Groundwater residence times and sources of solutes in - G-WADI
Transcription
Groundwater residence times and sources of solutes in - G-WADI
Groundwater Residence Times and Sources of Solutes in the Upper Floridan Aquifer, Southeast, USA Stephen Osborn (sosborn@hwr.arizona.edu) December 2006 Location: Figures and Captions Florida and Georgia, southeast U.S.A. (Figure 1). Main problem illustrated: •What is the residence time of groundwater in the Upper Floridan Aquifer (UFA)? •What is the source of solutes in the UFA? Summary: The Floridan aquifer underlies an area of more than 250,000 square kilometers in the southeastern USA and is a major source of fresh water for public, industrial, and agricultural use. Estimates of groundwater age and source of solutes can be used to determine recharge rates, identify recharge areas, and improve groundwater flow models. Improved hydrologic data may have direct bearing on best use management practices aimed at preventing the adverse affects of salt water intrusion, deterioration of water quality, and depletion of water resources, which on a human time scale, are non-renewable. Figure 1. Extent of the Floridan aquifer: Florida, Georgia, Alabama, and South Figure 1. Extent of1990). the Floridan aquifer: Florida, Georgia, Alabama, and South Carolina Carolina (Miller, (Miller, 1990). Tracers used: δ13CDIC, 14CDIC, 3He, 87Sr/86Sr, Noble Gases Hydrogeological setting: The Floridan aquifer is defined to be at least 10 times more permeable than its bounding confining units. It consists of an upper (UFA) and a lower (LFA) section of limestone separated by a semi-confining unit of varying mineralogy and lithology. Both sections generally thicken as they get deeper to the south from southern Georgia where the aquifer outcrops. Central Florida has been slightly uplifted into a mid-peninsula arch where karst features such as sinkholes (Figure 2), caverns, and depression springs are exposed. Aquifer transmissivity is highly coincident with the axis of the arch and consistent with the high porosity of karst features. The Floridan aquifer discharges at coastal boundaries, the continental shelf, streams, springs, sinkholes, and due to pumping activities. The LFA is generally not pumped for drinking water as it is more saline due to the presence of saltwater, it is deeper, and the UFA has traditionally yielded ample fresh water supplies for most uses. People affected, environmental, ecological impacts: Saltwater intrusion into the UFA at coastal boundaries has become a major issue as growing coastal communities like Tampa Bay, Savannah, and Jacksonville pump fresh water from the aquifer. Where the aquifer is too saline to be potable, mainly in southern Florida, treated sewage and industrial wastes have been pumped by deep-well injection into the subterranean karst features of the LFA. This is aimed at creating floating reservoirs of freshwater for future use. In other areas, drainage wells have diverted surface water runoff directly into the UFA. Figure 2.Figure Sinkhole in central (Miller, 1990). 2. Sinkhole in Florida central Florida (Miller, 1990). Water sampling and analysis summary: Groundwater samples from the UFA were collected along flow paths from a recharge area in southeastern Georgia for analysis of radiogenic 3He and noble gases temperatures. In central Florida, groundwater samples were collected from the UFA along flow paths from recharge to discharge at coastal boundaries (Figure 3) for analysis of the 14C (percent modern carbon, pmc) of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC). In a study conducted in northern Florida, surface lake water and subsurface groundwater samples were collected. Groundwater samples were collected sequentially from a surficial aquifer to the UFA at depth. These samples were analyzed for δ13CDIC values and 87Sr/86Sr ratios. Figure 3. Potentiometric map depicting sample locations and flow paths, and graphs of modeled 14C ages along flow paths (Plummer and Sprinkle, 2001). Figure 3. Potentiometric map depicting sample locations and flow paths, and graphs of modeled 14C ages along flow paths (Plummer and Sprinkle, 2001). Results of tracer studies: Helium excess measured in UFA samples generally increases with distance from the recharge area from 0.5x10-8 to 42x10-8 cc STP g-1 (Figure 4). The noble gas temperatures are separated into two groups of approximately 17.7 °C (up-gradient) and approximately 13.7 °C (down-gradient). The transition of approximately 4±0.6 °C between the two groups of noble gas temperatures occurs at a He excess of 10x10-8 cc STP g-1, which based on published He accumulation rates dates the upper limit of the transition at approximately 20 thousand years before present (ka) . In central Florida, the modeled 14C ages in the UFA Figure 4. Helium excess and noble gas temperatures along a transect in southeast Georgia (Clark et al., 1997). The helium generally increase along the flow path from recharge Figure 4. Helium excess and gasnoble temperatures a transect in southeas excess is the topnoble number and gas temperaturealong is the bottom areas in the center of the state (Figure 3). Deviations of each dataThe set. helium excess is the top number and noble g Georgia (Clark etnumber al., 1997). from the decreasing trend in specific wells are explained temperature is the bottom number of each data set. by mixing of waters with different 14C values that have been locally recharged. The modeled 14 C (NETPATH) adjusted age of groundwater at discharge areas per flow path are between 15 ka and 30 ka. The increased reaction of infiltrating water with carbonate rocks with depth is depicted in Figure 5. The mineralogy of the host rock changes from the silisiclastics of the surficial aquifer (high 87Sr/86Sr ratio and low δ13C) to the carbonates of the UFA (low 87 Sr/86Sr ratio and high δ13C) as the sample depth increases (along the arrow in Figure 5). Findings and conclusions: Figure 5. 87Sr/86Sr vs. δ13C for groundwater in northern Florida (Katz and The increasing He excess trend suggests Bullen, 1996). that groundwater age increases as well. The transition of noble gas temperatures Figure 5. 87Sr/86Sr vs. G13C for groundwater in northern Florida (Katz and Bullen, 1996). corresponds with the timing of the last glacial period (LGP). Furthermore, the decreased temperature of approximately 4±0.6 °C is consistent with published values from other areas in the southern USA for the LGP. The adjusted 14C ages of DIC show that most water from the unconfined parts of the UFA were recharged during the last 15 to 30 ka and that 14C values can potentially be used to identify where the UFA is locally recharged. The decreasing 87Sr/86Sr ratio and increasing δ13CDIC value with depth indicates that the dissolution of calcite and dolomite is the main source of solutes in the UFA. Take home message: Much of the groundwater in the UFA at coastal boundaries is non-renewable on a human time scale. Thus, groundwater pumping by coastal communities should be managed cautiously in order to prevent depletion of fresh water resources, salt water intrusion, and deterioration of water quality, while providing drinking water to the people in the region. Credits: The research presented herein was supported by the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Further readings: Clark, J.F., M. Stute, P. Schlosser, and S. Drenkard, A tracer study of the Floridan aquifer in southeastern Georgia: Implications for groundwater flow and paleoclimate, Water Resources Res., 33, no. 2, 281-289, 1997. Katz, B.G., and T.D. Bullen, The combined use of 87Sr/86Sr and carbon and water isotopes to study the hydrochemical interaction between groundwater and lakewater in mantled karst, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 60, no. 24, 5075-5087, 1996. Miller, J.A., Groundwater Atlas of the United States, Alabama Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina, U.S. Geological Survey, HA 730-G, published in 1990, http://capp.water.usgs.gov/gwa/index.html, 2006. Plummer, L.N., and C.L. Sprinkle, Radiocarbon dating of dissolved inorganic carbon in groundwater from confined parts of the Upper Floridan aquifer, Florida, USA, Hydrogeology Journal, 9, 127-150, 2001.