risk assessments (above)
and changes are implemented to help prevent
accidents.
Compliant
The risk assessment procedure was signed by worker
representatives, employer representative, safety specialist
and contracted workplace doctor.
Health and safety procedure posted on the site was seen.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
Compliant
None
N/A
Criterion 6.5 Wages
6.5.1
Indicator: The percentage a. Employer keeps documents to show the legal
of employees who are paid minimum wage in the country of operation. If
a basic needs wage [42].
there is no legal minimum wage in the country,
the employer keeps documents to show the
Requirement: 100%
industry-standard minimum wage.
Compliant
The legal minimum wage is being paid. Also, no income tax
deduction was made and net wage is always paid.
Applicability: All
82
b. Employer's records (e.g. payroll) confirm that
worker's wages for a standard work week (≤ 48
hours) always meet or exceed the legal
minimum wage. If there is no legal minimum
wage, the employer's records must show how
the current wage meets or exceeds industry
standard. If wages are based on piece-rate or
pay-per-production, the employer's records
must show how workers can reasonably attain
(within regular working hours) wages that meet
or exceed the legal minimum wage.
Compliant
The legal maximum working hour is 45 hours/week in Labor
Law. Monthly legal minimum wage paid and meets
industry standards. Farm is located in rural area and there
isn’t so many alternative industry in the area.
c. Employer maintains documentary evidence to
show compliance (e.g. payroll, timesheets,
punch cards, production records, and/or utility
records). Be advised that workers will be
interviewed to confirm the above.
Compliant
The farm supervisor and his deputy manually keep monthly
schedule to show workers in work, in day off. This record is
send to head office to prepare payrolls.
d. Proof of employer engagement with workers
and their representative organizations, and the
use of cost of living assessments from credible
sources to assess basic needs wages. Includes
review of any national basic needs wage
recommendations from credible sources such as
national universities or government.
Compliant
Living wage was calculated by social consultant considering
cost for basic needs making worker survey in 2015.
Since all of the farm workers are living in their own home
located in nearby villages and expenses are less than cities,
the living wage is calculated almost same with legal
minimum wage.
e. Employer has calculated the basic needs wage
for farm workers and has compared it to the
basic (i.e. current) wage for their farm workers.
Compliant
Living wage calculation and its comparison with legal
minimum wage was seen.
f. Employer demonstrates how they ensure
paying a basic needs wage to their workers.
Compliant
Employer posted legal minimum wage calculation on farm
kitchen.
6.5.2
transparency in wage
setting
None
N/A
a. Wages and benefits are clearly articulated to
workers and documented in contracts.
Minor
The payrolls are not regularly submitted to workers at the
end of each month.
b. The method for setting wages is clearly stated
and understood by workers.
Compliant
Interviews prove that workers receive payrolls, but not on
a regularly.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
83
c. Employer renders wages and benefits in a way
that is convenient for the worker (e.g. cash,
check, or electronic payment methods). Workers
do not have to travel to collect benefits nor do
they receive promissory notes, coupons or
merchandise in lieu of payment.
Compliant
The wages are being paid to bank account within 5 days in
the following month.
d. Be advised that workers will be interviewed to
confirm the above.
None
Compliant
15 workers (two of them are supervisor) were interviewed.
N/A
Criterion 6.6 Access to freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining [44]
6.6.1
Indicator: Incidences of
employees denied freedom
to associate, the ability to
bargain collectively or
denied access to
representatives, or
representative
organizations, chosen by
workers
a. Workers have the freedom to join any trade
union, free of any form of interference from
employers or competing organizations set up or
backed by the employer.
N/A
There is no workers union. Interviews prove that workers
were not attempt to join and/or establish trade union.
b. Union representatives are chosen by workers
without managerial interference. ILO specifically
prohibits “acts which are designated to promote
the establishment of worker organizations or to
support worker organizations under the control
or employers or employers’ organizations."
N/A
c. Trade union representatives have access to
their members in the workplace at reasonable
times on the premises.
N/A
d. Employment contract explicitly states the
worker's right of freedom of association.
N/A
Requirement: 0 (zero)
Applicability: All
84
e. Employer has explicitly communicated a
commitment to ensure the collective bargaining
rights of all workers.
N/A
f. Local trade union, or where none exists a
reputable civil-society organization, confirms no
outstanding cases against the farm site
management for violations of employees’
freedom of association and collective bargaining
rights.
Minor
There is no clear written statement that the
employer respect to workers freedom of association and
collective bargaining rights.
g. There is documentary evidence that workers
are free and able to bargain collectively (e.g.
collective bargaining agreements, meeting
minutes, or complaint resolutions).
N/A
h. Be advised that workers will be interviewed to
confirm the above.
Compliant
Workers were interviewed about this issue, most of them
are not ware trade union.
i. Others, please describe
Compliant
No complain was raised by workers about this issue, but
there is not workers representative selected by worker to
negotiation with employer.
Compliant
There is no evidence of threatening, humiliating or
punishing disciplinary practices.
Although there is no discipline practice implemented
observed, there are defined cases which result salary cut
and dismissal in internal company regulation. “Workplace
internal regulation” document was seen in each personnel
file, but not signed by worker.
b. Allegations of corporeal punishment, mental
abuse [46], physical coercion, or verbal abuse
will be investigated by auditors.
Compliant
There is no such cases detected during the audit.
c. Be advised that workers will be interviewed to
confirm there is no evidence for excessive or
abusive disciplinary actions.
Compliant
Workers were interviewed about this issue and no
complains received.
Criterion 6.7 Disciplinary practices
6.7.1
Indicator: Incidences of
a. Employer does not use threatening,
abusive disciplinary actions humiliating or punishing disciplinary practices
that negatively impact a worker’s physical and
Requirement: None
mental health or dignity.
Applicability: All
None
N/A
85
6.7.2
nonabusive disciplinary
policies and procedures
whose aim is to improve
the workers’ performance
[45]
a. Employer has written policy for disciplinary
action which explicitly states that its aim is to
assist the worker to improve [45].
Compliant
There is disciplinary procedure covered a part of Workplace
internal regulation. There are listed disciplinary cases
which result in salary cut or dismissal.
b. Maintain documentary evidence (e.g. worker
evaluation reports) and be advised that workers
will be interviewed to confirm that the
disciplinary action policy is fair and effective.
Compliant
There is no evidence about disciplinary practice. Workers
interviews prove that.
Compliant
There is Discipline committee defined in the “Workplace
Internal Regulation”. However it was not established in
practice. Management has mentioned that it will be
established when it is needed.
a. Employer has documentation showing the
legal requirements for working hours and
overtime in the region where the farm operates.
If local legislation allows workers to exceed
internationally accepted recommendations (48
regular hours, 12 hours overtime) then
requirements of the international standards
apply.
Compliant
b. Records (e.g. time sheets and payroll) show
that farm workers do not exceed the number of
working hours allowed under the law.
Compliant
4857 Labor Law:
The legal maximum working hours is 45 hours /day. Normal
working hours and overtime hours totally must not exceed
11 hours/day. Total OT hours must not exceed 270
hours/year.
The normal working time is 7.5 hours/day x 6 days= 45
hours/week in the farm.
There is no evidence that 11 hours total working time is
exceeded in the farm.
There is one day off in each 6 days work.
There is monthly schedule kept by supervisor manually.
OT is paid 1.5 times hourly rate for working day OT hours.
When he/she works in official holiday, his/her salary was
paid and also an extra daily rate is paid as mentioned in
Labor Law.
The OT work can be seen in this schedule.
Payroll and registered legal records prove this
implementation.
c. Payment records (e.g. payslips) show that
workers are paid a premium rate [49] for
overtime hours.
Compliant
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
Criterion 6.8 Overtime and working hours
6.8.1
Indicator: Violations or
abuse of working hours [47]
and overtime [48] laws and
agreements
Requirement: None
Applicability: All
Payrolls were seen for January 2016. Also 2015 payment
records were checked for all farm workers.
86
d. Overtime is limited and occurs in exceptional
circumstances as evidenced by farm records (e.g.
production records, time sheets, and other
records of working hours).
Compliant
e. If an employer requires employees to work
shifts at the farm (e.g. 10 days on and six days
off), the employer compensates workers with an
equivalent time off in the calendar month and
there is evidence that employees have agreed to
this schedule (e.g. in the hiring contract).
N/A
f. Be advised that workers will be interviewed to
confirm there is no abuse of working hours and
overtime laws.
Compliant
None
Total OT hours in 2015 is 58 hours per worker and OT work
12 hours per month between August and December 2015.
In 2016, 1st of January is officially holiday. Farm workers
worked in 1st of January 2016 and OT paid.
There is no shift.
The workers are interviewed about this issue and they
mentioned that OT is required very rarely.
N/A
Criterion 6.9 Interactions with communities
6.9.1
Indicator: For new farms,
evidence of engagement
and consultation with
surrounding communities
about potential social
impacts [50] from the farm
a. Provide evidence to show whether or not the
farm fits the definition of a 'new farm' as used
here. If yes, proceed to 6.9.1b. If not, then
Indicator 6.9.1 does not apply to the farm.
N/A
Since the farm was established almost 10 years ago, it is no
new farm. Therefore 6.9.1 does not apply to this farm.
b. Provide results of a participatory Social
Impact Assessment (p-SIA) or equivalent
methodology as evidence of the farm's
engagement and consultation with surrounding
communities about potential social impacts
from the farm. Mandatory for all farm sites with
greater than ten (10) staff/employees.
N/A
Since the farm was established almost 10 years ago, it is no
new farm. Therefore 6.9.1 does not apply to this farm.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All new
farms (see note)
87
6.9.2
regular communication,
engagement and
consultation with
c. Evidence provided in 6.9.1b should include
Since the farm was established almost 10 years ago, it is no new
minutes from community meetings and a log of farm. Therefore 6.9.1 does not apply to this farm.
communications with stakeholders.
Consultations should address economic impacts,
natural resource access and use, human health
and safety issues, and changes to physical
infrastructure and cultural issues, with a
particular focus on impacts to indigenous
people, where applicable.
N/A
N/A
None
a. The farm engages in consultations with the
local community at least twice every year (biannually). Note: farms with less than 6
employees consultations once every year is
sufficient. This may include local authorities
and/or elected community representatives.
Minor
Minor:
There is no evidence to ensure bi-annual communication,
consultation and engagement with community
representatives.There is only a meeting with the Karaçam
village headman dated 23.05.2015.
b. Consultations are meaningful. OPTIONAL: the
farm may choose to use participatory Social
Impact Assessment (pSIA) or an equivalent
method for consultations. Mandatory for all
farm sites with greater than ten (10)
staff/employees.
Major
There is no Social Impact Assessment or equivalent
methodology to ensure social impacts from the farm.
c. Consultations include participation by elected
representatives from the local community who
were asked to contribute to the agenda.
Compliant
Only Karaçam village headman was included.
d. Maintain records and documentary evidence
(e.g. meeting agenda, minutes, report) to
demonstrate that consultations comply with the
above.
e. Be advised that representatives from the local
community and organizations may be
interviewed to confirm the above.
Compliant
23 May 2015 meeting minute with Karaçam village
headman was seen.
Compliant
During farm audit, the Karaçam village headman was also
interviewed. Social impact of the farm and also the request
from the farm management were asked. He wishes that
more workers shall be employed from Karaçam village.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
None
N/A
88
6.9.3
Indicator: Evidence of an
operational grievance and
conflict resolution
mechanism to address
community concerns
a. Farm policy provides a mechanism for
presentation, treatment and resolution of
grievances (i.e. complaints) lodged by
stakeholders, community members, and
organizations.
Compliant
There is written “Farm Complain and request procedure”
(Pİ-PR-003)
It defines methodology in case of any internal or external
complain or request.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
b. The farm follows its policy for handling
stakeholder grievances as evidenced by farm
documentation (e.g. follow-up communications
with stakeholders, reports to stakeholder
describing corrective actions).
N/A
Since there was no stakeholder grievances raised, no
implementation of the procedure was seen during the
audit.
c. The farm's mechanism for handling grievances
is effective based on resolution of stakeholder
complaints and community concerns (e.g. followup correspondence from stakeholders).
N/A
audit.
d. Be advised that representatives from the local
community, including complainants where
applicable, may be interviewed to confirm the
above.
None
N/A
audit.
N/A
**********A farm seeking certification must have documentation from all of its fingerling and egg suppliers to demonstrate compliance with the following requirements.**********
89
SECTION 7: REQUIREMENTS FOR FINGERLING AND EGG SUPPLIERS
7.1
documents issued by
pertinent authorities
proving compliance with
local and national
authorities on land and
water use, effluent
regulations and use of
treatments
a. Obtain copies of supplier's business permit
and land title deed.
A. Verify that farm obtains copies of business permits and land title
deed from each supplier (if applicable).
Compliant
Özpekler fish farm, is partly a hatchery with growing from
eggs to fingerlings, in addtion to an ongrowing farm for
trout until the trout is ready for slaughtering at about 250gr
and higher than 250 gr grams. The main part of fingerlings
for the ongrowing farm comes from the company's own
hatchery. There are not deliveries of fingerlings or eggs.
b. Obtain records from suppliers showing
discharge permit requirements as required.
B. Verify that farm obtains records from suppliers to show compliance
with discharge permit requirements.
Compliant
The company has own discharge permit requirements.
c. Obtain records from suppliers showing
treatments used on fingerlings and eggs.
C. Verify that the farm obtains treatment records from its suppliers.
Compliant
The company has own treatment records.
d. Maintain on-site copies of laws governing
water use, land use, effluent regulations and
chemical treatments for animals.
D. Verify that farm obtains records from suppliers to show compliance
with water extraction permit requirements, if applicable.
Compliant
The company has own water extraction permit
requirements.
None
a. Obtain written evidence showing whether or
not the fingerling and egg suppliers use closed
production systems [51]. If yes, then Indicator
7.2 does not apply.
A. Verify that the farm has evidence that their suppliers use only
closed production systems [51]. Otherwise, proceed to 7.2B.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
7.2
Indicator: New
introductions of exotic
species from the date of
publication of the ASC
(7 February 2013), unless
the hatchery/fingerling
facility is a closed
production system [51]
N/A
Compliant
The farm produces their own fish (egg-fingerling).
Compliant
The trout produced is Oncorhynchus mykiss.
Requirement: None
Applicability: All
b. Obtain written evidence showing that the
B. Verify that the farm has evidence that their suppliers do not
fingerling and egg suppliers do not produce an produce an exotic species . If suppliers do produce exotic species,
exotic species. If they do not, then Indicator 7.2 proceed to 7.2C.
does not apply.
90
7.3
C. Verify that the farm has evidence showing that the exotic species in
7.2c was widely commercially produced in the area before publication
of the ASC Freshwater Trout Standard.
None
a. Obtain from suppliers of fingerlings and eggs a A. Review map and cross-check against supplier location.
siting in National Protected map showing the location of the operation
Areas [52]
relative to nearby protected areas as defined
federally/at the National level.
Requirement: None
[53,54]
noted in 53 and 54
7.4
c. If the supplier produces an exotic species,
obtain written evidence that the species was
widely commercially produced in the area
before publication of the ASC Freshwater Trout
Standard.
Indicator: Evidence of an
assessment of the property
for the presence of species
listed on the International
Union for Conservation of
Nature (IUCN) “Red List of
Threatened Species” as
vulnerable, near
threatened, endangered or
critically endangered; an
evaluation of the farm’s
impact on any such species
present; and clearly defined
mitigation measures to
reduce any negative
impacts and allow existence
of such species
None
a. Prepare a letter informing egg and fingerling A. Verify that the farm sent a letter to egg and fingerling supplier(s)
suppliers that the supplier must compile a list of informing them of requirements to compile the list outlined in 7.4a.
IUCN Red Listed species in the relevant
categories that may occur on their property
following the instructions in Indicator 2.1.3.
Compliant
The trout produced is Oncorhynchus mykiss, the species
has been introduced to Turkey freshwater farms in 1960s.
N/A
Compliant
The company has no supplier for eggs or fingerlings.The
company has its own hatchery.
N/A
Compliant
The hatchery comply with the list outlined in 7.4a. Which
covers the species IUCN Red Listed species.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
91
b. Obtain from egg and fingerling suppliers a
"risk assessment" (search and mitigation plan)
that evaluates how the supplier's operation
impacts on any IUCN Red Listed species
identified in 7.4a. The risk assessment may be
done by the supplier or it may be performed by
an academic ecologist or environmental
consultant.
B. Verify that the farm has a copy of the risk assessment produced on
behalf of the egg and fingerling suppliers and that this assessment
covers the species listed in 7.4a.
c. Obtain from egg and fingerling suppliers a
C. Verify that the farm has a copy of the egg and fry supplier(s)
copy of the supplier's ETP species response plan response plan and protocols.
and protocols based on the findings of the risk
assessment.
7.5
a. Obtain a written statement from egg and
the egg and fingerling
fingerling producers detailing the applicable
producer must have an
national and local disease regulations and
equivalent or better health guidance on disease management which the
status than that of the grow- supplier follows.
out facility, and must follow
all national and local
(jurisdictional) guidance on
disease management
None
Compliant
The farm has a copy of the risk assessment produced on
behalf of the hatchery and that this assessment covers the
species listed in 7.4a.
Compliant
The company has own hatchery and has response plan and
protocols.
N/A
A. Verify that the farm has a written statement from the egg and
fingerling producer detailing how the supplier conforms to applicable
national and local regulations and guidance on disease management.
Compliant
There is not any supplier for eggs or fingerlings.The
company has own designated veterinerian (Mrs Özge
Otgucuoğlu) and she visits the hatchery twice a month and
checks the health status of the eggs and fingerlings
according to the national and local disease regulations.
B. Verify that the farm has a copy of the letter informing its suppliers
of health status metrics developed by the farm's veterinary health
professional.
Compliant
The company has own Veterinary Health Plan designated
by the approved veterinerian (Mrs Özge Otgucuoğlu) and
the plan covers the health status metrics of eggs and
fingerlings as well.
Compliant
The company does not obtain eggs or fingerlings from other
fish farms but the conditions of the hatchery owned by the
farm is controlled and recorded.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
b. Prepare a letter informing egg and fingerling
producers that they must evaluate eggs and fry
using health status metrics developed by the
farm's veterinary health professional (see
4.1.2a).
c. Maintains records of the farm's evaluations of C. Verify that the farm keeps records of evaluating the condition of
the condition of eggs and fingerlings upon
eggs and fingerlings for each delivery.The fish farm deliveries eggs and
delivery.
fingerlings from own hatchery and maintaines records of conditions
(such as water temperature and oxygen levels,hygiene
instructions,treatments ext) by themselves.
None
N/A
92
7.6
disclosure to the grow-out
farm of all chemical and
antibiotic treatments on
eggs and fry, including the
reason for their use and the
quantity used
a. Prepare a letter informing egg and fry
A. Verify that the farm has informed its suppliers that they must
suppliers that they must disclose all chemical
disclose information on chemical and antibiotic treatments together
and antibiotic treatments on eggs and fry, along with the rationale for their use.
with stated rationale and the quantity used (see
Indicator 7.1c).
Compliant
The hatchery disclose information on vaccination and
antibiotic treatments together with the rationale for their
use. This can be seen from reporting by the designated
veterinerian.
b.Optional: Farm may conduct voluntary set
tests on a subsample of eggs and fry for each
stocking event, to test for chemical and
antibiotic use consistent with the supplier's
declaration.
B. Auditor includes in the audit report whether the farm has chosen to
conducted chemical and antibiotic test on a subset of samples for
each major stocking event.
Compliant
There is not any use of chemicals yet.
None
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
7.7
Indicator: , including
antibiotics or other
treatments, that are
banned under European
Union (EU) law
N/A
a. Inform egg and fry suppliers in writing that the A. Verify that the farm has a record of the statement sent to egg and
farm will not purchase from suppliers using any fry suppliers.
therapeutants or antibiotics that are banned
under EU law.
Compliant
b. Compare any results from 7.6b to the farm's B. Include a statement in the audit report describing a) whether the
EU banned list (see 4.2.2a) to show that the egg farm undertook optional testing of their supplier's fry/fingerlings and
and fry suppliers do not use banned chemicals. b) findings against the EU banned list, if any .
N/A
N/A
The hatchery of the company does not use any
therapeutants or antibiotics that are banned under EU law.
Requirement: Not
permitted
Applicability: All
None
The company does not use EU banned chemicals.
93
7.8
fish health management
plan implemented in
agreement with the
facility’s designated
veterinarian
a. For every supplier of fry and egg to the farm,
obtain a copy of the supplier's Fish Health
Management Plan (FHMP).
A. Verify that the farm obtains a FHMP from each supplier of egg and
fry.
Compliant
The company has FHMP for both growing fish and eggs,fry
as well.
b. Ensure that the egg and fry supplier's FHMP is B. Verify that the farm has record that supplier management approves
reviewed and updated at least annually with
review and update of the FHMP at least annually.
signatures by management indicating approval.
Compliant
The Fish Health Management Plan (FHMP) is updated and
reviewed by the designated veterinerian of the company
annually.
c. Ensure that the egg and fry supplier's
C. Confirm that the farm has supplier documentation showing
designated veterinarian reviews and approves
signature and date of review by designated veterinarian.
the FHMP annually and after each update of the
FHMP, by signature.
None
Compliant
See 7.8b
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
7.9
a. For suppliers identified in 2.4.1a, obtain a
A. Verify that farm obtains copies of relevant company-level policies
company-level policies and copy of the supplier's company-level policies and and procedures from suppliers.
procedures that
procedures relating to key ILO labor issues.
demonstrate the company's
commitment to each of the
8 key ILO labor issues
described in Principle 6
N/A
Compliant
Hatchery of the company commits to the principles in 7.9a.
Compliant
There is a declaration from the feed manufacturer
ABALIOĞLU and there is no another supplier and policies
and procedures (copy provided by the farm) to verifies each
of the 8 key ILO labor issues dated 11.08.2015.
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
-
B. Review supplier policies and procedures (copy provided by the
farm) to verify the supplier's commitment to address each of the 8 key
ILO labor issues.
None
N/A
94
7.10
regular communication,
engagement and
consultation with
a. Ensure that the farm obtains documentary
A. Examine copies of records and documentary evidence (e.g. meeting
evidence from egg and fry suppliers of regular
agenda, minutes, report) to verify that the farm's suppliers performed
communciations with surrounding community as community consultations in complance with requirements.
described under 6.9.2a, 6.9.2b, 6.9.2c and 6.9.2d
Compliant
The company complies comply with regular
communications with surrounding comminity as described
under 6.9.2a, 6.9.2b, 6.9.2c and 6.9.2d. Evidences from part
6. (Related meeting documents in detailed).
Requirement: Yes
Applicability: All
None
N/A
95
ASC Audit Report - Traceablity
Description of risk factor if present.
10
Traceability Factor
10.1 The possibility of mixing
or substitution of
certified and noncertified product,
including product of the
same or similar
appearance or species,
produced within the
same operation.
10.2 The possibility of mixing
or substitution of
certified and noncertified product,
including product of the
same or similar
appearance or species,
present during
production, harvest,
transport, storage, or
processing activities.
10.3 The possibility of
subcontractors being
used to handle,
transport, store, or
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Traceability
Describe any traceability, segregation, or other
systems in place to manage the risk.
Karaçam fish farm has only culture of trout under
assesment for ASC.
assesment for ASC.
assesment for ASC.
assesment for ASC.
There is no subcontractor.
There is no subcontractor.
96/121
10.4 Any other opportunities
where certified product
could potentially be
mixed, substituted, or
mislabelled with noncertified product before
the point where product
There is no risk for mixing or subsitution or
mislabelling with non-certified product before the
There is no risk for mixing or subsitution or mislabelling
with non-certified product before the point where product point where product enters chain of custody
enters chain of custody because there is no culture of fish because there is no culture of fish which are not
under assesment for ASC.
which are not under assesment for ASC.
10.5 Detail description of the There is a traceability system at Karaçam fish farm from broodstock to harvest,the farm has its own hatchery.
flow of certified product
within the operation and
the associated
traceability system which
10.6 Traceablity
Determination:
10.6.1 The traceability and
Karaçam fish farm has only products which are under assesment for ASC.
segregation systems in
the operation are
sufficient to ensure all
products
identified
The
traceability
andand Karaçam fish farm has only products which are under assesment for ASC.
segregation systems are
not sufficient and a
separate chain of custody
certification is required
for the operation before
products can be sold as
ASC-certified or can be
eligible to carry the ASC
logo.
10.6.3 The point from which
chain of custody is
The point which chain of custody is required to begin is the handling unit.
97/121
10.6.4 Is a sepearate chain of
custody certificate
required for the
producer?
The company has a handling unit and will have MSC CoC certificate after succes of assesment.
98/121
ASC Audit Report - Closing
11 Findings
11.1 A summary table that lists all non-conformities and observations
NC reference
NC Status
Clause Reference
1 2.5.4c
Minor
CAR v.2.0 - Audit report - Closing
2.5.4c. Make the results
from 2.5.4b publicly
available (e.g. by
publishing information
on the farm's website).
Keep records of when
and where the results
were made public for all
production cycles.
2.5.4b den gelen
sonuçlar kamuya açılır.
Tüm üretim döngüsü için
sonuçların nerede ne
zaman kamuya açıldığı
kayıtları tutulur. (Ör
çiftliğin web sitesinde
bilgi yayınlama)
Description of NC
Descriptions of actions
pending
Farm made the information of
unexplained results available
on the farms web site by
Büşra Güngör(HACCP Team
Leader) dated
Farm did not make the
25.02.2016 and the link is as
information of unexplained http://www.ozpekler.com/ind
results available on the
ex.php?icerik=66&goster=72.
farms web site.
Çiftlik tanımlanmayan
Çiftlik tanımlanamayan
ölümlerle ilgili ölümlerin
ölümlerle ilgili sonuçların sonuçlarını web sitesinde
kayıtlarını kendi web
yayımlamıştır./Büşra
sitesinde yayımlamamıştır. Güngör(HACCP Takım
Lideri)/Tarih: 25.02.2016 ilgili
link/http://www.ozpekler.com
/index.php?icerik=66&goster=
72
99/121
2 3.2.1g
3.2.1g. Maintain records
showing the amount and
type of feeds used
during the past 12
months.
Son 12 ay içinde
kullanılan yemlerin
miktarı ve türünü
gösteren kayıtlar tutulur.
Major
Total phosphorus of feed
amount as percentage
(85%) and this is identified
on the label of the related
feed.
Total amount of
phosphorus released in to
the environment per metric
ton is 4,5 and the result
must be less then 4 after
7th february.
Yemdeki toplam fosfor
yüzdesi % 0,85 olarak yem
etiketleri üzerinde
görülmüştür.Doğaya
bırakılan fosfor yüzdesi bu
durumda 4,5 kg/mt olarak
tespit edilmişir fakat 7
şubat 2016 itibariyle
standardın ilgili kriteri
gereği 4 kg/mt'den az
olmalıdır dolayısıyla
standardın ilgili kriteriyle
uyum sağlanmamaktadır.
The analysis report of the
Abalıoğlu feed manufacturer
has been seen done by SGS
laboratory dated 19.02.2016
(Report No: 41600672R1)and
the phosphor rate is %0,75 on
the formulation prepared by
Abalıoğlu feed manufacturer.
The feed usage for March is
%75 x 84,240 (total feed)=
0,63
Output phosphor
Harvest=80,701*0,0043=0,35
Mortality=1,178*0,0043=0,00
5
Mortality of
broodstock=0,28*0,0040=0,00
1
Sludge=0,5
tonnes*0,0037=0,00185
Totally=0,35
Pin -Pout/biomass (80,701
tonnes)*1000=0,630,35/80,701*1000=3,5!!!.The
value is less than the related
value 4 kg/mt and it
appropriate for ASC standard.
100/121
3 3.2.3d
Minor
3.2.3d. Have an
accredited laboratory
analyze the samples for
benthic invertebrate
fauna including
characterization of
species composition,
abundance, diversity,
and presence of key
sensitive indicator
species.
Türlerin
kompozisyonunun
karakterizasyonu, bolluk,
çeşitlilik ve duyarlı
anahtar indikatör
türlerin varlığı dahil
olmak üzere bentik
omurgasız faunası için
numunelerin analizi bir
The macro vertebrate
anaysis has been done by
Süleyman Demirel
University Aquacultural
Faculty and the laboratory
of related univesity is not
accredidated.There is not
any accredidated
laboratory for macro
vertebrate analysis in
Turkey yet.
Makro omurgalı analizleri
Süleyman Demirel
Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri
Fakültesi'ne yaptırılmıştır
fakat ilgili üniversitenin
laboratuvarı akredite
değildir. Türkiye'de makro
omurgalı analizlerini
There is not any accredidated
laboratory for macro
vertebrate analysis in Turkey
yet.AGFOCERT has sent the
variation form to
ASC./16.02.2016
Türkiye'de makro omurgalı
analizlerini gerçekleştirecek
akredite bir laboratuvar henüz
mevcut değildir.AGFOCERT
ASC'ye varyasyon formu
göndermiştir./16.02.2016
101/121
4 3.2.5h
Minor
5 4.2.4b
Minor
Data about water quality has
3.2.5h. Submit data on
been sent to
water quality monitoring The company has a analysis ASC(certification@ascto ASC in a suitable
table Doc.No: ÜSB-P-01.But aqua.org) by Mrs Büşra Evgin
format (required
data on water quality is not Güngör dated 25.02.2016.
parameters are shown in submitted to ASC.
Appendix II-B) at least
Firmanın su kalite kriterleri Su kalitesine ilişkin veriler
once per year.
için verilerin kaydedildiği
ASC'ye iletilmiştir
Yılda en az bir kez ASC bir tablosu
(certification@asc-aqua.org)/
ye uygun bir formatta su bulunmaktadır./Dök. No:
Mrs Büşra Evgin Güngör
kalitesinin izlenmesi
ÜSB-P-01 fakat ilgili
(HACPP Ekip Lideri) /
verileri gönderilir (
tabloyu ASC'ye
25.02.2016.
gerekli parametreler Ek II- iletmemiştir.
B de gösterilmiştir).
4.2.4b. Make a public
disclosure of all the
antimicrobial treatments
listed in 4.2.4a. by
publishing the
information on the
farm's website or via
another more effective
medium (see
Instructions).
Çiftliğin web sitesinde
veya daha etkili başka bir
ortam yoluyla bilgi
yayınlayarak 4.2.4a
Antimicrobial treatments are
published at farm's website
Information about
(http://www.ozpekler.com/ind
antimicrobial treatments
ex.php?icerik=38&goster=1
are not published at farm's 07) dated 25.02.2016.
web site yet.
Antimikrobiyal tedaviler
Antimikrobiyal tedaviler
yayımlanmıştır./http://www.o
yayımlanmamıştır.
zpekler.com/index.php?icerik=
38&goster=1
07/25.02.2016.
102/121
6 4.2.4c
Minor
4.2.4c. As an alternative
to 4.2.4b, farms may
choose to make a public
disclosure using the ASC
website. If applicable,
use the form in
Appendix VI of the ASC
Salmon Standard to list
all antimicrobial
treatments used on the
farm. Then submitt the
completed form to ASC
for publication on the
ASC website.
4.2.4b ye bir alternatif
olarak, çiftlikler ASC web
sitesini kullanarak
kamuya açıklama
yapmayı tercih edebilir.
Varsa, Çiftlikte kullanılan
tüm antimikrobiyal
tedavileri listelemek için
ASC Somon Standart Ek
VI formu kullanılır. Sonra
ASC web sitesinde
The company has been
(antimicrobial
treatments)completed
Appendix VI from the
Salmon Standard but not
submitted the information
to ASC publication.
Antimikrobiyal tedavilerle
ilgili veriler ASC'ye
iletilmemiştir.
Antimicrobial treatments are
sent to (certification@ascaqua.org) dated 10.03.2016 by
Mrs Büşra Evgin Güngör.
Antimikrobiyal tedavilerle ilgili
veriler ASC'ye
iletilmiştir./certification@ascaqua.org/10.03.2016.
103/121
7 6.3.1d
Minor
6.3.1d. All managers and
supervisors receive
training on diversity and
non-discrimination. All
personnel receive nondiscrimination training.
Internal or external
training is acceptable if
proven effective.
Tüm yönetici ve
danışmanlar çeşitlilik ve
ayrımcılık yapmama
konusunda eğitim alırlar.
Tüm personel ayrımcılık
eğitim alır. İç veya dış
eğitim etkili olduğu
kanıtlanmış ise kabul
There is no evidence record
to ensure that all managers
and supervisors received
training on diversity and
non-discrimination.
Tüm yöneticiler ve
gözetmenler için farklılık ve
ayrımcılık konusunda
eğitim görülememiştir.
The training about working
staff of discrimination has
been explained in the related
procedure Doc. No: Pİ‐PR‐002
and the training about this
subject has been given to the
farm staff by Mr Ragıp Tur
dated 15.02.2016.
Ayrımcılıkla ilgili eğitimler ilgili
prosedürde anlatılmıştır (Dök.
No: Pİ-PR-002) ve ayrımcılık
konusunda Ragıp Tur
tarafından personele eğitim
verilmiştir./15.02.2016
104/121
8 6.4.1.a
Minor
6.4.1a. Employer has
documented practices,
procedures (including
emergency response
procedures) and policies
to protect employees
from workplace hazards
and to minimize risk of
accident or injury. The
information shall be
available to employees.
İşveren işyeri
tehlikelerinden
çalışanları korumak ve
kaza veya yaralanma
riskini en aza indirmek
için (acil müdahale
prosedürleri dahil)
The emergency response
procedure was established
but emergency teams were
not assigned and trained
yet.
Acil durum sorumlulularına
ilişkin prosedür mevcuttur
fakat acil durum ekipleri
henüz atanmamıştır ve
eğitilmemiştir.
Emergency teams areassigned
and the emergency training
are given to the farm staff by
Occupational Safety Specialist
Ms Öznur Çeler dated
25.02.2016.
Acil durum ekipleri atanmıştır
ve acil durum eğitimi
personele İş Güvenliği Uzmanı
Öznür Çeler tarafından
105/121
9 6.4.1c
c. Employees know and
understand emergency
response procedures.
Çalışanlar acil müdahale
prosedürlerini bilirler ve
anlarlar.
Minor
There is Emergency
Response Plan, employees
are given training about
emergency response.
However, emergency teams
are not established yet
although the teams are
addressed in the
emergency response plan.
Acil durum müdahale planı
mevcuttur. Çalışanlara
eğitim verilmiştir.Ancak
prosedürde belirtilen acil
durum ekipleri henüz
belirlenmemiştir.
Emergency teams are
identified and the emergency
training are given to the farm
staff by Occupational Safety
Specialist Ms Öznur Çeler
dated 25.02.2016.
Acil durum ekipleri atanmıştır
ve acil durum eğitimi
personele İş Güvenliği Uzmanı
Öznür Çeler tarafından
106/121
10 6.4.1d
Minor
6.4.1d. Employer
conducts health and
safety training for all
employees on a regular
basis (once a year and
immediately for all new
employees), including
training on potential
hazards and risk
minimization,
Occupational Safety and
Health (OSH) and
effective use of PPE.
İşveren potansiyel
tehlikeleri ve risk
minimizasyonu içeren, İş
Sağlığı ve Güvenliği (İSG)
ve kişisel koruyucu
Occupational safety training
has been given to the farm
staff for 2014/2015/2016The
The Health and Safety
related records are kept at the
training records given in
2016 is available, but not farm hereafter.
available for 2015 to prove İş Güvenliği Eğitimi ile ilgili
yearly trainings were given. 2014/2015 yılına ait kayıtlara
denetimden sonra ulaşılmıştır
En son iş sağlığı ve
ve muhafaza
güvenliği eğitimi 30 Ocak
2016 tarihinde verilmiştir. edilmektedir./19.03.2016
2014 ve 2015 yıllarının
eğitim kayıtlarına denetim
esnasında ulaşılamamıştır.
107/121
11 6.4.2a
Minor
There was an accident
occured in farm area and
6.4.2a. Employer records result in broken heel which
all health- and safetyis not recorded as accident
related accidents.
and then investigated to
İşveren, tüm sağlık ve iş take corrective action.
güvenliği kazalarını
Özlük dosyaları
kaydeder.
incelenirken bir adet topuk
kırığı kaydı görülmüştür.
Bunun işyerinde olduğu
ancak merkez ofise bildirim
yapılmadığı tespit
edilmiştir.
The working accidents are
recorded according to the
Accident Procedure Doc. No:
ÜS-PR-005 dated 25.02.2016.
İş kazaları Kazalar
Prosedürü'ne göre kayıt altına
alınacaktır./Dök. No: ÜS-PR005/25.02.2016
108/121
12 6.4.5a
Minor
6.4.5a. Employer makes
regular assessments of
hazards and risks in the
workplace. Risk
assessments are
reviewed and updated at
least annually (see also
Indicator 6.4.1).
İşveren işyerinde tehlike
ve risklerin düzenli
değerlendirmelerini
yapar. Risk
değerlendirmeleri
gözden geçirilir ve (aynı
zamanda bkz.Gösterge
6.4.1 ) en az yılda bir
güncellenir.
The risk assessment which
was done in June 2016
does not cover all hazard
such as annimal attack,
falling from height.
2016 yılında yapılan risk
değerlendirmesi hayvan
saldırısı veya yüksekten
düşme gibi
değerlendirmeleri
içermemektedir.
Job security and risk analysis
has been revised by Ms Öznur
Çeler dated 25.02.2016.
İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği risk
değerlendirmesi revize
edilmiştir./25.02.2016
109/121
13 6.4.5a
Minor
6.4.5a. Employer makes
regular assessments of
hazards and risks in the
workplace. Risk
assessments are
reviewed and updated at
least annually (see also
Indicator 6.4.1).
İşveren işyerinde tehlike
ve risklerin düzenli
değerlendirmelerini
yapar. Risk
değerlendirmeleri
gözden geçirilir ve (aynı
zamanda bkz.Gösterge
6.4.1 ) en az yılda bir
güncellenir.
14 6.5.2.a
Minor
6.5.2a. Wages and
benefits are clearly
articulated to workers
and documented in
contracts.
Ücretler ve faydalar
açıkça işçilere ifade edilir
ve sözleşmelerle
belgelendirilir.
The risk assessment
metodology is defined in
risk assessment procedure.
The risk assessment
frequency was set out 4
yearly as defined in Risk
Assessment Requlation for
hazardous industry.
However, ASC trout
certification standart
requires annual risk
assessment.
Risk değerlendirme
prosedürü mevcut,
prosedürde risk
değerlendirmesinin
yönetmelikte belirtildiği
gibi 4 yılda bir yapılacağı
The payrolls are not
regularly submitted to
workers at the end of each
month.
Maaş bordrolarının her ayın
sonunda işçilere düzenli
olarak dağıtılmadığı
görülmüştür.
Ms Öznur Çelebi has informed
about the revising of the work
safety and risk analysis yearly
dated 25.02.2016.
İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği risk
değerlendirmesi revize
edilmiştir./25.02.2016
Personnel and Administration
Manager Mr Ragıp Tur has
informed the personnel about
the distrubition of the payrolls
monthly dated 15.02.2016.
Personel ve İdari İşler Müdürü
Ragıp Tur tarafından maaş
bordrolarının dağıtılmasıyla
ilgili personel bilgilendirme
yapılmıştır./15.02.2016
110/121
15 6.6.1f
Minor
6.6.1f. Local trade union,
or where none exists a
reputable civil-society
organization, confirms
no outstanding cases
against the farm site
management for
violations of employees’
freedom of association
and collective bargaining
rights.
Yerel sendika veya hiçbir
saygın sivil toplum
örgütü olmadığı
durumlarda, örgütlenme
ve toplu pazarlık
haklarının çalışanların
özgürlüğünü ihlal ettiği
The regulations about union is
explained in the related
procedure Name and Doc. No:
Pİ‐PR‐002 Farm Staff Working
There is no clear written
Procedure.However,Mr
statement that the
Erdoğan Erkaya has assigned
employer respect to
as Employee Representative
workers freedom of
dated 15.02.2016.Mr Erdoğan
association and collective
was freely chosen/elected
bargaining rights.
fellow by fellow workers on
Sendikaya üye olma ve
the farm,the related meeting
toplu iş görüşmesi
document of him.(Doc. No: 3haklarına saygı
2) dated 30.01.2016.
gösterileceğine dair açık bir
Sendika ile ilgili kurallar Çiftlik
ibare görülememiştir.
Personel Çalışması
prosedüründe Dök. No: Pİ-PR002 anlatılmıştır,Erdoğan
Erkaya'nın çalışan temsilcisi
111/121
16 6.9.2a
Minor
There is no evidence to
ensure bi-annual
communication,
consultation and
engagement with
community
representatives.There is
only a meeting with the
Karaçam village headman
dated 23.05.2015.
Yalnızca en yakın köyün
muhtarı (Karaçam Köyü) ile
23 Mayıs 2015 tarihli bir
toplantı tutanağı
Çiftlik her yıl (bir yıllık) görülmüştür.Paydaşlarla
en az iki kez yerel toplum yapılan başka bir görüşme
ile istişarelerde bulunur. tespit edilmemiştir.
6.9.2a. The farm engages
in consultations with the
local community at least
twice every year (biannually). Note: farms
with less than 6
employees consultations
once every year is
sufficient. This may
include local authorities
and/or elected
community
representatives.
The meetings with the
stakeholders will be done
twice a year according to the
related plan Name: Meeting
Plan with the Karaçam
Village,headmean of the
village and the people in the
village/ Doc. No: ÜS-P-016.
Paydaşlarla toplantılar ilgili
plana göre Dök. No: ÜS-P-016
yılda 2 defa
gerçekleştirilecektir./15.02.20
16
112/121
6.9.2b. Consultations are
Social impact assesment has
meaningful. OPTIONAL:
been implemented and
the farm may choose to
reported by the environmental
use participatory Social
concultant Ms Şermin Eyiler
Impact Assessment
dated 04.03.2016.This report
(pSIA) or an equivalent There is no Social Impact
Assessment or equivalent has been prepared for the
method for
purpose of evaluating the
methodology to ensure
consultations.
employees socioeconomic
Mandatory for all farm social impacts from the
structure and fish production
Major
sites with greater than farm.
Sosyal Etki değerlendirmesi is located in the Aegean
ten (10)
region,Karaçam
veya buna eşdeğer bir
staff/employees.
neighbourhood belongs to
metot ile konsültasyon
İstişareler anlamlıdır.
Ozpekler Company.That report
görülememiştir.
İSTEĞE BAĞLI: çiftlik
contains assesments about the
istişare için katılımcı
related topics:Climate and
Sosyal Etki
vegetation,structure
Değerlendirmesi (pSIA)
employment
veya eşdeğer bir yöntem
stataus,education,health
kullanmayı tercih
11.2 A copy of the non-conformtity report form completed for each non-conformity and observation raised.
11.3 If any approved requests for variations or interpretations have been used, a full copy of the approved variation or interpretation form shall
be appended to the report. If used in raing an NC, the ASC reference number (NCF 5) and a justitification for its use (NCF 6) shall be
completed in the NC report form.
17 6.9.2b
12 Evaluation Results
113/121
12.1 A report of the results of the audit of the operation
against the specific elements in the standard and
guidance documents.
The audit report shows the results from the first ASC Trout Standard audit of Karaçam
Farm/Özpekler.The audit was performed onsite 09-10.02.2016, for the farm audit as
well the social part of the audit. The audit day was
performed onsite on the freshwater farm with interviews of the employees, in
addition to quality management of Karaçam Farm/Özpekler. It was focused on all
principle in ASC Freshwater Standard and social responsibility, review of
documentation, processes and handling of equipment was examined. The interviews
of the employees were performed on the farm, the interview was performed without
interruption. Audit covering principle no 6 are done by walk around,review of
relevant documentation, intreviews with the
quality management and confidential interviews with the employee and
stakeholders. Auditor was given assess to all places, documentation and
employees,stakeholders as well.
12.2 A clear statement on whether or not the audited unit The Karacam Farm / Ozpekler satisfies the requirements of the ASC Trout standard
of certification has the capability to consistently
with 2 major and 15 minor. They are documented and described in the Non
meet the objectives of the relevant standard(s).
conformity report forms seperately.The farm has rectified all the major NCs and send
an action plan about minors and observations within the time frame after the audit.
Current status is that Lead Auditor recommends approval of the draft audit report
before the public announcement of the file.
12.3 In cases where Biodiversity Environmental Impact
Assessment (BEIA) or Participatory Social Impact
Assessment (PSIA) is available, it shall be added in
full to the audit report. IF these documents are not in
English, then a synopsis in English shall be added to
the report as well.
Attached the Participatory Social Impact Assessment but in Turkish only. This report
includes all social impacts of the site to the vicinity and public near to the farms.
Those factors are environmental polution risks, noise, crowd, utilisation of natural
resources used by the public, interactions with the community.
114/121
13.1 A copy of the non-conformtity report form
Attached 17 NC reports as annices of this report.
completed for each non-conformity and observation
raised.
13.2 If any approved requests for variations or
interpretations have been used, a full copy of the
approved variation or interpretation form shall be
appended to the report. If used in raing an NC, the
ASC reference number (NCF 5) and a justitification
for its use (NCF 6) shall be completed in the NC
report form.
There is 1 variance form but no answer has been received yet. Attached.
13,3 Is a separate coc certificate required for the
producer? (yes/no)
Yes
13.4 A report of the results of the audit of the operation
against the specific elements in the standard and
guidance documents.
13.4.1 A clear statement on whether or not the audited unit Lead auditor declares that audited unit of certification has the capability to
of certification has the capability to consistently
consistently meet the objectives of the relevant standard(s) after closing all the major
meet the objectives of the relevant standard(s).
NCs. Minors and observations will be checked in the next audit.
13.4.2 In cases where Biodiversity Environmental Impact
Assessment (BEIA) or Participatory Social Impact
Assessment (PSIA) is available, it shall be added in
full to the audit report. IF these documents are not in
English, then a synopsis in English shall be added to
the report as well.
Attached the Participatory Social Impact Assessment but in Turkish only. This report
includes all social impacts of the site to the vicinity and public near to the farms.
Those factors are environmental polution risks, noise, crowd, utilisation of natural
resources used by the public, interactions with the community.
115/121
13.4.3 Instructions to stakeholders that any complaints or
objections to the CAB decision are to be subject to
the CAB's complaints procedure. This section shall
include information on where to review the
procedure and where further information on
complaints can be found.
14 Surveillence
Has a certificate been issued? (yes/no)
14.1 The Eligiblity Date (if applicable)
Is a separate coc certificte required for the producer?
If a certificate has been issued this section shall
14.2 The date of issue and date of expiry of the
The scope of the certificate
Instructions to stakeholders that any complaints or
Next planned Surveillance
14.1.1 Planned date
14.1.2 Planned site
Next audit type
14.2.1 Surveillence 1
Stakeholders can access the AGFOCERT's complaint procedure via its web site
www.agfocert.com
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
February 2017
Karacam Farm
2017
116/121
This form shall be submitted by the CAB no less than thirty (30) calendar days prior to any onsite audit * . Any changes to this information shall be submitted
to the ASC within five (5) days of the change and not later than 10 days before the planned audit. If later, a new announcement is submitted and another 30
days rule will apply.
The information on this form shall be public * and should be posted on the ASC website within three (3) days of submission.
This form shall be written to be readable to the stakeholders and other interested parties.
This form should be translated into local languages when appropriate
PDF 1 Public Disclosure Form
AGFO Teknik Kontrol ve Belgelendirme Hizmetleri Ltd.
Sti.
PDF 1.1 Name of CAB
PDF 1.2 Date of Submission
27.1.2016
PDF 1.3 CAB Contact Person
PDF 1.3.1 Name of Contact Person
Cemal G. Kara
PDF 1.3.2 Position in the CAB's organisation
General Manager
PDF 1.3.3 Mailing address
Bağlarbaşı Mahallesi Bağdat Cad. No: 414 Gedik İş
Merkezi A Blok D: 43 Maltepe Istanbul Turkey
CAR V. 2.0 - Form 3 - Public Disclosure Form
* Except unannounced audits, for which this form will be sent to
the ASC and AAB without being published
117/121
PDF 1.3.4 Email address
ckara@agfocert.com
PDF 1.3.5 Phone number
+90-533-650 73 95
PDF 1.3.6 Other
PDF 1.4.1 Name of Contact Person
ÖZPEKLER İNŞ.TAAH.DAY.TÜK.MALL.SU ÜRÜNLERİ SAN.
VE
TİC.LTD.ŞTİ
Busra Evgin Gungor
PDF 1.4.2 Position in the client's organisation
Quality manager
PDF 1.4.3 Mailing address
Mesebuku Mevkii Karaçam Köyü Köyceğiz/Muğla
PDF 1.4.4 Email address
busra@ozpekler.com.tr
PFD 1.4.5 Phone number
0(258)3718338/Mobile: 0 533 502 87 89
PDF 1.4 ASC Name of Client
118/121
PDF 1.4.6 Other
PDF 1.5 Unit of Certification
PDF 1.5.1 Single Site
PDF 1.5.2 Multi-site
PDF 1.5.3 Group certification
Yes
No
No
PDF 1.6 Sites to be audited
Site Name
GPS Coordinates
Meşebükü Mevkii KARAÇAM Denizli
(Farm)
N27 02 189 E29 02 350
N37 02 108 E29 02 57
BOZBURUN MH. A.N.ZORLU
SAN.SİT.7152 SK.NO:4
Other Location
Information
Farm
Head Office
PDF 1.7 Species and Standards
Species (scientific name)
produced
Standard
Abalone
Bivalve
Freshwater Trout
Pangasius
Salmon
Shrimp
Talapia
Planned
Date of
Site Audit(s)
planned
audit
9-10.02.2016 9-10.02.2016
Yes
Included in scope
(Yes/No)
Yes
ASC
endorsed
standard to
Version
Number
ASC Freshwater
1 Trout
119/121
Other
PDF 1.8 Planned Stakeholder Consultation(s) and How Stakeholders can Become Involved
How to involve this
When
How this
stakeholder (instakeholder stakeholder
Name/organisation
Relevance for this audit
person/phone
may be
will be
interview/input
contacted
contacted
submission)
AGFOCERT will notify potential
The audit team shall acknowledge Prior to the
stakeholders of the planned audit
receipt of all written submissions. publication of the
through the ASC webpage. AGFOCERT
draft audit report,
will keep a list of all stakeholders that
the audit team will
indicate an interest in making a
respond in writing to
submission to the audit team.
stakeholders to
explain how audit
team addressed
comments.
PDF 1.9 Proposed Timeline
120/121
PDF 1.9.1
Contract Signed:
21.01.2016
PDF 1.9.2
Start of audit:
09-10.02.2016
PDF 1.9.3
Onsite Audit(s):
09-10.02.2016
PDF 1.9.4
Determination/Decision:
10.3.2016
Name
Kar Nazende Satir
ASC Registration Reference
PDF 1.10.1
PDF 1.10.2
Column1
Lead Auditor
Technical Experts
PDF 1.10.3
Social Auditor
Tulin Pervan Dikener
SA 8000 Auditor
PDF 1.10 Audit Team
121/121

agfocert asc trout audit report - Aquaculture Stewardship Council

Transcription

Similar documents

john fluevog shoes - Page One Publishing

Financial Strength - Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance

Pro Farm Manager is a virtual simulation/management oriented game

Homeowners Extra - Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance

Farms handout (16.75" x 10.75")

25, 26,27,28 September-2015 VOC Ground, Erode-India.

2009 West Virginia Statistics

maryland division of financial regulation

Farm Boy keeps it close to home with 40+ local suppliers New

January