Unofficial Copy Office of Chris Daniel District Clerk
Transcription
Unofficial Copy Office of Chris Daniel District Clerk
Filed 11 August 31 A10:02 Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County ED101J016473419 By: Kyndria Perkins Cause No. 2011-42579 § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Defendants Cl er k 133RD JUDICIAL MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE collectively, Ch Carl B. Vickery and .Margaret G. Baker (hereinafter and file this Motion to Transfer Venue and would respectfully of "Vickery and Baker" or "Defendants"), DISTRICT TO TRANSFER VENUE, FIRST AMENDED DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIM ris I. COME NOW Defendants, OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Da DEFENDANTS' FIRST AMENDED MOTION ORIGINAL ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE COURT fic e show the Court the following: Of Defendants, object to venue in Harris County, Texas and move the Court to transfer this matter to py District Court in Matagorda County, Texas pursuant to Rules 86 andS'Z? T.R.C r P. Co Matagorda County is the only county of proper venue pursuant to Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code, § ial 15.011. This case is a declaratory judgment suit to determine the rights of the parties related to certain of fic deed restrictions and is an action involving an interest in real property thus making it subject to the mandatory venue provision of Section 15.011 of theTexas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. In re Un • CARL B. VICKERY, MARGARET G. BAKER, MICHAEL A. BARTOSH, LANA S. BARTOSH, KOKOMO BEACH HOMES & PROPERTIES, LLC, ROY BOTARD, and KELLY BOTARD ict v. lD ist r Plaintiff IN THE DISTRICT nie SARGENT BEACH PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION Applied Chern. Magnesias Corp., 206 S.W.3d 114, 49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1006, 168 Oil, &, Gas Rep. 48 (Tex. 2006). In addition, Defendants object to venue in Harris County, the county in which this action was ., instituted, on the ground that this county is not a proper county and no basis exists mandating or permitting venue in this county. II. ORIGINAL ANSWER GENERAL DENIAL Defendants, Carl B. Vickery and Margaret G. Baker generally deny each and every allegation contained in Plaintiff's Original Petition and demand strict proof thereof pursuant to the laws and ill. DEFENSES • Cl er k constitution of the State of Texas. AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES affirmative defenses: lD ist ric t Without limiting their general denial, Vickery and Bakers plead the following defenses and The Original Petition fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. b. Plaintiffs' claims are barred by the Statute of Frauds. c. Plaintiffs' claims are barred by the doctrine of waiver. d. Plaintiffs' claims are barred by the doctrine of estoppel. e. Plaintiffs' claims violate the rule against perpetuities. f. Plaintiffs' claims are barred by laches. PREMISES CONSIDERED, Vickery and Baker pray that Plaintiffs have and Of WHEREFORE, fic e of Ch ris Da nie a. py recover nothing against Defendants and that Vickery and Baker recover from Plaintiffs all costs of Court Co expended and such other and further relief, both legal and equitable, to which Vickery and Baker may COUNTERCLAIM IV. DISCOvERY PLAN Un of fic ial show themselves justly entitled. Discovery is intended to be conducted under Level 2 of Rule 190 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. V. VENUE " Venue is proper in Matagorda County, Texas pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 15.011. VI. PARTIES -2- Counter-Plaintiffs, ("Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs" or "Vickery and Baker"), are individuals residing in Harris County, Texas. Counter-Defendant, ("PlaintifflCounter-Defendant" or "Sargent Beach Owners Association"), alleges in its petition that it is a Texas non-profit corporation with its principle place of business in Sargent, Texas. VII. FACTS and Baker assert that Sargent Beach Owners Association ("SBOA") is nothing more than a group of Sargent Beach property owners with no authority The Sargent Beach Addition Deed Restrictions lD ist ric t to act on behalf of any owners other than SBOA members. (the "Deed Restrictions") filed in Matagorda A true and correct nie County real estate record on April 3, 1954, do not provide for an owners association. Da copy of the Deed Restrictions are attached hereto as Exhibit "A". ris Vickery and Baker own lots 24 thru 41 block 15 Abstract 201 Robert Haley, Sargent Ch Beach Addition, and lot 22 block 22 Sargent Beach Addition. These lots are completely of unimproved and are not accessible from a paved road. VIII. CAUSES OF ACTION Declaratory :ludgment of fic ial Co py recreational vehicles on their lots. are parties to this lawsuit based on their alleged intent to place Of improve the property; however, entity for any permit to fic e Vickery and Baker have not made application to any governmental Pursuant to Section 37.009 et seq. of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code, Vickery and Baker request that this Court render a declaration of its rights, costs and attorney's fees. Un • and belief, Vickery Cl er k Based on information Pursuant to Section 37.001 et seq. of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code, Vickery and Baker request that this Court render a declaration of its rights by interpreting the Deed Restrictions, and declaring the deed restrictions void, unenforceable and of no effect as same are barred by the doctrine of waiver. -3- Pursuant to Section 37.001 et seq. of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code, Vickery and Baker request that this Court render a declaration of their rights by interpreting the Deed Restrictions, and declaring the deed restrictions void, unenforceable and of no effect as same are barred by the doctrine of estoppel. Pursuant to Section 37.001 et seq. of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code, Vickery and declaring the deed restrictions void, unenforceable and of no effect as same are barred by the doctrine of lD ist ric t laches. Pursuant to Section 37.001 et seq. of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code, Vickery and nie Baker request that this Court render a declaration of their rights by interpreting the Deed Restrictions, and and of no effect as same violate the rule against Da declaring the deed restrictions void, unenforceable Ch ris perpetuities. Pursuant to Section 37.001 et seq. of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code, Vickery and SBOA has no e of Baker request that this Court render a declaration that under the Deed Restrictions, Of fic authority to act. FEES py IX. ATTORNEY Co Vickery and Baker request that this Court award attorney's fees and costs pursuant to TEX. CIV. of fic ial PRAC. & REM. CODE § 57.009. PRAYER Un • Cl er k Baker request that this Court render a declaration of their rights by interpreting the Deed Restrictions, and Vickery and Baker pray that: 1. The SBOA take nothing in its claim against Vickery and Baker; 2. The SBOA be cited to appear and answer the allegations contained in this counter petition; " -4- 3. Pursuant to Section 37.001 et seq. of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code, this Court render a declaration of Vickery and Baker's rights under the Deed Restrictions, declaring the Deed Restrictions void and unenforceable; 4. Pursuant to Section 37.009 et seq. of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code, this Court Vickery and Baker be granted any other and further relief, special or general, legal or equitable, THE SC nie ~sp~. lD ist ric t as they may show themselves to be justly entitled to receive. Da ris Ch of ial Co py Of fic e F~ ~L2 By: ~ Cris A. Rasco State Bar No. 16551600 2709 Texas Avenue Texas City, Texas 77590 (409) 750-0436 Telephone (409) 943-5566 Facsimile ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS, VICKERY & BAKER of fic 6. Un • Cl er k award Vickery and Baker costs and attorney's fees; and, ., -5- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of DEFENDANTS' FIRST AMENDED MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE, FIRST AMENDED ORIGINAL ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIM have been served upon the following parties on this 31 st day Cl er k of August, 2011 . • Daniel P. Elms Chelsea L. Hilliard Bell Nunnally & Martin, LLP 3232 McKinney Ave., Suite 1400 Dallas, Texas 75204-2429 (214) 740-1400 Telephone (214) 740-1499 Facsimile ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF SARGENT BEACH HOME OWNERS ASSOCIA nON lD ist ric t nie Da ris Ch e of Via facsimile (281) 356-3333 and U.S. Mail Un of fic ial Co py Of fic Richard O. Werlein 32822 Westwood Square West Magnolia, Texas 77354 (281) 356-7300 Telephone (281) 356-3333 Facsimile ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS MICHAEL A. BARTOSH, LANA S. BARTOSH and KOKOMO BEACH HOMES & PROPERTIES, LLC Via facsimile (214) 740-1499 and U.S. Mail " -6-